HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191261 Ver 2_MBI_20191219ID#* 20191261 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 12/27/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal-12/19/2019
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* C Yes C No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer W Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Company/Owner:* EcoTerra Partners, LLC
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Ted Griffith ted@ecoterra.com
Project Information
Project Type: Q DMS C Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Kittrell Hill Nutrient and Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Bank
County: Pitt
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Bank Instrument
File Upload: MBI_KITTRELL HILL_12_19_19.pdf 599.85KB
Hease upload only one PDF of the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ted Griffith
Signature:*
1
AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE KITTRELL HILL MITIGATION
BANKING INSTRUMENT IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN FOR RIPARIAN
BUFFER AND NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION CREDITS PURSUANT TO
THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PREAMBLE ...................................................................................................................... 2..
II LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA .................................................... 2
III. AUTHORITIES ................................................................................................................. 3
IV. ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL ....................................................................... 3
V. BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE ............................................................. 4
VI. POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION ............................................................. 6
VII CALCULATION OF MITIGATION CREDITS .............................................................. 9
VIII. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE ................................................................................... 10
IX. PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING MITIGATION CREDITS ............ 10
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE ........................................................................................... 12
XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS .............................................................................................. 13
ATTACHMENTS
A - Division of Water Resources Authorities for UMBI/MBI
B - Buffer Ledger Template
C - Nutrient (Nitrogen) Offset Ledger Template
D - Rule Text 15A NCAC 02B .0240
E - Rule Text 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Effective November 1, 2015)
2 2
I. PREAMBLE
This Mitigation Banking Instrument ("Instrument") regarding the establishment, use,
operation, and maintenance of the KITTRELL HILL Nutrient and Buffer Mitigation Bank
Parcel ("Bank Parcel") to provide Neuse Riparian Buffer mitigation credit ("Riparian Buffer
Credits") and Neuse Nutrient Strategy nutrient load reduction credit ("Nutrient Offset
Credits") is made and entered into by and among EcoTerra Partners, LLC acting as the Bank
Sponsor ("Sponsor"), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality-
Division of Water Resources ("DWR"). This Instrument is in accordance with 15A NCAC
02B .0240 and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, which
became effective on November 1, 2015 (Attachment D and E).
The purpose of the Bank is:
A. To improve water quality, reduce nutrient loads, enhance flood attenuation and restore
wildlife habitat along tributaries to Oldwoman Branch and nutrient sensitive waters of Little
Contentnea Creek, through the restoration of riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas.
B. To convert agricultural land uses with riparian areas associated with streams and/or
agricultural ditches into a fully stocked forested community with the intent to substantially
reduce nutrient loadings into surface waters associated with agricultural land uses.
C. To provide mitigation and sell any resulting Riparian Buffer Credits and/or Nutrient Offset
Credits to third parties in Hydrologic Cataloging Unit (HUC) 03020203 of the Neuse River
Basin, for both existing and proposed development and NPDES-permitted wastewater
facilities requiring such mitigation.
II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA
A. The Geographic Service Area ("GSA") is the designated area wherein a Bank can
reasonably be expected to sell Riparian Buffer Credits and/or Nutrient Offset Credits for
impacts due to development activities.
B. The GSA for this Instrument is limited to the United States Geological Survey (“USGS”) 8-
digit Hydrologic Unit Code ("HUC'') 03020203 of the Neuse River Basin.
C. The project is comprised of one parcel of land in Pitt County, NC, accessed from Kittrell
Hill Road, northeast of Farmville, NC. Land use within the Bank parcel is currently row
crop agriculture with unnamed tributaries draining to Oldwoman Branch. The project is located
at approximately 35°36' 40.1" N and 77°32' 42.1"W.
D. Sale or transfer of Riparian Buffer Credits shall be limited to the 8-digit HUC 03020203 in
the Neuse River Basin, unless otherwise authorized by the DWR or delegated local
3
government in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
E. Sale or transfer of Nutrient Offset Credits shall be limited to the 8-digit HUC 03020203 in
the Neuse River Basin in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240, unless otherwise
authorized by the DWR in accordance with S.L. 2019-86.
III. AUTHORITIES
A. The Bank will be used to provide Riparian Buffer Credit and Nutrient Offset Credit in
accordance with the requirements in the DWR Authority document referenced herein as
"Attachment A" and attached to this Instrument.
B. Projects eligible for utilization of the credits are those requiring authorization under the
requirements of Attachment A and any new approved North Carolina ("State") statutes and
rules for the Neuse Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy.
C. All activities, including the selling of mitigation credits shall be consistent with approved
State statutes and rules for the Neuse Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy.
D. Mitigation activities proposed under this Instrument and corresponding Bank Parcel
Development Package (BPDP) to generate Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset
Credits shall be consistent with North Carolina statutes and rules for the Neuse Nutrient
Sensitive Waters Management Strategy that are in place at the time a complete BPDP is
submitted to DWR.
IV. ESTABLISHMENT OF KITTRELL HILL BANK PARCEL
A. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC 02B .0240, DWR has provided a
"Site Viability Letter" for the Bank Parcel proposed under this Instrument. The Site
Viability Letter is not an approval of the site to generate mitigation credits, but is a
preliminary review of the Bank Parcel that details and confirms existing land use conditions,
defines the riparian sites (Enhancement Preservation, or Restoration), and identifies features
(streams, ditches, ponds, etc.) that meet general criteria to be suitable to generate mitigation
credits. One (1) Site Viability Letter that applies to this Bank Parcel was issued by DWR on
December 18, 2019.
B. A valid Site Viability Letter is required prior to submittal of each BPDP. Site Viability
Letters will either expire on the dates listed in the table above or upon submittal of an
individual As-Built Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. If a Site Viability Letter
expires prior to submittal of a complete BPDP as described in Section V to DWR, then the
Sponsor must submit a formal request to DWR for a new Site Viability Letter for that Bank
Parcel.
C. The Bank Parcel proposed for inclusion under this Instrument shall require a Bank Parcel
4
Development Package ("BPDP") be submitted to, and approved by, the DWR prior to use
of the Bank Parcel for mitigation purposes or sale or transfer of any associated credits. The
contents of the BPDP are provided in Section V.
D. The BPDP will be placed on public notice and made available for public commenting for 15
calendar days.
E. Riparian Buffer Credit may be achieved through restoration of DWR riparian buffers as
they are defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0259, and other riparian areas as allowed per 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (n) and (o). Riparian buffer credits are only attainable if the width of
the restoration site is within at least 20 feet from tops of banks along streams and 30
feet from tops of banks along ditches. Riparian buffer credits are attainable to a
maximum of 200 feet from tops of banks of streams and 50 feet from the tops of banks
of ditches.
F. The Bank Parcel is intended to provide Neuse Riparian Buffer mitigation as follows:
1. Planting hardwood trees on a Restoration Site, as defined in 15A NCAC 02B
.0295(b) adjacent to two intermittent streams.
2. Planting hardwood trees on a Restoration Site, as defined in 15A NCAC 02B
.0295(b) and (o) adjacent to ditches
3. Diffused flow will be maintained onsite. The Buffer Interpretation/Clarification
Memo #2008-019 applies where maintenance of diffuse flow onsite is
unattainable.
G. Nutrient Offset Credit on this Bank Parcel may be achieved through restoration of the
riparian areas adjacent to the intermittent streams and ditches where agriculture is the
predominant land use. The ditches flow directly into intermittent streams that drain
offsite to the Oldwoman Branch that flows into Little Contentnea Creek. The width of
the restoration area begins at the most landward limit of the top of bank or the rooted
herbaceous vegetation and extends landward a minimum of 50 feet and a maximum of
200 feet on all sides of the surface waters.
H. The Bank Parcel is expected to provide Nutrient Offsets as follows:
1. Converting agricultural land uses within riparian areas to non-agricultural land
uses by placing a conservation easement around riparian areas along streams.
2. Planting hardwood trees on a Restoration Site, as defined in 15A NCAC 2B
.0295(b) adjacent to intermittent streams and ditches where agriculture has been
determined by DWR to be the predominant landuse.
I. The total area of riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset on the Bank Parcel is
expected to be less than 20 acres.
V. BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
5
A. The Kittrell Hill Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP) submitted under this
Instrument shall be submitted to DWR for review and must be approved by DWR prior
to any construction on the Bank Parcel. The BPDP must describe any changes that have
occurred to the site between the date of the Site Viability Letter and the date the BPDP
is submitted to DWR. The BPDP shall include detailed information consistent with the
sections below concerning; 1) site location (8-digit HUC is required); 2) existing
conditions with current photos; 3) proposed buffer mitigation and nutrient offset
activities including a detailed vegetation plan; 4) monitoring and maintenance plans; 5)
financial assurances; 6) associated buffer mitigation/nutrient credit calculations, which
shall include credit generation, service area, and accounting as appropriate for each
regulatory authority; 7) stream buffer determination letter from DWR; 8) Site Viability
Letter from DWR; 9) service area figure for each mitigation type proposed under this
Instrument.
B. The Sponsor will obtain all applicable federal, state, and local documentation, permits,
or authorizations needed to construct and maintain the Bank Parcel. This Instrument
does not qualify as, or substitute for, such documentation, permit, or authorization.
C. Any restoration activities or construction within the stream, riparian buffers and other
riparian areas on the Bank Parcel to produce Riparian Buffer Credit or Nutrient Offset
Credit must be approved by DWR in writing prior to implementation. The failure of
the Sponsor to comply with this requirement may result in a revised or reduced credit
release schedule.
D. Requests for deviation from the approved BPDP must be submitted to DWR in
writing. Written approval from the DWR must be received prior to implementing any
deviation from the approved BPDP.
Property Disposition & Long-Term Management
E. Prior to the release of any credits, the Sponsor shall acquire a permanent conservation
easement at the Pitt County Register of Deed's office that is sufficient to ensure
protection, operation and maintenance of restored riparian buffers and other riparian
areas for the duration specified in the approved BPDP.
F. The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards
employed by the State of North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers
and riparian areas and shall be approved by the DWR prior to the release of any
credits.
G. The Sponsor shall not grant additional easements, right of ways, or any other property
interest in or to the project areas, without prior approval from the DWR.
H. The Sponsor agrees to transfer or assign the conservation easement and its interests in
perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121-34 et seq. and
6
170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code prior to the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring
Report. The holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program that will hold and
enforce the conservation easement and the interests in perpetuity. The Sponsor shall
choose a land trust or stewardship program that is accredited by the Land Trust
Accreditation Commission and/or has been approved by DWR prior to the end of the
fourth year monitoring period. A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code.
I. In the event that the Sponsor is also the owner of the underlying fee interest in the
property, the conveyance of the conservation easement to a land trust or stewardship fund
must be arranged at the outset of the approved BPDP.
Financial Assurances
J. Following approval of the BPDP, the Sponsor shall provide a Performance /Maintenance
Bond from a surety company that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best to
construct the site according to the approved BPDP. It is the Sponsor's responsibility to
confirm that the surety company is rated at least "A-" with each annual bond renewal.
K. The Performance Bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of
the mitigation activities of the Bank Parcel as described in the approved BPDP. No bond
shall be less than $150,000.00 to cover construction costs.
L. Alternatively, in lieu of posting the Performance Bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct
the project prior to the first credit release.
M. Once DWR has released all credits for completion of all the items listed below, then the
Bank Sponsor will be released from its performance obligations under the performance
bond required in Item J and K of this section:
1. Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement Recorded, Financial
Assurance Posted;
2. Mitigation Site Earthwork and Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices
Completed;
3. As-Built Report as described in Section VI has been received by DWR; and
4. DWR has submitted a written approval of the As-Built Report.
N. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.
VI. POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION
As-Built Report
A. The Sponsor agrees to perform all necessary work, in accordance with the provisions of this
Instrument, to establish, maintain, and monitor Neuse Riparian Buffers or other riparian
areas until Item B (1) and (2) of Section X have been satisfied.
7
B. The Sponsor will submit an as-built plan and report for the Bank Parcel within 30
calendar days after completing the riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset areas.
The as- built report will describe any deviation from the approved BPDP and will
document all the following:
8
1. Buffer restoration: planting details and other construction activities that were
required in the BPDP, invasive species control, monitoring device locations,
vegetation plot locations, photo point locations, surface and groundwater
elevations, as appropriate.
2. Boundary Survey of the conservation easement area, signed and sealed by a
licensed surveyor, including an enumeration of the final mitigation areas for
riparian buffer credits and nutrient offset credits (in both square feet and acres).
3. As-built map of the mitigation area showing where riparian restoration was performed
and any deviations to the Bank Parcel from what was approved in the BPDP.
4. Aerial map of the mitigation area that was included in the approved BPDP.
Financial Assurance
C. After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance
Bond will be secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and
maintenance plan as described in the approved BPDP. The Bond must be from a surety
company that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best, and it is the Sponsor' s
responsibility to confirm that the surety company is still rated no less than an "A-" with
each annual bond renewal.
D. A Performance/Maintenance Bond shall be secured each year for a minimum of five years,
and until DWR has released all mitigation credits to the Bank Sponsor. Upon DWR
approval, the bond may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the
monitoring. No bond shall be less than $100,000 to cover monitoring and maintenance
costs. In lieu of posting the performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the
project prior to the first credit release. In that case no performance bond will be necessary.
E. Once DWR has released all credits for completion of Tasks 1-9 in accordance with the
credit release schedule in Section VIII, the Bank Sponsor can be released from its
performance obligations under the performance bond required in "C-D" of this Section.
F. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.
Monitoring and Maintenance Reports
G. The Sponsor shall monitor the Bank Parcel as described in the BPDP until such time as
DWR determines that the success criteria described below have been met. The monitoring
period shall be a minimum of five consecutive years.
H. Performance Standards for Vegetation: Native hardwood trees or native hardwood tree and
shrub species should be planted at a density sufficient to provide 260 stems per acre after
five years. A minimum of four (4) native hardwood tree or shrub species must be planted.
No one species shall be greater than 50% of the planted sterns. A list of species for planting
will be detailed in the BPDP for approval. Native hardwood tree volunteer species may be
included to meet performance standards as determined by the DWR.
9
I. A "stem" means a woody seedling, sapling, shrub or tree, no less than 10 centimeters
in height.
J. If the performance standards of the vegetation are not met, supplemental plantings may
be required. Supplemental plantings will be utilized until the required densities have
been achieved and maintained for five years. Bank Parcel maintenance; such as ensuring
diffuse flow, managing invasive species, and pest control will be included in the
BPDP.
K. Monitoring Reports for Riparian Buffer Credit or Nutrient Offset Credit: Reporting
criteria of the riparian restoration areas shall be based on the Carolina Vegetation
Survey (CVS)- EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level 2 Plot Sampling Only
Version 4.0 or any updated versions of this protocol in place at the date of acceptance
of the BPDP. The Sponsor shall submit to the DWR an annual monitoring report no
later than December 31 of each year for a minimum of five consecutive years after the
first full growing season. This report will describe the conditions of each Bank Parcel,
including an evaluation of the performance standards of the vegetation contained
within the approved BPDP. Reports shall contain the following:
1. A U.S. Geological Survey map showing location of the Bank Parcel;
2. A detailed narrative summarizing the condition of the Bank Parcel along with
any maintenance or remediation performed that year; and
3. A map, survey, or other figure showing locations of sampling plots, permanent
photo points, location of transects, etc.; and
4. Monitoring data, including specific vegetative counts showing that the trees or
tree and shrub species planted are meeting performance standards and updated
photographs; and
5. A copy of the most recent Bank credit/debit ledgers; and
6. Corresponding verification letters from designated local governments upon
request; and
7. Corresponding Mitigation Transfer Certificates upon request
8. Proof of performance bond renewal to cover the next monitoring year (if
applicable).
Contingency Plans/Remedial Actions
L. In the event the Bank Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria described in this
Instrument and the approved BPDP, the Bank Sponsor shall develop necessary
contingency plans in coordination with the DWR and implement appropriate remedial
actions for the Bank Parcel and the Bank. Depending on the degree of remedial actions
required, the DWR may modify the monitoring period.
10
VII. CALCULATION OF MITIGATION CREDITS
Riparian Buffer Credits
A. All Riparian Buffer Credits shall be determined based on the ratios and percentages
provided in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and (n).
