Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060973 Ver 4_More Info Received_20091112r t -yf Joyner Keeny, PLLC Land Planning & Surveying a small business " HUBZone' certified company LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: 11/10/09 Job No: 020386 Attention: Annette Lucas/Ian McMillan RE: DWQ Project # 06-0973 Birchwood Subd. TO: North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources ?RM&NOWLg Division of Water Quality - 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit 1650 Mail Service Center NOV 1 2 2009 Raleigh, NC 27699 Phone: 919.715.4631 DENR - WMTER 1WAIITY WETUNDS AND STORUWATEII BRANCH WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING: ? Final Plat Prints ? Preliminary Prints ? Original Mylar ® See Below ? Final Plat Prints Stamped ? Sketch Plan Stamped ? Construction Plans Preliminary Preliminary ? Legal Description THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ? For Price ? Bid For Construction ? As Requested ? For Your File ® For Review & Comment ? Please Reply ? See Below ® Regular Mail ? FedEx ? UPS ? Delivered by JK ? Picked Up -- Comes 5 Date I I --- Description - -? - - Response letter to 4'n Review Comments & Copy of DWQ 4th Review Comments 5 Soil Scientist Dan Bliley) Letter regarding SHWT 5 Drainage Area Map, Approved plans Sh. LS-12 (Ditch X-Sections) & Ditch Calcs. REMARKS: Annette/Ian, Attached are five copies of the information I emailed to you yesterday to address your 4`h review commnets. Please call me if you have any questions or require additional infor tion. Thanks Brent Niemann Copy(s) TO: FILE SIGNED: krW / ` ZAadmin\Forms\JK Letter of Transmittal.doc Post Office Box 7533 • 209 North Pearl Street. • Rocky Mount • North Carolina • 27804-7533 252- 977-3124 (office) • www.ioynerkeeny.com • 252- 985-6026 (fax) ,Joyner cr,,/, PL.La Planning & Land Surveying a small I winess "HL BZonC certified company November 9, 2009 Ms. Annette Lucas/Mr. fail McMillan North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit 2321 Crabtree Boulevard Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Re: DWQ Project # 06-0973 (JK Project# 020386) Birchwood Subdivision - Section 7 Town of Nashville, NC Dear Ms. Lucas/Mr. McMillian: IT 1@v5/;:NR0W@Y NO V 12 2009 SAND STTU"WAWiiil BRAM01 This letter is in response to your Request for More Information dated September 23, 2009. Following are responses to the additional information requested. 1. Attached is a letter dated October 20, 2009 from Daniel J. Bliley, Licensed Soil Scientist, detailing his findings from on-site hand augers to determine the Seasonal High Water Table. As previously noted on the Dry Extended Detention Basin Supplement Form from our original permit application on January 13, 2009, the existing dry detention basin on this site was designed and constructed to meet the requirements of The Town of Nashville to restore the peak runoff of the 2- & 10-Year Post-development storm to Pre-development levels. It was never the intent for this basin to meet the standards of a Dry Extended Detention Basin as defined in Chapter 17 of the NCDWQ Stormwater BMP Manual. Additionally, as previously requested by your office, we provided a detailed breakdown of on-site impervious surfaces by drainage area, none of which exceed 24%, thereby eliminating the requirement of a Stormwater Management Plan as part of this permit process (see attached Drainage Area map, as previously submitted). Subsequently, the design and construction of the existing dry detention basin does not fall within the jurisdiction of NCDWQ, as it pertains to acquiring the 401 permit for Phase 1 of this site. Therefore, the requirements of Chapter 17 of the DWQ BMP Manual do not apply to the existing dry detention basin. 3. The existing ditch along the southern property line was analyzed for the existing contributing drainage area plus the discharge from the dry detention basin. Per Sheet LS-12 of the approved subdivision plans (attached for reference), a NAG C350 permanent liner was specified (see Ditch#29). Additionally, I calculated that a permanent liner of 2"-6" Fescue is adequate as well. All of my calculations are attached for your reference. Post Office Box 7533. 1051 North Winstead Avenue • Rocky Mount • North Carolina • 27804 252- 977-3124 (office) • www.4oynerkeeny.com • 252- 985-6026 (fait) Ms. Annette Lucas/Mr. Ian McMillan Page 2 of 2 November 9, 2009 Please review the attached items and do not hesitate to call or email me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sin rely, rent. Niemann, PE Joyner Keeny, PLLC DANIEL J. BLILEY SOIL AND LAND USE CONSULTANT 614 SOUTH SECOND STREET SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA 27577 (919) 934-8610 October 20, 2009 Mr. Brent Niemann JOYNER-KEENY & ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. Box 7533 Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804 Brent: Attached with this letter is a sketch map showing the locations of the dry detention basin and associated ditches , which are part of the storm water containment system for section 7 of Birchwood Subdivision located in the Town of Nashville. Also shown on the sketch are the locations of soil borings that were made recently as a means of estimating the depth to the seasonal high water table. The locations of the features (including the soil borings) as shown on the map were estimated using a Trimble mapping grade GPS receiver. These locations should be of sufficient accuracy for the present discussion regarding the depth to the seasonal water table. The soil boring locations are marked with blue flagging strips attached to the local vegetation. You requested to know if there is evidence from the site and soils that the water table is within two ft. of the bottom of the dry detention basin as constructed and if there is a possibility that the basin could serve as sump to influence the natural drainage of the adjoining wetlands. The soils at this site are formed in loamy and clayey Coastal Plain Sediments on a broad upland flat depression in the Middle Coastal Plain province. These soils are mapped in the Rains soil series by the USDA Soil Survey of Nash County. These soils are dominantly poorly