The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160366 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20191230ID#* 20160366 Version* 1 Select Reviewer:* Mac Haupt Initial Review Completed Date 12/30/2019 Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/30/2019 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No Type of Mitigation Project:* V Stream r Wetlands W Buffer r- Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Jeremiah Dow Project Information .................................................................................................................................................................. ID#:* 20160366 Existing IDr Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank Project Name: Martin Dairy Mitigation Site County: Orange Document Information Email Address:* jeremiah.dow@ncdenr.gov Version: *1 Existing Version Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Monitoring Report File Upload: Martin Dairy_97087_RiparianBuffer MY2 2019-12- 2.98MB 18.pdf Rease upload only one RDFof the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted... Signature Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow Signature:* MONITORING YEAR 2 ANNUAL REPORT Final MARTIN DAIRY BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Orange County, NC NCDEQ Contract No. 006831 DMS Project Number 97087 NCDWR Project Number 2016-0366 Data Collection Period: September 2019 Draft Submission Date: October 21, 2019 Final Submission Date: December 17, 2019 PREPARED FOR: NC Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 PREPARED BY: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 Raleigh, NC 27609 Jason Lorch jlorch@wildlandseng.com Phone: (919) 851-9986 Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report 1 MARTIN DAIRY BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Monitoring Year 2 Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................2 1.1 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Monitoring Year 2 Data Assessment ............................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Vegetative Assessment ......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Monitoring Year 2 Summary ......................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................................4 Section 3: REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................4 APPENDICES Appendix 1 General Figures and Tables Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map Figure 2 Service Area Figure 3 Project Component / Asset Map Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3 Project Contact Table Table 4 Project Information and Attributes Table 5 Adjacent Forested Areas Existing Tree and Shrub Species Table 6 Planted Tree Species Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data Figure 4 Monitoring Plan View Table 7 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table Vegetation Plot Photographs Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data Table 8 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table Table 9 CVS Vegetation Tables - Metadata Table 10 Planted and Total Stem Counts Appendix 4 Overview Photos Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report 2 Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1 Project Summary Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) implemented a full delivery project at the Martin Dairy Mitigation Site (“Site”) for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore a total of 2,135 linear feet (LF) of perennial streams in Orange County, NC. The Site included the restoration of two unnamed tributaries (Martin Dairy Creek and UT1). The project also restored 10.139 acres (441,654.84 ft2) of riparian buffer at the Site, which will provide 379,169.330 Riparian Buffer Credits. The project Site was planned, designed, and constructed on land surrounding Martin Dairy Creek and its tributaries. The Site is located approximately eight miles northeast of Hillsborough, NC and eight miles south of Caldwell, NC (Figure 1) in the Neuse River Basin 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201. The project is located within a DMS targeted watershed for the Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201030030 and NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin 03-04-01. The Site drains to Buckwater Creek, which flows to Falls Lake, which is classified as water supply waters (WS-IV) and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW). The 11.155 acre site is protected with a permanent conservation easement. The project has been planned, designed and constructed per the Martin Dairy Mitigation Plan (2017) and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015). The purpose of the riparian buffer restoration is to provide riparian buffer credits to compensate for buffer impacts within the Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201 and the Falls Lake Watershed. The service area for the Riparian Buffer Credits is depicted in Figure 2. The mitigation credits generated from this Site are listed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 3. 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives Prior to construction activities, the primary degradation on the Site was the original clearing of the Site and channelization of Martin Dairy Creek and UT1. The channelization involved straightening and deepening of the stream (as indicated by the amount of dredge spoil in the floodplain). In the past livestock were grazed on the Site, which contributed to bank sloughing. Table 4 in Appendix 1 presents the pre-restoration conditions in more detail. The restored riparian buffer areas within the Site will aid in protecting water quality. The main objective of the project was to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus loading to the Neuse River tributaries by establishing a forested riparian buffer on land previously used for agricultural purposes. The riparian buffer will immobilize nutrients, reducing quantities available to downstream aquatic ecosystems in the Neuse River Basin. 