20070415 Ver 1_Application_20070309

r~M
e~~o~
v...
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
~% l~4
'" a`.
,~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 6, 2007
Mr. Steve Lund
US Army Corp of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office ~ ® ~ _~,,,
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 ~ .~
Asheville, N. C. 28801-5006
SUBJECT: Pipe Replacement on SR 2129 (Dyson Road), Iredell County
Dear Mr. Lund:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace a 66-foot, 72" pipe on SR
2129 (Dyson Road) in Iredell County with a 70-foot, 112" x 75" CMPA with inlet and outlet
headwalls and associated riprap for structure stabilization. The stream dimensions immediately
downstream of the existing pipe is overwidened; therefore, ~25-foot rock-faced benches will be
constructed at the new pipe outlet to restructure to "normal" channel dimensions. Due to surficial
bedrock in the area, the new pipe inlet will be placed on existing streambed grade and the outlet
will be buried ~6 inches. Due to the existing site conditions, NCDOT requests a waiver from
the Regional Condition 2(b)(e) permit depth specification, for the construction of this
project.
Temporary cofferdams and bypass pumping will be used for stream management during
construction. Upon project completion, the area impacted by the temporary cofferdams will be
returned to pre-project conditions and seeded and stabilized. The total scope of the work will
result in 4 feet of pipe impacts and 30 feet of permanent rock impacts (from structure stabilization
and rock-faced benches) to the connecting stream of Skyview Lake to Hunting Creek, which is
classified as a WS-III watershed by the Division of Water Quality.
The project is not located within '/z mile of any critical watershed area nor is SR 2129 a rural or
urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill
basin checklist.
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for historical sites and
threatened/endangered species sites. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places
are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. The
federally listed species for Iredell County include the bog turtle (USFWS listed dated March 8).

SR 2129, Dyson Road
Page 2
March 6, 2007
Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest bog turtle location approximately ] 0
miles northwest of the proposed project area. Bog turtles are typically found in bogs, marshes,
and wet pastures. There is no suitable habitat located within the project area. NCDOT is
recommending a finding of "no effect" for T&E species and historical structures.
I have enclosed apre-construction notification for a NW#14, sketches of planned activities, and
location maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150465-55120005-128.204911-3855
• TIP #: NA
• Project Category: $200.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank
you for your time and consideration to this matter
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY: ,/~/~, ~ /I ~.
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
Cc: John Hennessy, DWQ, 401/Transportation Permitting Unit
Polly Lespinasse, DWQ, Mooresville Regional Office
Ron Linville, Wildlife Resources Commission (Courtesy Copy)

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 7 0 4 1 5
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW #14 (WQC#3404)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Holder, N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9020 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Trish Simon
Company Affiliation: N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address: tsimon(a~dot.state.nc.us
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Pipe Replacement, SR 2129, Dyson Road
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 12B.204911
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Iredell Nearest Town: Harmony
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Harmony, east on
Hwy 901 turn left onto SR 2126• turn r~ht onto SR 2129 and proceed to site.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°56'56"°N 80°43'37"°W
6. Property size (acres): < 0.10 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Skyview Lake & Connecting stream to Hunting
Creek WS-III Watershed (from source to a point 1.1 mile upstream of Davie County SR
1147 .
8. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.em•.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing Conditions-ape on paved secondary road. General
Land Use- wooded, residential.
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used_
Replacement of a 66-foot, 72" CMP with a 70-foot, 112" x 75" CMPA. Due to bedrock in
the azea of the pipe replacement, the new pipe inlet will be placed on grade and the outlet
will be buried less than one foot below the existing streambed elevation. Riprap will be
utilized at the inlet and outlet for structure stabilization. The existing_~pe is slightlyperched
and the channel immediately downstream of the existing outlet is overwidened. Rock-faced
benches downstream of the new pipe will be constructed to restructure channel dimensions to
"normal" stream channel width (based upon a reference cross-section at ~80 ft upstream of
the centerline). Typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.) will be used for the
construction of this proiect.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to replace
a deteriorating_pipe for the safety of the travelling_public.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated at this site.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed sepazately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 8

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts from minor increase in
ape length and rock-faced bench construction.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no linear feet

