20181041 Ver 4_USACE More Info Received_20200121

Strickland, Bev
From: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 1:48 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; Homewood, Sue
Subject: [External] RE: Request for Additional Information; Cambridge Park phase 2, Mebane,
Alamance Co.; SAW-2017-02329
Attachments: 2924.5_Cambridge Phase 2 Response to USACE Request_1.21.20.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Good Afternoon David,
Please find the attached and below responses to your request for additional information. Please let me know if you
require more information. Thanks.
USACE Comment 1) Given the relatively steep slope (2.5%) of the proposed culvert, we are concerned that this stream
would be subject to headcutting above the proposed culvert due to the proposed V invert burial. Please confirm with
NCDWR regarding whether or not culvert burial is required/advisable in this situation. If burial of the culvert pipe is not
advised, please redesign accordingly and update the PCN and applicable plansheets;
Applicant Response: See attached updated PCN and impact exhibits.
USACE Comment 2) We have scaled the proposed culvert on the plans provided and determined stream impacts to be
different than those reported in the text of the PCN/plans:
A. Given that the culvert outlet would not occur directly in line with the existing stream channel, a portion
of the stream channel below the culvert would be cut off from direct stream flow. This does not appear to have been
accounted for in the reported permanent loss stream impacts. If a straight line is drawn along the center of the culvert
from the upstream point where the headwall intersects the stream centerline to the point where the straight line
intersects the stream centerline below the culvert (see attached, blue line), the impacts along the centerline of the
stream (see attached, red line) scale to approximately 114 I.f. Please update the PCN (including the mitigation proposal)
and plans accordingly;
Applicant Response: See attached updated PCN and impact exhibits.
USACE Comment 2)
Any additional impacts in the rip rap footprint not covered above would be considered rip rap only, i.e.
permanent impacts but no permanent loss;
Applicant Response: See attached updated PCN and impact exhibits.
USACE Comment 3) Given that the proposed culvert would intersect the downstream portion of the stream channel at a
skew, please provide additional stream bank protection to ensure scour does not occur along the stream bank

downstream of the proposed crossing. Please updated the project plans accordingly, and provide a profile/cross-section
clearly showing the proposed stream bank protection (see attached Profile Example);
Applicant Response: See attached updated PCN and impact exhibits.
USACE Comment 4) The proposed wetland impact includes fill in the top half of a small narrow wetland. Given the small
size of the wetland in question, and the fact that the drainage area for this wetland would be rerouted due to grading in
the upland portion of the site, the Corps would consider the remainder of this wetland as an indirect impact. As such,
the wetland loss due to direct and indirect impacts would include the entirety of Wetland WC, or 640 sq. ft. (0.015 acre).
Applicant Response: See attached updated PCN and impact exhibits.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 11:46 AM
To: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: Request for Additional Information; Cambridge Park phase 2, Mebane, Alamance Co.; SAW-2017-02329
Brad,
Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated and received 12/18/2019, for the above referenced project. I
have reviewed the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit 29
(http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP29.pdf). Please submit the requested information below (via e-mail
is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide
Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file:
1) Given the relatively steep slope (2.5%) of the proposed culvert, we are concerned that this stream would be
subject to headcutting above the proposed culvert due to the proposed V invert burial. Please confirm with
NCDWR regarding whether or not culvert burial is required/advisable in this situation. If burial of the culvert
pipe is not advised, please redesign accordingly and update the PCN and applicable plansheets;
2) We have scaled the proposed culvert on the plans provided and determined stream impacts to be different than
those reported in the text of the PCN/plans:
a. Given that the culvert outlet would not occur directly in line with the existing stream channel, a portion
of the stream channel below the culvert would be cut off from direct stream flow. This does not appear
to have been accounted for in the reported permanent loss stream impacts. If a straight line is drawn
along the center of the culvert from the upstream point where the headwall intersects the stream
centerline to the point where the straight line intersects the stream centerline below the culvert (see
attached, blue line), the impacts along the centerline of the stream (see attached, red line) scale to
approximately 114 Lf. Please update the PCN (including the mitigation proposal) and plans accordingly;
b. Any additional impacts in the rip rap footprint not covered above would be considered rip rap only, i.e.
permanent impacts but no permanent loss;
3) Given that the proposed culvert would intersect the downstream portion of the stream channel at a skew,
please provide additional stream bank protection to ensure scour does not occur along the stream bank

downstream of the proposed crossing. Please updated the project plans accordingly, and provide a profile/cross-
section clearly showing the proposed stream bank protection (see attached Profile Example);
4) The proposed wetland impact includes fill in the top half of a small narrow wetland. Given the small size of the
wetland in question, and the fact that the drainage area for this wetland would be rerouted due to grading in
the upland portion of the site, the Corps would consider the remainder of this wetland as an indirect impact. As
such, the wetland loss due to direct and indirect impacts would include the entirety of Wetland WC, or 640 sq.
ft. (0.015 acre).
