NCG020166_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20140421

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO. /V c"G20a0/�
DOC TYPE ! HISTORICAL FILE
1 MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE ❑ (il O I y � �I v�
YYYYMMDD

CIM" K rn1ey-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
April 21, 2014
Ms. Joanne Steenhuis
NC Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Re: 2013 Annual Summary of Hydrologic Monitoring
Martin Marietta Materials, Rocky Point Quarry
NC DWQ Project No. 03-1023
Dear Ms. Steenhuis:
On behalf of our client, Martin Marietta Materials (MMM), Kimley-Horn &
Associates (KHA) is submitting this Annual Summary of Hydrologic Monitoring
for the Rocky Point Quarry project referenced above. As presented in the
attached memorandum, the monitoring program conducted at the quarry per the
401 Water Quality Certification and Modified Pumping Plan has demonstrated
that wetlands and streams adjacent to the mine have sustained hydrologic
functions throughout the advancement of the mine.
As we discussed during our onsite meeting in January of 2013, mining at the
quarry has been suspended since 2012, and the only activity that has continued
since that time is dewatering to maintain accessibility to the lower portion of the
pit. There is no further southward expansion of the pit planned at this time.
Therefore, MMM is requesting that the hydrologic monitoring program be
suspended while the mine is inactive.
Please contact me at 919-677-2121 should you have any questions or need
additional information.
■
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068

C=n lCmley-Hom
�_ and Associates, Inc.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
00.
Chad Evenhouse, PWS
Project Manager
Cc: Horace Willson, MMM
IJ
■
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
■
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068

C Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Memorandum
To: Horace Willson
Martin Marietta Materials
From: Chad Evenhouse, PWS
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: April 15, 2014
Subject: Rocky Point Quarry — 2013 Annual Summary of Hydrologic
Monitoring
The following is a summary of hydrologic monitoring conducted at the Rocky
Point Quarry, in Pender County, NC. The monitoring has been conducted per the
requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification to monitor wetland
hydrology in areas adjacent to the active mine site per the NPDES Modified
Pumping Plan. The purpose of the annual monitoring is to assess the
groundwater levels of the wetland areas adjacent to the quarry and ensure that the
groundwater withdrawls associated with the quarry are not affecting the
hydrologic functions of these adjacent areas.
A site review meeting was conducted by NC Division of Water Resources
(NCD W R) staff on January 29, 2013. NCDW R approved a modification to the
monitoring plan since a large area of the quarry has been reclaimed. The
attached figure shows the monitoring locations which were observed throughout
2013 south of the mine (Locations 19-26).
Location 19
The monitoring gage at Location 19 is in a ditch south of the mine. The purpose
of this gage location is to monitor and demonstrate that the drainage feature
(considered a modified natural channel) is hydrated while mining activities
continue in the southern portion of the mine. Throughout the monitoring period
(May 2004-present) at this location, this feature has maintained flow except for a
brief time during severe drought conditions. Although there is a period of data
missing in the early portion of 2013, it appears that the feature was hydrated
throughout the entire year.
27636-3068 N
TEL: [phone]
FAX[phone]
■
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068

Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Location 19
The monitoring gage located
at Location 19 is in a ditch
considered to be a modified
natural channel. Throughout
the monitoring date, this
drainage feature has
continued to maintain a
permanent writer surface.
Date of photograph
January 9, 2014.
L"olon 19 - Surf+" War Level Wy (HW1I
J•--Y 1. 2013- L7• 1W 11, 2011
n oo
10 Oc
Locations 20, 21, and 22
Monitoring gages at locations 20, 21, and 22 are all located within an "oxbow
wetland" feature connected to the Northeast Cape Fear River. The wetland is
forested and located at a lower floodplain elevation than the general ground
surface around areas of the mine. These gages are located along the approximate
edge of the wetland feature, and compared to each other, vary slightly in ground
surface elevation. Gages at location 20 and 21 are slightly lower in elevation and
within the wetland boundary. Location 22 gauge is slightly higher in elevation
than the other two and just upslope from the wetland boundary.
2

PPI W Il Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
All three gages demonstrate that the water table within the wetland is near the
upper surface throughout most of the year and meets USACE wetland hydrology
criteria. As expected for a ftoodplain wetland, the water table is at or near the
ground surface for the dormant season, lowers during the growing season, and
throughout the year responds dramatically to rainfall events.
Location 21
s.
The monitoring g g a e located
at Location 21 is within the
forested floodplain wetland
i.e. the "Oxbow wetland"
feature south of the mine.
Hydrology in this wetland is
typically within the upper
surface for most of the year,
with periods of inundation
after storm events.
Date of photograph
January 9, 2014.
Loatlon 20 • Shallow Water Table Gaga (MM410E4)
January1 2013-D&"a b•r3f. 2013
—%*W L-M f OwM Sw%ce t 0SAW NMMtl C f ft s - ktaW y 0rP1h • A.Wa
[T-J
700
1.00
Date
A
0.00
IM
200
300
400
500
6.00
c
7.00 c
G
6.00
L
000 q
10 0[
11.0G
12 0G
1300
14.0C
1500
3

E-0
m
pppp-
i�
PnA
�r
s
�

PPP-r1Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Locations 23 and 25
The monitoring gages at locations 23 and 25 include an "overburden' gage
(approximately 17 feet deep) and a "deeper groundwater" gage (approximately
40 feet deep). The gages are located between the mine and a drainage ditch
system which is maintained downstream by a water control structure. Discharge
from the mine is directed to this drainage way to maintain hydration to the
feature and create a hydrologic barrier to flow within the surficial sediments
towards the mine.
The overburden gages at locations 23 and 25 include an approximate elevation of
the adjacent wetland ground surface (which is at a lower ground surface elevation
than the monitoring locations), and these gages provide monitoring data
demonstrating that the wetlands associated with the drainage way are sufficiently
hydrated while mining activities are on -going. in addition, a water surface gage
is located in the drainage way at location 25 to ensure flow is maintained in the
feature while mining activities are ongoing. In 2013, the surface water gage and
overburden gages demonstrate that the wetlands and drainage way were hydrated
throughout the year.
Location 25
The surface water monitoring
gage located at Location 25
shows that the drainage way
has been hydrated
throughout 2013.
Date of photograph
January 9, 2014.

U
C
f/7
C (�
00
(n
c Q
E�
Y cc
i�
u
irk'
���►
•i�i
%o

Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Loudon 23 •Overburden Gage (NW49)
Jewmfy 1. 2013• Deeen*" 31. 2013
F--- level t 01w,M GerYee Us," Do, ♦ RIVEN
3000
2900
2500
24.00
2200
>r 2000
i
s ,am
iE00
LL_
1400
12 00
�i 10.00
Goo
Goo
+ Location 23
The overburden and deeper
groundwater monitoring
gage located in the upland
area adjacent to the drainage
feature and its associated
vwtlands. The gages are
protected by a corrugated
plastic pipe section. The
gages show that the adjacent
wetland and drainage feature
were hydrated throughout
2013. Date of photograph :
January 9, 2014.
Locations 24 and 26
Monitoring gages at locations 24 and 26 were installed further to the south on the
other side of the water control drainage feature, to evaluate changes in the deeper
aquifer as the mine advanced southward, and as paired gages with locations 23
and 25. By 2012, the mine had advanced southward to its furthest extent, and
mining ceased in 2013. Groundwater data from 2013 shows that there were no
significant changes in water levels compared to previous monitoring years.
Deeper groundwater data for locations 23, 25, and 26 are shown below. The
7

Can Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
monitoring gage at location 24 has failed and attempts to rehabilitate the unit
were not successful.
woo
2e00
wJ 20.00
f 1l100
10.00
500
000
•5.00
Location 23 • Deep Ofoundwmr0aga(MW2e)
J-..,y 1. 2013- De mbnr31. 2077
Laaa>taa � - O��wa�rt�
Jwwwy f. ]-Aw�1Ywh. 7
VftW L" tORWw Sud ce—MaAwM0010 • wMri
Data
0.00
100
2.00
3.0D
4.00
5.00
8.00 i
700
1.00
too
r
10 00
1100
1200
13.00
14on
1500
o.00
1.0p
2A0
3AO
440
SAO
sine
7.00
In
em
76 J0
tt00
12M
13A0
MOO
1e00
9

Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Lo 4l 26. D♦♦y GFOUndw■Uf G♦q■f1AN4J
J—"I. 1. 2013 • E —4-31. 2013
3500
30.00
25,00
20.00
1400
■
It 10,00
S00
ii 000
400
Dom
Recommendations
0.00
100
2 00
3,00
4.00
s�
Boo !
u
700
too w
C
9A0 cc'■
1000
11 00
12 00
13 00
1♦00
1500
Mining activities ceased in 2013 and the mine was inactive. However,
monitoring at the southern location continued per discussions with NCDENR
staff and amendments to the 401 Water Quality Certification in early 2013. The
data shows that adjacent wetlands and drainage features have maintained
hydrologic functions throughout the year.
Since the mine has advanced to its furthest extent southward and raining
activities have ceased at the quarry, it is recommended that monitoring cease as
well. The drainage feature within the southern tract (Location 19) has
maintained hydration throughout the monitoring period years (2004-present) as
the mine has advanced southward without requiring additional discharge be
directed to the feature. It is not likely that this feature, or the floodplain wetlands
associated with the NE Cape Fear River (Locations 20, 21, and 22) would be
hydrologically affected by the mine without additional expansion.
Likewise, the drainage swale south of the mine will likely continue to stay
hydrated, even if discharge from the mine stops or is reduced since the feature
receives significant flow from the adjacent timberland ditches and the water
control structure maintains a permanent water surface for the area.

PPIP' = /1 Kimley-Horn
l• M and Associates, Inc.
Therefore, with the completion of the southward mine expansion, the monitoring
program has achieved the goal set forth in the 401 conditions. Adjacent wetland
and stream features were not adversely affected by dewatering activities at the
mine through the implementation of the water management plan and maintenance
of hydrologic barriers to prevent dewatering of adjacent features.
Chad Evenhouse, PWS
10

Martin MwWta M&IwWs
22.00
J
N
2
c
0
m
m
w
18.00
16.00
Location 19 - Surface Water Level Gage (NW1)
January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013
—Watert.evei --*--Ditch Bottom • Rainfall
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00 �a
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
�2 ca M M ao 0 M M Cl)M M _m
a o ro Cr) o
Date
PMp. d By GhM F�hMse
Pal.. 4MV2014

Rocky Point Quarry
= A Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 20 - Shallow Water Table Gage (NW410E4)
January 1, 2013 -December 31, 2013
Water Laval (Ground Surface +USAGE Wetland Criteria --s— Monitoring Depth ♦ Rainfall
9.00
7.00
1.00
m r� r� cn en of m to m
0 o n o o c
Date
Pr"d By, Chad E—h.yye
oat.: ur U2014
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6,00
r
7.00 C
8.00
C
9-00 'm
10-00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
M M M M c7
r r

Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 21 - Shallow Water Table Gage (NW12)
January 1, 2013 - December 31. 2013
— Water Level -21- Ground Surface t USACE Wetland Criteria f Monitoring Depth • Rainfall
11.00
9.00
s
25.00
1i
3.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
r
7.00
8.00
e
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
M :2 M M M C7 M M M M M M M v
O 01 N OQ N [s a [+f G O 0 O �
Q O O Q G C O O p 12 (�1
Date
Prepared gX Ched Evwt u raWnewl nc
Dale. 41IMM4 �� iuy.rwn

12.00
10.00
J
N
i
m
8.00
m
m
d
LL
C
p
w 6.00
w
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 22 - Shallow Water Table Gage (NW2)
January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013
—Water Level --0-Ground Surface +t1SACE Wetland Criteria tMoniloriN Depth ♦ Rainfall
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 m
s
7.00 c
8.00
C
9.00
10.00
11.00
8
12.00
ROWING
SEASON
13.00
h two
1
ow or
ibH r
15
14.00
4,00
15.00
M p0
M to M co m Cl) [h rl m
o O
HMV
O
_M
O
_M
to O w O m m
O O 0O CO O iN—
r r
Date
Dale= u v]of a

30.00
28.00
2600
2400
22.00
J
20.00
i
g 18.00
16.00
a 14.00
12.00
W
10.00
8.00
6.00
Location 23 - Overburden Gage (NW19)
January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013
—Water Level -t Ground Surface
f Monitoring Dept • Rainfall_
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
t+f t+f
th M
n s7 M
•')
� m
l+l m
t+f eh
oats
Pn 9Y ow&�
n Yllm. C31n trebly t

Rocky Point Quarry
"��� V^ Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 23 - Deep Groundwater Gage (NW26)
January 1. 2013 - December 31, 2013
—Water Level #Ground Surface Monitoring Depth • Rainfall
30.00
15.00
w
r7 M_ tYf p1 [+1 [h c+1 c+1 l7 C7 c� M
O O O Is O t0 O C3 O1 O r �—
Date
P,e.e By: Cne EvnWw�,ee
Oeie. u1112ou
OM
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
&00 �
L
7.00
8-00 R
w
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
i
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.A0
c7
C7
r
C ZFI Yee 411t

ht.."
Location 24 - Overburden Gage (MM5)
January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013
—Water Level -f-Ground Surrace - Monitoring Depth
30.00'117
ME 25 4
25.00
J
20.00
M
15.00
5.00
• Rainfall
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5,00
6,00
7.00
8.00 R
w
C
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15,00
V V c2 V c_7 V V a7 a7 M M N2 a.) Lr}
07 a a3
O N N N N Y r O O
a 0 0 o
0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 o r
Date
1"
Pm7d By, Chad E—eM o
D.W QIV2014 ��/1 � 14 ba

35.00
30.00
25.00
0 16.00
,v
lu
10.00
5 00
—Water Level
Location 25 - Overburden Gage (NW22)
January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013
f Ground Surfaoe ---w- Monitoring Depth • Rainfall
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
gull
u
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 m
r
7.00
8.00 iq
C
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13,00
14,00
15 00
T
C2 L'9
M
M
(2
N!
M
M
Pr
FI
S7
f7 M M
O a
O p
CN O
O
O
O
O
q
Date
Pmperep sy, CheE E—h—. si��..ffnn
Wta: III f12P14 C�� w�wMlYa

Location 25 - Deep Groundwater Gage (NW23)
January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013
—Water Level Ground Surface --a-Monitoring Depth • fiainfaq
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
0
A
m 10.00
m
u.
L
O
5.00
m
la.l
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
0.00
0
-5.00
M CAI C7
r r r
O� (O iB fM 00 (O C'3 O 35 lA M
rpm
0 0 0 a o `$ o 0 0 a
Date
FRepued By Chsd Ev howe
Dae. rH 112014
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00 =
8.00
G
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
I
14.00
15.00
cv
a
CUn "=..

W
Yrtle �t..�•�u u.�w�. 1� A
Location 25 - Surface Water Level Gage (CEC3)
January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013
F-- Water Level --*--Ditch Bottom • Rainfall
2000
16.00
1 C00
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
II
�
0 0
g o g o N N
Date
000
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
B.00 m
t
7.00 c
8,00
w
C
$.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.OD
15.00
rnprw 9y ev.+nwa C01 �s
ow: wt+r7oI4 u

Rocky Point Quarry
VA Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 26 - Deep Groundwater Gage (MM6)
January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013
—Water Level 0-Ground Surface tMoniloringDepth ♦ Rainfall
35.00
30.00
25.00
.2 20.00
a 15.00
LL 10.00
C
O
5.00
lil
0.00
-5.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
s.00 0
7.00
8.00
c
9.00
10,00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
M M
M cn
M
CO M M se M M M CO M
O
.-
QQ
aa
co
O O
C CD0
O
C3 0.r
Date
Prep ..d By Chad E—h—
D.1a.v1V201e
Con ry ~ .

�OF WATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
�do William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 14, 2005
Martin Marietta Materials
Mr. Horace Wilson, Manager
Environmental Services
Post Office Sox 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Subject: Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Quarry Expansion
Modified Pumping and Groundwater Monitoring Plan
Dear Mr. Wilson,
Thank you for the additional information you provided to DWQ on February 8, 2005, concerning the Modified
Pumping and Groundwater Plan for Martin Marietta Materials Rock Point Quarry Expansion received on January
31, 2005. This plan was submitted by Kimley-Horn on behalf of Marvin Marietta in accordance with the General
NPDES Stormwater Permit Number NCG020000 requirements.
The additional information was submitted for the purpose of addressing DWQ concerns that were discussed
during our January 31, 2005, meeting and outlined in the supplemental information that you provided.
DWQ has no objection to the Rocky Point Quarry Expansion provided that the following conditions are met:
In order to maintain the current hydrology in the jurisdictional stream in tract E during dewatering
activities and after the mine reclamation, please provide the volume of water proposed to discharge from
Outfall 004, prior to discharging from this outfall. The discharge must maintain the current hydrology of
the system without causing degradation of the stream on tract E and the intermittent downstream areas in
the adjacent southern tract. In addition, the natural outlet for tract E at the head of the jurisdictional
stream must be maintained when the dewatering stops. Based on the permanent pool of the lake after
reclamation, an engineered outlet structure may need to be designed in order to maintain this outlet under
the new site conditions.
2. Due to the nature of the disturbance proposed around the stream on tract E, please propose a 100' buffer
instead of 50' buffer and submit a copy of the revised plans to DWQ and the Division of Land Resources
prior to expanding into tract E.
3. Please perform a v;,etland delineation on tract D and on the southern tract of land -adjacent to tract E and
request a jurisdictional determination from the US Army Corps of Engineers. The US Army Corps of
Engineers is the only agency that has the authority to make this determination. This information is
needed to demonstrate the location of the wetlands that you are proposing to monitor and to clearly depict
the jurisdictional areas that you are proposing to maintain the hydrology of with the pumping plan. DWQ
understands that this process can take time and would like to help prevent the disruption of ongoing
mining activities; therefore, the jurisdictional determination map does not need to be submitted until
August 31, 2005. Please note that some of the proposed monitoring well locations may need to be
relocated based on the results of the delineation.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer 5errice1-877-623-6748
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 FAX [phone] Internet: h2o enr.state.nc us QRe
NorthCarolina
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Naturally

Martin Marietta Materials
February 14, 2005
4. Please provide surface elevation information for each well location. DWQ understands that this
information will not be obtained prior to well installation. This information is critical in determining if
the wetland hydrology is being maintained (saturation in the top 12" of soil for at least two weeks during
the growing season). Although DWQ does not want to slow down progress, base -line information for the
growing season is required to interpret this data prior to mine expansion.
5. Please respond by providing DWQ with a final monitoring plan that includes a well installation schedule,
and the proposed criteria for wetland hydrology success with a contingency plan. The actual well
locations and elevations can be provided after the wetland delineation is completed and the wells are
I nstalled. Please include these items in a proposed schedule in the final monitoring plan.
Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate
to call Ed Beck or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Noelle Lutheran
Environmental Specialist III
cc: Tom Reeder— Stormwater and Wetland Branch Supervisor
Ed Beck — Surface Water Protection Section Regional Supervisor
Harlan Britt, P.E. — Kimley-Horn and Associates
Chad Evenhouse — Kimley-l-lom and Associates
Noelle Lutheran — WiRO
Danny Smith — Stormwater and Wetland Compliance and Enforcement Unit

Martin Marietta Materials
P.Q. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
'telephone: [phone]
December 1, 2004
Mr. Ed Beck
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Subject: Notification of Additional Discharge Outfall
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Rocky Point Quarry
COC No. NCG020166
Dear Mr. Beck:
RECEIVEID
DEC ', 2 2004
BY:
On August 3, 2004, a letter and map was submitted to the Stormwater and General
Permits Unit concerning the location of an additional Outfall at the above referenced
facility. This letter and map was also copied to Mr. Rick Shiver at the Wilmington
Regional Office of DWQ. A copy of this letter is attached.
The purpose of that submittal was to notify DWQ that we were establishing a new
discharge outfall based on guidance and direction from the Division of Land Resources,
DWQ and the 4011Wetlands Unit. Outfall 003 will act to re -hydrate areas surrounding
this active pit. The Discharge Monitoring Reports that we submit each quarter show this
new discharge point that was activated in the 3d Quarter of 2004.
Attached is a revised map to show existing Outfalls 001, 002 and 003. Outfall 004, shown
on the south side of the property, is proposed and will not be activated until all
permitting and zoning requirements have been met.
Please get in touch with this office if any additional information is needed on this matter.
Sincer ly,
Steve Whitt, P.E.
Manager, Environmental Services
CC: Horace Willson
Rick Shiver, DWQ
Lillette Granade, USACOE

Martin Marietta Materials
p.0. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
Telephone: [phone]
August 3, 2004
NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Notification of Additional Discharge Outfall
Martin Marietta Materials, Lac. — Rocky Point Quarry
COC No. NCG020166
Dear Mr. Shiver:
DEC �, 2 2004
Based on recent permitting activity with the Division of Water Quality a new pit water
discharge outfall has been developed at our Rocky Point Quarry. This permitting activity
deals with our commitment to re -hydrate areas surrounding the active pit to the east. This
discharge point is shown on the enclosed map as Outfall 003.
Outfall 003 receives water that is pumped from our pit sump that has previous served
Outfall 002. The water pumped from this sump will now be split to serve both Outfall
locations. Outfall 001 remains unchanged. We will begin sampling water from Outfall
003 in the P Quarter of 2004 and the Discharge Monitoring Report will include
analytical data from this outfall.
Please get in touch with this office if any additional information is needed on this matter.
Sincerely,
Steve Whitt,, P.E.
Manager, Environmental Services
CC: Mr. Rick Shiver
Wilmington Regional Office
NCENR — DWQ .
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405

i
Ii�
IF-�-II
I�
`aQ
5
~
�
!!
itZ
kn
oc N II
0
da
'II
as
O N
z
U
W
�'
�
H
6
w
�
�
zo
3
O
�
z
�
aQ
z
�
o
z
N
N
Ir �
w
;
Y
Q
Q
o
oz
CIO
cn
L
U
H
O
O
_
z
z
0
0
0
0
N
0
0
0
0
N
O
• � �� v
I e��
d
� I .
7�
S-r
a
C
3
to
Cd
O
to
Q
5O
aFl
W
F1
Fl
U
O
U
a
w
C�
?�
U v
O -O
F••�
O
-C
0
0
>

Martin Marietta Materials
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
Telephone: [phone]
December 1, 2004
Mr. Ed Beck
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Subject: Notification of Additional Discharge Outfall
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Rocky Point Quarry
COC No. NCG0201 GG
Dear Mr. Beck:
RECEIVED
DEC �a),M4
BY:
On August 3, 2004, a letter and map was submitted to the Stonnwater and General
Permits Unit concerning the location of an additional Outfall at the above referenced
facility. This letter and map was also copied to Mr. Rick Shiver at the Wilmington
Regional Office of DWQ. A copy of this letter is attached.
The purpose of that submittal was to notify DWQ that we were establishing a new
discharge Outfall based on guidance and direction from the Division of Land Resources,
DWQ and the 401/Wetlands Unit. Outfall 003 will act to re -hydrate areas surrounding
this active pit. The Discharge Monitoring Reports that we submit each quarter show this
new discharge point that was activated in the 3d Quarter of 2004.
Attached is a revised map to show existing Outfalls 001, 002 and 003. Outfall 004, shown
on the south side of the property, is proposed and will not be activated until all
permitting and zoning requirements have been met.
Please get in touch with this office if any additional information is needed on this matter.
Sincer ly,
Steve Whitt, P.E.
Manager, Environmental Services
CC: Horace Willson
Rick Shiver, DWQ
Lillette Granade, USACOE

NOTE:
Silt Fencing will be utilized during
WELL P I IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY berm construction for sediment and erosion control.
0.45 MILES NNW FROM WELL P2
N/F
Hedi Trask
P2
On
S
Abandoned portion of pit used for settling ponds. Acreage included in total for Mine Excavation. wreen P- 4111ployee
Includes overburden storage and fines disposal not included in pit Plantings Buildin PIPE
Includes only haul roads located outside of Mine Excavation.
84'
12'
12
LLL L�i
TYPICAL SECTION
BERM ALONG S.R. 1517
100'BUFFER�
NT
Richard Shew
5PO'BUFFEI;t-
Q
I&Ci1afification 150'BUFFER (FROM CENTERLINE OF ROAD)
Pond
Prior Settling Area
(no longer active)
�'W
4
N
I- �EXIS�TTNG�
N/F
Nell Trask
Wetland N/F
2.30 acres total Plum Creek Timberlands, LP.
Existing Dirt Road
N/F
Plum Creek Timberlands, LP.
Z
Wetland
-,0
1.04 acres
4
�3'
21,
f
V-K
N�
A
t
�g
n'�
��11'10 i' �' I I, ", - � 4
2
'9
'k"iVY
WELL P6 WAS COVERED UP DURING
iR"
Wetland
CONSTRUCTION OF INTERSTATE 40
0.07 acres
N� 0"?
'-',tA'�"'
0,
g
PROPOSED 50"BUFFER
T" NAD"
11'4400z g
NT-b M3,
R
LEGEND
Permit Boundary
Paved Road
Adjacent Property Line
Dirt Road
Pit Limit
Body of Water
Future Pit Limits
"'J Diversion Ditch
Creek
Proposed 50 ft Buffer
Delineated Wetlands
Outfall Sample Location
(existing & proposed)
Treeline . . . . . . .
Berm (existing)
Tailings / Sediment Ponds
Berm (to be built)
Stockpiles
Building
Processing Area / Haul Roads
Above Ground Storage Tanks
P2 (Monitoring Well)
NOTES:
* Overburden is backfilled into pit
* Erosion control at existing pit will
consist of directing all drainage and
runoff back into pit.
Iffiffil 1111M N/F
Plum Creek Timberlands, LP.
............... .......................
PROPOSED
N/F
Plum Creek Timberlands, LP. OUTFALL 004
PROPOSED 50'BUFFER
SCALE: I" = 400'
0 200 400 800 1200 1600
PROPOSED 50'BUFFER
PROPOSED 50"BUFFER
* Well P6 has been covered.

Martin Marietta Materials
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
Telephone: [phone]
DEL � 2 04
August 3, 2004
NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Notification of Additional Discharge Outfall
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Rocky Point Quarry
COC No. NCG020166
Dear Mr. Shiver:
Based on recent permitting activity with the Division of Water Quality a new pit water
discharge outfall has been developed at our Rocky Point Quarry. This permitting activity
deals with our commitment to re -hydrate areas surrounding the active pit to the east. This
discharge point is shown on the enclosed map as Outfall 003.
Outfall 003 receives water that is pumped from our pit sump that has previous served
Outfall 002. The water pumped from this sump will now be split to serve both Outfall
locations. Outfall 001 remains unchanged. We will begin sampling water from Outfall
003 in the 3"d Quarter of 2004 and the Discharge Monitoring Report will include
analytical data from this outfall.
Please get in touch with this office if any additional information is needed on this matter.
Sincerely,
Steve Whitt,, P.E.
Manager, Environmental Services
CC: Mr. Rick Shiver
Wilmington Regional Office
NCENR — DWQ
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405

Rocky Point Quarry-MM
Subject: Rocky Point Quarry-MM
From: Carol Miller <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:15:37 -0500
To: Rick Shiver <[e-mail]>
Rick,
the modification for the Rocky Point Quarry you were rerfering to was received by
the LQS Central Office on June 22, 2004. The modification was approved on October
26,2004.
Carol
1 of 1 12/22/2004 1 1:27 AM

Notes on Martin Marietta Materials Rocky Point Quarry
January 9, 2004, Meeting
A meeting was held at DENR WiRO to discuss the pumping plan and 404/401 Individual Permit
application. Chad, Jim, and Harlan of Kimley-Horn, Horace of MMM, and Rick, Danny, and I
were present.
At the very beginning of the meeting, Rick Shiver asked why MMM could not expand to the
south instead of to the cast (due to property owner concerns to the east and propose wetland
impacts). MMM and Kimley-Horn staff stated that MMM did not own the land to the south.
The owners were Plum Creek, and it was not known if Plum Creek was interested in selling or
leasing the land. In addition, it was stated that it was unknown if reserves were available to the
south. They then explained that a special use permit would be required to mine to the south, and
they did not know if Pender County would even issue a special use permit. They also explained
that they already had a mining permit to expand to the east, not to the south. Plus, they
expressed their concern over the time it would take to research if reserves were available and to
secure necessary permits. They stated that it would take years.
Further on in the conversation, mitigation requirements for the proposed wetland impacts were
discussed. I suggested that they look into on -site restoration and that property to the west (tracts
B, and C) appeared to have been previously impacted by forestry activity and would make a
good mitigation site. They stated that they would look into it, but once again they did not own
the land and doubted the property owners would be interested, and please note that the original
IP application submitted to the USACE on April 15, 2003, also stated in the alternative analysis
section that "the property on the south-west corner of the permitted mine area, indicated as
Tracts B, C, and D, are owned by others and improperly zoned, therefore expansion of the mine
in this direction is not a viable alternative."
The proposal to expand to the south into Tract E also included plans to expand into Tract C, as
discussed at the meeting requested by MMM on November 23, 2004, at DENR WiRO.
February 9, 2004, MMM Response to Rocky Point Quark DWQ Letter January 20, 2004
MMM stated that `Because this permit is not guaranteed to be issued there is no guarantee that
the Special Use permit will be granted, MMM believes it would be highly speculative to launch
into a major effort to obtain the required mining permit prior to issuance of the Special Use
permit being issued, primarily because of the high costs of the studies typically required for
mining permits in this area", and "the mine permit process has not begun and should not begin
until the decision by local government has been related to the issuance of the required Special
Use permit."
DWQ has been informed by the Pender County Zoning Department that the Special Use Permit
was just approved at the last meeting and they still have to provide additional information prior
to moving forward. The Mining Permit to expand operations to the south was applied for on
June 21, 2004 and issued on October 26;-2004 (note that the final modified 401 Water Quality
Certification was issued on May 14, 2004), The Special Use Permit had not been approved prior
to pa plying for and securing a mining permit.

f � '
General Notes
At some point during one of our many meetings with MMM and Kimley-Horn, I also asked
about cumulative impact concerns and preserving wetlands on adjacent tracts. They quickly
responded, once again, by saying that they did not own the adjacent properties and could not
speculate on future impacts nor could they propose to preserve wetlands on properties that they
did not own. Clearly that is not the case because after securing a 401 WQC for impacting
approx. 7 acres of wetlands on Tracts_G1 and G2, they immediately applied for a mining.permit
to impact stream wetlands/waters on Tracts E and C. In addition, at request of the USACE, they
managed to`pIace wetlands in preservation/conservation on property they do not own.
One more note, during the last meeting with Harlan and Horace on November 23, 2004, Harlan
stated that the jurisdictional area on Tract E was wetlands, not a stream (pointing to a wetland
note on the survey). Clearly, Harlan was aware that this area was a stream. On more than one
occasion during previous meetings when asked why they could not expand to the south, he said
that there was a jurisdictional stream in excess of 1000 feet on Tract E and he was not sure that
404/401 permits could be secured to impact the stream. In addition, in the February 9, 2004,
response letter to DWQ from Harlan Britt, it states "Mine operations to the south have the
potential to impact the stream system that has been identified in what is referred to as Tract E."
It is my professional opinion that MMM and Kimley-Horn were not upfront and honest with
DWQ during the 401 permitting process and suggesting that they "out -maneuvered" the State is
a nice way of putting it. As of January 7, 2005, MMM has failed to comply with the 401 WQC
issued on March 15, 2004, and modified on May 14, 2004, and May 25, 2004 (note that the
required wetlands monitoring plan and the modifications requests were sent to John Dorney only
and WiRO was not copied). A wetland delineation (survey) has not been submitted to the
USACE for signature as required in condition number 2. In addition, DWQ reserved the right in
the May 15, 2004 modification to require additional well placement and monitoring on Tracts HI
and H2 when the JDs are received. At the November 23, 2004 meeting, I also requested a copy
of the Wetlands Monitoring Plan that was submitted to the Raleigh Wetlands Unit on May 13,
2004. 1 have not received a copy. In addition, Lillette Granade with the USACE has informed
me that MMM is currently in non-compliance with the 404 Permit for failure to submit a copy of
the recorded conservation casement by December 27, 2004, although they claim that it has been -
recorded.
Noelle Lutheran

Y
�Ec®S Stem
aII me �
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
Horace Willson
Martin Marietta Materials
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
Re: Project: Rocky Point Quarry
County: Pender
September 24, 2004
DWQ#: 03-1023
COE#: 200301159
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has received a check in the amount of
$84,000.00 check number 00449986, as payment for the compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality
Certification/Section 404 permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory
mitigation requirements for this project have been satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other
conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with
this activity.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCEEP is responsible for the compensatory
mitigation requirements associated with the subject permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified
in the permit. The NCEEP will restore 6.92 acres of non -riparian wetlands in Cataloging Unit 03030007 of the Cape Fear
River basin.
Payments to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program are NOT reimbursable unless a request for reimbursement is
received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Requests for reimbursement must be accompanied by a letter from
the permitting agency stating that the permit and/or authorization has be rescinded.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
Deborah D. Anderson
In -Lieu -Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Doug Huggett, Division of Coastal Management
Lillette Granade, USACOE-Wilmington
Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Regional Office -Wilmington
File
RUtD6gJ... L'... PYDtEGt' Our ft6ite,
e'
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 / 919-733-5208 / www.neeep.net

Martin Marietta Materials
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
Telephone: [phone]
June 21, 2004
Mr. Floyd Williams, PG
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Re: Permit No. 71-09
Rocky Point Quarry
Pender County
Cape Fear River Basin
Request for Modification
Dear Mr. Williams:
We are in the process of adding additional property to our Rocky Point operation. This has come
about .due to the tremendous loss of reserves located to the east as explained in more detail
below. We are now in short supply of permitted reserves and must move to the south where
additional reserves are located.
This needed addition will help replace the approximately 183 acres of reserves we have agreed to
leave as a result of an agreement with adjacent landowners.
The property in question is owned by Plum Creek Timber Company and is located directly south
of our existing operation. Our first step in the permitting process dealt with zoning issues with
Pender County. This is underway and should be completed shortly.
The Plum Creek property is a 345 Ac. tract that has been ditched extensively for timber
production by the former owners, Georgia — Pacific Corp. The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
approved the Wetland Delineation map on January 24, 2003. Please refer to Appendix "A".
Approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will be sought prior to any land disturbance
near the small drainage way noted as L16 through L27.
There is a small triangular area that is currently outside of the approved survey line. We plan to
get the Corps approval prior to moving close to this area. This is noted on the delineation map. i
,1.. .. _ .:F .0 1.A V-a. - •-.. ... M �''I-v1..l �r�Jy 1-.Y .

