20200068 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20200110

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200068
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Johnson Tract
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wyatt Brown
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1/10/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Little Bernal Branch 27-52-6-3-1
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
Class C, NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.453227
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.500018
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
7 Standard (IP)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
V

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit r Riparian Buffer Authorization
r Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification: r Yes r No
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit: r Yes r No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Don H Johnson and Keith G Johnson
2b. Deed book and page no.:
01340/0831
2c. Responsible party:
Don H Johnson
2d.Address
Street Address
2006 Tigris Dr
Address Lim 2
aty
West Palm Beach
Postal / Zip (ode
33411
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Wyatt Brown
State / Province / Region
FL
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:

4b. Business Name:
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
242 Batten Farm Rd
Address tine 2
City
Selma
Postal / Zip Code
27576
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
USACofE POA Consent. pdf
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
16.11KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^)
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Four Oaks, NC
2. Project tt Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
164200-90-1234
62.74
2c. Project Address
Street Address
11915 Raleigh Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Fbgion
Four Oaks
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27524
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Little Bernal Branch 27-52-6-3-1
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Class C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011301
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is located on Raleigh Rd, in Four Oaks, NC in Johnston County in the Southeastern Plains ecoregion of NC.
Current land use is appropmately 90 % cultivated agricultural fields (tobacco, corn) and 10 % undeveloped forestland. There is a private residence, and typical agricultural outbuildings
on site. Water service is provided by Johnston County Public Utilities. There is no public wastewater service.
There are 2 wetland areas on the property. Wetland A is located along the western portion of the site, and includes Streams 01 and 02 within the delineated boundaries. Both streams
are subject to NC Neuse River Riparian Buffer rules. There are no planned development activities in this area. Wetland B is situated in the approbmate center of the property and
extends from the northern property line to the southern property line. This wetland will require crossing to access appropmately 40 acres of developable uplands.
The property is located in a predominately rural area of Johnston County. Adjacent properties consists of agricultural use and forestlands.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r^ Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)

USGS Topo Map.pdf 1.01 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
NRCS Soil Survey Map.pdf 1.41 MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland A: 2.92 acres; Wetland B: 0.73 acres; Total Wetlands: 3.65 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Stream 01(perennial): 806 LF; Stream 02 (intermittent): 598 LF; Total Streams: 1,404 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Purpose is to construct a 55-lot single-family residential subdivision, with associated roadways and utilities, to meet increasing housing demand in the western Johnston County area.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project will consist of 55 single-family lots. Sandcastle Lane will extend from the entrance on Raleigh Road to the eastern extent of the project. Sandcastle Lane will require a single
crossing of Wetland B (no stream impact) in order to provide access for 42 of the 55 lots. The wetland extends from the northern property line to the southern property line, providing no
practical alternative. There are no other planned impacts associated with the project.
Type of equipment to used will consist of typical land clearing, grading, utility installation, and roadway construction equipment.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Plans combined.pdf 738.83KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
A request for a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination is included with this submittal.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Martin Richmond
Agency/Consultant Company: Lakenheath, Inc.
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands r Streams -tributaries f Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
a. Site #* (?) 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) �2�e of W. 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
_11
Culvert/Road Crossing P Headwater Forest Wetland B Yes Both 0.050
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.050
2g. Total Wetland Impact

