NCG020152_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160907

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO. I /V C&UUOI5�
DOC TYPE [9'HI5TORICAL FILE
0 MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE ❑ &0909
YYYYMMDD

AP_
Environmental
Quafi£y
September 7, 2016
JOHN TIBER], PRESIDENT MID -ATLANTIC DIVISION
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
2710 WYCLIFF ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607
Dear Permittee:
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
searrary
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Jamestown Quarry
Guilford County
Department of Environmental Quality staff from the Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of Ready Mixed Concrete, Co. — High Point, on August 24, 2016 for
permits and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Management
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at
your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and
regulations at the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact Charles Gerstell at (704)
235-2144 or Charles.Gerstell(r ncdenrgov. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
DEMLR Inspection Report
cc: DAQ WSRO Files
DEMLR WSRO Files
DWR WSRO Files
DWM WSRO Files
State of North Carolina 1 Environmei;tal Quality
Kinston -Salem R giwr of Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road. Suite :300 I Winston-Salem, North Caro[4na 27105-7407
336 776 %00 T 1 336 776 9797 F

14
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
Inspection Report
Date: 09/01 /2016
Facility Data
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - Jamestown Quarry
5725 Riverdale Drive
Jamestown, NC 27282
Lat: 35d 57.9000m Long: 79d 55.2100m
SIC: 1423 / Crushed And Broken Granite
NAICS: 212313 / Crushed and Broken Granite Mining and Quarrying
Contact Data
Facility Contact
Authorized Contact
Technical Contact
Dennis Cobb
John Tiberi
Jay Nivens
Plant Manager
Division President
Sr. Environmental
[phone]
[phone]
Engineer
[phone]
Comments:
Inspector's Signature -
Date of Signature- September 7, 2016 RS
Total Actual emissions in TONSIVEAR:
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - Jamestown Quarry
NC Facility ID 4100127
CountyIFIPS: Guilford/081
Permit Data
Permit 04281 / R19
Issued 2/25/2016
Expires 7/31/2018
Classification Small
Permit Status Active
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program Applicability
SIP
NSPS: Subpart 000
Compliance Data
Inspection Date 08/24/2016
Inspector's Name Charles Gerstell
Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code FCE
On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
* HAP
2012
3.40
---
---
---
---
1.30
---
2007
5.23
---
2.49
---
Five Year Violation History: None
Date Letter Type Rule Violated
Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None
Date Test Results Test Method(s)
II
* Hiehest HAP Emitted [i
Violation Resolution Date
Source(s) Tested

Permitted Emission Sources:
Emission
Source ID
Emission Source Description
Control
System ID
Control System
Description
Non -Metallic Mineral Processing Plant, with a rated primary crushing capacity of 840 tons per
hour, utilizing water suppression with no other control device, including:
ES -Crush f7 Crushing Operation
N/A- vY4- -NIA
ES -Screen :J _ Screening Operation
NI/A F NIA
ES -Convey € Conveying Operation
NIA N/A
Insignificant / Exempt Activities:
Exemption
Source of
Source of Title V
Source
Regulation
TAPS?
Pollutants?
1-Tank I - diesel fuel storage tank (10,000-gallon
capacity) _ _ _ _
2Q .0102
(c)(1)(D)(i)
I -Tank 2 - diesel fuel storage tank (I0,000-gallon
capacity)
I -Tank 3 - gasoline storage tank (3,000-gallon
2Q .O102
capacity) and dispensing operation GACT CCCCCC
{c)(1)(G)
`•
i
1-Tank 4 - 10-weight oil storage tank (1,000-gallon
capacity)
1-Tank 5 - used oil storage tank (1,000 gallon -capacity)
1-Tank 6 - lubricating oil storage tank (500-gallon
capacity)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Yes
Yes
t-Tank 7 - lubricating oil storage tank (500-gallon
capacity)
i
-
2Q .0102
(c)(1)(13)(i)
I -Tank 8 - hydraulic oil storage tank (500-gallon
capacity)
i
I -Tank 9 - hydraulic oil storage tank (500-gallon
capacity)
I -Tank 10 - 15w-40 motor oil storage tank (500-gallon
capacity)
-Tank 11 - 50-weight motor oil storage tank (500-
gallon capacity)
Introduction:
On August 24, 2016, Charles Gerstell, NCDEQ Multimedia Inspector, contacted Mr. Jay Nivens, Sr. Environmental
Engineer, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., for an announced multimedia compliance inspection of the Jamestown Quarry.
The facility was previously inspected by Mr. Stephen Helms, former Environmental Specialist of DAQ-WSRO on February
4; 2015, and reported the facility appeared to be operating in compliance with applicable Air Quality standards and
regulations at that time. All IBEAM contacts were confirmed to be accurate.

