20040845 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040524

North Carolina State University is a land- Office of Finance and Business
grant university and a constituent institution Environmental Health and
of The University of North Carolina Public Safety Division
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
http://www2.ncsu.edu/ncsu/ehs
April 3, 2006
Mr. Monty Matthews
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Reference: General Permit Verification - NWP #27
Action ID #200421113
Dated July 21, 2004
401 Water Quality Certification
DWQ Project # 04-0845
Dated July 7, 2004
Subject: Paul Derr Track, Stadium & Field Improvements &
Rocky Branch Stream Restoration, Phase II
Mr. Matthews:
Environmental Health and Safety Center
Campus Box 8007
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8007
Associate Vice Chancellor 919.515.4238
Environmental Affairs 919.515.6859
Industrial Hygiene 919.515.6860
Health and Safety 919.515.6858
Radiation Protection 919.515.2894
(Fax) 919.515.6307
APR 6 2006
UENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STof WATER BRANCH
As per our telephone conversation on March 31, 2006, I am writing to request an
extension for the Nationwide Permit #27 referenced above. It Is my understanding,
based on our conversation that the expiration date could be extended until March 18,
2007.
Currently, the project is still being reviewed by the Department of Insurance; however,
the project is expected to begin within the next six months. I respectfully request
written clariflcation and/or concurrence from the US Army Corps of Engineers regarding
the extension of the expiration of the permit.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me at [phone]. Thank you.
Program Manager
cc: Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Steve Bostian, NCSU Facilities Planning & Design, Campus Box 7216
O?O? W A r?9QG
co
r
..{
M n3
o c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
July 7, 2004
North Carolina State University
Attn: George Worsley, Vice Chancellor of Business & Finance
B Holladay Hall, Box 7201
Raleigh, NC 27606
DWQ Project # 04-0845
Wake County
Page 1 of 4
Subject Property: Paul Derr Track, Stadium & Field Improvements &
Rocky Branch Stream Restoration, Phase II
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Rocky Branch [03-04-02, 27-34-6, C NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Worsley:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
impact 1,550 feet of perennial stream and 76,288 square feet (ft) of protected riparian buffers
for the purpose of restoring Rocky Branch, conducting site improvements at the Paul Derr Track
and constructing a greenway trail as described within your application dated April 30, 2004 and
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 24, 2004 including additional
information and plans received on June 17, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3399
(GC3399). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 13 and/or 27 when
issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved
Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233.
In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control and.Non-discharge. regulations. Also,..this approval to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. This approval requires you to follow
the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) NCDM
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
NCSU Rocky Branch & Paul Derr Track / DWQ Project No. 04-0845
Page 2 of 4
July 7, 2004
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved - The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other
specific and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No
other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
(Units)
Stream 1,550 (feet) Phase II, Rocky Branch Restoration
404/LAMA Wetlands 0 (acres) -
Waters 0 (acres) -
Buffers 72,183 (square ft.) Paul Derr Track Improvements &
Rocky Branch Restoration
4,105 (square ft.) Greenway
(south side of Rock Branch)
2. Stream Relocation (Mitigation) with Approved Plans - The stream and buffer relocation
must be constructed, maintained, and monitored according to the approved plans in the
application and modifications to the application. Any repairs or adjustments to the site must
be made according to the approved plans or must receive. written approval from this Office to
make the repairs or adjustments.
In order for this project to be used as compensatory mitigation for other specific projects, you
must obtain written approval from this Office. The request should include the amount of
stream length and buffer area credit requested for accounting purposes. Please specify DWQ
project No. 04-0845 when making your request.
3. Buffer Restoration & Enhancement (Mitigation) with Approved Plans - The buffer
restoration and enhancement must be constructed, maintained, and monitored according to
the approved plans in the application and modifications to the application. Any repairs or
adjustments to the site must be made according to the approved plans or must receive written
approval from this Office to make the repairs or adjustments. You are required to replace
any trees (planted as part of the restoration and within the protected riparian buffer) that do
_not survive -and restore diffuse flow if needed for a period of five years following the
restoration and enhancement.
In order for this project to be used as compensatory mitigation for other specific projects, you
must obtain written approval from this Office. The request should include the amount of
buffer area credit requested for accounting purposes. Please specify DWQ project No. 04-
0845 when making this request. The request shall also include all of the required information
listed within 15A NCAC .0242 (9)(e), (f) and (g).
4. Soccer Field Drainage System - The subsurface drainage from the new soccer field shall
discharge to the floodplain pool proposed on the north side of the Rocky Branch restoration
project once construction of the floodplain pool is complete.
NCSU Rocky Branch & Paul Derr Track / DWQ Project No. 04-0845
Page 3 of 4
July 7, 2004
5. Emergency Vehicle Access - No impervious surfaces (e.g., asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick,
etc.) shall be utilized in the paving or maintenance of the emergency vehicle access path
proposed within Zone 2 of the buffer located along the north side of the Rocky Branch
restoration site. The emergency vehicle access path can be maintained as a grassed path.
Permanent turf reinforcement matting or other grass porous pavers (e.g., Geoblocv or
Grasspave) are acceptable (within Zone 2 only) to construct the emergency vehicle access
path as long as it is vegetated. If the path can not be maintained in a vegetated state (e.g., if it
can only be maintained as a dirt path or if impervious surfaces are required), then you shall
notify the DWQ and you may be required to obtain an Authorization Certificate for an
"allowable" or "allowable with mitigation" use as described within 15A NCAC 02B .0233.
6. Protective Fencing - The "stream limits of construction" and "greenway limits of
construction" depicted on the site plan approved under this authorization shall be clearly
marked with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that
have been approved to infringe within the buffer prior to any land disturbing activities to
ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233 and this Authorization Certificate. The
fencing shall remain through construction of the project and should be removed once
construction is complete.
7. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices - Erosion and sediment control practices must be in
full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation
and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters
standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
8. No Waste,'Spoil, Solids; or Fill 'of Any Yind -'No Waste,'spoil, solids, or fill of any kind'
shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts
depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities, including the
design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
9. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters - Sediment and
erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of
the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
NCSU Rocky Branch & Paul Derr Track / DWQ Project No. 04-0845
Page 4 of 4
July 7, 2004
10. Certificate of Completion - Upon completion of all work approved within the 401
Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to
the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the
approved buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the 'Director for a decision. The
Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob
Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/bz
Enclosures: GC 3399
Certificate of Completion
cc: Gwyn Rowland, NCSU Environmental Affairs, Campus Box 8007, Raleigh, NC 27695
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 040845
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
Environmental Health & Public Safety Center
Campus Box 8007
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
[phone]
TRANSMITTAL WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
Date: June 17, 2004
To: Bob Zarzecki
NCDENR 401 /Wetlands Unit
733-9726
RE: Rocky Branch/Derr Track
¦
We Transmit: Attached
The Following:
JUN z 7 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
From: Gina Dainson
NCSU Environmental Affairs
515-6850
? ?
Under Separate Cover As Requested
No. of Copies Description
One Design and reference reach parameter tables, cross sections, typicals,
etc.
For Your:
Remarks:
¦ ? ?
Approval Review & Comment Records
Received By: Date:
ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT, PHASE

Variables Existing
Channel C4
Reference
Reaches Proposed
Channel
(Reach 1) Proposed
Channel
(Reach II)
Stream Type Ros en G C C C
Drainage Areas . mi. 1.15 0.55-8.35 1.15 1.15
Bankfull Width Wbkl, ft 22.2-23.5 16.2-33.5 25.0 25.0
MEAN 22.9 '
Bankfull Mean Depth dbk/, ft 2.44-2.61 0.9.2.4 1.60 1.60
MEAN 2.53 '
Width/depth Ratio bk/ldbkl 8.5-9.6 14-18 15.6 15.6
MEAN 9.1 16.2
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area Abkl s q. ft. 57.3-57.9 15-80 40 40
MEAN 57.6 `
Bankfull Maximum Depth dmax ft) 3.52-3.70 1.4-2.9 2.50 2.50
MEAN 3.61 '
Ratio Bankfull Maximum Depth to Mean
Bankfull Depth dmsx/dbkl
1.4
1.2-1.6
1.6
1.6
Lowest Bank Height to Bankfull Maximum
Depth Ratio
3
1
1
1
Width of Flood Prone Area Wlpa ft 30.4-37.5 50.136 56-66 63-265
MEAN 34.0 59 139
Entrenchment Ratio W/ alWbkl 1.4-1.6 2.3-5.7 2.4 5.6
Meander Length Lm ft 90-94 '•'• 139-213
MEAN •• "" 178
Ratio of Meander Length to Bankfull Width 5.5-5.7 •"" 5.6-8.5
(LmlWbkl)
MEAN
-
6.6
"•"
7.1
Radius of Curvature Rc ft 160 63-85
MEAN 160 71
Ratio of Radius of Curvature to Bankfull
Width 2.0-4.0 recommended
7.0
0.9-1.6
2.5-3.4
(RclWbkl)
MEAN
7.0
1.1
'•'"
2.8
Belt Width Wbit ft •' 31-40 ••" 65-100
MEAN 84
Meander Width Ratio Wb/NWbk/ 1.6-2.4 2.6-4.0
MEAN "' 1.8 "•' 3.4
Sinuosity (Stream Length/Valley Length, k -
fUft
1.08
1.20
1.01
1.20
Valle Sloe Sva/le ft/It 0.009 0.014 0.009 0.009
Average Water Surface Slope Savg) 0.008 0.007-0.016 0.0072 0.0072
Pool Sloe Spool •'• 0-0.0012 "'• 0.000-0.001
MEAN '•' 0.0000
Ratio of Pool Slope to Average Slope
Spoo/lsav
-
0.0-0.1
0.0-0.1

Riffle Slope SdnfUft
•'"
.009-.059
0.0072 0.00576-
0.03528
MEAN - 0.023 0.0072
Ratio of Riffle Slope to Average Slope
SrifflSav
0.8-4.9
1.0
0.8-4.9
Maximum Pool Depth (d pool ft •" 2.5.4.1 3.35 3.35
Ratio of pool depth to mean bankfull depth
dpoolldbkl
1.7-2.7
2.1
2.1
Pool Width Wpoo/ ft "' 11.1-25.9 25 25
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull Width
(WpoolfWbkf)
•"
0.7-0.8
1.0
1.0
Pool to Pool Spacing P-P ft 76-227 75-202 68-128
MEAN •• 119 105
Ratio of P-P to Bankfull Width P-P/Wbkl 2.3-8.3 3.0.8.1 2.7-5.1
MEAN •' 6.2 4.8 4.2
Pool Cross-sectional Areas . ft. 20.1-89.0 51 51
Ratio of pool cross-sectional area to
bankfull cross-sectional area
1.2
1.3
1.3
Brushy Fork Trib #2 0 US Hwy 311 in Winston Salem, Morgan Creek near White Cross, and Richland Creek
in Moore County were used to obtain ratios shown. For individual numbers for each site, see attached sheets.
The existing channel does not show pattern or a consistent riffle-pool sequence.
"'Pool cross-sections were not taken.
****Reach I of the proposed channel does not contain pattern due to lateral restrictions.
Bed features will be created through in-stream structures.
imap://bob.zarzecki %40dwq.denr.ncmai1.net @cros.ncmail.net:143/fe...
Subject: Re: Rocky Branch
From: "Gwyn Rowland" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 12:46:19 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
Bob
I spoke with Jan Patterson (Earth Tech). She will have the information
ready for me to pick up and get to you no later than Friday morning. If
you need additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Thanks
Gwyn
Bob zarzecki <[e-mail]> 6/16/2004 10:10:01 AM >>>
Gwyn,
I received the planting plan and greenway impact calculations. I still
need one more thing. I need the design sheets (design and reference
reach parameter tables, cross sections, typicals, etc.) for the stream
restoration. John Hennessy will still need to review the plans prior to
our approval since DOT is involved. While we have 60 days to review
the
Derr Track project, we only have 30 days to concur that the stream
restoration meets our definition of stream restoration unless we place
the application on hold. As such, I'll need to write an on hold letter
to formally place the project on hold by Friday unless we decide we can
approve it before that time. Therefore, please get me the design
sheets
today or tomorrow if at all possible. I've seen draft copies of these
sheets during a meeting with DOT regarding this project on April 27th,
so they should be easy to get from Earthtech.
- Bob
1 of 1 6/16/2004 1:26 PM
mailbox : ///C l/Doc uments%20and%20Settings/bob_zarzecki/Appl icat...
Subject: Rocky Branch
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:10:01 -0400
To: Gwyn Rowland <[e-mail]>
CC: Barbara Doll <[e-mail]>, John Hennessy <[e-mail]>
Gwyn,
I received the planting plan and greenway impact calculations. I still need one more
thing. I need the design sheets (design and reference reach parameter tables, cross
sections, typicals, etc.) for the stream restoration. John Hennessy will still need
to review the plans prior to our approval since DOT is involved. While we have 60
days to review the Derr Track project, we only have 30 days to concur that the stream
restoration meets our definition of stream restoration unless we place the
application on hold. As such, I'll need to write an on hold letter to formally place
the project on hold by Friday unless we decide we can approve it before that time.
Therefore, please get me the design sheets today or tomorrow if at all possible.
I've seen draft copies of these sheets during a meeting with DOT regarding this
project on April 27th, so they should be easy to get from Earthtech.
- Bob
1 of 1 6/16/2004 10:10 AM

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
Environmental Health & Public Safety Center
Campus Box 8007
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
[phone]
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
TRANSMITTAL JUN 1 5 2.004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Date: June 15, 2004
To: Bob Zarzecki From: Gwyn Ann Rowland
DWQ 401 /Wetlands Unit NCSU Environmental Affairs
733-9726 515-4030
RE: Rocky Branch Restoration/Derr Track Renovations
0 ? ?
We Transmit: Attached Under Separate Cover As Requested
The Following:
No. of Copies Description
One Landscape/Planting Plan Sheets
One Impervious Area Calculation
¦ ? ?
For Your: Approval Review & Comment Records
Remarks:
If you require additional information, please don't hesitate to call me.
Thank you
Gwyn
Received By:
Date:
Gw,a Rowland - Rocky Branch: Impervious Surface in NRB Page 1
From: "Patterson, Jan" <[e-mail]>
To: Gwyn Rowland<[e-mail]>
Date: 6/14/2004 11:43:24 PM
Subject: Rocky Branch: Impervious Surface in NRB
Gwyn,
The impervious surface of the greenway within the NRB is about 4,105 sf or
0.09 acre. This includes the 10 ft. paved path in addition to the two ABC
sides since they are compacted.
I have the two landscape sheets that you requested ready for pickup. I have
placed 2-1/2 size copies at the front desk with your name on them in the
event I am out when you come by.
Let me know if there is anything else you need!
Thanks,
Jan M. Patterson, PE, CPESC
Earth Tech
701 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Please Note New E-mail Address!
CC: "Patterson, Jan" <[e-mail]>
777TV-71
kim
AnT`;
r
m o n ROCKY BRANCH STREAK RESTORATION &
CREENNAY PROJECT PHASE I
o m NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
m m
Vi
m_= LANDSCAPE PLAN
E A R T H q=) T E C H
101 Co parole Cesar OrIv%Solle '475 Roldpn NC 27607
PW�,
ya-1919/854-6200 Foxr(9191854-6259
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS V23/2004
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS 3/26/2004
UN 1, 5 7.004 PRELIMINARY PLAN$
RQUALITY VEC W REVISIONS CRN CHK DATE
,:.:.
D
t. m
'Sri :.R
777TV-71
kim
AnT`;
r
m o n ROCKY BRANCH STREAK RESTORATION &
CREENNAY PROJECT PHASE I
o m NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
m m
Vi
m_= LANDSCAPE PLAN
E A R T H q=) T E C H
101 Co parole Cesar OrIv%Solle '475 Roldpn NC 27607
PW�,
ya-1919/854-6200 Foxr(9191854-6259
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS V23/2004
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS 3/26/2004
UN 1, 5 7.004 PRELIMINARY PLAN$
RQUALITY VEC W REVISIONS CRN CHK DATE

A
/ C O
? D Z! m y OM M O -_
? xm iz v? yr? - ?I
N O O;; C O N 0 O
D m N o _
yTVyO x? mON Z
_ m y Wp W O p m a Z
mm m TmD XAy mN
IU DX 2a,r mm0 0120 + .
O
Ir NC Dy> 9y TOO?r m -
D 99r
c n p 20W y „mm D
CD OZ0 f°nZ CYi ymm ?NOy yy0 " _ m m
p ymr m
rN n as L N N Dom TOZ O0- / -ml y
A 00 9~ W O O r p a p° OT C'f O fC/? m ',.
[D Om m O 0 .,r.. -
?O 0-
T Nyy O y0 N O r< T- -
03
--i ° H f nm Da OS9m - - -
r y a T D T r o y _
O _0 mm rnD. m rZx - - -
D ° ° =1II Ii
cl)
rn 1-
Z -
R'--1 ° _ -==111= m = (?
ti N Z o W =-- '0 =
C) +!7 m
1-+ O J
- N =
m -
ru o N D m m _
Z -
m J - Z,
n H C ? -1 N H I
n O
U =
3 r Z =
N Z _ N
o - m
Z m ;
n Imo- _ _"1
m
O m! m Ommm m0 -1.
y •,
/ \ m? -Ni Ozzg ?g m?
y = oMmy zm yea mAoo 2 m
v
m
m = / NNi m0m-NI No mp2 N0 N
NJDC 9 mm D< oD D-OO I TU.,1n m
z - N g yyor •m-1 C m?Z ?O;i y
is? vD O?~ mr yN mO mfZ !
m p F ZO A j> N y N C A Z r p N a N T Z
v „; y y 0 01 C V T N N T m n a ' Z
m N D r?CZ SN r m Z A. N A. 0 mLD mr ym y In
0 ZrS'> 2 a 'O I"D 0 yD
V/ / d 0. 0 O r 2 m D 18 S Z Oa D m Z
y O D p y O
v a r ZSC mf H! < OT Wa a
OD r ODr y-i O rm m
C y S r S 0 2 2 00 y
_a o N_ mz f o m
O D m m m 01N N1 m
m m r vm ?< z r
`^ o> m m yr rm m
V' IF 0 zDmm' o s
z
O? O r
z w 2
X O Z O
IT! D °z
NC N DH
T O_ Z O
-1 V rN ;SN rm
N y
r
D Sf0 Dz Ny
00 0
Z M Z 7 O am?J Wm m 9! O y 9 O
D m m
Zl ° Z mm m D? my z0? O D
O O 'o O x p
z D /H ?y N rO ° m r m
C ° !n -i 0Tm mAr ?-ZI% ZN? ZO
O .
N C Z'DO D 5 ° Nm ODa ZmN NTK DON Sy m a
M 09 r a z1`> N=gm 1 ?0 m0? -OV=m rm C m
?mJ ; !?? ? T!O yZDr 5j?y ?=?nO pi 9(/0? (yy'l yaw N O
Vi III O? TOOrm ?yD pNO?S ZpHpO ad• y m
-1 A m Zy
D x D - m r ON ryTW ymg 7
H a? z?mw ooz m°a air S v
iy ZmOTC mss .N a m a N Na
Nr m y7C mN a py (7 -1 8. v m
C D=4 SL ml og? mom XID -IN^ m ? o
my °?m N m Rom mcm c>= v v
L=2'703' .m. yxmT oax ,m,Wf ?mN ma c> cmis
y9 mo?OOa ^mjzc m--1 roo im rD- ??
m Tr?2 JCm 2 r -i
2
it
N
r
TEMP
SEED LIVE
STAKE RIPA
RIAN SEED MIX
Ill. FLOOOPLAIN POOL
II. GENTLE SLOPE FOREST
1. NARROW FLOODPLAIN

#
0
0
A
D
0>
my
Gi
D
9
W
O
m
, 9
D z
Nm K
Z
a s x ? o v x m ? m ? ? m ?n m o m i x ? o o z z C r ? m a S a C m- o ? ? ,ti, o L m z z ? ? ?