0.050
2h. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Prior to site design, streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers were delineated to identify potential resource areas to avoid where practicable. Impacts
have been avoided where possible, while allowing access to upland areas.
Due to the location of Wetland B, which extends throughout the property, there is no practical alternative to crossing the wetland in order to access
the uplands on the eastern portion of the property. The single road crossing required for the project provides access to 42 of the proposed 55 lots,
with no other impacts necessary.
The width of the proposed road has been minimized to only the standard design necessary to meet project need and allow for required ingress and
egress.
The proposed road crosses the wetland at a relatively narrow area, and at an appropmate 90-degree angle, minimizing the overall impact area.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction will be conducted under an approved erosion and sediment control plan. Access to the crossing area will be from high ground.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Wetland impacts are less than 0.10 acres
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
W Proposed project will not create concentrated stormv✓ater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
The project Stormwater Management Plan will be approved by the Johnston County Public Utilities Stormwater Department.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will be constructed and completed as a single-phase project, with no planned future expansions.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater disposal will be through on -site subsurface septic systems, approved through the Johnston County Environmental Health Department.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A project review letter was requested of the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) to identify any potential occurrences of endangered species on or
near the proposed project. The review letter did not identify and recent occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical
habitat on the subject property, or within 1.0 miles of the project. A copy of the NHP review letter is attached with this submittal.
In addition, a review was made of the USFWS list of Endangered and Threatened Species for Johnston County, NC, updated 6/27/2018. Field reviews
did not identify potential habitat for federally protected species known to occur in Johnston County, including the Bald eagle, the Red -cockaded
woodpecker, and MIChau)es sumac.
There are no proposed stream impacts associated with the project; therefore, there will be no impacts to potential habitats for Neuse River waterdog,
Atlantic pigtoe, Dwarf wedgemussel, Tar River spinymussel, or Yellow lance.
Based on this information, the proposed project will have No Effect on federally protected species. Also, the forested area on the property is a natural
growth mixture of hardwoods (Red Maple and Water Oak) with little no pines (Loblolly Pine). There is a very dense undergrowth of holly, privet, and
greenbrier in all areas, with the exception of Wetland B. This very dense undergrowth, combined with the dominant presence of hardwood trees, and
lack of pine trees, provides no habitat for the Red -cockaded woodpecker. The wooded area of Wetland B is comprised of primarily of oaks and tulip
poplar, with some loblolly pines present. However, there are very few pine trees in the Wetland B area, and the undergrowth is primarily maple
saplings and arundinaria (with lack of forage grasses), and provides no habitat for the Red -cockaded woodpecker.
Consultation Documentation Upload
T&E Report.pdf 953.81 KB
IPAC list.pdf 371.4KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
There are no waters classified as EFH in Johnston County, NC.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
t^ Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A review was made of the NC State Historic Preservation Office online database, located at : https://vmw.ncdcr.gov/about/history/division-historical-
resources/gis-maps-and-data, to determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within the proposed project area.
There are several historic properties shown near the project site, listed as SL (Study Listing); however, the listings are for individual houses located on
the west side of Raleigh Rd. There has been no formal designation of eligibility for these listings. The SL structures are not on the subject property,
and the project will have no effect on these structures.
The SHPO review did reveal a Study List area centered across Raleigh Road from the project. The SL area as depicted encroaches onto the western
portion of the subject property; however, there are no shown SL sites on the subject property.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
NCHPO.pdf 367.25KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
ncfloodmaps.com and Johnston County GIS Services.
Miscellaneous
Comments
The Preliminary JD package has been attached for your review.
All wetland lines will be shown on the final S/D plat. These lines will be shown on each individual lot, a note will be added to the final plat by the surveyor stating all wetlands are
Federally protected and the US Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted before being disturbed.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Stream Call Letter (1).pdf
Johnson Property JD Request Packet For PCN 01022020 (2).pdf
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
757.62KB
8.31 MB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Wyatt Brown
Signature
�i �2"Ort9'F
Date
1/10/2020

8/1/2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Joshua Deal
Re: Johnson Tract, Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described 11915 Raleigh Rd, Four Oaks, NC 27524(NCPIN 164200-90-1234) for the
purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the
U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
onald Johnson

