NCG020051_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20180424

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/V U& OaDasj
DOC TYPE
STORICAL FILE
WONITORINGREPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ YYYYMMDD

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 2, 2018
Martin Marietta Materials, Incorporated
Attention: Mr. Richard Broughton
8701 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite 540
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Stormwater Certificate of Coverage- NCG020051
1vlecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Broughton:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
WILLIAM E. (TOBY) VINSON, JR.
Interim Director
RECEIVED
APR 2 4 ZOIB
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Reports for the inspections we conducted
at 4551 Beatties Ford Road, Charlotte on March 8, 2018. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should
you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or by email at
angela. [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Zahid S. Khan, CPM, CPESC, CPS WQ
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Enclosed: Inspection report
CcfStbrmwat� e� rxPermitting Branch

Compliance „Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020051 Effective: 05/09/16 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner : Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg 4551 Seatties Ford Rd
Region: Mooresville
Charlotte NC 28216
Contact Person: Richard Broughton Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/08/2018
Primary Inspector: Angela Y Lee
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Entry Time: 03:OOPM Exit Time: 04:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwate€ Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
f
r
Page: 1

Permit: NGG020057 Owner -Facility; Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 03/0812018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
This inspection was conducted as a routine annual inspection. Richard Broughton from Martin Marietta was on site. The site
was in compliance.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 0310812018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA Nls
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
in ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
Is ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
IN ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? IN ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA N@
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? .❑ ❑ ❑ .
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

i
Compiiance Inspection Repo
Permit: NCG020051 Effective: 05109l16 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg 4551 Beanies Ford Rd
Region: Mooresville
Charlotte NC 28216
Contact Person: Richard Broughton Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 11/10/2016 EntryTime: 10:15AM
Primary Inspector: Water Quality Program Meckenburg County
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Exit Time: 12:50PM
Phone: [phone]
Zahid S Khan Phone :
Reason for inspection: Routine Inspectlon Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1
PAV

permit. NCG020051 Owner - Facillty: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 1111012016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The Martin Marietta Charlotte Quarry is located at 4551 Beatties Ford Road on approximately 600 acres. The facility
extracts minerals and produces aggregate for use in asphalt, concrete, road base, and other purposes.
At the time of inspection, the facility was observed to be in compliance with the City of Charlotte Storm Water Pollution
Control Ordinance. The facility should evaluate and document all stormwater outfalls on the property to ensure that
compliance is maintained with the facility's NPDES permit. Please see the inspection report for comments and
recommendations.
Page: 2

Permit NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date:- 11110/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit- Routine
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: Semi-annual stormwater monitorina has not been conducted due to "no discharge" bein
Yes No NA NE
® ❑ ❑ ❑
MINI Imi
documented. Quarterly monitoring of the mine dewatering discharge is conducted; the most
recent documented events were conducted on 10/22/15, 7/20/15, 517115, and 2/6/15. No
instances of exceeding permit limits were observed. Analytical data from this calendar year was
not available for review.
Discharge from the facility's vehicle maintenance area flows to the mine -pit, where it is then
commingled with process water and discharges through the process water outfall.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ i ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ E ❑
Comment: The dewatering outfall and several sedimenUerosion'control basins were observed. Stormwater
outfalls were not clearly documented in the SPPP and facility personnel reported that discharge
from sediment control BMPs is sheetflow prior to reaching surface waters. CMSWS
recommends the facHlity_accurately document all stormwater discharge outfalls in the SPPP and
on facility maps.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: The facilitv has documented "no discharae" durina the previous vear and reports that no
Yes No NA NE
❑❑■❑
discharge has occurred since approximately 2007. At the time of inspection, evidence of
discharge from at least two of the sediment control basins was observed. Facilily personnel
stated that any discharge from the basins is sheet flow by the time it reaches surface waters.
CMSWS recommends the facility conduct and document a full evaluation of potential outfalls and
clearly identify all true outfalls.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 1111012016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
® ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
®❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
Comment: No significant spills have occurred within the previous three years._ A_ notation of no significant_
spills has been documented during the annual review.
The most recent non-stormwater discharge evaluation was conducted on 3/18/16 .
Employee training was conducted on 1117/16.
The plan was most recently reviewed/updated on 3/18/16.
The facility conducts weekiv inspections of sediment and erosion control measures, as per
permit requirements. The current inspection documentation includes no evaluation criteria for the
inspected items" CMSWS recommends including additional notes that document
presence/absence of discharge and other qualitative elements that are on the inspection form.
Page: 4