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acrea e, multi 1 len h X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Stream
Perennial or Average Stream Impact Area of
Number Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Width Before Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Im act linear feet (acres)
Skyview
Lake &
1 Connecting Pipe Perennial 7.5 feet 4 feet .0007
stream to
Huntin Crk
Rock faced benches
at outlet to restructure
1 existing overwidened 30 feet .005
stream/rock
stabilization
Temporary
1 CofferdamsBypass 40 feet .007
piping
* 34 feet •0057
Total Stream Im act b len hand acrea e
p (y ~ g) permanent Permanent
*Permanent impacts contained within area of temporary impacts 40 feet .007
temporary temporary
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8

Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0057
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
O en Water Im act (acres): 0
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0057
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 34 feet
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
NA
8. Pond Creation NO POND IMPACTS
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Minimal increase in pipe length
for adequate slope construction and construction of rock faced benches to restructure the existing
overwidened downstream section of channel.
Page 5 of 8

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on Januazy 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
MITIGATION NOT ANTICIPATED
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regazding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
3.
Amount of stream mitigation requested (lineaz feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-ripazian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 6 of 8

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multi Tiers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 I ~ 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total I ~ ~ ~
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 7 of 8

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
No increase in impervious surface is proposed.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater is generated from the project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The pipe replacement and rock-faced bench construction will not result in additional
development of the surrounding area. The replacement of the deteriorating_pipe must be for the
safety of the travelling public.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

-~'~~
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

NOTES:
Pumping system to be used to divert
stream around the Construction site
as needed.
Any contaminated water within the
COnsruCtion site is to be pumped into
silt bag
Silt fence to be placed around stock
pile and Dro ject as it allows.
Upon completion of the project all silt
fences are to be placed os needed.
Also seeding and mulching of dl5turbed
areas.
Proposed stream width
to be 6' to 8' wide
Fill with Earth Material &
cover with Coconut Fiber
Proposed Riprap at
all four corners
(Gloss II )
1 _ 1
C
~~ ~ _---
~5.
Gmbec4ded rc~l< on 6e~Gh~4c-e
with filter cloth between
the new fill area and ('ec~`l
C
O

Y
Nail set in Power Pole
Assume EIev.100.0
Proposed 112' x 75' x 70' CMPA
with concrete headwalls
on both ends
Existing 72' CMP 66' Long
to be removed along
with existing headwalls
N •.\ ~ •.
O ~I
~ Existing Boulder ~ ~'~,__._ .____
~ \ ~~ ---
Unnamed tributary to
Hunting Creek
Sheet loft 3 I
NCDOT 12th DIV.
Brldge f~AOlntenonce
Pipe Replacement on SR 2129
Dyson Rood Iredell Co.
Scale I'=20'
pR$ FB: B-2 1/07

can O tWl+ O l~P
liiiiliiiiliiiiliiiil
l (")
~ 1
m O
fll
a to
A N
C
O p
l ~
+ O
O ~
+ ~
~ O
m ~
m
~ ~
O
0
a
Vii O tWT O l~l~
v ° I ~
v
o ~ W ~~ q
x I ~~ ~
O 1+ ^~ to m
~ ~; ~ .+ a
ao ~ j ~ ~~
i ~
:D ~
~ O
a ~'
n
~+ j N m ~ s g
~ + m
a
O
a w ~G 9
CT W
~ ~~
~ o ~ I ~6 g
I 'o
I O
~.\• } I 4
D ~ J~ I I /~~,.
~ ~ r I I ~j
~ ~ .~~ I I
~ O ~ I I
O X I I
O m I
N x I
~ -1 Q ~ ~ + I
N ~W ~ pp ~W 7 ~ Or
w O ~ U' ~ I
I
m ~ ~_
~ n O~ ~ I
O 1 ~ m
O i~ ~
n ~ N ,
w O
N ~ Q
m
7
~ _
p~oo 4 6`
w a
~ ~ GJ
~ ~ ~ ~9i
a ~' ~ J9
D 0 n ~ .~
D I
o ~,
X ~' X99
~, I
~o :° + ~
~ - w 7 m
N ~ 01
N / W ~ ,9 6
7 ,
m ~ O
N °' m
o ~~ ~ I
~ + W
w
o ~ X93

