820126_Inspection_20190820

Dw�srpn o'atertesources€'
r
)�'acYlity Number
-
` ��tvtston
of Soil and Water Conservatron
(Other°Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 22' Arrival Time: Departure Time: r : ` County:.$n-yPKeva Region: XP-O
Farm Name: j r��G{(:( F&041s Owner Email:
Owner Name: �` l�� ([�tr/1g S ,1 C , Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 5;2'/�70k Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: � `ry (�� l� I c� ,�✓i Certification Number: 100 203
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
N1ay�7�1� �
-
IN
g Garreitt
Desagn
Ctient
1lesign Cutent
On
=� y
Swine Capacity Pap Wet Poaltr
Oa ac
p� i3
, ._
-Pop
CatleCaae�ty fop
-
Wean to Finish
Layer
Wean to Feeder
p(� Q Non -La er
Feeder to Finish'
Farrow to Wean
1 2-00 Design
Current
_
Farrow to Feeder
_
dry PoulttCa aacity,
s __
P_o
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
E —Other.
r
Other
_
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [) j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Lp NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes ❑ No r NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: 2�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
[-No ❑NA ❑NE
TT❑� No NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
� w
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 30 `7j% V
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[QP No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
1�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 1- ❑ Evide e of Wind Drift
f ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.'Crop Type(s): �^^'�� S� G. "T 5 '
13. Soil Type(s): _ &r'CA1F-''/" 0 b , t(l{ ro"I., —oex
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[F No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[�iNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 01 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 2-6 Date of Inspection: 2-z,
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes FQ9
r
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [$ No 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ai No
❑ Yes ��" No
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [ No
[:]Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �6�j92jr - Marble Phone: 910_3an
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: -6QQQ�¢ �Z��d� Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015