20191739 Ver 1_401 Application_20191219

6;')' 4 / W 1i (�
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2019-01310
Begin Date (Date Received): 12.13.2019
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Morgan Hills Subdivision
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]: RE(X VFD/,DS�D
Proposed Residential Development {l�/�
DEC 19 2019
Vlatarr Res°urc s
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Creeks Landing Holdings, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Pilot Environmental, Inc
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Morgan Road, Albemarle, Stanly County, NC
35.328940 0/-80.209762 0
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 653702869367 & 653702994036
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Stanly
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Albemarle
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Long Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Proposal for Environmental services
Pilot Proposol4607
March 25, 2019
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Morgan Road (Street Number unspecified; PIN:653702869367)
Property Address:
Albemarle, NC 28001
Owner Information: Carolina Development Services
Address: 2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, NC 28110
Telephone Number: 704-791-0331
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Llaweq
Pnnt Name
Capacity: _ Owner Authorized Agent
Date+ / t�
E

:l ,srryW,q DioOw[e
7 imn�MwD
❑ e.,rl,r,a.
J lrur wDi..a B,b+!M Maa
- e Y .nz Mr..n9, c•ew+o_� s» nw
P' .')7.Mwv.ep'.fra,urg .J. Si5.19
Li .g11
it Brysc DrY
M% irvw»DrtS
� � Nt iM.0 Pan'N1. 1G I f.19
. gYswa,
'+-� DtiDr.1r z
. L..Mi
B r w,.tw ne.ew
M • uaoa.aemve�
B • aPkr D,
. 0
MnD%n
- :J o
o a wr.m«
• � � Mc.e
:1 tr••r�
. pyeM
�-205!«ip.wr.6i scum
0 Su4w+x bM •Dleam�nale 1,: •rrr
U trry w,p vrovler
:l i,u.n lC.p
lnrna.Dr
-� lyr wome+i lean Pc.0
- ®Y.�1; M.mro.C*nwrsp_.M_S r5194v
0. 1'I}7.Mrs..•p�(�aaip_rfn.5 f1.f9
71. un,m.e Pam
Cl Y +lot tmr
G .p1
8 i•yv,n D.n
N irym Dw:
B! N(IMM Iwtek ,C 1 F 19
_ 0 i kmPPw Dace,
. LlVN.
q * Pr�Mn nno.1.
� • upum�.Ys
❑ B •�.w.,w�ee..
. 0 P Ivan•. re i.a+.
00
. =1 • arom.
9 � eo.a•
. iJ � Ocraw
. � q wewiw
• -� � G�Wr 4ar.m+
•7 i4ae
JIN rn

O�OF W ATE9OG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Morgan Road Subdivision
2b.
County:
Stanly
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Albemarle
2d.
Subdivision name:
Morgan Hills
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Creeks Landing Holdings, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
1671-917
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Michael Sandy
3d.
Street address:
2627 Breckonridge Centre Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Monroe, NC 28110
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Michael T. Brame
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip:
Kemersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.:
336.708.4620
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
653702994036 & 653702869367
Latitude:35.328754° Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
80.210315°
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
165 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Long Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains wooded land and fields. Residential and commercial development is located on nearby properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=0.902 Ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams=6,620 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a 593 lot single family residential neighborhood.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project includes the construction of a 593 lot single family residential subdivision and associated access
roads. In order to provide access to the sub -division from Morgan Road, it is necessary to install a stream crossing. To
facilitate the construction of the access road and development of the site, clearing and grading the site is necessary.
Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during grading and construction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments: SAW-2019-01310 JD Pending, Site Visit
10.29.2019
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Michael Brame/David Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD has not been received.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts are not proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 SPOT
Culvert/Rip-
Rap/Pump Around
Unnamed
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4
147/14/45
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
[]PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
147/14/45
3i. Comments: The proposed stream crossing will permanently impact 147 linear feet of stream from culvert fill and 14 linear
feet of stream associated with rip -rap that is to be keyed in to existing stream bed elevation. Additionally, 45 linear feet of
stream channel will be temporarily impacted associated with a coffer dam/pump around. The 14 linear feet of permanent
impact from keyed in rip -rap and the 45 linear feet of stream channel are not considered a net loss of stream. Therefore,
mitigation is not proposed due to net loss of stream being less than 150 linear feet. The 45 linear feet of temporary impact will
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