? W ?

m O

, CO

SF N " M O N
g
2
?
p
c
=
T
b.
3
O
?
O
'
GI%'
3
3
?
3
q
?
T
T
?
?
?
$
?
QI
?
of
?
f
4?
=
V
S
g;
m
_S
'
L9
V
':
N
?
T
a
2
W
?
3
N
N
Q
?
?
?
2
?
(t

? ,
? n
? ?,
m
a ?
l
p
! pF
3 7
M
3
w
3
?
3
3
-
.
o
S
R s
f
'
Vi' =
Q Q
15. 4
3 4
?tl
m
3
3
-
g o
i
? m

is
' 8 8

N
E

g
N
4
m
y
E
9
?
`'
II
N
E
-
U
e
`"
?
N
'
g
-
E
-
E
-
`'
?
?`
E a
N A
^
m
? g 9 E
p 10 tAn A (n (Aii lAn c°n N T ONi N ONE 0 ry
0 y
tr? A m 1• AN A
w $ ? ? i'o n
O

? ? a s' s s
o?
y y
m
0

? N •7 P W -m a? d? ???

& i 3d ?g 'ZO

0
aJ
s ? a

? I?III
IIIIII =
?
m _

m
-
-
N
_
_
r -

-
n H -
Z =

N -
O =
Z =

D r
Z O
IT! = = -
Z /

In

1 -
m

W w 2 cn
m ?
C
?oA
y
O z?? o c
/?
z m 2 zz
C
2
Dz
i l
il P
C
aM z 0
S a y D m x
- 0 ? /
?
?/ f?\
C
r
-
y
r 1
M
TxN
O "
Or 2 m .Tr Oym U'1
"ON
r m, = m m mz CD
Z=c
g 1
o
O j
m y m r 2 -1 x D O m C S
O N mz y Za

m Om mm
Or
a T
a SG 1.
(n ?!
rvr--m
m s .+m
r m x<m C
DN
Z COm (/? <
; DO
T
`V
m x o N m r O
m m ..r•
r
N
z 0

b
r
?
n
N
V
Q)
O
W
A °n SCHEMATIC DESIGN 5/30/2003
m o ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1/23/2004
< zo m y m GREENNAY PROJECT PHASE II CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS 3/26/2004
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
E A R T H T E C H PRELIMINARY PLANS
m ro : LANDSCAPE DETAILS 70fcarWoftC~ Lrft--,V a •475 ftWoh.NC 276W
` Pft*(")854-6200 Fox fW)654-6259 ryp REVISIONS DRN CHK OIITE
DWQ# Date Cy /I Yb`i Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage. -
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additiohal
information as to why it is necessary for this project. .
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over l acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide
Mitigation
copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
Cy M)
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
Environmental Health & Public Safety Center
Campus Box 8007
RaIeigh North Carolina 27695 W'
[phone]
Date: May 24, 2004
TRANSMITTAL W ErLAtins /401 GROUP
WATER QU`gL1TY SE
CTIpN
To: Bob Zarzecki From: Gwyn Ann Rowland
DWQ - 401 /Wetlands Unit NCSU Environmental Affairs
919, 733,9726 51A-4030
RE: Derr Track Improvements & Rocky Branch Restoration Phase II jy }
? ? iJ 1`t
We Transmit: Attached Under Separate Cover As Requested
The Following:
No. of Copies Description J
Seven Pre-Construction Notification Application
¦ ? ?
For Your: Approval Review & Comment Records
Remarks:
Any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at the phone number above.
Thank you
Gwyn Ann
.l
Received By: Date:
Office Use Only: A Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ 414 0 8 4
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 13 or 27/GC 3399
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not
required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete section
VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the
project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern
(see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information ?y ch
M _
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: George Worsley, Vice Chancellor of Business & Finance
Address: North Carolina State University o
B Holladay Hall, Box 7201 cn G-)
M
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
;a
Telephone Number: (919) 5 15-2 155 _-
Fax Number: [phone],
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such
as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and
development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include
a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities
must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic
Page I of 10
Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps
may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For
administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no
larger than 1 I by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-
size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans
are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the
project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Paul Derr Track, Stadium & Field Improvements and Rocky Branch Stream
Restoration Phase Il
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):_
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0794.19-50-7874
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Turn off of Hillsborough Street
south on Pullen Road. Sites are on the right (east) side between Cates Avenue & Western Boulevard.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
Derr Track coordinates: 766,900 N 2,081,850E
Rocky Branch coordinates: 35°46'50.28 N 78)40'1 0.92W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 13.05 acres for Derr Track Renovations and 6.0 disturbed acres for the
Rocky Branch Stream Restoration.
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rocky Branch Creek
8. River Basin: Neese River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River
Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admi11/111aps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the
time of this application:
The existing Derr Track site has a stadium, track utility buildings and athletic practice fields.
Approximately 24,733 square feet of existing impervious surface area was developed within the
Neuse River Buffer, prior to the effective date of the Rules.
The existing stream is severely incised and does not contain an adequate floodplain. The treed buffer
on the right bank exceeds the 50 ft. required by the Neuse River Buffer (NRB) rules. The buffer on
the left bank is narrow due to the existing adjacent landuse-track and field, former football practice
fields, and buildings associated with landuse. The culverts under Pullen Road are undersized, only
adequately passing approximately the 2-year storm event.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing structures and track and field facilities will be demolished. A new track facility,
enclosing a soccer field, a new softball field, new track & field facilities and stadium seating will be
Page 2 of 10
constructed. Conventional construction equipment (dozers, excavators, graders etc) will be used
throughout the construction.
The stream restoration project will involve the use of track hoes, bulldozers, front end loaders and
other types of equipment to construct a new channel inside of the existing channel adding natural
materials structures and meanders where the landuse pert-nits. In addition, a floodplain will be built at
bankfull elevation to allow the water from storms greater than the 1-2 year storm to flow out on the
bankfttll bench. A paved greenway will be constructed through the woods on the south side of the
creek and will connect into the existing City of Raleigh multiuse path along Western Boulevard.
Another let, of the reg enway will connect to Pullen Park through the culvert under Pullen Road. This
culvert will be replaced with a 48' x 11' arch culvert, which will carry both the stream and the
greenway under Pullen Road. The culvert length will be reduced by approximately 28.5 ft and will
allow floodwaters to flow through the culvert on a 23 ft bench inside of the culvert that will double as
the rg eenway.
Native vegetation will be planted along the stream and greenway to comply with the NRB rules. A
natural community approach will be used to ensure the appropriate plants are planted in the differing
elevations along the channel and floodplain. The planting schedule is broken into three communities:
narrow floodplain, gentle slope forest, and floodplain pool. Within these communities, a variety of
native species will be planted using a mixture of balled and burlapped trees, bare-root seedlings
container vegetation, plugs„ and peat pots. In addition to the three communities, a riparian seed mix,
live stakes, and a temporary seed mix will be used to complete the re-vegetation of the buffer and to
comply with the sediment and erosion control plan.
The existing buffer on the right bank (south) will have minimal impacts for the first 750 ft and
therefore will only be enhanced to complete the 50-ft buffer.. The existing vegetation along the left
bank (north) in this region has a narrow treed buffer adiacent to the stream. Due to the creation of a
floodplain in this region, this buffer will be removed during construction and replanted with native
trees, shrubs and a native seed mix in Zone 1 of the buffer. The remaining 20 ft, or Zone 2 of the
buffer, will be maintained as a grassed buffer to allow for emergency vehicle access to the proposed
adjacent sports complex. A 50 ft buffer will be planted aloe tlg he right and left banks for the
remaining 1,912 ft of channel. Additional buffer in excess of the required 50 ft will be vegetated in
this segment of stream due to available floodplain width. The two floodplain pools will be vegetated
with appropriate vegetation with larger trees and shrubs aloe the perimeter.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The existing Derr Track facilities are outdated. The soccer field and stadium do not meet current
NCAA standards for championship meets. The stadium, grandstand and bleachers do not meet ADA
standards. Also, there is no on-campus softball facility. The proposed facility will provide track &
Field, a soccer field, a softball field, and stadium seating meeting NCAA standards for championship
meets. The proposed facilities will more efficiently utilize the existing area for a broader range of
uses.
The intent of the Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Project is to restore the degraded channel to a
more stable dimension, pattern and profile. This requires the re-alignment and re-profiling of the
channel. Also, as part of the project, the three existing 60" concrete pipes under Pullen Road will be
replaced with a 48'x1 i' concrete arch culvert on parapet walls. In addition, a greenway will be
constructed to connect to the culvert under Pullen Road along the south side of the creek to connect
into the City of Raleigh greenway system.
A 50 ft. buffer will be preserved on the right bank and will be created on the left bank. The
vegetation on the left bank (north) will primarily be trees and shrubs along the full extent of the buffer
except where the proposed track and field and softball complex will be built (Reach 1). The culvert
under Pullen Road will be replaced to adequately pass storm flows and will contain a rely path
Page 3 of 10
to connect to Pullen Park below. The stream will be kept in the same location in Reach I due to
landuse restrictions, however a floodplain will be built at bankfull elevation to help dissipate the
energy of storm flows. In Reach iI, the stream will be meandered to help dissipate energy in addition
to building a wider floodplain. Shallow floodplain pools will be graded to add floodplain storage.
U_nderdrains from the proposed soccer field improvements will be diverted into the floodplain pool on
the north bank. This will provide continuous clean water flow to the wetland plants in the pools and
will further polish the water before transferring it into the stream.

The Derr Track contractors will make provisions for connecting drainage from the soccer field to the
floodplain pools. However, the softball fields are too far away. Since the timing of the Paul Derr a
project is not tied to construction of the Rocky Branch project the soccer field drain will be
constructed as currently designed then a solid drain from the collection pipe under the track will be

added at a point where it can be picked up by the Rocky Branch project. The connection to the ?•
existing 42" RCP can be plugged when the connection to the floodplain pools is complete and the h

soccer field will then drain to the floodplain pools.

IV. Prior Project History ?
0=?`

ti
If
i
di
ti
l d
t
i
d/
it
h
b
d
d/
i
f
b 3-
V OXI?
ons an
or perm
jur
s
c
ona
e
erm
na
s
ave
een requeste
an
or o
ta
ned
or this project E;
(including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE ?1
Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were
issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful
information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated
mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior
segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules.
This section does not apply to the Derr Track Improvements Project.
There are three phases planned for the Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Proiect. Phase I (Gorman Street
to Dan Allen Drive) was completed in 2002. The Phase I USACE action number is 199921138. The
permit was issued February 17, 2001. The DWQ Project # 010020 was assigned to the Phase I reach on
March 21, 2001. Phase II is described above. A feasibility study will be conducted on Phase III later this
year. Phase III includes the stream length between Phase I and 11 from Dan Allen Drive to Morrill Drive.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and
provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
A permit for Phase III may be requested depending on the results of the feasibility study as indicated in
Section IV above.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands,
open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification
for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed
herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all
streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are
proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as
appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly
for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is
needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Page 4 of 10
The Derr Track Renovations Project will not impact jurisdictional wetlands or stream channels.
The Rocky Branch Stream Restoration project will impact 1,550 ft of Rocky Branch including the
Culvert replacement and the two structures downstream. The three existing culverts under Pullen
Road will be replaced with a 60 ft arch culvert, decreasing the stream length contained in a culvert by
28.5 ft. There is approximately 100 fit downstream of the proposed Pullen Road culvert that will be
impacted through the installation of the culvert, two permanent structures and a temporary sediment
and erosion control structure. The resulting restored channel between Morrill Drive and Pullen Road
will be 1,580 ft (estimated) as measured along the thalweg. Including the proposed culvert
renovation, an estimated 1,640 ft of channel will be improved through Phase II of the restoration of
Rocky Branch.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact 100-year Nearest Type of Wetland***
(indicate on Impact
(acres) Floodplain** Stream (linear
ma) (yes/no) feet)
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage. etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FGMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FFMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FFMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://wavw.fetna.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACG only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
NOTE: Impacts listed below are a result of the Stream Restoration Project Only
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width of
Stream Before
Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)

1 Stream Restoration
incfudingculvert
replacement 1,550

existing
Rocky Branch BkF ° 23'

TOB = 48'
Perennial

OF = bankfull
TOn =Top of Bank
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but arc not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usL?S. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.to1ozo1le.com,
www.map luest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1,550 feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and
any other water of the U.S.) below:
Page 5 of 10
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

N/A

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included
above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here
and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down
valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local
stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial
viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and
explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the
desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed daring
construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts to the existing buffer on the right streambank (south) were minimized for the first 750 ft of
restored stream by maintaining the existing alignment through this section and by cutting the maiori!y of
the floodnlain into the left bank (north).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of
Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands
or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams.
USACE - in accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits,
published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure
that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed
impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining
acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing
and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and
replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving
similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for
USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required
mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also
Page 6 of 10
choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for
Stream Work in North Carolina, available at littp:Hli2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much
information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if
offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed
(restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed
restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed
method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation is not required for either project.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program
(NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at [phone]
to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior to submittal of a PCN.
For additional information regarding the application process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP
website at littp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check
the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):-
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
N/A
N/A
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public (federal/state)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of
the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: if you are not sure
whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at [phone] to review
current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of
the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state
and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these
impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly
identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts
are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Neuse), 15A
NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer
Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
N/A
Page 7 of 10
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is
required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 See Below 3 Not Required
2 1.5
Total
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel: Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Three types of land use are recognized within Neuse River buffers: Managed Open Space, Preserved Oaen
Space and Impervious Surface. A separate project in the same area, the Rocky Branch Stream Restoration
project, will relocate the stream and consequently the buffer zones as well. Although the schedule for the
Rocky Branch project hasn't been confirmed, it is expected to occur concurrently or shortly following
Paul Derr oroiect. The followinp- chart compares the three tvoes of land use within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the
existing buffer for three conditions:
1. The existing Derr Track land use within the existing Neuse River Buffer.
2. The reconfigured Derr Track land use within the existing Neuse River Buffer.
3. The reconfigured Derr Track land use within the reconfigured Neuse River Buffer (after the Rocky
Branch project).
PAUL DERR TRACK-STADIUM & FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 21 APRIL 2004 NCSPDS
NEUSE BUFFER IMPACT POST DEVELOPMENT
PAUL DERR TRACK ROCKY BRANCH
SUMMARY PROJECT PROJECT
1. 2. 3.
EXIST EXIST % NEW %
BUFFE
COND R CHANGE BUFFER CHANGE
AGED OPEN SPACE (SF) (SF) (SF
ZONE 1 19,148 32,755 +71% 11 43,514 +127%
ZONE 2 16,236 23,390 +44% 28,330 +74%
1PRESERVED OPEN SPACE
ZONE 1 10,066 10,066 0% 0 -100%
ZONE 2 2,000 2,000 0% 0 -100%
(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
ZONE 1 13,898 291 -98% 338 -98%
ZONE 2 10,835 3,681, -66% 431 -96%
(TOTAL AREA: 1 72,1831 72,1831
72,6131
The net effect of the Paul Derr project on the existing buffer is an increase in the Managed Open Space, no
impact on existing Preserved Open Space and a reduction to the existing Impervious Surface within both
buffer zones.
The net effect of the Rocky Branch project is a further reduction of impervious surface within the buffers. For
the purpose of this analysis, we consider existing Preserved Open Space that is being reworked as part of this
project as being converted into Managed Open Space. Ultimately this area will be restored to Preserved Open
Space (i.e. no net change).
Page 8 of 10
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of
Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or Payment
into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within
15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260. Not Required
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream froin tile
property.
The existing site is 32.0% impervious (4.18/13.05 Ac.); the proposed project will increase the site to
32.4% impervious (4.23/13.05 Ac.).
?? ov VX Two existing 42" diameter storm drainage pipes carry storm water fi•om other parts of campus across the
site. These pipes both have curb inlets on Cates Avenue within the limits of the site. Additionally, a curb
inlet on Morrill Drive is connected to a storm drainage system west of Morrill Drive. These systems will
continue to function essentially undisturbed.
Except for the connections to the storm drains described above, existing drainage on site is arimaril
sheet drainage from the fields to Rocky Branch. This area includes significant rooftops gravel parking
and drives. These areas are being; replaced with either under-drained sports fields, grass fields or
reinforced turf. Thus, both the total runoff and the peak runoff from these areas will be reduced. This
helps mitigate the increased peak flow from the impervious surfaces in other areas. The Storm Drainage
Calculations (attached) indicate the peak runoff will actually be less after development than it was before
development. This is true for any design storm.
Existing; drainage patterns will be preserved except for the addition of subsurface drains under the soccer
and softball fields. The subsurface drains will initially be connected to the existing; storm drains that
traverse the site. We will be making provision for diverting the drainage from the subsurface drains on the
soccer field to the floodplain pools as part of the Rocky Branch project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) t (?
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater 1
generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage disposal will be to the City of Raleigh's sanitary sewer system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1 .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ?No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ?No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction
dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints
Page 9 of 10
associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down
schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or
other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Mr. George Worsley ce Chancellor of B ' ess & Finance
North Carolina State -University
D
Page 10 of 10
NCSU Stormwater Management Program
Quantifying TN Export and Peak Runoff
Project Name: Paul Derr Track-Stadium & Field Improvements
Applicant: North Carolina State University
PART I Riparian Buffers
Does the project site include riparian buffers? [ ] NO [X] YES
[ '] Exempt Basis:
PART II Proposed Site Information
Total Project Arceage 13.05 Ac. Protected Open Space
Existing Impervious Area 4.18 Ac. Managed Open Space
New Additional Impervious Area 0.05 Ac.
PART III Nitrogen Calculations
A. Pre-develonment Loadina
Draft 3/2004
Date: 24 March 204
Phone:
Please show buffers on plans
0.23 Ac.
8.64 Ac.
TN Export Coeff. TN Export from Use
Type of Land Use Area Ibs/acl r Ibs/ r
Permanently protected undisturbed open space
forest, unmown meadows 0.23 0.6 0.14
Pemanently protected managed open space
(grass, landscaped areas, etc 8.64 1.2 10.37
Impervious Surfaces
roads, parking lots, driveways. roofs, etc) 4.18 21.2 88.62
1 TOTAL 13.05 99.12
I otal IN Mort
Nitrogen Loading Rate Total Area 7.60 Ibs/ac/yr
R_ Pnst-dPVelnnmPnt I nadinn (USING THE'GARNER' METHOD APPROVED BY DWO)
TN Export Coeff. TN Export from Use
Type of Land Use Area Ibs/ac/ r Ibs/ r
Permanently protected undisturbed open space
forest, unmown meadows 0.23 0.6 0.14
Pemanently protected managed open space
(grass, landscaped areas, etc 8.59 1.2 10.31
Impervious Surfaces
roads, parking lots, driveways, roofs, etc 0.05 21.2 1.06
1 TOTAL 8.87 11.51
Total TN Export
Nitrogen Loading Rate Total Area 1.30 Ibs/ac/yr
-
C RMP Tvnes TN Remnval Rates and Desian Standards
BMP Type Removal Design Standard which apply
Wet Detention Basin 25% NC Design Manual
Constructed Wetland 40% NC Design Manual
Open Channel Practice 30% NC Design Manual
Riparian Buffer 30% Neuse River Buffer Rule 15A NCAC 2B.0233
Vegetated Filter Strip w/ Level Spreader 20% NC Design Manual & Other literature information
Bioretention Area 20% NC Design Manual
Sand Filter System 35% NC Design Manual
Proprietary Devices Varied Per Manufacturer Subject to DWQ Approval
Green Tree Reservoirs TBD To Be Determined
D. Nitrogen Loading Rate after BMPs
Pre-development Loading Rate _
Post-development Loading Rate _
BMP Reduction Percentage
Nitrogen Loading Rate after BMPs
Nitrogen Load Offset through Payment
PART IV Control of Stormwater Peak Flow
Method Used for Calculation [)q Rational Method [ ] Peak Discharge Method [ J Putnam Method
Calculated Pre-development Peak Flow (Q2) 21.3 cfs Calculated Post-development Peak Flow 20.2 cfs
Please supply notes and details showing control of nitrogen and peak stormwater runoff calculations
NCSPDS
•
Integrated Design
Paul Derr Track-Stadium & Field Improvements
STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
TIME OF CONCENTRATION:
L=300'-400' S-1%-2% C-0.25
From Fig 11-5: tc = 22 - 27 minutes(use tc = 20 min - conservative)
(FAA, DOT Advisory Circular A/C 150-5320-513, Washington D.C., 1970)
RAINFALL INTENSITY:
I = 3.6 in/hr (Raleigh IDF chart, Malcom)
COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF:
C = 0.10 Sandy soil < 2%
C = 0.20 Clay soil - 2%
C = 0.95 Impervious surfaces
NCSPDS
Revised 22 April 2004
l 103
1? +
®a..iyGIN?E., \
118'1 11011`1'
PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF [RATIONAL FORMULA: Q = CIA]
Q2 = [(8.87 Ac)(0.22) + (4.18 Ac)(0.95)][3.6 in/hr] = 21.3 cfs
POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF
Q2 = [(6.01 Ac)(0.22) +(2.81 Ac)(0.10) + (4.23 Ac)(0.95)][3.6 in/hr] = 20.2 cfs
THREFORE THE PEAK POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF RATE FOR THE TWO-YEAR
STORM WILL BE LESS THAN PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF RATE.
ALSO, SINCE ONLY THE INTENSITY WILL VARY FOR ANY DESIGN STORM, THE PEAK
POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF RATE FOR ANY DESIGN STORM WILL BE LESS THAN
THE PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF RATE.
Integrated Design, PA Phone: [phone]
1111 Oberlin Road Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 email: [e-mail]
Mvo *43 Na SWISIA311
-900. 9911 -10M--tot .._. -..I ...
NV Id AHVXIWI`jHHd i
SNYId 1N31V(I000 NlNlof1N15N0?
?OOZ/CZ/I SNY1d 1143Ndol3A3o No153o1
LLJ
Half
6g
U.1
r N I r 1
a?QOJ1?C
IF,
^?x
iTf?v/ N II 1 r N ??\t(
N
I
?'G •'l ? t7j '? I 4 fri r ??/l
V50 I
$L'i c'?nuuNrl
QOJ1.- cz
' I
1:I I ;..
?? U R??II II N M r i,?!I f?!?lr'?
W Ir
QO:
'YNrn,?\ II' II Ili 1
a ?QoJI,tr,ll!
I!ilil I I I''I ?
It
/
W
u u r I r
11 lip
a?QoJti?l\
11?? ? t i 5..&,?+N
In V,
$n u u r N N I1,II I11411{
?tL?QO J{?IL ???`• `IIIISI 41
5 _
C9 ? .i... ?•1'?l!?1141 ?' o ' W
W N N N t t?, `1 6'rk
GI
a ?IN Jr 1 N
QI ot,r
km
5
' ?tq `P Nr ?
,apa?? W iQ?t?N?j.??jt4
GI CT1 II N II N H ? h ? N r ,I N II
a??QOJh? a??QOJF?K
h 7ij II,? p U? Ci n r p 11 p
Y?4QOJI?C ???QOJI?tY
CT.t ?M?SN U ?? rrjS? I
?? II???n u u u u t? ?iav?iu r u N N
a 0.QOJhQ: a ?QOJti? +',
V W
W ?'
j-8

