20061347 Ver 1_401 Application_20060806

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer.
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
From: Jason Payne
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Howard Farms
Person County, NC
~oos~3~r
On behalf of the applicant, Howard Farms of Person County, LLC, please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (U$ACE) that the road construction proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit
(NWP) 39. We also request Riparian Buffer Authorization and written concurrence from the N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWO) that these impacts may proceed under General Water Quality Certification GC3402.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PRO.IFCT Sl1MMARY
Project Name Howard Farms
Project T e Residential Subdivision
Owner / A licant Howard Farms of Person Count ,LLC
Count Person
Nearest Town Roxboro
Waterbod Name North Flat River
Basin /Sub-basin Neuse 03-04-02
Index Number 27-3-7
Class WS-III: NSW
IMPACT Sl 1MMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0926
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0926
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 142
Total Riparian Buffer Impact (square feet): 7,306
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization
Figure 1, USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2, NRCS Soil Survey Map
Overall Site Plan and Inset Impact Maps
Stream Evaluation Forms
Upland Data Form
$200 Application Fee to DWQ „~ ~~~
~~~t ~~ ~~~t~~~ ~~
{~~
Charlotte Office: ~~rIN - `~ ~ ce:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C ,~kat?ti~~`'''`~'i~h~-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Plione: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
August 21, 2006
S8~EC Project # 6442.W1
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260

Office Use Only: Fonn Version March OS
20061347
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~`~ ~~-~
Name: Howard Farms of Person County, LLC. '~~ ~ '~~~'-' 131
Mailing Address: Attn: Lin Cates
P.O. Box 679 ~~ r ~ ~_ 2006
Roxboro, NC 27573 ,
UEI~f. - ~~FeT ~ ~4 A~ tiRA~fCFi
v~El'{ANGS ~0 STQ.
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jason Payne
Company Affiliation: Soil 8~ Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Fax Number: [phone]
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Howard Farms
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0922-04-53-7111.000
4. Location
County: Person Nearest Town: Roxboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Howard Farms
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The property is located on the west side of SR 1746 at the intersection of SR
1746 and Readeland Court.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.2905 N, 78.9155 W
6. Property size (acres): + 66 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: North Flat River (27-3-2; WS-III;NSW)
8. River Basin: Neuse 03-04-01
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River
Basin map is available at h~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is forested. Land use surrounding the project is a mix of agriculture,
timberland, and rural housing.
Page 2 of 9

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project encompasses the construction of a residential housing
development. A road crossing is proposed to provide access to the northern
portion of the project. Heavy equipment typically used for grading and
excavation will be utilized for this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed work is to construct a residential community to
provide housing for the growing population in the area. The purpose of the
proposed roadwork is to construct an access that will connect an otherwise
