20170110 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report DRAFT-2019_20191219

ID#* 20170110 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 12/19/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/19/2019
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Raymond Holz
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20170110
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Weaver Farm
County: Wayne
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Plans
File Upload: Draft_Weaver Farm MY2-2019_12-19-2019_ pdf 21.5MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

YEAR 2 (2019) MONITORING REPORT

Weaver Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project #: 2017-0110v2

Neuse River Basin

In Agreement with:
The Weaver Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits & Pursuant to the
Neuse Nutrient Management Strategy

PREPARED BY:

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
And

December 2019

Weaver Farm Year 1 (2018) Monitoring Report Executive Summary page i
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Annual Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel). As agreed upon in
the Weaver Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on July 7th, 2017 by Restoration
Systems, LLC, acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). This document details Year 2 (2019) annual
monitoring at the Parcel.

Measuring 22.36 acres, the Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset
credits for impacts due to development within the Neuse River Basin. Neuse River Riparian Buffer
mitigation credits provided by this Parcel are available in the Neuse River Basin, according to 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule – CMB rule) (effective date– October 24th, 2014).
Mitigation credits for Nutrient Offset are made available within the Neuse River Basin USGS 8-digit HUC
03020201 excluding the Falls Lake Drainage Basin. Supporting figures and tables are located in Appendix
A & B.

NCDWR representatives Katie Merritt and Chris Pullinger conducted an onsite determination for parcel
applicability and suitability on February 21, 2017. A second visit was conducted with Chris Pullinger and
Anthony Scarbraugh on March 2, 2017.

Restoration Systems (RS) purchased the Parcel in fee simple and transferred a conservation easement to
the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation. The conservation easement was recorded at the Wayne
County Register of Deeds on June 27th, 2017; Book No. 3309, Page No. 279-290.

Restoration construction activities began in July of 2017 and concluded in December of the same year. The
Parcel was planted with native hardwoods on December 12th, 2017. On December 14th – 16, 2017, Axiom
Environmental installed twenty-two (22) Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) monitoring plots and collected
as-built data. Katie Merritt of DWR performed a restoration verification site visit on February 1st, 2018.

The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas is focused on improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat through the creation of a forested riparian buffer
adjacent to stream channels and a forested riparian area along agricultural ditches. These goals will be
accomplished by the following;

1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including a)
ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and
adjacent to Site surface water conveyances, and b) providing a restored buffer to filter runoff from
adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank erosion,
vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters c rossing Site
floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for agricultural
production.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Site’s riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Report Executive Summary page ii
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Success criteria was established to verify that the vegetation component supports community elements
necessary for forest development. Success criteria within the buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas
will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of
monitoring.

Year 2 (2019) vegetation monitoring occurred in October 2019 and included the measurement of twenty-
two (22) total vegetation plots. Stem densities across the Parcel averaged 200 planted stems per acre
(excluding livestakes) surviving. Seventeen of the twenty-two plots (Plots 1-5, 7- 14, and 16-18, 22) did
not meet success criteria. Overall, planted stem survival continued to decline as a result of existing site
conditions beyond the control of RS, specifically legacy contaminants within the project’s soils.

No signs of herbivory, easement encroachment, mowing, pruning, or mulching were observed.
Additionally, minimal invasive species were observed on the Parcel.

2018 Maintenance Summary;
Between the initial planting and Yr. 1 (2018) monitoring no active maintenance occurred on the site.
In September of 2018, approximately 20-25 inches of rain fell over a three to four-day period, resulting
in complete inundation of the Site for nearly a week. Based on site-specific indicators (high-water
marks and debris racks in trees), as much as 6-feet of water covered the project. The impact of Hurricane
Florence was assumed to be the main contributor to the poor survival of planted hardwood stems which
was determined during Year 1 (2018) monitoring efforts, completed in October of 2018. A remedial
action plan was developed as part of the Year 1 (2018) Monitoring Report and approved by DWR staff
via email (Appendix D). RS implemented the remedial action plan in 2019, detailed below.

2019 Maintenance Summary;
On February 24th, 2019, RS completed the remedial plant effort at the Site (Appendix __). Planting
8,500 additional bare-root stems within two different planting zones. No further maintenance work was
completed in 2019.