This modification should provide positive results, as we will be moving*our mining activities to
the South, away from adjacent neighbors. There is nothing other than raw timberland between
this tract and the N.E. Cape Fear River. Our pit discharge, outfall # 001, will continue to run
along the Western edge, creating a recharge effect between the new pit and I-40.
In summary, we would like to propose three modifications to the mining permit for Rocky Point
Quarry. The modifications are as follows:
First Modification — addition of 344.7 acres of expansion outside the existing permit boundary.
The tract of land, referred to as Tract E (Plum Creek Property), is located on the southern side of
the quarry (please refer to Mine Map). Of the 344.7 acres, approximately 325.6 acres are to be
affected as Mine Excavation (as shown by solid green line on Mine Map).
Second Modification — addition of 5.5 acres of expansion within the existing permit boundary.
The acreage to be added will be affected as Mine Excavation (as shown by dashed red line on
Mine Map).
Third Modification — reduction of 41.9 acres of expansion within the existing permit boundary.
This previously permitted acreage, was to be affected as Future Mine Excavation (as shown by
solid cyan line on Mine Map).
Sediment and erosion control plans have not been submitted with this proposal taking into
consideration that stripping activities will proceed in such a manner as to direct runoff into the
pit, and that the terrain is relatively flat. However, temporary sediment and erosion control
devices, such as silt fencing, rip rap check dams, etc. shall be installed should the need arise.
As a matter of record, we have sent notifications to the adjacent landowner, Calvin F. Wells, and
the County Manager.
Please find enclosed the following:
• Six copies of the completed mine permit application (only relevant pages included).
• Six copies of the Mine Map and Reclamation Plan.
• Six copies of the Wetland Delineation Map drawn by Draper Aden Associates.
• A check in the amount of $600 to cover the permit modification fee.

Should you have any questions, or should any additional information be required, please contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
��„✓��. � ,moo-_-.
Nuwan Wijesuriya
Environmental Engineer
cc: Douglas Pope
Andy Durden
Horace Willson
File

1,00041306 111' 1:053 L09084l: 6 263- 093149+1'

.le
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine _ _ Rocky Point Quarry County Pender
River Basin Cape Fear Latitude(dd.mm.ss) 34°25100" Longitude (dd.mm.ss) 77°51145"
2. Name of Applicant* Martin Marietta Materials. In
Permanent address for receipt of official mail** P.O. Box 30013, Raleigh._ NC_2.7622
Telephone [phone] _
4. Mine Office Address 1635 Martin Marietta Road. Rockv Point. NC 28457
Telephone [phone]
Mine Manager Mr. Douglas Pope
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature._ ,� CyZ� c '//— Date June 21.2004
Print Name Donald M. Moe
Title Senior Vice President
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
* * The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt of a
complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.

❑ NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining
operation for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding,
detailed mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
Answer all of the following that apply:
1. a. If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by the
permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned:
leased: Property owner if leased:
Acres
b. If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: Total
permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be based upon):
If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit
No.: 71-09 Total permitted acreage: 1287
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes X No . If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage
that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): +5.5 (Addition to Future Mine
Excavation) and -41.9 (Reduction of Future Mine Excavation)
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes X No If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: 344.7 (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application form
entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes X No (if no, a "minor
modification" fee of $50.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes,
indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acreage to
be added to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): 325.6
(Future Mine Excavation)
d. If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.:
Total permitted acreage:
❑ SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTIONS) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined:
Marine Limestone
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & Truck ---- X Shovel & Truck
Dragline & Truck ----X Self -loading Scraper Other (explain)
—2—

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of tailings/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect of the
mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
CURRENTLY
ACREAGE
CATEGORY
AFFECTED
PERMITTED
ACREAGE
TO BE AFFECTED
Tailings / Sediment
42.0
42.0
Ponds*
Stockpiles
18.2
18.2
Wastepiles* *
13.8
17.4
Processing Area /
16.7
16.7
Haul Roads***
Mine Excavation
614.5
1,073.5
Other
NIA
NIA
Total Acreage
Permitted To Disturb
663.2
1,125.8
Total Permitted
1,287
1,563.8
Acreage
* Abandoned portion of pit used for settling ponds. Acreage included in total for Mine Excavation.
** Includes overburden storage and fines disposal not included in pit.
*** Includes only haul roads located outside of Mine Excavation.
NOTE: IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN
THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORM). THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE MAPS.
—3—

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION
1, Donald M. Moe , an applicant, or an agent, or employee of an applicant, for a
new Mining Permit, or a modification of an existing Mining Permit to add land to the permitted area, from the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, being first duly sworn, do hereby attest that the following are all
known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining permit boundary
(including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract,
all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) and
that notice of the pending application has been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail, to said owners of
record at their addresses shown below, such notice being given on a form provided by the Department:
(Adjoining Landowner Name) (Address)
Mr. Calvin F. Wells, et al _ 1905 Ashbrook Drive, Wilmington. NC 2840'
(Attach additional list if necessary)
I do also attest that the following individual is the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in
which any part of the permitted area is located and that notice of the pending application has been caused to be
mailed, by certified or registered mail, to said office at the following address:
(Chief Administrative Officer Name)
[City Manager, County Manager, Mayor, etc.]
Andv Hedrick. Pender Countv Manager
(Address)
Pender Countv Government
807 S. Walker St., Burgaw. NC 28425
The above attestation was made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory to the Department that a
reasonable effort has been made to notify all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land
that are adjoining the mining permit boundary (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the
applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) and the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in
which any part of the permitted area is located in compliance with N.C.G.S. 74-50(b1) and 15A NCAC 513.0004(d).
I understand that it is the responsibility of the applicant to retain the receipts of mailing showing that the above
notices were caused to be mailed and to provide them to the Department upon request.
.Tune 21, 2004
Signature of Applicant Date
If person executing Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant, provide the following information:
(Name of applicant) Donald M. Moe; (title of person executing Affidavit) Senior Vice President.
I, Sarah M. LeCom te, a Notary Public of the County of Wake , State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that
Donald M. Moe personally appeared before me this day and under oath acknowledged that the above Affidavit
was made by him/her.
%�
Witness my hand and notarial seal this day of 20 b �Q '••�,'';
l,.
Notary: My Commission expires: August 3, 200.8
FLOCK

ROCKY POINT QUARRY
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED
Mr. Calvin F. Wells, et al
1905 Ashbrook Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
COUNTY OFFICIALS NOTIFIED
Mr. Andy Hedrick
Pender County Manager
Pender County Government
807 S. Walker Street
Burgaw, NC 28425

Martin Marietta Materials
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622.0013
Telephone: [phone]
CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
June 21, 2004
Mr. Calvin F. Wells, et al
1905 Ashbrook Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Rocky Point Quarry, Mine Permit Modification
Dear Sir:
In accordance with General Statue 74-50 of the Mining Act, this letter is to inform you of Martin
Marietta Materials plan to incorporate a 344.7-acre tract of land into the permit boundary at
Rocky Point Quarry.
Enclosed are an official notice and a reduced copy of our mine map that shows the general layout
of the operation.
The 344.7 acres will be utilized for future pit expansion and will have a 50 foot vegetated buffer
around the perimeter of the property as indicated on the attached site map.
Should you have any questions, or should any additional information be required, please contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Nuwan Wijesuriya
Environmental Engineer
ENC: OFFICIAL NOTICE, SITE MAP
cc: File

NOTICE
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bl) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Martin Marietta Materials. Inc. has applied on June 21 2004
(Applicant Name) (Date)
to the Land Quality Section, Division of Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
(a) a new surface mining permit ❑
(b) a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area N
The applicant proposes to mine Marine Limestone on 344.7 acres located approx. 10
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
Southeast of Buraaw off/near road SR 1517
{Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
in Pender County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bI), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort to notify all
owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining permit boundary; if an
adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of
tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary). In addition,
the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in which any part of
the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s) to the Department at the above address
within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the application for a permit, whichever is later.
Should the Department determine that a significant public interest exists relative to G.S. 74-51, a public hearing will
be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials are on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regardinp, the
snccifics of the nronosed mining activity. please contact the annlicant at the following telenhone number:
y '/ti[-4J,nU. Nor tntormation on the mining permit
gram staff at [phone]. Please note that
co
Mr. Calvin F. Wells, et al
1905 Ashbrook Drive, Wilmington, NC 28403
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
June 21, 2004
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
—5—
on review process, please
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact Person
& Company Name, if Applicable)
P.O. Box 30013 Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
(Address of Applicant)

Martin Marietta Materials
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622.0013
Telephone: [phone]
CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
June 21, 2004
Mr. Andy Hedrick, Pender County. Manager
Pender County Government
807 S. Walker Street
Burgaw, NC 28425
Re: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. --- Rocky Point Quarry, Mine Permit Modification
Dear Sir:
In accordance with General Statue 74-50 of the Mining Act, this letter is to inform you of Martin
Marietta Materials plan to incorporate a 344.7-acre tract of land into the permit boundary at
Rocky Point Quarry.
Enclosed are an official notice and a reduced copy of our mine map that shows the general layout
of the operation.
The 344.7 acres will be utilized for future pit expansion and will have a 50 foot vegetated buffer
around the perimeter of the property as indicated on the attached site map.
Should you have any questions, or should any additional information be required, please contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
:�?-/ /��' ---1
Nuwan Wijesuriya
Environmental Engineer
ENC: OFFICIAL NOTICE, SITE MAP
cc: File

NOTICE
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bl) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Martin Marietta Materials. Inc. has applied on June 21, 2004
(Applicant Name) (Date)
to the Land Quality Section, Division of Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environment
and'Natural Resources, 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
(a) a new surface mining permit ❑
(b) a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area
The applicant proposes to mine Marine Limestone on 344.7 acres located approx. 10
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
. Southeast of Burgaw off/near road SR 1517
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (NumberlName)
in Pender County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERUMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bI), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort to notify all
o%vners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining permit boundary, if an
adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of
tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary). In addition,
the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in which any part of
the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s) to the Department at the above address
within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the application for a permit, whichever is later.
Should the Department determine that a significant public interest exists relative to G.S. 74-51, a public hearing will
be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials are on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the apnlicant at the followine telephone number:
for information on the mining permit application review process, please contact
at [phone]. Please note_ that the Department will consider any relev
on
Mr. Andv Hedrick. Fender Countv Manager
Pender County Government
807 S. Walker St.. Bureaw, NC 28425
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
June 21, 2004
(Date of issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
-4—
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact Person
& Company Name, if Applicable)
P.O. Box 30013, Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
(Address of Applicant)

/
��T�� �. f � �..� r�{, ]'• / ""'ice -� - � �S
r e 4'h./4f ° "., ' - / .r`� 6" ,sue?•+? T �.R 4
c
�r.
n,7�N o
;yy £�='�`� ti. �{ � "��.,`` •� c�rAu w \ � l f \
v�ry -�2' RM
.osaa.�xlm
.rr�wl axa
�^ IL IiA
DIY Itf Ikt
M� � serf
r�
eR1QRvamao I.AII sJd
NOW
DlODMCATiO\ iUNI: 2004-
/ '.a. "• . =413 Acm proposed to be removed T :-
c� Alas To Be Affecmd as Funvs Mime Ewa_ i t
1
(shmwn by solid cyan lime —,). This oleo liea� .�
the pmi=ly appmved Pchnh Boundary. i ' '-
mv.InquIIl,
--------- -- �.� '.` xtt.m
ZElop"
Be.,4f£G-t�14F .R1%rrCRF-�l� .�:�.�. '=•=�.t
MODMCATIO\ - ILRQE 2004
s344.7 Acres proposed to be added to
the Ptmit Botcldary. Of this, :325.6 acres sre to be
affected u Future Mine Fsravatiom
(sboua by solid U= line —).
ra�da'ii rrwtail
h'1.f � -
—.K—
LEGEND
nur
� kw r�.r
11rI RlM
1AEA_;�T3 CF�apy
�
I�wlq.11�
TIW
lTwYwrv�-n
rs1�rY
® T.fylY�rsha
r.Mrria
e� �Va.
�y�y
iCrl
il�/A..Ie.,ItY
Ay„�p^I tiriW
{Q
1
lank
�Y y1s11 YbA
rw6Y�LL•�ww Nr� r
faoralrrr I�-
� w a al is is
wr
rro..rrrwu.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the,right of entry and travel upon our lands
or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations as
may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the
land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry
out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S.
74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature:
Print Name: Name: Plum Creels Timberlands, LP
Address: 22 North Main Street
Watkinsville, GA 30677
Telephone: [phone]
APPLICANT:
Signature:
Print Name: Donald M. Moe
Title: Senior Vice President
Company: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Mine Name: Rocky Point Quarry
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
Six (6) copies of the completed application, six (6) copies of all location maps, mine maps and reclamation
maps, and the appropriate processinog fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a check or money order
payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources must be sent to the Land
Ouality Section Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].

Michael F. Easley, Governor
Z-E C E I V E D William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
MAY 2 4 2004 Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
BY:
Division of Water Quality
May 14, 2004
Martin Marietta Materials
Attention: Mr. Horace Wilson
Post Office Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Re: Certification Modification and Wetland Monitoring Plan Approval
Martin Marietta Materials, Rocky Point Quarry, located at the end of State Road 1836 in P.endC
County, North CarolinaWQ .DPrrooject.No._03-.1023, US Army Corps of Engineers ID No. -�
200301159.
Dear Mr. Wilson:
On April 30, 2004, the Wetlands 401 Unit received a 401 Water Quality Certification modification
request for condition number 10 listed in Martin Marietta Materials' Rocky Point Quarry 401 Water
Quality Certification (DWQ project No. 03-1023) dated March 15, 2004. AIso, on May 13, 2004, the
Wetlands 401 Unit received a Wetlands Monitoring Plan from Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for the
Rocky Point Quarry, a requirement of the Certification.
With respect to the modification request of condition 10, it is agreed by copy of this letter that condition
number 10 (DWQ Project No. 03-1023) is modified such that mitigation payment as required in the
certification is due within 30 days of the issuance of the 404 permit. All other certification conditions
remain unchanged and in effect.
In addition, this letter also serves as written DWQ approval of the Martin Marietta Materials Wetlands
Monitoring plan dated May 12, 2004, with the stipulation that after the DWQ receives copies of the
USACE approved delineation for tracts H1 and H2, additional well placement and monitoring at these
locations may be required.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact
Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely,
Al . Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
(41 (11'7'11-1'72A r„ t,—N 01 rF ,.l — of— .,..

Martin Marietta Materials
DWQ 03-1023
Page 2 of 2
DWQ 03 1023
cc. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ, Wilmington Regional Office — Rick Shiver
DWQ, Wilmington Regional Office — Noelle Lutheran
DWQ, Wetlands1401 Unit -- Danny Smith
DLR, Wilmington Regional Office — Dan Sams
File Copy
Central files
Kimley-Horn and Associates — HarIan Britt
" P.O. Box 33068, Raleigh, NC 27636
Is

Kimley-Born
and Associates, Inc.
May 13, 2004
Mr. Rick Shiver
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Re: Modified Pumping Plan, Rocky Point Quarry
Dear Mr. Shiver:
"Ay 1 8 2004
Pursuant to the condition of certification 1. B, a as issued by the Wetlands Unit in the
March 15, 2004 certification, am providing your office with the proposed rate of
pumping that will be directed to the unnamed tributary to Strawberry Branch. This
tributary is located between tracts G 1 and G2.
The discharge rate will be a minimum of 1/3 of the daily discharge of water that is
discharged from Outfall 002 as designated in the mining plan and the NPDES permit.
The average daily discharge from Outfall 002 in 2003 was approximately 3.75 MGD.
The pumping rate going to the unnamed tributary is estimated to be a minimum of 1.25
MGD.
Please provide a written acknowledgement of receipt of this notification for our records.
A copy of this letter is being emailed with a hard copy via the Postal Service to follow.
On a second note, I had a meeting with John Dorney and Danny Smith this morning
regarding the approval of the Modified Pumping plan. While the pumping plan is a part
of the approved and issued 401 Certification, it was agreed that a separate letter of
approval from you regarding meeting requirements of the NPDES permit is necessary.
Please provide me with an appropriate letter of approval for the modified pumping
regarding the requirements of the NPDES permit.
Thank you for all your help in this matter and I look forward to your early response to
these requests.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
-�40.�.
Harlan K. Britt, .E.
Senior Project Manager
Cc: Mike Jones
Horace Willson
John Dorney
■
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
■
P,O Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3066

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
Project/Site: Rocky Point Quarry Date: 5/18/2004
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator:
Martin Marietta Materials County:
Chad Evenhouse, PWS
State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
Vegetation
N Plot ID:
Pender
NC
G1
10
Dominant.Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
Dominant:Plant Species. Stratum. Indicator
1. Sa1i nigra
T
ON
9
2. Acer rubrum
T
Fac
10,
3. Nyssa bifora
T
ON
11.
4. Myrica cerifera
S
Fac
12.
5. Polygonum spp.
H
Obl
13.
6. Foeniculum spp.
H
UPI
14.
7. Boehmeria cylindrica
H
Facw
15.
8. Impatiens capensis
H
Facw
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC,(excluding
FACU): 90%
Remarks:
Vegetation has been historically influenced by the ditch and changes in
discharge from the quarry).'
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 16 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
High moisture content in upper surface
activity, pumping
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Wediment Deposits
rainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other

map unit Name
(Series and Phrase): MumiUe
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Drainage Class: Very Poorly Drained
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type?. Y
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color'
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle -
Abund.ance/Coritrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
` HYDR|CSOIL INDICATORS r
'
Histosol X Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils �
]
HisdcEpipedon <3|oyadorLow-ChromaColors Listed onLocal HyddoSoils List '
3u|OdicOdor Concretions Listed unNational Hydhc So|sL|st
| |Aquio Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in | |Other (Explain in remarks) ' �
| |Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
HydhcSoU Present? (YYN) \(
Remarks -
. . .
WETLAND DETERMINATION HYN\
' ^
HydrophyficVegetation Present?
Y
Wetland Hydrology Present?
' Y
HydricSoils Present?
Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland?
Y
North of Ditch (-100') between G1 /G2 midpoint between culvert and future pit wall. Groundwater monitoring lo,ca
10, gage ID - NW 15 (installed May 2004).
Hydrology is to be maintained with a riser and discharge pumping per
NCDENR Pumping Plan for the quarry.
-0'mm

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
I 1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
r
Project/Site: Rocky Point Quarry Date: 5/18/2004
Applicant/Owner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Pender
I
investigator: Chad hvenhouse, PWS State: NC
I
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID: G1
i is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect ID:
i
Is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot ID: 11
1
Vegetation
--Dominant Plant Species,. ;.,
Stratum
indicator
Dominant Plarifv5pecies.' ` ..-,-:.Stratum
' _Indicator•
1. Pinus taeda
T
Fac
9. Liquidambar sryraciflua
T
Fac
2. Gordonin lasianthus
T/S
Facw
10. vaccinium corymbosum
S
Facw
3. Persea borbonia
T/S
Facw
11, Osmunda cinnamomea
H
Facw
4. Acer rubrum
T
Fac
12.
S. Cyrilla radmiflorta
S
Facw
13.
6. Myrica cerifera
S
Fac
14.
7. Lyonia lucida
S
Facw
15.
8. Clethra alnifolia
S
Facw
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding
FACU): 100%
Remarks:
The datapoint location is at the edge of the pine plantation (pines with bays in the midstory) and edge of the
drainage ditch (Titi, wax myrtle, fetterbush, sweet pepperbush, etc.).
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in) Water Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 48 (in) Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS: Other
The hydrology of the location is dominated by the drainage ditch approximately 50 feet from the location,

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phruua): Mumi&e Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type?.(Y/N) Y
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-6
1 OYR 2/1
Loamy sand
HYDR|CSOIL INDICATORS
Histosol
Suffidic Odor
|AquicMoisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
G|ayednrLow'ChromaColors
Concretions
High Organic Streaking in
| |SurfanoLayer inSandy Soils
Organic Streaking inSandy Soils
Listed onLocal HydhoSoils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in remarks)
HydhoSoil Present? (Y/N) Y
,
Uncoated.sand grains upper. 12", Streaking in upper 12", few condretions in 12"-36"
NETLANDDETEFl88|NAT|ON (YYN)
1ydmohyticVegetation Present? Y
VaUandHydrology Present? N
1ydrioSoi|u Present? Y
3 this sampling point aWetland? N
)ata point located at monitoring gage NW 18 at monitoring location 11. The gage is installed near furrow in bottom--.
iird of bed at the edge of a line plantation adjacent to the ditch. Wetland hydrology is not currently'present -due to th
tfluence of the drainage ditch and bed/furrows of the pine plantation.

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COI~ Wetlands Determination Manual
Project/Site: Rocky Point Quarry Date: 5/18/2004
Applicant/Owner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Pender
Investigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID: G1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot 10: 12
Vegetation
Dominant Ptant Species Stratum Indicator;,, . , 3 r ,. ;; Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator E
1. Pinus toeda T 'Fac 9. Osmunda cinnamomea N Facw
2. Myricacenfera S Fac 10.smilax spP V Fac
3. Acer rubrum
T
Fac
11,
4. Liquidambar sryraciflua
T
Fac
12.
5. Persea borbonia
T/S
Facw
13.
6. Lyonia lucida
S
Facw
14.
7. Ilex glabra
S
Facw
15,
B. Gordonia lasianthus
T1S
Facw
15.
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FACU): 100% "
Remarks:
Located in a pine plantation in the center of Tract G1.
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 48 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 48 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
The hydrology of the location is dominated by the
indicators present.
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other
and furrows of the pine plantation. No hydrology

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
PROFILE✓ DFSCRIPTION
Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) Y
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-8
A
10YR 211
uncoated sand grains
Loam
8 - 24
B
10YR 211
Loam
24 - 34
B
10YR 3/1
Sandy loam
34 - 42
B
10YR 412
Streaking
Loamy sand
42 - 48
C
10YR 411
Loamy sand
W k.
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol Reducing Conditions X Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Sulfidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present?. (YIN) Y
Remarks
Many uncoated sar id"grains in the'surface. -Soil profile evaluated in the furrow and surface is likley disturbed from
pine plantation and land management activities. No evidence of saturation in the upper soil profile.
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? N
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? N
Remarks:
The data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 16 at monitoring location 12. The location is not a
wetland due to the lack of hydrology indicators from the land management and pine plantation activities.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
Project/Site:
MMM - Rocky Point
Date:
5/1912004 _
Applicant/Owner:
Martin Marietta Materials
County:
Pender
Investigator:
Chad Evenhouse, PWS
State:
NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site?
Y Community ID:
H1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?)
N Transect ID:
Is the area a potential
Problem Area?
N Plot ID:
13
Vegetation
D0minant.PIant_Spe6es. _..-
Stratum Indicator
:'"DoininantiPlant'Species'T'''- 17Strat'Oe-Indicator
Ella rncirnioria
S Facw
9. luncus spp.
H ObI
2. Lyonia lucida
S Facw
10, Woodwardia areolala
H ObI
3. _Myrica cerifera
S Fac
11, Osmunda cinnamomea
H Facw
4. Pinus lneda
T Fac
12,
5. Acer rubrum
T Fac
13.
�-
6. Gordonia lasianthus
TIS Facw
14.
7. Persea borbonia
TIS Facw
15.
8. Clerhra alnifolia
S Facw
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are 08L'; FACW, or FAC (excluding FACU): 100%
Ramarks
Datapoint is located in a small depression within a managed pine plantation. Center of the depression is
herbaceous, ringed by shrubs (Titi, bays, young red maples) and then loblolly pines.
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 14 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 14� (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
Surface has a high moisture content - spongy feel.
PRIMARY INDICATORS
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment
Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
X Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other

gn
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) Ya
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Mansell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 - 13
A
10YR 211
Loam
13 - 23
B
10YR 412
Sandy loam
23 - 48
10YR 412
Sandy clay loam
rA
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol
Reducing Conditions
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon
X
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
X
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Sulfidic Odor
Concretions
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime
High Organic Streaking in
Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (YIN)
Y
Remarks:
No uncoated'sand!grairis at s'urface'as compared to `other surface soils observed in the pine plantation. " W
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? Y '
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? Y
Remarks:
he data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 4 at monitoring location 13
epressional, isolated wetland within the pine plantation.

Z '' _ _..-...� ......-L.: Ykt_t'�'.-4...�...�..k....w�w _ --.�-.i�..L_�"�::-w�_,-_.i.�..� Mw r• __. _
DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
Project/Site: MMM - Rocky Point Date: 5/19/2004
ApplicantlOwner: Martin Marietta Materials County:
Investigator:. Chad Evenhouse, PWS
State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? y Community ID
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
N Plot ID:
Pender
NC
H1
- 14
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
indicator w
Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator
1. Pinus caeda
T
Fac
9. Liquidambar styradflua T Fac
2. Acer rubrum
T
Fac
10, flex glabra S Facw
3. Gordonia Insianthus
TIS
Facw
11.
4. Vaccinium corymbosum
S
Facw
12.
5. Myrica cerifera
S
Fac
13.
6. Lyonia lucida
S
Facw
14,
7. Clerhra alnifolia
S
Facw
15.
8. Osmunda cinnamomen
H
Facw
16,
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding
FACU): 100%
Remarks:
Location is in a thinned row of the pine plantation in trash H1.
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: 0 (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 48 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 48 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
X Oxidized Root Channels in tipper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other
increase in soil moisture observed at — 36 inches. Very poor hydroloqv indicators due to the altered landscaoe.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) Y
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munseli Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-7
A
10YR 211
10% uncoated grains
Sandy loam
7 - 14
B
10YR 311
Loamy Sand
14 - 28
B
10YR 6/2
10YR 516
10% wl streaking
Loamy Sand
28 - 48
C
10YR 511
10YR 6/6
5%
Sandy loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol Reducing Conditions X Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon X Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Sulfidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime. High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (YIN) Y
Remarks:
Upper soil surface disturbed; profile taken in the lower third of the pine plantation bed; surface is very dry with un
sand grains
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? N
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? N
Remarks:
The data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 13 at monitoring location 14. The location is not a
vvetland due to the disturbed landscape and poor hydrology indicators.
.r:..

