20191759 Ver 1_JD Request Packet Revised 12202019_20191226

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
2. Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location – Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
8. Project Location – Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]:
9. Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]:
10. Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:
11. Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 and 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit Pre-Application Request
Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit # Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F
Part G
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Barnes Property
9113 NC Hwy 210, Four Oaks NC 27524
Johnston County
Property is located on NC Hwy 210, approximately 3.6 miles east of I-40
164400-71-0058
Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
242 Batten Farm Rd, Selma NC 27576
[phone] mobile
[e-mail]
Steel Bridge Crossing, LLC
5160 NC Hwy 42 W
Garner, NC 27529
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
4
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
See Attached Agent Authorization
F. ALL REQUESTS
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES

65.13
35.50974 N
-78.50572 W

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
(3) GPS SURVEYS
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough:City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ________________.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ________.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______.
or Other (Name & Date): ______.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________.
Other information (please specify): ______________.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Wyatt Brown 12/26/19
PROPERTY INFORMATION
ACCESS/AGENT AUTHORIZATION
* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Scale: 1:6000 - 1 in. = 500 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
May 27, 2019
Parcel Report
X Coordinate:2147108.6372549
Y Coordinate:640923.5375817
id:07G07015
Tag:07G07015
NCPin:164400-71-0058
Mapsheet No:1644
Owner Name 1:STEEL BRIDGE CROSSING,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1:5160 NC HIGHWAY 42 W
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3:GARNER, NC 27529-8417
Site Address 1:9113 NC HWY 210
Site Address 2:FOUR OAKS, NC 27524-
Book:05348
Page:0232
Market Value:458590
Assessed Acreage:65.13
Calc. Acreage:65.137
Sales Price:928000
Sale Date:2019-05-16
Township:Elevation
Water District:Hopewell Pisgah Water District
ETJ:N/A
City Limits:N/A
Town Zoning:N/A
County Zoning:AR
OverLay Zoning:N/A
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
May 16, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Ross Sullivan
Re: Barnes Property, Johnston County
i, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The properties PIN
number is 164400-71-0058.
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
Steel Bridge Crossing, LLC
Lanny Clifton

SITE EXHIBITS
Location Map
Aerial Photo
USGS Topographic Map
NCDOT Topographic Map
NRCS Soil Survey Map
County Soil Unit Map
Wetland Delineation Map
Figure 1. Location Map Barnes Landing Subdivision
Project is located at 9113 NC Highway
210, approximately 3 miles east of I-40
interchange.
9113 NC Highway 210
Four Oaks, NC
Johnston County
Date
12/19/19
-------------
Prep By
WB/MRR
Project Parcel
Legend
Figure 2. Aerial Photo Barnes Landing Subdivision
Source: Google Earth Images, 2018 9113 NC Highway 210
Four Oaks, NC
Johnston County
Date
12/19/19
-------------
Prep By
WB/MRR
NC Hi
g
h
w
a
y

2
1
0
0 250 500 750 ft
Project Parcel
Legend
Figure 3. USGS Topographic Map Barnes Landing Subdivision
Edmondson Quadrangle
1:24,000 Scale
Source: USGS Mapping Services
9113 NC Highway 210
Four Oaks, NC
Johnston County
Date
12/19/19
-------------
Prep By
WB/MRR
Project Parcel
Legend
240240 2102
4
2
224 226232
234
200230230
230222
2162262262282282
3
2
2
3
4
240
242 228238200202204
2
0
6
20819822021221
4216 218222212 218230204
232
238
2422
2
8
236238 23
2 234
238 228210
2
2
2
20
4
206208212
216198
198
202
20
4220230236224226214218
230
224226228
210
190
188
20
8
192
214
18
4
18418818
6
200
222
192
194196
198Figure 4. Topographic Map Barnes Landing Subdivision
NC DOT 2-ft Contours
Source: Johnston County GIS Services
9113 NC Highway 210
Four Oaks, NC
Johnston County
Date
12/19/19
-------------
Prep By
WB/MRR
NC Hi
g
h
w
a
y

