20040872 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040526

O?0 WAT ?
`? r
O '<
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
July 15, 2004
Dixie Development Company
Attn: Dr. Robert Schaff
5444 Deer Forest Trail
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject Property: Dixie Development Commercial Site, Louisburg, NC
UT to Tar River [03-03-01, 28-(24.7), WS-V NSW]
DWQ Project # 04-0872
Franklin County
Page 1 of 4
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Tar-Pamlico
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0259) with Additional Conditions
Dear Dr. Schaff:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.024 acres of wetlands, 25 feet of streams and 23,307 square feet (fta) of
protected riparian buffers for the purpose of installing a sewer system and at the subject property, as
described within your application dated May 26, 2004 and received by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) on May 26, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3374 and 3402 (GC3374 and GC 3402). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 12 and 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to
the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0259. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge and water supply regulations.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved - The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts
are approved including incidental impacts:
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
1,
Dixie Development / DWQ Project No. 040872
Page 2 of 4
July 15, 2004
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 25 (feet) Sewer (GC3374)
404 Wetlands 0.009 (acres) Fill (GC3402)
404 Wetlands 0.023 (acres) Sewer (GC3374)
Buffers 23,307 (square ft.) Sewer
2. Buffer Mitigation (EEP) - You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers.
The required area of mitigation to compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 6,933
square feet as required under this Authorization Certificate and 15A NCAC 2B .0260(buffer mitigation
rule). We understand that you wish to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund
administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement.
This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. In
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0260(7)(buffer mitigation rule), this contribution will satisfy our
compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2B .0259(10)(buffer protection rule). Until
the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted
at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund. You have one month from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting
purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund to compensate for 6,933 ft2 of required riparian buffer mitigation for impacts to 2,311 ft2 of
protected riparian buffers; 03-03-01 river and subbasin;,,28-(24.7) stream index number.
3. Written Stormwater Management Plans (Final Plans Needed) - An additional condition is that
individual final, written stormwater management plans (including signed and notarized Operation and
Maintenance Agreements) shall be approved in writing by this Office for each lot before the before
any buildings are occupied on the respective lots per Condition No. 4 in GC No. 3402. The
stormwater management plans must include worksheets, plans and specifications for stormwater
management facilities that are appropriate for surface waters classified as Class WS-V and designed
to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire
project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any
permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be
constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plans (as approved by this Office) shall
be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage
patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be
made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
4. Deed Notifications - Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained
jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future
wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any
wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and
Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit
web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be
modified as appropriate to suit to this project.
5. Streambank Stability - The proposed clearing limits associated with the approved sewer line near
Station 5+00 (on Figure 8 of the application) is within 15 feet of the stream. While the DWQ agrees
that this impact cannot be avoided due to the existing building, we are concerned about the potential
for creating an unstable stream bank by removing vegetation within this location. Soil disturbance
Dixie Development / DWQ Project No. 040872
Page 3 of 4
July 15, 2004
should be limited as much as possible and special precautions should be made to prevent stream bank
instability while working in this location.
6. Water Quality Certification(s) - The proposed project must comply with all of the conditions of
General Water Quality Certification(s) (GC) 3374 & 3402.
7. Sewer Systems - The project shall comply with 15A NCAC 2H.0219(i)(2)(G) and all other State,
Federal and local sewer system regulations.
8. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction
corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with
orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to
infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure
compliance with 15A NCAC 2B .0259, GC3374 and GC3402.
9. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices - Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full
compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
10. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind - No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall
occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-
Construction Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed
so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
11. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters - Sediment and erosion
control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If
placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they
shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of
Land Resources has released the project.
12. Certificate of Completion - Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality
Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
Dixie Development / DWQ Project No. 040872
Page 4 of 4
July 15, 2004
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Tar-Pamlico riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 213 .0259. If you
have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
AWK/bz
Enclosures: GC 3374 & GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
cc: Kevin Martin, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 040872
Sincerely,
J?
tOF WATF9 Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
-i Division of Water Quality
r7 ?
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION & AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500 and 2B.0259, Dixie Development Company has permission as outlined below
and within the General Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3374 & 3402 w/ additional conditions for the purpose(s)
of constructing the proposed Dixie Development Commercial Site Louisburg. All activities associated with these
authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached certification transmittal letter. THIS
CERTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE ARE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (EEP)
DWQ Project No.: 04-0872
Date: July 15, 2004
LOCATION: Louisburg
COUNTY: Franklin
BASIN/SUBBASIN: 03-03-01 (river/subbasin); 28-(24.7) (stream index no.)
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and 213.0259 and the conditions of WQC No. 3402 & 3374 w/ additional conditions,
you are required to compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of
wetlands, surface waters and/or buffers as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the
waters of the state.
[Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the EEP must be rounded up to one-quarter acre
increments according to 15A NCAC 2R .0503(b).]
0 acres of Class W L wetlands
0 acres of riparian wetland
0 acres of non-riparian wetland
0 feet of stream channel
6,933 square feet of stream buffers
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment of a fee
to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 2R .0503 and to the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC
2B .0260. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the EEP at the address listed below. An invoice
for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE
IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU HAVE RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN
PROCESSED BY THE EEP.
Signature
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (EEP)
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone]
Date
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
imap://bob.zarzecki%40dwq.denr.ncmail.net @cros.ncmail.net:143/fe...
Bob - I think these are all buffer projects. Can you handle these? I'm crunched trying to write Lowes
and get out the public notice for gc's prior to flying to Canada tomorrow. If you're crunched too, toss
whichever ones you want into my in-box and I'll get to them on July 12.
thanks.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:Re: RRO Tracking Notice, 7/23/04
Date:Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:14:46 -0400
From:Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>
To:Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
References: <40D9EB 9B. 1040304 @ ncmail.net>
TRACKING:
401 Applications
DWQ No. Project County Permit Type Received Expires
04-0849 Wake Estates, Wake Co., NW 14/NBR 5/24/04 7/22/04
Is the old roadway to remain abandoned? If yes, can it be removed.. stream portion restored-buffer
repalced??? - -\--_ _\ e ?sFA s 1-r,
Possible credit for mitigation. If not ..OK to issue
04-0838 City of Raleigh Walnut Creek Greenway, Wake Co., NW14/NBR 5/21/04 7/19/04
Do not like this one. Ten foot wide asphalt road with 5 foot gravel on each side making a twenty foot
road surface, 40,000 sq ft of which is in Zone 1 with a total impact to buffer of over two acres. Ask for
reason why so much. HOLD
04-0850 Yates Store Road South, Wake Co., NW39 5/24/04 7/22/04
Have talked w/ACOE and consultant also says project is separate from Amberly (Sandler @ Amberly or
Amberly South)
Lots of impacts if cummulative. Should be OK to issue.
u
04-0862 Ellerbe Creek Preserve subdivision, Durham Co., NW39/12/NBR 5/25/04 7/23/04
No DWQ letter. I have not been requested to write it. Stream present where sewer crosses to south
s.
04-0872 one I impacts!!!! Move road in Fig 3 to north to minimize. Figure 8 shows it all. Possible
stream ' tability in that area also.
2 of 3 6/25/2004 1:36 PM
imap://[e-mail]=t:
Subject: [Fwd: Re: RRO Tracking Notice, 7/23/04]
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:50:14 -0400
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
1 of 3 6/25/2004
IL
imap://bob.zarzecki %40dwq.denr. ncmail. net @ cros.ncmail.net:143/fe...
Stormwater for each lot, for entire development, OR WHAT? Lots of Zone 2 impacts.... Sheets 2,3,6,7,8
HOLd
Please use the staff recommendation sheet in Filemaker Pro, and then notify me that the report has
been filed. My e-mail address is [e-mail] or you can call me at 919-733-9721.
There are no tardy projects for RRO this week.
Thanks very much for your attention.
3 of 3 6/25/2004 1:36 PM
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Dixie Development Commercial Site County Franklin
Project Number 04 0872 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 5/26/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type sewer line
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet ME
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
?-
N r- 28-(24.7) WSV NSW 30,301. 0.02F
39 r HWF O 70
12 Strewn O Y ON ?-F-7--F- 30,301. F? 25.00 ? r-
', TPBR F - O Y 0 N F_ F_ F__F_ F_ F_ F_ F_ I
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? OQ Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
6/4/04
Issue with condition on future lot developers proy*d'na stormwater treatment
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Date: v vl e/3,304 Project Name: ? ' °?- ? ?? C? M ?-?7 ?-
DWQ#: 0 4 U'Z
County: V7?an k 1 ??
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
El MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
L9lJ RRO Steve Mitchell
From: Can wa C+ Z Man Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: -A Vol ? 11?'?
?? ?? f???? l ?? ?? G
(?'?JJJC?( ???TGI?i )Iy Q? c) il) Df
on
MPxd +V je4e-m*1Vke- N 5+0mW +aC flan
A
Pot- 1-41-1ACV1
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Ste. 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Attn: Mr. Kevin Yates
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
WETLANDS 14,11 GMUF
RE: Nationwide Permit 12, Courtesy NW 39, and Buffer Approval
Dixie Development Commercial Site Louisburg
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Proiect #: 5608.W0
Dear Mr. Yates & Mr. Dorney:
VVA1 LEI; dUA 1 Y SECTION