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
Project]Site: MMM - Rocky Point Date: 5/19/2004 _
Applicant/Owner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Pender
Investigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID: H1
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot ID: 18
Vegetation
Dom inant'.Piant-Species+" •, •,;-!
.Stratum.- •;
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species- Stratum 'indicator M
1. Pinus raeda
T
Fac
9. Lyonia lucida S Facw
2. Acer rubrum
T
Fac
10. Persea borbonia SIT Facw
3. Quercus nigra
T
Fac
11.
4. Myrica cerifera
S
Fac
12.
5. Ilex glabra
S
Facw
13.
6. Gordonia lasianthus
SIT
Facw
14,
7. Liquidambar gdyraciflua _
T
Fac
15.
8. Andropogon capillipes
i•i
FacU
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are 08L, FACW, or FAC (excluding FACU): 90%
Remarks:
Y
'Data point is located in a cut -over area adjacent to the pine plantation.' It appears that the area is a ridge between
Ithe swale and the pine plantation.
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 48 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 48 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
Poor hydrology indicators
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Field'Observations '>a
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) Y
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-6
10YR 2/1
Loam
6 - 12
10YR 3/1
10YR 518
5%
Loam
12 - 26
10YR 512
10YR 5/8
10%
Sandy loam
26 - 40
10YR 512
10YR 516
5%
Sandy loam
40 48-
10YR 711
10YR 5/6
40%
Sandy clay loam
.a
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol . X Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors X Listed on Local Hydric Soils list
Sulfidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (Y1N) Y
Ramarkc`
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? N
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? N
Remarks:
e data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 3 at monitoring location 18.
.d

Q
DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
0
4 Project./Site: MMM - Rocky Point Date: 5/19/2004
9 Applicant/Owner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Pender
Q '
0 Investigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS State: NC
p Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? y Community ID: H2
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect ID:
1
Is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot 1D: 15
i Vegetation
DdrninanPlanSpecies;".--;
t t
"';Stratum"•
-Indicator �
dit
�.
Dominah't PlantSpecies - Stratum a ''Indicator
1. Lyonia lucida
S
Facw
9.
1
2. Persea barbonin
SIT
Facw
10.
I 3. Gordonia lasianthus
SIT
Facw
11.
I 4. Cyrilla racemiflora
S
Facw
12.
5. Clelhra alnijolia
S
Facw
13.
6.
14.
-
7,r
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding
FACU): 100%
Remarks: , -
.. , I I
.. I _ .. I.
lVegetation community is typical of wet flat - pocosin.
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) Y
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
D - 16
1 OYR 211
Loam
16 - 48
14YR 311
Sandy loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosof X Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon X Gleyed or Low-Ch_roma Colors Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Sulfidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (YIN) Y
Remarks -
There is microtopography and depressions. The data point was taken in a small depression.
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
-
Hydrophytid Vegetation Present? Y
i
Wetland Hydrology Present? Y
=�
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? Y
-
Remarks:
data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 14 at monitoring location 15.
oil
®S=
9A 1

f9
v
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
®
Project/Site: MMM - Rocky Point
Date: 5/19/2004
®
ApplicantlOwner: Martin Marietta Materials
County: Pender
Investigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS
State: NC
a
®
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site?
Y Community ID: H2 .
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?)
N Transect ID:
B
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
N Plot ID: 16
g
Vegetation
. ; :. q,,;Dommani"Plant"Species_,_.. Stratum '-Indicator
Dominant Plant"Species Stratum"" 'Indicator
1. Acer rubrum T Fac
9.
2. Gordonia lasianlhus T/S Facw
10.
®
3. Persea borbonia T/S Facw
11.
4. Cyrilla racemiJlora S Facw
12.
5. Lyonia lucida S Facw
13.
6. Ilex glabra S Facw
14.
7. Picridium aquilinum H Facu
15.
16.
D
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding
FACU): 90%
p
Remarks:
1
1
Hydrology:
RECORDED
DATA:
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Inundated
1
Aerial Photographs
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Other
X
Water Marks
X
No Recorded Data Available
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
1
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
1
Depth to Surface Water NA (in)
I
lOxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 20 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other

.14 •pAW S:9
G 'X:',3. �.:r'X:...Ls.,. ...b,":x`'bs r t" 1`7�ir.,-'•. .s''i +,,,,.c'��"f. r._.'§��r.�h>� �Y '" Moll,.!j;r •i.- --..,; ,
SOILS
-1 _-, ...--,- - .. - ..,._. -
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murviile Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Rn
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type?.(YIN) Y
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munseli Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-6
A
10YR 2/1
Sandy loam
6 - 18
B
10YR 311
Sandy loam
18 - 24
B
10YR 212
Sand loam
24 - 48
C
10YR 4/3
n..
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Hlstosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Streaking in
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (YIN) Y
Remarks:
Uncoated Sand Grains in upper 6", and streaking in 24"-36"
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? Y
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? Y
Remarks:
X Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in remarks)
The data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 2 at monitoring location 16.

d DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
9'
Project/Site: MMM - Rocky Point Date: 5/19/2004
II' Applicant/Owner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Pender
g Investigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? y Community ID: H2
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?)
N Transect ID:
g
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
N Plot ID:
17
0
Vegetation
Gies,..-.�',>. _ ., atom -•' ,L<< ,- . -•,
Onminarit Plant Spe Stratum • Indic
Dominant,Piant Species
Stratums;�;;lndicator.';-",_:;;':
1. Persea borbonia T/S Facw
9. Pleridium aquilinum
H Facu
2. Gordonia lasianlhus T15 Facw
14, dsmunda cinnamomea
Fi Facw
3. Pinus raeda T Fac
11.Ilex glabra
5 Facw
4. Acer rubrum T Fac
12.
5. Myrica cerifera S Fac
13.
�.
6. Lyonia lucida S Facw
14.
7. Vaccinium corymbosum S Facw
15.
B. Clerhra alnifolla S Facw
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding
FACU): 90% .
B
Remarks
D
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
®
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Inundated
Aerial Photographs.
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Other
X Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available
Drift Lines
@
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
B
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 30 (in)
X Water Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 24 (in)
Local Soil Suvey Data
Q
Fac-Neutral Test
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
1 lother
1
A

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type ?,(YIN) Y
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-6
10YR 2/1
Loamy sand
6 - 11
10YR 2/1
Loamy sand
11 - 17
10YR 311
Loamy sand
17 - 48
10YR 3/1
Sand loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Streaking in
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (Y/N) Y
Remarks:
Uncovered grains in upper 6 streaking in':11"-17,
WETLAND DETERMINATION (Y/N)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? Y
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? Y
Remarks:
X Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in remarks)
The data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 12 at monitoring location 17.

Martin Marietta Materials RockY Point Quarry: Year I Monitoring Report.
Jane 2005
1.0 Introduction
The Rocky Point Quarn Monitoring Plan Year -I Honitoring Report is prepared to satisfy North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) requirements for Martin Marietta Materials
(MMM) to perform groundwater monitoring of adjacent tracts at the Rocky Point Quarry mine in
Pender County, North Carolina. The report contains a brief history of the evolution of the
monitoring program at the quarry since 2001 developed through coordination and input from the
US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and NCDWQ. This is the first annual report; however, the 1D5
o program ._implemented _00 ;rough e monitoring ro ram has been Since Au August � 7 through coordination with th
regulatory agencies. Therefore, this report presents the data -to -date (August 2002 — May 2005),
with a more focused evaluation of the past year's data (May 2004 to May 2005). Conclusions of
this report summarize the effectiveness of the monitoring program in �eeting the goals and
objectives for the project. �2 D C-> f
2.0 Background
MMM began discussions with the NCDWQ in 2002 to prepare a Modified Pumping Plan in order
to renew the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for discharge and
dewatering from the Rocky Point Quarry. In order for the Modified Pumping Plan to be
approved, MMM needed to demonstrate to NCDWQ that dewatering did not have a negative
effect on wetland hydrology of potential wetlands adjacent to the mine. Through coordination
with the agencies, MMM initiated a monitoring program to evaluate the nature of surficial and
deeper -aquifer groundwater levels in the wetland areas adjacent to the active mine. These
monitoring locations were selected as representative locations of potential adjacent wetlands
based on aerial photograph interpretation and an onsite field visit with the Corps. Figure l shows
the initial monitoring locations as submitted to NCDWQ. MMM continued to work with the
Corps to determine wetland boundaries on the tracts.
In 2003, MMM submitted a Section 404/401 permit application to expand the mining operations
east of the active mine (Tracts G I and G2, see Figure 1). As a condition of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification, NCDWQ required that the Monitoring Plan (which was also a component
of the Modified Pumping Plan) be amended to include additional monitoring locations and that an
annual report be submitted by June of each year as mining operations continue. Figure 2 shows
the modified monitoring locations approved by NCDWQ and installed in May 2004.

Martin Marietta Materials f�
Rocky Point Quarr . Year I Monitoring Report,
.bane 2005
The Modified Pumping Plan and Monitoring Plan for the Rocky Point quarry endeavors to
j manage a portion of the discharge from the dewatering activities of the mine in such a way as to
(i protect adjacent wetland areas from the cone of influence within the surficial aquifer. The design
1 of the Modified Pumping Plan was to utilize the existing drainage ditch system by adding water
control structures to maintain a constant head of water along a perimeter of the mine between the
adjacent tracts. This would create a hydrologic barrier to the cone of influence within the
0 surficial aquifer to allow for the mining activities adjacent to the wetlands.
1
a To date, data from the Monitoring Plan has been periodically submitted to NCDWQ through
discussions regarding permitting and evolution of the-Modified=Pum"ping'Plan. `ko" vever, since
this is the initial annual monitoring report, the entire groundwater monitoring dataset collected to
date is included with this report, shown by location. Note that Locations 1, 4, and 9 have been
removed through the permitted expansion of the mine and are not included in the current
Monitoring Plan. Data from these monitoring gages has been previously submitted to NCDWQ
and is not included with this report.
It is intended that the annual report will'satisfy reporting requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification and the Modified Pumping Plan required by the Mining Permit.
3.0 Goals and Objectives
3.1 Initial Monitoring Plan: August 2002 - May 2004
The initial goals for monitoring the adjacent tracts were to evaluate the nature of the groundwater
in those tracts to determine the potential cone of influence affecting wetland hydrology, as well as
to determine the baseline (existing) conditions of surficial hydrology in those areas prior to mine
expansion. In addition, the determination of wetland boundaries within the adjacent tracts
required significant evaluation between 2002 and 2004 since much of these areas had been altered
from past forestry practices. Therefore, the monitoring gage data provided additional information
in support of the jurisdictional determination of wetlands within these tracts.
3.2 Current Monitoring Plan: May 2004 - Present
The current goal of the Monitoring Plan is to evaluate the effectiveness of managing discharge
from the dewatering operation of the mine to maintain surficial groundwater supply supporting
adjacent wetland areas.
4

I
Martin Marietta Materials A
RockI' Point QuurrY: Year I Monitoring Report,
--- - v^ June 2005
4.0 Methodology
4.1 Initial Monitoring Plan: August 2002 -May 2004
The initial monitoring plan targeted representative areas within tracts G1, G2, HI, and H2 (Figure
) that the Corps agreed were appropriate in evaluation of the existing hydrologic conditions of
the adjacent areas.
A transect of deeper groundwater gages were installed extending eastward from the mine. These
gages are located in Locations 1, 2, and 3 shown in Figure I. Location 4 also provided another
.:..I •=deeper•graundwater monitoring location adjacent to the mine -wall. These deeper •groundwater .,,...�.,.•:,, ;-_.• :; •_w ,
monitoring locations included a deeper aquifer gage in the limestone layer (varies between 30 to
40 feet depth from the ground surface), and an overburden gage in the sands and clays above the
limestone (varies between 15 to 20 feet depth from the ground surface).
"rhe monitoring gages are pressure water level data loggers manufactured by Infinities USA, Inc.
The gages were set to record water level readings every hour and were downloaded on a monthly
basis. An on -site rain gage was installed between tracts G 1 and G2 (Figure I); however this was
vandalized and later replaced by a gage at the quarry scale house. Daily precipitation was
recorded at the shop area (approximately'/z mile from the study area) by MMM staff.
To evaluate wetland hydrology criteria at these locations, shallow water table gages (— 3 feet
depth) and piezometers (—I to 1.5 feet depth) were installed at all the other locations except
Location 4. The piezometers were included in addition to the shallow water table gages to
evaluate whether there was a perched water table condition within the upper soil horizons.
4.2 Current Monitoring Plan: May 2004 Present
The jurisdictional determination of the adjacent tracts were resolved between 2002 and 2004, and
along with the Section 404/401 permit application to expand the mine into tracts GI and G2, the
Monitoring Plan was amended to include additional monitoring locations as a condition of the
approved Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Figure 2).
The following methodology was approved by NCDWQ for the Monitoring Plan in May 2004:
5

Martin Marietta MateriahsA Rockv Point Quarry: Year I Monitoring Report,
June 2005
Installation Data Form
Data will be collected at each monitoring location to document the site conditions, US
Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) 1987 lVedand Delineation Manual wetland data
forms describing soils, vegetation community, and hydrology of the site will be included.
Reference photograph locations will be established for quarterly site evaluation.
Elevations of the monitoring gage locations and water control structures will be surveyed
upon installation.
Monthly Data Collection
Water table"monitoring gages will ~be inspiected on a monthly basis, including data
downloads. A maintenance log will document the site conditions, and identify any
actions necessary to maintain proper gage function and data collection. h7 addition, water
control structures (risers in the water control ditch, and outlet control structure), as well
as the water control ditch itself will be inspected on a monthly basis. The data will be
summarized and analysis performed to evaluate the hydroperiod and water table
elevations through the monitoring period.
Quarterly Site Evaluation
Each monitoring gage location will be evaluated to document any physical changes to the
landscape and/or wetland community on a quarterly basis. This evaluation will
encompass an area of approximately 100-ft radius from the gage location. Within this
radius, the land surface will be observed to identify evidence of instability, eroding,
sloughing, subsidence, collapse and/or removal of hydrology. Reference photographs
will be included to document any changes at the monitoring locations. The evaluation
will include a qualitative description of the site, and a comparison to the initial
installation form data, and previous quarterly site evaluation.
Annual Site Evaluation
At the completion of the monitoring year, a site inspection will be performed to evaluate
the monitoring site for wetland indicators, vegetation communities, and documentation of
any evidence of hydrologic change. The assessment will be a qualitative evaluation of
the wetland areas within G 1, H 1, and H?. The evaluation will be performed by walking
transects of the parcels and GPS survey of any locations of recent evidence of sloughing,
erosion, subsidence, etc.
6

Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Quarry: Year 1 Monitoring Report,
June 2005
AnmIal Report
An annual report will be submitted to NCDWQ by June I annually as long as mining
operations continue at the existing mine per the conditions of the 401 pert -nit. This
document will include all forms for the periodic monitoring (monthly and quarterly), a
qualitative assessment of the annual site evaluation, and an analysis of the monitoring
gage data. One copy of the report will be provided to the NCDWQ Wilmington Field
Office, and one copy will be provided to the NCDWQ 401 Wetlands Unit in Raleigh,
NC.
.5:0- Observations
5.1 Initial Monitoring Plan: August 2002 -May 2004 (Summary)
The initial monitoring plan provided two critical observations important to the development of
the modified and current monitoring plan. Those two points were:
1. In the areas adjacent to the mine, there are two groundwater systems, a deeper aquifer
(Castle Hayne Aquifer) and a surficial aquifer. The primary source of water that is likely
pumped from the mine for dewatering is from the deeper aquifer. At various depths,
generally between ten and fifteen feet from the ground surface is an impermeable or
semi -impermeable dense clay layer separating the surficial system from the deeper
aquifer where most of the dewatering water is drawn from. There is an area of influence
in the surficial aquifer from the mine wall where there is lateral flow and drainage to the
mine (i.e. the mine acts like a deep drainage ditch in the upper surficial aquifer). Based
on previous water table modeling, it estimated that this zone of influence in the upper
surficial aquifer is approximately 700 feet.
2. Wetlands adjacent to the mine met wetland hydrology criteria (i.e. the dewatering activity
had not removed groundwater from the study area to the extent previously hypothesized
and some areas met or exceeded wetland hydrology criteria). This was particularly noted
at Location 2 (less than 1,000 feet from the active mine), Location 3, and Location 7 (the
wet -flat wetland type comprising most of tract HI).
The data provided a better understanding of the hydrology of the adjacent wetlands. That is,
the hydrology of these wetlands were not significantly influenced from the dewatering
7

Martin Marietta Materials
Rock-y Point Quari-Y: Year I Monitoring Report,
June 2005
activity, but were more likely to be influenced from lateral groundwater flow in the upper
surficial aquifer towards the mine wall as the mine advanced. These observations led to the
development of the current monitoring location configuration. Through the mine expansion
plan east of the mine, there were portions of wetland areas in tracts G I and G2 which were to
be removed and mitigated for through the permitting process. The remaining, avoided
wetlands were to be protected from the advancing face of the mine by altering the existing
perimeter drainage ditch system to serve as a hydrologic barrier/recharge trench. The
additional monitoring gages were installed to observe the effectiveness of this water
nanagement system. Additional gages further from the mine were also added (tracts H.i and
H2) to continUie the water level data collection and to visually inspect these areas for potential
subsidence should there be a discontinuity in the impermeable layer creating sinkholes.
5.2 Current Monitoring Plan: May 2004 - Present
The monitoring gages were installed in May 2004 and the water management system (new
discharge location, risers, and water control structure) was completed in July 2004. The data
from the G 1 monitoring gages clearly demonstrates that the entire area has been significantly
hydrated.
A copy of the monthly download log collected by MMM staff is included in the appendix along
with the monitoring gage location data. The data is grouped by tract, and each monitoring
location includes the following:
• Corps Wetland Data Form
Periodic Site Inspection Form
• Water Level Data Graph
In review of the water level data, please note that the growing season is shown shaded and that an
estimate for the minimum duration to meet Corps' wetland hydrology criteria is 12 consecutive
days of saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil. This represents 5% of the growing
season stated in the Pender County Soil Survey.
The following is a discussion on each monitoring location:
8

Martin Marietta Materials Rook)• n'
Point Quar: Year 1 Monitoring Report,
A A
... v � June 2005
Tract G1
Tract Gl is fully encircled by the recharge trench and is nearest to the active mine area (Figure 2).
The tract contains avoided wetlands and areas that had been converted to pine plantation. There
is a depression in the center of the tract commonly referred to as the "Gator Hole".
Location 2
I Location 2 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 1 1), an overburden gage (NW 21) and a
t deeper aquifer gage (NW 26), The location is near the water control structure (RO) and has been
1
inundated since the implementation of the modified discharge design per the Modified Pumping
Plan (July 2004). The gages have been in operation since the initial monitoring plan began"
1
(2002) and demonstrate the re -hydration of G 1, and that the design to maintain water levels in the
recharge trench has been successful. The shallow water table gage (NW 1 l) shows that there
were periods of saturation within the upper surface of the soil sufficient to meet Corps' hydrology
criteria prior to the implementation of the water control structure and recharge trench. The deeper
groundwater gages show that the area is within the cone of influence as the water levels are well
below the ground surface, however, the shallow water table gage responds much differently to the
rainfall events.
Location 5
Location 5 contains a shallow water table gage (NW5) and is located in the "Gator Hole"
depression area. This gage was installed for the initial monitoring plan and had consistent
maintenance issues since the gage was consistently dry (note the spikes in the data that was Iikely
from a thin layer of sediment collected in the bottom of the casing that clogged the pressure unit
creating a vacuum). Hydrology criteria had not been met prior to the initiation of the pumping
and water control structure. Since July 2004, the area has been re -hydrated and has a water table
elevation consistently near or at the surface, meeting Corps' wetland hydrology criteria.
Location 10
Location 10 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 15) and is in an area that has been inundated
or saturated at the surface since the implementation of the water control structure. The data
demonstrates that the water table has been sustained at or near the surface since the pumping to
the recharge; trench began, and meets Corps' wetland hydrology criteria. Note that the gage was
D]

Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Qcaany: year 1 Monitoring Report,
An e 2005
installed in May 2004, and the pumping began in July 2004. Periods of data are missing due to
poor batteries and a malfunctioning data logger.
Location 1.1
Location I 1 is a shallow water table gage (NW 18) closest to the advancing mine. This gage was
installed adjacent to the recharge trench in an area of slightly higher elevation clue to relic spoil
piles adjacent to the drainage ditch. This was an area that was previously well drained by the
ditch and now has a raised water table (note the difference in water table elevations between May
and July 2004 which was prior to the pumping, and then after). The gage data demonstrates that
`during'ilie growing season there are brief periods where the water'table is within the upper' 12
inches of the soil in response to storm events; however, the duration of saturation in the upper
surface is below the Corps' minimum criteria for wetland hydrology (5% of the growing season,
or approximately 12 consecutive days). It appears that the area has been significantly re -
hydrated, although the water table appears to be consistently maintained at about 1.5 to 2.0 feet
below the ground surface. This is likely due to the,monitoring location being on a slight
topographic high point. It is likely that this area will only meet wetland hydrology criteria during
Periods of significant rainfall during the growing season.
Location 12
Location 12 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 16) and is located in the central area of G l .
This area was determined to be beyond the drainage influence of the drainage ditch system
although the area is significantly altered (beds and rows) from the forestry land management.
This gage demonstrated that during a period of rainfall in August and September, the water table
level was within the upper surface for 12 days, meeting the minimum Corps' wetland hydrology
criteria. During the later portion of the monitoring year, there have been maintenance issues with
the unit, likely due to a crimp in the pressure tubing, causing spikes in the data.
Tract H1
Tract H l is east of the recharge trench and tract G 1. The tract is predominately pine plantation
forest including beds and rows. There are areas of small depressions (Location 13). It was
determined by the Corps that the interior of the tract is jurisdictional wetland based on the
presence of hydric soils; however, this area does not generally contain hydrology indicators
10

Martin Marietta Materials /� q
/AVA1
Ruck_t- Point QuIrrr-Y: Year I Monitoring Report,
June 2005
sufficient to meet Corps' hydrology criteria. This is likely due to the altered landscape (beds and
rows) and land management practices for limber production.
Location 3
Location 3 is located in it depress ion/swale that defines the boundary between H I and H2. This
location contains a shallow water table gage (NW 17), an overburden gage (NW 20), a deep
aquifer gage (NW 25), and a surface water gage (NW$). This area is downslope from the water
control structure and since July 2004 has received discharge from the modified pumping plan.
The deeper groundwater gages (NW 20 arid NW 25) show that the this location is'likelylbeybad
the cone of influence from the dewatering activity of the mine as the water levels are much more
near the surface as compared to Location 2.
The shallow water table gage (NW 17) data demonstrates that this location has met and exceeded
Corps' wetland hydrology criteria at various times since the implementation of the monitoring
plan. There is a portion of data missing due to failed batteries and a malfunctioning data logger.
This was resolved prior to the beginning of the 2005 growing season.
The surface water gage (NW 8) shows that the wetland Swale periodically contained surface
flows in response to significant rainfall events even prior to the implementation of the modified
pumping plan (July 2004). Since the discharge has been redirected to this Swale, the surface flow
has been consistently sustained with much larger flooding events in response to rainfall.
Location 6
Location 6 contains a shallow water table gage (NW6) and is located in a forested pine plantation,
including beds and rows. The location has been monitored since 2002 and has shown that water
table levels have periodically been near the surface to meet minimum Corps' criteria for wetland
hydrology during periods of significant rainfall (criteria was met in 2003 and 2004 growing
seasons; 21 and 16 consecutive days respectively). There is a portion of data missing near the
end of the monitoring period due to failed batteries and data logger malfunction. This was
inspected prior to the beginning of the 2005 growing season; however, it was observed at the
inspection that the gage was dry and the unit was functioning properly.

Martin Marietta Materials
Location 13
Rocky Point Quarr_i': Year I iLlonitoring Report,
June 2005
Location 13 contains a shallow water table gage (NW4) and is located in a small depression area
surrounded by forested pine plantation. While visual inspection shows that the area contains
evidence of ponding and inundation, the data logger has had significant problems and has not
provided sufficient data to determine water table characteristics. The gage and data logger was
maintained prior to the 2005 growing season and will be re-evaluated at the next periodic site
inspection.
Location 1,4
Location. 1'4 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 13) and is located i1. n a forested pine 4
plantation, including beds and rows. This area did not contain any hydrology indicators to
support Corps' wetland hydrology criteria, however was determined to be a jurisdictional wetland
based on hydric soils. The gage data demonstrates that the minimum Corps' hydrology criterion
at this location was not met (longest duration of consecutive days saturation was 10 days). There
is evidence though that the water table does respond to rainfall events during the growing season,
so there is reason to believe that the water table — though not sufficient to meet wetland
hydrology criteria — is active in the surficial aquifer and is not affected by dewatering activities of
the mine. Under different land management practices (removal of pine trees and beds/rows) the
area may revert to wetland functions.
Location 18
Location 18 is a shallow water table gage (NW3) located in a cutover area adjacent to the forested
pine plantation. The data shows that the location met Corps' wetland hydrology criteria in the
last growing season in late August to early September of 2004. Some fine sediment that clogged
the bottom of the pressure gage likely caused the spikes in the data. This was maintained prior to
the 2005 growing season and will be evaluated at the next site inspection.
Tract H2
Tract H2 is a large wet -flat type wetland area typical of a topographic Flat area between drainage
features. There is a roadside ditch along the western boundary of the tract; however, the
remainder of the tract contains natural vegetation. The area was logged at one time, so there is
evidence of some disturbance of the soil surface; however, there is evidence of ponding and
saturation of the surface throughout the tract.
12

Martin Marietta Materials Rock_v Point Quarn.: Year / Monitoring Report,
v^ June 200.5
Location 7
Location 7 contains a shallow water table gage (NW9) and was installed as part of the initial
monitoring plan (2002). The data collected to date at this location shows that the water table is at
or near the surface throughout the dormant season and is maintained for longer periods of the
growing season in response to rainfall events. The data shows that this location has met Corp's
wetland hydrology criteria in each growing season monitored.
Location 15
Location 15 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 14) and is located in a natural vegetation
area similar to Location 7.' The gage was added in May 2004 to provide additional data for ilie�
H2 tract and is consistent with the shallow gage in Location 7. That is, the water table is
maintained at or near the surface during the dormant season and is within the upper surface for
long durations of the growing season depending on rainfall events. In the 2004 growing season,
water table was in the upper soil surface for a period of 72 consecutive days meeting Corps'
wetland hydrology criteria.
Location 16
Location 16 contains a shallow water table gage (NW2) and is located in a natural vegetation area
similar to Location 7 and Location 15, The water table dynamics are very similar to Location 7
and 15 at this location as seen by the water table response to rainfall events. As with the other H2
locations discussed above, the water table is sustained in the upper surface during the dormant
season, and is maintained in the upper surface during the growing season'by rainfall events.
However, this gage location is more than a foot higher in elevation than the other two locations
and thus the water table appears to be lower in elevation from the ground surface. In the 2004
growing season, Corps' criteria for wetland hydrology was met at this location with duration of
saturation within the upper surface of 54 consecutive days, Also, Corps' wetland hydrology
criterion was met within the limited portion of the 2005 growing season with duration of 38 days.
Location 17
Location 17 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 12) and is located in a natural vegetation
area similar to Locations 7, 15, and 16. The water table dynamics are also very similar as
observed in the other H2 tract monitoring locations where the water table is maintained at or near
the surface and fluctuates in response to rainfall events. In the 2004 growing season, Corps'
13

Martin Marietta Materials A A
1 Vy y%
Rocky Point Quarrt•: Year 1 Monitoring Report,
- June 2005
criteria for wetland hydrology was met at this location with duration, of saturation within the
upper surface of 55 consecutive days. Also, Corps' wetland hydrology criterion was met within
the limited portion of the 2005 growing season with a duration of40 clays.
Other Areas
Location 8
Location S contains a shallow water table gage (NW5) and a surface water gage (NW7) in
Strawberry Branch. The shallow water table gage is located along the toe of slope of the
Phodplain, and the surface gage is located in the channelized section of the stream. The
monitoring location is downstream from a discharge outfall from the mine dewatering and the
data demonstrates that water level is maintained in the stream and its floodplain consistently year
round.
Location 19
Location 19 contains a surface water gage (NW l) in the ditch south of the mine in tract F. This
location was added in May 2004 to monitor water levels in the ditch as it was determined to be a
jurisdictional wetland feature that had been historically channelized. At this time, the elevation
shown for the gage is relative to the channel bottom (i.e. elevation 0.00 is the bottom of the
ditch/bottom of the probe). The data demonstrates that water has been maintained in the bottom
of the ditch since the monitoring period began, with a significant spike in water level in late
August to early September due to large rainfall events.
6.0 Conclusions
The water management system is effectively hydrating the wetland areas adjacent to the mine as
the pit is being expanded per the approved 404/401 permit, and has been successful to date in
meeting the objective of not allowing dewatering activities to negatively affect wetland hydrology
in these areas. Much of the avoided area (including areas which were not jurisdictional wetlands)
within tract GI has been enhanced by rehydrating the entire block and raising the local
groundwater level for the entire area.
The recharge trench is continuous and separates tracts H I and H2 from the active mine, while
fully encircling the remainder of tract G l . Of particular interest to NCDWQ during discussions
regarding the design of the recharge trench/hydrologic barrier, was hydrating the depressional
14

Martin Marietta Materials Rocky Point Quarrv: Year ! lvlonitorinq Report.
Jamie 2005
area in the interior of tract G I (Location 5, often referred to as the "Gator I -tole"). Since the
implementation of the water management design, this area has seen sustained saturation at the
soil surface and periods of inundation exceeding the Corps minimum hydrology criteria.
Table 1 contains a summary of the shallow water table gage data regarding Corps' wetland
hydrology criteria. In summary, the water management design of the Pumping Plan has
demonstrated to be effective to date in maintaining surficial hydrology within the study area.
There is no evidence from the site evaluations and monitoring program that dewatering is having
any significant effect on wetland, or surficial hydrology in the adjacent tracts.
The remaining deep aquifer wells continue to be monitored along with the shallow water table
gages. The focus on the data from these wells is to observe whether the cone of depression
advances as the mine advances eastward. Table 2 provides a summary of where the cone of
depression was observed. Location 2 does appear to be within the cone of influence, but Location
3 appears to be beyond the cone of influence of the current mine. Nate that while the cone of
depression may be observed at this location, the surficial hydrology is not likely to be affected
due to the impermeable layer.
Table 3 contains a summary of the surface water level gages. Location 19 is a drainage ditch
south of the active mine in Tract E that has demonstrated to be hydrated throughout the entire
monitoring period to date. Note that the elevation shown for this gage is relative to the bottom of
the ditch and is not tied to an actual elevation at this time.
Based on the visual inspection of the monitoring locations, there have been no observed
occurrences of subsidence or sinkhole development throughout the study area. The general area
may be susceptible to sinkhole development during drought conditions due to the geology of the
region, however this has not been observed since the monitoring at the quarry began in 2002.
Table 4 shows the estimated discharge from the dewatering activities at the mine per the
approved Modified Pumping Plan. The interesting note is that the modified discharge locations
and water control design in tract G l was implemented in July 2004. The re -hydration volume is
an estimate of the amount of water utilized to re -hydrate the remainder of tract G 1 and/or was
returned back to the mine through seepage from the recharge trench. The significant volume of'
water being utilized, along with the demonstrated wetland hydrology at the monitoring locations,
15

Martin Marietta Materials ^� RockY Point Quarty Year I Alonitoring Report.
June 2005
indicate that the pumping plan and recharge trench have been effective in protecting adjacent _.
wetlands from the hydraulic impact caused by dewatering.

