The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About090133_Inspection_20190821[Y _ Dtvision'of eater Resources _ - Faraiiiylomf�er ''��i Davis'ion oSo>i afld `4'ater Consc�tioo €_0 Iier-. Agency �t WE —, Type of Visit: (D Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ° Departure Time: County: Region: r— Farm Name: �q`�r4 �Cp y� d f` C °`� Owner Email: Owner Name: r �f ti� �q t i Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: y Facility Contact: �� n ��p r�, Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: �l Integrator: i"PI t T�i�'�Iif Certified Operator: �I Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 9 Arky1.5 Ln, �`\ h`14 nik- esagn CorrenL Desagn Current E Deb Swine; Capacity Pop = met Poultry _ Capacity Pop Cattle Cap Wean to Finish = Layer Dai Cow Wean to Feeder Non -Layer - Dai Calf Feeder to Finish= = Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean _ Desagu Cni rent - Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Poultry Ca ae Pop � Non -Dairy w Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other- - x s _ �� _ _ -- - Turkey Poults = = Other Other , Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 rren [:]Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [:]No FZNA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No P NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No RNA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes " No ❑ NA ❑ NE 21412015 Continued Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No P NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3' Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in):----l--i� ,� Observed Freeboard (in): °� y % 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes rWNo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes .� No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc. ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window /❑t Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ �Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s) �`� l !/sY� 6,wrCGi. (4 -�r,C S l �l� , o PQ 13. Soil Type(s): 1-Z ) L-A b , Ko 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes FT No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes FUJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [`V' No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes T No ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [P No 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes W No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E;3 No the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes P§No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE [:]Yes [--I No ❑ NA ❑ NE [:]Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE [:]Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 5,jNo 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes, gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE lCornmea►ts {refer to gaestaon #`xplaan any YES an" alswers andiar any acditaanrecogr►mendations or ainy other e_o>rnments ' Uge-Ar-a-Wings of facilaLy`ta baiter explain situations:(use "additoonal'pages as necessary) - _, _. O h a `� `-tom i 1✓l `I j 0_ V 2 q _,_( vlrt I C�Ciii. J 10't 33-33�2 y era ctrile e41 r-.'500 Reviewer/Inspector Name: Re) o•4--G€ r-We Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: Rj to'g33 -3yo P Date: 2W,Iq 2/4/201 S