20021339 Ver 1_Complete File_20040623

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: torn steffens
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Boger Thorpe
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Oak Valley Farms c/o Tri-Land Developers
Project Number 04 1067
Recvd From APP
Received Date 6130104 Recvd By Region
Project Type
Certificates
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream
Type Type Impact Score Index
County Wayne
County2
Region Washington
Stream
Class Acres Feet
Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
Stream Impacts_(ft.)
tj_
14 stream & F-70 N F__ 27-(49.5) WSIV NSW 30,412. 0.17 229.25 1.00
I?f OY ON F-I1-IF-F-F-
r
Mitigation Wetland \
MitigationType Typo Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 352016
Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Longitude (ddmmss) 780424
Comments:
Issue n/c NOTE- After the Fact permit: Civil penalty pendjngnegotiations tas080204

cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office i
WAT?RP
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
January 24, 2003
Tri-Land Developers, LLC
c/o: James Weeks
P.O. Box 11180
Goldsboro, NC 27532
DWQ Project No. 02-1339
County: Wayne
Page 1 of 2
Subject Property: Tri-Land Developers, LLC (Oak Valley Farms, Old Grantham Rd. (SR1219), Brogden, NC
. Neuse River [03-04-04, 27-(49.5), WS-IV (water supply) NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Weeks:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact 0.17 acres of wetlands, approximately 290 feet of streams and 14,600 square feet (ft) of protected
riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing two stream crossings along the private subdivision road and one
driveway crossing on Lot No. 2 at the subject property, as described within your application dated August 20, 2002
including additional information dated November 22, 2002 (received by the DWQ on November 27, 2002). After
reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3362 (GC3362). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide
Permit 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved
Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should
obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge. Also, this approval will expire when the
accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the. General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new
owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you
must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Stream Mitigation
You are required to mitigate for permanent impacts to the perennial streams. The required length of stream
mitigation to compensate for impacts to the perennial streams is 290 feet as required under GC3362 and 15A
NCAC 02H .0506. The required length of stream mitigation was calculated by the DWQ from the design plans
provided with the additional information dated November 22, 2002. Condition No. 6 of GC3362 requires stream
mitigation for impacts to streams exceeding 150 feet. The DWQ will consider withdrawing this stream mitigation
condition, if you can provide adequate proof in writing that less than 150 feet of perennial stream impacts have
occurred or are anticipated to occur on the property.
A stream mitigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the DWQ in writing before the impacts approved by
this Certification occur. One option to satisfy this required stream mitigation is to make a payment into the
Wetland Restoration Fund administered by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP). Mr. Ron Ferrell of the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Page 2 of 2
WRP should be contacted at [phone] if you choose to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund.
You must provide proof to the DWQ within your mitigation plan that WRP is willing to accept this payment. Another
option to satisfy this required stream mitigation is to restore a stream in accordance with DWQ's current design
and monitoring protocols. You may obtain information regarding the current protocols from our web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands/restore.htmI or by calling [phone].
2. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and
protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms
shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this
Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate.
3. Diffuse Flow (No Review)
An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the
protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A
NCAC 2B.0233(5).
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream
impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter.
To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to
the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 1508.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
It is the understanding of the DWQ Wet1ands1401 Unit that the DWO Washington Regional Office has issued a Notice
of Violation for activities that have occurred on this site and that an enforcement action may be pending. This letter
does not absolve you of any violation or enforcement action that is currently under review by the Regional Office.
Please contact the Regional Office at [phone] if you have any questions regarding any outstanding violations.
Attachments: GC 3362
Cc: Jeffrey Kornegay, B.R. Kornegay, Inc., P.O. Drawer 1435, Goldsboro, NC 27533
USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 02-1339
Date: January 24, 2003
bz
Sincerely,
mai lbox:///CJ/Documents%20and%20Settings/danny_smith/Applicat...
Subject: Tri-land site visit
From: Danny Smith <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:14:13 -0500
To: Margaret Eagles <[e-mail]>
Tri-land Developers, LLC FYI:
Crossing #1
57.25 feet of 54" RCP
17.00 feet upstream impact
26.00 feet downstream impact
100.25 feet stream impact
Crossing #2
73.50 feet of 54" RCP
21.50 feet upstream impact
34.00 feet downstream impact
129.00 feet stream impact
Total stream impact for project: 100.25 ft. + 129.00 ft. = 229.25
With respect to PCN application and 401 Cert. Modificaiton. I requested that they
provide 7 copies of the PCN to DWQ, include a cover letter to the attention of Danny
Smith, include all
project changes, maps, vicinity maps, a mitigation acceptance letter from
EEP, and a fee ($475.00).
ds
1 of 1 8/14/2004 4:44 PM
?pF W RTF9?
p -e
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
September 9, 2002
DWQ # 02-1339
Wayne County
, CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Attn: James Weeks
Post Office Box 11180
Goldsboro, NC 27532
Dear Mr. Weeks:
On August 22; 2002 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your
application regarding your plan to fill wetland for the purpose of an access road in Wayne County. Approval
from DWQ is required to disturb these streams. Please provide seven copies of the following information and
refer to the DWQ# listed above in your reply. In particular as described in 15A NCAC 2B .0502, we will
require you to locate all streams and ponds on the property. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for
instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
1. Private roads in water supply watersheds need variances from water supply rules. Has this variance
been obtained?
2.. Buffer mitigation may not needed for these impacts. Please review our rules to determine this.
3. How do you plan to construct lot #2 without impact? Please provide the house footprint on Lot# 8.
4. Please provide stormwater management plans which will achieve sheet flow thru buffers.
5. Provide maps which depict the location of septic tanks in relation to buffers.
Please telephone Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies
of our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this. information is received. If
we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the
project and will consider it withdrawn.
kpkm?ey
Water Quality Certi cation Program
cc: Washington DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy "
Jeffrey Kornegay, B. R. Kornegay, Inc.
I. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
)19) 733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands

B. R. KORNECAY, INC.
LAND SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING
P.O. Drawer 1435 • 300 E. Walnut Street
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27533-1435
919-735-5886 Fax [phone]
November 22, 2002
Bob Zarzecki
Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit Q
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 NOS ?
`' Nos gE Project: Tri-Land Developments, LLC \N
NCSR No. 1219 (Old Grantham Road)
Wayne County, NC
Bob:
Please find enclosed seven copies of the revised drawing showing proposed level spreaders and
calculations. This is as requested in you e-mail dated November 14, 2002. The Wayne County
Health Department has issued septic tank permits for lots 9, 10, and 11. Only three lots had to be
investigated by them as required by the Planning Department. The remaining lots should be
developed the same.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey L. Kornegay, PE, PLS
cc: Tom Steffens
B. R. KORNECAY, INC.
LAND SURVEYING - ENGINEERING - PLANNING
P.O. Drawer 1435 - 300 E. Walnut Street
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27533-1435
919-735-5886
August 20, 2002

Bob Zarzecki
Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center 2ti?
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Cs
Project: Tri-Land Developments, LLC
NCSR No. 1219 (Old Grantham Road)
Wayne County, NC
Bob:
..trig-L?C?C??dl
2 2 M
Fax [phone]

Please find enclosed seven copies of permit materials and a check (#28090) in the amount of $200
for the permit application fee. This project proposes approximately 146 linear feet of cumulative
impacts to riparian buffers and approximately 0.17 acres of cumulative riparian wetland impacts.
This project is for a proposed private road needed to access the property which crosses two
existing streams with riparian buffers.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey L. Kornegay, PE, PLS
cc: Tom Steffens

Office Use Only:
Fornr\ ?Emion May 2002
USACE Action ID No DWQ No.
If an articular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" o? "NIA'
L Processing
2 22002
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: AUG _" _
Res
Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershhed%,Huffes ICU
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit-rbt -D
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Trl-Land Developers LLC cLo James Weeks
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 11180
Goldsboro NC 27532
Telephone Number: 919-778-4029 Fax Number: 919-778-1231
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jeffrey L Kornegay
Company Affiliation: B R Korne av Inc -
Mailing Address: P.O. Drawer 1435
Goldsboro NC 27533
Telephone Number: 919-735-5886 Fax Number: 919-580-9053
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Tri Land Developers, LLC
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 2577693120
4. Location
County: Wayne Nearest Town: Goldsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Tri-Land Developers LLC
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): NCSR No 1219 (Old Grantham
Road) approximately 2650 feet east of intersection with NCSR No. 1220 (Providence
Church Road)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): lat• 35-20-16 / long: 78-0424
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): t 220 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://l12o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/iiiaps /.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is wooded an undeveloped The property to the
west is a subdivision The property to the east is wooded and undeveloped.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes a proposed access road to the property Typical construction
equipment will be used such as graders pans and excavators.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction of proposed access road in
order to gain access to the portions of the property cut off by the existing perennial
streams.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts will occur at proposed
crossings of perennial streams with pipe and rip rap aprons (*NOTE: Estimated acreage of
wetlands is provided by Wetland and Natural Resources Consultants Inc.)
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
Sta. 12+20 Culvert & rip rap 0.08 No At stream riparian
Sta.17+83 Culvert & rip rap 0.09 No At stream riparian