Please let me know if you have any questions.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Cambridge Park (Turner Road) Phase 2
2b.
County:
Alamance
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mebane
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Desco Mebane Partners, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3752/642
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Eric Dischinger
3d.
Street address:
600 Market Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
3f.
Telephone no.:
336-317-3395
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 128
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e.
Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
163107, 163252, 163091, 163091, 163248 & 163523
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.04499 Longitude: - 79.26577
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
233.89 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Little Haw Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land and fields. Structures are not located on the site. The site is located in a
mixed use area of Mebane, North Carolina
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
—0.22 Ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
—9,020 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access and construct Phase 2 of the Cambridge Park residential
subdivision.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of the development of Phase 2 of the Cambridge Park residential subdivision. At this time,
Phases I A and 1 B have been constructed and Phase 2 has been fully designed. With the exception of Phase 7, the
remainder of the residential subdivision has been conceptually designed. At this time, Phase 7 has not been
conceptually designed. With the exception of Phase 7, it appears the remainder of residential subdivision can be
developed without future impact to WoUS outside of those proposed in this application. The applicant understands that
additional impacts associated with the remaining phases of the proposed subdivision will be cumulative for purposes of
permitting and mitigation requirements.
Phase 2 of the site consists of developing the site with residential lots, one stormwater retention pond and associated
roads. Access roads and residential lots will result in impact to streams and wetlands. To facilitate development of the
site, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used
during site construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes [I No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: SAW-2017-02329
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Three Oaks Engineering
Name (if known): unknown
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE JD SAW-2017-02329 (dated 2.9.18) & NCDEQ-DWR Letter (dated March 27, 2018)
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The applicant has previously provided information and obtained a NWP 29 Verification from the USACE (SAW-2017-
02329, dated 6.1.18) and a 401 WQC from the NCDEQ-DWR (#20181041 V3, dated 5.21.19) for the permanent impact to
185 linear feet of stream channel (90 linear feet permanent net loss) and temporary impact to 140 linear feet of stream to
construct access and sewer/water infrastructure for Phases IA and IB in the larger Cambridge Park residential
subdivision.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
The applicant obtained USACE NWP Verification and NCDEQ-DWR 401 WQC for the first two Phase of Cambridge Park,
a residential subdivision. Based on conceptual designs, additional impacts to WoUS are not anticipated in the remaining
phases, with the exception of Phase 7 which has not been designed at this time. The applicant is aware that impacts are
cumulative for permitting and mitigation thresholds for potential future impact to WoUS. However, the applicant is not
ready to proceed with Phase 7 of the subdivision or permit potential impacts associated with Phase 7 at this time.
Establishment of a timeline for future phases of development will be dictated by market conditions at that time. The
applicant acknowledges that the current and future development must occur in a manner to avoid and minimize impacts
to WoUS.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Road Fill/Indirectact
unknown
® Yes
EA Corps
0.008 (354SF)/
Impact
❑ No
❑ DWQ
0.007 (286 SF)
W2 ® P ❑ T
Road/Lot Fill
unknown
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
® DWQ
0.088
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.10
2h. Comments: Wetland impact 1 (Wetlands Impact A, Impact Area 11) will permanently impact 0.008 acres (354 SF) of 404
wetlands with road fill. Wetland Impact 1 will indirectly impact 0.007 acres (286SF), per USACE correspondence dated
January 16, 2020.
Wetland impact 2 (Wetlands Impact B, Impact Area 12) will permanently impact 0.088 acres (3,820 SF) of non 404 (isolated)
wetlands with road/lot fill.
Temporary impacts to wetlands are not proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Culvert/Rip-
Rap/Pump Around
Unnamed
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4
94/30/20
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
8
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
4
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
4
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
8
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
94/30/20
3i. Comments: Stream Impact 1 (Impact Area 11) will permanently impact 94 linear feet of perennial stream channel
associated with road crossing fill, permanently impact 30 linear feet of perennial steam channel associated with keyed in rip -
rap energy dissipater and temporarily impact 20 linear feet of perennial stream channel with the associated pump around. The
proposed culvert has been designed to discharge to the centerline of the stream. To prevent stream bank de -stabilization
immediate) down -gradient of the proposed culvert, the applicant has designed rip -rap rotection along the northern stream
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

bank immediately down -gradient of the proposed culvert. The applicant requests written waiver of culvert burial requirements
from USACE and NCDWR due to slope being approximately 2.5% and associated concerns with head cutting of the stream
immediately up -gradient above the proposed culvert.