Safety Equipment:
Site -specific personal protective equipment includes safety shoes, safety glasses, hard hat and reflective vest. Hearing
protection is required near any operating equipment. The facility has installed parking curbs in many of the parking spaces at
the administration building, making wheel chocks unnecessary. However, when parking elsewhere within the quarry, wheel
chocks are required when leaving any vehicle unattended. All visitors are required to attend a ten-minute safety orientation.
No unusual or unexpected safety hazards were encountered during the inspection.
Applicable Regulations:
Applicable regulations listed in the air permit include Title 15A NCAC, Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0501, 2D .0510, 2D .0521,
2D .0524 (40 CFR 60, Subpart 000), 2D .0535, 21) .0540, 2D .1806, and 2Q .0309. An exempt source at this facility is
subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart CCCCCC, which is not listed in the permit. This facility is not required to implement a risk
management plan (RMP) in accordance with regulation 40 CFR 68, Section 112(r), because they do not purchase, produce,
use or store any of the regulated chemicals in quantities above the threshold limits in the rule. However, the General Duty
clause contained in this rule requires all facilities to exercise safety precautions when handling hazardous materials.
Geographic Data:
Geographic data were checked using online orthographic resources and no corrections to the information in Division database
were required.
Discussion:
This facility is engaged in quarrying, crushing, and screening of granite stone for the construction industry. It typically
operates Monday through Friday, 10 hours/day, for approximately 40 weeks/year. The administration and sales offices are
open from 7:OOam to 5:00pm. Mr. Nivens provided the inspector with a current flow diagram and equipment list for all
equipment at the facility, indicating compliance with regulation 2D .0501. The facility operates 5 crushers, 8 screens, 6
feeders, 7 bins, 1 hopper and 34 conveyors. All sources were observed by the inspector. Majority of primary and secondary
crushing, screening and conveying equipment was operating at the time of inspection. Equipment observed not running
included the feed hopper (ID No. 69), conveyor i 1 (ID No. 70), conveyor 12 (ID No. 71), and conveyor 4 (ID No. 64). The
wet suppression systems appeared to be well maintained and operating properly, in likely compliance with regulation 2D
.0510. The facility's ultra -fines recovery (UFR) system was not operating. These sources include a water cyclone, single -
deck screen (ID No. 74), and conveyor I 1 (ID No. 75) which process only saturated material.
The facility operates two 65-ton haul trucks which were hauling material from the pit and depositing it into the primary
crusher. The facility was also operating one 8,000-gal Ion -capacity water truck during the inspection.
The facility owns portable crushing, conveying and screening equipment for this facility. No portable equipment was at this
facility during the inspection.
The facility lists several exempt sources which include; two above -ground I0,000-gallon diesel fuel storage tanks (I -Tank 1
and I -Tank 2), one 3,000-gallon gasoline storage tank (1-Tank3), one 1,000-gallon 10-weight oil storage tank (I -Tank 4), one
1,000-gallon used oil storage tank (I -Tank 5), two 500-gallon lubricating oil storage tanks (1-Tank 6 and I -Tank 7), two 500-
gallon hydraulic oil storage tanks (I -Tank 8 & I -Tank 9), one 500-gallon 15W-40 motor oil storage tank (1-Tank 10), and one
500-gallon 50 weight motor oil storage tank (I -Tank 11). All were observed during the inspection.
Specific Permit Conditions:
Condition A.2 contains 15A NCAC 2D .0202 permit renewal and emissions inventory requirements. The permit expires
July 31, 2018 and the facility is required to submit a renewal request and emission inventory report for the 2017 calendar year
90-days prior to the expiration of the permit. This condition was discussed with Mr. Nivens and compliance with this
condition is anticipated.
Condition A.3 contains the 2D .0501(c) equipment reporting requirements. The permittee shall maintain a flow diagram and
a complete equipment list of all permitted equipment operating on the site, including identification numbers, equipment
dimensions, production capacities, dates of manufacture, NSPS applicability and performance testing data. The facility is
allowed to install new, or replace existing, non -primary crushing equipment without obtaining a permit modification as long
as it does not change the primary crushing rated capacity of the facility, and as long as they provide written notification to the
Division at least 15 days prior to installation, including a revised equipment list and flow diagram. The facility may also
relocate existing equipment as long as it does not change the primary production rate of the facility and as long as they
3