' List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. impacts mciude, out are nUL mmuxi w: iawu:uuc.c:u C.u,...,b, t;.?u,,,s, •_•_,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fenia.eov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: + 3.5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: t 0.17 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intennittent7
leasespecify)
Sta.12+20 Culvert & rip rap 68 UT to Neuse River t 8 ft. perennial
Sta.17+83 Culvert & rip rap 78 UT to Neuse River t 8 ft. perennial

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts include, out are not urmtca W. ctuvez u auu abamiau u.,t,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
"" Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
x,,tivw.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., wN w.topozone.com,
www.mapnuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 146 L.F.
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U. S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not fmmfed to: fill, excavauou, u,UL,buis,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The two perennial streams cross the entire width of the property. Therefore, crossing
the streams is unavoidable The proposed roads cross at 90° angles to the streams and
the proposed cross section widths are minimized
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
T
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp://h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands/strm,gide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at 11ttp://112o enr. state nc.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,760 3 26,280
2 5,840 1.5 8,760
Total 14,600 35,040
' Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Total site area = t 220 acres
Existing impervious area = 0 acres, Proposed impervious area = t16 acres.
XU. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Septic tanks will be used
YdH. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
It is necessary to construct the proposed culverts during this summer. This will help avoid
construction problems and delays associated with wet weather conditions in the fall and
winter.
2-
-Applicant/Agent's Signature I Date
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
r\
o ) J J --
i-
? ot° li
TRI-LAND DEVELOPMENTS, LLCM,
1 2000' --J
SOUTHWEST GOLDSBORO
%Z*N*ecoro,ny+rnVGIi..u•o-.yoV"203 Wn\0zoswecnr«.DA13
1'cP
S
TRI-LAND DEVELOPMENTS, LLC
1" = 1667'
....___..?........vuwarii.s...nwtan7o]g1?Cwa?020783EC nw.DNt3
USDA SOIL SURVEY
SHEET 24 ?'?

May 10, 200}
North Carolina Department of Water Quality 'NETLANDS 1401 GROUP
Wetlands Division
2321 Crabtree Blvd. i lAY ?
Parkview Bldg, T 7004
Raleigh, NC 27604 lNATER QUALITY SECTION
Attn: John Dorney - Environmental Supervisor II
Re: Matthews Farm -- Lot 85
Mr. Dorney, as per our conversation today (5-10-04) at approximately 11:40 am,
you requested a letter describing the concerns I had in regards to lot 85 in the Matthews
Farm subdivision, Johnston County North Carolina. As I stated in our discussion, I am
requesting an investigation as to lot 85 adjacent to my property (Lot 84) and the fact that
the majority of said property is indicated as "wetlands" according to the attached
subdivision plat for Matthews Farm phase two. The driving force for my request is the
fact that the selling agent assured us that there would be no developing on lot 85 due to .
the, fact that it was "wetlands", and at most, the possibility of a future road might be
established if necessary (as indicated on the plat). Upon the purchase of our home I
researched the restrictions in regards to building a privacy fence on our property which
would include the "wetlands" portion. According to my findings it was determined that
we would be exempt under the BufferlNationwidr 39 rules due to the fact that we would
not be backftlling the area, or using mechanized equipment to clear out trees with more
than five inches in diameter or taller than chest high. It is evident that the developer is
not abiding by these. Stipulations in regards to "wetlands" clearing. I appreciate your
assistance in this matter and thank you in advance.
Sincerely,
David S, Graham
2843 Matthews Rd.
Clayton, NC 27520
Home phone: [phone]
Work phone: [phone] l
Cell phone. [phone] l?
Enclosure -? I/ f'?
1
a
X41

V-
N
U
? a
?N
Q [A
O
ae
UN
A.M. FL
I R` m ^N
h ???? 1710
It.

• m 1 +
r . U W? 1 + I

g A >P f. P1 7i4 n C'i Y .. R , -
b ??
++ " s . M
x _ .? a a _ ? ?t

T.J ?cc•Ml

V3
H
in
'iy N 4
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
p /
/
Bp:
g9i
8

WE5
o
O
rn
a
m
ALP
iI! 4
aG?
ti ?y
n
Nx??
E E9m¢it
LM
RclIhO
'ik
`ME9
1? O
vl
o D ??
?y N O
. id T
m ?r? • ????'b?? U l . N? NO
1 NG a? ? •
ti to 9(1 '1 '• Z?.RA+' • b T„
%nm
1 1 ?ti ?.r W m u
Not
Y
MV? NO
1 I N W IS ? NO
1
1 ' i ?mi 5? Muu1.l
SS
1 a I .6 I ?? `cODS;
f
W'!E>•I TO SHEkT 3 OF 3
g ti 1 ? ? } 9??'
mm 11 w j I at
° All
z
?+ y
?0.
x?a
o?

? w
s w
x w F
-
a p
g
o
?
- u
.
€
.
.. m
;e
RR
;
z
?
w?'
?^
^.?
?
a?
fA
Z
F.
Gt
?I
X
?
? '
L{?
?S g A gg ? 0 ? gg ? ? g E ? p?
fJ A 5i ? s3 5l

lkiia D33 i 'x
r

r-4 0
rq
w
Tw . Sao
00 C-4 C
.

?z v
A?
?W

?
tol c
'
avc
V? v
gdsa;
C2 C? 11• t
y ?
-*d

A

No ?
'? ?Thl
?•C•„pI.BSM ?
1
p

? r7
in
w C
"T Z f
?U
\a p,
N G?l+ Of
O m
?63 Y
f ?O y
1
DC DL r
•LY 1 ?4f?M173N .?14l , N

14 in

A?
WAR, -, I
awNgg1
ti:Z -b00Z'aT'
ti?
imap:Hdanny.smithy/[e-mail]:143/fe...