fgg
41
?4g

a a
Dil`l {
On-00416WaDd 00896-?58(616) mumId
"M W YOPM SK. 8079VA/q NWR7 WoJWuo AW
N 9 a 1@ H l 11 V 3

ITIII
v
v
W r ?
k '

W
ti
r` ` F i ? i 11 = ?.
' ut , ? Nt a 1111 ..
w ` ,,'S \ L 1
I a G?
da l °b, r}
oiz <s ?%
t.
?? ? i `? ` `,gip ?\? 1 •\ ` ? ? ?
a.. t w It ?, 1
M

I I ?c
to ? ., 6rc `bnCR
ll ti/? It 1
II,{ ?? I Iij 'i?'r
,
?-
Md-I d 31 I S
AlIS83AINn 31VIS VNI108VO H1MON ? G 4
II 3SVHd.103P08d AVMN3380
V NOIIVHOIS38 MUMS HONV89 ANO021 g
?. \ \ N 0
r- \ y I w
LL
la ti.,. , , 1 r I o=
UJO(A
j5 ?? f rl?\ I? i o J Q
v \J ' I I I x j
LL.
w W3
a
wao
' I tooz o
?';?? ? ? ??, `?`? I I \•,\I ? v=ia ?
IA F-wow
? j I I I / , fl \ I <
li
/ / t /I li{?I ,I `I V I I I
I ?, ' I I 11 ?- ? 111
Neil+`, r ???yl1l ?`I4? I(!II? `S?a i' ?'? I I I I
??r ; ?:.? IIIJ?I r
ZI!
h O
•? ?' 114.r Il?.cjt., I ?\?`\ N? WO?i N
! f"
%
I ??r I I t 1 `?? ? W
r ?, ?, V/;y f 1\ r\ t\\l \
III
z 7/
(II/' 7J' I' Wl'6
,
rl?l
1
1f

7
1
i
rl?`, 1 f
/
410.
f jl!I
??Ilil I I? ? I
Ij III I P? 1 1 i i I ? I
. 44
I'' , ??'11'I ?; li n'? • A 1
II I ?II IJ? , ?\
I} I \
ss3lvl osa :31b0 ssa3snos ry33snn
1 ! ?
(
I1 +{ I ?II w?, I,I
11 7 F `f, f? ? ?I'111 'I
i ?Ll 1 ',I ?t'1}', I? ?IIII?? I??l
W
h '4

j
C!
( N
C9 h
t;
0
Cb
co
/.z m
0
c;
Cb
to
?
W W W W W W W W W W W

h h h h h h h h h At
h

T
?
r
?r
td
a
?
?
N
? IB
J J J J J J J J J J J
Cri U U U CIi U

t?
2

?

V
W
,
pipqc
ui W

? W

V W

aW
?

W

?
In

?
+

W

W W

a^y`
W

tx
? ? t8 ;" i
b ". M ? ? ta kl u u . N ?
h h h h h h h h h t h 2 to 2 h
i T
J t?
J iry
J T
J ^J `P
J ?
J `I°
J Y'
J ?
J T
J T
J T
J T
J T
J

3N
W
W
T vE
W ?_
?NpMNy??N?
??R Qo JI??
M p
ti
T "wlOwi
fffls w.n
_CI ? 11 II II N r
W ??QOJI+?
It
Q n : u61sa0 pgpioalul o, o u°0i ? E em?o?eJ y7x ;rte `yYia?e21 0 m p
?'V J. ?` ^ ¢°n eN u Mls,aniun mme euij-v:)'11-N m m O O
i , Z a via
SJ (77 ??TT?7L?L aYV.TA7UL] AOQLLY Hl ?7 ?T TATi
o y J? ©?' oz ?? ° . } w 0 w
$nd WA?? 00???° m m NS M?
r? °?e u . mm 3 a IAI3 28 WfIICIVJ S Y °m
Meisso slaaes -NDV-UJ. d' gG IflVd o u ?w of Q
d01N01D311nDiff • 0 0

_ O Z Q
to
0
w
?°- ¢N Z
_
m
.
y9o - ZO
Cl)
$V
S w
D P
¢
° a
4ix
iv

oN

3niaa a31s3r
1 ?!
i

U

b\ Z-
0 Q
.? F-- w
U
Q

\\ z O
0-
C) >
>
w
w

I S
1
t
1 I

0
0
0
0
W
J
Q
U
N o
}
0
r
eep0is ! ??dsB
woe •?• I,/, die 1?'1
Pct.cia m C-,)
c? : V) 00
??i o•• li? •vi \ a
101,4%
w
W
Qr ial r i UIR Mtl^7R ` °o o va0i v"i E???T?1?I • o m ?p
om m? o m m
z "' ?? o N m a 42-14uCl 2-S vuq-:) quoN o o
o o g : `J
W = W „?? a= SLNRWaAO'ddNII g w° w
dWAO
6d,?°'maiow NI/ttI t100It ?__ = x ; 3 = °wm ??
71i .
N r???rou?3unour - ; -NDVIL Uuaa •InVa N o
0
„
rTas
W
i
g
B Z
k?«
ule ° ?/1

o
Q
? a
o VJ
$?O
,
? F? mmV
r?

Z

?... Q

00
\A U
F-

\??\ LLJ
O O
z a ?I

I'

? ;t o
•
O
u a
Zr
V) O V
d:
M ?.
O
00 ,
• Q

® 11 p ?
?I
i
i?
1
A
W
U
K
N
N
O
3
z
0
u
z
0
U
H
a
P corn m,n r.u!ioae? gj-N'LjWMjVH 2 1 a t
e ,,«, r " u6isappalQj6alul ° NN E > J
J. ?° °u .Si,s?aniun .1.1,g -ikon-) yp.N m m z K
Z L.. A c ciof a O K Q
ci3 &_ [LJ _u M. a
o `S f, 0 w ?z mm S.I,N?lW9A02IdWl w
sndwklo mm CI'I;?Id v wfltQd.Ls Y m w ry
??"1N?iem MnIsao slroas -}IDVII.L 2I2IIQ "I[ldd ??
V31N01331lnDMV • o
z ca
a _ _ O
ov w U
- z
.ndo
- 3 ZW -r1
?lJ
0
,
©,E v
- Lum
1
a
a ° Cc
a 0
1
Fo\
ff€<
dI
nI
, ,
zF NR ? ,
??¢vz ?RT ?? ??\\ y?
o° .°?? ` rr ??? BI4
%
•? ?¢ w i
i
%
` r ,
? f
t 1
3AINO N3183f lr
FIT] 57
cl
f o o II
0
I'
?m
' 1 awx3as nvwd
4j
, a
---------?Aa?iTaaow ------------ -
0

Z o
N
O o
N
U

?w o

Cr)
Q
z o
Om ?

Uw o
=
LL_
W LL
4;
O Of D
z a- m a
o

C

iM hei
`e?,.. r
`rrr
`
t> ; "• ,?

??s?0/fj••eeee e•• M«vr
••O?,
l
p P' r UYIRRI? -qonj tluoN ` qfpl-g o m r
t ION • J
c?'' ?; ?.r` OU,1--2 .f-n amS •n!P=•:)N co m
In 37 on '? `? nnu v
@ o t Z &Li? MT--TAO'dcE II ° w
sSAdWAio E o m m >
r ?P?e ©©© v ° ° ; cmid 79 14MIC[VILS , Y o a
v3iir'(u33iinoin -xOVILi. II'3Q 'IRvCI
?o
I I
k,=8?E5 ? VJ
a
\ Z ? o
Q
O Q:?
U Q
I- W o
\ (n li °
LL-
0 D 0
1:1 V) U7 w
O O X :?
z n W Vu) o
? o
00

i
1

? 0
O ? A r.

V

,.
n ?
? U
I ?
I
I v
1

I ?

/- \
I i.

P a' ?? 1?1? o ?n m in E ??K'1s1I a m r
J
..a , ` ?` ° r ° S?nneton a?ag •v!f??N m m
z
oW I U at??r $ Z rn m S.LN9WaL ]OQCWl Y } w
- ?® SAdWAlO oz e /-?.7?-?? ???nic V/-??I in m >
ow a ?=?? lllall v l?S oa1 0 W CD ?
??? tNO/il0 A lL#041If - o yio ; ti^V?U U UM ?Tf1V 3 x O ?
M
''!NI ? Ii INCUMMOv • = - ? ; _ D V a a'?\.t 111 V d ° a o
- N l..
nI
i
rY
a
g
s? ?
°
?
fr`uo
`n 9 U) co

\
? O
O
\ O
W O
N
<

b U) LLJ O
Z
OLL.
0
'
U Z U
)
m ° o
I O O W
U
Z a. Z v) o

H
? ;may
d
z Q)
,

,,SIIIIIIII W%v

,l

mJ / T
J
y
-- 'Z J ?? -
m
1
s
+ ? J
a
J? 77? 7W77
41
? a
`off
16
- e
12
r
Sinuosity -1.2 > 1.2 > 1.2 rVa
Eg$
?a
?nuluiijjjiniluii?iiiuuijunlini?iiuliii jjjiiitlui?inliu j ??
MLLIMEMRS
i
rtv
4
IO,t
!V
I
i
-? CA - )
f DO jZ
I" C) G X-
? N ?I
n- Y
U,
7-s
rn
w U W
PRIMARY DELINEATIVE CRITERIA FOR THE MAJOR STREAM TYPES
s
m?
a

f.

I " j
c I

n s? r s

_1
sa3.awrnw
?III?IIII?IIII?IIII?IIII?IIII?IIII??Ill?llll?llll?llllillll?llll?llll?lll?llli?llll?llll?llll?llll?llll?llll?llll?llll?llll?llll?
6 L W 4 08 OB OL OB OE De OL
t

w
0.
7
SH3AlM -ivmnlVN :J0 NOI1dOIdISSd-13 N30SON 01 AMI
P
P FILE COPY
ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT,
PHASE II
N
Gy C ?Jv

Variables Existing
Channel C4
Reference
Reaches Proposed
Channel
(Reach 1) Proposed
Channel
(Reach II)
Stream Type (Rosgen) G C C C
Drainage Area (s q. mi.) 1.15 0.55-8.35 0 ID 1- '.
Bankfull Width (Wbkt, ft) 22.2-23.5 16.2-33.5 25.0 25.0
MEAN - 22.9 "
Bankfull Mean Depth (dbkf, ft) 2.44-2.61 0.9-2.4 1.60 1.60
MEAN 2.53 '
Width/de th Ratio Wbkf/dbkf 8.5-9.6 14-18 15.6 15.6
MEAN 9.1 16.2
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (Abkr sq. ft.) 57.3-57.9 15-80 40 40
MEAN 57.6
Bankfull Maximum Depth (dmax ft) 3.52-3.70 1.4-2.9 2.50 2.50
MEAN 3.61 "
Ratio Bankfull Maximum Depth to Mean
Bankfull Depth dmaxldbkf
1.4
1.2-1.6
1.6
1.6
Lowest Bank Height to Bankfull Maximum
Depth Ratio
3
1
1
1
Width of Flood Prone Area (Wrpa ft) 30.4-37.5 50-136 56-66 63-265
MEAN 34.0 " 59 139
Entrenchment Ratio Wfpa/Wbk/ 1.4-1.6 2.3-5.7 2.4 5.6
Meander Length (Lm ft) " 90-94 139-213
MEAN ** 178
Ratio of Meander Length to Bankfull Width ** 5.5-5.7 "** 5.6-8.5
(Lm/Wbkf)
MEAN
**
5.6
7.1
Radius of Curvature (Rc ft) 160 **"" 63-85
MEAN 160 ' **"* 71
Ratio of Radius of Curvature to Bankfull
Width 2.0-4.0 recommended
7.0
0.9-1.6
2.5-3.4
(Rc[Wbkf)
MEAN
7.0
1.1
2.8
Belt Width (Wbtt ft) .` 31-40 65-100
MEAN 84
Meander Width Ratio Wbtt/Wbkf ** 1.5-2.4 2.6-4.0
MEAN ** 1.8 **"" 3.4
Sinuosity (Stream LengthNalley Length, k -
ft/ft)
1.08
1.20
1.01
1.20
Valle Slope (Svattey) ft/ft 0.009 0.014 0.009 0.009
Average Water Surface Slope (Savg) 0.008 0.007-0.016 0.0072 0.0072
Pool Slope (Spool) *** 0-0.0012 **"" 0.000-0.001
MEAN *** 0.0000
Ratio of Pool Slope to Average Slope
Spool/Savg
***
0.0-0.1
""**
0.0-0.1

Riffle Slope (Srifl ft/ft)
.009-.059
0.0072 0.00576-
0.03528
MEAN 0.023 0.0072
Ratio of Riffle Slope to Average Slope
Sriff/Savg
***
0.8-4.9
1.0
0.8-4.9
Maximum Pool Depth (dpool ft) '** 2.5-4.1 3.35 3.35
Ratio of pool depth to mean bankfull depth
dpoolldbkf
***
1.7-2.7
2.1
2.1
Pool Width (Wpoot ft) *** 11.1-25.9 25 25
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull Width
Wpoo1fWbkf
0.7-0.8
1.0
1.0
Pool to Pool Spacing (P-P ft) 76-227 75-202 68-128
MEAN ** 119 105
Ratio of P-P to Bankfull Width P-P/Wbkf ** 2.3-8.3 3.0-8.1 2.7-5.1
MEAN *" 6.2 4.8 4.2
V k
v
VAII
ie.
D
* Brushy Fork Trib #2 @ US Hwy 311 in Winston Salem, Morgan Creek near White Cross, and Richland Creek
in Moore County were used to obtain ratios shown. For individual numbers for each site, see attached sheets.
** The existing channel does not show pattern or a consistent riffle-pool sequence.
***Pool cross-sections were not taken.
****Reach I of the proposed channel nnel does not contain pattern due to lateral restrictions.
Bed features will be created through in-stream structures. ?7C?'
C/
. ,
4/27/2004 Entrain mentCalcs.xls
ENTRAINMENT CALCULATION FORM
Stream: Rock Branch, Phase II Reach: 19+00
Team: BAD/JMP Date: Apr-04
Information Input Area
38.3 Dso Riffle bed material D50 (mm)
19.7 D"so Bar sample D50 (mm)
105:0 D; Largest particle from bar sample (mm) 0.34 (feet) 304.8 mm/foot
;;.0.007, - Se Existing bankfull water surface slope (ft/ft)
1.6 :;. de Existing bankfull mean depth (ft)
25.90 R Hydraulic Radius of Riffle Cross Section (ft)
1.65 7S Submerged specific weight of sediment

Calculation of Critical Dimensionless Shear Stress
1.94 D50/D^50 If value is between 3-7 Equation 1 will be used: T*-0.812
ci = 0.0834(Dso/D so)
2.74
0 '881
D;/D50 If value is between 1.3-3.0 Equation 2 will be used: T*?, = 0.0384(D/D50)-
0.0157 TC; Critical Dimensionless Shear Stress Equation used: 2

Calculation of Bank full Mean Depth Required for Entrainment of Largest Particle in Bar Sample

1.27 dr Required bankfull mean depth (ft) dr = -r c; SD;
Se

1.60 de Existing bankfull mean depth (ft)

