20011812 Ver 1_Complete File_20010111

Y'.md 'woiaa'4W
?zt 5MMA, jVC.
()11812
gw tt IT. .foul
%!! ? ,.?fauwon
Allen Davis
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Joanne Steenhuis
NC Division of Water Quality
127 North Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Nationwide # 18 application
Lot 83, Indigo Plantation, Southport
Dear Allen / Joanne:
.a& .-4
9J -V." 0 9'.,4
3805 V,*4 , 4- mw
WlmiV&Z, M 28403
Following Allen's initial review of the above mentioned permit application, I have
discussed further minimization of wetland impacts with the applicant. You indicated
concern over the length of the driveway and suggested shortening the drive to reduce
wetland impacts. The site plan has now been revised and the home site shifted 20'
towards Marsh Grass Court. This reduces the driveway length from 96' to 76'. The
driveway width has also been reduced from 12'-wide to 10'-wide. Together, these
changes minimized total driveway area from approximately 1306 ft to 936 ft2.
As discussed, road-side ditches are present along both Cottage Creek Road and Marsh
Grass Court. Both carry substantial amounts of water, with flow moving from Cottage,
Creek Road to Marsh Grass Court. The building contractor indicated that any driveway
accessing the lot from Marsh Grass Court would need to be culverted over this ditch.
The drive was originally planned at the southern-most edge of the property, in an attempt
to locate the culvert as far away from the corner as possible. It was thought that any pipe
located too close to the corner, where flows slow, would accumulate sediment and need
frequent repair. However, to further minimize wetland impacts, the driveway and the
location of this culvert has now been shifted to abut the southern edge of the existing pad.
This allows the driveway to partially utilize the existing pad without placing it too close
to the corner. This further minimizes the area of wetland impact for the driveway from
936 ft2 to 848 ft2.
At C _Oax ,2522
dmai?e?/an, ?Ym& na 28402
6, d. 9.-0-452-0009
r
The overall landscape of this area often carries large volumes of water and appears to
flow in the direction of Marsh Grass Court. With the road-side ditches directing a good
bit of this water around the SW corner of this lot, the applicants would like to keep the
house off the road fronts and as near lot #84 as possible.
As you know, when Indigo Plantation was subdivided in the early 1980's, a minimal
amount of fill was allowed on lots which were mostly or entirely wetland. This was
intended to provide a minimal area for parking and access. On most of the lots, it appears
the dirt was delivered to the lots but never spread over the intended area. That is case
here, and the small fill pad is located in the SW corner with approximately one-third its
area in the front building setback. Since this upland area would never be useable for the
purpose it was intended, we would like to remove the area of fill now located in the front
setback and returned to the adjacent wetland grade. This would be an attempt to offset
wetland fill needed for the driveway, by relocate unusable fill so that it is useable for its
intended purpose. Removal of the fill pad within the setback could provide 265 f12 of
restored wetland area. With this area offsetting the total driveway fill of 848 ft2, a
balance of 583 fl of wetland would be filled for driveway construction.
These efforts to further minimize wetland fill resulting from the driveway are
summarized in the table below:
Initial Plan Revised Plan
Driveway length 12' 10'
Driveway width 96' 76'
Portion of driveway 0' 88 sq ft
over existing pad:
Area of wetland restored 0' 265 sq ft
by removing portion of
pad located in setback:
Total wetland fill for driveway: 1, 306 sq ft 583 sq ft
It is noted that the 912 ft2 of fill requested for parking and storage underneath the house
remains unchanged. Thank you for your prompt review of this application. If you have
any questions about the proposed revisions, please don't hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
5WMA, .inc.
