NC0020664_Wasteload Allocation_19930204

NPDBS DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SNEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0020664
Spindale WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocatio
fi
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Correspondence
201 Facilities Plan
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
February 4, 1993
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content q3,xx the reverse side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERNff= NAME: Town of Spindale
FACILITY NAME: Town of Spindale W WTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal with Modification
Major -1 Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 6.0 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 23 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 77 %
Comments:
Modification to relocate discharge to Catheys Creek from existi
dis haze to Holland Creek. Pretreatment information attach
Ps,j. MOL S '%U 1-VjSA, .
RECEIVING STREAM:Catheys Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-08-02
Reference USGS Quad: F11NW (please attach)
County: Rutherford
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: class IV
Classification changes within three miles:
change to WS-III at Second Broad River
Requested by: Raynyd Kepler Date:-1-IL
Prepared b*K4 Date: / 7,% "
Reviewed y Date: 1 Cl.
SOS, //1,
w'L14�L- —4— 02 3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
fMAJ
7 t ya.
701
c
Drainage Area (mil ) g/, to Avg. Streamflow (cfs): G Z
7Q10 (cfs) Zo Winter 7Q10 (cfs) Zi 30Q2 (cfs) IS
Toxicity Limits: IWC 37, % Acu hronic
Instream Monitoring:
ParametersT I)b f3abSIV#3
Upstream Y Location
Downstream i Location , k C-P A, U
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (m
30 (wG)
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
3
F. Col. (1100 MI)
7�
pH (SU)
6�9
Ciimr,u., i 2
/ S7
z-11 C78w
liL
-77
u
/6
0,0Y

. ..__ 1 WL[
o—�.4000=--5ppp —600D IODD FEE[
1 MOWER
RiAL 20 FEET
•14 SEA LEVEL
N Cj
-}
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
JAL NAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
AIRVEY. WASIIINGTON. D. C. 20242
AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILAOLE ON REQUEST
001 KVNV
HeM duly _ _ Light duty �..
Medium -duty. _ _ Unimproved dirt ,...,....
n U.S. Route
+u
r16
001
rIS.N.
35'22'30"
2' 30"
�0
sz�F�A
C,
"LOCATION MAP" FEB. t ^�
From USGS map - I"r,6
RUTHERFORDTON NORTH, N.C.
N 3522.5— W B 152.5/ 7.5
1966
AMS 4654 IV NW —SERIES V842

i
'1 li � •'/ • 'i• 1i.Y
FACILITY NAME: F/NDAGf' WLyj p 7'01,,, AF NPDES NO. NCO
O 2 O 4 REIESTER: ICA�aY KEnteg DATE: `{ REGION:
PN v me wM✓. col., ��,
PE = CONDITIONS CCVERING PREIREATME TP
This facility has no SIDS and should not have pretreatment language.
This facilitshould and/or is developing a pretreatment am. '
.,"'"`�'-�se inclu the following conditions: program.
RECEIVED
j j t ® Program DevelopmentREC i 1/ Phase I due
Phase II due
APR 2 8 1992 Additional Conditions
(attached)
TEC41 This facility is currently implementing a pretreatment program.
1CALSUP NWlude the following conditions:
i ; F► Program Implementation ;
�tl Additional Conditions
(attached)
SIGNIFICANT IMUSTRIAL USERS' (SIUs) CONTRIBUTIONS
SIU FLOW - TOTAL: -3.35 M3D
- COMPOSITION: TE)CTII,E: s MGD
METAL FINISHING: _- Mrs
OTHER: MD
, MGD ,
i M3:)
i
MGD ,
1 �
PASS
PARAMETER
I
:THROUGH
DAILY IAAD
IN LBS/DAY ACTUAL
�
�
jAL1kXZU1LE
DOMESTIC
FEFQffI`PED
INDUSTRIAL
X REMOVAL
Cd
Cr
-�.
Ni
.Cu lo
16.-76
2.ca'
i '
76
.03
-1.9LF
Pb-
Zn
—
4=l
7._�
014
CN
Phenol
"SyOther
�
76
n G
1
-
`o
�1
,
,
i RECEIVED: _/ t / 5 z —REVIEWID BY: REIVRNfD: ' /3� / •- _,

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Town of Spindale
NCO020664
23% Domestic / 77% Industrial
Existing
Renewal with Modification
Catheys Creek
C
030802
Rutherford
Asheville
Kepler
7/2/92
F11NW
Request # 7018 a
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
41.6
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
20
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
26
Average Flow (cfs):
62
30Q2 (cfs):
35
IWC (%):
32
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of existing NPDES permit. Spindale is looking at relocation to Catheys
Creek because of toxicity problems. ARO recommends that effluent limits be given for both
existing and relocation sites.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: ���*-••mot
Recommended by:
9/202
1a/6/ty
Reviewed by
InstreamAssess ent: Date: �0 S
Regional Su \� Date:
Permits & En 'neering: Date: `72
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BNt NOV O 7 1992
W** ow"ty 01wB wy
OCT 15 RECD

2
r
Existing limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH, (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/i):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
Color (ADMn:
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
6.0
6.0
30
30
13
monitor
6
5
30
30
1000
1000
6-9
6-9
monitor
monitor
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
6.0
13 (JD 0)
6
30
200
6-9
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge.
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study,. interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
WQ or EL
WQ
WO
Parameter(s) Affected
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)

TOXICS/METALS
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic P/F
Existing Limit: 32%
Recommended Limit: 32%
Monitoring Schedule: MAR JUN SEP DEC
4(
Existing Limits — "
"'t
Chromium (µg/l):
Copper (µg/l):
Nickel (µg/1):
Lead (µg/1):
Zinc (µg/l):
Mercury (µg/1):
Recommended Limits —
Cadmium 1
Chromium
Copper(µl
Nickel (µg
Lead (µg/►)
Zinc (aWl)
Silver (µg/l):
Chlorides (mg/1):
Tetrachloroethylene (µg/l):
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Daily Max.
63
monitor
67
30
monitor
monitor
Daily Max.
monitor
157
monitor
277
79
monitor
16
0.04
monitor
monitor
monitor
Failing toxicity test
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
CZK
WQ or EL
WQ � uee�l�- �te�ru}�r•� n� �� cow'
WQ
WQ
McKbr n*X4.+Vv * 0 v Li n-L
WQ
WQ
Cd,Cr,Cu,Ni,Pb,Zn,Cn,
Hg,Ag/
Tetrachloroethylene (Env.
Defense Fund data)
_X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
•'
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

