NCG020076_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20170908

PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
STORMWATER DIVISION t
NCG PERMIT;
[?' HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING RE
DOC DATE ❑ 30) q L S Obi
YYYYMMDD

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secrewry
Environmental
Quality
September 8, 2017
JOHN TIBER[, PRESIDENT MID —ATLANTIC DIVISION
POST OFFICE Box 30013
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Thomasville Quarry
Davidson County
Dear Permittee:
Department of Environmental Quality staff from the Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Thomasville Quarry on August 29,
2017 for permits and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Management
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at
your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached. you may assume compliance with that Division's rules and regulations at
the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact Charles Gerstell at (704)
235-2144 or cliarles.gerstellr7.ncdenr.,toy. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
DEMLR Inspection Report
cc: DAQ WSRO Files
DEMLR WSRO Files
DWR WSRO Files
DWM WSRO Files
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450West Hanes.MillRoad.Suite 3001 Winston-Salem, North Carolina'27105-7407
336 776 9600 T 1 336 776 9797 F

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
Inspection Report
Date: 09/05/2017
Facility Data
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - Thomasville Quarry
691 Upper Lake Road
Thomasville, NC 27360
Lat: 3 5 d 51.1210m Long: 80d 9.7270m
SIC: 1429 / Crushed And Broken Stone Nec
NAICS: 212319 / Other Crushed and Broken Stone Mining and Quarrying
Facility Contact
Johnny King
Plant Manager
[phone]
Comments:
Inspector's iiSignature:
Contact Data
Authorized Contact
John Tiberi
Division President
[phone]
Technical Contact
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental
Engineer
[phone]
Date of Signature: Se tember 7, 2017 RS
Total Actual emissions in TONSNEAR:
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - Thomasville
Quarry
NC Facility ID 2900132
County/FIPS: Davidson/057
Permit Data
Permit 03216 / R23
Issued 3/8/2017
Expires 2/28/2025
Classification Small
Permit Status Active
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program Applicability
SIP
NSPS: Subpart 000
Compliance Data
Inspection Date 08/29/2017
Inspector's Name Charles Gerstell
Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code FCE
On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
HAP
2016
2.75
--
---
---
---
1.0000
---
2011
1.62
---
---
---
---
0.5900
---
Five _Year Violation History: None
Date Letter TYae Rule Violated
Performed Stack Tests since last FCE:
Date Test Results Test Method(s)
01/16/2017 Compliance Method 9
07/15/2016 Compliance Method 9
* Hiahest HAP Emitted (in
Violation Resolution Date
Source(s) Tested
ES -Convey
ES -Convey, ES -Screen

PERMITTED SOURCES:
Emission Emission Source Control7 Control System
Source ID F Description System ID Description
Non-metallic Mineral Processing Plant, utilizing water suppression with no other control devices, including:
1
ES -Crush
Crushing operations
(NSPS — 000)
NIA
N/A
ES -Screen
(NSPS — 000)
Screening operations
ES -Convey
Conveying operations
(NSPS — 000)
INTRODUCTION:
On August 29, 2017, Charles Gerstell, NCDEQ Multimedia Inspector, contacted Mr. Jay Nivens, Sr.
Environmental Engineer, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. for an announced multimedia compliance inspection
of the above referenced facility. Mr. Johnny King, Plant Manager and Mr. Brian Robertson, Plant Foreman
were also present and represented Marin Marietta Materials, Inc. during the inspection. The facility was last
inspected by Mr. Blair Palmer, Environmental Specialist for the WSRO-DAQ on April 7, 2016, and appeared to
be operating in compliance at that time. Martin Marietta -Thomasville Quarry crushes various size stone, which
is used for various purposes, such as road construction. The facility mainly operates Monday -Friday, 8 -10
hours/day, and 51 weeks/year at the present time. However, the quarry may operate intermittently during the
colder months. It is not recommended for DEQ personnel to conduct inspections during very cold weather,
especially if there is or recently have been ambient air temperatures at or below 32 degrees Fahrenheit because
the plant relies on water for the crushing operations. The facility does not have an emergency generator at the
current time. All IBEAM contacts were confirmed to be accurate.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
The applicable air quality regulations as listed in condition A.1 of Air Permit No. 03216R23 are: 2D .0202, 2D
.0501(c), 2D .0510, 2D .0521, .0524 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart 000), 2D .0535, 2D .0540, 2D .1806, and 2Q
.0309. This facility is not required to implement a risk management plan under the federal regulation 40 CFR
68, Section 112(r) because they do not produce, use or store any of the regulated chemicals in quantities above
the threshold limits. However, the General Duty Clause contained in this rule applies to all facilities and
requires the safe and responsible handling of hazardous materials in any quantity.
SAFETY:
Safety vest, shoes, hardhats, and eyewear are required at the plant. The office parking lot has a slight incline
and an asphalt berm is provided at the parking spaces to act as a wheel chock. An annual safety meeting video
is required for all visitors (including DEQ inspectors) at all Martin Marietta locations. No blasting was
occurring during the inspection.

DISCUSSION:
The process begins with holes being drilled into the quarry walls, usually in a vertical axis. After holes are
drilled, a mixture of ammonium nitrate and other material is ignited with blasting caps resulting in an explosion,
causing rock to break into pieces of various sizes, which fall mainly to the pit floor and/or roads leading into
and out of the pit. The blasting operation is subcontracted out to a company specializing in blasting.
Currently, the blasting occurs on average of once per week. The loose rock is then picked up by 50-ton front
end loaders and placed into piles known in the industry as "Muck Piles." The piles are occasionally watered by
the facility's water truck to prevent fugitive dust, before being transported by approximately 50 to 70-ton dump
trucks and offloaded into the dump hopper (ID No. 1) and associated feeder (ID No. #2). The rock is then fed
into the primary jaw crusher (ID No. 3) and then routed to the remaining circuit of various conveyors, screens,
and secondary crushers. The crushed pieces of rock are eventually placed in stockpiles of varying diameters of
stone. Some RIP -RAP (the. largest stone---2.5 inches in diameter) is also made at this location. The following
are the types of stone produced at this location:
78M (crushed stone) - Used in the asphalt and concrete industry.
57, 67 (crushed stone) - Also used in the concrete and asphalt industry.
5 (crushed stone) - Used or placed around septic tank drainage (nitrification) lines
Aggregate Base Course (referred to as "ABC" crushed stone) - Used for road bases, building
pads, residential driveways, and some parking lots.
Most of the plant was crushing stone during the inspection. Slight, intermittent visible emissions were observed
at the transfer point from the 5 V2 Std. crusher (ID No. 13) and conveyor (ID No. 14). However, no other visible
emissions were observed from other equipment that was in operation during the inspection. Several pieces of
equipment were not running, and they included item ID Nos. 7, 9, 10,11, 12, 26, 35, 38, 42, 43, and 44 (on
diagram revision 1/16/17). The facility was also moving stone inside the quarry and trucks were being loaded
with various sized stone for customers.
It should be noted that since the previous inspection, the facility permit was modified to a "modeling exempt"
permit.
PERMIT CONDITIONS:
Condition A.2 contains the 2D .0202 permit renewal and emissions inventory requirements. The permit
expires on February 28, 2025 and the facility is required to submit a renewal request and emission inventory
report for the 2023 calendar year 90-days prior to the expiration of the permit. This conditions was discussed
with Mr. Nivens and compliance with this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.3 contains the 2D .0501(c) out -of -pit diesel engine capacity limitation requirements. This
requirement sets forth certain power output capacities from diesel or fuel oiled -fired engines located outside of
the quarry pit. There are currently no such engines at this facility, but the condition is provided in the permit to
give the facility the flexibility to add these types of engines in the future. Compliance with this condition is
indicated.

Condition A.4 contains the 2D .0501(c) production rate limitation requirement. The daily and annual
production of crushed stone at the facility shall not exceed a Maximum Allowable Production Rate of 7,000-
tons per day and 2,250,000-tons per year (per permit review R23 by Leo L. Governale). The Permittee shall
record the total quantity of crushed stone produced (in tons) during each calendar day. The Permittee shall
record the total quantity of crushed stone produced (in tons) during each consecutive 12-calendar month period.
Required production records shall be retained in a logbook (written or electronic format). All records for a
calendar month (including daily production rates for each operating day within the month and the 12-month
rolling production rate) shall be recorded prior to the last day of the following calendar month. All production
records were being maintained on site in both written and electronic format. Records indicated that the facility
produced 477, 760 tons in 2016. For 2017, production was 238,765-tons of crushed stone as of the date of the
inspection. Daily production was well under the limit of 7,000-tons per day. Compliance with this condition is
indicated.
Condition A.5 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0501(c) equipment reporting requirement. This condition requires
this facility to maintain on -site a plant plot plan, equipment list and plant flow diagram of all equipment covered
under this permit. The plant plot plan shall be sufficient to identify and measure the "boundary distance."
"Boundary Distance" is the shortest distance between any non -road emission source (e.g. crushing tower, pit
edge, storage pile, etc.) and property boundary at the facility. This equipment list must include the rated
crushing capacity of all crushers, width of belt conveyers, dimensions and configurations of screens, the rated
capacity of all other equipment not exempt from permitting, dates of equipment manufacture, dates of required
NSPS testing, and must bear the date of last revision. This condition also requires the permittec to provide a 15-
day written notification to the Regional Supervisor of the Division of Air Quality, including a revised plant flow
diagram and equipment list, any time the permittee installs new non -primary crushing equipment or relocates
existing non -primary crushing equipment. Upon arrival at the facility, Mr. Nivens provided an equipment list
and plant flow diagram to Mr. Gerstell. This list appeared to be the same as the list submitted during the last
submittal received by DAQ on January 25, 2017 documenting the VE test results for the 36" Conveyor (Item ID
#47). No changes to the stationary equipment have occurred since the last inspection. A plant plot diagram was
also being maintained on site. Compliance with this condition is indicated.
Condition A.6 contains the requirements for 2D .0510-particulate control requirements for particles from sand,
grave, or crushed stone operations. This condition requires the facility to take steps to reduce, to a minimum,
any particulate matter from becoming airborne to prevent exceeding the ambient air quality standards beyond
the property line. This facility makes use of wet suppression to control process particulate matter. The wet
suppression systems were observed during the inspection and appeared to be functioning properly. A water
truck is also used to wet road surfaces throughout the workday. Compliance with this condition is indicated.
Conditions A.7 contains the 2D .0521 visible emission control requirement. This facility is limited to 20%
opacity visible emissions, for sources manufactured after July 1, 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period.
Slight, intermittent visible emissions were observed at the transfer point from the 5 1/2' STD Symons Crusher
(ID No. 13) to the 36" x 194' Conveyor 3 (ID No. 14). The visible emissions were not likely to exceed
emission standards. Compliance with this condition is expected.
Condition A.8 contains the 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 40%
opacity visible emissions, for sources manufactured as of July I, 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period.
No visible emissions were observed beyond those described under Condition A.7. Compliance with this
condition is expected.