11.115 acres of land were protected with a conservation easement. Out of the 11.155 acres, 10.139 acres were restored for Neuse River buffer credit and 1.017 acres will not generate buffer mitigation credit. In general, riparian buffer restoration area widths on streams extend out to 200 feet from top of bank for Neuse River buffer credits. Maps detailing the credit generation are provided in Figure 3. 1.3 Monitoring Year 2 Data Assessment The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by DMS in March 2017. Construction activities were completed by Land Mechanic Designs, Inc in July 2017. The planting was completed by Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. in December 2017. The baseline as-built survey for the stream mitigation work was completed by Turner Land Surveying in August 2017 and for the buffer mitigation component in January 2018. Monitoring Year 1 vegetation survey was completed September 2018. Refer to Appendix 1 for detailed project activity, history, contact information, and watershed/site background information. Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report 3 Vegetative performance for buffer restoration areas will be in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n)(2)(B), and (n)(4) (effective November 1, 2015). To meet success criteria, areas generating buffer mitigation credits shall include a minimum of four native hardwood tree species or four native hardwood tree and native shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, and have a survival of 260 planted stems per acre at the end of the required monitoring period (MY5) (no interim success criteria required). In order for the monitoring to be terminated, DWR must provide a written approval of vegetation success of buffer restoration areas generating buffer credit. Annual monitoring was conducted to assess the condition of the vegetation in September 2019. 1.3.1 Vegetative Assessment The quantity of monitoring vegetation plots was determined in accordance with the Carolina Vegetative Sampling Protocol (CVS Levels II) such that at least two (2) percent of the Site is encompassed in monitoring plots. A total of eight (8) vegetation plots (10 meters by 10 meters) were randomly established between the conservation easement boundaries and five feet from the top of stream banks. The plot corners have been marked and are recoverable either through field identification or with the use of a GPS unit. Reference photographs will be taken at the origin looking diagonally across the plot to the opposite corner on an annual basis. Species composition, density, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot and for the entire site. The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary. The Monitoring Year 2 (MY2 of 5) vegetative survey was completed in September 2019. The 2019 annual vegetation monitoring resulted in an average survivability of 405 stems per acre, which is greater than the final requirement of 260 stems per acre, but approximately 32% less than the baseline density recorded (597 stems/acre) in January 2018. There was an average of 10 stems per plot compared to 14 stems per plot in MY0. Vegetation Plot 7 had an increased tree mortality rate from MY0 to MY2 due to herbaceous competition from Alligator Weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). Vegetation Plot 7 is on track to meet the MY5 success criteria of 260 stems per acre but exceeds requirements by less than 10 percent with 283 planted stems per acre. Even with herbaceous competition, several volunteers were assessed in the plot including green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), bringing the total stems per acre to 405, exceeding the success requirements by more than 10 percent. The Site is on track to meet its final success criteria. Please refer to Appendix 3 for vegetation plot criteria attainment data, CVS vegetation plot metadata, and vegetation summary tables and Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs, vegetation condition assessment table, and monitoring plan view. Tree vigor along UT1 was good but is not performing as well as the rest of the Site. This is likely due to floodplain grading during construction. Approximately 100 pounds of biochar, rock phosphate, azomite, and humic acid was added to the floodplain to promote tree growth during MY2. Remedial action will be taken as necessary in subsequent monitoring years to promote tree growth. 1.4 Monitoring Year 2 Summary Overall, the Site has met the required vegetation success criteria for MY2. All the vegetation plots met the MY2 success criteria as seen in the monitoring components map. While tree mortality rate in Vegetation Plot 7 increased, it is still meeting the success criteria and with volunteers is on track to exceed the success criteria with 405 stems per acre. At this time no remedial actions are proposed. Summary information/data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report 4 information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on DMS’s website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from DMS upon request. Section 2: METHODOLOGY Planted woody vegetation was monitored in accordance with the guidelines and procedures developed by the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2006). A total of eight standard 10 meter by 10-meter vegetation plots were established within the project easement area. Section 3: REFERENCES Breeding, R. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. October 2004. Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved from http://www.nceep.net/business/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm. Peet, R.K., T.R. Wentworth and P.S. White. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A.S. 1990. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation. Wildlands Engineering (2017). Martin Dairy Mitigation Site. NCDWR, Raleigh NC. http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/nutrientbufferbanks APPENDIX 1. General Figures and Tables 03020201030030 03020201020020 03020201030040 03020201020010 03020201020030 Hydrologic Unit Code (14) Project Area DMS Targeted Local Watersheds Figure 1. Project Vicinity MapMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Orange County, NC¹0 10.5 Miles The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of theNCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site mayrequire traversing areas near or along the easement boundary andtherefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access byauthorized personnel of state and federal agencies or theirdesignees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the termsand timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation oractivity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned rolesand activites requires prior coordination with DMS. Directions:From Raleigh, NC, take I-40 West towards Durham. Take exit 279B for NC-147 N towards Durham/Downtown. Travel approximately 13 miles and merge onto I-85 S. Travelapproximately 2 miles, take exit 170 for US-70 W.In 0.2 miles turn right onto Pleasant Green Road. Travel 5.8 miles and stay straight through the intersection with St. Mary Road onto Schley Rd. In 0.7 miles, the parking area is on the left in a powerline R/W 200 feetsouth of Lipscomb Grove Church Road. FallsLake 0 105 Miles ¹Figure 2. Service AreaMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Orange County, NC ^_ Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Service Area- Riparian Buffer County Boundaries Martin Dairy CreekUT1 Martin Hills Lane Schley Raod2017 Aerial Photography Conservation Easement Internal Easement Powerline Easements Streams Buffer Restoration TOB - 100' Buffer Restoration 100' - 200' Powerlines Figure 3. Project Component / Asset MapMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Orange County, NC¹0 200100 Feet DMS Project No. 97087LocationJurisdictionalStreamsRestoration TypeReach ID/ComponentBuffer Width (ft)Creditable Area(square feet)Initial Credit Ratio (x:1)% Full CreditFinal Credit Ratio (x:1)Riparian Buffer Credits (BMU)Convertible to Nutrient Offset(Yes or No*)Nutrient Offset: N (lbs)Nutrient Offset: P (lbs)Martin Dairy0-100348,392.88100%1.00000348,392.88No0.0000.000Martin Dairy101-20093,261.9633%3.0000030,776.45No0.0000.000441,654.84379,169.330.0000.000Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting HistoryDMS Project No. 97087Year 4 Monitoring2021December 2021Year 5 Monitoring2022December 2022Year 2 MonitoringSeptember 2019December 2019Year 3 Monitoring2020December 2020As-Built & Baseline Monitoring DocumentJanuary 2018January 2018Year 1 MonitoringSeptember 2018December 2018Mitigation PlanMarch 2017March 2017Bare Root PlantingN/ADecember 2017Conservation EasementN/ANovember 2016RuralSubject RestorationMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteMonitoring Year 2 - 2019Activity or ReportDate Collection CompleteCompletion or Scheduled Delivery1SUBTOTALS*Riparian buffer credits are not convertible to nutrient offset because the site was used for hay production and livestock have been removed.Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation CreditsMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteMonitoring Year 2 - 2019MITIGATION CREDITSRiparian Buffer (15A NCAC 02B.0295)If Converted to Nutrient Offset Table 3. Project Contact Table DMS Project No. 97087 Table 4. Project Information and Attributes DMS Project No. 97087 Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Monitoring, POC Jason Lorch Designer Angela Allen, PE Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 Raleigh, NC 27609 919.851.9986 Planting Contractor Bruton Natural Systems, Inc P.O. Box 1197 Fremont, NC 27830 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit Nursery Stock Suppliers Dykes and Son Nursery Monitoring Performers Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36° 7' 25.76"N 79° 0' 14.26"W Project Area (acres) 11.155 919.851.9986, ext. 107 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site County Orange County Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 03020201030030 PROJECT WATERSHED SUMMARY INFORMATION Physiographic Province Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province CGIA Land Use Classification 59.0% forested, 40.6% cultivated, 0.40% impervious DWR Sub-basin 03-04-01 Project Drainage Area (acres) 526.0 Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious 0.4% River Basin Neuse USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020201 DMS Project No. 97087 Common Name Scientific Name Wetland Indicator Status Red Maple Acer rubrum FAC Water Hickory Carya aquatica OBL Sugarberry Celtis laevigata FACW Sweet Pepperbush Clethra alnifolia FACW Swamp Titi Cyrilla racemiflora FACW Persimmon Diospyros virginiana FAC Water Ash Fraxinus caroliniana OBL Deciduous Holly Ilex decidua FACW- Virginia Sweetspire Itea virginica FACW+ Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana FACU- Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ Yellow Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera FAC Water Tupelo Nyssa aquatica OBL Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica FAC Loblolly Pine Pinus taeda FAC American Sycamore Platanus occidentalis FACW- Willow Oak Quercus phellos FACW- Red Oak Quercus rubra FACU Shumard Oak Quercus shumardii FACW- Black Willow Salix nigra OBL DMS Project No. 97087 Common Name Scientific Name Number Planted % of Total River Birch Betula nigra 926 16% Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis 58 1% Flowering Dogwood Comus florida 58 1% Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1,042 18% Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 926 16% Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 1,274 22% Pin Oak Quercus palustris 811 14% Willow Oak Quercus phellos 695 12% Total 5,790 100% Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Table 5. Adjacent Forested Areas Existing Tree and Shrub Species Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Table 6. Planted Tree Species APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data Martin Dairy CreekUT1 Martin Hills Lane Schley Raod1 3 8 5 7 6 4 2 2017 Aerial Photography Conservation Easement Internal Easement Powerline Easements Streams Buffer Restoration TOB - 100' Buffer Restoration 100' - 200' Vegetation Plot Powerlines Figure 4. Monitoring Plan ViewMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Orange County, NC¹0 200100 Feet Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 2 - 2019Planted Acreage 10.139Vegetation CategoryDefinitionsMapping Threshold (Ac)Number of PolygonsCombined Acreage% of Planted AcreageBare AreasVery limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material0.1 00 0%Low Stem Density AreasWoody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.0.1 00 0%00 0%Areas of Poor Growth Rates or VigorAreas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.0.25 Ac 00 0%0 0.0 0%Easement Acreage11.155Vegetation CategoryDefinitionsMapping Threshold (SF)Number of PolygonsCombined Acreage% of Easement AcreageInvasive Areas of ConcernAreas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).1,000 00 0%Easement Encroachment AreasAreas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).none 00 0%Table 7. Vegetation Condition Assessment TableTotalCumulative Total VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS VEG PLOT 1 (09/18/2019) VEG PLOT 2 (09/18/2019) VEG PLOT 3 (09/18/2019) VEG PLOT 4 (09/18/2019) VEG PLOT 5 (09/18/2019) VEG PLOT 6 (09/18/2019) VEG PLOT 7 (09/18/2019) VEG PLOT 8 (09/18/2019) APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data Table 8. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site DMS Project No. 97087 Monitoring Year 2 - 2019 Plot 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 100% Met Success Criteria Tract Mean Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Table 9 CVS Vegetation Tables - MetadataMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation ProjectDMS Project No.97087Monitoring Year 2 - 2019Report Prepared ByJason LorchDate Prepared9/20/2019 14:12Database NameMartin Dairy- cvs-v2.5.0.- MY2.mdbDatabase LocationF:\Projects\005-02158 Martin Dairy\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 2\Vegetation AssessmentComputer NameCARLYNN-PCFile Size51679232MetadataDescription of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.Project PlantedEach project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.Project Total StemsEach project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.PlotsList of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).VigorFrequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.Vigor by SppFrequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.DamageList of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.Damage by SppDamage values tallied by type for each species.Damage by PlotDamage values tallied by type for each plot.Planted Stems by Plot and SppA matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.ALL Stems by Plot and SppA matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.Project Code97087Project NameMartin Dairy DescriptionStream Restoration ProjectSampled Plots8DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------PROJECT SUMMARY------------------------------------- Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 2 - 2019PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all TBetula nigraRiver Birch Tree1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3Cephalanthus occidentalisButtonbushShrub TreeCercis canadensisRed BudShrub TreeCornus floridaFlowering DogwoodShrub TreeFraxinus pennsylvanicaGreen AshTree2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1Liquidambar styracifluaSweet GumTree41Liriodendron tulipiferaTulip PoplarTree3 3 31 1 1Platanus occidentalisSycamoreTree2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4Pyrus calleryanaBradford PearTree12Quercus palustrisPin OakTree2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3Quercus phellosWillow OakTree3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2UlmusElmTree111 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 14 12 12 14 10 10 105 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 8 4 4 4445 445 445 445 445 445 405 405 567 486 486 567 405 405 405Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakesP-all: Number of planted stems including live stakesT: Total StemsTable 10. Planted and Total Stem CountsCurrent Plot Data (MY2 2019)Scientific Name Common Name Species TypeVP 1 VP 210.02VP 3 VP 4 VP 510.0210.02Stem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRE10.0210.02 Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 2 - 2019Betula nigraRiver Birch TreeCephalanthus occidentalisButtonbushShrub TreeCercis canadensisRed BudShrub TreeCornus floridaFlowering DogwoodShrub TreeFraxinus pennsylvanicaGreen AshTreeLiquidambar styracifluaSweet GumTreeLiriodendron tulipiferaTulip PoplarTreePlatanus occidentalisSycamoreTreePyrus calleryanaBradford PearTreeQuercus palustrisPin OakTreeQuercus phellosWillow OakTreeUlmusElmTreeColor for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakesP-all: Number of planted stems including live stakesT: Total StemsTable 10. Planted and Total Stem CountsScientific Name Common Name Species TypeStem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACREPnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 14 14 16 16 16 17 17 1711 112 81 1 1 3 3 32 2 2 2 2 21 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 30 15 15 45 17 17 29 18 18 184 9 21 1 3 5 5 7 7 7 7 19 19 194 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 7 22 22 27 24 24 25 25 25 2532 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 12 12 12 16 16 16 20 20 201 1 1 1 1 1 12 12 12 14 14 14 14 14 141 2 110 10 21 7 7 10 9 9 49 80 80 140 97 97 121 118 118 1185 5 6 4 4 5 6 6 8 6 6 9 8 8 11 8 8 8405 405 850283283 405 364 364 1983 405 405 708 491 491 612 597 597 597Current Plot Data (MY2 2019)VP 7 VP 8Annual MeansMY2 (2019) MY1 (2018) MY0 (2018)VP 610.0210.0280.2010.0280.2080.20 APPENDIX 4. Overview Photos