submit written notification, including a revised equipment list and flow diagram, within 15 days of the relocation. As
previously noted, Mr. Nivens provided the inspector an equipment list and plant flow diagram. No changes to the stationary
equipment have occurred since the last inspection. Compliance with this condition is indicated.
Condition A.4 contains the requirements for 2D .0510 particulate control requirements for particles from sand, gravel, or
crushed stone operations. This condition requires the facility to take steps to reduce, to a minimum, any particulate matter
from becoming airborne to prevent exceeding the ambient air quality standards beyond the property line. This facility makes
use of wet suppression in order to control process particulate matter. The wet suppression systems were observed during this
inspection, and appeared to be functioning property. Compliance with this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.5 contains the primary crusher specifications. This condition requires the facility to submit a permit application
if any changes are made to the primary crusher other than like -for -like replacement. requires the facility to submit a permit
application in the event the primary crusher is replaced by a dissimilar crusher. The primary crusher (Telesmith Model 4448)
is listed as having a maximum rated throughput of 1,030 tons per hour at a 12-inch jaw setting. Mr. Nivens confirmed that
the crusher was set between 5 to 6 inches at a rate of 450 to 500 tons hour. Compliance with this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.6 contains the requirements for operation of additional primary crusher(s) at the site. (a) Simultaneous
operation of the primary crushers is not allowed. This restriction shall not apply for a crusher that is being used to process
material that has already been processed through a primary crusher on the site. (b) The throughput of any additional primary
crusher shall not exceed the rated capacity of the Jaw crusher (rated at 1,030 tons per hour at a maximum discharge opening
setting of 12-inches per the manufacturer's specifications) described in the permit. The Telesmith 44 X 48 jaw crusher (ID ,
No. 3) was the only primary crusher at the facility during the inspection. Compliance with this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.7 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 20%
opacity visible emissions, for sources manufactured after July 1, 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period. Slight,
intermittent visible emissions were observed from the primary crusher at the at the point where rock enters the crusher from
the shaker device and at the transfer point from Cone Crusher No. I (ID No. 16) onto conveyer C2 (ID No. 50). The visible
emissions were not likely to exceed emission standards. Compliance with this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.8 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 40%
opacity visible emissions, for sources manufactured as of July I., 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period. No visible
emissions were beyond those described under Condition A.7. Compliance with this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.9 (2D .0524, 40 CFR 60 Subpart 000) concerns "New Source Performance Standards." The facility is
required to notify the Division in writing no later than thirty days after commencing construction of a crusher, screen or
conveyor, and to report again within fifteen days after the initial startup of the source. This condition limits visible emissions
from affected sources to 15% opacity for crushers and 10% opacity for conveyors and screens. A rule change for this subpart
requires affected sources constructed after April 22, 2008, to have visible emissions further limited to 12% opacity for
crushers and 7% opacity for conveyors and screens. For affected sources that use wet suppression and were installed after
April 22, 2008, this condition requires monthly periodic inspections of water systems and spray nozzles to be recorded in a
logbook. Records indicate no affected sources have been constructed at this facility after April 22, 2008. The facility is
required to conduct performance testing on any affected source within 60 days of achieving maximum production but no later
than 180 days after the initial startup. A testing protocol must be submitted to the Division at least 45 days prior to testing
and at least 15 days advance written notice must be afforded the Division to provide an observer. Only 7 days advance notice
is required for testing involving only visible emissions. A provision of this condition exempts the replacement equipment
from testing if it is of equal or lesser production capacity than the existing source. On December 20, 2005, written
notification was received from the facility indicating three affected sources, crusher 22 and screens 32 and 46, commenced
operations on December 12, 13 and 15, 2005, respectively. A testing protocol was received on January 12, 2006, and visible
emissions tests were performed on all three sources on February 24, 2006. 'test results were received on March 14, 2006,
and accepted on April 20, 2006, indicating compliance.
Condition A.10 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0535 rule which requires the permittee to notify the director of any excess
emission lasting longer than four hours resulting from a malfunction, breakdown of process or control equipment or any other
abnormal conditions. Mr. Nivens stated that he was unaware of any process malfunctions since the last inspection and there
were no issues registered to this facility in IBEAM. Compliance with this condition is indicated.

