NCG030352_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20180110

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET -
RESCISSIONS.
PERMIT NO.
DOCTYPE
❑COMPLETE FILE -HISTORICAL
DATE OF
RESCISSION
❑ ao)
YYYYMMDD

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALFTY
Mr. David Volk
13421 North Rocky Ford Road
I-aurinburg, NC 28352
Dear Mr. Volk:
ROY COOPER
Gor;'?W"
MICHAEL S. REGAN
.tieerefof y
WILLIAM E. (`i-OBY) VINSON, JR,
!nferiol
L'trccow
January 10, 2018
JAN 10 2018
INFORMATION PROC � SING UNIT
Subject: Rescission of NPDES Stormwater Permit
Certificate of Coverage Number NCG030352
Scotland County
The Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources received your request to rescind your
coverage under Certificate of Coverage Number NCG030352. In accordance with your request,
Certificate of Coverage Number NCG030352 is rescinded effective immediately.
Operating a treatment facility, discharging wastewater or discharging specific types of
stormwater to waters of the State without valid coverage under an NPDES permit is against
federal and state laws and could result in fines. If something changes and your facility would
again require Stormwater or wastewater discharge permit coverage, you should notify this office
immediately. We will be happy to assist you in assuring the proper permit coverage.
If the facility is in the process of being sold, you will be performing a public service if you would
inform the new or prospective owners of their potential need for NPDES permit coverage.
If you have questions about this matter, please contact us at 919-707-9200, or the Stormwater
staff in our Fayetteville Regional Office at 910-433-3300.
Sincerely,
fior William E. (Toby) Vinson, Jr., PE, CPESC,
CPM
Interim Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Program
Central Files
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Senice Center 1 512 North Salisbury Street I Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
919 707 9200 T

A
• Division of Energy, Mineral 8 Land Resources
A
Land Quality Section/Storrnwater Permitting Program
NCDENRNational Pnilulant Discharge Elimination System
ENvn�HMrm ,w� NAURAL RE6 RC[! RESCISSION REQUEST FORM
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year
Month
❑a
RECEIVED
•*^%t A A nn4'i
I1U r 4j"o
Please fill out and return this form if you no longer need to maintain your NPDES stormwater permit.
DENR-LAND QUALITY
1) Enter the permit number to which this request applies: STORMWATER PEI SMITTING
Individual Permit (or) Certificate of Coverage
N I C S N I C I G Q go S
2) Owner/Facility Information: * Final correspondence will be mailed to the address noted below
Owner/Facility Name
Facility Contact r U
Street Address a ) e, a
City r State AJ —C_ ZIP Code 15�3 S';Z
County ScoI1ILA E-mail Address
Telephone No. 71D 74 '1 Fax: 1 n 7 Z— 7,7/a
3) Reason for rescission request (This is required information. Attach separate sheet if necessary):
Facility closed or is closing on (DE-t-31 J,rAll industrial activities have ceased such that no discharges of
stormwater are contaminated by exposure to industrial activities or materials.
❑ Facility sold to on �___� . If the facility will continue operations under the new owner it
may be more appropriate to request an ownership change to reissue to permit to the new owner.
❑ Other:
4) Certification:
I, as an authorized representative, hereby request rescission of coverage under the NPDES Stormwater Permit for the
subject facility. I am famil' with the information contained in this request and to the best of my knowledge and belief
such information is tru pletearfq accurate.
Signature Date
F1�►1.�
Print or type name of person signing above Title
Please return this completed rescission request form to: NPDES Permit Coverage Rescission \
Stormwater Permitting Program 1n
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

40-.4�0*0
ewESCOPE
BUILDINGS
BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
Laurinburg, North Carolina
July 19, 2017 RECEIVED
Division of Water Quality JUL 2 7 2017
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center CENTRAL FILES
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 DWR SECTION
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR 5 — PERIOD 1)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
Please find enclosed, our completed Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for Stormwater samples collected from BlueScope Buildings North America,
Inc. as required by our permit. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) samples were analyzed for
total recoverable: lead, copper, zinc, pH, oil & grease, and TSS. These results and total rainfall are
included with this report.
Per Tier it requirements in the permit, attached is a Monthly report. This analysis report shows a 5"
exceedance of the zinc benchmark of 0.067 mg/L. TSS and Copper were within normal limits. Additional
sampling indicates that the source of zinc is from the deterioration of the metal roof covering the
manufacturing facility.
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Sincerely, '
i•.
i
Davi o
Plant Manager
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfall #1,- #4)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Markus Elliott
Date of Inspection: 30-Jun-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 1 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Shoe Heel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Fabrication of Steel Building Parts this outfall drains majority of facility property)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Light grey
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
no distinct odor
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
th
(1 J 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
O2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
1 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES
8. Oil Sheen
Is
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NCD
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES
If any, list and describe on separate page. ED
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Markus Elliott
30-Jun-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 2 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Shoe Heel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (Drains small arassv area bordered by a railraod track)
2. No FLOW
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. NoFiow
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
None
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Markus Elliott
30-Jun-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 3 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Leith's Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Steel Parts Storage Drains primarily grassyarea, but also drains some storage areas
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
None Detected
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES CD
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.:
Markus Elliott
30-Jun-17
910-277-1166
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 4 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (drains grassy area only)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
No Flow
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
No Flow
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

•
Blue Scope Bldgs North America
Mr. Markus Elliott
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinburg NC, 28353
0MICROBAC'
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual
Date Reported: 07/12/17
Date Received: 06/30/17
Date Sampled: 06/30/17
Sampled By: AES
Site 1, grab
K7F1063-01
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Field Data
pH
6.5
pH Units
06/30/17
11:55
AES
pH
Analyzed by; Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Copper
<0.005
mg/L
07/05/17
13:58
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Lead
<0.003
mg/L
07/05/17
13:58
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Oil & Grease (SGT HEM)
<5.00
mg/L
07/10/17
10:10
1R
EPA 1664
pl-i
6.5
pH Units
07/06/17
11:00
ELM
SM 4500 H+B-2000
H
(Aqueous)
Iota] Suspended Solids
48.2
mg/L
07/05/17
10:17
TAB
SM 2540 D-1997
Zinc
0.099
mg/L
07/05/17
13:58
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
QC Batch Run - (Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units
Source
RPD
Limit
Lead
ND
mg/L
K7171057
200
Lead
0.242
mg/L
0058538
0.8
200
Copper
ND
mg/L
K7171063
10
Copper
0.261
mg/L
K7F1057
3
10
Copper
ND
mg/L
K7171057
5
10
Copper
0.247
mg/L
0058538
6
200
Zinc
0.106
mg/L
K7F1063
6
10
Lead
ND
mg/L
K7171063
200
Copper
0.248
mg/L
K71-1063
4
10
Zinc
0.332
mg/L
K7F1063
0.5
10
pH
6.9
pH Units
K7F0993
0
200
Total Suspended Solids
46.0
mg/L
K7G0020
10
5
Total Suspended Solids
34.4
mg/L
K7F1035
18
5
Lead
0,230
mg/L
K7FI057
4
200
O'd
0,223
mg/L
K7FI063
1
200
Zinc
0.255
mg/L
K7F1057
4
10
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 1 of 3
2592 Hope Mills Road I Fayetteville, NC 28306 1 910.864.1920 p 1 910.864.8774 f I www.microbac.com

Blue Scope Bldgs North America
Mr. Markus Elliott
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinburg NC, 28353
OMICROBAC4
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual
Date Reported: 07/12/17
Date Received: 06/30/17
Date Sampled: 06/30/17
Sampled By: AES
QC Batch Run - {Micrabac Laboratories, Inc - Fayetteville}
Analyte Result Units Source RPD Limit
Zinc 0,019 mg/L K7FI057 4 10
Zinc 0.243 mg/L 0058538 0.8 200
Notes and Definitions
H Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time
0
State Certifications:
NCDNR HI
NCDOH #377W
•
0
Respectfully Submitted
Bonnie K. Sanders, Senior Project Manage
Thank you for your business. We invite yourjeedback on our level ojservice to you. Please contact the Division Manager, Rob Dermer at 910-864-1920 with any
questions. You may also contact J. Trevor Boyce, President at [e-mail]
Microhac Laboratories, Inc. Page 2 of 3
2592 Hope Mills Road I Fayetteville, NC 28306 1910.864.1920 p 1910.864.8774 f J www.microbac.com

a® `K7F1063- .
Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road -Fayetteville, NC 28306 [phone] / 864-8774 fax
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE 1 OF 1
CIJENT NAME a ADDRESS:
Blue Scope Bldgs
North America
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinbur , INC 28352
Poll 7LaUrinburd
OJECTI LOCATION:
Plant
W
p
�.
U.y
TMPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION(CODE)
c�
rn
Z5
�`
0 Q.
o
�a
m
¢
H
m
a
o
U
c,
J
m
o
0
!V
CODE: A = None
B : HNO3 (pH<2) + <6°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6°C
d = NaOH + cfi°C
E = ZN Acetate + <6°C
F = HCI
G = Sodium Thio
CONfAGT PERSON:
Mr. Markus Elliott
PHONE:
910 277-1166
sAemLER:.
'
Markus Elliott
DATE IMETHOD OFSHIPG:ENT:
Pick up
LAB ID #
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COUP
GRAB
PH
FLOW
TEMP •C
RES.
OR
CHLORINE
SULFIDE
r l
Water Site 1
06/30/17
11:55
X
2
C
U
1
A
1
B
C
Sample 1 A
06/30/17
11:44
X
1
B
Ca
Sample-1 B
06/30/17
11:46
X
1
B
Ca�
L.a b
Rebnq d
O*te
a I
Tim
IS.
Reeei y. (5 natuPm)
.�--� 2
Date
Trots
R wshetl
Tm a
Received nature)
Date
1
ime
ReLnquishetl�Gy:
Go.
Tune
ReceivM hy: (Signature)
Oath- t
Time
5
B
pH riela Site 1 : 6.5
pH Feld Site 2 :
phi Field Site 3 :
pH Field Site 4
initiais--Pp� MAt
Tumaround time: REGg L#jL_ RUSH
Comments or Special Hazards:.
Rain Fail: 0.6 inches Ty ` � ( k
IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
NO YES X WHICH: SPPP
Page 3 of 3

4W.400
BUIESCOPE
BUILDINGS
BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
Laurinburg, North Carolina
May 25, 2017
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR 5 — PERIOD 1)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
RECEIVED
JUN 0 8 Z017
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Please find enclosed, our completed Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for Stormwater samples collected from BlueScope Buildings North America,
Inc. as required by our permit. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) samples were analyzed for
total recoverable: lead, copper, zinc, pH, oil & grease, and TSS. These results and.total rainfall are
included with this report.
Per Tier 11 requirements in the permit, attached is a Monthly report. This analysis report shows a 4"'
exceedance of the zinc benchmark of 0.067 mg/L. TSS was in normal limits. This analysis certificate
indicates an exceedance of the copper benchmark of 0.007 mglL for the second time.
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
i further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Since y
vU�
David Volk
Plant Manager
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfall #1 - #4)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
N CG030352
Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Inspector(s): Aaron Stephen _
Date of Inspection: 24-Apr-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
r 2L �-- �--
Signature of Permittee or Designee
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 3
Receiving Stream: Leith's Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Steel Parts Storage (Drains primarily grassy area, but also drains some storage areas)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
None Detected
4. Clarity
Choose the numb'err which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
mb
NA �1 ) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely
`�muddy.
el
NA [1 ) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence. of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG: NCG030352
County: Scotland Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Inspector(s): Aaron Stephen _
Date of Inspection: 24-Apr-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permiftee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 4 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (drains grassy area only)
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
No Flow
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
No Flow
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFAI_L (SOO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG: NCGO30352
County: Scotland Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Inspector(s): Aaron Stephen
Date of Inspection: 24-Apr-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
0 %-, F-
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 2 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Shoe Heel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (Drains small grassy area bordered by a railraod track)
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.)!
None
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with
w''ith floating solids:
th
NA 1 (2 � 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? 'YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES CED
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Aaron
Date of Inspection: 24-Apr-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
ignature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 1
Receiving Stream: Shoe Heel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Fabrication of Steel Building Parts (this outfall drains majority of facility property)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Li4ht Brown
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
no distinct odor
4. Clarity
Choose the number
rwwhich best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
be
1 (2 } 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely
�muddy,
1 (2 ) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES CD
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

