20200038 Ver 1_401 Application_20200107

,,�oa.0009
(10�At.
rvttOame
O�C /
�ge��O�a, Of�tee
V ANe1%
TO: STEPHANIE GOSS
ENVIRONMENTAL SENIOR SPECIALIST
3800 BARRETT DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27609
lee
Civil Engineer — Consulting Engineer — Land Development
PO BOX 4580
EMERALD ISLE, NC 28594
[phone]
[e-mail]
TES y Firm License Number P-1532
j "PY LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 24-Dec-19
REF: HAVEN
HARNETT COUNTY
PCN FORM APPLICATION
PACKAGE CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING:
ONE (1) SET OF PLANS; ONE (1) PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN) FORM
DELIVERY VIA:
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
❑ For Approval
❑ For Your Use
❑ Other
❑ As requested
❑ For Bids Due
❑ For Review and Comment
COMMENTS:
Mrs. Goss, if you need anything else don't hesitate to reach out. Thanks,
D A. Bunn, Project Manager
Copies To:
(if enclosures are not as noted above, please contact us)
RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT - CIVIL CONSULTANT - ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING - WATER,
STORMWATER & SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑Yes No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes M No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
HAVEN
2b.
County:
HARNETT
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
BARBECUE
2d.
Subdivision name:
HAVEN 0
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
?
3.
Owner Information cs
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
XCESSIVE RISK DEVELOPMENT, INC o
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB: 3681; PG: 0667 a'
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A o C t
3d.
Street address:
7401 ARCHERS CREEK CT; PO BOX 4580
3e.
City, state, zip:
EMERALD ISLE, NC 28594 U
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-795-9594
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
SAME AS OWNER
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
ATHAN M. PARKER, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
AMP'D ENGINEERING, PLLC
5c. Street address:
7401 ARCHERS CREEK CT
5d. City, state, zip:
EMERALD ISLE, NC 28594
5e. Telephone no.:
919-795-9594
5f. Fax no.:
N/A
5g. Email address:
ATHAN.PARKERCa AMPDENGINEERING.COM
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
NC PIN: 9597-49-3461.000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.337389 Longitude:-79.019504
1 c. Property size:
62.902 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
HANDY BRANCH
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
CAPE FEAR
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site is currently un-developed farm and wood land. At the location of the proposed impact area, the property currently has an existing
crossing using an old farm tile (size and material unknown) supporting access to the rear of the property. The tile is approximately 19.5, long.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 17.121
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 5,163
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
68 lot single family residential subdivision is proposed on the property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project as proposed includes 68 lot single family residential subdivision. The equipment that can be
expected to be used to construct the infrastructure of the project - dozers, excavators, pans for grading,
motorgraders, rollers, highway capable dump trucks and other tractors.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
Z Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Emily Greer
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other: Pittman Soil - 910-330-2784
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
11 /19/2019
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
This project contains two phases. The first phase consists of 40 lots, which will include the wetlands crossing. Phase two will be the remainder 28 lots.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries 0 Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Unknown
Yes
DWQ
.125
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.125
2h. Comments:
Wetlands impact are for fill around the culvert crossing. Existing culvert is an old farm tile (size and material unknown) and only 19.5' long. Extension
and up -size is required for the crossing.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individualiv list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman Z Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Residential Subdivision
Handy Branch
No
1,563
3,147
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
1,563
3,147
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Layout specifically designed to follow existing culvert crossing of wetlands and meet NC DOT design requirements. To access the majority of the
develop -able land on the tract it was not feasible to avoid impacts. Proposed roadside ditches shall terminate and diffuse flow prior to entering the
wetlands. The only sections of buffer proposed to be disturbed are those needed to construct the required NC DOT right turn lane.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The erosion control design has been compiled such that temporary sediment basins be installed directly up -slope of the 2 road side ditches that
discharge up -slope of the wetlands. Silt fence will also be utilized to surround any/all disturbed area and straw wattles will be utilized where needed to
slow velocities and reduce suspended solids prior to entering the wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes 0 No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ ro Payment to in -lieu fee ram
y program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWO
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Z Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Z Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
24%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c: If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The SMP includes low density design methodology to include a limited amount of allowable impervious area per lot for home construction, the right of
way cross section includes Harnett County required 20' wide asphalt paved road, 6' grassed shoulder, and a 2' 3:1 grassed open ditch to convey
stormwater runoff. The project as design minimizes runoff collection and allows runoff to sheet flow where feasible. No treatment or retention of
stormwater runoff proposed at this time.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Harnett County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's 'urisdiction is thisproject?
