20041272 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040802

t
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: :John Dorney, DWQ
Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
FROM: Kevin Marin
RE: Your 9/2/04 letter regarding Hunters Park S/D, Rocky Mount,
NC (DWQ # 04-1272)
I have asked the project engineers (Herring tip Sutton) to address your
questions since they relate to design issues. However, I did want to
partially address item 1. You say that Mr. Horan has determined that all
subject features are not shown on the plan. However, based on a site
determination by Steve Mitchell and another consultant (Appian), they
are all shown. I do not know if this was based on a review of soil and
USGS maps or a site visit. I do understand your alignment question
north of Hunterbrook Lane, and have asked the surveyor to address this
matter. I also met Mr. Mitchell on-site on 3/26/02 to confirm that I
correctly understood where buffers were located. Please contact Mr.
Mitchell if you need independent verification of this.
Please call me if you still believe that all subject features are not shown.
However, if your question is an alignment issue only, the surveyor will
address that separately.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone:; [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
TFq
L ?1 Imo'
Q ;'
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 21, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
JW Hunter Construction Company
Attn: Bill Hunter
PO Box 2107
Wilson, NC 27893
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 04-1272
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
Subject Property: Hunters Park S/D, Winstead Avenue (SR1613), Rocky Mount, NC
UT to Goose Creek [03-03-07, 29-33, SA HQW NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Hunter:
On August 8, 2004, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) receird your application dated August 2,
2004 to impact an additional 0.15 acres of wetlands to construct the proposed subdivision. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed
below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact
protected wetland, streams and/or buffers on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the
additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and 2B .0259(8) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until
we receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue
to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Buffers - Mike Horan of the Raleigh Regional Office has reviewed your "Current.Proposed Plan"
and has determined that the plan does not show buffers on all of the subject features. Please contact
Mr. Horan and provide plans that accurately depict the extent of the protected riparian buffers.
Also, please clarify on your plans why the buffers north of Hunterbrook Lane are not aligned with
delineated wetlands area / stream.
2. Impervious Cover - Please provide calculations on how you determined that the expected percent,
impervious coverage for the subdivision would be less than 30%.
3. Diffuse Flow - All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets must be directed and maintained to
flow in a diffuse manner at non-erosive velocities through the entire protected stream buffers
without re-concentrating. If this is not possible, then it may be necessary to provide stormwater
facilities that remove nitrogen. Please provide a stormwater management plan and calculations
(include completed worksheets) for this project. The plan must specify all stormwater discharge
points, plan details, and calculations to indicate that diffuse flow through the protected buffersQr
nitrogen removal as described above will be achieved.
4. Deed Notifications - Please be aware that deed notifications will be required on all lots with
retained wetlands, streams and/or protected buffers.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27004
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetiands
None Carolina
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
JW Hunter Construction Company
Page 2 of 2
September 21, 2004
5. Building Lots - Please provide typical building footprints and any other expected site improvements
(e.g., driveways, decks, etc.) for all lots containing wetlands, streams and/or buffers.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Mike Horan of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office at 919-571-4700. If we do not hear from you
within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr. Danny Smith (733-5083 ext. 353) or Mike Horan if
you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
i
rDDo
, tlands / 401 nit
D
JRD/bz \
cc: Kevin Martin, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 041272
a
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Michael Horan
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Ken,SrhllStpr
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Hunters Park c/o JW Hunter Construction County Nash
Project Number 04 1272 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date $/2/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type residential S/D
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
•O
F 39 I " "? 1 Y Q N ??-33 SA HQWNS 30,307. 0.15 ?-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? O Y ON
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments: G 3pk
Place on Hold: Current proposed plans do not show buffer on subject features. Need %
1i11pervious on estimated build-out conditions. Need to show diffuse flow through buffers where
applicable. Remaining wetlands on site should have deed restrictions or conservations easements
placed on them. The channel located within the wetlands located on lots #5-12 is not a stream and is
not subject to the rule. 8/30/04 (Michael Horan)
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1

Triage Check List
Date: Project Name:
To:
From:
? ARo
? FRO
? MRO
Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded toipur for your evaluation.
Please call if you need ash stance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Aland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
FY7
DWQ#: O C-1 County: X ? h
Kevin Barnett ? WaRO Tom Steffens
Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
Alan Johnson ?' WSRO Daryl Lamb
Mike Horan ?
7
Comments:60. 7`? RI-Z ?? Q Mks 5 l Z 61?e'7L ?e?2,) ne?4 A
I
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
August 2, 2004 AUG 0 2 2004
S&EC, PA Project #6849.W0
USACE NCDWQ WATER QUALITY SECTION
Attn: Mr. Kevin Yates Mr. John Dorney
6508 Falls of Neuse Road 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 120 A 1272 Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27615 4 Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Mr. Yates and Mr. Dorney:
Please find enclosed a complete application for a Nationwide 39 Permit and associated
water quality certification. Current requested impacts total 0.15 acres of headwater forest
wetland, zero feet of stream and zero ft2 of buffer impacts. Previous project impacts total
0.33 acres of stream and 140' of stream channel.
A previous client was involved in buffer and wetland violations that have been resolved
with the Corps and DWQ and is described in the attached PCN form. The current owner
re-designed the project to eliminate one crossing of a buffered stream and associated
wetlands and re-designed a cul-de-sac to avoid wetland and buffer impacts related to lots
(see attached large "old site plan").
Current impacts are necessary to access high ground for lot development (see 11x17
current site plan attached). Parts of the impacted area were previously disturbed by the
previous owner. High quality wetlands along Goose Creek are being preserved.
Please call if you have questions regarding this application..