Condition A.11 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0540 fugitive dust control requirement. During the inspection, the water truck
was operating and appeared to effectively minimize fugitive dust emissions from operations of the loaders and haul trucks.
The inspector observed no fugitive dust emissions migrating beyond the facility's boundary during the inspection nor have
any complaints been received, indicating likely compliance.
Condition A.12 contains the requirements for 2D .1806 control and prohibition of odorous emissions. concerns the control
of odorous emissions. The inspector detected no objectionable odors at any time during the inspection and the facility does
not have any previous odor complaints in [BEAM. Compliance with this condition is indicated.
MACTIGACT Applicability:
The facility operates an exempt, 3,000-gallon-capacity gasoline storage tank which is subject to regulation 40 CFR 63,
Subpart 6C. Since the tank is exempt, this regulation is not included in the permit. The facility is required to provide
documentation within 24 hours of being requested, that less than t0,000 gallons per month of gasoline is used by the facility.
Mr. Nivens provided the inspector with records showing the facility purchased 3,515-gallons of gasoline during the 2015
calendar year, indicating likely compliance with this rule.
The facility does not operate a stationary engine, boiler or water heater and does not appear to be subject to other
MACTIGACT regulations.
Permit Issues:
There appear to be no permit issues at this time.
Facility -- Wide Emissions:
These actual facility -wide emissions provided from permit review R19 (Read Plott, Review Engineer):
Pollutant
Expected Actual Emissions
Potential Emissions
(tons per year)
(tons per year)
PM 6.5a 57
P W, 2.4b 22
13.4 [from review R181 + 3.14 [from Attachment A] = 6.54 tons per year
b 1.3 [from review R18] + 1.14 [from Attachment A] = 2.44 tons per year
Compliance History:
This facility has not been issued a Notice of Violation in the past five years.
Conclusion:
Based on observations and record reviews, the facility appears to be operating in compliance with applicable Air Quality
standards and regulations.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
N PERMITTED MINE SITE ❑ UNPERMITTED MINE SITE
1. MINE NAME: Jamestown Quarry 2. MINE LOCATION: Riverdale Rd, High Point NC
3. COUNTY: Guilford 4. RIVER BASIN: Cane Fear 5. CASE:
6. OPERATOR: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. _
7. ADDRESS: 8701 Red Oak Blvd., Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
8. MINING PERMIT #: 41-04 ❑ NIA 9. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: 12/11/2012 ❑ NIA
10. PERSON(S) CONTACTED AT SITE: Jay Nivens, Sr. Environmental Engineer
11. PICTURES? ❑ Yes N No TAKEN BY:
12. TYPE OF INSPECTION:
❑ A. Initial Inspection (Unpermitted Mine Sites)
1. Size of affected land: ac. (attach sketch map)
2. How was this area measured? Measured by:
® B. Routine Inspection (Permitted Mine Sites)
C. Follow-up Inspection
13. Date of last inspection: 7/9/13
14. Any mining since that date? N Yes ❑ No If yes, cite evidence of such mining activity: Mine was
active at time of inspection. Material was being processed. _
15. Was mine operating at time of inspection? N Yes ❑ No If yes, explain:
16. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? N Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA If
no, explain:
17. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? N Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA If
no, explain:
18. Is there any off -site damage? A. ❑ Yes B. N No C. ❑ None observed
If A, describe the type and severity of the damage:
If B or C, is there potential for offsite damage? U Yes 1�g No Explain:
19. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
20. Other recommendations and comments: Grading has ceased on area designated as "Future Plant Site" on
the mine man last revised 5/26/15. All disturbed areas have been seeded with good germination of seed. As discussed
on site, the area of slight erosion leading to SB # 15 should be should be regraded as necessary and stabilized with a
groundcover sufficient to restrain erosion. If grading in subject area recommences in the future, all basins must be
restored to original design and storage capacity. SB 418 has not . even installed as wading has not commenced in
the drainage areas leading to the device.
21. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ® Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed ❑ NIA
22. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes N No Proposed date
23. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 0 24. Copy of Report sent to operator 9/7/2016
INSPECTED BY: Charles Gerstell DATE 8/24/16
Telephone No: [phone]
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

Permit: NCGO20152
SOC:
County: Guilford
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Jay Nivens
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 10/01/15 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Jamestown Quarry
5725 Riverdale Dr
Jamestown NC 27282
Title: Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 08/24/2016
Primary Inspector: Charles Gerstell
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time: 09:27AM Exlt Time: 02:52PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COG
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Pager: 1

Permit NCG020152 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 0812412016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020152
Inspection Date: 08/2412016
Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Appeared that analytical monitoring was being performed as required and records were being
maintained on site.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: No concerns were observed at outfalls.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Appeared that qualitative monitoring was being performed as required and records were being
maintained on site.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
■ END ❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
E ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit NCG020152 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 0812412016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Comment: SPPP was being maintained on site and appeared to be updated annually.
Yes No NA NE
Page: 4

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020152 Effective: 01/01/10
Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner : Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective:
Expiration: Facility: Jamestown Quarry
County: Guilford
5725 Riverdale Dr
Region: Winston-Salem
Jamestown NC 27282
Contact Person: Jay Nivens
Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 02/19/2013 EntryTime:
01:30PM Exit Time: 03:00PM
Primary Inspector: Sue White
Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

-I
Permit: NCG020152 Owner- Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 02119=13 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

t
Permit: NCG020152 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Data: 02/19/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? O ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment:
(qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
O ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Pany(s)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

Ms. Stephanie Graham
Martin Marietta Materials Inc
P.O. Box 18565
Greensboro, NC 27419
Subject:
Dear Ms. Graham:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
June 16, 2008
Representative Outfall Status (ROS) Approval
Permit No. NCG020152 - Jamestown Quarry
Guilford Countv
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
The Winston-Salem Regional Office staff reviewed your request for a determination that Stormwater
Discharge Outfall (SDO) 001 for Land Disturbance and Process Areas be granted representative outfall
status. Based on the information and map provided, and our site visit on June 5, 2008-by Steve Tedder;
Rose Pruitt, and George Smith, all of this office, we are making the following ROS determination.
In accordance with 40 CFR § 122.21(g)(7), you are authorized to sample outfall number 001 as a
representative outfall. This approval is effective with the next sampling event. We also want to remind
you that the permit still requires Qualitative Monitoring be performed at all SDOs, regardless of
representative outfall status.
Please armend this letter to your Stormwater Permit to document that representative outfall status has
been approved. If changes in drainage areas, structures, processes, storage practices, or other activities
occur that significantly alter the basis of this approval, notify this office for an updated ROS
determination. If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter, please contact George
Smith, or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Regional Supervisor
ATTACHMENT
cc; Central Office/Stormwater Permitting Unit
SWP Central Files
WSRO File one
North Carolina
,%1 atrrra!!�
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Phone [phone] Customer Service
Winston-Salem Regional Office Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Fax [phone] I-877-623-6748
Internet: www.itcwatergualit,Lorg
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

