20041387 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040803

041881
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
July 27, 2004
S&EC, PA Project #8862.W1
USACE-Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Ms. Todd Tugwell
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
""'ANDS /401 GROUR
A UG 0 3 2004
WAt ER QUALITY SpCT10N
The purpose of this letter is to request the use of Nationwide Permit 12 for the construction of the
proposed Sutton Oaks Sewer line located east of Raynor Road (NCSR 2555) approximately one
mile south of Highway 70 and north of Dogwood Lake, south of Greensboro; North Carolina.
Cumulative impacts to wetlands and waters total 0.0023 acres (NW12) and 0.021 acres (NW39).
Sixty-eight feet of perennial stream channel is also being impacted under NW 12.
S&EC, PA believes that no mitigation will be required for this project. The only impacts to
riparian buffers are for utility crossings. The utility crossings will be less than 40 linear feet
wide. Utility crossings will cross at perpendicular angles to the buffers. Parallel buffer impacts
are limited to Zone 2 only.
Ms. Cyndi Karoly and,Mr. Daryl Lamb of the NCDWQ reviewed surface waters on the site for
subjectivity to the 50-foot Randleman Riparian Buffers. Corps Action ID for the delineation is
#200220606.
Please call if you have questions or require further information. Please contact S&EC, PA if you
choose to visit the site so that someone may accompany you. Anything you can do to expedite
this approval will be appreciated by the Trellas (see attached letter).
Sincerely,
ffju? ?
Kevin Martin
President
Enclosures: USGS
Soil Survey
PCN Form
Agent Authorization
Upland and Wetland Data Sheets
Letter from interested party
. Impact Maps
cc: Bob Zarzecki, DWQ (courtesy)
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: , [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from IDWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information WETLANDS/ 409 GROUP
Owner/Applicant Information AUG 0 3 2004
Name: Sutton Oaks, LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 1975 WATER QUALITY SECTION
Jamestown, NC 27282
Telephone Number: 336-508-8143 Fax Number: 336-294-4492
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 8
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans 'should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1'. Name of project: Sutton Oaks at Olde Sedgefield Subdivision & Sewer Outfall
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: Greensboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Sutton Oaks at Olde Sed _ e. fg ield
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Take 140 West to the High Point
Road Exit, turn left onto High Point Road(SR4121), follow High Point Road to just past
MacKay Road near Adams Farm Shopping Center, turn left onto Suttonwood Drive
(SR1370), travel approximately 850 feet and the entrance will be on our right.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 31.45
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Dogwood Lake
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The subdivision site is mostly wooded vacant land with no
building structures present. The land to the north, east and south is residential. The land to
the west is business or commercial.
Page 2 of 8
Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Create a new subdivision with roadways, curb &
gutter, along with all the utilities to include sewer, water, electric, gas, cable and telephone
services
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the-same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Wetlands for the subdivision site have been delineated with the Corps of Engineers and buffers
by NC - DWQ. USACE ID Number 200220606, DWQ Project Number 030208. 0.021 acres of
wetland was previously impacted during grading of an access road under non-reporting NW
permit #39.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None known at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts are to perennial stream
channels and wet depressions for a sewer line.
Page 3 of 8
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) . Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
A4 Excavation/fill 0.0013 No 30' depression
B4 Excavation/fill 0.001 No 30' depression

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.355
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0023
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
B3A Excavation 22' UT Dogwood Lake 10' Perennial
C3 Excavation 21' UT Dogwood Lake 8' Peremnial
B3B Excavation 25' UT Dogwood Lake 10' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www?mapguest_com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 68' temporary
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Page 4 of 8
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
(' )
'Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

(acres)
(if Name applicable) Wate) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,

bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proiect engineer completely redesigned the sewer line to keen all riparian buffer impacts in
Zone 2 except crossings. The only other project impact was for an access road which is at the
only location that the property is accessible from a public right of way on its southern end.' That
impact was done under non-reporting NW #39.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please!attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Since impacts were minimized and avoided we do not believe further mitigation should be
required. Impacts are below DWQ notification and mitigation thresholds.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http.//h2o enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index_htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3939 3 0
2 26572 1.5 0
Total 30511 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 6r.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Single Family Residential
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal
XIH. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ? Existing impacts are below DWQ thresholds but are
above Corps thresholds*
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
*Only the access road has been graded and work has stopped pending this application. Sewer
line construction other than minor clearing has not begun. Please see the attached letter from a
landowner who is selling heir property which describes a financial hardship they are under.
Anythingouu can do to expedite this process would be appreciated.
Applicant/ gents ignature (Date
(Agent's signature ' my if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
c ? ?'?,Fs? >Er <+? J ?'' ref( ,••..t . n ? . ?
_ r,. ? t_ 1 t ?a • ? {F:? ?f T'{ - ?? ? "'rte. ?_ _ '
?11 ( \\??,. , ? rte/
1r'
??zsx)t ?t
Sri
i-J
A\l?/????--„`? "`? ? 1? I •,l???i? ?.1?( dgeh d? ? _t Jl?/{,FI I•
-Pq
?tt1 ??t-._ ?• r?? ./`?,%?%)r ?!• ? '7 ? fi ? -,. ??./.mix {• ?,r'? r 1?i)I `` I'-J? f ,`` E
:?1? ?\ IC 1 mil, \. 'y-f yaf ' • _ `' r 1 `' C'7
•?? y - '.? 1,,\??t` ,: '?."\?-??^s--, y / f - ?? (Tw?;1 ?%. a ?yr{???,c1.?S• j/...:. _ .?,i :\??`??%? i ?-?" `/i 1
d1 ?..• ?? ? `? Ei?d?"'? ? , ?? ? t ? /. ?'?L_ ?",? ? ?i?, ?w`v ?rJJJ?? ?.?f -.--- i`..` ..?s ?
- '? { ? ??+?-? ? ? ,f+---' 1 t?? l ?? ?(? ? -' ? ? : . 1 ? ? t ".S ? ?? I? ?i? ? ' V ? / ?' e ( / ? a ? ? ? ? ?' yin ,. ? t-'?
? . /?? ?tia - 23 31 4.
c+Pa'' ? ? ? ? `" ??? ? = - ,,^ } ? ^? . (? i i ?t ? ? /k I?'". t?f: ?, l `.y"'^a f??'" ..?' `?-f; ? •
_? f 1' i r? r 1???, ? `\.? L ?C1 ?'_'\/ ?js `. ?, t `? ?1?iti-'ter f a\ t?tty?' (' ?? r?? Y1 ? `?+ •? t ? ,
?
;?,,,???\? 1,,,"\JJlv - ?i t:?_o -„-•f
- ? ?iJf s ?r?`z ? ..1J1 `?a\ ctC `:.i 4 - ?i .?.? I1 7 ts `?? `??. ?-_' ?,' ? J 1 c? 7'f1 Y.? {`- I!,,,`•! ?? ?r ?7?777?? ? I`j1( 1 `\ ? -? ?? ' _ .1_ --? !!! i 'f 11 ? r1' ?1{-? ? t ?y ? r,? te3 ,. ???/ ^}_ i7? _? ? ? ? rt ,? . ,•1,? ? ) j ?i" .) ? '} 1?`' ' - ? \ ?n ? -.Jf -
(\j? s.fj t 6 { -'? ?-i ,{ - ? ?? t q 1 4ti \ ? ?t ? I . n f ?a .; •- ? t 77, f
__ .P' / _ '1 .1 ?'I /(1 1 - ? 1 ? \\ _ • 11?? ?- r?..r Ala '( ? ?
1:K r
?e
r c i
? rt 'f r p>,'-? ? 1 ? •..,? ? t x < .i v r r" .,+C°. '" i ? /' I `t.
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
)LINA - SHEET NUMBER 32
-W
UU/21/U4 MON 15:40 FAX [phone] AROSA MANAGEMENT
0621/2004 14-29 FAX
Name
[a 002
Qo02
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Ravra W&c PDad - Ralvgh, Nord, C=Una 27114 - Phone: [phone] - F? (919') F'6.9467
?.t,a?anrlECwm
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blan4s To Be Filled In. Sy The Current Landowner
Addy ess_ ? ? ?3 ° x l°t ^l S ?? -,,._ ?-S -?? ,? i r,•? L- Z-'t 2?' 2_
Phone: Co ^ • Sc) S - el `E 3 ACV
Project Name/ Descriptions:
Date: . 2 l - c
The Depart aunt of the Arty
T.T.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilnm-ington District
P.O. Box 1890
wiirnington. NC_ 28402 Atrr,: ?--? ilk
Field 67 ice: c? 2 ( -- ?je u ? J?UL a
Re. Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
L the current ra v owner, hereby desigctate and avthori= Soil & Bnvironmerstol Coxesultartts, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of pernn-dt applications, to fsmiish upon request
supplewientall7irdonnation in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 2? day of
rv ti : L G..i.?.xD(4'
This notification supersedes arty previous correspondence cancemmg the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professi rW courtesy reasor+s, is valid only for
government modals to eater the property when accompatried by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site nseetiug prior to visiting the site.
Ptin.t Property Owner's Name
CC! Mr.. John Domey
NCDENfi - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
P?alei h NC ??604
.a3 f) % ? ? r
Property Owner's Signature
cc Mr. Kevin C. Martin
Soil & Environmental Consuitarsts, PA
g?
[1fiTc Morst??ai[e LAIC
Qndgm
236 i ephmp Court, suim C 3817-L- Lawndale Drive 622 Coon
CMU;Ord. NC 29025 Qmenshonx NC 27455 TaylorsvWc. NC 19681
phofl-I [phone] phbae: (336) 540-823; Phony (82s) 6d5.Sg--o
Fur: (704) 7--10-9406 FdX: [phone] Fut: (S29) 635-5820
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sutton Oaks S&EC # 8862.w1 Date: 7/7/2004
Applicant/Owner: Keith Badorf County: Guilford
Investigator: Jonathon Townsley, Brandon Fulton State: NC
Do Normal. Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Zone 2 Buffer Zone
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes x No Transect ID: Wetland
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes x No Plot ID: S&EC flag 03
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VFC,FTATIOM
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator
1. Microstegeum vimineum Grass FAC+ 9.
2. Impatiens capensis Herb FACW 10.
3. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 11.
Ulmus Americana Tree FACW 12.
5. Platanus occidentalis Tree FACW- 13.
6. Carex sp. Sedge FAC 14.
7. Rosa palustris Shrub OBL 15.
8. Phytolacca Americana Herb FACU+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 75%
Remarks: The vegetation at this location meets the criteria for hydrphytic vegetation.
HYnRn1 nr;Y
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
x No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test `
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)
Remarks: This location has hydrologic indicators of a wetland.
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Sutton Oaks S&EC # 8862.w1 Plot ID: S&EC flag 03
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? - Yes X No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 10YR 4/2 Silt loam
8-24 Bt 10YR 5/1 7.5YR 3/3 >50% 10YR 5/1 Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: This location meets the criteria for hydric soils. It is more like the Wehadkee (Poorly Drained) than the Chewacla series
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks: This location meets the criteria for a wetland. c3 ?F
G?? JAN C.