Calculati on of BKF Water Surface Slope Required for Entrainment of Largest Particle in Bar Sample

0.0056 Sr Required bankfull water surface slope (ft) Sr = T ci?/sD;
de

0.0070 Se Existing bankfull water surface slope (ft)

Sediment Transport Validation
0.67 Bankfull Shear Stress T, = -/RS (Ib/ft2) where the Density of water = = 62.4 Ibs/ft3

50-150 Moveable particle size (mm) at bankfull shear stress (predicted by the Revised Shields Diagram by
Ros en, 2002

0.5-1.2 Predicted shear stress required to initiate movement of D; (mm) (see Revised Shields Diagram,
Ros en, 2002)
Note: If available bankfull shear stress exceeds D100 of bed, degradation potential exists.
4/27/2004EntrainmentCalcs.x1s
ENTRAINMENT CALCULATION FORM
Stream: Rock Branch, Phase II Reach: 20+00
Team: BAD/JMP Date: Apr-04 `
Information Input Area
23.8 D50 Riffle bed material D50 (mm)
7.1 D^50 Bar sample D50 (mm)
72.0 D; Largest particle from bar sample (mm) 0.24 (feet) 304.8 mm/foot
s O.007, Se Existing bankfull water surface slope (ft/ft)
1.6 de Existing bankfull mean depth (ft)
25.90 R Hydraulic Radius of Riffle Cross Section (ft)
1.65 ys Submerged specific weight of sediment

Calculation of Critical Dimensionless Shear Stress
3.35 Dso/D"5o If value is between 3-7 Equation 1 will be used. Tc; = 0.0834(D50/D ^50)-0 872
3.03 Df/ D If value is between 1.3-3.0 Equation 2 will be used: T*-0'887
5o c; = 0.0384(D;/Dso)
0.0290 TIC; Critical Dimensionless Shear Stress Equation used: 1

Calculation of Bank full Mean Depth Required for Entrainment of Largest Particle in Bar Sample

1.62 d, Required bankfull mean depth (ft) dr= T c,/ sD;
S8

1.60 de Existing bankfull mean depth (ft)

Calculati on of BKF Water Surface Slope Required for Entrainment of Largest Particle in Bar Sample

0.0071 S, Required bankfull water surface slope (ft) Sr = T c;, sD;
de

0.0070 Se Existing bankfull water surface slope (ft)

Sediment Transport Validation
0.67 Bankfull Shear Stress Tc = -/RS (lb/ft2) where the Density of water = = 62.4 Ibs/ft3

50-150 Moveable particle size (mm) at bankfull shear stress (predicted by the Revised Shields Diagram by
Ros en, 2002

0.3-0.9 Predicted shear stress required to initiate movement of D; (mm) (see Revised Shields Diagram,
Ros en, 2002
Note: If available bankfull shear stress exceeds D100 of bed, degradation potential exists.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
Memorandum of Understanding
between North Carolina Department of
Transportation and North Carolina
State University
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (hereinafter, "MOU") is made and entered
into on the date herein below last written, by and between the NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT) and NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY (NCSU),
collectively referred to hereinafter as the Parties.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, NCDOT is required by state and federal environmental laws and regulations to
obtain stream and buffer restoration to be used as mitigation for stream and buffer impacts caused by
transportation improvement projects, for the purpose of obtaining necessary environmental permits;
WHEREAS, NCSU is constructing stream and buffer improvements (hereinafter,
"Improvements") along portions of Rocky Branch Creek ("Rocky Branch") located on the NCSU main
campus in Raleigh, NC;
WHEREAS, NCSU has secured various funding to construct and monitor portions of the Rocky
Branch to be restored and is desirous of obtaining additional funding from NCDOT;
WHEREAS, NCDOT is desirous of securing conservation easement(s) for portions of the
Improvements and using said conservation easement(s) to secure mitigation credits from resource and
regulatory agencies for the issuance of environmental permits for certain transportation projects;
WHEREAS, the Council of State for the State of North Carolina approved a conservation
easement to NCDOT for a portion of Rocky Branch at its meeting held on April 2, 2002;
14 1
WHEREAS, NCDOT is authorized to acquire such interest in stream and buffer mitigation
pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 136-18 in order to comply with applicable federal and state laws and regulations;
and
WHEREAS, NCDOT and NCSU are authorized to enter into intergovernmental agreements
pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-24.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals above and for good and valuable
consideration, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1.0 Scope and Consideration. NCDOT agrees to pay NCSU a total payment of $1,448,489.00, in
accordance with the terms herein, and conditioned upon the conveyance to NCDOT from the State of
North Carolina, for NCSU, of stream and buffer compensatory mitigation credits ("Compensatory
Mitigation") created from "Phase I" and "Phase II" stream and buffer areas of the Rocky Branch in the
form of the conservation easement ("Conservation Easement") identified in attached Exhibit A. Phase I
stream and buffer areas have been identified as a part of the conservation easement adjacent to Sullivan
Drive, while Phase II has been generally identified as being adjacent to Paul Derr Track. NCSU's
obligations (as follows) shall be the same for both Phase I and Phase II stream and buffer Improvements.
Should NCSU, at its sole discretion, decide not to request a conservation easement or agree to
Compensatory Mitigation from Phase II Improvements, all references in this MOU to Phase II shall be
void.
2.0 NCSU Obligations. NCSU shall perform the following responsibilities regarding the
Compensatory Mitigation in return for the aforementioned consideration to be paid by NCDOT:
2.1 Site Mitigation Plan and Agency Approval of Compensatory Mitigation. In
connection herewith, NCSU shall fully cooperate with NCDOT as NCDOT seeks
mitigation credits from resource and regulatory agencies such as the North Carolina
16
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), including the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and all other
applicable regulatory and resource agencies to facilitate and expedite the acceptance of
the plans for stream mitigation and buffers, which plans include: design plan sheets,
maintenance plan(s) and conservation easement(s) (collectively herein referred to as the
"Mitigation Plan")
2.2 Site Grading, Earthwork and Planting. NCSU shall complete all necessary stream and
buffer grading, earthwork and planting pursuant to the approved Mitigation Plan and site
design.
2.3 Donation of Conservation Easement. After completion and regulatory approval of the
construction activities, NCSU shall facilitate the donation to NCDOT of a conservation
easement for both Phase I and Phase II programs in the form of the conservation
easement provided in Exhibit A, over the mitigation areas of the applicable portions of
Rocky Branch. . NCSU agrees to the terms and conditions of the conservation easement
provided in Exhibit A. The conservation easement(s) shall be recorded with the Wake
County Register of Deed immediately following execution by the State of North
Carolina. By donating said land interest to NCDOT, NCSU shall also transfer any and all
available and future stream mitigation and buffer credits that are generated by the
Improvements in accordance with the Mitigation Plan encompassed by the conservation
easement(s).
2.4 Warranty of Construction and Design. NCDOT has reviewed the design for the
Improvements and acknowledges that the design meets the intent for improvements that
are necessary to qualify for mitigation credits. If, in the mutual opinion of the Parties, any
construction defects are detected wherein the Improvements were not constructed
according to the approved design, NCSU shall be responsible for correcting any such
construction defects in order to preserve the conservation values of the Improvements.
2.5 Monitoring and Conservation Easement Conditions. NCSU agrees to maintain the
easement areas contained within Phase I and II in accordance with the Conservation
Easement attached.
2.6 As-Built Drawings and Reports. At the conclusion of the site activities, NCSU shall
submit to NCDOT "as-built" drawings of the constructed conservation easement area
over Phase I and Phase II areas providing limits and/or boundaries of the site construction
and character using accepted surveying practices (GPS, transit, etc.) and monitoring data.
3.0 Payment Schedule. There shall be a total of three separate lump sum payments made to NCSU
for both Phase I and Phase II stream and buffer mitigation programs. Phase I shall include Payment #1
($1,017,989.00), while Phase II shall include Payment # 2 ($387,450.00) and Payment #3 ($43,050.00).
The total consideration for all payments to be made by NCDOT is $1,448,489.00.
3.1 Phase I: Payment #1 -- Payment #1 shall be the only payment made for the Phase I
stream and buffer Improvements. Payment #1 shall in the amount of $1,017,989.00.
Said Payment #1 shall be due upon execution of this MOU. NCSU shall invoice
NCDOT for Payment #1 at the NCDOT address provided herein. NCDOT shall submit
payment to NCSU within 30 days of receipt of said invoice.
3.2 Phase II: Payment #2 -- Payment #2 shall be made by NCDOT after approval by the
NCSU Board of Trustees and the Council of State of the donation of a conservation
easement to NCDOT, for the Phase II portion of the Improvements as outlined in Section
1.0 of this MOU. After commencement of construction activities for Phase II, NCSU
shall invoice NCDOT for Payment #2 in the amount of $387,450.00. NCDOT shall
submit payment to NCSU within 30 days of receipt of said invoice.
3.3 Phase II: Payment #3 -- Payment #3 shall be made no sooner than May of 2003 and
after NCSU has completed the Improvements associated with the conservation easement
area for Phase II. Following completion of Improvements, NCSU shall invoice NCDOT
for the remaining total consideration identified above, or $43,050.00. NCDOT shall
remit said Payment #3 to NCSU within 30 days of receipt of said invoice.
All invoices shall be directed to the following address and contact:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attn: Dr. Charles Bruton, Assistant Manager
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
4.0 Notices. All notices required or remitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent
by Certified or Registered U.S. Mail or by a national courier service or hand delivered to the addresses
set out below. Notices shall be deemed delivered and given when mailed, if mailed, or when delivered
by hand or by courier, upon receipt.
Notices to NCSU shall be sent to:
North Carolina State University
c/o Director of Real Estate
P. O. Box 7230
Raleigh, NC 27695
Notices to NCDOT shall be sent to:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attn: Dr. Charles Bruton, Assistant Manager
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed by their
proper officials thereunto duly authorized as of the dates below indicated:
EXECUTED by NCDOT this ;2 0 day of , 2002.
SEAL: NORT CAOLINA DEMa-?ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
Projec'kvelopment & ?tal Analysis Branch
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROV L . 16
By:
Contracts Manager, Office of Natural Environment
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Approved as to form and execution:
ssist t Attorney General
SEAL: NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
By: c ?EJ)---
George Date
Vice Chancellor for Finance and Business

USER: rbarbour DATE: 0412612004
DGN: kA6211ZVvdM2112Jshd9n TIME. 09:11:36 PM
?r
0M
aZ
O C7
(A
M=
zrn
? D
X?
rc
zm
mo
m

r_g
z "i
C7 =
O
xc
o-
TI Z
-i r
rrI Cp
rTT z
Z 0
? n
X C
M (-
?<
rri
O ?
C_
mr
nm
? Z
C')
VI -4
x
:s
LID
m
r-
---1
s
0
s
u
(A
x
? m
<
x
m
D
C)
M
m
x
z
C)
- r
in m
w z
i
C-)
S
-1?
D
r
M0
mo
°N
rm
m°
zn
Cl:)
o ---4 -U
X X
-0
T x
i
nx
r O
D
N O
N N
CD m v
n
Di -1
o?
zm
D
M X
D O7
M
D
M
D n
I cn
D oD
D
e;u
M
L/I
On --1-10 Wo OC 0> (A mZ
mCr-i ams -< z' °zo vmlr- z S
mm mmm mm c.0 mc7s < _ Z
am zm mn °z 0)-',M 4 r0.
nms (? w z s o N
oO pr0 Z-< W ° mN C
PD C
W z;-V1i Am or- mon -nl -04 Zm 00A Z m-4 Mxm z
O r 0 m rA
03.z m nA sow m
n (n c) Z >O
AD -< :i 0 ;n :n o, o
(A nn -o?z?r11 n 3;M (ns -<
C< n r m n Z Z 0
out m1 v(^
W m mm (A
I m
m n m°a °
v W r r, ? Cq 2
-403 mm c? z
x r
° p p z z xN Z 0
O EA O
O (A)- r -I D m
m ° N
m z (-= -Ir o
m° o -4r, v
rn zo m ?m no trig z --I
° >0 m m Cx r
O OS `O <Z J
°Z am n ?1 NO N
M o
-( ZA ° °o, O
00 r N n
to mm ; m ? m
c ?-4 -+n v
m -1 to x mo a
z xz m m?
?v v -
ny _v o
m c: = 0
I m o
;lD
< z ,-'1 f
n ° m
r
A
onooDz (n
(D 00 *OL0
vl:3 (n]a3 -I
W E (D-1W M
N -I (n 0
c: z (n izD
ooo+?o D
1:3 aL- D
:7 K: CD?o
.f
WoO:3 -4
Oto 7 -'DZ
?W +<on
I0 (D C-0
nn0'1
0
+I (nom mm
°pm NIC
0 n < Z
i" m
D
co rn
= r^ o ?(n
c- ° ) C -1
CD p D (n
<
T<Z CODC
7 z x On
WNW
0 N
O 00
::T -, 7 ?x
0 :7 (D D
JO yZ
co 7 # r- (7
# LO a:
1
Lf) Ln Z M
ao lD ?-,, C7 D
Cn
J? 00
1 O (V x
m (;' (n rT1
N t0 (/1
N - -{
Co E) O
N N D
?O
z
D
z
°
0
x
M
M
z
D
O
m
n
x
D
N
M
N
IN
N wl
4
m
z
v
v
M
0
--1
Z
O
2
n
TD
N
O
r-
Z
D
N
D
M
C
Z
M
x
_N

All,
?
@.
P
VI? K,
?? 4yFNf /r?
.,y Ffggr
RO40
Is 40
!s an t1 ? a? ?`
D_
Z
(7
D
C
xr n
- N ?
Zl I _ 1 I I I
CCOlC W N-
x r C? c?
I , 1 ,
(n W W (n
C7f r--40 -0M0-I-I
X D D x M x x M::?-<-4
0ZZ>Z?nOOm?q r-
o NDOTrr' --n(n - c7m
(n DD rON D M
-I zm0 zr,?
oo-oZ-?z zC)
ZM D r ?DO X700
N>Nr-(A OD (Z/1
(/l p N p Z
M r0
D z n
D
z
r
a ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION &
GREENWAY PROJECT PHASE II
o m
? NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
n m
N s TITLE SHEET
Z
0
M
X
O
0
D
C
Z
C)
V)
E A R T H@ T E C H
701Capcrde Corer DrftSuft •475 RaWoh #C 27601
Pto ^IMT 854-6PM r- 19IV P141959
-JULJ I MAN ST. ILL-i O U
Q?QO DORMAN ST,
OQ ?
O
y ?
1 . a
a
DS R"1
D
7 o?ro?
W O N DR
om
0 BRaON
0
m Q
cn
1
a O
r)O? w A-
a PDa(¢ S
N
ti
? ® R
D.
p U gONEr Uq ., COCA .
ENTERPRISE ST.
Q
_ ?ND
ALE LN.
0
O
c Oz
f7
a0 :ro -I
0007_0'10
aom 01,7-1 X 00
+Q -10 ;a
rn rn
O. +EO1 O
<-1 Q v 7 OS, o :5.'o >
fC07 O O
+ Q
_O7l ? z
0 O 00
7?pm70 p
,v- a
n
Q,: 000
gmm>>m{ z = rn
m m+E4 0
?EmO0gF
Crou 907IS 0 ? =< z C
0N'1 m g a3 _n Z
O ire 9) 1? 1 ?
R?ooAmo rn -v p _
m°°m ,
° < m :p z
0° C N C
o<s1°o
c 00L
,a -,o In ic 0 cl) M
rn
0 > =j ;u
o:?(n01n
v 0irm0
0
±0°ep.m rn
15voaaX
F 00
3+0
+
C :) 0 ¦^
O m CD:)
0 0, .1XO > =<
¦
Dal N 0m
0
+ ic
O z
7
cl)
%moo
_ SCHEMATIC DESIGN 5/30/200
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1/23/2004
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS '3/26/200
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NO RQVISIONS DRN DW DATE

r
I
USER: rbarbour DATE. 0412612004
DGN. k.A62l0cadd\62112Jyp.d9n TIME: 09.11,34 PM
v
O
mm
0
z
T , J
oy
r r
m
O
z Z
m
O
DDD JS
N N N
2
WW
t ++ +
N N O
000
:umm
mmm
U) ca w
saa
A N N
O A mo
C
H N
` N
I Z
m
v
< r ?0
K 0 I9\

z 2
m
N ^
mo
r
/

O
/
?S /m/om\
l! v
r
m
U)
cw Q
Q
f P _
°_O
M
CI Oz Z
m
nl?ll I
y
I" N
r Z
?1 a
O
m.
\
A
O
C 8
N D ?J1?
?, N
I
a
D
m
m +
+
O

°
o
° I
N
m ?"
S

M
0 10
m D G)"
O < ch y
° O
0
me N
D
4???
/--, L-6?
mi
m
N
m?
c V
A` m .?. m f;
m m
v ?
m N T
zo -oN mid
Oa i?N H
m
N NH o r
m
o a' Z "
A --I N fi.
' m
I ? N ' ? A Or ? N V
I /? l 1
r to ' Dr- -
s N II J m °i111
41
m I
ro C7
N A m Z N
N A m dl O G yy.,
y v_ Z Z?? m2
j O - N m
L m <
1 ca
' N Z
ti A D
? p A O
O O
m + m
? N w N w _
> N N N N
° A
o ;mN o
) d
a m?O A
H
t.'4
? -+a D HA
M
i w m N (O IT-1 a'-
I a?'. m to
s
N m H °
O
m
N
vm
m
D
m
m
? ro
or--A
. 0
?b
om
m
z
me
n
= H
(4) Z
Az?
r
c0ii m
m
o H
O Z
oO
T O
?m
o:F
tzn
n
S
N

z
m
m
Eli
m o
n
D
r
N
m ?