be restored to similar pre -construction conditions.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required.
131 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The site is located in the Yadkin River Basin. Protected Riparian Buffers are not located on the site.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the proposed residential sub -division to avoid other impacts to streams and wetlands. The
remaining roads, utility lines and lots/pads have been designed to avoid additional impacts to streams and wetlands. The
applicant has designed the stream crossing in a relatively straight reach of the stream that does not contain adjacent
wetlands. The portion of the stream being impacted is intermittent and has been dry during our site visits. The stream quality
improves down -gradient of the proposed crossing location. The crossing was desinged in a reach of the stream that is of
lower quality compared to other waters located on -site. The remaining 6,414 linear feet of stream and 0.902 acres of wetlands
are being avoided.
Additionally, the applicants engineers have tried several alternatives to cross the stream perpendicular or avoid it altogether.
The owners have tried to aquire a small, triangular parcel of land directly east of the site so the road could be built in that
location. The owner of this tract was not willing to sell, even with a very generous offer. The engineer looked at shifting the
new road's intersection with Morgan road westward, to allow a more perpendicular stream crossing. Shifting the road this
direction wouldn't allow the road to meet NCDOT's vertical sight distance, creating an unsafe intersection. Given the
constraints, the engineer was able to design a crossing that includes a net loss of less than 150 linear feet of stream channel
with culvert and sideslope fill.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used. Temporary coffer dams (impervious dikes) will be installed up -
gradient and down -gradient of the proposed culvert. During construction, water (if present) will be pumped around the
construction footprint. Appropriate stream bank protection will be provided in the channel during construction and all excess
excavated material will be immediately removed from the stream bank crossing area. The rip rap is being keyed in to further
minimize the impacts to the stream. The rip rap has been sized to minimize the length of stream impact. Upon completion of
the culvert installation, the temporary coffer dams (impervious dikes) will be removed and flow will be diverted through the
culvert. Following construction, disturbed stream banks will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions and matted.
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Page 8of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ®No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
24.86 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Based on the percent impervious, a
stormwater plan is not required.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Albemarle
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the proposed subdivision will be discharged into existing sanitary sewer lines located on the site.
Stream and wetland impacts are not necessary or proposed in order to tie into the existing lines.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
We consulted the USFWS Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened species inhabit Stanly
County, NC.
The Bald Eagle is listed as a federally protected species. There are no waterbodies located on the site or nearby
properties that provide habitat for this species. The proposed project will not disturb the bald eagle.
The Northern Long-eared Bat is listed as a federally protected threatened species. Hibemacula is not located in the
vicinity of the project area. Additionally, the project area is not known to occur within 150 feet of a known summer
roosting tree based on the most recent publically available information from the USFWS. Potential summer roosting
habitat is present on the site, although msany of the trees had been recently cleared during our most recent site visit. At
this time, it has not been determined if additional tree removal activities will be conducted during the summer. If tree
removal activities do not occur between May 1 through August 31, then it's our opinion that the proposed project is not
likely to adversely affect the NLEB. If tree removal activities, associated with site development, occur between May 1 and
August 31, then the developer meets the criteria of the final 4(d) ruling for NLEB and any associated take would be
considered exempt from Section 7 requirements of the ESA, assuming the associated take is not prohibited intentional
take.
Schweinitz's sunflower is listed as a federally protected endangered species. We did not observe this species or potential
habitat for this species on the site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. The
stream that is being impacted is intermittent and was dry during our site visits. Fish habitat is not present. Best management
practices will prevent sediment from entering down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) to identify historic and/or archaeological resources of the site.
The map does not identify eligible for listing properties at the site or on properties within one-half mile of the site. A copy
of the map is included as an attachment.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM (Drawing 4)
Michael T. Brame PWS
Dlglt"Iy signed by m'd'" frame
Michael Brame DN: rn=Michael frame, o=Pilot
E"""°"1erft,ou,
1otemr1mcom,r—US
12.13.19
ema�mbrame
Date: 2019.12.13 10.24:06 -0500'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