B. Riparian buffer restoration on the Bank Parcel, as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(n) and (o), defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b) and performed on agricultural lands
within the Bank Parcel, may be used for either Riparian Buffer Credit or Nutrient
Offset Credit, but not both.
C. Riparian Buffer Credit is defined as one (1) buffer credit per one square foot or 43,560
buffer credits per one acre.
Nutrient Offset Credits
D. All Nutrient Offset Credits will be determined by including the applicable ratio as
provided in 15A NCAC 02B .0295(m) for a Restoration Site. All riparian areas
proposed for Nutrient Offset Credit must be a minimum of 50 feet from the top of
stream and ditch banks with adjacent agricultural land uses as noted in a Site Viability
Letter.
E. Nutrient Abatement of Restored Riparian Area/Buffers: The Sponsor and DWR agree:
1. The pounds of nitrogen offset per acre of restored riparian areas/buffers shall
be 2,273.02 pounds per acre.
F. The Sponsor and DWR agree that the methodology and calculations for determining
nitrogen and total phosphorous reduction, associated with restoration of riparian areas
on this Bank Parcel, shall be fixed as part of the approval of this Instrument , with the
fixed amount not changing unless the viability letter has expired and a BPDP has not
been submitted to DWR.
This space left blank intentionally, do not add text to this space.
11
VIII. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
A. Upon submittal of all appropriate documentation by the Sponsor, and subsequent
approval by DWR, it is agreed that the mitigation credits associated with the Bank
Parcel will become available for sale to a third party in accordance with the Credit
Release Schedule in Table 1 below:
Table I - Credit Release Schedule for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
Task
Project Milestone
% Credit
Available for
Sale
I
MBI and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement Recorded* and
Financial Assurance Posted
20
2
Mitigation Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed
20
3 Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As-Built Report 10
4 Monitoring Report #1: App roved by the DWR** & financial assurance renewed 10
5 Monitoring Report #2: Approved by the DWR** & financial assurance renewed 10
6 Monitoring Report #3: Approved by the DWR** & financial assurance renewed 10
7
Item B (I) of Section X in this Instrument has been completed and approved by
DWR.
5
No remaining credits will be released until Task 7 has been satisfied, assigning the conservation
easement to an approved land trust or long-term steward.
8 Monitoring Report #4: Approved by the DWR** & financial assurance renewed 5
9
Monitoring Report #5: Approved by the DWR** and final site visit by DWR has
been conducted
10
Total 100%
* For specification, please see Section V in this Instrument
** DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting success criteria contained within the
approved BPDP
B. DWR may modify the credit release schedule based on the information submitted
or the order in which required information is received. DWR will notify the
Sponsor of any modification to the credit release schedule.
C. DWR may consider a Credit Release Schedule for a Bank Parcel based on the
extent of change between current onsite conditions and proposed post construction
conditions.
IX. PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING MITIGATION CREDITS
Credit Ledgers
A. The Bank Sponsor shall maintain a credit ledger for each mitigation type for the
12
Bank Parcel under this Instrument: one accounting for Riparian Buffer Restoration
Credits in square feet and acres, and one accounting for Nutrient Offset Credits in
pounds and acres.
B. Each credit ledger shall be submitted on a separate 8 ½ in X 11in spreadsheet with
legible font style and font size. All ledgers shall be submitted using the templates
provided in Attachments B and C of this Instrument or any updated versions to
these templates as provided by DWR.
Credit Processing
C. Riparian Buffer Credits generated on this Bank Parcel must be provided to offset
impacts within the Neuse River Basin in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(g).
D. Nutrient Offset Credits generated on this Bank Parcel can only be provided to offset
nutrient loadings within the 03020203 HUC of the Neuse River basin in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
E. Available Riparian Buffer credits (credits that have been released by DWR, but
not sold by the Sponsor) that are generated from riparian buffer restoration, as
defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b) and described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and (o), the Site Viability Letter, and the corresponding BPDP, can be converted
from Riparian Buffer Credits to Nutrient Offset Credits. Once a credit has been
converted to another credit type, the transaction is permanent and the credit cannot
be converted again.
F. Available Nutrient Offset Credits (credits that have been released by DWR, but
not sold by the Sponsor) that are generated from nutrient offset buffer restoration,
as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b) and described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(n) and (o), the Site Viability Letter, and the corresponding BPDP, can be
converted from Nutrient Offset Credits to Riparian Buffer Credits upon written
approval from DWR. Once a credit has been converted to another credit type, the
transaction is permanent and the credit cannot be converted again.
G. All ratios and percentages of full credit will be applied to Riparian Buffer Credits
in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and (n) and ratios will be applied to
Nutrient Offset Credits according to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m).
H. Available mitigation credits that are generated from riparian restoration, as defined in 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (b) and described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) along two agricultural
ditches, are not able to be converted from Nutrient Offset Credits to Riparian Buffer
Credits unless the ditches meet all the requirements of 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8).
13
I. The Bank Sponsor shall obtain verification of nutrient offset need from a
designated local government in HUC 03020203 of the Neuse River Basin, or from
DWR through an approved NPDES permit facility for wastewater nutrient
sources, prior to debiting Nutrient Offset Credits from the Bank Parcel.
J. The Bank Sponsor shall obtain verification of buffer mitigation required from the
delegated local government in HUC 03020203 of the Neuse River Basin or DWR
prior to debiting Riparian Buffer Credits from the Bank Parcel.
K. After Bank Parcel Closure has commenced, which is described in Section X of this
Instrument, the Bank Sponsor will be unable to add mitigation credits to the
Kittrell Hill Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank.
L. All credit and debit transactions for each Bank Parcel under this Instrument shall
be accurately depicted in the credit ledgers. The Sponsor shall submit accurate and
up-to-date credit ledgers for each Bank Parcel by the tenth (10th) of each month. At
a minimum and only upon request, DWR shall receive a hard copy of updated
credit ledgers along with corresponding Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates and
all corresponding letters from the designated local governments or DWR where
applicable once a year. Notification of all credit sales shall be provided to DWR
until all credits that have been released have been sold.
Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates
L. All credit sales will include a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate ("Certificate”)
that is required to be provided to the buyer of Riparian Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset
credits, that will include, at a minimum, the following information:
1. Bank Details: (1) sponsor Name, (2) Bank Parcel name as it appears in this
Instrument, (3) DWR project number for the BPDP.
2. Credit Details: (1) date of receipt, (2) identify if full or partial payment, (3
- when applicable) amount of nitrogen credits purchased in pounds and
confirmation from the designated local government of the amount
required, (4 - when applicable) amount of phosphorous credits purchased
in pounds and confirmation from the designated local government of the
amount required, and (5 - when applicable) amount of Riparian Buffer
Credits purchased in square feet and the confirmation from DWR or the
local government of the amount required.
3. Debiting Project Details: (1) project name as it appears on DWR or local
government permits and/or certifications, (2) 8-digit HUC, (3) river basin,
(4) nutrient strategy applicable to the project, (5 - when applicable)
designated local government requiring Nutrient Offset Credits, and/or (6)
DWR authorization number or delegated local government requiring
14
Riparian Buffer Credits for this project.
M. If the DWR determines that the Bank is operating at a deficit (e.g. the Sponsor is
closing on sales and/or transferring credit that is not available), or the Bank is
selling credits out of compliance with statutes, rules or this Agreement, the
sale/transfer of credits will immediately cease, and the DWR, in consultation with
the Sponsor, will determine what remedial actions are necessary.
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE
A. Bank Parcel Closure shall be identified as the event when the Sponsor is relieved
of all of its responsibilities to the Bank Parcel and there are no mitigation credits
left to sell.
B. Bank Parcel Closure shall commence only after all the following events have occurred:
1.Transfer or assign the conservation easement and all its interests, in
perpetuity, to a land trust or stewardship program as described in Section V of
this instrument.
2. All five years of monitoring completed and all monitoring reports
submitted and approved by DWR
3. All credits have been released and debited and updated ledgers showing
zero credit balances have been submitted and approved by DWR.
XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Upon the presentation of proper credentials, and during normal business hours, the
Sponsor and the landowner shall grant permission to the Director of DWR, an
authorized representative of the Director of DWR, to enter the property containing
the Bank Parcel(s).
B. Amendments: This Banking Instrument may be amended or modified only with
written approval of all signatory parties.
