20200090 Ver 1_Final WMMS PJD Request_20200121

S&ME, Inc. | 3201 Spring Forest Road | Raleigh, NC 27616 | p 919.872.2660 | www.smeinc.com
December 6, 2018
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attention: Ms. Tasha Alexander
Reference: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request and Supporting Documentation
West Millbrook Middle School Site
8115 Strickland Road
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project 4305-18-242
Dear Ms. Alexander:
On behalf of our client, S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby submits this Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request. In
support of this request, please find enclosed the following:

 Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
 Agent Authorization form completed by Property Owner
 Figures –USDA- SCS Soil Survey Exhibit (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Exhibit (Figure 2), 2017 Color Aerial
Exhibit (Figure 3), Feature Exhibit (Figures 4), LIDAR Exhibit (Figure 5), National Wetlands Inventory Exhibit
(Figure 6), National Hydrography Dataset Exhibit (Figure 7), FEMA Flood Zone Exhibit (Figure 8)
 USACE Routine Data Forms
 NCDWR Stream Identification Form
 Site Photographs
Please let me know when you are available to review the jurisdictional features on-site. If you have questions or
need additional information, please contact me at 919.801.3798.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.

Walter Cole, L.S.S., R.E.H.S.
Project Manager
Ashley Bentz
Staff Scientist

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 1

This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.

ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]

RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]

WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]

INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 3

D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4

By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.

Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5

Date

Signature

E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)

I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 4

F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)

I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.

A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.

I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.

An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).

I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.

G. ALL REQUESTS

Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.

Size of Property or Review Area acres.

The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 5

H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS

Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________

A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
 North Arrow
 Graphical Scale
 Boundary of Review Area
 Date
 Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
 Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
 Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
 Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
 Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.

Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)

____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8

Vicinity Map

Aerial Photograph

USGS Topographic Map

Soil Survey Map

Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)

Landscape Photos (if taken)

NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets

NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms

Other Assessment Forms

_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/

Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD)
FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:11/30/18
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Mr. Walter Cole of S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road, Raleigh, NC 27616
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake Co. City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:35.89268 Long.: -78.63229
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: UT-Mine Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALTHAT APPLY): Office (Desk)
☐ Determination. Date:
☐ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE” SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
S1 35.89373 -78.63365 899 LF Non-wetland 404
W1 35.89362 -78.63236 0.07 ac Wetland 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources
in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her
option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s
acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing
a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of
Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic
resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or
judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any
Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD,
the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination
whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,
the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This PJD finds that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic
features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on
the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should
be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: .
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
Corps navigable waters’ study: .
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: USGS National Topo Map Viewer.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:1970 USDA-SCS Published
Soil Survey of Wake County, Sheet 49.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI 2017 dataset.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
FEMA/FIRM maps: .
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date):2017 NC One Map aerial orthoimagery layer.
or Other (Name & Date):Site photos taken 11/25 and 11/28/2018.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
Other information (please specify): .

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the
Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.