770.90
Y.
/Z
V
M, If
O WO
4N'#5
5�7
7608o
x
"RQPQ5ED�BERMW' A/~ U; r '� , ' AI! IDS-
.,orspo
v
N v
------ ml
N X Minpk IV
IN
-v
i-W7
40
CE',— �Ilj
OFFI
SCALES- -j-
, 'Ito
qg
rY
�HO'P—' A 'EA
71830
V v;I
AREA ;?
L
_�i"fit < : +1`\ 1 f, i\ rr f C' n�+ v ; 't %'Y -..� :�.}�1.._ /r':,i��s.=
42

29
70
85
62
JAMESTOWN VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
AT THE TIME THAT AN ACTIVE FACE
BECOMES A DEAD WALL, INFORMATION
WILL BE SUPPLIED IN SUPPORT OF
THE DETERMINATION OF FINAL SLOPE FOR
UNCONSOLIDATED MATERIAL
(MAXIMUM SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 3:1)
10, r- SAFETY BENCH - --------- % 10,
BENCH HT. VARIES
WITH ROCK ELEVATION
APPROXIMATE HEIGHT RANGE:
0 50
WIDTH
VARIES -APPROXIMATELY
112 OF HEIGHT OF BENCH
FACE ABOVE
PROPOSED
MAXIMUM
DEPTH = 300'
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION - PIT
y
�.
Hold-down Dike F 3:1 T 1.5'
Stakes L in.
I
Inlet
h
plank do
Corrugat _
Pipe
Stabilize
Outlet
-
level section
PLAN VIEW STANDARD TEE -SECTION
(PROPOSED 8' HIESH LAMSCAP146 BERM WUL
FOLLOW THE SAME CROSS-SECTION AS BELOW
WITH A BOTTOM WIDTH OF +/- 50')
50'-01r 25'-0" 50'-0"
�o T
I
TY'PICAt BERM CROSS SECTION
PLACE MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION ON
DOWNHILL SIDE OF FLOW. USE ADDITIONAL 2' MIN
FILL TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED HEIGHT AND WIDTH.
r/7T�4
SEED AND MULCH DIVERSION CHANNEL AND DIKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CHOOSE
APPROPRIATE SEEDING MIXTURE FROM THE
SEEDING SCHEDULE.
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
PIPE
DRAINAGE
Q25
SIZE
SLOPE
ENERGY
AREA
DISSIPATOR
#1
8.02
1 23.98
1 24" CMP
1 4.3 %
1 12' CLA55 I RIP -RAP
1 1 1 1 1 1• • 1 1 1•
1f' 512 1
nil.u.lf.�f �n.IE-411:il IE-111,Wk
r 1.
-tl.-a�n.-u:-lc=]Lcn-1L=�L-ICclrucJl:- ff-il-u=
_-n=I11='fir-u=�l=CIE=n=11�n JI
.=n=�f.
ri:ll71'�A_�1�E=71=7C�71=.1��7f.=:f1�71=:If1=71=:tfF:1� �i::n=71=71: ,:11�7f er
If �_=I1 11:511 �7iT:` i_{' 1i 71:11.� 11 �:11.lI ICII��.II .i1.u�1 N l 11MN ll:li=
1-7�71'f�71'�17r�71'1�7f11�.g.�;1t �n.lf7t��-
691.10
x \ Q25 = CIA, where C = 0.4, I = 7.2
50of the initial protect.
_---� �\ /� �� RFC\
/ / 1 1 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SARAN
n HAZELTON
722
z'
rt= ;r
,c
I
u'
z.
,.,
I
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED OYME ENGINEER
(8" MAX.)
_ _ MIN. 12 1/2 GA.
MIN 10 GA. 'I - INTERMEDIATE WIRES
LINE WIRE
1
_I
I
i
F- ~
002 FO
3a �a
STEEL OR WOOD POST
WIRE FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
V
m
v
O LL C!
Z el Fzw
LL
m _ J
M .. GROUND LINE
N ro
ANCHOR SKIRT MIN. OF 6"
o o� 6"
�a 30
ALTERIATE: IN LIEU OF BURYING SKIRT 6", 5" OF #5 STONE
MAY BE USED TO ANCHOR SKIRT.
TYPICAL SILT FENCE
BASIN
DRAINAGE AREA
DISTURBED AREA
VOLUME
Q25
LENGTH
WIDTH
DEPTH
WEIR LENGTH
SETTLING EFFICIENCY
1
4.95
4.95
8910 CF
14.25 CFS
90'
45'
4'
18'
4054 SF
2
2.28
2.28
4104 CF
6.56 CFS
65'
30'
4'
12'
1868 SF
3*
6.73
6.73
12114 CF
19.39 CFS
115'
50'
4'
18'
5512 SF
4
4.40
0.15
270 CF
12.67 CFS
90'
40'
4'
25'
3603 SF
5*
5.67
5.67
10206 CF
16.32 CFS
100'
50'
4'
25'
4643 SF
6
2.59
2.59
4662 CF
7.42 CFS
75'
30'
4'
18'
2121 SF
7
4.02
1.75
3150 CF
11.58 CFS
85'
40'
4'
25'
3292 SF
8
2.92
2.92
5256 CF
8.41 CFS
70'
35'
4'
12'
2392 SF
9*
5.39
5.39
9702 CF
15.52 CFS
100'
50'
4'
25'
4414 SF
10
1.65
1.65
2970 CF
4.75 CFS
75'
30'
4'
10'
1352 SF
11 *
11.74
11.74 `
21132 CF
33.81 CFS
140'
70'
4'
40'
9615 SF
12
4.86
4.86
8740 CF
14.00 CFS
120'
50'
4'
18'
5759 SF
13*
8.92
8.92
16056 CF
25.69 CFS
155'
75'
1 4'
35'
11190 SF
14*
6.56
6.56
11908 CF
17.85 CFS
160'
50'
1 4'
30'
7776 SF
OVLDERS
3 Lx3' Wx3'D
r(
i
t�HIGHWALL �\
BOULDER BARRICADE
w
A #14 .;
XISTTPiG ✓`5W.40a L
IW III,
�i. ;
• w STOCKPILE
CATEGORY
AFFEC 1) ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
16.72
Stockpiles
28.62
Wastepiles
28.13
Processing Area/Haul Roads
10.26
Mine Excavation
110.76
Other (undisturbed)
69.70
Total Site Acreage
264.19
O
AL
WALTER rWALT
CHARLES
IEREDI i WALTER
t
MEREDITH (
WALTER
( MEREDITH
WALTER
MEREDITH j
4
CH
BO
FLORA
\ GRISSOM `.
.� (HEIRS) �
RICHARD
O ` � DELL