Subject: RE: site visit
From: "Jeffrey " <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:58:39 -0500
To: "Danny Smith" <[e-mail]>
Danny,
That is okay with me. I'll meet you there. I drive a white and tan Ford Explorer
with my company logo on the side. My cell phone number is [phone].
Jeffrey L. Kornegay, PE, PLS
B.R. Kornegay, Inc.
P.O. Drawer 1435
300 E. Walnut St.
Goldsboro, NC 27533-1435
919-735-5886
fax [phone]
[e-mail]
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Smith [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Jeffrey
Subject: site visit
Jeffrey,
I would like to meet you on the Tri-land Developers, LLC site to confirm
the linear footage of the stream measurements. March 16th at 11:00.
please let me know if you can make it.
danny
1 of 1 3/15/2004 4:54 PM
about:blank
RE: James Weeks, owner
Tri Land Developers, LLC
Oak Valley Farms, Old Grantham Rd. (SR 1219))
DWQ Project No. 02-1339
Wayne County
Danny,
This is to follow up my telephone conversation with you and Bob Zarzecki on February
12, 2004. The road design as submitted to DWQ showed stream crossings that created a
total stream impact of 290 feet. This design was based on DOT standards because Mr.
Weeks had indicated that it was possible he might want to dedicate the road to NCDOT.
When actually building the road, Mr. Weeks decided not to build to DOT standards.
Instead, less fill material was used, resulting in a lower final road grade relative
to the stream crossings. That significantly reduced the width of the road cross
section at each crossing. In addition, less riprap was actually installed.
My measurements at the stream crossings on February 13, 2004 are as follows.
Crossing no. 1:
42 feet of 54" RCP
6 feet or rip rap at
4 feet or rip rap at
Total impact: 42' +
Crossing no. 2:
56 feet of 54" RCP
9 feet or rip rap at
6 feet or rip rap at
Total impact: 56' +
the downstream end.
the upstream end.
6' + 4' = 52 feet
the downstream end.
the upstream end.
9' + 6' = 71 feet
Total impact of the two streams: 52 ft. + 71 ft. = 123 feet.
I did not include temporary construction disturbances along and parallel to the
stream banks during construction of the road crossings. The streams in these areas
do not appear to have been relocated, straightened or otherwise permanently impacted.
Silt fence was installed along the banks during construction, which remains today,
but can be removed.
Based on my discussion with the Wetlands Restoration office, they have said that they
will accept mitigation payment for any required mitigation, once the Corps issues its
NWP 39 approval. I expect to have an approval from the Corps soon.
For your information and review, I have attached several photographs of each
crossing.
Please let me know if you need any additional information from me on this project.
Thanks for your assistance.
Jeffrey L. Kornegay, PE, PLS
B.R. Kornegay, Inc.
P.O. Drawer 1435
300 E. Walnut St.
Goldsboro, NC 27533-1435
919-735-5886
fax [phone]
[e-mail]
<<Oak Valley crossing 1 upstream B.jpg>> <<Oak Valley crossing 1 upstream A.jpg>>
<<Oak Valley crossing 1 downstream B.jpg>> <<Oak Valley crossing 1 downstream
A.jpg>> <<Oak Valley crossing 2 upstream A.jpg>> <<Oak Valley crossing 2 upstream
B.jpg>> <<Oak Valley crossing 2 downstream B.jpg>> <<Oak Valley crossing 2
downstream A.jpg>>
I of 1 3/15/2004 4:56 PM
----------------------- 1. X ---- •-- -
- ___- -_
------------------ ----------------------------------- -----
-- ------------ -- •4 b?07 Sod is -
- A?X ?d -?lo " ---
- °- 154
. 152°
-------------- - ------------
--- -------- ------
------ --- - ------
911 u b'h? .J 9 -3 l111?ft
. ---- ?
ti°,`a; ----------- 5 - RIP N---BUrFE,
b IX
------------------ -
^?."?:? O N 1? 4 ,1l
W -
CLiJ by
------------
cli
CH"
L*,a o ?,-
----------------
'...-- , ,..1
zo -- ;;?" _ " pPpSEp - O
-- ------------
pR 6
.,
. J of
---------------
At+--BUFF
-
------------------
"
_.
--------------------
;..
---------------
:-
-------------------
-----------
•Z•?-
--- - r' 0??
------------
<u ;?• % dT., ue
CL F4a
a m a ?` ?'".• a?
?iE In d.
(5 V)
FX Zv
111
O - --_
O
----------------- -
------- p?
-------------
QQO?h JU 8 4J y
4L x
/ • 9m
------------------- ----
z r / 0 Q
Ra a2-,/ / ??Q
~ ?? ?Y b., eon' tab ----------------
o-yam 9b?.
l I •'- Ifl..... . %
-"•-
- -------------------
--- ,
-ob! ------
trr /
Q_ 9L--- j
---------- _ __---
.
---124
ro +s? .td.
- -----------
----------------
+ Ld F?
--- -------------------
W g z ` df
------------------------- -------
• C l ?. .................
--- . y f
-------------
ss i .? -
--------------
136 :\
Z
g I r-...
_
/ --
- a ----- "'"-• 140--- -- -•
-142--
i ----------
-----------------------
------- - -144 --• '
-------------
Z • ( 1 ------ ,48 --
a I 150- -
%
g
o ?- 157. --- -- --
-------------------
w I -154 _
LLJ
------------
Lu.
---------------
vii. U ea .:_
-------------
Ld I
23 w -156 --------
? d = 0
z
a W o
?•IAM _ D iI' 3
W sz I sz + N
N I 1 W3\ d II'
?• i O
~ ? C9 I I '?,
%
z CL
a. 0
LJ?? $? ?•
Q N ` N N , ,
0 El
ic/18/2002 08:40 919-705-1815 INSP/PLANN/ENVIRCN F'AUt t71
i WAYNE COUNTYENWRONM.ENTAL HEAL TH. DEPARTMENT
REF. NO:, 011219_TLD.: -7 DATE • :10104102'_
HOUSE
MOBILE NOME
OTHER
EXPANSION
REPAIR
REVISION
PROPERTY ADDRESS SR* 1219
ADDRESS:, f
TWP .•:BROCiDEN.
IVA TER SUPPLY
PUBLIC x
PRIVATE
VALLEY' PARMS'.
7784024 ,IETU,,iWS G?-,OI'
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT
X FEE
$
The above sigoatare indicator that I have read, wldctst:utd, and agree with all the provWuna and information as outlined on the hack of thin foon, aztd ovthorize Wayne Couuty
Envirvnmcntal Hcaldt Dc runcut pcrsonnel to go onto this pro pcrty for evaluation.
r SYSTEAH TYPE DEPTH OF NITRIFICATION LINES
BI;DROOAI3
a FROAI TOP OF THE GROUND
SURFA
E
TANK SIZE ' ? ?1 :
C
PLOW RATE ", '/ /?

NITRIFICATION FI'
? gg1o p
OPERATOR ?'?
2 //
!1
T!'-?
7)
LENGTH OF LINE 319o Ya 9g10C REPAIR Id V_ _
REMARKS: Vhi. Mf jS Swi Ar.bk' 'FOC Ck 3
rrn house.
PAID
D?;7E _ •!? AMT.
SATE IF ISSUED 0 10 ` V -ram- /EXPIRES: ?ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST
DATE CA ISSUED Al _IQ=`6 C /EXPIRES: JL? ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST
)ATE OP ISSUED
n,rrrAI r EV 1~NVIRNOMENTALBRAOM SPECIALIST
FILE NO. TAX ID NO.
OWNERS NAME / ADDRESS
TRI'=.LAND. DRVEL0PERS
P.A %BOX 41180,
(11OL'3 oit0; AFC: [? (2
27530 ; ?t I? Ilstill a 7 rr..rn
IN 18/2002 08:40
919-705-1815
1NSN/NLUNN/ENV1KUN

mZ
n ? tD
c?
00
?z
rHuC UA.
la/18/2002 08:43 919-7U5-lb1b irv?r?r?wiv?v?ctvvircUN Mum "1
WAYNE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
REF. NO.' 02:1219.'TTD' /67 10/OM:' Iyyp .:RRWREN • FILE NO,
DATE TAX IA NO. l
WATER S UPPLY OWNERS NAME / A p p RESS
HOUSE
MOBILE HOME 3 SR'hlEi'
PUBLIC X
•-W-LAND-.DEVBLOPM
'-P-.G.,- BOX . 14-180.
OTHER PRIVATE 'G=5BORO;:NO.
EXPANSION 27530--
REPAIR
REVISION
PROPERTYADDRESS SR 1219. OAK VALLEY IrARMS r= TELEF' ONE(S)

7794029•
ADAl?I3S3:

t? 1
Fill
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AUTIIOPJZB.D AGENT FEE $
G0
x
The above slgtutute Indicates [bat I have read, understand, and ggmo with all the provisions and information as outlined on the back of tWa form, xod authorize Wayne County
Environmeotal Health Department petsotmel to go onto this property for evaluation.
_
INES
DEPTH F II
? r ryn SYSTEM TYPE
ECATION
ID
Ir
ROM
BEDROOMS
E TH
(
TANK SIZL Q a . ro SURFACE:
-
v
FLOW RATE
71
3
OPERATOR
NITRIFICATION Firs
P
1
r t r
A4 V om 0
f,t`_ REPAIR
11 Pfl
LENGTH OF LINE

RElIfARKS: 1o .'s. fc> a. 3 r m ho use,
t
D

o
o n
JowO w(1 no- eJ J4*
P AU
// ,may
OATS . AMT,

F! -''U 1IY ?.?.. _.
E.N. SrECl_
DATE IP ISSUED /EXPIRES: /t
`O ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST Q* tymn
/EXPIRES.
DATE CA ISSUED ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SYECIAIIS
DATE OP ISSUED
ENVIROOMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST
1MgTAr T FR _
10/18/2002 08:43
919-705-1815
INSP/PLANN/ENVIRON
by • C 1 ?^ ^, ,,
w ?
Z Z
,7 v ??j f'?' a I U) Lil
WU)w(n r t?
/ ?.
ti o Q d W n//?vl ,V Y
N Q .0 C,
CSI :D CV r / y i I
U
10 ?o
Z xr

PAGE 02
oP
1
J

Z?
wLLJ
:2 M
WW
U) V
a¢
ww
ZZ

W
0
V)
Q
t-
r
W
In
Q
O
10/18/2002 08:43 919-705-1ti15
WAYNE COUNTY ENvIRONMENT.AL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
REF. NO.'02:12191W* DATE
TWP •:BRO(H)EN FILE NO. TAX ID N0.
im TER S UPPLY OWNERS NAME / ADDRESS
HOUSE PUBLIC X. 'WI -- LAND: Ll1?MOFERS.
MOBILE HOMB F;0;-'D= 11180••
OTHER PRIVATE O.OLL*BORO; NO° ..
EXPANSION 27530
REPAIR
REVISION
PROPERTY ADDRESS TELEPKONE(S)
SR' ' 1/21-9 ' °OAK' VAL?D3?Y1 ' FARIVI3 LOT.
ADDRESS: 778.4029
SIGNATURE OF O{VNER OR AUTIYOR17,ED AGENT FEE $ t'l
x .16
The above signature indicatca that I have read, vnderatand, and agree with alt the provisions and information as oudincd on the back of this form, and authotize Wayne County
Rnvtrmmnental Health Derat(meot personnel to go outo this property for evaluation.
BEDROOMS
'T'ANK SI7.R
FLOW RA'Z'E
NITRWICATION FT'
LJENOTH OP LINE
SYSTEAl TYPE
OPERATOR
ItI?I'AIR ? b ? ?
DIM OF NITRIFICATION LINES
FROM TOP OF THE GROUND
SURFACE.