&)MICROBAC®
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 04/28/17
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 04/24/17
Post Office Box 1529 Date Sampled: 04/24/17
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: AES
Site 1, grab
VD0750-01
I Analyze
Result
Units
Analyzed
Analyzed By
Method
Qualifier
Field Data
pH
7.0
pH Units
04/24/17 09:30
AES
pH
Temperature
57.5
°C
04/24/17 09:30
AES
Field
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Copper
0.014
mg/L
04/27/17 10:41
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Lead
<0.003
mg/L
04/27/17 10:41
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Oil & Grease (SGT-HEM)
<5.00
mg/L
04/29/17 10:40
JR
EPA 1664
pH
5.8
pH Units
04/27/17 11:19
ELM
SM 4500 H+B-2000
H
(Aqueous)
Total Suspended Solids
12.8
mg/L
04/26/17 09:00
TAB
SM 2540 D-1997
Zinc
0.077
mg/L
04/27/17 10:41
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
QC Batch Rut! - (Microbac Laboratories, Inc - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units
Source
RPD
Limit
Copper
0.018
mg/L
K7D0774
0
10
Lead
0.232
mg/L
K7D0743
2
200
Lead
ND
mg/L
K7D0774
200
Lead
ND
mg/L
K71310743
200
Lead
0.237
mg/L
0055755
0.8
200
Lead
0.244
mg/L
0055755
2
200
Copper
0.263
mg/L
VD0743
4
10
Copper
0.018
mg/L
K7130774
17
l0
Copper
0.021
mg/L
K7D0743
21
10
Copper
0.245
mg/L
0055755
2
200
Copper
0.237
mg/L
0055755
2
200
"Zinc
-0.004
mg/L
K700774
10
PH
7.2
pH Units
K7D0797
0
200
Total Suspended Solids
113
mg/L
K7130800
0
5
Total Suspended Solids
25.2
mg/L
K7130783
5
5
Microbac Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 3
'3900 1-- Mill. Anted I Alr: 9Rina I ain RrA 109fl n 101n RRA R77A f I -- mi-hai- i-nm

&MICROBAC
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 04/28/17
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 04/24/17
Post Office Box 1529 Date Sampled: 04/24/17
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: AES
QC Batch Run - (Microbac Laboratories, Inc- - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units
Source
RPD
Limit
Total Suspended Solids
10.3
mg/L
K71)0771
3
5
Lead
-0.009
mg/L
K7130774
200
Zinc
0.243
mg/L
K7130743
1
10
Zinc
ND
mg/L
K7130774
10
Zinc
0.007
mg/L
K7D0743
122
10
Zinc
0.234
mg/L
0055755
4
200
Zinc
0.239
mg/L
0055755
4
200
Notes and Definitions
H Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time
State Certifications:
NCDNR N l 1
NCDOH #37714
Respectfully Submitted
Jeanne Overstreet, Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We invite yourfeedback on our level ojservice ro you. Please contact the Division Manager, Rob Dermer al 910-864-1920 with any
questions, You may also contact J. Trevor Boyce, President at [e-mail]
Microbac Laboratories, Inc. page 2 of 3
1901 1- — (Mill. D—A I mr7a ang I ain AAA ia,2n n I ain ARA A77A f I arum, mi—h— rnm

Fayetteville'Division 2592 Hope Mills Road Fayetteville, NC 28306 (910) 864-19201
*MIC.ROBAC` ;
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
CWENTNAME &ADDRESS:
Blue Scope Bldgs
North America
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinbur , NC 28352
Poe
ROJECTILOCATION:
FaurfriburgPlant - S-m
-
w
0O
m
O
-TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION (CODE)
I
y
m
(7
O
o
"'
g
=
C.
US
QL
o
U
.c
1714
J.
CODE: A =:None
B ='HNO3 (pH<2) + `6°C
D = NaOH + �6°C
E = ZN Acetate + <6°C
F = HCI
G = Sodium Thio
coNTACTPERSON:
Mr. Markus Elliott
P"O"E
910) 277-1166
'"`P'
Ae
DATE IMETKODOFSMPMENT:
LAB ID #
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
PH
fA 'C
� ES.
SULFIDE
Site #1
q12-
q y �
6
2
C
2
A
1
B
i
►NI
1
Lab
Re ui6hetl by.
1
Otte
f�
ime
Rec ivad by: (S�gnalure).
Date
2� r�
13 a
2
uithed Oy:
3
F-11-luished
Oate
i���j•I�
Time
r5�z
Rebeivedb
j
9ignawtej
(4 4
Oats
1-2I9
Time
tbZ21-
by:
pate
Time
Received by: (Signature?,
Date
Time '
5
5
inmals—w
Turnaround time- REGULA RUSH
Comments or Special Hazards: D l Ce
�. ( C
pH Field Site 1 : IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
pH Field Site 2: NO_ YES./ WHICH:
pH Field Site 3
pH Field Site 4 : REVIEWED
4i4a I Page 3 of 3

March 22, 2017
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
4wwo
BwescoPE
BUILDINGS
BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
Laurinburg, North Carolina RECEIVED
MAR 28 Z011
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR 5 —PERIOD I)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
Please find enclosed, our completed Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for Stormwater samples collected from BlueScope Buildings North America,
Inc. as required by our permit. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) samples were analyzed for
total recoverable: lead, copper, zinc, pH, oil & grease, and TSS. These results and total rainfall are
included with this report.
Per Tier II requirements in the permit, attached is it Monthly report. This analysis report shows a 3rd
exceedance of the zinc benchmark of 0.067 mg/L. TSS was in normal limits. This analysis certificate
indicates an exceedance of the copper benchmark of 0.007 mg/L for the first time,
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. 1 am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Sincere ,
avid Volk
Plant Manager
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfall #1 - #4)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)

April 21, 2017
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
400**
BLfiIESCOPE
MOLDINGS
BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
Laurinburg, North Carolina
RECEIVED
APR 2 5 201)
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
In accordance with the requirements of Permit NCG500000 Tier III response for exceeding the Zinc
Benchmark, monthly Storm Water analytical monitoring is required. This letter is to inform you that we
were unable to obtain a legitimate run-off sample during the month of March 2017.
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Sinc r
David Volk
Plant Manager

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Markus Elliott
15 Fen 17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
e_,e.�l Z A"-- --
(Signature of Permittee or Desi )
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 1 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Shoe Heel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Fabrication of Steel Building Parts (this outfall drains majority of facility property)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
slightly clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
no distinct odor
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. VFloating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 P 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 iiis�extremely muddy.
!i/ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. [/Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES PO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES VNO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall �j
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES � /NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES10�
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Matrkus Elliott
15-Feb-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
rgnature of Permittee orDesignee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfali No.: 4 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (drains grassy area only)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
No Flow
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
No Flow
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Markus Elliott
15-Feb-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
z6-- -mow &;e
(Signature of Permiftee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 3
Receiving Stream: Leith's Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Steel Parts Storage (Drains primarily grassy area, but also drains some storage areas)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
None Detected
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA ( Pi 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 11P 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YE 112 DO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Markus Elliott
15-Feb-17
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
//� �_ la'
r. . . o-I.Je
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 2
Receiving Stream: Shoe Heel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (Drains small grassy area bordered by a railraod track)
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Yellow light tint
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
None
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 _n 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA __Z�? 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 � 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES /I o:)
8. Oil Sheen
Is
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES =Nb
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES �O
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

J
0MICROBAC®
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 03/03/17
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 02/16/17
Post Office Box 1529 Date Samplcd: 02/15/17
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: Elliott
Site 1, grab
K7B0625-01
j Analyte
Result
Units
Analyzed
Analyzed By
Method
Qualifier
Field Data
pH
7.2
pH Units
02/15/17 11:25
Elliott
pH
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. -
Fayetteville
Copper
0.008
mg/L
03/01/17 11:59
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Lead
0.011
mg/L
03/01/17 11:59
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Oil & Grease (SGT-HEM)
<5.00
mg/L
02/27/17 20:20
JAW
EPA 1664
pH
5.4
pH Units
02/24/17 14:00
ELM
SM 4500 H+B-2000
H
(Aqueous)
Total Suspended Solids
12.8
mg/L
02/22/17 07:55
JR
SM 2540 D-1997
Zinc
0.090
mg/L
03/01/17 11:59
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
QC Batch Run - (Microbac Laboratories, Inc- - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units
Source
RPD
Limit
Copper
0.275
mg/L
0053550
1
200
Copper
0.231
mg/L
K7B0807
7
10
Copper
L57
mg/L
K7130644
1
10
Copper
0.265
mg/L
K7130564
4
10
Copper
0.278
Mg/1'
K7B0563
4
10
Copper
ND
mg/L
K7130807
10
Copper
1.24
mg/L
K7130644
7
10
Copper
0.010
mg/L
K7130564
1
10
Copper
0.270
mg/L
0053550
2
200
Lead
0.251
mg/1_
0053550
2
200
PH
5.0
pl-I Units
K7130846
0
200
PH
6.6
pH Units
K7130840
0
200
pH
6.0
pH Units
K7130599
0
200
Total Suspended Solids
360
mg/L
K7130670
5
5
Total Suspended Solids
560
mg/L
K7130669
27
5
Total Suspended Solids
53.0
mg/L
K7130644
0.6
5
Microbac Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 4
1401 W--- U; 11c D-O'l I IUf• 1winc 1 Gin RRA ia?n n 10in RRA R77A f I un�nu �ninrnhen nnm

�VMICROBAC&
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 03/03/17
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 02/16/17
Post Office Box 1529 Date Sampled: 02/15/17
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: Elliott
QC Batch Run - (Micrabac Laboraroriee, Inc. - Fayetteville)
I Analyte
Result
Units
Source
RPD
Limit
Total Suspended Solids
12.0
mg/L
K7B0614
3
5
Copper
0.033
mg/L
K7130563
3
10
Zinc
0.734
mg/L
K7B0563
3
10
Zinc
0.249
mg/L
0053550
0.4
200
Zinc
0.257
mg/L
0053550
2
200
Zinc
0.277
mglL
K7130807
6
10
Zinc
0.295
mg/L
K71310564
2
10
Zinc
0.027
mg/L
K7B0807
6
10
Zinc
0.349
mg/L
K7130644
0.7
10
Zinc
0.068
mg/L
K7B0564
23
10
Zinc
0.491
mg/L
K7B0563
8
10
Lead
0.267
mg/L
K7130807
5
200
Lead
0.255
mg/L
K7B0644
2
200
Lead
0.249
mg/L
K7B0564
2
200
Lead
0.264
mg/L
K7B0563
4
200
Lead
0.023
mg/L
K7130807
0
200
Lead
0.011
mg/L
K7130644
9
200
Lead
0.012
mg/L
K780564
9
200
Lead
0.041
mg/L
K7B0563
9
200
Lcad
0.241
mg/L
0053550
0.8
200
Zinc
0.614
mg/L
K7130644
3
10
Rainfall:.7"
Notes and Definitions
It Analyze was prepared and/or analyzed outside ofthe analytical method holding time
Microbac Laboratories, Inc. page 2 of 4
7SO7 W1 ^& U;Ile 12^�A I Ur 9R3nA 109n AAA 409n n I GIn f19A 277A f I -- mirrnh— r^m