? N

O
DD O

Z ,
?A
m
m _
O m Hm
m
r
O -I w
N
o ?
c H
Z mr
y
$ o
'
r C F (o m
Z m p m1 nN
y .

m C. m

O
O
D

C n D t0

m 0

m

v
a

cl)
m OZ

x

o v
A
N ym
m
$ o $ ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION &
a
m m m "? GREENWAY PROJECT PHASE II
m o
?
N
e NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
N N TYPICAL SECTIONS
0 :2
D
cl r-
0
o _
N
z O
v z
a
O Z
O
f 0,
1
c
r
z
O
b
1
r4n
A
m
x
z2
.-. Cn
z
r
m4 ?t
is
o
z
?a
D
y
E A R T H@ T E C H
70l Cwporale Carter Alva Sufle •475 Ralala, XC 9607
)
m
] r
m
Z
0
i0
c
m
J A
J ?

m ?
0
? N
y M
0
mO
m
m
1 z
j
J
y1 O
DD
co Ln
80
og
0
op
(A
Dy
c N
(+il
N +1
m r
-rf)
0
2r
m r
M
M
iO
S
SCHEMATIC DESIGN arJVrcuw
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1/23/2004
'CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS 7/26/2004
PRELIMINARY PLANS
X
v

N
O
An y
W

a O An
H
ff1
Fn

m
A H
?
=
0
O

N
a
? V

USER: rborbour DATE, 0412612004
DGN: kA62112kwdd\62112-0sh01 dgn TIME, 09,11.31 PM
c, C3 zt

4
II 11 iI if
? o

rn

? ?, R
d
O'
lI
b???oo
m x
aH
-
AtT Mg

y? rnm 'rn
II
I
II
If II
f" o m y ? O? O`

H ? N ,n ?n ? N 2
W
o

m fi?irOD? ?b >
4 4 11 N 1S!2 Vas n if it 11 11 11
if III' fill! 'It
bW ?wn,IV 1u `?,n o 'un
R1?1,1 ro yY @x 01>
. to N. - ` u R 11 N u t?l / C u u 11 n u ca ? C (n
SS??
o
give
m -IroD??? 01>
oNia?iooo ? If Nooo
h?yrn?c 01r1 D? C?
m
t CC?Fn T? 11 N 11 11 I' CC C
YYY
_ Q "@t
.I
ro m .
m;
g ? ,, - II N 1?' II 11 Q ? f0 c?
. • .: ?{? ccdii a C
1In? _
N' O 'I U a b '?1 L, L, ?A W CA-
LA ?tgw?t, 1? m
mxm?_A 4E E-?At, w
r- -v LA
zom
m
Dcm°n? ?ro o ??,, m y?yy -1r-0
1> _'o
'D C3
m F a?
- ' w
2 ?
a 0
-0 -4T
r- 0
zm?
w y'
r
arm-Am?
DO NOD O
r 4
I r `( PC 1n 2 `f C
-<z ?N? rn x m tnw P4 as Di r3i
m
N?
W. Cb
If 1- ro C> -0
yp j N2yPn? yQ 11 "wif ryQoo
'It
'tl"^r
it R
91A n Cvl u N 11 tn? (uV In c)
? „o wy, w c?
L ` mRm rJ'
tn 11 11 0 If 114
ITI
Lit!
m
O
VI RI rn o _ r,I y r o D
v A m o ? m o n If gN u If C?l
ty2A $ r a?o, N` + ?p, r? It??
Ln 72 :16
rn It
a? >?
?yroD? ?
C II 11 N If If ?0 C
C ?2 rny £
-SCHEMATIC DESIGN 5130/2003
A m S ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION & DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1/23. /2004
GREENWAY PROJECT PHASE II CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS 3/2'6/2009
m NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
E A R T H T i C H
g „ = a ?R?LIMINARY PL.?$
s `? d SITE PLAN 70/Ccrparole CMx OrNm Suft • ff5 Rokloh h1C 2r6m
L 0
/'Imnf9191954-5P00 Fna, l451 A'I f>?59 wl RFVISIRNS ORN CHN URTE

USER: rbarbour DATE: 0412612004
DGN: kA62112\cadd\62112JcpO1dgn TIME: 09:10:58 PM
Ll0
AVENT FER
? F?D (?-
v
8 g
ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION &
m n GREENWAY PROJECT PHASE II
A m " S NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
A? E A R T H T E C H
n N N
s P N n TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAIL 70/ Ca-mrdeCadwDrN&Sulle•475RaldobX27601
rn,,,, l"IT 0 4 r.r'u r,; Yl
JET ?R_ =fir
: --
vz
m
z ••
Z
cn m
cn m
m
9m
cn o
?s
g c'
0
0
rn
a
z z
?s
ZM
47 Dy0
D
O ?
O
r?
0
Ena
0
N
V,
Z
D
N
m
T?
W
r
m
0
m
z
v
SCHEMATIC DESIGN 5/30/2003
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1/23/2004
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS .3/26/2004
PRELIMINARY PLAN
r ,
USER: rbarbour DATE: 0412612004
M.N. F.?r.91lamAr7U.7//7 1r.4- NAn l"F. /lO.ln.A9 011

7
¦

r '

D
,u p
e

BULLPEN DUGOUT

-k
e M
'?
HH n
M ? A ? L

"I
N
,-n
N ?I
J
?
t R ? Kai

g 8 ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION & SCHEMATIC DESIGN 5/30/2003
m z `M ^7
GREENWAY PROJECT PHASE II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1/23/2004
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS 3/26/2004
a
E A R T N T E C H -
s N o PRELIMINARY PLANS
LANDSCAPE PLAN laCwpµvo/e Caftr 011a&ft •475 Raagh AC 27607
Ptx (9191 8 5 4-20 0 Fox,[phone]
NO REVISIONS ORN CIO( DATE
8?
??
gN
?W
Oti.
a
4
P
N
??
?N
8
W(2?
j0
LEGEND
CROSS VANE•
• See General Dstalls
DOUBLE DROP CROSS VANE•
• See Genera/ Dafalls
ROOF WAD
• See General Lblalls
• Plon mtnl Denotes 3 Rcct Wads
ROCK SILL•
• See General Details
CHANNEL PLU(#
• See General Details
SREV GREENWAYI
CURVE C-! CURVE C-2 CURVE C-3 CUMf G-! CURVE G-2 CURVE G-3 CURVE G-4 CURVE G-5 CURVE G-6 CURVE G-7 CURVE G-B CURVE G-9 CURVE G-!0
PI Sia 20+2854 PI Sta 20+9981 PI Sta Z+9771 P1 SM 10+7986 P1 Sta 12+5757 PI Sfa 13+9323 PI Sta 15+1819 P/ Sta 15+9150 PI Sfa 18+16.42 PI Sta 18+7385 PI Sta 20+/378 PI Sto 21+42,06 P! Sla 27+0753
PCSta. 20+1033 FCSto. 20+6102 PCSta. 21+5385 PCSta. b+3240 FCSta.12+2888 PCSta.13+6Bb7 PCSta.14+8413 M:Ste.15+7392 PCSta. 0+9956 PCSta.18+43b2 PCSta.19+9181 PCS/a 20+8105 PCSto. 22+7936
PrSto. Po+41SB PTSta. 21+2627 PTSto. 22+2589 PTSte.11+2510 PTSla.12+8594 PTSta.14+1754 PTSta.15+5136 PTSta.16+0894 PTSto,18+3315 PTSta. !9+0334 PTSfo. 20+35.40 PTSto. 21+8952 P7Sto. 23+34,44
p= 3555'D7lILT1 p= 7T53'082'fRTI p= 8246'199fLT1 p= 302r057'(RT1 p= I6'44455'fLTI ?= IS59'565'fRTJ p= 2239'365'(LTJ p= 1256'432fRT1 p= 1224'483'fRTJ ?=22'04228fLT1 p= 16'05'358fArJ p= 6525'1011'(LrJ p=29'29'4291
D = 11435'298 D = 119' 2r 583' D = 114 35' 298' D = 3Z 44 258 D = 3Z 44258 D =2838' 524' D = 33'42' 122' D = 3E 57' Sol D = 36'57' Sol D = 3657' 541 D = 36'57'541 D = 60' 18' 408' D = 5332' 508'
L = 3134' L = 6525' L = 7223' L = 9270' L =5726' L =48.81 L =6723' L = 3502' L = 3358' L = 59Jr L = 4354' L = IOB.4T L = 5508'
r = 162r T = 3879' T = 44D6' T =41.41' T = 2889' T = 2456' T = 34176' T =1759' r = 1686' T = 3023' T = 219r T = 6/Ar T = 2817'
R =50.00' R = 481XY R = 5004 R = l15.OfY R = A5.D0' R =200.00' R =ROOD' R = 1551X0' R = 155,00' R = 155,IXY R = !5500' R = 95.00' R = ID7.IX1'
CURVE C-4 CURVE C-5 CURVE Chi SAFETY FENCE TD Bf rNSTN1f0 Ar CULVERT C1?S51NG ?°SREV- STA?+93
THE DIRELTION OE THE ENGINEER PRDPDSEO 601f.Of CONCRETE ARCH '!
Pl Sta 23+2296 PI Sia 24+6555 PI Ste 25+5916
PCS}e. 22+6052 PCSYa. 23+7921 PCSto. 25+3256' {48SPAN X 11 815E CONSPhN OR EoUNI?NTJ
PrSto. 23+5716 PTS1a. 24+9522 PTSta. 25+74,46 ON PARME7 orals WTTN WING Wails
?= 920'OIlfRTJ p= 1l435'592'fLTI p= 34!/'423'(RT1 1NV /N J155O
D = 9529' 34.7' D =98'41' 090' D = 8T 5r 040' 300 INV LYIT 11430
L =9684' L = 116Ar L = 41517' ? ? ? ??
T = s24a r = 903M r = 21,6(Y
NOTE: Structure p'ecerrord on Plan Sleets R =601X?' R = 58D0' R = 701X7'
are forlxotlon ony.Actuol plocementsMll
be directed by Resldect Erglneer. See tAs
??
de/oll sleets for slrucfure conslrudlon, '
- -:. USE EXISTING ROAO POR -
coxsrRUC7'roN accESS', sraGE AND kD CONSTRUCTION
STOC1fPILE NiEA SREV .28+3 92
?: <{I3f AD;RES1
END. CONSTRUCTION
. 4+
71E TO PROPOSED CULVERT
REPNR AND REPLACE DAMAGED

` - `' PAVEMENf,CURB & GUTTER,
.

. _ `
- AND S10EWAD fSEf 7YP/CALSI -
Po NOT aSTURB
' ? " REPLACE PEOE'STRIAN PLANT
EXISTING FW1AE
STRIPING

BEGIN CONSTRUCTKON w
?
'_ ?; ?

ASIN:•f '
?/
? GRADE lF1W j ' - '
AREA TOORNN ?

ITS OF ?a

EMOVE APPROX.54
OF 42'CONCPIPE
1//'?
.:
REMOVE 12'OF 18CY7NC.&TIEJO
DISSIPATOR BASIN }/
F

PROPSED STEP ,? ?;/
? CUTFNl i
OUTItT EfEV.= 32007 ?
°? /
? PROtlSED GRELNWAY I
I
? LA4CPE7E DROP INLE' lNCIXN 840k1
?,b? 1 W/ EROSION CDNTHOL i.4Lf7 SE(XNENf
2?? TRA° (N0007 I632.03J
,? 3??
?,
??.IMPER?lOIAS DINE
6EE DETac
.?---TDDNCRETE DROP INLET fNCIXI,' 840141
i Wl EROSION CONTROL INlE7 SEDIMENT
;yp TRAP fNCDOT 1632031
A?
? ?D coNSrRD 1DN
71E r0 EX,'SrING SIDEWALK
60ULDER BASIN 3
' ' ? I
lNPERVlO(IS'DIKE L?NST+tUCTION ? ? SEE DErNL PROPOSED _ _ _ _ _ _ -' ? ? - 1
SEE DETNL BCUlDER BASIN •2 THALWEG _ - ' ' ? FOPUSED
-. SEE DETAIL - - - - - - ?' ? ? " ? : 1 ?\,.,;6011f0?AI,V?tL
- - - ' ,??.
Lb v.
- FIPoDPLAIN POOL s
,,,_ - - - -? NEAOWALL
- ? .r- ? UM/TS OF CONSTRUCTION. 80TTO,MEl.EV.?T19L11 ?'? V'i'i '.,
___-?-" ? ?? f1
` RENOJE 42 ? ?.' ? IQ FLOODPLl4N POOL BOJlDER BASIN •5
EAOIYAU ,a SEE DETluL ? ?. 1,MRER?Iws 1NXE
------- - ------ - -.- ? ? SEE DETNL
? (y SEAL (A.BAN?NI WELL ?? ? ? _ ?- ' ? - _ _ - I D ? r.2 ? ? ? C^f h -_ _ J
!i ! AQ. -. ? ? ti
--. PROR75ED AJGNMENr ,. C-I % :-b J
? - UTILPY UNf ? ' -. _ - .?
? SLOPE PF?7TECTION ? l-1 _ _ _ _ _ ? C_J 1
i ? F7NL 1 L-5 ? SED ? ? Cwr `V
`r ? - _ _ ? NJ NEI(T FLLODPLWN PCQL
G1 ? ? ? ? ` - ' - -- ? - - - - ? ? OM ELEV.= 31954
.? 2 - _ -
/ y STREAK UN PROP fLU"NAO (lYP1..
L _
?___._,._ Ly,r I'T `. OF CONSTRUCTION _-
13 --16------- ?_ _, p -,__
' ? -' J5 -- ? ?- ?? 21 G
6-2 L-P E?J (?y g.8 L,e, O•d ? Gti! (?B1 ? ?
', -W _ L _
-- --
J ? _ _ ----
PR?POSED - - -' ? ? i - ? PEL.? o - L
" OREENWAY 1 PROMISED ? ! REdNN ? N PROX 8d ?" S
'? -
BOULDER WAIL . - ' - ? ' PfUPOSED ! ? ? ? 'BOT
- ? .$EE DETAIL GREENNAY1 ? '?^CN?wPIPE ? ` L _ 3y?p
?_
rrE rG ExstlNC ( ? -+11 a-+2
PEDESTRIAN WdLXWAY ? CONSTRUCf10H _ - - <Yy ?` 3
.,
?'FOP08EDCRDSS VANE OYP1. ,. ?., .,
GREEN%'AK-UNIT'S
SREV ? DF CONSTRUCTION
' STRUCt '. USf DREENIVAY: AS CONS'TR!(CTRbN - 0-13 ?? ?
G I :A.
GREENWAY 2
CURVE G-Il CURVE G-12 CURVE G-13
P! Sta 10+9280 PI S1o 12+1515 PI S1a /2+gTJ2
PCSta. ro+6335 PCSto. lI+9667 PCSta.12+652f
PTSto.ll+2fb0 PTSta.l2+33.46 PTSta.l3+2924
p= 2P5r338fLT1 0= 1310'313'fRTI p= 2421'268(RTl
D = 3548' 355' D = 3548' 355' D = 3811499
L =5825' L = 3680' L = 6903'
T =29.45' T = 18.48' T = 3251'
R = Ni000' R = I600D' R = 150,00'
UNE BEARING LENGTH ffT! CURVE
L-! S 6309'S9b9'E 202.463
L-2 5 7809' 4198' E 49853
L-3 5 6518'35$5'E IISJfiI
L-4 S 4213' 5326' E x79341
L? s 6Q a41r$6' E 129DB5
Lfi S 4801 4555'E 108926
L-7 S 7Q 36' 58$1 E 62849
C-8 S 6r15'0275'E 152322
L-9 S 5T 5T 19$9 E 10332 C-I
L-ID N 860T3250'E !9347 C-2
C-fl S 1559'19.68'E 27181 C-3
L-12 N 8r l4 20.73' E 34635 C-4
L-!3 S 6' 28 3821E 22051 C-5
C-14 N 58' 55' 2271E 31141 C-6
L-15 S 8646'54$6'E 256.454

a o
0
a o
N N
\ n _
:?
i
a
'^ a
a
J ?'
a w
3?3?
?yo
a o
o w o_
U W F
r o ?
7 Z ¢
w ? u?i
u w o
N O U
z
??
r'
z.
W
i
? A
??
W ?
a?
F ??
m
Rk
a?
??
r ?k`p
? kaP
a 8
W

z >
o_ ?
~-?
O??
Paz
aa? Z
??? a
?cJQ J
W?? Q.
0
yai W
......,. ,.,........ ,... m? ,.,,_ -
FINAL STA6E5 OF CONSTRUCT?ONJ - .CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ? ? - = a o ?'
zaa H
GREENWAY I cREENwar 2 sralo+oD.oo = <w? fA
GREENWAY ! STA 18+83.43 t-? m W =
UNE BENtING LENGTH fFTI CUME
L-16 S 731P' 5241E 32398 G-1
L-R S 42 49' 4675' E 103580 G-2
L-IB S 6r34'332G'E 82735 G-3
L-19 S 4x34' 3679' E 66589 G-4
L-20 S 70'14' 1324E 22557 G-5
L-21 5 5111 30.110'E 190b24 G-6
L-22 5 4452'4lbT E 10.476 G-7
L-23 S 665T043Of 88530 G-8
L-24 550 51' 28.48' E 45550 G-9
L-25 N 63 43' 2153' E 89841 G-10
L-26 5 8646'555TE 91371

??
_. Y O
DO NOT DISTURB TREES BETWEEN o z
STREAM CONSTRUCTION UM1TS AND NOTE: ?
GREENWAY CONSTRUCTION UM/TS L SEE SHEET TC-I FOR DETOUR PLANS
GREENWAY 2 2. FOR PROPOSED ATHLETIC FIELD BY OTHERS)
UNE BEARING LENGTH fFTI CURE
L-27 S 32'4438.4E 63147 G-N
L-28 S 53 36' 120' E 75070 G-12
L-29 S 4025'34TE 31.748 G-13
L-30 S 1558' 079E 3634

SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS, SHEET L- I oaTE
SCALE eeaaEC 06/?IT/2004
50 0 50 100 a2ii2
FILENAME
-.. sMEEr Na C-3
oAAwN er cNNO er
CAB JWJ
Nf P
I O.? O
O O w
O
N N F
? N ?
I O t0 p
I I N ? N
\ N \
N ? I1
I Y
I I
Z
8?
?"?
\?
?N
?W
OI?
Q
O
N
N
D
\?
?N
B
W2
??
I REV
_ _ _ _-
z
a
??
z a
a' F
J
a, w
r I
?' I Z ? O
u r< o
0
w ? z
? O W p
U W ~
H O J
I z ?
W ? V1
x Vi2
r'1 U W O
0
' .1. N O U

a
? e isrgvc c

I

i
eaxr
uu ?
? :

--?- . I
I. z

I

I TH EC
i ? _

I I
I
A
U!`??
W ?
r
A?
?
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ?
?
. I_ Q

.... o
??
?
R
?
?r
?
ro
= m
REV
??
?
?
I
s a
, , W

360

I Z r
o r

I a-?
ww
W
1CZ t?_ , 350 ?
0?>
az J
E E isn c P
W?? H
?
??? o
340 ?w?
W ?
o ?
? ?
~aZ
'^ -
rw >
U
?
330 3
a
e ?
w
f11?2

I
? N ??
I
320 U Z
&

50 U Q 00
310 onrE
oeiiv2ooa
PAOJEC7 NO 622
; _ FILENAME
:. 300 SHEET N4 C 4
?BAWN BY CNKO BY
CAB JBJ
8?
?N
Cm
gN
?w
oti
a
N
o?
N
N
?apaY
RN
s
WS2?
JO
V f
O
N C ?N W
? ? ? 6
O n N o
n iv
?
;_ ?.ry ?
N? Ml
Y

REENWAY 1 0

z
?
?
c
? .?
8 IN QN RU fON ?

€ .=
' 340 4^
N
Tl 70 EX! !
G SID AC!(

1 ?? ?5 ? i ? < ? N

N a ,
?
(. ? ? - ? a F
J fJ
,
F-I

- . ':E ISfw?
_.
.
_._ .
__,___
._..?_.
?_
--
?..
_.
... _.
_ a w
? ? H ';
pd .
1= 39 ? :?g

C?
I00'
?o'° H
?

' -
P6-16
i EN CO ST T ?w?
?Wr
?;-
3
l
• E 23 =
PI l8 0R NW 1 A ' + !9 ? o ? ?

?`

?S _

.
- ? -
5,

I

_
VC-I

•_
-

?Z?
?
i
?
p
S

' ?
U W O
vl OU
?. i .. i
Pr-
+50 O
• VC = EL 32 Pl = 2 +Qp
E _

-X3 281. ....
f-1/
33
,

i f=11
?
_ _
u A
W

i
__ ?
a
?
?
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 f

??
i ? a
?
_
?
REENWAY 2 ? ?
?
?
?
¢
<?
: W

AY 1
33 30' 1
360 a dM ? oN r?uc roN 360

6f? E 1 A +8 43 z r
r
o
~-?

350
350 ?ww
oQ> W
J
_
v~ia? H
w
w
LL

340
E
=
28.5 _
EL
3
69''

340
awe
?
?
Wow
??a n.
?? SE Gkf ? ? Z

330 ??,...
330 vat
awe
?
rr
mom= N
?
-
-
_
- -
-

? ??

} ?