_________________________ __________________________
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not
respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up
is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Feature A
Site Parcel
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
11 " = 500 '
10-1-18
TBD
WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE8115 STRICKLAND ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUN TY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2018\Proposals\WestMillbrookMS\SOILS.mxd plotted by abentz 10-01-20180 500 1,000(FE ET)
USDA-SCS SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 1970 USDA-SCS PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY OFWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, SHEET 49 AND THE FEBRUARY 2018 WAKE COUNTYPARCEL SHAPEFILE. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURELOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEYINFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
SOILS:AgB2: Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2-6% slopes, erodedApB: Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopesApB2: Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopes, erodedApC2: Appling sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, erodedCeB: Cecil sandy loam, 2-6% slopesCeB2: Cecil sandy loam, 2-6% slopes, erodedMe: Mantachie soils
Site Parcel
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
21 " = 500 '
10-1-18
TBD
WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE8115 STRICKLAND ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUN TY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2018\Proposals\WestMillbrookMS\USGS.mxd plotted by abentz 10-01-20180 500 1,000(FE ET)
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE USGS NATIONAL TOPO MAP VIEWER ANDTHE FEBRUARY 2018 WAKE COUNTY PARCEL SHAPEFILE. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED AREAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE.
CLEARBROOK DRCIRCLEWOODCTC H A N D O N
L N
N CRESTWYCK CTD W E L L IN G H O U S E
C T
HEATHFIELD DRMEETING HOUSE CIRCARRIAGE TOUR LNCHATTERSON DR
MOURNING DOVE RD
STRICKLAND RD
2-Foo t Contours
Site Parcel
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
31 " = 250 '
10-1-18
TBD
WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE8115 STRICKLAND ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUN TY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2018\Proposals\WestMillbrookMS\TOPO.mxd plotted by abentz 10-01-20180 500 1,000(FE ET)
COLOR AERIAL AND TOPOGRAPHIC EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERYLAYER, 2013 WAKE COUNTY CONTOURS SHAPEFILE, AND THE FEBRUARY 2018 WAKECOUNTY PARCEL SHAPEFILE. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALLFEATURE LOCATIONS DISPL AYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVILSURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
!G
Potential Non-Wetland Water of the USStream feature S1; 899 LFRepresented by Flags S1.5-S1.40
Potential Wetland Water of the USStream feature W1; 0.07 acRepresented by Flags W1.1-W1.15
DP1
DP2
SF1
!G Revised Start Point
Culvert Outlet
Stream Determination Form Location
USACE Data Form Location
Culvert
Greenway Trail
Stream
Wetland
Site Parcel
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.4
1 " = 135 '
12-3-18
4305-18-242WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE8115 STRICKLAND ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: T:\Projects\2018\ENV\4305-18-242 WCPSS West Millbrook MS_Natural Resources\GIS\FEATURE.mxd plotted by abentz 03-25-20190 150 300
(FEET)FEATURE EXHIBIT³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE L AYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERYLAYER. THI S MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PU RPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION,UNL ESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Site ParcelElevationHigh : 46 2.182
Low : 336.193
HillshadeHigh : 254
Low : 0
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
41 " = 400 '
11-15-18
TBD
WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE8115 STRICKLAND ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUN TY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2018\Proposals\WestMillbrookMS\LIDAR.mxd plotted by abentz 11-15-20180 500 1,000(FE ET)
LIDAR EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETYEMERGENCY MANAGEMENT QL2 LIDAR DATASET DOWNLOADED 11/15/18. THIS MAP ISFOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED AREAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE.
PUBHh
R4SBC
R4SBC
R4SBC R4SBC
NWI Wetlands
Site Parcel
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
61 " = 500 '
11-15-18
TBD
WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE8115 STRICKLAND ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUN TY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2018\Proposals\WestMillbrookMS\NWI.mxd plotted by abentz 11-15-20180 500 1,000(FE ET)
NWI EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERYLAYER AND THE 2017 USFWS NATIONAL WETL ANDS INVENTORY DATASET. THIS MAP ISFOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED AREAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE.
NHD Wa te rbody
Site Parcel
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
71 " = 500 '
11-15-18
TBD
WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE8115 STRICKLAND ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUN TY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2018\Proposals\WestMillbrookMS\NHD.mxd plotted by abentz 11-15-20180 500 1,000(FE ET)
NHD EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERYLAYER AND THE 2017 USGS NATIONAL HYDROLOGIC DATASET. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED AREAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE.
Site ParcelFEMA Flood Zone
0.2 % Annual Chance FLood Hazard
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, BDE Determined
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
81 " = 1,000 '
11-15-18
TBD
WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE8115 STRICKLAND ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUN TY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2018\Proposals\WestMillbrookMS\FEMA.mxd plotted by abentz 11-15-20180 1,000 2,000(FE ET)
FEMA FLOOD ZONE EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIALORTHOIMAGERY LAYER AND THE NC FLOOD MAP FEMA GEODATABASE FORWAKE COUNTY. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALLFEATURE LOCATIONS DISPL AYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ONCIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X X
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
2
Is the Sampled Area
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:West Millbrook Middle School Raleigh/Wake
DP1
11/28/18
Wake County Board of Ed.NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:A. Bentz, W.Cole
0-2concaveFloodplain
Datum: NAD83-78.6326335.89368LRR P, MLRA 136
N/ANWI classification:Appling sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Maintained easement - herbaceous vegetation only
)
=Total Cover
FACW
FACU
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
Multiply by:
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
(A)
(B)
(A)
1538
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
)
75
No
No
5Cardamine hirsuta
5Viola bicolor FACU
Persicaria pensylvanica 65
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
)
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
100.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP1
1
1
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
Loamy/Clayey95C
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 2/1 7.5YR 3/40-14
DP1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%
Prominent redox concentrations
Texture
5 PL
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:West Millbrook Middle School Raleigh/Wake
DP2
11/28/18
Wake County Board of Ed.NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:W. Cole, A. Bentz
5nonehillslope
Datum: NAD83-78.6326935.89352LRR P, MLRA 136
N/ANWI classification:Cecil sandy loam, 2-6% slope
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)
=Total Cover
FAC
FAC
No
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
40 16
15
10 No FAC
Yes
Yes
UPL
FAC
5
Yes
Multiply by:
Prevalence Index = B/A =
FAC
UPL
Yes
Yes FACU
FACU
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FACU
Total % Cover of:
(A)
(B)
(A)
Yes
1
513
2
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
)
4
Juniperus virginiana
No2
Quercus phellos 5
5
Vaccinium arboreum
Toxicodendron radicans
Gelsemium sempervirens 2
25
Oxydendrum arboreum
Liquidambar styraciflua
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Pinus taeda
Oxydendrum arboreum
Quercus rubra
Acer rubrum
)
80
Indicator
Status
35
20
No
Dominant
Species?
Yes
5
5
FAC
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
42.9%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP2
3
7
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
2.5Y 4/4
10YR 3/3
1-6
0-1
DP2SOIL
6-12 2.5Y 5/6
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
100
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11

