NC0089885_Fact Sheet_20191127

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Fact Sheet
NPDES Permit No. NCO089885
Permit Writer/Email Contact: Derek Denard, [e-mail]
Date: 27Nov2019
Division/Branch: NC Division of Water Resources/Water Quality Permitting Section
Compliance & Expediated Permitting Branch
Fact Sheet Template: Version 28Mar2019
Permitting Action:
❑ Renewal
❑ Renewal with Expansion
0 New Discharge
❑ Modification (Fact Sheet should be tailored to mod request)
See Permit Application Attachment A and additional information Attachments B, C & D.
Complete applicable sections below. If not applicable, enter NA.
1. Basic Facility Information
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Charlotte Metro Office Tower Construction
Applicant Address:
526 S Church Street, EC03T, Charlotte, NC 28202
Facility Address:
510, 518, 522 S College Street and 509, 515, 521, 525, 527 S Tryon
Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Permitted Flow:
0.072 MGD
Facility Type/Waste:
100% Industrial / Groundwater Remediation Discharge (construction
dewatering)
Facility Class:
Grade I Physical Chemical
Treatment Units:
• an 18,500-gallon weir tank
• bag filters (10-micon following by 0.5-micon)
• two (2) 1,500-pound granular activated carbon filters (GAC)
filter vessels
• flow totalizers for Outfalls 001 & 002
• an effluent sample ports for Outfalls 001 & 002
Pretreatment Program (Y/N)
No, not applicable
County:
Mecklenburg
Region
Mooresville
Pagel of 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Briefly describe the proposed permitting action and facility background:
The new NPDES permit will be for discharge of treated groundwater that will be generated from
construction dewatering of a high-rise office building in downtown Charlotte. The development will be
for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Charlotte Metro Office Tower Construction. The site is the location of
historical groundwater contamination including a garment cleaning facility, an automotive sale and repair
facility, and an automotive painting facility. Contaminants are outlined in the sample results attached to
the application.
2. Receiving Waterbody Information:
Receiving Waterbody Information
Outfalls/Receiving Stream(s):
Outfall 001 & 002 / UT to Little Sugar Creek
Stream Segment:
11-137-8
Stream Classification:
C
Drainage Area (m12):
0
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0
30Q2 (cfs):
0
Average Flow (cfs):
0
IWC (% effluent):
100%
303(d) listed/parameter:
Yes, Copper [See attachments E & F]
Subject to TMDL/parameter:
No
Basin/Sub-basin/IfUC:
Catawba, 03-08-34 [030501030102]
USGS Topo Quad:
Charlotte E, NC
3. Effluent Data Summary
No data. New facility. Not applicable. See groundwater data in attached application.
4. Instream Data Summary
Instream sample will not be required.
Instream monitoring may be required in certain situations, for example: 1) to verify model predictions
when model results for instream DO are within 1 mg/l of instream standard at full permitted flow; 2) to
verify model predictions for outfall diffuser; 3) to provide data for future TMDL; 4) based on other
instream concerns. Instream monitoring may be conducted by the Permittee, and there are also
Page 2 of 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Monitoring Coalitions established in several basins that conduct instream sampling for the Permittee (in
which case instream monitoring is waived in the permit as long as coalition membership is maintained).
If applicable, summarize any instream data and what instream monitoring will be proposed for this
permit action: Instream sampling will not be required.
Is this facility a member of a Monitoring Coalition with waived instream monitoring (YIN): N.
Name of Monitoring Coalition: NA.
5. Compliance Summary
Summarize the compliance record with permit effluent limits (past 5 years): New permit, NA.
Summarize the compliance record with aquatic toxicity test limits and any second species test results
(past 5 years): New permit, NA.
Summarize the results from the most recent compliance inspection: New permit, NA.
6. Water Quality -Based Effluent Limitations (WQBELs)
Toxicity Testina Limitations
Permit limits and monitoring requirements for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) have been established in
accordance with Division guidance (per WET Memo, 8/2/1999). Per WET guidance, all NPDES permits
issued to Major facilities or any facility discharging "complex" wastewater (contains anything other than
domestic waste) will contain appropriate WET limits and monitoring requirements, with several
exceptions. The State has received prior EPA approval to use an Alternative WET Test Procedure in
NPDES permits, using single concentration screening tests, with multiple dilution follow-up upon a test
failure.
Describe proposed toxicity test requirement: Acute, Monitor Only; Monthly (Pimephales promelas) 48-
hour static test. [See Section A. (3)].
7. Technology -Based Effluent Limitations (TBELs)
Total Suspended Solids will be limited with 30 mg/L as monthly average limit and 45 mg/L as the Daily
Maximum Limit.
8. Antidegradation Review (New/Expanding Discharge):
The objective of an antidegradation review is to ensure that a new or increased pollutant loading will not
degrade water quality. Permitting actions for new or expanding discharges require an antidegradation
review in accordance with 15A NCAC 213.0201. Each applicant for a new/expanding NPDES permit
must document an effort to consider non -discharge alternatives per 15A NCAC 2H.0105( c)(2). In all
cases, existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing use is
maintained and protected.
Page 3 of 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
If applicable, describe the results of the antidegradation review, including the Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA) and any water quality modeling results: Additional information for the engineering
alternatives analysis (EAA) was received on August 21, 2019, August 30,2019, and September 18, 2019
[See Attachments B, C & D]. Charlotte Water, the Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW), does not
accept groundwater discharges per the City of Charlotte's Sewer Use Ordinance. The Division concurs
that alternatives such as land application of wastewater, infiltration galleries, ex -situ treatment &
injection, and a sewer connection are cost prohibitive and/or technologically infeasible as compared to a
NPDES discharge.
9. Antibacksliding Review
Sections 402(o)(2) and 303(d)(4) of the CWA and federal regulations at 40 CFR 122.44(1) prohibit
backsliding of effluent limitations in NPDES permits. These provisions require effluent limitations in a
reissued permit to be as stringent as those in the previous permit, with some exceptions where limitations
may be relaxed (e.g., based on new information, increases in production may warrant less stringent TBEL
limits, or WQBELs may be less stringent based on updated RPA or dilution).
Are any effluent limitations less stringent than previous permit (YESINO): New permit NA.
If YES, confirm that antibacksliding provisions are not violated. New permit, NA.
10. Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring frequencies for NPDES permitting are established in accordance with the following
regulations and guidance: 1) State Regulation for Surface Water Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B.0500; 2)
NPDES Guidance, Monitoring Frequency for Toxic Substances (7/15/2010 Memo); 3) NPDES Guidance,
Reduced Monitoring Frequencies for Facilities with Superior Compliance (10/22/2012 Memo); 4) Best
Professional Judgement (BPJ). Per US EPA (Interim Guidance, 1996), monitoring requirements are not
considered effluent limitations under Section 402(o) of the Clean Water Act, and therefore anti -
backsliding prohibitions would not be triggered by reductions in monitoring frequencies.
For instream monitoring, refer to Section 4.
11. Electronic Reporting Requirements
The US EPA NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was finalized on December 21, 2015. Effective
December 21, 2016, NPDES regulated facilities are required to submit Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMRs) electronically. Effective December 21, 2020, NPDES regulated facilities will be required to
submit additional NPDES reports electronically. This permit contains the requirements for electronic
reporting, consistent with Federal requirements.
Page 4 of 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
12. Summary of Proposed Permitting Actions:
A. Table. Permit Conditions — Outfalls 001 & 002
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 1
Monthly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
[Parameter Code]
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Locations
Flow (MGD) a
50050
0.072 MGD
Continuous b
Recording b
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
C0530
30.0 mg/L `
45.0 mg/L `
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Turbidity (NTU) 2, f
00070
Monitor & Report 2' f
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
pH (su) 9
00400
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units 9
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Acetone (µg/L) h
81552
2000 µg/L h
2000 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Benzene (µg/L) h
34030
51 µg/L h
51 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Dichlorobromomethane (µg/L) h
32101
17 µg/L
17 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Chloroform (µg/L) h
32106
2000 µg/L
2000 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene (µg/L) h
77093
720 µg/L
720 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Chlorodibromomethane (µg/L) h
34306
21 µg/L h
21 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Naphthalene (µg/L) h
34696
12 µg/L
12 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
sec-Butylbenzene (µg/L) h
77350
Monitor & Report
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Tetrachloroethylene (µg/L) h
34475
3.3 µg/L
3.3 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Trichloroethylene (µg/L) h
39180
30 µg/L
30 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Xylenes (µg/L) h
81551
670 µg/L
670 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
1-Methylnaphthalene (µg/L) h
77418
2.6 µg/L
2.6 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
2-Methylnaphthalene (µg/L) h
77416
85 µg/L
85 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (µg/L) h
C0010
5 µg/L h
5 µg/L h
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Pyrene (µg/L) h
34469
30 µg/L
30 µg/L
2/Month d
Grab e
Effluent
Oil and Grease (mg/L)
00556
Monitor & Report'
2/1\4onth d
Grab e
Effluent
EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM
Total Chromium (µg/L) 3,1
C003
Monitor & Report
2/Month 3 ' d
Grab e
Effluent
Chromium, Hexavalent (µg/L) 3'J
01032
11 µg/L J
16 µg/L J
2/Month 3,d
Grab e
Effluent
Total Copper (µg/L) 3'j'k
C004
7.88 µg/L J
10.47 µg/L J
2/Month 3 ' d
Grab e
Effluent
Total Lead (µg/L) 3,1
C005
2.94 µg/L J
75.49 µg/L J
2/Month 3 ' d
Grab e
Effluent
Total Nickel (µg/L) 3,1
C006
37.33 µg/L J
335.21 µg/L J
2/Month 3 ' d
Grab e
Effluent
Total Zinc (µg/L) 3'1
C009
125.71 µg/L 1
125.71 µg/L 1
2/Month 3 ' d
Grab e
Effluent
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)(mg/L)3'1
00900
Monitor & Report
2/Month 3,d,1
Grab e
Effluent
Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity 5'm
TAA6
Monitor & Report 5'm
Monthly 5,m
Grab e
Effluent
Organics, Total Purgeables (VOCs)
n
e
6,n
76029
Monitor & Report
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
(EPA Method 624) (µg/L)
Base Neutrals & Acids (Semi-VOCs)
n
e
6,n
76028
Monitor &Report
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
(EPA Method 625) (µg/L)
Page 5 of 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Footnotes:
1. The Permittee shall begin submitting Discharge Monitoring Reports electronically using NC DWR's
eDMR application system. See Condition A. (3.).
2. The effluent shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving stream to exceed 50 NTU. If natural
background conditions in the receiving stream (upstream) are greater than 50 NTUs then the effluent
shall not cause an increase in the turbidity of the receiving stream.
3. Effluent hardness sampling should be performed in conjunction with sampling for hardness
dependent metals (Copper, Lead, Nickel, Zinc, Chromium).
4. The Permittee shall sample instream hardness, upstream of the facility's discharge. The sample shall
be representative of the hardness in the receiving stream.
5. Whole Effluent Toxici . (WET): Acute, Monitor Only; Monthly (Pimephales promelas) 48-hour
static test. [See Section A. (3)].
Cnnd1tinns-
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Discharge shall show no evidence as a source for oily film or sheen on the receiving stream.
Basis for Condition:
a. Flow is limited per the design flow of 0.072 MGD.
b. Flow — If >= 10,000 gpd continuous flow monitoring is required. [ 15A NCAC 2B .0505]
c. TSS_ TBEL. Secondary treatment standards/40 CFR 133 / 15A NCAC 2B .0406
d. The monitoring frequency of twice per month (2/month) monitoring is required because of the short
duration of the construction dewatering activities.
e. Grab sampling is required instead of composite because of the nature of sampling a groundwater
remediation system and 15A NAC 2B .0505 (c).
f. Turbidity — Groundwater facilities have potential to discharge turbid effluents. Considering that North
Carolina has established standards for Turbidity in accord with receiving -stream classification,
monitoring and permit limits are deemed appropriate to evaluate effluent compliance for freshwater
[NCAC 02B. 0211(21). Turbidity monitoring was included along with Footnote 2.
g. pH — WQBEL. State WQ standard, 15A NCAC 2B .0200
h. Organochlorine Pesticides by GC/ECD EPA Method 808113, Semi -volatile Organic Compounds by
GC/MS EPA Method 8270D, Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS was used to analyze
groundwater. Analysis for VOCs/Semi-VOCs serve to identify a comprehensive list of potential
contaminants at new facilities, or to identify parameters of concern (POCs) during GW-REM site
assessment. Monitoring well data were provided in the application (see factsheet Attachment A)
indicated the presence of these compounds at detectable levels in untreated groundwater. North
Carolina 15A NCAC 02B Surface Water Standards, NC In -stream Target Values, and EPA
Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria that apply to these compounds are listed in
Factsheet Attachment G. Since Little Sugar Creek is currently classified as C waters both fresh water
aquatic (FW) and human health (HH) standards apply for these VOC parameters. The most stringent
standard will be used for the permit limit. Since the facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to
Little Sugar Creek with zero flow conditions the water quality standards apply without dilution. The
applicable standard applies at the point of discharge at Outfalls 001 & 002 and is given as both the
daily maximum and monthly average limit in the permit [see permit Part I, Section A. (1.)].
i. [EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM] O&G monitoring is added as monitoring only. A narrative standard
can be found at 15A NCAC 2B .0200 (12).
j. Metals — WQBEL. State WQ standards, 15A NCAC 2B .0200. Monitoring well data were provided in
the application (see factsheet Attachment A) indicated the presence of these metals at detectable
levels in untreated groundwater. New WQS have been approved for that are based on implementation
of dissolved metals Criteria. The NC 2007-2014 Water WQS Triennial Review was approved by the
NC Environmental Management Committee (EMC) on November 13, 2014. The US EPA
Page 6 of 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
subsequently approved the WQS revisions on April 6, 2016 with some exceptions. Implementation of
instream dissolved metals Criteria will apply to metals data upon the next renewal. Effluent hardness
sampling and instream hardness sampling, upstream of the discharge, is being inserted into all permits
with facilities monitoring for hardness -dependent metals to build a more robust hardness dataset. This
permit only requires effluent hardness samples because of the zero flow conditions of the unnamed
tributary to Little Sugar Creek. A Total Hardness default value of 25 mg/L is applied for streams with
zero flow conditions. For information on calculation of metals limits please see Fact Sheet
Attachment H: Dissolved to Total Metals Calculator and Fact Sheet Attachment I: NPDES
Implementation of Instream Dissolved Metals Criteria.
k. Outfalls 001 & 002 discharge to an unnamed tributary to Little Sugar Creek [11-137-8], which is
currently listed as impaired for Copper in the 2018 Integrated Report 305(b) [see Attachment E].
Monthly monitoring for Total Copper and Hardness have been added to the effluent page for this
permit to establish a database.
1. Hardness has been added to the effluent page for this permit to establish a database. WQBEL. State
WQ standards, 15A NCAC 213.0200
in. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) - Acute, Monitor Only; Monthly (Pimephales promelas) 48-hour
static test. [See Section A. (3)]. Acute toxicity (monitoring only) is recommended because the final
effluent is to be polished with activated carbon, historically rendering effluent too clean to prevent
WET -test failure. [WQBEL. No toxics in toxic amounts. 15A NCAC 213.0200 and 15A NCAC
213.0500 (not limited).]
n. Additional annual monitoring for VOCs and Semi-VOC is added with the following methods:
Organics, Total Purgeables (VOCs) (EPA Method 624) and Base Neutrals & Acids (Semi-VOCs)
(EPA Method 625)*. Footnote 8 is added to provide instructions for electronic reporting for EPA
Methods 624/625. Monitoring frequency is monthly (BPJ).
13. Public Notice Schedule:
Permit to Public Notice: 10/17/2019 [See Attachment J]
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0109 & .0111, The Division will receive comments for a period of 30 days following
the publication date of the public notice. Any request for a public hearing shall be submitted to the
Director within the 30 days comment period indicating the interest of the party filing such request and the
reasons why a hearing is warranted.
For Mooresville Regional Office Comments See Attachment K.
14. Fact Sheet Addendum (if applicable):
Were there any changes made since the Draft Permit was public noticed (Yes/No): No.
If Yes, list changes and their basis below: No.
Page 7 of 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
15. Fact Sheet Attachments (list in order of reference):
A. Permit Application 20190708, 114 p. (not attached due to file size, see application in Laserfiche)
B. Pretreatment System Summary, 20190708, 5 p.
C. Engineering Alternative Analysis, 20190821, 37 p.
D. EAA Cost Analysis Table, 1 p.
E. 2018 NC Category 5 Assessments "303(d) List" Final, p. 50.
F. 2018 NC Integrated Report, p. 464-466.
G. Standards Table 06102019, 7 p.
H. Dissolved to Total Metals Calculator, 1 p.
I. NPDES Implementation of Instream Dissolved Metals Criteria, 4 p.
J. Affidavit of Publication — The Charolotte Observer, 10/17/2019, 1 p.
K. NC0089885 Staff Report, 20190918, 3 p.
L. NC0089885 Review Checklist
Page 8 of 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
N ❑ VA
July 8, 2019
NCDENR - DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES - NPDES COMPLEX PERMITTING UNIT
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Subject: Proposed Pretreatment System Summary
CHARLOTTE METRO OFFICE TOWER CONSTRUCTION
Charlotte, North Carolina
NOVA Project Number 2019008
NOVA Engineering and Environmental, Inc. (NOVA), on behalf of Childress Klein, is requesting a
NPDES permit be issued for water generated from dewatering operations during the
construction of a new high-rise office building. Once construction below the groundwater table
is completed, the collection and discharge of on -site water will be terminated.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Subject Property consists of six (6) land parcels referenced by Mecklenburg Tax
Assessor's office as Property Identification Numbers (PINs) 12505302, 12505303,
1250304, 1250306, 1250307, and 125308 with corresponding addresses 522 South
College Street, 518 South College Street, 510 South College Street, 509 South Tryon Street,
521 South Tryon Street, and 525 South Tryon Street, respectively. The Subject Property
encompasses a total of approximately 2.09-acres of active construction.
A previous Phase II Environmental Site Assessment performed by Anchor QEA dated April
2017 identified soil and groundwater impacts resulting from the historical use of the Subject
Property as a garment cleaning facility, an automotive sales and repair facility, and an
automotive painting facility. Petroleum impacts to soils were reported in four (4) of the nine
(9) soil borings. Chlorinated solvents above NC DEQ 2L regulations were reported in the
groundwater samples in two (2) of the five (5) groundwater monitoring wells installed.
NOVA collected groundwater samples from three (3) of the on -site monitoring wells on May
30, 2019. The remaining two (2) monitoring wells were dry at the time of NOVA's May 2019
sample collection. The collected samples were analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Solid Waste (SW)-846
Method 8260D, Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) by USEPASW-846 Method 8270E,
Chlorinated Pesticides by USEPA SW-846 Method 8081, and Total and Dissolved Metals by
USEPA SW-846 Method 6010D and 7470A. Tetrachloroethylene (0.72-pg/L) and total
Chromium (0.029-pg/L, 0.020-pg/L, and 0.024-pg/L) were identified above NC DEQ 2L
regulatory standards. Dissolved Chromium was not detected above laboratory detection
limits.
P R 0 F E S S 1 0 N A L I P R A C T I C A L I P R O V E N
5401 Reagan Drive, Suite 8, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
t. 980.321.4100 / f. 980.321.4099 / usanova.com