isolated portion of the parcel north of the stream.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC personnel conducted a soil suitability study during July, 2001. During the
soil evaluation, drainage features and otherwise unsuitable areas were noted on a
soil suitability map. S8~EC returned to the site in May, 2006 to conduct a
preliminary evaluation of the site and delineate wetlands that may exist in the
corridor of the proposed roadway. No previous permits or determinations have
been issued for this property.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
Page 3 of 9

should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed road construction will result in approximately 142 linear feet of
important, perennial stream in Person County, NC.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and fl~oding_
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(es/no) (linear feet

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
No wetlands were identified on the site during the preliminary evaluation.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Im act linear feet) (acres)
1 UT North Flat River Road Crossing Perennial 15' 142 0.0926
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 142 0.0926
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
Page 4 of 9

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0926
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0926
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 142
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The property is bisected from the northeast to the southwest by a large, perennial
stream. Due the configuration of the stream on the site in proximity to the
property boundaries and adjacent points of ingress and egress, a road necessary
to access the northern portion of the site could not be constructed without
crossing the stream. The client has avoided impacts to other streams on-site and
cannot avoid the crossing proposed in this application.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 9

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the client has minimized the stream impact to construct the road and
because the impacts are less than those typically required for mitigation, we
do not believe that mitigation should be required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wr~p/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 9

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify: Meuse )? Yes ®No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 4,218 3 0
2 3,088 1.5 0
Total 7,306 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular ftom the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet ftom the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Because the buffer impacts proposed are allowable within the regulations and
below the thresholds for buffer mitigation, we do not believe mitigation should
be required.
Page 7 of 9

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The proposed development consists of two phases of construction; the first
phase (lots 1-24) did not require 404/40 permit authorization, as no impacts
occurred. The second phase (lots 25-39) will require permit authorization for
completion. The percent impervious surface for the development has been
broken down by phase for review:
Lots 1 - 24: Roads: 0.72 acres
Houses: 2400 sfllot = 1.32 acres
Driveways: 1500 sfllot = 0.83 acres
Total 2.88 acres
Total area 38.10 acres
impervious = 7.6%
Lots 25 - 39: Roads: 0.61 acres
Houses: 2400 sfllot = 0.83 acres
Driveways: 1500 sfllot = 0.52 acres
Total 1.96 acres
Total area 25.30 acres
impervious = 7.7%
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The development will utilize single lot, on-site wastewater treatment systems