drained. The present local vegetation consists of a mixture of Loblolly Pine and Oak-Maple hardwoods less than 20 to 25 years in age. The soils at sites 1 & 2 have very dark grayish brown loam surface layers 8 to 10 inches thick. The underlying subsoils are gray heavy clay loam to sandy clay, that are mottled with reddish brown and brownish yellow. The subsoils are underlain by light gray, grayish brown and light yellowish brown structureless sandy loam layers at depths ranging from 40 to 48 inches from the soil surface. The subsoil clays apparently have slow permeability, which is associated with the high clay content. In their natural (pre-development, pre-settlement) condition these soils had a seasonal high water table within 12 inches of the soil surface as evidenced by the dark colored surface organic rich surface layers and the gray subsoil matrix colors. At present it is unlikely that the seasonal high water table will be within 12 inches of the soil surface except for relatively short periods during the winter months of the year and at times following unusual rainfall events. This may be perched water affected by the clayey subsoils. Also the natural hydrology of the site has been altered by the development of the adjoining properties (with diversion of surface water) and the clean up and r-establishment of positive drainage in the existing ditch (Old Ditch) that borders the southern edge of the property. Furthermore the evergreen (pine) vegetation on the site will withdraw more water throughout the year from the soil via evapotranspiration than hardwoods. At the time of these investigations (10/16/2009) the observed water table was below 60 inches from the soil surface. It should be noted that wetland delineations in these soils areas are difficult to make and can often be questioned because of the intermittent nature of the wetness condition and the wetland hydrology indicators are seldom clearly defined. Soil borings 1 & 2 are in close proximity to the elongated wetland area that adjoins and is impacted by SOIL MAPPING - SITE INVESTIGATION - LAND RESOURCE DATA EVALUATION Licensed Soil Scientist co) > 0 00 ? o 3 L cD CL o CD b a o c I fl ' ? O n n ? 7C rt 0 ? a 00 ?- r CD tTj (C CF z O ?--: N .y J ? W J e -r ao: N 7? a, ? v S w NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary September 23, 2009 DWQ Project # 06-0973, Ver. 4 Nash County CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Claude Mayo Maevco Development, LLC 3051 Sunset Avenue Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Subject Property: Birchwood - AFTER-THE-FACT Ut to Sapony Creek [030302, 28-55-(5.5), WSIV, NSW] REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION Dear Mr. Mayo: On August 25, 2009, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your After-The-Fact application dated August 20, 2009, to fill or otherwise impact 0.243 acres of 404/wetland, and 0.00 square feet of Zone 1 Tar-Pamlico River basin protected riparian buffer, and 0.00 square feet of Zone 2 Tar-Pamlico River basin protected riparian buffer, to construct the proposed residential development at the site. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the additional information requested below, we will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. If we do not receive the requested information, your project will be formally returned as incomplete. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project. Additional Information Requested: 1. Please provide the results of in-field soil testing to determine the level of the Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT). 2. Per Chapter 17 of the DWQ BMP Manual, the SHWT must be at least two feet below the invert of the dry detention basin. Given the proximity of the dry detention basin to the wetland, it is extremely unlikely that this separation exists. Per the DWQ BMP Manual, the only detention devices that may be used in an area with a high SHWT are wet detention basins and stormwater wetlands. 3. Please provide calculations to show that the drainage feature that is receiving the flow from the BMP will be able to convey the flow without becoming eroded. 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-733-17861 FAX: 919-733.6893 Internet: http://h2o,enr.slate.nc.uslncwetlands/ North Carolina Natu&11! An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Maevco Development, LLC Page 2 of 3 September 23, 2009 Please submit this information within 30 calendar days of the date of this letter. If we do not receive this requested information within 30 calendar days of the date of this letter, your project will be withdrawn and you will need to reapply with a new application and a new fee. This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter. Sincerely, 1 42, CBKI m Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor I Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Lauren Witherspoon, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office File Copy Jay Keller, Keller Environmental, 7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC 27615 Filename: 060973 Ver4Birchwood(Nash)On_Hold O o ? o S ? .0 a 0 0 S n c x r o J N ?-p O V k CD O ? A? n O n r N ? O ? A n? O C7 CD O D n O O n O • CD O i 10 O CD o n KI W O c O CD W CCD C CD 1? O W C7 0 CD Hydrograph Plot 3 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 10 Birchwood---1-22-05 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Storm frequency = 10 yrs Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = Birchwood --1-22-05--wide Storage Indication method used Q (cfs) 30.00 25.0( 20.0( 15.00 10.00 5.00 Birchwood---1-22-05 Hyd. No. 10 --10 Yr Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 Hyd No. 10 Hyd No. 1 Sunday, Jan 23 2005,12:42 PM Peak discharge = 10.79 cfs Time interval = 1 min Max. Elevation = 182.52 ft Max. Storage = 6,010 cuft Hydrograph Volume = 8,956 cult 0.7 0.8 1.0 0.00 1.2 Time (hrs) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCADO Civil 3DO 2009 by Autodesk, Inc. Monday, Nov 9 2009 Birchwood Subd - Section 7: Existing PL Ditch Analysis Trapezoidal Highlighted Bottom Width (ft) = 3.00 Depth (ft) = 1.84 Side Slopes (z:1) = 3.00, 3.00 Q (cfs) = 66.00 Total Depth (ft) = 4.00 Area (sqft) = 15.68 Invert Elev (ft) = 180.00 Velocity (ft/s) = 4.21 Slope (%) = 0.30 Wetted Perim (ft) = 14.64 N-Value = 0.020 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 1.55 Top Width (ft) = 14.04 Calculations EGL (ft) = 2.12 Compute by: Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 66.00 Elev (ft) 185.00 184.00 183.00 182.00 181.00 180.00 179.00 0 [ o 7 N t4 W w ?7 io a ? m n ? w 0 0 x y Y N ? n O lD n O ?