Condition A.9 (2D .0524) concerns "New Source Performance Standards" as promulgated in the federal
regulation 40 CFR 60, Subpart 000. The facility is required to notify the Division in writing no later than
thirty days after the commencement of construction of a crusher, screen or conveyor except in the case of mass-
produced sources, and to report again within fifteen days after the initial startup of the source. Additionally,
this condition limits the visible emissions from these affected sources to 15% opacity for crushers, 10% opacity
for the conveyors and screens and 0% opacity for conveyors and screens that process saturated materials. The
rule was changed on April 22, 2008 and allows 12% opacity for new crushers and 7% for new conveyors. The
facility is required to conduct performance testing on any affected source within sixty days of achieving
maximum production but no later than 180 days after the initial startup. A testing protocol must be submitted to
the Division at least 45 days prior to testing and at least 15-day advance written notice must be afforded the
Division to provide an observer. A provision of this condition exempts the replacement equipment from testing
if it is of equal or lesser production capacity than the existing source (Like -for Like). This facility is also
required to perform monthly periodic inspections to check that water is flowing to discharge nozzles on wet
suppression systems for sources that were constructed on or after April 22, 2008. The plant must record each
inspection including the date and any corrective action taken in a logbook that can be made available to DAQ
personnel upon request. The facility performs inspections on all subject 000 equipment regardless if is before
the April 22, 2008. The facility usually performs monthly inspections on the equipment and the last monthly
inspections occurred on August 29, 2017. Compliance is indicated.
There are several pieces of equipment that are subject to NSPS Subpart 000. These NSPS subject pieces of
equipment that were in operation during inspection have had the appropriate method 9 testing performed. The
facility has replaced one piece of equipment (Item # 3-Jaw Crusher) back in 2012 that is subject to 40 CFR 60
Subpart 000, and it has the required method 9 testing performed at another location back on January 14, 2004.
The last official method 9 testing at this permitted location was conducted on January 16, 2017 on conveyor (ID
No. 47). The test showed compliance with 40 CFR 60 Subpart 000 and a letter dated January 23, 2017
indicating the fact was sent to DAQ. Compliance with this condition is indicated.
Condition A.10 contains the 2D .0535 notification requirement which requires the permittee to notify the DAQ
director of any excess emissions lasting longer than four hours resulting from a malfunction, a breakdown of
process or control equipment or any other abnormal conditions. Mr. King and Mr. Nivens indicated that no such
incidents had occurred since the last DAQ inspection. Compliance with this condition is indicated.
Condition A.I1 contains the 2D .0540(e)(1) Fugitive Dust Control Plan Requirement which requires the
permittee to create and implement a written Fugitive Dust Control Plan to minimize dust emissions from
fugitive sources, including customer and plant haul roads and storage piles. Each version of the plan shall be
submitted to the DAQ for approval, including the initial plan and any subsequent revisions. The required
Fugitive Dust Control Plan was received as part of the R22 permit application submittal (evaluated by Leo L.
Govemale, Review Engineer) and was found to have addressed all the required elements of the plan.
Compliance with this condition is indicated.
Condition A.12 contains the 2D .0540 requires fugitive dust control requirement. No fugitive dust emissions
were observed migrating beyond the facility's property boundary nor have any complaints been received
indicating likely compliance.

Condition A.13 contains the. 1806, "Control and Prohibition of Odorous Emissions" requirements. No
objectionable odors were detected during the approach to the facility or within the property boundaries. The
facility does not have any previous odor complaints in the IBEAM database. Compliance with this condition is
indicated.
MACT/GACT:
The facility does not currently have any boilers, hot water heaters, or emergency generators on site.
There is no new area source MACT or GACT that is applicable to this facility at this time. NSPS Subpart 000
is applicable to the subject equipment at this facility.
FACILITY -WIDE EMISSIONS:
These actual facility -wide emissions provided from permit review R23 (Leo L. Governale, Review Engineer)
-----------------------------
Pollutant Actual Emissions Potential Emissions
PM 2.75 14.69
PM10 1.0 5M
COMPLIANCE HISTORY (within the last five years):
No NOVs or NODs have been issued within the last five years to this company based on review of the facility's
file and an IBEAM documents search. There have also been no complaints lodged against this permitted
facility.
PERMIT ISSUES:
None noted during the inspection.
CONCLUSION:
Based on observations and records review, this facility appeared to be operating in compliance with all
applicable Air Quality standards and regulations at the time of the inspection.

Permit: NGG020076
SOC:
county: Davidson
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: .fay Nivens
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 05/09/16 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Thomasville Quarry
691 Upper Lake Rd
Thomasville NC 27360
Title: Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 08/29/2017
Primary Inspector: Charles Gerstell
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time: 09:20AM Exit Time: 12:20PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

permit: NGG020076 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 08/29/2017 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

W
permit NCG020076 owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection date: 08/29/2017 Inspection Type; Compliance Evaluation Reason for Malt; Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan indude a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
IN
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
M
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: SPPP was being maintained on site and appeared to be-u dated annual)
last updated 6/20/17
.
Employee training was last performed on 2/20/17. Secondary containment records were being
maintained on site.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? N ❑ [] ❑
Comment: Qualitative Monitoring was being perfored as required. Last event was performed on 5/25/17.
Analytical Monitorinq Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Analytical monitoring was beinq performed as required and records were being maintained on
site.
Permit and OutfalIs Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# if the facility has representative outfalI status, is it property documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? S ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Facility received representative outfall status in July 2008. No concerns were observed at the
outfall.
Page: 3

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
® PERMITTED MINE SITE ❑ UNPERMITTED MINE SITE
1. MINE NAME: Thomasville Quarry2. MINE LOCATION: Upper Lake Road
3. COUNTY: Davidson 4. RIVER BASIN: Yadkin 5. CASE:
6. OPERATOR: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
7. ADDRESS: Attn: Mr. Jay Nivens — 8701 Red Oak Blvd., Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
8. MINING PERMIT #: 29-03 ❑ NIA 9. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: 9/14/2022
❑ NIA
10. PERSON(S) CONTACTED AT SITE: Jay Nivens, Johnny King, Brian Robertson
11. PICTURES? ❑ Yes ® No TAKEN BY:
12. TYPE OF INSPECTION:
❑ A. Initial Inspection (Unpermitted Mine Sites)
1. Size of affected land: ac. (attach sketch map)
2. How was this area measured? Measured by:
® B. Routine Inspection (Permitted Mine Sites)
II C. Follow-up Inspection
13. Date of last inspection: 4/7/2016
14. Any mining since that date? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, cite evidence of such mining activity:
Stone was
being processed at the time of inspection and trucks were bein loaded with material.
15. Was mine operating at time of inspection? E Yes D No If yes, explain: Stone was being
processed
and sold during the inspection.
16. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No
❑ NIA
If no, explain:
17. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NIA
If no, explain:
18. Is there any off -site damage? A. ❑ Yes B. ® No C. ❑ None observed
If A, describe the type and severity of the damage:
If B or C, is there potential for offsite damage? ❑ Yes ® No Explain: No potential for off -site damages_
observed.
19. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: No corrective actions needed.
20. Other recommendations and comments: Facility was well operated at the time of inspection. Majority
of disturbed areas drain into the pit.
21. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ® Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed ❑ N/A
22. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes ® No Proposed date
23. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 0 24. Copy of Report sent to operator 9/8/17
INSPECTED BY:. Charles Gerstell DATE 8/29/17
Telephone No: [phone] _
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Air Quality
04vtwm MENTAL QUALITY
April 18, 2016
Mr. Jay Nivens, Senior Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Materials, Incorporated
8701 Red Oak Blvd, Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Thomasville Quarry
Davidson County
Dear Permittee:
Department of Environmental Quality staff conducted a multimedia compliance
inspection of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Thomasville Quarry on April 7, 2016
for permitted and/or other activities administered by the following Divisions: ,
Division of
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Air
Mineral, and Land.
Resources
Management (DWM)
Quali DAQ
Resources (DEMLR)
(DWR)
We hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our initiative to provide a single
inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at your
facility. The results of each applicable inspection area and any associated
response actions or necessary corrective measures are detailed in the Division
specific areas of the attached report. If there are no notes or comments under
each Division header, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's
rules and regulations at the time of inspection. Should violations be noted in the
attached report, you may receive separate enforcement related correspondence
in addition to this report.
If -you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact Mr.
Blair Palmer at [e-mail]. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Mining Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
DAQ WSRO Files
DEMLR WSRO Files
DWR WSRO Files
DWM WSRO Files
State of Yordt Carolina I Environmental Quality j Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mt11 Road, Suite 300 j Winston-Salem, NC 27105
336-776-9800 T 1 336-776-9797 F