1
F�LE
NCDENR_----- �4
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 7, 2012
Martin Marietta Materials
Mr. Richard Broughton
2000 Center Point Drive, Suite 2325
Columbia, SC 29210
Subject: Charlotte .Quarry
Permit No. NCG020051
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Broughton:
Attached is a copy of the subject stormwater permit inspection conducted on July 26, 2012 By
Mr.Samar Bou-Ghazale of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory: however, should you have any questions concerning the
report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bou-Ghazale at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Attachment
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterouality.org
An EgUW Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledli O% Post Consume( paper
Qac
NrnthCaroIin4

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020051 Effective: 01/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
__SOC: Effective: Expiration: f'W Facility: Martin Marietta -Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg 4551 Beatties Ford Rd
Region: Mooresville
Charlotte NC 28216 _
Contact Person: Dean Borud Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/26/2012 Entry Time: 01:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Samar E Bou Ghazale
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Exit Time: 02:30 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Ext.2199
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 07126/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Site is in compliance with the permit.Thank You!
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 07/26/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan-T_ -__ --- ------
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non Stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA —NE— ----
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■ n n n
■nnn
■nnn
■ n n n
®nnn
■nnn
■ n n n
■ n n n
■nnn
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
■ n n n
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
Page: 3

OtoF W A rEgQ
G
0 Y
Ms. Julia Andoe, Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Materials
8701 Red Oak Blvd., Suite 540
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Subject:
Dear Ms. Andoe:
Michael F. Easlev, G veWor
William G. Ross Jr., retary )
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural t1sources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 16, 2008
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Martin Marietta Materials — Charlotte Quarry
Stormwater Pennit Number COC NCG020051
Mecklenburg County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) report for the
inspection conducted at the subject facility on March 25, 2008, by Mr. Ron Eubanks of
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services. This inspection was conducted as part of a
cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water
Quality. In addition, the inspection was conducted on behalf of the City of Charlotte in
compliance with the City's NPDES Permit, NCS000240, Part II Section H. Thank you for your
assistance and cooperation during the inspection,
Overall, the inspection found that the Charlotte Quarry operated by Martin Marietta
Materials has developed and implemented a Stormwater program and this Office commends the
permittee's efforts to ensure compliance with your NPDES permit.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions
concerning this report or have any questions regarding your permit, please do not hesitate to
contact Ms. Marcia Allocco of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office
® � Npr hCarolina
WDENR watura!!ty
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwatergualitv.ore 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

NO
Ms. Julia Andoe, Martin Marietta Materials
Charlotte Quarry CEI, Page 2
June 16, 2008
Enclosure
cc: NPS-ACO Unit
Rusty Rozzelle, Mecklenburg County
Craig Miller, City of Charlotte
Mr. Mike Hamrick, Plant Manager
Martin Marietta Materials — Charlotte Quarry
4551 $eatties Ford Road
Charlotte, NC 28216

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020051 Effective: 01/19/05 Expiration: 12/31/09 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg 4551 Beatties Ford Rd
Region: Mooresville
Charlotte NC 28216
Contact Person: Brian K North Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 03/24/2008 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 11.30 AM
Primary Inspector: Water Quality Program Mecklenburg County Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment. summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
ft
Inspection Date: 03/2412008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Facility Description:
Martin Marietta Aggregates, a Division of Martin Marietta Materials, operates the Charlotte Quarry for the purpose of
producing crushed aggregate for use in the construction industry. The quarry is located at 4551 Beatties Ford Road in
Charlotte, North Carolina.
Compliance History:
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services responded to a discharge from the Martin Marietta Charlotte Quarry on May
21, 1999, due to elevated turbidity levels in Stewart Creek. A Notice of Violation was not issued for the discharge.
The permitteelfacility was inspected by DWQ in Sept. 2007 for compliance with the stormwater permit.
Industrial Operations/City of Charlotte Stormwater Ordinance Review
Quarry/Pit Sump —
AII discharges at the site are either stormwater discharges or a combination of groundwater seepage and stormwater
runoff. Groundwater seepage collects in the pit sump prior to be discharged. The sump also collects the majority of the
stormwater runoff. All other discharges at the site are the result of stormwater runoff. Pit dewatering is a typical quarrying
activity and is authorized under the NPDES permit. The implementation of diversion ditches, rock check dams, and
sediment basins are used to manage stormwater runoff at the site. Pit expansion is to be conducted in a manner so as to
divert all stormwater runoff from disturbed areas to the pit, which allows sediment to settle out prior to discharging.
Analytical monitoring of any mine dewatering wastewater discharges shall be performed as specified in Part III, Section C
of the the general permit.
Detention Pond —
The detention pond at the site is used to collect runoff from the aggregate wash area. The water in the detention pond is
recycled at the facility. Therefore, there is no discharge from the detention pond.
Storage Tank Area
There are several aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) located at the facility; there are no records of any underground
storage tanks (USTs) at the site. The ASTs contain petroleum products used to service mobile and plant equipment. The
tanks included a 6,000-gallon diesel AST, a 530-gallon gasoline AST, a 1,000-gallon bulk oil AST, a 2,000-gallon bulk oil
AST, and a 500-gallon waste oil tank. In addition to the ASTs, there are also several 55-gallon bulk oil drums located in
the storage tank area. Secondary containment was provided for all of the ASTs and drums. During the inspection,
several new tanks were observed at the site. Mr. Mike Hamrick (Plant Manager) indicated that the old ASTs were going
to be replaced with the new double -walled ASTs within the next few months.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 03/2412008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®
❑
n
n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
©
n
n
n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®
n
n
n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
®
n
n
n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®
n
n
n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
® n
n n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
M n
n n
Comment: The SPPP should be updated after the the new ASTs have been installed.
Qualitative Monitorin
Yes No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
n
n n
Comment: The permittee has initiated qualitative monitoring since the Sept. 2007
inspection.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
® n
n n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
n n01
Comment: Analytical monitoring of any mine dewatering wastewater discharges shall
be performed as specified in Part III, Section C of the the general permit.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No
NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage availab€e at the site?
W n
n n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
M n
n n
# if the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑ n
® n
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
ja n
n n
Page: 3