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 2 Gage ID: NW 11
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfall < 5 hours
Vegetation Community:
Polygonum hydropiperoids
Submerged aquatic vegetation
Soil Description: None take due to
inundation
Hydrology Indicators: Ponded'at gauge _
approximately 2'
Evidence of Altered Landscape: No
observed change or evidence of subsidence
Other: Continued of beaver activity
Date: 3/8/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse and Tyler McEwen
Insert reference photograph (s)
Reference Photo Description:
Insert reference photograph (s)
Reference Photo Description:

Rocky Point Quarry, Ponder County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site inspection
Location: 5 Gage ID: NW 10
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 650F
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Fooniculum, Rubus,
but Polygonum hydropiperoids taking over
Soil Description:
Too saturated to get a profile
Hydrology indicators: 3"Yof, pond ed water
at gage
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Other: No subsidence
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Even
use
Insert reference photograph (s)
Photo Descrintion-

. . . . . . . . . . . .
2=1

)
) .
)
)
Rocky Point Quarry, Pcnde,County
/ Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
� Location: 10Gage |D: NW 15
Weather Conditions: Sunny 050F
Vegetation Community: Scirpus,
)
)
| '
�
/
Soil Description: — N
/
/
. -. .
'--,Hydrology Indicators:
�..
�
�
..
Evidence ofAltered Landscape: None
--------
Other: Evidence of beaver activity
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Reference Location to Gage
Insert reference photograph (s)
ReiorenoePhoto Description:

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
lame
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location` 10 Gage ID: NW 15
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloud - 50OF
ice
Last Rainfall ¢ 5 hours
Vegetation Community: Scirpus,
Polygonum hydr_opiperoids, Sa1ix,
Nyssa sylvatica
i�
Fh'gra,''alu' ,
cue 'r.�.`d '-.t'Xia^'s't:• .,
Soil'Descriptioii:'' `No profile taken
so
Hydrology Indicators: Inundated at
,J -
gauge approximately 1.5' • '•'
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Ilia
to
go
Other: Evidence of beaver activity
Date: 3/8/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse and Tyler McEwen
Insert reference photograph (s)
Reference Photo Description:

Rocky Point Quarry, Ponder County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 11 Gage ID: NW 18
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 650F
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Morelia cerifera,
Acer rubrum, Pin us taeda, Salix Nigra,
Liiquidambar styraciflua, Arundinaria gigantea,
8oehmeria
Soil Description:
0-14" 10YR 211 Loam
14-24" 10YR 312 Sandy Loam
Saturation at 12"
Water Table at approximately 18"
Q Hydrology Indicators .Ponded water in
adjacent ditches appro)cimatel ,2y 0' North _
and West "."��•
4
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
p
i
a
4
Other: No subsidence
1
1
}
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Insert reference photograph (s)
Description:

Rocky Point Quarry, Ponder County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site inspection
Location: 11 Gage ID: Nth! 18
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfall < 5 hours
Vegetation Community: Morella cerifera,
Acer nfbrum, Pinus taeda, Salix Ni ra,
Liquidambar styraciflua, Arundinaria gigantea,
Boehmeria
Soil Description:
0-12" 2.5Y 2.5t1
12-24" 10YR 3i2 with -30% 2.5Y 2.511
Saturation at 8"
Water Table at approximately 12"
Hydrology indicators: Ponded water in
adjacent ditches approxirnatel�� 20; North
and West "-�-
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Other: No subsidence
Date: 302005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse and Tyler McEwen
Reference Photo Description: From Refernce Location to Gage
•.1% .-L

Rocky Point Quarry, Render County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 12 Gage ID: NW 16
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 650F
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Lyonia lucida,
Persea borbonia, Morelia cerifera, Pious Taeda,
osmunda cinnamomea
-Soil
DescIption:
0-10" 10YR 8/1 Loam
10-24" 10YR 4/2 Sandy Loam
No moisture in upper soil layers
tD
Hydrology Indicators: None Up2er 24" dry
compared to the other locations in G1
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Other: No subsidence
o
Date: 10/2712004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Insert reference photograph (s)
Reference Photo Description:
A,-

Rocky Point Quarry, Ponder County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 3 Gage ID: NW 17
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Increase in obligate
vegetation. Carex, Polygonum hydropiperoides,
Scirpuus
Some downed trees possibiy from beavers
tio�6;-.�'fir's�-�'.�+'fiui'ii:''"a�;}r:.;
Soil Descripn: No profile taken
area too wet
Hydrology_ Indicators: Change in hydrology
fn due t2�umping continuous flow, entire swale
inundated With 2-6" flow
Evidence of Altered Landscape:
Sustained flow
Other: No visual subsidence or sink holes
4 -
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Insert reference photograph (s)
Heterence Photo Uescription:

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 3 Gage ID: NW 17
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Increase in obligate
d vegetation. Carex, Polygonurn hydropiperoides,
iY scirpus
Some downed trees possibly from beavers
Description:'"'' `'"x - No;profile taken
area too wet
Hydrology Indicators: Change in hydrology
due to pumping continuous flow, entire swale
inundated: average depth —3", approximately_
1 40' wide. -
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
i
3
i
Other: No visual subsidence or sink holes
M
}
1
I
I
I i .
Date: 3/4/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Reference Location to Gage
Insert reference photograph (s)
c

Rocky Point Quarry, Perkier County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 3 Gage ID: Nw 8
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65°F
Last Rainfall a 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Increase in obligate
vegetation. Carex, Polygonum hydropiperoides,
Some downed trees possibly from beavers
26
Soil Description: No profile taken
area too wet
Hydrology lndicators: Change in hydrology
i due to ° urn ing continuous flow, water extends
r across 50%width, entire swale with 2-6" flow
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Other: No visual subsidence or sink holes
Date: 10Y2712004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Reference Location to Gage
Reference Photo Description: Around 6" of flowing water
Insert reference photograph (s)
Reference Photo Description:

Pl�

I
I
1
Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
I Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
I Location: 6 Gage ID: NW 6
I
I Weather Conditions: Sunny - 650F
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
I
I
I Vegetation Community: Pinus taeda,
I Persea borbonia, Acer rubrum, flex glabra,
Liquidambar styraciflua, Vaccinium corymbosum,
I Osmunda cinnamomea, fennel
I
Soil Description:: `
0-10" 10YR 311 Sandy Loam
10-24" 10YR 4/1 Loamy Sand
24-36" 10YR 6/2 with —10% 10YR 616 mottles
Loamy Sand
I
I Hydrology Indicators: No hydrology indicators
1
I
I
I Evidence of Altered Landscape:
I None since gage installation site is altered from
Ipine lantation establishment beds and rows) T
I
I
I
I
Other: No visual subsidence or sink holes
I
I
I
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Reference Location to Gage
rence
Vj; y- ..
. .S

}
!
1
l
Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 6 Gage ID: NW 6
a
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 500F
Last Rainfall < 5 hours
!
Vegetation Community: Pinus taoda,
! Persea borbonia, Acer rubrum, Ilex glabra,
Li uidambar st rac llua, Vaccinium co mbosurn,
Osmunda cinnamomea, fennel
�,•:q.,s,a:: -wv.. ,.
Soil Description:,.
0-10" 10YR 311 Fine Sandy Loam
10-22" 2.5Y 511 with 20% 2.5Y 5i2
Sandy Loam
! 22-30" 2.5Y 613 with •- 5% 2.5Y 6/4
Loamy Sand
Hydrology Indicators: No h drolog ` .
! indicators observed ,'..
!
!
I
!
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
!
!
!
! Other: No visual subsidence or sink holes
!
!
!
!
!
!
Date: 3/8/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse and Tyler McEwen
Reference Photo Description:

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 13 Gage ID: NW 4
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
i
Vegetation Community: Lyonia lucida,
i Cyrilla, grasses
i
I
Ltd"){Ae F+�ay,r�•U�4^ �}. „•, �+, �1,'.:..;:"ar:` _
µ*Soil Description:
J 0-12'r 10YR 211 Mucky Loam
J 12-24" 10YR 3/1 Loam
Saturated at 12"
y
:a
Hydrology Indicators: Evidence of ponding••-'W •'•
around the gage
1 •.
1 .
I+
I
I
} Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
}
r
r --
r
Other: No subsidence or sink hole development
B
4
P
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Gage to Reference Location
Reference Photo D
IVI—h

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location-. 13 Gage ID. NW 4
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Lyonia lucide,
grilla, grasses, Acer rubrum
Red maple beginning to bud, possibly start of
growing season.
S811 bes . crip . tion:
0- 11 " 1 OY R 2/1 Mucky Loam
11-24" 10YR 3/1 Sandy Loam
Saturated at 8"
Hydrology Indicators: Evidence
of ponding,
around the gage
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Other: No subsidence or sink hole development
Date: 3/4/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Gage to Reference Location

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 14 Gage ID: NW 13
Weather Conditions: Sunny_- 650F
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Pinus taeda,
_Persea borbonia, Lyonia lucida, flex glabra,
Acer rubrum, Osmunda cinnamomea,
Morelia cerifera
Soil De-scfiptiori: .; `" ;
10YR 7/1 Sandy Loam
3-12" 10YR 3/2 Sandy Loam
12-24" 10YR 6/2 with 20% 10YR 5/6 mottles
Loamy Sand
24-36" 10YR 7/1 with 40% 10YR 5/8 mottles
Loamy Sand
Saturation at approximately 28"
Hydrology Indicators: None
Evidence of Altered Landscape: No change
since gage installation. Site is altered from pine
plantation establishment (beds and rows)
Other: No visual subsidence or sink holes
Date: 10/27/2(104
Inspected By: Chad Fvenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Reference Location to Gage
Photo D
e..-,

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 18 Gage ID: NW 3
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Acer rubrum,
Q Lyonia lucida, Ilex 21abra, Pinus taeda,
Persea borbonia, Lyonia lticida
rSoil Description:
0-4" 10YR 3/1 Sandy Loam uncoated grains
I 4-14" 10YR 412 Loamy Sand
14-30" 2.5YR 613 with 10% 10YR 518 mottles
Loamy Sand
1 Hydrology indicators:'. None
f
f
I
M
I
I
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
I
I
I
I
Other: No visual subsidence or sink hole
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Reference Location to Gage
Reference Photo Description: From Gage to Reference Location
Reference Photo Description:

�r i.rrs � �'rfv l+�.I.I!`�� r 'Fa.l �.�i �������.�'"��"+�;Y•.,
r - Y w17�.a r .I.yhll Y�is;�S-..e �. >t.. r..:�r j•3•
A 9,. 1 �f /v �Y 1 Q� ►?,f ry 1
r r.: fr� dr �•�, biY �,l wRr�-��. �rk ee- •e
✓'7>;��?.

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 7 Gage ID: NW 9
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65OF
i Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Morella cerifera,
t Lquidambar styraciflua, Acer rubrum,
Gordonia lasianthus, Lyonia lucida,
Vaccinium corymbosum, Osmunda cinnamomea
:` :. .... F :..,i' _ ii �:L ;po-raEa.ildb,dl.:.}.i e. �, .{s.•t-~ .>
Soil Description.'
0-6" 10YR 211 Sand Loam
6-12" 10YR 411 Loam Sand
12-18" 10YR 312 Loamy_S_and
I Water table at about 19'
High moisture content and saturation in upper 12'
Hydrology Indicators: Sphagnum Moss
^ i eviderice,of ponding in depressions
'.','high moisture content in surface soils
fr
r
I
I
` Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
I
I
I
I
j Other:
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
1
-Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Reference Location to Gage
Reference Location is 25' South of gage T
Insert reference photograph (s)
n:

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 7 Gage ID: NW 9
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfa[I > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Morelia cerifere,
Lquidambar styraciflua, Acer rubrum,
Gordonia lasianthus, Lyonia lucida,
Vaccinium corymbosum, Osmunda cinnamomea
Soil Description:
0-12" 10YR 211 Sandy Loam
' -- —
12-18" 10YR 3i1 Sandy�Loam
Hydrology Indicators: •Ponded water in
depressional areas. Sp adrium.moss at dauge
establishing. Saturation and Water -table 2t'
surface. ,.� ..,.." „..
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Other:
i
Date: 3/4/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Location is 25' South of gage
Reference Photo Description: Soil Profile

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 3/4/2005
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
V Location: 15 Gage ID: NW 14
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Persea borbonia,
Gordonia lasianthus, Lyonia lucida, Pteridium,
Morelia cerifera, Pinus taeda, Clethra alnifolia
P
! Sok'Descript onl
p 0-6" 10YR 2/1 Sandy Loam
' 6-18" 10YR 312 Loam Sand Reference Location is 25' West of gage
18-24" 10YR 4/1 Loamy Sand
Hydrology Indicators: Approximately 4"
l ded water'at gauge location., •Water table
at;surface'. w.
I t
I
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None Reference Photo Description:
I
Other. No visual subsidence or sink hole
From Gage to Reference Location
Insert reference photograph (s)
Reference Photo Description:

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
s. Location: 16 Gage ID: NW 2
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65OF
` Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
• • • • r.1�
'�'e9
j}i1S
lb�,
Y.
1 •
DYA 1.46 IPA 0•. •
1 y�
d � t
jyp�tr..1•y ..,�rl�1�'�Vp� T �
Nine rayb]
Other: NIA
Reference Photo
.From Gage to Reference Location
Insert reference photograph (s)

r
f
Rocky Point Quarry, Pander County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 16 Gage ID: NAPY 2
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfall n 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Lyonia lucida,
Persea borbonia, Clethra alnifolia, Cori la,
Pinus taeda, Acer rubrum, Pteridium
Soil Description:
0-4" Organic Material
4-14" 10YR 211 Sandy Loam
14-16" 10YR 211 Loamy Sand
some organic matter present
16-24" 10YR 211 Loamy Sand
Hydrology Indicators: Saturatation at 8"
I
'
r
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
0
0
Other: NIA
0
0
0
Date: 3/4/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
`k'� lr [1 r., r ]� � ��`"'F.•y, its'
=q.A�f 4 ',�-k"� ��• F- � .15L� Y��1 �� J{: lA �� t F'i !Y�1
f -=StIT S„r:i - -., .::, �.1 �rry `�.. •^. }"!� .�� L¢Tr. �� c - .. .
'hoto Description: From Reference Location to Gage
Reference Photo Description: From Gage to Reference Location
Reference Photo Description:

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 17 Gage ID: NW 12
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 650F
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Sonia lucida, �!
Persea borbonia, Clethra alnifolra, Cyrrlla,
Pinus taeda, Acer rubrum, Pteridrum,
Gordonia laianthus, Osmunda cinnamomea,
Morella cerifera
'1 a, yr. "y ,yy>v: i1. ',� • a..
Soil Description:
0-6" 10YR 211 Sandy Loam
6-12" 10YR 511 Loam Sand —+ Sand
12-24" 10YR 3/2 Sandy Loam
18-20" Saturated
Hydrology Indicators: High moisture content
?> but no visible water table within upper 24"
r
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Other: No subsidence or sink hole
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Location Bearing 3300 25'
Insert reference photograph (s)
RaferPnra Phntn DPsrriotion,

I
Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
I Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
4
Location: 17 Gage ID: NW 12
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
i
t
i Vegetation Community: Lyonia lucida,
Persea borbonia, Clethra alnifalia, Cyrilla,
Pinus taeda, Acer rubnim, Pteridium,
i Gordonia laianthus, Osmunda cinnamomea,
! Morelia cerifera
i Soil Description:
i 0-6" iOYR 211 Sandy Loam
1 6-12" 10YR 511 Loam Sand Sand
12-24" 10YR 312 Sandy Loam
1 18-20" Saturated .
:•1'
Hydrology Indicators: Water table near
surface. Water ponded in depressional areas.
.I
I
I
1
1 Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
1
1
1
1
1
1 Other: No subsidence or sink hole.
1 Transect cleared by propertyowner, otherwise
no change in vegetation.
1
1
1
1
1
Date: 3/412005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Location Bearing 3300 25'
Reference Photo Description: Ground Surface around Gage.

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site inspection
Location: 8 Gage ID: NW 5
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Lemna, Sabal,
Impatiens carpensis, Saururus cernuus,
Arundinaria gigantea, Nyssa sylvatica _
Soil Description: —
0-24 inches - 10YR 211 Loam with
mucky mineral modifier
r_
Hydrology lndicators;° "ice .•4,inches%6f porided
water at the gage ;
t _ -
Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
Other: NIA
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Gage to Reference Location
Reference Photo Description: Ponded water at the edge of
the gage

Rocky Point Quarry, Ponder County
A Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 8 Gage ID: NW 5
4
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50°F
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Lemoa, Sabal;
® Impatiens carpensis, Saururus cernuus,
Arundinaria gigantea, Nyssa sylvatica
Soil Description:"
0-24 inches - 10YR 211 Loam with
mucky mineral modifier
.Hydrology Indicators: 4 inches of ponded
water at the gage
I Evidence of Altered Landscape: None
1
I Other: NIA
I
I
I
Date: • 3/4/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Insert reference photograph (s)
Descriot'son:

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Location: 8 Gage ID: NW 7
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 650F
' Last Rainfall 7 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Lemna, Sabal,
lmpatiens carpensis, Saururus cernuus,
Arundinaria gigantea, Nyssa sylvatica
Soil Description"�
�a Hydrology -Indicators:
F• ram]., I � . - '
}
Evidence of Altered Landscape:
Other: NIA
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Desc
From Gage to Reference Location
Insert reference photograph (s)
Heterence Photo Description:

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Quarterly Monitoring Cage Site Inspection
Location: 8 Gage ID: NW 7
Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy - 50OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community: Lemna, Sabal,
Impatiens carpensis, Saururus cernuus,
Arundinaria gigantea, Nyssa syivatica
Soil Description: NIA
Hydrology Indicators:
Evidence of Altered Landscape.
Other: NIA
Date: 3/4/2005
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description: From Reference Location to Gage
Insert reference photograph (s)
ranra Phntn Desrrintinn-

08/23/02
09/22/02
10/22/02
11 /21 /02
12/21/02
01 /21 /03
02/20/03
03/22/03
04/21 /03
05/21 /03
06/21 /03
07/21 /03
08/20/03
09/19/03
10/ 19/03
11 / 19/03
12/19/03
M.
ro 01 /18/04
02/17/04
03/18/04
04/ 18/04
05/18/04
06/17/04
07/17/04
08/17/04
09/16/04
10/16/04
11 /15/04
12/15/04
01 /15/05
02/14/05
03/16/05
04/15/05
Water Level (Feet above MSL)
�r
r
J
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
p 00 -i O
O O O O
Rainfall (Inches)
Cn A W N — O
O p O O O 00
I
z
m
m
CO
0
0
3
O_
n
v
m
w
9

fE
Water Level (Relative to Bottom of the Ditch)
0 0
0 0
0
0
05/18/04
06/02/04
-
06/16/04
07/01 /04
07/15/04
07/30/04
08/13/04
—
08/28/04
09/12/04
09/26/04
10/11 /04
10/25/04
v
11 /09/04
11 /24/04
—
12/08/04
12/23/04
01/06/05
-
01/21/05
-
02/04/05
02/19/05
-
03/06/05
-
03/20/05
-
04/04/05
04/18/05
-
—• 1 s 1 c0 M -I W U1 A W N
CT1 W N - O
O O 0 00 0 p O O O O O 0 0 0O
Rainfall (Inches)
O 0
MENVIE

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
A OD N
O O O
p O O
08/23/02 ,
09/22/02
-
10/22/02 -
11/21/02
-
12I21102
-
01/21/03 -
02/20/03
-
03/22/03
04/21 /03
�,..._
-----------------,.{
05/21 /03
-
06121I03 -
07/21/03
g'
-
08/20/03
-
th
09/19/03
10/19/03
11/19/03
-
© 12/19/03
-
r.
CD 01 /18/04
,
-
02/17/04
-
-
03/18/04
-
04/18/04
05/18/04
06/17/04
-
07/17/04
08/17/04
"
09/16/04
10/16/04
11 /15/04
12/15/04 -
01/15/05
02/14/05
-
03/16/05
04/15/05
1'
_• p 0O 74 p Uh P. W N + O
O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O
Rainfall (Inches)
I
z
m
m
0
0
0
0
m
v
Cn
a�
h
R
�r
r-
ro
C
c�
0
0
cc
m
9

Martin Marietta Aggregates
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
23.00
J♦�
CM!
G
� I
7
O
aa) 19.00
LL
1 S 00
Monitoring Location #17
Shallow Water Table Gage
�� l�W 12 �- Elev- Ground Surface -� COE Wetland Det. Hydrology -�- Elev. Bottom of Casing � Rainfall
a oa
A.,
IJ' I
kt
rl
11I
JIF'i
. r{.
Tzt
•
al + F ~1
I JF
F
Y
:I
II
Duration: 6 days
I'
a
Ii,
it
v I
ro.
1
!rr
Fa4
Duration: 55 days
l
i (5/20/04 - 5/26104)
;
f
1
s
H (811
3104 - 10/7/04)
I
r
r
I
I r,'' - �
�
NJ'
:. ;
�.. -:
� J
5 '
?t
�,ir�.•s
r �
,��
S
;.lNs
�xa
u,
II
w
f:
5 -..
S
�b�•'
4
t
^rt.�f
��i°�'ih
!rt.-
1
t
I
S':
tl1-
Y
k
w
c
Iy
N}
I
yr:
m
7
j1
1
Duration:
d
40 days
7105 4/26105)
I
,
(3/1
-
`
J
1.
3fi-JiF[}�i,
I
_
�.
1
r
)
rF 1¢
•
]ll
*,
�..�E
*
'r°
L 1
,<.
1
3,�5�-s
Ik�
C`, :.
.i•
e:
�
',
f,
'-:>",_ e
r.-=
i v
Y
?
4.2
�
I
J.-`
is
IT'��Li�'j
I ,•.I
1.-.
'"',.>.'-r"'
[.°%-.
ov
ary
b
1
E
1.00
2.00
3.00
1
4.00
l
5.00
7.00 C
8.00 ,
' 9.00
10.00
i
i 11.00
12.00
13.00
it 14.00
� 15 00
O O
o O o O
O O
Nr
O
qr
O
v It N v
o O O O O 0
LO V) LO
O o O
LO u')
O O
U'j
O
LO
O
U")
O
c0 N
CD LO O
m CO
N
CO
m-q CO C")
0 N
CD r
O N O
O CD
— O
O
N
It
O
CO
LO to
Q Ca
CO r— r• ti
O O O O
00 C>0
a O
O
O
O
O O .— N N
— N
0 O 0
N CO
O O
CO
O
O
d
Date

Martin Marietta Aggregates
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
P"WOU
Q
Q 21.00
U.
Monitoring Location #16
Shallow Water Table Gage
NW 2 --%— Elev. Ground Surface 0 COE Wetland Det. Hydrology --H— Elev. Bottom of Casing 0 Rainfall
Q.
K
R
r
"7.
T
--p-
-z�
leg',
VIL
f
gi�
it-
cn".
Si;
A.g
N5
'
ta
-%3
�-J54 days
(811 3/0410/0lDuration:
[6104)
jz-4
6,
4TL',
�47
7.g
'p
a
4.
Duration: 38 d@ YS
5&'
(3/17/05 - 4/23105)R
A
1"50
�Q
"Sc
.................
ar(,
ON
enib
4.
16.00
lzt
L0
to
V)
Lr)
V)
Lr)
U')
L0
C)
(0C
C
C
0
C
!R
C
co
N
CD
Ln
C)
0)
1*
00
CI)
to
�
—CC
0)
CD
O
4
C1-D
C)
Cn
C
Q
N
(D
zz
CD
N
n
2z
LO
(D
—
(D
�z
iz�
rl-
co
co
0)
0)
C)
I
—0
C�
—
N
N
N
—
M
�;5
"t
4r
0
0
0
C)
C)
C)
0
0
Ca
7
0
(Z)
0
0
0
C)
0
Date
0.00
1.00
2,00
3.00
4.00
5,00
6.00
Q
TOO
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14,00
15.00
7z a9W�Va& og& * & cw i2l 01 9=1 901 0; 921 'M! 'a' d

Martin Marietta Aggregates
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
�r
23.00
Monitoring Location #15
Shallow Water Table Gage
'•'a -NNW 14 --D-Elev. Ground Surface --A COE Wetland Det. Hydrology --a- Elev. Bottom of Casing -*-Rainfall
0 00
W
®
I
�
r" �
1
�
f,•
�i
��
Duration: 72 days
i
.r'�
,
Duration: 16 days
5
t
`
.
(8/13/04 - 10/27/04
(5/19/04 - 613/04) S 1
t
'
q
; Y
i
L
t 5
Duration: 40 days
(3/17105 - 4126105)
l.I T
5
€
1-
e_
,i$
c
-
}
S,^q..
-
{iF
-,z•i
�y�
a,
Duration:
7 days
(6/7/04
- 6/14/04)
[
A
.§s,aYz
1
r
�
,.
t
I : 1
1
F
f-. 1
�
}
J Ifi
.�,
� x"
�
Y'
J, •.-
I �:
#
b �
�
��
e -3c
-
O
'I
-
t
} J
Ma-rc
17^f
i
o
be
'15
'
l
4
4I
a
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 y
G1
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13,00
14.00
15 00
0 0
o a
o
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U7 LO
0 0 0
to U') U) LO L[7
0 0 0 0 0
00 N
O
CD
r 0
Lo
r
C]
M
M
00
N
N Cp r 11J 00 Cl)
*^ N N O N Q N
CD *- I�r
Q N Ca
N 0
_
LO CO
O 03
_
[0 r`
0 CD
—
r—
—
r-
0
—
Co
O
00
O
M CF) O 0 .— - N N
C7 0 r r- r T T
—
N
O Oa O
N M M Vt ''
CD 0 4 O O
Date
s r ..WepWad wrlasoo.Diar—
a � .� � � � � � � � � � � — � � � •� '� — — — — — — — — � - - - - -

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
0 o
O o O
08/23/02
2.
09/22/02
10/22/02
11/21/02
z
12/21 /02
01 /21103
02/20/03
!T1
CD
03/22/03
04/21 /03
05/21 /03 a
Cn
06/21 /03
07/21 /03 m
08/20103
09/19/03 0
rn
1 Q119/03
11 /19/03
iv 12/19/03 -14
Q
01 /18/04 - CD C
02/17/04 - Cr
03/18/04 0
Cm
04/18/04
05/18/04
06/ 17/04 m
R.
07/17/04
08/17/04
09/16/04
0
10/16/04 N
11 /15/04
12/15/04
01 /15/05
02/14/05
03/16/05
04/15/05
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O
Rainfall (Inches)
-
.
: `a o. .
r s O
a I o a
w m
N O7 1
� J NCs
:F (D., h4.r..;t
z
�.:. . �'�r!,�..:,;,.,
� 1 'i,tr '7 i'JJ `' - - .Gyy.!E ..,a.• � 7.��%..1.i 5. T7�% ,�^g .,M ��, _..dk ��s 1 :.W.f, z t. _i ,i [ 1..i 7�i ;di'.
aR ,.�
CO � � d
� N A `G
o� r � m
�-.,k1l:i
i _�
�yi�:L �*�f Y J C.' � ":L Jss�r, ••i l�� Rr4� � MJFI.y FY �'}j�.:.'- 'il 1"E��`lijir.(�9� e�'�(<{�, i M1- F `i��j;'i2Y i_'' R'
1'it�i�j �' r1d! ,I if' P>< < f�" � .. 154�{I �F'1'���k�'"r�fr';'}drs7 - _ F/ ��� .ti1�.1Fi`,:11'.���ii tiJ ♦?J}7r5-��-.`{r,�,
i - '� _fi � ?�i aK�r nt rN�n�1..4 x=�'7��{ �C*f;i �'F3u,Pa' �"�t',•wi i�`r-f`�-r3 +� a">F'",�Y' "�-
t1µ
�]
A �! it � C f�`. `�a+�Y �� �t��A.a4��1?..�' ���} ✓,.q,�e� �'. vu;.r ���"� � ��n^` "' _ .
Y��� CO � $ i O � $4{� �§pt;.
{: o .G 1 � P� :a (�yt >K'f � a_•.�F r c � c
� N ' ��. ����'
Tj`'%�
W Q � O — A C
dNi � N N
arc r w�
I
I
^-v •a"'r�- � � " .r.-" „"�.—_� -*-^:,".. _.s7_,-.-1�"� �„- 'Y'�- ..ems "-3'
? � :a tr. �`>l, v� ^;s k i<-.• t ,. "-ypd Ci -,. ,c Ty a "1:'.l� li _S� t:E✓
m p

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
•--. j N
A OP- N
O O O
O O O
05/18/04
06/02/04
_
OA�`�A
np
-e.�.3`'
ti;Y_.,'-.,:
...p�r..,
�yi�—.
{t,yr.,-,
iIi?'1.-
:
,�lY
,.��
.F,i
tE1
y'
�-���-1
1(�.S
'
:,
rarc'.
o•
!�y4 .'�."`i�"4ik
4k
.rt-[
ss�l
.
11i".fY�..
.
v
F;kf':''�_�=y'.
�
•
4y
':
L:-..•
-#=.y�".-:L.'
��AaAn�?CD06/16/04
i
.•
s�1���
C,'
1'h.s�.Y�..�,.r
�r
*{zuFi#.i
i
:'
.•
.,_iY_NY4.TrF?.
�[�'-•
;.� .-i
u�SrS�.
r��ns'S.W
r4.tiY-`-.O
��q'I:
�s.',.•
-lr
!1
�;`,raa�,.��7�
�
'
1_
-."���i1<'.
a'gL.Y-�k
a*'F�
-
V:
.
v-r,
4r-_,''T�.fiF�d
ik_,
L.
v r ,
�w—a�.i�-
"°-a'.E�xxiH"
y •
rs`�
`Mh. ^
�i..}o��+F-_.?Y
x.r: -ty
�h_�
:'le
? l �
'.
- -
..a.
O�.Sr.
�r-D
CO

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
0 0 � o
05/18/04 '
06/02/04
06/16/04
Z
07/01 /04
07/15/04
m
07/30/04 CD
08/13/04 0
C
08/28/04
C
09/12/04
09/26/04 N
10/11/04 5� p
t3 CD
10/25/0403 CD
11 /09/04
»
11 /24/04 z
Q
12/08/04 0
to12/23/04
01 /06/05
01 /21 /05
02/04/05 2
m
m
C
O
O
02/19/05 m
fn
03/06/05
03/20/05
cn
N
04/04/05 m
04/18/05
W
� p V, Y w N s
cn w ry o o a o 0 o a o a 0 0
00 0 0 o a 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0
0 0 0 o a o
Rainfall (Inches)
r
I_�i� .. 1f �
I
t y, Yf !�, •� hY Y {. a 1n 4
_t
---++.
.4tr - IS. Y - 1 _ , +•? -
r, A Y�,i7x�
ice.
X. .4, fl.c ,] a i�' . � ..Ri.t .Ill - _ •I �1.. . 1f .H�
ii
-f5. �-.
-yd
14 1tHr '.:''•� lll�' -, k -f � 'i �
.r
-2.1
)I _ 14
r< -4.• �tl
f _ 1.
r
s�' a•
4' `! �.h�
# J1T`t t��i f'� ,j a{di � h S. �ji Yi f�.�•W '@
`n.l J �.
q � r1 ^1 '.:4
i a�,� 1 ��
f!r e..� { - r•
I 'T
II ..r,vCD
1 V�;' j�.. tT;'�
f7.7Tn fa y � F •tr, 1 n 5 .ne 'T „ � k:+ r
��5•[ 4`.,zK„4 �6'`"'Y'ai�...3� v I.xv� 1-t e 'd t, Iv
t 4 ka �''d:Ti ,J r �t 4; esl`- �, 1 ra 'i� r �'I
y>..5 .. •F! fsl+KTx �i��?�ii ir.. � € a. r. G . �_: _ � �.�Frk .Fs .
t T 2 �
dail'yy v
K,s! Ir 'r�
•F M
s� � �,�.� � .,!1.Y:... •A_
>✓ '. - iiJ T -.n>
I 'I+xa 1- ,� Y �. i 1~ f'. 4.okti, c t IJd' ,�
.-•
'a -f,�n sA _.
y .I!.`n S -Ff�i4
9if .^-.I�.t. 'S 4-`
l y A •h r�i -', .k.; •.i'A l,3-�1 '�'. �' I- `IiMM � :r i5 4 -' -4_
C- Sir ;d�+. � tYI �R��`Mr ,f ✓'4s fins ax `a Lrti,�v7t;
s �
w
4`. id - --�'
� O
N Q
O �
I
I
I
I
i
f
I
I
i
_
I
_
�+e: x��, .,n
.sF" 4L.• r43:t .f, �k;,..sAk, ..�,':, i:.hl. :,.h d. ,�4d.'�F.ar-..�i i,+f1'�a,
:.a�ev- .'z E'�a'. Ir�',.'y+,,:
L � �-�J""�'`
K`}k ...{ .� �.l{'- '.. .. .... .. ...._ .+.r.Mi•1;.11... siF%,.':Y♦ .i°r-.F•r� 5�.�7c�
1
l�{[��
•�•-�+- c
0
C� � — r �
n-: }l + '��'=fit�Y3*'?.. -r. ks ai:- rsf a
y �. t f FR a 'r�r }�'� �i, ,i.i,�.71 w s 1 �f� T � 'Y `tip' S ''
r - , r - .e• -
r -• V �,G"�]'r: r `''' Yi
.y✓'.I ;_, ce '
dn.:+� , Prtl.,_L'�r , ix .L?�� w.-s. '�i�h"�S, ..:�i.'1� rin?9'..n�E.7!"! 3w� s ,..7U
.,�^'�"+.,1� --y �'�
g tt