Sincerely,
Ott I obc
Kevin Martin,
President
Attachments
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ® 4 1272
(If any particular item is not annlicahle to this nrnivnt nlPn- -f- 1TT.,r 0.,..1: ..Lien RAT/ A 11
. r ------ - - - - - -I'.. . , - q
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ® (if required)
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: JW Hunter Construction Company
Mailing Address: Attn: Bill Hunter
PO Box 2107
Wilson NC 27893
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:- [phone]
E-mail Address: kmartinPSandEC.com
Page I of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hunters Park
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Nash Nearest Town: _ Rocky Mount
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Hunters Park
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
North of SRI 544 (Hunter Hill Road) and East of SRI 613 (Winstead Avenue)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 51.4 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Goose Creek
8. River Basin: Tar
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is a partially developed residential subdivision
adjacent land is undeveloped or single family residential or multifamily residential
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Finish construction of a single family residential development utilizing conventional grading
and construction equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Allow construction of a single family residential
subdivision on uplands.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The Corps issued an after the fact authorization for 0.33 acres of wetland and 140 LF of stream
Action ID #200020403 (Amanda Jones Todd Tuawell of the USACE confirmed the original
wetland delineation, Kevin Yates confirmed the delineation of the current impact area Action
ID# 200421175. Steve Mitchell of DWQ coordinated the wetland and buffer violation resolution
and made site buffer determinations. All violations were performed by a previous owner and a
previous consultant handled delineations and after the fact applications.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future impacts are proposed.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
Page 3 of 9
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Fill of jurisdictional wetlands for road access to high ground and for some fill on three lots.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 Fill 0.15 no >100' Headwater forest

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fem&gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: ±5.75 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.15 current (0.33 previous, so project total =0.48
acres)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated np-rap
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain):
Page 4 of 9
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.Qov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: none current (140' previous)
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* 7 : _ _L
-XOL va?ll unyact NcyaiaMy ana iaennry temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The new owner completely redesigned the project to avoid a stream crossing to access hieh
-ground (see attached original plan) and redesigned the lots around Tara Court on the original
Page 5 of 9
plan because at least three lots would require substantial bottomland hardwood wetland impacts
and because the previous consultant located the stream buffers erroneously such that many lots
were unbuildable. The current plan complies with buffer rules and has minimal wetland impacts
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm6de html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Impacts are below DWQ thresholds for mitigation The client proposes to preserve
remaining high quality bottomland hardwood wetlands on-site (±5 acres) which would result
in a 10:1 preservation to total project impact ratio if this is not adequate for the USACE
payment to NC EEP is proposed
Page 6 of 9
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wKQ/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.15 ac
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No El
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 7 of 9
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
e feet
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Gone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Diffuse flow of stormwater will be provided project impervious is <30%
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal (existing sewer line)
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 9
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Numerous site and office meetings receded this a lication and the proposed impacts are
consistent with consensus reached with agencies in order for the new owner to develop a viable
project while minimizing impacts that would have been caused by the previous design

Y-10
?rru?auu s p.guature Date
(Agent's signature i d only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
February 18, 2002
Mr. Kevin Martin, President
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Subject: Authorization Letter
Hunter's Park Subdivision
Rocky Mount, North Carolina
Dear Kevin:
By copy of this letter you are hereby authorized to act on J. W. Hunter
Construction Company's behalf regarding the gathering of information
concerning the current permitting of wetlands at the above subject subdivision.
J. W. Hunter Construction Company recently purchased a 50 acre tract of land
known as Hunter's Park located near the intersection of Hunter Hill Road and
Woodruff Road in Rocky Mount.
If you should have any questions concerning any of the above please feel free to
call Ron Sutton of Herring-Sutton and Associates at 252-291-8887. ;
Respectfully,
J. W. Hunter Construction Company p
A- Ile
Bill Hunter
GoP
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ? ?ee+cl
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE

D STATES kc) O
OF THE INTERIOR STATE OF NORT
-AL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AN
242 =43 RALEIGH, NORTH
_ DORTCHES 1.2 M/
X45 2 46 (D5456 RAKE)
t52 J 1612
, ? r 1 48 ?J „ i
1 142 - - '
1613
Cem
\ _ --}` - Cem` - ISO
-? y. Cem
37
- . it -
14
11 119 Z
1 0__ „ BS It L
'it //9 ji Cem
133
? i? emu--- ? - ? ?t ??• ??. U
Cem sn Grave a a o _ ?/
?? II -1 __.•.`? . DI .? x••147 •??J - vi •i ll
o
/44
129
16I8
Joe \\?\\ / . -J 618) -
,<1s7\ ?? o.. '1635 - _ \'[ 1617
it Benvenue
Country ClubO .
P?ver
?V r
N John
I 1s -
-?= - I?General Kos ^S-!+ \ )i O \ • ?.
1615. ry
47
- -
'BM. 140 -?_? ?????? )?azl?wood •? _
163
?-r ? _ !! ?' ? ? ?.` •1 ?"
?? I - - 1613 11 - I 1 i •? >' i'
? ?- - _ II 1? ?? • ??_? p =-' - ?, all - _lv
• ? I i (SUNb I l i7?Engleµood` I .AVE' . •: a_ ?? I r 1770 _ I 1 ` OoW [s
(WEB
Aft
1 ?? /? }?i ur • - A _
4 _ , . r
?L_ t,hV?
J '
wooD awn II r _ ?? A //K\
JI? 1( -193 Roa !'r '\\ 1f /' j ~ ~ r \
v 7Fg0 - I ?
H
?
?? ohnsorr ?.