4
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Hudlow Rd.
Downstream Location: Rock Corner Rd.
Parameters: Temperature,Do, Conductivity, Fecal Coliform, BOD5, NH3
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCTLi_ANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adcquacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demons ted the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

66
Facility Name % a�'- Permit # 4)G ooPipe #
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
(**Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at--!?, %, MAR JO L87 10CL , See part _, Condition
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which them may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is jZ % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
MAC ,?flilf AV Arc . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1(original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607-6445
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
,Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 '?b cfs
Permitted Flow 4, o MGD Recommended by:
IWC% sa
Basin & Sub -basin ;5XP 02
Receiving Stream1 C/tc%
County hi-�l d ate /t 9 Z
QCLR Version 9191

State of North Carolina
Department.of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Ann B. Orr
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 15, 1992
Mr. Bill Penson, Town Administrator
Town of Spindale
Post Office Box 186
Spindale, North Carolina 28160
Subject: Effluent Limitations
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Town of Spindale
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Penson:
The Asheville Regional Office recently received the effluent
limitations proposed for The Town of Spindale's new wastewater
discharge permit. A copy of those limitations is attached. The
proposed effluent restrictions differ from existing limits as follows:
BOTH HOLLANDS AND CATHEYS CREEK LOCATIONS
Parameter Existing Limitation Proposed Limitation
Fecal Coliform 1000 organisms/100 ml 200 organisms/100 ml
HOLLANDS CREEK LOCATION ONLY
Parameter Existinq Limitation Proposed Limitation
Cadmium no limitation 2.8 ug/1
Chromium
63 ug/l
69 ug/l
Nickel
67 ug/1
121 ug/l
Lead
30 ug/l
34 ug/1
Cyanide
no limitation
6.9 ug/l
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone [phone]
An Faual Ononrncnity Affirmative Actinn Fmnlnver

Page 2
Bill Penson
October 26, 1992
HOLLANDS CREEK LOCATION (continued)
Parameter Existina Limitation
Mercury monitor only
Silver no requirement
Chlorides no requirement
Tetrachloroethylene no requirement
Toxicity pass 73%
Proposed Limitation
0.017 ug/1-
monitor only
monitor only
monitor only
pass 75%
CATHEYS CREEK
LOCATION
ONLY
Parameter
Existing Limitation
Proposed
Limitation
Cadmium
no
requirement
monitor only
Chromium
63
ug/1
157
ug/l
Nickel
67
ug/1
277
ug/l
Lead
30
ug/1
79
ug/l
Mercury monitor only
Cyanide no requirement
Mercury monitor only
Silver no requirement.
Chlorides no requirement
0.04 ug/l
16 ug/1
0.04 ug/l
monitor only
monitor only
Tetrachloroethylene no requirement monitor only
Toxicity Pass 75% Pass 32% .
The fecal coliform limit change is due to a more restrictive water
quality standard which became effective on October 1, 1989. Changes in
chromium, lead, and toxicity limitations are due to new stream data
revealing slightly higher flow in the receiving stream. New
pretreatment data are responsible for modifications of requirements for
cadmium, nickel, zinc, cyanide, mercury, and silver. Monitoring for
chlorides was added because of the relationship between toxicity and
chloride levels. The tetrachloroethylene monitoring requirement was
added as a result of data available. from the Environmental Defense
Fund.
Current self -monitoring information reveals that the. Town of
Spindale would be unable to meet the proposed limitation for cyanide at
either Hollands Creek or Catheys Creek. Please .contact me at your
earliest convenience so that we may discuss ways in which to address
the cyanide situation.

Page 3
Bill Penson
October 26, 1992
Your attention to these matters is appreciated. Phone me at
telephone [phone] if there are questions concerning the proposed
wastewater discharge -permit.
Sincerely,
z , X 6
LC1__
James R. Reid
Environmental Chemist
Enclosure
xc/with attachments: Ronnie Pack