' ALPHA
CHARLES \WILLIAMS
WALTON
n SCALE: r' = 200'
0 100 200 400 600 800
POND
DRAINAGE
Q 25
RISER
BARREL
SLOPE
DISSIPATOR
AREA
LENGTH
#1
1.81 Ac.
5.23 CFS
24" CMP
18" CMP
0.063 FT/FT
9' - CLASS B
#2
2.25 Ac.
**11.71 CFS
24" CMP
18" CMP
0.060 FT FT
9' - CLASS B
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN MINING PERMIT.
2. CLEAR ONLY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THE PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASINS
OR ROCK DAM SEDIMENT BASINS FOR THE PROJECTED WORK.
3. CALL [phone], WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE, LAND QUALITY SECTION, FOR ON -SITE
INSPECTION. BEGIN CLEARING ONCE ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE..
4. THE FUTURE PIT AREA WILL BE CLEARED IN SMALL PARCELS, APPROXIMATELY 5 ACRES
EACH. BEFORE CLEARING OF THESE AREAS BEGINS, PROVIDE DIVERSION DITCHLINES
TO DIVERT SURFACE DRAINAGE TO THE EXISTING PIT. IN AREAS WHERE THE RUNOFF WILL
NOT NATURALLY DRAIN INTO THE PIT, DIVERT ALL RUNOFF TO THE RESPECTIVE
SEDIMENT BASIN.
5. MAINTAIN THE SEDIEMNT BASINS, AS NEEDED ANS CLEAN -OUT WHEN SEDIMENT
VOLUME IS 1/2 FULL.
6. THE BERMS ARE TO BE SEEDED ACCORDING TO THE SEEDING SCHEDULE UPON THEIR
COMPLETION. AFTER THE BERMS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY SEEDED, THE TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT BASINS MAY BE REMOVED.
SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES:
1) Surface water measures are to be installed according to plan.
2) Areas to be seeded shall be ripped and spread with topsoil (if necessary), 3"
deep. Total seedbed prepared shall be 4"-6" deep.
3) Loose rocks, roots, and other obstructions shall be removed from the surface
so as not to interfere with the establishment and maintenance of vegetation.
Surface for final seedbed preparation, at final grades shown, shall be reasonably
smooth and uniform.
4) If no soil test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to seeding
schedule. In addition provide 15 Ib./1000 sq. ft. of super phosphate.
5) If soil test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to the soil test
report. Soil testing is recommended.
6) Lime and fertilizer shall be applied uniformly and mixed with the soil during
seedbed preparation.
7) WATER all seeded areas and keep moist until new grass is established.
PLANTING DATE SEED MIX RATES: LB./ACRE
April 1 - August 15 Serica Lespedeza (scarified) 30
Pensacola Bahiagrass 50
Common Bermudagrass 10
Germit Millit 10
Prior to May 1 or
after August 15 Rye (Grain) 40
Fertilize seedbeds with 3 tons/acre lime and 500 Ibs/acre 10-10-10.
Mulch with 2 tons/acre clean straw or hay.
Tack with rapid setting emulsified asphalt at 10 gal./1000 sq.ft., or other
tacking agent approved by Owner.
#5 Wosi
Tap Elevation of Stormwater Stone
Fj 4' Sediment Storms Area
Fr'
Carry Rip -Top up
Sides of Spillway
10' Min. r 3' Min.
crvl-
1' Min Freeboard
... ->" 7, a: r.. _ _ _.,_ - Class I Rip-Rc
5' APProx.
SECTION THROUGH BERM AND FILTER
GRAVEL RIP -RAP FILTER BASIN
Key in Bottom
Layer of Rip-Rop
_ LOATAION I
BLOCK REQUURED
RISER bETAIL OF PROPOSED PONDS
-`� C-S-o S
9. t 6 M''.c
5'G1Y'r-
M Y '1
7 l.0
2�ia' �
R65L �rbi t6
SILTFENCE
ROCK DANVSEDIMENT BASIN
PLANT AREA
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY DIVERSION
BUFFER
PERMIT BOUNDARY
.�
SETTLING CELLS:
BODY OF WATER
'w
FLOODPLAIN
- -=
CREEK
DIRT ROADS
PAVED ROADS
TREE LINE
10-YEAR PIT LIMIT
FUTURE PIT LIMIT
INDEX CONTOUR
INTERMEDIATE
CONTOUR
Martin Marietta Aggregates
RALEIGH, NC
STORMWATER BMP MAP
DATE
REVISION
JAMESTOWN QUARRY
COUNTY, NC
10/8/02
MINING PERMIT RENEWAL 6 PROPERTY CHANGES
3/7/03
BERM, FRESH WATER PONDS 4PIT EXPANSION
4/25/03
REVISIONS PER NCDENR COMMENTS
�/GUILFORD
QUARRY: JAMESTOWN
"'C
6/9/03
REVISIONS PER NCDENR COMMENTS
8/22/03
REVISIONS PER NCDENR COMMENTS
DRAWN BY:
DON BRIGHT
DATE:
8/16/02
DWG. NO.
JOB III,
� O � 1
4/2Alq¢
BERM AND STOCKPILE AREA EXPANSION
b/Q _- :
REVI5IONS PER NCDEN2 COMMENTS
CHECK BY:
BRIAN NORTH
SCALE:
1" = 200'
SHEET NO.
Boy 12Z
t•y � I i( 'i. 1 r i i �. rr.