Martin Marietta Aggregates
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
18.00
Monitoring Location #13
Shallow Water Table Gage
NW 4—M--Elev. Ground Surface -- 0 COE Wetland Det. Hydrology—0—Elev. Bottom of Casing 0 Rainfall
f
cl-
-
r
�1 .x
s
;
i
��'
r i•
ti-t
`f
Y
53.
r-.
f
�1�
'�
'jL
I
o
f
{
3 t
.':
'�'
r
°-3�,.
;'€`
r
I
'✓
`,,,,�,
_
_�
_
.f
t
ti.'I�.�
tt
i.
4..t`-.1N
rl�x
iz
M
i
6
1 GRO
IN
E
SDI
:1
1
i
-
Marcni
1,
to
Ni
4
bf
12.00 t
0
0
0
0
co
N
O
Cp
�
o
Q
LO
O
CEO
O
iD
Q
ti
O
v v
qr
Nr
'gr
It
�
'IT
Kr
lqr
Irr
V")
L0
In
Ln
Ln
V)
0
Ln
O o
o
O
o
0
0
o
O
O
o
0
0
o
O
O
O
o
0
0
crs 'a
M
00
cv
co
in
rn
oa
M
cD
a7
cfl
o
v
co
M
N
N
r
N
O
N
O
N
O
C�V
Q
r
Q
(V
O
I-
co
co
07
M
Q
O
■—
r
N
N
f
N
N
Ch
M
-
IT
Q CDO
O
O
CD
.--
•—
•—
r
�—
O
' Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 U)
7.00 C
G
8.00 w
C
9.00
10.00
11,00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
oft .,M 111kVd B�"3s2bpajM �R1 4M SM A gM 4ft .A oft AM dft ems' AM e AM AM 9ft ,b d& 4ft $ A% d% A% d% ,* d% 9% Ift 9% Ift ift Ipi Oft dft AM In€ 'a

Martin Marietta Aggregates
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
J
25.00
Monitoring Location #6
Shallow Water Table Gage
NW6 --B— Elev. Ground Surface 0 COE Wetland Det. Hydrology'--5— Elev. Bottom of Casing --0— Rainfall
`
R.
I
b N
'• A��
LIS
�
r
� � Y^
I"
.Fr
-
?..7 s rF
{. !
r
F':� is
t
f S
Duration: 21 days
g
(5123103 6113103}
'
Duration: 16 days I
Duration: 10 days
s
Fa
s
.
(917104 - 91221 14) Y
(6/18103 - 6125/03) �,
}
!
Duration: 9 days
y
r
i ill
F
`
l"
(4110103
4119103}
i
Duration: 10 clays F s
� 'y
sJ91,
31
`
r (10129/03 - 11/7/03} ♦�
x
d
{ LL ..
R
"`�
T.
N1
L
�•
111'Ji
"
4
in
'1
1;
o
i'`Sr
J
+
4T •
.y
-
h
v
i`•(
a
fd
f
y
�or�.
��
f -
IyT
9
t'
i s
iI
4j
fis
3
J
t4
¢
f
6.
w
f
S..'7M
r
H
��uxJ
R
3
34
sv{
>C
�„3p
G
I
S
+
x
C
jJ
-
r
h1
oN
v
e..1
-_
f
i
:
rri
a
��s,vi
�!
-
I
•¢
�'
� t
>; �
e
�� �2
1R'Zyi
jar
s,
-�
�
I �
Fes.
f y�.
'C?1
{4
.t�L
,Y�-
L'
+.a
1<
h
�a�'
11.00
N
N
N
N
N
M
co
M
CO
M
M
co
M
M M
M
M
�
V
V
";t
� �
't
�
V
`�t
'It
' 3'
"Q
I
l[7
Lo
o
O
O
O
c)
O
o
CDQ
CDo
Q
o
0 o
CD
CD
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
Q
Q
Q,O
O
Q
M
N
N
,-
O
N
r
—
Q
M M
�
W
r•
co
a0
xi t`
i`
CO
(O
Ln
In
M
'gr
cc
In
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NCn
N
N
�-
O
T
_
Q
�
�_
OT
CD
CD
O
CD
CD
Q
Q —O
—
r
o
Q
Q
Q
Q O
CD
o
O
Q
Q
Q
O
Date
1.00
2.00
3.00
- 4.00
- 5.00
6.00
7.00 c
9.0o
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By: Jason Diaz
P fa t4yr(�O31"AW @ :0 4D 4D Ch CA d• db 4* w 0`1dNNMsidWo14giicditwl nrgg cis Age dMW",, Uft�wjwasiA=P XWft Ab Ab Ah do► m AD o pow—mm OW&MAb dM Ab a

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
N A ;5;
O O Q
0 0 0
08/23/02
09/22/02
10/22/02 -
/21
11 /02
12/21/02 -
/21
at
01 /03 -
-
02/20/03
03/22/03
/03
04/21
05/21 /03
06/21 /03
07/21 /03 -
z
08/20/03 -
CO
09/19/03
C
m
10/19/03 -
11/19/03
_
&
n
0
12/19/03
p
CD
r
01/18/04
0
02/17/04
-
c
m
03/18/04
co
1
CP
04/18/04
05/18/04
I4
-
06/17/04
�.
-
07/17/04 -
08/17/04
09/16/04 -
10/16/04 -
-
11/15/04 -
12/15/04
01 /15/05
02/14/05
03/16/05
-
04/15/05
C.TI A C,J N 1 O p O O O O, O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O
CD 0 O o 0 0
Rainfall (Inches)
ig

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
N N
O O O
O O O
O O O
08/23/02
09/22/02
CO t-
NJ
-
10/22/02 -
11121
/02
12/21/02
IL
01/21
/03
02/20/03 -
—
03/22/03
04/21/03
-
i
0 5/21 /03
1
06121
/03
—
07/21/03
-
t
-
08/20/03
09/19/03
10/19/03
t
-
11/19/03
12/19/03
rt
- - -+-
01/18/04
02/17/04
+
03/18/04
04/18/04
05/18/04
06/17/04
t
07/17/04
€
i
08/17/04
-
i
09/16/04
i
10/16/04
11 /15/04
--
12/15/04
01/15/05
02/14/05
-
03/16/05
04/15/05
-
...• � � �, co Oo �1 rn C.ia P W N � O
W N O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o a
O 0 0 0 0 0
Rainfall (Inches)
z
N
cn
m
c�
a
O
0
Q
U)
c
w
0
ca
n
O
m
Ll
0
rn
a
0
1
v
ca
CD
'o
0
q
O
a
a
a)
0
tv
t�
CD
m
O
z
0
Q
r
O
0
O
w

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
s N
O �
O O O
O O O
08/23/02
09/22/02
10/22/02
-
rSPICE
11/21/02
/02
12/21
10=4-
01/21/03
-
02/20/03
L
03/22/03
1
-
04/21 /03
1
I
1
05/21/03
1
06/21 /03
1
- _1
07/21/03
08/20/03
09/19/03
10/19/03
11 /19/03
-
12/19/03
1
4
-
01/18/04
02/17/04 -
�—
03/18/04
I
04/18/04
1
-
I
4
05/18/04
1
_
-
1
06/17/04
1
-
F
07/17/04
�—
-
I-
08/17/04
09/16/04
-
10/16/04
1—
—
11 /15/04
-
12/15/04
+—
—
1-
01 /15/05
-
02/14/05
03/16/05
�—
i
04/15/05
1
O 00 � 9) P, A w N O
O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O b O O O
Rainfall (Inches)
I
z
N
O
m
m
C
0
Q
rn
m
n
ml
I
C)
O
m
CD
v
O.
0
CID
1<
fl-
0
0
c0
m
CD.
C
a
0
3
0
n
cn
a
x
C
CD
c
a
0
0
m
9

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #3
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
W
M
17,00
Shallow Water Table Gage
�—NW17 &- Elev. Ground Surface -79—COE Wetland Det. Hydrology --M—Elev. Bottom of Casing 0 Rainfall
:"19
z�
'A
v"
A
7
m
'
g
�J"
Duration: 112 day s
1Duration: 40 days
(3/17/03 - 716103)
k,
Z.t
R
;1(3/17/05 - 4/26/05
.
4a,
2-
47,
Z,'�j
-4
1�7
m
.7
k,
4�
ry
Duratiow 30 days
uration: 44 days
D
(3/17/04- 5/18/04)
-8/5/04) (6122/04
4,
th
1
0
N
7.00 -
N
04
04
N 04 M M
M
M
M
CV)
M
M
M M M M
-;r ­r
p
-;r �
O O
qzr
O
-,t
(D
-.1,
C
'CT
C)
qj- .j-
C 0 0
"'T LO LO
CD O
LO LO
2
C
Cv
(p C> o C
n
C
C14
C
C
C
C
C>
C CD p p
p
I,-
M M
CO
1,-
(0 U-)
2
U3 U-)
cc LO
CN �q CN N
—
— —
—
—
zz
W
0
M
C)
C)
-
CD
M
0
qT
C)
Ln
M
(0
C)
CD
M
0
M C) CN
0 - - -
—
N
0 CD
��) 144-
C) 0
n
C)
(0
C�
1,-
(=
W
0
M 6
C� -
N - N
- C) C)
Cn v
0 (D
Date
n nr)
- 1.00
-2.00
- 3.00
- 4.00
;%$X
6.00
7.00
8.00
"I 9.00 Ir
10.00
11,00
12.00
13.00
14.00
- 15.00
p a fW,1WYW5,Ma�r& M a a ft M ft a M LO& ft 0& ft ft ft ft ft A% ft ft ft 4ft M fft �ft Aft Mft 4ft L40 4M �ft oft IQ Aft -Ift 4ft .0 40

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
C> b o
o O a
05/18/04
06/02/04
06/16/04
Z
07/01/04
07/15/04
m
07/30/04
CD
C
G)
08/13/04
0
08/28/04
can
^C
W
09/12/04
m
N
09/26/04
.S
4
l J
10/11 /04
10/25/04
`
11 /09/04
0
m
�
11 /24104
0
12/08/04
12/23/04
01 /06/05
m
C
01 /21 /05
0
0
02/04/05
11
O_
n
02/19/05
N
03/06/05
03/20/05
04/04/05
04/18/05
} 00 O N O
A N O Q O O O O
O O O O O O O O
O C7 O
Rainfall (Inches)
.>CD
�.
r
i
�' FK �' r. �. � � — j°�v� k' I � :r
Y4 �q? � :$V" 'i„):
i.SYl`�•
�14-
r
f CI Ta � +, r: •Yv.;.-.;ialhl7
'L; k; `•`
taa^er- �'
rr
_i
Y•j ': - L»..11.t' , rr--e'..••� ... 3. '. re ...1 �qi,-. .]7 i
i i
� .f
''
{J
'�.,r
�
- trl• it r w 1R H I ,- � i
A:x.Q Z
H- 1 S� Y i't'�
�(Q v
3�'•6;
, r,r, �:1f "^- . ,�z•. ��-;i � s
a.: x. ,�... � �.
flr�i'1jy`N
ff��2r'ti:
-� *-' 1-0 a,.�a.C` a �h" *5 ITj az
r,t 13g Lv Ia '' '9 r.,1..
✓ *'n �s p i'�
;fie i
A \ IY ?k5t
� f` I
0.35^..1��
•? X...
i5
i.
- I
1
I
I
I
s
r ��•� �:=�
t��"}`�{�,,
Ir�`\0, 4E �,.=M1S�IFh��ir. �-'�yifct �..l
+� 4 �-II�SY'.��Y y.ry4�''I��ky��U°•�{ dM kY ;bier; .",
�:ftf
pL LLI, r,.Kv...}J ii'.Yir.:.,, .4�'3TS4v!'=R,1',H'�.Y:£
{ -M'.t�liv. F.� '�`^�l 2.1f .{. `�"'l�j-Ytb� Nj IKflGy„1M14 C

)o
Water Level (Feet above MSL)
O O O
O O O
05/18/04
06/02/04
IKA
06/16/04
z
07/01 /04
CO
07/15/04
07/30/04^^
L1
08/13/04
0
C
08/28/04
N
09/12/04
N
09/26/04
l !
w
10111 /04
10/25/04
m
a
a
11 /09/04
0
C
11 /24/04
=
a
CD
12/08/04
0
cn
(Q
CD
12/23/04
01 /06/05
m
m
C
01 /21 /05
CO
O
O
02/04/05
3
0
n
02/19/05
v
03/06/05
03/20/05
3
04/04/05
04/18/05
� ...� 1 1 .� —• UJ Oti �i O Cii A W N � O
(Jt A W N O O O O O O O O Q O O
q O O O O O O O O O O O O O C7 O
O O O O O O
Rainfall (Inches)
w
I
-
r a r,f
�- n
s
�!'.,
��
V -V
..,k z:• 2.
[.. ae.b ..'� .�..1 „u. ro I a.-�'.� .Y ti „S� ,1J{i ca-
_r.
�Jf t
b1
� J�`'j.•r�G.
[, �,. .1 :tti ✓... �'
�r��'r.l-3G���:h.
v '�+ M1G'}re. �
•l_
rl'.,»I,tiS:-i�
-W.�?
ff'i"_,
...1 t,lfi
_� '� 1 F�6A �y+
']"� �. ".' � � � . E
aa" °"r...Z�.K
y, Sf 4��'f..;� A r L•. E,'�
�1 1h
r°-
•
O
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rt -- r� a -
-f � t z } Cam» t t '• a:% ahkb'�i �
;fin i L�r -�` 3i t 7nat r' r 4"� _, _.�,
�
�
�x �9�1,.�f+�'.^31�._..._.T.I -t
.G"".-7
I
!` �i-.'�4' }� I r '^- it*4.
7 r�
mill
f51�.-.h� i T-T x Y.^ii .isS��'.
.d;��A9t". „�fv, {�k!�q'4i �{ Yle'��"{� K�i{7�'r1d'hs,' n�:--..�'u±�,��
�;SN`�{��- � 1. ., +'•aH' r'�'r,-.{� -.. if'A.
-.rev
.,,_a'ai ', u $ .q• .�
}� TM5'i rf'r .��
_
�rV1,n�`�.,s���e

Martin Marietta Aggregates
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
rF�
19.00
Monitoring Location # 10
Shallow Water Table Gage
NNW --M--Elev. Ground Surface —0 COE Wetland Det. Hydrology —fir-Elev. Bottom of Casing -0 Rainfall
IL,
x
i-
ji
�•
I
�
f - ' I i
y,
A
1 �
rt 1
7�i Sf
„ v'
4.
�
�
_
-
_
..
y�
-
�
L
� j
`'�
Duration:
157
days
Duration:
40
days
# '.'i
i
r
{61$I04
10130104}
(3/17/05
- 4126/05)
$a
Y
r
7
-
r
5
:'
nt
"1,
S
-
-
li�
Ik,
{
I
x
',r.l
7177
�i.
I
j
I
€
€
€
€
�,
C
V
�f,
E 1
i
�4: �:
Y
f
li
l
.[
-# F
Sir
r2
,
h_
r
-
r
µ
i•
�,
V
L.
��„i
'-
R
_
{'
L-
ty
�
^r..
�
'i
au,
fug
•L
t
i^ ?
F
�
-
,.
L,
, {:
}i.li3
�
'T
sir
JF
R
1NG
.S
r
a
c_h
15
`�
"
11.00 ,
.
dT
a
r
O
4
a
4
O
v
O
v
O
v
O
v
O
T
O
v Nr
O O
v v v
O O O
v
O
Iqr
O
�
O
u7 LO
O O
n
O
Ln
O
u�
O O
c0
N
O
cp
O
to
a
co
M
ca
N
N
.—
cD
Ln O It
CO
m
c0
rn
co
O
u7
O
CO
O
cD
O
1-
O
ti
O
ti
O
c0
O
00
O
O
O
07 O
O
O
— — r
N
r-'
N
r
r
O
r N
O O
N
O
co
O
C
O O
LO
0
Co
C]
a o0
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
7.00 c
8.00 «^^a
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Date
Ip ja jWepew? "has' a1ft ,h :® Im 1Ch ilb Ab '.M Fft ;M TM !9;h :ft -lid Aft ;h 1® ,® Aft ;h Am Ah ® Ah r® ,® A 'M !® r4, (Ei i! ;Ah rdm :ift "9. da :e

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
j N
1
0 0 0
O O O
08/23/02
09/212/02
10/22/02
/21
11 /02
G)GZ
12/21 /02
0
01 /21/03
02/20/03
03/22/03
`�°
04/21 /03
M MEN
O
05/21 /03
Q
06/21 /03
07/21 /03
CD
08/20/03
09/19/03
n
10/19/03
0
m
—
o
11/19/03
12/19/03
a
o
0
01 /18/04
02/17/04
.�
03/18/04
(�
04/18/04
05/18/04
m
06/17/04
CD07/17/04
00
08/17/04
0
09/16/04
0
10/16/04
11 /15/04
CO
12/ 15/04
01 /15/05
02/14/05
03/16/05
04/15/05
1 s (0 CO v 0) (.I A W N O
Ul A W N O O O O O O O O O O O
O O CD O O O O O O O O CD O O O
O p p O O O
Rainfall (Inches)
1
- y ."„'
I
I
I
I
N �
Q
`"
_
,.,'�.�.,
f� :�•- �, E r��
��:��:'r `-
�,�,�.� �.> :�• �a .h.
s j�4
;,'k'n'i h Yr,yi.. �* ,Lri ..:. Jw
�a ifs ; 1.-��r�
,a. H"-i>w r'! `��� •�,_.ru; �j•; O.'�
7 'e., •1'�.`
f:i'?,y iY.'-;'. �
xr ': A. a.!'�:;
J:e ', i; .i.�`.7« t', 1,, ,z'i`,x.
.,.TG:1u!`. !
{�ji+.:v kP'-,'r�y ^'Z��.•
� 3.�.. -.1:
i y: it [ti,. -�.?4� _
(
= N
N �
b �
v m
•r.y,_
f ,dj•y
2�u.�. :dhy�
- is °i
%{J -r'.f R.. ,f-k
S s d F 4- t \ =5�-}' �'.:..E:.�t 0� 1 i, •_ � 4 - f phi �Y .:r'�1:,- ri 1 .
I
'
I
_
I
1
t
x_4
,xH'
0
0
r
0
h
O
w

■
Water Level (Feet above MSL)
� N
N m A
O O O
CD O O
08/23/02 '
09/22/02
p
-
,.
10/22/02
11/21/02
12/21 /02
N
01 /21 /03
F
02/20/03
03/22/03
'-
-
a
04/21 /03
05/21/03
06/21/03
-
i
07/21 /03
-
-
08/20/03
i
09/19/03
�-
10/19/03
11/19/03AV
12/19/03
r
m 01/18/04
o
-
02/17/04
03/18/04
04/18/04
05/18/04
06/17/04
4-
07/17/04
08/17/04
-
09/16/04
10/16/04
-
11/15/04
12/15/04
-
01 /15/05
-
r
02/14/05 -
r
03/16/05
749
04/15/05
Vi A W N -- 8 P 00 v P Cn A W N — O
O O 0 pO000 OOOpO O O0 0Od CO
Rainfall (Inches)
Z
N
m
cn
e
CO
0
0
3
0
0
v
W
cn1
n�
v
0
m
CD
V
Q
I
0
c
CL
m
rt
lD
G�
a
Q
CD
o
x _
I<
1

Water Level (Feet above MSL)
s N
O O O
O O O
08/23/02 s
09/22/02 -
10/22/02
11 /21 /02
12/21 /02 -�-
01121 /03
02/20/03
03/22/03
-
04121 /03
05/21 /03
'
06121 /03
-
i
07/21/03
-
08/20/03
-
09/19/03
10/19/03
11 /19/03
12/19/03
t
—
r.
CD 01/18/04
IT
02/17/04
03/18/04
—
04/18/04
i
05/18/04
t
-
i
06/17/04
-
07/17/04
08/17/04
—
09/16/04
-
—
10/16/04
-
11 /15/04
12/15/04
01/15/05
02/14/05
i —
03/16/05
-
-
04/15/05
-
-• -� (D 0O -4 p 5p A W N + p
(y� .A W N O O O O O O O O O O O
p O O 0 O p O O O O O O O O p CD
Rainfall (inches) „
z
m
m
t7
0
c
m
Q
c
v
co
A
C
m
rr
c
Q
m
Q
w
to
M
t

0
Water Level (Feet above MSI_)
1
0 o CD
08/23/02 10
09/22/02
j
10/22/02
11 /21 /02
12121 /02
6 8z
01 /21 /03
CD w
02/20/03
m
04/21/03
05/21 /03
77-
�
a
06/21 /03
C
07/21 /03
0
n
CD
08/20/03
09/19/03
10/19/03
11/19/03
12/19/03fu
CD
01 /18/04
02/17/04
03/18/04
04/18/04
n
mm
CD0
0-
0
-+
Q
2
a
o
S
S
Cu
Cr
cp
a�i
05/18/04
9
at
N

V4A rF Michael F, Easley, Governor
��K0 9pG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Co f Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
O Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 15, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Martin Marietta Materials
Attention; Mr. Horace Wilson
Post Office Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Re: Martin Marietta Materials, Rocky Point Quarry, located at the end of State Road 1836 in Pender County,
North Carolina DWQ Project No. 03-1023; US Army Corps of Engineers ID No. 200301159.
Dear Mr. Wilson:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3452 issued to Martin Marietta Materials dated March 15, 2004. If
we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Klimek, P.E. ire for
#i1i n of Water QUa,,,y
Attachments
DWQ 03 1023
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ, Wilmington Regional Office — Rick Shiver
DWQ, Wilmington Regional Office — Noelle Lutheran
DWQ, Wetlands/401 Unit — Danny Smith
DLR, Wilmington Regional Office — Dan Sams
File Copy
Central files
Harlan Britt, Kimley-Horn and Associates, P.O. Box 33068, Raleigh, NC 27636
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
165D Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733.6893 (fax),(http;/lh2o.enr.state,nnc.us/newedands)
b. 1 .Q9-F A:9z G'YAo

Page 2
This Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC
2H, Section .0500 to Martin Marietta Materials, resulting in the discharge of fill, side casting and the excavation of
overburden to 7.52 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and waters associated with the 87 acre construction and expansion
of the existing Rocky Point Mine in Pender County, North Carolina, pursuant to the application in the form of the
Corps Public Notice received on the Ist day of December, 2003 and subsequent amendments to the application that
include the Modified Alternative Pumping Plan (received dated February 19, 2004) and the Response to NCDENR
Division of Water Quality letter of January 20, 2004, and Meeting of February 12, 2004 (received dated February 19,
2004).
The application provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will not result in a violation of applicable
Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity
will not violate the applicable portions of Section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted
in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purposes and design that you submitted (and modified) in your application in
the form of the Corps of Engineer's Public Notice received on the 1" day of December, 2003, as modified in the
Modified Alternative Pumping Plan (received February 19, 2004), and the Response to NCDENR Division of Water
Quality letter of January 20, 2004 and Meeting of February 12, 2004 received dated February 19, 2004 (received
February 19, 2004), and as conditioned below. If you change your project, you must notify the Central Office of
Division of Water Quality in writing and may be required to send the Central Office of the Division of Water Quality
an application for a new certification. If Martin Marietta Materials is sold or the if the name of the company is
changed, or the property is sold, you must notify the Central Office and the Wilmington Regional Field Office of the
Division of Water Quality in writing, and the new owner(s) of the company and/or property must be given a copy of
the Certification, approval letter, all necessary supplementary information detailed in the application subsequent
amendments, and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Should wetlands or
fill be requested in the future, additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H
.0506 (h)(6) and (7).:You must follow the conditions ;listed below. In addition, you should get any other federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) a Mining Permit and a
USACE 404 Permit.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Mine Pumping and Dewatering:
A) During the time of construction and through the duration of time the facility is actively mining and
conducting measures necessary to reclaim the mine footprint, full compliance with the Modified
Alternative Pumping Plan, Rocky Point Quarry Pender County, NC, dated February 17, 2004, prepared
for Martin Marietta Materials, Raleigh, NC by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc is required.
B) In addition to the Modified AIternative Pumping Plan, Rocky Point Quarry Pender County, NC, dated
February 17, 2004, the following additional items are also required and are conditions of this
Certification:
a. Pumping of water onto the wetland polygons located on the Western portion of tract G2 is
required during the time of construction and through the duration of the time the facility is
actively mining and conducting measures necessary to reclaim the mine footprint. The proposed
rate of pumping must be submitted to NCDWQ within 60 days of the date of this Certification
for NCDWQ written approval.
b. Additional wetland monitoring wells must be located within tract GI on the polygon labeled
"F". One well must be installed in the northwestern portion of the wetland polygon labeled "F'
and a second well must be located near the location of the label "F' as depicted on the map

Page 3
labeled Figure 3, dated January 5, 2004, in the Modified Alternative Pumping Plan, Rocky
Point Quarry, Pender County, NC, dated February 17, 2004.
c. An additional wetlands monitoring well must be installed on tract GI on polygon labeled "E" at
the location of the label "E" as depicted on the map labeled Figure 3, dated January 5, 2004, in
the Modified Alternative Pumping Plan Rocky Point Quarry Pender County, NC, dated
February 17, 2004.
d. Monitoring of wells located on Tract GI must occur during the time of construction and through
the duration of the time Gland G2 are being mined and for 5 years after the mining efforts have
been completed on Tracts G1 and G2 unless otherwise approved in writing by NCDWQ.
e. Monitoring of wells located on Tract Gl must also occur from the period of time the facility is
conducting/constructing measures necessary to reclaiming the mine footprint and fora period of
5 years after the Division of Land Resources has released (agreed the mine site has been
reclaimed) the Rocky Point Mine unless otherwise approved in writing by NCDWQ.
2. Prior to impacts of wetlands for the mine expansion, Martin Marietta Materials must submit a wetland
delineation to the US Army Corps of Engineers for their written approval for tracts known as H 1 and H2.
Prior to impacts of wetlands for the mine expansion, Martin Marietta Materials must provide NCDWQ a
monitoring plan that addresses wetland monitoring for H 1 and. H2. The well locations must be provided on a
map and the map must depict all of the wetlands (as determined by the USACE). Martin Marietta Materials
must secure written approval from NCDWQ of the wetland monitoring well placement and the monitoring
plan before impacting wetlands for the mine expansion.
Monitoring of wells located on Tracts H 1 and H2 (their location as approved in condition number 3 above)
must occur during the time of construction and through the duration of the time tracts G1 and G2 are being
mined and for 5 year after the mining efforts have been -completed on Tracts G1 and G2 unless otherwise -
approved in writing by NCDWQ.
Monitoring of wells located on Tract H1 and H2 (their location as approved in condition number 3 above)
must also occur from the period of time the facility is conducting/constructing measures necessary to
reclaiming the mine footprint and for a period of 5 years after the Division of Land Resources has released
(agreed the mine site has been reclaimed) the Rocky Point Mine unless otherwise approved in writing by
NCDWQ.
6. Wetland Monitoring Plan: For tracts G1, H1, H2, the wetland monitoring must include the following:
A. Physical monitoring of wetlands is required quarterly as a condition of this Certification. if wetland
impacts are determined to have occurred (these impacts may include indications of instability,
eroding, sloughing, subsidence, collapse, and/or removal of the hydrology) Martin Marietta
Materials shall notify the NCDWQ Wilmington Regional Office in writing. This notification shall
be within 24 hrs of first knowledge of these impacts or the first business day thereafter and shall
include a detailed explanation of the nature of the problem.
B. Physical monitoring of wetlands for instability, eroding, sloughing, subsidence, collapse, and/or
removal of the hydrology of wetlands (monitoring frequency- annual). This monitoring may be
accomplished by visual inspection of the wetland areas while conducting well maintenance efforts.
C. The water level control structures proposed for the ditches along H 1 and H2 and the modification to
the culvert, as depicted in the Modified Alternative Pumping Plan, Rocky Point Quarry Pender

Page 4
County, NC, dated February 17, 2004, are required to be implemented prior to impacting wetlands
for the mine expansion.
D. The water level control structures along H1 and H2 and the culvert modification, as depicted
in the Modified Alternative Pumping Plan Rocky Point Quarry Pender County, NC, dated February
17, 2004, are required to be maintained. Within the monitoring plan, the above -mentioned plugs
and culvert must also be inspected to ensure they are stable and not failing. This review must be
conducted quarterly and the results addressed in the annual Wetland Monitoring and Pumping Plan
Report.
E. Wells as depicted in the Modified Alternative Pumping Plan Rocky Point Quarry Pender County,
NC, dated February 17, 2004 and the additional well required by this Certification must be properly
installed and properly maintained throughout the active life of the mine, through reclamation efforts,
and for 5 years after the Division of Land Resources releases the site and determines the Rocky
Point mine site has been reclaimed unless otherwise approved in writing by NCDWQ.
F. All well data must be provided annually to DWQ along with a written account of the hydrological
status of the wetlands on the tract (by June 1 of each year). This includes each wetland polygon
(and all wells) as indicated on the map labeled Figure 3, dated January 5, 2004, as well as wetland
monitoring wells required in the above -mentioned conditions.
G. At a minimum, daily water table levels must be recorded from all wells and daily rainfall must be
collected by the monitoring gages and rain gages (this data must be collected and available for
NCDWQ review). At a minimum, monthly data logger downloads, well and well site
inspections/maintenance must occur for the monitoring duration depicted in conditions of this
certification.
H. Initiation of data collection (including well and rainfall data) must begin prior to impacts of wetlands
for the mine expansion.
7. Wetland Monitoring and Pumping Plan Report:
A report must be submitted annually to both the Central Office of the Division of Water Quality and the
Wilmington Regional Office of DWQ, by June 1 of each year. All well sample results and rain gage results
must be provided as an addendum to the reported (regardless of well location). The Wetland Monitoring and
Pumping Plan Report must include the following: 1) a written account of the hydrological status of wetlands
on tracts H1, H2, and G1, 2) a written account of the physical status of wetlands on tracts H1, H2, and G1, 3)
well maintenance records, 4) an account of the "re-hydration/pumping" efforts to tract GI, and 4) a written
account of water level control devices and pumping efforts to the ditches along H1 and H2.
The annual report must also include monthly monitoring results of the stream monitoring gage (e.g. staff
gage) that is already located on Strawberry Branch. Also, Martin Marietta Materials must also install,
monitor and include in the annual report monthly monitoring results from a stream monitoring gage for the
jurisdiction channel feature located on Tract E. If the owner of tract E will not allow Martin Marietta
Materials to install and/or conduct monitoring at this station, Martin Marietta Materials must document this
issue in each annual report.
8. The monitoring results will be reviewed by the NCDWQ. If NCDWQ determines or has concerns regarding
removal of jurisdictional wetland hydrology, the NCDWQ will confirm the removal of wetland hydrology
from the USACE (or the current delegated authority).

Page 5
9. If wetlands on Tracts G1, as depicted on the map labeled "Figure 3", dated January 5, 2004, in the Modified
Alternative Pumping Plan Rocky Point Quarry Pender County, NC, dated February 17, 2004 and the map
required in condition 2 for tracts H 1 and H2 are determined to be impacted beyond the impacts authorized by
this Certification, then compensatory mitigation (described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506) will be required.
10. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP):
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand that
you wish to make a payment to a fund administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to
meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the
mitigation requirement. This contribution will satisfy ourcompensatory mitigation requirements. Until the
EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR — Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office),
no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at
[phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into the EEP. You have one month from the
date of this approval to make this payment.
Co!n2ensatoKy Mitigation Required
River and Subbasin Number
Stream
none (feet)
Wetlands
7.52 (acres) As depicted in application plans for tract
G1 and G2
11. During construction and while the facility is actively mining and conducting measures necessary reclaim the
mine footprint, full compliance with sediment and erosion control practices is required:
A. Approved erosion and sedimentation control devices and practices, which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the Division of
Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices) shall be properly implemented.
B. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
12. Waste, spoil or fill shall not be placed, dumped or located in wetlands, waters, riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts as depicted in the application.
13. At no time shall the discharge(s) from this site cause violations of surface water (including wetland)
standards.
14. Mine construction and operation must be conducted within the footprint approved by the Division of Land
Resources.
15. Access will be granted to DENR staff for sampling, inspection or other purposes as deemed necessary by
DENR upon request.
16. It is a requirement of this Certification that this facility must maintain full compliance with all of the NPDES
Permit conditions required for this facility.
17. The following conditions are required to assure compliance with the appropriate water quality standards:
A. Beyond what is specifically authorized as a part of the 7.52 acres of wetland impacts authorized in
this Certification, waste, fill, removal of wetland hydrology, or sedimentation may not occur in
wetlands or waters.