On behalf of Dixie Development Company, we request authorization from the US Army
Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permit 12, and from the NC Division of Water
Quality, for Buffer Approval for the proposed project to impact Zone 1 and 2 of the Tar
River Buffer for sewer line and roads. Attached, please find a completed Pre-
construction Notification Application (PCN) and signed Agent Authorization Form,
among other attachments detailed below.
The proposed project consists of installing a sewer line to connect the applicant's site on
Hwy 401 to an existing City of Louisburg sewer easement. Please refer to the attached
USGS Map for the location of the site on a USGS topographic quadrangle. It is south of
the intersection of Hwy 56 and Hwy 401 in Louisburg, NC.
The proposed requires the applicant to install a sewer line parallel to an unnamed
tributary of the Tar River, and to cross a channel in order to tie to an existing sewer line.
The sewer line will cross the channel at a perpendicular angle. The channel impact is
quantified in the attached PCN. Impacts to less than 0.1 acre of jurisdictional features are
proposed. Parallel impacts to Zone 1 and 2 of the buffers will occur. These impacts are
quantified in Section X of the PCN and on the attached impact maps.
The applicant has pursued multiple options to avoid impacts and, where unavoidable, to
minimize them. Prior to implementation of the Tar buffer rules, the applicant owned and
made some improvements to the tract and anticipated the need to connect to an existing
City of Louisburg sewer line. Due to existing buildings, Hwy 401 and depth to rock on-
site, parallel impacts to Zone 1 and 2 of the buffer are unavoidable.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
May 26, 2004
Ad, Gk 13 1
May 26, 2004
Page 2 of 2
S&EC Project # 5608.W0
The applicant has requested mitigation through payment to EEP for parallel impacts to
Zone 1 only, because such impacts are considered "allowable with mitigation." Parallel
impacts to Zone 2 are considered "allowable" and are therefore not expected to require
mitigation. The applicant has not proposed mitigation to cover Zone 1 impacts to the
perpendicular channel crossing. Because similar temporary impacts to streams have not
typically required mitigation in the past, no stream mitigation is proposed at this time.
Sincerely,
Kkutm ?Ic?t+ti.l?iu
Kevin Martin
President
Attachments:
PCN
Agent Authorization Form
E-mail from engineer
USGS Map
Soil Survey Map
Overall Site Map
Road and Sewer Impact Map
Site Air Photo of Existing Conditions
Note: A check has not been enclosed since this is a request to DWQ for buffer approval
only.
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 872,
ku any paructuar item is not appucaome to this project, please ewer iwt tippucavie ui iiitL .)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12 (0.023ac); 39 (non-
reporting, 0 009ac)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Dixie Development Company
Mailing Address: Attn: Dr. Robert Schaff
5444 Deer Forest Trail
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 9
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Dixie Development Commercial Site Louisburg
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 2804-39-1528
4. Location
County: Franklin Nearest Town: Louisburg
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Southside of US 401 at its
intersection with Hwy 56 in Louisburg, NC see attached USGS map).
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 170742027E, 3996160N
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 26.92 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT of Tar River
8. River Basin: Tar
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htti):Hh2o:enr.state.nc_us/admin/mal)s/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is mostly undeveloped and wooded except a road
network was rough graded with culverts installed mangy years ago (see attached 11x17 air
photo). Roads are partially graveled but not paved. Adjacent property is undeveloped to the
south and commercially developed to the north, east, and west.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: _
_
Installation of a gravity sewer line using equipment typical for excavation and grading.
Filling of <0.1 acre of wetland for widening an existing rough graded road.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Currently the project involves installation of a
sewer line and paving an existing road network so that the property can be marketed for
commercial development.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
A wetland delineation was performed by S&EC and approved by Amanda Jones of the USACE
on 4/24/01 Action ID #200120768. No DWQ site buffer meeting has occurred because only one
feature is present on soils and USGS maps and it will be buffered.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts to wetlands and waters are
for perpendicular crossings of a utility line and less than 0.1 acre for widening an existing rough
graded road. Buffer impacts are for parallel impacts as well as perpendicular ones.
Page 3 of 9
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
A3A Excavation .005 No 0' Headwater Forest
A313 Excavation .002 No 40' Headwater Forest
A3C Fill .005 No 250' Headwater Forest
A313 Excavation .008 No 55' Headwater Forest
ME Fill .004 No 75' Headwater Forest