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Proposed Pretreatment System Summary July 8, 2019
South College Street and South Tryon Street NOVA Project Number 2019008
Based on the previously detected concentrations of chlorinated solvent and petroleum
constituent concentrations in groundwater at the Subject Property, NOVA anticipates the
required use of a pretreatment system to remediate groundwater prior to discharge to the
storm water sewer.
Summary of Proposed Groundwater Pretreatment System
The proposed groundwater pretreatment system consists of an 18,500-gallon weir tank to
settle large gross solids (50 microns and larger). The water would then be pumped through
bag filters sized at 10-micron followed by bag filters sized at 0.5-micron bag filters. Finally,
the groundwater would be pumped through two (2) 1,500-pound granular activated carbon
(GAC) filter vessels. NOVA anticipates the GAC vessels will remove the detected chlorinated
solvent and petroleum constituent concentrations. This system has an approximate capacity
of up to 100 gallons per minute.
If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Sincerely,
NOVA Engineering and Environmental, LLC
Keith Rice
Senior Geologist
Attachments: Component Specification Sheets
yz/1'
Nickolaus DaSantos
Business Unit Manager
Environmental Services
N OVA
DRAFT Page 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Steel Tank
Overview:
Store liquids with confidence with Rain for Rent's
18,100-gallon Open -Top Wier Tank. The over and under
weirs allow for separation of oils or particulates. Permanently
attached axles, for maximum maneuverability, allows this tank
to be moved with ease on the jobsite. The staircase ensures
proper protection for workers on site. The tank also offers
optional epoxy coating, which offers chemical resistance and
additional cleanliness for sensitive environmental applications.
Features:
• V-drain floor with front and rear 4" 150-lb flanges with valves
• OSHA Compliant Stairway
• Rear 4" or 6" SCH40 fill line**
• Rear 4" or 6" skimmer port**
• Each tank has 2 or 4 weirs per tank, which are up to 8.5ft
wide**
• Optional: Epoxy Coating- chemical resistance for a wide
variety of chemical compatibility and keeps stored product
within the tank cleaner
**Features may vary
Specs:
Material
Steel, Epoxy Coated
(Option)
Capacity
18,100 gallons
Manways
Three 22" hatches
Dry weight
27,000 lbs.
Footprint:
516" x 102, x 126"
Open -Top Weir
Accessories:
• E-CONTAIN®Spillguard
• SolidGroud®Traction Mats
• Radar Level Gauges
• Mechanial Level Gauge
• PipeStax°
• HoseTrae
• Suction and Discharge Hose
PUMPS • TANKS • FILTRATION • PIPE • SPILLGUARDS
Rain for Rent is a registered trademark of Western Oilfields Supply Company. Features and specifications are subject to change without notice.
Liquid Ingenuity,
800-742-7246
rainforrent.com

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Bad Filter
Overview:
The BF200 bagfilter unitfeatures two bagfiltertanks and
utilizes 7" x 30" bag filters for superior filtration from 100 to 1
micron for flows up to 200 GPM.
Features:
• No moving parts
• Skid mounted
• Fitted with bleed valves and pressure gauges
• Chambers constructed of 304 Stainless Steel
• Piping constructed of 304 stainless steel
• Stainless Steel inlet and outlet manifolds
Specs:
Max Flow
200 GPM
Material
Stainless Steel
Max PSI
125 PSI
Dry weight
800 lbs.
Footprint:
48" x 36"
Inlet x outlet
3" x 3" Flange
Accessories:
• Spillguard
• Suction and Discharge Hoses
BF200
Liquid Ingenuity,,
PUMPS • TANKS • FILTRATION • PIPE • SPILLGUARDS 800-742-7246
Rain for Rent is a registered trademark of Western Oilfields Supply Company. Features and specifications are subject to change without notice. ralnforrent.com

