NCG020202_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20151008

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS �
PERMIT NO.
oa U�
DOC TYPE
F� HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ a0IS 100
VYYYMMDD

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
October 8, 2015
Martin Marietta
Attention: Mr. Richard Broughton, Environmental Services Manager
8451 Monticello Road
Columbia, SC 29203
Subject: Receipt Letter
Stormwater Pernit 9 NCG020202
Martin Marietta- Matthews Quarry
- Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Broughton:
The Division has received the sample results with your letter dated October 1, 2015.
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Samar Bou-Ghazale at [phone], or
at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Zahid S. Khan, CPM, CPESC, CPSWQ
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
cc: Mr. Bradley Bennett, Stormwater Permitting Program
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Energy Section • Geological Survey Section • Land Quality Section
610 E Center Ave Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115• Phone: [phone] - FAX: [phone]
Internet: httpJ1pprtal.ncdenr.orglwebllrl
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

FAA
Aice
C®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
September 9, 2015
Martin Marietta
Attention: Mr. Richard Broughton, Environmental Services Manager
8451 Monticello Road
Columbia, SC 29203
Subject: Receipt Letter
Stonnwater Pemit # NCG020202
Martin Marietta- Matthews Quarry
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Broughton:
The Division has received the sample results with your letter dated September 3, 2015.
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Samar Bou-Ghazale at (704)
663-1699, or at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Zahid S. Khan, CPM, CPESC, CPSWQ
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
cc: Mr. Bradley Bennett, Stormwater Permitting Program
Division of Energy, Mineral, and land Resources
Energy Section • Geological Survey Section • land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612.919-707-9200 I FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 • Internet: http:I/portal.ncdenr.org/web4rl
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

ATA
® NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvar!a, III
Governor Secretary
August 14, 2014
Martin Marietta Materials
Mr. Richard Broughton
2000 Center Point Drive, Suite 2325
Columbia, SC 29210
Subject: Matthews Quarry
Permit No. NCG020202
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Broughton: �-
Attached is a copy of the subject stormwater permit inspection conducted on July
2-6, 2_0-2 By Donna Hood, Chad Broadway and Samar Bou-Ghazale of this Office.
7/v
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning the report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bou-Ghazale at (704)
235-2199.
Sincerely,
Zahid S. Khan, CPM,
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Attachment
CPESC, CPSWQ
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section - Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Telephone: [phone] FAX: [phone] • Internet: http:llportal.ncdenr.orglwebtirlland-quality
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020202 Effective: 01 /01110 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner : Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Matthews 0
County: Mecklenburg 1215 Sam Newell Rd
Region: Mooresville
Matthews NC 28106
Contact Person: Richard Broughton Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 08/1212014 Entry Time: 09:30AM
Primary Inspector: Samar E Bou Ghazale
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Exit Time: 11:35AM
Phone: [phone] Ext.2199
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: []• Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
BE Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
inspection date: 08/1212014 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Inspection revealed sediment loss to the stream from basins# 28,29,30 and 31. Please maintain these basins as required
per your permit. Also, provide a clear path to basin 10, so the basin can be inspected for discharge. Please note that
discharge from processed materials is considered wastewater discharge. Process materials was noted at the outlet of
basin 17 all the way to the stream. Basin 17 is located in a steep slope and approximately 50 feet from the stream.
Waste materials and sediment discharged to the stream from basin 17 and basins 28,29,30 and 31 are to be removed.
Please start monitoring all stormwater discharge and wastewater discharge as soon as possible. Please coordinate
sediment removal with the Division of Water Resources. Site will be re -inspected in September 2014.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020202 Owner- Facility: Marlin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 08/12/2014 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
5torunwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
iIs ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
I] ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
80 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
EM ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
®❑ ❑ ❑
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ®❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment: Stormwater discharge through the stone outlets from the sediment basin was not considered a
dischargeaccordinp to Mr. Richard Broughton with Martin Marietta Materials. That's why
analytical monitoring was not conducted at the facility.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalfs observed during the inspection? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 09 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