permitted by the county health department.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (1 SA NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401
Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared
by the NC Division of Water Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft
states that most residential subdivisions are unlikely to cause cumulative
Page 8 of 9

impacts. Howard Farms does not meet any of the three criteria of private projects
that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. We anticipate that you will advise
us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~~~1
--
Applicant/Agent sSignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Page 9 of 9

Rl1,G 16 2006 2: 14PM
08/18!2008.13:55 FAX
Noat6- Lrrolaar 27614 •
arrw.S.adE'+C.oom
p.2
336-597-3042
!Q)002
ConsuXtants,
!Aoo~e: (919) Bd6S9Q0 ~ Fax: (9t9)
All Hlsalsg To Lie Filled !n By I7ic Cu>rreN l.attdewntt or Munic~.$1 Of3i~ial
Name: _~~epr./ ~ s o~ ~ fin, - ~,.~~.~-
AddreBS: _~ Sa.[Pr. [~v.r~. T•-t~d~.. -
Phone:
Pmjoct Nan4elDescription: ~Ir ~.~.,1 ~.-~~j~cQ't
Date; ~.~1~1n~
The Department of the Assay
U.S. ArmyCorpr ofEagiaera~, WilmingtonDirtrict
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmingto4 NC 28402
Mtn:
Field Office: _ -_ __ _
Rr: Wetlands Rtlated Consulting end Permitting
To Whom [t May Concern:
S~SC Projod #
1, the ew'trttt landowner or municipal o6fiael, het'Cby designate and authod¢e Sail at Eavirontndlatl Consultants,
PA to act in my bei>elf as my agent in the processing o f permit appticatiams, co furnish upon request aupplemeatal
information in tatPpott of ttpplicatioas, tdc. from this day forward. The ~_ day ofd ~„/r 2~Q~,,, -
This notifieadion supersedes any previous comspondettce coneaming the agent for this project.
NOTfCE: T'rte and-eNzalios. for Na6dity and praferriopal courtesy reaaona~ la valyd muy for 8werntneat af'i1cWr to
cater tlse propetry why aaeoaspoakd by S&EC sNfT. Yoa should eaU Sk>6C to arra»ge a rice iaccting prior to
vidting the dt<~. /t
f-+ow~rd YR/M.S 0'` ~tfSO ~ COr"~ ~ «~
~E c/'
Print Property Owner's or Muaidpad ia1'a Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Gabtr+ee Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 2'7bOt
Pro 4 O 's or Municipa~officiat's signs e
cc: Mr.lason Payne
Soi! dt finvisonmeaW Consulturl8, PA
Charlotte Offioc: Gdensboro OFtioe:
236 LePhiltip Court Suite C 9g17•E Lewndple Drivc
Concord, NC 28025 GreensGan, TIC 27455
Pho~o: (~64) 720-4405 Phone: [phone]
Fax: (7Ui) 720-9406 Fan: (336) 54Q-8235
HUBBRRD RHD CRIES
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

r i,, ,\, _ .. S r . ~
~~`~~' ~ __, i r ~.y
~,
l `
.. ~,, ~ i
~ 1
'~
Y`,~
s
~ ter
~i;i )., ~ s ,„r j `V ~~ LYtNl~NG T~ V.s~~ r~r,
! i ~ - _,` r ..... it it ~ 1 `!'.i It ~' j ` ~j \ ! 1 57 c : ~J \~J t : / .,
~~_ ~ ' ~ f ~- ~ r t ~ y _
1, r^'{~ 1 I ! } r `~ ~ ., A 1!f ~~r i ~'t _ -' j~._~/ ~.,f ~~'~ S` +~!
~~~ >, ~ `.~ ~~ _ ~ \ ~, ~ i P: 1. A ~~ ~ (~~I~~. ~t if
_` ) +, : I. ( i ~ --_.. 1' ~ h E fir, ~ '~) / ! ~'~" 1~~~,F'
L~ ,~) Gem:.•.`~ , ~ ~~_~ ~ ~~~, /~~ ,` ~~ s ~ .ter, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~
,. L 1 t
` ~ ( ~S~)i f r t ~ ~ ~,4 r~ ~, .5 /',~ ~~~!' ~ ~ I~ ~tl f / 1 ~1. ,~ r--l~ i i~ '`a~ } f t'~~ _~/%F
~~ ,r' tr ~ r ~~iY~ /~r~ f ~~ ~~ rI ~~ f ~n~ ~,A f ~ / ~ ~;~f~
~ ` ~~\ ~' 1~ s~ e i s l+// s ~ ~ r / ~ I
_r' ~ ~ ~5~ ~- ! ~~.~/'f ""\~ ~ ~ ~ !.r l rf .--- i 1123 '~' ~r~ i
?~ ~ (;\ ~'~-1rt t (j1 ! '. r. yr/ ,; 1 '~ I
u, t .'1 i ... ,,.~ 1'. ( L r ,s~Cl~"3~, ; .~e-- 'ti ~7~ \ i ~'1 ~ .. 1 /lI r
-~/t •' _
~\. -I1 .~ ~ ~J y
'~t s
f / ~ ,~ ~~
~~ ' r` y
.~ '' ~ ',. ~ ~r
r j q ~ S i i"±S.
I
/ ~ ~,~ ~ ,
l -x
If ~~' - ,- - ~r ~-~~...
~-
O -ti -- - ~~
,j %'r~ { ~ ~ ,,~ ,
f 't~;r i~ '~ft,rf
~ '' ~, ~ r~
._,~ J ~„~~,00(
fi~4
Project No.
6442.W 1
Project Mgr.:
JP
Scale:
1" = 2,000'
08/15/06
2,000
7
11 1++~