09/21/92 ver 3.1
Facility:
NPDES Permit No.:
Status (E, P, or M):
Permitted Flow:
Actual Average Flow:
Subbasln:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
7010:
INC:
Stn'd / Bkq
Pollutant AL/Crt'a Cone.
(ug/1) (ug/1)
--------- -- --------
Cadmium S 2.0
Chro 3 50.0
Copper AL 7.0
Nickel S 88.0
Lead S 25.0
Zino AL 50.0
Cyanide S 5.0
Mercury S 0.012
Silver Al 0.060
Selenium S 5.0
Arsenic S 50.0
Phenols S NA
NH3-N C
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0
Pollutant
Cadmium S
Chromium S
opper _
Nickel S
Lead S
Zinc AL
Cyanide S
Mercury S
Silver AL
Selenium S
Arsenic S
Phenols S
NH3-N C
T.R.Chlor.AL
TOWN OF. SPINDALE
NCO020664
E
6.00 mgd
2.90 mgd
'030802
CATHEYS CREEK
C
20.00 ofs
31.74 t
Removal Domestic
Eff. Load
t (f/d)
92%
38%
39t
778
33%
77%
59%
86%
94%
sot
Hot
99.00%
1--------------- ALLOWABLE
I Effluent
Cone.
I Allowable CHRONIC
I Load Criteria
(4/d) (ug/1)
I-----------------
1 3.30 6.301
1 10.64 157.527
1.51 22.054
1 50.50 277.247
4.93 78.763
1 28.69 157.527
1.61 15.753
[ 0.01 0.038
1 0.13 0.189
I 3.30 15.753
1 33.00 157.527
I 0.000
I 0.000
53.559
T 0 X I C S R E V I E W
1--------- PRETREATMENT DATA -------------- I ---- EFLLUENT DATA---- I
ACTUAL PERMITTEDI I
Ind. + Ind. + I FREQUENCY I
I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic I OBSERVED of Chronic[
Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total I Effluent Criteria I
Load Load Load Load I Cone. Violationel
(i/d) (4/d) (4/d) (4/d) I (ug/1) (Iv1o/{sam)1
--------
0.00
--------
0.02
-----------------
0.02
0.18
-------- I
0.180 1
--------
---------
0.03
0.22
0.25
0.75
0.780 I
140.00
-4/29 I 1
0.10
2.58
2.68
16.76
16.860 I
84.0
'28/29 I N
0.03
0.22
0.25
3.84
3.870 I
223.00
'4/29 I P
0.08
0.62
0.70
1.47
1.550 I
461.00
'14/29 I U
0.44
3.17
3.61
7.60
8.040 I
225.00
'2/3 I T
0.10
0.14
0.24
0.31
0.410 1
75.00
'1/2 I
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.003 1
1.00
10/1 1 S
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.010 1
1 E
C
I
IT
I
II
I 0
I
I N
I
PRDCT'D
PRDCT'D
I
I
PRDCT'D--------- MONITOR/LIMIT ---------
I
I
1--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent
Effluent
Instream
using
using
Cone.
Based on
Based on
Based on
I Recomm'd INSTREAM
ACTUAL
PERMIT
using
ACTUAL
PERMITTED
OBSERVED
I FREQUENCY Monitor. I
Influent
Influent
OBSERVED
Influent
Influent
Effluent
I Effluent Recomm'd 7 I
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
--------
Loading
--------
Loading
--------
Data
---------I
I Monitor. (YES/NO) I
----------------- I
--------
0.052
--------
0.596
0.00
Monitor
I NCAC NO I A
6.360
20.004
44.44
Monitor
Limit
Limit
I NCAC YES 1 N
67.690
425.415
26.66
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
WEEKL YES 1 A
2.350
36.818
70.78
Limit
Limit
I NCAC YES L
19.261
42.957
146.32
Limit
Limit
Limit
I NCAC YES I Y
34.326
76.491
71.42
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
I WEEKLY YES S
4.002
6.953
23.81
Limit
Limit
Limit
I NCAC YES I I
0.016
0.019
0.32
Limit
Limit
Limit
I NCAC YES I S
0.050
0.025
0.00
Monitor
Monitor
I MONTHLY NO 1
0.000
0.000
0.00
I NO I R
0.000
0.000
0.00
NO I E
0.000
0.000
0.00
NO I S
0.00
I NO 1 U
0.00
NO 1 L
0.00
NO 1 T

I
09/09/92 ver 3.1
Facility:
NPDES Permit No.:
Status (E, P, or M):
Permitted Flow:
Actual Average Flow:
Subbasin:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
7010:
IWC:
Stn'd / Bkg
Pollutant AL/Crt'a Cone.
(ug/1) (ug/1)
--------- -- -------- -------
Cadmium S
Chromium S
Copper AL
Nickel S
Lead S
Zinc AL
Cyanide S
Mercury S
Silver AL
Selenium S
Arsenic S
Phenols S
NH3-N C
T.R.Chlor.AL
Pollutant
Cadmium S
Chromium S
Copper AL
Nickel S
Lead S
Zinc AL
Cyanide S
Mercury S
Silver AL
Selenium S
Arsenic S
Phenols S
NH3-N C
T.R.Chlor.AL
2.0
50.0
7.0
88.0
25.0
50.0
5.0
0.012
0.060
5.0
50.0
NA
17.0
,TOWN OF SPINDALE
NCO020664
E
6.00 mgd
2.90 mgd
'030802
CATHEYS CREEK
C
20.00 ofs
31.74 4
Removal
Eff.
r
921,
38%
39►
77%
334
77%
59%
86%
94%
804
804
99. Do*
Domestic
Load
(:/d)
0.00
0.03
0.10
0.03
0.08
0.44
0.10
0.00
0.01
1---------------
ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D
1
Effluent
Effluent
I
Cone.
using
Allowable
CHRONIC
ACTUAL
Load
Criteria
Influent
I (4/d)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
I_________
I 3.30
________
6.3011
_________
0.052
I 10.64
157.527
9' 6.360
I 1.51
22.054:'
67.698
I 50.50
277.247
! 2.350
4.93
78.763.0
19.261
28.69
157.527
V 34.326
1.61
15.753
r 4.002
0.01
0.038
0.016
0.13
0.189
0.050
3.30
15.753
1 0.000
33.00
157.527
0.000
I
0.000
0.000
0.000
53.559
T 0 x I C S R E V I E W
I --------- PRETREATMENT DATA -------------- I ---- EFLLUENT DATA----
I
ACTUAL
PERMITTEDI
I
Ind. +
Ind. + I
FREQUENCY
I
I
Domestic
PERMITTED
Domestic I
OBSERVED
of ChrOnicl
Act.Ind.
Total
Industrial
Total I
Effluent
Criteria
I
Load
Load
Load
Load I
Cone.
Violationsl
(t/d)
(4/d)
--------
(t/d)
---------
(4/d) I
--------
(ug/1)
--------
(/vio/#Sam)1
---------
I
--------
0.02
0.02
0.18
0.180 I
I
0.22
0.25
0.75
0.780 1
140.00
'4/29
1 I
2.58
2.68
16.76
16.860 1
1790.00
'28/29
1 N
0.22
0.25
3.84
3.870 1
223.00
'4/29
1 P
0.62
0.70
1.47
1.550 1
461.00
'14/29
1 U
3.17
3.61
7.60
8.040 1
225.00
'2/3
1 T
0.14
0.24
0.31
0.410 1
75.00
'1/2
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.003 1
1.00
10/1
1 S
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.010 1
I E
C
I T
I
I I
I
I 0
I
I
I N
I
PRDCT'D
PRDCT'D
I
1
--------- MONITOR/LIMIT
---------
I
I
1--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S-- I
Effluent
Instream
I
I
using
Cone.
Based on
Based on
Based on
I Recomm'd
INSTREAM I
PERMIIT
using
ACTUAL
PERMITTED
OBSERVED
I FREQUENCY
Monitor. I
Influent
OBSERVED
Influent
Influent
Effluent
I Effluent
Recomm'd 7 I
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Loading
Loading
Data
---------
I Monitor.
I _________
(YES/NO) l
_____--_ I
________
0.596
________
0.00
____
--------
Monitor
I NCAC
NO I A
20.004
44.44
Monitor
Limit
Limit
I NCAC
YES l N
425.415
568.16
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
I WEEKLY
YES 1 A
36.818
70.78
Limit,?
Limit
I NCAC
YES I L
42.957
146.32
Limit
Limit?
Limit
I NCAC
YES I Y
76.491
71.42
Monitor
MonitoY
Monitor
I WEEKLY
YES I S
6.953
23.81
Limit
Limit
Limit
I NCAC
YES 1 1
0.019
0.32
Limit
Limit
Limit
I NCAC
YES I S
0.025
0.00
Monitor
Monitor
I MONTHLY
NO I
0.000
0.00
1
NO I R
0.000
0.00
1
NO I E
0.000
0.00
I
NO I S
0.00
NO I U
0.00
I
NO I L
0.00
I
NO I T
I S