HENRY FARMER FAMILY
'I LTD PARTNSHP ,Me1 PDD
1I 't PIN: 5
5547- 04165p�PD9e b4
/ ZONING: A
I I
616 pee8
H Je kin e .,
Po I o�°i5g4• PD9
,
4754Y77.56'W
as.ao � a ra
CURTIS GARFIELD I -. .S. _ - '_.•-f�•� \ 1 1 ^J
D.B.
PROPOSED IMPN
REFERENCE ENLAR
3 4
A",,LE ROAD I HWY 52
�o
S N
N V N
ROAD SR 2009
1 rn O
� W o
- KU�a L COMBS ¢ �e l I
D.B.-1074, P.C. H9,�' K _m
' PIN: 6 t-0188-25�1$
ZONING: WS1y,$i-20
1 m i
-
¢.
-
Q41
rr I.r,
Imo'
ua
i
a
ED
O
`c E.
0
STEVEN DARRELL7k R�f6a,1a°OB p?d
ELAINE WHITLEY STORY JS a0
D.B. 1629, P.G. 892
PIN: 0537-02BB-SUS
ZONING: COU, R-20
COMING 100 YEAR
ROOD ZONE
2
MDR\
J�LO J
\ vat
91
' 04-.
MICHAEL E. SIN k
MICHAEL E. SNYDER REVOC TRUST
D.B. 1476, P.C. 113
PIN: 5537-0288-9367
ZONING: COU, R-20 / COU, RA
^� :m vic5U wo us
I �o m
I I
MM0 5 DAMS
m - Q D.S.5
. 250. P.G. 174
' PRN:
m o ZONING, COU, R5
ZONING: COU, RA
1 0
•o CITY OF AIBEMARLE
D.B. 392. P.G. 600
mmmm PIN:
E aD d a 8537-D464-966s
ZONRNG: ALB, HID
a�=a
ma Qn
i�
W
0
II
I, JAMES VERNE HOLT
ET ALS
i D.B. 490. P.C. 748
PIN: 6547-0304-&S10
ZONING: COU, RA
_ 1
/
LINDA F HUDSON
D.S. 264, P.C. 52
. / 69 abmo F�� PIN:
ZONING R=. RA
e
'Ei1°'11 Ailp oPow+R1V
NOT FOR SALES, RECORDATION
OR CONVEYANCES p
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTLON�
INFORMATION INCLUDED W1T1 THIS
DRAWING WAS SUPPLIED FROM A SURVEY
PROVDED BY DENT H TURNER R LAND
SURVEYOR ON 5-15-19.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 168 AC
PROPOSED LOTS: 593
ROAD IMPERVIOUS AREA: 8.42 AC
HOUSE & DRIVEWAY IMPERVIOUS AREA: 33.35 AC
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 41.77 AC
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS: 24.86%
o r Y
SCALE /• a 200'
R UNA DLVELOPMENT
IILRVIDEB

