The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20200023 Ver 1_PCN Application_20200106O vlli::� Y Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑X Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑X Yes ❑ No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ❑X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Sagewood - Phase 4 & 5 2b. County: Pitt 2c. Nearest municipality / town: City of Greenville 2d. Subdivision name: Sagewood 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Bill Clark Homes of Greeneville, LLC 3b. Deed Book and Page No. DB 3461, PG 502 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): Landon Weaver 3d. Street address: 200 E. Arlington Blvd 3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27858 3f. Telephone no.: 252-317-0940 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: (weaver@billclarkhomes.com Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Richard A. Brown, PE 5b. Business name (if applicable): Stroud Engineering, PA 5c. Street address: 107E Commerce Street 5d. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27858 5e. Telephone no.: 252-756-9352 ext 233 5f. Fax no.: 252-756-2345 5g. Email address: rbrown@stroudengineer.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 83356 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.51 Longitude: 77.31 1 c. Property size: 11.15 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Indian Well Swamp 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The existing parcels are currently used as farmland and a portion is wooded. The adjacent properties are primarily residential or agricultural in nature. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,677 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Single Family Residential Development, utilizing 20 ton dump trucks, excavators, dozers, etc. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This is a single family residential development, which will require a road and utilities to cross existing WOTUS in two places and a pond discharge. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases in the past? ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑X Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Kyle Barnes and Jonas Hill 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Phase 1 of Sagewood had an impact. A NW 46 (impact was within floodplain) was issued by Krystynka Stygar.(28 LF OF IMPACT WAS PERMITTED) 0 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑X Yes ❑ No 6b. If yes, explain. The project is currently proposed to be constructed in five phases and will continue as long as the economy supports the development. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P Culvert Unknown INT Corps 4.42 59.25 S2 P Culvert Unknown INT Corps 3.96 61.58 S3 - Choose one S4 - Choose one S5 - Choose one S6 - Choose one 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 120.83 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 Choose one Choose O2 - Choose one Choose 03 - Choose one Choose 04 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number — Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B 1 Yes/No B2 - Yes/No B3 - Yes/No B4 - Yes/No B5 - Yes/No B6 - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed roads cross the wetlands at right angles, or as near to that as practically possible. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Large enough equipment will be used such that the disturbance to the wetlands will be minimized during construction and the equipment will be able to stay away from the wetlands as much as possible. Appropriate Erosion and Sedimentation control measures will be installed to prevent sedimentation within the stream. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank El Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑X No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes X❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 32 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑X Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The subdivision proposes dry detention (3 basins) to attenuate the 1, 5 and 10 year events. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? City of Greenville 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? City of Greenville ❑X Phase II ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑X Other: City of Greenville 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑X No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ❑X No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. The lots are serviced by public sewer provided by Greenville Utilities Commission Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑X Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑X Yes ❑ No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? US Fish and Wildlife Service, IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation, Regulatory Documents (http://crithab.fws.gov/ipac/gettingStarted/index) 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? US Fish and Wildlife 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Verified that no historic or archeological resources were listed for the property on the interactive NCSHPO HPOWEB GIS Services. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑X No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Flood Insurance Rate Map Landon Weaver Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided. Page 10 of 10 Soil Map —Pitt County, North Carolina 3 289830 2B9900 35' 31'5'N� 35' 30' 33" N 28UW 2a3B30 2E9900 290000 290100 3 m - MapScale: 1:4,690 if pined on A por6aR (8.5" x 11'j sheet N Metes 0 50 101 Z00 301 0 200 400 800 1200Feet Map projediorl: Web Mer ator Corneraoordlnahs: WGS84 Edge tim: UfM Zone 18N WGS84 t m Natural Resources Web Soil Survey -mm Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 35' 31' V N I I 11/19/2019 Page 1 of 3 Soil Map —Pitt County, North Carolina MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) -A Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest (AOI) ad Stony Spot Y 1:15,800. Soils Very Stony Spot Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Wet Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause ,y Soil Map Unit Lines misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil p Other line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of Soil Map Unit Points Special Line Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed Special Point Features scale. (� Blowout Water