,1
FILE
7-0
HCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E Dee Freeman
Governor . Director Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 11, 2012
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Mr. Richard Broughton, Environmental Services Manager
2000 Center point Drive, Suite 2325
Columbia, SC 29210
Subject: Matthews Quarry
Stormwater Permit# NCG020202
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Broughton:
Attached is a cope of the subject•stormwater permit inspection conducted on December 6, 2012 -
by Mr. Samar Bou-Ghazale of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning the
report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bou-Ghazale at [phone].
Sincerely,
01
Michael L. Parker
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Attachment
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville. NC 26115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NoAhCaro9ina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.oM A'atimally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer paper

I
Compliance Inspection Report
- ..Permit: N uu2B202Y t .Effective: 01/01110 . Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner' Martin Marietta f 606als iric
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Matthews Q
County: Mecklenburg
1215 Sam Nowell Rd
Region: Mooresville
Contact Person: Dean Borud
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title:
Inspection Date: 12/06/2012 EntryTime: 10:00 AM
Primary Inspector: Samar E Bou Ghazale
Secondary Inspector(s):
Matthews NC 28106
Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Ext.2199
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Marlin Marietta Materials Inc
i;:speziion'Date=-•42/06/20420-4rs`Insp-wc`;; "V.:t „'^"Reason forksii:t Rdi3- -tl.
Inspection Summary:
Site is in compliance with the permit. No Problems were noted during the investigation.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection IPs^gal-on Type:- Compliancr' Evp-Nation• Rcas.�r.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a `Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the. Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: Please shaw in updated plan feasible alternatives to current practices.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
■ n n n
■ n n n
■nnn
■nnn
■ n n n
nn■n
■nnn
■ n n n
■nnn
mnnn
®nnn
■nnn
ennn
® n n n
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
®nnn
nn■n
Page: 3

1
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Charlotte District V 199M eaaw,
P.O. Box 7446
Charlotte, NC 28241-7446
Telephone [phone] Nov 2007
Fax [phone]
November 29, 2007 DENR MRv CERTIFIED MAIL
'� # § ACC o0v80006R52EsTED
-..,r 051220 0048DW5U
Ms. Marcia Allocco
Surface Water Protection Section
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Letter of Deficiency, Martin Marietta's Mathews Quarry
NPDES Permit No. NCG020202
Dear Ms. Allocco:
In response to the stormwater inspection conducted by Ms. Lespinasse on September 10, 2007 at Martin
Marietta's Mathews Quarry, I am providing information to address the concerns outlined in the
Compliance Evaluation Inspection.
In accordance with the most recent SPCC regulations, it is our understanding that secondary
containment is not required for designated fuel dispensing areas (i.e. tanker transfer to bulk
storage or dispensing fuel for quarry vehicles). Our current SPCC Plan requires that the fuel
supplier have a spill containment kit available during the transfer of product. In addition, Martin
Marietta has on site absorbent pads, granular material, and booms to address incidental spills.
We feel that all feasible alternatives have been provided associated with fueling activities to
protect the waters of the State. However, it is our intention to maintain the standards established
by our company and implement good housekeeping practices, as well as, continue to educate all
employees to meet the desired standards set forth by our company.
The runoff from the vehicle wash area discharges as overland flow before reaching any area that
may cause concern. However, we will evaluate the implementation of passive and/or active
practices to address this issue.
2. Annual training of SPCC regulations has taken place at each location. This training is conducted
during our annual refresher training as required by MSHA. As part of this training, we have
modified the content to include SPCC regulations. In addition, annual training is conducted to
the plant managers concerning all environmental issues (i.e. changes in regulations, changes in
corporate standards, current topics of concern, etc.). This training also includes quarterly
discharge sampling, annual stormwater sampling, as well as, other environmental issues related
to our sites.
Training logs are available and copies will be sent to each quarry to be maintained on site for
future inspections.