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.51
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.024 (0.023 temporary, 0.009 permanent)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please sec' )
A3A Excavation 25' UT of Tar River 3' Upper perennial

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
Page 4 of 9
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U. S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Existiniz roadbeds were used as much as possible. Parallel impacts to buffers are not avoidable
due to proximity of existing roads (Hwy 401) and buildings at the eastern end of the project.
Topography and depth to rock limits the distance the line can be shifted on the western end of
the site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 9
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment to NCEEP for unavoidable Zone 1 Buffer impacts. No wetland mitigation should
be required because impacts are below notification thresholds. No stream mitigation should
be required because impacts are below DWQ thresholds and are temporary.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 6933
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
if yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
Perpendicular 1 1176 3 0
Parallel and
Perpendicular 2
19820
1.5
0
Parallel Zone 1 2311 3 6933
Total 23307 6933
' Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260.
Payment into Riparian Buffer Restoration fund is proposed.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Calculations and worksheets for levelspreaders for stormwater from proposed roads are attached.
There are no plans for the lots on the current site therefore the client understands that individual
stormwater plans will be required for each lot as a development plan is designed. See attached e-
mail "Bnyineers Site Impervious Information".
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal
XM. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Since site plans will not be developed until potential buyers of a lot come forward the approval
should be conditioned for such plans to be submitted and approved by DWQ before each
individual lot is developed. However, this cannot be done before impacts occur since the sewer
must be installed prior to marketing the lots.
Page 8 of 9
U ?
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Name: !lt,r.lc byc_Lu0me_-a-, 6e,Y, PA NI % , 7fL- V-ot-?,gtr 54mpr
Address: 5 4-444 D6e Z r" &-i --
Phone: iZ.AL r- I o W y 0 <. 4-
Project Name/ Description:
ui5?',azir Pp?ft-'f?i
Date: A f lZ1 %_ S; 1 1--4 1
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: _ Todd Tugwell
Field Office: Raleigh_
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current 12rolpe!U owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The S day of
ARLii. . ir1
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
- 4 6 CAT: !?M& F:
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR - DWQ, Water Quality Planning
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Property Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
blank agent auth form.doc
Wetland Delineation/Permitting/Mitigation Soil/Site Evaluations On-Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments/Audits
Neuse Basin and Watershed Buffer Evaluations Groundwater Hydrology Endangered Specie
Western Branch Offices: [phone] • [phone] • [phone]
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner

_

J`

?
? UrF-

Il

II•
n 21
? _ 1
? 1 II
•
/i r 1 rl/ \

' ` II
\\ II
)sSewage

e-o

l

M M `i. E '?r? 25p g
,_\\ \\ • -

o a2
I
I

rl
/ . 7
II

1100
/

C 300 11
It oo

i!
A 11
? •`? ? II
II l
? of C

II, r
I
A o ri
°. II

r 250
/ LOUISBURC, N. C.