Harnett County
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
El Session Law 2006-246
ZOther:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
0 Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Z Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
Z No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
N No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Individual
septic systems permitted under the Engineering Option Permit (TOFF") through Harnett County Environmental Health
Department.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Contacted USFW office in Raleigh NC - John Ellis - 919-856-4520 ext 28 [e-mail]
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Z No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Contacted Fritz Rohde at NOAA - 252-838-0828
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
httpJ/gis.nedor.gov/hpoweb/, the closest site is the HT0398 1915 Miscellaneous Victorian house that is roughly 0.2 miles to the East along NC HWY
27 and is located on the South side of NC HWY 27 while the project site is located on the North side of the highway
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No development is proposed within this area. The flood plain extends out from the northern property line 170+/- feet to 575+/- feet, but does not extend
beyond the wetlands line.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Harnett County GIS Viewer
u
ATHAN M. PARKER, PE7"
--• ""
12-20-2019
ApplicanVAgent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

VICINITY SKETCH
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT SITE
BARBECUE
CHURCH RD BUIE RD
BELLA
BRIDGE RD
NC 27 W
TINGEN RD DOCS RD
EDWARD PACE
PIN 9598-40-9531.000
IDS 2531 PG 0025
THIS PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF AMPD ENGINEERING. PLLC. AND MAY
g AM P'D
LEGEND:
NOT BE USED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION. DESIGNER
ENGINEERING, PLLC
DEED BOOK
D.B.
ASSUMES NO UABLITY FOR ANY STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM THIS
-AILS nv I mnSU TANI
EXISTING
EX
PLAN. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED IN
sAONNwCIV OEsIcN
AINSPECTIDN
MAP BOOK
M.B.
MAKING ANY CHANGES IN THIS PLAN.
{STUD oEVELOPMfNr
PAGE
P.G.
9NECUNs
ROW
RIGHT OF WAY
NOTES:
ANvneKs<®cMaL-coN
TYPICAL
TYP
1.
ALL PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WETLANDS.
WETLANDS
r
2.
INITIAL DISTURBANCE CROSS NG E LIMITED THE EXISTING
IPMMENT PREPARE FOR THE
CROSSING ALLOWING PASSAGE OF EQUIPMENT
IIL—
�
REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF THE CROSSING.
U (V .4-
3. ALL MATERIALS TO INCLUDE BUT NOT UNITED TO EQUIPMENT, WATER.
—
STORM DRAIN AND EROSION k SEDIMENT CONTROL MATERIALS OR DEVICES
AND
J 1-) U
SUFFICIENT TO SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION
0)
J Lo
STABILIZE THE CROSSING ARE STAGED OR STOCKPILED AT THE LOCATION
PRIOR TO BEGGING DEMOLITION ON THE EXISTING CROSSING. THE
U)
d Y 00
CONTRACTOR SHOULD EXECUTE THE REPLACEMENT OF THE CROSSING WITH
I LJ (V
DUE CONSIDERATION OF INCLEMENT WEATHER THAT POTENTIALLY AFFECT
U LLJ
THE TIMELINE OF THE CROSSING .
z X (�
4.
CLEARING LIMITS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED PER THE APPROVED PLANS.
CROSSING PER THE PLAN.
O U Z
THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD PREP THE EXISTING
ONLY AFTER PREPPING THE EXISTING CROSSING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
LLJ Z In
REMOVE THE EXISTING PIPE CROSSING, CLEAR h GRUB TO PROVIDE
SUFFICIENT AREA FOR PROPOSED CROSSING AS NEEDED. IMMEDIATELY
Z LLJ �' J �
INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN. UPON GRADING THE SLOPES FOR THE
Cn LLJ
0 = N
CROSSING THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD LINE ALL SLOPES WITH EROSION
CONTROL MATTING 8 SEED PER THE SEEDING SCHEDULE. THE
Z
Z LLI U
CONTRACTOR SHOULD NOT CLEAR OR DISTURB ANY UN -PERMITTED AREAS.
LLJ U 0 Ln
m
S
CONTRACTOR. WHEN POSSIBLE. SHOULDALL WORK IN &AROUND
J Q Q OT
SCALE 1=200'
THE CROSSINGDURINGPERIOD S OF DRY WEATHER.
6,
THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION TIME WORKING WITHIN
(if I
THE CROSSING AREA TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE.