\7
Page 6
B. Live or fresh concrete may not come in contact with waters of the state until the concrete has
hardened.
C. The Wilmington Regional Office of DWQ must be notified by telephone within 24 hours and in
writing (within 5 days) of Martin Marietta Materials becoming aware of the formation of any new
sink holes or soil surface collapse beyond the proposed mine portions of tracts G1 and G2, within
tracts H1 and H2, within tracts E and within the property of any of the adjacent land owner to the
Rocky Point Mine.
18. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, Wilmington Regional Office and North Carolina Division of Water Central
Office at 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
The conditions of this Certification notwithstanding, Martin Marietta Materials or its successor is required -to
conduct its activities in a manner consistent with water quality standards and classifications as well as all applicable
state and federal laws. If water quality standards and classifications are not met or if state and/or federal laws are
violated, the Division may reevaluate this Certification. This reevaluation may result in modifications to the
Certification to include conditions appropriate to ensure compliance with water quality standards and classifications
as well as state and federal law in accordance with 15A NCAC 211.0507 (d), Before modifying this Certification, the
Division shall notify Martin Marietta Materials or its successor and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide notice
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0503, and provide opportunity for a public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to Martin Marietta Materials or its successor in
writing.
Violations of any conditions herein set forth.may result in revocation of this Certification and' may. result in
criminal and/or civil penalties.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon; written request
within the sixty (60) days following the receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written
petition conforming to Chapter 15013 of the North Carolina General Statures and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If modifications upon are made to
an original Certification, you have right to adjudicatory on the modifications upon written request within sixty days
following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This thel5th day of March 2004
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WQC # 3452

Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
JUN 2 7 2002
Y.-
June 26, 2002
Mr. Rick Shiver
Wilmington Regional Office
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Quarry
NCG020166
Monitoring Information and Wetlands Standards, Pender County
In Reply to Your Letter of June 10, 2002
Dear Mr. Shiver:
Pursuant to your June 10, 2002 letter and our subsequent meeting (June 18, 2002)
regarding the Rocky Point Quarry, Martin Marietta Materials requested that we
respond to you regarding your comments. We have prepared a response to your
comments (attached) and a revised (Version 2) "Monitoring and Operations Plan"
(attached) that addresses the issues of concern to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) - Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
with respect to NPDES Permit NCG020166.
We ask that you carefully read over the documentation and figures enclosed as we
have attempted to address all of your concerns. Where possible, we have provided
specific responses to issues you raised in your June 10 correspondence as clarified in
our June 18 meeting.
As discussed during our meetings, DWQ was expecting to have results from the
monitoring plan Martin Marietta Materials implements and a recommendation for a
pumping plan by July 16 (90 days from our initiai meeting). To that end, Martin
Marietta Materials is anxious to implement the monitoring plan as soon as possible.
Your timely review of the attached would be greatly appreciated. Please let us know
if there is anything we can do to help facilitate/expedite that review. We do not
believe that the July 16 deadline provides sufficient time to obtain meaningful data
and to develop an appropriate pumping plan. We request that you extend the deadline
90 days so that appropriate data can be collected and analyzed.
We hope you find this submittal useful and responsive to your concerns. We wish to
reiterate that we regard your efforts and guidance to the development of our
programs very important and that the ongoing input from you will be invaluable. The
Monitoring Plan attached will be implemented upon your written concurrence.
O
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068
TEL [phone]M
FAX [phone]

Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Mr. Rick Shiver, June 26, 2002, Page 2
Martin Marietta Materials and Kimley-Horn look forward to continuing this
cooperative working effort and initiating the data collection.
With Best Regards,
/KI Y-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
James M. Eis nhardt
Vice President
Copy to: Horace Willson, Martin Marietta Materials
Danny Smith, NCDENR-DWQ, Raleigh
Harlan Britt/Chad Evenhouse/Bruce Cutright, KHA
H:IPN1011185010\MMM shiver ltr.doc

Rd
/I
/I
Abandoned portion of pit used for settling ponds. Acreage included in total for Mine Excavation.
** Includes overburden storage and fines disposal not included in pit 41�el
*** Includes only haul roads located outside of Mine Excavation. wV
84'
IT
?',
�'-
12'
3 . ,
�11 PIl, IIIII111=11111,=-,1I
TYPICAL SECTION
BERM ALONG S.R. 1517
I�4
N/F
Richard Shew I /
/I
II
/I
/I
/I
MODIFICATION - JUNE 2004 1�
±344.7 Acres proposed to be added to
the Permit Boundary. Of this, ±325.6 acres are to be
affected as Future Mine Excavation
(shown by solid green line — ).
NOTE:
Silt Fencing will be utilized during
berm construction for sediment and erosion control.
N/F
Hedi Trask
t 5.00'BUFFER
lariflcation�r h'� n 150' BUFFER (FROM CENTERLINE OF ROAD)
Pond N40DIFICATION JUNF 2004
Prior Settling Area
(no longer ative)
1 a-41,9 -Awres proposed to be removed rom
.r
S Vo1. i tl t��l Litt _
shown by solid cyan line •.•- . This area lies . CH
the previouslyapproved Permit Boundary.
5
EXISTING >k ����A � {� C �, � r���d� � , t �>��,, �� ,✓��,<
OUTFALL 001
SUMP EXISTING
t w:
�} OUTFALL 003
K:.3'4rx'
,
-. � �xs� r� 2 ,� ., '' r ;.-' c, :�,:� � e ,- t �"-- _.._-•"`: `. r,. r� r 's .,N e..;: 5 .. - - - r
`S.- ,y t „nx:. '-Ev a:-'•``�+.€�`�,�t5r n - k, :4w,"o-,-r • "Y t. a.... � � .
..... '-, <�.:y t . w.. , fir..... , . . �i. � r:. m fi".--�` ir< .... •, ,.' '. , v. . drF .. _F J. .w},
':'si1 ,. x< .. `as � -.- "-°�,.
�, . C� FICATION �C7NE 2004 s
-
_....
1.. °a
--.
N , , , � .� � ..�, „ W,�r�, ",� . �.� i�C"r rp 4S d to ,, �„��k. � x.5 x �';. r- ,».rr� �s v`+Z, yv� }1��
.:::. d'«_§.:; ti �' S'ra., - ,„ a'? -.; >Y. a?'3,�, -'.l r :a::. _, 1
... ..a:...r r.
F €., y<.. P w *>ff. rt ,.
....deE w U .x n Wetland
.::.. _.. - J....., { T. <r ..•..., .. �... X:a. t. , .,�. '. -..Si R Y. . N ..W ..-Y��* i str
. � �.� .. �„r ,x . a � , ._ _ ., � 2.30 acres total
w _ , f Areas T BeAffected n ., x . . , �� _ .. e e as 3 , r .. �,. _- ,, . _,
.. .."« a
. Existing Dirt Road
. ,.. .. .�` shn
S
t
<.
h b dashed line ,. . Al", m. R. ).
-
�.-.
the previouslya a...
Plum Creek Timberlands, LP...
,
'fi 4r ...n.- :.., , _. i¢•. ,. ...... . .... i :. zq, .. '�. 3:. _. a. ..,
<';.. r
,. .... .. ..._.. . ,r;, .. r.- ___ ice.. _ �._ --rz� , „. _: .,.. a<,. ...zr,-. .:.s' .'" v.:. ..,<F- --•-- -
-ma`s ,. . , nr , :.- ::. :�
-iM
v a ,. e �;::. ... ,.,.. 1. u.. .... � ...A _.*" r... . .. e, .... v,.. .. ,. n_n.. �.; ..'.#..a...
w. _, ... -. .. s _. _ ,. 1... ,... •:.,. , ::. ,. ..: a ... .. :... - __ _.,.--E-.t ='•'a .,. >. '_ r ¢
R " n. , _ _3r.�J ,. ::., , . _ v.� .. .e. S _ a. u c ...:- ..c .... r , »c.,:,.. ._. ..,:. .,.. i•<........ ...� « ... ._
r' `Lim dr. , r <.. . , ,, ....... ...e9 - -R. �-.-.E:. . ,,,< , w.:. .., ♦ ... ",. z .. ... ..: . .... .
ZZ
_ -.... .r <_ .. .. ,... ,.. .... ... _ .sin t'.. Kx a ... .. .a .-... ..:. ...,_ . 5,... ...
g "
{ r,
T A
S rr
PROPOSED 50' BUFFER
LEGEND
Permit Boundary
Paved Road
Adjacent Property Line
— — Dirt Road
Pit Limit
Body of Water OMNI=
Future Pit Limits
Diversion Ditch -- - =- - - -_ ---->—
Creek ,._---.___ .__ __... _... _...___.._.--
Proposed 50 ft Buffer
Delineated Wetlands
Outfall Sample Location
(existing & proposed)
Treeline
Berm (existing)
Tailings / Sediment Ponds
Berm (to be built)
Stockpiles
Building
Processing Area / Haul Roads
Above Ground Storage Tanks
,
NOTES:
* Overburden is backfilled into pit
* Erosion control at existing pit will
consist of directing all drainage and
runoff back into pit.
aTr,w+, . °v",,: 3 xffit';kr`+,
�... _ „ _.. _.,, _ �,<.. _ .... , _ ,.- - x. .. -,.'� _. _'x_.•xSs��.' t� ��-f-„ _ ......, _ ,_ ,_ �'�s� o .. _,_. ., ...,..' ,..,v„'t .,.,,x'.ti �,a_..���..,x�✓n��`,'�
N/F
Plum Creek Timberlands, LP.
PROPOSED 50' BUFFER --/
SCALE: 1" = 400'
0 200 400 800 1200 1600
PROPOSED 50' BUFFER
OUTFALL
GATE
N/F
Plum Creek Timberlands, LP.
Wetland
O 0.07 acres
PROPOSED 50' BUFFER
N/F
Nell Trask
Wetland
1.04 acres
1-1)
N/F
Plum Creek Timberlands LP.

Martin Marietta Materials `•;
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Rocky Point Quarry
Mine Permit Modification Application — addition of Tract E
Permit No. 71-09
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
919-78.1-4550
June 21, 2004
EGEOVE
D
COPY

.. )
Cr
0
r
�� .�

7 cm
..
~CA
NOTES:
1.FIELD SURVEY WORK WAS PERFORMED IN NOVEMBER, 2002.
2.THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT.
3.THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES THAT A DETAILED TITLE SEARCH
MAY DISCLOSE.
4.ALL MEASUREMENTS SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
5.AREA CALCULATED BY COORDINATES.
6.NO USGS MONUMENT WITHIN 2000' OF SITE.
7.HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATUM TIED TO GPS PANEL DATA PROVIDED TO DRAPER ADEN ASSOCIATES BY
KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
8.BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN ARE TO THE EXISTING CL OF DIRT ROADS.
9.WETL ANDS SHOWN PROVIDED TO DRAPER ADEN ASSOCIATES BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
yy,
r
• p.�
L
O
O=�
cC U
cow U
C
.J
T�
V 1
C
O
L
C
C
L
O
�
o rn
U d
.L
O N U
@m
W
•ytQrn
is in
L
Ln
N �
L
0
W
Q.
cz
f.—
Z
Q
o
U
0
cz
�
o
.�
r)
Q
Cj
-0
0
z
cz
Z
)
Q
o'
U
Z
70
czo
CIL
i
0
c
W
~
c
�J
CL
cz
REVISIONS
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
ASD
CHECKED BY:
RAC
SCALE:
1 " = 300'
DATE:
Decer,iber
23,
2002
PROJECT NUMBER.
RA02268-01
OF

Typical slot configuration as determined
from topography and anticipated water
elevation (10' Mean Sea Level MSL) in
Strawberry Branch.
Topographic information provided by Landair
Surveying, Inc. See TOPOGRAPHY NOTES for
details regarding data gathering and accuracy.
Berm Seeded
to Stabilize; Unmo"
If
Haul Roads at':
Roads (crush4 s
to Remain
rl
Ir
Ifl�
•.' 1l
/f ,tip
n
\\
\\ r
on ' &
0 to Remain
EPF41k3�P0P'_
Natural Grade
0000
00010
`. •
Berm Seeded to
Stabilize; Unmown
r'
V
e��
Berm Seeded to i1 r,,�--•� �\ �kl
Stabilize; Unmown
QilCi'' � il`
401
\\
v
i
h
f h \1i
kk
n Area Not To
— Be Mined t
p
\\
r Yi \l
ri= it \V
y \\ %
t
Water at 14' MSL
(Established by Skelly & Loy
April 18, 2003)
SCALE: V = 400'
0 200 400 800 1200 1600
Typical Cross Section of Exterior Perimeter
(Not to Scale)
2.
�— 8' Min. —I
Typical Cross Section of 8' Wide
Path to Remain in Former Pit
not to scale
Table 16-3. Seeding for Coastal Region, Sandy Soils, Low Maintenance
(from North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual]
Seeding Mixture
Species (lbs/ac.)
Pensacola bahiagrass 50
Sericea lespedeza 30
Common bermudagrass 10
German millet 10
During appropriate seeding periods, when seed is available, the following Native Warm Season
Grasses will be added to the seeding mixture:
Seed Species Mixed Rate
Switchgrass I lb/acre
Bluestein 2 lb/acre
Indiangrass 2 lb/acre
Coastal Panicgrass 2 lb/acre
Seeding notes:
-Where a neat appearance is desired, omit Sericea lespedeza.
-Use Common bermudagrass only in isolated areas where it cannot become a pest.
Bermudagrass may be replaced with 5 lb/ac. Centipedegrass.
Nurse Plants
Prior to May I or after August 15, add 40 lb/ac. Rye (grain).
Seeding Dates
Apr. 1 -Aug. 15
Soil Amendments
Apply lime and fertilizer according to soil tests, or apply 3,000 lb/ac. ground
agricultural limestone and 500 lb/ac. 10-10-10 fertilizer.
Mulch
Apply 4,000-5,000 lb/ac. grain straw or an equivalent cover of another suitable
mulching material. Anchor mulch by tacking with asphalt, roving, or netting, or
by crimping with a mulch anchoring tool. A disk with blades set nearly straight
can be used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenance
Refertilize the following April with 50 lb/ac. nitrogen. Repeat as growth requires.
May be mowed only once a year. Where a neat appearance is desired, omit Sericea
lespedeza and mow as often as needed.
February 1996 Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources 16-12
SEEDING SCHEDULE FOR ALL GRASSED AREAS
NOTES:
1) All unpaved areas above water level (i.e. road shoulders, berms, dams, etc.)
to be stabilized with vegetation. If sufficient cover does not exist, overseed
as in Seeding Schedule.
2) After seeding as per Seeding Schedule, berms and slopes beyond road
shoulders outside the office area shall be umnown and allowed to revert
to natural vegetation.
3) Timber rights are retained by Others.
4) Berms are to be built as material becomes available. The extent of the berms
shown on this plan are anticipated; final dimensions may vary.
TOPOGRAPHY NOTES:
1. Accuracy Specifications: Contours - Ninety (90) percent of
the elevations determined from the solid line contours of this
topographic map has an accuracy with respect to true elevation of
one-half (1/2) contour interval or better and the remaining ten
(10) percent of such elevations are not in error by more than one
contour interval. In densely wooded areas where heavy brush or
tree cover fully obscures the ground and the contours are shown
as dashed lines, they have been plotted as accurately as possible
from the stereoscopic model, while full use of spot elevations
obtained during ground control surveys and all spot elevations
measured photogrammetrically in places where the ground is
visible.
2. This map was compiled by LandAir Surveying, Inc. using
photogrammetric methods. Contours portrayed as dashed or
broken lines represent areas of dense vegetation and should be
considered approximate. This map has not been field varified.
Prior to use as a basis for design/construction, it should be field
verified.
3. Buildings area shown roofline only.
LEGEND:
Permit Boundary ■� ■ ■ —
Surface Rights
Held By Others
Berm
Water
8' Wide Path

Kimley-Horn
w
® and Associates, Inc.
d
I
' December 27, 2004
Ms. Lillette Granade
K= Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Re: Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County, NC
Submittal of Preliminary Wetland Mapping and supporting
documentation for Tract H1
Dear Ms. Granade:
Attached is "HI Preliminary Wetlands Map" depicting jurisdictional wetland
areas within tract H 1 at the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Rocky Point
Quarry in Pender County, NC.
The jurisdictional wetland area shown is based on the soil survey mapping which
shows the entire tract as Murville Soil Series, a hydric soil, The area shown as
non -jurisdictional wetland is the area drained by roadside ditches, calculated as
550' from the ditch. This drainage influence distance is based on DRAINMOD
modeling of the site applying methodology approved by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) for the Jurisdictibnal Determination"of tracts G1 and G2. .
9
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068
It is noted that within tract H1 there exist upland areas including sand ridges and eJ
pine plantation beds, which have not been delineated (i.e. the wetland area shown W
includes pockets of upland areas). � > c
Tract H1 is included in an agreement between MMM and the property owners C"
(David Wells and Calvin Sloan) for establishment of a permanent conservation W
easement. The conservation easement also includes tract H2, which provided a , Q
portion of the Section 404 mitigation requirements for impacts in tracts G 1 and
G2. Permanent conservation of H1 is not included in the Section 404 permit LN
requirements.
a
3
a
0
a
Ref: 011185010 Data: 12/30/2004 SHIPPING:' 6.75
Dep: W9t: 0.8 LSS SPECIAL: 0.88
HANDLING: 0.00
DV: 0.00 TOTAL: 7.53
Svcs: STANDARD OVERNIGHT
TEL [phone] t TRCK : 6880 4788 2130
FAX [phone]

a
f
Kimley-Horn
EM and Associates, Inc.
Preliminary Wetland Mapping and supporting documentation for Tract HI
December 27, 2004
No impacts to jurisdictional areas within H1 are proposed. However,
determination of a jurisdictional wetland boundary is required per the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Section 401 conditions to impact
wetlands in tracts G 1 and G2.
.
Also, per the quarry's Pumping Plan and Monitoring Plan, as well as the Section
401 permit conditions, H1 is included in the -area currently being monitored to
observe wetland hydrology. adjacent to the pit. Areas adjacent to the pit have
been monitored since August 2002 as part of the Pumping Plan, and were
;.
modified in May 2004 per the conditions of the Section 401 permit for G1 and
G2 for the Monitoring Plan. The current monitoring locations within tract H I are
R
shown on the "H1 Preliminary Wetlands Map".
The Rocky Point Monitoring Plan, Monitoring Gage Locations map, as approved
by DWQ is included as a reference and to show the Hl tract in context with the
current Monitoring Plan. Also, monitoring gage information collected to date for
gages within tract H1 are attached for reference. The monitoring gage
M
information attached includes:
!
• Corps Wetland Data Form from the gage. installations.
f�
• Site inspection form for a quarterly review of the gage•sites dated
October 27, 2004 (per the current DWQ Monitoring Plan). This form is
based on the Corps data form and is included to provide a visual
��—
inspection of the monitoring locations for any evidence of land
„ -
subsidence and vegetation community.
• Water table data collected to date. Note that Location 6 (gage NW6)
was installed in August 2002 as part of the original Monitoring Plan an(!. --
Locations 13, 14, and 18 (gages NW4, NW13, NW3) were added in
May 2004 for the amended Monitoring Plan. Two graphs are included
"
for Location 6, one showing all of the data to date, the other showing the
data for the dates consistent with the other three locations.
• H2 Jurisdictional Determination Map signed by the Corps on 116I04
(prepared by others and included as reference)
• Survey Plat for Calvin F. Wells and David B. Sloan, dated 9/13/95
(prepared by others and included as reference to show the H1 boundary).
Please review the attached figures and provide any additional comments. With
Fes' your approval of the H 1 Preliminary Wetlands Map and supporting
documentation, a formal JD request will be submitted with an appropriate survey
plat. It is anticipated that the plat will show the boundary as shown in the Wells
and Sloan boundary survey (attached), and will include the wetlands boundary
,- within H1 as shown on the H1 Preliminary Wetlands Map with appropriate
► 3'
.. 2

Ik
Preliminary Welland Mapping and supporting documentation for Tract HI
December 27, 2004
wxwly Kimley-Horn
-and Associates, Inc.
Corps' language regarding the inclusion of uplands within a jurisdictional
wetland area.
Please feel free to contact me at 919-677-2121 if you have questions or need
additional information.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chad Evenhouse, PWS
Attachments:
1. H1 Preliminary Wetlands Map, dated 12/9/04
2. Monitoring Gage Information
a. Monitoring Gage Locations Installed May 2004, dated 6/18/04
b.. Location 6 gage information
i. Corps Wetland Data Form, dated 7/29/02
ii. Quarterly Inspection Form, dated 10/27/04
in. Water table data — 8/02 through 11/04
IV. Water table data —'6/04 through 1,1/04
c. Location 13 gage information
i. Corps Wetland Data Form, dated 5/19/04
ii. Quarterly Inspection Form, dated 10/27/04
iii. Water table data — 6/04 through 11/04
d. Location 14 gage information
i. Corps Wetland Data Form, dated 5/19/04
ii. Quarterly Inspection Form, dated 10/27/04
iii. Water table data -- 6/04 through 11/04
e. Location 18 gage information
i. Corps Wetland Data Form, dated 5/10/04
ii. Quarterly Inspection Form, dated 10/27/04
iii. Water table data — 6/04 through 11/04
3. Wetland Survey Wells and Sloan Tract (i.e. Tract 342), dated 12/16/03,
signed by the Corps 1/6/04, two sheets
4. Plat for Calvin F. Wells and David B. Sloan Jr., Dated 9/13/95
Cc: Horace Willson
Harlan Britt
H: 4PN10111850101404 permittCOEltr_11-27-04_prelim JD mnp Hl.doc
3

r9 —
�ren. cou+,� •.m m. �o.�.on era a.9yrs a.sex.a n«ea, es m .�v�r a efmces. K .nero.a oay re bo syeatc
V a,en re.n�rn t,.� w.oe.a. a.� a .ra.,waoe �K. oa roe man,.e,wrtau..nea a,more®aa era aaa+sa,�
y.mn era .sm„ssx. KnXryllen ere ftsooss, IM
Notes:
1) H1 boundary shown based
on "Plat for Calvin F. Wells and
David B. SLoan, JR", Prepared
by Hanover Design Services, P.A.
September 13, 1995
2) The wetland boundary along
the northern H1 boundary was
surveyed by Hanover Design
Services, P. A. for Calvin Wells
and David Sloan and approved
by the USACE on January 6, 2004.
3) The area shown as Tract H1
is entirely mapped as Murville Soil
Series in the Pender County Soil
Survey, and is listed as a hydric
soil. The hydrologic model
DRAINMOD was used to
determine the drainage influence
of roadside ditches in H1 consistent
with previous wetland delineation
methodology applied in adjacent
tracts and approved by the USACE.
4) Areas in H1 beyond the drainage
influence of the roadside ditches as
modeled is shown as jurisdictional
wetlands based on the area mapped
as hydric soil.
Water Table Monitoring Gage Locations
2002 Aerial Photograph
"-HOm Fd
_- and Associates, Inc.
Martin Marietta Materials H1 Preliminary Wetlands Map
Martin Marietta Mate=AA
Rocky Point t �e iIvo. eo: asoee - rt .pm wn a,w,. 7�`"^^
,,.�,. December 9, 2004

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
Project]Site: MMM - Rocky Point Date: 7/29/2002
Applicant/Owner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Pender
Investigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID:
_ Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect ID:
is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot ID:
Vegetation
H1
6
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus roeda
T
Fac
9.
2. Acer rzibnrm
T
Fac
10.
3. flex giabm
S
Facw
11.
4. Liguidambar sryracij7ua
T
Fac
12.
5. Vaccinium corymbosum
S
Facw
13.
6. Persea borbonia
T/S
Facw
14,
f 7. fennel
15.
B_
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are
OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding
FACU): 90%
j Remarks:
Vegetation has been historically influenced by the lane; management for pine plantation.
Hydrology:
_ RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
lOxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 748 (in)
Water Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 78 (in)
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
Other
-(None, however,, drought conditions at time of sampling (July 2002) and installation of monitoring gage.
1
d .

..q
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very Poorly Drained'
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) Y
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 - 18
A
10YR 211
Sandy loam
18 - 24
B
10YR 511
Sand
24 - 48+
C
10YR 514
Sand
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils-
Histic Epipedon X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Su€fidic Odor Concretions, Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (YIN) Y
.:ci - parks:
Disturbed soil surface from pine plantation
ment
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? N
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? N
Remarks:
[he data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW.6 at monitoring location 6.

25.00
23.0Q
c
I
13.00
., M�". � M
Lccation 6
Shallow Water Gage
—�---NW6 —0 Elev. Ground Surface —�—COE Wetland Det. Hydrology —M Elev. Bottom of Casing —�— Rainfall
�
'F
��M1.
�
�
�s .4a ESN
d
�rit'1
�31
a.
P
• �
�
r
+'
-�
�
� �
�',
v�fi�at p
,�
g�. l".I
� [
;� � ; I�� a 1�'7' ,"y{��
� �'
,>,!F'
3�
I
�*��
�
_
01
�'r,�
���1
to
dv
it
;-
;6*10E`{{{
}
,
.c
a
'�.
a
`
"' � Duration:
'
p
21 days
Y�.]
(5/23/03 - 6/13/03)
' Duration.
10 days
r �' ' �
Duration: 10 days Ar, ;
g
s
'�
x
�
i
>a
7xy
IT
R�'�
!14P$
`t
_
( 6118103
- .3125103
)
�a y43 �
(10/29103 - 1117103} I s ,•
Txe ^'�?`M''�uti-iP�#-
�
r
s
:
;"
59��
t
Duration: 9 days
0103 - 4/19/03}
-r,R;�
k
3II
c
eft
N
tl
T
h
-
t
r:�
Ik
a
pa:k
Duration: 16 days
Y
(917104-9122104)}
Ph�.9
x
jj�?y�..s
'�
4:xx
E6
1iIN
^{{��
,yg;
;�''
f51
-fi
tl
C�
rl
F
:
i
K r x
.'}'.
'-
-�"I i
�:i"
if '
�flir
1.w
It: r. -
iC•k
t
i-
•�
a
'] q
sf
��'
xs
�
�
�
�
��
r" € �
�
� �
�f
�F` I
I�
�P
'r
�14
�
��
R� �
�
!W
� �r'�
�
�
�C
AI
bl]F
3
17�
u
1
I
J�
°
�
°�
r
,� ]�
y
k1l,
I
� i�'dX
1'afI
Q
N�
Ea
a
E
ti
p
L
i'
Vq
=
i
qLj�'
bx
k�
1S
is i
r��i
x�
R
'��
�y x i aFgsia
dry
y3,
a�
R
c
1
I
o
E
e
O
F
1'
FF
(
`
�
�..
�c
�
�
lcII�
�
9'�u
, VL
�
SI�!
!•�
��., ��
L��
7�
11.00
N N
N N N
M
cy) co r7 M
M M.
r]
(*) M M co
-
0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
o
o
0
0 0
ce) N
N N
00
N r r
N (V N
i—
N
O N ,— r
N N N N
r r
N N
O
N
t
C!) W cn 0) c0 ti O co O r__
r r r r r r r r T
0
r— 1`
T r
0
(D
r
(O li7
r r
00 O
M
0
O r N
r
�
N S+7 �' LCS
co r
(p ti
�
�) O r N �— N M � In (:)
M
t, �
Q7
O �-
O
p O O O
O O
0
O r r r
O O O O O O
O Q
Q
r r
_Date .
W.lQA1111�
I
1��r}4f55RACnii�rin��M1A..ni4�rinn
l
to
-3finr)!z nanw {tatalWekk
ngta
� _
NPW,Locations
H1.xIs-
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
- 4.00
- 5.00
9,00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

06/01 /04
I;
06/08/04
06/ 15104
06/23/04
I
06/30/04
0
07/08/04 -
cOOn
07/15/04
O
I;
11
07/22/04
O
7
,
i o
07/30/04
cn
08/06/04
I O'
k o
Ir
08/14/04
IG
CO
08/21/04
r
j O
08/29/04
CD 09/05/04
CO
? c°
09/12/04
Q
N
I.
09/20/04
I' n
09/27/04
W
-- �Z
10/05/04
CID
10/12/04
r
' I chi
!' o.
10/19/04
10/27/04 -
s{III
11 /03/04
I
i
11 /11 /04
e�
I
11/18/04
11 /26/04
Water Level (Feet above M5L)
W C31 v CD
O O O O O
O O O O O
N � N
W C.fl
O O
O O
V-11-Mm
k
OWN,
O_
e�
� �,�,;��j.��-_�"� y •�,�„ �� 3
dHH��
'vC""'''''ilk-"I
T�� � �} � R.,..:��i
Sy✓iHn�����` d' �-^ 'S '�+..er�wY
�- .3i� ?�.�"�3` �JE•i �'�r_
cP� �1�, �F ��.����i1F�� - s�e��h�'s".'.
� .R ti�eeq�
��+�- �
{pa'?"a.,,'
.117- 01
Id
3L.-:Yl�iL6��'�"R--�.
-� #*e•3'yCLs,JFC"y'E" 33���ann''�� �f
��S�,
„„�-��:�
111:
�' �• s.-vim'='Jh'.h ME 1M®R ,u�
` "
� - � Y
M. 1"'N
INK
AM
n-' MISON
i'"f�-„�.F-,�f�
�_� ia4��*"II ;''il ' "`7�:E`
.C' J N'+` 9 ,,y� `I .�-.r. � •=^'a}R: Qrv-.vim`&'
IR .67-1100
—tuM -0—
1�P�.�,����ya.�'ah� y-S'
yt - ,}}•Yt �Y" f�
K' TMM
'i'
i
i
i
1 — — � J
p A W -
O O O O O
s cD w -I O
O O O O
C> O O O O
CD
Rainfall (Inches)
Cn .A W N O
O d O O O
O O O O O O'
0
0 N
m :r
C Q)
m a r
0
n
0
Q m
O
Q
O CD
cQ
CD}
O !E

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
ProjectlSite: MMM - Rocky Point Date: 5/19/2004
Applicant/Owner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Pender
Investigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID: H1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect 1D:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot ID: 13
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator i
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1_ Cyrilla racimiflorin
S
Facw
9, luncus spp.
H
ON
2. Lyonin lucida
S
Facw
10. Woodwardia areola[a
H
Obl
3. Myrica cerifera
S
Fac
11. Osmunda cinnamomen
H
Facw
4. Pinus taeda
T
Fac
12.
S. Rcer rubrum
T
Fac
13.
6. Gordonia lasianrhus
T1S
Facw
14.
7. Persea borbonia
T/S
Facw
15.
8. Clerhro alnifolia
S
Facw
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are
08L, FACW, or FAG (excluding FACU): 100%
Remarks:
Datapoint is iocated in a small depression within a managed pine-piantatiori. Center'uf the depression is
herbaceous, ringed by shrubs (Titi, bays, young red maples) and then lob.lolly pines.
r, Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
4 Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge -
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
•f
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
Y Depth to Free Water in Pit: 14 (in)
k.
. Depth to Saturated Soil: 14 r (in)
+a-
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
Surface has a high moisture content - spongy feel.
PRIMARY INDICA TORS:
Inunoatea
Saturated in Upper 12 inches .
X Water Marks `
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
X Water Stained Leaves
Loca[ Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral rest
Other

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) Y
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 - 13
A
10YR 2/1
Loam
13 - 23
B
10YR 4/2
Sandy loam
23 - 48
10YR 4/2
Sandy clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Sulfldic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils "
Hydric Soil Present? (Y/N) Y
Remarks:
No uncoated sand grains at surface as compared to other surface soils observed in the pine plantation.
WETLAND DETERMINATION (Y/N)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
+` Wetland Hydrology Present? Y
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? Y
Remarks:.
'The data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 4 at monitoring location 13. The location is a
fdepressionai, isolated wetland within the pine plantation.