]003 O?
OFNOR?i GPR
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sutton Oaks S&EC # 8862.w1 Date: 7/7/2004
Applicant/Owner: Keith.Badorf. County: Guilford.
Investigator: Jonathon Townsley, Brandon Fulton State: NC
Do Normal. Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Zone 2 Buffer Zone-up
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes x No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes x No Plot ID: 30ft. N of RMS#5I
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Fagus grandifolia Tree FACU 9.
2. Carya glabra Tree FAC 10.
3. Fraxinus Americana Sap FAC 11.
4. Quercus alba Tree FAC 12.
5. Microstigeum vimineum Grass FAC+ 13.
6. Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC 14.
7. Ulmus Americana Tree FACW 15.
8. Lidodendron tulipifera Tree FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 75%
Remarks: The vegetation present at this location meets the criteria for hydrophytic vegetation.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
x No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: na (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18" (in.) FAC-Neutral Test `
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18" (in.)
Remarks: There are no hydrologic indicators present at this location.
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Sutton Oaks S&EC #8862.w1 Plot ID: 30ft. N of RMS#5
SOILS
Map Unit Name Madison Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrocrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes X No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 5YR 4/4 Sandy loam, granular
5-24 Bt 2.5YR 4/6 clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: There are no characteristics of hydre soils at this location. Soil is more like the moderately well drained Congaree series
than Chewacla.
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks: This location does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
?pSOIL8
Jul 08 04 10:05a dot Coble 378-9913 p.2
July 7, 2004
TO: Corp of Engineer's:
We are owners of property located 5823 High Point Rd. and Queen Al;.ce
Rd. totaling approximately 8.5 acres p;Lus our house. This property has
been under Contract since January 2.6, L002. The buyer, Keith Badorf, has been
working to get sewer to this property since he had it under Contract. Initially
he requested sewer throuh the City of Greensboro which meant he would have to
get the property annexed by the City of Greensboro. Due to the problems of
right-of way easements, etc, Keith decided to apply to the Sedgefield Sanitary
Systems and did get approval from them. The City of Greensboro then came back
and said since he had requested annexation, he would have to go through the
city of Greensboro. This required obtaining and negotiating Contracts from all
the owners over which this right-of-way easement would run. This has beer) a
very long process-
When Keith got approval from the Sedgefield Sanitary District, everyone felt'
we would be closing on this property within a reasonable time. Therefore, we
went ahead and bought another house. It has now dragged on for months, and
we areuunder a great hardship. We purchased another property assuming the'.
cio3ing of our property would occur in no longer than 2_3 months.
it we can't settle this soon, we may have to give up on our new home and
move back to 5823 High Point Rd.
We would greatly appreciate any help you can give us in expiditing the
approval through the Corp of Engineers.
Sincerely,
Cu_(::D??'
arilc Z Trelia