DWR and RS staff conducted a field verification of the replanting effort in April of 2019. RS along
with DWR staff were unable to locate an abundance of living, planted stems. The survey triggered RS
to begin a robust evaluation of the Site to determine how planted stems from the initial planting (Dec.
2017) and the remedial planting (Feb. 2019) were faring; further surveys indicated planted stems were
struggling to establish and visual mortality of planted stems was near 80%.

To further investigate the mortality issues, RS conducted multiple soil tests with the Site. The results
of these tests are included in Appendix D and indicate high levels of zinc and copper.

RS is currently evaluating remedial action plans to determine the best course of action for the Site. Upon
review of the monitoring report, RS will work with DWR staff to determine the next steps.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Report Table of Contents
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES ......................................................... 1
1.1 Location and Setting .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................. 1

2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL ............................................................................................................ 1

3.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA ................................................................................. 2
3.1 Monitoring Protocol ............................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Success Criteria ...................................................................................................................... 3

4.0 MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................................. 3

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Site Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation

Appendix B. Figures
Figure 1. Site Location and Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Component and Asset

Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. 2019 Herbicide Application Log
Vegetation Plot Photographs

Appendix D.
2019 Remedial Action Plan
Soil Test Report

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Page 1
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Annual Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel). As agreed upon in the
Weaver Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on July 7th, 2017 by Restoration
Systems, LLC, acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR).

1.1 Location and Setting
The Parcel is located approximately 2.1 miles north east of Grantham in Wayne County, NC. (Figure 1,
Appendix A). The Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin in the 14 -digit United States Geological
Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020201170010 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Region (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03-04-12) (Figure 1, Appendix A).

Latitude: 35°18'16.01"N, Longitude: 78° 7'44.27"W

Directions to Parcel:
- Take I-40 East out of Raleigh,
- Take Exit 341 for NC-50/NC-55 toward US-13/Newton Grove,
- At the traffic circle (1.3 miles), take the 4th exit onto US-13 N,
- 9.4 Miles Turn Left onto Weaver Rd.,
- 0.7 Miles Turn Right at Angie Drive,
- Parcel is located on the left.

1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas is focused on improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat. Goals will be achieved through the creation of
a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream channels and a forested riparian area along agricultural ditches.
Goals will be accomplished by the following.

1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including a)
ceasing the broadcast application of poultry litter, fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural
materials into and adjacent to Parcel surface water conveyances and b) providing a restored buffer
to filter runoff from adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank erosion,
vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing Parcel
floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for agricultural
production.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel’s riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.

2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The removal of livestock had immediate benefits to the Parcel’s drainage features, specifically Feat ures 1-
3. Flushing flows established a new top of bank within these features. Planting of the new “benches”
occurred during reforestation efforts, and the revised top of bank was measured during as-built survey work
and used to generate as-built credit calculations. Additionally, the final easement boundary was slightly

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Page 2
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
adjusted along the southern boundary of Feature’s 1 and 2’s origin; approximately 20 feet was added to the
easement in the section above the proposed boundary detailed in the Bank Parcel Development Package
(BPDP). These two factors resulted in a slightly higher mitigation potential than original detailed in the
BPDP.

The DWR has determined the nitrogen nutrient abatement of restored riparian area to be 2,273.02 lbs. p er
acre. Riparian buffer credits will be measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted into square feet.

Per the as-built survey, the conservation easement measures 22.81 acres, and includes 21.53 acres of restored
riparian area. Of the restored riparian area, 15.37 acres will generate nutrient offset credit, generating
34,936.31 lbs. of nitrogen offset credit. 6.16 acres of restored riparian area will generate 268,329.6 sq. ft. of
Neuse River riparian buffer credits. Riparian buffer mitigation generated via restoration, can be used for
either Neuse River riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset credits, but not both. RS must request and receive
approval from DWR to transfer any mitigation credits between riparian buffer and nutrient offset. All
mitigation credit assets shall be shown on the credit ledgers. The Parcel’s mitigation potential is detailed in
Table 1 (Appendix A).