[Al
i
LOM422
IT
.m
•A�����i LOT. 10-0
I PH I I qll I
-Opp,- -
TEMPORARY DIVERSION INSE I
LEGEND OPE MATTING TO BE INSTALI III
ALONG STREAM BANKS
E.I.I W.11-d TEMPORARY IMPACT AU
Los
�1
47
I
I
480
75
I
47
—
70
OSED
-PR
OR
46
i
46
-- RETAIN
I
-_
-----
0
—
I
WALL
_ — -
I-_ -___.___.
5
1
T—
PROPOSED 54' RCP
PROPOSED
18' Rep
PROPOSED 54' RCP
""—
PROPOSED 50' RCP
-445
-�
_.. —.
STRESTREwC
AM PROFILE
'
47
—
II
ROADWAY
STREAM GROSSING
— PROFl
F
f
I
SCALE 1'-50'(NORZ.) 1'=5'(VERT.)
1.50
2+00
2+
3+m
3+5D
m utn
eam
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL.
OPEN SPACE : 2
4a5-
'
I
47
Ifs
1
i
I
I
I
I
PROPOSED
ROADWAY
47
70
46
46
--
E)QSTING GROUND
0
PROFILE
55
PROPOSED
�SED 50'
I
i
ROADWAY
SCALE I'-50'(HORZ.)
STREAM
CROSSING — CROSS TON
1'•5'(VERT.)
a
04W
1a
m
0 ;• Z'
SCALE 1'-W
STREAM IMPACTS
TEMPORARY (LF)
PERMANENT (LF7
45 IeWASSSION FµNG OR
140 (CULVERT R FILL)
7 RM-RAP
45 (TOTAL)
147 (TOTAL)