C. Any transfer of the Sponsor's rights or obligations outlined in this Instrument or
any other agreement referenced in this Instrument to a third party must be
approved by DWR prior to the transfer.
D. Force Majeure: After 100% of all the credits have been released according to the credit
release schedule in Section VIII and confirmation has been received by the DWR that
the Conservation . Easement has been successfully assigned in compliance with Item H
of Section V, the Sponsor will not be responsible for Bank failure that is attributed to
15
natural catastrophes including but not limited to flood, drought, disease, regional pest
infestation, etc. that are beyond the control of the Sponsor.
E. However, if an event occurs before I 00% of all the credits have been released
according to the credit release schedule in Section VIII, the Sponsor shall take
remedial action to restore the property to its condition prior to the event, in a manner
sufficient to provide adequate mitigation to cover credits that were sold prior to the
occurrence of the event. Such remedial action shall be taken by the Sponsor only to
the extent necessary and appropriate, as determined by DWR and the Sponsor.
DWR must concur in writing that a force majeure event has occurred for this provision to apply.
F. Oversight: Actions taken by DWR may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Site visits
2. Issuance of Site Viability Letters.
3. Mitigation determinations /mitigation viability assessments.
4. BPDP review and approval of items listed in Section V of this instrument.
5. As-Built Report review and approval of items listed in Section VI of this
instrument.
6. Monitoring Report review and approval of items listed in Section VI of
this instrument.
7. Credit Ledger review and approval of items listed in Section IX of this instrument.
8. Certificate review of items listed in Section IX of this instrument and cross
analysis to credit ledgers.
9. Information requests, file reviews and audits Reports, ledgers, files
and other information shall be made available to DWR upon request,
unless otherwise specified in this or any other document.
G. Validity of the Banking Instrument: This Instrument will become valid on the date
of the last party's signature.
H. Specific Language of Banking Instrument Shall Be Controlling: To the extent that
specific language in this document changes, modifies, or deletes terms and
conditions contained in those documents that are incorporated into the Instrument
by reference, and that are not legally binding, the specific language within the
Instrument shall be controlling.
I. Any disputes over decisions regarding this Instrument, shall be referred to the
Director of DWR for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as
provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
J. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and 1s entered into knowingly,
intelligently, and voluntarily.
16
K. Notices: All notices and other communications which may be or are required to be
given or made by any party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed to
have been properly given and received on the date delivered in person or deposited
in the United States mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested, to the
addresses set out below, or at such other addresses as specified by written notice
delivered in accordance herewith.
If to Bank Sponsor: Eco Terra Partners, LLC
1117 Peachtree Walk, NE
STE 126
Atlanta, GA 30309
If to DWR: NC Division of Water Resources – 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Attn: Nutrient Offset and Buffer Banking Coordinator
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
L. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of
North Carolina.
ECO TERRA PARTNERS, LLC
By: _________________________ (Print)
________________________ (Signature)
Title: ________________________
Date: ________________________
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY-
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
By: _________________________ (Print)
________________________ (Signature)
Title: ________________________
Date: ________________________
Nutrient Offset Program & Buffer Mitigation Program: Updated 10/28/19
Authorities for UMBI
ATTACHMENT A
Authorities pertaining to the Kittrell Hill Mitigation Banking Instrument
All Basins
General Statutes:
G.S. §143-214.11 Ecosystem Enhancement Program
G.S. §143-214.26 Nutrient Offset Credits
G.S. §143-214.20-24 Riparian Buffer Protection Program
G.S. §143-214.7 Stormwater runoff rules and programs
G.S. §143-215.8B Basinwide Water Quality Management Plans
Session Laws
S.L. 2015-246
S.L. 2015-149
S.L. 2014-90
S.L. 2014-120
S.L. 2013-413
S.L. 2013-121
S.L. 2013-265
S.L. 2012-200 (Amendment to G.S. §143-214.23 and G.S. §143-215.1)
S.L. 2011-343 (Amendment to G.S. §143-214.11)
S.L. 2009- 337 (Amendment to G.S. §143-214.11)
Administrative Rules:
15A NCAC 02B .0202 Definitions
15A NCAC 02B .0223 Nutrient Sensitive Waters
15A NCAC 02B .0237 Best Management Practice Cost-Effectiveness Rate
15A NCAC 02B .0240 Nutrient Offset Payments
15A NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers
Neuse River Basin Buffer and Neuse Nutrient Strategy
Session Laws
S.L. 2019-86 (Amendment to G.S. §143-214.26)
S.L. 2011-394
S.L. 1998-221 (Part I)
S.L. 1995-572
Administrative Rules:
15A NCAC 02B .0232 Basin Nutrient Reduction Goal
15A NCAC 02B .0233 Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers
15A NCAC 02B .0235 Basinwide Stormwater Requirements
15A NCAC 2B .0236 Agricultural Nitrogen Loading Reduction
15A NCAC 2B .0238 Agricultural Nitrogen Reduction Strategy
15A NCAC 2B .0239 Nutrient Management
ATTACHMENT B
Buffer Ledger Template
*Credits shown below are only for mitigation credits approved by the MBI, BPDP, and As-Built.
Sale/
Release Date Purchaser or % Credit Release Project w/ HUC #Gov't
Requiring
Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres
Credits Released/Available
to Bank
Credits Debited/Sold From
Bank Buffer Credit Balance
EcoTerra Partners, LLC Kittrell Hill MBI
(Kittrell Hill Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank)
HUC 03020101
Buffer Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated:
DWR Bank Parcel Project #:
Total Credits Released To Date:
ATTACHMENT C
Nutrient (Nitrogen Offset Ledger Template)
*Credits shown below are only for mitigation credits approved by the MBI, BPDP, and As-Built.
Sale/
Release Date Purchaser or % Credit Release Project w/ HUC #Gov't
Requiring
Pounds of
Nitrogen Acres Pounds of
Nitrogen Acres Pounds of
Nitrogen Acres
Credits Released/Available to
Bank
Credits Debited/Sold From
Bank Nutrient Credit Balance
(Sponsor name & Instrument name)
(Parcel Name w/ HUC #) Nitrogen Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated:
DWR Bank Parcel Project #:
Total Credits Released To Date:
EcoTerra Partners, LLC Kittrell Hill MBI
(Kittrell Hill Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank)
HUC 03020101
Nitrogen Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated:
DWR Bank Parcel Project #:
Total Credits Released To Date:
ATTACHMENT D
Rule Text 15A NCAC 02B .0240
15A NCAC 02B .0240 NUTRIENT OFFSET PAYMENTS
(a) The purpose of this Rule is to establish procedures for the optional payment of nutrient offset fees to the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program, subsequently referred to as the Program, or to other public or private parties where the
Program or such parties implement projects for nutrient offset purposes and accept payments for those purposes, and
where either of the following applies:
(1) The following rules of this Section allow offsite options or nutrient offset payments toward fulfillment
or maintenance of nutrient reduction requirements:
(A) .0234 and .0235 of the Neuse nutrient strategy,
(B) .0258 of the Tar-Pamlico nutrient strategy, and
(C) applicable rules of the Jordan nutrient strategy, which is described in Rule .0262; and
(2) Other rules adopted by the Commission allow this option toward fulfillment of nutrient load reduction
requirements.
(b) Offset fees paid pursuant to this Rule shall be used to achieve nutrient load reductions subject to the following
geographic restrictions:
(1) Load reductions shall be located within the same 8-digit cataloguing unit, as designated by the US
Geological Survey, as the loading activity that is being offset;
(2) The Division shall track impacts by 10-digit watershed, as designated by the US Geological Survey
and providers shall locate projects proportional to the location of impacts to the extent that the projects
would meet the least cost alternative criterion per S.L. 2007-438. The location of load reduction
projects shall be reviewed during the approval process described in Paragraph (c) of this Rule;
(3) Impacts that occur in the watershed of Falls Lake in the upper Neuse River Basin may be offset only
by load reductions in the same watershed; Impacts in the Neuse 01 8-digit cataloguing unit below the
Falls watershed, as designated by the US Geological Survey, may be offset only by load reductions in
that same lower watershed;
(4) Restrictions established in the Jordan nutrient strategy, which is described in Rule 15A NCAC 02B
.0262; and
(5) Any further restrictions established by the Commission through rulemaking.