REMARCKS: 7Il I'S (<? t 5 S (L i `? R b l F. p c' CL J l3 C?? (' tr-, hc) wS p ,
PAID
t7ATC V AMT.lk-0-
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH VECIALIS'x 'h ? ^ ?'
ISSUED ?? t I 'Oct IItES:--- P?I 1 Mac doWu
DATE DATE lP CA ISSUED
VIRONI.?NJCAL IiEALTH SPkCIAI,IS?'.?-.---_--- iDAU Of ISSUED ENVIRNOWNTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST
,10/18/2002
08: 43
919-705-1815
INSP/PLANN/ENVIRUN
rmum U4
Storm Drainage Calculations
Nov 2 7 2V-
Tri-Land Developers, Oak Valley Farms
Wayne County, North Carolina
Owner:
Tri-Land Developers, LLC
P.O. Box 11180
Goldsboro, NC 27532
November 22 2002
f 17),
Vc
B. R. KORNEGAY, INC.
Y LAND SURVEYING - ENGINEERING - PLANNING
P.O. Drawer 1435.300 E. Walnut Street
Goldsboro, N.C. 27533-1435
9191735-5886 Fax [phone]
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 27+00 northeast side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
0.32 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.11 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.21 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0.00 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.51 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.16 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 fUsec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.01 = EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
16 ft = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
7% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
25 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft? = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.0 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FOBAY
34% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
1.50 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
209 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
42 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided by:
W.F. Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandari, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stormwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 26+00 northeast side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
0.17 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.05 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.12 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0.00 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.48 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.08 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.01(5 ft- = EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
= LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
8 ft
3% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
50 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
1.0 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
29% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
1.30 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
96 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
19 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided bv:
WE Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandah, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stormwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 17+20 northeast side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
0.15 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.05 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.10 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0.00 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.50 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.08 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.015 ft-) = EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
7 ft = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
20% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
17 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.9 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
33% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
1.46 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
95 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
19 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided by:
W.F. Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandari, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stormwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 18+40 northeast side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
0.36 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.12 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.24 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30) .
0.00 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.50 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.18 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.015 ft =EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
18 ft = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
I.
1'3% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
25 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.0 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
33% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
1.46 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
229 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
46 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided by:
W.F. Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandari, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stormwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 98+40 southwest side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
1.16 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.12 acres= IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.24 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0.80 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.29 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.34 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.015 ft = EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
34 ft = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
18% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
17 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.9 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
10% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
0.59 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
298 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
60 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided by:
W.F. Hunt, D.E Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandari, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stonnwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 17+20 southwest side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
0.52 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.05 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.10 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0.37 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.29 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.15 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.015 ft = EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
Qf5!D = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
20% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
17 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.9 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
10% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
0.59 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
134 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
27 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided by:
W.F. Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandan, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stonnwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 11+75 northeast side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
0.32 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.11 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.21 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.51 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.16 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.015ft =EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
6 ft = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
35% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
17 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.9 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
34% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
1.50 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
209 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
42 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided by.
W.F. Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandari, R.E Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stormwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 11+25 southwest side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
1.10 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.11 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.21 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0.78 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.29 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.32 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.015 P = EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
32 ft- = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
35% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
17 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.9 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
10% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
0.59 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
283 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
57 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided by:
W.F. Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandari, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stonnwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 12+60 northeast side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
0.40 acres = DRAINAGE AREA
0.06 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.12 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0.22 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.34 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.13 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.015 ft = EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
13 ft / = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
13% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
25 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.0 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
15% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
0.78 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
136 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
27 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided by:
W.F. Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandari, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stormwater BMP Academy
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN
PROJECT: Oak Valley Farms, Tri Land Developers, LLC
DATE: November 22, 2002
LOCATION: sta. 12+60 northeast side of road
FLOW TO LEVEL SPREADER
0.18 acres= DRAINAGE AREA
0.06 acres = IMPERVIOUS AREA, (C= 0.90)
0.12 acres = GRASSED AREA, (C= 0.30)
0 acres = WOODED AREA, (C= 0.20)
0.50 = RUNOFF COEFFICIANT (C)
1 in/hr = RAINFALL INTENSITY
0.09 cfs = FLOW (first 1" flush)
LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER
trees/shrubs : DOWN SLOPE GROUND COVER
0.67 ft/sec = MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWED OVER LEVEL SPREADER
0.015 ft = EQUIVALENT WATER HEIGHT OVER LEVEL SPREADER
9 ft = LENGTH OF LEVEL SPREADER REQUIRED
24% = AVERAGE SLOPE FROM LEVEL SPREADER TO STREAM BANK
17 ft = EFFECTIVE DISTANCE OF LEVEL SPREADER
50 ft = WIDTH OF RIPRARIAN BUFFER
2.9 = NUMBER OF LEVEL SPREADERS REQUIRED
FORBAY
33% = IMPERVIOUS
3.0 feet = ASSUMED PERMANENT POOL DEPTH FOR WET POND
1.46 = SURFACE AREA TO DRAINAGE AREA RATIO (Table 1.1 from BMP manual)
114 sf = REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
23 sf = FOREBAY SURFACE AREA (20% of required surface area)
Design concept provided bv:
W.F. Hunt, D.E. Line, R.A. McLaughlin, N.B. Rajbhandari, R.E. Sheffield
North Carolina State University
Stormwater BMP Academy

Table 3. Maximum Velocities of Flow Across Level Spreader
Down Slope Ground Cover Velocity at Level Spreader "Equivalent" Water Height over
Level Spreader, X
Grass 1.33 s 0.058 ft
Gravel 1.5 s 0.074 ft
Thicket Shrubs, Grass 1.33 s .0.058 ft
Mulch (Trees/ Shrubs) 0.67 s 0.015 ft
Using Allowable Velocities to Establish Level Spreader Length
With an allowable velocity determined based upon down slope ground cover, it is now
possible to calculate the necessary level spreader length. The calculation is based on two
equations: 1. the Weir Equation and 2. the Continuity Equation. They are described
below.
Weir Equation:
It is assumed that the level spreader functions as a long weir. Flow over a weir is
described by the following equation and graphically shown in Figure 7.
Q=C,oLoH3/2
Where Q = Flow
L = Length of Level Spreader
CW = Weir Coefficient (set to 3)
H = Driving Head (shown in Figure 7)
Flow over the level spreader is a function of its length and the height of water up slope.
Increasing the length reduces the height of water, as they are directly related. This is
important because the height and length of water flow dictates the velocity of flow over
the level spreader. This relationship is shown in the second equation, the continuity
equation.
Continuity Equation:
Q=VoA

Where, Q = Flow
V = Velocity
A = Cross-Sectional Area of Flow = (L • 2/3 H)
The allowable velocity is determined by down slope cover (grass, gravel, mulch). This
then dictates the cross-sectional area, L • 2/311. Combining the two equations lead to the
following relationship:
N.C. DOT Level Spreader Workshop
February 19, 2001 - Raleigh, NC
through a wooded buffer than when flowing over a grassed buffer. Water will typically
regroup faster if it flows over steep slopes than over gentle slopes. Effective distances
based upon observed flow recollection are shown below in Table 5.
Table 5. Effective Distance of Level Spreaders
Ground Cover Slope from Level Spreader
to To of Stream Bank Effective Distance
feet
Trees/ Shrubs 0-6% 50'
Trees/ Shrubs 6-15% 25'
Trees/ Shrubs >15% 17'
Thicket 0-8% 50'
Thicket 8-25% 25'
Thicket >25% 17'
Grass 0-8% 50'
Grass 8-25% 25'
Grass >25% 17'
Putting Level Spreaders in Series
The outcome of effective distance is that level spreaders may need to be placed in
series, particularly on steeped sloped sites. If a level spreader were installed in a
tree/shrub area 50' from a stream bank with a standard slope of 15%, three level
spreaders in series would be needed to maintain a degree of sheet flow throughout the.
riparian buffer. For a quick calculation of the number of level spreaders in series needed
throughout a riparian buffer use the following equation:
NS=W-.- Ed
Where: Np = Number of Level Spreaders in Series
W = Width of Riparian Buffer through which flow is spread
Ed = Effective Distance Flow is Sheet Flow (from Table 5)
Example Calculation
A complete level spreader design is reviewed below:
Problem Statement:
A road in a residential development on the western shores of Lake Norman will encroach
within 75 feet of the lake. A 50' foot wooded buffer has just been required along the
Catawba River in Lincoln County. No concentrated flow is allowed through the buffer.
The drainage area (all road runoff) collecting at a point 75' from the lake is 1.2 acres. The
average slope from the roadway to the Lake Norman waterline is 7%. This slope is
continuous. The existing condition is shown in Figure 8.