Blue Scope Bldgs North America
Mr. Markus Elliott
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinburg NC, 28353
State Certifications:
NCDNR 411
NCDOH 437714
�VMICROBAC`
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual
Date Reported: 03/03/17
Date Received: 02/16/17
Date Sampled: 02/15/17
Sampled By: Elliott
Respectfully Submitted
Jcanne Overstreet, Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We invite yourfeedback on our level ofsenice to you. Please contact the Division Manager, Rob Dermer at 9In-8h4-1920 wish any
questions. You may also contact J. Trevor Boyce, President at president@microbac. cam
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 3 of 4
9609 1Jnnn IUillc 0^24 1 Wr 7R ma 10!n ARA ia?n n I nin RRA R77A f I - mi-hnr- r-nm

OMICROBAC" Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road - Fayetteville, NC 28306 [phone] / 86z
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD .
I
loolilifillillilill
CLIENT NAME 6 ADDRESS:
Blue Scope Bldgs
North America
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinbur , NC 28352
PO
PROJECT/LOCATION:
11-aurinburgPlant
J
k
m
u_
01,
TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION CODE
U)
m
is
O
O
Co.o
J
S
1,—
CDC
v,
C_
5
"
N
CODE: A = None
B = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6°C
= H2SQ4 (pH<2) + <6°C
D = NaOH + <6°C
E = ZN Acetate + <6eC
F = HCI
G =Sodium Theo
CONTACT PERSON:
Mr. Markus Elliott
PHONE:
910 2n-1166
SAMPLER:
Markus Elliott
DATE I METHOD OF SHIPMENT:
Pick up
LAB lD 4
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
PH
FLOW
TEMP
CHLORINE RES
SULFIDE
0 1
Water Site 1
02/15/17
11:25
X
2
C
G�
-CC
D
2
A
B
�a
Sample 1
02/15/17
9:00
X
1
B
L Z
Sam le 2
02/15/17
9:05
X
1
B
I
,.
Lab Initials—r MA
Relingui b .
e
Tima
3.D
Received Ayx[5igna rc)
Date
Time
°6
19111, Al?Re
(//JY{ill 2
z-16
7
by:
Da
�� �7
e
LLL5
Rec d nature}
Date
a- i �7Retmqumhed
Time
,� 3
/ 4
by:
Dam
r
Petered by: (S�gnxwm)
Data
Tim.
5
fi
ph Field Site 1 7.2
pH Field Site 2:
pH Field Site 3 :
pH Field Site 4:
Turnaround time: EGULA RUSH
Comments or Special Hazards: CAA--'- ,
Rain Fall :0.7 jit dies
IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
NO YES X WHICH: SPPP
Page 4 of 4

40-40;�*
BLUESCOPE
BUoaDowGs
BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
Laurinburg, North Carolina
February 10, 2017
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVED
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR 4 — PERIOD 2)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
FEB 14 2017
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Please find enclosed, our completed Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for stormwater samples extracted from BlueScope Buildings North America,
Inc. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) sampling as required by our permit (lead, copper zinc,
pH, oil & grease, TSS, and total rainfall). Attached is a summary of the Tier 1 response for exceeding the
TSS base line of 100.0 mg/L. This analysis report shows a 2°1 exceedance of the zinc benchmark of
0.067 mg/L requiring the facility to collect samples monthly under Tier 2 Response.
Coinciding with the rainfall event, a sample should be obtained from the non-stormwater discharge (to
meet the requirements of NCG500000). However, there has been no flow from the discharge point during
this period. Therefore, no results have been included for flow, temperature, oil & grease, and pH from the
non-stormwater discharge.
hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Sincer ,
c
4�0�
David Volk
Plant Manager
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfall #1 - 44)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)
Summary Tier I Baseline Exceedance Response

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
,rtificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
`NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276,7676
Inspector(s): Markus Elliott
Date of Inspection: `�'7X-De6
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2017
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
( jgnature of Permittee 'oK Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 2
Receiving Stream: Shoe Heel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None Drains small grassy area bordered by a railraod track
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Yellow light to medium tint
3. Odor
-nescribe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
None
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 2 r(3% 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA r .1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES �fV ,
8. Oil Sheen �� -
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall ? YES rONO
{ ). Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page. 4!
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
rtificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Markus Elliott
Date of Inspection: 29-Dec-16
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permitteeor Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 1 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Shoe Heel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Fabrication of Steel Building Parts (this outfall drains majority of facility property)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors
yellow light - mediu,
3. Odor
escribe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
no distinct odor
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
1 2 3 (/4f 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where i is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
1 'U 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
J. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
�rtificate of Coverage No. NCG:
county: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Matrkus Elliott
29-Dec-16
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Si nature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 4
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (drains grassy area only)
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
1►L:79M
3. Odor
r)escribe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
No Flow
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the —surface covered with floating solids:
(ti.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES CNO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of materiai (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
). Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
0ificate of Coverage No. NCG: NCG030352
County: Scotland Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Inspector(s): Markus Elliott
Date of Inspection: 29-Dec-16
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Srg`nature of Permf ereor Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 3 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Leith's Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Steel Parts Storage (Drains primarily grassy area, but also drains some storage areas)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
1�escribe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
( . None Detected
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1� 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. FI a frig Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA V 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1� 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam,/
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES CN
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO,
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES rN
]. Other Obvious Indicators of stormwater Pollution; YES O 1
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

OMICROBAC@
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 01/13/17
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 01/04/17
Post Office Box 1529 Date Sampled: 12/29/16
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: Elliott
Site 1, grab
K7A0097-01
Analyte
Result
Units
Analyzed
Analyzed By
Method
Quaiil-ier
Field Data
PH
6.9
pH Units
12/29/16 07:30
Elliott
pH
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. -
Fayetteville
Copper
<0.005
mg/L
01/10/17 12:25
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Lead
<0.003
mg/L
01/10/17 12:25
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Oil & Grease (SGT-HEM)
<5.00
mg/L
01/11/17 12:53
'JAW
EPA 1664
PH
5.9
pH Units
01/05/17 10:10
SW
SM 4500 H+B-2000
H
(Aqueous)
Total Suspended Solids
120
mg/L
01/05/17 10:26
JR
SM 2540 D-1997
Zinc
0.152
mg/L
01/10/17 12:25
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
QC Batch Run - (Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units
Source
R.PD
Limit
Total Suspended Solids
72.0
mg/L
K7A0085
6
5
Copper
ND
mg/L
K7A0097
10
Copper
ND
mg/L
K61-1253
10
Copper
0.255
mg/L
0051700
1
200
Copper
0.240
mg/L
K61-1253
0.4
10
Total Suspended Solids
30.0
mg/L
K7A0107
10
5
Copper
0.221
mg/L
K7A0097
7
10
Total Suspended Solids
3.00
mg/L
K7A0076
18
5
Zinc
0.147
mg/L
K7A0097
3
10
Lead
ND
mg/L
K7A0097
200
PH
8.3
pH Units
K7A0139
1
200
Lead
0.241
mg/L
K7A0097
7
200
Zinc
0.377
mg/L
K7A0097
7
10
Zinc
0.403
mg/L
K6L1253
13
10
Zinc
0.114
mg/L
K6L1253
9
10
Lead
0.252
mg/L
K61-1253
2
200
Microbac laboratories, Inc.
Page 1 of 3
9SQ9 Nnna Mille P^nol I Fwa"avilln Pir 7R anR 14-in RRA in?n n I taro RRA R77A f I -- mi—h., i-nm

OMICROBACN)
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 01/13/17
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 01/04/17
Post Office Box 1529 Date Sampled: 12/29/16
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: Elliott
QC Batch Run - (Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units Source
RPD Limit
Lead
ND
mg/L K6L1253
200
Lead
0,269'
mg/L 0051700
0.4 - 200
Zinc
0.265
mg/L 0051700
1 200
Rainfall: 0.62"
Notes and Definitions
H Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time
State Certifications:
NCDNR 911
NCDOH 437714
Respectfully Submitted
Jeanne Overstreet, Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We invite yourfeedhack on our level ofsen tee to you. Please contact the Division Manager, Roh Dermer at 910-864-1920 with any
questions. You may also contact J. Trevor Boyce. President at [e-mail]
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 2 of 3
9.09 4l— ■Aille 0—d I P—.44—ill. kid' 9A4nt" I ain RRA 7a911 n I aln ARA 1277A f I ur—, nnie,nh— wr,m

Stormwater Benchmark Exceedance Plan
February 10, 2017
Purpose:
In accordance with BlueScope NA Stormwater Pollution Prevention Permit, a Tier 1 response is required for a
baseline exceedance. The last storm water sample exceeded the Zinc baseline of 0.067 mg/L and the TSS
baseline of 100'mg/L at outfall 1. Per that permit, a stormwater management inspection of the facility is
required.
Procedure:
On December 29, 2016, a storm water sample was collected from outfall 1. The sample was collected in
accordance with protocol and shipped to a certified laboratory. An exceedance alert date January 6, 2017 was
received indicating that the TSS level exceeded the baseline. A Formal laboratory report was received with a
0.113 mg/L Zinc concentration and a 120 mg1L TSS concentration on January 13, 2017.
On January 9, 2017, a Tier 1 investigation for TSS exceedance was started per requirements of the
Stormwater General Permit No. NCG030000 as follows:
If: The first valid sampling results are above a benchmark value, or outside of the benchmark range, for any
parameter at any outfall,
Then: The permittee shall:
1. Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving sampling
results.
2. identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark value exceedance.
3. Identify potential and select the specific: source controls, operational controls, or
physical improvements to reduce concentrations of the parameters of concern,
and/or to bring concentrations within the benchmark range.
4. Implement the selected actions within two months of the inspection.
5. Record each instance of a Tier One response in the SPPP. Include the date and value of the benchmar
k exceedence, the inspection date, the personnel conducting the inspection, the selected actions, and
thedate the selected actions were implemented.
A tour the BBNA Laurinburg property was conducted to identify potential sources of TSS. A review of
manufacturing process and production that has changed since the last storm water samples were taken.
Storage of product and raw material in the yard was reviewed. Non -Hazardous Waste handling methods were
also investigated.
The January 13 sampling report was a second benchmark exceedance for Zinc. This required the facility to
begin monthly sampling per the Tier Two response in Stormwater General Permit No. NCG030000. The
monthly sampling will begin February 2017.

Findings: '
The following evaluations are reported:
1. Dead vegetative materials along the ditch to outfall 1.
2. No natural filtering in the ditch to the outfall.
3. Storm water samples were collected and analyzed from various potential zinc sources throughout the
facility. Zinc concentrations from the roof of Building 1 were 3 times the outfall concentration.
Conclusion:
Based on this investigation, it is concluded that the most likely source of the Zinc runoff is the metal roofing of
the facility structures and not the manufacturing processes. More data is needed to validate that conclusion.'
Lack of natural erosion control (dead vegetative growth). Need to evaluate the need for winter cover crop.
Continue evaluation of other sources.
Recommendations:
Based on these findings and conclusions, the following recommendations are considered:
1. Plant winter rye as erosion control.
2. Evaluate the need for additional rip -rap closer to outfall.
3. Conduct monthly Stormwater samples to include samples for building downspouts.