(c) The Program and other parties shall obtain Division approval of proposed nutrient offset projects prior to
construction. Other parties shall sell credits in compliance with approved credit release schedules and with the
requirements of this Rule. Project approval shall be based on the following standards:
(1) Load reductions eligible for credit shall not include reductions used to satisfy other requirements under
the same nutrient strategy;
(2) The Program and other parties shall agree to provide adequate financial assurance to protect and
maintain load reductions for the stated duration, including for maintenance, repair and renovation of
the proposed measure;
(3) The Program and other parties shall agree that once credits are established for a measure and until they
are exhausted, they shall provide a credit/debit ledger to the Division at regular intervals;
(4) The Program and other parties shall agree that the party responsible for a measure shall allow the
Division access to it throughout its lifetime for compliance inspection purposes;
(5) The Program or other party seeking approval shall obtain a site review from Division staff prior to
Division approval to verify site conditions suitable to achieve the proposed load reductions through the
proposed measure; and
(6) The Program shall submit a proposal, and other parties shall submit a proposal or a draft banking
instrument, addressing the following items regarding a proposed load-reducing measure:
(A) Identify the location and site boundaries of the proposed measure, the geographic area to be
served by credits in compliance with the requirements of Paragraph (b) of this Rule, existing
conditions in the contributing drainage area and location of the measure, and the nature of the
proposed measure with sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction required in this
Paragraph;
(B) Provide calculations of the annual magnitudes of load reductions and identify final credit
values incorporating any delivery factors or other adjustments required under rules identified
in Paragraph (a) of this Rule;
(C) Define the duration of load reductions, and provide a conservation easement or similar legal
mechanism to be recorded with the County Register of Deeds and that is sufficient to ensure
protection and maintenance of load reductions for the stated duration;
(D) Identify the property owner and parties responsible for obtaining all permits and other
authorizations needed to establish the proposed measure, for constructing and ensuring initial
performance of the proposed measure, for reporting on and successfully completing the
measure, for holding and enforcing the conservation easement, and for ensuring protection
and maintenance of functions for its stated duration;
(E) Provide a plan for implementing the proposed measure, including a timeline, a commitment
to provide an as-built plan and report upon establishment of the measure, elements to be
included in the as-built plan and report, a commitment to provide a bond or other financial
assurance sufficient to cover all aspects of establishment and initial performance prior to the
release of any credits, and criteria for successful completion; and
(F) Provide a monitoring and maintenance plan designed to achieve successful completion, that
commits to annual reporting to the Division until success is achieved, that recognizes the
Division's authority to require extension or re-initiation of monitoring depending on progress
toward success, and that commits to a final report upon completion. The final report shall
reaffirm the party that shall hold and enforce the conservation easement or other legal
instrument.
(d) The Program shall establish and revise nutrient offset rates as set out in Rule .0274 of this Section. Offset payments
accepted by the Program shall be placed into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund administered by the Department
pursuant to G.S. 143-214.21
(e) Persons who seek to pay nutrient offset fees under rules of this Section shall do so in compliance with such rules, the
requirements of Paragraph (b) of this Rule, and the following:
(1) A non-governmental entity shall purchase nutrient offset credit from a party other than the Program if
such credit is available in compliance with the criteria of this Rule at the time credit is sought, and
shall otherwise demonstrate to the permitting authority that such credit is not available before seeking
to make payment to the Program;
(2) Offset payments made to the Program shall be contingent upon acceptance of the payment by the
Program. The financial, temporal and technical ability of the Program to satisfy the mitigation request
will be considered to determine whether the Program will accept or deny the request;
(3) Where persons seek to offset more than one nutrient type, they shall make payment to address each
type;
(4) The offset payment shall be an amount sufficient to fund 30 years of nutrient reduction.
(5) Persons who seek offsets to meet new development stormwater permitting requirements shall provide
proof of offset credit purchase to the permitting authority prior to approval of the development plan;
and
(6) A wastewater discharger that elects to purchase offset credits for the purpose of fulfilling or
maintaining nutrient reduction requirements shall submit proof of offset credit acquisition or a letter of
commitment from the Program or third party provider with its request for permit modification.
Issuance of a permit that applies credits to nutrient limits shall be contingent on receipt of proof of
offset credit acquisition. A discharger may propose to make incremental payments for additional
nutrient allocations, contingent upon receiving a letter of commitment from the Program or third party
provider to provide the offset credit needed for permit issuance. In that event the Division may issue
or modify that permit accordingly, and shall condition any flow increase associated with that
incremental purchase on payment in full for the additional allocation. Offset responsibility for nutrient
increases covered under this Paragraph shall be transferred to the Program or third party provider
when it has received the entire payment.
(f) Credits associated with load reducing activities funded under this Rule shall be awarded exclusively to the person,
municipality, discharger, or group of dischargers who paid the offset fee.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-214.1; 143-214.20; 143-214.21; S.L. 1995, c. 572; S.L. 2007, c. 438; S.L. 2009, c.
337; S.L. 2009, c. 484; S.L. 2009, c. 486;
Eff. August 1, 1998;
Amended Eff. August 1, 2006;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2010.
ATTACHMENT E
Rule Text 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Effective Nov. 1, 2015)
15A NCAC 02B .0295 MITIGATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR PROTECTION AND
MAINTENANCE OF RIPARIAN BUFFERS
(a) PURPOSE. The purpose of this Rule is to set forth the mitigation requirements that apply to applicants listed in
Paragraph (c) of this Rule and to set forth requirements for buffer mitigation providers.
(b) DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this Rule, these terms shall be defined as follows:
(1) "Authority" means either the Division or a local government that has been delegated or designated
pursuant to Rules .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267, or .0607 of this Subchapter to implement the
riparian buffer program.
(2) "Compensatory Buffer Mitigation Bank" means a buffer mitigation site created by a mitigation
provider and approved for mitigation credit by the Division through execution of a mitigation
banking instrument.
(3) "Division" means the Division of Water Resources of the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
(4) "Enhancement Site" means a riparian zone site characterized by conditions between that of a
restoration site and a preservation site such that the establishment of woody stems (i.e., tree or
shrub species) will maximize nutrient removal and other buffer functions.
(5) "Hydrologic Area" means the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD), located at no cost at
http://data.nconemap.com/geoportal/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid={16A42F31-
6DC7-4EC3-88A9-03E6B7D55653} using the eight-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) prepared
by the United States Geological Survey.
(6) "Locational Ratio" means the mitigation ratio applied to the mitigation requirements based on the
location of the mitigation site relative to the impact site as set forth in Paragraph (f) of this Rule.
(7) "Mitigation banking instrument" means the legal document for the establishment, operation, and
use of a mitigation bank.
(8) "Monitoring period" means the length of time specified in the approved mitigation plan during
which monitoring of vegetation success and other anticipated benefits to the adjacent water as
listed in the mitigation approval is done.
(9) "Non-wasting endowment" means a fund that generates enough interest to cover the cost of the
long term monitoring and maintenance.
(10) "Outer Coastal Plain" means the portion of the state shown as the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
(63) on Griffith, et al. (2002) "Ecoregions of North and South Carolina." Reston, VA, United
States Geological Survey available at no cost at
http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/ncsc_eco.htm.
(11) "Preservation Site" means riparian zone sites that, as determined by a site visit conducted by the
Authority, are characterized by a forest consisting of the forest strata and diversity of species
appropriate for the location.
(12) "Restoration Site" means riparian zone sites that are characterized by an absence of trees and by a
lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems (i.e., shrubs or saplings) or sites that are
characterized by scattered individual trees such that the tree canopy is less than 25 percent of the
cover and by a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems (i.e., shrubs or saplings).
(13) "Riparian buffer mitigation unit" means a unit representing a credit of riparian buffer mitigation as
set forth in Paragraph (m) of this Rule.
(14) "Riparian wetland" means a wetland that is found in one or more of the following landscape
positions:
(A) in a geomorphic floodplain;
(B) in a natural topographic crenulation;
(C) contiguous with an open water equal to or greater than 20 acres in size; or
(D) subject to tidal flow regimes excluding salt/brackish marsh wetlands.
(15) "Stem" means a woody seedling, sapling, shrub, or tree, no less than 10 centimeters in height.