Features Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map ® Borrow Pit measurements. Transportation Clay Spot 1 ► Rails Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Closed Depression Web Soil Survey URL: �y Interstate Highways Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Gravel Pit ry US Routes Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator • Gravelly Spot Major Roads projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the a Landfill Local Roads Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more ■ Lava Flow accurate calculations of distance or area are required. 7L Background 46 Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. R Mine or Quarry Soil Survey Area: Pitt County, North Carolina a Miscellaneous Water Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 16, 2019 Q Perennial Water Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales V Rock Outcrop 1:50,000 or larger. + saline spot Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 20, 2015—May 15, 2017 Sandy Spot • • The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Severely Eroded Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor 0 Sinkhole shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Slide or Slip Sodic Spot I,,. Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/19/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map —Pitt County, North Carolina Map Unit Legend Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Map Unit Symbol By Byars loam 13.4 23.1 % ExA Exum fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 24.8 42.8 % ExB Exum fine sandy loam, 1 to percent slopes 111.2 19.4 % GoA Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0.7 1.2 % Ly Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast Flatwoods 4.8 8.3 % Re Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast Flatwoods 2.2 3.9 % Ro Roanoke silt loam 0.8 1.3 % Totals for Area of Interest 57.8 100.0 % LEDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/19/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 r J&D WALKER PROPERTIES D.B. PARCEL O6 6 9 7 9MP�N (> F � w ZONING: RA JAMES COWARD �P�EFL 41N��P�� ti6 o,Y?o 'Ic' pQ D.B. 0 43 PG. 397 eWG vaP�O\oNP��y\ ' °�1 WWDo Ski PARCEL 28724 A 20' F ��0�'''/ 51 z0fu _ ZONING: RA F� ONEOWE� P' Of 00 ae \l SE / tr /0 00 \ xLd > TO .0 N0000 ` - z°zZ 00— NO 50' R/w GUC INDIAN WELL \ \�� ' ,° / x�0uLnC 11' 28' B-B 11 PUMP STATION SITE ,-\��\ N6�g9� �� / GES'' �o uz00-06 NQ PAVING I \ �..� (\ � \ �ceN ON N� Y Q I DETERMINEDTB�NCBR TO BEST 5 WALK 1 ��'' .�'�'�� Vic•/ �SPOMF Q Wa- NO / u 2: \ t� Z / n J L� Lij Z W W 2:1 a Per t. ," PER FT. SLOPE r ft. I �� / <\ 86) SF —�_ : 4 —� M—! ( �� 9A `. AlcloL T T 6" THICK SIDEWALK O 0 3'-0" X 0'-4" '�� \\ «�♦ �D � CABC UNDER CURB 0 0, 24" CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER c\ /-'' : l Z o,\ \\ \\ � G �' �. ( ROLL TYPE) CITY STD. 41 1 .02 \r\E�p\�� y F� Fed / r' Q�G �'.\\�'v `��, u', ��'� BOO ltll p _ S15° 00'26"W TYPICAL STREET SECTION y L°SF �'' �� '•`` 13) co 157.23' AC MILL ACRES, LLC ��1 /' '� / �p1` \ o� \\ �% D.B.2357 PG. 281 1 r f -<' ��\\\ % N,•� PARCEL 23121 l C QPJ�O /. ' .' ik� \ /- 1 '%% ZONING: RA N / ' , r' /- ' p ( (b( \ 12) \ �y \ G �J \ \\ � ♦ f 96 �0 \A G` - \ 6A g1 \\ , S10° 53'47"W oo�oN\� 11) \ N gg �',\\ ♦ j i 108.00, N /''' ♦ s% -(/ EFL � \ 5 � . \\� \ E- a a�5 /'"/�'' ' / '' \ �P�G tIPMP,\� \ �10) �}. 