9/10/2019
_________
Prep By:
WB/MRR
Johnson Tract
11915 Raleigh Road
Four Oaks, North Carolina
Johnston County
Project Parcel
LEGEND
Benson & Four Oaks Quadrangles
Source: TNM/USGS Mapping Services, 2016
USGS Topographic Map
3
Figure Raleigh Road
9/10/2019
_________
Prep By:
WB/MRR
Johnson Tract
11915 Raleigh Road
Four Oaks, North Carolina
Johnston County
Project Parcel
LEGEND
Soil Survey of Johnston County, 1994
Map Sheet 9
NRCS Soil Survey Map
5a
Figure
9/10/2019
_________
Prep By:
WB/MRR
Johnson Tract
11915 Raleigh Road
Four Oaks, North Carolina
Johnston County
Project Parcel
LEGEND
Soil Survey of Johnston County, 1994
Map Sheet 10
NRCS Soil Survey Map
5b
Figure
Johnson Tract
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Know what's
before you dig.
SITE
0
SCALE: 1" =
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
100' 100'
100'
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1"=1,000'
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW
PURPOSES ONLY
OF 1 SHEETS
THIS ORIGINAL SHEET IS 24"X36", OTHER DIMENSIONSINDICATE IT HAS BEEN ALTERED. ALL INFORMATION
REPRESENTED ON THIS SHEET IS THE PROPERTY OF
RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. UNDER PENALTY OF LAW,
THIS INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN PART
OR WHOLE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
FROM RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. 2018 ©
REVISIONS:DATE:
DATE:ISSUED FOR:
PROJECT NO.:
DRAWN BY:
REVIEWED BY:
SHEET NUMBER:
SEAL
041318
SEAL
C-3075
RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. (C-3075)123 RALEIGH STREETFUQUAY-VARINA, NORTH CAROLINA 27526PHONE - [phone]PRELIMINARY
DRAWING
NOT RELEASED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES
ONLY
1 -
--
19-025
CSB
CSBPOSTEEL, LLC.5160 NC HWY 42 WESTGARNER, NORTH CAROLINA 27529RUTH HARBOR SUBDIVISIONPRELIMINARY SITE PLANC1
20'10'x70'SITE TRIANGLER/W25
'

R
R/W
ROADWAY 30' RPROPOSED ROAD SECTION DETAIL
TYPICAL DETAIL
PROPOSED 50' R/W
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
FOR PROPOSED 20' ROAD PROP.
(R/W)
25'-0" (TYP.)CL 25'-0" (TYP.)
10'-0"
CROWN 1/4" PER FT.
10'-0"6'-0"
SHOULDER
1" PER FT.
3:1 3:1
6'-0"1:18" ABC ON
COMPACTED GRADE
6"
1 1/2" S 9.5 A SUPERPAVE
ASPHALT MIX
PROP.
(R/W)
6'-0"
SHOULDER
1" PER FT.
3:13:1
6'-0"
INTERIOR INTERSECTION DETAIL
RALEIGH ROAD30' R10'x70'SITE TRIANGLE
R/W
EXISTING ROADWAYR/W25
'

R
20'
50'
30'A50'
R
A35'R
6'6'
ROW50'
20'15'25'R
1" PER FT.
SECTION A-A
LC
SLOPE AS REQ'D.
35'
35'R
3:1 3:1
SYMMETRICAL CUL-DE-SAC
TYPICAL DETAIL
N/F
EDWARD & BETTY
SUE STEPHENSON
DB 4470 PG 0174
PIN # 164200-81-5301
50'
R
A35'R
ROW50'
20'15'
3
SC
DUE TO M
20'10'SITE TRR/W25
'

R
ROADWAY 30' R30R/W'
R
20'
30'RALEIGH ROAD (SR1330)
OLD SCHOOL ROAD (SR1350)
SITE PLAN INFORMATION:
1. NAME:JOHNSON TRACT
2. STREET ADDRESS:11915 RALEIGH ROAD
FOUR OAKS, NORTH CAROLINA 27544
3. P.I.N.: 164200-90-1234
4.LAND USE (EXISTING/PROPOSED):SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
5. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS:55
6. TOTAL AREA:59.56 ACRES / 2,594,542 SF
7. CURRENT ZONING:AR
8. BUILDING SETBACKS:FRONT - 25 FT.
SIDE - 5 FT.
REAR - 5 FT.
9.DENSITY SUMMARY:
MAX DENSITY (AR)1.5 UNITS / ACRE * 59.56 ACRES = 89 UNITS MAX
PROPOSED DENSITY (55 UNITS / 59.56 ACRES) = 0.92 UNITS / ACRE
10.IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA:
MAX IMPERVIOUS 8.93 ACRES (15%)
STREETS 1.95 ACRES
MAX IMPERVIOUS PER LOT 5,528 SF
11. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY:NO (PER FEMA MAP #3720164200K)
EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 20, 2018
12. WATERSHED DRAINAGE AREA:LITTLE BERNAL BRANCH (C, NSW) TO NEUSE
NOT IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA
13.DEDICATED STREET RIGHT OF WAY:50' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
CONNECTION DETAIL
8'-0"6'-0"VARIABLE
PAVEMENTWIDTH SHOULDERWIDTH
5'-0"
1/4" / FT.- 1/4" / FT.+1" / FT.
+2" / FT.
+3" / F
T.
5'-0"
- 1" / FT.-2 1/4"
/