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
Inspection Report
Date: 04/11/2016
Facility Data
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - Thomasville Quarry
691 Upper Lake Road
Thomasville, NC 27360
Lat: 35d 51.1210m Long: 80d 9.7270m
SIC: 1429 / Crushed And Broken Stone Nee
NAICS: 212319 / Other Crushed and Broken Stone Mining and Quarrying
Facility Contact
Jason McCray
Assistant Plant Manager
[phone]
Contact Data
Authorized Contact
John Tiberi
President Mid -Atlantic
Division
[phone]
Technical Contact
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental
Engineer
[phone]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - Thomasville
Quarry
NC Facility ID 2900132
County/FIPS: Davidson/057
Permit Data
Permit 03216 / R21
Issued 11/I312015
Expires 6/30/2017
Classification Small
Permit Status Active
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program Applicability
SIP
NSPS: Subpart 000
Compliance Data
Comments: Inspection part of multi -media program,
Inspection Date 04/07/2016
Inspector's Name Blair Palmer
Inspector's Signature: Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance- inspection
Action Code FCE
Date of Signature: 04/12/2016 RS On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR:
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
* HAP
2011
1.62
—
—
--
---
0.5900
---
2006
2.89
---
---
---
--
1.38
---
Five Year Violation History: None
Date Letter Tyne Rule Violated
Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None
Date Test Results Test Method(s)
1
* His hest FL4 P Emitted (in
Violation Resolution Date
Sources Tested

PERMITTED SOURCES:
Emission
Emission Source
Control
Control System
Source ID
Description ,'
_.�.... System ID_...-._ _
Description
(NSPS) Non -Metallic Mineral Processing Plant, utilizing water suppression with no other control
devices:
ES -Crush (NSPS) ;Crushing Operations NIA NIA
ES -Convey (NSPS)
lConveying
NIA
NIA
Operations
ES -Screen (NSPS) IScreening
NIA
NIA
Operations
DISCUSSION:
On April 7, 2016, Mr. Blair Palmer, Environmental Specialist for the WSRO-DAQ, contacted Mr. Jason
McCray, Assistant Plant Manager for Martin Marietta- Thomasville Quarry, and Mr. Jay Nivens, Senior
Environmental Engineer for Martin. Marietta Materials, for the purpose a compliance inspection. The
inspection also served as part of the multi -media inspection program. Members of the WSRO inspection
program were present during the inspection. The facility has a new plant contact, which is Jason McCray and
he has been added in IBEAM as the facility contact for this permitted facility. This permitted quarry was last
inspected by DAQ personnel on April 1, 2015 and the facility appeared to be operating in compliance at that
time. Martin Marietta -Thomasville Quarry crushes various size stone, which is used for various purposes, such'
as road construction. The facility mainly operates Monday -Friday, 8 -10 hours/day, and 51 weeks/year at the
present time. However, the quarry is operating intermittently during the colder months. It is not recommended
for DEQ personnel to conduct inspections during very cold weather, especially if there is or recently have been
ambient air temperatures at or below 32 degrees Fahrenheit because the plant relies on water for the crushing
operations. The facility does not have an emergency generator at the current time.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
The applicable air quality regulations as listed in condition A.1 of Air Permit No. 032161119 are: 2D .0202, 2D
.0501, 2D .0510, 2D .0521, .0524 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart ODO), 2D .0535, 2D .0540, 2D .1806, 2Q .0308,
and 2Q .0309. This facility is not required to implement a risk management plan under the federal regulation
40 CFR 68, Section 112(r) because they do not produce, use or store any of the regulated chemicals in
quantities above the threshold limits. However, the General Duty Clause contained in this rule applies to all
facilities and requires the safe and responsible handling of hazardous materials in any quantity.
SAFETY:
Safety vest, shoes, hardhats, and eyewear are required at the plant. Blasting in the quarry currently occurs on
average once per week. The office parking lot has a slight incline and each parking space is fitted with a wheel
chock. An annual safety meeting video is required for all visitors (including DEQ inspectors) at all Martin
Marietta locations. No blasting was occurring during the inspection- .

PROCESS and INSPECTION:
The process begins with holes being drilled into the quarry walls, usually in a vertical axis. After holes are
drilled, a mixture of ammonium nitrate and other material is ignited with blasting caps causing an explosion,
causing rock to break into pieces of various sizes, which fall mainly into the quarry floor and/or roads leading
into and out of the quarry. The blasting operation is subcontracted out to company specializing in blasting.
Currently the blasting occurs on average once per week. The loose rock is then picked up by 50 ton front end
loaders and placed into piles known in the industry as "Muck Piles." The piles are occasionally watered by the
facility's water truck to prevent fugitive dust, before being transported by approximately 50 to 70 ton dump
trucks and offloaded into the dump hopper (ID # 1) and associated feeder (ID #2). The rock is then fed into the
primary jaw crusher (ID #3) and then routed to the remaining circuit of various conveyors, screens, and
secondary crushers. The crushed pieces of rock eventually are stock piled into different diameter stone. Some
RIP -RAF (the largest stone-2.5 inches in diameter) is also made at this location. The following are the types of
stone at this location:
78M (crushed stone) - Used in the asphalt and concrete industry:
57, 67 (crushed stone) - Also used in the concrete and asphalt industry.
5 (crushed stone) - Used or placed around septic tank drainage (nitrification) lines
Aggregate Base Course (referred to as "ABC" crushed stone) - Used for road bases, building
pads, residential driveways, and some parking lots.
Most of the plant was crushing stone during the inspection. No visible emissions were noted at the transfer
points of the equipment, indicating compliance with NSPS Subpart 000 or 2D .0521. Several pieces of
equipment were not running, and they include item Nos. 7, 9, 10,11, 37, and 45 (on diagram revision 211/16).
The facility was also moving stone inside the quarry and trucks were being loaded with various sized stone for
customers.
PERMIT CONDITIONS:
Condition A.2 (2D .0202) deals with "Registration of Air Pollution Sources." The permit for this facility
expires on June 30, 2017. At least 90 days prior to the expiration of this permit, the Permittee shall submit a
permit renewal and an emissions inventory for the 2016 calendar year. The facility was reminded of this
requirement during the inspection and the facility will be targeted for another inspection before the permit
expiration.
Condition A.3 contains the l 5A NCAC 2D .0501(c) equipment reporting requirement. This condition requires
this facility to maintain an on -site equipment list and plant flow diagram of all equipment covered under this
permit. This list must include the rated crushing capacity of all crushers, width of belt conveyers, dimensions
and configurations of screens, the rated capacity of all other equipment not exempt from permitting, dates of
equipment manufacture, dates of required NSPS testing, and must bear the date of last revision. This condition
also requires the permittee to provide a 15-day written notification to the Regional Supervisor of the Division of
Air Quality, including a revised plant flow diagram and equipment list, any time the permittee installs new non -
primary crushing equipment or relocates existing non -primary crushing equipment. A current equipment list and
flow diagram that adhere to the requirements of this condition were included in the most recent changes to
equipment. Upon arrival at the facility, Mr. Nivens provided an equipment list and plant flow diagram to Mr.
Palmer. This list appeared to be the same as the list submitted during the last submittal of a newest conveyor

(item No. 47). The facility has also added a new deck screen (item no. 17), changed conveyor (item No.18),
a� added a new conveyor (item No. 32), added two conveyors from another location (items Nos. 34 and 46). The
plant appeared to match the equipment listed by the company on the list and diagram. The plant has submitted
' the proper written notification(s) to the DAQ WSRO. The official start-up of the pieces of the equipment
mentioned above was on January 20, 2016, except item no. 47 (February 3, 2016). Compliance with this
! condition is demonstrated. The facility will have to test some of this new equipment by the end of June 2016, in
order to satisfy the no later than the 180-day testing requirement (after initial start-up) as outlined in NSPS
} Subpart 000. iBEAM has been updated accordingly with the upcoming due date.
Condition A.4 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0510 particulate control requirement. This condition requires the
permittee to not produce materials in such a manner that PM, PMEc, and total suspended particle ambient air
quality standards are exceeded beyond the property boundary. Additionally, the facility is required to control
fugitive dust emissions as required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540 (and permit condition A.10), and control process
generated emissions from crushers with wet suppression so that all applicable opacity standards are met. The
plant was not operating, so there was no way to evaluate the process. Mr. Palmer observed no visible
emissions from haul roads. A water truck was not wetting the haul roads during the inspection due recent rain.
Compliance with this condition can be expected.
Condition A.5 characterizes the primary crusher being limited to 615 tons per hour production capacity and
prohibits the permittee from changing this crusher without submitting a new permit application. The crusher
currently has never exceeded 600 tons per hour production rate. The primary jaw crusher was replaced in
October 2012 with a similar one in terms of description, but does not qualify for Like -For -Like under 40 CPR
60.670(d), since it had a larger crushing setting at another facility: The replacement crusher (also mentioned
previously in condition A.3) had previous accepted EPA Method 9 testing performed back in January 2004 at
another permitted NCDAQ location, but not within the Winston-Salem region coverage area. The replacement
crusher is now limited at this facility due the maximum 10-inch setting or 615 tons per hour capacity. Mr.
McCray commented that they do not exceed this capacity and the most that the facility was operating at a .
maximum of 550 tons/hr. Compliance is indicated.
Conditions A.7 and A.8 contain the 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This condition limits
sources to 20 percent or 40 percent opacity depending on manufacture date. It should be noted that 40 CFR Part
60 Subpart 000 limits many of these sources to more stringent visible emissions standards than the limits
listed in 2D .0521 and is discussed below. Compliance with these limits is expected.
Condition A.9 (2D .0524) concerns "New Source Performance Standards" as promulgated in the federal
regulation 40 CFR 60, Subpart 000_ The facility is required to notify the Division in writing no -later than
thirty days after the commencement of construction of a crusher, screen or conveyor except in the case of mass-
produced sources, and to report again within fifteen days after the initial startup of the source. Additionally,
this condition limits the visible emissions from these affected sources to 15% opacity for crushers, 10% opacity
for the conveyors and screens and 0% opacity for conveyors and screens that process saturated materials. The
rule was changed on April 22, 2008 and allows 12% opacity for new crushers and 7% for new conveyors. The
facility is required to conduct performance testing on any affected source within sixty days of achieving
maximum production but no later than 180 days after the initial startup. A testing protocol must be submitted to
the Division at least 45 days prior to testing and at least 15-day advance written notice must be afforded the
Division to provide an observer. A provision of this condition exempts the replacement equipment from testing
if it is of equal or lesser production capacity than the existing source (Like -for Like). This facility is also

