HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0060691_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20191230ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Mr. Sean Peters
MVP Group International, Inc.
435 Gentry Road
Elkin, NC 28621
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 30, 2019
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
MVP Group International, Inc. WWTP
NPDES Permit # NCO060691
Surry County
Dear Ms. Peters:
A Compliance Evaluation Inspection was performed by North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NC DWR) staff person, Justin Henderson on December 3, 2019. Mr. Don Taylor,
Facilities Manager, and Hal Transou, ORC, were present during this inspection. This type of
inspection consists of two basic parts: an in -office review of the facility files and self -monitoring
data and an on -site inspection of the facility. While this inspection mostly reflects compliance with
the subject permit, the following items of concern warrant your attention and action:
1) The location of Outfall 002 was unknown and unable to be inspected during this inspection. To
allow for complete inspection of the wastewater treatment system authorized by the subject permit,
the location of all components of the treatment system shall be identified. Please determine the
location of Outfall 002 and notify this office upon making this determination.
2) Failure to maintain a copy of the current permit, residual removal records, and copies of laboratory
analysis for the required effluent monitoring on -site. While these records were subsequently
provided to this office after the date of this inspection, they should be maintained and available for
review upon request in accordance with Permit Condition Part II. Section D. (6.).
3) Reportedly, effluent associated with Outfall 001 directly discharges into a sedimentation/storage
lagoon located on -site. The static water level within this sedimentation/storage lagoon remains
below the discharge level of the associated riser pipe, thus a discharge to waters of the State does
not occur per Don Taylor, Facilities Manager, and Hal Transou, ORC. However, should a
discharge occur, the effluent would subsequently discharge to an Unnamed Tributary (UT) to the
Yadkin River as opposed to the permitted discharge point for Outfall 001 as indicated in the subject
D North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
EQ�p
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
NORTH CAROLINA �
o•o•°"•mme""°"^•"vin"•i� /� 336.776.9800
permit. A Permit Correction shall be requested to reconcile this discrepancy, and to prevent the
potential of illegal discharge violations being incurred in the future.
4) The Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee, authorized by Permit Condition Part
II Section B. (14.), was overdue at the time of this inspection. While, payment for this fee has since
been received by the Division, future payments shall be received within 30-days of receipt of
invoice to prevent incurring future violations related to overdue fees.
5) Excessive woody vegetation was observed growing on the earthen embankments associated with
the sedimentation/storage lagoon. Failure to properly maintain earthen embankments, to prevent
the growth of woody vegetation, and the habitation of burrowing mammals may result in seepage
of effluent. It is strongly recommended that all woody vegetation existing on the earthen
embankment of 4-inches in diameter or less be removed and regrowth prevented to protect the
integrity of the embankment as well as the lagoon's liner.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Justin Henderson or me at (336)
776-9800.
Sincerely,
EDocuSigned by:
LOw, -T 15mJ r
145B49E225C94EA...
Lon Snider, Asst. Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
enc: Inspection Report
cc: Don Taylor, Facilities Manager- dontaorrkMypgroupint.com
Hal Transou, ORC- hal.transou(absuez.com
Laserfiche Files (electronic copies)
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN I 2 IF I 3 I NC0060691 111 12 I 19/12/03 I17 18 I S J 19 L G] 201 I
211111 I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I f6
Inspection
Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ---------------------- Reserved -------------------
671
70 I I 71 I I 72 I r I 73 I I 174 751 I I I I I I I80
u I� I I i
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES oermit Number)
10:OOAM 19/12/03
19/01/01
MVP Group International
430 Gentry Ln
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Elkin NC 28621
12:30PM 19/12/03
23/12/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Hal W Transou/ORC/910-835-9817/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Wayne Gentry,430 Gentry Rd Elkin NC 28621//336-527-2241/
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Justin L Henderson DocuSigned by:
L DWR/WSRO WQ/336-776-9701/ 12/20/2019
0 s v , �t,1�,�i tAbV
D51F3525961`8113496...
Signature of Management Q A RSigned by: Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
12/30/2019
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.)
NCO060691 I11 121 19/12/03 117 18 ICI
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Dear Ms. Peters:
A Compliance Evaluation Inspection was performed by North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NC DWR) staff person, Justin Henderson on December 3, 2019. Mr. Don Taylor, Facilities Manager,
and Hal Transou, ORC were present during this inspection. This type of inspection consists of two
basic parts: an in -office review of the facility files and self -monitoring data and an on -site inspection of
the facility. While, this inspection mostly reflects compliance with the subject permit, the following item
of concern warrants your attention and action:
1) The location of Outfall 002 was unknown and unable to be inspected during this inspection. To allow
for complete inspection of the wastewater treatments system, authorized by the subject permit, the
location of all components of the treatment system shall be identified. Please determine the location of
Outfall 002 and notify this office upon making this determination.
2) Failure to maintain a copy of the current permit, residual removal records, and copies of laboratory
analysis for the required effluent monitoring on -site. While these records were provided to this office
subsequently after the date of this inspection, they should be maintained and available for review upon
request in accordance with Permit Condition Part II. Section D. (6.).
3) Reportedly, effluent associated with Outfall 001 directly discharges into a sedimentation/storage
lagoon located on -site. The static water level within this sedimentation/storage lagoon remains below
the discharge level of the associated riser pipe, thus a discharge to waters of the State does not occur
per Don Taylor, Facilities Manager, and Hal Transou, ORC. However, should a discharge occur the
effluent would subsequently discharge to an Unnamed Tributary (UT) to the Yadkin River as opposed to
the permitted discharge point for Outfall 001 as indicated in the subject permit. A Permit Correction
shall be requested to reconcile this discrepancy, and to prevent the potential of illegal discharge
violations being incurred in the future.
4) The Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee, authorized by Permit Condition Part II
Section B. (14.), was overdue at the time of this inspection. While, payment for this fee has since been
received by the Division, future payments shall be received within 30-days of receipt of invoice to
prevent incurring future violations related to overdue fees.
5) Excessive woody vegetation was observed growing on the earthen embankments associated with
the sedimentation/storage lagoon. Failure to properly maintain earthen embankments, to prevent the
growth of woody vegetation, and the habitation of burrowing mammals may result in seepage of
effluent. It is strongly recommended that all woody vegetation, existing on the earthen embankment, of
4-inches in diameter or less be removed and regrowth prevented to protect the integrity of the
embankment as well as the lagoon's liner.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Justin Henderson or me at (336)
776-9800.
Page#
Permit: NCO060691
Inspection Date: 12/03/2019
Owner - Facility: MVP Group International
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Yes No NA NE
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Outfall 001 discharges to an UT to Yadkin River as opposed to the Yadkin River indicated by
the Permit description.
Bar Screens
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment: Screenings are removed at same frequency that digestor is pumped.
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Ext. Air
Diffused
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
Page# 3
Permit: NCO060691
Inspection Date: 12/03/2019
Aeration Basins
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
Comment:
Owner - Facility: MVP Group International
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Primary Clarifier
Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/ of the sidewall depth)
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Standby Power
Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the generator tested under load?
❑
❑
0
❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑
❑
0
❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment: There is no back-up power available at this facility. The Facility Manager
indicated that
operations would be shut down in the event of an extended power outage thus no
wastewater would be expected to be generated.
Page# 4