3.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA

3.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for riparian vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and annual
plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed
as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Photos
will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. All planted
stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded. Detailed qualitative and quantitative
monitoring is proposed for vegetated riparian areas; marsh treatment areas will be visually inspected
periodically and reported qualitatively within the annual monitor report, which will include photographic
record of the Parcel’s assets.

Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Restoration Systems shall submit an annual monitoring report to DWR, no later than December 31st of each
year. Quantitative monitoring includes measurements of 20-10x10 meter, permanent vegetation plots (2.0%
of riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit areas). Plots were randomly placed throughout the
planted riparian areas and are representative of credit generating areas. Sampling of vegetation will be
performed in the Fall of each year; monitoring data can be found in Appendix C.

Vegetation will received a cursory, visual evaluation on a periodic basis to ascertain the degree of
overtopping of planted elements by nuisance species. A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion fencing
will also be performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
• No cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservations easement area; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would negatively
affect the functioning of the buffer.

No signs of herbivory, easement encroachment, mowing, pruning, or mulching were observed. Additionally,
minimal invasive species were observed on the Parcel.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Page 3
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
3.2 Success Criteria
Success criteria within the riparian buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas will be based on the survival
of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring. A minimum of four
native, hardwood tree and shrub species must be present, with no one species representing greater than 50%
of the stems. In addition, appropriate volunteer stems of native hardwood tree and shrub species may be
included to meet the final performance standard of 260 stems per acre upon DWR approval.

4.0 MAINTENANCE
2018 Maintenance Summary;
Between the initial planting and Yr. 1 (2018) monitoring no active maintenance occurred on the site. In
September of 2018, approximately 20-25 inches of rain fell over a three to four-day period, resulting in
complete inundation of the Site for nearly a week. Based on site-specific indicators (high-water marks
and debris racks in trees), as much as 6-feet of water covered the project. The impact of Hurricane
Florence was assumed to be the main contributor to the poor survival of planted hardwood stems which
was determined during Year 1 (2018) monitoring efforts, completed in October of 2018. A remedial
action plan was developed as part of the Year 1 (2018) Monitoring Report and approved by DWR staff
via email (Appendix D). RS implemented the remedial action plan in 2019, detailed below.

2019 Maintenance Summary;
On February 24th, 2019, RS completed the remedial plant effort at the Site (Appendix __). Planting 8,500
additional bare-root stems within two different planting zones. No further maintenance work was
completed in 2019.

DWR and RS staff conducted a field verification of the replanting effort in April of 2019. RS along with
DWR staff were unable to locate an abundance of living, planted stems. The survey triggered RS to
begin a robust evaluation of the Site to determine how planted stems from the initial planting (Dec. 2017)
and the remedial planting (Feb. 2019) were faring; further surveys indicated planted stems were
struggling to establish and visual mortality of planted stems was near 80%.

To further investigate the mortality issues, RS conducted multiple soil tests with the Site. The results of
these tests are included in Appendix D and indicate high levels of zinc and copper.

RS is currently evaluating remedial action plans to determine the best course of action for the Site. Upon
review of the monitoring report, RS will work with DWR staff to determine the next steps.

5.0 REFERENCES

Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule - 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Published November 17, 2014)

Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.

Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A NCAC 2B .0233,
15A NCAC 02B .0240, and 15A NCAC 02B .0295

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix A.
Site Background Tables

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Buffer Zone Credit
Type
Mitigation
Type
Total
Acreage
Credit
Ratio
Credit per
Acre Total Credits
UT2 Zone A (TOB to
50')
Riparian
Buffer Restoration 3.16 1:1 43,560 sq.
ft./acre 137,649.6 sq. ft.
UT2 Zone B (51’ - 100') Riparian
Buffer Restoration 2.99 1:1 43,560 sq.
ft./acre 130,244.4 sq. ft.
Total Riparian
Buffer 6.15 267,894.0 sq. ft.

UT2 Zone C (101’ - 200) Nitrogen Restoration 5.26 n/a 2,273.02
lbs./acre 11,956.08 lbs.
Ditches (TOB - 200') Nitrogen Restoration 10.10 n/a 2,273.02
lbs./acre 22,957.50 lbs.
Total Nitrogen 14.64 34,913.58 lbs.

Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity / Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA July 7th, 2017
Parcel purchased in Fee-Simple June 2017 June 22nd, 2017
Parcel Protection via conservation easement June 2017 June 27th, 2017
Cattle exclusion / fence construction June 2017 July – August 2017
Removal of poultry houses / impervious
surfaces June/July 2017 August – October 2017
Soil preparation July through November 2017 October – December 2017
Removal of Powerline/Pole NA December 2017
Planting December 2017 December 12th, 2017
As-Built Data Collection January 2018 December 14th – 16th, 2017
Construction Completion Walkthrough NA February 1st, 2018
As-Built Report Submittal January 2018 March 2018
Year 1 (2018) Monitoring October 2018 October 2018
Remedial Replant #1 NA February 2019
Year 2 (2019) Monitoring October 2019 October 2019

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Table 3: Project Contact Table
Firm POC & Address
Bank Sponsor Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Designer: Axiom Environmental, Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC 27603
Construction Contractor: Strader Fencing Inc
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592-7756
Planting Contractor: Carolina Silvics
Mary-Margaret McKinney 252.482.8491
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Seeding Contractor: Land Mechanics, Inc.
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592-7756
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection &
Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC 27603

Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Project Information
Project Name Weaver Farm
County Wayne
Project Area (acres) 21.81
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) Latitude: 35°18’16.01”N , Longitude: 78°7’44.27”W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020201 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-
digit 03020201170010
DWQ Sub-basin 03-04-12
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles) 0.07 mi²
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area < 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification Cropland and Pasture

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix B
Figures

Figure 1. Site Location and Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Component and Asset

RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC1101 HAYNES ST, SUITE 211RALEIGH, NC 27604PHONE : [phone]FAX : [phone]
This map and all data contained within are supplied as is with no warranty. Restoration Systems, LLC expressly disclaims responsibility for damages or liability from any claims that may arise out of t he use or misuse of this map. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine if the data on this map is compatible with the user’s needs. This map was not created as survey data, nor should it be used as such. It is the user’s responsibility to obt ain proper survey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, where required by law.
SCALE:
DATE: 3-2018
1 in = 54,167 ft
Coordinate System:NAD_1983_SP_NC_FIPS_3200_Ft.
Aerial Imagery: (c) ESRI
0 4.5 9 13.5 182.25
Miles
SITE: WF01-000
Weaver FarmFigure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Weaver Farm Bank Parcel35°18'16.01"N78° 7'44.27"W
Directions to Parcel;• Take I-40 East out of Raleigh,• Take Exit 341 for NC-50/NC-55 toward US-13/Newton Grove,• At the traffic circle (1.3 miles), take the 4th exit onto US-13 N,• 9.4 Miles Turn Left onto Weaver Rd.,• 0.7 Miles Turn Right at Angie Drive, • Site is located on the left.
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, incrementP Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Legend
Project Pin Point
USGS Neuse 03020201 River Basin Bdry
Service Area - Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset (Neuse 01 Minus Falls Lake Water shed)
4
5
6
3
79
2
8
11
11
17
15
12
19
13
14
22
20
18
16 10
21
NC Cen te r fo r Geograph ic Information & Analysis
FIGURE
Dra wn by:
Dat e:
Sca le:
Pro jec t No.:
AMR
OCT 2018
1:1750
17-021
Tit le:
Pro ject:
Pre pa red for:
Wa yn e C ou nty, NC
WEAVER FARMRIPARIAN BUFFER &NUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
CURRENTCONDITIONSPLAN VIEW
2
Not es:1. Bac kground Im agery Source:Latest ae rial photographyprovided by the NC OneMapprogram (online, provided bythe NC G eographic InformationCoordination Council)
0 500250Feet
Legend
Ditches and Stream
Vegetation Plots
Easement ¯
Feature 1
Feature 2
Feature 3
UT-2
New 24" pipe inserted, Existing fence replaced as was.
Approx. 20' of historically piped ditch,now open. Area to be re-surveyedduring as-built effort.
Origin Point for UT-2
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC1101 HAYNES ST, SUITE 211RALEIGH, NC 27604PHONE : [phone]FAX : [phone]
This map and all data contained within are supplied as is with no warranty. Restoration Systems, LLC expressly disclaims responsibility for damages or liability from any claims that may arise out of t he use or misuse of this map. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine if the data on this map is compatible with the user’s needs. This map was not created as survey data, nor should it be used as such. It is the user’s responsibility to obt ain proper survey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, where required by law.
SCALE:
DATE: 3-2018
1 in = 250 ft
Coordinate System:NAD_1983_SP_NC_FIPS_3200_Ft.
Aerial Imagery: (c) ESRI
0 120 240 360 48060
Feet
SITE: WF01-000
Figure 3Component and Asset
Service Layer Credits:
Legend
Final Conservation Easement: 22.81 Acres
Top of Bank (Features + UT-2): 0.65 Acres
TOB - 50ft
TOB - 100ft
TOB - 200ft
AsBuilt Credit Determination
Stream (UT-2), Zone A (TOB to 50'), Riparian Buffer: 3.16 Acres
Stream (UT-2), Zone B (51' - 100'), Riparian Buffer: 2.99 Acres
Stream (UT-2), Zone C (101' - 200'), Nutrient Offset: 5.26 Acres
Surface Water Conveyance, (TOB to 200'): 10.10 Acres
Buffer Zone Credit Type Mitigation Type Total Acreage Credit Ratio Credit per Acre Total Credits
UT2 Zone A (TOB to 50') Riparian Buffer Restoration 3.16 1:1 43,560 sq. ft./acre 137,649.6 sq. ft.
UT2 Zone B (51’ - 100') Riparian Buffer Restoration 2.99 1:1 43,560 sq. ft./acre 130,244.4 sq. ft.
Total Riparian Buffer 6.15 267,894.0 sq. ft.
UT2 Zone C (101’ - 200) Nitrogen Restoration 5.26 n/a 2,273.02 lbs./acre 11,956.08 lbs.
Ditches (TOB - 200') Nitrogen Restoration 10.10 n/a 2,273.02 lbs./acre 22,957.50 lbs.
Total Nitrogen 14.64 34,913.58 lbs.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix C.
Vegetation Data

Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. 2019 Herbicide Application Log
Vegetation Plot Photographs

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Table 5. Planting List
Vegetation Association: Basic Oak-Hickory
Forest
Coastal Plain
Bottomland Hardwoods
Acreage: 22.10 Acres 15.02 acres 7.08 acres
Species (bare root = BR) Spec-ed Planted Spec-ed Planted
White oak (Quercus alba) - BR 2,750 2,750
*Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) - BR 2,750 0
Shumard oak (Quercus shumardii) 0 1,375
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda) 0 1,375
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) - BR 2,750 2,750
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) - BR 2,750 2,750
Water oak (Quercus nigra) - BR 1,900 1,900
Willow oak (Quercus phellos) - BR 22 1,900 1,900
River birch (Betula nigra) - BR 1,900 1,900
Total (18,600) 11,000 11,000 5,700 5,700
* Due to availability issues, Northern red oak was removed from the proposed planting list. Shumard and Cherrybark
oak were used as substitute species.

Table 7: 2019 Herbicide Application Log
Date: Herbicide\
Surfactant: Rate/Amount: Total: Target
Species: Method: Applicator:
5/29 &
31/19
Roundup®
Custom
(glyphosate)

Agri-Dex®
.3%
10.8 fl oz
.5%
17.25 fl oz
30 Gallons
Multiple:
nuisance
herbaceous
species
Foliage
ATV-
Broadcast
Joshua G
Merritt (NC
026-33717)

