820076_Inspection_20191122

M
40 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ®- O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (a Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: i0! County: ids eyRegion: ��
Farm Name: P-A Owner Email: �T
Owner Name: S' j�!�P 1we M- j Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: /�� !S Title:
Onsite Representative:
It
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
q9j uJ;jjic���s��1 ,�
abhkiq
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: i _ci
Certification Number: �/&/
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
4IL
ayer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Poo.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
[:]No
10 NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[:]No
NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No f�5 NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection: 4 �2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
[:]Yes
E� No
❑ NA
0 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q§)NA
0 NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
r No
E] NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
- No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
7
T
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes rVehNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ E •deuce of Wind Drift ® Application Outside of roved Area
c
12. Crop Type(s): &4mja�d�/lc5
13. Soil Type(s):AJ�j-v We -A. b o 4-
14. Do the receiving crops duffer from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
P] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
P, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
99 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes P�_11 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

D
Facility Number: - ate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
j� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[B No
❑ NA
❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑YesrM W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes `P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Ep No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pates as necessary).
q,C)--gC)qcce'u)
io-433-- 332 Co �(4,,,)
robe4v mc,v1_71e@ nCdee1r �c0V
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: q 10-q J3 3-3 cy
Date: 't-2 f `d
21412015