0 2 /' f ` s A\ \EFL \ i \ \ •, 1 \ 1 Z "' N626�O r'' ''i%� R3 \OEpv1� �P /� \ \ \ �8 )\JFICI II / 0, \ I 1 m /'' � ' E �' \ \ 9,' \ \ �FEL\ ` /till itVN ''' ✓� �% �o \ �9 o �G \ 8) \ jgg \ F PSG \ i l/ �� 1 \ �'�3 i p S13° 31'47"W // / 17 8.8 4' v�i QPGC g \ \ 1J11 12�•,\\ \\\ \ \ 0 �yMNv \Cs�'g\\G �, �: �% ��ii i \ 9i) ' 1 \ 1_ U, ',��•' -�� /' \ Bg� g°oo� 21)P \ E \N �o \�.,\ \\\, \ /4) �5�\ \\ \`��\ 1\1''�\ MAC ROSS RUTH FORREST ,' .'f \ \ 2 0 \�� ! \\�•� \\ D.B. A1009 G. 4354 l �, S ♦ \ /,�'. . `\ / / \ 111 •�1', PARCEL ZONING RA 83 D.B. 112 PG. 238 ' \ \ �\ �° F�F SF �•\`\\ ♦ \\ \ . -� \ o ` \\�1•• -\ m 1 w PARCEL 05060 4)/10) ZONING: RA ' \ \ \J62 \0 1) / ,.p / \ / \ O / \ 1 , ♦ I i / \ \\ NO, ERVIN WILLIAMS / " ,' ,,', ,,'" \ \ \ .) \ 4 69 SF �� \ 2) F �; ?�' \ / / \ 111 \\\;,\ D.B. 281 PG. 349 i'�'�' \ -� \ \ ix�p`b A °° • IAg S�" I� /' /11) \ `Y / \24) \ n 1 \11;� ` \ 1',,1► PARCEL 24997 / ° 1 ZONING RA ,` \ \ 5F ♦ / �� iC\I , \32)`I 1` W \ \ 2) \ �� Q�' , \��' ` �\ \�' E`EcSR 1 u 1 1\\+� ` /_/ 1 \`11` N° Cyv 1`\1 F\ q ` 72 \ 00 in 71 °� r �,�' �'/12) \ `\ a \ / , 1\ \11 ,-111 !','EASE ` `�)V. \ - O 0 i ♦ \\ \ F' a \ - �- �1� 0 \ \I• \ . �\ ♦ R\ \ / / - \I 111 ; \11', ` T i I,;' i o� 74 (3.z F \\ �� /� `�'; �♦ \ o �22)1\;' I �J \ 13) \ \ -s Z - ° 5�0�`� Zc,O SF / : �,\ ;•s �, `,�16 61 / / \� + ! \ \\ , �2 7) \u + , o /41 6,��9 /141,\ \\ �� 21) 1 OBE° \p`I o n 1� 143 sF 1;11, 62 1 \`� 11 / \\ ,� \ Sb VED 1 ,. G x EPK AT CENTERLINE O 12'$5 s SF SF ,+1 1\ tQtl 11,455 SF REMD 1 \\ yW - INTERSECTION OF NC i ' r.`5 \ F 76 63 g18 \ 11.7g1 tee;\ 1 \I —�` ► Ilti, �- d� �' , 30"CMP " ✓ roL \rp SF 15, - INV = 42.1 HIGHWAY 43 8 IVY ROAD \ 30 — h 1 b �r u / o hP ��h1a'1�2 / �1_5i �l �,1, lit �2_O) 112 o sF ` li\ � �o;a6a sF \,\ \ w 10.841 SF 1I II 12,419 SF I,- N � 2 2 , 015 S F �c^��c� 530 4 — Nil ° �y 65 \5 16 --- �,I u�Kl�' / I SF 10'WATERLINE � 0�6 f 66 83Z SF \ �/ �� 15 961 'EASEMENT 1� I 10'ELECTRIC \29) 1 °I1 - 4 \36) �6 �2' - " I(�y. , 1 II EASEMENT 1 111 1 C� 12.757 SF �' 67 ALn SF 6 oSF j \17) ++';� III I /18) / 1 13.512 SF 1 1 Illii __I�' 1 ,'' '' \ ♦ / O F 98 ��' 11.865 5F l�j 1 It \ / \ 1 1 — I 41 0 2 _ — — _ i it STJ LELAND RAY SPAIN, Jr. I 59 ''" 14.a6o SF G \ 6 SF i 1 11 I ) 71u � n 0? D.B. 435 PG. 749 - I, 18,406 SF I / 58 \ A.51 I I TT 1 \19 S /�� 1+� PUASE_\ 2 PARCEL 05069 I ° �, I 68 / / F -- �r 13.330 \30) 1 1 ZONING: RA I ;—__y 1 o Q5 SF 57\6 __-- �1 \\ 1 Illi 11.431 SF\37) `lJ------------- I 13.698 SF ; I — _ _ — 56 'Q "��--��L7�7 ��: `"`��\�_ ,,I ; IM \38) 00 y \ d �`� �� ---________'' II 1 11;±� 11.538 SF II HARRELL NORMAN &1�✓ - --- 11� a IJ LYDIA BRYANT WEATHERSBY Irp/ \ n� 55 12'1 QED 2 46)�2'�' _��b.-----P1s _------ \ t-Y_II' 2868 PG. 828 1 C SF FOR SHO - • SF J� `1 �.A _ __ �- 1 1 -1-- D.B. PARCEL 50132 I h / �tll 54 �I C1- Z717'L7` /3g1— ZONING RA 80 ��O1AA \Z, 1�,z �45) `�1"� `�V �1'�=L117I 1 I+� L_� I I ___� O SF 5, _ I �7�1 �� 1 �I I cn �� / Il,yr m 11.528 SF L o 15,069 SF I10'ELECTRIC II,� o ...... ......