320
E81
D .: ?
li
I

320 Y O
U Z
?
i
??
?
- _ _ - _
t _

310 i 54 Q Q 00 !
310 OHTE
ofinrizaoa

? PPOJECT ND
62112
__ _ __ ____ ___ FILENRME
300 300 SNEET ND C_6

10
11 12 13
14 15 16 17
18 DRAWN BY CHKD BY
cRe Jwd
v r
a o
N ° w
N ,
\ ?
? rv o
N ?
u
8?
?o
?N
?w
i
oti
a
a
m
N
N
?7
?N
Wi
??
d? ?Yy4r
fd? 1 YA^/v de
tP ,, .p? ?J?r. ?
}J ?yd` ?
?` '.

rf '?
? tt4 ? .2t?
"? ?.
CATES ;?
s?¢.
F,4,p? ? ?? ?, ?.
,u n /
,q AV
ENUE *?
.
_ s
n9` ?+Y'??? fi`d??f` I ? ta?,l:?
>d? " ru i
fit.
51 '
?fic ? StJy°€'
i` V r r ?
I I
I

ua

,\F

F' 3d'
d

.. ?"

f

?

'X??e
?: ?
td.

Pe, w
Z.

?. a,

` a u?y.,F`
a ?E 'f' ?

e?
? U
CATES AVEN

?

o+

"' „

?
??` t
ffd'

0

o a =
F ?

? o
e

r`

? to
? ?+?
wp fr tY
?

P" ?
t?1? tf .M1 ?
,?,I,?'SV?'q
,?d ?
s.
4 d ? Om .?.t
Sf r" ?. ?y!
'dM -

?
® ct.
2

? ?
? a
W OJ z
? W D
> F
'" N Ad d
?hJdt fe dd? iw 1 P
?t fief ;: a Q.?. - a
z
+?
,A?,V°
? ?
?
S ?.9
m ddt'??
'rn
9 °S? `?
r" p
'
,?y?
? s'a'?F
? fi0 ??p
S r' Pt???O? ?y
FO ?E QEP
O
P Q
P Z
w ? a
x w z
? o °

.
"
?
cdE
efo r
?+8'?. s?S
ew
?4
W d+dr
t?,r'' r+ 9'
4y' °.d"A°
t?6*' e
?'" e
4 a
edFf
f t d QR
O
.
?10?Sy 0pP'N
e
0\ u
tP
? .>
0? Y?6 Y `?!
?A
t1e'
td
?
?' ti d,
,?
S
.B tf7? ? tC d !?

may.
a?
"V'`d Mtf

?p+y?
4",a d
d'

- :
0''

sfi el
.,6'?rf?
d?,.
o`? ?

-
QJ?.?'? -.. ?.!
- A / ?0
F 0 t.

VI
z
c
r?
C
z
L?
?/?
W .;

yw f d`r e ?Ydc y,
r ,pEF.id pti{e` t? Sy - J?• ? ? g tS ?A'?o
?f. ? W ? '? ?'o ? x'`;0°1
? ? ?
t???„a 1 ? ?O d dY" ? ?d" ,c" `" tiui
?n ?,??n ,
°'?' p ? E?'E?,?et d ?Y,{9E?N?o?,rey"f? ,tfa'?' },d r??¢p '? ??' p; v A
N tpw?ib l?Y+`?e. .,y S? p".A? lry??t ?;t,! \ ?p
d U°°`` ? N? dr? ?? ? ? ? - ? 0
f? ? e ? - n ek ,f ? ?!p?
?!'?jM1e e : 9Y51 a 4 ? 5`?dS'A? ? ? sV`rif i 5' ? W
. s+">•^?''N'?'''? gf ta'a ir??+?d ?"?,?y d?'°i , r ,y ?F:s?°' R o
Stq?+".`?'?t??e d'Y? ag Sid` f???? F r 'F°` rAeu Luc cq Tneu g ?` ? ?
iT?? ?'?AY ? !??{1 ? jC" 4y9 $
sw ??cd? ? %'? s ?d W
t ?,E wl? - ? f5laghE J 4 f / ? _. ? ?Y
PW '1 YY ^^„ ? 4 = m
.]
?` .? f?lS f" "d ??-x. Yew caw xcE ? So /. Yf
k g},
hw - }J 4 ffd d0.' d CNFpS ? i/ ,fi sW '?` ? p..
Fa
d
? ? ?? ?_r.....
? rte`
--
- '
?' ?' Ii ?'
-_ _- -
? _ _- t ,
-_._
_. _
i r? u f°? ?f .?°- / ? ? ? F 4 pN a'l? „C? ... -? O ,; 0.f
f ?a? \
*0 A
-???? ?? ? J,A
,? o
_ a _' - z
n ,.
,??»: ? .
_ -
.f Paz
;.
,. ?? •` w
? >• .. ? E+ ??w 0
}/ ++ ,. d ?.vrto vrca xumYOOOSi ?. ?. ? Ja •*.:. ? ?` ?. rr s;a- ? eyY4
4.,,?+ `` rS ..:: ddf? . ; ,gyp'.. : ,+"f .F , ? .. _,.e_ x _.... a ?. 1? ? U Q Z
f a?°` ?? `?, ` ? .?, ? Wow 0
. _- _ ,.?
? / ', p• r ?
+' ;; x o ?
w . ?? a
o;e , m
r ? rrr?,r F? F1 , c Pd ??b?? ?? ? W U ~
f ? ? "? ? ? s''' 4°, ? ^' ? roux ?
Frs ? -prr? ?+Q +. ?' r'
r. ,.` < Z
rrF _ rr ,/? '?f W
?' ? s ,,:
rrrF, rrr ?,, ?,, ?,` ? ?.•
pppppp : r r ? °+n •.. rraA'OF Y ":. - ? .,,.. -_ -.. GATE
/ li ? ..:? TA ? ?? F'` ®i ? ' ` _ _ - SCALE 06/17/2004
'R' ,x, ?.., _.
9 ,y ? / ,. PROJECT NO 62??2
s?,a ,- d ? 50 0 50 100
5 ? f
.di r' SJ r` S ? ;.r ... FILENAME
,
.. t '4 ? - ?f, „.. _ SHEET NO C_6
???w ?
} F r A't4 ?' ?? - DAAWN BY CNKO BY
. ? ..... ?+.. F? ,? ?. F '.. CRB JWJ
P
SAEV N O' o. W
\ ? \ Q
CROSS n n N' G
STATION ELEVATION ??' m
SREY ..
13+04 325.32
14+45 324.30
15+22 323.74 SAEV

MN LENGTN 25
CAOS3
STATION ELEVATION SAEV

AALI LENGTH 25
18+45 322. A6 CA035 LENGTH A,0 CRO38 LENGTH 8.0
18+48 321.38 ?'LE 201 23+83 318.54 ANGLE p01
19+41 320.71 SLOPE 1 28+24 318.82 SLOPE

21+51 319.51 RISE 2,y RISE 2.5'
23+89 918.54 I I
27+70 E%ISTING
DOUBLE DROP ROCK CROSS VANE
ROCK CROSS VANE DESIGN DATA
DESIGN DATA
SAEV
SILL
STATION ELEVATION
13+95 32A.88
19+88 320.41
20+38 320.08
SBEV
STATION
TYPE BANKFULL
ELEVATION THALWEG
ELEVATION CENTERLINE
ELEVATION
12+50.00 Riffle 328,22 325.72 325,72
12+75.00 Riffle 328.03 325.53 325.53
13+00,00 Riffle 327.85 325.35 325.35
13+25.00 Riffle 327,87 325.17 325.17
13+50.00 Riffle 327,49 324,98 324.99
13+75.00 Riffle 927.31 324.81 324.81
14+00.00 Riffle 327.13 324.83 324.63
14+25.00 Riffle 326.95 324.45 324.45
14+50.00 Riffle 326.77 324.27 324.27
14+75.00 Riffle 326.58 324.08 324.08
15+00,00 Riffle 326.40 323.90 323.90
15+25.00 Riffle 328.22 323.72 323.72
15+50.00 Riffle 326.04 323.54 323.54
15+75.00 Riffle 325.86 323.36 323.36
16+00.00 Riffle 325.88 323.18 323.18
18+25.00 Riffle 325.50 323.00 323.00
18+50.00 Riffle 325,32 322.82 322.82
18+75,00 Riffle 325.14 322.64 322.84
17+00.00 Riffle 324.96 322.46 322.48
17+25.00 Riffle 324.78 322.28 322.28
17+50.00 Riffle 324.80 322.10 322.10
17+75.00 Riffle 324.41 321.91 321.91
18+00.00 Riffle 324.23 321.73 321.73
18+25.00 Riffle 324,05 321.55 321.55
18+50.00 Riffle 323.87 321.37 321.37
18+75.00 Riffle 323.89 321.19 321.19
19+00.00 Riffle 923.51 321.01 321.01
19+25,00 Riffle 323,33 320.83 320.83
19+50.00 Riffle 323,15 320.65 320.65
19+75.00 Riffle 322.97 320.47 320.47
SAEV
STATION
TYPE BANKFULL
ELEVATION THALWEG
ELEVATION ENTEALINE
ELEVATION
20+00.00 Riffle 322.79 320.29 320.29
20+11.00 Riffle 322.68 320.16 320.18
20+26.00 Pool 322.65 319.30 319.78
20+41,00 Riffle 322.63 320.13 320.13
20+62,00 Riffle 322.39 319.89 319.89
20+83,00 Pool 322.36 319.01 318.49
21+24,00 Riffle 322.33 319.83 319.63
21+53,00 Riffle 321.99 319.48 319.49
21+88.00 POOL 321.95 318.60 319.08
22+23.00 Riffle 321.92 319.42 319.42
22+60.00 Riffle 321.48 318.98 318.98
23+08.50 Pool 321.44 318.09 318.57
23+57,00 Riffle 321.39 318.89 318.89
23*84,00 Riffle 321.04 318.54 318.54
24+34.50 Pool 320.99 317,64 318.12
24+85.OD Riffle 320.93 318,43 318.43
25+33.00 Riffle 320.21 317.71 317,71
25+52.00 Pool 320.20 316.85 317.33
25+71.00 Riffle 320.18 317.68 317.88
25+86.00 Riffle 320.00 317.50 317.50
25+96,00 Riffle 318.50 317.00 317.00
26+11.00 Riffle 318.25 316.75 316.75
26+26.OD Riffle 319.10 316.60 316.60
26+36.00 Riffle 316.80 31fi.1D 31fi
10
26+51,00 Riffle 318,10 315.60 .
315.60
26+62.61 Riffle 318.OD 315.50 315.50

G? 0
z
?'
??
?;

z ? i
¢,
y
J ?J a
`ti o
?
za
??
a z z:

??
Z U
O H
?
?dO
w ? z
? w O
' F I-1
?
u w
H O j r
l
(?
? z ?'
w
g Q4
U W O
you
a

22+59 318.99
24+87 318.40
25+29 317,77

STONE I
S LL DATA ? ?
STREAM FEATURES TABLE =m
W
?
a
8
??
F
R
?
f
??
??
NA% POOL = ro
a
~ ?P
SUMMARY
OF EARTHWORK °? ??

fN CUBIC YARDS P? Gf l?,
NOTES: G 8
8?
N^
C?
?N
4141
ql?
a
a
a
N
N
??
?N
B?
?m
W2
?a
LOCATION UNCL.
EXCAVATION UNDERCUT EMBT+/ BORROW WASTE

sREY nNCLUOES FLOOOPLatN PooLS1 35 345 0 4 919 0 30 424
GREENWAY 1
GREENWAY 2 274
25 0
0 1 710
211 1 436
186 O
0

SUB-TOTAL 35 644 0 6 840 1 622 30 42q

TOTAL 35 644
28 804

SITID
1, AREAS IN BETWEEX LABELED FEATURES AAE TRANSITION AREAS.
2. SEE TYPICALS ANO STATIONING FOA NDAE DETAIL,
IRMISIT
3, THE MEA BETWEEN THE CONC W
I
URRENT RIFFLE CROSS-SECTIONS AAE
'{?"? CONSIDERED THE AIFfLE SECTION.
4. THE AREA BETWEEN THE DOWNSTAEAY RIFFLE AND AUN CROSS-
SECTION I9 CONSIDERED THE RUN SECTION.
1
? 5. THE AREA BETNE:EN THE AUN 0.N0 GLIDE CROSS-SECTION IS dS
CONSIDERED THE PODL SECTIDN.
?
a 9 6. THE AREA BETWEEN THE GLIDE ANO THE UPSTAEAII AIfFLE
`'
CAOSS?SECTION IS CONSIDERED THE
? Z }
p F_
A
$ ?
4
GLIDE SECTION. F-o V7
4
ti
'" ?
w
m ov
i> J
?aZ H
way Q
rr F w F-
?? W
W O
T pV1
4 m ?? J
? e
4 9 a
Naz
} J Q
?
4 * _
°
e <m cl;o W
QZU Z
?w W
m?F (}
N ACC
Y p
o Z

ORTE
o6n7izoo4
RAOdECr No 621@
FILENAME
CROSS SECTION TRANSITION LOCATIONS SHEET ND p_7
SCALE: N79 DRAWN BY CHNO BY
CRB JWJ

8?
N?
C?
?N
C??
?W
Q?
?F
Q
T?
I
N
N
a
??
?N
B?
?r
WC2?
JO
0 0 °o
N N N W
o ? ? a
WING CROSS WING ? ?. ?
N' \ M
SILL ROCK 6HALL BE SET AT BANKFULL ELEVATION
TD PREVENT WATER FROM CUTTING AROUND STRUCTURE z
SET HEADER ROCK AT BASE FLOW NO GAPS ?
PROPOSED BED ELEVATION ELEVATION BETWEEN Zj
(VARIES) ROCKS
?qq
k1
WING CAD53 WING Z ? ,?
r a
i FLpY y ? -
_ = u i
a? z
O LL LL LL LL 2 N R
I ° PROPOSED ?' ?
r
° I o STAEAY SED ?
? ELEVATION ?. d o° ?"i`` ?
1.0 FT MIN w ?. z k? S'..
FILTER FABRIC FOR BASEFLGW o wo
DRAINAGE, TYPE 2 20° FOOTER ROCKS u w ? ? `?;
WILL BE PLACED INIO F °?
U' THE EXI6TING SUBSTRATE FLOW -y a. z'? q
SILL ROCK A MINIMUM OF THE AOCK ? w ??'a W
? CROSS SECTION DIAMETER PROPOSED \\ SCOUR _ v°ro°
STAEAWBEO ELEV. HEADER RDCN \ POOL l
STREAMBED ELEV. z
M57 STONE
FILTER FABRIC FOA DAAINAOE, TYPE 2 FOOTER ROCK DEPTH Of SCWA POpL TO EQUAL
TO EXTEND 0.5 fT BELOW BOTTOM NA% POOL DEPTH, LOCATION OF MRX.
STRUCTURE STONE, CU33 A POOL DEPTH WILL CO]NCIDE WITH
SILL ROCK TOE OF BANK OF FOOTER ROCK TO FILL VOIDS BETWEEN BOVLDEAS POOL FEATURE STATION AS SHDNN
ON STREAM FEATURES TABLE
PLAN VIEW FCDTEA ROCK
HEADER ROCK PROFILE VIEW
Mores:
ROCK CROSS VANE 1. SCOUR POOL TO BE LOCATED PER STREAM FEATURES TABLE. ? A
2. HEADER, FOOTER, AND SILL ROCKS TO BE
SCALE; NTS STRUCTURE STONE, CLASS BOULDER. W &
??
F R$
0
??
HEADER ROCK V'? v3
9
1,0 FT MIN F7?, a
BASEFLOW ?
BANKFULL N[DTH PROPOSED
FLOW ?Tyf =
x STREANBED ELEV. FLOW -i
FILTER FABRIC FOR ? N57 STONE W9 ~
DRAINAGE TYPE 2
LL FLOW PROPOSED ? ?
° 0 9ILL 0.0CK STREAABEO ELEV. k ?
LL c 6
0
F ? FOOTER ROCK 6 a
I I 9TAUCTURE STONE, CLA93 A ? TRUNK OF W
? TO FILL VOIDS BETWEEN BWLDEAS gppiyyp
FILTER FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE, TYPE 2 / t/ f0'-15' ?/
SILL ROCK TO EXTEND p.5 FT BELOW BOTTOM -1
OF FOOTER ROCK /
PROFILE VIEW
FOOTER ROCK / ?\? BANKFULL STRU °W
HEADER ROCK / ?? (BWLDEA BURIED?INLBANK?LDEA Z }
BANKFULL WIDTH AC?O RESTING ON FOOTER LOG O ?
BOULDER (TYPICAL) WITH SO]L PLACED ON TOP) F . N
PLAN VIEW ae a ? cn
SILL RACK SHALL BE SET AT BANKFULL ELEVATION / i?0? R00T WAD (MIN. ? N j J
TO PREVENT WATER FROM CUTTING AROUND STRUCTURE / \ BASAL OIA. 12") ? a Z N
SET HEADER A K AT BASE FLOW NO GAPS ? \? W d = Q
PROPOSED BED ELEVATION ELEVATION BETWEEN LCF ? LF
(VA0.IES) ROCKS / ?fU? O
a?
?i4 FOOTER LOG (TOP OF FOOTER LOG ??? ..I
PROPOSED ? SHALL BE BELW'1 POOL THALWEG ELEVATION Hd Z Q
STREAB BED ? N
ELEVATION } J ?
FOOTER LOG Z ; ? W
(DIR. 10"-24") a Z
a Z U W
? W
NOTES: m D:?
O
HEADER, FOOTER, AND SILL ROCKS TO BE U Z
STIiUCTUAE STONE, CLASS BWLOER ? _J PLAN CROSS-SECTION &
HEADER 6 FOOTER AOCK3
IN:MEA ROCK
CROSS SECTION wHELCHANNELCBE FULLY INTO
OHTE
06/17/2004
ROCK SILL PRDJECTND a2uz
SCALE; NTS ROOT WAD FILENRME
SCALE: NTS
SHEET ND C-B
DApWN BY CHKO B7
cqB dwd
8?
\m
??
?N
?W
01?
c
Q
Q
N
a
N°
?\
??
By
W(2?
JO
M P
O PO O
rv O N W
WINO CR093 IRNB \ N' \ ?
O \ ?
M P1 N a
N
wl
? ?
wiNO OA095 WINO BILL ROCII BNALL BE SFT Ai EWNFULL ELEVATIOY
TO PREVENT INTER FRgI WTTIINB AAW1R1 6T11WNRE ,. y
4' HEADER ROCK
9ET NEA?EA HOCK AT BASE FLdI NO GAPS
ELEVATION BETIIEEN u

?
v
FL
OW
°
PROPOSED BED EIEVATIIXI
(VARIES) AOCK6
0
e c
? ? ? z
LL W
n
a

NOTES:
7 0' 1. eCWA POOL TO BE LOCATED PEA STREAM FFANAEB TABLE. ? ., ,

?
P. HE/DER, FWTEA, M'0 SILL ROCKS TO BE
..
?/ .
B7REAY
BEO STRUCTURE STWE, CLASS AOULOER. y
..
2 ).(y
ELEVATION <' ?I
' 2 Za' VN
--?? ?

FWTEA AWXS
WILL BE PlACEO INTO
i ?.
' _ ?/
?
H
?
TIE ENISTIM3 SUBSTPATE D
W h') `
A MINIMW OF THE AWK
mANETEA F.. ?
?
CROSS SECTION ?'o ?„'
' ';
6'HEAOEflRacK Lo Frnw
BA&EFLpI ?.ol.°

d W O ?