required to perform monthly periodic inspections to check that water is flowing to discharge nozzles on wet
suppression systems for sources that were constructed on or after April 22, 2008. The plant must record each
inspection including the date and any corrective action taken in a logbook that can be made available to DAQ
personnel upon request. The facility performs inspections on all subject 000 equipment regardless if is before
the April 22, 2008. The facility usually performs monthly inspections on the equipment and the last monthly
inspections occurred on March 6, 2016. Compliance is indicated.
There are several pieces of equipment that are subject to NSPS Subpart 000. These NSPS subject equipment
that were in operation during inspection has had the appropriate method 9 testing done based on a file review.
As mentioned above, the facility has replaced one piece of equipment (Item # 3-Jaw Crusher) back in 2012 that
is subject to 40 CFR 60 Subpart 000, and it has the required method 9 testing performed at another location
back on January 14, 2004. The last official method 9 testing at this permitted location was conducted on
October 4, 2011 on conveyor (ID No. 35). The facility had Stephanie Graham Environmental Engineer for
Martin Marietta Materials conduct the October 4, 201 I test. The test showed compliance with 40 CFR 60
Subpart 000 and a letter dated October 28, 2011 indicating the fact was sent to the facility. The facility will
have to test some of the newer equipment by June 2106, which was discussed earlier in this report under
condition A.3. Compliance is indicated at this time.
Condition A.10 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0535, Notification Requirement, requires the permittee to notify
the DAQ director of any excess emissions lasting longer than four hours resulting from a malfunction, a
breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal conditions. Mr. McCray and Mr. Nivens
indicated that no such incidents had occurred since the last DAQ inspection. Compliance with 2D .0535 is
expected.
Condition A.1 I per 2D .0540 requires fugitive dust controls from the unloading and loading area, stockpiles,
parking lots, and haul roads. The water truck was not operating during the inspection due to recent rain. There
were some trucks being loaded with stone during the inspection and these trucks were traveling to and from the
facility. DAQ personnel did not observe any dust problems and compliance with .0540 is indicated.
Condition A.12 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .1806, "Control and Prohibition of Odorous Emissions"
requirements. No objectionable odors were detected during the approach to the facility or within the property
boundaries. The facility does not have any previous odor complaints in the ]BEAM database and the process is
inherently low in odor. Compliance with 2D .1806 is expected.
EMISSIONS:
Annual emissions as listed in the 2010 emissions inventory are as follows (in tons):
- -.
7E.:" i� _ e:q^. _._. __ '}:!.-"..n! lihxx 'eF���€i
-
'!�v:oib_�;Ei�!_i•�SiiiS:�e_efF_�rl:! :r^ :: G:. 5 .:'r't..u:
a•!i;i3i`•"'i9k • . ,�.,::::-::.,�__r.:� .^-...,1�:.�. _ ...............�-�•_s :
=�=�:_.; .�; ::�•�;f�
PM
1.62
PMio
0.59
The facility crushed approximately 380,000 tons of stone (via the primary jaw crusher) during 2014 according to
Mr. McCray. No specific data'was given to Mr. Palmer for CY 2015, but business was good. Mr. Nivens projects
approximately 500,000 tons for CY 2016.

MACT/GACT:
The facility does not currently have any boilers, hot water heaters, or emergency generators on site.
There is no new area source MACT or GACT that is applicable to this facility at this time. NSPS Subpart 000
is applicable to the subject equipment at this facility.
COMPLIANCE HISTORY (within the last five years):
No NOVs or NODs have been issued within the last five years to this company based on review of the facility's
file and an IBEAM documents search. There have also been no complaints lodged against this permitted
facility.
PERMIT ISSUES:
None noted during the inspection.
SOURCE TESTS:
This facility is required to conduct Method 9 visible emissions tests on crushers, conveyers, screening
operations and other affected facilities within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the
sources will be operated but no later than 180 days after that initial start-up. The equipment list maintained by
the site contains testing dates for equipment that requires visible emissions tests under NSPS Subpart 000.
The last testing occurred on October 4, 2011 for conveyor (ID No. 35). The facility had Stephanie Graham
Environmental Engineer for Martin Marietta Materials conduct the October 4, 2011 test. The test showed
compliance with 40 CFR 60 Subpart 000 and a letter from this office dated October 28, 2011 was sent to the
facility indicating the fact. Compliance is indicated.
CONCLUSION:
Based on observations and records review, this facility appeared to be operating in compliance with Air Quality
standards and regulations at the time of the April 7, 2016 inspection.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
X PERMITTED MINE SITE
❑ UNPERI'IITTED MINE SITE
1. MINE NAME: Thomasville Quarry 2. MM LOCATION: Lipper Lake Road
3. COUNTY: Davidson 4. RIVER BASIN: Yadkin 5. CASE:
6. OPERATOR: Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
7. ADDRESS: Attn: Mr. Jav Nivens 8701 Red Oak Blvd., Suite 540 Charlotte NC 28217
8. MINING PERMIT 4: 29-03 N/A 9. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: 9/14/2022 NIA
1.0. PERSON(S) CONTACTED AT SITE: Mr. Jay Nivens & Jason McGreggor
11. PICTURES? ❑ Yes X No TAKEN BY:
12. TYPE OF INSPECTION:
❑ A. Initial Inspection (Unpermitted Mine Sites)
1. Size of affected land: ac. (attach sketch map)
2. How was this area measured? Measured by:
X B. Routine Inspection (Permitted Mine Sites)
C. FolIow-up Inspection
13. Date of last inspection: 12/15/2010
14. Any mining since that date? X Yes ❑ No If yes, cite evidence of such mining activity: Mine still
crushing and selling aggregate.
15. Was mine operating at time of inspection? X Yes ❑ No If yes, explain: Stone being crushed and
sold on site today. _
16. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? X Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If
no, explain:
17. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No X NIA If
no, explain:
18. Is there any off-site.damage? A. Yes 13. X No C. None observed
If A, describe the type and severity of the dama e: None noted.
If B or C, is there potential for offsite damage? Yes X No Explain: Not at this time
19. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: N/A
20. Other recommendations and comments: Mine in good condition during inspection, Work on newl
approved culvert completed and stabilized in 2012. Outer areas are stabilized well and most disturbed areas around
the pit drain -into the pit as designed- This ins ection part of a Multimedia Inspection with Air Quality,Water
Oualitv and Solid Waste Divisions.
21. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? X Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed ❑ N/A
22. Follow-up inspection needed?
23. No. of additional pages of Insl
Yes X No Proposed date
n Report 0 24. Copy of Report sent to operator 4/11/2016
INSPECTED BY: Chuck Kirchner, Ryan Swaim, Matthew Gantt DATE April 07, 2016
Telephone No: 336-776-9800
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

Permit NCG020076
SOC:
County: Davidson
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Jay Nivens
Directions to Facility:
System Classlflcations:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Compliance Inspection Repo
Effective: 01/01/10 Expiration: 12131/14 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Thomasville Quarry
691 Upper Lake Rd
Thomasville NC 27360
Title: Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Phone:
Inspection Date: 04107/2016 Entry Time: 09:OOAM Exit Time: 12:15PM
Primary Inspector: Lon Snider Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Sue L Homewood
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stomnvater Discharge COG
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

permit: NCG02D075 OWner- Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Data: 0410712016 Inspection Type : Campliance Evaluation Reason For Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
r
Page: 2

v
permit; NCG020076 owner- Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
iInspection Date: 041177/2015 Inspection type : compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
i to water Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# fs the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: This site visit was part of a Multimedia training inspection.
Faciltiy had their BMP inspection records.
i Employee training was conducted on 1/27/16.
Secondary containment records are being kept per the permit._
Plan was updated on 2/22/16,
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: Qualitative monitoring was conducted on 6/19/2015 & 12/3/2015 of last year.
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: All analvtical monitoring was conducted per the permit as follows:
Process water - 1127/2015, 4/28/2015, 9/2112015 & 11 /25/15_
Wastewater - 11/24/2015
EeEMit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stcrmwater) discharges?
Comment: Facility recieved representative status July 2008.
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
* ❑ 1111
❑ ❑ ❑
■. ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
Yes Ny NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
Yea No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑■❑
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
IN ❑ ❑ ❑
E ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Ole
" t
MCDERR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P.E.
Governor Director
February 4, 2013
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Attn: Mr. John A. Hawley
Assistant Plant Manager
691 Upper Lake Road
Thomasville, NC 27360
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Certificate of Coverage #NCG020076
Martin Marietta Material, Inc. — Thomasville Quarry
Davidson County
Dear Mr. Hawley:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Enclosed, please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) form from the inspection
conducted on January 15, 2013. The CEI was conducted by Jenifer Carter of the Winston-Salem Regional
Office of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). You and Jay Nivens, Senior Environmental Engineer, were
present for the inspection. The inspection consisted of two parts: an on -site inspection of the treatment facility
and a file review. The following are the findings from the inspection:
I. Permit
The General Permit became effective on January 1, 2010 and expires on December 31, 2014. A signed copy of
the permit is maintained on site.
II. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SPPP
• A Stormwater Management Plan has been developed for this facility, with stormwater BMPs being
inspected and maintained as required.
• A signed copy of the erosion and sedimentation control permit issued by the Division of Land Resources
was available for inspection.
• Equipment is well maintained and Good Housekeeping Practices are in place.
• Secondary Containment is provided where required.
• Employee Training records were available for review.
III. Oualitative Monitorin
Qualitative Monitoring is performed as required by the permit. The Division authorized one outfall as a
representative outfall for the other outfalls at the mine.
IV. Analytical Monitorins�
Analytical Monitoring is performed as required by the permit. Representative Outfall status nowapplies to
analytical monitoring, as well as Qualitative monitoring.
Samples taken of the outfall's effluent the day before the inspection revealed an exceedence of the stream
standard for Turbidity. Mr. Nivens contacted our office upon receiving the results, and a Tier One response has
been initiated as required.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] ti Customer Service: 1-877.623-6748
Internet: htip:flportal.nodenr.org/webAvq
continued of reverse...
NorthCarolina
Natwall,#
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