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Specifications
P
_. q w_
Model
PC 5 PC 7
PC 13
PC 20
PC 28
PC 50
PC 78
PC 113
Flow Range (gpm)
3-50 4-70
6-130
10-200
14-250
40-360
40 - 550
55-800
Carbon Capacity (lb)
500 1000
1500
2500
5000
10,000
20,000
20,000
Vessel Diameter
2'-6" 3'
4'
S'
6'
8'
10'
12'
Vessel Height
7' -3" 7' -7"
8'-4"
8' -5"
12' -5"
13' -3"
17' -7"
IT- 11"
Bed Area (ft2)
4.9 7.1
12.6
19.6
28.3
50
78
113
Empty Weight (lb)
780 980
1230
2500
3500
11,500
12,500
16,600
Loaded Weight (lb)
1280 1980
2730
5000
8500
21,500
32,500
36,600
Operating Weight (lb)
2670 3670
6150
9200
17,450
40,600
75,600
82,650
Spent & Drained Weight (lb) 1900 3230
4600
8100
14,750
30,520
55,750
61,450
Design Pressure (psig)
90 90
90
75
75
75
75
75
Influent Connection
2" 2"
2"
3"
4"
6"
6"
8"
Effluent Connection
2" 2"
2"
3"
4"
6"
6"
8"
Design Features
•Welded Steel Construction
•Corrosion Resistant Acrylic Polyurethane Coated Exterior
• Multi -Coated Corrosion Resistant Epoxy Interior
•Built to ASME code
•PVC Internals
• Two 12" x 16" Access Ports
Options
❑ Influent/Effluent Sample and Pressure Taps
❑ Influent/Effluent Quick -Connect Couplings
❑ Flexible Interconnecting Hose
❑ External Sample/Gauge Ports
❑ Piping Packages
❑ Flow Instrumentation
❑ ASME Inspected and Stamped Vessel Available
❑ Complete line of granular activated carbon and other media

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
N ❑ VA
August 21, 2019
NCDENR - DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES - NPDES COMPLEX PERMITTING UNIT
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Subject: Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA)
CHARLOTTE METRO OFFICE TOWER CONSTRUCTION
Charlotte, North Carolina
NOVA Project Number 2019008.1
NOVA Engineering and Environmental, Inc. (NOVA), on behalf of Childress Klein, is requesting a
NPDES permit be issued for water generated from dewatering operations during the
construction of a new high-rise office building. Once construction below the groundwater table
is completed, the collection and discharge of on -site water will be terminated.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Subject Property consists of six (6) land parcels referenced by Mecklenburg Tax
Assessor's office as Property Identification Numbers (PINs) 12505302, 12505303,
1250304, 1250306, 1250307, and 125308 with corresponding addresses 522 South
College Street, 518 South College Street, 510 South College Street, 509 South Tryon Street,
521 South Tryon Street, and 525 South Tryon Street, respectively. The Subject Property
encompasses a total of approximately 2.09-acres of active construction.
A previous Phase II Environmental Site Assessment performed by Anchor QEA dated April
2017 identified soil and groundwater impacts resulting from the historical use of the subject
Property as a garment cleaning facility, an automotive sales and repair facility, and an
automotive painting facility. Petroleum impacts to soils were reported in four (4) of the nine
(9) soil borings. Chlorinated solvents above NC DEQ 2L regulations were reported in the
groundwater samples in two (2) of the five (5) groundwater monitoring wells installed.
NOVA collected groundwater samples from three (3) of the on -site monitoring wells on May
30, 2019. The remaining two (2) monitoring wells were dry at the time of NOVA's May 2019
sample collection. The collected samples were analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Solid Waste (SW)-846
Method 8260D, Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) by USEPASW-846 Method 8270E,
Chlorinated Pesticides by USEPA SW-846 Method 8081, and Total and Dissolved Metals by
USEPA SW-846 Method 6010D and 7470A. Tetrachloroethylene (0.72-pg/L) and total
Chromium (0.029-pg/L, 0.020-pg/L, and 0.024-pg/L) were identified above NC DEQ 2L
regulatory standards. Dissolved Chromium was not detected above laboratory detection
limits.
P R 0 F E S S 1 0 N A L I P R A C T I C A L I P R O V E N
5401 Reagan Drive, Suite 8, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
t. 980.321.4100 / f. 980.321.4099 / usanova.com

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Engineering Alternative Analysis August 21, 2019
South College Street and South Tryon Street NOVA Project Number 2019008.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of the construction of a new high-rise office building located on six (6)
land parcels encompassing approximately 2.09-acres. Foundation construction will extend
below the groundwater table which will require dewatering for an estimated period of four (4)
months.
Currently, dewatering pumps will be placed in the areas of excavation with the water being
routed through a pretreatment system prior to discharge into the municipal storm water
system located along South Tryon Street and South College Street. The storm drains discharge
to an unnamed tributary of Little Sugar Creek, part of the Sugar Creek watershed.
Applicant Information
Childress Klein
301 South College Street, Suite 2800
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
[phone]
Attention: Mike Haney
E-mail: [e-mail]
Facility
Charlotte Metro Office Tower Construction
South Tryon Street and South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
EEA Preparer
NOVA Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
5401 Reagan Drive, Suite 8
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
[phone]
Attention: Keith Rice, Senior Geologist
E-mail: [e-mail]
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
Evaluation of potential restrictions to a wastewater discharge to surface waters
Based on review of Low -Flow Characteristics of Streams in North Carolina, published by the
USGS and issued in 1993 and the Low -Flow Characteristics and Flow -Duration Statistics for
Continuous -Record Stream Gaging Stations in North Carolina through 2012, published by the
USGS in 2015; Little Sugar Creek is a Class C (fishable/swimmable) water located within the
Catawba River Basin. The USGS reports provide the following information:
N OVA Page 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Engineering Alternative Analysis August 21, 2019
South College Street and South Tryon Street NOVA Project Number 2019008.1
• Drainage Area - 40.80 square miles
• Summer/Winter 7Q10 - 34 cubic feet per second (cfs)
• 30Q2 Flow Statistics - 87 cfs
• W7Q10 Low -Flow Yield - 55 cfs
• Qavg Unit Flow Yield - 12 cfs/square mile
Little Sugar Creek is listed on the 303(d) as an impaired waterway. The total maximum daily
limits (TMDLs) include fecal coliform (9.4x1012 cfu/100mL), dissolved oxygen (no less than
5.Omg/I for the daily average and no less than 4.Omg/I for a minimum instantaneous value
during 7Q10 conditions), and turbidity.
NON -MUNICIPAL FLOW PROJECTIONS
Based on similar construction projects from the Charlotte downtown area, it is estimated that
the dewatering pumps will produce a flow rate of approximately 50 gallons per minute
(72,000 gallons per day).
EVALUATION OF FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES
Alternative A: Connection to Existing Wastewater Treatment System
Ms. Sarah Daley, Environmental Compliance Supervisor with Charlotte Water sent a response
letter to NOVA on May 28, 2019 stating that they do not accept groundwater discharges as
referenced in the City of Charlotte Sewer Use Ordinance Section 23-79 (b)(14).
Alternative B: Land Application
Based on the proposed new construction occurring from approximately property boundary to
property boundary, on -site land application is not feasible due to the limitations of land area
available. Due to the location of the project within the downtown area of Charlotte, there is
limited land available in the vicinity of the Subject Property. Available land in this area is
currently valued at approximately $5,000,000 to $10,500,000 per acre (supporting
information attached) making the purchase of land for the purpose of off -site land application
cost prohibitive. A table detailing the cost of off -site land application is included as an
attachment.
Alternative C: Infiltration Galleries
Based on the proposed new construction occurring from approximately property boundary to
property boundary, the use of on -site infiltration galleries is not feasible due to the limitations
of land area available. Due to the location of the project within the downtown area of
Charlotte, there is limited land available in the vicinity of the Subject Property. Available land
in this area is currently valued at approximately $5,000,000 to $10,500,000 per acre
(supporting information attached) makingthe purchase of land for the purpose of creating off -
site infiltration galleries cost prohibitive. A table detailing the cost of utilizing off -site
infiltration galleries is included as an attachment.
N OVA Page 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Engineering Alternative Analysis August 21, 2019
South College Street and South Tryon Street NOVA Project Number 2019008.1
Alternative D: In -Situ Remediation Wells
Based on the proposed new construction utilizing dewatering pumps and the proposed new
construction occurring from approximately property boundary to property boundary, this
alternative is not feasible due to excess water entering the system and the limitation of on -
site land available.
Alternative E: Closed Loon Remediation Wells
Based on the proposed new construction utilizing dewatering pumps and occurring from
approximately property boundary to property boundary, this alternative is not feasible on -site
due to excess water entering the system and the limitation of on -site land available.
Additionally, there is limited land available in the vicinity of the Subject Property. Available
land in this area is currently valued at approximately $5,000,000 to $10,500,000 per acre
(supporting information attached) making the purchase of land for the purpose of installing
off -site injection wells cost prohibitive. Atable detailingthe cost of utilizing off -site closed loop
remediation wells is included as an attachment.
Alternative G: Discharge to Surface Waters
Discharging removed groundwater into the municipal stormwater system located along South
Tryon Street and South College Street is feasible for this project. Charlotte Water has approved
the use of the storm drain system as it is not anticipated to create hazardous conditions.
Neither Mecklenburg County nor City of Charlotte have returned a completed Local
Government Review Form. Consequently, the certified mail receipts and delivery tracking
information is attached as proof of delivery.
If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Sincerely,
NOVA Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
Jason K. Harris
Staff Geologist
Attachments: Cost Analysis Table
Property Valuation Documentation
Certified Mail Receipts
Delivery Tracking Information
Z�ZK�eith Rice
Senior Geologist
N OVA
Page 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
APPENDIX
COST ANALYSIS TABLE

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
------------
N OVA
Charlotte Metro Office Tower Construction
Table 1: EAA COST ANALYSIS
Engineering Alternative
Capital Casts
Recurring Costs -
PCVA
Land Aquisistion
Costs
Equipment Cosh
Labor Cosh
Installation Cosh
Design Cosh
Total Capital Costs
0&M Costs
Laboratory Costs
Operator Cosh
Residual Disposal
Cosh
Connection Fees
Permit Fees
Utility Cos[
Total Recurring
Cost
Land Appli ton
$70,000,000.00
$170,000.00
$95,000.00
$95,000.00
$50,000.00
$70,410,000.00
$6,750.00
MOOD 00
$50,000.00
None known
None known
None known
$3,000.00
$107,750.00
$34485,27820
Infltratlon Gallenes
$25,000,000.00
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
$50,000.00
$25,110,000.00
$7,500.00
MOOD 00
$50,000.00
None known
None known
None known
$1,500.00
$107,000.00
$12,331,863.46
Closed Loop Remedietion Wells
$25,000,000.00
1 $120,000.00
1 $30,000.00
1 $100,000.00
1 $50,000.00
1 $25,300,000.00
1 $7,500.00
1 $48,000.00
1 $50,000.00
1 None known
I None known
1 $5,000.00
1 $3,000.00
1 $113,500.00
1 $12427,95781
O&M - Operation and Manitanance
--Assumes a six (6) month operation period

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
APPENDIX 6
PROPERTY VALUATION DOCUMENTATION

s�
's'if ti
P s'
Ae
410
g SITE 1
,
+ / fob - � �✓ •� � � '.. ; �0 ! '
�_ ® G ..,.p fi �` ,ice • b
i ♦ e (�4 a

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
ABOUT 120 N MYERS ST , CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Price
$4,995,000
Building Class
C
Sale Type
Investment
Total Lot Size
1.00 AC
No. Lots
1
Zoning Description
MUDD
Property Type
Land
APN / Parcel ID
080-098-02
Property Sub -type
Commercial
Cross Streets
E 5th St
Proposed Use
Commercial
Listing ID: 3875865
Date Created: 4/7/2016
Last Updated: 6/19/2019
1 LOT AVAILABLE
Lot 08009802
Price $4,995,000 Lot Size 1.00 AC
SALE NOTES
Seller looking for JV opportunities. One acre that can be expanded
One acre of MUDD zoned land in Downtown Charlotte. Located at the corner of 5th and Myers with easy access to the new Trolley.
Ideal for Office, Retail, Multifamily, or Data Center. Owner is open to a sale, and can develop for any use.
Located at the corner of 5th and Myers in Downtown Charlotte

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
DEMOGRAPHICS
1 mile
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
$10...
30....
$75K $106,191
Average
AGE DISTRIBUTION
65+ _ 0 -
$OK - 7.7°/� 19
$35K 50 - 20%
29.... 64
13.... 35
40-
$35K 20-
49 Average 29
17....
15.1...
$75K 39
28....
25....