\ ..

> H /.
k? .'
1 6' ? FLOIY y F WO j n/ -'

FILTER FABRIC FW
D14VNAOE, TYPE P
PROPOBEO ? 3CgIA
BTAEAYBEO ELEV. HEADER RW PWL PROP09FD
BTRFAYBEO ELEV.
? \
W'.. u, y'
U' W'. O qW
W

FWTEA AWK
MST 9TIXE V? SCpWWR ?
HEADER AW P"
'--_- - ? ° U
z
TYPE P FWTEA RWK
FILTER FABRIC FOfl OMINAGE ?
,
TO EXTEND 0.5 FT BELdI BOTIdI STAUCIURF BiOXE, CLA99 A
OF FWTEA AWK TO FILL VOIW BETAEEN BWLOER6
OEPTX dF 9CWA PWl TO EOWL
MAX POOL OEPTN. LWATION OF MAX.
PWL OEPTN NIIL WINLIOE

SILL RWK SILL RWK MITX
PWL FEATURE STATIW A6 6XpM
TOE OF 8WK PROFILE VIEW W sTRFAX FEATURES TABLE
PLAN VIEW
DOUBLE DROP ROCK CROSS VANE
_
SCALE: NTS
A
?

1.0 FT NIN

W y
5
$
BASEFLOW g NOTES: ? A
J

\ FLOW '??
1. CHANNEL PLUGS TO BE LOCATED AS
SHOWN ON THE PLANB ANO AT OTHER
F Rq
,,
? d,
? `
LOCATIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE

PROPOSED ? SCOUR ?
STREANBEO POOL
?- _-? PROPOSED
A
A ENGINEER. p
_
HEADEA AOCK
STRFNRED ELEV. 2:1 2:1 2. BOb COMPACTION AATE IS REOUTAED

M57 STONE
EXIST]NG ON CHANNEL PLUG OA AS APPROVED 8Y
EXISTING THE ENGINEER

FOOTER ADCK
DEPTH OF fiCOUA POOL 70 EQUAL
CHANNEL .
CHANNEL
3. THIS STRUCTURE SHALL 8E PLACED
= ro
STRUCTURE STONE, CLASS A ? POOL DEPTH. LOCATWN OF NA%.
POOL DEPTH WILL COINCIDE WITH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ?
TO FILL VOIDS BETWEEN BOULDERS
POOL FEATURE STATION AS SHOWN
FILTER FABRIC F AAINAGE, TYPE 2 ON STREAM FEATURES TABLE
? h
TO E%TEND 0.5 FT BOTTOM u
OF FOOTER ROCK < a
PROFIL IEW B W
STAEAYBANK
IMPERVIOUS
MATERIAL
PLAN VIEW OF EXISTING CHANNEL WITH CHANNEL PLUG °"

TOP OF BANN EDGE OF WATER 3lpp }
O ?
~

? s -?
? W W
/
?? \ O??
~QZ
4
?_
J N ??
W
113 TD 1^I WING WIDTH p /
OF PROPOSED CHANNEL / ?'
NEADEA ROCK
? E%ISTING EXISTING CHANNEL
WIDTH YAIIIES Z W
Q
5
CHANNEL 1•
1• ?U
W?
/
20° BOTTOM W ? N
PROPOSED Z ? Q
I?
E
APU BANAFI? ?0_Z
L
BE
CEO INTO
W
HEADER ROCKS THE E%ISTING SUBSTRATE
h MINIMUM OF THE ADCK DIAMET
/ STREAB BED
ELEVATION 2,1 ?'T 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i

1 E
?
4 2 Qp
U; ?
Z
FILTER FABRIC FOA E%ISTING ? /
L a Z V
/ DRAINAGE, TYPE 2 S ION A - A S" M[N.OF BOTNON
- - - J CO ? 2
p
` TOPSOIL
IMPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS
MATERIAL }
} U?
q
???/// MATERIAL y U Z
TOP OF BANK O
FOOTER POCKS
EDGE of WATER SECTION A-A SECTION B-B
NOTES:
AN VIEW ??
1. SCOUR POOL TO BE LO CATED PEA STA FEATURES TABLE. 06/1 7/20 04
2. HEADER, FOOTER, AND SILL ROCKS TO BE
STRUCTURE STONE
pLABfi BWLDEA PROJECT NO 62112
,
. CHANNEL PLUG FILENAME
ROCK VA
E
N SHEET NO
SCALE: NTS
SCALE: NTS
C_S
DRAwN BY CHKO BY
CRB JWJ
PROFILE
L
CULVERT p
213 L (POOL LENOTN) 113 L (APRON LENGTH)
PROPOSED
SANKFULL
ELEVAT]ON
VARIER
+ 14,5'
E
-SAEV-
TAILWATEfl
ELEVATION
VARIES
NATUAA
CHANNE
.. 2, .? a.? .2.
1.5' MIN, TAEPY TOE
1.5' MIN.
BOULDERS
NOTE: YiNINUM "POOL LENGTH" = B' fILTEA FABRIC
MINIMUN "APflON LENGTH" = 4' HARP APRON TO
+ 15.0' AFACH II NATURAL STREAM
COMPACT EARTH MATERIAL INTO GAPS AND VOIDS. ++ IF PIPE INVERT IS BELp7 BANKFULL ELEVATION, CHANNEL AS NEEDED
CLA55 A STONE MAY BE USED AB NEEDED TD FILL BOULDER GAPS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 2' FflOM INVERT TO BASIN BOTTOM.
PLAN
RANRFIII I
8
??
?m
gN
?W
¢?
OI?
c
Q
R
a
N
N
N
?N
Wi
??
NOTE: BASIN BOULDERS NOT SHOWN FOP CLARITY,
THE HANGING BAFFLE ASSEMBLY WILL BE PLACED AT THE OPTION OF THE DESIGNER.
LOCATION IS TO BE AT THE DIRECTION Of TXE DESIGNER.
ADDITIONAL RIP AAP ANO FILL MATERIAL MAY SE REWIRED APOUNO FOOTER ROCKS FOA PROPER EYBEOIIENT.
MINIMUM DISTANCE FRDN CULVERT OUTLET TO LOG BAFFLE IS 1'.
MA%IMUN D35TANCE FADN CULVERT OUTLET TO LOG BAFFLE IS TXE %PE DIAMETER.
STREAM FLOW
BOULDER BASIN
SCALE: NTS
SECTION A-A
aPADN wIDTx
W LYERT
1 /I
1.5'
PROPOSED BANKFULL
SECTION B-B
BASE WIDTH
CULVERT
1
BA91N L

(feet) POOL
LENGTH
(feet) APAOH
LENGTH
(feet) BASE
WIOTN
(feet) APRON
WIDTH
(feet)
N1 39 26 13 10.5 10.5
N2 24 18 8 10.5 10.5
k3 33 22 11 10.5 10.5
N4 16 18 0 8 NIA
MS 24 16 8 10.5 10.5
? r
P
O
O
o
NON w
;?N a
'?N
n ? n
i
a
??
zd
a?
a w
? ?
??o
a ?
w, ° z
o w o_
u' w ?
F o ?
z
w c? v~i
x ? z
u wo
N O U
z
?11i
M/A+4
k'?1
C
z,
H ,
k? -
;(
q?
W

v
W O
s?
? ??
Ro
??
g
_ ?m
~ ?P
°C h ?
U
a a
W
2 >
O ?
N
?WW J
O Q Z 1„1
Nam Q
??? ?
W
W ? ~
¢?a J
anaz Q
=r0 ?
a W
ZZQ Z
?w? W
m?2
>?CC
U Z
O
G:
ORTE 06/17/2004
PgOJECT NO 62112
FILENAME
BHEE7 NO C-13
ogawN er cHKO ar
CRD JWJ
PROPOSED BANKFULL
I"1 P
O
O
O
ry N N.
O ? W'
M N
? N ?
N ? 1?1
-... Y
C
O
z
??
Z
a ?`
? I, a
4 z
J ? K
a, W' ?
a, o H -
w ? z
o w o r.1
U W f k?
F 0 j
I Z ?
w ?' m
xaz
U W O
VI ? U
8
\?
C?;
?N
?w
oti
c
a
C
a
N
a
L
`V
?N
s
W2
??
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
1
PLAN VIEW

BRSEfLOW
PLAN VIEW
„\ FLOW ?? _.
i ?
SCOUR
HEADER ROCK \ PO ?L / ?? -? PROPOSED
STAEABBED ELEV.
FOOTER ROCK DEPTH OF SCOUR POOL TO EQUAL
MAX POOL DEPTH. LOCATION OF NAX.
3TAUCTUAE STONE, CLA59 A POOL DEPTH WILL COINCIDE WITH
TO FILL VOIDS BETWEEN BOULDERS POOL FEATURE STATION AS SHOWN
ON STAEAY FE47UAES TABLE
PROFILE VIEW
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE USING SILL AND CROSS VANE OPTIONS
SCALE: NTS
1
Z
? A
rr ?
??
h "?
R
pp k
i?
??
??
= k 41
a
Up„
r 6?
? dry
a (o
W
dS
Z }
o ?
? WW N
J
OQZ H
tnap Q
?H..F W
Q?? ?
wpN
??6 J
?aZ Q
=r0 ?
a W
ZZa Z
?ww W
mix C7
r?¢
U Z
O
tr
DATE
06/17/2004
PIIO JECT NO 62?I2
FILENAME
SHEET NO D.4
OAAYIN BY CHIm BY
CRB JWJ

1.0 FT M1N 6TRUCTURE STONE, CLASS A
TO LINE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
TD 8 INCHES THICK
PROPOSED 1.D FT MIN i r-
STAEMIBED ELEV.
SEDIMENT ?
CONTROL
STONE
PADPOSED
STAEAAIBEO ELEV.
M57 STONE
FILTER FABRIC FOP DRAINAGE, TYPE 2
TO EXTEND 0.5 FT BELOM BOTTOM
OF FODTEA ROCK
??
\N
\m
?pN
?W
QI?
Q
D
N
N
0
??
N
B
W2
??
M P
O
N O N w
\ N \
O ? tP O
Yf M N
\ N \
N ? nl
L
BOTTOM WIDTH SOTTOM WIDTH BOTTOM WIDTH ? °
OF CHANNEL OF CHANNEL OF CHANNEL
FILTER FABATC FOA FLOW' FILTER FABRIC FOA FLOW FILTER FABRIC FOA FLDN
DRAINAGE, TYPE 1 DRAINAGE, TYPE 1 OMINAGE, TYPE 1 '. C
SILL ROCK SILL POCK SILL HOCK q~q
ksl
1 1 1 l 1 ?,,'
N. Fly
Z
a
i a : ? ?°:.
SILL ROCI( SILL ROCK SILL ROCK ? z ?j ,;
Qp O 00 QO dw H °:
?. 0 ? ? ? ?
Qo ? ?J FOOTER ROCK ? Q FOOTER ROCK ? ? 0 FOOTER ROCK ° ? -
2 OQ Y O O 3y3 0 O ??', ? p ~
? O 0 ? QO O d 0 w °. z
0 0? O O ? ?'o
n ? ? COIR FIBER L005 LL ? O (? ? ROOT WADS ?, _ ? ,_
a 0 a O OO V? a 0 ?pO ln,? F o' ?. A?/
? Q-? O?O ? ° ? O 0 ? °v ? ?O? ? v° w u. vi,
FILTER FABRIC FOA V FILTER FABRIC FOA 0 FILTER FABRIC FOiI ? O s z
"0 0 0 0? o u?o
DRAINAGE, ttPE 1 O 0 n DRAINAGE, TYPE 1 1/??0 Op T DRAINAGE, ttPE 1 O 0 T N ?: u'
v _
O O
O O ? SILL ROCK ? 0 ? SILL ROCK O ? SILL ROCK
x x >;
SILL ROCK ?'? SILL ROCK "-?/ S[LL HOCK `?
1 1 1
FOOTER POCK FOOTER ROCK FOOTER ROCK
V
??
YI ?
PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW ??
f
Go
€'?
??
8?
m
BOTTOM WIDTH = ? m
OF CHANNEL
F]LTEA FABRIC FOR FLON ~ ? ,?
DAAINAOE, TYPE 1 2 ? d
SILL ROCK
i a
1 W
1.0 FT MIN
STgUCTU1IE 9TONE, CUBS A
TO LINE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
SILL ROCK O TO 8 INCHES THICK
///??? PROPOSED
O ? p STREANBED ELEV. :? FLgY °B
x 0 ?0 FOOTER ROCK SEDIMENT Z >
< O O CONTROL O ~
O W S 0 PROPOBED ?
0 0o Q ? STREAMBEO ELEV. ? W L? J
a O0? ? pQ> F-I
00 0 0 0 -? H-aZ a
v FOOTER ROCK W
FILTER FABRIC FOR O o ? W ?
DRAINAGE, TYPE 1 I/??O o0 STRUCTURE STONE, CLAS6 A UF- LLI
v" ? Q FILTER FABIIIC FOR DRAINAGE, TYPE 1 TO FILL YOIDS BETWEEN BWLDERS f a
OQ O? ? SILL ROCK TO EIITEND 0.5 FT BELOW BOTTOY IQ 7N ?
OF FOOTER ROCK ? O? J
PROFILE VIEW wa ? Q
S } p ?
Q W
Z Z Q Z
?W U W
W
SILL ROCK ?? m?¢
1 U Z
O
!r
FOOTER POCK
?? 06/17/2004
PLAN VIEW CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE USING SILL OPTIONS PRD?ECr"° 62A2
SCALE: NTS FILENAnE
sHCCr No C-16
DAAMN BY CNND BY
CRB JWJ
??
??
??
?N
??
?W
Q=
oti
a
0
8
N
N
??
?N
8
Wi
??
SIGN ASSEMBLY LEGEND
NOTE: REFER TO MUTCD AND NCDOT AOADWAV STANDARD
DRAWINGS FOR STANDARD SIGN NAMING AND COLORS
ROAD ROAD
P CLOSED CLOSED
HEAD 00 Fi
R1.1 W20-3 W20.3
48" X 48" 48" X 48"

)STOUR DETOU R
M4-10 R
AHEAD ae" x iB"
W20-2
48" X 48"
G

DETOUR
M4-10 L END
DETOUR
M4..g A
48" X 18" 24" X 1B"
n R11•a I
so' x3o" ROAD R11-2
" 48" X 30
ro CLOSED
M4-10A
48"X18"
TYPE III BARRICADE TYPE III BARRICADE(S)
? ROAD R11-2
CLOSED 48" X 30"
N4-10L
ae"x1e°
TYPE III BARRICADE(S)
R11-4
80"x30"
roan cwuo
m
M4-10L
48"X18"
TYPE III BARRICADE
A11-2
ROAD ae'xao°
CLOSED
TYPE III BARRICADE
V
???
On
(Y
w
??
L,J
??
?- r
z
w
? ?
? ??
CQ
??
,?
_?
ROCKY

PULLEN
BRANCH
?/ R?
V- 1?,\
Q
?, ? ??
? ??L
J Q
Q n
??Q a
??
??
??,5
ROAD DETOUR
?-0
V O
00
?N
N ?
\ ,y
MI N
N ?
\ ?
i
a
?a
z
a F
J-j
aW
? ?
u
0
a?
a' w o
?W?
r o ?
z
9
i ? i
U W O
I/? D U
??
?,
+'
..
???III ;
fi
H .
?'
CG
x
? A
s?
W ?
a
F ??
h
?o
??
a
m
??
r O`p
G ?4
U
8
W
J
H
aS Q
Z r ?
-? W
?ww 0
o"^>
Paz
way J
??w ?
Ewa ?
¢??
??a Z
v,az O
xao U
Z3C
Ga W cai U
mix H
>"o: LL
o Z LL
? Q
F-
oaTE
06/17/2004
PROJECT NO 62112
FI LENRME
SHEET Na C-I6
oaawN er cMEO sv
CAB JWJ
C7 ? U
G
LL
J f-
Z
W
>,.?
Q
W
7.
8<
?^
?°
gE
?:
Q:
oh
c
t
c
t
0
0
V
4
t
?f
??
B?
??
Ws
??
S?
\?
??
?W
Oa
'a
u
E
N
N
ll0
O?
N
??
lY
W2'
??
TREE PROTECTION MEA - NO
TflESPASSING WITH7N THE
FENCE
PAOHIBIDO ENTAAA / ZONA
PAOTECTOAA PAAA LOS
AABOLES
REQUIRED RADIUS FOA EACH TREE
TO BE SAVED, PEA LOCAL OAOINANCE.
ORANGE POLYETHriENE LAMINAR
FENCING SHALL BE 4 FEET HIGH.
8 FORT STEEL "T' POSTS
MIN. B FEET O.C., NA%. 10 FEET O.C.
E%TENDING TO RADIUS PEA LOCAL
OAOINANCE.
E%ISTING GRADE
METAL "STAKES" AS TEMPORMY
FENCE POSTS (TYP.)
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
SCALE: NTS
UNDISTURBED SOIL LINE (IF'I I
SOIL HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY I,i
DISTURBED, COMPACT SOIL
UNDER ROOT BALL).
TILL SOIL TD A 6 INCH DEPTH
UP TO A 4 FEET AADIUB fAOM
THE TRUNK-EXCEPT ON DOYMHILL
SIDE OF SLOPE.
REMOVE ALL TIES 8 BURLAP
FROM TDP 113 DF AOOTBALL.
TOP OF fl00TBALL TO BE A
MIN. OF 3 INCHES AND NA%. 8
INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.
REMOVE THE TOP 2!3 OF WIRE
BASKET WHERE PRESENT. flEXOVE
FADY TREE PIT.
SCALE: NTS
sr
HA
Ml
EX16TP
GRADE
DND
sou
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
SCALE: NTS

SIDE B
AT SLI

SCALE: NTS
JIIII?
I II I I ??
I II ? III I ?
III I I of
III I I III III
'? ,III III II III II III ,III ?
1 1111.,111„JII III iil ,lll,illllllilll " 111111
12" YIN. TYP. I I III'
TREE PLANTING ON SLOPE
SCALE: NTS

usan

atchell
Landscape Architecture, PLLC

743 W. Johnson Sf. Suite E Raleigh, NC 27603 M P
O O
rv O O

? N ?
O ? ul
"
M M N
" ? "
p
__ ? °
z
-.
`
I? '.
MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ? -

TREE IN THE NURSERY AND
', _
LOCATE TO THE NORTH '.
IN THE FIELD. ?N ;':
N.. ICI ..
w

,? SAUCER BEAM TO BE LEVEL.
M'. a'
=
? '? o

N
? 8 INCH HIGH WATER BEAM ?. F'.. z .....
? BACKFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL AND ?
?'
' kd
WATER TO SETTLE SOIL. u?
z I-?
C7
Z
? ?i
d
. L?
o w o r_? ,
4 INCHES MULCH (SEE SPECS.
? NO MULCH SHALL BE PLACED ? w u
r o ?
WETHIN S INCHES OF TRUNK. ? z. F,
u
O
COMPACT FILL TD BE BENCHED IN. a o
U '
r- FINISHED GRADE '. i
PLANTING SCHEDULE
KEY SCENDFIC NAME COMMON NAME LS B6B BA CON7 PLUG PEAT
pQT
SEED%
REMARKS
BN BetrNa ' RNer hitch d8
Cell Hadme 48
z Linodandim YeAmv IM 4 1.75" cal 98
N a Bled um 4 175" cal
s Black um 3 25" cal B6B u irMiwMd on plere
BR 1N
o PfabnwavrWrrtab cpnore 8 1.5"cal 48 .
Beadlirps randany placed an&lo
g P B P/elanwanMvzaae amore 5 2'cal 12-A Cen9als