The Division appreciates the Thomasville Quarry's renewed staff efforts to obtain and maintain compliance.
Please do not hesitate to contact Jenifer Carter at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
r
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
attachment
cc: WSRO-Files
NPS-ACO Unit
SWP --- Central Files
Mr. Tay Nivens (Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.; 8701 Red Oak Blvd, Suite 540; Charlotte NC 28217)

ljc's�, af\r Nor,
Faxed To: John - Martin Marietta Materials
aeiA/ ,
Fax #: [phone] Phone [phone]
NCG020000 Inspection Checklist
A complete coov of this information should be available to the inspector at the time of the inspection or delivered to the
WSRO before the scheduled inspection if requested.
Facility: Thomasville Quarry NPDES: NCG020076
Permit Effective Dates: January 1, 2010 to December3l, 2014
Inspection Date: 01/15/2013 Inspection Time: 1:00 pm
Section A: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP), included but not limited to:
1) Site Plan, including maps, list of spills/leaks, and annually re -certification records for the evaluation of all
stormwater outfalls.
2) Signed copy of the mining permit and/or erosion and sedimentation control permit issued by the Div of Land
Resources for this site.
3) Stormwater Management Plan, including BMP inspection records (weekly and within 24 hrs of storm event
that produces a discharge) for the preceding 12 months.
4) Spill Prevention and Response Plan
5) , Employee Training Records.
Section _B=D:_ Analytical and Qualitative Monitoring Requirements for Discharges Composed Entirely of Stormwater
monitored dg re resentative storm events
1) Semi -Annual analytical monitoring records (DMRs) for SW discharges from areas of mine excavation, other
land disturbance, process areas, and vehicle maintenance (only if calendar year average exceeds 55 gal of
new motor oil per month).
2) Semi-annual Qualitative monitoring for SW discharges,
Section E: Mine Dewatering Wastewater and Process Wastewater Monitoring Requirements
1) Approved DWQ Pumping Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan if mine dewatering activities have the
potential to drain wetlands or other surface waters.
2) Quarterly monitoring records (DMRs) for
a. mine dewatering wastewater
b. process wastewater [i.e. slurry transport, washing, sawing of mined material, air emissions control or
processing (exclusive of sand, gravel and stone washing, dimension stone cutting & air scrubbing and
dust control operations)]
c. overflow from closed -loop process recycle wastewater system designed to operate with a minimum of 2'
of freeboard.
Supporting documentation
1) DMRs(Dates: Januaa2010 to Present }
2) Lab Data (per DMR dates), calibration records
3) Laboratories used for analysis & certification #'s
4) Chain of Custody forms (per DMR dates)
5) Facility visual inspection
6) Stream accessible for inspection (at effluent discharge pipe)
Please call with questions:
Jenifer carter
NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
[phone] Fax: [phone]

Martin Marietta MateriaW
February 1, ;013'
Mrs. Jennifer Carter.
NCDENR -Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown'Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Re: Martin Marietta Thomasville Quarry — NCP020076
Stormwater,Sample Exceedance
Dear Mrs. Carter:
This let tevis to provide your officelwith the notification°of a Siormwater-sample exceedance-that
was taken at our Thomasville Quarry.on January 15, -2013. 1 have enclosed_ a Storm_ water
exceedance:report, proposed corrective actions and the lab results for this sample.
Should you. have any questions or need any additional .information., please do riot hesitate to
contact,me at (704); 409A475 or via e-mail [e-mail].
Sinc _ lY,
`.
Jay Nivens,
Environmental _Engineer
Martin,Marietta Materials, Inc.
9701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 546
Char]otte,.NC`28217
tHoriias"ville storinwater sample excee'dahce 1-2§-13.docx!

k
Martin Mari®tta Matbrlals
IVY NY'
Stormwater Sample Exceedance Report:
Site: Tlioinasville Quafry
Date sample�was collecied::.January 15, 2013
Outfall:loeatiion: Existing Stormwater Basin,
Benchmark.Paraiiieter.Eiceeded: Turbidity—'138;NTU (niea§&ed"at,oiitfdll)
Date of Lab Results: January22,-2Q 1'3.
Date of St6fniwatee, Manakemehf Ins"pectidn: January-15,12013
Personnel in attendance:' Jay Nivens —Environmental Engineer Martin, Marietta
John Hawley Ass t..;Plani'Manager Martin Marietta:
Jennifer Carter — NCDENR— DWQ
Inspgetton_Ob ervations: This basin was discharging the. day' of theJfispection. and a sample
was taken .at tliis location. During'the inspection it was noted this'basin,i eeded;to be, cleaned out
due 'to the accumulated sediment present ,in the basin: This ,basin was -not providing sufficient
volui ie to: treat`the� runoff_piior to disclarge., The discharge weir was, not. functioning properly
i
allowing water.to be;discharged'before the.designed treatment.
Proposed Actions: The accumulated sediment will, be :removed, from. this basin. This will
allow this basin to.provide°the.necessary storage to treat the runoffprior. to discharge: The -weir
section will'bexe-established to provide, sufficierif treatment -and filtering ofthe �runoff.:
Da#e,Actions Im lemenie&.: Week of)~ebruary. 11, 2043.
thomasville Stormwater sample exceedance 1:-29-13docx

_TIER,2 or BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCE DMR - STORMWATER
SEND TO YOUR LO-CA'L REGIONAL OFFICE
SPOR-WATER DISCHARGE OUT -FALLS (SDO)
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NiCG010000 (MINING),
FWcthis —form,ifyou have MEE .. —DED BENCH for any parameter or are in Mr,2 Mbnitoring. Send sample results to.DTQ.Regional Office within 30 . days, of receipt
from tab,
CERTIFICATE OF -COVERAGE -No. NCG020076 PERIOD: 4 (9.1 D
MONTHLY: EJ MONTH
PERSON- COLLECTING SAMPLES John'Hawley FACILITY NAME. Thbrhasville-'
CERTIFIED'LABORATORY Pke Tnalytical, �Lab.#j 2. -COUNT`Y-Wvidson
Click here,to enier lexi�L.ab PH.ON E*O..(�36 . ) 475-9168
Pair( A: StorijaWater Monit ring,Reguiiements.
.Outfall`
1
No
Date'sa'mpW
Collected
(m6/dd/yr.OR,.
�Nqnt%,i
1. Monitoring?
Moi l6g?
#.6f M66ths-,
-
,, Ti&21 j
, i-4
�'S i hfol ne-
T6tal Flo*
(MG);
Tota],Suspended;
S.
Solids.
TurbiditySettleablb
(NTU)
S ids (MI/11
Total
RMnfill
Event;
Duration
(minutes)
100T
Sii F66
SDO1.
1/15/13'
N
01034
59A
138
ND
.50
300
t
If "NO FLOW" -or "NO DISCHARGE, Enter "NO FLOW"'or "No . ekh,6utfall:here and the: Date. Range.
Per-NCG02 Tier 2 Monthly sampling shall be done unti I 1 1 3 . consecutive sam. ples;are below the benchmark or withih.the.befichmark range
'If avalue-is in excess:of the benchmark; or_ouislde tfie%enchmaik range (for OH), you must implement t1fe'Tier I di Tier 2 responses in the General Permit,
'TSSiberichifiCurkyalues are I00.mg/I,ixccIii. in ORW,'HWQ,.trout, and P14A waters "where-th-e'y,.^are '5"O ' mok'
'The discharge
.otcause.an,ifist_antanebusm6guremen t of the turbidity of the receiving water io exceed:- I 0,NTU f6r:freshwater'streams, lakes,;and reservoirs deiignatcid as trout
waiers_;_:i5']�TU for all lakes and reservoirs, and all: sa I It waters; 50 NTU f6i all other streams 'and surface. -waters. Turbidity may be'monitored 'at-the'S'tormwater Dischame Outfall.
Alternatively; the permittee,may. choose to monitor'turbidity in the're.c.eiving water, diiectly upstream and downstrea7m,df the SbO.
Permit Ddte`' V t/2010-12/31/20 14 Last Revised 02-02-11'
Page 11 of 2

cart:&: VehicleMaintenance Activitv Monito ring Reauirements for-fadlities using > 55 t=al of new..motor oil/month on average
- Outfall
Nb:'
Date San pie
`Collected
(mo"ldd/yr:OR
NO FLO,W)t
In Tier 2:
:Monthly
rMonitoring4-
(y%n}
# of
Months",
Tier"2
Sampling?
New Mbtor`Oil.
Usage
al/month
Total'Flow
(MG)-
TPH using
method 1664A
SGT--HEM. 0
Total,SusPended
Solids
i /I
pH.
(Standard.
Total
Rainfall`
in
Event.
`Diiration
minutes
L-
15.in 1
-Units)'
100`rti 11
0:9, ,
HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE: BENCHMARKEXCEENDENCES AT
ANY ONE,OUTFALL (ALL.SDOs;INCLUDING' VEHICLE MAINTENANCE)?
HAVE=YOU CONTACTED THE`REGi6N?
WHO AT THE REGION'HAVE YOUSPOKEN WITH?
Asheville Regional Office (ARO)
`Roger Edwards, Surface:Water`Protection
:Supervisor.
2090. US Highway-70
•Swannanoa, NC 28778
COURIER 12-59-01
,Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fayetteville Regional Office(FRO)13elinda:Henson, Surface Water_ Protection
:Supervisor.
.225 Green Street
,Systel Building Suite 714
Fayetteville„NC 28301-5043
COURIER 14-56-25
Phone: (910),43'3'-3300
Fax: [phone]
Mooresville,Aegiotial Office (MRO)
Rob Krebs, Surface -Water Protection!
Supervisor
610 East Center AVenue_,,Suite, 301
Maores.Aie,_NC 281,15.
COURIER 09-08-06
Phone: [phone]'699
Fax: (704) §03-b040
Raleigh,Reglbrial:Office (RRO)
Dahriy Smith; Surface Water'Protection
Supervisor
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609.
COURIER 52=01-00
Phone..[phone]
Fax: (919)' 71-4718
YES ® NO.❑
JenriAr Carter
Wash ingfon.Region al Office (WaRO).
Al Hodge, Surface Water Protection
Supervisor
943`Washington.Square Mall
Washington; NC27889
COURIER 16-041701
Phone: (252) 946=6481
Fax-.[phone] or [phone]
Wilmington Regional Office (WRO}
Rick Shiver,i Surface Water Protection
Supervisor
127-Cardinal,Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405=2845
COURIER 04-16=33
Phone' (910).796-7215'
Fax: (910).,350-2004
Winston-Salem°Regiona1 Office (WSRO)
SteveTedder,;Surface Water Protection
Supervisor,
585 Waughtown Street.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
COURIER.13-15=01
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
YGUMUST•SIGN THISCERTIFICATION'FOR ANYINFORMATION REPORTED:,
y p y ., t and all attachments were prepared under` my direction -or supervisiomin accordance.with.a system designed to
Lcertif ;under• ena[t 'ofaaw that this document
assure -that qualified ;personnel properly;.gather and evaluate the information submitted, Based'on-my inquiry of the person. or persons who manage the system,. or
those persons directly,responsible for gathering the information, the information'submitted.is; to the_best of my knowledge.and belief,,true,.accurate, and.complete.
Tama there are si nificant:periAies;for submitting'false information, includingthe possibility of, fines and imprisonment'for knowing; violations;"
(Sigpdture of Permittee)
�Permit:Date. 1/1 /2010=12l3172014
I,3
:(pate)
1,ast Revised'02-02-11
Page 2 of 2.