O- O LLI 0)
7.
ALL EXCAVATED SOILS SHOULD BE STOCKPILED SEPARATELY TO ALLOW FOR
:2 ck� .4- m
APPROPRIATE TOPSOIL MATERIAL TO BE PLACED BACK GIVING VEGETATION
—
Q LL ^ W LT
/•', . ;;f ('. / •�•�`'' THE NECESSARY SOILS TO PROVDE HEALTHY GROWTH.
•/•' �,/ \ / ��', •;. •' \. 8. THE CONTRACTOR TO IMMEDIATELY INSTALL THE WATER MAIN UPON
J '.�' �. •; . \x_j REMOVAL OF EXISTING CROSSING. CROSSING PIPE TO BE IMMEDIATELY
'> I '•'� ' BEDDED, INSTALLED, AND COMPACTED AFTER THE WATER MAIN. UPON
.`. / •' :�` '�''' • { I•, . • I ' '' BEAVER DAM COMPLETING THE CROSSING PIPE THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD THEN PROCEED
-•t` [, _; _ _ — ' L TO FILLING k GRADING THE AREA TO MATCH THE PROPOSED CONTOURS.
• '�''•' '.'POND LIMITS B. SILT FENCE SHOULD BE MAINTAINED THROUGH OUT CONSTRUCTION AND BE
\ \ r — — — ♦ PLACED AS SHOWN.
•;t''. •', • \ \ 1 • •; .; , ♦♦ 10. SHOULD ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE SHOWN IMPACT ZONE BE DISTURBED
•:,; (t : ; ; ,; ; ,; ; ,; ; . \ \ ♦♦ DURING THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF THE CROSSING THE J
•( \ \ �; ; .'; .; , \ ♦♦ .; ,; • ,.• CONTRACTOR SHOULD RE -GRADE THE SITE TO EXISTING CONDITIONS, SEED Q U
THE AREA 'NTH ANNUAL SEED, LINE WITH HIGH VELOCITY EXCELSIOR
JJ II �'; .'; •'; • ♦ ')\; , . •, MATTING THEN STAKE PATH LIVE WILLOW STAKES 3' ON CENTER. Z
�, \ \� \ \ ♦. .. 11. SEE FULL CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PERMITTING DOCUMENTS FOR Z =
\ SECTION II �•''•''•' • HARMONY TRAIL , ADDITIONAL DETAILS AND INFORMATION. Z Q ~ Z
1 , i. • \ \ 50' PUBLIC ROW" ���N.CAq'v''.,� LLJz ?i Z
1'11 FALLS RIVER COURT SECTION I \ \ �� �p1�R OPSFESSlo��7ti w w - o �
50' PUBLIC ROW �/ I I \\ \ I` , ;\�o.'SAUM R 2.QQa 1%y�•.9 > O LJ O
-- - - --- g. Q o w
/ / \
—WOODS LINE i I \♦ Q D m Z
L \ I WETLANDS ♦' .'�;� �'''.�,M., f P'`��, Q O] _
I T� RAISE THE
ROOF HOMES LLC
48-6021 000 PIN 9597
tERo IDS 3734 PG 0899 DATE: 12/20/2019
— \ 31147 SF ZONE 2 .
PLACID POND DRIVE — — But IMPACT'', •'
50' PUBLIC ROW EXISTNG OPEN FARMLAND �' .' ;.'•'. I REV: DATE:
\ Q \' • • �'". 1,563 SF ZONE 1
BUFFER IMPACT
WETLANDS IMPACT'�"�''
,515
EDWARD CAMERON
PIN 9597-39-5194.000
IDS 3748 PG 0880
WETLANDS IMPACT
1,080 SIF
REBECCA CAMERON
PIN 9597-47-0621.000
IDS 3722 PG 0001
WETLANDS AND
BUFFER IMPACT
SITE PLAN
SHEET 1 OF 3

LEGEND:
DEED BOOK D.B.
EXISTING EX
MAP BOOK M.B.
PAGE P.G.