3. Qualitative Monitoring will be initiated in accordance with the conditions of the NPDES permit.
Quarry personnel will be informed of the schedule and procedures required to conduct this
monitoring, and appropriate records will be maintained.
OutfalIs noted during this inspection will be included in the monitoring schedule.
4. Representative outfall status was requested from DWQ on August 8, 2000. No response was
ever received for the request. A copy of this documentation will be sent to the quarry for their
records, and has been provided for your information.
5. An amendment and/or revision section will be added to the BPM Plan/SWPPP to document
updates that have been implemented.
6. The stained soil around the vehicle maintenance area will be removed and disposed of properly.
It is Martin Marietta's Corporate policy, as well as, a requirement of the SPCC regulations to
remove oil from portable oil containers used for maintenance at the end of the work shift and
store the product in the used oil containment structure. The portable containers should be
covered such that stormwater will not come in contact with the product. Quarry personnel have
been reminded of the requirements to maintain the standards established by Martin Marietta for
stained soil removal and oil handling and containment storage.
This information should complete the requirements of the Notice of Deficiency. Should you have any
questions, please contact Richard Broughton at [phone].
Sincerely,
Zn
TIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
4K.0E
Manager, Engineering Services
6481DWQ Letter of Deficiency Response

. " Martin Marietta Aggregates
Charlotte District
P 0. Box 240635
Charlotte, North Carolina 28224-0635
Te{ephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
August S, 2000
Mr. Tony Evans
NPDES Group
North Carolina DENR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Request for Representative Outfall Status - Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Arrowood, Asheboro, Bakers, Bessemer City, Bonds, Caldwell, Charlotte, Denver, Hickory,
Jamestown, Kannapolis, Kings Mtn., Maiden, Mallard Creek, Matthews, Pomona, Rocky
River, Salem, Statesville, Thomasville and Woodleaf Quarries
Dear Mr. Evans:
Based on our past conversations and subsequent meetings with your Department, I am officially
submitting two copies of each stormwater maps for the above referenced quarries. This request is
for Representative Outfall Status for stormwater discharges from Land Disturbance, Process
Areas and Vehicle Maintenance Areas at our quarry locations, as indicated in the General Permits.
I have identified the outfall location for each sample type on the stormwater map for your review.
The land disturbance sample location for each site was based on current exposed areas (berm
construction or overburden removal) and the maximum acreage exposed. Process and Vehicle
Maintenance areas were located on the map, based on drainage features and actual topography of
each site. I plan to begin the stormwater sampling in September. I trust the information provided
is adequate for your review and approval. If any additional information is required, please feel
free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
Brian K. North, PE
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Attachments genualvep outfall satuts

. of wAr.
r
\9ichael F, $alley, Governor ) L
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mr. Brian North
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
P.O. Box 7446
Charlotte, NC 28241-7446
Dear Mr. North:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 29, 2007
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit No. NCG020202
Matthews Facility
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at
the subject facility on September 10, 2007, by Ms. Polly Lespinasse of this Office.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by November 29, 2007, addressing the
deficiencies noted in the Inspection Summary, Qualitative Monitoring, and Permits and Outfalls
Sections of the report. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of Ms. Marcia Allocco.
The report should be self-explanatory, however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Ms. Lespinasse or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Shelton Sullivan, DWQ, NPS-ACO Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Internet: h2o.enr.statemc.us Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
No Karolina
Naturally
An Equal OpportunitylAifirmative Action Employer— 50°% Recyc1ed110°% Post Consumer Paper

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020202 Effective: 01/19/05 Expiration: 12/31/09 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials ]no
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Matthews Q
County: Mecklenburg 1215 Sam Nowell Rd
Region: Mooresville
Matthews NC 28106
Contact Person: Brian K North Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Entry Time: 03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Polly Lespinasse Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ® Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

,7;%
Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 0911012007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The facility has a SWPPP, evert though this document is not required in the general permit. The facility has developed an
SPCC plan which incorporates many of the elements of the stormwater plan into the document. The following issues
were observed at the facility:
1. The facility did not perform an evaluation of feasible alternatives (i.e., contained vehicle wash areas, secondary
containment for fueling areas).
2. The training log was not available on site and the training did not include a specific storm water section.
3. The facility did not perform qualitative monitoring. Additional areas were identified at the facility which would require
monitoring. There is a ditch which eventually outfalls to a stream. The slopes around this ditch were somewhat unstable.
A check dam was in place at the end, however, there was still an opportunity for sediment to enter the stream.
Recommended stabilizing the slope and adding the outfall to the monitoring schedule. In addition, there are two sediment
basins which outfall off -site. Recommended that these outfalls be added to the monitoring schedule also.
4. The facility did not have paperwork available to document the representative outfall request.
5. Recommended that a sheet be added to the plan to indicate when the annual update of the plan had been perfomed
and containing the appropriate signatures.
6. Areas around the vehicle maintenance area contained stained soils and open containers which were not under cover
and/or in containment. These areas must be inspected and maintained. Stained soils must be excavated and properly
disposed of.
Page: 2