- N3600-W7815/7.5

r? 1978

AMS 5356 III SE--SERIES V642
C ?
FIG.1
/?
may,

i

3 ? a
+ "v
t7
O' p a .W

kA C 1*1
F <
L4
_ f ?Y}
L Z? r

C

,?L< t

qy
?I3'
n
? ?eVu ?' c
Nr?`. 4,,, 4 `pP 1
•1+` ? ? t tea, a'jrf?t D .,<

W

N ?

I
d rw.'
4 r
f 7?•
t?
Vii' id
Pg
f 4. .,?P

.. '
'
"'F
" i

? w \?
? F4 d
4
?
• 4
?t
? ,?' ??Y.?•
k
? ? SY;4J?y +.?9 }
S*f- rN
.
? T yy
i
?
??
'? '? -?
s ? +'? ??
'4?
?
:
?t {;-,
??' E
,x
s.?? %
`.
ut 1
T r ?,p8t?? ,,?
?
?
J
fir. ?t A
.?? ? ? 7 . ? ?r ""?„_a. ?z>s°'r' 4 ? w,??? 3' '" q we ? [ ? C?^•.? J-'?.? n
- Y +
1 tt .if S} - An nrs®? y?ta1y %" ,c _. 3.
/^
(
2
1G
.
SOIL SURVEY FIELD SHEET
APPROX.SCALE
1
FRANKLIN
COUNTY
CAROLINA
NORTH
S
fo TW
RT„ TEX AS D
E
ub
SVRVEV HAS HOT BEEN COMPILED NOR CORRELATED. NAMES
MAV BE CHANGE. AND AREAS MAV BE COMBINED.
W
y?t 4fI

?4' ? Y T9 *uw^
r
-te h

0
?O

0 A
0

Sf
?
S
Dc
t-j ?. 1
Lo
J
A2
P E
j L
T ?
?
C ?NE
A2B

??k O U
0+00
? NI EADER F S ? 2
WER 9 0 (?
co
D
?a

'A" 5 `L
c r

Q
?8 R ? 5
Al
IVER U
A e
5
2 2 7.00
Wire
A2D
PROPOSED IMPACTS 0 50 100 150
A1A - 0.013 Ac
' A1B - 0.014 Ac
A2A - 0.040 Ac SCALE:1"=50'
A28 - 0.009 Ac
SLAM, TODD, crA.N BROSI A2C - 0.018 Ac
UEMFANw .L9M*VAI%
aV ZNa*M IbW.IAMt=C0tGMM /I
A2 D
- 0.007 Ac FIGURE 1
WGIW slv PARKWAY /RLTM203
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27313 osA A3A - 0.005 Ac
(OFFICE) 919.678.1071 DIXIE DEVELOPMENT
(FAX) 919.678.1290
(EMAIL) dd@bdIsmAhAft LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
°
a 8
h
d r-?r6x
a
y
ra nt
co
"
"
1 ea 8
x6
tee
1 ate valve 11
?- DING LIMITS rL`b ea hydran

1?0 u
4.
+
ip

14, J
27
ERGY I A ?
W,-?4, c S S N

U
Q

cp 0
x

279
?4-oa

2 A2F
27 0
0
Al

0 0
°
e a
0 Acre 5 4
N
7,403 Sq.Ft.
2 7.00 P E 27?

4
PROPOSED IMPACTS

A2E - 0.002 a 50
Ac 100 150
ME A2F - 0.065 Ac
A313 - 0.002 Ac SCA LE:1" =50'
HI.AM, TODD, dAivIBROSi
UtRORAMEM.IANWAMARCHUMIM
CnM .LAND UM C?IM

FIGURE 2
2601 NB81?ON PARKWAY / SUM 2m
CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27113 USA
(
)
.1071
- DIXIE DEVELOPMENT
FAX)
.I
(FAX)91 919.6
M.678
(EM"°'"A@bd?"'""
LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
ea 8"x6" tee
1 ea 8" gate N
1 ea 8"x6" tee 1 e hydrant
le valve& b
ea hydran l
ka
v
.p
27
S
i W 9 IL S 9S
A I F E IS
3 T A3C Ftia .
6g
j \\\`\\(A1 C

y?o
PROPOSED IMPACTS
Al C - 0.001 Ac
' Al D - 0.003 Ac
Al E - 0.001 Ac
A2G - 0.031 Ac
EL-4&4L TODD, d'AINBROSI A2H - 0.089 Ac
(1V?S.ffi1R??l10' .t?AtOL1i AX - 0.005 Ac
7601 WBSTON PARXWAY / StXM 700
CARY, NORTH CAROLRIA 27513 USA
Pond
Wetland Area "C"
2.338 Acres
101,854 Sq.Ft.
0 50 100 )50
SCALEV=50'
EIGU RE 3
(OFFICE) 919.678.1071 DIXIE DEVELOPMENT
(FAX) 919.678.1290
(°"AE)"`'@"°"°o"'°" LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ea 8"x6" tee
gate valve& box
vdrant
8"? WL
?b00
??
ti
6.9 C
?FJ
6 A2J
26? 263
2 260
rat
r -? 53
14X
ti
El
tx
EIP S
EIP