PERMIT NO.. NCO020664
PERMITTEE NAME: Town of Spindale
FACILITY NAME: Town of Spindale WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal with Modification
Major q Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
6.0 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 23 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 77 %
Comments:
Modification to relocate dischar�
disch t Holland Creek. Pre
Pc�.�.% i`�oa,. S '.11 7. l.wse-.
RECEIVING STREAM: � Wla,.,4 atK-
Class: C
03-08-02
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Reference USGS Quad: F11NW (please attach)
County. Rutherford
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: class IV
Classification changes within three miles:
change to WS-III at Second Broad River
Requested by: 09 ,Randy Kepler
Prepared by: A,
Reviewed
--80 pk
wQ-ken-4—
Date: I -I -1
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
r
4
Drainage Area (mil ) 7 / Avg. Streamflow (cfs): /o. Z
7Q10 (cfs) 3.5 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 4, S 30Q2 (cfs) 4. o
Toxicity Limits: IWC 73 % Acu hronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters ���0 Ft V 51-A)
Upstream Y Location' f*0-+✓
Downstream r Location A°'� C01*w�'t
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BODS (m )
30
30
NH3-N(mS/1)
(3
hVmi
D.O. (mg/1)
/O
S
TSS (mg/1)
�j0
30
F. Col. (/100 ml)
ZaU
Z FO
pH (SU)
6'9
wr
0S�a
r L1*1
3f

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Town of Spindale
NCO020664
23% Domestic / 77% Industrial
Existing
Renewal
Holland Creek
C
030802
Rutherford
Asheville
Kepler
7/2/92
F11NW
Request # 7018 b
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
7.1
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
3.5
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
4.5
Average Flow (cfs):
10.2
30Q2 (cfs):
6.0
IWC (%):
73
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of existing NPDES permit. Spindale is looking at relocation to Catheys
Creek because of toxicity problems. ARO recommends that effluent limits be given for both
existing and relocation sites C et}drd
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream .
Regional
Permits &
921/92
/a/S/9L
RECEIVED NOV C
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES B)*mftr Q1 y Dlytstan
13CT 15 RECD
VV4Wjjrn kftkw*i 17
"Wo" Mpr9b

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg;4):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
6.0
6.0
30
30
13
monitor
6
5
30
30
1000
1000
6-9
6-9
monitor
monitor
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
6.0
6.0
30
30
13
monitor
6
5
30
30
200
200
6-9
6-9
monitor
monitor
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
WQ or EL
WQ
WQ
WQ
Parameter s Al ffected
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)

Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
.Chromium (µg/l):
,Copper (µg/1):
,,Nickel (µg/l):
,Lead (µg/l):
.Zinc (µg/1):
,Mercury (ltl;n):
Cadmium (
Chromium
XoPPer(µ€
,Nickel (µgi
-head (µg/l)
,Zinc (uu/1);
Silver (µg/1):
Chlorides (mg/1):
Tetrachloroethylene (µg/1):
TOXICS/METALS
Chronic P/F
73%
73%
MAR JUN SEP DEC
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Daily Max.
63
monitor
67
30
monitor
monitor
Daily Max.
2.8
69
monitor
121
34
monitor
6.9
0.017
monitor
monitor
monitor
Failing toxicity test
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
WQ or ELWQ
n
WQ Wtrn errl d 4r co er
�eeK �� mau-Mr; ✓u� l�°
WQ 0
WQ
u�eeKly-ms�.�Fcr;nc�, /ec�✓n✓�u�c(sd �` z�b+c
WQ
WQ
Cd,Cr,Cu,Ni,Pb,Zn,Cn,
Hg,Ag,
Tetrachloroethylene (Env.
Defense Fund data)
_X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
•'
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

i
4
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Hudlow Rd.
Downstream Location: Rock Corner Rd.
Parameters: Temperature,Do, Conductivity, Fecal Coliform, BOD5, NH3
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Ad Quacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(if yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

r.
r.
Facility Name I/&IL Permit #
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QR'I'RLY)'
(**Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at %3 % Aleo/ Ep 0-' , $ee part _, Condition
Pipe #�
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic to using test procedures outlined in:
1
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
Quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
Im A So DrcZ . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT -I (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607-6445
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data.. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 3's cfs
Permitted.Flow 6 - V MGD jt
mmended by:
IWC% 73 �f
Basin & Sub -basin o l/
Receiving Str am A j e =K
County mod- w 2LI/ Z
QCLR Version 9191