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 10/27/2004
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Location: 13 Gage ID: NW 4
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours -
Vegetation Community: L onia lucida,
C rilla, grasses
Soil Description:
I 0-12" 10YR 211 Mucky Loam
F 12-24" 10YR 3/1 Loam
Saturated at 12"
Hydrology Indicators: Evidence of pondin
around the gage
F
I
Evidence of Altered. Landscape: None
Other. No subsidence or sink hole development
Reference Photo Description:

O
-
u6tul/04
06/08/04
06/15/04
.06/23/04
06/30/04
C)
07/08/04
07/15/04
K
07122104
D
07/30/04
W06/04
08/14/04 -
2.
08/21/04
08/29/04
r)0
09/05/04-
09/12/04 -
U�
09/20/04'-
09/27/04--
.10/05/04
10/12104 -
10/19/04
1012tt04 -
11/03/04 -
11/11/04 -
11/18/04-
11/26/04 -
. . .
®R
t, mg.
. . . . . . . . . . . . To& i mom w5am,
-1now08 Mllw
1•-"
1, Big 4,
t:WM
M j2r,•6�-
IN
Wg�
MR M, M4
V ME-
I'M Own
'gpffl-
101MOPM-0
All=
'
M.
AM
44 EW-A IM4�v. M�
-Mr
I-E
a-- I I No.
9106
19i
"I M INAMAN M
M
pm�
IF - Em �P, 01"
IN
4: -LE7
®r,
-M
Azl I , r, -
AN,
M
'0 N WE' ffill M
, Rw M val
S�
ft
FIWW
WIN, To
6M
M.
0
- I � -
i
54.
92 t
xm�
I
W1.
"
Mod, t�>.
M,
W a mgg
IN
1
ON
ak�Z fffff-.!
LLY
Or g
U11
4 i g f �r-a� Y!,
I 044-w
I
iN I
!!57=
- - p
- p PO �11 p
aO C) C) C) 0 C) 0 0 C) CD C) CD CD C�
Rainfall (inches)_
p N — p
O 0 6 0
C) O C) 0
0
0

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
"roject Site: MMM - Rocky Point Date: 5/19/2004
pplicantlOwner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Pender
,ovestigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS State: NC.
to Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID: H1
s the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N Transect ID:
i
Is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot ID: 14
Jegetation
)ominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator.
Dominant Plant Species
1. Pinus tneda
T
Fac
9. Liquidambar sryraciflua
2. Acer nibmrn
T
Fac
14. Rea glabra
3. Gordonia lasianthus
TIS .
Facw
11.
1. Vaccinium corvmbosum
S
Facw
12.
5. Myrica cerifera
S
Fac'
.13.
6. Lyonia lucida
S
Facw
14.
7. Clerhra alnifolia
S
Facw
15.
a. Osmunda cinnamomea
H
Facw
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are
OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding
FACU): 100%
Remarks:
LOcatlofl is''sn a thinned row-uf `tile pine plantation -in tract, H1
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
. b
X No Recorded Data Available
_ FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: 0 (in).
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 48 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 48 (in)
' WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
ncrease in soil moisture observed at — 36 inches. V
Stratum Indicator
T Fac
S Facw
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Water Marks
i
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves `
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other
poor hydrology indicators due to the altered landscape

I
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN). Y
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Mansell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-7
A
10YR 2/1
10% uncoated grains
Sandy loam
7 - 14
B
10YR 3/1
Loamy Sand
14 - 28
B
10YR 612
10YR 5/6
10% wl streaking
Loamy Sand
28 - 48
C
10YR 511
10YR 6/6
5%
Sandy loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS -
L Histosol Reducing Conditions _ X Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
j Histic Epipedon X. Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Suifidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 7-
Hydric Soil Present? (YIN) Y
Remarks:
Upper soil surface disturbed; profile taken in the lower third or 'the pine'plantation bed; surface is very dry with uncoaiedl
sand grains
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? N
Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? N
Remarks:
The data point location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 13 at monitoring location 14. The location is not a
wetland due to the disturbed landscape and poor hydrology indicators.

r
A
i
Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 10/27/2004
Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Location: -14 Gage ID: NW 13
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 65OF
Last Rainfall > 48 hours
Vegetation Community:' Pinus faeda,
Persea borbonia, L onia lucida, flex glabra,
Acer rubrum, Osmunda cinnamomea,
r� Morelia cerifera
I
r Soil Description:
0-Y .1 OYR 711 Sandy Loam
3-12" 10YR 3l2 Sandy Loam
12-24" 10YR 6/2 with 20% 10YR 516 mottles
Loamy San
' 24-36" 10YR 7/1 with 40% 10YR 518 mottles
Loamy Sand
Saturation at approximately 28"
I
Hydrology Indicators: None
r
r
Evidence,of.Altered Landscape:- None... .
P
Other: No visual subsidence or sink hole
�r
Reference

06/01/04
06/08/04
_06/15/04
06/23/04
{
L
06/30/04
07/08/04
n
07/15/04
07/22/04
3
07/30/04
08/06/04
i
08/14/04
08/21 /04
08/29/04
CD
09/05/04
r�
ll
3
`D
09/12/04
v
09/20/04
09/27/04
�!
10/05/04
10/12/04
0
10/19/04
n
'
10/27/04
=
n
11/03/04
11/11/04
11 /18/04
11 /26/04
O
O
Water. Level (Feet above MSL)
Q) V OD CO Q
p O O O Q p
aq�,S
V••
-_n�6i
R •�'HrA=�'y�:""`ftF�. �: *:Pi-;Z'.� G3'4Y_'.�`S-'""�_^�i.'� "gyp - �.,•o,G
Sm n--."'�cf y��w�€�. ,�4,A tC•'y' `C
a � ��`/L.�`%�"x•eX'SS-'LF"s�a "'[4..t5.J-�WFL:r�' _ �' '.s
�M-1
`�' _ _ � �.6. 6
Y.}�`
m��C�"��F.e� �j L'�``
,�ti� �a
�•- � i`�'s xa"6c- •� ref
�MEN
aFd
bG
NE
. K#�..'m
_ , _
0-61
`.�4.
��
�� � 's ,_�F� �;c� ,r�'�}�,� "fin:. �i+' .1;� '�• � .,,�4' ,' aG�n��
!�� .. ;
�r��+�
-
,���'Ps
5; :: ..- � ..���� __� 'St � ��c-ai a'i�G.u$ ',
�y����
�'+��Q�:s� �• -o .' a G-?a;5�,.
.
-m-.v.
s
[[ Rate» ,st-xsc.:g11 .
ii�wvk Fa, '-FJ�'��i�i"•_S; �•I. f ''•`J`6. # ib��-� Fi��
—OM, •s = r
r _
c . -rae'rME
.
f'
f S-�3F
IM
rY
aye G
Tip A ate titia�x s a Lx-
,'x� '�-R.�',-_ut _,..LL-�+pp3ai�r4=•.�w�{ha. .aceE.r 1
r'�r #rr�.
n u REV no a r m
�tr �+.ys..��.: �dA9Y�Mt'•$Y5�
�+NEW
l� w
i� r
M w t}��rrE
�•
��
t.
P• a ydm`tl,..... ,R"'7<`I�i 1's
4^P'r ��I .�a'4�{e�
PRE
OEM m. .
WW
oEM
w i M*
�
pia-_gyp
'rb'ST
irk, +-.ri3YyF
_' ��
WNW`
"iL.] k-Ym
7-•F�
�'�-r"T 3... z•a_.. aF�_�2
NOD
3
2 "�f•'Iff�
.,
�"'
1'_,a+'
ei
�'w;:'L:.�
�r�g:��� - �y1�'.s"��
���� ��F� k k
"`xfi`J7 '.�`J$'���'ET�t' Y•��'l' rst v3 �px1.4• .50.3�
r-�w �`-.--imra•se�.s= lz""P" - i' i :{'43`3� Y ,::,. I,...�
sr '0 € `ty f Klix�aa, -1-��s
���_ S r. �v. b'}, =
^.�.1. ��1��5� "'S iG.}.} d"'Y TJ:'C T-,4 ,dam'+�tl'u�i�
EEF.; ,E�'u�%:y r: �n['�e;v„'�L•t� _s_. �.__1c�-L..:Y hF �ci.«. 3..-��v!1A-.r� t`�`�,�P.�a
i
i
- -
Un � - N -
p Q QO O O
-� p 9D V rn
O
O O O O QO
O
Rainfall (Inches)
(ll A W N O
O Q OO O C) CD
Z
m ;®
c -�
G)
O
Q
c
m
n .
ro' -
n
m
m
CD
0 Y
M
CD
C
ao �
O
o
v
e
5�
m

r
r
Jw
DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual
Project/Site: MMM - Rocky Point Date: 5/19/2004
Applicant/Owner: Martin Marietta Materials County: Perider
Investigator: Chad Evenhouse, PWS State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID: H1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) N . Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot ID: 18
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
indicator 1
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus meda
T
Fac
9. Lyonia lucida
5 Facw
2. Acer rubrum
T
Fac
10. Persea borbonia
SfT Facw
3.. Quercus nigra
T
Fac
11.
4. Myricci cerifera _
_ S
Fac
12.
5. flex glabra
S
Facw
13. _
6. Gordania lasianlhus
Sfr _
Facw
14.
7. Liquidambar styraciflua
T
Fac
15.
8. Andropogon capillipes
Fi
FacU
16.
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FACU): 90%
Remarks:
Daia poir;t is located in a cut -over area adjacent to.theone plantation:-.It<appears that the area -is a ridge betwQen
the Swale and the pine plantation.
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X ,No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:.
Depth to Surface Water: NA (in)
= Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 48 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >448 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
Poor hydrology indicators
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
:CONDA,RY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Lipper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data'
Fac-Neutral Test
Other
dam,.
Xy:
az:
0

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Murville Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) .Y
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth
(inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
I 0-6
10YR 211
Loam
6 - 12
10YR 3/1
10YR 5/8
5%
Loam
12 - 26
10YR 512
10YR 5/8
10%
Sandy loam
i 26 - 40
10YR 5/2
10YR 5/6
5%
Sandy loam
40 - 48
10YR 7/1
10YR 5/6
40%
Sandy clay loam
j HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol X Reducing Conditions
E Histic Epipedon X Gleyed or Low -Chrome Colors
Sulfidic Odor Concretions
'i Aquic Moisture Regime. High Organic Streaking in
�. Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (Y/N) Y
:emarks:
i.-- WETLAND DETERMINATION (Y/N)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? N
F Hydric Soils Present? Y
Is this sampling point a Wetland? N
Remarks:
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils -
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in remarks)
The data point.location is at the groundwater monitoring gage NW 3 at monitoring location 1S.

C
6
r
�r Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
f� Quarterly Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
r
Location: 18 Gage ID: NW 3
e ,
Weather Conditions: Sunny - 650F
Last Rainfail > 48 hours
r
E
r
Vegetation Community: Acer rubrum,
Lyonia lucida, flex glabra, Pinus taeda,
Persea borbonia, Lyonia lucida
i
e_ Sail Description:
04" 10YR 311 Sandy Loam uncoated grains
4-14" 10YR 4/2 -Loamy Sand
14-30" 2.5YR 613 with 10% 10YR 518 mottles
Loamy_Sand
r�.
Hydrology Indicators: None
:.
Evidgnce ot?Altered Landscape: None
Other: No visual subsidence or sink hole
Date: 10/27/2004
Inspected By: Chad Evenhouse
Reference Photo Description:

A
0
0
06101 /04
06/08/04
06/15/04
06/23/04
L
06/30/04
07/08/04
fi 07/15/04
07/22/04
7
.07130104
08/06/04
7
08/14/04
08/21 /04
O
n -
o •�U8129/04
Cn CD 09/05/04
N
s]
M 09/12/04
09/20/04
0 09/27/04
10/05/04
z
10/12/04
r
O
n
10/19/04
O'
in
10/27/04
11/03/04
N
11/11/04
11/18/04
1,1 /26/04
Water Level (Feet above M5L)
0 o a o o
0 0 o a o
N N_
O
O O
0 0
WHO
4yt 'i�
�E
rr.+_,�ooyE.is-aa
'aZen .§"-3.
M `��i6e
ate. A
''zs� W
il�e�r
wF �-
. [ � 3�
g#�3}
� "R (�
'r.1-�,%$�-111
'"�„tt."aaY'.""°y+�k�"�tfASC
-.'-i#.i".t
I IF
MAIM Wm
P CD
;��..Wl: i='.Y'w'
J[ `�`,T� - Y 6'F•.y, w
tI rE
r
CT
07
---
KIM
�-
.e
"Gi�.G'
'w.
- e� �
^CM�1����.7 ink4,��"•"��'.='7�-1XCT"`i"�i���4�'�i��.�'i��.�
S�Id.w.SS�'�Y� :"frL34LK���.'�i.�.
UgAW
—I
r v#�
qm ME
cD
VIEWING � �Sa�i 4
aj se
P.
ME—�.a—�r+r»
;��
—is
M� ��-•�
��V'L3.
F � 'S^ 7L�. Rik.+. v �'R�'m' ar'.�-•- .,�.
t:.
._... SP Lg
�n_e'��i=��,
72.
r
i
i
cn oo � rn
U A W N 1 O c, O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O
Rainfall (Inches)
p A W N O
CD0 a o a o
0 0 0 0 0 0
}
C
0
3
O
n
it
n,