?VF
=1?
PROPOSED IMPACTS 0 50 100 150
A2J - 0.003 Ac
t
SCALE:1"=50'
SLAM, TODD, &AMUROSI
VW O MAfir=
UMUUR
?` '°' IA DW IM FIGURE 4
2601 WRSTON PARKWAY / StRW 201
CARY.IMRM CAROLINA 27313 USA
(OFFICE) 919.678.1071 DIXIE DEVELOPMENT
(FAX) 919.678.1290
(E"1AII)°`'°"-"''A" LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
hydrant N
N

2

,
roh
S#4 u
L
2t?6

Q
+p0
RIP A EN RG A
N
S GRRB3 -6 F F S A
?
OD 6
N
S
F S +
c EL S _R
3
ISSIPATO
^ F = 7. FT, CLA
? E
We
8 A
35, 21

EIP I
N
N

EIP
C
PTO T 0f EIP
241.10'
?? \
2 4
P?
-Ip EIP EIP
PROPOSED IMPACTS

A2K - 0.009 Ac 0 50 100 150
' A3D - 0.008 Ac
A3E - 0.004 Ac
SCALE:1"=
50'
SLAM, TODD, dA "ROSI
FI GURE 5
26
01 sve6mON PARKWAY /SUM 203
CARY. NOWM C"OLD" 27513 USA
(OFFICE)

9
919.678.1071
DIXIE
DEVELOPMENT
.7
(FAX) 91996
..678
(EMAIL) Eea6hnal LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(IV
, I l I / / /-_ 248
10)
244
?cll
25?
234
00
,1k EIP
2?5
46
v
L ,,Lxo
i

"?1" \
8 Acre
1 q.Ft. EIP
PROPOSED IMPACTS 0 50 100 t50
Al F - 0.00002 Ac
' A21- - 0.044 Ac
SCALE:1"=50'
SLAM, TODD, d'ANWROSI
PLAIMM.
f7Ve.8NIECIBIRIIiD. LAND USHODtYfA.'RA
3601 WDSION PARKWAY /gt=283 FIGURE 6
CARY. NORTH CAROL@IA 27313 USA
(OMCE) 919
(PAX) X) 91 919..678678.1.1290 DIXIE DEVELOPMENT
(EMAIL)*W@b IwWh- LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Frame & Brick Buildin

t3
`o
1 ?'

EIP
SLAM, TODD, d'A CEIROSI
UR&WRM0mo. KAIWWA aAR®EMM
MILE70IKSMUNO. IAIDUSE 0014S12L' M
2601 W88I0N PARKWAY / SUITE 203
CARY.NOK119 GRO7.INA 27313 USA
(OFFICE) 919.678.1071
(FAX) 919.678.1290
(EMAIL) Ild@bdb-h--
Wetl nd Ar " F2"
0.003 Acre
128 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED IMPACTS
A2M - 0.043 Ac
A2N - 0.012 Ac
b
A2P
44"
Vfr7"06P
C 1. =Of
C
CC E 9.33'
Charles M. Da
D.B. 894, Pg.
PRE 3, SI. 11
D.B. 1076, Pg.
BOOK 1997-
0 50 100 150
SCALEV=50'
FIGURE 7
DIXIE DEVELOPMENT
LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
N
Rim = 234.54' -)5
Invert In = 227.13' B
Invert In = 226.51'
Invert Out = 226.48'
S u? ,
237.65'
231.98'
= 232.25' --S P
= 232.62'
it = 231.98'
NI
N
W
Leonard `il G?
)g. 2Q C
G
& Brick Buildin ?J
NIP
<?9J? A2P
A 1 G
IP
x CC
Piles Of
PROPOSED IMPACTS
A1 G - 0.043 Ac
1 Al H - 0.005 Ac
A2P - 0.014 Ac
A2Q - 0.032 Ac
BLAM, TODD, dwr?RO$I A2R -
' M 0.037 Ac
IfJMPIANNM. 1•NKO
MCI1ri Wr=
CrAL1?.1AMU=00NKXT A
7601 WBS7VN PARKWAY / SLIM 2113
CRY. NMTU CAROLINA 27517 USA
A2R
0 50 loo 150
SCALEV=50'
FIGURE 8
919.6-M. DIXIE DEVELOPMENT
(FAIL) 919.678.678.1.1290
(EMAE.)*W@bdlea[hm LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 9
ZONE 1 TRB IMPACT ZONE 2 TRB IMPACT WETLANDS IMPACT
A1A - 566.28 SF, 0.013 Ac A2A - 1742.4 SF, 0.040 Ac A3A - 217.8 SF, 0.005 Ac
Al B - 609.84 SF, 0.014 Ac A213 - 392.04 SF, 0.009 Ac A38 - 87.12 SF, 0.002 Ac
Al C - 43.56 SF, 0.001 Ac A2C - 784.08 SF, 0.018 Ac A3C - 217.8 SF, 0.005 Ac
Al D - 130.68 SF, 0.003 Ac A2D - 304.92 SF, 0.007 Ac AM - 348.48 SF, 0.008 Ac
Al E - 43.56 SF, 0.001 Ac A2E - 87.12 SF, 0.002 Ac A3E - 174.24 SF, 0.004 Ac
Al F - 0.87 SF, 0 .00002 Ac A2F - 2831.4 SF, 0.065 Ac
Al G - 1873.08 SF, 0.043 Ac A2G - 1350.36 SF, 0.031 Ac
Al H - 217.8 SF, 0.005 Ac A21-1 - 3876.84 SF, 0.089 Ac
A2J - 130.68 SF, 0.003 Ac
A2K - 392.04 SF, 0.009 Ac
A21- - 1916.64 SF, 0.044 Ac
A2M - 1873.08 SF, 0.043 Ac
A2N - 522.72 SF, 0.012 Ac
A2P - 609.84 SF, 0.014 Ac
A2Q - 1393.92 SF, 0.032 Ac
A2R - 1611.72 SF, 0.037 Ac
TOTAL
3484.8 SF, 0.080 Ac 19819.8 SF, 0.455 Ac 1045.44 SF, 0.024 Ac
PROPOSED IMPACTS
Al G - 0.043 Ac
' Al H - 0.005 Ac
A2P - 0.014 Ac
A2Q - 0.032 Ac
HL-AM, TODD, crAJT MROSI A2 R - 0.037 Ac
UMMr-Q*M'
?, XPINNIIIII&M.
FIGURE 9
2601 WSWOK PARIMAY / SUM 260
GRY.M MMCAROLINA 27313 URA
(
.1071
DIXIE DEVELOPMENT
.1290
(FAX) AX) 9 919 (9..67788.12
(EMAIL) eW®bdleaYh.ml LOUISBURG TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