.~ ~ /
\ ~ / ~
' 108 o
~~
p
s \ ~ O
/ 210 `~~ 2111 "\
.s
,` . ~ ^ 2110 '~ 3 ~ '9
210 2112 ,.
2103 e Z '' '3
~^ 2102 ,~ ~ 2 00 2105 .p 2111 2179 2105
~ ~ 2100 ~ a e ~® e ° 3 . s \ 2121 ~
To~~'bA~ b Zll 2104 211 2105 .e • 3 Zt20
2, 5 '.
1828 ~ a a •~ ~ ~ ~ \ -' /~} 113 Rock ' e \
ti ~ t 2121
~ 6
.,~,,, ~'" 2116 ° J ° `
' ~ 4 °~ \ ' r '' 2126 • ~ \
' "~' p - ~ ~; ~ 212 ' 2127
1824 ' /^irm ~ '~ 1 ,~ 1829 ~ ' ~, H~na„y 2123 ~ s c..
2130
\ ' ~ 2117
' 1827 ,` o_ I - ~,, 2115 .-° ~ 2120 ` ` ~~ ~ \
• ~ ~ ~ ~ 813 ~ 182' , Hou onville ~ 2117 2~ 2128 ., 213
~~ ~' - ~ 2118 ~~ 2125 • 3 ` , ..
1825 1826 -~ j 3 18-~,•, ~ 1 • ~ p ~.
~ ° agle 183 C ~ 1833 2120 ~ ~ ~ ° .~ ~ \:'~'' ~ 2
~ + 1821 ~Mills?"~" \ ° T952, 4 0 129 e ~ . , . ,
• 1823' 1985 - ,°182.1 \ 18 ti . 3 1838 ,~ ;'V 2126 b ~ ~ `'
rl~ - - _ , 'P932 033 2 4 ~ ~,. ~ ~ ^2125 2191 ~ s 2 39 ~'it
t 1991 ~ •, 3183 21 ~ 1
, 2132 V PoirM•
~=822 ~ ~ ~ - 1837 ~` ~ ,~ ry 215P
1836 '
•
291 2031 1819 - 1835 _ 1 ~
' ~ 1. 3
~ ~ -, ''7 ~ ~ BO ~ ~ ~ 2j ~ 2142 ,~~
d./f817 1820 / 1832 83 ,~ 5 ~6 rondo,, - 2133 ~
'z
V ~ 1816 s ro ~ s , a ,. 2 HARMONY I% . e 2134 ~ ~ e
~ ~ ~ 1983 ~ c 1845 t~,.,liamsburg POP. 548 !~ n/ 2T o 2135 a 21 ~'
° a . e ~. 818 ~ ~,/ '
e ~ ~ - ~ ~ 1846 t ~ ~ X231, E ° e 2140
1832 1815 1816 ~ 2 ' 1 82 •
3 2 1845 . ' ~
o / - ao o ~ s 184 ~ 3026 2136 . p 2247' ; ± ~ * t '°
1814 ° ~ 1849 t^~ 184 202 ~ ~ ~ 184 38 .s •
' ' - e ,~ , ~ 2027 ~ 0y~,~~ 999 ~ 2136
~, ,~ 1946 18 ° ? ~ 1884 ~•~ 1847 ~ 1887 , ~ _ 2~L 2138 - '
~ 3~. s '1$51' ~. ° ~ e 1845 2, `
~,. ~ '~ ~ ~ 2152 ~ _ ~
392 z , 1852 ~ ~ . , 3. s X981 1884 ~ ' 1890 u '~ a G: - 2152 ° 21
1857
,~, 0 1848 , t p 1° l 1889 ,•~ 3
e
'z a -~ ~ ~ :X, ~ '*_~' ~ 2262
~ ~-'=//~ 1887 ~ _rt -
\ j nning 18 1 e 1 58 4~ ~~ , ~ ,. ~ ~, 1888 ~ ` Tumors ~ _-2154 ~~ ~ 0
t ~ ~ n, 185'5 1885 .' ',?t', ' 1891 s. ° ~ t - . ,
,~ o o Olin 228
~ ~ 1852 C -
~ 1858 189 ~ ° • + ' ~ ~ ' p T, ~~~ ~ ,~, ~ ~~ ,
~ - ~ ~~ ` ` ~ 1987 2156
_ - ; ,, -~ 1861 X78 ~a 1891 - 'e 036 ~ - 189
_ , o ~ .o ~
~ ~ ~ 1677 3 3 .1 . ' t . ~+- n , `I ~eieon He n ,^+~,^~. °
\ p 1 N 1 h ''•7 ~ 3
'• 6ro~ p r~ ° 1879 `~=' f '.,~ ° ,e
881 ~ ., 1
• ~ .s s\\ 3 1858 1880 1883 -1891 ~ ., ~ `•~. 1919
186 ~ • c 1 , Fairmont
~ 1860 ' \-1 76 ~-', ~. - ~ ~ _ . z . 3 ~ ~, + ;-_, ch.
~ , 1979 3 1917 ,
° e ~ 1'882 s ~ , ~2 ~ cT
p 1880 ~- ° ' o ,,, ~
1862 , \ ~, -~ lg 1894 1892
- L ~' 1.8623 187 + ° ' ~ 41893 ~' ° e p ~ 1890 1916 1918 ~~~ ~ z,
~_ ~ 1858 ~ e 18 , 'a 2012 Charles ~ i - n
. 3 ~ 3 ~ ~
61 ~ 1868 1896 \. 874 1895 1894 ~ 1904 1918 1915 ,
,i,:,~ '~, \ -~~ - _..,~ 1892
_ ~e 197 ~~\\ ?o c}• r ~., ~~ ~6
_ '~ `1869 \,av~ one / ~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~.~,