ATTACHMENT 3
WETLAND SURVEY: WELLS AND
SLOAN TRACT'
4N,

nNt \I\ Mk� 11
WETLAND SURVEY
WELLS AND SLOAN- TRACT
PENDER COUNTY
NORTH CAROLfNA
SHEET 1 OF 2
LINE
I BEARING
DISTANCE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
UNE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S 5416 56 E
55.88
L86
S 5728 59 E
29.65
L171
S 2821 02 E
37.23
L2
S 42'33 20 E
24.5
L87
S 54'32 31 a E
27.38
L172
S 64'50 01 E
32.20
L3
S 48 34 09 E
46,01
LBS
S 515818 E
20.41
L173
S 82'59 49 E
23.65
L4
S 05'08 44 W
26.95
L89
S 66'05 39 E
17.96
L174
S 88*05*050 E
36.4
L5
S 1420 08' W
20.96
L90
S 62'39 22 E
29.10
L175
S 63'48 18 E
44.36
L6
S 19'38 47 E
36.95
1.91
S 64108490 E
27.79
L176
N 66'41 48 E
29.24
L7
S 28-01 36 E
22.02
L92
S 54'13 57 E
22.00
L177
1 S 79b0'52 E
32.78
L8
S 132 35 E
35.32
L93
N 68*1 6'08w E
27.36
Li 78
1 N 74'13 01 E
27.81
L9
S 11'45 02 E
43,33
L94
S 21 *03 25 E
14.48
L179
1 N 51'31 40 E
20.33
L10
S 11 32 38 E
27.13
L95
N 39'S9 21 E
26.95
L180
N 7423'22w E
27.99
L11
S 3518*05w E
63.56
L96
N 4350 25 E
M.60
L181
S 6822 58 E
21.83
L12
S 002912 E
25.85
L97
N 10 49 53 W
17.3
LL182
S 67'10 37 E
23.62
L13
S 0234 04 W
45.85
L98
N 13'32 03 E
34.36
L183
S 34'55 12 E
19.76
L14
S 06'23 04 E
67,00
L99
N 48'58 44 E
22.62
L184
S 58'46 07 E
28.72
L15
S 4140 38 W
9.21
1.100
S 8516 28 E
33.90
L185
S 05"10 00 W
22.59
L16
N 68'3W460 W
30.03
001
N 52'003 E
23.90
L186
S 43'13 14 W
30.72
L17
N 32*W31f W
32.11
L102
N 64'01 25 E
33.43
L187
S 1126'05W
23.62
L18
N 20"d.WOlw W
106.91
L103
S 76'12 OS E
31.66
L188
S 25'56 57 W
27.78
L19
N 17'12 33 W
69.93
L104
N 87'19 04 W
30.62
L189
S 4227 08 W
7.45
L20
N 05V6'210 W
67.00
L105
S 35'31 03 E
26.56
L190
S 31 *37'530 E
14.84
L21
N 1553 08 W
80.13
L106
S 10'10 42 E
4-4.7W
L191
S 39'46'50 E
30.5
L22
N 1411,02m W
84.49
L107
S 66'17 44 W
25.81
L192
S 13'52 06' E
37.95
L23
N 16 4519 E
16.471
LIDS
S 34'O 41 E
32.93
L193
S 6711 06 E
64.65
L24
N 29IS570 W
28.
L109
S 3628 23 E
12.59
L194
S 65'32'54 E
24.66
L25
N 0825 06 E
26.92
L110
S 08'14 55 E
21.40
L195
N 5235'330 E
12.12
L26
N 48'46 50 E
19.50
L111
S 81 *1415 E
28.40
L196
S 74'36'42 E
22.05
L27
N 81'S5 51 E
39.74
L112
S 20.36 43 E
31.29
L197
S 71'19'52 E
34.55
L28
S 42'4 11 w E
29.46
L113
S 2656 14 E
34.61
L198
S 4320 30 E
45.77
L29
N 28'48 27 E
20.03
L114
N 8430 52 W
24.84
L199
S 15'13'42 E
42.71
L30
N 18'S0 32 W
33.82
L115
N 34'30 31 a E
14.2
1-200
S 08'50 40 W
39.14
L31
S 60'45 22 E
19.39
1-116
N 2934 13 W
40.50
L201
S 26'12 20 W
57.21
L32
N 89'09 05 W
25.38
L117
N 75'S8 59 E
24.54
L202
S 65'15 48 E
13.78
L33
N 462 58 W
57.60
L118
N 86-02 32 E
36.94
L203
S 04'D4 47 E
34.13
L34
N 23'5019 W
22.85
L119
S 64'39 20 E
23.20
L204
S 2354'50 E
57.59
L35
N 03-09 24 W
19.45
L120
S 30'1313 E
34.82
L205
S 69'19 24 E
45.94
L36
S 0213 2 E
19.85
L121
S 5338 0 E
31.75
L206
S 3937 29 E
28.40
L37
N 1623 1.2 E
29.31
L122
S 66''08 29 W
21.24
L207
N 74'38 35 E
69.76
L38
N 30*14 53 E
79.58
L123
S 702 52 5W
28.91
L208
N 81'3 40 E
37.17
L39
N 18'04 02 E
93.257
L124
S 20'45 02 E
45-W
L209
N 8013*24 E
34.00
L40
N 68'514 E
39.04
L125
S 40'05 49 E
28.51
L210
N 6923 33 E
47.41
L41
N 32'43 20 E
19.28
L126
S 39*01 08 E
30.48
L211
N 56'0 47 E
60.01
L42
N 24'58 290 W
27.09
L127
N 22-06 30 E
27.06
L212
N 37100 56 E
42.9
L43
N 0418 22 W
30.36
L128
N 20'94 30 E
30.31
L213
N 11.48 42 E
67.61
L44
N 68MV58w W
32.76
L129
N 09'S0 36 W
22.8f
L214
N 83'38 50 E
29.79
L45
N 015212 E
52.46
L130
N 50'56 42 E
26.94
L215 I
N 66'40'57' E
40.D4
L46
N 20*48*3r E
32.41
L131
S 87'14 36 E
23.9
L2161
S 8627 51 0 E
45.46
L47
N 13'3121 W
42.58
L132
S 3932 02 E
19.85
L217
N 13'49'07 W
60.15
L48
N 02'13 05 W
37.2T
L133
S 28'59 50 E
40.95
L218
N 72*33*40 E
53.22
L49
N 353913 E
36.321
L134
S 2328 43 E
44.1
L219
N 4512 18 E
35.50
L50
N' 52'48 06 E
24.86
L135
S 8823 21 a W
36.69
L220
S 3022 23 E
52.11
LSt
N 051DS39w E
43.84
L136
S 85'34 51 w W
35.
L221
S 12"12 06 E
37.10
L52
N 06'12 40 E
41.52
L137
S 54S1 38 W
23.39
L222
S 7412 1 Ow E
23.03
L53
N 07 59 42 W
3-75"f
L138
N 83-12 35 W
-21.16#
L223
S 80'03 08 E
18.74
L54
N 1221'0 E
60.9
L139
N 2130 31 W
22.55
L224
N 37'12'59 E
28.6
L55
N 062 54 E
44.6
L140
N 39b010 E
16.0
L225
S 12'44 56 E
30.83
L56
N 67'1812 W
27.76
L141
N 72'46 25 E
34.14
7226
S 13'33 32 E
37.13
L57
N 56'45 00 W
39.93
L142
N 58'01 53 E
24.32
L227
S 10'47 55 E
5969
L58
N 03 40 28 W
55.10
L143
S 8814'59 E
39.53
L228
S 54'02 51 E
55.76
L59
N 32*45*08w E
35.83
L144
S 3946 11 W
62-Ilr
L229
S 20'03 11 E
46.52
L60
N 353514 W
42.82
L145
S 2034 38 W
24.88
L230
S 56'38 36 W
38.51
L61
N 37'4316 E
34.02
L148
S 25*39,07 W
2ill
L231
S 23'36 58 E
40.0
L62
N 01'49 E
28.55
L147
S 16*51'47w W
27.33
L232
S 07'08 38 W
50.92
L63
N 10'3210 W
3 . 5
14
N 86'59 12 W
22.52
L233
S 44'39 06 W
52.1
L64
N 2MV087 W
35.11
L149
S wwma W
23.56
L234
N 58'52'20 W-'46.91
L65 •
N ' 73 Ot W
38.48
L150
'S-183 41 W '
'"', '443
L235
N 81'25 06 W
46.82
L66
N 44 42 14 W
2949
•L151-
S 3638 38 E
27.16
L236
N 84'02 38 W
42.1
L67
N 04'31 34 E
3&971
L152
S 03'30 56 E
38.25
L.237
N 18'08 47 W
46.62
L68
N W425F E
42.247
Li53
S 3425 32 E
48.19
L238
N 43-55'1 T E
46.72
L69
N 13'52 20 W
46.1
L154
S 5723230 E
19.88
L239
N 65'00'40 E
41.22
L70
N 37'4 01 E
36•.83
L155
S 40'26 48 W
22.01
L240
N 86'4 12 E
82.11
L71
N 67'11 16 E
37.71
L156
S 66'58 180 W
26.14
L241
S 72'31 01 E
24.29
L72
N 811512 E
45,89
L157
N 6052 54 W
19.58
042
S 7434 27 E
29.36
L73
S 591302Cr E
481.61
L158
N 6915 5 W
25.31
L243
S 66'45 30 E
12.72
L74
N 71'0 25 E
30_05
L159
N 8528 40 W
22.22
L244
S 41'38'52 E
37.12
L75
N 8720 52 E
45-7r
L160
S 86'12 33 W
21.03
L245
S 38*38*27 W
29.48
L76
N 71 15 E
19:51
L161
S 66'45 56 W
30.96
L246
S 67'31 00 W
29.91
L77
N 78'38 39 E
2401,
L162
S 685419 W
27.72
L247
S 8917'23 W
39.55
L78
S 48'Ot 54 E
40-BV
L163
N 88'59 21 w W
23.01
L248
S 09'39 28 W
30.62
L79
S ST3W5r E
26..93
L164
N 3736'430 W
30.30
L249
S 5812 44 E
47.00rl
L80
S 50-16510 E
37.,4
L165
N 7013 42 W
28.16
L81
S 09*3WO6w E
33.46
L166
N 73'46 23 W
25.3
L82
N 8419 48 E
42.'75
L167
S 88'13 42 W
32.:8
L83
S WW44w E
46.74
L168
S 61'47 11 W
35.09
L84
N 77-57p4P W
17.09
Li69
S O 30 W
39.54
L85
50
N 3157 W
13.�01
L170
S 47-16 04 E
34.25
LOCATION MAP
( NOT TO SCALE )
```�t1lNtttNrrpi�
\A CAAGi`-,,,
od
9 c a SEAL
r L-3391 ccF
.� SU �...
100' 50' 0 100'
SCALE IN FEET
!- ! 100PT "
n` HA N 0 VER DESIGN SERVICES, P.
LAND SURVEYORS ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS
319 WALNUT STREET
WILMINGTON, N.C. 28401
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
4142W--0.3-1 dw
0.

WETLAND SURVEY
WELLS AND SLOAN
PENDER COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 2 OF 2
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S 67-11 06 E
64.65
L121
N 06'54 20 W
35.35
L2
S 65 32 54 E
24.66
L122
N 09'1017 W
47.97
L3
N 52'35 '330 E
12.12'
L123
N 40'11 46 W
41.3
L4
36
S 74'42 E
22.05
L124
N 1170*250 W
22.74
L5
S 71'19 52 E
34.55
L125
N 07'5514 W
21.40
L6
S 4320 30 E
45.77
L126
N 3529 23 W
21.82
L7
S 15'13 42 E
42.71'
L127
S 55'0219 W
26.96
L8
S 08'50 40 W
39.14
L128
S 59'52 05 W
24.10
L9
S 26*12'20 W
57.21
L129
S 07'39 38 W
27.72
L10
N 6515 48 W
13.78
L130
S 12 39 08 W
24.49
L11
S 0404 47 E
34.13
L131
S 14'49 48 E
21.68
L12
S 23'54'50 E
57.59
L132
S 000 10 W
45.80
L13
S 69'19 24 E
45.94
L133
S 18'02 51 W
38.35
L14
S 3937 29 E
28.40
L134
S 08'28 46 W
21.73
L15
N 74'38 35 E
69.76
L135
S 1906 43 W
46.46
Lib
N 81 37 40 E
37.17
L136
S 23'38 20 E
17.44
L17
S 80'13 24 W
34.00
L137
S 07'40 27 W
21.37
L18
N 692333m E
47.41
L138
S 27'10 31 E
25.48
L19
N 56'07 47 E
60.01
Li39
N 89'25 24 E
34.15
L20
N 37'00 56 E
42.97
L140
N 33'14 09 E
29.30
L21
N i 1'48 42 E
67.61
L141
N 61'28 25 E
47.18
L22
N 83'38'50 E
29.79
L142
S 3r4W200 E
30.99
L23
N 66'40 57 E
40.04
L143
N 79'S8 21 W
18.22
L24
S 86'27 51 E
45.46
Li 44
N 2511 16 E
31.66
L25
N 13'49 07 W
60.15
L145
N 2106 04 E
29.62
L26
N 72'33 40 E
53.22
L146
N 05'09 59 W
28.03
L27
N 45'1218 E
35.50
L147
N 19-10 33 W
24.77
L28
S 30'22'23" E
52.11
L148
N 18'42 42 E
37.92
L29
S 12'12 06 E
37.10
L149
N 2609 47 W
20.95
L30
S 741210 E
23.03
L150
N 26'42 24 W
43.90
L31
S 8003 08 E
18.74
L151
N 55 39 32 W
14.37
L32
N 37'12 59 E
28.62'
L152
S 66*55'1 7m W
31.20
L33
S 12'44 56 E
30.83
L153
S 74'45 45 W
52.89
L34
S 13'33'32 E
37.13
L154
S 2638 31 a W
25.91
L35
S 10'47'55 E
55.69
L155
S 0138 34 W
22.35
L36
S 5402 51 E
55.76
L156
S 2206 49 W
58.25
L37
S 200311 E
46.52
L157
S 70-15 56 W
31.10
L38
S 5638 36 W
-T8-.5-1-T
L158
N 68"18 24 W
24.75
L39
S 23'36 58 E
40.07
L159
N 37'10 51 W
16.18
L40
S 0708 38 W
50.92
L160
N 1906 56 W
24.98
L41
S 44'39 06 W
52.17
L161
N 05'04 56 W
21.38
L42
S 10'11 48 W
65.93
Li62
N 55'40 49 W
28.71
L43
S 70"1 0'02n W
62.22
L163
N 31'i07 01 0 W
35.08
L44
S 00'36 47 E
52.93
L164
N 13 05 4 W
40.46
L45
S 2633 57 W
23.48
L165
N 28'37 03 E
36.11
L46
S 40 35 07 E
47.46
L166
N 01'4218 E
30.10
1.47
N 44'48 42 W
40.14
L167
N 47'31 32 E
63.6E
L48
N 84'41 35 E
18.30
L168
S 3538 31 E
54.88
L49
S 66'43 52 E
41.75
L169
S 36452 31 E
24.25
L50
S 72'38 46 E
22.11
L170
N 7705 51 E
47.35
L51
N 81'21 34 E
38.63
L171
N 78'42 58 E
18.48
L52
S 48'47 48 W
41.68'
L172
N 5809 52 E
53.32
L53
S 86'18'09 W
7.67
Li 73
S 38'40 54 E
24.00
L54
S 01'16 09 E
44.37
L174
N 24'52 22 W
13.87
L55 I
S 60'42 01 W
15.82
L175
S 44'3611 W
27.88
L56
S 45'57 20 W
44.18
1176
S 03'42 58 E
27.49
L57
S 82 41 16 W
32.86'
L177
S 30'47 39 E
24.36
L58
S 36*3013 W
24.21
L178
N 380810 W
13.72'
L59
N 40'01 38 W
55.99
L179
S 02'27 44 E
36.80
L60
N 82'45 101 E
14.29
L180
S 12'38 29 W
21.47
L61
N 03'54 54 W
23.45
Li81
N 88'5916 W
27.30
L62
N 19'44 05 E
12.18
L182
N 7603 45 W
33.55
L63
N 47'50 52 W
24.76
Li 83
S 52V8*55w W
19.87
L64
S 70.41 58 W
52.09
L184
S 61'548 W
33.94
L65
N 62'49 03 E
26.99
L185
S 19*4511 W
39.87
L66
N 865618 W
28.75
L186
N 4701 0 W
17.66
L67
N 52'41 126 W
48.94
L187
N 672118 W
31.49
L68
N 54*0371 5w W
37.88
L188
S 59'20 23 E
24.19
L69
N 2204 04 W
18.59
L189
S 47'35 24 E
33.25
L70
N 18'52 34 W
46.32
L190
S 70'S6 26 E
32.66
L71
N 09.1013 W
54.32
L191
S 76*IW290 E
34.97
L72
N 75'2727 W
36.63
L192
S 34*5415 E
34.34
L73
N 31'55 51 W
36.26
L193
S 2508 58 E
35.58
L74
N 39'15 25 E
15.31
L194
S 13 35 26 W
33.16
L75
N 27-43 53 W
60.58
L195
S 56'59 3 E
20.43
L76
N 76*51 26w W
34.37
L196
S 85'44 39 E
28.07
L77
N 58'12 44 W
47.00'
L197
S 64'3 08 E
44.34
L78
N 09'39 28 E
30.62
L198
S 35'558 E
38.54
L79
N 89'17 23 E
39.55
Li99
S 77'20 31 W
37.90
L80
N 67'31 00 E
29.91
L200
S 75'32 55 W
33.77
L81
N 38'38 27 E
29.48'
L201
S 73'46 34 W
28.73
L82
N 41*38'.52 W
37.12
L202
S 6312503 WW
35.02
L83
N 66'45 30 W
12.72
L203
N 5505 3S W
25.69'
L84
N 74'34 27 W
29.36
L204
S 7855 56 W
33.68
L85
N 7231 01 W
24.29
L205
N 23'27 38 W
37.86
L86
S 86*4712 W
82.11 #
L206
N 07*4243w W
25.29
L87
S 6500 40 W
41.22
L207
N 49'1215 E
13.83
L88
S 43*5515 W
46.72
L208
S 4316 29 W
26.13
L89
S 1808 47 E
46.62
L209
N 0326 52 W
53.39
L90
S 8402 38 E
42.17
L210
S 100312 E
114.49
L91
S 81'25 06 E
46.82
L211
S 05'10 25 E
72.01
L92
S 58'52 20 E
46.91
L212
S 11'12 50 E
57.36
L93
S 55'55 29 W
66.02
L213
S 00'34'30 W
33.24
L94
S 12'56'03 E
62.27
L214
N 5401 42 E
31.14
L95
S 030719 E
33.591
L215
N 6203 46 W
17.96
L96
S 36'51 1S W
50.63
L216
S 6913 30 E
21.91
L97
S 0005 53 W
36.36
L217
N 622819 E
41.97
L98
S 5302 14 W
27.33g
L218
N 59'22 00 E
18.57
L99
S 26 55 53 W
25.01
L219
N 25'1016 E
46.86
1-100
S 2606 32 W
27.651
L220
N 70*1516 E
28.47
1-101
S 09'14 45 W
36.98
L221
N 64*16'470 E
60.23
L102
S 04'14 42 W
24.90
L222
N 41'57 35 E
30.30
L103
S 0300 55 E
48.24
L223
N 26'12 00 E
28.01
L104
S 1009 08 W
15.47
L224
N 39'12 56 E
65.74
L105
S 18'01 07 W
45.73
L225
N 6106 58 E
31.21
L106
N 67'17 52 E
12.83
L226
N 61'1311 E
42.07
L107
S 28'48 38 E
34.98
L227
N 46'47 51 E
22.59
L108
S 27-31 21 E
11.18
L228
N 1920 41 E
22.85
L109
S 7824 30 E
43.48
L229 I
N 47*5614 E
29.52
L110
S 4301 01 E
29.83
L230 I
N 67'41 22 E
15.63
011
N 01'2311 E
10.93
L112
S 4731 51 E
26.72
L113
S 47'28 56 E
25.83
L114
S 8000 41 E
30.16
L115
S 46.17 50 E
26.14
L116
S 78*07'1 4n E
35.87
L117
N 55'20 30 E
28.32
L118
N 20'50 05 E
29.63
L119
N 461513 aW
38.71
L120
I N 1232 29 W
35.70
TRACE
1
an
Unvo
we
E171,
"'
eo1 at Q00,
002 J
bti 703
UpLAN
e04
sv
tta
A
eo7 �
Leo! Lt57
eft
ato
704
t SS eirV"r E
�RE IM
`� 4-7
r-�
710
711
712
H7
c'� 081
M4 M we
•• 3304 303
306 is 302 •
Sae �s
301
UPLAND
J00 •
v �
z„
2M
2"
�my
!M rw MIS t ty 208
z>b cr•� 203 L1e L17
�.r L16 2M
�'' Lse 225 22s
222
`e\ 22e
22t $ • 231 22e
1Z30
220 00 231t
219 218
234
N er.1e►rr e
Me t"
tE off wo
e07t,�tt�,
ON
90
7s7 t�os �
`,J' �
� sfot
`'ma`s►
Ltd
754 Li93
�•
� no
.-
753
a" �y
e
7112 �
ei�3 '�
911
1000
v UPLAND
v
751
es2 %
UPLAND J 01_
toot
so
�002
lee
�� awto11 ?tom
1010
NO3 •
eeow
`.
�i>• eke 1000
+�
�tlt
t00e t00 Lrle��� 1004
eS1 IJIy� 855 $57 am
100e
toot
eel
fast
21e
21s
214
213
"
w
_ w
2t1 t.
210 8�
200 �.
v
Zoe
207 $
r-
8.
207,#
'mow
204
206
293
204 1
2e2
293 4 27e
2e4 t24 282
2!3 2at M k27 i
J '
274 '
273
NE LAW
2n 1
` 271 '
270 '
IV
L43 2" 1
• *236 UPLAND
2e7
206 '
tie ' r' 265 l'� 263
2p 264 !*9 290 '
• moo, 241 �>ft
e1�242 246 258 250 '
243
UopL/11VD tea
250 p249 2 7
L57
252 >
251
200 and
201
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L231
N 76'5116 E
11.71
L232
N 77'18 54w E
17.59
L233
W--44-0554D E
33.35
L234
S 83'37 59 E
19.74
L235
N 41'22 28 E
23.55
L236
N 23'21 32 E
33.72
L237
N 2351 06 E
26.60
L238
N 50'2144 E
49.63
L239
N 50'14 51 E
35.15
L240
N 45'29 37 E
43.54
L241
S 69'35 27 E
34.13
L242
N 6817 23 W
20.72
L243
N 66'01 08 E
54.54
L244
S 32'35 38 E
32.19
L245
S 75'32 01 E
38.73
L246
S 31'29 03 E
37.48
L247
S 45'47 58 E
28.10
L248
N 6274 41 W
23.18
L249
N 6938 22 E
16.74
L250
05
N 7137 W
61.11
L251
N 80'21 16 W
15.72
L252
N 81'29 46 E
42.48
L253
S 5118 48 W
22.59
L254
N 730315 E
18.97
L255
N 53*1218 E
41.60
L256
N 60'3915 E
13.27
L257
N 72'44 52 E
31.05
L258
S 44'17 02 W
14.77
L259
S 69'5315 E
29.90
L260
N 70'21 50 E
14.17
L261
S 58'49 23 E
16.98
L262
N 62'18 05 E
40.41
L263
S 73'43 35 E
29.94
L264
S 89'40 54 E
70.34
L265
S 70'35 421E
35.13
L266
N 7538 33 E
49.97
L267
S 85*2017 E
48.64
L268
N 61'522 E
22.81
L269
N 520718 E
47.98
L270
N 87 53 E
35.23
L271
S 84'30 04 E
32.74
L272
N 4905 34 E
25.81
L273
S 7220 21 E
27.86
L274
S S6'5519 W
13.01
L275
N 44'59 07 W
21.16
L276
S 25'30 00 E
9.72
L277
S 40 091 E
69.5
L278
S 50'32 47 E
30.89
L279
S 8901 3 E
25.44
L280
S 87'3815 E
47.83
L291
S 69'20 21 E
29.97
L292
S 03'59 23 E
43.23
L293
S 160 36 W
29.83
L294
N 56'10 003 W
42.22
L295
N 11'4915 E
60.12
• Ile GEORGIA PAanc CORP.
M.B. 17 M 12
�.� `r�jvlw'1�
or U
100, 50, 0 100�
• SLE CANV FEET
HA N 0 VER DESIGN SERVICES, P.
LAND SURVEYORS ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS
319 WALNUT STREET
WILMINGTON, N.C. 28401
PHONE- [phone]
FAX. • [phone]
4142W-03-2. JW
�5'
103 _
777
77-
.. / - 1` r

1
' �
F
92 1

M' Cd
W ^
a .
as
Nr,
CUR'
1
i
LEGEND
E.C.M. =
E.I.P. _
I.S. = I
NOTES,
CALVIN F. WELLS
PLAT FOR
AND DAVID Rl -,Ijf)AN JR,
ROCKY
POINT
TOWNSHIP
PENDER
COUNTY
NORTH
CAROLINA
1.
SURVEYED IN SEPTEMBER OF 1995.
2.
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL.
3.
AREAS COMPUTED BY D.M.D.
4.
ALL BEARINGS ARE N.C. GRID PER M.B. 17 PG. 12.
5.
FOR REFERENCE SEE MAP BOOK 17 PAGE 12.
6.
BOUNDARY LINES FROM POINT A-B ARE ALONG THE CENTER OF OLD
STRAWBERRY ROAD.
-777 r' ; r ;
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCAL£
tN.C. 210
S.R. 1517

■❑
Technical Memorandum
Modified Pumping Plan
Rocky Point Quarry
Pender County,- NC
February 10, 2004
Prepared for:
Martin Marietta Materials
Raleigh, North Carolina
©KiHey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2004
E=5
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
E C E i V.ED
FEB 1 1.2004
PROJ 0 DWQ

Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
T e c h n i c a I M e m o r a n d u m
Date: February 10, 2004
Project: MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES, Rocky Point, NC
Subject: Modified Pumping Plan
Background
Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) has been operating the Rocky Point Quarry under a mining
permit since 1983 and a NPDES permit since the rules were established. A condition of the
NPDES permit indicates that should there be a potential to affect wetlands adjacent to the
operation, that pumping plans that require alternatives to pumping for three days and ceasing
pumping for seven days need approval from NCDENR. MMM has managed dewatering of the
pit through an alternative pumping regime since its inception. That is the operation has required
continuous pumping in order to mine in the dry. As the mine has expanded, questions on
potential wetlands to the east of the mine (in the direction of proposed expansion) and in the areas
approved in the mining permit necessitated the evaluation of the pumping plan. MMM has
prepared an alternative pumping plan for NCDENR review and approval.
This modified Pumping Plan for the Rocky Point Quarry is presented to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality (DWQ) as part o1'
MMM's efforts to comply with NPDES requirements for operation of the mine at the Rocky
Point Quarry in Pender County. The dialogue between Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA),
representing MMM, MMM, and DWQ regarding the Pumping Plan has been a process of
investigation, analysis, and modification of the Pumping Plan as new information has evolved
and the project has conformed to the status of regulatory requirements for the project.
MMA has proposed expansion of the quarry eastward to continue mining operations, and is in the
process of meeting Section 404/401 water quality permit requirements for the proposed
expansion. The determination of jurisdictional wetlands through the US Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) has been a separate, however concurrent process through the evolution of the

RockY Point Quarry Pumping Plan
2/10104
Pumping Plan, and is applicable to the Pumping Plan to the extent only of identifying wetlands
areas which may or may not be influenced hydrologically through dewatering of the mine.
To address the issues of the NPDES permit conditions, Pumping Plan, and wetland regulations,
KHA and MMA met with DWQ staff in early 2002 to discuss the monitoring approach of
adjacent wetlands, and had follow-up meetings to clarify the methodology and to determine the
near -surface (wetland) hydrology, and deeper aquifer hydrogeology of the site. This groundwater
monitoring component of the Pumping Plan was established through meetings with DWQ and
updated through the process of implementing the monitoring. A Technical Memorandum (dated
May 9, 2002) was submitted to Mr. Rick Shiver, DWQ to document the monitoring methodology.
Subsequent correspondence was provided to DWQ (letter dated July 10, 2002) to clarify the
monitoring locations and figures included in the Technical Memorandum. A letter from Mr.
Shiver dated July 17, 2002 stated that DWQ approved of the monitoring approach, locations, and
methodology.
Groundwater monitoring gages (deeper gages, and near -surface gages) were in stalled in the
summer -fall of 2002, as well as topographic survey of drainage features, soil delineation and
profile descriptions, pump/discharge calibrations, and installation of an on -site rain gage. A
Technical Memorandum (dated November 6, 2002) was submitted to DWQ to provide an update
on the field efforts, gage installation, and preliminary data collection from the monitoring gages.
A meeting between KHA, MMM, and DWQ was held on December 13, 2002 to specifically
discuss the site history and "Drainage Chronology" of the mine operation (i.e. pre-existing
drainage ditches and pumping discharge locations), and the implications for discharge locations
and pre-existing drainage networks in place for timber management purposes.
A Technical Memorandum dated April 30, 2003 was submitted to DWQ to update the status on
the monitoring plan and data collected to -date. The Technical Memorandum was discussed at a
status meeting between KHA, MMM, and DWQ on July 2, 2003. At the meeting, KHA provided
updated monitoring gage data and preliminary observations on the stratigraphy of the site, and its
hydrogeology. The following are meeting notes from that meeting regarding the hydrogeology of
the site:
"The meeting initiated with a sununaty hY Bruce Cutright. KHA on h1.111rogeology of the site
and a summarization of the deeper groundwuter monitoring gages. Field investigations and
2

Rocky Point Quarn, Pumping Plan
2110104
groundwater monitoring data collected over the past nine months lead KHA to believe that
there is cm impermeable%semi-impermeable layer approximately 10 to 12 feet from the ground
surfirce that separates the groundwater regime oJ' the site into a sur./icial aquifer, and a
deeper aquifer. The surJicial aquifer is predominated by climate and precipitation -
evapotranspiration inputs and outputs. The deeper aquifer is affected by the pumping and
dewatering from the mine, and based on the dula collected to date, is believed to have cur
influence of approximately 1,300 feet to 2,300 feet east from the mine.
The dewatering is not c ffecting the surJicial uqu{'fer excepl for the area immediately adjacent
to the mine. Approximating the mine as a very deep ditch using the DRAINMOD model (more
on the model later), it is estimated that the influence of the ditch qI' the sieficial aquifer
through subsurface drainage is approximately 700 feet from the mine. Also, dewatering of
the deeper aquifer Wray have some influence on the surJicial aquifer, but only during extended
drought conditions (considering that the component of deep seepage across the impermeahle
clew laver is a minor portion of the overall water hudget of the strrfrcial aquifer tinder normal
conditions). Sink holes are likely localized areas where there may he a discontinuity in the
impermeable clay lover. Mr. Shiver agreed that the marine clav ("marl" or " gumho) is
likely continuous in that area and that sinkholes associated with discontinuities in the
substnface layer are likely to have only localized affects on the surJicial aquifer.
The monitoring gage data were presented (updated through end ofJtme 2003) and referenced
during the discussion of the groundwater regime ol'the site. Danny Smith and Rick Shiver
requested that the updated dater he provided (in color) to Them after the meeting. "
Action items from the July 2003 meeting were that KHA would continue to monitor gages
through the fall of 2003 to complete data collection through the grossing season to observe the
full hydroperiod cycle. Once the monitoring period was complete, KHA was to prepare the
modified Pumping Plan to address the results of the monitoring efforts. In preparation of the
Pumping Plan, KHA requested an additional meeting with DWQ in November of 2003 to discuss
the preferred alternative for the Pumping Plan prior to submittal.
That meeting between KHA, MMM, and DWQ was held on January 9, 2004, and the following
Pumping Plan is prepared considering the monitoring data, modeling, site assessment and
analysis, and agreed to methodology through cooperation with DWQ and the Corps through the
evolution of this project.
3

Rocky Point Qurr;y Pumping Plan
2110104
Approach
The preferred alternative Pumping Plan is prepared with the intent to protect wetland areas
adjacent to the mine from drainage influence of the mine wall to the surficial aquifer. It was
presented to DWQ that based on the observed stratigraphy of the site, and supported with
monitoring gage data, the hydrogeology of the site is separated into two systems: the surficial
hydrology, and the deeper aquifer.
A preconceived notion, based on previous discussions between MMM, KHA and the agencies, of
the site was that there were extensive wetland areas adjacent to the mine and that these wetland
areas were hydrologically influenced (sufficient to remove wetland hydrology criteria) through
pumping and dewatering of the mine pit. The monitoring program and initial discussions
regarding the Pumping Plan were initiated under this understanding. These potential wetland
areas were identified on a broad scale through a site visit with the Corps to establish monitoring
locations to initiate the monitoring program. Through subsequent detailed site assessment by
KHA and field verification by the Corps, it was determined that much of the adjacent areas are
significantly drained and influenced through ditching and forestry land management activities and
do not constitute jurisdictional wetlands. These activities existed prior to site disturbance and
dewatering associated with the mine, and land management for timber production has continued
on the adjacent properties. Documentation of the extent of wetlands and the site history
(Drainage Chronology) were previously provided to DWQ.
In summary, the goals of the Pumping Plan are threefold:
I. Create a hydrologic barrier to subsurface drainage from the eastern parcels to the
proposed mine limits.
2. Offset surficial aquifer drainage on depressional wetlands in G I (west of the forest road)
to be avoided as the mine is expanded into G l and G2.
3. To redirect a portion of the dewatering discharge currently directed to Strawberry Branch
to the drainage way east of the mine between H l and H2 per agreements with the
adjacent property owners.
Therefore, with more accurate site information and supporting hydrologic data, the Pumping Plan
approach was modified to address the drainage influence of the mine wall on the surficial aquifer
only, and which meet the goals outlined above. Controlled drainage in the roadside ditch (west of
4

Rocky Point Quarry Pumping Plan
2110104
the f-orest road) between G I IG2 and H 11H2 is proposed to create a hydrologic barrier to
subsurface flow in the surficial aquifer by maintaining a water elevation in the ditch and driving
head such that drainage influence of the mine would be limited to the area between the forest road
and the east of the mine. That is, the mine drainage influence in the surficial aquifer is to be
limited to no further east than the existing forest road. In addition, to offset surficial aquifer
drainage to wetlands in G 1 (avoided wetland areas that exist west of the forest road in G 1), the
outlet culvert under the forest road between GI and G2 will be modified (raised to an elevation of
16.00 feet MSL) in order to raise water table elevation in G 1, and to supply hydrology in the
depressional wetlands of G 1.
In addition to supplying hydrology to the depressional wetlands of G I and creating a hydrologic
barrier for drainage from 1-12, MMM has an agreement with adjacent property owners to the East
of the mine that discharge will be maintained through the duration of mining operations in G l and
G2 at the modified culvert outlet in order to supply hydrology to off -site tracts to the East. This
discharge will be redirected from the current discharge at Strawberry Branch. Approximately 113
of the current discharge will be redirected to the modified outlet.
The following figures are included for interpretation of the proposed Pumping Plan:
Figure 1: Rocky Point Quarry Mite Map
The mine map is the most recent, approved mine map submitted to the North Carolina Division of
Land Resources (DLR) in September 2002. The Mine Map shows the location of the existing
sump locations and discharge outfalls. Outfall 001 is located in the Southwest portion of the
mine (gray shaded area) and discharges to the South of the mine. Outfall 002 is located in the
Northeast portion of the mine (gray shaded area) and currently discharges north to Strawberry
Branch. The proposed Outfall (shown as Outfall 000) is located at the 002 sump however; it
splits the pumping discharge and directs flow east to the roadside ditch along the forest road. It is
intended that the roadside ditch will be improved with water control structures installed
(discussed below). It is proposed that the split of flow will be 113 of the current pumping volume
at Outfall 002 to be redirected to the new outfall location. The quantity of 1/3 discharge is an
agreed -to quantity per the request of the adjacent property owners. Recalibration of the pump
discharge was performed by MMM and submitted to DWQ at the July 2003 status meeting.

Roclrn Pain! Quarry Paunpin,, Plena
2110104
Figure 2: Monitoring Gage Location 11ap
This figure is the same figure that was submitted to and approved by DWQ in July 2002 in
Finalization of the groundwater monitoring program. The figure shows locations of the
piezotneters (1-ft depth), shallow monitoring gages (3-ft depth), overburden gages (15-ft depth),
and deeper aquifer gages (approximately 30-ft depth). Also, designations of the Parcels G 1, G2,
I -I 1, and H2 are shown.
Figure 3: Pumping Plan Mop
This Figure shows the proposed location of the pumping discharge pipe/ditch, energy dissipater,
controlled drainage ditch (western roadside ditch between G1/G2 and H 1I1-12 parcels),
approximate normal pool footprint at the modified culvert outlet, and relocated shallow water
table monitoring gages. In addition, the figure shows the jurisdictional wetlands in G I and G2,
both those proposed to be impacted through mine expansion, as well as avoided wetlands in G1.
Note the relocated shallow monitoring gage locations are those gages which are proposed to be
moved as the mine expansion removes monitoring locations 1 and 9.
Figure 4: G11G2 Topography and Moclifiecl Outlet
This figure is a lager scale view of the modified outlet/culvert location under the forest road and
the proposed footprint of the normal pool. This footprint represents an approximation of
delineation of the 16.00-ft contour in G I/G2. The area of ponded, open waters will be mainly in
the ditches. It is estimated that maintaining a ponded area at 16.00 MSL through pumping will
maintain saturation within the upper 12 inches of the depressional wetland areas (determined by
the Corps) for sufficient consecutive days during the growing season to meet Corps wetland
hydrology criteria. Note: the delineation of the inundated area is approximated from elevations
developed through photogrammetry. The final footprint extent may change based on actual site
conditions.
Figure 5: Pre -Mine Surficial Drainage Cross Section
This figure shows the historical drainage influence of the roadside ditches in G IIG2 and H l /H2.
The extent of the drainage ditch influence is presented based on the results of DRAINMOD
hydrologic modeling analysis performed for the Corps' determination of jurisdictional wetland
areas in G 1 and G2. The stratigraphy shown in the cross section is that observed through
installation of the deeper aquifer monitoring gages, as well as observation of the mine wall (i.e.
observation of the marine clay layer as a continuous stratigraphic unit).

Rocky Point Quarn, Pumping Phin
2110104
Figure h: Proposed Surficial Druinoge Cross Section (without Controlled Drainage)
The drainage influence of the mine to the surficial aquifer is approximated by applying the same
methodology and parameter assumptions for determination of the drainage influence of the
ditches approved by the Corps. Essentially, the mine wall is modeled as a deep ditch dug to the
depth of the impermeable clay layer. Note that consideration of a buffer and access road around
the mine wall, ditch widths, road width, and drainage influence of the eastern roadside ditch, the
drainage influence of the mine determined through modeling is approximately the same distance
in H2 as pre -mine drainage influence from the ditches.
Figure 7: Proposed Surficial Drainage Cross Section (with Controller! Drainage)
This figure shows the approximated drainage influence of maintaining a water depth and
hydraulic head in the western roadside ditch through water control structures. The intent is that
the ditch will function as a recharge of the surficial aquifer and reduce the drainage influence of
the mine to the area between the ditch and the mine by creating a hydrologic barrier to subsurface
flow from H2 towards the mine. Note that the relocated shallow water table monitoring gages are
installed to monitor the water table profile of H2 from the roadside ditch to evaluate the boundary
of wetland hydrology in H2.
Monitoring and Contingency
The groundwater monitoring program initiated in 2QQ2 will continue through mining operations
in G1 and G2 except for locations l and 9 which will be removed through expansion of the mine.
The removed shallow monitoring gages will be relocated as shown in Figure 3 along a transect
perpendicular to the roadside ditch in H2 and online with the monitoring location 7. The shallow
water table monitoring gage data in location 7 has shown that wetland hydrology criteria has been
met in areas of 1-12 through the monitoring period to date, and it is proposed as a control wetland
to compare to the additional gages to be installed in H2 once the mine is expanded. Based on the
data to date and DRAINMOD analysis, it is believed that the control wetland at location 7 is
beyond drainage influence of the mine and drainage ditches under normal climate conditions.
The rain gage located in G2 was vandalized after installation. The gage will be replaced in an
appropriate protected area onsite. In the interim, daily manual rainfall readings have been

Hocks Point Quan-v Pumping Plan
2110104
collected at the scale house at the quarry. Rainfall data collection will continue through the
monitoring period.
Pumping volume and discharge locations will continue to be monitored and documented in status
reports per this Pumping Plan.
If after one growing season under normal climate conditions, monitoring data indicates that
drainage influence sufficient to remove wetland hydrology (per Corps hydrology criteria),
extends beyond the 500-ft influence of the roadside ditch in H2, and is attributable to the mine
dewatering, then an alternative pumping plan will be developed in cooperation with DWQ and
through guidance by the Corps as to additional (as needed) monitoring locations.
END
H: /PN/O 11185 010/Teclr_menro_punrpijigplart_ 2-10-04_Fuurl. due

►—I
u
Fill
Fl✓ir'N@.Lt4 ntQ+G >b M I6r M ifJu�d1FA
NOTES.
• Oyerburdea a h.cYlllled info pir
Ern.w.—o ial—mg P'l-11.-1 ar
difening all d...S. -4 rumrrb.ek -4-0 Pls.
• Adju prWP y owner Takeo fi— MS Survey
or W.IIVSI..o Tncr,
SCALE : I" = f 200'
0 6W 1200 2400
,:n..c...wn cum. >PrrwN•M1,•••�•'• IL1SLQgeaY3{GS�S.Sla[ srar sa-+m
CC" --=�
WAR
Approved by Land Quality
�D
Ptll}tlP aPblIPA.y � — — � MNE
0
MOH!® TC w
on September 13, 2002
"""'RAL�'g'"a
SEOT! �
1Sr..re M�
nT1MiNEO
ioTUNm EauTs
.auto soar
��
MINE MAP
smm�uw.
MT.OAo ®
ROCKY POINT QUARRY
P£NDER COUNTY, N.C.
du„QUAkRYr.
v e
ROCKY POINT QUARRY
a wava
Rocky Point Quarry
Martin Marietta Materials Pumping Plan
M
Figure 1
Rocky Point Quarry Wetlands delineation shown has been superceded
Mine Map since the filing of the mining permit map.
ar.a+e.Ha ...ssimxw
0

Z1.
20
i-6
X
21.10
x
0 23.20 0
-� x 21.20
�- Lr
.10
20
za II
20.66
X
20
NOTES. 1) Accuracy Specifications
a. Contours - Ninety (90) percent of the elevations determined from the sotid
line contours of this topographic map has an accuracy with respect to
true elev alion of one -halt 1112) contour interval or better and the remaining ten
(101 percent of such elevations are not in error by more than one contour
interval. In densely wooded areas where heavy brush or tree cover fully obscures
the ground and the contours are shown as dashed lines. they have been plotted as
accurately as possible from the stereoscopic model, while making full use of
spot elevations obtained during ground control surveys and all spot elevations
measured phatogrammetrically In places where the ground is visible.
2) This map was compiled by Landair Surveying, Inc. using photograrnmetric methods.
Contours portrayed as dashed or broken lines represent areas of dense vegetation
and should be considered approximate. This map has not been verified.
Prior to use as a basis for designlconatruction, it should be field verified.
Legend
® Jurisdictional Wetlands -Not Impacted
Jurisdictional Wetlands -Impacted
Ponding Area-16' Elevation
0 Existing Mine Area
Proposed Mine Area
0 100 200 400 600
Peet
106
Cmn "r.- .
21.5
20.8
20.20
19.20
X
21.60
Y
20.36
20.78
X
i
18.79
X
7.45
18.56
X
•75
x
' C
19.5
`_10
19.90
�. zoXsa ��-tea.:-,��z.zo . _._. -�- ----
_........-.__r-......... ._.�,..,v,_...... x .._.. za
- 20
17.18 -15.73 16.2
X 4�-°
17.5F
X
6.50
V
Modified CulvertlOutlet
16.54 i 15.
X 1j,9 . i u
iSSy{x
}
7
F
r
#1 es
O
'.64 17.83 18.26
X
16.90
X
16.23
i,
x41�
19.35 19.24 18.88 1?�8.31 17,
X X X X
i
" 1
21 . 3.Q
r X
Rocky Point Quarry
Martin Marietta Materials Pumping Plan
f 0`
011185010
Figure 4
G11G2 Topography and Wetlands based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Modified Outlet Jurisdictional Determination dated 11117/03
A&

Locations of the installed monitoring gages, shown
here, are consistant with the proposed locations
shown in Figure 6, submitted July 10, 2002, 7
The location symbol, previously shown as 0 , was
changed to the call -out symbol shown here to be able
to show more detail of the monitoring location_
PLY
Active Mine AreaAV'
+ Location 9
i
.� Rain Gage
F2
,
F1
Location 1
Location A
Figure 6: Ground
Kimley-Horn Water Monitoring
nd Associates, Inc. Gage Locations
.a'w/��r^_.Sri.wua.�.��aAJa.�•�v,.wanwwP••W,...: ...
�M
r .w.�fns+r
. ay. 3 a101
E z F I rtz „
rerrs r�.•waw...rwx�r
r•rir. MF.T.]M w., A�M.i.Ir
Location 2
MO
+ i\ _J%
1
�4
AL
Location 5
Active Mine Area Rain Gage o ShAk 'v INtA
Cut Lines • Stream Gage o
Q) Study Area o Piezometer o Deep well
O Adjacent
Martin Marietta Materials
V .�
1185010
• Locattiionn 8
Partners
Location 7
Location 3
N 600 1.200
Feet
Not to scale
Figure 2
Rocky Point Quarry Pumping Plan Monitoring Gage Location Map
(as submitted to DWQ)
z *"Property is portion of
A 780-acre parcel, which
also includes study area
parcels F1. F2, G1. G2
H1, H2, and portions of
the mine area,
t i
� t
i it
^4 I
,
. t
*►
��i .. 3
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Rocky Point Expansion:
" ,Monitoringln
Color Infrared Aenals Flown spring 1998

Install energy
dissipation structure
Install water level control structures
in roadside ditch (west side of forest
road) as needed to maintain 24"
depth at each structure
Minimum 150' undisturbed
buffer between forest road
W a Minimum of 50' buffer between mine and mining area
wall and Jurisdictional wetland areas G
S
Legend
mv■ g*tee Ditches \���♦
D Jurisdictional Wetlands -Not Impacted
, L_ IMaintain discharge to drainage
p' Jurisdictional Wetlands -Impacted �' �j�
— '��F , �`. � ,� way during mine operation per
Ponding Area-16' Elevation j ��+� �. �_�
agreements with adjacent
Existing Mine Area ����*i!�!�!�!��e���e�i property owners
Proposed Mine Area OFA
Drainage Ditch Zone of Influence'
13 I �!•r�
Discharge Pipe/Ditch
I) Raise culvert elevation
Existing Monitoring Wells C ` to 16.00 ft. MSL to detain flow
. I'I Proposed Monitoring Wells
Note: Zone of Influence where
wetland hydrology criterion is
removed due to the drainage of I
the roadside ditch in H1 and H2.
800 i
Cam ' Rocky Point Quarry Pumping Figure
umpngure 3 Map
Martin Marietta Materials ^� Pumping Plan Wetlands based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Jurisdictional Wetlands Map Jurisdictional Determination dated 11117/03
•O M \MYYN� Y�Gw��M0411M
�dv/1/l Mw Yw��WYn� Yr R� '
Kkr�YwW stiM�wssw�rwC�UwV>Mw�s.~aRw+ra�wnrsw�a w�A an.r NA�Mar.IW
Of1185010

-- - WATER TABLE
UNSATURATED ZONE
(PROPOSED MINE EXPANSION DRAINAGE INFLUENCE
WITH CONTROLLED DRAINAGE IN ROADSIDE DITCHES)
200'--25' -50'
ROAD
25'
500'
200'
N10'-12'
\\\-WATER LEVEL
SURFICIAL SANDS.` MONITORING
,. i A 2Q 3Q G y � GES
VARIES :- =.=- - - - - _L�IARIN.E�-&Y=-----:::
(MINE AREA)
(PROPOSED)
SANDS/CLAYS
M ES N I= `, f .,; ..•'-.: ryy /y \-.- . f .. - / Vyy `_
G�I1 �R
Tones Cams
Jrnrr 5. e10M
G2
Martin Marietta Materials
SANDS
Rocky Point Quarry
Pumping Plan
H2
Figure 7
Proposed Surficial Drainage
Cross Section (with
controlled drainage)

Q WATER TABLE
/I UNSATURATED ZONE
--`-� (PRE -MINE DRAINAGE INFLUENCE)
SANDS
G2' I H2
Rocky Point Quarry Figure 5
a Martin Marietta Materials Pumping Plan Pre -Mine Surficial Drainage
Cross Section
JawryS, hi'aa 1IIIIr� '\�/ `,
�n w�ncmr�vraxym �mmea Rn�nc.�n.ev�v��l-a.wembonrmin �.IonVbn-➢mo rr�In%6n.mv
011185010
�Nf^Gn �+Vm ric vsw;aMs, q.MG

WATER TABLE
UNSATURATED ZONE
(PROPOSED MINE EXPANS4ON
DRAINAGE INFLUENCE)
N200' -25' -50' r 25' -500'
ROAD
77-
'J � 5, ,.�, ���`' � • ..�j..' /;' it �.:.�•.�� �-
N10'-12, �.
SURFICIAL SANDS.'
VARIES , � �I#��E��-:"�.�.
1 i-1 i
(MINE AREA)
(PROPOSED)
SANDS/CLAYS '
� Lk�1P�Yre2n nr��on%PmY¢�IJ�rv4iaPnP•RF�MPn{6.^'R
I\ wT wR'Uc
1�5�
G2
Martin Marietta Materials
SANDS
Rocky Point Quarry
Pumping Plan
H2
Figure 6
Proposed Surficial Drainage
Cross Section (without controlled
drainage)
011185010