• • d,a. STATE o
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Ann B. Orr
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 15, 1992
Mr. Bill Penson, Town Administrator
Town of Spindale
Post Office Box 186
Spindale, North Carolina 28160
Subject: Effluent Limitations
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Town of Spindale
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Penson:
The Asheville
Regional Office recently received the effluent
limitations proposed for The Town of Spindale's
new wastewater
discharge permit.
A copy of those limitations
is attached. The
proposed effluent restrictions
differ from existing limits as follows:
BOTH HOLLANDS
AND CATHEYS CREEK LOCATIONS
Parameter
Existing Limitation'
Proposed Limitation
Fecal Coliform
1000 organisms/100 ml
200 organisms/100 ml
HOLLANDS CREEK
LOCATION ONLY
Parameter
Existing Limitation
Proposed Limitation
Cadmium
no limitation
2.8 ug/1
Chromium
63 ug/l
69 ug/l
Nickel
67 ug/1
121 ug/l
Lead
30 ug/1
34 ug/1
Cyanide
no limitation
6.9 ug/1
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 9 Telephone [phone]

Page 2
Bill Penson
October 26, 1992
HOLLANDS CREEK LOCATION (continued)
Parameter
Existing Limitation
Proposed Limitation
Mercury
monitor only
0.017 ug/1
Silver
no requirement
monitor only
Chlorides
no requirement
monitor only
Tetrachloroethylene
no requirement
monitor only
Toxicity
pass 73%
pass 75%
CATHEYS CREEK LOCATION ONLY
Parameter
Existing Limitation
Proposed Limitation
Cadmium
no requirement
monitor only
Chromium
63 ug/l
157 ug/l
Nickel
67 ug/l
277 ug/l
Lead
30 ug/l
79 ug/l
Mercury
monitor only
0.04 ug/1
Cyanide
no requirement
16 ug/1
Mercury
monitor only
0.04 ug/1
Silver,
no requirement
monitor only
Chlorides
no requirement
monitor only
Tetrachloroethylene
no requirement
monitor only
Toxicity
Pass 75%
Pass 32%
The fecal coliform limit change is due to a more restrictive water
quality standard which became effective on October 1, 1989. Changes in
chromium, lead, and toxicity limitations are due to new stream data
revealing slightly higher flow in the receiving stream. New
pretreatment data are responsible for modifications of requirements for
cadmium, nickel, zinc, cyanide, mercury, and silver. Monitoring for
chlorides was added because of the relationship between toxicity and
chloride levels. The tetrachloroethylene monitoring requirement .was
added as a result of data available from the Environmental Defense
Fund.
Current self -monitoring information reveals that the Town of
Spindale would be unable to meet the proposed limitation for cyanide at
either Hollands Creek or Catheys Creek. Please contact me at your
earliest convenience so that we may discuss ways in which to address
the cyanide situation.

Page 3
Bill Penson
October 26, 1992
Your attention to these matters is appreciated. Phone me at
telephone [phone] if there are questions concerning the proposed
wastewater discharge -permit.
Sincerely,
James R. Reid
Environmental Chemist
Enclosure
xc/with attachments: Ronnie Pack

5
-;o/ol
A�c„/.r r, A, dcl) ,CO t � ec�
// ^Ja,
< ooz ale - . �d9 0t f
11t)
o� C ryyZf-w•,- A-r �• °vf
—iVd O�/•q /44 ;A%l7✓4,.y. W;I IXAA'�iYT-ONMVUL..,'M•,;.7�'f.,.
/� A/ nqJ rc r. • n

STREAM DATA
A
INSTREAM SELF -MONITORING DATA
MONTHLY AVERAGES
Discharger: jv mac, Permit No. I(J&O-b ZS6G
Receiving Stre m: lh 11,fWdls Ci'£c% Sub -basin: 03 ° 8uZ
Upstream Location:. 5$17- /5'Y7 Downstream Location: 5X /5Y7
DATE TEMP D.O. COND. ' FECAL COLI. TEMP D.O. OOND. FECAL CO
Dec-91
Nov-91
Oct-91 /y, % / yw �/� .6 mil,?t; y'o o 9
Sep-91 If,7 Y,S w /6 S 2-2,3 7 It 970
Aug-91 ?0,3 917 22,f, 17I3& 3?C
Jui-91 ?/,9 b_s �« Aa. 9 2S�,o ?,"YG 32 S(. 1"r
Jun7.91 T,o. S' % a IJ® alS� 22,1 , � /0 S �/
May-91 /2• S 9,3 G6a 33V 2Jca % °/ Fs-?
Apr-91 %b,�
Mar-91
Feb-91
Jan-91
Dec-90
Nov-90
Oct-90
Sep-90
Aug-90
Jul-90
Jun-90
May-90
Apr-90
Mar-90
Feb-90
Jan-90
Dec-89
Nov-89
Oct-89
Sep-89
Aug-89
Jul-89
Jun-89
May-89
Apr-89
Mar-89
Feb-89
Jan-89
1, G `l w
)3.1
6,7
ass
6 z/
�r y2
I?,�
9,6 /oS
/9. y
-7, 7
SY 3
7-,/9
44 SZ
ly.s
g, z �,�
6af
1 �, y
g,o
s sy
�oz
+,,/ 42,
//, a
<,do
�66
/y
"y
1 s -7
Z ? s—
Page 1

Asq7 Aftf,4,GO—
, /2Z //V ,OS6 / ,07
5
. 02,
211
L, aZ L, 07,
.02 0 33
,OG'?
y/jr
G, 04
of's
,/db
311
.107 \ 073
/
, /zZ
/
,lZ7
3/2-
.031
.070
./f/
y/s'
.Oy9
as9
,03
Y//7
.6G2
obL
,680
CO
.0/v 0/1
, ou ,Of
AD/
slay
Oq
, os�s
,036 V7 Z,o/ ?(07) o/G i•63'/
f071 7//Z ,o/y o5Z
,08Z 74u
,071 fly 4,05 or .
,09 o 7 7 ,70