(16) "Urban" means an area that is either designated as an urbanized area under the most recent federal
decennial census available at no cost at http://www.census.gov/ or is located within the corporate
limits of a municipality.
(17) "Zonal Ratio" means the mitigation ratio applied to impact amounts in the respective zones of the
riparian buffer as set forth in Paragraph (e) of this Rule.
(c) MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS. Buffer mitigation is required when one of the following applies:
(1) The applicant has received an authorization certificate for impacts pursuant to Rule .0233, .0243,
.0250, .0259, .0267, or .0607 of this Subchapter and is required to perform mitigation as a
condition of the authorization certificate; or
(2) The applicant has received a variance pursuant to Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267, or .0607
of this Subchapter and is required to perform mitigation as a condition of a variance approval.
Any applicant covered under this Paragraph shall submit to the Authority a written mitigation propos al that
calculates the required area of mitigation and describes the area and location of each type of proposed mitigation.
The applicant shall not impact buffers until the Authority approves the mitigation plan and issues written approval.
(d) AREA OF IMPACT. The Authority shall determine the area of impact in square feet to each Zo ne as defined
by the applicable Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267, or .0607 of this Subchapter of the proposed riparian buffer
by adding the following:
(1) The area of the footprint of the use impacting the riparian buffer;
(2) The area of the boundary of any clearing and grading activities within the riparian buffer
necessary to accommodate the use; and
(3) The area of any ongoing maintenance corridors within the riparian buffer associated with the use.
The Authority shall deduct from this total the area of any wetlands that are subject to and compliant with riparian
wetland mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 02H .0506 and are located within the proposed riparian bu ffer
impact area.
(e) AREA OF MITIGATION REQUIRED ON ZONAL MITIGATION RATIOS. The Authority shall determine
the required area of mitigation for each Zone by applying each of the following ratios to the area of impact
calculated under Paragraph (d) of this Rule:
Basin/Watershed Zone 1 Ratio Zone 2 Ratio
Neuse River Basin (15A NCAC 02B .0233) 3:1 1.5:1
Catawba River Basin (15A NCAC 02B .0243) 2:1 1.5:1
Randleman Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B .0250) 3:1 1.5:1
Tar-Pamlico River Basin (15A NCAC 02B .0259) 3:1 1.5:1
Jordan Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B .0267) 3:1 1.5:1
Goose Creek Watershed (15A NCAC 02B .0607) 3:1A
A The Goose Creek Watershed does not have a Zone 1 and Zone 2. The mitigation ratio in the Goose
Creek Watershed is 3:1 for the entire buffer.
(f) AREA OF MITIGATION REQUIRED ON LOCATIONAL MITIGATION RATIOS. The applicant or
mitigation provider shall use the following locational ratios as applicable based on location of the proposed
mitigation site relative to that of the proposed impact site. Locational ratios shall be as follows:
Location Ratio
Within the 12-digit HUCA 0.75:1
Within the eight-digit HUCB 1:1
Outside of the eight-digit HUCB 2:1
A Except within the Randleman Lake Watershed. Within the Randleman Lake Watershed
the ratio is 1:1.
B Except as provided in Paragraph (g) of this Rule.
(g) GEOGRAPHIC RESTRICTIONS ON LOCATION OF MITIGATION. Mitigation shall be performed in the
same river basin where the impact is located with the following additional specifications:
(1) In the following cases, mitigation shall be performed in the same watershed where the impact is
located:
(A) Falls Lake Watershed, as defined in Rule .0275 of this Section;
(B) Goose Creek Watershed, as defined in Rule .0601 of this Subchapter;
(C) Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed, as defined in Rule .0248 of this Section;
(D) Each subwatershed of the Jordan Lake watershed, as defined in Rule .0262 of this
Section; and
(E) Other watersheds as specified in riparian buffer protection rules adopted by the
Commission.
(2) Buffer mitigation for impacts within watersheds with riparian buffer rules that also have federally
listed threatened or endangered aquatic species may be done within other watersheds with the
same federally listed threatened or endangered aquatic species as long as the impacts are in the
same river basin as the mitigation site.
(h) MITIGATION OPTIONS FOR APPLICANTS. The applicant may propose any o f the following types of
mitigation:
(1) Riparian buffer restoration or enhancement pursuant to Paragraph (n) of this Rule;
(2) Payment of a compensatory mitigation fee to a compensatory buffer mitigation bank pursuant to
Paragraph (i) of this Rule or payment of a compensatory mitigation fee to the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund pursuant to Paragraph (j) of this Rule. Payment shall conform to the
requirements of G.S. 143-214.20;
(3) Donation of real property or of an interest in real property pursuant to Paragraph (k) of this Rule;
(4) Alternative buffer mitigation pursuant to Paragraph (o) of this Rule; or
(5) Other buffer mitigation as approved by the Environmental Management Commission as a
condition of a variance approval.
(i) PURCHASE OF BUFFER MITIGATION CREDITS FROM A PRIVATE OR PUBLIC COMPENSATORY
BUFFER MITIGATION BANK. Applicants who choose to satisfy some or all of their mitigation by purchasing
mitigation credits from a private or public compensatory buffer mitigation bank shall meet the follo wing
requirements:
(1) The compensatory buffer mitigation bank from which credits are purchased shall have available
riparian buffer credits approved by the Division;
(2) The compensatory buffer mitigation bank from which credits are purchased shall be located as
described in Paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of this Rule; and
(3) After receiving a mitigation acceptance letter from the compensatory buffer mitigation bank, proof
of payment for the credits shall be provided to the Authority prior to any activity that results in the
removal or degradation of the protected riparian buffer.
(j) PAYMENT TO THE RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION FUND. Applicants who choose to satisfy some or
all of their mitigation requirement by paying a compensatory mitigation fee to the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund
shall meet the requirements of Rule .0269 of this Section. Payment made to the NC Division of Mitigation Services
(DMS) shall be contingent upon acceptance of the payment by the DMS. The DMS shall consider their financial,
temporal, and technical ability to satisfy the mitigation request to determine whether they shall accept or deny the
request.
(k) DONATION OF PROPERTY. Applicants who choose to satisfy their mitigation requirement by donating real
property or an interest in real property to fully or partially offset an approved payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund pursuant to Paragraph (j) of this Rule shall do so in accordance with 15A NCAC 02R .0403.
(l) MITIGATION SITE REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS AND MIT IGATION PROVIDERS. For each
mitigation site proposed by an applicant or mitigation provider under Paragraphs (n) or (o) of this Rule, the
Authority shall identify functional criteria to measure the anticipated benefits of the mitigation to the adjacent wa ter.
The Authority shall issue a mitigation determination that specifies the area, type, and location of mitigation and the
water quality benefits to be provided by the mitigation site. All mitigation proposals shall meet the following
criteria:
(1) The location of the buffer mitigation site shall comply with the requirements of Paragraphs (f) and
(g) of this Rule. In the Catawba watershed, buffer mitigation may be done along the lake
shoreline as well as along intermittent and perennial stream channels throughout the watershed.
(2) The mitigation proposal shall include a commitment to provide:
(A) a perpetual conservation easement or similar preservation mechanism to ensure perpetual
stewardship that protects the mitigation site's nutrient removal and ot her water quality
functions;
(B) a non-wasting endowment or other dedicated financial surety to provide for the perpetual
land management and hydrological maintenance of lands and maintenance of structures
as applicable; and
(C) financial assurance in the form of a completion bond, credit insurance, letter of credit,
escrow, or other vehicle acceptable to the Authority payable to, or for the benefit of, the
Authority in an amount sufficient to ensure that the property is secured in fee title or by
easement, and that planting or construction, monitoring and maintenance are completed
as necessary to meet success criteria as specified in the approved mitigation plan. This
financial assurance obligation shall not apply to the NC DMS.
(3) Diffuse flow of runoff shall be maintained in the riparian buffer. Any existing impervious cover
or stormwater conveyances such as ditches, pipes, or drain tiles shall be eliminated and the flow
converted to diffuse flow. If the applicant or mitigation provider determines th at elimination of
existing stormwater conveyances is not feasible, then they shall include a justification and shall
provide a delineation of the watershed draining to the stormwater outfall and the percentage of the
total drainage by area treated by the riparian buffer with the mitigation plan specified in Paragraph
(n) or (o) of this Rule for Authority approval. During mitigation plan review and approval, the
Authority may reduce credit proportionally.