0
1
2
xnALunox a[a."uNnTs;
' s�rtapaaorl mliRa ulAxYfs Wawxn w RAP [NDIm
2 [W:AVAII m puva+ aNlxEt MRxUT oe,IlRenlo M
ENERGv
:x551PATNN, --
--
FARRIC —RI—,-
AND SECURED
DSsifw aIWRn.
1 ftl.fE Poly -PARK WQ M aRRImIM pAxx6 YTx A WMN
ZnR m paOa/,PPED TDRAI V9,a IT W II rODT dF
x. �Cpll[Wn M WYI6a1[AY anQ9W O,AMEL xro m
puIKL AID zac m PaY-f.Bl"c
I,1
FABRIC:iNED
\ DMRSN)N CHANNEL
UNDI AT M Ceal[CIISIL
uMIISAT tHNU
e. f4a[tt m LssiIRAN and,[lTH OUL11 Mro m UIT THE
DSSII,a O+WREL AND 5lWII[ M RQY-TANG IAQ AT m
M OI9111,a ENAMEL AT M
e. ro olvaT m F,m x,0 M oneJlRBx
1. WNS T WI NNf11wBU9 aI2 W M D[51W0 MNREL AT M[
. ..'
BOTl,aTRrAN soE To IetlAR M aaQ AR[A
WInfM, . M _v," cD,IS1xcTKW. RFMp.L m
s e[RWp15 — No —I M W Wa,Fa aAIX xm M
- t
l -' jj _
/
`
a
f. R�DIOK M P1Y-PARK I/QI A�D M M pr4R9W
Anus
OF BANK
O(mNq M PoLv�Aa'xCR IlQ NI RAa[lIY dYINJ NObA1
RR
i O[IX M IaGI rM wAautt Ar1O1 EAtlI RAKALL edT.
MPERNOUS DINE
DEVAATERING DEv`CE
SAx[eA0 I6TAWIKM xpl6
I, yR �1lIMIaRANOL" AXa ROtl(f IIItl, AREA TIER[ M
I. MelaY pt®AroA ro E Ao RN.
2. YDRQn IW¢ ro RL aArcaAo
a Y — M fIF[RNOUe P0.Y-- uxm 'IM m otNmt
Or m . LR . OV£A M[ mnp of TIE sA,D B.ao altF.
A w�K iM YVPOR "r ufl,
NOTEsvosulan0
`-WORK AREAAY9aM
A Y�iTA�e,Fro
TS ARC 41AOTAR PAIX
ENSURE TOANCx —
A YW MWNpK P0.Y-IAeK ARauO SAxaBAE aIR AAn
�Ilun AND FIFES SECUREiY.
4nxE fn,l FRIAL uaL1 V SAIosAm
i � �r xsa[cr�s.�a°Aato �aaT. wWa Wa Iws
FABRIC LINED DIVERSION CHANNEL
NO SCALE
A E, T<ExTeA, ap"psx' a :.. a'
r �
OR
ormses
o[ FLM
I
. . . . .; . . . . . .-. . . -.. no am
slRraorsn oAR
�- I' aVRRurInR)
, cBxTERf PUN VIEW "'_
SAItl191 tENq
I
QSfT[M
WTTIxa fACVILL RIIIYI. J
i� C.TiiEXT
.
nwIMTT
Aru—
To YrsEL ` —o• nR _
ARatQa a � I
, TEalH4 j
RERc11 Is•
• ♦' Wnax! u
I ,LLQ
—E. o a" ° a ANCHOR OPTIONS
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
COIR FIBER MATTING DETAIL
NO SCALE
PLANTING TING DETAILS
IAE arAYIS r1M'[C Y: DETAIL
evaeo , n m`,G KIML
av�ivc ns nc"iLL•mXwT"w
IM STAKE
—
yl
F
PLANTING DETAILS
NO SCALE
STRFA6IBM RIEFOROSTATION TYKCAL
TTIE o
A,a Awm'x I'en IxxmtxW a I-allm n�
IRCBTIIsm aArtl
INSTALLED FLUSH WITH EXISTING
STREAMBED.
COR raklt WT
r I Pbn�ey>� I�YmC nTIK WMNN b4M N.FInI
pYn�n� w .+KKr,R eQ ..w.Y N a
l ""R IS nwnM .srm<Y a9Nr NWi,pWiYy�°buctNn
STREAM RESTORATION
NO SCALE
aLvan rrE
a
�M,WG/ PRRV4D
auvA W1piw°C.L w'"�uWn
N[v M-YAIDWWpaIRD
.`�t«wdr wt•.N =.ml�o NUL.
L � m •� a o,.� • PAR. a.N,a
TEMPORARY CULVERT EQUIPMENT CROSSING
NO SCALE
MATTING TO BE INS
STREAM BANKS N
tARY IMPACT AREAS
5
PLAN Vww
- O a[II EaY tl a.Rl
64(IJ-0
�� IIIMkIREII
•Itl
�A g
A OY Wtl
WMI
SECTION A -A
A R
ro.as Yl� - x L
LHIVI
�6oW
a Io 61. OO b
is aN oleo
11113mul" I"'
2 C 3-11104 ■ QO-m)
RIOT w IQee b
.r YiI
6 ! m)
♦ (is
S
�' -
-- -- i earl (1dal
II�_-- --'
wRtlR a.lal
DEWATERING BASIN DETAIL
NO SCALE C
PLAN VIEW
approved
dewatering device
Stream
diversion pumps
discharye hoses - -- P intake
- p dewetering pump I hose
A.. A 1
/ 1
-fllow intake hose .. -flow
sediment dike Clean water dike sump..tKJle
or pool
_ . 02' to 18' deep
work area Y dia.)
pumps should discharge length not t0 exceed
onto a stable velocity that Aich can be
dissipator made of rip rap completed In one day
or sandbags
SECTION A -A
.,impemoua ShBe ng
base flow + 1 foot
work area
- � (2 fool minmum)
aces sedan of sandbag die
PUMP AROUND DETAIL
NO SCALE
CAROLINA aEVLLOPMlNT
fERVIDEf
B��
O � N
J
W
iz� JJ
z (—u
A =jz Z�
<O� O
Oda 'K'
= W
w
SHEET NUMBER
1
I�

,
Fw%, `•.
27
(� } `i i ` 'fw �J. N 4 i'riln6tV• w.a
t' r ate!
f wa+3ns�t ;� Park .
f♦ - ••',
sely
.,�,�-- -� ' � / '`• . 3 -1 • of ner� f . -� � ,
•RC--k V k
� � •' '. I ` _ ' - 1 ,
j. a , ` { I' ,, - �• k''t-tile
-w-+4
1 `
Cem
, .
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 1
USGS Topographic Map
Albemarle, NC Quadrangle
Scale: 1" = 2,000'
r I L 07 ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
USGS Topographic Map
Morgan Road
Approximate 165-Acre Tract
Albemarle, Stanly County, NC
Pilot Project 4607