J
Oawrase mroheudi
Swam Gwtnutoek
4 2'ral
48 .
Tarodum tlisddmm BaM reu 1 2" wl
VI Cre oaida HasMom 5 1.75" cal BO
C ?wremG'aane Iromvaatl BO
Comas Aaitla Flapri od 2 1.5"cal BO
ID tlardeaiua Pauumhaw 118 2 el
_ Lmdwa benaom eh 208 1 BI
Rladodendron Pinxher-Aaron 1M 1 al Place en }foot tarriMreu ?Qwted an
YOumum nrMMn Bladhaw 108 2 al Dlam au tlieded by DeaiQnx
P Pptlrxroasws U inie r 13 3 el
C albs Modcemuthide 28
P' nuthkk 28
Fraainus icMn Green ash 28
NiccUMmn Yelbw lar 3 1.75"cal 26
a LmadeMrm Yeltrx lar 2 2'tal
¢ s Bled um 8 1.T5" rel 28
o a ? Bled um 3 2.5" cal 28
Quxan ame NMda oak 8 7 cal 28 B8B u Indl
n
l
110 BR
eMd
w
o OMra/s Ar1wM SouMem red oak 9 2' d g
c
o
are.
rerMaml
lawd on & to 11-A centers

OMaM mMa
NaNam red oaN
28 y p
.
m ueran rehAna cloak 28
w
2 MMaxhiaer6aee urvi 45
Y Ceara nmdeneie RedbW 7 "cal 45
? Chianentlals 'map F' etrea 8 45
Canes Raids Flawed ad 8 15' cal 45
Nammpla ' iupM Wdch•hazel 45
Umbrella m nMia 8 1.6" cal 45
0 ar6arelm Soawood 8 1.76" cal A5
AmeH h PlKe an 3- ronlepa nGated on
' caHhxa Ne lansau dzedea DaN nor
PeNendia ' ' ' Groan ermw-sum 85
Pidcerehmetl S5
. . MA'foge f
Sawaw wmuus rrEmil 1%
CarezairNM FH ad eed 100
? Cararl Ere H sad a 100 34mt wntere u irdicaMd a glare
Caarlaide Lurid eed 100
o re Blunl ikemah 100
LL Junaw caiarmw Leelh rush 150
Jarrow eMpue SoA nwN 150
A7usouidxadis Budonbush 45 Hoot canton u indicated a lore
Caar H $ a 2
cad 'iap Vi nie VAld 20
Jae 2
S N dds Bottlekrvah 0 2
o Ilea ? Vi nie VAllvw 5
w Jump elluew Soft RUah 20
p Lea?la Rlw CutG? 16
Z
rc Pomean Dee ue 5
a

S ' VAwI 2

Canty enomam Sil 1100 In.Mell N 3A OC, Z oAaet rowe 1 A
?? BI Wdl epedel henkfulluiMiwled an
y typal derail.
Haa§an Bed 50 A
l
°
Fw
Semb cereeb
VAMar
50 Summer-
ppy et 306e
aae.
?'m Pankumrvmoawn B Mllet 50

PennbaEum ucun
PeeH MWeI
50 YMrHer-Apply a<30IWlecre.
? A
W #?
a?
F ??
?`
p33p0
Nd?
2?
a?
~ ?k?
kd?
6
6 $
W

Z >
o ?
H=?
??> N
I-a2 Q
Wa= ?
??? W
?UQ
w?? W
O
??Z fl
N - Q
» U
c=i; °? fA
?WU Z
tD ? IZ- Q
Y o J
U Z
O
?? 06/17/2004
PROJECT NO 62112
FILENAHE
SHEET NO L_2
OAAWN BY CHKO BY
CRB UWJ
- SAUCER BEAM TO BE LEVEL.
- 2.6 INCH HIGH WATER BEAM,
- BACKFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL AND
WATER TO SETTLE SOIL.
- 4 INCHES MULCH (SEE SPECS).
NO MULCH SHALL BE PLACED
WITHIN 6 INCHES OF TRUNK.
- COMPACT FILL TD BE BENCHED IN.
FINISHED GRADE.
IIT?
AABOAKNOT OA APPROVED EQUAL
(SEE SPECS).
FLUOAESCENi FLAG, TYPICAL.
AABOATAPE OP 44 INCH WOVEN BELT
SYNTHETIC FABRIC STRAP, GREEN.
UNDISTURBED SOIL LINE QF S01L
HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED,
COMPACT SDIL UNDER ROOT BALL).
1 z 2 z 18 INCH W000 STAKE WITH
CENTERED ?" HOLE OR "DUCKBILL"
ANCHOIIS. PLACE OUTSIDE BACKFILL.
TILL SOIL TO A 8 INCA DEPTH UP
TO 4 FEET RADIUS FROM THE TRUNK
-EXCEPT ON DOyMHILL SIDE OF SLDPE.
AEYOVE ALL TIES 8 &IALAP FA01.1
TOP 113 OF AOOTBALL. TOP OF AOOTBALL
TO BE A M[N. OF 3 INCXESIMA%. OF
8 INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GAAOE.
AEMOVE TOP 2(3 OF WIAE BASKET WNEAE
PRESENT. REMOVE FROM TREE PIT.
?" - ,?„
FLAT TOP END H=1/5L
TEAYINAL BUD
SCAR
LATEML BUD-?'?
GADUND I/ ?
BARK RIDGE I1
0
RANCH REMOVED ?? ? r
GHT ANGLE a -N
BRANCH COLLAR ()?? o
LDN SEASONAL _ I?l
45° TAPER
BUTT ENO
LIVE STAKE
SCALE: NTS
DRIP LINEAL
EV'?6?cT 6 I'LIL
TREE TRUNK 1R I N
STARE
E%IS
GAAI
DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL
SHRUB PLANTING ON SLOPE
A J. REFE NCE N0. H AL SHEETS
X-1 S

i
?
-

__
? .
i _ -
-
i

.. ? ?.? ?_ ..? _ - -_ _" __ _ - -- -- - - -.. .-- -- -'- - -- -. ? 32 .41
''..
:. i
f9 25
_ _ _

?
_
__ _
2,
.? ti
'
? _

wF n a craw -;

-?
_ i

,,
?:
?
- y _
?
' r
i
0? . _ _ _: ?
3 ?

_ _ _ __ __. _ _. __ __ _._ _ _ ?__ __ _ _ _? .__ __ _... _.. _ _ __. _ ?

?_ 33? ?8
1
_
_?
- ?
? j ? i
20a 20:1
3 .68
A>F n c?rox

?-
I
8?
\m
\?
?N
?W
oti
a
0
a
N
N
??
?N
8u1.
??
?2
??
so' So'
1, 5'
A ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
L A'
¦ ,... a _,
¦ ¦
¦ ¦
¦
¦ ¦
¦
? ?.
? x? ?
1.5'
PLAN VIEW
BACKFAL
STAKE DETAIL
2 IN. x 2 IN. (NOMINALI
WOODEN STAKE
1 IN.
2 IN.
2 IN
2'
HAAgYDpD STAKES
TYPICAL
LEGEND
? HMpgOD STAKE (S' LENGTH
HARDWOOD STAKE (2' LENGTH(
I. ?¦in.(
TOP OF f
DO NOT PUCE BOULDER
ON TOP OF UTILITY LIN
PLAN VIEW
TOE OF BANK
_
??
?- " `_ ` SET TDP ADCK AT BANKFULL ELEVATION
2 IN. x 2 IN. (NOYINAL)
N'OOOEN STAKE NO GAPS
1 IN. BETWEEN UTILITY LINE
BOULDERS

2 IN, ?- ? _ ?-
2 IN. PROPOSED
THALWED
ELEVATION
1' YIN.
9' CLAS6 'A' STONE 8 N0. 57 STONE AS -
AEDUIRED FOA PROPER BWLDEA ENBEOMENT
CROSS SECTION
COIR FABRIC DETAIL
GDALE: NTG UTILITY LINE SLOPE PROTECTION
SCALE: NTS
OF BANK
U&E CARE WHEN PLACING BWLDERS
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOA
REPAIRING ANY DAYAGE TO UTILITY LINES
P p
? O
\ \ W
N N
? O
N N
\ M
Y
?. ?
z
?:
.:
? ? m
z ? _ o
a
m i
a ?i i
? FI z
U
a o H11 .:.:
? z Cam`
J
W ~
o? q?
z rc W
? r
w
?z
o '
O U
0
v ?
W ??
$u?
h
F ??
Ro
??
??
E?
_ }m
u?p
~ ?P
? ?a
a a
W
ati
Z >
O ?
_ N
? WW J
O??
HaZ H
W tL= Q
?~? W
N
W ? ~ O
??a J
f/]aZ Q
} J ?
c=ia? W
aZa Z
?WC? W
m?? (}
>?'?
o Z
tr
OgtE
06/11/2004
PAD JECT NO 62112
FILENRME
SHEET NC D-D
DRAWN BY CHNO BY
cwe dwd
COIA FABRIC FOLDED OYEA
_ _ SECTION A-A'
_ _ -I III
?a
C?
,pN
?w
oti
Q
1
N
N
a
??
?AU
B?
?Y
Wi
??
O
w C(ARA AVE.
? --?
o ???
° VgNOE ?-,
??LT AV .3? ?
0
? =
0
3 ?
: ?
T
__
I
i A
L a
6 0
?,
0
MARCO.
?? .
? ?
NORTH
O? (?IIl4???1??? l?
m
CENTRAL CAMPUS V , ??U //
O o
BEGIN PROJECT R
0
OC PULLEN PARR
0
i ? ?? gq9 ? END PROJECT
p a icy
?` J
P?
`? ? OPO
P{
O e
0 4q.
S I 2? ? 8
UU ? '`? ??
P
Qq/? n? B?
°9 `?L`
`t?ll L
o `U
`$ ? _ O'
d 9
'? ? ° MAIN CAMPUS
?? ?
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
SITE DATA
Name of Protect: NC STATE UNIVERSITY ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION AND GREENWAY PROJECT PHASE 2
Address: RIDDICK STADIUM WEST, CAMPUS BOX 7216, RALEIGH, NC 27695-7216
Owner: NC State University
Design Manager Contact: STEVE BOSTIAN Phone ? 919-515-8059
Construction Manager Contact: TED DEVENS Phone # [phone]
Designer: Earth Tech, Contact: Bill Jenkins Phone: ° 919-854-6228
DISTURBED AREA: 5.8 ACRES
STREAM DATA
STREAM REACH EXISTING LENGTH (FTf? PROPOSED APPROX.
THALWEG LENGTH (FT)* PROPOSED STREAM
CLASSIFICATION
SREV 1,53 I 1,580 C
»LENGTH IS MEASURED WITHOUT INCLUDING CULVERT LENGTH.
PROPOSED CENTERLINE LENGTH OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT IS 1579 FT.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY ?`k
ROCKY BRANCH STREAM
RESTORATION AND -
GREENWAY PROJECT
PHASE 2 ,g? F
.(CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLANS);;
100' 500'
soo? a uo?
Clearlnq,gradlnq,eroslan control, stream restoratlon,dralnage,4B'x II'concrete
arch culvert,pavinq,concrete curb and gutter, asphalt greenway,dralnage,excavation
for floodplaln pools, landscaplnq, and other improvements as noted on the plans.
Thls work will be completed In two phases. Phase IA wlll consist of all Items
necessary to construct the stream,greenway,culverts,floodplain pools and
assoclatad structures. Phase IB wlllconslst of aNlandscaDlnq,Dlantings,
seeding and live staklnq required to be completed during plant dormant periods.

INDEX OF DRAWINGS ?
? A
a ?
C- I TITLE SHEET
-I
m
m
--i

W
>;
U
a
C-2 TYPICAL SECTIONS ? ?
C ? ??
C-3 SITE, GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND p Z o v a
EROSION CONTROL PLAN r ?'` ?'
_
C-4 THRU C 5
PROFILES
? .z -a,
??
C-6 EXISTING CONDITIONS m o ?,
? ,
?
C-7 THRU C-15 GENERAL DETAILS cD ° D
? = ??
C-16 TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAIL =i
? o ?
??
-I
L AN CAPE PLANS
L DS m ? a
L-2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS
X-I THRU X-21 CROSS SECTIONS W
GENERAL NOTES
I. SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY JOHN J. JOHNSON, PLS L-1762 DATED 4/ I I/00
2. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE NCDOT STANDARD `140
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES DATED JANUARY 2002 UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED ON THE PLANS.
3. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE
CONTRACTOR BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION.
4.ORANGE SAFETY FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE PROJECT LIMITS AS DIRECTED
BY THE DESIGNER.
5. STOCKPILE AND STAGING AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED ALONG THE PROJECT AND WITHIN
THE PROJECT LIMITS AS APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCSU
TRANSPORTATION POLICY.
6. ALIGNMENT OF GREENWAY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO FIT FIELD CONDITIONS UPON APPROVAL
OF THE DESIGNER AND NCSU. 1&sa
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CULVERT INSTALLATION.
CONTACTS: PROGRESS ENERGY, ROBERT HARDEE,(9191BB1-3TTT
PUBLIC SERVICE OF NORTH CAROLINA, RE10 CRANE, 1919) 367-2713
6. NCSU CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR ADJOINING PAUL DERR TRACK PROJECT IS
RUDY LOPEZ,19 191 5 15-8 1 14.
70
4
?n
z >
o ?
~-? LL
pN > r
?_? W
wa W
??? 2
a?? N
wpN
?az W
? J
yJ
v3ir ?
Q Z U L~L
a)?2 r
>-??
U Z
0
GATE
06/17/200
PROJECT NO 62112
40
FILENAME
SHEET NO C-
CRB JWJ
oR.
?%•o
J MLRIMMON
CENTER
o
o
0 0
o° Q
0
o d j
FRATERNITY
_ COURT
/ /
LOCATOR MAP
8?
\?
C
?N
?w
o?
c
N
N
??
?N
412
??
L
128' BUFFER
VARIES 5' TO 30' 4.4' .1' 4.4' 4,4' 2.1' 4.4' VARIES 5' TO 30' MULCH GREENWAY MULCH
ZONE II 5' MIN. 5' MIN, DO NOT DISTURB EXIST.
P .SEED ZONE ! 8 1.87 1.6T ZONE I 8 N N-INYAS V VEGETATI N
PERM SEED 2 0' 2 0' PERM SEED
EXISTING EXISTING
GRADE 7 '. 1? GRADE
BANKFUL ? ?? ,151
:? -_ STAGE g?
COIA FIBER 1'45' d ?'`
20: 0:1? O. B3' BARE R00T
MATTING 0.22' 1 2 SEEDLINGS
LIVE STAKES COIA FIBER
MATTING
TYPICAL SECTION N0.1
USE THIS TYPICAL IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SREV STA 12+52.32 TO SAEV STA 15+09.00
SAEV STA 18+68.00 TO SAEV STA 19+gg,00
`L
J
13D' BUFFER
ZONE II 12.0' 4,4' .i' 4.4' 4,4' 2. ' 4.4' 12.0' ZONE II
PERM, SEED ZONE I & ZONE I & PERM. SEED
PERM SEED 1.67' 1.67' PERM SEED
2.D' 2.0'
EXISTING i .1 EXISTING
GRADE 2. ? ? Z. GRADE
BANKFUL
= STAGE
1.45' ?. •'`
COIA FIBER ? 20:1 20:1 ?' 0.83' BARE R00T
MATTING 0.22' SEEDLINGS
LIVE STAKES COIR FIBER
MATTING
TYPICAL SECTION N0.2
USE THIS RIFFLE TYPICAL IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SREV STA 15+10.00 TO SREV STA 16+85.00
SREV STA 20+DO.DO TO SREV STA 26+62.61
)?
130' BUFFER
ZONE II 13.5' 11,4' 5.8'
PERM. SEED ZONE I 8
PERM SEED
2.0' 1.1'
EXISTING Ity?.
GRADE ; 7 __ BANKF 1? _
___-.? STAGE
VARIABLE WIDTH 2.0'
ZONE !I
4"ABC
10.0' 2.0' VARIABLE WIDTH
ZONE II
2" ASPHALT
TYPICAL SECTION N0.5
USE THIS TYPICAL IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: GAEENWAY 1 STA 10+00.00 TO STA 23+51.41
GREENWAY 2 STA 10+00.00 TO STA 13+32.86
L
GAEENWAY MULCH PULLEN ROAD CULVERT
CON/SPAN ARCH 333.0
332.0
STREAM
9.0'
z
321 BANKFULL BOULDER WALL ?, 321
1.8' STAGE (3' x 3' x 2') EXPANSION JOINT
318.5'_
315 5 1 .8'
7' 12.0' ZONE II EXISTING MULCH GREENWAY
ZONE I 6 PERM. SEED VEGETATION
PERM SEED
2. o'
?x EXISTING
? GAADE

/ \ 3.95' BARE ROOT
COIA FIBER J " \ SEEDLINGS
MATTING
COIR FIBER
LIVE STAKES MATTING
TYPICAL SECTION N0.3
USE THIS POOL TYPICAL IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SAEV STA 20+00.00 TO SREV STA 26+62.61
(REVERSE TYPICAL FOR LEFT POOLS)
NO ZONE III VARIABLE WIDTH
(SEE SREV CRDSS SECTIONS)
PROPOSED ? 5' PROPOSED
GRADE GRADE
SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR PAOP(ISED ELEVATIONS
TYPICAL SECTION N0.4
USE THIS FLOODPLAIN POOL TYPICAL IN THE FOLLOWING LDCATIIONS: SAEV STA 21+00 TO SREV STA 22+95 +!• (LT)
SAEY STA.23+15 TO SREV STA 25+60 +l- (.LT)
SAEV STA 22+15 TO SREV STA 24+70 +l- (RT)
4 CONCRETE
PARAPET WALL
BTAAT AT SCOUR DEPTH
33.8' 14. D'
FILTER FABRIC FDA.
DRAINAGE, TYPE 2
IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL
4B' x 11' CON/SPAN ARCH ON PARAPET WALLS
(INLET SHOWN)
TYPICAL SECTION N0. b
USE THIS TYPICAL IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: PROPOSED CULVERT AT PULLEN ROAD
9.5' 12.0' 12. D' 9.5'
GRADE 1'-O"
PDW7
2$ 2? 2?
1'-D" 2'- 6" CONCRETE
CURB AND GUTTER
5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3" ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE
TYPE S9.58
4" ASPHALT INTERMEDIATE COURSE
TYPE I19,OB
R" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
TYPICAL SECTION FOR PULLEN ROAD
NOTE:
ALL ROAD CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOT
AND CITY OF RALEIGH STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
P ?
N ?' L'
\ .n
\ ?
i
a
'^ o'
a
a z
w
??
u
??ao
o w o
U W ~
+ o ?
? z rc
w???
x w z
U W O
N O U
z
?'
;,
.i
z
pHp? -
A
H
c_

i
v ?
i?
W ?
o?
t ??
h
Ro
??
??
g?
_ ?m
U?
F ¢?
Q
6 3
W
atf
O ?
?_? Z
o?> ?
r- a'z
?a? ?
w V
?rw
?Wa w
a?N L7
Wp
¢?
?°-i J
}J Q
Zia U
aW? H
a
mix }
??
U Z
0
oprE
06/17/2004
PROJECT NO 621!2
FILENAME
sNEEr No C-2
DRAWN BY CNKD BY
CR