2
1
0
0 250 500 750 ft
Project Parcel
Legend
Figure 5. NRCS Soil Survey Map Barnes Landing Subdivision
Soil Survey of Johnston County, 1994
Map Sheet 5
9113 NC Highway 210
Four Oaks, NC
Johnston County
Date
12/19/19
-------------
Prep By
WB/MRR
Project Parcel
Legend
NoB
NoB
NoB
NoA
NoB
NoB
CoC
CoC
CoC
CoC
CoC
CoC
CoCCoCUcC
UcB
UcB
UcC
UcB
UcB
UcC
FaB
FaB
FaB
FaA
FaB
Bb
Ra
Bb
Bb
Ly
w
w
w
w
Figure 6. Soil Unit Map Barnes Landing Subdivision
Soil Survey of Johnston County, 1994
Source: Johnston County GIS Services
9113 NC Highway 210
Four Oaks, NC
Johnston County
Date
12/19/19
-------------
Prep By
WB/MRR
NC Hi
g
h
w
a
y

2
1
0
0 250 500 750 ft
Project Parcel
Legend
Soil Descriptions:
NoB - Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
UcC - Uchee loamy coarse sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes
CoC - Cowarts loamy sand, 6 to 10 precent slopes
FaB - Faceville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Bb - Bibb sandy loam, frequently flooded
Wetland A-C1.23 Acres401/404 jurisdictional
Stream 11496 feet401/404 jurisdictional
DP1, DP2
DP3, DP4
Stream 2479 feet404/404 jurisdictional
Wetland B7.27 Acres401/404 jurisdictional
³
610 0 610305 Feet
TextBarnes PropertyPreliminary Wetland Map
Drawn by Wyatt Brown5-21-2019
USACE DATA SHEETS
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Barnes Property
Applicant/Owner: B. Barnes, Four Oaks NC
Investigator(s): WBrown & M. Richmond
City/County: Johnston Co
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC
Sampling Date: 5/20/2019
Sampling Point: DP-1
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Moderately sloped forestland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Drainageway Slope (%): 'f 1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.506512 Long: -78.506753 Datum: NAD84
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb sandy loam
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NWI classification: Headwater wetland
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point was collected within Wetland A, near Flag C-6. This data form includes information
collected throughout and representative of Wetland A
HYDROLOGY
n
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑, Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
11❑---ff
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓
❑
�LJr
Saturation (A3) LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (61) LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
✓❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133) I --I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
I__L
Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
II✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 101, Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point, based on Primary and Secondary indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
40
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2 Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover:
10
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Magnolia virginiana
35
Yes
FACW
FACU species x 4 =
2 Diospyros virginiana
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3 Ilex opaca
10
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
g 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
II✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
55
= Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 27.5
20% of total cover:
11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Athyrium filix-femina
30
Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Woodwardia areolata
10
Yes
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
40
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1 Vitus rotundifolia
15
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 7•5 20% of total cover: 3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point based on the Rapid Test for Hydrophytic
Vegetation and the Dominance Test.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture Remarks
04" 10YR2/2 100 Loam Sandy loam; saturated
4"-15" 10YR2/2 90 7.5YR5/6 10 D M Loam Sandy loam; saturated
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑ 2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
El Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
D✓
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
D
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
D Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR o, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
D Sandy Redox (S5) F] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
D Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators (Redox Dark Surface) were present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Barnes Property City/County: Johnston Co Sampling Date: 5/20/2019
Applicant/Owner: B. Barnes, Four Oaks NC State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): WBrown & M. Richmond Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Moderately sloped forestland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Moderate slope Slope (%): > 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.506512 Long: -78.506753 Datum: NAD84
Soil Map Unit Name: NoB - Norfolk sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point was collected within uplands adjacent to Wetland A, near Flag C-6.
HYDROLOGY
n
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑, Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
1E--lf
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑
�LJr
Saturation (A3) LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑
Water Marks (61) LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133) I --I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑, Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
�, FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 101, Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Diospyros virginana
30
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Pinus taeda
20
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
r
3• Quecus falcata
10
No FACU
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
60
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover: 12
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
FAC species 125 x 3 = 375
1 Ilex opaca
40
Yes FAC
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
2 Diospyros virginiana
20
Yes FAC
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 135 (A) 415 (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.07
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
g 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7•
II✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
60
= Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover: 12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 None
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1 Vitus rotundifolia
15
Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 7•5 20% of total cover: 3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point based on the Dominance Test; however,
dominant vegetation in this area was entirely FAC, absent of FACW or OBL vegetation, and the