_, _ ,_ WATERS OF THE US I �� I / EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY I 192g8 ♦ �'� ✓� 479500 I — — — — — I 3°I /13896 SF / EASEMENTS 48 /\4-3� ) I 41� ) III , m8° 8`, 1 5 SF MATCHLINE NO3° 21'59"E 5 F 50 1,S7.65 SF MINIMUM BUILDING LINE 1.87' 49 w----- - - - - -- A6 17,085 N —•--------- 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE �I ' �s `` OP 2• I II -- "� ' 8 2 F MEMEMEMEMEM PHASE LINE N09°06'49"W i 1 50° S 11 51 'So0 �; / 2\8 �11 DRAIN PIPES 99.51' 1 %(3 51 SF \ Oi; '" N WATER L I NE o 5283 F �O�PGE i /� _ ii 566 86 19 1 i SILT FENCE 1 \ .� SF p• tOSFM �% = !' TEMPORARY GRAVEL N12°47'19"W ' S°° 53 G FP %!: - i'i' ' HAMMERHEAD 99.92' 1 1°• �Rl =� �' !% (g" ABC STONE) TYPE 1 \p'EMEN� SF j 025 ! % 20' X 120` TOTAL BARRICADE LEGEND AC - ACRE GUC - GREENVILLE UTILITIES ABC - AGGREGATE BASE COMMISSION COURSE INV - INVERT BB - BACK TO BACK LF - LINEAR FEET BC - BACK OF CURB MAX - MAXIMUM CF - CUBIC FEET MBL - MINIMUM BUILDING LINE CL - CENTERLINE MH - MANHOLE CB - CATCH BASIN MIN - MINIMUM DBL - DOUBLE NTS - NOT TO SCALE DI - DROP INLET OS - OUTLET STRUCTURE DIP - DUCTILE IRON PIPE P - PIPE EL - ELEVATION R - RADIUS EIR - EX. IRON ROD RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE EOP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY EPWC - EASTERN PINES WATER SDMH - STORMDRAIN MANHOLE CORP SH - SHEET EX - EXISTING SIR - SET IRON ROD FE - FINISHED ELEVATION STA - STATION FES - FLARED END SECTION TC - TOP OF CURB FH - FIRE HYDRANT TEL - TELEPHONE FT - FEET TYP - TYPICAL GV - GATE VALVE 1 JEFFREY GRABOWSKI�- D.B. 3226 PG. 856238 \ 84 1 PARCEL 23083 ♦ SF- \ ZONING: R-9S PEEP 3 / JOHNNIE M. SMITH _ N16° 51'52"W \ ` ��NEP D.B. 112 PG. 238 / 100.12' \ , O z �E�N,pN�g SF PARCEL 44120 / r 6 / SF ZONING: RA/ N22° 43'38"W 100.15' \, \ 20 � / / 102g 8 AMP E�N� SrARO �ONO F-A / 1`� �\aPMM PSG � / ��pnnnrprrrrr N20° 44'37"W / ' z I S` \ 5 146.38' \ / \ / / z 36a� _ \ CZ \ ERNEST GREGORY WILLIAMS DPARCEL 44246 ZONING RA �' BARD P• ��`' 100 50 0 100 200 \ / / 10 ONO" PROJECT NO.:P1545-SEC 4&5 \ GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=100' Z DRAWING NO.: 001 �? / �`\ � / RICHARD A. BROWN, P.E. CP2017-0026 PARCEL NUMBERS 23083, 02247 AND 46270 BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) O O D (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! R E V I S I O N S r J&D WALKER PROPERTIES D.B. PARCEL O6 6 9 7 9MP�N (> F � w ZONING: RA JAMES COWARD �P�EFL 41N��P�� ti6 o,Y?o 'Ic' pQ D.B. 0 43 PG. 397 eWG vaP�O\oNP��y\ ' °�1 WWDo Ski PARCEL 28724 A 20' F ��0�'''/ 51 z0fu _ ZONING: RA F� ONEOWE� P' Of 00 ae \l SE / tr /0 00 \ xLd > TO .0 N0000 ` - z°zZ 00— NO 50' R/w GUC INDIAN WELL \ \�� ' ,° / x�0uLnC 11' 28' B-B 11 PUMP STATION SITE ,-\��\ N6�g9� �� / GES'' �o uz00-06 NQ PAVING I \ �..� (\ � \ �ceN ON N� Y Q I DETERMINEDTB�NCBR TO BEST 5 WALK 1 ��'' .�'�'�� Vic•/ �SPOMF Q Wa- NO / u 2: \ t� Z / n J L� Lij Z W W 2:1 a Per t. ," PER FT. SLOPE r ft. I �� / <\ 86) SF —�_ : 4 —� M—! ( �� 9A `. AlcloL T T 6" THICK SIDEWALK O 0 3'-0" X 0'-4" '�� \\ «�♦ �D � CABC UNDER CURB 0 0, 24" CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER c\ /-'' : l Z o,\ \\ \\ � G �' �. ( ROLL TYPE) CITY STD. 41 1 .02 \r\E�p\�� y F� Fed / r' Q�G �'.