aceAnalytical
www.Faterahs.oarn
PaceAnatytical Services, Inc:
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
January 22, 2013
Mr., Jay N vens,
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 18565
Greensboro; NC 27419
RE: Project: Thomasville. Semi,Annual
Pace Project No.: 92.144922•
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 2880C
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersvilte; NC 28078'
.[phone]
Dear Mr., Nivens.-
Enclosed are the -analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on January-15, 2013.
The results relate -only to the saniples.iriciuded in this report. Results reported herein conform,.to the.
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where; applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report..
Analyses wewpe6rmed afthe Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for ahalysis.unless otherwise footnoted:
If you have;any questions concerning this report, please feeffree to contact me.
Sincerely;
Jon. D Bradley for
Erin Waters.
[e-mail],
Project Manager
Enclosures
co: Plant Manager, Martin Marietta Aggregates
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shad not be reproducer!, except in fug,
,A fhout the written consent of Pape Analytical Services. Inc..
Page 1 of 9,

,�ac�ieAnalyfical
rnrw.patelatis tom
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
205 East Meadow Road -.Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Project' Thomasville Semi -Annual
Pace Project No: 92144922
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.,
Ashevi8e, NC 28804
[phone]'
CERTIFICATIONS
Asheville teriikation lDs-
2225.Riverside' Dr., Asheville;, NC 28804 North Carolina VVa§tewater, Certification #. 40
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648,- South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
Massachusetts Certification #: M=NC030 West Virginia Certification-0: 356
North Carolina,Drinking Water Certification #: 37712 VrginiaNertrfi EEAP.Ccattan # 460222
Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28073'
(7.P4)875-9092
REPORT OF'CABORATQRY ANALYSIS Page-2 of 9-
This report shall not be reproduced, except In full,
i ithoutthe.wdtten consent of Pace _Analytical SerJicesJnc.,

PaceAnaiyfical Services. -Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceAnalytkc l 205.East Meadow Road - Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr.
www.lvw1abs.mm Eden, NC 27288 Asheville, NC 28804
[phone] (82B}2547976:
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT'
Project: Thomasville Semi -Annual
Pace Project No.:. 92144922
Pate Anaiyttcal Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave; Suite 100
HuntersWle, NC'28078
g04)875-90e2
Analytes,
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analysts
Reported
Laboratory
92144922001' Seml-Annual SW SSfTur FSS EPA 180.1
EWS
1
PASI-A
SM 25400
LIVID
1
PASI=,4
SM 254OF
LIVID
1
PASI=A
REPORT -OF LABORATORY'ANALYSIS.
This report shag not be reproduced, except in tuil,
without the written consent of Pace AnelytiFaI Services, Inc..
Page 3 of W

aceAnalytical
wwwpacelabs.com
Pace Ana Wical Smicea, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road , Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Project: Thorimsville Semi -Annual
Pace Project No.: 92444922
Pace Ana"cal .Services,
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
'[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.,
9800 Kinney Ave. Suite 1.00
Hun*nville, NC 28079'
[phone]
Sample: Semi=Annual SW
LabID: 92144922001 Collected: 01/15/13 10:45
Received: 01/15/13 15:10 Matrix: Water
SSlTurlTSS
Parameters
Results: Units
Report Urnit, bF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
180.1 Turbidity
Analytical. Method: EPA 1t30.1
Turbidity
138 NTU
10:0 1
01/17/13 09:45
2540d Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Tdtal.Suspended;Solids
59.4 m9A
Tl 1
Oldl/13.15:05
264OF Total Settleable Solids
Analytical.Method:'SM 254OF
Total Settleable Solids
NO mtlUhr
0.10 1:
01115113 21:V
0
bate: t)1l2212013.11:02A' M' REPORT-0F'LABORATORY ANALYSIS; Page 460.9.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in fult,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, lnc..

,�aneAnalytical
WWW49 elaRScam
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Read - Suite
Eden, NE 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY -.CONTROL DATA
Project: Thomasville Semi -Annual
Pace Project No_: 92144922
QC Batch: WETM868 Analysis Method: EPA 180.1
QC. Batch Meihod: EPA 180:1 Analysis Description. 180.1 Turbidity
Associated Lab Samples: '92144922001
METHOD BLANK: 907001 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92144922001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Wits Result, Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Turbidity NTU ND 1.0 01/17/13 09:45
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 907002
Pace Analytical Servlces, Inc.
9800 IQrncey Ave. Suite 100
Muntersville, NC 28078
(704)8754b92
Spike LCS :LCS % Rec
Parameter Units; Conc.. Result O Rec Limits Qualifiers
Turbidity NTU 10 101 100 90-1110,
SAMPLE DUPLICATE 907003
92145005001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Turbidity NTEI ND 'ND,
Date: bi122/2013 11:02'AM. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS, Paga 5 of
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full; .
without the written consent ai Pace Anaiy =l Services, Inc..

aceAnalyti+cal s
iH1'NCp3C81db3-�Q+n
Pace Analytical Services, inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC'27288
[phone]
Piire'A_ 6alytieal SCrvlces,,Inc:
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville; NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA'
Project: Thomasvifle Semi=Annual
Pace Project No.: 92144922
QC Batch: WET/23889 Analysis Method: SM 254013,
QC.Batch Method:. SM 25400 Analysis Description: 2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 9214492200-
METHOD BLANK: 908566, Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92144922001
Pace Arsa[ytwal Services, Inc.
9800 tGneey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
(704)875-9D92
blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total SuspertdedSolids, mg/L NO 2.5 01,I2l/i315:02'
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 908567
Spike LCS :LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Cant. Result % Rec. Limits Quallfters
Total Suspended Solids mg1L- 250 250 100 80-120
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 908568
9214.WO.001 Oup.
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 25.1 22:9' 9
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 908569;
92144897001 Oup'
Parer *ter Units Result Result ROD Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg1L 147 141 4
Date: 01/22/2019 11:02AM, REPORT OF LABORATORY -ANALYSIS Page.6:.of R
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
wiftui the, wriftw consent of Pace Analytical Services; Inc...

aeeAnalytrcalg
www.paoslabs.mm
Pace Analytical Ser0ces; rnc:
205 'F.ast Meadow Road : Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Project: Thomasville Semi -Annual
Pape Pra;ect NO.: §2144922
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
.[phone]'
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC -Batch: WET1238351 Analysis;Method: SM 254OF
QC Batch Method: SM 2540F Analysis Description: 254OF Total.Settable Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 92144922001
METHOD BLANK: 906002 Matrix: water
Associated Lab Samples: 92144922001
Blank Reporting
.Parameter UnitsReso: Limit. Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Settleable Solids mLlllhr NO 0.10 01115113'21:37
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 906003
Parameter
TotalSi6 tleable Sands
Units
mLl dhr
92144805001 Dup
Result Result RPD Qualifiers
ND NU
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KrroeyAve, Suite 100
Huntersville,,NC 28078
(T04)875-9092
Date: o1I22l20t3 i1':02 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS, Page 7 of 9'
This report shall not be reproduced; except in full,
without the written conserii of Pace Analytical Servfces, Inc..