T
Ch /
sv
' n 1 // ? ?? ''\ Jn e
( 1`a a 4_ 1 4ubsta y13 / o BN- 90 '? ?' P
/ i
. ch-11 $j?5 MusGum???
1
i? i\ i - \? 1 i )/ ? Izz _ ??'\ % I r?WT(? tSNa?er Treatment??
- ??4 anti/;'
f
ob %'L It te 4?
0000, e
kCxV11k%
WOODRUFF ROAD ($R 16131
200
?4 Herring-Sutton & Associates, P.A. HUNTERS PARK SUBDIVISION
a ? Engineers - Surveyors - Planners Rocky Mount, NC
CINEY c
2201 Nash Street NW, Wilson, North Carolina 27896 (252) 29E-8867
Overall Wetlands
Impact Map
0
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PUT IDENTIFIES AS WATERS OF
THE U.S. OR WETLANDS ALL AREAS OF WATERS OF THE U.S.. INCLUDING
NA7T7EERµNA?CT INS aµmE UNDERR D ON sI D EE.
UNIESSTIEAE R %C FNE IN LAW OR WR PUBUSNED REODUTN7NS,
THIS DEIFAINNATON OF iECTIDN •W4 JJR%OICTON MAY BE RELIED UPON
FOR A PEIIIOD NOT TO CX. Fl1E YEARS FRpI iFY$ DATE. THIS
DETERM
WETLAN os o'?"EUNE"'Anuv out THE Isar CORPS OF ENONEERS
NAME:
TITLE:
DATE:
200 400 600
>?Ya4oVoµrcnAws-a-wkraa T/w/Np' sws•ro.T
B Dale July 2004'
'em BuNa 7/1e/04 %1K
yam Bwter 7/2+/a vix Scale : Map Na.
I" 2o0' 03-9948
Sheet, No. I of 1
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
JW Hunter Construction Company
Post Office Box 2107
Wilson, NC 27893
DWQ# 04-1272 - Nash
A. Signature
X ? &? r..t " \ // AXt J ? Agent
? Addre:
B. Receive y (Printed Name) Q. Date of Deli
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
3. Service Type
,Certified Mail
? Registered
? Insured Mail
? Express Mail
Return Receipt for Merchandis(
? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number 7004 1160 0002 2706 6028
(rransfer from service i
3G Fnrm `?Ri 1 Fahninr 9nnd nnmp tir Robim Raevint inomr
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE , O J'd I-
• Sender: Please print
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
?3 3 IiFlif3iffi!#l3tiii3Fltiiiiill?FiIi?i?3ilfif?lili!!IFlFFFl?#i?
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
NC Division of Water Quality
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference
3834 080204 Invoice 08/02/04
Date: 08/02/04
Balance
$200.00
Q .?
IZZ
? O Q
c
016866
Check Number: . 16866
Check Amt: $200.00
Discount Pay Amount
$0.00 $200.00
~ -
,
,S 1
I
•
NOT TO SCALE
PERMITTED USES: ALL LAND USES THAT ARE ALLOWED IN AN R-8 ZONE AP TTY M VICIN
GENERAL ABBREVIATIGNS
cavornolvs ~ 1. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MAY CONSIST OF SINGLE FAMILY Z
,.,Lines Surveyed DWEWNG UNI15, DUPLEXES, CONDOMINIUMS, ATTACHED ~ / Lines Not Surveyed DWEWNG UNITS FOR INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP OR RESIDENTIAL . z
EIP Existing Iron Pipe CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT, OR COMBINATION THEREOF AS OUTLNED 0 )IRECT N TANGET RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH A
EIS Existing Iron Stake IN THE qN OF ROCKY MOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE THERE N0. DELTA ANGLE DEGREE OF CURVE CHORD DIRECT N 1 EIA Existing Iron Axle SHALL BE NO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT CONSISTS OF -I '
NIP New Iron Plpe Set THREE OR MORE DWEWNG UNITS LOCATED WITHIN THE SAME C1 70"52'19" 11'27'33" N21'41'29"W I'29"W 355.80 500.00 618.47 579.79 I ~
PKN P K Nail Found BUILDING OR LOCATED ON THE SAME LOT OF RECORD. PKS P K Nan Set C2 38'18'10" 11'27'33" N75'18'~3"W B'43"W 183.92 500.00 318.80 311.53 s
RRS Railroad Spike Z NO MODULAR HOMES SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE RESIDENTAL ROCKY MOUNT 9 aTY u~nTs
NI No Iron Set or Found pEVELOPMENT. ECM Existingg Concrete monument M
W Road Ri ht-of-Wa R~ g y d. DEVELOPMENt OF 1HE PROPERTY SHALL PROVIDE A PUBUt `r
C/L Rood Centerline STREET CONNEC110N WITH HURT DRIVE o Indicates Property comero
INV Pipe Invert 4. THERE SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 550 DWELLING UNITS
FES Flared End Section RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 1HE 55 ACRE SUBJECT PROPERTY. '~R
CMP Corrugated Metal Pipe E%. F.O. d: O.H. POWER THIS VIdMITY Qt
