820233_Inspection_20190805

yi S is `i
Dxsto of V�'aterResources -
,
Factlfly dumber ��� �{� Divasi�n of Soild Water,onseru�t<n.€.
0 OtherAgeney `` _
Type of Visit: 99 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: �County: `' e>/%/Region: A�__Z7
Farm Name: Reeves� gq�owes Owner Email:
Owner Name: ` 6ey es Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,j0'.� Title: Phone:
OnsiteRepresentative: �%! DI°� 1 `fie P—S Integrator: -6t.., 44a�C
Certified Operator: 419us_e Certification Number: /D ®q%
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Cams�c
Ala^
DesignCarreit
- Designs CurrentsDdsign
Current; .. .
Swine Capacity
wet Poultry Capacity —�op
Cattle "
Capacity fop
Layer
Dairy Cow
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
=_
?esign g Current
D Cow
Dri mk
Po"ultry., Ca achy ',lao
Non airy
Layers
Beef Stocker
Non -Layers
E
Beef Feeder
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
v
Turkeys
"
Other'
"
Turke Poults
v
Other
_
Other
_
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
� �'7
Feeder to Finish
?;i
�
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No M NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [']JNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
21412015
❑ No
� NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Mj
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: , C,
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): `7 t 7
Observed Freeboard (in): vI� :r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 5
M No ❑ NA ONE
❑ No ®NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
[:]Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable CropWindow ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
l_
12. Crop Type(s): ogi k' &,/�'✓tcyk u L,I 4,,,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ frortli those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
[!�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
14 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes @ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Wl No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes [21 No
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 2- Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes % No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes rVI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes W] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes FL-71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes 00 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
C„onunents (re%r=to gpestie�n : lExpla�n amy,Y] S answers°and/or "any addihoa�al deco m ndafions atr any other ca�minenis
Use dra %n s of facih, to better a l_Ain situations :use 'ditional ` ,ages as necessa
�lI.IGrl1Ii JLl! V(?4j .('Vq'5 CDVKPe
J a
cl 10 -(02-L-l- q r%t ic( (cc ev
r o q 53 332�f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ')�1CO U'e4 ma'r o
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9/0-�.Vto
Date: .1-25/-/ 7
21412015