<,os /3 C.oS o3�
,oil"
o8 /0/y
./2y /%
,0Y9 -iI// 'C, oo r
.004 ii//r < , oo y
,06& / z/F
,maw ,0o8
,oZ
.07 113 , o�
,ob 1//7
• of 217 c. o3
lib 2l1K- c, o3
0� 3/' L'03
49 3//L c, 0.7
.ob -0
foz > 0Z'6
,p?Z
4. oo cii
07
, oo7
,oz
,a3
c,o3
< 0 3
,03
oS'

09/21/92 ver 3.1
Facility:
NPDES Permit No.:
Status (E, P, or M) :
Permitted Flow:
Actual Average Flow:
Subbasin:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
7Q10:
IWC:
Stn' d / Bkg
Pollutant AL/Crt'a Conc.
(ug/1) (ug/1)
---------
Cadmium
-- --------
S
2.0
Chromium
S
50.0
Copper
AL
7.0
Nickel
S
88.0
Lead
S
25.0
Zinc
AL
50.0
Cyanide
S
5.0
Mercury
S
0.012
Silver
AL
0.060
Selenium
S
5.0
Arsenic
S
50.0
'Phenols
S
NA
NH3-N
C
T.R.Chlor.AL
17.0
Pollutant
Cadmium S ]
Chromium S I
Copper AL I
Nickel S I
Lead S I
Zinc AL 1
Cyanide S I
Mercury S I
Silver AL I
Selenium S I
Arsenic S I
Phenols S 1
NH3-N C I
T.R.Chlor.AL 1
I
I
I
Allowable
Load
(#/d)
1.08
3.47
0.49
16.47
1.61
9.36
0.52
0.00
0.04
1.08
10.76
T O X I C S R E V I E W
TOWN OF SPINDALE
NC0020664
E
6.00 mgd
2.90 mgd
'030802
HOLLAND CREEK 1--------- PRETREATMENT DATA -------------- I---- EFLLUENT DATA---- 1
C I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI I
3.50 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + I FREQUENCY 1
72.66 I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic I OBSERVED of Chronic]
1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1, Effluent Criteria I
I Eff. Load Load Load Load Load I Conc. Violationsl
I % (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) I (ug/1) (#v1o/#sam)1
I-------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- I -------- --------- I
I 92% 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.180 I I
I 38% 0.03 0.22 0.25 0.75 0.780 1 140.00 14/29 1 I
1 39% 0.10 2.58 2.68 16.76 16.860 1 84.00 128/29 1 N
1 77% 0.03 0.22 0.25 3.84 3.870 I 223.00 14/29 1 P
1 33%- 0.08 0.62 0.70 1.47 1.550 1 461.00 114/29 1 U
1 77% 0.44 3.17 3.61 7.60 8.040 1 225.00 12/3 I T
I 59% 0.10 0.14 0.24 0.31 0.410 I 75.00 11/2 1
1 86-% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003 1 1.00 10/1 I S
1 948 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.010 1 ] E
1 80% I I C
I 80% I I T
1 99.00% I I 1
1 I I 0
I I I N
I I I
I I I
1 I I
- ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D--------- MONITOR/LIMIT --------- 1--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream I
Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on I Recomm'd INSTREAM
CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED I FREQUENCY Monitor.
Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent I Effluent Recomm'd 7
(ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 Monitor. (YES/NO)
---------------------------------------=------------------I-----------------
2.753 0.052 0.596 0.00 Monitor Limit I NCAC NO
68.817 6.360 20.004 101.72 Monitor Limit Limit I NCAC YES
9.634 67.698 425.415 61.03 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 WEEKLY YES
121.118 2.350 36.818 162.02 Monitor Limit Limit I NCAC YES
34.409 19.261 42.957 334.95 Limit Limit Limit I NCAC YES
68.817 34.326 76.491 163.48 Monitor Monitor Monitor I WEEKLY YES
6.882 4.002 6.953 54.49 Limit Limit Limit I NCAC YES
0.017 0.016 0.019 0.73 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES
0.083 0.050 0.025 0.00 Monitor Monitor I MONTHLY NO
.6.882 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 NO
68.817 0.000 0.000 0.00 I NO
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 NO
0.000 0.00 I NO
23.398 0.00 1 NO
0.00 I NO
I
I
r

/A,t4dj;4�
63�9oZ/1
�c/�55.- �..�[�'— a...Q_ i1(+. �iR�++�-• CsZ l_ S • �-w.4 • �`` _
%1 �'c. m .x,.ti /990
4
7w /6
FPS .-