VCP VItrlAed qay Plpe N03'30'27~'w CONC Concrete "'li'6;~ ....-----.-"~pCPA PA ex. F.O. i T r EJC_ _ ~
ASP Aspholt ~q. _ _ _ • wA~u~ I I ~ (n Z
P Ed a of Pavement AnoN Ex. Is - - - E g r EXACT lOC - - - r GRAV Gravel r - ~-.......s_ ' I a Q
FC Face of Curb -~--,~--.r.. ~ 1 I ~ 2 ~ i I n 4~ _ I' I i o o Q
BC Back of Curb I TC Top of Curb r I "'r' T' c Z ~ ~ ! ~ o I I ~ W j ~ I ~ j ~2 t~ ~ _
EASEMENT FOR Z ~ m I ~ FL -Flow Llne of Curb ? ,I I ~ m I, ~ I I FENCE dr PLANTING ~ ; z a x I z e~ i
FiGD Horizontal Ground Distance I ~ z oF~o ~~,4 I ~ ~ Ind I ma .2 A ~Z S'1 A~ I ~ ! Z 0 N ~ I~ 2 I +1 ~ I ~ y A ~ ~ i ~ a j I LEGEND
r ~ ~a I ~ I of I ~ i z r °0~- aq.' ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ I s I ~ ~ I- I x 2 I I ~
~ ~°9~ R ~ I I F I I ~ Z ro`t ~ Id x ,o ~ D 0 A +T 4CF A i; z y~ ~ I D 15 Rds I Q ~
~ si I ~ I r ~ s 1 T r ~ I~ . I ~ I, ~ a I ~ N01'141J i ~ 18 85 EXISTING CURB do GUTTER p„ ~
SITE INFORMA .ION ~ ~Z = ' ~ I , I D I ~ I N NO4'1 I 07~ 3 105.E ~6~ Q »Nr ~ N04'11 ~"M' ~ 63.33 ~ ~ ~ ed RB de GUTTER Z
, N049142 156.33 I ~ PROPOSED CU ~ ~ ~ 104.83 b . h ~
•51.36 ACRES ' ~ ` ~ ~ ~ I ~ ' N03'28~~ is TRACT ACREAGE. ~ I ~ o r ~ J I N I I No~'~"w ~ 1oao9 r ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ NOJ~B'04 4 b - toe ~ ~ ~1 ~ z, 00 o DRA?NAGE PIPE, FES (FLARED I-
No. OF LOTS SHOWN: ~ ~ . ,J ~ 1.' ~ "E b 210.2 I y,;'~y, r \ ~ N0~} OQ E ~IOOtTB 52 W a 211.8) ~ NOJ'1J'2T"W 1 w . +Ir' +b +b +t` +ti +r ,dr~+it~ o ND SECTION dt RIP RAP ~ a.
MAXIMUM N0. r ~ - ~ I ~ ~ t ~
T 550 t OF l.0 I S ALLOWED: • - ..~ll • I 1 I I r1. +I ~ ` . b _ ~ I ~ N.o. woooauro CATCH BASIN, DRAINAGE (n
LINEAR FOOTAGE I I ..:;;y.;•::.:::.:•.• ~ • ~ I ~ ~ aROarRrr PIPE do JUNCTION BOX Z
OF STREET: 1 :W:•:r::•~~;~:::::
AREA OF I - "1 i
STREET R/W. _ ~ ~ I q •4 . . \ ~ , I i I 1' ~ Lv ~a
ZONc. R ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I / ~ Q TEE, G.V. dt FlRE HYDRANT Q ~ T,bti g"6 t ~ 5 1 ' ~ W BLOCKING '~It~ 1~1~ /
~ ~y. Ah ,
MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK , _ ~ ~l ~ ~ ' ~ \ ~ ~ .
REQJIREMENTS: ~ ! ~ I c ~ ~a ~j,M, ~ SEWER MAIN W/MANHOLE
T' ee ~ ~ '>;•'r ~ FRON ~ 1 Q I,;,• ,1 1 l v ~d? +4• ~ ~
SIDE 10 Feet ' ' I ti ti t~:::.,. I ~ o r . ,.,.,r, ~
~ I E, ~ ~ ~ l o ~d l 0 v ~0
REAR 20 Feet _ I a :.k~: ~ r I - ~0' ' ~ TEE do G.V. W/BLOCKING ~I 4 a 1
SIDE STREET: 1 set ~ 1 ~ M Z~ ~ I~ ~ w j
~ i, i•: MIN. FRONTAGE Hq v 1$I_ ti ~ ~ ~ r
AT MBL 60 Feet Mrs, r 1 . , 4p F. ~4Cf A,oa I M ~ ~n:.1~11YYi~ry / f11~. ° w~ ~ RHE~D UTILITY a ~ ~ OHW EXISTING OVE wl ~ N WIPES
P R~ O p Fro = 1~ ~ I z ~ 21 ~ 0 SS EXISTING SEWER MAIN
~ ~ ~ ~ ,a ~ ~ r W EXISTING WATER MAIN
I q ~ t~• , C ~ y MAIN
B~ ~ G EXISTING GAS I ~ ~ a o ~
r ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ a ' ® PROPOSED w ~~.L i~ \ f T
J / PROPOSED STREE ~ SIGN I
, I . ~ . _ f ~ 1.•r- - - L . - I ~ t - ~ ~ '~j ~ EXISTING WATER ~~ETER
i / ~b / ~ Hf , / / DATE ~ ~ \6~ ~ ~ ~ TgR TO BE REMOVED
~ ~~~t / W AUG. 9, 2001 y? ~ ~ r ' ~ u ecKY s~rn+ STREET CENTERLINE PC,PT,PI
r,-. ~ ~ / L - ~ . i ~ SCALE
~ ~ „ 4 t ~ ~ ~`I? C = set \ ~ ~ ~ r ~ BM BENCH MARK 1 100 F
r ~ . Lib" . NA r I ~ ~ ,M, +Ir ,,y, +Irr. ~ y ~ / r TAR eu1rER Q DI ~ \ ~ / ~ / BUi?ER rr ~ +b +i~? `
\ I? ~1 +I~ ~ DRAWN BY
2 F` Uoo ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~h s , P POWER POLE and ~ ~ 6 ~..rr /P KAW \ ~ ~ Q" A s 0h ANCHOR(GW)
~ _ ~ - - ---s , . q ~E . _ - . _ a - \ „ „ _ ~t~, JOB NUMBER
~ / r khl ?p, \ ~ T.PED TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 980917
\ ~ o ~ / / \ r . f 1,.: _ , . y +.rr,~ CO SEWER CLEAN OUT
r ~r ~ / \ \ ~ i i ~ ` ' ti ? ~ y., • ~4 ~ R ~a ~ r DRAWING FILE ~ ~ a.,, z
~ ~ i / Q \ ~i ~ ~ . Q e Q CB STORM DRAINAGE CONST4A ~
~ r 1 \ h , CATCH BASIN ~ ~f ` ~ ti
/ \ ~ ; ~ ; ~t~~:~.;3a i* ^?.*'~~`fl: DI DRAINAGE INLET ,
y, ,y. ~ pQ WV WATER VALVE
/ ~ / /
f a ~ ~ 't'' ~ oh ~ © GV GAS VALVE ti ? ~ ~
2- y y 1 ~ ~ ,J9 SIGN GENERAL SIGN
i• i ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~
V ~ / i \ ~ EXISTING CONTOURS ~ I 1 * ~ ? ~ t ter..