FUMMIR 131
WQ
Drawing 2
USDA Web Soil Survey
of Stanly County, NC
Scale: 1" = 600'
V I LOT ENVIRONMENTAL. INC
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Web Soil Map
Morgan Road
Approximate 165-Acre Tract
Albemarle, Stanly County, NC
Pilot Project 4607
T

to
It
-I' ~ a -TO
B�[ �:BF Ida Y
k
_�.-� � f{ter {•}• �, a0
NJ
0,�
r/
I
f
yrt'. KIf
Ban,
-..
' k 6
s • ' `tSrS'
1..77"JJTT
► ^ 4C r' '1 i11 i� E r l-'+_ _; �' l�_1 � RAF3
+y
lad� f % _
ti .. . -
v -frf : i fy'
Ti
fD3L rp
f °% •�
-»• _ - •tip � A _ ,_ •..
h F �I 'sue' -�_-~ --
I e'
LFEGEND
i�i J i 7 I€ ' i s Site Boundary
Drawing 2A
Published Soil Map
USDA Published Soil Survey Morgan Road
Approximate 16S-Acre Tract
of Stanly County, NC
Published 1989, Sheet 6 Albemarle, Stanly County, NC
Not to Scale PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL. INC Pilot Project4607

1 --
1�y f i l
0
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1" = 600'
ti
�.4
4,.
r IIU
P I L 0 T ENVIRONMENTAL. I NC
r
2 46
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Riverine
Other
NWI Map
Morgan Road
Approximate 165-Acre Tract
Albemarle, Stanly County, NC
Pilot Project 4607

x
- A
*7
s
y, � �► y tit � 4+•
DsHL'iRQ
�wr
LEGEND
Pr Site Boundary
"M 1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard
ORegulatory Floodkray
® Sped al FloodLvay
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conlditior - 1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard
MAreawith Reduced Risk Dueto Levee a
_r
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
National Flood Hazard Layer Morgan Road
from FEMA Web Map Service Approximate 165-Acre Tract
Scale: V = 600' P'� Albemarle, Stanly County, NC
P I LOT F N V I R O I M F N T A L. I N[ Pilot Project 4607

;CIL
• " Ilk
0 024
DSB31-3 DSIM
90 LF 40 LF
DP-2
DSB21-28
710 LF
i
DSBll-14
+ 630\f
R
\
DWB 32-35
DP-1
DWB 39-42
0.019 ac.
w MWC1-12 O-4 ac. Site Boundary
0.69 ac. DWB 24-31
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO DP-3 / 0.024ac. Wetland
DWB 1-22 Stream — Perennial
WETLAND FLAGS = 0.14Sac.
STREAM FLAGS Stream — Intermittent
Stream Flags = 43
wa 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
Wetland Flags = 192
Total Flags = 235 Data Point
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR THE
NCDEQ-DWR. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES. DELINEATION CONDUCTED BY PILOT PERSONNEL ON
6.27.19.
Drawing 5
Aerial Imagery from ESRI
and Pilot GPS Data
Scale: 1" = 650'
Date: 7.01.19
�ILt�T
t I LOT ! N V I R O N M f N T A L. 1 N C
Wetland Map
Morgan Road
Approximate 165-Acre Tract
Albemarle, Stanly County, NC
Pilot Project 4607

114C1?Jr� ♦ 7 y
r`r
ts�x:.tm
■ tales.-mm.w_ p ,, w e: M �a�vx�vro * rot-tis^tto� �utztsca�r� �t-aw.wtr�t s / ■ +• k d r Q m= t'y°tyrn9