O
O
?
t}
\ W ?+ g

00
W O LL 3
m O 0

L.L. p F?
? e o ?
t LLJ O

I F ,........
LL
i Q
Z

\

CO

O J
O
y
t r
a
O Q
O
\
q y LLJ
c
\.
W "
D
It
O
Z

? Z
I e
w Z
e m I
z
D
O <
_
LL
W
A °-
" z
?
?r 3
A O

m
s u_'
O
O
J

W L j
F-- O
/

/ \\ a
` 0

LL-
N
? N
\ \
\
\
= Q
00
I-
OC)
, CD

t
L
/ N 0
Y??
lL
\
\1
Ll? Q rn V'
V
1 nn
x
F-0_ Q
Z LL- I
w O..

?!I c=

D EK-
r
CD

End C U
j

J L?
r
N
\
q g

j I

Page 1 of 5
Kevin Martin
?,r(o 08
From: Robert Tucker [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:14 PM
To: 'Kevin Martin'
Subject: RE: sCHAFF IOUISBURG
This is the text from the second page
Schaaf Louisburg
1723 LF STREET AND SIDEWALKS
1723 X 45' BB
1723 X 5'SW
SUTOTOTAL 86150 SF (1.98 AC)
EXISTING STON E SURFACE ROAD
26 X 1281 = 33,306 SF (0.76 AC)
New Impervious surface 52,844 sf
Site area = 26.92 ac
% Impervious
Based on new street = 1.98 ac/26.92 ac = 7.36%
Based upon new impervious created by new street = (1.98-0.76)/26.92=4.53%
Individual site end users are unknown. It is anticipated that each would provide stormwater
management controls on a site by site basis if required.
Robert E. Tucker, P.E.
Vice President
ETd, PA
2601 Weston Parkway
Suite 203
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Voice 919-678-1071
Fax [phone]
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Martin [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:26 AM
To: Robert Tucker
Subject: RE: sCHAFF IOUISBURG
Got your second fax, it is still cutting over last part of second page, writing is too close to bottom of page,
3/ 1 /2004
05/03/04 17:24 FAX [phone] ELAM TODD d'AMBROSI
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET'
1. PROJECT INFORMAtION (please complete the blowing information):
Project Name : EV M 4
Contact Person: -Qua T tAg ?&' E. Phone Number. 6W-1611
Level Spreader ID: _ F S
Level Spreader Length 49 It (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area
1D. 9
ac.
(on-site and off-site drainage to Hhe level sp; Bader)
Impervious Area ' 0.5 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to Ilie level sp, ;ader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer dope 6,75 % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for N' k ground cover)'
gross
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 3-7 6 cfs
Max- Discharge to Level Spreader 3.7 jj eft
FlIW Strip/Buffer Vegetation, krRA , _ (thick ground cover or grass, can iWiied fore:. with leaf lifter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Metfhod NqA
IL REQUIRED ITEMS CIIIECKLIST
[a 003
Initial in the space provided to indicate ft Mowing design requinernents have been met and suPportkKi doturment tion is attached. ff a
requiremerht has not been Oft an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormvwater management pl sn submittal Includes
a worksheet for each BMP? dESign caladations, plans and spedfications showing all BMPs and oatlet struchrr a details, a detailed
drainage .plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal pirkage will r muff In a request for
additional information and will abstanfially delay final review and approval of the project
A ica rlFii'ais
Levu spreader IS at least 13 IL per ds for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft p:r ds in can )pied forest with leaf
N/? litter.
Pre-fionn Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
1fIA Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
elk Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter ship is hydraulically and Spatial) y separate I vm the bypass
discfhorge.
M1J4 No structures are located In protected buffers.
-Play details for the bypass and outlets are provided-
The gperetion and maintenance agreement Includes annual erosion and vegetative repair.
2. The Operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsitde party is xovided.
Level spreaders in series cn be used on slopes of up to 15% In forested areas with leaf litter lover or cut slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grss N designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option DoCwromt. This pc entially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zoo e 1 of a pru ecfed buffer area
05/03/04 17:24 FAX 919, 678 1290 ELAM TODD d'AMBROSI 0 004
m
m
a
0
ty1
L
(W?
v /
E
t-
o
-1-0
'A

? is U ?I ? u. U

U tai UT U U o
0
N
I

m
W

Q

Z C.
U)
T C?
m

p?