J ~ Cat ~~ C~ - _._ _ ~? !, ~'., _ a-'~. _ v _"~- ~` r-- 4~~ \~ -,;'r. ~~ ' f r~f
-"`~._ -- -~ •~'_ t~ } '~fF~`t ~~` fit./~~~ ~,~ ~-'r'~(• ~1~ ~.~jt 1'~' ~ ~r ~. ', '
- __- __ Lit .i 4 +/. ._~~ `.'l '_' - S ~,~`! ;'~ ~ ~f~' ~.
'y '. s 1 i
~: " .f
! ~yy ~ ! ~ ~\ ,S
~•t r ~ '~.
~~ z ~ - ~
~., ~ ._ ~-
--
___ _ r ~ ~~~ Pipe ~. .., :i ~_ '~ . ~_
ter,- ,; i f-
r ~ ~~ ~~ Replacement F ,, _ ___ ~.~_ ~,.r- (f_~
r~ t - 4
_ d° ~ 1
1 ~ L' :_
- : ~ ..-z.~ _ ~ i
~~ w
.. ~ r ~ R~r. - -
e+ ;
K i~ r ~ pr~
_ i
_ ~. ~ ~ j , .' _ ' f
- ,
J: ; ,`
I '` `, -
4 ~~,` ~
f ,
~ f,~ `,4
_ _ ~ ; <.
Name: CALAHALN
Date: 2/19/2007
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet
Location: 035° 56' 56.52" N 080° 43' 37.62" W
Caption: Pipe Replacement, SR 2129 (Dyson Rd), Skyview Lake _
Connecting stream to Hunting Crk, WS-III; Yadkin Basin
1996,

T
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 1 ~ County: TrP~PII Project ID:
River Basin: Yadkin Bridge No: Pipe Replacement
Route: SR 2129, Dyson Road Stream: Skyview Lake and connecting
stream to Hunting Creek, WS-III Watershed
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r r
ORW r r
WSI r r
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area r' r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Arterial Urban r r
Arterial Rural r r
Yes No
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? r r
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).

85 CL
80
75 10.6 7.8 0' 7.6 8.8
Existing Cross Section taken Approximately
40' Downstream of the Centerline of Rood
a{ ovterWidGned Sec.~ton)
85
CL
80 -- -
6.7' 4.5'2.4' 0' 2.9'4' 8.4'
75 j~efercnCe Cross Section taken Approximately
80' Upstream of the Centerline of Road
Fill with Earth Material
and Cover with Coconut
Fiber
CL
85 Streorn
80
W~• _.
75 ~ ~ rmht~~ed ~o~k Gr` ~'Jenr.;'1~U(-( With Filter
LLL Fabric between Rip-ROp and F11I Material
10.7. 7.8' 0• 7.6'8.8'
a('oPoSec~ CrOSS SectlOn token Approximately
qD' Downstream of th Centerline of Road
Sheet 3 of 3
• Cross Sections ore token
looking Upstream
Revs 2/07

SR 2129
Dyson Road
Pipe Replacement
~~ ~.
_:,~~
,,
--
~-
~_ ~ - _~..
.:-~.:a ~
_~- ~ .
~~