�� /� .�✓'� °� .ue..�,�..._.Q� . = � fie,.✓

09/09/92
ver 3.1
T 0 X I C
S R E V I E W
Facility:
TOWN OF SPINDALE
NPDES Permit
No.:
NCO020664
Status (E, P,
or M):
E
Permitted
Flow:
6.00
mgd
Actual
Average
Flow:
2.90
mgd
Subbasin:
'030802
Receiving Stream:
'HOLLAND CREEK
I --------- PRETREATMENT DATA -------------- I ---- EFLLUENT DATA----
I
Stream Classification:
C
I
ACTUAL
PERMITTEDI
1
7010:
3.50
efs
I
Ind. +
Ind. + I
FREQUENCY
I
INC;
72.66
4
Domestic
PERMITTED
Domestic I
OBSERVED
of Chronic]
Stn'd /
Bkg
I Removal
Domestic
ACt.Ind.
Total
Industrial
Total I
Effluent
Criteria
I
Pollutant
AL/Crt'a
Cone.
I Eff.
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load I
Cone.
Vlolational
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
I 6
(1/d)
--------
(4/d)
--------
(f/d)
--------
(f/d)
---------
(4/d) I
-------- I
(ug/1)
--------
(tvio/isam)I
---------
I
---------
Cadmium
--
S
----------------
2.0
--------
921
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.18
0.180 I
I
Chromium
S
50.0
38%
0.03
0.22
0.25
0.75
0.780 I
140.00
'4/29
1
Copper
AL
7.0
39k
0.10
2.58
2.68
16.76
16.860 I
1790.00
'28/29
I N
Nickel
S
88.0
77%
0.03
0.22
0.25
3.84
3.870 I
223.00
'4/29
I P
Lead
S
25.0
33%
0.08
0.62
0.70
1.47
1.550 1
461.00
'14/29
I U
Zinc
AL
50.0
I 77%
0.44
3.17
3.61
7.60
8.040 1
225.00
'2/3
I T
Cyanide
S
5.0
I 59%
0.10
0.14
0.24
0.31
0.410 1
75.00
'1/2
1
Mercury
S
0.012
I 86%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.003
1.00
10/1
I S
Silver
AL
0.060
-
I 94%
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.010
I E
Selenium
S
5.0
I So%
I
I C
Arsenic
S
50.0
80%
I
T
Phenols
S
NA
99.0"
I
I I
NH3-N
C
1 0
T.R.Chlor.AL
17.0
I
i
I
I
N
I
I
I---------------
1
1
ALLOWABLE
PRDCT'D
PRDCT'D
PRDCT'D
I
--------- MONITOR/LIMIT ---------
I
I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S-- I
I
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Instream
I
I
1
Cone.
using
using
Cone.
Based on
Based on
Based on
I Recomm'd
INSTREAM
1 Allowable
CHRONIC
ACTUAL
PERMIT
using
ACTUAL
PERMITTED
OBSERVED
I FREQUENCY
Monitor. 1
Pollutant
I
Load
Criteria
Influent
Influent
OBSERVED
Influent
Influent
Effluent
Effluent
Recomm'd 7 I
1
({/d)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Loading
Loading
--------
Data
---------I
I Monitor.
---------
(YES/NO) I
-------- 1
---------
Cadmium
--
S
I ---------
1.08
--------
2.753
---------
0.052
--------
0.596
--------
0.00
-------
Monitor
Limit
I NCAC
NO 1 A
Chromium
S
3.47
68.817
6.360
20.004
101.72
Monitor
Limit
Limit
I NCAC
YES I N
Copper
AL
1
0.49
9.634
67.698
425.415
1300.55
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
I WEEKLY
YES I A
Nickel
S
1
16.47
121.118
2.350
36.818
162.02
Monitor
Limit
Limit
NCAC
YES l L
Lead
S
1.61
34.409
19.261
42.957
334.95
Limit
Limit
Limit
NCAC
YES I Y
Zinc
AL
9.36
68.817
34.326
76.491
163.48
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
I WEEKLY
YES I S
Cyanide
S
I
0.52
6.882
4.002
6.953
54.49
Limit
Limit
Limit
I NCAC
YES I I
Mercury
S
I
0.00
0.017
0.01G
0.019
0.73
Limit
Limit
Limit
I NCAC
YES I S
Silver
AL
0.04
0.083
0.050
0.025
0.00
Monitor
Monitor
I MONTHLY
NO I
Selenium
S
1.08
6.882
0.000
0.000
0.00
NO I R
Arsenic
S
I
10.76
68.017
0.000
0.000
0.00
I
NO I E
Phenols
S
I
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00
I
NO I S
NH3-N
C
I
0.000
0.00
I
NO I U
T.R.Chlor.AL
I
23.398
0.00
I
NO 1 L
0.00
NO I T
I S