Permit: NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 03/24/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment:
Page- 4

_ it _•-,;.,+.
Martin Marietta
Charlotte District NOV 3 Q 2007
P.O. Box 7446
Charlotte, NC 28241-7446
Telephone [phone] NC DENR SRC
Fax [phone]
November 29, 2007 M-Sufte Wator Rrtc, n"'Or���
f,'ERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
7005 1820 0000 0465 3575
Ms. Marcia Alloceb
Surface Water Protection Section
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Letter of Deficiency, Martin Marietta's Charlotte Quarry
NPDES Permit No. NCG020051
Dear Ms. Allocco:
In response to the stormwater inspection conducted by Ms. Lespinasse on September 10, 2007 at Martin
Marietta's Charlotte Quarry, I am providing information to address the concerns outlined in the
Compliance Evaluation Inspection.
In accordance with the most recent SPCC regulations, it is our understanding that secondary
containment is not required for designated fuel dispensing areas (i.e. tanker transfer to bulk
storage or dispensing fuel for quarry vehicles). Our current SPCC Plan requires that the fuel
supplier have a spill containment kit available during the transfer of product. In addition, Martin
Marietta has on site absorbent pads, granular material, and booms to address incidental spills.
We feel that all feasible alternatives have been provided associated with fueling activities to
protect the waters of the State. However, it is our intention to maintain the standards established
by our company and implement good housekeeping practices, as well as, continue to educate all
employees to meet the desired standards set forth by our company.
The runoff from the vehicle wash area discharges as overland flow before reaching any area that
may cause concern. However, we will evaluate the implementation of passive and/or active
practices to address this issue.
2. Annual training of SPCC regulations has taken place at each location. This training is conducted
during our annual refresher training as required by MSHA. As part of this training, we have
modified the content to include SPCC regulations. In addition, annual training is conducted to
the plant managers concerning all environmental issues (i.e. changes in regulations, changes in
corporate standards, current topics of concern, etc.). This training also includes quarterly
discharge sampling, annual stormwater sampling, as well as, other environmental issues related
to our sites.
Training logs are available and copies will be sent to each quarry to be maintained on site for
future inspections.

.v
3. We will initiate efforts to emphasis the importance of making corrections to any deficiencies
noted during our weekly site inspections.
4. Qualitative Monitoring will be initiated in accordance with the conditions of the NPDES permit.
Quarry personnel will be informed of the schedule and procedures required to conduct this
monitoring, and appropriate records will be maintained.
5. Representative outfall status was requested from DWQ on August 8, 2000. No response was
ever received for the request. A copy of this documentation will be sent to the quarry for their
records, and has been provided for your information.
6. An amendment and/or revision section will be added to the BPM Plan/SWPPP to document
updates that have been implemented.
This information should complete the requirements of the Notice of Deficiency. Should you have any
questions, please contact Richard Broughton at [phone].
Sincerely,
TIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
Brian K. orth, PE
Manager, Engineering Services
6180WQ Letter of deficiency Response