4W.400
BLvEgcoPE
BUIodDowGs
BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
Laurinburg, North Carolina
November 28, 2016
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVED
DEC 0 1 2016
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION!
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING TIER I RESPONSE
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
Please find enclosed the completed laboratory analysis report for storm water samples extracted from
BlueScope Buildings North America Inc., Laurinburg, NC from various locations. Sampling was
conducted under our Tier I Response Plan for exceeding the "Line base line of 0.067 mg/L and is an
attempt to identify Zinc source(s) at this facility.
These samples were not intended to comply with the Semi-annual Monitoring requirement of the SWPP
permit, but are for our investigative purpose to assist us in identifying the source(s) of Zinc. As a result of
one or more of these samples exceeded the Zinc base line, we are forwarding the results to keep you
abreast of our efforts to identify and control the source(s).
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis.of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Vol
Plant Manager
Enclosures
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody
Summary Tier I Baseline Exceedance Response

Stormwater Exceedance Tier 1 Plan
August 1, 2016
DEC U 4 -u1F;
CEN7'k,4 Ft! �S
Purpose: QWR. ` 'JON
In accordance with BlueScope NA Stormwater Pollution Prevention Permit, a Tier 1 response is required for a
baseline exceedance. The last storm water sample exceeded the Zinc baseline of 0.067 mg/L at outfall 1. Per
that permit, a Stormwater management inspection of the facility is required.
Procedure:
On June 28, 2016, a storm water sample was collected from outfall 1. The sample was collected in
accordance with protocol and shipped to a certified laboratory. An exceedance report date July 6, 2016 was
received indicating that the Zinc level exceeded the baseline. Formal laboratory report was received with a
0.113 mg/L Zinc concentration on July 18, 2016.
On July 7, 2016, a Tier 1 investigation was started per requirements of the Stormwater General Permit
No. NCG030000 as follows:
If: The first valid sampling results are above a benchmark value, or outside of the benchmark range, for any
parameter at any outfall;
Then: The permittee shall:
Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving sampling
results.
2. Identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark value exceedance.
3. Identify potential and select the specific: source controls, operational controls, or
physical improvements to reduce concentrations of the parameters of concern,
and/or to bring concentrations within the benchmark range.
4. Implement the selected actions within two months of the inspection.
S. Record each instance of a Tier One response in the SPPP. Include the date and value of the benchmar
k exceedence, the inspection date, the personnel conducting the inspection, the selected actions, and
thedate the selected actions were implemented.
A tour the BBNA Laurinburg property was conducted to identify potential sources of Zinc. A review of
manufacturing process and production that has changed since the last storm water samples were taken.
Storage of product and raw material in the yard was reviewed. Non -Hazardous Waste handling methods were
also investigated.

Findings:
The following evaluations are reported:
1. Raw materials were studied. The only material stored in the yard is unpainted steel. This material is
staged by order between buildings open at one end. The Safety Data Sheet indicated very low
concentrations of Zinc in the metal, making it an unlikely source.
2. Dust from welding operations was considered. Zinc is not a desired element in filler wire and again the
very low concentration of Zinc in the raw material did not make this a probable source.
3. Paint used to coat the metal has a significant amount of a Zinc compound in it for the pigment. The
majority of the product coated at this facility grey containing a Zinc compound. The coating is allowed
to dry inside the building before moving to the yard for later shipping.
4. Truss Purlin XT is assembled inside and staged in the yard for shipping. The purlin is a coated
galvanized material and then acrylic coated and is stored and assembled inside the building.
5. Waste hopper content was evaluated. A landfill hopper is where waste is placed for weekly pick-up.
Included in this general waste is the filters and other coverings from the paint booths. This material is
allowed to dry, making it safe for landfilling. Particles of dried paint could break away from the
materials and get into the waste -stream. The dumpster is located approximately 100 yards across a
paved lot from the outfall sampling point.
6. The roof is made of a galvanized metal. Due to the age of the building, breakdown of the metal is a
consideration.
Conclusion:
Based on this investigation, it is concluded that the most likely source of the Zinc runoff increase is the paint
waste and/or the galvanized roof. Best Management Practices need to be implemented to contain paint
particles to the dumpster. Continue evaluation of other sources.
Recommendations:
Based on these findings and conclusions, the following recommendations are considered:
1. Identify and implement BMP for handling disposal of filters and paper overspray protection waste.
2. Evaluate the need for downspout filters on building gutters.
3. Check Zinc at Outfall 1 thirty days from this report.
4. Collect Semi -Annual Runoff Sample in 90 -- 120 from last semi-annual sample (provided a rain -event
occurs)
5. Continue to investigate sources of Zinc at this facility.

gp cF-NF-'D
C W R SF-�T pN
D
0MICROBAC"
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 10/31/16
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 10/18/16
Post Office Box 1529 Date Sampled: 10/07/16
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: Elliott
Site 1, grab
K610580-01
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Zinc 0.085 mg/L 10/25/16 10:38 AC EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Site 2, grab
K6J0580-02
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Zinc 0.307 mg/L 10/25/16 10:38 AC EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Site 3, grab
K6J0580-03
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Zinc 0.136 mg/L 10/25/16 10:38 AC EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
QC Batch Run - Microbac Laboratories, Inc
- Fayetteville)
Analytc
Result
Units
Source
RPD
Limit
Zinc
0.259
mg/L
K6.10723
0.4
10
Zinc
0.248
mg/L
K6J0722
2
10
Zinc
0.016
mg/L
K6J0723
13
10
Zinc
0.016
mg/L
K6J0722
0
10
Zinc
0.241
mg/L
0049024
0
200
State Certifications: Respectfutly Submitted
NCDNR #I1
NCD011 937714
Bonnie K. Sanders, Senior Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We invile your feedback on our level ofservice to you. Please contact the Division Manager, Rob Dermer at 910-864-1920 wilh any
queslions. You may also contact J. Trevor Boyce, Presidenl al president a�lmicrobac.com
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 1 of 2
')rn') u....- tu:u. o—a i IJP 701nG 1 04n EGA 40sn w ; nAn MCA 077A s i ... .....—, 6-- ---

Blue Scope Bldgs North America
Mr. Markus Elliott
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinburg NC, 28353
OMICROBACO
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual
Date Reported: 10/31/16
Date Received: 10/18/16
Date Sampled: 10/07/16
Sampled By: Elliott
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
'JRo9 LJnnn Mille DnsA I Fwe44varill. W!' 9R9na I ain ➢RA •f09n n I oin RRA A77A f I unam� mirrnha� r-nm

Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road - Fayetteville, NC 28306 [phone] / 864-8774 fax
*MICROBACe
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE 1 OF 1
CLIENT NAME h ADDRESS:
Blue Scope Bldgs
North America
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinbur , NC 28352
PDX
PROJECT r LOCATION:
11-aurinburgPlant
LLIJ
O
m
u_
O
1
TYPE
OF
ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION CODE
�
a)@
to
O
°�
a
L
2
Q
u)
H
�,
CL
a
U
C
J
IN
B
CODE: A = None
B = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6°C
D = NaOH + <6°C
E = ZN Acetate + <6`C
F=HCI-
G - Sodium Thio
CONTACT PERSON:
Mr. Markus Elliott
PHONE:
(910 277-1 166
SAMPLER:
Markus Elliott
DATElMETHOD OF SHIPMENT:
Pick up
LAB ID #
SAMPLE TYPE
Site #1
DATE
10/07/16
TIME
9:30AM
COMP
GRAB
PH
FLOW
TEMP °C
RES.
CHLORINE
SULFIDE
Site #2
10/07/16
10:05AM
1
B.
Site #3
10/07/16
9:45AM
1
B
Lab Initials--*
Relinquished by:
Date
Time
Re y (Signatyie
Date
Time
ReWhquished by:
Data
ime
Recervetl y: (frgnaiur
Rate
Time
3
4
Relinquished by:
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Rafe
iime
5
1
1 6
MAE
Turnaround time: REGULAR
Comments or Special Hazards:
RUSH
pH Field Site 1 : IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
pH Field Site 2 : NO___ _ YES_ WHICH:
pH Field Site 3 :
pH Field Site 4 :

4W400
suUEscore
BUILDINGS
BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
Laurinburg, North Carolina
August 4, 2016
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ReGOVED
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORNIWA'ITER ANALYTICAL MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR 4 — PERIOD 1)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
AUG 0 9 2016
CENTRAL FILES
0WR SECTION
Please find enclosed, our completed Stornwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for stormwater samples extracted from BlueScope Buildings North America,
Inc. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) sampling as required by our permit (lead, copper zinc,
pH, oil & grease, TSS, and total rainfall). Attached is a summary of the Tier I response for exceeding the
Zinc base line of 0.067 mg/L.
Coinciding with the rainfall event, a sample should be obtained from the non-stormwater discharge (to
meet the requirements of� NCG500000). However, there has been no flow from the discharge point during
this period. Therefore, no results have been included for flow, temperature, oil & grease, and pH from the
non-stormwater discharge.
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Sine el.y,
David Volk
Plant Manager
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfall #1 - #4)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)
Summary Tier I Baseline Exceedance Response
M

STORMWATER DID �'GE OUTFAi,T, (SDO)
MONiTOI REPORT
0
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG030000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR:
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 O 3 S 2- (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days frona
��J the date the facility receives t am ling results f om the I horatory.)
FACILITY NAME 43) u e S roy& 13"'1 114 4 S A/A --RECEIVED COUNTY -„ - - S_ C�a 16 -
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES /y�trk r //� 1f- I HONE NO. (�ZQ
CERTIFIED LABORATORY 14 r(rb Lab # _ - Alit U 9 20.16
Lab # PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE
CENTRAL FILES
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements DWR SECTION
OUAW
No.
Date
Sample Collected;
mo/dd. r. ..
00530
0040Q. ..
_ 01051
04.S5G:. ..
'78141
dofal:Snspended Solids,
..-m
pH,
Standard:units
Lead,,rng/L
O11 and.GreQse,.
`Total,Toxtc,Organics
Benchmark
-
100.
Within 6:0- 9 0
0.033.
30
I
,o03
<
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes, )(no
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity onitoring Requirements
'Outfall
No.
Date
Sample ColtectM'
m6ldd/�r
00556..
00530:. _
.00400
Oil and Grease;
ni
Tatal.Siispeirded.Solids;.
pH,
Stoddard units
New;lVlotnr Oil Usage,
Annual.avera c gallyho
Benchmark
30
Note: if you report a sampled value to excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date 1/Y (first event sampled)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Date (list each additional event sampled this reporting period, and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
S WU-245-102107

Total T t ganics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform �Iinishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture etecti.._:; crystals, or
manufa, athode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject
to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469 12; fcr.
electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may request that DWQ waive monitoring of total toxic organics. The solvent
management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. For those facilities allowed such a waiver, the
discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics (TTO), I
certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or stormwater
runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report: I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the solvent management
plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Mark,,, 7--//' o
Name, (Print name)
Title (Prizit title}
(Signature) ate)
"ff certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and complete. t am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the pos5*ility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
s
of 1Per""ttee)
(Batqf

BlueScop a Buildings North America, Inc. P/P
9
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
unty: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910-277-1166
Markus Elliott
28-Jun-16
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Sgnature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 1 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area'.
ditch
Fabrication of Steel Building Parts (this outfall drains majority of facility property)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
yellow very light almost clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
r no distinct odor
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
1 62, 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 2 '01 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
1 -% 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES fNO8
. Oil SheenIs there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall?hY-Ek NO
.10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids andlor.the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
unty: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Markus Elliott
28-Jun-16
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
A144��4'11 -
(Si nature of Permrttee or D'es, 96ee)
1
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 2
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None Drains small grassy area bordered by a railraod track
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
No Flow
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
No Flow
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1?
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
ONA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam ^�
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES 6N
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES r—NO)
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YESO
iny, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
( unty: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Markus Elliott
28-Jun-16
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
z a22�
(S gnature of Perrnittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 3 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Leith's Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Steel Parts Storage (Drains primarily grassy area, but also drains some storage areas)
2. Color
RECEIVED
AUG 0 9 i0u
CENTRAL Fll E`7
DWR SECT10t
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e, smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
CNone Detected
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA ( D1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA (1) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the storrwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge?
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge?
6 7 8 9 10
YES ICN Q
YES ON 0
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall 11-77
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES
' iny, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
unty: Scotland
Inspector(s):
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Matrkus Elliott
Date of Inspection: 28-Jun-16
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
e,4,1. Ael_;�
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 4 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): ditch
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (drains grassy area only)
2. Color
RECO V ED
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECT10'
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
No Flow
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
No Flow
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the arnount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
N DA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
`. V
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES �O
8. Oil Sheen r
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES DNO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES
-10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES
any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure, These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

