Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191660 Ver 1_More Info Received_20200116Strickland, Bev From: jwaller@jcwaller.com Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:36 PM To: Homewood, Sue; David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil; David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil Cc: Jason.Geary@greensboro-nc.gov; Terri.Aprile@greensboro-nc.gov; jerome@d3v3loping.com; jhabeger@jcwaller.com Subject: RE: [External] Request for Additional Information: Penry Crossing, Greensboro, Guilford Co., NC; SAW-2010-01793 Attachments: PCN1-4StreamPermitCompleteRevised(1-16-20).pdf, 19-036-274 NCDEQ RESPONSE- 1 - 1 6-20.pdf, 19-036-274 US ARMY CORPS RESPONSE(1-16-20).pdf; 19-036-274 Penry Road Sheets (1-16-20).pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to report.spam@nc.gov Sue and David, Please find attached the revised PNC, Drawings, comment response letter for the Army Corps comments, and a comment response letter for NC DEQ's comments. If you have any questions please feel free to give us a call. Sincerely, Juhann Waller, PE Principal 191 A Minority Owned Engineering and Surveying Firm 7-L Dundas Circle Greensboro, NC 27407 Tele# (336) 697-2637 jwaller(a-jcwaller.com On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:03:21 +0000, "Homewood, Sue" <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> wrote: Please see attached Sue Homewood Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 336 776 9693 office 336 813 1863 mobile Sue. Homewood@ncdenr.gov 1 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 4:20 PM To: Jerome Myers <jerome@d3v3loping.com>; Juhann <jwaller@jcwaller.com> Cc: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Subject: [External] Request for Additional Information: Penry Crossing, Greensboro, Guilford Co., NC; SAW-2010-01793 External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to report.spam@nc.gov Messrs. Myers and Waller, Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated 11/7/2019 (received 11/8/2019), for the above referenced project. I have reviewed the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit 29 http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP29.pdf. Please submit the requested information below (via e-mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file: 1. As discussed in the field on 8/13/2019, the purpose of the project is to provide access for a multi -family residential development. However, the proposed wetland and stream impacts exceed those needed for access, and include impacts proposed for parking facilities. Based on the Master Plan, it appears that additional avoidance and minimization could be demonstrated (per Nationwide Permit General Conditions 23a and b) whereby portions of the proposed development could be shifted east to avoid parking lot impacts within streams and wetlands; 2. On the PCN, itemize stream impacts into three separate parts: permanent impacts due to the culvert, permanent impacts due to rip rap (if proposed), and temporary impacts due to dewatering; 3. Is rip rap proposed to be placed within the stream channel? If so, show the rip rap on the plan and profile views, and add this impact to the PCN (see item 2)above. Note that any rip rap placed within the stream channel must be depressed/imbedded such that the top of the rip rap is no higher than the existing stream bed elevation (see Regional Permit Condition 4.1.6); 4. Your proposed wetland impacts exceed 0.1 acre. Please revise your project to minimize your proposed wetland impacts below the 0.1 acre threshold (see item 1 above). Otherwise, compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts is required per Nationwide Permit General Condition 23c. Please provide a mitigation acceptance letter from either a mitigation bank with the correct service area (HUC 03030002) or the NC Division of Mitigation Services for riparian non-riverine wetland credits. Note that he Corps would require compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 mitigation to impact ratio based on the relative quality of the wetlands proposed for impact. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Dave Bailey David E. Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE-SAW-RG-R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30. Fax: (919) 562-0421 Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0 Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey. Office use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑X Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑X Non-404 ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express X❑ Riparian Jurisdictional General Permit Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑X No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ❑X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or indieu fee program. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes X❑ No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: 402404 Penry Road Stream Crossing 2b. County: Guilford 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Greensboro 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Penry Crossing, LLC 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 6956-1267 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): David Levy 3d. Street address: 300 S. Greene Street, Suite 13-11 3e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27401 3f. Telephone no.: 336-273-0568 3g. Fax no.: N/A 3h. Email address: dlevy@ahmi.org Page 1 of 10 PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Buyer 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): Technology Row 4d. Street address: 6151 Burlington Road #169 4e. City, state, zip: Sedalia, NC 27342 4f. Telephone no.: 757-207-0529 4g. Fax no.: N/A 4h. Email address: jerome@d3v3loping.com 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Juhann Waller, PE 5b. Business name (if applicable): JC Waller & Associates, PC 5c. Street address: 7-L Dundas Circle 5d. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27407 5e. Telephone no.: 33M97-2637 5f. Fax no.: N/A 5g. Email address: jwaller@jcwaller.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): PIN:7885631518 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36,09309 Longitude:-79.725184 1c. Property size: 6.33 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: South Buffalo Creek 2b, Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-V 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The site is undeveloped with trees and vegetation. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.534 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 296.29 3d. The Explain the purpose of the proposed project: propose of this project is for the installation of stream crossing for access to the western portion of the property. 3e. The Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: current project is for installing a culvert in a portion of the existing stream that bi-sects the property for access and the future development. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases)in the past? ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? El Preliminary Final ❑X 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Jim Cutler Agency/Consultant Company: Pyramid Environmental Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? El Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑X Yes ❑ No 6b. If yes, explain. The intent is to install the culvert/stream crossing which will allow for the clearing property with Multi -family units. of the rear of the property. The second phase will be to develop the Page 3 of 10 PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary 2b, Type of impact 2c, Type of wetland 2d, Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P Culvert Unknown Yes Corps 0.069 W2 Choose one Yes/No W3 Choose one Choose one Yes/No W4 Choose one Choose one Yes/No W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No 2g, Total Wetland Impacts: 0.069 2h, Comments: Wetlands disturbances is required for the installation of the culvert/stream crossing. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b, Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d, Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f, Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P Culvert unnamed tributary PER Corps 4 60 S2 T Dewatering unnamed tributary PER Corps 4 21 S3 Choose one S4 Choose one S5 Choose one S6 Choose one 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 81 3i, Comments: A portion of the stream is being piped for access to the rear of the property. Page 4 of 10 PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary 4b, Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d, Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 Choose one Choose 02 Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b, Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d, Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g, Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico []Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑X Other: Cape Fear 6b, Buffer Impact number — Permanent (P) or —Temporary 6c. Reason for impact 6d, Stream name 6e, Buffer mitigation required? 6f, Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g, Zone 2 impact (square feet B1 P Culvert Crossing unnamed Tributary No 33215.34 11389,76 B2 T Culvert Crossing unnamed Tributary No 3,403.7 2,987.8 B3 Yes/No B4 Yes/No B5 Yes/No B6 Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 61619,04 41377,56 6i. Comments: Impacts are due to the culvert crossing for accessing the rear of the property. Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The measures taken to avoid and/or minimize the proposed impact is to design and construction the roadway near the southern property line and make the roadway perpendicular to the stream. In addition to the location 3:1 side slopes are utilized within the buffer area to minimize disturbance. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. The construction techniques that will be utilized to avoid and/or minimize the impacts would be installing erosion control measures and installing the culvert in the dry. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank El Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b, Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c, Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d, 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project does not require a stormwater management plan due to the impacts are for access only and less than 1 acre will be disturbed. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? City of Greensboro 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? City of Greensboro ❑X Phase II ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been El Yes ❑X No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 [:]Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑X No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑X Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? El Yes ❑X No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes ❑X No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act 0 Yes ❑ No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d, What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NHP-data layer from ArcGis. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes F No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? No EFH resources In Guilford County 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes 0 No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NC DCR GIS Viewer- accessed 11-1-19 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑X No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Guilford County GIS Viewer floodplain layer -accessed 11-1-19 , plicant/Agent's Signature Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date ( rfl's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant isprovided.) J Page 10 of 10 Waffer 6t Associates, PC LEE � January 2, 2020 Sue Homewood North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 RE: NC DEQ lst Round Comment Response for 402-404 Penry Road Stream Crossing JC Waller &Associates Project Number: 19-036-274 Ms. Sue Homewood Please find below our response to your comments issued on December 19, 2019. 1) Comment: Please provide the Division a copy of your response to the December 3, 2019 email from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) requesting additional information. [15A NCAC 02H.0502(c)]. Response: A copy of our response to the email on December 3, 2019 from the U.S Army Corps of Engineers has been provided to the Division. 2) Comment: Please note that the City of Greensboro is the regulatory authority for the Jordan Lake riparian Buffer Rule. Since the Project includes development activities within the protected buffer that are not designated items within the Table of Uses 15A NCAC 02B .0267, please provide a copy of the Buffer Approval from the City. Response: The development activities of the project are now activities within the protected buffer that are designated items within the Table of Uses 15A NCAC 02B. 0267. 7-L D u�1 cCas Ciac Ce Gree�ls6oro, NC 27407 P�n�ie9 i33rW9 "';7 Ms. Sue Homewood North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality RE: NC DEQ I" Round Comment Response for 402-404 Penry Road Stream Crossing 3) Comment: The PCN indicates that this project "does not require a stormwater management plan". However, the justification for the requested impacts are for final development. You may either request approval for access to the property for another purpose (please note that avoidance and minimization is determined based on the project purpose), or update Section E. of the PCN form to indicate the project is for development. A stormwater management plan reviewed and approved by the local government us a requirement of Condition I.5 of 401 Water Quality Certification #4139, Response: Approval for access to the property for another purpose has been requested. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (336) 697-2637. Sincerely, uhann Waller, PE Project Manager CC: David Bailey, PWS Jerome Myers, PE `eN & �AS3 as � •I•...... O ,� :ate•` F'OA••''•�i �; �O� n� ; •.� { N "e8,``�y`� 1 Va[fer & Associates, PC January 29 2020 Mr. David E Bailey, PWS US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 150 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27601 RE: US Army Corps of Engineers lst Round Comments Response for Penry Crossing, Greensboro, Guilford Co., NC SAW-2010-01793 JC Waller &Associates Project Number: 19-036-274 Mr. David Bailey Please find below our response to your comments issued on December 3, 2019. 1) Comment: As discussed in the field on 8/13/2019, the purpose of the project is to provide access for a multi -family residential development. However, the proposed wetland and stream impacts exceed those needed for access, and include impacts proposed for parking facilities. Based on the Master Plan, it appears that additional avoidance and minimization could be demonstrated (per Nationwide Permit General Conditions 23a and b) whereby portions of the proposed development could be shift east to avoid parking lot impacts within streams and wetlands; Response: The proposed development has been shifted east to avoid parking lot impacts within streams and wetlands. 2) Comment: On the PCN, itemize stream impacts into three separate parts: permanent impacts due to the culvert, permanent impacts due to rip rap (if proposed), and temporary impacts due to dewatering; Response: The stream impacts have been itemized into two separate parts: permanent impacts due to culvert and temporary impacts due to dewatering. There is no rip rap proposed. 7-L Duw.das Ci.tcle Greens6oro, :NC 2,•4Q7 P(ujue* (3 6) 6N1 2G;7 Mr. David E. Bailey, PWS US Army Corps of Engineers RE: Penry Crossing, Greensboro, Guilford Co., NC 3AW-2010-01793 3) Comment: Is rip rap proposed to be placed wn the stream channel? If so, show the rip rap on the plan and profile views, and add the impact to the PCN (see item 2) above. Note that any rip rap placed within the stream channel must be depressed/imbedded such that the top of the rip rap is no higher than the existing stream bed elevation (see Regional Permit Condition 4.1.6); Response: There is no rip rap proposed to be placed in the stream channel. 4) Comment: Your proposed wetland impacts exceed 0.1 acre. Please revise your project to minimize your proposed wetland impacts below the 0.1-acre threshold (see item 1 above). Otherwise, compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts is required per Nationwide Permit General Condition 23c. Please provide a mitigation acceptance letter from either a mitigation bank with the correct service area (HUC 03 03 0002) or the NC Division of Mitigation Services for riparian non-riverine wetland credits. Note that he Corps would require compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 mitigation to impact ratio based on the relative quality of the wetlands proposed for impact. Response: With the eastward shift of the proposed development, the proposed wetland impact is less than 0.1 acre. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (336) 697-2637. Waller, PE Project Manager Attachment Co Sue Homewood Jerome Myers, PE Map Map Map Map Map Map