,�acie
wmv
Project:
Pane Project NFI DENITIONS
w
Pace Analytical Seiices, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc_
'Xical
205 East Meadow Road '-,SuiteA
2225.Riverside Dr.
9800I(inceyAve. Suite100
P e
Eden. PVC 27288
Asheville, NC 28804'
tiurdersvii1e,.NC 28078
[phone]
[phone]
(704)875=9092
QUALIFIERS
Thomasville Semi -Annual
o.: 92144922
DF - Dilution Factor, if: reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data'due to changes in sample preparation; dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND Not Detected at or..above.adjusted reporting.limiL
J - Estimated concentration above `the adiusted'ineth6d.detecti6n limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL-Adjusted Method Detection: Limit.
PRL- Pace Reporting Limit_
RL - Reporting Limit:
S - Surrogate
1,2-Dipheny1hydrazine (8270 fisted analyte) decorriposes.to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are.displayed and have been used.to calculate % recovery and RPD values:
LCS(D),- Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUPE- Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Ctean-Up
U - indicates the comporiiid was analyzed lot, taut iotdetected.
N-Nitrosodiphenyiamine"deicomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine usih4,Method 827.0. The, result reported'for:
each anaiyte fs•a combined canceniration.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chforoethylvinyl •ether, Styrene and Vinyl ch.10de.
PaceAnalyticat is TNI,aecreditad: Contact your Pace PM for,the current fist of accredited analytes.
`TNI -The NELAC institute.
LABORATORIES
PASI-A: Pace Analytical Services: Asheville
Date:01/22/2613 11:02AM REPORT OF'LABORATORYANALYSIS, Page 8 of,9.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace, Analytical Services; lnc..

aceAnalytical
www.pir�dtrGccarri
f
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road- Suite
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pate Analytical Services, Inc:.
2225 Riverside Dr..
Asheville. NC 28804.
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Pace Analytical Servicas, Inc.,
8800IGnceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersvr7la, NC 28078
[phone]'
Prajed:: Thomasville Se_rn-Annuaf
Pace Project No:: 92144922
Analytical
Lab ID Sample ID 00 Batch Method be Batch Analytical Method Batch
92144922001
Semi -Annual SW SSlrur/TSS'
EPA 180.1'
92144922001
Sam! -Annual SW SSrrurlTSS
SM 26400
92144922001
Semi -Annual SW SS1Tur[TSS
SM 2540E
WEr123858
WET123889
WET123835
Date: 01/22/2013 11:02AM REPQRT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page.9 of 9'
This report shatl not be reproduced, except in Lull,
without the 4itte0 consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

2aceAnaiical •
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY f Analytical Request Document
The cwri ar-custody is a LEcm DocumEmr. Ali iawa =t tEkis umt be.sample}Dd accutateEy.
SocWn A Section B Secticn C
RagWmd C31" tnkuenMlon: Ra nid Protect kltart m*i4 Inv alco InkrMn. l M:C-npap
1"•, /�atr>fe w. 1Y�grle fG. RepwtTa: 6[ 'lr�S ntbn:
1605000
Adarcae: Copy
To:
Cortwm Nerve:
REGULATflRYAGERCY-'-
O+ iS V: rN AX7360
NPOES r' GRQUNC WATER, r. QRIN ING WATER
r usT r RcPA (' OTHER
Email To:
mha" Order No.:
pwa Chlow '^
Rafcraa a: G+9I Gt-r , lc GYC .
x5
a� ,�
F,3.V �X5-,pj79
erect Nemec Aw+c�,Vi t�
Ped P'MI r �wY,rSe.i►r{i4 h C oZ?i3rat7
Slte Looalloii
; ST117E
Requested Due CaSaIfAT PraJect
Number. A
sort % ' i
Peu Proms b
i2etjileste�l
Analjlais_Fitt
Mil
(YIN
.`
,
.
�
9edton l7 Mabtir Codne.
RagdradClhr1t 4d0lmLadl. .MAT=M CODE
Ortnkhip WOW -aw
Wster
WaateWeter WW
Product P
SAMPLE ID oil OL
AZ;691,_} 'Air AR
Sample JD* MUST .6EUNiQUE Tleeire T9
0111er OT
SL'
e' _ A. u g � S L'i
�
S
�I
_
�
8
�
COLLEGTEt7'
�
O
�
AfB99rYAtiyAS
m
�ir'
crE
COL9.0arrez
n
c
�
�
O
Z
�
V
x
p
2
�
�
0
A
e
Q
;y
i6h�
: r
'
1
cY
Pace Project No.1 Ub I.D.
DATE
TIME
DA75,
TIME
IW
S,
4
6.
8
T
1t7
12
Aof71710liAL COMMEAiT8
RFLItdQU1BHE6s'! lAFFILWTDON <
0%T8 ,
,. .
Titer
- '
ACCEP-= BY l AFFI
TION
CATS
1w
8AMPl.E CoNorriams
fLL
ORIGINAL
.
BAMPLER_44NiE ZRD 16NATURE ,, .. -•i;
p
�&
9��'�•
��
�8�
��
PRJNTN=mafSAMPLFlb
S[GKATURE cf SAMPLER:
ftned
-knpodwa Ndi 81a4ing rb tor"m you ace acoepfnp Pwati NET 20 dar 7aY trams end t pmi' q to has d iA% W monk Ior airy knoirm mt field i Atlski M d+ra F N L Q fl2Uiay.fl7.;t 5�utay 2D07

Document Name: Document Revised: October 31, 2012
�• Sample Condition Ubn'Recel t (SCUB.,Pgge 1 oft
Document Number: Issuing Authority:.
F�CHR-CS-03-rev.08 Pace Hurttemv' ille.Qu' ItyQifice. .
Client Name: _ - f ';�._ ! ^ri l,�ojegt #. `-SLq
Where Received: "u ersville 0 Asheville ❑ Eden Ralelgh
Courier: El 'Fad Ex ❑ UPS❑' USPS❑ � CommercWD Pace Other
Cusfady Seal on'Coolerl8ox Present: ❑ yes, Seals inCac ❑ •yes ❑ no
Paldking Material: [] Bubble Wrap faubbffi eas ❑ an ❑ Other
7herin meter Used: IR Gun 1 (� Type bf ice: ;jor Blue None ,,,'Samples an Ice; cooNng process has beguin
Terns Canrection Factor' T1101: No Correction T1102: No Correction
Corrected;Coale�Ternp» C
Temp.should be above freezingto 80C, .
Biological Tissue is Frozen: Yes No NA
°�
Confinents:.
Date and initials of parson examtnl
contents:
Chain of Cost Present:
'ON* ONIA
1.
Chaln of C ustody Filled Out _
es ONfo ONIA
2.
Chaln'of Cusfody Rell ed:
ONO CINA
3.
Sampler Name & S nature -on COC:.
❑Yeses❑WA
4.
Saab leg Arrived within Hold Time:
Yes ONO. -O'NA
&
Short Hold Time Ass . s t72h •;
ei ONO ONUA
&
Rush Turn Around Time Requested:
❑Yes DNA
7.
Sufficient Volume:
Zl ei- ❑wo OWA
8.
Correct Containers used:
-Pace Containers Used-
byes 13No 'OwA
Y s '❑No ❑NA
9.
..
Containers intact-
,fV8—. E7iN6 .©wA
10.
Pilterad voluhid received for Dissolved fiesta
❑Yes .❑No
11.
Sarnple Labels match COC:'
-Includes date%rriellD1Ana Mabiic
❑Yrs,OKo--. OfVA
12. jet f�L`'
` n�c�: c`u—
AM ooaiainers_need'sng preseryVkw) have been attacked.
Ail oontalners needing preservatlon are faund to be In.
aorrrpfiance with EPA necommendalion.
6meOwIr VOA. = tarn, TOC, O&G, Wl-DKO
❑Yes ONO
❑Yes ONO.©N1I
OYaa • ❑No
13.
lodid when comyetw
-Sam lea checked for dechlorinatfon:
❑fires 01N6 NIA
14-
Headspace In VOA Vials -.>6mm :
❑Yes ONO
15.
Trip Blank Present:
"trip Blank Custody Seals Present
Pace Trip Blank Lot # if rchased
Ores ON. � A'
❑Yes Onto ❑
18.
Client Notlflcet16n1,Res6lutl6n: Field Data Regrared? Y / N
Person Contacted: DateMme:
Comments! Resolutlon:
SCURF Rev! - awl oste: f I� f � SRF Review: 0' ate:
Note: Whenever there Is a.dlscrerancy affecting Morin Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEf-(NR
' Certihkatlon office (Le out of hold. incorred preservative. out of temp. lr=frect.oantalners)

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William Cr. Ross In, Secretary
Forth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 18, 2008
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Attn: Ms. Stephanie Graham,
Environmental Engineer
P.O. Box 18565
Greensboro, NC 27419
Subject: Representative Outfall Status (ROS) Approval
Certificate of Coverage #NCG020076
'Martin Marietta Material, Inc. -- Thomasville Quarry
Davidson County
Dear Ms. Graham:
The Winston-Salem Regional Office staff reviewed your request for a determination that Stormwater
Discharge Outfall (SDO) for Land Disturbance and Process Areas be granted representative outfall
status. Based on the information and map provided, and on our site visit on July 1, 2008 by Jenifer
Carter and George Smith of this office, %ve are making the following ROS determination:
In accordance with 40 CFR § 122.21(g)(7), you are authorized to sample outfall number 003, as observed
by the Division on July 1, 2008, as a representative outfall. This approval is effective with any sampling
events that have or will take place after July 1, 2008. Please be reminded that the permit still requires
Qualitative Monitoring to be performed at all SDOs, regardless of representative outfall status.
Please append this letter to your Stormwater Permit in order to document that representative outfall
status has been approved. If changes in drainage areas, structures, processes, storage practices, or other
activities occur that significantly alter the basis of this approval, notify this office for an updated ROS
determination. If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter, please contact Jenifer
Carter or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
attachment
cc: WSRO Files
NPS-ACO Unit
SWP — Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtowm Street; Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

�A'lC,4
i
IT
HAROL.D & SfIELBY
,GALLIMORE .
s
as
AV

o��F wA r1�SRp�
bu_U
a .;;t
w^+
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Brian K. North, PE
Manager, Engineering Services
P.O. Box 7446
Charlotte, NC 28241-7446
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 18, 2008
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Certificate of Coverage ##NCG020076
\Martin 1VIarietta I'VIaterial, Inc. — Thomasville Quarry
Davidson County
Dear Mr. North:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed, please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) form from the inspection
conducted on July 1, 2008. The CEI was conducted by Jenifer Carter of the Winston-Salem Regional
Office of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). George Smith (DWQ), Stephanie Graham (plant's
Environmental Engineer) and Wayne Scarlett (Plant Manager) -were also present for the inspection. The
inspection consisted of two parts: an on -site inspection of the treatment facility and a file review. The
following are the findings from the inspection:
I. Permit
The General Permit became effective on January 19, 2005 and expires on December 31, 2009. A signed
copy of the permit is maintained on site.
II. Stormwater Best Management Practices (BiN•IP) Plan
A Stonnwater BMP Plan has been developed for this facility.
• Storm,,vater BMPs are inspected and maintained as required.
• A signed copy of the erosion and sedimentation control permit issued by the Division of Land
Resources was available for inspection.
• Equipment is well maintained and Good Housekeeping Practices are in place.
• Secondary Containment is provided where required.
III, Qualitat-i_ve Monitoring
Qualitative Monitoring of all stormwater outfalls with stormwater runoff form land disturbance, process
and vehicle maintenance areas is performed as required by the permit.
IV. Analvtical Monitoring
Analytical monitoring of stonnwater and wastewater discharges was performed as required in 2005 and
2006 as required, but was missed in 2007. Ms. Graham took over as the plant's Environmental Engineer
in September 2007, is aware of the missed monitoring, and has already begun reinstituting all permit
requirements for the current year.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtowm Street; Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 lnternei: www.ncwaterquality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/I 0% Post Consumer Paper