V ~k ~ ~ ~ i L~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ +I~ +Ir, • - _ . _ - - _ 132.56 ~ / _ X EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION ~
the ~ ! o , ~I ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ V ~ 1t`' ~ 32,56 PROPOSED FlNISHED GRADE to
A ~ ~ ~ i \ a . ~ y o
a ~ w~' - 132 PROPOSED CONTOURS
A y~ \ ~ ~ . - G7 ' ~ti4
_ A "S ` \ 1 / o I I I I / 1REE - DECIDEOUS c~1~ •rosErr+ e. RaMSEr
~ \ Z / \ ~ , ~ ~ p~ ~ rI i II . I I • TREE -CONIFER
~ \ ~ ~ ,I~ \ S AREA . ~ V 1 I ~ _ ~°I F F I ~ ~ w
1 ~ ~ ~ CQ I ~ 1 ~ I I-~,~ ! ~ AREA LIGHT POLE Q
~ \ o \ \ i E. ~ ~ i 1 . ! v
~ fy'
~ ~ ~ ~ so\ 4 ~ , 4 I _ - Certification by the Department of Plannlny C ` ~ = y` and Development that this Construction Piot Z
3 1p`` his. , ~v ~ d . Q lµ ''c ~ Q D Y J I \ \ d I I ~ I ~ ~R 9~' ~ - ~ was approved by the Clty Planning Board on
Q ~ IA I ,i , ~ _ Z 0f] day of 20~ o:w> N-oz~n ~ ~
1? I ~d S ~ r~ ~ I I N
v , ~ o I 3 ? . I I ~ `u a Q Director I ~~t». ~ ~ I _
g ~ ` I I a J ~ ? \ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~a
a^ \ ~ I I ~ r. \ \ ~ ~ / ltd. II ~ , ~ I i Z i. MASTER PLAN shown hereon le r ~ StE~
~ \ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ eubJect to: ? ? I O A Cityy of Rocky Mount Review and Approval ~p~ 12, This Is a Master Plan and la NOT to be used for RECORDATION,
N ~ \ ~I ~ ? ~ B NCDOT Review n ? a d prowl p ;,ONVEYANCE or SALES.
9 ~ ~ ~ C 404 Wetlond Delineat on [ems I ~ ~ 13, All Right-of-ways ore Public I Y D Held Topographical Survey unless noted otherwise. ~ ASSOdATEs
~ A I . V 2. Street construction shall conform to the requirements of the , LAND PLANNING k SURVEYING ' O . , 14. Street Corer Radii ¦ 20 unless noted otherwise (Measurements are
J ~ NCDOT Standards and Speciflcatione for Roadway and Structures, 1 199 t0 P.I.) P.O. BOX 7833, 909 N. PEARL ST. I Z 0, latest revision. 15. Aroa Com Uted b coordinate method. ROCKY MOUNT, N,C. 27804
~ ~ D 1 b \ 1 FX. ~ ~ . _ , I :i A~. ~ 3. Topographic Data taken from CRM TOPO MAPS. Contour Interval is 2'. p y 2s2) 9n-3124 vdCE
rn ~A ~ t L f' ~ 0. ~0' DMl EASEMEN I I • - ~ , n r ~ ? - - - - T T. +{r +i•_+b'_+fr_+k-.+Ir_+lY ~ j+1• ' ~ ~i'' a . ~ ~ s ~ ~ 1 Reference Datum is based on Mean Sea level. 16, All distances are chord. ~ 2s'1 ABS-8026 FAX ~ ~ '1'1 ~ ~ ~ • t7, 00 Indicates Address. ~ ~
r _ _ _ I a 4. Boundory Information taken ham mop entitled Property of Octavla S. ~ I 1 ~ R er b Jo er Keen d< Associates dated 7 9. 18. This map does not depk;t encumbrances that are found during a thorough 1 . ~ aP y yn y, 3/2 /8
_ I 'r' I 5. Minimum lot Size ¦ 6 0 title search. Lri.. , 00 Sq. Ft. 19. Surve r DI N T visl e o en areas 1 I +1 ~1I 6. 404 Wetlands. HAVE NOT been detertnlned on this property. Yo D 0 bly s e any cemeteries In any p
a a~ ~ ~ -L _ I r ~ Il \ sor~o'a1"w - ~ I - i 7. A cam ete and thorou unless otherwise noted. - i . Pi gh Survey and Soil Evaluation Is required i
' I ~ ,Ma ..~,,..,.,...,rl..r ~ 20. Locatlnn of Underground Utgttlee ers APPROXIMATE and must be field ~ /!r
O N~ i 1 ,-N3 ruN CSI m Yv Ylv 'IYI YIIV01111J N YO~OIVyllla LV\O, " " " , (1-800-632-4949). x 8. Lot Dimensions shownare approximate, verified Cali N,C. One Call Center before digging'
xx LO 1 CD UABCE J. tio.; ; z 9, Electric Power is proposed to be placed UNDERGROUND. 21. Joyner-Keen do Associates can only locate utilities that are above
10. NCDOT prohibits the use of plastic -ulvert and drainage pipe, the groynd at the time of field survey. Underground lines shown hereon are construction of bulk heodp • ..r entrances1 masonry light and approximate or as reported by various responsible parties.