F
T
.
-3" / F
T
.
DRIVEWAY TURNOUT GRADES
TYPICAL DETAIL
RALEIGH ROAD (SR1330) -(50' PUBLIC R/W)1
ELEVATION ROAD (SR130
8
)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
34
35
36
37
3839
4041
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
495051
52
53
54
55
EXISTING
HOUSE
50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
(MEASURED FROM
TOP OF BANK, APPROX.
LOCATION)
N/F
JOHN STEPHENSON
DB 4470 PG 0178
PIN # 164200-81-7351 N/F
DANNY STEPHENSON
DB 5202 PG 0602
PIN # 164200-81-8189 N/F
JERRY KING
DB 4470 PG 0186
PIN # 164200-91-1438 N/F
GARY STEPHENSON
DB 4470 PG 0190
PIN # 164200-91-4138
N/F
LAYNELLE STANCIL
PIN # 165200-00-5919
N/F
HAROLD & SCOTT
JOHNSON
DB 0565 PG 0275
PIN # 165100-09-9478
N/F
GARY & BRENDA
JOHNSON
DB 1696 PG 0530
PIN # 164100-89-8385
N/F
NEAL & SHERRY
HUDSON
DB 3803 PG 0998
PIN # 164100-89-4535
21
3370' BUILDING SETBACK100' (TYP)
50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
(MEASURED FROM
TOP OF BANK, APPROX.
LOCATION)
WETLANDS
WETLANDS
SHARED DRIVE
SHARED DRIVE
11
SANDCAS
T
L
E

L
A
N
E

-

(
5
0
'

P
U
B
L
I
C

R
/
W
)SANDY BEACH WAY- (50' PUBLIC R/W)FLIP FLOP CIRCLE- (50' PUBLIC R/W)SALTLIFE PLACE - (50' PUBLIC R/W)
220
225
230
235
240
245
0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00
-0.50%
0.50%GRADE BREAK STA = 0+00.00ELEV = 232.497PVI STA: 6+00.00
PVI ELEV: 229.50
K: 150.00
LVC: 150.00
BVCS: 5+25.00BVCE: 229.87EVCS: 6+75.00EVCE: 229.87LOW PT. STA: 6+00.00
LOW PT ELEV: 229.68
PVI STA: 10+25.00
PVI ELEV: 231.62
K: 100.00
LVC: 150.00
BVCS: 9+50.00BVCE: 231.25EVCS: 11+00.00EVCE: 230.87HIGH PT. STA: 10+00.00
HIGH PT ELEV: 231.37
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00
+00+00+00+00+00+00
1+001+00+00+001+001+00
2+002+000002+002+00
3+00+00+00 +00+004+00+00+00 +00+005+00+00+00 +00+006+00+00+00 +00+007+00+00+00 +00+008+00+00+00 +00+009+00+00+00 0+000+0010+000+000+00