N t r, ( i
i NJ~ l

~ s i t ~i
t
T*'~( ~\ }
r
-- '---
r-, 4 1. ~ ~
'
i ~_, . ,

_-, i ti
t iti ~
i
~
l ! ~_1 ~ ,
~ f
~~' l
~ --
S
~_ . .,~,..--
f
f
. _r,r~~'_.~'ft~ z ,
.
,,

Figure 1 - 1:24K USGS
topographic Quadrangle
Chambers & Cates Tract
Howard Farms
Person County, NC
Timberlake quadrangle
Dated 1981
1
yy~
1 _\1 ~ +,. r i/41~4~,;1L(4 ~t.i J ~ ~'/ ~~ '~ - / \ f~1 f ".
4 ~,~~,~,
,-~` Ja-x'"56? ~.--, ~ ~ {/ ~(j ! --ti, -~'-„ ~ ~ 1 { S- ~~t\`~~\. ,.
i i _.- r. sic i r 'lf •{"~, 1~":.=~ C`.._-~t. L~ t~, t .~i t:..
j Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.^ Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com

,.
,: , -
~. -
.. ~ ., .... _... ~; k
- -
~I
i- .
\ `
r ~.. - i = '
~ ~
_. - .. ;~
v_.-.- / ~ L .~ I i I `
.-..- I i __. r0~ v ) _
- ..,
'Y'~ l ~ ~
r I ilk( ~j, i , IV~~~\\ f \~ ;!\ ~'rI! ~~1 ~, ~~HYr; ~ ~--n ~ l f I1
~~, ' ~`~ ~ / ~\~_ ~.\~~~ {~ ~_` ~_.~ ~ sae-C ~ ~ _~~~~ _°l~H (~,/~/ J'y r j_,
(\ /) ( %\f '~ 1,
~~ 1 ~ \1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ / L~Q l ,_, 4 ~~ ; /-r
I~ Hr6 . !~ oo ~ ) J
~~ ~ ~ % 111 ~\ ( ~~ HrE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~... ~ - Y"_ r try -
,( ~ ~
.~ ~l ~1 ~~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ oa / ~. Eye ~ .~ ~ i ~ i•.., I
t> >~i/;~ \~( Hrh~C.l~Z~/ ~ ~ Hr3 ' CN /.~~ \ F?rf' ~~ ~ ;~`l t ~,~ ~ .'~,
~!~ ~ ~~ -~< <6' ~ ~ ~Pi ~) Y~\.-'~ Hrl3 ~g8 ' I f rPV ~ ~ frR \ C ~
'~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~ ,C, j m HrB~-.~, ~~ In7 ~ HeR ~ ,~.- i , '` ~~
~.,,
~ HrB ~.I ~ ~ ~ i iz ~ o~~~ ~~ l ~ HrFt _ ~_ ~ ~.~,~ it {'
l / C e° - LcH _ ~ ]'-IirC ~ -~i i .~' B ~ > "'o ~. ~J. ~"~i ~ Cy
~' !:gE ~l °^ Z~1 Hr8 1 Cr~~ I~ ~ ~ ~ CEg , ,i ~ ~l I~
~~, ._ \ / ~. ~.r ~A ~-\~~ _ ~~ ~ i
( L \ 1709 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; - -,-1 ~y:~ r rs .` .:
~ LgH ~ Lg 3' ~ // ~ , Flr ~ t1{
.~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~, - "~-;~,r gee ;,~.• 1 ~~1 ~
r` °° 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ V ~.AGeB ~I ~ "~ a ns I ~ „cam ~, ~ I ~CI ~ ,-~ rC' i.i~~
L j/)y ~.
f ~ 1 } -'
tit ,
~/ I
r
t ~__
i -F-. E;~~ , t}~ ~ ~ Frr ~\~ J ~ /f; 4\;~ ~~1 >>Ci- ~a~ ~.-~~
1 /J
~ - ~ ~ ~ --~x, ~~ er / -Y`GEC t j. ~ " \~ ~J~' ~~r~~~..'a+de, r ~ ~ _ .L. ~.
c„ ~ (( L_ ,
Lev ~ ~ ~ Ce~ ~e ~ ~' i- t FC J ~ ~ _Ci~
r J ~/ ~~~~ / Hrt ~- ~ !~ ~ ~y~
t 1 ~ ~! :~ ~..-r ~- -~
~T, G e a e~ ~~~~ . i ~ ~ .- ~ L u~, ~ ,~--~ - ~ ~ ''~ ~' ~ ~~ ,, ~` jJ ~'~ t
t-~ ( ~
`~ -'~ lY ~:, ~, i Al ~ ! / ~ - S
~ ~',r rF ~ - ~ t~ ' n ~ L e
~F ~`-' ~f/ ~1 "i -~ J~' •. 1 ~J~ ~ ~ C~tc/ ~,.~1 -~, '~~ ` _~(' 1 - ~ : ~`~~t t~ `l,
.~ ll ~'ti ~~ ~./ ~ t .ice ~ ~ rs" -. / ~ l~ \~
~f-r~) ~ _.i~~ ~ ~rJ,~J/ 1'/~r ~ l.Ny(',r~. ,.ti`~~ ^' ~ - L€B ~ llr[. ~~~~ 1 ~,, ~
~ ~ ~~ ~
,r._~ \\ 1~1 ~ r~'_I.iC i ~'~' Ler' ° ~ fi3E~( \\~ ;e8 ~ ?`. tICF ~ 1` ' -_
- .-
t 1
Project No. Figure 2 - NRCS S®il
s4a2.w1 Survey Map
..,,-- ~,
Project Mgr.: Chambers & Cates Tract ~`~ ` r ~' ~'
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P1~
Jason Payne Howard Farms Yk~~. - ~ 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
s~aie: Person County, NC {' ~~ ~~~' '`~ [phone] • [phone]
~~ :~, ~ ~~ ~,.~ ~~-~~~~.il ~n~r.SandEC.com
1 = 2,000 -i- =-- -~ ~~ `'~ .,. e° J ~)
Pecs®a~ Ccaur~ty S®il S~c~ey ~ j
~,
08/15/06 June 1995 ,~;Ij(; ~ ~ 1
41c~*ai; .:`Frr a; !:~~.~ i 'r
~ I~ F1,~'ef 1~ I G 'ry5 Si!~MK'+~ f M ''IL^•,~+~{,h'