\ ? V? O o ? V CD ? ? r^ r W CD ^ y.?O r V rD ? V? M VQ• O N ? F-! O ? (TQ vi ? d n O C CD O. CD n O n. ? o ? r 0 m ^0 C ? O A O. CD n C ti i' C CD UQ rf e~-r C CD n 11/01/01 02438(v gl>?4100 40H. -5?G7"to?-S 4 TEtAPbAaY GWEv- AtAtycx-?, Use = iJaa--r4 AM6,94dW 0-?o-J W si oP3 c*j7n-oL Mko,&, DEQ 41 3 4OF-r..A" ? I,3 N tha -- 7 1_ -- -E I:_ 6Ih ADM SiAi UENCY-. 10-Yeer HYURAUUI kL US Ols O'l Peak Fbw VebcAy (Ips] Atea lsq.lll dtft Nprmal C390 (n=0.017' ql Peiud Lh,.) RadwLlIIj D! 12th It I fi60 0.1 1.71 11.03 1.01 1.72 S = 0 0030 1 a d11i? 3.000 301 LINER RESULTS Not W Scale Reach Mating Type ;lability Anals- Vegetation Chatactnielits P-mble Cabulaled Wely Fatty Remarks ;leple Pallern Phase Class T,y Densly Sheer Stress Pdl ;heel;ness Ipall sft.ghl C390 U-gelaled 1 3.20 032 991 STABLE Staple E E 5eLLret '.,4m Acr c-35o (Pe-p- 5ker bS-m OA Ngvk--D S;(*D. AAA ) 11I691oq OZ038(,?(Rc4,)oO 5qD. -- 5EGTk*? -T- Nn -.. uosver.k?e nS+Alo9 [5.77 Pht r?-:: 3• i?•. _- I?sr;,r N t UHAULI lL I' L' ULl 5 Oischage Peak Flow Vetoc4y[IAS) Area ls0.I11 llydraW'c Normal Urxe'xllorced Vegelali 1 00411 le Pergd lhr.l Radwsllll 05 litl 66.0 Ql 217 2671 1.41 1 2.53 S = 0.0030 30 Wdrh.3.00X D LINER RESULTS NIX I. Scale N ?( Reach Mall", Tyge StabiliryAnalysis Vegetation Characterislice Permissible C led Safety Factor Remarks slavle Panern Phase clan ryve oena4y sneasness ,St snaasre:, Ivdl Iv=II Slrer3hl Umeinlorced Vegetation 0 Bunch5075%. 3U U47 7.04 STAKE Soil Loam 0035 0.040 0.87 UNS iAUL r oti ? o w C7 3 7 s n m c s? 0 3 N Y N n ? X CD 7 C) C) O N (D CD x D CD C7 CD T 0 O W O p .? ? ?? C O W ? ? O N r W O CD W Qq' S N O A D w (D C" O CD O n n < C C? CD ry C? N CD .t r^f l I r?'S V 1 ~ ~ , : ; BIRCHWOOD PARK i~ ~ GOLFERS LANE ~ ~ ~ ®0 mr ~ ~ , ~-G® PRESTWICK DR. ~ ~ 5~ Q y hq 50 C' Sr ~T~ sr~ s$ ~ , . Q NOT TO SCALE Y ° r° / ° e, / ° ° ° ° ~ oa o ~ o0 200 goo g ° ° . ° ° _ ° ~ ~ ° ° i; _ 1 4 1 ° c a e = ° ~ a? ~ ~ ~ / ~ ° P~ l t 1 / ° / / r~ 1 1 , / t _ ~ ~ 1 TOTAL. DRAINAGE AREA TO BMP 41.086 cc ; / ~ 1 1` > ° ~ ~ ~ / / ON- ~ OFF-SITE AREAS ~ ! ° ° w ~ ( ) .d 1 1 ° 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ° l~~ t I , ` ~ ® ~ TOTAL SITE AREA (18 LOTS ~ COS)= 20.880 AC ON-51TE TO BMP = 15.813 AC 1 t t ~ u Y ON-SITE BYPASS BMP = 5.067 AC ' >z 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 / ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ON-•SITE_IMPERVIOU TO BMP_(ENTIRE R/W & 14 LOTS) r' ° ° 1 ' l , ~ ~ • ~ 1 ~ , , ~ ~ ASPHALT ROADS = 0.710 AC 1 ° / I 1 / ~ II ~ ~ l t T P. A, l . . IV CHES IN R W = 0.052 AC DRIVEWAYS (14 LOTS) = 0.386 AC ! ! / ° 1 / 1 „ / HOU~$®(14 L T 0 57~ AC 1 -....-,1, / - ~ l.;' 1 1 - 'TOTAL. ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS TO BMP - 1.727 AC ~ l l 1 / 1 \ nom,,,, . 1 ~ tr T , X ~ I; , ~ Je ~,P~Ir I l/ \ `f\ ON-SITE AREA PERCENT IMPERVIOUS TO 8MP (1.727/15,$13 AC) = 10.9% ! / _ .,~1 t t ° i , ~ ON.:~ITE IMPERVIOUS BY-PAS (-4 LOTS & COST / i £ 4f~~~o~ }r 1 1 1 ;ti ~ ~ ® .~t{,' Ir III /l \ ,ASPHALT ROADS = 0.000 AC ° 1 t;~,, t / DRNE APPROACHES !N R/W = 0.000 AC 1 / l „ I 1 I T ~."fin ~1 "••I I I I , ' DRIVEWAYS (4 LOTS) = 0.110 AG t 1 1 t l ! ~;..,..r M+ I I I t ~ f ~ ° I II II . 7 I t / ~ S f, i~ , ~ ~ I I F / 'OTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS TO 8MP = 0.275 AC 1 , " I ; , t , ON-51TE AREA PERCENT IMPERVIOUS BY-PASS (0.275/5.067 AC) = 5.4% r l 1 ! V I 1 `F ' F J I~ I "~1j II ~i, I ~ . E f ~ I ~,e~ I ~ I I ~ II I I \ ~ 1 1 1 I ~i, X y; : ' l !p®$ypX F ~ ~ ~ A I ! ,'i/ s TOTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA (1,727+0.275 AC = 2.OOZ AC TOTAL ON-SITE PERCENT IMPERVIOUS (2,002/20.880 AC) 9.6% ( / 1 i r~ II ~ I I r~~ i h l . Y, ~ 7 TOTAL AREA OF DEVELOPED LOT5 6c R/W = 91.202 AC ` . ~ ° ~ 1 / ~ ' ~ o ` I PROPERTY r ~ , I r ; i ~/T l BOUNDARY II I ~'1''~„ ~ I ~ I ~ TOTAL. PERCENT IMPERVIOUS OF pEVELOPED AREA (2.002/11.202 AC) = 17.9% 1 1 °a, F I (TYP) , I , ' '=t ~ V ~ 't ? i ~ 8 i, PROPERTY V~° ~ ~ , I. i A\ r ~ ~ ~ al , ,a o ' BOUNDARY °y ~ h x tt r ('7YI1'1) \ Y f a4; - ,.w;viq by " ~o ~.e` ~ 1, ,PF` ;~N~ I rs , a~ 1 I ~1"~ 1 ! I,., ~i 11~~ J i < ~ l r g ' \ 1 i. W a,~~a"~ ~ Z~ Gail Y J~,F t~r;~ : z>» I I ~ ~ DATE 3 F, t DA; 0 AC- ~zry~€ \ \ ~ s i e : <3 . ~ I ~f~' MARCH 1~, 2009 ~a ~ tAny Y ` ' t I "t'~.. .(~Y-PAS) \ ~ ,s. a~„. s {h p : I SCALE s~ ~ ~ 'v`~ x~ . s a st2 ~ w - G ~ I { I ~ ~ yx~ ~ ~ 1,r _ 100 Feet ' - t 3 DA ~ 4t AC ~ , ~ e ~ < k -a I , ,y, S ~ "Y ' ~ ~ C~®TAL TD ) F w r~ , ~ r a a : ~ M.° ' , ~ AWN BY Ir I DR ' . _ • , , / ~ Z 5 . m ' ~ ° _ ` u. ~ ~ y I JOB NUMBER bT Y~X ` 1 y Y t: ~ ~ ~Y~~ F ~ .a / • I 0203136 ~ / l / / t f k / ..Z i / ~ °h Y.. / t e ~ / i ~ F , t ~ ae E9 ~ ~ ~ I ~ DRAWING FILE r- / / j h ~ Q a. ' 3 e.. / \ ~P~ ~ ~ \ I 0203136 Birchr~ood DA,dwg ~ / , ty ti. ~ r ' L ' ~ d.~ I ' / / 'rdp. ~ 'i s"e~ i ! 4' , 5, ' / PROPERLY ~ I ~ t, ~ t, BOUNDARY ~ I \ (TYP) \ ~ 1 ~ 1~ s,A ~ , / ~f` s~ . d E ` / f ,,,..G8. ~ s \ I N. ' y I ' - - : FIELD N .z~ s`~• DRAINAGE AREA ''4:, TOPO ' O rv~ • (TYP) (T . ON-SITE N Y - . ` I _ ~ N v z ~ r. ~9~~ ~ x f ~ ~ ~~y ` ~ t 4 r rx ~ ~ a' r'.~ i ~ ~ ~ r , a . > k f , . t 4" £ s f' ~ Y I ~ I ~ ` r NASH COUNTY I \ ~ I ~ a I ~X ap` ~Fy~ Y E . ~ nrs ` R GIS TOPO I j ~ i E3 I (TYP.OFF-SITE) - I ~ ~'°a~ .y r ~ ® ~ \ ~Y s::,!. }i r ~ ~ ; ~ ~ , _ , ~ ~ t ' I i° I a t ~ [R . ' ~ r t - I , _ _ . f. PROPERTY ' • , . I , BOUNDARY I ~ l~ , ~ , ' ~ T® e PL ) t (TYP) ` (~Y-PA ) ~ w , ,1 ar 9. I r t n i ~ ' \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I t I ~ ~ I ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ I tAND PtANNINC & SURVEnNG l~ , l' ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ; I I P.O. eox 7533, 209 N. PEARL ST. ~ I , i ROCitY 0.SOUNT, N.C. 2780a ' t I ~ ' - - ~ tz5zj s77-3~za vo~cE ® ~ ~ ~ t i ~ F (z52j 985-6026 FAx i I ~ i \ ~ I ! t I ~ L ' ~ s t