41

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Sketch:

WCPSS West Millbrook Middle School Renovation Project
Strickland Road, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4305-18-242
Taken by: W. Cole Date Taken: 11/25/2018
1

1 A view of the stormwater control measure (SCM) adjacent
to West Millbrook Middle School (WMMS) property which
releases stormwater onto school property.
2 View of triple 48-inch RCP outlet culverts associated with
off-site SCM which releases stormwater onto school
property.

3 A view of stormwater drainage from off-site SCM that
flows into culvert that extends underneath the WMMS
access road.

4 A view of 24-inch RCP culvert inlet that extends
underneath WMMS access road.

WCPSS West Millbrook Middle School Renovation Project
Strickland Road, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4305-18-242
Taken by: W. Cole Date Taken: 11/25/2018
2

5 A view of the 24-inch RCP culvert outlet that extends
underneath WMMS access road and start of Feature S1
an intermittent stream at Flag S1.1 tie to culvert.
6 A view of Feature S1 at Flag S1.1 looking downstream of
culvert outlet.

7 View of Feature S1 at Flag S1.7 looking upstream where
NCDWR Stream Form (SF-1) was recorded.
8 View of Feature S1 at Flag S1.7 looking downstream
where NCDWR Stream Form (SF-1) was recorded.

WCPSS West Millbrook Middle School Renovation Project
Strickland Road, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4305-18-242
Taken by: W. Cole Date Taken: 11/25/2018
3

9 A view of Feature S1 and inlet culvert that extends
underneath school bus access road at Flag S1.11 looking
downstream.
10 A view of Feature S1 at Flag S1.11 looking upstream.

11 A view of Feature S1 and outlet culvert that extends
underneath school bus access road at Flag S1.12 looking
upstream.
12 A view of Feature S1 and outlet culvert that extends
underneath school bus access road, and adjacent
stormwater culvert at Flag S1.14 looking upstream.

WCPSS West Millbrook Middle School Renovation Project
Strickland Road, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4305-18-242
Taken by: W. Cole Date Taken: 11/25/2018
4

13 A view of Feature S1 and inlet culvert that extends
underneath greenway trail at Flag S1.15 looking
downstream.
14 A view of wetland Feature W1 at Flag W1.4 looking
toward vertical stormwater culvert.

15 A view of vertical stormwater culvert at Flag W1.8 tie to
culvert.
16 A view of Feature W! looking up drainage from vertical
stormwater culvert.

WCPSS West Millbrook Middle School Renovation Project
Strickland Road, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4305-18-242
Taken by: W. Cole Date Taken: 11/25/2018
5

17 A view of Feature S1 and outlet culvert that connect to
vertical stormwater culvert at Flag S1.19 looking
upstream.
18 A view of Feature S1 at Flag S1.19 looking downstream.

19 A view of Feature S1 and inlet culvert that extends
underneath park area public parking access road at Flag
S1.31 looking downstream.
20 A view of Feature S1 looking downstream of outlet culvert
that extends underneath park area public parking access
road looking downstream.