Insert Table 6. Planted and Total Stems
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer rubrumred mapleTree111Betula nigrariver birchTree111Celtis laevigatasugarberryTree111Fraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ashTree222111111Liquidambar styracifluasweetgumTreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptreeTreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreeQuercusoakTree222Quercus albawhite oakTree111111222111222111Quercus nigrawater oakTreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak Tree111222111Quercus phelloswillow oakTree444111111444111Quercus rubranorthern red oak Tree111222Quercus shumardiiShumard's oak Tree1 1 1111111Quercus shumardii var. shumardii Shumard oak Tree333333777555555888000444333222333333444444666000111333121.4 121.4 121.4 121.4 121.4 121.4 283.3 283.3 283.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 323.7 323.7 323.7 0 0 0 161.9 161.9 161.9 121.4 121.4 121.4Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Pnols = Planted excluding livestakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planted including livestakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakesFails to meet requirements by more than 10%T includes natural recruitesCurrent Plot Data MY2 2019 Scientific NameCommon Name Species Type17021‐AXE‐0001 17021‐AXE‐0002 17021‐AXE‐0003 17021‐AXE‐0004 17021‐AXE‐0005 17021‐AXE‐000617021‐AXE‐0009Stem countsize (ares)1111Species countStems per ACREsize (ACRES)17021‐AXE‐0007 17021‐AXE‐00080.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.0211111Table 6. Project Code 17‐021. Project Name: Weaver Nutrient
Table 6. Project Code 17‐021. Project Name: Weaver NutrientPnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer rubrum red maple TreeBetula nigra river birch TreeCeltis laevigata sugarberry TreeFraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2111111111 222Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree2Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree333 111Platanus occidentalis American sycamore TreeQuercus oak Tree 1 1 1111Quercus alba white oak Tree111333Quercus nigra water oakTree 1 1 1 1 1 1Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree111222111111111Quercus phellos willow oak Tree444111Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1111Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak TreeQuercus shumardii var. shumardii Shumard oak Tree333111222222666161616557555111222111222222333333556222111121 121 121 40.5 40.5 40.5 80.9 80.9 80.9 80.9 80.9 80.9 243 243 243 647 647 647 202 202 202 202 202 202 40.5 40.5 40.5Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10% Pnols = Planted excluding livestakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P‐all = Planted including livestakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakesFails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruitesCurrent Plot Data MY2 2019 Scientific Name Common Name Species Type17021‐AXE‐0010 17021‐AXE‐0011 17021‐AXE‐0012 17021‐AXE‐0013 17021‐AXE‐0014 17021‐AXE‐0015 17021‐AXE‐0016 17021‐AXE‐0017 17021‐AXE‐0018Stem countsize (ares)11111Stems per ACRE1111size (ACRES)0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02Species count
 Table 6.Project Code 17021. Project Name: Weaver NutrientPnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer rubrum red maple Tree 1 1 1 2Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1222222323232Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree111Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree444777777 292929393939595959Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree2Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree444444373737Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree111222Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1555666202020Quercus alba white oak Tree111111141414242424484848Quercus nigra water oak Tree222222222Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree222111222 242424404040848484Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 18 18 19 19 19 44 44 44Quercus rubra northern red oakTree 1 1 1666666101010Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak Tree333777101010Quercus shumardii var. shumardii Shumard oak Tree1111118889910111111222109109112151151151349349349444334444222121213121212121212324 324 324 364 364 405 445 445 445 80.9 80.9 80.9 201 201 206 278 278 278 642 642 642Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10% Pnols = Planted excluding livestakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P‐all = Planted including livestakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakesFails to meet requirements by more than 10%T includes natural recruitesCurrent Plot Data MY2 2019 Annual MeansScientific Name Common Name Species Type17021‐AXE‐0019 17021‐AXE‐0020 17021‐AXE‐0021 17021‐AXE‐0022 MY2 (2019)111122MY1 (2018) MY0 (2017)22 220.54 0.540.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.54

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Weaver Farm
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2019

Plot 5
Plot 1
Plot 4 Plot 3
Plot 2
Plot 6

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Weaver Farm
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2019 (continued)

Plot 11 Plot 12
Plot 7
Plot 10 Plot 9
Plot 8
Plot 13

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Weaver Farm
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2019 (continued)

Plot 18 Plot 19
Plot 14
Plot 17 Plot 16
Plot 15
Plot 20

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Weaver Farm
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2019 (continued)