V.
AUG o 9 2016
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Blue Scope Bldgs North America
0MICROBAC"
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinburg NC, 28353
Site 1, grab
K6F 1169-01
Date Reported: 07/18/16
Date Received: 06/29/16
Date Sampled: 06/28/16
Sampled By: Elliott
I Analyte
Result
Units
Analyzed
Analyzed By
Method
Qualifier
Field Data
pH
7.4
pH Units
06/28/16 12:15
Elliott
pH
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. -
Fayetteville
Copper
0.007
mg/L
07/05/16 16:37
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Lead
<0.003
mg/L
07/05/16 16:3.7
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Oil & Grease (SGT-HEM)
<5.00
mg/L
07/14/16 09:00
SW
EPA 1664
Total Suspended Solids
14.2
mg/L
06/30/16 10:20
CCR
SM 2540 D-1997
Zinc
0.113
mg/L
07/05/16 16:37
AC
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
QC Batch Run - (Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units
Source
RPD
Limit
Lead
0.237
mg/L
0045247
8
200
Total Suspended Solids
3.60
mg/L
K6F1166
11
5
Total Suspended Solids
55.0
mg/L
K6F1187
4
5
Total Suspended Solids
6.33
mg/L
K6171193
11
5
Copper
0.240
mg/L
0045247
6
200
Copper
0.009
mg/L
K61--0993
11
10
Copper
0.009
mg/L
K6F1181
0
10
Copper
0.257
mg/L
K6F0993
6
10
Zinc
0.355
mg/L
K6F1181
4
10
Lead
ND
mg/L
K6F0993
200
Lead
0.003
mg/L
K6F1181
0
200
Lead
0.239
mg/L
K6F0993
3
200
Lead
0.240
mg/L
K6171181
4
200
Zinc
0.244
mg/L
0045247
7
200
Zinc
0.090
mg/L
K6F0993
3
l0
Zinc
0.108
mg/L
K6F1181
3
10
"Zinc
0.340
mg/L
K6F0993
3
10
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 1 of 3
1901 W— W11. 12-4 1 C—.14-411. kit' 9R7nr I o4n RCA 4a,3n n I cin RCA R77A f I uaunu minrnh�r rnm

OMICROBAC&
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 07/18/16
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 06/29/16
Post Office Box 1529 Date Sampled: 06/28/16
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: Elliott
QC Batch Run - (Microbac Laboratories, Ina - Fayetteville)
Analyte Result Units Source RPD Limit
Copper 0.251 mg/L K61`1181 4 10
State Certifications:
NCDNR #I11
NCDOH 037714
91�-Ia-"'1.14'�- tf:5"' '-&
Respectfully Submitted
Jeanne Overstreet, Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We invite yourjeedback on our level ojservice to you. Please contact the Division Manager, Rob Dermer at 910-864-1920 with any
questions. You may also contact J. Trevor Boyce, President at [e-mail]
Mlcrobac Laboratories, Inc.
rPage 2 of 3
h{09 U--- Mill. 12^aA I lur` 7n%na I ain ARA 400n n I ain AAA 077A f I .,...n.1 mirrnhsr r.,m

Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road - Fayetteville, NC 28306 [phone] / 864-8774 fax
OMICROBAC.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE 1 OF
CLIENT NAME& ADDRESS:
Scope Bldgs
North America
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinbur , NC 28352
PO
OJECTILOCATIQN:
rLaurinburgPlant
r
to
LL•
O
TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION(CODEBlue
[n
N
m
�
g
¢
�,.
o
U
Q
N
o
D
CODE: A = None
8 = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6°C
D = NaOH + <6°C
E = ZN Acetate + <6°C
F = HCI
G = Sodium Thio
CONTACT PERSON:�
Mr. Markus Elliott
PHONE
910 277-1166
SAMPLER:
Markus Elliott
DATE METHOD SHIPMENT: f� _
►fA O` I' l Otcc.ta �—
LAB ID #
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
PH
FLOW
TEMP*C
CHRORINE
SULFIDE
(�
Site #1
06/28119
12:15
X
2
C
2
A
1
B
<Z
Lab
ReUnq ' d bT:
Date
Time
Rec ' by. {Si )
Date
Time
iq�
Date
Time
Reti rshetl b
Date
ime
R ature)
s
�-- 4
Co IV
14 Flo
Reiarqutshe by:
Date
Time
Received by: ( nature)
Date
Time
' S
5
pH Field Site 1 : 7.4
pH Field Site 2 :.
pH Field Site :3 :
pH Field Site 4 :
Initials--lo.
Turnaround time: REGULAR RUSH
Comments or Special Hazards:
IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE? REVIEYVED
NO YES X WHICH: SWPPP
Page 3 of 3

Stormwater Exceedance Tier 1 Plan
August 1, 2016
Purpose:
In accordance with BlueScope NA Stormwater Pollution Prevention Permit, a Tier 1 response is required for a
baseline exceedance. The last storm water sample exceeded the Zinc baseline of 0.067 mg/L at outfall 1. Per
that permit, a stormwater management inspection of the facility is required.
Procedure:
On June 28, 2016, a storm water sample was collected from outfall 1. The sample was collected in
accordance with protocol and shipped to a certified laboratory. An exceedance report date July 6, 2016 was
received indicating that the Zinc level exceeded the baseline. Formal laboratory report was received with a
0.113 mg/L Zinc concentration on July 18, 2016.
On July 7, 2016, a Tier 1 investigation was started per requirements of the Stormwater General Permit
No. NCG030000 as follows:
If.- The first valid sampling results are above a benchmark value, or outside of the benchmark range, for any
parameter at any outfall;
Then: The permittee shall:
1. Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving sampling
results.
2. Identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark value exceedance.
3. Identify potential and select the specific: source controls, operational controls, or
physical improvements to reduce concentrations of the parameters of concern,
and/or to bring concentrations within the benchmark range.
4. Implement the selected actions within two months of the inspection.
5. Record each instance of a Tier One response in the 5PPP. Include the date and value of the benchmar
k exceedence, the inspection date, the personnel conducting the inspection, the selected actions, and
thedate the selected actions were implemented.
A tour the BBNA Laurinburg property was conducted to identify potential sources of Zinc. A review of
manufacturing process and production that has changed since the last storm water samples were taken.
Storage of product and raw material in the yard was reviewed. Non -Hazardous Waste handling methods were
also investigated.

Findings:
The following evaluations are reported:
1. Raw materials were studied. The only material stored in the yard is unpainted steel. This material is
staged by order between buildings open at one end. The Safety Data Sheet indicated very low
concentrations of Zinc in the metal, making it an unlikely source.
2. Dust from welding operations was considered. Zinc is not a desired element in filler wire and again the
very low concentration of Zinc in the raw material did not make this a probable source.
3. Paint used to coat the metal has a significant amount of a Zinc compound in it for the pigment. The
majority of the product coated at this facility grey containing a Zinc compound. The coating is allowed
to dry inside the building before moving to the yard for later shipping.
4. Truss Puriin XT is assembled inside and staged in the yard for shipping. The purlin is a coated
galvanized material and then acrylic coated and is stored and assembled inside the building.
5. Waste hopper content was evaluated. A landfill hopper is where waste is placed for weekly pick-up.
Included in this general waste is the filters and other coverings from the paint booths. This material is
allowed to dry, making it safe for landfilling. Particles of dried paint could break away from the
materials and get into the waste -stream. The dumpster is located approximately 100 yards across a
paved lot from the outfall sampling point.
6. The roof is made of a galvanized metal. Due to the age of the building, breakdown of the metal is a
consideration.
Conclusion:
Based on this investigation, it is concluded that the most likely source of the Zinc runoff increase is the paint
waste and/or the galvanized roof. Best Management Practices need to be implemented to contain paint
particles to the dumpster. Continue evaluation of other sources.
Recommendations:
Based on these findings and conclusions, the following recommendations are considered:
1. Identify and implement BMP for handling disposal of filters and paper overspray protection waste.
2. Evaluate the need for downspout filters on building gutters.
3. Check Zinc at Outfall 1 thirty days from this report.
4. Collect Semi -Annual Runoff Sample in 90 — 120 from last semi-annual sample (provided a rain -event
occurs)
5. Continue to investigate sources of Zinc at this facility.

STORMWATER DI'GE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITOI REPORT
GENEkAL PERMIT NO. NCG030000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 b 3 Z_
FACILITY NAME j3 Fu.e_ Af
PERSON COLLECTING SAMP ES eF,75
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NG Nk Lab #_
O /,/- Lab #
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: _
(This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the samp.ng results from the laboratory.)
COUNTY
PHONE NO.( !3ZP) 1,9 ZZ/
PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Outfau
No.
Date
Sample Collected: ,
moldd/. r:
.00530..
06400.
.. 01051
00556:.
T78141
-Total,Susperided Solids,
m
`pH,
Standard: units .. -
:i;ead mg/L
Oil and Grease,
m.
Tatal',Tozi�.Otganics
Benchmark
Withih-6.0' 9�0: '.
... _:.. 0.033.
30
I
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than-55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes ,tno
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity onitoring Requirements
Outfall
No:
Date
Sample Collecfeif;
_
mo/dd/ r
00556 . � .
:00530;
00400
.. .. .
Oil and Grease;-
m
Total.Snspeiided Solids;
. .. . - -:
:.m WL
pH,
Statidard:units:. ..
New Niotor.0i1 Usage,
: .
°.. Arinual'h*cri a gal/rho
Benchmark
-'
30 .
100
_
ivoie: it you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date �• I� (first event sampled) l�
Total Event Precipitation (inches): 1
Date (list each additional event sampled this reporting period, and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: D WQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
JAN 9.6 'tits
DEi RRR-LAi�D QUALITY
S PONAT�RP�Rrlif'�
S WU-245-102107

Total T Alganics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perforni'7unishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture elecq. ; rystals, or
manufa. _e cathode raytubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject
P rP g
to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11;-for semiconductor manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 464.12; for,
electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
'Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may request that DWQ waive monitoring of total toxic organics. The solvent
management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. For those facilities allowed such a waiver, the
discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics (TTO), I
certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the sormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or stormwater
'runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report: I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the solvent management
plan included in the Stormiater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
K
Title (Print title)
gnature) (Date)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, -and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possibjlity of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
of Vernlittee)
(Date)
SWI1-245-1 n')1 m

January 20, 2016
NCDEQ — Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Attn: Stormwater Billing
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL, MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR 1 —PERIOD 1)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
Please find enclosed, our completed Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for stormwater samples extracted from B1ueScope Buildings North America,
Inc. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) sampling as required by our permit (lead, pH, oil &
grease, TSS, and total rainfall).
Coinciding with the rainfall event, a sample should be obtained from the non-stormwater discharge (to
meet the requirements of NCG500000). There has been flow from the discharge point during this period.
Results have been included for flow, temperature, oil & grease, and pH from the non-stormwater
discharge.
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me,
Since
David Volk
Plant Manager
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfall # 1 - #4)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)
RECEIVED
JAN 2 8 h-16
DENR-LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING
11fiRl 1U1 S100vifJ�slirrred�SuJcr�lFmirnruric+rtul_Cunrplirrnr:e_Re�isrerllarrirn+i»rentu1201 �Sre,runrur�rAlr,nitr,rin� Report (17mv).docm