Martin Marietta Aggregates
Charlotte District
P.O. Box 240635
Charlotte, North Carolina 28224-0635
Telephone: [phone]
Fax; [phone]
August 8, 2000
Mr. Tony Evans
NPDES Group
North Carolina DENR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Request for Representative Outfali Status - Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Arrowood, Asheboro, Bakers, Bessemer City, Bonds, Caldwell, Charlotte, Denver, Hickory,
Jamestown, Kannapolis, Kings Mtn., Maiden, Mallard Creek, Matthews, Pomona, Rocky
River, Salem, Statesville, Thomasville and Woodleaf Quarries
Dear Mr. Evans:
Based on our past conversations and subsequent meetings with your Department, I am officially
submitting two copies of each stormwater maps for the above referenced quarries. This request is
for Representative Outfall Status for stormwater discharges from Land Disturbance, Process
Areas and Vehicle Maintenance Areas at our quarry locations, as indicated in the General Permits.
I have identified the outfall location for each sample type on the stormwater map for your review.
The land disturbance sample location for each site was based on current exposed areas (berm
construction or overburden removal) and the maximum acreage exposed. Process and Vehicle
Maintenance areas were located on the map, based on drainage features and actual topography of
each site. I plan to begin the stormwater sampling in September. I trust the information provided
is adequate for your review and approval. If any additional information is required, please feel
free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
Brian K. North, PE
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Attachments
generallrep outfall satuts

>� OF W A rF9
Q
�O�a G
❑ `C
Mr. Brian North
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
P.O. Box 7446
Charlotte, NC 28241-7446
Dear Mr. North:
Michael F. Easley, Governbif"
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 29, 2007
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit No. NCG020051
Charlotte Facility
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at
the subject facility on September 10, 2007, by Ms. Polly Lespinasse of this Office.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by November 29, 2007, addressing the
deficiencies noted in the Inspection Summary, Qualitative Monitoring, and Permits and. Outfalls
Sections of the report. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of Ms. Marcia Allocco.
The report should be self-explanatory, however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Ms. Lespinasse or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
v3
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Shelton Sullivan, DWQ, NPS-ACO Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Internet: h2o.encstate.nc.us Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
No hCaroiina
,,/ urally
An Equal opportunitylAfSrmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020051 Effective: 01/19/05 Expiration: 12131I09 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg 4551 Beatties Ford Rd
Region: Mooresville
Charlotte NC 28216
Contact Berson: Brian K North Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Rep rosentative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 0911012007 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Primary Inspector: Polly Lespinasse Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Q Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

A
Permit: NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 09110/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason far Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The facility developed a SWPPP plan even though the general permit does not require one. In addition, they have an
SPCC plan which incorporates many elements of the storm water permit in it. Issues observed at the facility include the
following:
1. No evaluation of feasible alternatives to current practices (i.e., containment for fueling area, designated vehicle wash
area with containment).
2. Training log not available on site and training program does not specifically include storm water.
3. Inspection reports indicated that deficiencies were noted, but they were not explained nor was there indication that they
had been resolved.
4. Qualitative monitoring is not being conducted.
5. Request for representative outfall status not available on site
6. Need to provide an annual update page in the SWPPP.
DWQ staff needs to determine whether the discharge of mine dewatering water directly to surface waters is in compliance
with the permit. The facility indicated that they are closed loop (yet analytical monitoring is still conducted). However,
when there is no need for the water collected from the pit, it is discharged directly to a "pond" which outfalls to a stream.
There is no weir or other device to hold the water in the pond prior to discharge to the stream. The analytical sample- site
is located in this stream, downstream of the pond.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 - H Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine ..
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
n
Q
Q
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
®
0
Q
Q
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
M
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
n
n
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
n
n
n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
n
n
o
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
n
In
n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
n
n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
n
n
n
Comment: The plan does not include an evaluation of feasible alternatives. Based on
the site inspection, feasible alternatives to current practices exist on the site and were
discussed with the facility representative. The annual training log was available on site,
but according to facility representatives, it is conducted annually and the log is kept at a
main location. In addition, the training materials do not include a specific section on
Stormwater. Staff discussed the necessity of including a specific section on stormwater
in the training.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Q
■
❑
Comment: The facility has failed to conduct and document qualitative monitoring.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■
D
n
0
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
Q
Comment: Results from analytical monitoring indicate that all parameters were below
the cut off concentrations/benchmarks.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
0
Page: 3

Permit: NOG020051 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 0911012007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# if the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: The facility has stated that they have requested representative outfall
status for the facility. Documentation to substantiate the request was not available on
site. Will require the facility to provide documentation.
0000
n®nn
®nr�n
Page: 4