II ~1 I D 1 mail box supports (i.e. amanint structure) within the Right 22, Surveyor does NOT guarantee that any underground structures such as D 1'
100 0 100 200 300 1 II I . A of Way, utilities, tanks, and pipes are located hereon. A 1 r I ti:n of that it. Contractor Do not place or run heavy equipment across proposed 23. Legal Reference: Being a pcr property described in Deed Book
+ ao _ N/F 1 m - - 'I I BETTY DANIEL HEIRS N drainfield areas. Likewise, these areas are not to be borrowed 1389 Page 352, Stoney Creek Township, Nash County Registry, N r,
from or filled. N
II "11F JOSEPH M. BATTLE 1 Scale ff 100'
I i LS-1
4

ti , -
NOT TO SCALE
PERMITTED USES: , ALL LAND USES 1HAT ARE ALLOWED IN AN R-6 ZONE. AP ITY M VICIN
GENERAL ABBREVIATIONS
coNDrnofrs ~ i. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MAY CONSIST OF SINGLE FAMILY Z
~~.ines Surveyed DWEWNG UNITS, DUPLEXES, CONDOMINIUMS, ATTACHED ~ / Unea Not Surveyed DWEWNG UNITS FOR INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP OR RESiOEN11AL z
EIP Existing Iron Plpe CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT, OR COMBiNAl10N THEREOF, AS OUTLNED 0 TANGET RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH ~1
EIS Existin Iron Stake N0. DELTA ANGLE DEGREE OF CURVE CHORD DIRECt N TANGET g IN THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE. THERE EIA Existing Iron Axle SHALL BE NO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1HAT CONSISTS OF ~
NIP New Iron Pipe Set THREE OR MORE DWEWNG UNIT5 LOCATED N?THIN THE SAME Ct 70"52'19" 11'27'33" N21'41'29"W 355.80 355.80 500.00 614.47 579.79 I b
PKN P K Noil Found BUILDING OR LOCATED ON THE SAME LOT OF RECORD. P K Nan Set C2 38'18'10" 11'27'33" N7518'~3"W 183.92 PKS 183.92 318.80 311.53 s
RRS Ranroad Spike 1. NO MODULAR HOMES SHALL BE LOCATED iN THE RESIDENIAL AOCKY MOUNT 9 an u~nrs
NI No Iron Set or Found DEVELOPMENT ECM Exlating Concrete Monument 4
R/W Road Right-of-Way , D OPMENT OF THE PROPERTY SHALL PROVIDE A PUBLIC R
C Rood Centerline J ~ STREET CONNECnON WITH HURT DRIVE. o Indlcotes Property comers
INV Pipe Invert 4. THERE SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 550 OWEWNG Ulv'rT5 D ~
FES Flared End Section P Reinforced Concrete PI a CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE 55 ACRE SUBJECT PROPERTY. RC p ' de
CMP Corrugated Metal Pipe E%. F.O. ~ O.H. POWER THIS VIgMITY ~ J•--•-~
VCP Vltrifled Clay Plpe N03'30'2Tw CONC Concrete _ -1i6_~ -.,.~.~•-apt pA _ -_ex. F.or+. ex. f.0. ~ ~ Ll.)
ASP Asphalt • WAr R IIIK ~ - `N' :+~-ex, O.H. ~0~,,.~" ~T ~ ~ w v~ Z • I w
EP Edge of Pavement Exaer ~ocnnoN ex. - - - - ~ Q ~
GRAV Grovel ~ _ r FC Face of Curb ~ ' I I i ~ I 2 I ~ s A Q I o o ~ ~
B^ Back of Curb ice-... I ~ ~ ~ 2 ~I ~ LLJ I o I ~
TC Top of Curb ~ _ ~ EASEMENT FOR ~ m I FL Flow Line of Curb i I ' m ~ I SZ I ~ I 2 ~ V/ az I ~Z ~ ~ a 4-
II I I i FENCE r!< PLANTING > z a Horizontal Ground Distance ~ ~ ~ Z ~ HGD DF ~ I ~ I fa qM I ~ o . a g x~ I ~ ~ ~ LEGEND
9 O I ~ I pi I N ~ i r $ ~ A I I f- 7 ~ Z ~ I I j Q ~
CD'F' O'9i' ~ ~ I ~ 1~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~D9' ~'P jI ~ O I I Az aZ 15" RCP I
c o m I a ~ ~ js~~ I I t I, ~ ' a I I ~ N0T141 18 85 EXISTING CURE do GUTTER Q. ~ ~Aa" '3 .01 I a g - - Q I ~ ~ 07'05 105 1 r4,
SITE INFORMA?ION ~ ~ i a~ A ; y~ I N 4° ~ j ~ 2 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ '11'42"w , „M, ~ N04'f249"W I 83.33 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,x•10 PROPOSED CURB do GUTTER z
~ ~ \ I , I i ~ I N ~ N04 b ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ N03'25 104.83 N04'1142 1!16.33 / ~ 04.93 b ~ U 1 / ~ ~ FLARED - ~`y;;'
TRACT ACREAGE 51.36 ACRES 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ N I ~ Nos25'+e'~ ~ 1oao~ ~ ~ \ 1 O,T•J8 04"E ~ 210.2 i Sy. ~ PIPE FES I- I o INAGE ~ Q z. ,1,. ooo° DRA RIP RAP ~ ``y
~ . „ Y~ ~ 211 ~ w• N o. OF LOTS SHOWN: ~ ~ • ~ NOSt~ 0e E ~IOOV9 52 W ~ •8J N03'23 2J"W w ~ END SECTION) dt U w wl ~ W
MAXIMUM N0. ~ ~ ~ x..,21. ~ 6 104.eo IR n :11~;?~,. t I ~I I ~ +i.