goat 0fp 5x 2522
'ldmMytm, ?YoA &W4-w 28402
.'?et 990-452-0009
92dettdY d?-l Y.Ae 94
O! 99?ien. '16. 8805 94'04tw& .Q4"t W
94 em, .4W m408
Allen Davis
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Joanne Steenhuis
NC Division of Water Quality
127 North Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Nationwide # 18 application
. Lot 83, Indigo Plantation, Southport
Dear Allen/Joanne:
Please find enclosed a joint Nationwide #18 application / 401 Water Quality Certification
request for lot 83, Indigo Plantation. This lot is nearly 100% jurisdictional wetland, thus
making total avoidance of wetland impacts impracticable. The wetland is a wooded flat
located adjacent to the estuarine system associated with Cottage Creek. The applicant is
proposing to construct a single family home and is requesting a minimal amount of
wetland fill for a driveway, parking, and storage. The home itself would be constructed
on pilings, approximately 9' above the wetland surface and would avoid any direct fill
impacts. Access to the home would be provided by a 12'-wide driveway and a minimal
area underneath the house would be filled for parking. The parking area would extend
24'-deep across the width of the house (approximately 3
8') to accommodate parking for two cars and a small utility/storage room. Proposed
wetland fill for the drive, parking, and storage would not exceed 0.05-acre. Further MOA
information is provided in the application form. If you have any questions, or would like
to discuss the project, please do not hesitate to call.
?j A w.
9Zd () Zoz ,252.2
VilmrurW&n, ./{roes. Vawkna 28402
9d'- 990-452-0009
Se a.-/
Sincerely,
??L
Laura Stasavich
Environmental Scientist
Y,d& ;f4
9 A-A o/? 9-A
.7805 94r ? .t 4mme
9fidmingtm, ?t'f8 M403
cc: Wayne Smith, contractor
Janet Russell, NC Division of Coastal Management
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
ET'§'ection 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
[2'401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
11. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Wavne Smith. contractor (on behalf of Russell and Harriet Barlowe, owners
Mailing Address: Wayne Smith and Son
2800 Eleanor Street SW
Supply, NC 28462
Telephone Number: 910.842.6317 Fax Number: 910.842.9857
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Laura Stasavich
Company Affiliation: Land Management Group, Inc.
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 2522
Wilmington, NC 28402
Telephone Number: 910.452.0001 Fax Number: 910.452.0060
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Lot 83. Cottage Creek Rd., Indigo Plantation
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Brunswick Nearest Town: Southport
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Lot 83, Indigo Plantation
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
From entrance of Indigo Plantation, left onto Cottage Creek Road. Lot is on the corner of
Cottage Creek Road and Salt Grass Court (first road on the right).
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 78°2'30" E 33°55'N
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Lot is currently in a natural, vegetated state with road-side ditches along two property lines.
7. Property size (acres): 0
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Cottage Creek
9. River Basin: Lumber
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Purpose is to construct a single family
residence.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project Standard construction
equipment including dumptrucks pile drivers, backhoes.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
A jurisdictional determination was made in 1991, with subdivision development. A Corps site
visit in 6/2001 confirmed wetland limits have not changed. At the time of subdivision, sand was
placed on SW corner of lot for an intended 0.1-acre upland area for minimal parking needed for a
single family residence. However, dirt was never spread across 0.1-acre area and pad is now
only 0.02-acre in size.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No additional permits are anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
Page 5 of 12
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100 year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 fill 0.03 yes 1,000 wet flat

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www. fema. aov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: virtually all 0.6-acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.03-acres
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Im Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease specify)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
Page 6 of 12
wwvv.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.toTozone.com
vrw?'.mapquest_com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U. S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): . ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The lot is virtually 100% jurisdictional wetland, and the proposed house would be constructed on
pilings (roughly 9' above the wetland surface) to avoid direct fill. No lattice work or
underpinning would be installed, in order to allow sunlight to reach the wetland surface. A
minimal amount of wetland fill is requested for a drivewu, parking underneath the house, and a
utility room underneath the house. The only upland on the lot is a man-made dirt pad which was
Page 7 of 12
placed on the SW comer of the lot after the original 1991 wetland delineation. Although this
was intended to provide an upland area suitable for future parking, the dirt was never spread
pad
across the lot and the12ad is now only 25' x 40' in size. Furthermore the location of this dirt
in the SW corner of the lot makes it an impractical location for the driveway. Road-side ditches
along both of the roads which abut this corner lot carry considerable amounts of water. Any
driveway into the lot will need to be culverted over one of the road-side ditches. Due to the
landscape, the ditch along Cottage Creek Road and particularly at the corner of Cottage Creek
and Salt Marsh Court, is consistently full. Placing a driveway at this corner would be expected
to restrict flow and cause sediment build-up. Therefore the proposed driveway has been located
along the very southern end of the existing pad, to place it as far away from the corner as
possible and still utilize a portion of the existing fill. An alternative analysis has been done, and
the originally preferred siting of the house has been relocated to shorten the drive width.