6)MICRO13AC"
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Bldgs North America Date Reported: 01/04/16
Mr. Markus Elliott Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual Date Received: 12/18/15
Post Office Box 1529 Date Sampled: 12/17/15
Laurinburg NC, 28353 Sampled By: Elliott
Site 1, grab
K5L0936-01
Analyle
Result
Units
Analyzed
Analyzed By
Method
Qualifier
Field Data
PH
8.2
pH Units
12/17/15 14:55
Elliott
pH
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
- Fayetteville
Lead
0.004
mg/L
12/21/15 12:12
JAW
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Oil & Grease (HEM)
<5.00
mg/L
12/31/15 09:15
SW
EPA 1664 Rev. B
PH
5.8
pH Units
12/21/15 16:00
ELM
SM 4500 H+B-2000
H
(Aqueous)
Total Suspended Solids
27.5
mg/L
12/21/15 10:55
CCR
SM 2540 D-1997
QC Batch Run - (Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units
Source
RPD
Limit
PH
6.2
pH Units
K5L0934
0
200
Total Suspended Solids
40.0
mg/L
K5L0871
2
5
Total Suspended Solids
18.3
mg/L
K51-0930
0
5
Lead
0.004
mg/L
K5L0658
0
200
Lead
0,003
mg/L
K5L0936
29
200
Lead
0,234
mg/L
K5L0658
9
200
Lead
0.255
mg/L
K5L0936
0.8
200
Total Suspended Solids
13.0
mg/L
K5L0937
5
5
Rainfall: O.S"
Notes and Definitions
11 Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time
Microbac Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 3
gaol "--- Uill. 12-1 1 F",e..e,.rne rut' 9R211R I ain RRA i09n n I ain RRA R77A f I

s— i-,
Blue Scope Bldgs North America
Mr. Markus Elliott
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinburg NC, 28353
State Certifications:
NCDNR # I I
NCDOH #37714
�MICROBAC
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Project: Storm Water Sample - Biannual
Date Reported: 01/04/16
Date Received: 12/18/15
Date Sampled: 12/17/15
Sampled By: Elliott
Respectfully Submitted 1
Jeanne Overstreet, Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We invite yourfeedback on our level ofservice to you. Please contact the Division Manager, Rob Dermer at 910-864-1920 with any
questions. You may also contact J. Trevor Boyce, President at presidentClmicrobac.com
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 2 of 3
7tti07 41nna Mille Annrl 1 Pnwa"awilla 411'- '22Qf19Z I OIn 2RA 4ci in - 104A RRA A77A f I ..nano ..airrr.l.ar r...n

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Matrkus Elliott
28-Dec-15
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Sig ature of Permittee or bes'ig ee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 4 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (drains grassy area only)
2. Color
ditch
PCCC I VED
JAN 2 8 2016
DENR-LAND QUALI y
SrORMWATER PERMITTING
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
No Flow
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge?
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge?
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
6 7 8 9 10
YES NO
YES NO
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG: NCG030352
County: Scotland Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Inspector(s): Markus Elliott
Date of Inspection: 17-Dec-15
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
, �; �'�;�AK 01-wi; �-=
~�
(Signature o Pe ittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 1
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Fabrication of Steel Building Parts this outfall drains majority of facility ro e
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Light yellow tint
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
none
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
1 2 3 0 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 ' 12J 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely mudd .
1 2 (4 5 6 7 $ 9 10
V
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES 10
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES jN0/
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Markus Elliott
28-Dec-15
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 2
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None Drains small grassy area bordered by a railraod track
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
redish brown tint
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
None
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 2 %� 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 2 V 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall?
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES N
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Markus Elliott
17-Dec-15
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
,�I,g5tne Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 3 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Leith's Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Steel Parts Storage (Drains primarily grassy area, but also drains some storage areas)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA V 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
S. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA D, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA P 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES ONO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES VO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? /YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

NPDES - Semiannual Monitoring
Version: R1 - April 2003
Monitoring Overview
This monitoring involves a trained individual from BlueScope performing the following tasks:
1. Measure temperature of the NPDES effluent, as well as temperature in the receiving stream into which the
effluent is discharged both updstream and downstream of the discharge point.
2. Measure pH of the effluent.
3. Check to make sure that the effluent contains no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than
trace amounts.
4. Collect a sample of the effluent to be sent offsite for Oil/Grease analysis.
5. Document estimated flow of the effluent. Flow is estimated as the difference between total water received
from the local water supply minus the water that is discharged to the local POTW. These water amounts are
contained in a bill received from Laurinburg Maxton Airport Commission ("Meter 1" is water recieved, and
"Meter 2" is discharge to sewer).
Monitoring Data
Data collected and obtained is to be entered below in the Yellow Fields.
Monitoring Performed By:
Markus Elliott
Date:
12/17/2015
Time:
2:55PM
Temperature of Effluent Stream: 60 °F
Converted Temperature of Effluent Stream: 15.6 °C
Temperature UPSTREAM of discharge point: 60 °F
Converted Upstream Temperature: 15.6 oC
Temperature DOWNSTREAM of discharge point: 60 joF
Converted Downstream Temperature: 15.6 °C
Is Downstream Temperature less than 2.8°C higher
than Upstream Temperature? YES In Compliance
Is Downstream Temperature less than 32°C? YES In Compliance
pH of Effluent Stream: 8.2
Is pH between 6.0 - 9.0? YES In Compliance
Is discharge of solids or visible foam only of trace - l
amounts or less (YES/NO)? yes In Compliance
Results of Oil & Grease Analysis: 1 4.9999 mg/L (from Outside Lab)
Is Oil & Grease <15.0 or <20.0? YES
Total Water Received (last months bill)
Total Water Received (bill from two months ago)
Total Water Received (bill from three months ago)
Total Water to POTW (last months bill)
Total Water to POTW (bill from two months ago)
Total Water to POTW (bill from three months ago)
Estimated Average Monthly Flow:
Estimated Avg. Daily Flow (based on 30 days):
20
10
20
4.7
4.9
12
0.4
In Compliance
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
Note: After data is entered into form, print it out and send to plant manager to be archived in the
compliance manual. If any of the values are "Out of Compliance" or "Take Another Sample", contact
Plant Manager immediately.

am
STORMWATER DOGE OUTFALL (SDO) ,
MONITOI REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG030000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: v2�
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 0 3 �5.1 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME tj J ES C-o P : COUNTY C07 L ^ ,-,3 rZ>
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES „Riz%(za:v 5 re P He--) _ PHONE NO. 10 -7
CERTIFIED LABORATORY ATC903PC.1r 93 _ Lab #
Lab # PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
Outfall
No.
Date
SampleCollected,
.
00530.
00400.
', _ 01051
00556...
.: ':78.141
Total Suspended Solids;
m
pH,
Standard units
Lead; mglL
..
:Oil.and..Grease,:
m
'Total .Toxic.Organi0sl
:... m /L..
Benchmark
-
100
Within 6:0. 90:.
0,033
30
1
21 iS
�Gc
�
• �l5
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month?_ yes Yno
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activitv Monitoring Requirements
Outfall
No:
Date
Sample Collected;
ino/dd% r
00556
0053& .;_
00400 .
Oil and Grease-.
Total Suspended Solids,.
, In /L.
p1T,
Standard units
New Motor Oil Usage,
Annual averak a alhuo
Benchmark
.
rr-
inure: ii you report a samptea vatue m excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date 5121 (first event sampled)
Total Event Precipitation (inches): ► �oS
Date (list each additional event sampled this reporting period, and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attu: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SWU-245-102107

Ar
Total T anics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform' finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture elects. __c ;;rystals, or
marwfa, ..e cathode raytubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject
p rP P g tY J
to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for
electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may request that DWQ waive monitoring of total toxic organics. The solvent
management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. For those facilities allowed such a waiver, the
discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics (TTO), I
certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed tq rainfall or stormwater
runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report: I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the solvent management
plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
}
PG & 4L &j v t_"ej M I; cam};f�4 Ccxa 2� x-,jAr-o rL
Titl (Print title)
^^
(Signature) — (Date)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and copolete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possib' Ry n s Xnd imprisonment for knowing violations."
".'e
(Signature of Permittee)
� _(0 -(5
(Date)
SWi1-?45-tn?tin

June 10, 2015
RECEIVE®
JUN 15 Z015
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files CENTRAL FILES
1617 Mail Service Center DWR SECTION
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SENII-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING.
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR I — PERIOD 1)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
Please find enclosed, our completed Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for stormwater samples extracted from BlueScope Buildings North America,
Inc. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) sampling as required by our permit (lead, pH, oil &
grease, TSS, and total rainfall).
Coinciding with the rainfall event, a sample should be obtained from the non-stormwater discharge (to
meet the requirements of NCG500000). There has been flow from the discharge point during this period.
Results have been included for flow, temperature, oil & grease, and pH from the non-stormwater
discharge.
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of'
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Lee Peterson
Plant Super inte dent
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfali #1 - #4)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)
1V>blrlufs'100161f�sLurecllSufer�Vi+n'irwrmenlu!_Cr,n+p�ittnce_Re�i.rrrr�Enrirn+urrerrruf20lS�Srru'natir'urrr'h7nnirnri+r� Report y7ow).dorm

Him Scopc fildgs North America
N1r.Aaron Stephen
Post Office lion 1529
Laurinburg NC. 28353
*MICROBAC'E'
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Project: Storm WAter Sample - Biannual
Site 1, grab
K51:08 i 9-01
Date Reported:06/04/15
Dute Received: 05/22/15
Date Sampled: 05/21/15
Sampled 13y: Steplron
Analyle Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Mclhud Qualifier
I`ield Data
PH 6A PI -I Units 05/21/15 14:45 Stephen PH
Temperature 24.44 °C 05/21/15 14:45 Stephen field
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Lead
<0.00150
mg/l,
06/02/15 21:17
JAW
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4 1994
Oil & Grease (HEW
10.8
mg/1-
05/29/15 08:20
rVIIw
I:PA 1664 Rev.13
PH
5.5
pH Units
05/28/15 14:35
DSK
SKI 4500 1-11-B-2000
1.1
(Aqueous)
'['otal Suspended Solids
26.0
mg/l,
05/27/15 11:00
MLw
SM 2540 D-1997
QC Batch Run - (micruhuc Luhurulurie,c, kee. - PaYelfeville)
Analvte
Remill
Units
smiree
RPD
Limit
Total Suspended Solids
164
mg/L
K510820
24
5
Total Suspended Solids
16.0
mg/L
K517.0853
34
5
Total Suspended Solids
1.50
mg/l,
K51 0866
59
5
PH
6.7
PH Units
K5170957
0
200
ph1
6.0
phi Units
K51:0962
0
200
Lead
0.236
mg/l,.
K5E0790
0.8
200
Lead
ND
mg/L
K5E0647
200
Lead
ND
mg/L,
K5E0714
200
Lead
ND
mg/1.
K510790
200
Lead
0.245
ntg/L
K51]0647
4
200
Lead
0.238
mg/L
K51i0714
3
200
Rainfall: 0.68"
Microbac Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 Of 3
2592 Hope Mills Road I Fayetteville, NC 28306 1 910.864A920 p 1 910.864.8774 f j www.microbac.com

VMICROBAC5
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope l;ldgs Notili America Date Reported: 06/04Y15
Mr. Aaron Stephen Pru_ject: Storm !rater Sample - Biannual Date Received: 05/22/15
Post Office Box 1529 Dale Samplcd: 05/21/15
Luurinburg NC, 28353 Samplcd By: Stephen
Notes and Definitions
u
I I Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holdins, tine
Q
State Certitications:
NCDNR #II
NCDOI1 #37714
Respectfully $ubmi�,ttcc!
Jeanne Overstreet- Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We inrne rnnr feedbueA on rnir lecet r f�,emc,. fu t'ua. !'!ruse conlacr the A; twon AlenuiKer, Rob Oernuer en 910-d'64-1920 wnh ane
gne.wwn,5 }int rnrrr alvn cunruc! .I. 7rvror liutxe, Yms'NA'111 tit presirJ'ivrwnicrnhur.cnnr
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 2 of 371
2692 Hope Mills Road I Fayetteville, NC 28306 j 910.864.1920 p 1910.864.8774 f I www.microbac.com

Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road Fayetteville, NC 28306 [phone] !
()MICROBAC" AK5E0819'
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
CLIENT NAME L ADDRESS,
Blue Scope Bldgs
North America
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinbur , NC 28352
PDs PROJECT r Loc.TON:
oZ�DY70;L Laurinbur Plant
W
O
LL
O
TYPE OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION (CODE)
w
`1
m
C
of
LL
m
=
rq
Cooe: A'= None ,
B = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + ZVC
D = NaOH + <6'C
- I E = ZN Acetate + <6"C
F=HCI
G = Sodium Thio
DpNT6gS PERSON:
Mr, Arron Ste hen
P"0"E`
91 O 277-1101
SAMPLER:
iYIA rL�IA:. .SZ'b I?1+6 F•1
Met s
DATE l METHOD or SHIPMENT:
5z Z /V EIL U 9
LA13 ID k
SAMPLE
TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAD
PH
FLow
TEMP'C
CRLDRmE
SULACE
0 j
Site #1
Evz (�
q
G' `�s�'
2
C
42
2
A
1
B
L
I
L.aD In,Dals--i�
Turnaround time: REGULAR RUSH
ft - hb by:
D.1•
Tmr
R•c•Iva by: IS'c I
Dib
T!m•
zz
9.'rZA
z
R•lin9uish,d bV
Dcn
SIr11•
R•c•ivo Y ISipn unl
D�1�
3
a-/S
t3'S0
<
5 as I
f3
R•Ihgiu by:
Da!•
fun•
R•c•rv•0 by: ISlvn•b,nl
D,M
llm•
5
6
Wn rielu ane i : �0. y 1.: �nvl-
pH Field Site 2:
pH Field Site 3
pH Field Site 4
Comments or Special Hazards:
SD te$" RArn: tali
WA-rer?— -rr.1—P "7L'
IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
NO YES WHICH:
Page 3 of 3

• 0 •
Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road - Fayetteville, NC 28306 [phone] / 864-8774 fax
&)MICROBAC-
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE 1 OF 1
CLIENT NAME B ADDRESS:
Blue Scope Bldgs
North America
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinburg, NC 28352
PO#
R&$70�-
PROJECT I LOCATION:
11-aurinburg Plant
w
m
ILL
O
TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION (CODE)
0
N
O
�
i7
_
O
LLL
g
�
R
M
-j
CODE: A=None
B = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6e C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6'C
D = NaOH + <6'C
E = ZN Acetate + <6"C
F = HCI
G=Sodium Thio
CONTACT PERSON:
Mr. Arron Stephen
PHONE:cc-
[phone]
SAMPLER:
DATE! METHOD OF SHIPMENT:
6J L Z 1S ZC1G LieI
LAB ID #
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
pH
FLOW
TEMP'C
RES.
CHLORINE
SULFIDE
Site #1
%
�l lI
Z''`���
;/
(J
2
C
2
A
1
i3
Lab Initials—lo.
Turnaround time
R quishetl by:
Date
Time
Received by: (Signal e)
Date
Time
zZ .
9,'rZA
2
Relinquished by:
Date
Ime
Received by: jStgnafturej
Date
TIme
3
4
Relinquishad by:
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Time
5
fi
REGULAR RUSH
Comments or Special Hazards:
. �a S RP'TV: Fa L'�.-
pH I-leia -.we i : [o, y z: SSplkv IS DATA FOR REG, COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
pH Field Site 2 : NO YES WHICH:
pH Field Site 3 : —'
pH Field Site 4 :

. NPDES - Semiannual Monitoring
Version: R1 - April 2003
Monitoring Overview
This monitoring involves a trained individual from BlueScope performing the following tasks:
1. Measure temperature of the NPDES effluent, as well as temperature in the receiving stream into which the
effluent is discharged both updstream and downstream of the discharge point.
2. Measure pH of the effluent.
3. Check to make sure that the effluent contains no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than
trace amounts.
4. Collect a sample of the effluent to be sent offsite for Oil/Grease analysis.
5. Document estimated flow of the effluent. Flow is estimated as the difference between total water received
from the local water supply minus the water that is discharged to the local POTW. These water amounts are
contained in a bill received from Laurinburg Maxton Airport Commission ("Meter 1" is water recieved, and
"Meter 2" is discharge to sewer).
Monitoring Data
Data collected and obtained is to be entered below in the Yellow Fields.
Monitoring Performed By: Aaron E. Stephen
Date: 5/21 /2015
Time: 2:45 PM
Temperature of Effluent Stream:L 76 OF
Converted Temperature of Effluent Stream: 24.4 °C
Temperature UPSTREAM of discharge point: 76 OF
Converted Upstream Temperature: 24.4 °C
Temperature DOWNSTREAM of discharge point: 76 OF
Converted Downstream Temperature: 24.4 °C
Is Downstream Temperature less than 2.8°C higher
than Upstream Temperature? YES In Compliance
Is Downstream Temperature less than 320C? YES In Compliance
pH of Effluent Stream: 6.4��
Is pH between 6.0 - 9.0? YES In Compliance
Is discharge of solids or visible foam only of trace
amounts or less (YES/NO)? yes In Compliance
Results of Oil & Grease Analysis: 10.8 mg/L (from Outside Lab)
Is Oil & Grease <15.0 or <20.0? YES
Total Water Received (last months bill)
Total Water Received (bill from two months ago)
Total Water Received (bill from three months ago)
Total Water to POTW (last months bill)
Total Water to POTW (bill from two months ago)
Total Water to POTW (bill from three months ago)
Estimated Average Monthly Flow:
Estimated Avg. Daily Flow (based on 30 days):
25
20
20
5.4
4.5
5.1
17
0.6
In Compliance
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
1000's of gallons
Note: After data is entered into form, print it out and send to plant manager to be archived in the
compliance manual. If any of the values are "Out of Compliance" or "Take Another Sample", contact
Plant Manager immediately.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
r Certificate of Coverage No. NCG: NCGO30352
County: Scotland Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Inspector(s): AAfZ-003
Date of Inspection: �6 • oft !-
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
I. Outfall Description
Outfall, No.: 4
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (drains grassy area only)
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
(' L4E A2-
3. Odor
r--\ Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 (a 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely m
ddy.
NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam ��
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES ( N�
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES 9
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES ONO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG: NCG030352
County: Scotland Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Inspector(s): ,F--ij laQs-'3 Q tf cJ
Date of Inspection: .115 . a }— t 5
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 3 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Leith's Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Steel Parts Storage (Drains primarily grassy area, but also drains some store areas)_
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
C. U INiz-
3. Odor
—\Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
k—/ 0,0 tJ e
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 (D 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES N,
8. Oil Sheen �/
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES (:N:O)'
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall?
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG: NCG030352
County: Scotland Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Inspector(s): PlA2C ,.j STt P A C'J
Date of Inspection: S . Z - l Sr
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 2
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (Drains small_ grassy area bordered by a railraod track)___
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
3. Odor
r1 Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
A-) d N C.
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 1 0
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA 1 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 1 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES GO)
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? Y S ONO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Inspector(s): (�q ,� 5 H L ,,
Date of Inspection:
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
Qti
Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 1 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Fabrication of Steel Building Parts (this outfall drains majority of facility property)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
L L C- (-\(.
3. Odor
r-1Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
'— K)00E,
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
(1 } 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 0 2 j 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
1 C2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outlall? YES NO
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES NO
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

sr -
August 12, 2014
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Piles
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVED
AUG 18 2014
CENTRAL FILES
DWai80G
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR 1 -- PERIOD 1)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
Please find enclosed, our completed Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for Stormwater samples extracted from Blur -Scope Buildings North America,
Inc. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) sampling as required by our permit (lead, pH, oil &
grease, TSS, and total rainfall).
Coinciding with the rainfall event, a sample should be obtained from the non-stormwater discharge (to
meet the requirements of NCG500000). However, there has been no flow from the discharge point during
this period. Therefore, no results have been included for flow, temperature, oil & grease, and pH from the
non-stormwater discharge.
I hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Sincer
Lee Peterson
Plant Superintendent
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfall #1 - #4)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of� Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)
1V�blcrirfsl0111,11f�;slaurerhSufcltilF.'ririr-nrrnrenru! Cr»7r�]iunc•e_Kc�;rsrcrllirnirr»arnnnru12014�5turnn+•ulcr-dfurrirorrn�; lteporf.rlr,cur

Blue Scope Bldgs Notch America
Mr. Aaron Stephen
Past Office Box 1529
Laurinburg NC, 28353
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Protect: Storm Water Sample - Biannual
Date Reported: 08/08/14
Date Received: 07/22/14
Date Sampled: 07/21/14
Sampled liy: Molis
Site 1, grab
K4G0700-01
Analvte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Field Data
PH
6.0
pH Units
07/21/14 14:00
Molis
pH
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Lead
0.00204
mg/L
08/08/14 07:50
JAW
SM 3113 B-2004
Al2
Oil & Grease (HEM)
<5.00
mg/L
08/01/14 22:15
MSL
13PA 1664 Rev. B
PH
5.6
pH Units
07/25/14 10:00
DSK
SM 4500 H+B-2000
H
(Aqueous)
Total Suspended Solids
11.5
mg/L
07/24/14 07:35
JAO
SM 2540 D-1997
QC Batch Run - (nficrohuc 1 uhururrrria%, Ine, - Fayetteville)
Analyte
Result
Units
Source
141117
Limit
Lead
0.00221
mg/L
K4G0585
20
Total Suspended Solids
302
mg/L
K4G0775
10
5
Total Suspended Solids
524
mg/L
K4G0741
13
5
Total Suspended Solids
16.5
mg/L
K4G0720
6
5
Lead
ND
mg/L
K4G0700
20
Notes and Definitions
I I Arnalyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time
A 12 MS/MSD fail recovery, but the LCS pasae:s criteria.
State Certifications:
NCDNR 411
NCDOH #i37714
Respectfully Submitted
��ea ✓cu- Chu-�L.�-z`i.-�P�
Jeanne Overstreet, Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We rnvrre your feedback on nrrr• level nJserviee topm
ou, !'lease ennxrcr the 1)ivr.rrnra A7unuger, l�nh IJerurvr ur q10-Rfi�-Ildl1 e ilh any
que.riionr. You muy ulna cunrucl J. Trevor hnvice, Presldenl at pre,vrde+r+0nricruhac.cnur
Page 1 of 3

Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road -- Fay.deville, NC 28306 (910) 864-19201864-8774 fax
05)MICROBAC'
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE 1 OF 1
CLIENT NAME& ADDRESS:
Blue Scope Bldgs
North America
Post Office Box 1529
Laurinburg, NC 28352
Po
y%;5y1
I PROJECT I LOCATION:
Laurinburg Plant
C
�
(—
O
LL inm
O
TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION CODE
w
Q
_
❑
m
g
T
CL
V
cn
a
CODE: A = None
B = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6°C
D = NaOH + <6°C
E = ZN Acetate + <6'C
F= HCI
G = Sodium Thio
CONTACT PERSON:
Mr. Arron Stephen
PHONE:
[phone]
SAMPLER:
Molis
DATE 1 METHOD OF SHIPMENT:
LAB ID #
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
pH
FLOW
TEMP 'C
RES.
CHLORINE
SULFIDE
Site 41
��L �� a(
Y
ZPM
✓
s/
2
C
2
A
1
B
Lab
Rol' ished by:
Date
Time
Received y: iSignatvre)
Date
Time
Relinquished by:
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Time
3
4
Relinquished by:
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Data
Time
5
fi
Initials— it
Turnaround time REGULA RUSH
Comments or Special Hazards:
75 " 2:-) sIJ
war&: e- 'Tc rl,—A 7 % Q
pH Field Site 1 IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
pH Field Site 2 : NO_ YES t/ WHICH:
pH Field Site 3
pH Field Site 4 :

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Aaron E. Stephen
21-Jul-14
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee --
1. Out#all Description
Outfall No.: 4
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (drains grassy area only)
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
F Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
6-11 No Odor
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES c:1ra&
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES NO
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES Q�Q
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES 1�
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Aaron E. Astephen
21-J u I-14
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 3 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Leith's Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Steel Parts Storage (Drains primarily grassy area, but also drains some storage areas)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
Clear
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
No odor
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
NA 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
NA O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
NA O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any loam in the stormwater discharge? YES
8. Oil Sheen
Is
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES QEP
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Aaron E. Stephen
21-J u I-14
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 2 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
None (Drains small grassy area bordered by a railraod track)
2. Color
ditch
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
No Flow
3. Odor
.1 Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
No Flow
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
O1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 iss extremely muddy.
WA) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES O�
8. Oil Sheen �►��
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES N( O �}
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall ���/
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES `m
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES.
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation.