Areas of rip -rap will be keyed into existing grades of beds and banks and would not be considered a net loss requiring
mitigation. Areas of temporary impact will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Pi
Stormwate r
below
P2
Stormwater
below
K Total
below
5g. Comments:
Pond D
Surface Area (ac): +/- 4,620 SF
Drainage Area (ac): +/- 4.4 AC
Pond E
Surface Area (ac): +/- 11,859SF
Drainage Area (ac): +/- 10.4 AC
Pond F
Surface Area (ac): +/- 15,538 SF
Drainage Area (ac): +/- 14.3 AC
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
Above:
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Above
5k. Method of construction:
Excavated in uplands.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ® Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
131 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: A No Practical Alternative's Buffer Authorization request will be submitted to the delegated local municipality
separate of this application. We request the NCDEQ-DWR conditional 401 approval without receipt of the buffer authorization.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The road crossing location was selected in an area of stream that is relatively straight with few meanders and will cross as
near to perpendicular as possible given field and design constraints. The applicant has further demonstrated avoidance and
minimization of stream impacts by proposing to construct approximately 5.5 feet tall culvert head/end walls. Furthermore, the
Applicant has designed rip -rap stabilization measures to be keyed into existing grades of stream bed and banks, thus reducing
the net loss of stream.
There are approximately 9,020 linear feet of stream channel and 0.22 acres of wetlands located on the site. Phase 2 has
been designed to avoid the remaining 8,896 linear feet of stream channel and 0.13 acres of wetlands.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used. A Temporary coffer dam will be installed up -gradient of the
proposed road crossing. During construction, water will be pumped around the construction footprint. Appropriate stream
bank protection will be provided in the channel during construction and all excess excavated material will be immediately
removed from the stream bank crossing area. Upon installation of the culvert, the temporary sand bag coffer dams will be
removed and flow will be diverted through the culvert. Disturbed banks will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions,
matted and seeded/live staked.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Motes Creek Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type stream
Quantity 228 credits available
3c. Comments: The applicant proposes to mitigate for 94 linear feet of permanent net loss of stream by purchase of 188
credits from Motes Creek Mitigation Bank. If 188 credits are not available at the time of permit approval, then the applicant
will obtain all or the balance of necessary credits from NCDMS. SOA dated 12.10.19 attached. Mitigation is not proposed for
direct/wetland impacts, permanent impact to streams from keyed in rip -rap or temporary impacts to streams from de -watering.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
94 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
NA square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
NA acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
NA acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
NA acres
4h. Comments: The applicant proposes to mitigate for 94 linear feet of permanent net loss of stream by purchase of available
credits from Motes Creek Mitigation Bank. If credits are not available at the time of permit approval, then the applicant will
obtain all of the balance of necessary credits from NCDMS. NCDMS letter dated 6.10.19 attached. Mitigation is not proposed
for wetland impacts, permanent impact to streams from keyed in rip -rap or temporary impacts to streams from de -watering.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Buffer Authorization will be obtained from the local delegated
❑ Yes ® No
municipality.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
37 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
A stormwater management plan will be submitted to the delgated local municipaity separate
of this application. We
request NCDEQ-DWR conditional 401 approval without receipt of the approved stormwater management plan.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Mebane
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
El USMP®
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: We are not aware of a NEPA or SEPA being required as part of this
project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality outside of the 8 Phase
residential subdivision.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will connect to existing municipal sewer and water lines. Impacts to WoUS associated with
water/sewer line installation are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS List of Federally Protected Species, dated 6.27.18, identifies the Cape Fear Shiner as being listed within
certain river basins in southern Alamance County. The site is centrally located in Alamance County. Therefore, we have
made a determination of no effect for Cape Fear Shiner. Other federally protected species are not identified in Alamance
County.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering
down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
According to the NC SHPO Historic Properties website (attached), eligible or listed resources are not located within the
proposed project area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Panel #s: 3710980300K & 3710981300K
signed by Bradley S. Luckey
LDigitally
DN: cn=Bradley S. Luckey, o=Pilot
Enviromental, Inc., ou,
Bradley S. Luckey
r email=[e-mail],
1.21.20
c=US
Date: 2020.01.21 13:47:03-05'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

N59'51'42•E
32.30'
yc/
0 .+i
o 4
�� is Jyp y I \ 2Bq` I 0 9°Jp I JJ
N59'SI'4 • �B� Ain AFB N59'52'12•E I
' 2 E q° 9,9,p \ 143.07' TO
631.02' N590SI'03'E L-29 'MeWHITE
176.63' FipOAR /
L-28
i
FUTURE
PHASE -NOT
11
DESIGNED
I
I
� I
I y
I
�w
S63'Z4• 3wW un;I
247104' a }p S66 % PROPOSED WET
14•ly
309.3p.