Mitigation to offset the remaining impacts is offered through the removal of the existing fill
located within the building setbacks.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 8 of 12
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
In-formal mitigation offered with the removal of the unusable portion of the existing fill pad
located within the building setbacks. This is intended to reduce the total balance of wetland
fill on the lot.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at h"://h2o.enr.state.nc.usNnVindex.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? . No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
Page 9 of 12
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will'the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (squhnpact are feet) Multiplier Mitigatio
1 N/A 3 N/A
2 1.5
Total
• Zone 1 extends out 30 teet perpendicular ttom near bank of channel; Gone 1 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
There is currently no impervious cover on the lot, and 0.09-acres or 15% of the total lot area is
proposed as new impervious cover. Stormwater will be allowed to naturally sheet flow over the
adiacent vegetated areas.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 12
Ci y sewer Ustem available
X M. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Page 11 of 12
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
N
0 1 2 4
SCALE 1" = 2 miles
Nationwide 18 / 401 Water Quality
Land Management Group, Inc Certification application
Environmental Consultants VICINITY MAP Applicant: Wayne Smith, contractor
P.O. Box 2522 Location: Indigo Plantation, Southport
Wilmington, NC 28402 Proiect Name: Lot 83, Indigo Plantation
910-452-0001
Date: 6/28/01 Sheet 1 of 7
41
{l ? i S??dRLi r r fv)"IF? - -- _-FV-Ve Dl t
20 BM 32 ITAi1?i 30
rjg ;,152
T11111 I
?zs 2, 1 / 1 f
iJ y J.• ff _ _ / _,l h lr'1 1`+ n? ?'rFnl
? / I enn
` ,?? i• ?-+- 4r ? ? ?M1 f :•_, 1.
rJ. 1 J
,r J ]4 , J 2Z op -k •: al?
,zi i f - 4 ` Ili / / r - 26
J r fti Stevens)
r •-J , / ?` ?, i r' '`!-ethnic ... ??, b._ J ;'•"`?-,?,?:
--- _ 3 =5otlthgort / f f I S tm th ti t -? ._
0/6
cwk
r,r..- Cl __ ? D sRRsDL` •r „', ? ??,rm ?'? ? J ?r`?"-'- -°
I (' '\ - ? NA i B Y r
V?rrl SITE
? ? ? ?. r• r CAS' ?L?tlE3J. C W rte..-- j `
- P
_._`_-_-? ?- ?, )jam - r-,.?.,7 \7 I .. ? ..?_ '-? _•? I ? ? • h .?}t` f.
0 500 1000 2000
SCALE 1" = 2000'
Land Management Group, Inc. Nationwide 18 / 401 Water Quality
Environmental Consultants USGS Topographic Map Certification application
P.O. Box 2522 Applicant, Wayne Smith, contractor
Wilmington, NC 28402 Southport Quad Location: Indigo Plantation, Southport
910-452-0001 Project Name: Lot 83, Indigo Plantation
Date: 6/28/01 Sheet 2 of 7
SCALE 1" = 200'
Nationwide 18 / 401 Water Quality
Land Management Group, Inc. NRCS SOIL SURVEY Certification application
Environmental Consultants Applicant: Wayne Smith, contractor
P.O. Box 2522 Brunswick Co., pa. 18 Location: Indigo Plantation, Southport
Wilmington, NC 28402 Project Name: Lot 83, Indigo Plantation
910-452-0001 Date: 6/28/01 Sheet 3 of 7
r
51
------------
9a
CATTAIL CT.