f'
Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 09/1012007.s -. Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
Cl
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®
fl
n
n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®
0
Cl
0
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
■
El
0
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
n
n
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
0
❑
Q
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
®n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
fl
n
n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
n
n
n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
0
❑
0
Comment: The facility has not evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices.
Staff discussed possible alternatives with facility representatives. The annual training
log was not available at the facility and based on a review of the training materials, does
not include a specific section on storm water.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
NO
NA
nt
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
n
■
n
Comment: The facility has not conducted and documented qualitative monitoring.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
WOOD
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
■
n
❑
n
Comment: Based on a review of the analytical data, the stormwater samples are not
exceeding the cut off concentrations/benchmarks for the identified parameters.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
Q
Q
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
n
n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
n
■
❑
0
Page: 3

Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
inspection Date: 09110/2007 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: Facility representatives indicated that they have requested representative
outfall status from DWQ, but have not received confirmation. Documentation to
substantiate the request was not available at the facility.
® D D D
Page: 4

Michael F. Easley, Governod
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mr. Brian North
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
P.O. Box 7446
Charlotte, NC 28241-7446
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 29, 2007
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit No. NCG020202
Matthews Facility
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. North:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at
the subject facility on September 10, 2007, by Ms. Polly Lespinasse of this Office.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by November 29, 2007, addressing the
deficiencies noted i.n the Inspection Summary, Qualitative Monitoring, and Permits and Outfalls
Sections of the report. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of Ms. Marcia Allocco.
The report should be self-explanatory, however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Ms. Lespinasse or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
__�( 6 le�
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Shelton Sullivan, DWO, NPS-ACO Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
o `
NhCarolina
�/litT,<CA�II�
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

It I
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020202 Effective: 01/19/05 Expiration: 12/31/09 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Matthews Q
County: Mecklenburg 1215 Sam Nowell Rd
Region: Mooresville
Matthews NC 28106
Contact Person: Brian K North Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:,
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Entry Time: 03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Polly Lespinasse Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Oate: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The facility has a SWPPP, even though this document is not required in the general permit. The facility has developed an
SPCC plan which incorporates many of the elements of the stormwater plan into the document. The following issues
were observed at the facility:
1, The facility did not perform an evaluation of feasible alternatives (i.e., contained vehicle wash areas, secondary
containment for fueling areas).
2. The training log was not available on site and the training did not include a specific storm water section.
3. The facility did not perform qualitative monitoring. Additional areas were identified at the facility which would require
monitoring. There is a ditch which eventually outfalls to a stream. The slopes around this ditch were somewhat unstable.
A check dam was in place at the end, however, there was still an opportunity for sediment to enter the stream.
Recommended stabilizing the slope and adding the outfall to the monitoring schedule. In addition, there are two sediment
basins which outfall off -site. Recommended that these outfalls be added to the monitoring schedule also.
4. The facility did not have paperwork available to document the representative outfall request.
5. Recommended that a sheet be added to the plan to indicate when the annual update of the plan had been perfomed
and containing the appropriate signatures.
6. Areas around the vehicle maintenance area contained stained soils and open containers which were not under cover
and/or in containment. These areas must be inspected and maintained.- Stained soils must be excavated and properly
disposed of. . I
Page: 2