W A 7_F9p
�O G
Y
June 11, 2008
Ms. Stephanie Graham
Martin Marietta Materials Inc
P.O. Box 18565
Greensboro, NC 27419
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: Compliance Sto=,vater Inspection
Jamestown Quarry
NPDES Permit # NCG020152
Guilford County
Dear Ms. Graham:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
On May 12, 2008 a Compliance Inspection was performed by George Smith, of this office. Ms.
Stephanie Graham, Environmental Engineer; Steve Carter, Plant Manager; and Barry McConnell,
Assistant Plant Manager were present for the inspection.
The attached inspection form evaluates six (6) areas as noted in this letter of the attached EPA
inspection report, and the.observations and comments during the inspection are addressed
belo►v:
Permit
The NPDES general permit became effective on January 19, 2005 and expires on December 31,
2009. Your certificate of coverage became effective on February 7, 2005.
The inspection covered the following Terms and Conditions in the permit:
l . Authorization to Construct and Operate a Treatment Facility per Part II, Section A.
2. Operation of a Treatment Facility per Part II, Section B
3. Monitoring, Controls, and Limitations for Permitted Discharges per Part II1, Section A.
4. Analytical and Qualitative Monitoring for Discharges Composed Entirely of Stormwater per
Part I1I, Section B.
5. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring for Mine Dewatering and Process Wastewaters per Part
III, Section C.
6. On -site Vehicle Maintenance analytical monitoring per Part III, Section B, Tables 3 & 4.
At the time of this inspection Representative Outfall Status (ROS) was not granted. ROS will be
addressed in a separate letter.
Onc
NehCarolina
Aktura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Phone [phone] Customer Service
Winston-Salem Regional Office Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Fax [phone]
Internet: wwW_ncwater�C ualily.orQ
An Equal OpportunitylAifirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Y
Ms. Graham
June 11, 2008
Page 2 of 3
Records & Reports
The following records for this site were inspected per the Terms & Conditions of the NPDES permit:
1. An Authorization to Construct is not needed at this time per Part II, Section A; since the
treatment facilities are not being expanded.
2. Operation of the treatment facility per Part 11, Section B, states that process wastewater shall
be monitored. There was a discharge of water from Outfall 001. The discharge enters Copper
Branch, Class WS-IV waters, which did not have any noticeable adverse impacts.
Monitoring, Controls, and Limitations for Permitted Discharges per Part III, Section A
requires that Best Management Practices (BMPs) be implemented. Please insure that all
stormwater BMPs are inspected and documented at defined per paragraph 3.
4. Analytical Monitoring for Discharges Composed Entirely of Stormwater per Part 111,
Section B were performed as required per Tables I & 2. The vehicle maintenance Area
was monitored at Outfall 002 per Tables 3 & 4. There was a deficiency noted with the
qualitative monitoring required per Table 5, please insure that the qualitative monitoring
is performed as required in this Subsection 3.
Mine dewatering & Recycle wastewater discharges per Part III, Section C (Quarterly
Monitoring) were performed at Outfall 001.
b. Nondischarging closed loop recycle system per Part III, Section C had greater than 2-feet of
freeboard (4-feet). There was no evidence of overflows.
Facility -Site Review
The vehicle maintenance area contains various types of petroleum products in drums and storage
tanks. They all have secondary containment measures. The containment structures were not
thoroughly inspected at this time. This office encourages the facility to make sure the containment
areas are maintained in the event of future inspections.
The closed recycle primary and secondary ponds had greater than 2-feet of freeboard. This meets the
requirement of a minimum of 2-feet.
Laboratory
Analytical tests, such as.. Settleable solids; Total Suspended Solids, Turbidity, pH. Oil & Grease; etc.
are all performed using approved analytical methods by a certified lab/person. All tests are properly
performed and documented.