°p 0,
117
m a
Ui
o
Lb
O
E N N Cl! n N N O
a

E
_
CR
o
°
C3
W?
C) m
c
n N O N
N

0 h ti Ir]I co
to O
W O

m
W
c@p
N

N
?r
Gy Y
'
N "
V
N

N

$
asb
td
~ cu
o C?
of
of
N N c
?4 N N N
m

O N m r ti
W N N C`R N N N o
?
e
a
ua7
i
o
v
m
*
3 O
G
Cl!
t?
CR
ti
E
R
N N cf
.
?
f?f N N N
O vii v 1
ICX t? ti 1,;
10 o o cO N O O
IL m
N c co in 1 m `o O
y %
co Iq
N N
T
l
m 9
[ w m
V w ? eq 1to
0
v
ti
?'
4
f` to
to
n i
a ro v
0 _ p
'C o cGC
n ?
p
t?7 W N
j i7 N ?i
( CO v
C
?=
G
N
:
N ?
N'
-I
N
N
N
l
}
r n r
I n n r o
_

r 1 c
N
U7
o
U7
CS
ItJ?
CI
?{'?
N
to
O
1? 11
?
L
a

E
?

E
O

lei
a

to
OI

ui!
o

lei
0

Ln
o

U) CL

E

V
X
w
p

tInn

N

N

W

r

' -

,
Un7 u
?
W F O O M CV r O C

6
o h[?.?
?
?
6 c
cal °o

v
(? ?I
C4 N
f
0
a' U o 0 0? d O O
^

0 is
0
1-

%
m
rn
V
n°I
c°o
E

L
a C C) V+ C o m

O
G
w
N
9 V,
v!
q
m
m
s e
N
4 4 v? N O O
/p
V 61
r
G U)
In
6
Oi
.9 O
O
M
O
M

W j1

O

0 ,
r
l
C

C m
9
UCA
'OCI
W
't7
W
V
W

Lo
IL.
O N
L
LU
o
I O
J r N CA v t17 m Z
8
n
ro
05/03/04 17:25 FAX [phone]
SLAM TODD d'AMBROSI
PROTECTION OUTLET DATE
DESIGN 21-Apr-04
PROJECT NAME PROJECT NO
Dixle Development 2004005
LOCATION BY
Louisburg, North Carolina) MGR
CHECKED BY
RET
Storm Outlet Structure
FES No.= FE$ #1
Pipe Dia= 18 in
Q10= x.81 cfs
Qfull = 7.62 cfs
-
V - 3.79 fps
From Fig. 8.06.b.1:
From Fig. 8.06.b.Z
G
S
1 Lrxx]?-
Zone
D50
DMAX
Riprap Class
Apron Thickness
Apron Length
Apron Width = 3xDia
1
4 in
6 in
A
9 in
Ei.0 ft
11.5 ft
Storm Outlet Structure
FES No.= FEt #3
Pipe DO= ; 36 in
Q10= 27.20 cfs
Qfull = 171.30 cfs
V= 6.76 fps
From Fig. 8.06.b.1:
From Fig. 8.06.b.2:
?_ Lrx? t%t
i
Zone = 2
D50 - 8 in
DMAx = 12 in
Riprap Class B
Apron Thickness = 18 in
Apron Length = 18 ft
Apron Width = 3xDia 9 ft
0005
DESI(i,N PHASE
PRELIM
CON:: TR
REVI:: ION
RECC: RD
OTHE: R
(SPECIFY)
SchaafOutlet LATEST REVISION: 51312004 4:19 PM PAGE 1 OF 2
05/03/04 17:25 FAX [phone] _ ELAM TODD d'AMBROSI
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEEI•
I, PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information)*
Project Name : D t
Contact Person Phone Number: (Atl] , i - L! U
Level Spreader ID:. {, # 6
Level Spreader Length 107 ft. (perpendicular lo flow)
Drainage Area l . Ze SIC, (on-site and off-site drainage loo 'fie level spi Bader)
Impervious Area 1-7# ac. (on site and off-site drainage to ,die level spi Bader)
Maximum Filter Sh ipSiffer Slope { _ tt o % (6% for forested, leaf fllfler cover, 8% for f : k ground cover)'
grass
Max_ Discharge from a 10 YW Storm $0$_ Cts
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader _ S ! 19 cis
Filter ShipBulfer Vegetatim GfrL4Sf (thick ground cover or grass, can*pied fore:; t with leaf Ater
grD? )
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method VIA
IL REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
0006
Initial in the space provided to Indicate the lowing design requirements have been met and supporkl document. lion is attached. N a
requirement has not been rr(ef, at(ach an a kinahon of why. At a minimum, a complete slormwater management p an submittal includes
a worksheet for each 8MI3, design calculations, plans and speci6gtions showing all BMPs and outlet struclu a details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully e*arted operation and maintenance agreemenL An incomplete submittal paMlrage will i esult In a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
lican In'}? I
tjK Level spreader fs at least 13 R per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 it p ,-r cis In car opied forest with leaf
li teri
Prwform Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
--- VIA, Bypass method is specified (f applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
lY/? Discharge to level spreader and subsequent Ifter strip Is hydraulically and spatially separate ' rom the bypass
disc, Orge,
KNo structures are located in protected butlers.
r'(A Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
VIA The 6peration and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetatkn repair.
WA The gpmdon and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the r'espordble party Is 3rovided.
" Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% In forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes al up to 25%" in areas
with thick ground cover or gross If designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option DownanC This po m0atiy requires a
minor variance in protected tiuffer areas. in any event the second level spreader cannot be located In Zofe 1 of a prr tected buffer area.
05/03/04 17:25 FAX [phone] ELAM TODD d'AMBROSI
m
CL
Q
c
O
¦ tt_
r
L
''W^
v+
V ,
0007