T ` .w~• YY' 1 I OF LOSS ALLOWED: 550 ~ - "u .~,'~;,,,,:,.:;:::r•::.;:.. I ~ ' I ~ - - I ~ ~ A IN DRAINAGE I ,~o N.D. WOODRUFF CATCH B S , (n 0
, , • I ~~NEAR FOOTAGE _ +~.-.~W~ +Ir +1~ +b ~ 'I'' do JUNCTION BOX ~ " ~ ~ y PROPEPrr PIPE Z . ~ I +b I~ +Ir ~ U
OF STREET: ~ ~ .,::;..•....,:•:~.~;,r::::: o
AREA OF ~ - - - - ~ i l' nD ~ N ~ V? U a J' ~ I ~ ,
STREET R/W: _ q ':4`~•:',:::\ I ~ I ~ ~ +F. ~ ANT ~ +V' ~ a G.V. do FIRE HYDR Q TEE,
ZONc. R-6CU ~ ~ I ~ I Q 4 ~ 1.68 9"E W BLOCKING ~ e 1 ~ /
t ~ ~ ;1 ~ 52 ; Ati '
A K ~ _ iti ~ MINIMUM BUILDING SETS C ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I ~ ~`.o - -
REQUIREMENTS: t , I d d ~ ~ d p • ~ 0 d b SEWER MAIN W/MANHOLE V
tti ? C~ - I / I FRONT: 25 Feet ~ Q , • .1 ~ ~I ~
~ q ~ ::AIJ . ~ ~ G
SIDE 10 Feet o •k•: / ~ ~ ~ t o L6 ~ Q V ~ Edo G.V. W LOCKING nn TE /B
REAR 20 F t _ m • ri" ~ ~ ~ M , :t, Q °U ~n a
SIDE STREET: 12.5 Feet ~ Q z ~ r W ~ ~ ~ r ~
MIN. FRONTAGE ti . ZS ti ( :•:~l:::. ~ qMa " j~ 1p~, ~ w ~ ~ry o ~.,I td. OHW EXISTING OVERHEAD UIiLiTY 1
AT MBL 60 Feet Mqp ti<<4 w n~ ~ / F Cfgp I 'Y •~.•i~YYii. WIPES ~,y w ~ N ~ _ J
pgCf fyT 2 ~ 1 ~ / :•~r >I I ~ 2 ~ Z' EWER MAIN O SS EXISTING S
~ I o WATER MAIN ~ ~ W EXISTING
~ ti ~ a / ~ of -r5 G EXISTING GAS MAIN e
a ~ o ~
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ® PROPOSED W'.~L \ of / PROPOSED STREET SIGN I
/ - ~ ~ ` / \ ~ . _ ~ ~ ` -EXISTING WATER f,~Et~R
. . 7 ~ ~ aF . ~ ~ DATE
~ - -rte - / / 7 / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 18R TO BE REMO \e^ / AUG. 9, 2001
~ ~ ~ j uo EcKy su,TM STREET CENTERLINE PC,PT,PI _ ~ •
I a / L- ~.e~. ~ ~ SCALE
4 ~ ~ ~ C BM BENCH MARK 1 = 100 Feet ~r . o
. i J D / TAR BUirER 1 ? C x~ ~ ~ t / a DRAWN BY
~s ~ o / / d0. \ ~ ~ . . . . . . ,ry,~ ~ P/P POWER POLE and KAW
~ \ ~ ANCHOR(GW) Q~ ~r1 _ _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ry . - - JOB NUMBER
~ ACf FC5 / ~ \ \ i ~ ~ / IYhi \ , ~ Tg'?'. A t'!""ft'~ O T.PED TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 980917
~ ~ 1 ~1~G3~ \ ~ C~ / ~ 4. q O CO SEWER CLEAN OUT r, ~ f,, ~ WING FILE ~ iJy~~ ~ R ~y ~a ~ ~ DRA
~ ~ / / \ \ n ~ ` ~ CB STnRM DRAINAGE A a o e ~ ) CONST4
. / / \ Q a Q ~ ~ \ ? H BASIN CATC
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~1 ° 1 ~ 1 E,C f.N. / ~ \ ~ ~ - ! 4 F ' <..°1',« R" ; T•'~'"~ ` ~ DI DRAINAGE INLET
W / / ~ ~ . ~ 18 RCP / ~
1....=L~. t" .r ~3 r3 •~+f< rC. D4 WV WATER VALVE dr +lr +b w
~ ~ N. ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti • ~ ~ \ \ ~ / / ~ h a © GV GAS VALVE
/ i / \ / o/ ~ n , SIGN GENERAL SIGN Q +~+~+~+~~i 1~ 'ir z
- EXISTING CONTOURS ~
J _ - 132.56 XISTING SPOT ELEVAliON -
~ / - U
~ ( +i• +i~ e - 32.56 PROPOSED FlNISHED GRADE N ~ v I ~ ~ w
~ ~ y ~ ~ 1 m Q ~ y / 132 - PROPOSED CONTOURS 1 w~
b \ - I .ptiti TREE - DECIDEOUS
\ - ( I 1 I ~ ~ I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ JOSEPH B. RAMSEY ~ ~ II , _
~ 2 ~ i , ~ W p~ , I , TREE CONIFER LI~~ . W
~ ~ V DS ARfA V , - s 'rt, I I I AREA LIGHT POLE ~
1 ~ ~ ~ 1 e I I ~A I Xj a I o
~ a. i ? ~ 1 -R 9
~ ~ A " ~lr y..t, Ua'Tt~l, a f~ _
~ o [tit ~ ~ \ ~M I I , ~i~' .l~- I' • - Certiflcatlon by the Department of Planning a
' ~ ' - : y~~ U~~~'Q- ~ and Development that this Construction Plat z ~ ~'a e?~ was approved by the Clty Planning Board on