ROW RIGHT OF WAY
TYPICAL TYP
WETLANDS �I
WETLAND
4
j
WETLANDS
4 4 4
WETLANDS IMPACT—
_ �N 2,515 SF I-4--
\
j�V: 263.70 1
PROPOSED
CONTOUR O�o7nT2269.51 44 LF OF ���
36" RCP
® 0.50% 1
08 _ — —
WETLANDS IMPACT INV: 263.92 — —
1,080 SF --_
WETLANDS
SCALE 1"=40'
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=10'
PLACID POND DRIVE
50' PUBLIC ROW
6' SDR21
THIS PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF AMP'D ENGINEERING, PU.C, AND MAY
g AMP'D
NOT BE USED OR REPRODUCED "THOUT THEIR PERMISSION. DESIGNER
ENGINEERING, PLI
ASSUMES NO UABIUTY FOR ANY STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM THIS
PLAN. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO
-SITE QYlL CONSULTANT
PROCEEDING NHTH CONSTRUCTION. CAUTION MUST BE EQRCISED IN
-STORMWATER OESION
MAKING ANY CHANGES IN THIS PLAN.
A OE0evEL
-LA NO LTICIN OPMErrt
-SITE PLANS
,, I I I I I I,,,,,
20�IFESSJp��7Z.�'�
QN , 9
"�9�i�'f�11t}rr�FcQ �.Q'�:
••'••qN M. PPQL,��•
'r•rRurHH��,
PROPOSED
AT CL
GRADE
OF ROAD
ibn�
WATER
EXISTING
GRADE
36" RCP
BELOW EXISTING
STREAM
1'
BED
6"
MAIN
CROSSING
DI WATER
BELOW
J M U 0)
J Ln Ln
a I W Cq
CD 00
uj
Zao_U
E O U Z
w Z � �
w LLJ 0)Z w � J In
0 = U) 0)
I
wU0_0Ln
o �Qal�
a- MIX
MO_d:
QLi r- wHT
J
Q U
a Z
1=
Z =
z
Nw�Z
w
w O -=)
ckf O � O
Q
0 J W
ZLLI
>cy
Z LIJww
Q o m Z
QQ
m=
Q
DATE: 12/20/2019 1
WETLANDS IMPACT
SITE PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET 2 OF 3

LEGEND:
DEED BOOK D.B
EXISTING EX
MAP BOOK M.B
PAGE P.G.
ROW RIGHT OF WAY
TYPICAL TYP
WETLANDS
RIPARIAN BUFFER
IMPACT PLAN VIEW:
WETLANDS >
\ HANDY BRANCH
STREAM INDEX: 18-20-13-7-1
CLASSIFICATION: C
A� �\ 1,563 SF ZONE 1
y N�,,4 BUFFER IMPACT
PIPE A2
271.28 c,
2 tN
WETLAND IMPACTS. W:>�
SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 r r
1 I
WETLANDS
1
I
THIS PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF AMP'D ENGINEERING, PLLC, AND MAY
NOT BE USED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION. DESIGNER
ASSUMES NO UABIUTY FOR ANY STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM THIS
PLAN. CONTRACTOR MUST MERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED IN
MAKING ANY CHANGES IN THIS PLAN.
,r
SCALE 1"=40'
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=10'
SF ZONE 2
2 IMPACT
,LLLLIL„
tH CAPO
20Q�FESSip,���Q9
613—
' l` °13p
9�'•.FNGINE�P' . �Q:.
qH M QPP •,
TURNING LANE REQUIRED BY
NC DOT, IMPACTS CAUSED
BY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
STREAM BRANCH
HEAD LOCATION
II
EXISTING PIPE
PIPE Al
i \
h
PIPE CHART
EXISTING PIPE - 50 LF OF 24" RCP AT 4.447
PIPE Al - 82 LF OF 18" RCP AT 7.83%
PIPE A2 - 32 LF OF 36" RCP AT 0.53%
AMP'D
.SITE cML CONSULTANT
-STORMWATER DESIGN
A INSPECTpN
-LAND DEVFIOPMENT
-SITE PLMLS
J IN
J to U7)
alw�
zLLI
X L)
�OOz
LLI
LLI LLJ Ld J
00)
Z=NOT
Wwl
(.3 Lf)
p J Q Q
OL 0 W 0)
M Ofd m
Q =I,- Lua)
LIJ
Q
Z
Q
F= D z
z =
LLl F- Z ?
0 W � z
LLI :2 O D
O'-O�-O
p J �
z > 0 �-
z LLI LL1 LJ
<mmz
Of cl�
� Q Q
m 2
Q
DATE: 12/20/2019
RIPARIAN BUFFER
IMPACT SITE PLAN
SHEET 3 OF 3

NC Dept of Environmemal Quality
DEC 3 G ?n}q
Raleigh Regional Office