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,~„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
S rti ~ -
1. Applicant's name: Lew ~ ~, e ~ P~~sor. (s 2. Evaluator's name: G' D
3. Date of evaluation: fir! ~` 4. Time of evaluation: ~ ~ 3 S
5. Name of stream:- f/lT ~ ~la'{ ~•>"t-r 6. River basin: /~~PJc,4 ~ ~
7. Approximate drainage area: ~" `JS :-~Gl~S 8. Stream order: 3`J
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~ ~~ 10. County: Pt~S c `^
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): ~ l~~_~', ~'~~ -S
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3~ • ~ ~ 0 ~ Longitude (ex. -77.556611): r ~~ ' ~ ~ S 5
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS ~ Other GIS' Other 7J Pc 2a 4~ e•
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): R~.a G or S ~~
15. Recent weather conditions: ~ G ~~ ~ a' y ~ rf ` ,~ / 1
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ~'I/a o ~C~ ~Pw!'~'~-t y ~ ~- ve p~+~-cJ ~ ~ ,~ 5 ~"
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters ~ Nutrient Sensitive Waters /-Water Supply Watershed ~(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: ,~ stn
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width: f y ,
.+
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends
_% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
Cleared /Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): Y
-Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ^ ~G( h Comments: rG ~(~. ~~~~- 5 1~~,.1. ~V 1 ~ c.~~ ~.«.~
Evaluator's Signature ~~' ~`~- Date ~/ 5 /~`
This channel evaluation for is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
~ CIIARACTF,RISTICS
~ ECOREG IOI~ l'OINT IZ.ANGF _~ SCORh.,
~.
` ~Coaslal •:'
. Piedmont .Mountain-~

l
Presence of Ilow /persistent pools in stream .:

_
_" (no flow or saturation =0; stron~~ flow = max points) -
_ _- 0 - 4
__ ~___ - 5
_ __ !~

` 2 Evidence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration = 0; nn alteration = max Dints
P _
0
0 - 5
- 5
a - - ----- - -- - ---
3 Riparian zone .

(no buffer = 0; coati uous,~widc.buffcr = max points)
--- - ~---
0 -
0 - 4
0 - _ 3
4 ~•~ , F,v-dence of nutrient or chemical discharges

.~ '(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) ~; 0-5' - 0 -4 -4 3
~~' . `~ ,:~ Groundwater discharge
~
"
~

U
(no discharge = 0 springs seeps, wetlands, etc, - ma~omU) 0 0 4~ 4 3
}-+ ~ ~ '~ ~.`Presence of adjacent floodplam• -„ ;` _ -
,r., ~ #~ no flobdplarn Q; oxtensive floodpl yin = max pornts) .~r ,

-x' V
~ ~
>~ IJntrenchmen~Ihoodhlarn access ~ Ex
~'^.~~
`~
~ ~~ ~~ 1 entircnched
~ ~'rcgu
entfloodm~~_=max~ornts)~ ~ ~,x ~„,~ '=~~
r {
"~ " ~$ ~ ~ ~
_
~
-3~resence of9dlaccnt wcflands ~ ^~~',
, ~
~
~ ~~ ,~
'
~ '~ ~ 1 ~
£
_
_
..n no;~ etlands 0~1ar~,e. adjacent wetlands = max pornts) ' + ~~
ya0
~
t
~ {; 7 Ea;, ' 0 a
~
: ,~z
~F ~~
~
'2 ~

~
<~.~~~ ;;Channclsrnuosrty ~ .. •
•~}~ ~~ `~
~ ,, ., ,
'
,, exteilsrve c iannelrzation t); Natural rireandc.r max points)
x =
~
T
~ ~
~' l01 ~~
~ r5edimennput
~'~
'~
~
- _t.
,
~:. ~
- _ )~
extensrvc, de osrtion`'.O; little or no sediment - inax' Dints [ _
3
11 _ '+
Size ~C diversity of channel bed substrate ~~'"~ r~,
,
' ::fine homoi~enous = 0;7arae, diverse sizes - max poinisj "
~ _ ~ _ _ v
~.
"` ^ N ~,~'
-~ . t ~ .
0 4
S y

r
J : ` 12 ~_` .• Evidence`of channel incision or widening ,
;:
`
~ ---

;:

(dceptti~ inctsed D; stable bed R banks = max points) '
5."
0-4
_
5
_ 3

i3'' _
t~ Presence of ma'o~ bank faildres '
; ~ Y;
.
- J - •'
s

r-r - .
,
(severe erosion O;no erosion, stable banks - may points) ~ 0- 0-5 0 Z.

_
~ _
x
t ~ Root do th and densrf on banks
~
`
'
"
~
~
'~ 3
0 4
5
F,~ ~(ho ~s161e riots ~0
dense toots
t
hi=ounhont .ri~ax
points)
+. `
~ ~ ~"Impact by agncul[urc, ~rvestock,'~r~timber produchon~ :' ~ + s ~.
~_ ~~ ~ubstan'tial ympact ~ no evidence . nlak Points}
-- :-
--~- ~ ~:~~ ~a~
- = ~ ~~~
-
~` k16~~ -
rescnce'of.t'ift7c pooUrrpplc=pool complezcs ,~Y 4=,`
k 0 `` ~t '' ; 0 5 T `

~..~°
~
:
r n ~e~hr lcs or .Dols ' p'~
PP
P well=tie,Veloped niax points)

~ ,„ ':
0 6 ; .5

`
~x~a i
r
s Lke +~y~ s~ wklabltaiCOmplCCltx~~~^.~ ~ 7`' a'~ .'
~:
4
'
.
a ~ a?~~i~~~~ ~ ~~? ~ ~~ ~ a - /

~~
*
' • :
. ~
4.'r
~
r~o'ha =
t btt
~r uea~ ~ ' )
~.,A ~~'artedhabrtais max Dints
-
~

~ ~ =,~F 1

~ ~~,i•

~': r~

S

;~,; 8` _ _
,
~~ ~,.~
~ ~,~~anoPY ~ver~ge pti e `~trcarzibec~ ' ~ ~`~!~~'
4
j~h ,~ s~ s~~~
~~
~
~

,` ~
.{t r :
t.~` d k~ i. .il_'s ~ ~ ~ r w. '.y, ~t~:,~. CA : uT'
~ Ye~efa'~r~in
, 0 rAntrn~ous canc,py ~~-~aa oan'~s)
X ~ :. i
' ~
~
1J .7
`~ 4
~ ~~~ 3
~ .
~'" s~u'es'lrate einbcdde`dness `'
~ ~ ~'
` '~ ~?- w '
; ~ ' s~~
~
-
;; X19
~ ~ ,
~
}~~ ~ . ~.z ,. ~ ~
,.
k
" ~~ ' o ~ ,
?
~ ~~

'
` dc~l}r ~m6eode~ ~ Dose max r
,StrllCtllfC ~ . ~ ' Yx~f
r

,.'}
° ~, 3

r~
, 2Q f
~,~Presence of stream inti ericbr.itcs (see p i~~'4) ,-= ;.k
,
,
,-'

~(no evidence ~0; common,°nunierous types n~ax points) ,~
, 0 S ~ 3
-~ ~ 1 ~~x ' :; , ;, Presence of amphibi ins
' -