Gay 11a
T -
ova-wn ? /
? J

F
f
F

3
ca
0
m p Z
Z O
N N
? O D
n A N
ow
v
r
mz?
O

A
Z m<
V?O
O
JiD A
C
A D
C
>
Z
D
n

_ z D
r
!?1
x rZn 0 II'
M
W W ¦
(A (A
p
J V
cn cn
I I
pNj (
W W C
D
Moo rr
i 1; 0 /
70
\ cC\\ _ / • i rl70
C
r
N
N
CA) N
O
O
P

J
,
f rr
ari
j ? ?'? r rr ? rr
rr ,
„? a ? r` J 111
;or O
?? rr
CO)
O I ?? m
mr is V r? ? 'p m
r ? ¦
I a?
1i / a??? I r ?I is
rn ? ' ° r
rr
rn Z ?o J
6
Np -_-I
y ICI.
? 1 1 r !?, ?a '.A
m
c _ -~ m
on C*
`? r I I
\ \ 1\
ti ?" ? \1j % 1 \? 1
o
',
(A wo
?
O -I vai
p ;
mz
°
V?O
t o A ?/J /) 'I
?
z? a o
A it an
_0 m
Z I I m
m
x 1
W I _ I O
14 -j
pNj CA
rn
moo tm. I 1 .4
j W
N
m N
O
t
i
A
w4 V+ 114
/
417 y
109
/i (A I
o ? ? o
a
-4 Ch
rq 10 ?D
O A -? +
Q , •
Al N !D $ x
G)
~• N = rn 1\
on N) (n
(A 08
d? Rt z <o?z N / ?
C ?D 4
00
?v o°
Wo +
=1 co) au
+u
C '< - Q
W 14 (A
m CD
...? .0. CD cD (D0
w _ O o z?
w = ? P' D aat
rn G)co 0 m
o N a au
W m u
N Z?
<U. °A x
N0
?. ?4 n m a D ott J
0,o+ 0 Z N ve
o Z OU
31V0-0Nl1 c cAgk -1 0 1 y y
w N
N

<
Z W
,0 -
o
9y
w ? ul W
D
pp m
cnq+

N
V r
D
?
?
o?
= O
-0 Z C
Z
v C) ;U
N mO
\ O r ?

a
?N' \
<o0Z
D c
-?i II
1
P O , co-4rnm

200
PTl
\ 00 ?
o=
I
°?
jdzmm \ J
\
Z m N -'
Or- cD
W
DD N N
00 -0 C) o"
Z \ Vx
?
- O Z 4`
>>
00 - ?z
co ,
z
01,10
I mm
CA
I 0 m
•
•
•
?

N' 3
n
wro •oa
ONLLSbf3
N
?1
3 n n o Br-
oNLLSOC3
?] '
- - ? -- -- I \

D I

rr
CIi rn M
O 5
'0 Z
? CD m R°
N w O m z Ix
N 2D
1N3/OSY3
x
1
x !
:x
\x"\ ?\1
` r
N) M
0o O C
52
N
0
0
v
v
m
W
1-49
c?
c0

CA m

cm
C-)v
m
0
O
0
v

W ?
N O
P
IQ
---------- --
a
Z
+
rn N
O
o '0 0 D
C) K:
? O ?
n cc
O
?
o °
z
a M

W
w
g?i O
-70
cD
W S
?D
a°
c
mz
C
"O zZ
v
0 ?
C77
P
t W N c?Z
I I I n IM co co -P? L4
I k D I I 1 1
m r C? N N (n
p \ I 1 y. z Zm A, MO
z
D -? -
to >> V N 0
00ER ---
id c 1 00
M 00)
000
00-00
M:z
m (p C)
r slo ?IS I.[ y sC e r N D
M"W
a j cs. i y o O
0 C)
C Z>
CO a
c oo?
?,ew z z
a? ?b
C
\ / \ \ \ rk? zk I \
\ \ s=[+ I m
\ ?sr
? I
u
F
??\ \ \ \ \
V` \ \ \ \
\ \ 11
(o(?
D 00 \ \ / ?y
OPh
v?0 iw N, 0
cony ca_ I I I ;I 0 i / / / / N/
OD 0 a
o?N?
" ° % -o cn C7 ( /
Xm DDN?-i
w U i
?- D D
1414
(.n CA
W W a ?i L4
rnw (? rw j // / N Cp
-n 0-oloo,
< co
N /
N N
N 00,
w
s11
M.
r. II
,C N
I a)
I
/ l
I /
N I
I / I
I
I / /