(4) Sewer easement within the buffer. If the proposed mitigation site contains a sewer easement in
Zone 1, that portion of the sewer easement within Zone 1 shall not be suitable for buffer
mitigation credit. If the proposed mitigation site contains a sewer easement in Zone 2, the portion
of the sewer easement in Zone 2 may be suitable for buffer mitigation credit if:
(A) the applicant or mitigation provider restores or enhances the forested buffer in Zone 1
adjacent to the sewer easement;
(B) the sewer easement is required to be maintained in a condition that meets the vegetative
requirements of the collection system permit; and
(C) diffuse flow is provided across the entire buffer width.
(5) The applicant or mitigation provider shall provide a site specific credit/debit ledger to the
Authority at regular intervals as specified in the mitigation plan approval or mitigation banking
instrument once credits are established and until they are exhausted.
(6) Buffer mitigation credit, nutrient offset credit, wetland mitigation credit, and stream mitigation
credit shall be accounted for in accordance with the following:
(A) Buffer mitigation used for buffer mitigation credit shall not be used for nutrient offset
credits;
(B) Buffer mitigation credit shall not be generated within wetlands that provide wetland
mitigation credit required by 15A NCAC 02H .0506; and
(C) Buffer mitigation credit may be generated on stream mitigation sites as long as the width
of the restored or enhanced riparian buffer meets the requirements of Subparagraph (n)(1)
of this Rule.
(m) RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION UNITS. Mitigation activities shall generate riparian buffer mitigation
units as follows:
Mitigation Activity Square Feet of
Mitigation Buffer
Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Units Generated
Restoration Site 1 1
Enhancement Site 2 1
Preservation Site on Non-Subject Urban Streams 3 1
Preservation Site on Subject Urban Streams 3 1
Preservation Site on Non-Subject Rural Streams 5 1
Preservation Site on Subject Rural Streams 10 1
(n) RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION SITE OR ENHANCEMENT SITE. Authority staff shall make an on -
site determination as to whether a potential mitigation site qualifies as a restoration site or enhancement site as
defined in Paragraph (b) of this Rule. Riparian buffer restoration sites or enhancement sites shall meet the following
requirements:
(1) Buffer restoration sites or enhancement sites may be proposed as follows:
Buffer width (ft)
Proposed
Percentage
of Full Credit
Less than 20 0 %
20-29 75 %
30-100 100 %
101-200 33%
(2) The applicant or mitigation provider shall submit a restoration or enhancement mitigation plan to
the Authority for written approval. The plan shall demonstrate compliance with the requirements
of this Paragraph and Paragraphs (l) and (m) of this Rule and shall also contain the following:
(A) A map of the proposed restoration or enhancement site;
(B) A vegetation plan that shall detail the activities proposed to ensure a final performance
standard of 260 stems per acre at the completion of monitoring. Th e final performance
standard shall include a minimum of four native hardwood tree species or four native
hardwood tree and native shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent
of stems. Native hardwood and native shrub volunteer species ma y be included to meet
the final performance standard of 260 stems per acre. The Authority may approve
alternative vegetation plans upon consideration of factors, including site wetness and
plant availability, to meet the requirements of this Part;
(C) A grading plan (if applicable). The site shall be graded in a manner to ensure diffuse
flow through the entire riparian buffer;
(D) A schedule for implementation, including a fertilization and herbicide plan if applicable;
and
(E) A monitoring plan to document whether the site is expected to meet the final performance
standards as defined in Part (n)(2)(B) of this Rule and other anticipated benefits to the
adjacent water. The plan shall include a proposed schedule and method for monitoring
the vegetative status of the restoration or enhancement site for five years, including the
health and average stem densities of native hardwood tree or tree and shrub species that
are to be counted toward the final performance standard.
(3) Within one year after Authority approval of the mitigation plan, the applicant or mitigation
provider shall present documentation to the Authority that the riparian buffer has been restored or
enhanced unless the applicant or mitigation provider requests, and the Authority agrees in writing
prior to that date, to a longer time period.
(4) The applicant or mitigation provider shall submit written annual reports, unless an alternative
schedule has been approved by the Authority during the mitigation plan approval, for a period of
five years after completion of the activities identified in Par t (n)(2)(B) of this Rule at the
restoration site or enhancement site showing:
(A) compliance with the monitoring plan approved pursuant to Part (n)(2)(E) of this Rule;
and
(B) that diffuse flow through the riparian buffer has been maintained.
If the Authority determines that the native hardwood tree or tree and shrub species at the site are not
expected to meet the final performance standards listed in Part (n)(2)(B) of this Rule, then the Authority
may require that the applicant or mitigation provider re place trees or trees and shrubs as needed during that
five-year period. If the Authority determines that diffuse flow through the buffer is not being maintained,
then the Authority may require that the applicant or mitigation provider restor e diffuse flow. If the
Authority determines that the final performance standards listed in Part (n)(2)(B) of this Rule have not been
achieved at the end of the five-year monitoring period, the Authority may require additional years of
monitoring. The Authority shall ma ke determinations referenced in this Subparagraph on a site specific
basis based on the annual reports, any supplemental information submitted by the applicant or mitigation
provider, or a site evaluation by the Authority.
(o) ALTERNATIVE BUFFER MITIGATION OPTIONS. Alternative buffer mitigation options are detailed in this
Paragraph. Any proposal for alternative buffer mitigation shall be provided in writing to the Division, shall meet the
content and procedural requirements for approval by the Division, shall meet the requirements set out in Paragraphs
(l) and (m) of this Rule and the requirements set out in the named Subparagraph of this Paragraph addressing that
applicable alternative buffer mitigation option:
(1) Retroactive Credit. Alternative buffer mitigation sites constructed and within the required
monitoring period on the effective date of this Rule shall be eligible for use as alternative buffer
mitigation sites. Alternative buffer mitigation sites that have completed monitoring and were
released by the Division on or within the past 10 years of the effective date of this Rule shall be
eligible for use as alternative buffer mitigation sites. All alternative buffer mitigation site
proposals submitted under this Subparagraph shall meet the following:
(A) A map or maps of the proposed alternative buffer mitigation site;
(B) Documentation of pre-existing conditions showing that the proposed alternative buffer
mitigation site met the criteria to qualify for the applicable alternative buffer mitiga tion
type identified in the applicable Subparagraph of this Paragraph;
(C) Documentation of the activities that were conducted at the proposed alternative buffer
mitigation site to meet success criteria identified in the applicable Subparagraph of this
Paragraph; and
(D) Documentation that the proposed alternative buffer mitigation site met the success
criteria identified in the applicable Subparagraph of this Paragraph.
These alternative buffer mitigation sites shall receive credit in accordance with the criteria set
forth in Paragraph (m) and Subparagraph (n)(1) of this Rule.
(2) Coastal Headwater Stream Mitigation. Wooded buffers planted along Outer Coastal Plain
headwater stream mitigation sites may also be approved as riparian buffer mitigation credit if the
site meets all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n) of this Rule. In addition, all success
criteria specified in the approval of the stream mitigation site by the Division shall be met. The
area of the buffer shall be measured perpendicular to the length of the valley being restored. The
area within the proposed buffer mitigation site shall not also be used as wetland mitigation.
(3) Buffer Restoration and Enhancement on Non-Subject Streams. Restoration or enhancement of
buffers may be conducted on intermittent or perennial streams that are not subject to the applicable
Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267, or .0607 of this Subchapter. These streams shall be
confirmed as intermittent or perennial streams by Division staff certified per G.S. 143-214.25A
using the Division publication, "Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and Their Origins (v.4.11, 2010)" available at no cost at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ws/401/waterresources/streamdeterminations. The proposal
shall meet all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n) of this Rule.
(4) Preservation of Buffer on Non-Subject Streams. Preservation of buffers on intermittent or
perennial streams that are not subject to the applicable Rule .0233, .0243, .0250 , .0259, .0267, or
.0607 of this Subchapter may be proposed in order to permanently protect the buffer from cutting,
clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer.
These streams shall be confirmed as intermittent or perennial streams by Division staff certified
per G.S. 143-214.25A using the Division publication, "Methodology for Identification of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (v4.11, 2010)." The preservation site shall
meet the requirements of Subparagraph (n)(1) of this Rule and the requirements set forth in 15A
NCAC 02R .0403(c)(7), (8), and (11). The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation
site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation.