r0
.
.n~~ ~{no evidence = 0; comrnvn; numerous types nia~oints) 4 , 0-4 0 4
~ ~
:a ~ _ _
° -
r .~ , ,~ n ~
. - Pr'cscncc oC fish _. _ ~
-- ~- -
~ ' 4, (no evidence - 0; common, numerous types mar points) _ _ '
_
~ ~ E~'IdCrICC Of Rlldlrfe IISC
,
~ i
~ ~ ~-
; ~
no c~ id~nc~ 0 abundant c~ ~
( _____ den~~ mix points)
L `
~f ,~ ~~ rz ,'Total Pointti 1'ossibte'r .~ ~.. 100 ~. 10(1
•
-` a ~ ~~ ;~ ~r "" ~'<TO7'~1L ,SCO1Zr
(also enter o~i fi
- rst }~a~;ej '` ~
_ ~
_ ~ b
~
^' i nese cnaracterrstres are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ~/~ /~
Evaluator: `~~/~~ P
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ? 19 or erennial if ? 30
Project: ~}e4,.~ ~~~5
Site: Pt~S~ ~,,,,,..1-y
Countw: P~-~e-~---
Latitude: ~ S _ ~ ~ G~
Longitude: - ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ S
Other 7 ~`:~ i5~~ <<.i~e
e.g. Quad Name: ~y~,N„
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = /~ ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 ~
2. Sinuosity 0 1 'Q- 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 '3~
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 `2- 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 '~ 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 ~ 3
7. Braided channel ~6-~ 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 ~ 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 `1- 2 3
10. Headcuts `A-. 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 1?5-_ 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 'I'mo
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
" Man-made ditches are not rated; seQe discussions in manual
6. Hvdrnlnnv (Suhtntal = L~ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 '~
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or rowi season 0 1 `S. 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 `'h 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 '6:5-- 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 ~ 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes =~95~.
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = ~ 1
20°. Fibrous roots in channel ' 3 `F~. 1 0
21 °. Rooted plants in channel 3 '~ 0
22. Crayfish 0 b:5- 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 ~ 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; per9phyton b~ 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1 1.5
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV =~9;, Other = 0
-Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)

Data Form
Routine Wetland Determination
Job Number: 6442.W1
city:
Wetland Data Point: Upland
ProjecUSite: Howard Farms
ApplicanUOwner: Howard Farms of Person Co. LLC
investigator: Jason P.
Date: May 09, 2006
County: Person
State: NC
[X] Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland
[ ]Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: Data Pt 1
[ ] Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID:
Vegetation
Dominant,_.__Species,_ Common Name % Cover Indicator
Herbaceous
X Polystichum acrostichoides Fem,Christmas FAC
X Eulalia viminea Microstegium,Nepal FAC+
Tree
X Betula nigra Birch,River FACW
X Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ash,Green FACW
X Liriodendron tulipifera Tree,Tulip FAC
X Acerrubrum Maple,Red FAC
Quercus albs Oak,White FACU
Yt~
X Parthenocissus quinquefolia Creeper,Virginia FAC
X Lonicera japonica Honeysuckle Japanese FAC-
%Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (except FAC-): 87 Cowardin Classification:
Remarks
Hydrology
[ ]Recorded Data (describe in remarks)
[ ]Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ ]Aerial Photograph
[ ]Other (describe in remarks)
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0
Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >14
Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >14
Remarks
Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
[ ]Inundated
[ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches
[ ]Water marks
[ ]Drift lines
( ]Sediment deposits
[ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands
Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ ]Oxidized root channels
[ ]Water-stained leaves
[ ]Local soil survey data
[ jFAC-Neutral test
[ ]Other (explain in remarks)
$OIIS
Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle / 2nd Mottle Texture,
(in.) Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 10YR 4/1 Loamy Sand
2-7 6 2.5YR 4/3 Sandy Clay Loam
7-12 2.5YR 5/4 Silt Loam
Hydric Soils Indicators
[ ] Histosol
[ ] Histic Epipedon
[ ] Sulfidic Odor
[ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime
[ ]Reducing Conditions
[ ] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee Soils
Drainage Class: somewhat poorly to poorly
Remarks
[ ]Concretions
[ ]High Organic % in Surface Layer
[ ]Organic Streaking
[ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[X] Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ ]Other (explain in remarks)
Taxonomy: Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts and Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts
[ ]Field Observations match map
Wetland Determination
[X] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ ]Hydric Soils Present
[ ]Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks
[ ]This Data Point is a Wetland
Page 1 of 1