70
t
73
74
+so
50
53
75 3 157
0
23 33 21 65
\ \ 'V
air. +m ?
OP ? '
upland isla I
SITE
entire lot is jurisdictional wetland
0 50 100 200
SCALE 1" = 200'
Nationwide 18 / 401 Water Quality
Land Management Group, Inc. WETLAND SURVEY certification application
Environmental Consultants first approved in 1991 Applicant: Wayne Smith, contractor
P.O. Box 2522 ACOE site visit in 2001 Location: Indigo Plantation, Southport
Wilmington, NC 28402 Project Name: Lot 83, Indigo Plantation
910-452-0001
Date: 6/28/01 Sheet 4 of 7
NMMNNMNwMNNNNNNw?
ZK?c 41)
91 W LK
+ ur. ,wt 79
20 Nn 211 e4 77
90 224 A4 .213
1/8' - 1'0'
Note: Lattice underneath house may be removed, if required to avoid shading impacts.
Land Management Group, Inc. Nationwide 18 1401 Water Quality
Environmental Consultants FRONT ELEVATION Certification application
P.O. Box 2522 Applicant: Wayne Smith, contractor
Wilmington, NC 28402 Proposed House Location: Indigo Plantation, Southport
910-452-0001 Project Name: Lot 83, Indigo Plantation
Date: 6/28/01 Sheet 5 of 7
L A L ;aags W/8Z/9:91ea
uollelUeld 061pu1 '88;0-1 :auaeN;oalod L000- ZOV8Z ONuo 'uol ui M
liodglnog 'uollelueld 061Pul 3nIiMJ3lld *d
.?oloe.?;uoo 'UVws au?teM ZZSZ X08 *O'd
a3b2:13=13Ud s4uellnsuoo Ienu8wu0nAUa
uol;e011dde uol;eogl>a93 ':)U/ `dnojE) ;uewoBeueyv pue7
?yilenp as;eM LOb / 8L apinnuol;eN
,0£ _ « ? 31VOS
09 OE 9? 0
Z
(Ztl 9Z0'Z) 9b x ?9t7 Agbnoi
ooe}ins pue!jann anoge pe1BA919 aq o} ?
}upolool asnoy pasodo..ad
11 bs 99Z = ped II!j Jo !enowaa lilt
'uolleaolsei puellem pesodad
9Joe-80.0 = ABMaAlap pue 'eaje Appin
tu!?jed .aol 11!1 pue!lem pesodOJd
s?? Ns?d W
ksNoeglas utyl
lenouaa1 ?(q
', Zll E8?
A`dM3Al
aplM-,0 L
119 puellam to
,11M=,8E
woos All
aN`d oNl>
Jo; 114 pui
t7810,
29101
0
r
rO
v
L 10 9 19 44s W/oz/9:91e0
u011e;veld 061Pul 'E810ff :aweN;oa,oad
.pul :u011e00-1
pody}nog 'uolIe;ueld o61
Joloea;uoo 'QWS auAVAA :;u?.iddy
tiop,olldde uoi;eoy!:peo
I(;llenp aa;eM 6ot / 96 apinnuol;eN
W00-M-o 66
SISAIVNV zotsz ON 'uo;su!WIM
3niltlN?31Ib/ zzsz XOa *o*d
swumnsuoo le;uawuoalnu3
1-:)ul `dno f);uawaFeueW pue7
AE = ,, ? 31VOS
09 OE 96 0
¦
z
NSgdW
(ztj 5ZO'Z) qt7 x 5t7 Agf)noi
ooe,pns pueJ}aM anoge pa}en819 eq o} ?
tuijd}ool asnoq pesodoad
ajae-90,0 = AennaniJp pue 'Me A iii}n
tui?jed jol ig puellem pasodOJd

0
v
t7e I
Z8 10l