WQ0002708_Staff Report_20200115

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Fnvir onmental Staff Report
Quality
To: Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Ashley Kabat
From: Rick Trone, RRO
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 6r5119
b. Site visit conducted by: Rick Trone
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No See Laserfiche
Facility: Wrenn Road Facility
(WQ0002708)
County: Wake
d. Person contacted: Tracy E. McLamb and their contact information: ext. 919-662-5024
e. Driving directions: Facility located at 8828 Wrenn Road, Garner, NC 27529
2. Discharge Point(s): NA
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: NA
Classification:
River Basin and Sub -basin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
Il. EXISTING FACILITIES:
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA
ORC. Tracy McLamb Certificate #: SI-15950 Backup ORC: Eric Batchelor/Steve Honeycutt Certificate #: Sl-
991560/SI-988689
?. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: As outlined in current permit.
Proposed flow: NA
Current permitted flow: 704,618 GPD
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.): Possible construction of I540 through southern portion of facility.
FORM; WQROSSR 04-14 Page l of 5

Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or F1 No
If no, please explain:
3. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ® Yes or ❑ No
If yes, please explain: Addition of 4 background monitoring wells.
4. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
5. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
6. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: See notes and information
pertaining to additional wells that have been installed.
7. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
9. Monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N.-'A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5

10. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA
If no. please complete the following lexnand table if necescarvl-
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
o , of
r. , to
t,. f ,1
6 1 If
4 1 to
p 1 If
C f to
f If
L 1 f1
f If
11. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any
requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable: BIMS currently flags the facility for failure to report Nitrogen,
Ammonia Total and Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total. These two parameters are not listed in the current permit
for PPI001.
Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BQVIS violations? ® Yes or ❑ No
If yes, please explain: See #11.
12. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues
❑ Notice(s) of
Deficiency. -'Violation
❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer -comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.) NA
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place? NA
Have all compliance dates,'conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NiA
If no, please explain: Condition 1.3 (submission of report to DWR regarding DAF residual flow from DE
Benton). Reviewer unsure if this has been satisfied.
13. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NIA
If yes, please explain:
14. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: None observed
15. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): NIA
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 5

III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit, Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request: None
C
List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued: None
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
Notification
Notify the Division when plans for 1540 are completed (if facility is to be
impacted).
5. Recommendation: ❑ HoId, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny {Please state reasons: )
- Y
6. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervis
Date: _ ty-_ 20,1d
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 5

1V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
1540 project may impact facility at a later date.
Four new wells have been installed to aid facility in determining background levels of Fe, Mn, and As. See
permit renewal application for documents relating to the Groundwater Monitoring Plan. Should these
background wells be included in the permit? Should a permit condition be added relating to any data collected
from these background wells?
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5