\\�'v `��, u', ��'� BOO ltll p _ S15° 00'26"W TYPICAL STREET SECTION y L°SF �'' �� '•`` 13) co 157.23' AC MILL ACRES, LLC ��1 /' '� / �p1` \ o� \\ �% D.B.2357 PG. 281 1 r f -<' ��\\\ % N,•� PARCEL 23121 l C QPJ�O /. ' .' ik� \ /- 1 '%% ZONING: RA N / ' , r' /- ' p ( (b( \ 12) \ �y \ G �J \ \\ � ♦ f 96 �0 \A G` - \ 6A g1 \\ , S10° 53'47"W oo�oN\� 11) \ N gg �',\\ ♦ j i 108.00, N /''' ♦ s% -(/ EFL � \ 5 � . \\� \ E- a a�5 /'"/�'' ' / '' \ �P�G tIPMP,\� \ �10) �}. 0 2 /' f ` s A\ \EFL \ i \ \ •, 1 \ 1 Z "' N626�O r'' ''i%� R3 \OEpv1� �P /� \ \ \ �8 )\JFICI II / 0, \ I 1 m /'' � ' E �' \ \ 9,' \ \ �FEL\ ` /till itVN ''' ✓� �% �o \ �9 o �G \ 8) \ jgg \ F PSG \ i l/ �� 1 \ �'�3 i p S13° 31'47"W // / 17 8.8 4' v�i QPGC g \ \ 1J11 12�•,\\ \\\ \ \ 0 �yMNv \Cs�'g\\G �, �: �% ��ii i \ 9i) ' 1 \ 1_ U, ',��•' -�� /' \ Bg� g°oo� 21)P \ E \N �o \�.,\ \\\, \ /4) �5�\ \\ \`��\ 1\1''�\ MAC ROSS RUTH FORREST ,' .'f \ \ 2 0 \�� ! \\�•� \\ D.B. A1009 G. 4354 l �, S ♦ \ /,�'. . `\ / / \ 111 •�1', PARCEL ZONING RA 83 D.B. 112 PG. 238 ' \ \ �\ �° F�F SF �•\`\\ ♦ \\ \ . -� \ o ` \\�1•• -\ m 1 w PARCEL 05060 4)/10) ZONING: RA ' \ \ \J62 \0 1) / ,.p / \ / \ O / \ 1 , ♦ I i / \ \\ NO, ERVIN WILLIAMS / " ,' ,,', ,,'" \ \ \ .) \ 4 69 SF �� \ 2) F �; ?�' \ / / \ 111 \\\;,\ D.B. 281 PG. 349 i'�'�' \ -� \ \ ix�p`b A °° • IAg S�" I� /' /11) \ `Y / \24) \ n 1 \11;� ` \ 1',,1► PARCEL 24997 / ° 1 ZONING RA ,` \ \ 5F ♦ / �� iC\I , \32)`I 1` W \ \ 2) \ �� Q�' , \��' ` �\ \�' E`EcSR 1 u 1 1\\+� ` /_/ 1 \`11` N° Cyv 1`\1 F\ q ` 72 \ 00 in 71 °� r �,�' �'/12) \ `\ a \ / , 1\ \11 ,-111 !','EASE ` `�)V. \ - O 0 i ♦ \\ \ F' a \ - �- �1� 0 \ \I• \ . �\ ♦ R\ \ / / - \I 111 ; \11', ` T i I,;' i o� 74 (3.z F \\ �� /� `�'; �♦ \ o �22)1\;' I �J \ 13) \ \ -s Z - ° 5�0�`� Zc,O SF / : �,\ ;•s �, `,�16 61 / / \� + ! \ \\ , �2 7) \u + , o /41 6,��9 /141,\ \\ �� 21) 1 OBE° \p`I o n 1� 143 sF 1;11, 62 1 \`� 11 / \\ ,� \ Sb VED 1 ,. G x EPK AT CENTERLINE O 12'$5 s SF SF ,+1 1\ tQtl 11,455 SF REMD 1 \\ yW - INTERSECTION OF NC i ' r.`5 \ F 76 63 g18 \ 11.7g1 tee;\ 1 \I —�` ► Ilti, �- d� �' , 30"CMP " ✓ roL \rp SF 15, - INV = 42.1 HIGHWAY 43 8 IVY ROAD \ 30 — h 1 b �r u / o hP ��h1a'1�2 / �1_5i �l �,1, lit �2_O) 112 o sF ` li\ � �o;a6a sF \,\ \ w 10.841 SF 1I II 12,419 SF I,- N � 2 2 , 015 S F �c^��c� 530 4 — Nil ° �y 65 \5 16 --- �,I u�Kl�' / I SF 10'WATERLINE � 0�6 f 66 83Z SF \ �/ �� 15 961 'EASEMENT 1� I 10'ELECTRIC \29) 1 °I1 - 4 \36) �6 �2' - " I(�y. , 1 II EASEMENT 1 111 1 C� 12.757 SF �' 67 ALn SF 6 oSF j \17) ++';� III I /18) / 1 13.512 SF 1 1 Illii __I�' 1 ,'' '' \ ♦ / O F 98 ��' 11.865 5F l�j 1 It \ / \ 1 1 — I 41 0 2 _ — — _ i it STJ LELAND RAY SPAIN, Jr. I 59 ''" 14.a6o SF G \ 6 SF i 1 11 I ) 71u � n 0? D.B. 435 PG. 749 - I, 18,406 SF I / 58 \ A.51 I I TT 1 \19 S /�� 1+� PUASE_\ 2 PARCEL 05069 I ° �, I 68 / / F -- �r 13.330 \30) 1 1 ZONING: RA I ;—__y 1 o Q5 SF 57\6 __-- �1 \\ 1 Illi 11.431 SF\37) `lJ------------- I 13.698 SF ; I — _ _ — 56 'Q "��--��L7�7 ��: `"`��\�_ ,,I ; IM \38) 00 y \ d �`� �� ---________'' II 1 11;±� 11.538 SF II HARRELL NORMAN &1�✓ - --- 11� a IJ LYDIA BRYANT WEATHERSBY Irp/ \ n� 55 12'1 QED 2 46)�2'�' _��b.-----P1s _------ \ t-Y_II' 2868 PG. 828 1 C SF FOR SHO - • SF J� `1 �.A _ __ �- 1 1 -1-- D.B. PARCEL 50132 I h / �tll 54 �I C1- Z717'L7` /3g1— ZONING RA 80 ��O1AA \Z, 1�,z �45) `�1"� `�V �1'�=L117I 1 I+� L_� I I ___� O SF 5, _ I �7�1 �� 1 �I I cn �� / Il,yr m 11.528 SF L o 15,069 SF I10'ELECTRIC II,� o ...... ......