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
TRADE AREAS
GE) EE)
(ED 15 min drive
�L41Y
CREEK .
18
.�.� MOUNIAIN
ISLAND
MALLARD CREEK
- WITHROV!
� 641hN5
9HarrishuEg
,er
aIn Mt Hally ,} �
49
well Woodford
McAdenvllle !17 Green
I AS WkT
lb
Belmont F4
NOD
Ch rl t
Allen
704
Wildwoods s,
rFs
Mint Hill z,s
CARCLAVDOWNS
5,
STEELE CREEK ,{p
CLHIRE
SOUTN
49
v
Matthews
R"ep t a map error
1 MILE
3 MILE
5 MILE
Total Population
30,843
139,110
290,147
2010 Population
17,055
93,917
223,964
2024 Population
35,117
155,609
319,975
Employees
68,383
157,071
245,812
Total Businesses
4,843
13,460
21,371
Average Household Income
$106,191
$95,100
$82,997
Median Household Income
$76,409
$64,758
$52,979

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Median Age
Households
Percent College Degree or Above
Average Housing Unit Value
$406.46M $1.5B
34.4
34.8
16,355
63,330
36%
28%
$451, 913
$440, 622
R TRANSIT/SUBWAY
Charlotte Transportation Center/Arena Transit Stop
(Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
7th Street Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
9th Street Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley)
3rd Street Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
Stonewall Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
AIRPORT
Charlotte Douglas International Airport
WALK SCORE
84
Very Walkable
TRANSIT SCORE
82
Excellent Transit
DRIVE
2 min
2 min
3 min
3 min
2 min
WALK
10 min
11 min
14 min
14 min
18 min
DRIVE
17 min
$2.8B
35.1
122,848
23%
$367, 650
DISTANCE
0.5 mi
0.5 mi
0.7 mi
0.7 mi
0.9 mi
DISTANCE
8.4 mi
BIKE SCORE
72
Very Bikeable

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
MAP OF 120 N MYERS ST CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Discovery Place Science e B E L M C N T
Levine Museum
of the New South °
\P V
Charlotte
e FIRST WARD
Go,0 �, Central $1
s set Piedmont hs�
S- NASCAR Hall of Fame Q 19 Community
�� College -...
ca Central Ave
4g Marshall Park 74
o
Independence
s Park
o` Fgr ELIZABETH
a, bs cr
p hs,
5 C H A N T I L I
C H E R R Y Map data ©2019 Google
The LoopNet service and information provided therein, while believed to be accurate, are provided ''as is''. LoopNet disclaims any
and all representations, warranties, or guarantees of any kind.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Scott Mladenik
[A [phone]
1�i Loop NetT
Justin Day
[phone]
217 W Dunbar St
Charlotte, NC 28203 - Office (Under Contract)
THE OFFERING
Price
Sale Type
Sale Conditions
Property Type
Property Sub -type
Building Class
RE/MAX
$525,000 Lot Size 0.05 AC
Investment or Owner User Rentable Building Area 913 SF
Deferred Maintenance No. Stories 1
Office Year Built 1917
Office/Residential Zoning Description UMUD
C APN / Parcel ID 073-063-09
$525, 000
Listing ID: 14307446 Date Created: 11/6/2018 Last Updated: 7/9/2019

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
ABOUT 217 W DUNBAR ST , CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
+/-0.051 acre parcel near BofA stadium and Uptown Charlotte on W. Dunbar St. The parcel does have a
+/-913 sf home. Built in 1917, Value is in the land for development.
HIGHLIGHTS
Just outside of Uptown and 277 Utilities to site
Less than 1,500' from BofA Stadium entrance UMUD Zoning
Great piece for redevelopment project on this street

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
MARKETING BROCHURE
Mixed -Use Property
FOR SALE
Property Description
+/-0.051 acre parcel near BofA stadium and Uptown Charlotte
on W. Dunbar St.The parcel does have a +/-913 sf home built
in 1917. Value is in the land for development
-just outside of Uptown and 277
Less than 1.500' from BofA Stadium entrance
• Great piece for redevelopment project on this street
• Utilities to site
• UMUD Zoning
The above Worsahon has been obkdned fray sources we bekeve to be rella , however we do not
take r@Spons+77iHtyl for ffs coffactnesS. Wce: Uniew a Consent to Ova Agency has been Signed Uy
both parties to a t urwcPon for "s property Scoff Mkid% represents the Seger only, and not the Buyer.
R E/M A X
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
217W Dunbar
Charlotte, NC 28203
Listed at:
$525,000
For Information Contact:
Scott Mladenik
Managing Broker
Commercial Division
[phone]
Scott, Mladeni [e-mail]
Justin Day
Commercial Broker
jDayga remax.net
704-330-4552
Demographics
Population 2018
1 Mile 22,177
3 Mile 129,630
5 Mile 265,076
Househiold Income
I Mile $1 16,944
3 Mile $92,200
5 Mile $84,182
REIMAX Executive - Commercial Division
2901 Coltsgote Road, Charlo#e, NC 28271
704-602-5900
www. ChailotteComrnerciafl?eolty.corn
+/-0.051 acres on W. Dunbar Street in very close proximity to Uptown Charlotte with UMUD zoning. The +/-913sf home on the
parcel is not likely to be used due to deferred maintenance, and is probably best torn down and this lot utilized as assemblage for a
larger project.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
DEMOGRAPHICS
M
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
$10...
37.... $116,944
$75K Average
$10...
14....
AGE DISTRIBUTION
$OK - 65+
z i
$35K 8.2%
50 -
23.... 64
13....
$35K 40 -
49
$75K 1
23.... 30 -
39
26%
0-
19
19....
35.1 20 -
Average 29
19.1...

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
TRADE AREAS
GE) EE)
(ED 15 min drive
(rFs)
.:oJNIAI',
h9ALLAAD CREEK
WITHRow
.iAM,
� DOWNSza
as
� 15
9Harrisburg
er
Bin V,L lolly
3F 1Fs
0
as
veil
YVoodf Ord
McAdenvllle !17
GrFir
EASTWAY
Belmont T4
cn
r tte
Allen
sFs c:
F
r�
Wildwoods 51
zFs
Mint Hill zlas
.
ARC dQ
Clb
51
y7q : STEELE CREEK 1@O h90TC
RE
49
I.fy
i a4a 4vvlla
I
Matthews
Report a map error
1 MILE
3 MILE
5 MILE
Total Population
22,177
129,630
265,076
2010 Population
11,366
86,715
200,006
2024 Population
25,397
145,135
2931079
Employees
61,384
152,609
245,790
Total Businesses
4,156
12,776
20,729
Average Household
Income
$116,944
$92,200
$84,182
Median Household
Income
$94,806
$62,347
$53,688

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Median Age
Households
Percent College Degree or Above
Average Housing Unit Value
$329.27M $1.4B
34.1
35.0
12,535
59,183
40%
27%
$390,937
$407,479
]a TRANSIT/SUBWAY
Morehead Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley)
Carson Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
Bland Street Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue
Line)
Stonewall Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
3rd Street Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
AIRPORT
Charlotte Douglas International Airport
WALK SCORE ® TRANSIT SCORE
64 71
Somewhat Walkable Excellent Transit
DRIVE
2 min
2 min
2 min
2 min
2 min
$2.6B
35.0
113,229
23%
$363,683
WALK
8 min
8 min
12 min
17 min
16 min
DRIVE
15 min
BIKE SCORE
67
Bikeable
DISTANCE
0.4 mi
0.4 mi
0.6 mi
0.7 mi
0.8 mi
DISTANCE
7.1 mi

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
MAP OF 217 W DUNBAR ST CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
WESLEY
HEIGHTS
z� Discovery Place Science
vLevine Museum
of the New South
��C�read 5t
Bank of America Stadium'P C h a r l o t t e
74 5% FIRST WARD
Wilkinson�'r�
� Go,`e�� a Central 5 Fr ems, Piedmont
5� NASCAR Hall of Fame d�� �sr Community
STOVER HILLS 5 College
Marshall Park
West B1v6 i 04 b
4
�at�n9et W I L M O R E
sr
Map data ©2019 Googfe

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
ADDITIONAL PHOTOS
GIS
20181010_100326
20181010_100403
The LoopNet service and information provided therein, while believed to be accurate, are provided ''as is''. LoopNet disclaims any
and all representations, warranties, or guarantees of any kind.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Ronald Berry
[phone]
205 N Myers St
___ __ K..
1�i Loop NetT
-and For Sale
PRIME PARCEL FOR SALE
AT $3 MILLION
i'
i
_ 4�
�� ��� .,5 L i• �I
I -
I _
Located at: 205 R. Myers Street
Lend: Al Roes
Z.I.S: V RC (can pot—UMly change)
E
The Celeste Group,
LLC
$3, 000, 000

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
ABOUT 205 N MYERS ST , CHARLOTTE, INC 28202
Price
$3,000,000
Property Sub -type
Commercial
Sale Type
Investment
Proposed Use
Commercial
Sale Conditions
Build to Suit
Total Lot Size
0.50 AC
No. Lots
1
Zoning Description
URC
Property Type
Land
APN / Parcel ID
080-085-03
Listing ID: 12802494
Date Created: 6/8/2018
Last Updated: 7/23/2019
1 LOT AVAILABLE
Lot 08008503
Price $3,000,000 Lot Size 0.50 AC
Great lot for redevelopment. Would be ideal for Mulit-Family, Data Centers, and Retail. Zoning can
be changed to UMUDD after a review with Charlotte City Planning..
DESCRIPTION
Property located in the prime uptown area of Charlotte, NC. Easy access to key areas of Charlotte. Great
development opportunity.
HIGHLIGHTS
Great proximity to key Charlotte, NC Uptown sites

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
MARKETING BROCHURE
PRIME RARgEL IFFFFFFFGR SALE
AT $3.5 MILLION
9 9a'--0-11
Located at: 203 N. Myac* Street
Lands Al Awes
Zoning: URC
Jry
1. Myers 81-
ks� .. RONALD BERRY - MANAGING PARTNER- 704.588.1652
THE CELESTE GROUP, LLC, COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES
SALE NOTES
Prime real estate in uptown Charlotte, NC. Near the Spectrum Arena and short drive to Bank of America Stadium, NASCAR Hall of
Fame.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
DEMOGRAPHICS
1 mile
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
$10...
30....
$75K $105,925
Average
AGE DISTRIBUTION
65+ _ 0 -
$OK - 7.6°/� 19
$35K 50 - 20%
29.... 64
13.... 35
40-
$35K 20-
49 Average 29
17....
15.1...
$75K 39
28....
25....

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
TRADE AREAS
CE) 3 D (E) 1 15 min drive
iall Ik.
P-'OJNIAl'
I5LAN1,
,er
.ain Mt HoIly F
well E
McAdenvllle rV
Belmont s
zFs
------------ ---u
274 STEELE CREEk SOUTH
•s• 49
Total Population
2010 Population
2024 Population
Employees
Total Businesses
Average Household Income
Median Household Income
HIGHLAND
CREEK
qw
:REEK
ow
5
Harrisburg
29
as
Y
Allen
W I ldwoods 51
Mint Hill zing
51
LAa*4kn. R(Wep a map error
1 MILE
3 MILE
5 MILE
30,723
138,321
291,682
16,949
93,217
225,030
34,987
154,754
321,687
68,167
157,159
245,124
4,768
13,465
21,319
$105, 925
$94, 674
$82, 721
$76, 219
$64,486
$52, 708

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Median Age
Households
Percent College Degree or Above
Average Housing Unit Value
$404.29M $1.5B
34.3
34.8
16,302
62,967
36%
28%
$449,030
$438,330
R TRANSIT/SUBWAY
Charlotte Transportation Center/Arena Transit Stop
(Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
7th Street Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
9th Street Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley)
3rd Street Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
Stonewall Transit Stop (Charlotte Trolley, LYNX Blue Line)
AIRPORT
Charlotte Douglas International Airport
WALK SCORE
85
Very Walkable
TRANSIT SCORE
82
Excellent Transit
DRIVE
2 min
2 min
3 min
3 min
3 min
WALK
10 min
10 min
13 min
14 min
18 min
DRIVE
17 min
$2.8B
35.1
123,371
22%
$367, 222
DISTANCE
0.5 mi
0.5 mi
0.7 mi
0.7 mi
0.9 mi
DISTANCE
8.4 mi
BIKE SCORE
72
Very Bikeable

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
MAP OF 205 N MYERS ST CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Discovery Place Science
Levine Museum
of the New South
'PC harIotte
qW 1§1 1�- FIRST WARD
Central
Piedmont
,9- NASCAR Hall of Fame as sr Community
College -...
�a
49 Marshall Park
o
G�ogle
ADDITIONAL PHOTOS
BELMONT
`e v
q,
o�
.6% St
Central Ave
9
Independence
Park
sr
CHERRY
ELIZABETH
fiA nU A A1T11 I
Map data C2019 Google
The LoopNet service and information provided therein, while believed to be accurate, are provided ''as is''. LoopNet disclaims any
and all representations, warranties, or guarantees of any kind.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
APPENDIX C
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
,.-0 --Domestic O
nly
u7
CO For delivery information, visit our we ite at wwmusps.com".
rL Certified Mail FeevE 5[l ti_I1
0a— $ 50
Extra Services & Fees (check box, add tee prb are)
© ❑ Return Receipt (lr r cepy) s l- • �"�
© ❑Return Receipt (efectrcnlc) s,,., rf-I _ I It 1 POstmerk
❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ Q..� _ Here
p ❑ Adult Signature Required $
[] Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $
© Postage cr
0 Total Postage and Fees!t']/itr/20i
$ $Cr.0_t
Sent To
------------------
Street an YApi. No., or PO Sox Na, `h _
-----L0(90 3r .--�-----'----------------------------
City,StagZtP^ J�Ie.L�I
Postal
CERTIFIED MAILP RECEIPT
Er Domestic mailonly
C11 t70
rU Certified Mali Fee $3.50 50
M 1
Extra Services & Fees (check box, add reap ale)
❑Return Receipt (hardcopy) $
d f 1 Postmark
1-3 ❑Return Receipt (efeclronlc) $ti Cll-i_ Here
❑ certified Mail Restricted Deiivery $
I:n [}Adult Signature Requlged $:*--
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery s ��
1--3 Postage $0.55
r R Total Postage and P s c
E3 . rtL
Ir $
ent To 0 V:V rt-6 "`i Ot COWZ 1-� Ahlp[a��------------
----------------------------------------
Q Sfreef and Apt• No., or pB Sox No.
---------
�ity, Sfate, ZlP+4� t _ t

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
APPENDIX D
DELIVERY TRACKING INFORMATION

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B USPS.com®- LISPS Tracking® Results
USPS Tracking' FAQs > (https://www.usps.com/fags/uspstracking-faqs.htm)
Track Another Package +
Tracking Number: 70190160000090268456 Remove X
Expected Delivery on
T
CD
by Q
21 JUNE
2019 aQ' 8:00pm aQ' ^
C✓ Delivered
June 21, 2019 at 7:01 am
Delivered
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
Get Updates \/
Text & Email Updates
Tracking History
u
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?qtc_tLabeIs1=70190160000090268456 1 /3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B USPS.com®- USPS Tracking® Results
Product Information
See Less /\
Can't find what you're looking for?
Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions.
FAQs (https://www.usps.com/fags/uspstracking-faqs.htm)
u
TI
rD
rD
Q
flJ
n
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?qtc_tLabeIs1=70190160000090268456 2/3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B USPS.com®- USPS Tracking® Results
The easiest tracking number is the one you don't have to know.
With Informed Delivery°, you never have to type in another tracking number. Sign up to:
• See images* of incoming mail.
• Automatically track the packages you're expecting.
• Set up email and text alerts so you don't need to enter tracking numbers.
• Enter USPS Delivery Instructions TM for your mail carrier.
TI
CD
CD
Q
Sign Up
(https:Hreg.usps.com/entreg/RegistrationAction_input?
*NOTE: Black and white (grayscale) images show the outside, front of letter -sized envelopes and mailpieces that are processed
through USPS automated equipment. app=UspsTools&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.usps.com%2Fgo%2FTrackConfirmActii
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?qtc_tLabeIs1=70190160000090268456 3/3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B USPS.com®- USPS Tracking® Results
USPS Tracking' FAQs > (https://www.usps.com/fags/uspstracking-faqs.htm)
Track Another Package +
Tracking Number: 70190160000090268449 Remove X
Expected Delivery on
T
CD
by Q
21 JUNE
2019 aQ' 8:00pm aQ' ^
C✓ Delivered
June 21, 2019 at 7:01 am
Delivered
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
Get Updates \/
Text & Email Updates
Tracking History
u
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc=3&text28777=&tLabels=70190160000090268449%2C%2C 1 /3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B USPS.com®- USPS Tracking® Results
Product Information
See Less /\
Can't find what you're looking for?
Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions.
FAQs (https://www.usps.com/fags/uspstracking-faqs.htm)
u
TI
rD
rD
Q
flJ
n
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc=3&text28777=&tLabels=70190160000090268449%2C%2C 2/3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B USPS.com®- USPS Tracking® Results
The easiest tracking number is the one you don't have to know.
With Informed Delivery°, you never have to type in another tracking number. Sign up to:
• See images* of incoming mail.
• Automatically track the packages you're expecting.
• Set up email and text alerts so you don't need to enter tracking numbers.
• Enter USPS Delivery Instructions TM for your mail carrier.
TI
CD
CD
Q
Sign Up
(https:Hreg.usps.com/entreg/RegistrationAction_input?
*NOTE: Black and white (grayscale) images show the outside, front of letter -sized envelopes and mailpieces that are processed
through USPS automated equipment. app=UspsTools&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.usps.com%2Fgo%2FTrackConfirmActii
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc=3&text28777=&tLabels=70190160000090268449%2C%2C 3/3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
NOVA
Charlotte Metro Office Tower Construction
Table 1: EAA COST ANALYSIS
Engineering Alternative
Land Application
I nfi Itratio n
Galleries
Closed Loop
Remediation
Wells
Surface Waters
Capital Costs
Land Aquisistion Costs
$70,000,000.00
$25,000,000.00
$25,000,000.00
$0.00
Equipment Costs
$170,000.00
$20,000.00
$120,000.00
$75,000.00
Labor Costs
$95,000.00
$20,000.00
$30,000.00
$15,000.00
Installation Costs
$95,000.00
$20,000.00
$100,000.00
$25,000.00
Design Costs
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Total Capital Costs
$70,410,000.00
$25,110,000.00
$25,300,000.00
$165,000.00
Recurring Costs*
O&M Costs
$6,750.00
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
Laboratory Costs
$48,000.00
$48,000.00
$48,000.00
$48,000.00
Operator Costs
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$75,000.00
Residual Disposal Costs
None known
None known
None known
None known
Connection Fees
None known
None known
None known
None known
Permit Fees
None known
None known
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
Utility Cost
$3,000.00
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
$860.00
Total Recu rri n g Cost
$107,750.00
$107,000.00
$113,500.00
$136,360.00
PCVA
$34,485,278.20
$12,331,863.46
$12,427,957.81
$147,374.01
0&M - Operation and Manitenance
* - Assumes a six (6) month operation period

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
2018 NC Category 5 Assessments 19303(d) List" Final
Catawba River Basin Lower Catawba Subbasin 03050103
11-137-1 Irwin Creek
From source to Sugar Creek
Classification C Length or Area 12 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
4ssessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating Parameter of In Category
Exceeding Criteria Poor Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW)
11-137-8a 'Little Sugar Creek
From source to Archdale Rd
Classification C Length or Area 12 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
11-137-8b
411111111119 Category
Exceeding Criteria > 10% and >90 conf Copper (7 µg/I, AL, FW) 5
Little Sugar Creek
From Archdale Rd to NC 51
Classification C Length or Area
5 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
Assessment Criteria Status
Reason for Rating
Parameter of Inter1111111111111
Category
Exceeding Criteria
Fair
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
� I
11-137-8c Little Sugar Creek
From NC 51 to North Carolina -South Carolina State Line
Classification C Length or Area 3 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
Assessment Criteria Status
Rem n for Rating
Parameter of Interest
Category
Exceeding Criteria
Fair
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
5
11-137-9a McAlpine Creek (Waverly Lake)
From source to SR 3356, (Sardis Rd)
Classification C Length or Area 9 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
essment Criteria Status Reason for Rating
Exceeding Criteria Fair
Parameter of Intere— Category
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) � I
6/3/2019 2018 NC Category 5 Assessments "303(d) List" Approved by EPA May 22,2019
Page 50 of 262

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
2018 NC Intergrated Report
Catawba River Basin
11-137-8a Little Sugar Creek
rom source to Archdale Rd
D_E Qs}
Lower Catawba Subbasin 03050103�'
Classification C Length or Area 12 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number I
Parameter of I
Aldrin (0.00005 µg/I, AL, FW)
Arsenic (10 µg/I, HH, NC)
Arsenic (50 µg/I, AL, NC)
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
Benzene (51 µg/I, AL, FW)
Berylium (6.5 µg/I, AL, NC)
Cadmium (2 µg/I, AL, FW)
Carbon Tetrachloride (1.6 µg/I, AL, FW)
Chlordane (0.0008 µg/I, AL, FW)
Chloride (230 mg/I, AL, FW)
Chromium (50 µg/I, AL, FW)
Copper (7 µg/I, AL, FW)
Cyanide (5 mg/L, AL, FW)
DDT 4,4 (0.0002 µg/I, AL, FW)
Demeton (0.1 µg/I, AL, FW)
Dieldrin (0.00005 µg/I, AL, FW)
Dissolved Oxygen (4 mg/I, AL, FW)
Endosulfan (0.05 µg/I, AL, FW)
Endrin (0.002 µg/I, AL, FW)
Fecal Coliform (GM 200/400, REC, FW)
Category
Assessment Criteria Status
Collection —Year
Meeting Criteria
2014
Meeting Criteria
2012
Meeting Criteria
2012
4s
Exceeding Criteria
2008
Meeting Criteria
2012
Meeting Criteria
2012
1�
Meeting Criteria
2012
0
Meeting Criteria
2012
Meeting Criteria
2014
0
Meeting Criteria
2014
Meeting Criteria
2014
0
Exceeding Criteria
2012
Meeting Criteria
2014
0
Meeting Criteria 1
2014
Meeting Criteria
2014
0
Meeting Criteria
2014
Meeting Criteria
2014
0
Meeting Criteria
2014
Meeting Criteria
2014
4t
Data Inconclusive
2014
7/23/2019 2018 NC Integrated Report
Page 464 of 1727

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
2018 NC Intergrated Report
Catawba River Basin
Lower Catawba Subbasin 03050103
[Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW)
4s
(Exceeding Criteria
2007
Fish Tissue Mercury (Nar, FC, NC)
4t
Exceeding Criteria
2012
Flouride (1.8 mg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2012
Heptachlor (0.00008 µg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2014
Hexachlorobutadiene (18 µg/I, AL, FW)
0
Meeting Criteria
2012
Iron (1000 µg/I, Natural, FW)
3z1
Data Inconclusive
2014
Lead (25 µg/I, AL, NC)
0
Meeting Criteria
2012
Lindane (0.01 µg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2014
Mercury (0.012 µg/I, FC, FW)
3a
Data Inconclusive
2012
Methoxychlor (0.03 µg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2014
Mirex (0.001 µg/I, AL, FW)
0
Meeting Criteria
2014
Nickel (88 µg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2012
PAHs (0.0311 µg/I, AL, FW)
0
Meeting Criteria
2012
Parathion (0.013Sul µg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2014
PCB (0.064 ng/I, HH, NC)
0
Meeting Criteria
2014
pH (6 su, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2014
pH (9.0, AL, FW)
0
Meeting Criteria
2014
Phenols
Meeting Criteria
2014
Selenium (5 µg/I, AL, FW)
0
Meeting Criteria
2014
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- (4 µg/I, HH, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2012
Tetrachloroethylene (3.3 µg/I, HH, FW)
0
Meeting Criteria
2012
Toluene (11 µg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2012
Total Suspended Solids
1t
Meeting Criteria
2014
Toxaphene (0.0002 µg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
2014
DWQ�
7/23/2019 2018 NC Integrated Report Page 465 of 1727

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
2018 NC Intergrated Report
Catawba River Basin
Trichloroethylene (30 µg/I, AL, FW)
Turbidity (50 NTU, AL, FW miles)
Vinyl Chloride (2.4 µg/I, AL, FW)
Water Temperature (329C, AL, LP&CP)
Zinc (50 µg/I, AL, FW)
Lower Catawba Subbasin 03050103
IMeeting Criteria
2012
1i
Meeting Criteria
2014
1�
Meeting Criteria
2012
0
Meeting Criteria
2014
0
Meeting Criteria
2012
DWQ�
7/23/2019 2018 NC Integrated Report Page 466 of 1727

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
North Caroli is Division of Water Resources
Surface Water Quality Standards, Criteria & In -Stream Target Values
tables in this workbook detail the various water body classifications, surface water quality standards, criteria, and in -stream target values that
State of North Carolina employs to protect the designated uses of its surface waters.
will find five separate tables in the worksheettabs below. These tables are:
1- North Carolina Designated Uses for Surface Waters (Designated Uses - orange tab)
2 -North Carolina 15A NCAC 02B Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters (02B Standards -green tab)
3 -Environmental Protection Agency Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria (EPA-NRWQC-vel low tab)
4 - North Carolina In -Stream Target Surface Waters (In -Stream Target Values - blue tab)
5 - Supporting information such as footnotes, descriptions of acronyms, and references (Supporting Info -bright veIlow tab)
Determine the designated use(s) for the water body of concern.
1.1- Identify the classification associated with the water body of concern by referring to the NC Surface Water Classifications interactive map, river
basin classification schedules, and any NC Title 15A rules associated with the water body of concern.
NC DW R Surface Water Classifications Map
River Basin Classification Schedules
15A NCAC 02B rules
1.2 - Identify all designated uses associated with the classification identified in step 1.1 by referring to the North Carolina Designated Uses for
Surface Waters table (orange tab in this workbook):
North Carolina Designated Uses for Surface Waters
-Search the NCO2B Standards (green tab), EPA NRWQC (yellow tab), and NC In -Stream Target Values (blue tab) tables for the parameter(s) of concern.
2.1- Search for chemicals by Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number. If you do not know the CAS number for the chemical of concern, a simple
google search should provide it.
2.2 - Chemicals can be searched for by name, but be advised that all known synonyms are not included in these tables. Searching by chemical name
may miss important information.
2.3 - Search for non -chemical parameters (pH, temperature, etc.) by name as they do not have CAS numbers.
2.4- Search all tables for each chemical or non -chemical parameter as different water quality standards, EPA recommended criteria, or NC in -
stream target values may apply for different designated uses.
- Read across the table to identify the available standards, criteria or in -stream target values once a parameter has been located.
3.1- The most sensitive use must be protected. Refer to the designated uses table when deciding which standard, criteria, or in -stream target
values to apply.
3.2 - North Carolina Standards are established in rule (15A NCAC 02B) and take precedence over EPA national criteria. EPA national criteria have
undergone thorough scientific and national stakeholder evaluation, but have not been through the NC rule making process. EPA national criteria
take precedence over NC in -stream target values. NC in -stream target values are determined based on available toxicological data for chemicals per
language in Title 15A the North Carolin Administrative Code (15A NCAC 02B .0202 and .0208). Classifications & Standards staff should be contacted
for guidance on the use of these values.
Click here for an example of this process
The standards, criteria, and in -stream target values in these tables do not substitute for any written regulations, nor are they themselves regulations.
- We are here to help. Please contact us with any questions and comments.
Name
For questions concerning:
Email
Phone
Connie Brower
Standards, standards tables
connie.browerCalncdenr.gov
919-707-3686
Christopher Ventaloro
Standards, standards tables
christopher.ventaloroOncdenr.gov
919-707-9016
Elizabeth Kountis
Classifications, reclassifications
elizabeth.kountisCdncdenr.gov
919-707-3685
Adriene Weaver
Classifications, reclassifications
adriene.weaverClncdenr.gov
919-707-3692
Bridget Flaherty
Groundwater standards
bridget.flahertvPncdenr.gov
919-707-9022
Determiningwhat in -stream concentration of Carbon Tetrachloride would protect the uses in Mountain Creek. Other factors, such as dilution, may
need to be considered for determining permit limits.
Parameter of concern = Carbon Tetrachloride (CAS 56-23-5)
Water body of concern = Mountain Creek (Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin, Stream Index: 13-5-(0.7))
Step 1- Determine the designated uses associated with Mountain Creek
Step 1.1-The following classification for Mountain Creek was found using the online NC Surface Water Classifications interactive map
(see link above):
Class WS IV (Water Supply)
Step 1.2-The following designated uses were identified using the classification for Mountain Creek (See the designated uses table):
Class WS IV (Water Supply) --> Water Supply uses plus Class C uses (Aquatic Life, Secondary Recreations, Fish
Consumption)
Step 2- Search for Carbon Tetrachloride, for each of the designated uses, in the NC 02B Standards, EPA NRWQC, and NC In -Stream Target Values
tables.
The following information was found:
NC 02B Standards table:
Water Supply = 0.254 ug/L
Fish Consumption = 1.6 ug/L
EPA NRWQC table:
No information
NC In -Stream Target Values table:
Freshwater Aquatic Life = 560 ug/L
Step 3 - Choose the most protective value from those identified in Step N2 to protect the most sensitive designated use.
The most sensitive designated use for Mountain Creek is the Water Supply use. Therefore,
The Water Supply standard of 0.254 ug/L for Carbon Tetrachloride will be used.
Note: If the most protective value is not a NC 02B water quality standard, it is best to contact NC DWR Classifications &
Standards staff for more information.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Designated Uses for North Carolina Stu -face Water Classifications
Notes on Classifications & Designated Uses
1- Refer to the NC Division of Water Resources Classifications webpage for information on how to determine water body classifications.
(httP://deg.nc.gov/a bout/d ivisions/water-resources/plan ni ne/class ification-standards/classifications)
2 - Class C (for freshwater) and Class SC (for saltwater) provide basic levels of protection for aquatic life, recreation and consumption offish and aoolv to all freshwater and
saltwater classifications, respectively. For example, a Class WS (Water Supply) water must meet all ofthe standards for Class C waters in addition to those standards specifically
described in the Class WS description.
3 -The NC 02B Standards (green tab) and NC In -Stream Target Values (blue tab) tables show Designated Uses for the Class C, Class B, Class WS, Class SC, Class SB, and Class SA
primary classifications as well as the Trout, Swamp, and HOW supplemental classifications. The EPA Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria (yellow tab) apply only to the
aquatic life, fish consumption, and water supply Designated Uses. Designated Uses for the ORW, HOW, WL, UWL, and NSW classifications do not appear in these tables, however
the Class C or SC uses must be maintained at a minimum. These classifications may have additional water quality requirements which can be determined by referencing the
classification in rule. The 15A NCAC 02B rules can be found here:
15A NCAC 02B rules
Freshwater
Primary Classifications
Designated Uses that Apply
Associated Rules
Class C
Freshwater Aquatic Life, Secondary Recreation and Fish Consumption. Apply to all
freshwater classifications.
15A NCAC 02B .0208 & .0211
Class B (Primary Recreation)
Primary Recreation and all Class C uses
15A NCAC 02B .0219 (Class B)
and .0208 & .0211 (Class C)
15A NCAC 02B .0230 & .0231
Class WL (Wetlands)
Wetlands and all Class C uses
(Class WL) and .0208 & .0211
(Class C)
15A NCAC 02B .0212, .0214,
Class WS (Water Supply I-V)
Water Supply and all Class C uses
.0215, .0216, & .0218 (Class
WS) and .0208 & .0211 (Class
C)
Supplemental Classifications
Designated Uses that Apply
Associated Rules
Class HQW (High Quality Waters)
High Quality Waters, any special considerations and permit requirements as described in
15A NCAC 02B .0224 (Class
rule, and all Class C uses.
HQW) and .0208 & .0211
Nutrient Sensitive Water, any considerations for specific NSW waters as described in rule,
15A NCAC 02B .0223 (Class
Class NSW (Nutrient Sensitive waters)
and all Class C uses.
NSW) and .0208 & .0211
(Class C)
Outstanding Resource Waters uses as well as any specific actions assigned to individual
15A NCAC 02B .0225 (Class
Class ORW (Outstanding Resource Waters)
ORWs as described in rule 15A NCAC 02B .0225, High Quality Waters, and all Class C uses.
ORW) and .0208 &.0211
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0225 has a list of waters classified as ORWs with specific actions.
(Class C)
15A NCAC 02B .0101 & .0202
Class Sw (Swamp)
Swamp and all Class C uses
(Swamp) and .0208 & .0211
(Class C)
15A NCAC 02B .0101 & .0202
Class Tr (Trout)
Trout, High Quality Water, and all Class C uses
(Trout) and .0208, & .0211
(Class C)
15A NCAC 02B .0101 & .0202
Class UWL (Unique Wetlands)
Unique Wetlands and all Class C uses
(UWL) and .0208, & .0211
(Class C)
Saltwater
Primary Classifications
Designated Uses that Apply
Associated Rules
Saltwater Aquatic Life, Secondary Recreation and Fish Consumption. Apply to all
Class SC
saltwater classifications.
15A NCAC 02B .0208 & .0220
Class SA (Shellfish)
Shellfishing and all Class SC uses
15A NCAC 02B .0221(Class
SA) & .0208 & .0220 (Class SC)
Class SB (Primary Recreation)
Primary Recreation and all Class SC uses
15A NCAC 02B .0222 (Class
SB) &.0208 &.0220 (Class SC)
15A NCAC 02B .0230 & .0231
Class SWL(Wetlands)
Wetlands and all Class SC uses
(Class WL)&.0208&.0220
(Class SC)
Supplemental Classifications
Designated Uses that Apply
Associated Rules
High Quality Waters, any special considerations and permit requirements as described in
15A NCAC 02B .0224 (Class
Class HQW (High Quality Waters)
rule, and all Class SC uses.
HQW) & .0208 & .0220 (Class
SC)
Nutrient Sensitive Water, any considerations for specific NSW waters as described in rule,
15A NCAC 02B .0223 (Class
Class NSW (Nutrient Sensitive waters)
and all Class SC uses.
NSW) and .0208 & .0220
(Class SC)
Outstanding Resource Waters uses as well as any specific actions assigned to individual
ORWs as described in rule 15A NCAC 02B.0225, High Quality Waters, and all Class SC
15A NCAC 02B .0225 (Class
Class ORW (Outstanding Resource Waters)
uses. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0225 has a list of waters classified as ORWs with specific
ORW) & .0208 & .0220 (Class
SC)
actions.
15A NCAC 02B .0101 & .0202
Class Sw (Swamp)
Swamp and all Class SC uses
(Swamp) and .0208 & .0220
(Class SC)
15A NCAC 02B .0101 & .0202
Class UWL (Unique Wetlands)
Unique Wetlands and all Class SC uses
(UWQ and .0208, & .0220
(Class SC)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
North Carolina 15A NCAC 02B Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters
Freshwater Fresh & Salt Saltwater
Class WS All waters All waters All waters
Class B Class SB Class SA Supplemental Classifications
(I - � (Class C) (Class C & SC) (Class SC)
Aquatic Life' &
Aquatic Life' &
High
Pollutant or
Primary
g
Water
6
Secondary
Fish
3
Secondary
Primary
8
Shellfish'
Swamp
Troutz 6 Quality
Synonyms & Other
Canter
Reference Source (See
CAS #
Recreation
Supply
a
Consumption
a
Recreation
Waters
io
Endpoint
Parameter
Recreation
Recreation
Waters
Information
supporting info tab)
(FC & WS)
All values reported as ug/L unless labeled otherwise.
Benzene
71-43-2
1.19
51
Yes
IRIS 2000
Acute:
Click to calculate
Calc (d,h)
EPA NRWQC-
Chromium III"
16065-83-1
freshwater aquatic life
NA
Chronic:
Correction 1999
standard
Calc d,h
Acute:
Acute: 16
Hexavalent Chromium;
1100 (d)
EPA NRWQC-
Chromium VI"
18540-29-9
(d) Chronic:
Dissolved metal for aquatic
NA
11 ()
Chronic: 50
life
Correction 1999
d )
Acute:
Acute:
Click to calculate
Calc (d,h)
4.8 (d)
EPA NRWQC-
Copper"
7440-50-8
freshwater aquatic life
NA
Chronic:
Chronic: 3.1
Correction 1999
standard
Calc d,h
d
Hardness
NA
100 mg/L
As CaCO3 or Ca & Mg
NA
EPA QCW 1963
Acute:
Acute:
Click to calculate
EPA AW QC - Lead
Calc (d,h)
210 (d)
Lead"
7439-92-1
freshwater aquatic life
NA
1984; EPA NRWQC-
Chronic: Calc
d,h
Chronic:
8.1 d
Correction 1999
standard
Acute:
Acute: 74
Click to calculate
Nickel"
744-02-0
25 (t)
Calc (d,h)
(d) Chronic:
freshwater aquatic life
No
EPA NRWQC-
Chronic: Calc
d,h
8'2 (d)
Correction 1999
standard
See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 and
Oil and Grease
NA
(N)
(N)
NA
EPA QCW 1976
.0220.
See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 and
pH
NA
6.0-9.0(N)
6.8-8.5(N)
(N)
.0220 for addition
NA
EPA QCW1976
requirements
10000
Total suspended solids
Suspended Solids
NA
(E, Tr+
20000 (E)
Effluent Limit. See 15A NCAC
NA
EPA QCW 1986
HOW)
026 .0224
Tetrachloroethylene
127-18-4
0.7
3.3
PERC, PCE, Perchloroethylene
Yes
EPA NRWQC(HH) 2006
Trichloroethylene
79-01-6
2.5
30
TCE
Yes
EPA NRWQC(HH) 2002
Streams <
50 NTU,
< 10
See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 and
Turbidity
NA
Lakes &
< 25 NTU (N)
NTU
.0220for more details. NTU =
NA
EPA QCW 1972
Reservoirs < 25
(N)
Nephelometric Turbidity Units
NTU N

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Zincll
7440-66-6
Acute: h)
Calc (d,
Chronic: Calc
d h
Acute: 90
(d) Chronic:
81 (d)
Click to calculate
freshwater aquatic life
NA
EPA NRWQC-
Correction 1999
standard
The values in these tables do not substitute for any written regulations, nor are they themselves regulations.
Hardness -Dependent Metal Calculations
Metal
Equations for Hardness -Dependent Metals (ug/L)
Enter in -stream
hardness (mg/L)
Calculated standard (ug/L)
Cadmium, acute
WER*[{1.136672-[In hardness](0.041838)1*eA{0.9151[In hardness]-3.14851]
25
0.82
Cadmium, chronic
WER*[{1.101672-[In hardness](0.041838)1*eA{0.7998[In hardness]-4.44511]
25
0.15
Cadmium, acute, trout waters
WER*[{1.136672-[In hardness](0.041838))*eA{0.9151[In hardness]- 3.62361]
25
0.51
Chromium III, acute
WER*[0.316*eA{0.8190[In hardness]+3.72561]
25
183.07
Chromium III, chronic
WER*[0.860*eA{0.8190[In hardness]+0.68481]
25
23.81
Copper, acute
WER*[0.960*eA{0.9422[In hardness]-1.7001]
25
3.64
Copper, chronic
WER*[0.960*eA{0.8545[In hardness]-1.7021]
25
2.74
Lead, acute
WER*[{1.46203-[In hardness](0.145712))*eA{1.273[In hardness]-1.460)]
25
13.88
Lead, chronic
WER*[{1.46203-[In hardness](0.145712)1*eA{1.273[In hardness]-4.705)]
25
0.54
Nickel, acute
WER*[0.998*eA{0.8460[In hardness]+2.2551]
25
144.92
Nickel, chronic
WER*[0.997*eA{0.8460[In hardness]+0.05841]
25
16.10
Silver, acute
WER*[0.85*eA{1.72[In hardness]-6.591]
25
0.30
Zinc, acute
WER*[0.978*eA{0.8473[In hardness]+0.8841]
25
36.20
Zinc, chronic
WER*[0.986*eA{0.8473[In hardness]+0.8841]
25
36.50
See the Supporting Info tab for information on all footnotes, notes, and abbreviations

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
EPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Aquatic Life & Human Health
Below are all Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria for which NC does not have a Water Quality Standard for one or more uses
Freshwater Fresh & Salt Saltwater
Class WS
Class C Class C & SC Class SC
I -V
Water
Fish
Is there anIs
Supplyb
Aquatic Life'
Consumption
Aquatic Life'
Cancer
Most Recent EPA
there an
Synonyms & Other
to
NC Aquatic
Is the EPA Criterion being reviewed for
Pollutant or Parameter
CAS #
(WS)
(FC)
Endpoint
Criterion
NC FC or WS
Information
(FC &WS)
Publication Year
Life
Standard?
adoption as a NC Standard?
All values reported as ug/L unless labeled otherwise.
Standard?
Chlorodibromomethane
124-48-1
0.8
21
Yes
2015
No
No
Reviewing 2015 Criterion for FC & WS
Chloroform
67-66-3
60
2000
2015
No
No
Reviewing 2015 Criterion for FC & WS
NC has
NC has
Based on EPA Drinking
aquatic life
aquatic life
Copper, Total
744-05-08
1300
standards for
standards for
Water Maximum
Yes
1992
Yes
No
No
Dissolved
Dissolved
Contaminant Level Goal
(MCLG)
Copper
Copper
Dichlorobromomethane
75-27-4
0.95
27
Yes
2015
No
No
Reviewing 2015 Criterion for FC & WS
See NC
See NC
See NC
Nickel
7440-02-0
4600
1998
Yes
No
No
Standard
Standard
Standard
Pyrene
129-00-0
20
30
2015
No
No
Reviewing 2015 Criterion for FC & WS
See NC
Trichloroethylene
79-01-6
See NC Standard
2015
No
Yes, for WS
Reviewing 2015 Criterion for FC & WS
Standard
The Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria values presented in this table are based on the values reported on EPA's Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria
website as of 7/22/2016.
See the Supporting Info tab for information on all footnotes, notes, and abbreviations

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
North Carolina In -Stream Target Values for Surface Waters
Established per language in 15A NCAC 02B .0202 & .0208. Contact DWR staff for further information.
Freshwater Fresh & Salt Saltwater
Class WS All waters All waters (Class C All waters Supplemental
Class B Class SIB Class SA
Class C & SC Class SC Classifications
Aquatic Life' &
Aquatic Life' &
High
Primary
a
Water
e
Secondary
Fish Consumption;
Secondary
Primary
s
Shellfish9
Troutz
Swamp
Quality
Synonyms & Other
Cancer
Reference Source (See
Pollutant or Parameter
CAS #
Recreation
Supply
a
Recreation
4
Recreation
Recreation
Waters
,
Waters
Information
io
Endpoint
p
supporting info tab)
(FC & WS)
All values reported as ug/L unless labeled otherwise.
Acetone
67-64-1
3100
2000
1100000
300000
2-Propanone
No
IRIS & ECOTOX 1/07
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate
117-81-7
5
10
DEHP
NA
ECOTOX 9/15
Dichlorobromomethane
75-27-4
0.55
17
Yes
RAIS 1/07
1,2-cis-Dichloroethylene
156-59-2
60
720
Cis-1,2-dichloroethene
No
IRIS 7/11
Isopropyl Benzene
98-82-8
2700
250
11000
8000
Cumene, Cumol
No
IRIS & ECOTOX 8/10
ECOTOX 9/15 & RAIS
1-Methyl naphthalene
90-12-0
0.8
450
2.6
95
Yes
4/10
2-Methyl naphthalene
91-57-6
90
85
200
30
No
ECOTOX & IRIS 9/15
Naphthalene
91-20-3
400
12
950
52
Mothballs
NA
IRIS & ECOTOX 8/10
Tetrachloroethylene(PERC)
127-18-4
120
65
PERC, PCE, Perchloroethylene
NA
ECOTOX 2/07
Xylene Mixture
1330-20-7
1
6200
670
1 57000
370
450
1
No
IRIS & ECOTOX 6/12
1,3-Dimethylbenzene, Human
m-Xylene
108-38-3
6200
420
54000
180
420
Health and Water Supply use
NA
ECOTOX 6/12
Xylene Mixture as surrogate
1,4-Dimethylbenzene, Human
p-Xylene
106-42-3
6200
420
54000
100
130
Health and Water Supply use
NA
ECOTOX 6/12
Xylene Mixture as surrogate
1,2-Dimethylbenzene, Human
o-Xylene
95-47-6
6200
600
57000
60
400
Health and Water Supply use
NA
ECOTOX 6/12
Xylene Mixture as surrogate
See the Supporting Info tab for information on all footnotes, notes, and abbreviations

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
Supporting Informafion
Notes & Descriptors
Calc = hardness -dependent metal standards are calculated based on in -stream hardness
(d) = dissolved metal standard. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(E) = effluent limit for High Quality Waters. See 15A NCAC 02B .0224.
(h) = hardness -dependent dissolved metal standard. See below for hardness -dependent dissolved metal equations. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(FC) = Fish Consumption
(LD) = limited data.
(N) = narrative standard.
(P) = public policy document.
(S) = toxicity exceeds solubility, no visible sheen or free product in water or on sediment or shoreline per 15A NCAC 02B .0211 & .0220
(t) = based upon measurement of total recoverable metal. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(Tr + HQW) = trout waters also listed ar High Quality Waters.
WER = Water Effects Ratio. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(WS) = Water Supply.
Designated Use Definitions
(1) Aquatic Life standards protect both fresh and saltwater aquatic organisms to promote biological integrity. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 and .0220.
(2) Trout Waters are protected for natural trout propagation and survival of stocked trout. See 15A NCAC 02B .0101 and .0301 as well as .0224 for trout waters that are
also HQW.
(3) Fish Consumption standards are based on consumption offish (including shellfish) tissue. These standards are commonly referred to as "Human Health" standards.
See 15A NCAC 02B .0208.
(4) Secondary Recreation standards apply to activities in surface waters that result in incidental body contact. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 and .0220.
(5) Swamp Waters have low velocities and other natural characteristics which are different from adjacent streams. See 15A NCAC 02B .0101.
(6) Water Supply standards are applicable to all Water Supply Classifications (WS I-V) and are based on consumption of fish and water. See 15A NCAC 02B .0208, .0212,
.0214,.0215,.0216, and .0218.
(7) High Quality Waters are a subset of waters with quality higher than the standards and are described in 15A NCAC 02B .0101 and .0224.
(8) Primary Recreation standards apply to activities in surface waters that result in full -body contact. See 15A NCAC 02B .0219 and .0222.
(9) Shellfish Area standards apply to surface waters that are used for shellfishing for market purposes. See 15A NCAC 02B .0221.
(10) Carcinogens are listed in 15A NCAC 02B .0208 and relate to Human Health water quality standards which include fish consumption and water supply. All standards in
this table that are designated as carcinogens were calculated from oral cancer slope values obtained through EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
(11) Acute & chronic values for all metals on the NC 02B Standards table are based on the following language in 15A NCAC 02B .0211: Acute = "Compliance with acute
instream metals standards shall only be evaluated using an average of two or more samples collected with one hour." Chronic = "Compliance with chronic instream
standards shall only be evaluated using averages of a minimum of four samples taken on consecutive days, or as a 96-hour average"
Reference Sources
= Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40
!EC = Enviromental Protection Agency Ambient Water Quality Criteria
J = Enviromental Protection Agency Quality Criteria for Water
JQCC = Environmental Protection Agency Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria. (FC) denotes Fish consumption, (WS) denotes water supply, and (AL)
aquatic life Water Quality Criteria.
= The ECOTOXicology knowledgebase.
P = US Food & Drug Administration National Shellfish Sanitation Program.
CED = GEI Consultants -Chadwick Ecological Division. Reviewed EPA 2001 Update of Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium.
= Integrated Risk Information System.
NR = National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (EPA)
NR = National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (EPA)
= The Risk Assessment Information System