t ~ I ,.1l1P61re+ m ~e n i ' ~ / ~ I s~~ ~ ~ / ~ - , ~ ~ ~ ~ rI c ~ \ ~ ® a ® ` y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , x . S DA-IA Trench Upstream End of Storm Drain ~ Dpi c . ~ f L °~6 C ~ Overflow 5 nthetic Liner such as ° NAG C350. ~ Synthetic Liner such as ~•0 ,'32 NAG C350. ~ S nthetic Liner such ae P i 2.5' J 1.6° ° NAG C3 P 2.5' 1.7 50. such as , Q • , : e . ; . • 1,06 2 4 2 P J f•`qP. .9."u. •'a:~ •.'e`' ~a P" Diameter ~ 2 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 4 NOT TO SCALE c ~ D®~5 ^'~~u C ~ w~~ C~ 3/4" Exterior Plywood ~ 5 nthetic Liner such os - Fury Bottom ° ° NAG C350. ~ Synthetic Uner such as 1.5 0.79 of .Plywood J O,q.S° NAG 0350. 0 Synth®tic liner such as t 1,0 P J ° 1.99' NAG C350. such as 2 ~ 2.5 J J 2 q NOT TO SGAIf 2 NOT TO SGA1E ~ PLYWOOD INLET PROTECTION FOR STORM ,DRAIN UNDER CONSTRUCTION NOT TO SCALE C ~ C ~ Steel Fence i Post ~ Upstream End r of Storm Drain ~ S nthetic iner y L such os ° NAG C350, ~ Synthetic Liner such as 2,0 P 1'35' ry 1,59' NAG C350. ~ Synthetic Liner such as _ P b.0' , P P 2,5° 1.6 NAG C350. such as ~ . ~ ~ . ,,`1 2 q J J 2 ¢ NOT TO SCALE 2 4 NOT TO SCALE Overflow t NOT TO SCALE c L D°~~ _ , _ _ - - _ . ~ ~ ~29 . ra 1 ..e•• , • '~d • / Ipe C , k • P dp _ _ _ , . o _ __.p . ~,,.--i" ,r. td n: .:'a;!•~ d'"'•:•<°S bad". ~ S nthetic Liner such as o i 1, 5e NAG C350, ~ Synthetic Liner such as 1.5 J 1 O,gg° NAG C350. ~ Synthetic Liner such os IEJCh d9 J 1 2.5' i.55° -NAG 0350. 2 ~ 2 _ J 1' Hardware Cloth NOT TO SCALE 4 m.___ NOT TO 5 , ~ CALF - Washed Stane Filter NOT TO SCALE Across Pipe :Inlet c L °`I9 CL -STONE FILTER INLET PROTECTION FOR STORM DRAIN UNDER CONSTRUCTION i --____W__._ DATE i I i OCT. 5, 2004 . ~7 Synthetic Liner such as _ _ _ SCALE Synthetic liner such os _ _ _ = 0.63° NAG C350. - 9.5 J P 1.5' 0.89' NAG C350, - - - N/A _ , J J _ Not to Scale DRAWN BY 2 4 2 ¢ NOT TO SCALE DWM NOT TO SCALE t3.9` DRAWING FILE CONST C p®~®, . L _ . _ 10' O - L _ . _ _ _ . _ _ - tti TOP .OF DAM ~ 194,93 0.63 EMERGENCY „ SPILLWAY ~ 194,30 ® S nthetic Liner such as 9 ~ ° NAG C350. ® Synthetic (iner such as O.aS 1.5° J 0,55° NAG C350. CLASS A RIP RAP P 1.5 J P Q. MIRAFI 14DN ~ 2 _ 2 4 ; U Nor To scALE NOT TO SCALE RETENTION- POND _ ® _ EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CROSS SECTION a°~ j CL ®~3 NTS 0L i ~ _ a c Not to Scd':e ~ ° ® S nthetic Liner u z ° y i s ch os NAG 0350. Synthetic Liner such as ` 1.0° 0.5 , n J P 2,5° 0.65 NAG C350. J J z ~ 4 NOT TO SCALE 2 4 c N ~ I~ OT TO SCALE c 013 c L D~~ c ~G ~ ~ ~ a- L c cG , ©a ~e< ~ Oa .~y~ z c c JOYNER> KEENY & ASSgCiA3FS ® Synthetic Liner such os , S'y~edy IAPID PI~WN(NO do SURVEYING ~c~®'yG°~® ~~`sS gyp`' pa ROCK`( MOUNT, NC. 27801 NAG C350. ® Synthetic Liner such os 1.55° 2.5 P J 9<5° "y (252) 977•-3124 VOICE i L25' NAG 0350. ~ J J R=25' ~ ° ~ R=25 (25 j 985-6026 FAX ~9A Q 2 4 ~ LL.! 2 NOT 70 SCALE ~ ' NOT TO SCALE ~ ,~®9®®® ~+y 9 i - - ~ ~ In~ersec~~on T icel YP CURS & GUTTER TO DITCI-I TRANSITION ~I~a C n ~~P~ n y~qe®~ G n FOR EXISTIONG CURD ON NORTH AND G C SOUTH SIDE OF PRESTWICK DRIVE ?MOM Not to Scale 9 G C No 9 Not to Scale r