N.C. DOT Level Spreader Workshop
February 19, 2001- Raleigh, NC
3. General
a. Basin shape should minimize dead storage areas and short circuiting. Length to width
ratios should be 3:1 or greater. (Barfield, et al., 1981, pp. 426-429; Florida DEP. 1982,
pg. 6-289).
b. If the basin is used as a sediment trap during construction, all sediment deposited during
construction must be removed before normal operation begins.
c. Aquatic vegetation should be included for a wetland type detention basin (Maryland
DNR, March 1987; Schueler, 1987, Chapter 4 and 9). A minimum ten foot wide shallow
sloped shelf is needed at the edge of the basin for safety and to provide appropriate
conditions for aquatic vegetation (Schueler, 1987). This shelf should be sloped 6:1 or
flatter and extend to a depth of 2 feet below the surface of the permanent pool (Shaver
and Maxted, DNREC,1994). A list of suitable wetland species and propagation
techniques are provided in Schueler (1987) and Maryland DNR (1987).
d. An emergency drain (with a pipe sized to drain the pond in less than 24 hours) should be
installed in all ponds to allow.access for riser repairs and sediment removal (Schueler,
1987).
Table 1.1 Surface Area to Drainage Area Ratio For Permanent Pool Sizing For 85% Pollutant
Removal Efficiency in the Piedmont
% Impervious
Cover 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
0-59 0-49 0-41 015 0
31 0
19 026
20 0.97 0.79 0.70 0.59 -
0.51 -
0.46 0.44
30 134 1.08 0.97 .0.83 0.70 0.64 0.62
40 1.73 1.43 1.25 1.05 0.90 0.82 0.77
56 2.06 1.73 1.50 1.30 1.09 1.00 0.92
60 2.40 2.03 1.71 1.51 1.29 1.18 1.10
70 2.88 2.40 2.07 1.79 1.54 1.35 1.26
80 3.36 2-T8 2.38 2.10 1.86 1.66 1.42
96 3.74 3.10 2.66 2.34 2.11 1.83 1.67
Notes: Numbers given in the body of the table are given in percentages.
Coastal SA/DA ratios can be obtained from the local DWQ Regional Office.
\o?OF \ NA
TF9pG
September 9, 2002
DWQ # 02-1339
Wayne County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Tri-Land Developers, LLC ? >` '
Attn: James Weeks y
Post Office Box 11180 Goldsboro, NC 27532 ? J'
Dear Mr. Weeks:
On August 22, 2002 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your
application regarding your plan to fill wetland for the purpose of an access road in Wayne County. Approval
from DWQ is required to disturb these streams. Please provide seven copies of the following information and
refer to the DWQ# listed above in your reply. In particular as described in 15A NCAC 213 .0502, we will
require you to locate all streams and ponds on the property. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for
instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
Private roads in water supply watersheds need variances from water supply rules. Has this variance
been obtained?
Buffer mitigation may not needed for these impacts. Please review our rules to determine this.
How do you plan to construct lot #2 without impact? Please provide the house footprint on Lot# 8.
Please provide stormwater management plans which will achieve sheet flow thru buffers.
Provide maps which depict the location of septic tanks in relation to buffers.
Please telephone Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies
of our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If
we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the
project and will consider it withdrawn.
PRPD o "me y
Water Quality Certi cation Program
cc: Washington DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Jeffrey Kornegay, B. R. Kornegay, Inc.
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
14CDE f,,-i
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
D. .:t0F1H:-GAV2 INC.
LAND SURVEYING - ENGINEERING - PLANNING
P.O. Drawer 1435 - 300 E. Walnut Street
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27533-1435
919-735-5886 Fax [phone]
r
1 IZY'17
August 20, 2002 Ci6
Bob Zarzecki J
Division of Water Quality z;
401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Project: Tri-Land Developments, LLC
NCSR No. 1219 (Old Grantham Road) VETLODS GROUP
Wayne County, NC YtATEit QU LITY SECTI"vIJ 1
Bob:
Please find enclosed seven copies of permit materials and a check (#28090) in the amount of $200
for the permit application fee. This project proposes approximately 146 linear feet of cumulative
impacts to riparian buffers and approximately 0.17 acres of cumulative riparian wetland impacts.
This project is for a proposed private road needed to access the property which crosses two
existing streams with riparian buffers.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey L. Kornegay, PE, PLS
cc: Tom Steffens
. f
Office Use Only: " fl y Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or 7
, (Z
I. Processing AUG 2 2 X02
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Waters Lem-upir
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Per'nIT . ?.
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Tri-Land Developers, LLC clo James Weeks
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 11180
Goldsboro. NC 27532
Telephone Number: 919-778-4029 Fax Number: 919-778-1231
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jeffrey L. Kornegay
Company Affiliation: B.R. Kornegay. Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Drawer 1435
Goldsboro. NC 27533
Telephone Number: 919-735-5886 Fax Number: 919-580-9053
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 12
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Tri-Land Developers, LLC
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 2577693120
4. Location
County: Wayne Nearest Town: Goldsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): NCSR No. 1219 (Old Grantham
Road) approximately 2650 feet east of intersection with NCSR No. 1220 (Providence
Church Road)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): lat: 35-2046 / long: 78-04-24
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): t 220 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at littp://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps!.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is wooded art%ndeveloped. The property to the
west is a subdivision. The property to the east is wooded and undeveloped.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes a proposed access road to the property. Typical construction
equipment will be used such as graders pans and excavators.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction of proposed access road in
order to gain access to the portions of the property cut off by the existing perennial
streams.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts will occur at proposed
crossings of perennial streams with pipe and rip rap aprons. (*NOTE: Estimated acreage of
wetlands is provided by Wetland and Natural Resources Consultants, Inc.)
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
Sta.12+20 Culvert & rip rap 0.08 No At stream riparian
Sta. 17+83 Culvert & rip rap 0.09 No At stream riparian

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
•• 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://w??w.fcnui.21ov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (detemlination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: ± 3.5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: ± 0.17 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )
Sta. 12+20 Culvert & rip rap 68 UT to Neuse River t 8 ft. perennial
Sta.17+83 Culvert & rip rap 78 UT to Neuse River t 8 ft. perennial

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and alter, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
donnstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.,;ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
w111ymygpgUest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 146 L.F.
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U. S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The two perennial streams cross the entire width of the property. Therefore. crossing
the streams is unavoidable. The proposed roads cross at 90° angles to the streams and
the proposed cross section widths are minimized.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
Imp://h2o.enr.state. nc_tis/ncwetlarnds/strmgide lrtml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httl-://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrh/indexlitm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No El If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,760 3 26,280
2 5,840 1.5 8,760
Total 14,600 35,040
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Total site area = t 220 acres
Existing impervious area = 0 acres / Proposed impervious area = f1.6 acres.
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Septic tanks will be used.
X1H. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
It is necessary to construct the proposed culverts during this summer. This will help avoid
construction problems and delays associated with wet weather conditions in the fall and
winter.
Z
Applicant/Agent's Signature bate
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
TRI-LAND DEVELOPMENTS, LLC
1" = 1667'
USDA SOIL SURVEY
SHEET 24
Al? /
i
i
%Zemer%CompanyOWC6ksUe6eyD WG%020363W&gy 020363EC -DAG
MEMORANDUM 7 % U c= I I l j
0 0 V v
/
1 !,q C-0 LO i,?4
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: tom t Wens
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Roger Thnrpp
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Tiger Landing
Project Number 03 1072
Recvd From APP
Received Date 8/26/03 Recvd By Region oil/ J -? ?j
Project Type construct linear road crossings to reach high ground

Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream
Type Type Impact Score Index
County Wayne
County2
Region Washington
Stream
Class Acres Feet
Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
Stream Impacts (ft.)
tR7t:li tnl[it=1?1!
14 Stream P-7- _@N F__ 27-101-40- C Sw NSW 30,410. ? 290.00 290.00
NI31 -Buffers FT-0 N F- ??? 30,410. 0.62 F_
[-- I -
F__OY ON ?-?F__ F__ F_ F_ F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
A 0.t 1),Q-,r i1 CC 5 71-- n C-, A t ? _C G ?10 " ?-,` i - t^ .0 /f) L-', C "U" 1) Gti S Sw? i(i??CW
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Project Number 02 1339
Recvd From APP
Received Date 8/22/02
Project Type access road