Analytical sampling in 2005 and 2006 revealed exceedances of the permits cut-off concentrations for
Total Suspended Solids (TSS). It was believed to be due to a poor sampling location, and has been
addressed by moving the sampling point to an acceptable downstream location, after further settling and
treatment take place, and prior to the discharge point. The effectiveness of this change will be evaluated
once data from the next analytical sampling event is obtained. No negative impacts to surface waters
were observed during the inspection.
The Division appreciates the Thomasville Quarry's renewed staff efforts to obtain and maintain
compliance. Please do not hesitate to contact Jenifer Carter at [phone] if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
attachment
cc: WSRO Files
NPS-ACO Unit
SWP — Central piles
Stephanie Graham (Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.; P.O. Box 18565; Greensboro, NC 27419)

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020076 Effective: 01/19/05 Expiration: 12/31/09 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Thomasville
County: Davidson 691 Upper Lake Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Thomasville NC 27360
Contact Person: Brian K North Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Stephanie Graham
Certification:
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 07/01/2008 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Jenifer Carter Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
George S Smb Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant D Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020076 Owner- Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 07/01/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
ROS established during this inspection.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020076 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 07/01/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ® n n ii
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
n n ® n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
n n M n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
® n n n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
n n ®fl
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
n n ® n
# Does the facility provide a.11,necessary secondary containment?
M n n n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
® n In n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
® ❑ n n
# Does the Plan include a. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
® n n n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
n n ® ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®n n n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ M n
# Does the Pfan indude a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
® n n In
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
® n n n
Comment: This permit requires a Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan, which
is similar to an SPPP, but does not contain all of the same requirements.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
o n I! n
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
n ® n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehfcle Maintenance areas?
n ® n n
Comment: Monitoring was performed in 2005 and 2006 as required, but due to staff
turnover, was missed in 2007. Cutoff concentrations for TSS were exceeded in both
2005 & 2006 (as well as preceeding years). This was thought to be due to poor
sampling location, which has since been moved to a point that allows more
treatment/settling to occur, prior to the discharge point.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ® n ❑ n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ® n n In
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ® n n n
Page: 3

.,A
i; ,
Permit: NCG020076 owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 07101/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (nor stormwater) discharges?
Comment: ROS established during this inspection.
® n n n
Page: 4

Martin Marietta Materials
Greensboro District
P.O. Box 18565 - ,
Greensboro, NC 27419
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
May 23, 2008
Mr. Steve Tedder, Regional Supervisor
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ — Surface Water Protection Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
i
MAY 2 l 2008
Regk nal omca
Re: Requested Stormwater Maps for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Asheboro, Jamestown, Pomona, Salem Stone, and Thomasville Quarries
Dear Mr. Tedder:
Please find enclosed a copy of the associated Stormwater BMP Maps for the above quarries
located in the Winston-Salem Region. After your meeting with Mr. Brian North on May 20,
2008, he forwarded to you via email the letter that he sent to Mr. Tony Evans on August 8,
2000, which documents Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. did request Representative Qutfall
Status for the listed quarries_ Included with his email were the 2005 and 2006 Annual
Stormwater DMR's. I forwarded to you, later that afternoon, the 2007 Annual Stormwater
DMR's. It is my understanding that these maps were the only remaining items that your office
has requested.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] or at [e-mail]
should you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Graham
Environmental Engineer, Greensboro District
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Enclosures

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan
Thomasville Quarry
Table of Contents
Page No,
Plan Certification - 40 CFR 112.3(d)..........................................................
Cover
General Information...............................................................................
3
Applicability - 40 CFR 112.1..............................
4
Record of Amendments - 40 CFR 112.5(a) &(c).............................................
5
Plan Review - 40 CFR 112.5(b)..................................................................
5
Management Approval - 40 CFR 112.7.........................................................
5
Plan Conformance - 40 CFR 112.7(a)(1) & (2) ..................
Facility Layout - 40 CFR 112.7(a)(3)..........................................................
6
Discharge Reporting Procedures - 40 CFR 112.7 (a)(4).....................................
7
Discharge Countermeasure Procedures - 40 CFR 112.7(a)(5)..............................
8
Potential Equipment Failures - 40 CFR 112.7(b)..............................................
8
Containment and Diversionary Structures - 40 CFR 112.7(c)(1).........................I .
9
Demonstration of Practicability - 40 CFR 112.7(d)...........................................
9
Inspections, Tests and Records - 40 CFR 1 I2.7(e)...........................................
10
Personnel, Training and Discharge Prevention Procedures - 40 CFR i 12.7(f) ............
10
Security - 40 CFR I I2.7(g).......................................................... I ....I ......
10
Tank Truck Unloading -- 40 CFR I I2.7(h)......................................................
11
Field Construction Containers - 40 CFR112.7(i).............................................
1 I
Conformance with State Programs - 40 CFR 112.70).......................................
11
Facility Drainage - 40 CFR I I2.8(b).........................................1...................
11
Bulk Storage Containers - 40 CFR 112.8(c)....................................................
12
Transfer Operations - 40 CFR 112.8(d)......................................................
13
Certification of the App. of the Substantial Harm Criteria (40 CFR 112 App, C).........
14
Plan Understanding and Acknowledgement.....................................................
15
Figures
Figure No.
USGSQuad Sheet........................................................................ 1
Site Map - 40 CFR 112.7(a)(3).......................................... I ............ I .... 2
Containment Volume Calculations...................................................... 3
Appendices
Tank Inspection Checklist ............................ . .......................... - ... A
Secondary Containment Drainage Log .. ............................................. B
Detailed Discharge Report Form.. .............................. .
Training Briefings...... (Optional)... .................................................. D

I. NAME OF FACILITY:
Thomasville Quarry
2. TYPE OF FACILITY:
Quarry
SIC: 1423 NAICS: 212313
3. LOCATION OF FACILITY,
691 Upper Lake Road
Thomasville, NC 27360
Lat: 35 48 12 Long: 80 55 18
4. OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR:
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-00I3
[phone]
5. OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: Wayne Scarlet, Plant Manager
Telephone: [phone] (Office)
[phone] (Home)
6. COMPANY CONTACTS;
Dean Hardy, Vice President/General Manager Jimmy Davis, Area Production Manager
Telephone: [phone] (Office)
Telephone: [phone] (Office)
[phone] (Home)
[phone] (Home)
Brian K. North, Sr. Environmental Engineer
Telephone: [phone] (Office)
[phone] (Home)
7. LOCATION OF SPCC PLAN:
Facility Office
4

COMPLETION. AFTER THE BERMS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY SEEDED, THE TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT BASINS MAY BE REMOVED.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
ROCK DAM SEDIMENT BASIN
SURVEYING, INC
40 MVMDM ALIVE MTE K PUCKTIME CITY, CA =W
c-M 6M-M FAX CrM 631-OM TSL MM 730. M
DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHYi 02/13/02
I 2 1 1.0 AC. I 0.25 AC. I 450 cf I 2.9 cfs I 20' I 10' 1 4' I 4'
NOTE: CALCULATIONS BASED ON THE RATIONAL FORMULA; Q = CIA, C =0.40, I = 7.2 71-R, WEIR FORMULA = Q = CLH 1'5 , C = 3.0, A = 1
50'-0" 15'-0" 50'-0"
5 SECTION
b
H
LL
b N
QNw
F o GROUN
D LINE
b 6„ T MIN. OF6'
NO O 'n
v7a 30
:IATE: IN LIEU OF BURYING SKIRT 6", 5" OF #5 STONE
MAY BE USED TO ANCHOR SKIRT.
TYPICAL SILT FENCE
SEEDING 5CHEDULE FOR ALL GRASSED AREAS
PREPARATION NOTE5:
e water measures are to be installed according to plan.
ra be seeded shall be ripped and spread with topsoil (if necessary), 3"
al seedbed prepared shall be 4"-6" deep,
,oaks, roots, and other obstructlons shall be removed from the surface
'o Interfere with the establishment and maintenance of vegetation,
rr final seedbed preparation, at final grades shown, shall be reasonably
d uniform.
all test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to seeding
In addition provide 15 Ib.IWW sq, ft, of super phosphate,
test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to the moll test
PI-1- testing is recommended,
Id fertilizer shall be applied uniformly and mixed with the soil during
reparation.
t all seeded areas and keep moist until new gross is established,
DATE SEED MIX RATES: LB./ACRE
igust 15 Serica Lespedeza (searlfi 30
Pensacola Bahiagrass 50
Common Bermudograss 10
Germit Mllllt 10
rylor
st 15 Rye (6roln) 40
sedbeds with 3 tons/acre lime and 500 Ibs/acre 10-10-10.
2 tons/acre clean straw or hay.
•apid setting emulsified asphalt at 10 gal./1000 sq.ft., or other
lent approved by Owner,
1200
SILT FENCE
ROCK DAM/SEDIMENT BASIN fry
PLANT AREA,,...4,.:
PROPERTY LINE - - ---
TEMPORARY DIVERSION
BUFFER
PERMIT BOUNDARY
SETTLING CELLS
BODY OF WATER
FLOODPLAI N
CREEK
DIRT ROADS
PAVED ROADS
TREE LINE
10-YEAR PIT LIMIT
FUTURE PIT LIMIT
INDEX CONTOUR
INTERMEDIATE
CONTOUR
j •i1 1 1• it it •1' 1