Know what's
before you dig.
0
SCALE: 1" =
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
50' 50'
50'
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1"=1,000'
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW
PURPOSES ONLY
OF 1 SHEETS
THIS ORIGINAL SHEET IS 24"X36", OTHER DIMENSIONSINDICATE IT HAS BEEN ALTERED. ALL INFORMATION
REPRESENTED ON THIS SHEET IS THE PROPERTY OF
RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. UNDER PENALTY OF LAW,
THIS INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN PART
OR WHOLE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
FROM RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. 2018 ©
REVISIONS:DATE:
DATE:ISSUED FOR:
PROJECT NO.:
DRAWN BY:
REVIEWED BY:
SHEET NUMBER:
SEAL
041318
SEAL
C-3075
RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. (C-3075)123 RALEIGH STREETFUQUAY-VARINA, NORTH CAROLINA 27526PHONE - [phone]PRELIMINARY
DRAWING
NOT RELEASED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES
ONLY
1 -
--
19-025
CSB
CSBPOSTEEL, LLC.5160 NC HWY 42 WESTGARNER, NORTH CAROLINA 27529RUTH HARBOR SUBDIVISIONWETLAND IMPACT EXHIBITC1
SANDCASTLE LANE - PROFILE VIEW
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 50'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5'
SANDCASTLE LANE - PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1" = 50'
AS-BUILT NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEER &
OWNER WITH AS-BUILT SURVEY OF ALL INFRASTRUCTURE,
UTILITIES AND STORMWATER DEVICES. ENGINEER, OWNER,
JOHNSTON COUNTY, AND NCDOT MUST APPROVE ALL
INFRASTRUCTURE PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. ALL
BONDS AND SURETIES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND ACTIVE
FOR AT LEAST 1 YEAR AFTER AS-BUILT APPROVAL.
18" MIN
SANDCASTLE LANE - (50' PUBLIC R/W)
1
5
51
50 49 48 47 46 45 44
6 15
SITERALEIGH
ROAD (SR1330)
OLD SCHOOL ROAD (SR1350)
ELEVATION ROAD (SR130
8
)
WETLANDS
RIPARIAN BUFFER AND WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
WETLAND IMPACT - 2,101 SF$&5(
12675($0255,3$5,$1%8))(535(6(17
WETLANDIMPACT -
2,101 SF$&5(
48" RCP w/
HEADWALL
48" RCP w/ HEADWALL
(BURY 12" BELOW GRADE
TO PROMOTE AQUATIC
PASSAGE
EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED
GRADE
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 1/10
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly aected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of eects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specic (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project-specic (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS oce(s) with jurisdiction
in the dened project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 2/10
Local oce
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Oce
 [phone]
 [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Oce Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 3/10
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
inuence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly aected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a sh population, even if that sh does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential eects to species, additional site-specic and project-specic information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local oce and a species list which fullls
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an ocial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local eld oce directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an ocial
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1
2
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 4/10
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an oce of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially aected by activities in this location:
Birds
Amphibians
Fishes
Clams
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed Endangered
NAME STATUS
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 5/10
Flowering Plants
Critical habitats
Potential eects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
1 2
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 6/10
THERE ARE NO MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN EXPECTED TO OCCUR AT THIS LOCATION.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identied as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to oshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-
and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 7/10
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to
the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest
there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with
it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specied. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacic Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. oshore
energy development or longline shing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, eorts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially aected by oshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also oers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 8/10
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location”. Please be aware this report provides the “probability of presence”
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey eort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey eort is the key component. If the survey eort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey eort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to conrm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be conrmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 9/10
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very large projects that
intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identied based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classication established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verication work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be occasional dierences in
polygon boundaries or classications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tubercid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
1/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CYXOX45EFFDOXMIUSHN6SLZ5UA/resources#endangered-species 10/10
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may dene and describe wetlands in a dierent manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to dene the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specied agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may aect such activities.
NCNHDE-11041
January 6, 2020
wyatt brown
Brown's Environmental Group, inc
242 Batten Farm Road
Selma, NC 27576
RE: Stephenson Road Property
Dear wyatt brown:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally-listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Stephenson Road Property
January 6, 2020
NCNHDE-11041
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33753 Somatochlora
georgiana
Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S2?
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on January 6, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q4 Oct 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3
11/19/2019 Johnston County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern,
and Candidate Species,
Johnston County, North Carolina
Updated: 06-27-2018
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Carolina madtom Range by Basin
Noturus furiosus
ARS
Current
Neuse River waterdog Range by_
Necturus lewisi
ARS
Current
basin
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Current
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe Range by Basin
Fusconaia masoni
ARS
Current
Dwarf wedgemussel Range by
Alasmidonta heterodon
E
Current
basin
Green floater
Lasmigona subviridis
ARS
Current
Tar River spinymussel Range by_
Parvaspina steinstansana
E
Current
basin
Yellow lance Range by basin
Elliptio lanceolata
T
Current
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush
Lindera subcoriacea
ARS
Current
Carolina bogmint
Macbridea caroliniana
ARS
Current
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
Historic
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylisVjohnston.html 1/2

11/19/2019 Johnston County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting
species proposed for listing.
FSC=Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species
Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of
conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is insufficient information to support
listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties and other
selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage
Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)_
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visithhttp://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A))_
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylisVjohnston.html 2/2