DETENTION
POND-F
9REIX$ EDG
PB
y
I., 7I PC it
I
J a
/ �I JJ9bB 4f I L-3
IMPACT-2
PREVIOUSLY- `,
PERMITTED
i 28�20' 205 Zg �W
I` 5299 B•W
S,2
367;5q?•W
I ` 1
-J e
NOTE: OFFSITE BUFFER IMPACTS
840 HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY
PERMITTED. (NOT SHOWN)
N
A
N \
N N
0/ \
EXISTING WET
DETENTION
1 ri
N55'1549' \ m II "A /
Ao9 , ` \ ^ L- 2 C� L-34\� 3B L-38
_ a4. IMPACT-3
1 � •
r c ►ji rM_ u
FUTURE
PHASES -CONCEPTUAL
PROPOSED WET
DETENTION
POND-E
Fip
POND -A
WEBSTER GROVE SUBDINSIO`I
P.B. 36 PG. 46
_ _ CONNECTION L54 . ;
POINT FOR PH2
I
!;Oea
IMPACT4
PHASE 2
PREVIOUSLY
PERMITTED
SEWER
CONNECTION
POINT FOR PH2
EXISTING SEWER
OUTFALL
JAMES D. BURGESS A/W
CHERYA P. BURGESS
D.B. 441 PG. 438
PARCEL ID 163231
OLO TAX MAP 10-25-33
PHASE 2
O
PROPOSED WET
DETENTION
�- POND-D
/ N442675•E Dp
IMPACT355
SHEET 1 OF 5
�+ F`�� PREVIOUSLY BEVERLY LIMALIE STEWART
pfA D.B. 441 PG. 337
PARCEL ID 163254
PERMITTEDClO TAX MAP 10-25-330
�.. •c.�— x x x m
PREVIOUSLY D.B. EL I PC. 253
P.B. 45 PG. 163
PARCEL ID 10 253
OLD TAX MAP 10-25-60
PERMITTED23.369 ACRES
PREVIOUSLY
PERMITTED
of IXXXXX�?<:
EXIST. j m IMPACT-1
PHASE 1A
8 LA
IMPACT-11
WETLANDS -A
PHASE
IMPACT42
F,p ` � y FUTURE
�� PHASES -CONCEPTUAL
JN
uyI
N �I
EXISTING WET
DETENTION
- PON-B
m I
D
EXIST.
PHASE 1B
IMPACT-6
t' 8
1�0'0 ova
r1u m m
>f
r`1 i
N
1 aJ
aos.aG
SEAL
=A 18914
OAF ;, F�ylG'II NE�� `441
STREAM WETLAND IlVIPACTS 11-12
MELVII,LE TOWNSHIP�ALAMANCE COUNTY
MEBANE^'NUlf, TH CAROLINA
JANUARY 20, 2020
400 0 200 400 800
1 inch=400ft.