Ms. Graham
June 11, 2008
Page 3 of 3
Self -Monitoring Program
The facility had monitoring records on -site; as required inthe records & reports section of this report.
The analytical monitoring was performed. The qualitative monitoring was not performed.
Please insure that the qualitative monitoring is performed.
Effluent/Receivin Waters
The effluent to the Copper Branch, Class WS-IV waters of the State was not discharging at the time
of the inspection.
The compliance stormwater inspection is satisfactory. If you have any questions please contact
George Smith or me at [phone].
Sincerely;
Steve W. Tedder
Regional Supervisor
cc: SWP Ceiitral Files
WSRO Files

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020152 Effective: 01/19/05 Expiration: 12/31/09 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC.. Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Jamestown
County: Guilford 5745 Riverdale Dr
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Bnan K North
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title:
Inspection Date: 05/12/2008 Entry Time: 11:00 AM
Primary Inspector: George S Smith
Secondary Inspector(s):
Jamestown NC 27282
Phone: [phone]
Certification:, ,
Exit Time: 12:10 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Stormwater
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
t
Page:1

Permit: NCG020152 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 05/12/2008 Inspection Type: Stormwater Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Stormwater inspection is satisfactory. ROS determination will be made in a separate letter.
Page: 2

IN
Permit: NCG020152 owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 05/12/2008 Inspection Type: Stormwater
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Pian include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility -Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: Monitoring will be performed. Mentioned in the report.
Analvtical_Monitorina_
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment, -
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: ROS determination will be granted in a separate letter.
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
®nnn
®nnn
®nnn
mnnn
®nnn
n n n
nnn®
®nnn
® n n n
® n n n
n n n
®nnn
nnn®
® n n n
®nnn
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
®nn❑
®nnn
Yes No NA NE
® n n n
®nnn
n®nn
®nnn
Page: 3

Stormwater Inspection
General Information:
Facility: i r
Permit Number: l l 0 f,3' � Activity: m to l e y
Mailing Address:
City: -
County: ire 0 rr err I
State: Zip:
■ r a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r a a■ a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a a r r a r r a a a a a a e a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 1
Facility Information: Q�yr y nip Cconne,l1 ^ IisJZ- el
Contact Person: '62kn Title : RL'IT n ! r
Telephone Number:
Physical Location: ,S`7)-f R vcr�,.(.c pa _ M
a■■■■r8aarraaaaaara8aaa0ahis aaaa6aaaaraaaaaaaaaIa6aaaaaaaaaaa9aa9aa0aaaaaaaaaaaa
Key Permit Requirements:
Yes No NA
Implement SPPP
Secondary Containment
On -site Vehicle Maint. ✓
Yes No NA
Analytical Monitoring ✓_
Qualitative Monitoring V-"_
a a r a a a a a a a a a a■■ s a a a a a a a a r aim a a a a a a a a a a a a r r r a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r r a a a a a r a a
Inspection Comments/Site Review:
P fo- -'-k
•■aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaraarraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaarraaaaaaaaaaaaa■
Inspector: Date: