HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0006220_STAFF REPORT_19940331 NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit: , NC0006220
Kannapohs WTP
' Document Type: Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Staff Report
201 Facilities Plan
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date: March 31, 1994
Thies doca eat is priated oa r-exam a paper-more any
coateat oa the reverse side
SOC PRIORITY �,PRQJE7 7T : r No
To : Permits and Engineering "nit
Water Quality Section rae� `
Attention: Sean Goris �'7 R ,} Q,,;.
Date
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECO ENDATIONS
County : . Rowan
NPDES Permit No . : NCO006220
MRO No. : 94-97
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1 . Facility and Address : Kannapolis Water Treatment Plant
Post Office Boy: 107
Kannapolis , N . C. 28082
2 . Date of Investigation: March 28 , 1994
3 . Report Prepared By : Michael L . Parker , Environ . Engr . II
4 . Person Contacted and Telephone Number : John Erickson, (704 )
939-2503 .
5 . Directions to Site : From the jct , of west "C." Street (SR
1124 ) and SR 1109 (Pump Station Rd. ) , travel north on 5R
1109 t 0 . 3 mile . The WTP is located on the right (east ) side
of SR 1109
6 . Discharge Point (s ) , List for all discharge Points : -
Latitude : 35 ° 30 ' 34"
Longitude : 80 ` 38 ' 48"
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site
and discharge point on map .
USGS Quad No . : -E 16 SW
7 . Site size and expansion area consistent with application :
Yes . Adequate area exists for the construction of WWT
facilities , if necessary .
8 . Topography ( relationship to flood plain included) : Gently
rolling, 2-8% slopes . The WTP is not located in a flood
plain .
9 . Location of Nearest Dwelling : No dwelling exists within 500
feet of the WWTP site .
Page Two
10 . Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters : Irish Buffalo
creek
a . Classification : C.
b . River Basin and Subbasin No . : Yadkin 030712
C . Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses : The receiving stream had a well
defined channel with flow observed (a water supply
reservoir is located immediately upstream) . There are
no other known di'schargers located within one mile
downstream of this facility .
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1 . a . Volume of Wastewater : * MGD (Design Capacity)
* Intermittent (see Part IV)
b . What is the current nermitterd capacity : N/A
C . Actual treatment capacity of current facility (current
design capacity) : N/A
d . Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
ATCs issued in the previous two years : N/A
e . Description of existing or substantially constructed
WWT facilities : There are no existing WWT facilities .
f . Description of proposed WWT facilities : There are no
WWT facilities_ proposed at this time .
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters : DEM studies
have documented toxic impacts from WTP effluents . For
this reason , the TSB should decide whether toxicity
testing is necessary at this facility .
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only) : Not Needed .
2 . Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme : Residuals
(alum sludge) are being disposed by pumping to the '
Fieldcrest Cannon Plant No . 1 pretreatment facilities , which
ultimately discharge into Concord 's Rocky River WWTP .
3 . Treatment Plant Classification: Less than 5 points ; no
rating (include rating sheet ) . This facility does not meet
the minimum criteria for a Class I facility .
4 . SIC Code(s ) : 4941
Wastewater Code(s) : 21
5 . MTU Code(s) : N/A
,f
Page Three
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1 . Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only)?
No
2 . Special monitoring or limitations ( including toxicity)
requests : None at this time .
3 . Important SOC/`70r or Compliance Schedule dates : N/A
4 . Alternative Analysis Evaluation
a . Spray _Irrigaticn : Insufficient area available .
b . Connect to regional sewer system: The City of Concord
receives for treatment all wastewater generated in the
City of Kannapciis . ^oncord has refused to accept the
filter Dark wash water into their collection system,
therefore, a discharge appears to be the best
alternative at this time .
C . Subs•urface : Insufficient area available .
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The City of Kannapolis requests renewal of the subject
Permit . There have been no changes and,/cr modifications to this
facility since the Permit was last renewed.
Pending receipt and approval of the WLA, it is recommended
that the Permit be renewed as requested ,
3 zy $
Signature 'ef Report Preparer D to
/'D - /(-:-� , 6
2 S
Water Quality R onal Supervisor Date