Stream
CI
County Wayne
County2
Region Washington
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream ass Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
39 6TH P770 N 27-(49.5) WSIV NSW 30,412. 0.17 146.00
NB13utTers KT _0N F-??? 30,412. 0.34
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream F 290.00
F_ F F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N
Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 352016 Longitude (ddmmss) 780424
Comments:
Issue n/c
enforcement action ep nding
Recvd By Region
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
DWQ# 02-1339 Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Subject: Re: DWQ# 02-1339 Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:28:55 -0500
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: [e-mail]
Jeffrey:
I returned your call last night and left a message. I'm calling you as I type this. You where busy and
couldn't talk. I'm not familiar with your project, but am currently reviewing your file and the 9/9/02 letter.
• I'm not sure why the first question was an issue since the streams you're crossing are not solid,
perennial "blue-line" stream on the USGS topo maps. Therefore, I don't believe that the Water
Supply regulations are an issue.
• Buffer mitigation is not required since each crossing is less than 150 feet and 1/3 acre of buffer
impacts.
• It looks like you're going to need a driveway crossing to develop Lot No. 2. Please provide
additional information depicting the design, location and impacts (both stream and buffer) associated
with this crossing. We'll approve this crossing at the same time we approve the road impacts. Any
approval that we authorize for this crossing can be transferred with the deed to any perspective
buyers.
• You are required to provide information on how you intend to provide diffuse flow of stormwater
from the road. The roadside ditches can not directly discharge through the buffer and to the stream.
You may want to review the Draft Level Spreader Design Options (
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands/ievel.pdf ) before providing this information.
• Please note that the septic systems (tanks, drain fields, etc.) will need to be located outside of the
buffer.
• Is this subdivision residential or commercial? (I assume single-family residential.)
If you provide the additional information needed on the Lot No. 2 driveway and diffuse flow and provide a
response as I've indicated above for the remainder of the questions within the 9/9/02 letter, then we can
move forward with the approval of this project. I'll put a copy of this email back in the file.
- Bob
[e-mail] wrote:
Tri-Land Developers, LCC
DWQ # 02-1339
11-12-2002
Bob,
This is a follow up to the phone message I sent 11-13-02. This project is still on going. I have questions
concerning the review comments dated 9-9-02. I need to discuss them with you or even meet to get them
answered. To add to the confusion, the owner (James Weeks) has completed construction of the road.
Land Quality has sent him a Notice of Violation but they can't approve the erosion control plan until
approval from your office. I need to discuss this project with your office in order to find out how to
obtain the needed approvals although the road is constructed. Please contact me so I can finish this
project.
Jeffrey Kornegay
B.R. Kornegay, Inc.

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: tom steffens
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Birk Shiver
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Project Number 02 1339
Recvd From APP
Received Date 8/22/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type access road
County Wayne
County2
Region Washington
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Class ii,tt_t
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ?1•i; +s?f;i= •t-
39 OTfI FT-0 N F- 27-(49.5) WSIV NSW 30,412. 0.17 146.00 F_ F
NBR Buffers O Y O N F_ ??-? 30,412. 0.34
F__ OY ON F_F__F__F_F__F__F_ __F__
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y p N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 352016 Longitude (ddmmss) 780424
Comments:
Issue n/r. -- -
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Project Number 02 1339
Comments (continued from page 1):
County Wayne
Regional Contact:
Date:
tom steffens

cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
Rc: (Fwd: Tri Land Dcvelopcrs, LLCJ
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Tri Land Developers, LLC]
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:24:58 -0500
From: Tom Steffens <[e-mail]>
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
1339
Bob,
I think we can issue this, though I haven't been able to get the enforcement action fo:
a valid 401 out the door yet. (hopefully tomorrow) If you don't think this will hinder
the e-action issue it.
tom
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
> Tom:
> Project No. 02-1339
> Ok to Issue? Todd reviewed the diffuse flow/stormwater and said that it
> looks fine.
> - Bob
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: Re: Tri Land Developers, LLC
> Date: P1on, 16 Dec 2002 14:08:52 -0500
> From: Bob Zarzecki <bob.zarzecki@ncma!l.net>
> Organization.: Division of [rater Quality; 401 Certification Unit
> To: Jeffrey <kornsepPbellsouth.net>
> References: <BC273D000337B841330C9A4DDBD703F6CD280]iost2-null.null.bellsoutli.net>
> Jeffrey:
> The nec,, information received on November 27,111 (dated 11/22) :ti'as sent to our Regional
> ['1,ciS12111gt011 for review. We have not yet received their comments.
> - Bob
> Jeffrey wrote:
> > Tri Land Developers, LLC
> > Oak Valley Farms
> > Bob,
> > I have not heard anything about the permit. approval since I submitted the revised ;
> > Jeffrey Kornegay
> > B.R. Kornegay, Inc.
>
----------------------------------
> Bob Zarzecki
> NC DENR/D[ti'Q 401 [wetlands Certification Unit
> 919-733-9726
> Bob Zarzecki
> NC DEI R/+D[,,Q 401 [Vetlands Certification. Unit
> 919-733-9726
.321 Crabtree Blvd (office address) 1650 ?ail Service Center (Frail address) Fax:
> Raleigh ['York
> N C.
> 27669-1650
> Additional Information:
> Vers_i on 2.1
>
I of 2 12/I8/02 7:17 A M
Re: Fwd: Tri Land Developers, LLCI
> Bob Zarz ecki
NC DETTR1DCo-7Q 401 ct 1ar.cls CertiIli ca tior. Unit
> 91.9-733-9726
> Bob Zaszeckl
> NC DENR/D:vQ 401 1vCt2andh; Certification Uri.i t
> 919-733-9726
> 2321 Crabtree 31vc1 (office acldress) 1650 Service Center (Tnai1 acid ess) Fax:
> Raleigh Work
> INC
> 27669-1650
> Additional Information:
> Version 2.1
Tom Steffens <[e-mail]>
Environmental Specialist II
DENR/DWQ/WaRO
.401 Wetlands
2 of 2 12/18/02 7:17 1
Triage Check List ?LE H Date: I1 ?? Project Name:
DWQ#: Oz - 133q
county: To: ? ARO Mike Parker WaRO -Beborridi
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Joanne Steenhuis I
? MRO Mike Parker ? WSRO Jennifer Frye
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From:D Telephone : (919)3 -cclt-?
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
s the application consistent with pre-application meeting ?
s?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
revh

Ll)s
I-0 rr
6

C' P
Tri-Land Developus. LLC 02-1339
Subject: Tri-Land Developers, LLC 02-1339 'I
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:33:32 -0500 / -
From: Bob Zarzecki <bob.zarzecki @ncmail.net>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: John Dorney <[e-mail]>, John Hennessy <[e-mail]>,
Danny Smith <[e-mail]>, "Todd St. John" <[e-mail]>,
Dave Penrose <[e-mail]>,
"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>,
Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, "bob.zarzecki" <[e-mail]>,
"cynthia.vanderwiele" <[e-mail]>,
Beth Barnes <[e-mail]>, Larry Eaton <[e-mail]>,
Mike Horan <[e-mail]>,
"Ed Schwartzman (WetlandsUnit)" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Tom Steffens (WaRO)" <[e-mail]>
Wetlands Unit:
Do not approve this project until the WaRO has a chance to comment. The owner has already constructed
the roads sometime after the PCN was submitted. The owner has since sold the property with the newly
constructed roads. The WaRO will be sending an Enforcement Action on this to the new owner and coping
the previous owner. This project is betting messy. The WaRO would be fine with us issuing this project
out of house but doesn't want it approved until they work out the Enforcement Action. The applicant will
be sending a response to our on-hold letter. The biggest issue with the PCN currently is diffuse flow.
- Bob
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
1 of 1 11/22/02 10:37 AN
Re: DWQ# 02-1339 Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Subject: Re: DWQ# 02-1339 Tri-Land Developers, LLC
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:28:55 -0500
• Er Af: r ,
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: [e-mail]
Jeffrey:
I returned your call last night and left a message. I'm calling you as I type this. You where busy and
couldn't talk. I'm not familiar with your project, but am currently reviewing your file and the 9/9/02 letter.
• I'm not sure why the first question was an issue since the streams you're crossing are not solid,
perennial "blue-lisle" stream on the USGS topo maps. Therefore, I don't believe that the Water
Supply regulations are an issue.
• Buffer mitigation is not required since each crossing is less than 150 feet and 1/3 acre of buffer
impacts.
• It looks like you're going to need a driveway crossing to develop Lot No. 2. Please provide
additional information depicting the design, location and impacts (both stream and buffer) associated
with this crossing. We'll approve this crossing at the same time we approve the road impacts. Any
approval that we authorize for this crossing can be transferred with the deed to any perspective
buyers.
• You are required to provide information on how you intend to provide diffuse flow of stormwater
from the road. The roadside ditches can not directly discharge through tile buffer and to the stream.
You may want to review the Draft Level Spreader Design Options
littp:Hli2o.eiii-.state.iic.us/ilcwctlands/level.l)df' ) before providing this information.
• Please note that the septic systems (tanks, drain fields, etc.) will need to be located outside of the
buffer.
• Is this subdivision residential or commercial? (I assume single-family residential.)
If you provide the additional information needed on the Lot No. 2 driveway and diffuse flow and provide a
response as I've indicated above for the remainder of the questions within the 9/9/02 letter, then we can
move forward with the approval of this project. I'll put a copy of this email back in the file.
- Bob
[e-mail] wrote:
Tri-Land Developers, LCC
DWQ # 02-1339
11-12-2002
Bob,
This is a follow up to the phone message I sent 11-13-02. This project is still on going. I have questions
concerning the review comments dated 9-9-02. I need to discuss them with you or even meet to get them
answered. To add to the confusion, the owner (James Weeks) has completed construction of the road.
Land Quality has sent him a Notice of Violation but they can't approve the erosion control plan until
approval from your office. I need to discuss this project with your office in order to find out how to
obtain the needed approvals although the road is constructed. Please contact me so I can finish this
project.
Jeffrey Kornegay
B.R. Kornegay, Inc.
1 of 2
11/14/02 3:29 11b
Re: DWQ4 02-1339 Tri-Land Developers, LLC
P.O. Drawer 1435
Goldsboro, NC 27533
919-735-5886
fax [phone]
jeffreyksep @bellsouth.net
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
2 of 2 11/14/02 3:29
-
--------------
oa - -------- - --- --- ------- -- 1 :*-?, .:? NoMb © ohs •-tse _ _ - ------
! ,
--- ___ o
------
9 I ,. ?ly - --------15
- p,
"' 6F ?' /4 p t? -""152 ------------
AC)'
/? ti •.
LCt _
---
{ ... _
,
;
,
;9
• , ?- -- r\-- 10 50,
,
t? B U
lAN ?FE•
,aw N /J / -6y ---
--------- FU,v_.a2. - - ------- BRANCH
„
6Zt= = --
,
,
U'-?? - - pOSE O
„
0
R 6
------ -----------
,
RlAW
BUF
---
s.-
---------------------
---_..
.;
:: :-- - ----
0L 4U
Ewa
,
a
,
,
,
,
f _
-------------
----•- --•
O ? U 6 5,
eu 0J
r a ?mo3c
----------- ------
r
03
•!ZCL 961• ?j
'WO
.' I _
-- ----------
66l O?
fq- ? •_ ..
_ 06
z :c--- _ _
--------------
---.,
e -~?----- -? -
-^`-_._-fie -
- - - -- -----
0
----
?i
-------------------
------ - -------
., ZF
w n
!tQ.f .v---- rn \ tT?
----- 6r! _ ??,
•C --
- --------------------
------- --------------
,
•? -----
%
6
---------- --------
< z
N 0.j ----- 140
?...
s? MM
1
------------
N_
I w
Z 14648:
------ ------ ------
0 -1
a? •I 1? 150 .
o • I , ---------'- 152' --- -
__
_--__•'• W I I
jz ----------- 154
W
L d. I 8 ° --------------.
------------------
N U B 3 •' _' ,
U^) I N Z Q m
....
N• Z ?? .- Oghm
_
a d 156•-------------------
¢ ax 0 _ _ -
d W 0 Q
w•IA M = N01 3
W .9d 6Z +
N I 1 WW3A d `
CO
z:3 Z
z ?
z a I.a•E I• IPJ
?O 7N ?••I N N
Triage Check Dist
Date: I1 ?Z Project Name:
DWQ#: OZ - 133Cc
county: f
To: ? ARO Mike Parker WaRO-g?`?,?„? jj
El FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
? MRO Mike Parker ? WSRO Jennifer Frye
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From: Telephone : (919) --l53 -
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
k s the application consistent with pre-application meetings? 3 Wit` G? L??
? Cumulative impact concern
V
Comments: hum c
gal i7?
1 /J G Lt [6 4+yk

c..)!!&
CIL
1-O ,me .
ti
r
e,ll?
le?

Re: Tri-Land Developers, LLC 02-1339
Subject: Re: Tri-Land Developers, LLC 02-1339
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:34:35 -0500
From: Bob Zarzecki <bob.zarzecki Q ncmail.net>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: "Tom Steffens (WaRO)" <[e-mail]>
CC: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
?r1
Tom:
We received the additional information that we requested today (11/27). We're sending the entire package
your way for WaRO comments. Although, it looks like the engineer already copied you on it. It looks OK
to Issue. Todd's reviewing the diffuse flow requirements. Please review and make sure that it doesn't mess
up any violation or enforcement action that the WaRO currently has with the site. Please provide
comments ASAP. Thanks.
- Bob
John Dorney wrote:
be sure you put a note in the file. thankx
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Wetlands Unit:
Do not approve this project until the WaRO has a chance to comment. The owner has already
constructed the roads sometime after the PCN was submitted. The owner has since sold the property
with the newly constructed roads. The WaRO will be sending an Enforcement Action on this to the
new owner and coping the previous owner. This project is getting messy. The WaRO would be fine
with us issuing this project out of house but doesn't want it approved until they work out the
Enforcement Action. The applicant will be sending a response to our on-hold letter. The biggest issue
with the PCN currently is diffuse flow.
- Bob
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
1 of I 11/27/02 3:34 PN
I
_ x _ , a~~_.~ W...._....._ . _ . _ _ . . ~ ~.~.......__......_.~.v...~.. ~ .
i
~ i " '3
Q ~i? t ~`'d,
O n~ v '~.~f s..