Im
Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 0911012007 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:;Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Ptan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
n
n
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®
El
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
®
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
n
❑
n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
0
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
n
n
n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The facility has not evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices.
Staff discussed possible alternatives with facility representatives. The annual training
log was not available at the facility and based on a review of the training materials, does
not include a specific section on storm water.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
M
❑
❑
Comment: The facility has not conducted and documented qualitative monitoring.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
®
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
■
n
❑
n
Comment: Based on a review of the analytical data, the stormwater samples are not
exceeding the cut off concentrations/benchmarks for the identified parameters.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
A
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 3

jy
Permit: NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: Facility representatives indicated that they have requested representative
outfall status from DWQ, but have not received confirmation. Documentation to
substantiate the request was not available at the facility.
Page: 4

wArE�QG
ULU
February 7, 2005
Donald M Moe
Martin Marietta Materials Inc
PO Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 276220013
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.G. Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Martin Marietta -Matthews Q
COG Number NCG020202
Mecklenburg County
Dear Permittee:
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NGG020000 the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. Please review the new permit to familiarize
yourself with the changes in the reissued permit. The general permit authorizes discharges of stormwater and some types of
wastewater. You must meet the provisions of the permit for the types of discharges present at your facility. This permit is
reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
• A new Certificate of Coverage
+ A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG020000
• A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
• Five copies of Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Forms - wastewater and stormwater
• Five copies of Qualitative Monitoring Report Form
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require modification
or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other
permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable
federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Bethany Georgoulias of the Central Office Stormwater
Permitting Unit at [phone], ext.529.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. +u. •^ 'F
cc: Central Files FEB 2 1 2005
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Mooresville Regional Office
• E~
' r4
G Eutf'
Noc�ehl,Carolina
11Vahrra!!il
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.uslsulstormwater.html 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020202
STORMWATER AND PROCESS WASTEWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Martin Marietta Materials Inc
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and to operate treatment systems and discharges associated
with mine dewatering wastewater and process wastewater from a facility located at
Martin Marietta -Matthews Q
1215 Sam Nowell Rd
Matthews
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as a UT of Irvans Creek, a class C stream in the Catawba River Basin in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II,
III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective February 7, 2005.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day February 7, 2005
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

M.4 A J eW �, j $ o �n
NCS Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BIMS1��
i ,.V, iAl,(o
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan �,�i ,�
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
W
❑
❑
❑
Site Plan
1. Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
❑
❑
Facility location in relation to roads and surface waters. Includes: name of receiving stream or name of municipal
storm sewer system, and accurate lat. and long. of point of discharge. This helps the permittee to understand their
location with respect to receiving waters.
2. Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? IV
1 ❑
1 ❑ I ❑
Should cover storage practices, loading and unloading areas, outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating
or control processes, and waste disposal practices, etc.
3. Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and
❑
❑
❑
drainage areas?
Should show
• Location of industrial activities (storage areas, disposal areas, process areas, unloading and loading areas)
• The drainage structures
• Drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring in the drainage area
• Building locations
• Existing BMPs and impervious surfaces and the % of each drainage area that is impervious
• For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants which could be expected to be present in the
stormwater discharge.
This forces permittee to analyze the site with relation to stormwater discharges. It is also a tool for the inspector to
understand if the site has changed over time, i.e. if site map does not match facility they must update their plan.
4. Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3
ElEl❑
years?
Needs to include corrective actions that were taken. The permittee needs to know what the reportable quantities are
for wastewater, oil pollution, and SARA Title III.
5. Have stormwater outfalls been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater
❑
❑
Eldischarges?
Signature required:
• Corporation - signed by Responsible Corporate Officer or assigned manager
• Partnership or Sole Proprietorship — General Partner or the Proprietor
• Municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency — either principal executive officer or ranking elected official
Comments:

NCS Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BIIVIS
Stormwater Management Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
❑
❑
❑
• Provide a review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations and/or
storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to Stormwater.
• In areas where elimination of exposure is not practical, the stormwater management plan shall document the
feasibility of diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas of potential contamination.
2. Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ I ❑
• Applies to liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials, or by-products
• Single AST capacity > 660 gallons
• Multiple AS containers in close proximity to each other with a total combined capacity of > 1,320
• If connected to SW conveyance; controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices? (Closed?)
• Collected water observed for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens, and dry weather flow prior to release
• Document individual making description of water, date, and time of release (RR=5 yrs)
1observation,
�LGG)f�CJ�r A1\�ki 1rv�.1T pray (JUV(�'b nA SQL I n TQ�rl1ri d VSErN4el afo\A^8 ar e4_
< < uc
3. Does the Plan include a BMP su mary? J
[✓ _ ❑ 6
❑
❑
Narrative description of BMPs to be considered including oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filter
strips, infiltration and stormwater detention or retention, where necessary.
• The need for structural BMPs shall be based on the assessment of potential sources to contribute significant
quantities of pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater
discharges.
4. Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ 1
❑ I
❑
• Assessment of potential pollutant sources based on materials inventory of the facility
• Facility personnel responsible for implementing the SPRP shall be identified
• Responsible person shall be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to
contaminate stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations.
sn } 1 n
Cc� I�tf1C f �fl(l r r� L} `� S� I l ►.
5. Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping
❑
❑
❑
Plan?
• Document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant
equipment and systems
• Inspect material handling areas
• Regular cleaning schedules of these areas
6. Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ j
❑ I
❑
• Provide at a minimum, annual training for all personnel including: proper spill response, cleanup procedures,
preventative maintenance activities for all personnel involved in any of the facility's operations that have
the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff
• Develop training schedule and identify facility personnel responsible for implementing the training
Arlrlwd ce

NCS Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BIMS
Yes
No
NA
NE
7. Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Parties?
[r
❑
❑
❑
Identify position responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and revision of the SPPP
8. Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
1 [y
1 ❑
1 ❑
I ❑
Have there been any changes to the design, construction, operation, or maintenance of the facility, which would have
a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters? Does plan include changes?
Cwkd a)oi
9. Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
/Qr
❑ ❑
❑
• Inspect at a minimum semiannually once in Fall (Sept. -Nov) and once in Spring (Apr -June)
• Inspection and subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented
o Record date and time
o Individual performing inspection
o Narrative description of the stormwater outfall and plant equipment and systems
• Records should be incorporated into the SPPP
10. Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
I ❑ ❑
Have they done what they said they were going to do and have they documented it. Examples include:
• Monitoring and measurements including sampling data
• Inspections
• Maintenance activities
• Training provided to employees
• Activities to implement BMPs associated with industrial activities including vehicle maintenance. (RR=5 yrs)
Comments:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
❑
❑
Sampling in Spring (April -June) and Fall (September -November)
Color Odor Clarity Floating Solids
Suspended solids Foam Oil Sheen Other indicators
Comment:
,Str►'� i C.�nn���.1 InsP�e�l�ns rec�utre�

NCS Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BIMS
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑
❑
2. Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance
Qr
❑
❑
❑
areas?
Comment:
OLATA 1� sA� pl►� �r�Q _ �� SLR ar.d
�
vA� -1, d
11
1�liC�t�1'tGl1L1f�C �
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
9f
❑
❑
❑
2. Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
[✓-
❑
❑
❑
3. If the facility has representative outfall status; has it been documented by the
[0'
❑
❑
❑
Division?
4. Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
2
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
C CA-0 AJ
P
Cesar n ?n �� �O�nC� cirauA� TUWA) ` ' Ccle--
1�j rt }}
Q'Qt'. z_ bA --jt j {�JTA A'S O fecl

&V4xrr-
NCG Stormwater Questions for Facilities in RIMS
Yes
No
NA
NE
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
❑
❑
❑
❑
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? -' Omt) 1>`q,,j
0'
❑
❑
❑
Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
53"
❑
❑
❑
Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
2T
❑
❑
❑
Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
©
El
❑
El
Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
[�r
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
0'
❑
❑
Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
z
❑
❑
❑
Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
10'
❑
❑
❑
Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? SPCA 0
A5 S59R_ '
❑
❑
❑
Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0
❑
❑
❑
Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0
❑
❑
❑
Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Y
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
[0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
Qualitative Monitoring ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ [f ❑ ❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
Analytical Monitoring
❑
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
Z
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
19
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE ,
Permit and Outfalls
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
19
❑
❑
❑
Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
[a'
❑
❑
❑
If the facility has representative outfall status; has it been documented by the Division?
❑
2-
❑
❑
Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non Stormwater) discharges?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
`3, C/j, 6 b-U-L