—Since 1974�
Surveyors Planners
4609 Dundas Drive
_ North Carolina 27407
Fax [phone]
Phone [phone]
Firm License No.: C-0168
Greensboro,
PARK PH2—WERAND IMPACTS—CML3D.DWG �

Vl' J
-®00000
ZOOOOO F /
0000
J
r
WC-1
+�
WETLANDS AF�EA-A /
I / / x� i
00000
N ZONE 2 \�
WETLANDS AREA -A
PROPOSED FILL -
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from
this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
�1\ CA
Title: 91ka;;'10trs i Qom, I ESS/
Date: U\ 7�•'z�� _ pF O
SEAL��
70 18914
4
I INF TARI F FIIR WFTI ANn ARFAS
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
W-1
N60'32
29 E
5.97
W-2
S24' 15 51 E
75.60
W-3
S41'31 20 W
"Ti .72
W-4
N20'51 46 W
80.00
W-5
N40'04 44 E
9.37
W-6
S24' 15 51 E
1 37.19
W-7
N20'51
46 W
1 38.02
WETLAND AREA -A
TOTAL WETLAND AREA SHOWN: 640 SF
WETLAND AREA FILLED: 354 SF
WETLAND AREA NOT FILLED INDIRECT IMPACT: 286 SF
IMPACT-11 (WETLANDS -A IMPACT)
C�AMRRTi�(~TF, PARK -PHASE 2
STREAM/WETLAND IlVIPACTS 1142
MELVILLE TOWNSHIP�ALAMANCE COUNTY
MEBANE�NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 20, 2020
—Since 1974 —
Surveyors Pl
4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro,
North Carolina 27407
Fax [phone]
Phone [phone]
Firm License No.: C-0168

SHEET 4 OF 5
This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from
this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Name L':.�gey st�q •
Title: QOAD2IVP�l -
Date: OIt10rZ.Q
WETLAND AREA-B
TOTAL WETLAND AREA
WETLAND AREA FILLED:
SHOWN:
3,820 SF
3,820 SF
CApo
\ 0� ESS/
= SEAL D%01 Ito
18914
4v
IMPACT-12 (WETLANDS-B IMPACT)
CAMBRIDGE PARK -PHASE 2
STREAM/WETLAND IlVIPACTS 1142
MELVILLE TOWNSHIP�ALAMANCE COUNTY
ME
BANE�NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 20, 2020
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch =30ft.
, ll
II'eyors Planners
4609 Dundas Drive
b Greens
oro,
North Carolina 27407
Fax [phone]
Phone [phone]
Firm License No.: C-0168
PARK PH2-WETLAND IMPACTS-CML3D.DWG

SHEET 5 X 5
RIP RAF
7 WNC STI
PIPE INI
IX INV.
CREEK
REMOVE ENOUGH SANDBAGS TO ALLOW FLOW
THROUGH WHEN NOT PUMPING AROUND.
SECTION A —A
3'
MIN. FROM
PUMP
POLTETHYLENE FABPoC ON
FACE (B ML THICK)
TEMPORARY "PIPE CROSSING —PUMP AROUND"
FOR PIPE INSTALLATION
NOTES
1) EROSION STONE TO BE 'CLASS I' RIP —RAP UNLESS DESIGNATED DIFFERENTLY ON
CONSTRUCTION PLAN.
2) PUMP AND LINE SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR USING THE BASE FLOW
SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS
3) MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
SANDBAGS: SANDBAGS SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS WHICH ARE RESISTANT TO
ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION, TEARING AND PUNCTURE, AND WOVEN TIGHTLY ENOUGH TO
PREVENT LEAKAGE OF FILL MATERIAL (i.e. SAND, FINE GRAVEL, ETC.)
1)INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF TEMPORARY
STREAM CROSSING TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. BEgN PUMPING AND
CONTINUING PUMPING WHILE WORKING NITHIN THE SIREAM.
2)INSTALL DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY STONE DAM AND FILTER FABRIC TO PREVENT
BACKFLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA.
3) INSTALL PROPOSED SILT FENCE ALONG TOP OF BANK EACH SIDE OF THE
CONSTRUCTION AREA
4) UPON CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION, REMOVE TEMPORARY DAMS, FILTER FABRIC.
DEPRESS TEMPORARY DAM BOTTOMS INTO STREAM BED UNTIL TOP OF RIP RAP IS LEVEL
WITH STREAM BOTTOM.
5) UPON STABILIZATION OF CLEARED AREAS, REMOVE TEMPORARY EARTH BERM, SEDIMENT
TRAP, AND DEWATERING BASIN.
DETAII,SHEET
CAMBRIDGE PARK -PHASE 2
STREAM/WETLANDS B PACTS 1142
N CARD �ii�� MELVILLE TOWNSHIP�ALAMANCE COUNTY
Essi �z MEBANE~NORTH CAROLINA
_ oF o,�<,/ 9 JANUARY 20, 2020
SEAL O+Z = SCALE: AS INDICATED
=A 18914
OQ1 46`VGINE�� \ �0�
+ ���� 4609 Dundas Drive
FR `'�` Jl e
Greensboro,
North Carolina 27407
FE ngineering9 InC. Fax [phone]
—Since 1974- Phone [phone]
I Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168
BRIDGE PARK PI2-WETLAND IMPACTS-CML3D.DWG