a ~ a ' ' ~ lil% Y ~ ~ \ D a I C~ I A A ~ do of 20_. o:w>-w-ozrn ~A ~ _ y
~ Q I , . , I ~ Z o~ c, I K~ ~ r= ,w. ~
m `~w VI~~ I~~ 0 I I D ? I ~ I I a~ I ° Director
S ~ o I I~ ~
~ ~ \ ~ ~ I I \ ~ II ~ I ~ ~o I I
a , g~ ~ ` d I I g ~ . \ I ~ z ~E ~ I I~ 1. MASTER PLAN shown hereon la sub to: rb~ St r
i? ~ ~ ~ J~ ~ . O A Clt of Rocky Mount Review and Approval e~ 12 This Is a Master Plon and la NOT to be used for RECORDATION, ~ I td. G~ .
, ~ ~ B NCDOT Review and royal i~ 4 I Ilneat p r~ ~ „ONVEYANCE or SALES. 5• ~ C 40 Wet and De on
a ~ ~ ( ~ ~ y. r 1 13. All Right-of-ways are Public JoYN~A, Key ~ AssoaAt~s 3 Y D Field Topog aph cal Survey unless noted otherwise.
, , ~ a ~ , _ ~ ~ I I, ~,,y V 2. Street conatructlon shall conform to the requirements of the re t Co-ner Radii = 20' unless noted otherwise Measurements are LAND PLANNING k SUAVEI1NG O NCD T an rds and S ecificotlone for Roadwa and Structures 14. Ste ~ ,1,, ~ 0 St da p Y ~ to P.I.) P.o. eoz TS33, 7os N. PEARL ST.
1990, latent revision. ROgfY MOUNT N.C. 27804
m ~ ~ ~ _ . l A~ x 3. T o hlc Data taken from CRM TOPO MAPS. Contour Interval la 2'. 15. Aron computed by coordinate method. (2sz 9n-J124 vdcE A~ " ~ aD 9rop 16. Ail distances are chord. a , ~ ~ ~ c Reference Datum is based on Meon Sea level. ~ t7, 100 Indicates Address. (2s) ea5-eo2a rAz
~ 4o DdN EASEMd~1T I -tom ~ 1+~ I~ I~ ~ 4. 8oun Information taken from ma entitled Pro ert of Octavla S. ~
~ , ~ 1 '~`'y ~ ~ p p y 18. This ma does not depk:t encumbrances that are found during a thorough ~ Raper b Jo er, Keen , do Associates dated 3/27/89. p ~ n1 ~ title search. 5. Minimum Lot Slze 6 000 S . Ft.
- ~ T ' q 19. Surveyor DID NOT visibly see any cemeteries in any open areas ~ ~i I 6. 404 Wetlands, HAVE NOT been determined on thin property.
~ SO1'40'Si ~ ~ ' +Ir ±lr 7. A complete and thorough Survey and Soil Evaluation is required unless atherwlae noted. ~r ~ . 20. location of Underground Uttlities oro APPROXIMATE and must be field
and recommended before purohoaing or developing Lots. ~ at..i.~ t~_ann_a3~_aoaol.
~ ) ~~~i/? ~~Gk ~ J 7~ ~ XX~ ' N ~ NIr T4 8. Lot Dimensions shown are approximate. YO""°" "yy y' ` 21. Joyner-Keen & Associates can only locate utilities that are above
H C I O MAPLE J. 9. Electric Power is proposed to be placed UNDERGROUND. shown hereon are ~ 10. NCOOT prohibits the use of plastic -ulvert and drainage pipe, the gro~nd at the
NQ> or as time reported orted field b survey. various responsible onalble lines artier. construction of busk heodA ..y entrances, masonry light and app p y p p 22. Surveyor does NOT guarantee that any underground structures such as
11 l nt ~ ~ man box supports (I.e. ermonent structure) within the Right of Way. utilities, tanks, and pipes are located hereon.
100 0 100 200 300 Ali' Co + 11. Contractor Do not lace or run heavy equipment ment across proposed 23. Legal Reference: Being a port!an of that property described in Deed Book p aQ p proP 1389 Page 352, Stoney Creek Township, Nash County Registry.
(7) I N N 1f droinfield areas. Likewise, these areas are not to be borrowed from or filled.
CO II BETTY DANIEL HEIRS N E T N CY) Ql IV11E
JOSEPH M. BATTLE I I l LS - t
Scale 1 100 = a ~I