_, _ ,_ WATERS OF THE US I �� I / EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY I 192g8 ♦ �'� ✓� 479500 I — — — — — I 3°I /13896 SF / EASEMENTS 48 /\4-3� ) I 41� ) III , m8° 8`, 1 5 SF MATCHLINE NO3° 21'59"E 5 F 50 1,S7.65 SF MINIMUM BUILDING LINE 1.87' 49 w----- - - - - -- A6 17,085 N —•--------- 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE �I ' �s `` OP 2• I II -- "� ' 8 2 F MEMEMEMEMEM PHASE LINE N09°06'49"W i 1 50° S 11 51 'So0 �; / 2\8 �11 DRAIN PIPES 99.51' 1 %(3 51 SF \ Oi; '" N WATER L I NE o 5283 F �O�PGE i /� _ ii 566 86 19 1 i SILT FENCE 1 \ .� SF p• tOSFM �% = !' TEMPORARY GRAVEL N12°47'19"W ' S°° 53 G FP %!: - i'i' ' HAMMERHEAD 99.92' 1 1°• �Rl =� �' !% (g" ABC STONE) TYPE 1 \p'EMEN� SF j 025 ! % 20' X 120` TOTAL BARRICADE LEGEND AC - ACRE GUC - GREENVILLE UTILITIES ABC - AGGREGATE BASE COMMISSION COURSE INV - INVERT BB - BACK TO BACK LF - LINEAR FEET BC - BACK OF CURB MAX - MAXIMUM CF - CUBIC FEET MBL - MINIMUM BUILDING LINE CL - CENTERLINE MH - MANHOLE CB - CATCH BASIN MIN - MINIMUM DBL - DOUBLE NTS - NOT TO SCALE DI - DROP INLET OS - OUTLET STRUCTURE DIP - DUCTILE IRON PIPE P - PIPE EL - ELEVATION R - RADIUS EIR - EX. IRON ROD RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE EOP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY EPWC - EASTERN PINES WATER SDMH - STORMDRAIN MANHOLE CORP SH - SHEET EX - EXISTING SIR - SET IRON ROD FE - FINISHED ELEVATION STA - STATION FES - FLARED END SECTION TC - TOP OF CURB FH - FIRE HYDRANT TEL - TELEPHONE FT - FEET TYP - TYPICAL GV - GATE VALVE 1 JEFFREY GRABOWSKI�- D.B. 3226 PG. 856238 \ 84 1 PARCEL 23083 ♦ SF- \ ZONING: R-9S PEEP 3 / JOHNNIE M. SMITH _ N16° 51'52"W \ ` ��NEP D.B. 112 PG. 238 / 100.12' \ , O z �E�N,pN�g SF PARCEL 44120 / r 6 / SF ZONING: RA/ N22° 43'38"W 100.15' \, \ 20 � / / 102g 8 AMP E�N� SrARO �ONO F-A / 1`� �\aPMM PSG � / ��pnnnrprrrrr N20° 44'37"W / ' z I S` \ 5 146.38' \ / \ / / z 36a� _ \ CZ \ ERNEST GREGORY WILLIAMS DPARCEL 44246 ZONING RA �' BARD P• ��`' 100 50 0 100 200 \ / / 10 ONO" PROJECT NO.:P1545-SEC 4&5 \ GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=100' Z DRAWING NO.: 001 �? / �`\ � / RICHARD A. BROWN, P.E. CP2017-0026 PARCEL NUMBERS 23083, 02247 AND 46270 BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) O O D (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! R E V I S I O N S u:s. 4µ•'�` United States Department of the Interior Fes$ $ME$ g Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE #trt a.iA 551 PYLON DRIVE, SUITE F RALEIGH, NC 27606 PHONE: (919)856-4520 FAX: (919)856-4556 Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2016-SLI-0211 Event Code: 04EN2000-2016-E-00453 Project Name: Sagewood Subdivision January 05, 2016 Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized, funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the web site often for updated information or changes If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys. If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles. Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://www. fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://www.towerkill.com; and htW://www. fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html. Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7 consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at john_ellis@fws.gov. Attachment 2 United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sagewood Subdivision Official Species List Provided by: Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office POST OFFICE BOX 33726 RALEIGH, NC 27636 (919) 856-4520 Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2016-SLI-0211 Event Code: 04EN2000-2016-E-00453 Project Type: DEVELOPMENT Project Name: Sagewood Subdivision Project Description: 36 acres single family subdivision with public utilities. Request being made to complete the USACE PCN for a waters of the US road crossing. Project to begin construction in the early spring 2016 Please Note: The FWS office may have modified the Project Name and/or Project Description, so it may be different from what was submitted in your previous request. If the Consultation Code matches, the FWS considers this to be the same project. Contact the office in the 'Provided by' section of your previous Official Species list if you have any questions or concerns. http://ecos.fvvs.gov/ipac, 01/05/2016 12:53 PM 1 / IIlY5II.L. United States Department of Interior T. Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sagewood Subdivision Project Location Map: Not Available Project Coordinates: MULTIPOLYGON (((-77.31598377227783 35.51393268452484, - 77.31279730796814 35.51569673046739,-77.31289386749268 35.51498937016546, - 77.31231451034546 35.51369689326903,-77.31203556060791 35.51317291022124, - 77.31193900108337 35.51233453023172,-77.31311917304993 35.51213366705925, - 77.31397747993468 35.51223846529889,-77.31762528419495 35.51035207605711, - 77.31831192970276 35.511758138910636,-77.31775403022766 35.51196773623342, - 77.31810808181763 35.51259652491886,-77.31598377227783 35.51393268452484))) Project Counties: Pitt, NC http://ecos.fvvs.gov/ipac, 01/05/2016 12:53 PM 2 / IIlY5II.L. United States Department of Interior T. Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sagewood Subdivision Endangered Species Act Species List There are a total of 5 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your project area section further below for critical habitat that lies within your project. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. Birds Status Has Critical Habitat Condition(s) Red -Cockaded woodpecker (Picoides Endangered borealis) Population: Entire Clams Tar River spinymussel (Elliptio Endangered steinstansana) Population: Entire Fishes Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser Endangered oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) Population: Carolina DPS Shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser Endangered brevirostrum) Population: Entire Mammals West Indian Manatee (Trichechus Endangered Final designated manatus) Population: Entire http://ecos.fvvs.gov/ipac, 01/05/2016 12:53 PM 3 United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sagewood Subdivision Critical habitats that lie within your project area There are no critical habitats within your project area. http://ecos.fvvs.gov/ipac, 01/05/2016 12:53 PM 3 , ` HpollataL 46adc4rourl d'Y[BAP" � __ � �a��x f r.•'ii{' —(mil � �, ` � •J� � 1 - � � � . r I f lli �i13 .Seardi Results P. Ek. . , � � I . I �� i1, ON