WI 101.1. 1+19.MNI IFix v 11 Y I1:.S'1'IN(; OISP:1.1'-AfUNl IUI21NG SGMb1AR1'1 '11nr. AIIh I't, I'✓p.
n v.rrY NP. ❑IRFMFVI
... 9
Y BB (FAIL)
FAIL
..
FAIL
.-
ffMU
WWI 1) PERM Cl IR LIM:61%,8%014MGD
B9 --
F
FAII.
FAIL
MR
...
PAIL
t�76W Rcgm:1(MI/Sg' 1'x ryn'n" Q JA' MAR JON SIT DHC N-C"!-T:
n0
FA
_._ _-
FAIL
FAIL
...
Qmm1,:R1TIl IIiRI'GRD Regirn+: AKO SuM1M1uin: Cl'O(12
...
91 .-.
... PAS
... PASS
Dr Wl�"-
51-.:W
PP: r.o
fb'kn
92 PASS
�- PASS
-
m
_
��
] IP. 3.10 Iw'Cj'b): ]5.0 -
-
_
-..
_.
I'RnGOIi I],IiCll(IC CO)tPA:NY-1103 %iRM CHR hIM:1.%&.
re ._
... ...
..
N(.YaaaIl I91C(15 I1cgul:07/01M I'r'.Iry: Q P/P A MAR JUN SI'.P DEC
Caunty:ASIIE Rcginn:WSRO Snbb.in:NRWn)291
_
1'P:OS Slxcr
92 ...
... ...
...
PASS
...
IR
III
PRAOtlE. L1JL(IYA1C.ILL IT.RM Cl IN LM:29'b
88 ...
99 _
_. ..-
... PASS
._
-
(M
F
FAIL
bl
NC0000019/001 IkR^':01NNMN Pra(mn y Q PIT` MAR JUN 51.11 DK Nr+rrG+nT:
_
Nn
.. PASS
PASS
...
...
County:ASHE RcRinn:WSRO Subb.Iin:NI-WM
90 ..-
91 ...
...
-- PASS
-
PASS
E
PP: 0.75 S"'..1
92
._ MR...
_.
NR
7Q10:4100 OVEi"176 (11P
...
1'1(I.NG FAKE WWII PEItM CI IR I.IM:5.5%
W ...
B9 _.
... -_
... .-.
... ._
_. ...
---
...
...
NC(KA(19]0 Bc&:ON/01/91 I'rorycrrry: Q Pp' A 1111 MAY AUG NOV NuICIIPT:
Cnumy:NM017R1AN0 1?egi+m:IRO SlihMain: CPPL1
91 _-
...
PASS
IT: 13 R9m.l.l
92 ...
PASS ...
._ PASS
-.
(hder
1115(ill 11))
SPRINGER PUIIANK CO. lml (%P
as
n9
... ...
_. ...
..-
...
NCOn7/6A2 IhRu+:ltd/I (:90 Fr.yrrcno. .. N+nCmnp.
_.
g1 ...
... ...
... PASSI
_.
PASSI
--
Cnulny:NGW INNUVI?R Ncginn: N9ID Snbbr n:. f:PPll
...
.-
PF:NA Rl"�•iJ
92
...
...
Or+kc
...
SPH6G5I5D115'I'Rlf\ PPRM AC I.IM:NO SIGNMOR'ro-nin)
PO """
._
PASS
...
PASSI
._
NCIXIOS]Sa Rcgm: U2A11M9 I'Icyuclwy. Q Pp' lAN AI'N JUL OCI' Nrn+CrnrT:
B9 ...
9p PASSI
...
-- ...
PASSI -.
-.-
PASSI
-
CPumy:SCOTI.ANO Hcgirmalt0 SuM1M1xin: YAD55
91 PPS51
- _.
bt LATE
PASSE
PASSI
--
i`P:0.0) Speeld
92 PASSI
-- --
PASSI
-
PASSI
-]010 Sao IWCY%) 016 o"kO
(PASS) ...
-
(PASS)
_,
SPRUCE PINE WWII 11iRM. CIIR LIn1:2.19,
Y N (PASS)
09 (PASS)
.- ...
PASS
---
PASS
NC('O2M]J IkRm:(NA11B9 19nprncy:Q PA' A I1:11 MAY AUG NOV NmCnuo,
PASS ...
... PASS
...
PASS
Cnu+Ry:MO"C"oj. Hegicn: ARU Suhha<in: I'RR
99 __
91 ...
PASS
... PASS
..-
--
PASS
IT: 0.00 SP ild
92 -.
PASS
.- PASS
-
Mkr.
STAI.LINGS OIF COARILSIIWA)N 2 PI:RM CIIR LIM:9IY.L (GRAB)
...
-_ -..
._
._
...
NC0009618 Rcgin:l2/I2J91 Pmrynxy: Q PA: A IliO MAY AUG NOV N-C•,r,P:
ou
...
...
._ ._
...
...
...
Crminy:NASII Rcgiun: RRO SuM1balm:"1"AR02
..-
91 ...
._
._ ...
... ...
...
...
...
PF:0.012 RI'miJ
92 ...
NR ...
_. M
_-
...
AN'y PIiRMII'C11110NIC LIMFI':90b (OHAR).____-____.:O?A6,92
BO ...
... ...
...
FmI,I,:rxy: 01`R' A Il{II MAY AUGNOV NmCmrT:Singlc
09 -
___
___
Itcion: RHO $nbb+xirt'ITItn2IT
fff
[pu:...MR
...
.. ...(Y
)100 (h kr92
P15
NONE NONE
NONE
-..
FAIL
3FANL1?Y W W"fl' PI!ItM CIA Ij.MA %
y Be <So
<So
FAR.
... FAIL
FAIL
-
JAN
NCOn2n(p(+ 14rin:RIARf91 15apmrwy. p 0T n JAN APR 11!I, fXlf NmIGn'T..
B9
qB _,
...
FAIL
I All Fnl
FMI
MI
Fall
("numyt CASNIN He l:i..n: MR(I %011...... CI It 11
rII 1 M
1'A:':;
IA!;:;
VA:;:I
I'P: (IS Rlm�+d
;
92 Pn;t$
-. ...
FAIL NFL
NN
In, n: 11TI IWQ%):]a
SIP
OCI A'OC
1)IIC
.-.
... PASS
MR
MR
FAIL
FAIL
_. _.
PASS
FAIL
PASS PASS
FAIL
N
PASS .- --- PASS
NN PASS ... PASS
IJR ... ... PASS
..- .-. ... PASS
... ... PASS ...
_. ... ... PASSI
PASSI
IATE
PASSI
PASSI
- -
(PASS)
- -
PASS
...
PASS ...
..-
PASS -
--. ... FAIL ---
FAIL FAIL
FAII. FAIL FAIL PASS
I All MI I'A':I -
0 2u, - li1 1 .. -- R
T "Ai - 1 h, IUS• P:+ n .I I.
(. IS ('mMuainN nkper hnumJy
CGI-ND
'1 M ' ' G Q 1.I' M \ I1\1 P '. Ilv S\ StI­ A Annuu
y, OV'1 b ly Irn Ili
['+I'
II RM ❑. 'I R 1 mnl
Ill.-] A 6R I 1 n p _ I
I thl. 1 hI1-: M1 BIL.1 R
JAp AItI JUI.00I'
14cin .t J 'reA
]QIO Hea IY 1 ❑ I (k) 1 n.l 2
h, liul
[ I 1 [ I. I I i I II, DF\t A I
-1.1' 1..1 U I. I
( : lva
SIG - (IRC i,Pm— n Icd
Pm.•p f I tl+c'IM
C 4 1.' vt .Chv C]
Ac,, 11 ('.'•, a l.r + 01 11 A,Li,.. bn n+i d'd
•_, „
I:u;pmvnF ]mniml: - D.tn
r+9+rrl \R-NrtnlmwJ;f J ll" v:nl:I I G+c mr Iadlp+v

0
W
0)
Lr
O
M
N
facility �iac�A�c Nastefl& (MGD) 9.fr CFO Gi(
Potential effluent limit. combinations:
BOD5 NH3-N -

GfSDATA4S
0 wt Y
0
s
� 6.o HGa
Facility j1dc�a�c Hasteflow (MGO) 9.Sf A+Fa Sf l
J/
BOD5 NH3-N -
.2 JI2) /o (45') ✓
,s (aa) iz (If) 77-