~ 7 c1, I LEGENQ
~ ~ EXISTING PROPOSED
T _ _ CONTOUR - 100.
. ~ ~ , EDGE OF WOODS
CONSTRUCTION I_Ih41TS ~ ~ . G ~ ~ ~
, - ~ ~ ~ / i~ i~ SILT FENCE - --x-x-x x-
• i UTILITY & MAIfJTEfJANCE EASEMENT _
i fY ~ ~ ~ ~((Ii,~ i liJ ~ ~ r I~ CONCRETE BLOCK HFADW?.LL
~ ~0 ~ 50 ' i ~ , ~ ~ ~ RIP RAP APRDN
~ ,,.~.---.--ri,. ; ~ 1 ~ u, r ~ ~ fil . ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ',J ' ' ' , UI ~ GRAVEL RIP RAP FILTER BASIN
m I ~ 1 ,~;m 50 , ' , I ~ _ 50 , U ~I 1 F; j' ~ ~ STRAW ANC NET IINING ~ ~
~ 2 ~ i 111h-Z a. -.m i •Q _ I i ~ f IO_ ~ ~ ~ ~ R1P RAP LINING . ` ~ `'Z~
~ i ~ ' f i ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ 1 I(9~ I i (9Q ~ ~ 1 ~
Q- ~ ~ ~ I 2 ~ ~ d Q.'' I I I ~ ~ 1 I ~ ; i r,
~ ~ I li I ~ i I .i " ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ SEDIP,iEN T' ~ ~ i Ju,P
~ I r iI
iI ~ I
i I I I i ~ I ~ I, I ~ I • I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! l i d ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ Il
I I i it
~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ j ~ ~ 4.; ! iF
~ ~ ~ / i I i ~ ~ i / I i 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~
I ~ ~ ~ i; ~.i ~ ~m , ljj , ~ <; ~ / W ~,i,
I! ' ` I _ 4 U7c ~ ~II '~hJ,
. RIP RAP APRON ~ 1 ' i , IENGTH - 1U FT. ~ ~ I ~ i ' j i ~ ' ~ ~0~~ 'i`4~
_ CLASS B RIP HAP li,l ~ I
~ / 24' THICK , j ~ ~ i RIP RHP APRON SHnIL NOT ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i ~ f NSiRIaC~ ~~~5 DIA~ENL ~ , ~ CROSS INTO RIPARIAN 6UfFt'R. ! `TRIP RAP AkRDN I i 1ftA~P AT }'O~~O~SLOP~ ' ~ENL I ~ 'ro 'i 4
CULVERT ~ STA. 26+27 ; i ~~44 ~ ~ I uEN6jhl d ~1~ I, ~ ~ 44 LF.-:f6" R%P ®1.Oy~ ~ j ~ PROPdSED ~ ALA S B',RII' RAP I i ~ ~ LOPE w 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , h I I i ~
i . A coNSTRUC~ioN u~irs I ,i 1 , 7~' 1rHie1 , ' ~ ~ ~ i , ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ d
srRAw ANO Ner ~iNiNC . ~ - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ PRIVATE 50 INGRESS, EGRESS & REGRESS EASEMENT ~ ~ ~4T,FENC€,~ ! ~ I , . ~ i CS ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ih ,
r - - ~ - 1 _ _ _ ~ ~ k I i i ~ _ ~ ti > ~ a .<.u~ ~ , , ~ i ~y * ~CU,~yERT~ ® TA. 17+83 ~ ~ ~i~l i~ ~ I ~ ®~TA. 1~7+83 x0 ~ ~ ~ t ~ v ~ ~
~ ~ _ S ~l .e ~ b .-tit C, t~ ~ ~ c 3,,.-:~~.~'ii:`~: - ~ 7 4i x. ~~'3~ ~,f.-'4°~CM1P' ._._y___ ~ - ~i Y ` 1 } ~ ~ r ~~.,a i , i4" ~CMPI ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ° i
31i J~, ~i~ ~ n a _ ~ s . ~ c y xYYx~ _ ~ . ` TRAW AN[ ! ' I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ li~ I i I ~ j
UTILITY ~ ~4aWTENANOE E~1~EMENI ~ - . ~ ~ ~ y~~ ~ - > 11 iQ llTI~ITY & P.fAINTENANC~ E_ASEM _NT ' ~ ~ ~TRAW AND NET ~ ~ ~ ~ ( l 1 LINING \ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ J
, ~ ~ - I _ - ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ t 'RIP R AID ~ ~ Ap RON ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~
~sTRAw ANN NLT uNiNC I • I ~ ~ ~ ~ . P ~ ~ u 1 t ; . ROPO.,ED RIP RAP e ~ - ~ STRAW AND NEi LPJING ~i 6 LF - 4" 2 FES ~ (,OI~SIh'UG110N LlhdiT.. I I LINING 1 ~ ~ r ~ ~ 11 IE~JG71j 30 FT ~ I I I t ~ CLASS !8 RIP RA)~ I I ~ i ' ' I
~ ~ 4 - ~ ~ 24" T}NC ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ i
I ~t~' ~ I 'I I' ~ .~i. ,a ~ I ~
1 z ~ ~I L~S i I ` ~~x~ . silt E~c~ ~ ~tbNSrR~~T a sEOIn~ENr ~ . ~ I ~ ' ~ , ~ /tRAPS'AT Toy oF~sl:oP€ ~ g~ ~ I ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 'PROppsEO _.--T i I PPsEO~ ~ ~ ~ Ct1LVERr ®sTA. L2+zo ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ I i
~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ coNSTRUCTioN"'" I i i ~ ~ I ~ LIMITS RI ~i I ai. ~8 L,,I`. 54" CMP ~ i { ~ - LIMITS RIP RAP ~ ~ ~ ~ L ' i
~I ~ i l I ~ _ A~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ l I _ IINING ~ ~ ~T~ ` ~ i ~ ~ i ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ! f I I I ~ i ~ ~ ' / 1 ~ I i ~V _ ~ ~ ~
~ I i ' i i ! i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
` ~ ~ i I ~ / ' ~ ! I i ~ 11 i ~ , i RIP RAP APRON ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ ~r.°. i ~ LENtdTH = 12 FT
I ~ I ~ ~ ( SILT F~CE~? + r? `~}w,, _r ~ ~ ~ CLASS F3 RIP RAP 24" THICK TCMPORARY ! ~
6 ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ STR/}W AJJ ~ ~ ~ ' GRAVEL & RIP RAP ' ~ ~ I I ~ ,~r NETLINIfI(~ ~ _ EXISTING DIiQH z IFILT[P2 B4SIN v ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED 20 DRAINAGE
i~ ~ I ~ p i ~ A~'<- ' ~ CONSIRUCpid; Li},UTS ~ _ EASEMENT ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~'`~e ~ , e - A„ % STRAW AND NET fJP!IiJG
I , ~.`54 ~ i , f i i \ , ii ~ ~ I ' 7~[Y - ~ CULVERT ®SiA. ?44.46 \ /
0 t ~ ~ , ~z I ~ e... ~ i r,,,.,«., i ~-ti ~ `4 3 ~ ems, 1 ,
~ f i
~ , ~ ~ i ~ o , I I ~ ,rr ~ , ~
s ~ ~ ~ ~J .F . ~ , y~ ~ ` y~ , ~ ~ IINING ~ . T ~ ~ ~ ~ +
~ ~ I ~ ~ ~W ~ i ~i r ~ ~ iii
i i ~ •j ~ I' ~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ` d . ~ ~ r. •"o ..~h~ ,hrt,: ~
I I I ~ i ~ I ~ , ~ r ~ ~ E
1, ~I I i ~ I ~i I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 _1_~ , ~r~. ~~CE ~i`~~ ` t ~ ; ~s L.F. - 3o°E s I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ° ~ Lf TE1~1AN~ RIP ~ i ~ I I / / & MAIN RAP upllNC~~ / ~
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 STRAW AND NET / N
i I , o = Q ~ I I'. ~ ~ I \ i Q ~ ti~ ~ ~ iININ„ %
1 I ~ o, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PR6POSED TEALPORARY GRAVEL. i ~ p~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ,u4' ~ ~ COIJSTRUCTION LIMITS ~ ENTRANCE~EXIT ~
.,h ~ C` O i ~'Oi r V ~ ~ ~
i ~ " i ~ i ~.I,~ 11 ~ i ~ , I
,:,a , ~a'' 5p ' `F ~ /
~ ~ V'~5~ I.~ ~ I i 1 ~
2. ~ I ~ i•~ ~ I I n: o _ ~ ; r~
l ~j , Q1 ~ ! 1 fm ~ ' > > ~ ~ / O' G 7A ~ ~ I I i ~ I / ~ I 'i 1 I ~ ~
+ - ';il _ ~ . i ~ ~ ~ I s
_ ~ ~ ; ~ , ~I I
i i' I ~ ~
i ~i ~ ~ i 5 1 1 2 i., ~ I I I
Ij ~ T _ _ - I • ~ ~ ~ i I _ ~ ~ i i i 1 1 I
PINEGROVE ACRES - ~ ~ ~i,, ~ ~ i 1
SUBDIVISION ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I i, I
I i
I ~ ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 I I 1
- i ~ 1, ~ \ 1
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ 1 I ,
~ ~ ,i i I- i i ~ I i ~ ~
i ~ i ~ ~ i L ~ i I I
I I. ytic,~ t ''i ~ ~ i 9~~~ I 'v~~ _ I ~ ~ I I . ~ ~ ~ I )
~ ~ I I ~ %~~e~,,. I:9~~~ j ~ 'I' ) ~ ~ 1 , ~ ! I i ~ ! l
NOT~~ ~ I ~,r~ I, 1
~ CO~dIOUfI~ ARh= F EOM AN AERIAL ~i!It` EY F4t p~ B~i ~ ~ ~ CAF:CLIiVA AERI~;L ~;1APPING SERVICE, I~dC. Dt;TED '17/1999. ~ V ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ \ I ~ i 1 ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ l ~ ,
I I ~ ~ ~ ~ \A ~ I ~o_ _ /
I i ~ i .j ~ i
,1 ~ 1 ~
r ills / ~ ~ ~ ~I ' ~ ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ I
,i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ r ! ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~
iiso /~I I ~ i
i ~ ~ 1 I i ~
' 1131 ~ i ~ ~ i i2aa T _T I - ~ ~i ~
/ ~ ~ ;
~ I I j I ~ I ~ ~
~1E LODY WOODS SUBDIVISION 1220 ~ j~ ~ I 1 I
j~;, ~ ~ ~ ~
N ~ !117 ~ 1 ~ I
I _ ~ Z ~ ii~o 1 ~ . Z / nsi~ ~ A i
NOR711 ~ I id 4 ~ ! . q~',-
I~ ~ w Z LOCATION SFET('li r
AIl1 nr~nninu ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ I
DAIL
1 EROSION COfJTHOL COMMENTS D p - - 7/2502 p 0 DRAWN BY:
, 9 2 REVISE CUL`7Fk g19/02 D SI IEET: CL
AND C SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING 0 LH CT DESIGNED BY: 0 0 V a
- - i P .O. Dr;;~er 1a 3-;,0 East Walnut Stree'. y d D 0o JLK D r
0 Gc,._-o t',.C_ 2 7533--1435 DATE: OF: J
919735- c ax 919580-90f,3 ~ 7/10/02 BROGDEN TOWNSHIP TIT 01-77-
SCALE: WAYN 020363 E COUNTY, N.C.
1"=100' C, ED MwG: 020383EC
,27