Prevalence Index is > 3.0.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks
0-5" 10YR3/4 100 Loam Sandy loam; dry
C=Concentration. D=Deoletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
0 Histosol (Al)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2)
0 Black Histic (A3)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
D Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
0 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
D Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Loam Sandy loam; dry
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑
_❑ 2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
E1 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material
(F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
(TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators were not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Barnes Property
Applicant/Owner: B. Barnes, Four Oaks NC
Investigator(s): WBrown & M. Richmond
City/County: Johnston Co
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC
Sampling Date: 5/20/2019
Sampling Point: DP-3
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Moderately sloped forestland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Drainageway Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.509312 Long: -78.50466 Datum: NAD84
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb sandy loam
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NWI classification: Headwater Wetland
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point was collected within Wetland B, near Flag 13234. This data form includes information
collected throughout and representative of Wetland B.
HYDROLOGY
n
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑, Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
1E-j-f
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓
❑
�LJr
Saturation (A3) LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (61) LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
✓❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133) I --I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
I__L
Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
II✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point, based on Primary and Secondary indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-3
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Lirodendron tulipifera
30
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2
Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3•
r
Li uidambar st aciflua
9 y
10
Yes
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 89 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover:
10
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Magnolia virginiana
20
Yes
FACW
FACU species x 4 =
2
Diospyros virginiana
20
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3
Ilex opaca
10
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
g 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
II✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
50
= Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover:
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Athyrium filix-femina
20
Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Woodwardia areolata
10
Yes
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
20
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover:
4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1
Vitus rotundifolia
15
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 7•5 20% of total cover: 3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point based on the Rapid Test for Hydrophytic
Vegetation and the Dominance Test.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture Remarks
0-5" 10YR2/2 100 Loam Sandy loam; saturated
5"-15" 10YR3/2 90 10YR 5/8 10 D M Loam Sandy loam; dry
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑ 2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
El Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
D✓
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
D
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
D Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR o, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
D Sandy Redox (S5) F] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
D Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators were present at this sampling point.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Barnes Property City/County: Johnston Co Sampling Date: 5/20/2019
Applicant/Owner: B. Barnes, Four Oaks NC State: NC Sampling Point: DP-4
Investigator(s): WBrown & M. Richmond Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Moderately sloped forestland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Moderate slope Slope (%): > 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.509312 Long: -78.50466 Datum: NAD84
Soil Map Unit Name: NoB - Norfolk sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point was collected within uplands adjacent to Wetland B, near Flag B234
HYDROLOGY
n
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑, Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
1E--lf
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑
�LJr
Saturation (A3) LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
71 Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑
Water Marks (61) LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133) I --I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑, Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
�, FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Lirodendron tulipifera
30 Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2 Pinus taeda
20 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Ox dendrum arboreum
3• y
20 Yes FACU
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
70 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 35
20% of total cover: 14
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Ilex opaca
40 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
g 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
II✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
40 = Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 None
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1 Vitus rotundifolia
10 Yes FAC
2 Smilax rotundifolia
10 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20 = Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point based on the Dominance Test.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks
0-91, 10YR4/4 100 Loam Sandy loam; dry
715 14i i i 11YA S M, i [eIe7
C=Concentration. D=Deoletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol(Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Loam Loamy clay; dry
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑
_❑ 2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
E1 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material
(F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
(TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators were not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0