BlueScope Buildings North America, Inc.
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO), QUALITATIVE MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG:
County: Scotland
Inspector(s):
Date of Inspection:
NCG030352
Phone No.: 910.276.7676
Aaron E. Stephen
21-Jul-14
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
zL
ignature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.: 1 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream: Shoeheel Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ditch
Fabrication of Steel Building Parts (this outfall drains majority of facility property)
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
light brown
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.):
no odor
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy:
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids and
10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
O2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where 1 is no solids
and 10 is extremely muddy.
(1 ) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? YES O
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? YES
9. Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Is there erosion or deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? YES f
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: YES
If any, list and describe on separate page.
NOTE: Low clarity, high solids and/or the presence of foam or oil sheens may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These
conditions may warrant further investigation,

STORMWATER DISCT—,GE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITOI'� REPORT
��,''
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG030000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR:��
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 Q_�2.)S �2 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME 3tX r E S[czPC Ry z 4,p r_&3!G!�, ILA COUNTY Sra T LA ^10
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES A /, 2,= N 5; E P f t M.%,3 PHONE NO. (910 72 — A9
CERTIFIED LABORATORY M ZC2a_ ZAP _ Lab # - /V
Lab # PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE -�
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
Outfall
No.
Date
Sample Collected;
mo/dd/ r:
.00530.
00400.
.- 01051 ....
00556:...
; .... ..'79141
TotahSuspended Solids;
=...
-m
p13,
Standard- units J.
)Dead, mg/L
.,
Oil.and Grease?
m`
Total Toxxc,Organics
IL.
Benchmark
-
100•
Within`6.0 -- 9 0.:
...-.. • 0.033
30
..1'
44-1
7
< S. 0a
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or TiR re Pilo V®
See General Permit text. L�NJ
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes )no
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitorine Requirements
MAY 0 5 2014
CENTRAL FILES
DWQIBOG
Outfall
No:
Date ...
Sample CofiecEeii;
ato/dd/' r
00556. ,
00530.; -.
Oil and Grease;.
. 1
Total.Suspended Solids;..:
„m LI,
pH,
Standard>units, _
New Motor,Oil Usage,
Annual'averak a al/hio
Benchmark
-
30
.1007. ...
60'.-.9.0 .
_
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date 41/s /V (first event sampled)
Total vent Precipitation (inches):
Date (list each additional event sampled this reporting period, and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16I7
r•
S WU-245-102107
Page 1 of 2

Total T ganics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform�l finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture electi..__:� rystals, or
manufa.`_e cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject
to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for
electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may request that DWQ waive monitoring of total toxic organics. The solvent
management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. For those facilities allowed such a waiver, the
discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics (TTO), I
certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or stormwater
runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report: 1 further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the solvent management
plan included in the S tormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Ara rzcr?.,j E . �r k e-xj
Name (Print name)
Cn1 V C2a,u M err A [_ tom_ 0 �u� To 2
Title t title)
1A, C �3v y
( rgnature) (Date)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate,.and comp ,et". I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the nossihility oUfiues d ' arisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
4
(Date)

April 25, 2013
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: BLUESCOPE BUILDINGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER ANALYTICAL MONITORING
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE: NCG030352
(YEAR 1 —PERIOD 1)
Dear Director of Environmental Management:
Please find enclosed, our completed Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report, along with
laboratory analysis reports for Stormwater samples extracted from BlueScope Buildings North America,
Inc. Outfall 01 (determined to be representative) sampling as required by our permit (lead, pH, oil &
grease, TSS, and total rainfall).
Coinciding with the rainfall event, a sample should be obtained from the non-stormwater discharge (to
meet the requirements of NCG500000). There has been flow from the discharge point during this period.
Results have been included for flow, temperature, oil & grease, and pH from the non-stormwater
discharge.
hereby certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with it system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible; for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
I further certify that cyanide and fluoride are not used or stored at this facility and therefore no analysis of
Total Toxic Organics has been performed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Sincerely
p—,
Lee Peterson
Plant Superintendent
Enclosures
(SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report (Outfall #1 - #4)
Certificate of Analysis
Chain of Custody (for total rainfall & field pH)
llbbluirjs lOO�N�� shred SufemVan ironxre+i�u!_Complrunce_Rr� rsreiiEm irnnnienrul 201 tlSrornr�rurer hlnni�urirr� Nepon - Chiller h-low.r win

a
Fayetteville Division
2592 1lope Mills Rd
Fayetteville. NC 28306
910.964.1920 Phone
910.864.8774 Fax
Certificate of Analysis
Blue Scope Itldgs North America
Mr. Aaron Stephen Project: Slorm Water Sample - Hiannual
Post Ounce Box 1529
Laurinburg NC. 28353
Site 1, grab
1404321-01
Dale Reported: April 30, 2014
Date Received: April 15, 2014
Date Sampled: April 15, 2014
Sampled By: Molis
Analete Result Units Analw.ed Analyzed l3v Method Qualifier
Field Dala
PH
6.2
PH Units
4/15/14
8:40
Molis
PH
Temperature
68.5
°C
4/15/14
9:40
Molis
Field
Rainfall
0.5 inches
inches
4/15/14
8:40
MONS
Field
Analyzed by: Microbac - rayetteville Division
Lead
<0.00100
mg/1_
4/28/14
17:21
JAW
SM 3113 B-2004
Oil & Grease (11EM)
<5.00
mg/l.
4/25/14
13:00
MSL
IaPA 1664 Rev. B
PH
5.40
pH Units
4/17/14
16:30
DSK
SM 4500 H+13-2000 1-1
(Aqueous)
"Total Suspended Solids
11.5
mg/L
4/16/14
8:30
JTL
SM 2540 D-1997 SI
QC Duplicate
Results
Anahte Result Units Source RPD Limit
Total Suspcndcd Solids
44.6
mg/l,
'total Suspended Solids
10.0
tngA,
Total Suspended Solids
2.50
mg/L
Lead
ND
Mg/1,
Lead
ND
mg/L
Lead
0.00115
mg/L
Notes and Definitions
S I Relative Percent DitYerence (RID)
outside accepted recovery limits
I I Analyle wus prepared and/or analyzed
outside of the analytical method holding
time
State Cenillcations:
NCDNR HII
NCDOII P37714
USDA #3787
1404274
1404323
1404313
1404250
1404340
1404340
4
14
35
12
5
5
5
20
20
20
Respectlulh' Submitted
Bonnic R. Sanders. Senior Project Manager
Page 1 of 1

Tent I
Chiller
Client ID#
Chiller
Client 1BtY
Chiller
Client Em
Chiller
Client E
Chiller
Client_1D#
Chiller
Client [
Chiller
Chiller
Client 011
Chiller
Client ID#
Chiller
Client ID#
Chliler
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC
Lab 1D#
Collected Anaivte
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 Chromium
Lab U34
llected An. alytte
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 Iron
Lab II3#
Collect Analoe
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 Lead
Lab 110u
Collected Analyt
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 Zinc
Tab 1D#
(:Qllected An_ alz
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 BOD
Lab 1D# Collected Analyl
1400061-01 09-Jan-14 COD
Lab IDS
Collected AM -__aloe
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 Oil & Grease
Lab TD#
Collected Analnte
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 pH
Lab ID#
Collected Analyse
1400061-01
09-3an-14 Phenolics, total
Lab 1ET#
ollected Analytte
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 Total Solids
Lab JD#
Collected Matyte
1400061-01
09-Jan-14 TSS
January 21, 2014
Client: Blue Scope Buildings
Address: 13421 North Rock Ford Rd
Laurinburg, NC 28352
Received: Ill 1 /2014
Project 4: N/A
Result
Units
Matrix Method
DF
LQQ
Run Analyst
ND
mg/L
L 200.7
1
0.02
14-Jan-14 VVK
Result
Units
Ma nx Method
DF
LONG
R.p Analyst
0.56
mg/L
L 200.7
1
0.1
14-Jan-14 VVK
Result
Unfits
i+iquix Meft d
DF
L49
Run Analyst
0.029
mg/L
L 200.7
1
0.015
14-Jan-14 VVK
Result
Units
Matrix Method
DF
LOCI
Run Analyst
0.08
mg/L
L 200.7
1
0.02
14-Jan-14 VVK
Result
Units
Matrix Method
DF
LQQ
Run AnAyst
ND
mg/L
L SM
1
5
14-Jan-14 AYS
5210B
Result
Units
Matrix Method
DF
LQQ
Run Analyst
25.7
mg/L
L SM
1
10
16-Jan-14 TIR
5220D
Result_
Units
Matrix Method
DF
LO9
Run Analyst
ND
mg/L
L 1664
1
5
21-3an-14 JCD
Result
Units
Matrix Method
DF
LONG
Run Analyst
s� 6.43
S.U.
L SM4500-
1
0.01
14-Jan-14 AYS
H
Result
Units
Matrix Method
DF
LQQ
Run Analyst
ND
mg/L
L 420"1
1
0.05
20-Jan-14 TIR
Result
Units
Matrix Method
DF
l OQ
Run Malvst
ND
mg/L
L 160.3
1
14-Jan-14ILD
Result
Vnhs
Jvlatt-ix Mcthvd
DF
LQQ
Run Analyst
ND
mg/L
L SM2540
1
2
14-Jan-14 3LD
D
Page 4

ENVIRONMENTAL. TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Report Narrative
Client: Blue Scope Buildings
Order Number: 1400061
3
Solid sample results are reported on a wet weight basis except as noted.
No problems were encountered during analysis of this order number, except as. noted.
Method numbers, unless specified as SM or ASTM, are EPA methods.
Method of analysis for TCLP Volatiles is 131118260E
Method of analysis for TCLP Metals is 1311/6010B and 1311/7471A
Method of analysis for TCLP BNA is 1311/8270C
Data Qualifiers:
B = Analyte found in the method blank
J = Estimated concentration of analyte between MDL (LOD) and Reporting Limit (LOQ)
C = Analyte has been confirmed by another instrument or method
E = Analyte exceeds the upper limit of the calibration curve.
D = Sample or extract was analyzed at a higher dilution
X = User defined data qualifier.
S = Surrogate out of control limits
U = Undetected
a = Not Accredited by NELAC
ND = Non Detected al LOQ
DF = Dilution Factor
Limit Of Quantitation (LOQ) = Laboratory Reporting Limit (not adjusted for dilution factor)
Limit Of Detection (LOD) = Method Detection Limit
Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) = (same as LOQ)
Method Detection Limit (MDL) = (same as LOD)
Reporting Detection Limit (RDL) = (same as LOD)
Estimated uncertainty values are available upon request.
Matrices:
A=Air
C = Cream
DW = Drinking Water
L = Liquid
O = Oil
SL = Sludge
SO = Soil
S = Solid
T = Tablet
TC = TCLP Extract
WW = Waste Water
W = Wipe
The test results meet the requirements of the NELAC standard, except where noted. The information contained in
this analytical report is the sole property of Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. and that of the client_ It cannot
be reproduced in any form without the consent of Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. or the client for which this
report was issued. The results contained in this report are only representative of the samples received. Conditions
can vary at different times and at different sampling conditions. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. is not
responsible for use or interpretation of the data included herein.

Monitoring Data
Data collected and obtained is to be entered below in the Yellow Fields.
Monitoring Performed By:
Aaron Stephen
Date:
1 /9/2014
Time:
8:00 AM
Temperature of Effluent Stream: 34 °F
Converted Temperature of Effluent Stream: 1.1 °C
Temperature UPSTREAM of discharge point: 34 °F
Converted Upstream Temperature: 1.1 °C
Temperature DOWNSTREAM of discharge point: 34 OF
Converted Downstream Temperature: 1.1 °C
Is Downstream Temperature less than 2.8°C higher
than Upstream Temperature? YES In Compliance
Is Downstream Temperature less than 320C? YES In Compliance
pH of Effluent Stream: 6.4
Is pH between 6.0 - 9.0? YES In Compliance
Is discharge of solids or visible foam only of trace
amounts or less (YES/NO)? yes In Compliance