(5) Preservation of Buffers on Subject Streams. Buffer preservation may be proposed on streams that
are subject to the applicable Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267, or .0607 of this Subchapter in
order to permanently protect the buffer from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar
activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer beyond the protection afforded by the
existing buffer rules on sites that meet the definition of a preservation site. The preservation site
shall meet the requirements of Subparagraph (n)(1) and the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC
02R .0403(c)(7), (8), and (11). The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall
comprise of no more than 25 percent of the total area of buf fer mitigation.
(6) Enhancement of grazing areas adjacent to streams. Buffer credit at a 2:1 ratio shall be available
for an applicant or mitigation provider who proposes permanent exclusion of grazing livestock
that otherwise degrade the stream and riparian zone through trampling, grazing, or waste
deposition by fencing the livestock out of the stream and its adjacent buffer. The applicant or
mitigation provider shall provide an enhancement plan as set forth in Paragraph (n) of this Rule.
The applicant or mitigation provider shall demonstrate that grazing was the predominant land use
since the effective date of the applicable buffer rule.
(7) Mitigation on ephemeral channels. For purposes of riparian buffer mitigation as described in this
Part, an "ephemeral channel" is defined as a natural channel exhibiting discernible banks within a
topographic crenulation (V-shaped contour lines) indicative of natural drainage on the 1:24,000
scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic map prepared by the U.S. Geologic Survey, or as seen
on digital elevation models with contours developed from the most recent available LiDAR data,
available at no cost at http://www.ncfloodmaps.com/lidar.com. Ephemeral channels only flow for
a short period of time after precipitation in the drainage area and do not have periods of base flow
sustained by groundwater discharge. The applicant or mitigation provider shall provide a
delineation of the watershed draining to the ephemeral channel. The entire area proposed for
mitigation shall be within the contributing drainage area to the ephemeral channel. The ephemeral
channel shall be directly connected to an intermittent or perennial stream and contiguous with the
rest of the mitigation site protected under a perpetual conservation easeme nt. The area of the
mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent of the total area of
buffer mitigation. The proposal shall meet all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n) of this
Rule for restoration or enhancement. The proposal shall meet all applicable requirements of
Subparagraph (o)(4) or (o)(5) of this Rule for preservation.
(8) Restoration and Enhancement on Ditches. For purposes of riparian buffer mitigation as described
in this Part, a "ditch" is defined as a man-made channel other than a modified natural stream that
was constructed for drainage purposes. To be used for mitigation, a ditch shall meet all of the
following criteria:
(A) be directly connected with and draining towards an intermittent or perennial stream;
(B) be contiguous with the rest of the mitigation site protected under a perpetual conservation
easement;
(C) stormwater runoff from overland flow shall drain towards the ditch;
(D) be between one and three feet in depth; and
(E) the entire length of the ditch shall have been in place prior to the effective date of the
applicable buffer rule.
The width of the restored or enhanced area shall not be less than 30 feet and shall not exceed 50
feet for crediting purposes. The applicant or mitigation provider shall provide a delineation of the
watershed draining to the ditch. The watershed draining to the ditch shall be at least four times
larger than the restored or enhanced area along the ditch. The perpetual conservation easement
shall include the ditch and the confluence of the ditch with the intermittent or perennial stream,
and provide language that prohibits future maintenance of the ditch. The proposal shall meet all
applicable requirements of Paragraph (n) of this Rule for restoration or enha ncement.
(9) Stormwater Treatment Options. All stormwater treatment options shall meet the following
requirements:
(A) Structural options already required by other local, state, or federal rule or permit cannot
be used as alternative buffer mitigation credit, except to the extent such measure(s)
exceed the requirements of such rule or permit. Stormwater Best Management Practices
(BMPs), including bioretention facilities, constructed wetlands, infiltration devices and
sand filters are all potentially approvable BMPs by the Division for alternative buffer
mitigation credit. Other BMPs may be approved only if they meet the nutrient removal
levels outlined in Part (o)(9)(B) of this Rule. Existing or planned BMPs for a local, state,
or federal rule or permit ma y be retrofitted or expanded to improve their nutrient removal
if this level of treatment is not required by other local, state, or federal rules. In this case,
the predicted increase in nutrient removal may be counted toward alternative buffer
mitigation credit;
(B) Minimum treatment levels: Any structural BMP shall provide at least 30 percent total
nitrogen and 35 percent total phosphorus removal as demonstrated by a scientific and
engineering literature review as approved by the Division. The mitigation proposal shall
demonstrate that the proposed alternative removes an equal or greater annual mass load
of nutrients to surface waters as the buffer impact authorized in the authorization
certificate or variance, following the calculation of impact and mi tigation areas pursuant
to Paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this Rule. To estimate the rate of nutrient removal of the
impacted buffer, the applicant or mitigation provider may use the "NC Division of Water
Quality – Methodology and Calculation for determining nutrient reductions associated
with Riparian Buffer Establishment" available at no cost at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=55c3758f-5e27-46cf-8237-
47f890d9329a&groupId=38364. The applicant or mitigation provider may propose an
alternative method of estimating the rate of nutrient removal for consideration and review
by the Division;
(C) All proposed structural BMPs shall follow the Division's "2009 Stormwater Best
Management Practice Design Manual" available at no cost at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/lr/bmp-manual. If a specific proposed structural BMP is not
addressed in this Manual, the applicant or mitigation provider shall follow Chapter 20 in
this Manual for approval;
(D) All structural options are required to have Division approved operation and maintenance
plans;
(E) All structural options are required to have continuous and perpetual maintenance and
shall follow the Division's "2009 Stormwater Best Management Practice Design
Manual";
(F) Upon completion of construction, the designer for the type of BMP installed shall certify
that the system was inspected during construction and that the BMP was constructed in
conformity with plans and specifications approved by the Divi sion;
(G) Removal and replacement of structural options: If a structural option is proposed to be
removed and cannot be replaced on-site, then a structural or non-structural measure of
equal or better nutrient removal capacity, as determined by calculatio ns submitted to and
approved by the Division, in a location as specified by Paragraphs (f) and (g) of this Rule
shall be constructed as a replacement;
(H) Renovation or repair of structural options: If the applicant, mitigation provider, or the
Division determines that a structural option must be renovated or repaired, it shall be
renovated to provide equal or better nutrient removal capacity than as originally
designed; and
(I) Structural options, as well as their operation and maintenance, are the respo nsibility of
the landowner or easement holder unless the Division gives written approval for another
responsible party to operate and maintain them. Structural options shall be located in
recorded drainage easements for the purposes of operation and mainte nance and shall
have recorded access easements to the nearest public right -of-way. These easements
shall be granted in favor of the party responsible for operating and maintaining the
structure, with a note that operation and maintenance is the responsibility of the
landowner, easement holder, or other responsible party.
(10) Approval for other alternative buffer mitigation options. Other alternative riparian buffer
mitigation options not specified within this Rule may be submitted to the Division for re view and
recommendation to the Environmental Management Commission on a case-by-case basis. Any
proposal submitted under this Paragraph shall provide documentation or calculations to
demonstrate that the proposed alternative mitigation option removes an equal or greater annual
mass load of nutrients to surface waters as a riparian buffer. Upon completion of the Division's
review, and prior to recommendation to the Environmental Management Commission, the
Division shall issue a 30-calendar day public notice through the Division's website and the
DWRwetlands Listserve. Division staff shall present their recommendations, including comments
received during the public notice period, to the Environmental Management Commission for a
final decision. If approved by the Environmental Management Commission, the alternative buffer
mitigation option may be proposed by other applicants and mitigation providers.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-214.1; 143-214.5; 143-214.7; 143-214.20; 143-215.3(a)(1); 143-215.6A; 143-
215.6B; 143-215.6C; 143-215.8A; 143-215.8B; 143-282(c); 143B-282(d); S.L. 1998-221; S.L.
1999-329, s. 7.1; S.L. 2001-418, s. 4.(a); S.L. 2003-340, s. 5; S.L. 2005-190; S.L. 2006-259; S.L.
2009-337; S.L. 2009-486; S.L. 2014-95;
Temporary Adoption Eff. October 24, 2014;
Eff. November 1, 2015.