780087_Inspection_20191212

'UD
ivision of Water=Resources qG
Facility ATun►bei [ O'Division of Soil and Water Conservation -
Q`OtherAgency°
-
Type of Visit: Compl�pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: a Arrival Time: ,� �' Departure Time:, County:
Farm Name: r' b[-e, :S o ko, Owner Emnil-
Owner Name: tiucl s sL�t S �%'� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: p a-t'i IuCStT `1 Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
'.Other 5.
`(
Latitude:
Region. � (%
Phone:
Integrator: W'l)
Certification Number: / e' f C?S
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design ,� Current
-_ .Design
Current'Design
° =Current =_
Q Capacity a; fop.
Wet Poultry, Capacity
Pop _ Cattle -
Capacity s Pop, _
La er
Non -La er
Design Current£
Dry Poultry Caviaeity APon_
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
D ry Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes ®moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No Q- A— ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) [:]Yes [:]No QUA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [:]Yes [:]No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ED-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued ,

Facility Number: 7b - F77 Date of Inspection: Cc
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑-too ❑ NA
❑ NE
' a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in). -
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
/
Eg-Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Ej-1 0
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
0 Yes
0-ilo­
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
E to
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
FI-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4Q "o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): No
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
[:]Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
©filo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ©�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ©lqo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes [rNo
[�I� ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued ;

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ©-9o- ❑ NA ❑ NE
'.the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ,o N6_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑,?<o— ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [T N ❑ NA. ❑ NE
❑ Yes
LJ 1Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑-<o-
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question 4): Explain anyYES answers and/or any -additional recommendation's or any other comments.
Use°drawings of facility,to hetter�expiain`situations (nse additional -pages as necessary)_ _-
f 6710 -3 6 1�_ 4g15f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: t �0V,, Phone:�l
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4 Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015