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
T4,c 0artotte Obsc ucr
/�#, E(^j y^�'''�y�'y+ �^� �charlotteo bs(erven co
m in
LC...I k e V �.,.% ! 1 1 I G..it1 I + �' \. S' _ Carol y■Q^yy�{ `�], T
M A. Ca A 2 1 N E I M A G A L I N f I a Bride,. I
n
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Account #
Ad Number
Identification
145583
0004421850
1 Public Notice North Carolina Environmental Management Commission/�
Attention: Wren Thedford
NCDENR/DWQ/POINT SOURCE
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 276991677
PUBLIC NOTICE
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail, Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit NCO089885 Charlotte Metro Office Tower
Construction
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to issue a NPDES
wastewater discharge permit to the persons) listed below. Written comments regardingb
the
proposed permit wi be accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. The ec-
tor f theNCDivision of Water Resources(DWR) may hold a public hearingould there e asign'rfindegree of public interest. Please mail comments and/or informan requestto
DWR at the above address. Interested persons may visit the DWR at 512 N. Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC to review information on file. Additional information on NPDES permits and this no-
tice may be found on our websfte: http:/ideq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources water-res
ources-per mits/wastewater-branch/npdes-wastewater/pubic-notces,or by calling (919) 707-
3601. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC applied for a NPDES permit for the Charlotte Metro Office
Tower Construction [NC0089885], S. College St. & S. Tryon St., Charbtte, Mecklenburg Coun-
ty, discharging treated groundwater to Little Sugar Creek, Catawba River Basin.
LP4421850
North Carolina } SS
Mecklenburg County }
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public
of said County and State, duly
authorized to administer oaths
affirmations, etc., personally appeared,
being duly sworn or affirmed according
to law, doth depose and say that heishe
is a representative of The Charlotte
Observer Publishing Company, a
corporation organized and doing
business under the laws of the State of
Delaware, and publishing a newspaper
known as The Charlotte Observer in the
city of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg,
and State of North Carolina and that as
such he/she is familiar with the books,
records, files, and business of said
Corporation and by reference to the files
of said publication, the attached
advertisement was inserted. The
following is correctly copied from the
1
Insertion(s)
Published On:
October 17. 2019
Chem Foster, Regional Office Associate
In Testimony Whereof I have hereunto set
my hand and affixed my seal on the 23rd
day of October, 2019
4L� i�
Electidnic Notary Public State of North
r arnlina

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ® NPDES Unit ❑ Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: NCO089885
Attn: (Derek Denard Central Office NPDES Permitting)
Facility name: Charlotte Metro Office Tower Construction
From: (Edward Watson in MRO)
Choose an item. Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ❑ Yes or ® No
a. Date of site visit:
b. Site visit conducted by: Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No
c. Person contacted:
e. Driving directions:
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude:
Latitude:
and their contact information: (_)
Longitude:
Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Little Sugar Creek
Classification: C
River Basin and Subbasin No. Catawba River Basin 11-137-8
ext.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Impaired stream
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow: 0.072 MGD into two Outfalls to be determined by permittee
Current permitted flow: New Permit
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, explain: Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes
❑ No ® N/A If no, please explain:
3. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain: The site diagram does not indicate a location for the treatment system.
4. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. N/A
5. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
6. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Only if treatment system fails to work properly.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Pagel of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
7. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): NA
1. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: NA
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
2. Check all that apply:
❑ No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
3. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑Yes®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
4. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: High turbidity related to short term construction period; if there's a
treatment system failure low level organics like solvents and petroleum constituents could be released to
waters of the state.
5. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):NA
REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit to obtain through an additional information request:
Item
Reason
1
The application does not indicate the use of frac tanks being employed to
capture the dewatered water. Is the Water vault on the site diagram, the point
where the dewatered water is being collected prior to treatment?
2
The site diagram does not indicate a location for the treatment system. Is the
system to be trailered on at a fixed location which should be shown on the map?
3. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
Monthly Acute Toxicity
This is a short term construction project (approximately 4 months) and a close
monitoring.
monitoring schedule will be necessary to maintain effluent quality to an
impaired stream.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
4. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
® Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
5. Signature of report preparer: Edward Watson September 18,2019
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date: 9.18.19
Docu Signed by:
F161 FB69A2D84A3...
A Pre -application meetine was held reizardine this construction work on June 14. 2019. During the meeting. MRO
staff suggested using the existing treatment system from the Wells Fargo building which would only require a permit
modification to existing permit NCO088226 with the addition of a settling tank, a transfer pump and piping to feed to
alreadv permitted treatment system. Subseauent communication has indicated that thev were not able to Lyain
ermission to access the Wells Fargo treatment system.
No engineering alternative was presented in the permit application.
The system is yet to be classified and no ORC or Back-up ORC has been named for this facility.
Since timing of construction and issuance of the permit may not align well, the permittee should be advised that
industrial pump and haul, a deemed permitted activity under 2T .0203 provided a few conditions can be met, it
available to them.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
NPDES PERMIT NEW / RENEWAL
DRAFT / FINAL
CHECK LIST
Permittee
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Facility
Charlotte Metro Office Tower Construction
Permit No.
NCO089885
Stream Class
C
Regional Office
MRO
Permit Writer
Derek Denard
Permit Drafting Initiated [BIMS Events] (review application for completeness)
08/29/2019
RO staff report requested [BIMS Events], sent email to:
Watson, Edward M <[e-mail]>
09/10/2019
RO staff report received [BIMS Events] :
Watson, Edward M <edward.watson ncdenr. ov>; Andrew Pitner <adrew. itner ncdenr. ov>
09/18/2019
EAA Review new or expanding)
10/11/2019
Draft Permit
09/10/2019
Create/Edit GIS Map
10/14/2019
Update/ Create Permit Outfall (Lat/Lon, HUC code, etc. BIMS
10/15/2019
Data/RPA Review
9/10/2019
Add. Info. Requested [BIMS Events]:
08/29/2019
09/18/2019
Add. Info. Received [BIMS Events]:
08/21/2019 — EAA w/ cost analysis, 08/29/2019 — EAA revised cost analysis table w/ discharge
09/18/2019 — system summary (incorrect dates where included in the cover letter)
08/21/2019
08/30/2019
09/18/2019
Complete Draft Permit
10/14/2019
Draft Fact Sheet & Fact Sheet Binder
Draft Cover Letter
10/14/2019
Proof Read for Peer Review
09/10/2019
Submit Cover, Permit, Map, Factsheet Binder (including Application, Add. Info.) for Peer Review
by Emily Phillips
09/10/2019
Peer Review Completed
09/18/2019
Proof Read Draft for Public Notice
10/14/2019
Prepare Public Notice Statement
10/14/2019
Updated Public Notice System
10/14/2019
Submitted for Public Notice on
10/16/2019
Region comments on draft requested to (see draft to whom list):
Watson, Edward M <[e-mail]>
09/10/2019
Region comments on draft received from:
Watson, Edward M <edward.watson ncdenr. ov>
10/16//2019
Draft to additional reviewers ATB [BIMS Events]:
hannah.headrick a)ncdenr. oy; cind .a.moore a)ncdenr. ov
10/16/2019
Draft from additional reviewers ATB [BIMS Events]:
None
Draft to additional reviewers WOCG [BIMS Events]:
Maureen.Kinneykncdenr.gqv
Not sent
Draft from additional reviewers WOCG [BIMS Events]:
Maureen.Kinne ncdenr. ov
Send Final
If stream class WS, Draft to additional reviewers PWS (see draft to whom list) [BIMS Events]:
NA
If stream class WS, Draft form additional reviewers PWS [BIMS Events]:
NA
Other agency comments re uested see draft to whom list, for S —DMF / Shellfish BIMS Events]:
NA

DocuSign Envelope ID: 90070567-98D6-4693-865C-05E405FABA5B
I Other aaencv comments received [BIMS Event!
NA
Newspaper Notice Received (add to factsheet binder) 10/23/2019
Public notice published [BIMS Events] 10/17/2019
BIMS Scheduled Issuance Date [BIMS Events - automatic]
12/01/2019
Permit Effective Date for Final
01/01/2020
Expiration Date
12/31/2025
Prepare Final Permit
11/27/2019
Finalize Factsheet & Binder
11/27/2019
Prepare Final Cover Letter
11/27/2019
Final to DocuSign (proof read):
11/27/2019
Add (3) Document packages to the Envelope Page to send to John- Please upload in the following order:
1. Cover Letter, Draft Permit, Map (combined into one file), Boilerplate
2. Fact Sheet, plus supporting documents in one file (called "Fact Sheet Binder"):
i. PDF copy of Application
ii. RPA and supporting data sheet (see Tips section)
III All calculations for limits
iv. Emails (see Tips section)
V. Any comments received
vi. Affidavit of Publication (scanned copy)
vii. WET testing and Monitoring summary
vill. Compliance Summary
ix. Any other pertinent information supervisor needs to look at
3. Copy of Previous Effective Permit (also include necessary versions)
After signing:
1. Permit writer receives an email from DocuSign that states the Document has been completed.
2. Click View Completed Documents.
3. While viewing the documents in DocuSign, click Download icon which appears above the
document. Download as separate PDFs to your personal permit file folder on the H drive or OneDrive.
4. Permit writer prints and sends out 3 copies:
a. To Permittee: permit, cover letter, map, boilerplate
b. To NPDES File Room: cover letter, permit, map, fact sheet
c. To Central Files: cover letter, permit, map, boilerplate, fact sheet
5. Permit writer imports e-copy of cover letter and final permit (signed) to Laserfiche.
6. Permit writer imports e-copy of Fact Sheet (i.e. all documents) to Laserfiche.
7. Permit writer imports WORD version of Final Permit into Sharepoint or the S: Drive under SWP-Point
Source>NPDES>Permit Files> (find permit number, import your files as a file folder labeled as
"permit number year", or create a file for the current renewal year and import your files into that folder)
8. Permit writer imports WORD version of Fact Sheet into Sharepoint or S: Drive. (same instructions as 97)
9. Charles processes permits as usual and puts a stapled Permittee copy in the mail basket "Already scanned
in Laserfiche". Also, if stapled, Wren knows it has already been put in Laserfiche.
10. Charles puts NPDES File Room copy in the NPDES File Room. Charles gives Central Files copy of
the permit to permit writer after updating BIMS to QA/QC.
11. To QA/QC:
-Once Charles issues the permit in BIMS, then Permit Writer goes into BIMS>Tasks>Maintain
Permit>Input Permit Number>Outfall>Highlight outfall>Select Maintain>Limits>Check that limits match
what is in the permit
12. Permit writer responds via email to Charles Weaver that QA/QC is completed.
13. Permit writer puts hard copy of permit in Central Files basket at end of hall to send to Central Files.
Email Final to the following recipients: MRO / Corey Basinger [corey.basinger&cdenr.gov], Edward Watson
[[e-mail]]; Andrew Pitner [andrew.pitner&cdenr.gov]; Wes Bell [wes.bell&cdenr.gov]; Aquatic Toxicology Branch / Hannah
Headrick [[e-mail]]; Cindy Moore [cindy.a.moore&cdenr.gov]; Wastewater Operator Certification Group / Maureen Kinney
[[e-mail]]; Richard Farmer [[e-mail]]; McIntire, Mark D, Duke Energy
Corporation [Mark.Mclntirenn,duke-energy.com]; David Penalva, NOVA [dpenalvagn,usanova.com]; Keith Rice, NOVA [kricegn,usanova.com]