~ Project
' ~~~~~~~Q~Q~Q~~Q~~~~~~~ HOWARD FARMS
EnGirvEERInG~vUnnlnGl/uVD SURVEYinG1Ar1D5CPaE MGnOECrUnE Own¢fID¢V¢Ope!
111 West Moira S(reet Ournam, Nw(h Carolina 77701
PHONE [phone]}68 FAX: [phone]fi46 HOWARD FARMS
TIMBERLAKE, NC 27583
Job Number: 0632
PRELIMINARY
NOT RELEASED o1¢wrv xR
FOR CONSTRUCTION Cnecxee sve
Date 7ini«
Re~s~s
Sheet Tille: Sheet Number:
OVE LL
SITE LAN
NOTES:
1. LOTS 1-24 ARE PART OF EARLIER DEVELOPMENT PHASES.
2. LOTS 25-39 COMPRISE CURRENT AND FINAL PHASE OF
DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS PARCEL.
PROPOSED LOT
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
v
BOUNDARY (TYP.) PRE-DEVELOPMENT PARCEL BOUNDARY (TYP.)
~N
i¢
~1 SITE
S9 ~4', i49tlC pE~ h
~' ~ RR 17th
MCI ~FlEryti~~ /
. ~~y SR I>IS ~ O
bry \ •
ro
~'
.~o+ ` 6
BOPO SP
lQ u a
~~Py9y SW
\\
O I I 300 0 300 600 900
Scale 1" = 300'
Z
~i~~~ -~1
, f~
AIY~f 2 9 29C~
~1i.;
~ ~~r :iriC;j!
VICINITY MAP
NOi TO SCALE

z~
IMPACTS
CHANNEL: 4050 SF / 142 LF
BUFFERS:
ZONE 1: 4218 SF
ZONE 2.~ 3088 SF
EDGE OF NEUSE RIVER
BUFFER ZONE 2
_ _ _ - - ~,.
20' ~~ •, EDGE OF NEUSE RIVER
`- BUFFER ZONE 1
30' ~ _ _ ~~p J..
F~~~.
- \ J ~F S ,p~LF
F~ ~
_ _ _ - \ 'piL~ ~G~
RIP RAP OUTLET \ \ ~ ' ,Jr ~'A'. ~`~~
F~
PRO rECTION OF CHANNEL, ~ ~ ~ =' '' ~ ~`~ ~` ~ ~ - ~~ ~' "~~
~ ;~ „, ,. GTe /'
CLASS 1 STONE, 56 LF ~ ~-,~~, `ar ~~~or, ~ ~~ ~'~"~.
~ ~~E~,< <.o~~~o ~ ~`, A
A ~. ,
~~~. ~ ~G
\ F~
~
~
~,
~F , ~
PROPOSED

50' R/W ~ ~ ~>>
`~
`~~ ~~~
Ur FERN
~
~
~~~
r
`~
\.
u~
~, ~~~
/ ~ \\

~'

' ~
/
~
/ ~,~ 1
, ~" /
~ /,
,C
//
/ / i ~
~
i ~ /
~ Q ~ /
k,
~l ~
' '
~ /
~ ~~ ,/ ~ i
\, PROPOSED ROAD ~ I ~
CENTERLINE -' i
I I
END OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT

EXIST/NG EOP EDGE OF NEUSE RIVER
BUFFER ZONE 2
\ EX~sr~NC ROAD
~ ~ CENTERLINE
€t,
,t~ 3 ~t~
~ ~ ~~~ ~ _ ~ >~
~t ~ ~F~

^~-W-h
n ~..

VI
r % , ,.
/ '.
I ;/
~ ~ i
~ l ~I I
~'
f
r' ,-
I
EX. TOP OF
CREEK BANK

I
I
1
I
1
I
-SEDIMENT TRAP ~
(rrP.) 1
I
1
1
PROPOSED 18'~
PAVEMENT ~
I
~,,~
~'~
----_ __ Q
PROPOSED 120"
D/A. CMP CULVERT
70' LONG
EDGE OF NEUSE RIVER -' 40 0 40 80 120
BUFFER ZONE 1
Scale 1 " = 40'
-' ~'- ,
~~_
IJ
'I^r
,I
I
~ PRELIMINARY -
~ NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
r~
f
~_~
~`_
~o~
~'=q
~~~<
~_~`
~=a~
~=°o
~ p'P
=a
~ W;~
Q
3
m
a,
n
n
~u
E_
a
¢Y
m ~~
fm
o IF
f
0
PRELIARNARY
NOT RELEASED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
Jo0 Number: 0892
~,r.
Revisans
Shoat TiNe:
WETLAND
IMPACT
Sheet Number
CD 2e0A