to A
e LL U

J U-
' V
w g U- to ?
Nom O
U U UL. LL V U N
C4
01

ton
W C)
?
o
W oe E r-

m oo 90

'r c
?
m
E
• N ° N `'S
d
co p

Il'/

ton

y
A
CN o o N N
N ? a rn o 0
G

G
'd-
to
co
0)
?
W N N 00 t4 N N N
J
=

°
CL n
g
;
o
f
?
a v v
co .
ry o a
N C7 N N N co

O
O [ g
O C
0 ? W
N -
I7 O
? I
n
tCl h H
O
W N N CA N N N -
V
m

G
19
8
4

O

N

w E
D
m

A

t
ca
rr ?
z
N N N
40
o Z
?
W
ti
to
CL y O o Cd C4
O
o

a m
~ v
N 00 N 0 O lt]
C
7

O/ M
h pQ
It7
M
~

N
? ? ri N cp O Iri c
ri
N to r < 1`
h M
to
O r- C?
? d ? ? ? b C07 O N
H i N N r od v
a
C
?^ C N N r- N N N

a ?
N
O
O
O
N
O
{A td to m Id Id Lo _
V
C-
ro C O 4 ? o O O
E N to to tri Ijy ui
V tl? N b N
x !Q i,
O O -,
M N O
m
N 1 j It~7
V O N
O M CV O O _
9 9 !( m m 9
lil (?
° iV o 0
tj o o d O
W `? R 9 j O N O 9
rq O
Y t
D
a O G 4 CV - O 94
O C
m *M rOO C
W
D G A N
d O V,
7 9
N O O
•
0
d V ? ? ?j O O N
U
1 m

V G C IC G C
p F- .J W ? t17 W W to •1 _ - G
? a
O G
J ? N M v ? O
8
r
s
v,
x
}
u
O
O
N
C1
G
3
a
a
c
N?
N
m
E
m
C
O
O
9
11
cN
y
uj
W
0
z
05/03/04 17:25 FAX [phone] ELAM TODD d'AMBROSI
PROJECT NAME
Dixie Development
LOCATION
Louisburg, North Carolina
Storm Outlet Structure
FES No.= FE,-4 #5
Pipe Dia= : 30 in
010 = 1$.36 cfs
Ofull = 60.47 cfs
V = 6.31 fps
From Fig. 8.06.b_1t
DATE
21-Apr-04
PROJECT NO
2004005
BY
MGR
CHECKED BY
RET
Zone = 2
[d] 008
DESIt, iN PHA5E
PREL M
CON:; TR
REVI:;.ION
RECORD
OTHE: R
(SPE,,:IFY)
D5a = 8 in
DMAx = 12 in
Riprap Class = 8
Apron Thickness = '18 in
Apron Length = 15.0 ft
Apron Width = 3xDia = 7.5 ft
Storm Outlet Structure
FES No.= FEt #6
Pipe Dia= 18 in
010 = 8.18 cfs
Ofull = 8.77 cfs
V = 5.72 fps
From Fig. 8.06.b.,1:
From Fig. 8.06.b,2:
r
3
Lcngtri
Zone 1
D5o = 4 in
DMAX = 6 in
Riprap Class = A
Apron Thickness = 9 in
Apron length = 6 ft
Apron Width = 3xDia = 11.5 ft
SchaafOutlet LATEST REVISION: 513/2004 4:19 PM
PAGE 2 OF 2
Welcome To Franklin County, North Carolina
Page 1 of 1
A??r Photo- ?ac;s?F,ry
C?.•d ; -? i o+?S
Click on the Map to:
C Zoomin C ZoomOut C Recenter Map (*- Identify: Tax PaiZeis
Zoom Factor: 2X 7 C Radius Search (feet) 1?
• Parcel Number(PIN):2804-39-1528
• Record Number.' 15342
• Account Number:27943 301
• Old Map Number: LG52 00 003 OUT
• Property Record Card
• Property Record Card p2
If Avaliable
• Deed Book/Page:1133 586
• Sale Amount: $0.00
• Total Value: $31,472.00
1
• Plats:
• Owner Name 1: SCHAAF ROBERT EDMUND & DIANE G
• Owner Name 2:
• Mailing Address: 5444 DEER FOREST TRAIL
• Township: 110
• Fire District: 20
• Square Footage: 0
• Year Built: 1900
• Acres or Lots: 15.4
• 7nninn, R9 AR

B(
r
r
F-1
F
r
r
r
r
r
In-
Pt
rv--
r
r
r
InvE
foul
and
rec(
oth(
USE
noti
afoi
prin
sho
veri
con
Frai
and
ass
fort
on t
Dat
4/2
? Ah
h?-
r l ?, n //l A !? A
Parcel Data
Find Adjoining Parcels