Plot 21 Plot 22
T-1 T-2
T-3

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix D.
Remedial Activities

2019 Remedial Action Plan
Soil Test Report

Ray Holz
From:
Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 15, 2019 4:25 PM
To:
Ray Holz
Cc:
Matthew Harrell
Subject:
RE: [External] RE: Weaver Farm Year 1 review -
Hey Raymond,
By copy of this correspondence, the Year 1 monitoring report is approved and the remediation plan with the
modifications noted below is also approved. Based on your performance bond #22BSBHT4261, the bond term ends with
the approval of the Year 1 Monitoring Report. Therefore, please provide DWR with a continuation certificate extending
the bond through next year's monitoring year. Once I receive confirmation of renewal, I will issue a credit release letter.
Thank you,
Katie
From: Ray Holz <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:09 PM
To: Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matthew Harrell <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Weaver Farm Year 1 review-
• rnal email. L7a not click links or open attachinentS u111�55 y;a,u,.r r' i d. S.enrJ,all.suspic a ail as an attacle"elo
blj
Katie — thank you for the review and for catching the cypress - that was an oversight on our part. Although I would love
to pant cypress, because they will not count towards success, we will instead plant 1,000 Quercus appropriate to the
target natural community (300 Q. laurifolia, 300 Q. lyrata, 400 Q. michauxii).
As for the maple, we understand and agree with the general DWR policy of not planting red maple (Acer rubrum), given
its abundance and prolific nature. However, in this specific case, a portion of the site (Zone 1 on the Remedial Action &
Maintenance Map) demonstrates such impaired soil conditions that we believe including red maple is justified and
beneficial.
While we have completed intensive soil remediation in this —5-acre area (lime, disc, herbaceous seed), there is still some
question about how fertile the soil is where the turkey houses area once stood. In the 2018 monitoring season, this area
was notable for poor tree survival and sparse herbaceous cover.
Red maple is known to tolerate a wide variety of site conditions, even growing on poor sites such as mining spoils. We
consider its inclusion in the planting mix an important part of reclaiming this particular area in a timely fashion. We plan
to plant 200 red maple/acre in Zone 1. That will constitute 1/3rd of the stems/acre planted this year in that zone. The
additional 400 stems/acre will be a mix of the other species on our remedial planting list. The combination will allow
Zone 1 to meet success criteria moving forward by establishing an adequately dense and diverse native hardwood
community despite the difficult soil condition.
Please do not hesitate to give me a call if you would to discuss any part of this plan in greater detail.
Sincerely,
Raymond Holz.
Raymond J. Holz I Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 1 Raleigh, NC 27604
tel:[phone] cell:919.604.9314 1 fax:[phone]

email: [e-mail]
From: Merritt, Katie[mailto:[e-mail]�]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2019 2:58 PM
To: Ray Holz <r fiolz restorationsystems.com>
Subject: Weaver Farm Year 1 review -
Hey Raymond,
I have finalized my review of the Year 1 Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Mitigation Site. Thank you for providing
a remedial action plan in response to the impacts to the site associated with Hurricane Florence. I do have concerns
with the proposed planting plan, considering not all the trees are part of the original approved planting plan. It is
proposed in the report, to plant the following species: Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera, Quercus nigra, Ulmus
Americana and Taxodium distichum. Three of the five species chosen, are not part of the approved planting plan. Acer
rubrum is not usually accepted as a preferable species to plant on riparian buffer sites due to its ability to colonize
rapidly, potentially outcompete other planted stems and possibly produce a monoculture. Ulmus Americana is an
acceptable species to plant on this site and DWR approves the use of this tree in the remediation plan. Taxodium
distichum is not a hardwood tree and would not be allowed to use towards the performance standards, which require
"native hardwood tree species".
Due to the special nature of this site, DWR will allow alternative species of trees to be planted for the
remediation. However, RS is required to provide DWR with a specific reason as to why Acer rubrum should be planted
on this site. This must include site -specific characteristics that warrant the use of Acer rubrum over other species
approved in the planting plan in the BPDP. Nursery availability of stems will not be considered a reasonable explanation
to use Acer rubrum on the site. Additionally, RS must acknowledge in writing, they understand that Taxodium distichum
will be excluded from counting towards the performance standards on the site. Otherwise, RS must choose a different
species from the original planting plan in the BPDP.
Once I have received a response to this email, I will be able to issue a credit release.
Thank You,
Katie
""please note my phone number has changed"*
Katie Merritt
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 919-707-3637
Work Cell: 919-500-0683
Website: http:llportal.ncdenr.ordweblwg/401bufferpermitting
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27620
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Ray Holz
From: Ray Holz
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 12:23 PM
To: Katie Merritt - NC DENR - DWR ([e-mail])
Subject: Weaver Farm - Remedial Action Implementation Summary
Attachments: Weaver Farm —Remedial Action Plan_Implementation Summary.pdf
Katie —
RS completed the remedial action work at Weaver Farm on February 24t''. Please find attached a summary of the work
completed. I have also updated a copy to the DWR edocs website.
At your earliest convenience, I would like to schedule a site visit to both Weaver Farm and Pancho.
Thank you for the time,
RH
Raymond J. Holz I Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 1 Raleigh, NC 27604
tel:[phone] cell:919.604.9314 1 fax:[phone]
email: [e-mail]

Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation
1
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation
Species List of replanting
2
Zone 1 # of Stem Date Completed
Red Maple 1,000 02/24/19
River Birch 500 02/24/19
Yellow Poplar 1,000 02/24/19
Overcup Oak 500 02/24/19
Water Oak 500 02/24/19
American Elm 500 02/24/19
Bald Cypress 300 02/24/19
White Oak 500 02/24/19
Zone 2
River Birch 500 02/24/19
Yellow Poplar 1,000 02/24/19
Overcup Oak 300 02/24/19
Water Oak 500 02/24/19
American Elm 400 02/24/19
Bald Cypress 1,000 02/24/19
Total 8,500
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment in footprint of old turkey houses
Herbaceous establishment in footprint of old turkey houses
3
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses
4
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 7)
5
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 12)
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 10 & 11)
6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/Report No. FY19-SL001200
Mehlich-3 ExtractionSoil Report
Client:
Links to Helpful Information
Advisor:Predictive Raymond Holz
1101 Haynes St
Raleigh, NC 27604
Josh Merritt
120 Singlton Street
Raleigh, NC 27606
Sampled County : Sampson
Client ID: 489322 Advisor ID: 489323
Sampled:
Received:
Completed:
07/21/2018
07/23/2018
07/27/2018Farm: Weaver Farm
Lime History:
Sample ID: More
Information
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm ; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm ; NO3-N in mg/dm ]: Soil Class:
Ca%NO3-NSS-IESPNaCu-IZn-AIZn-IMn-AI2Mn-AI1Mn-IS-IMg%K-IP-IpHAcBS%CECW/VHM%
2 -
1 -
Crop
Recommendations:Lime
BCuZnMnSMgK2OP2O5N
Mineral
Hardwood, E
Hardwood, M
0.3
0.0
WEAV1
80-120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4772835.32.0757.91.310.76 616519272243
0
0
0
0
Note: 11
Note: 11
192
(tons/acre)
333
0
0
33 12
Nutrients (lb/acre)
0.5
Lime History:
Sample ID: More
Information
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm ; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm ; NO3-N in mg/dm ]: Soil Class:
Ca%NO3-NSS-IESPNaCu-IZn-AIZn-IMn-AI2Mn-AI1Mn-IS-IMg%K-IP-IpHAcBS%CECW/VHM%
2 -
1 -
Crop
Recommendations:Lime
BCuZnMnSMgK2OP2O5N
Mineral
Hardwood, E
Hardwood, M
0.4
0.0
WEAV2
80-120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
876445.32.4728.41.220.76 193677011445
0
0
0
0
Note: 11
Note: 11
770
(tons/acre)
333
0
0
55 12
Nutrients (lb/acre)
0.1
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-management system that makes this report possible is
being funded through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/Report No. FY19-SL001200
Page 2 of 2Josh Merritt
Recommendations
Lime
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or lb/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
For no-till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 lb/1000 sq ft) at one
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-I and P-I values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-I levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to . In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of lb/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit to find information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read
.
Test Results
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-AI1, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS-I, Na, ESP, SS-I, NO 3-N (not routinely
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit
Report Abbreviations
Ac exchangeable acidity
B boron
BS% % CEC occupied by basic cations
Ca%% CEC occupied by calcium
CEC cation exchange capacity
Cu-I copper index
ESP exchangeable sodium percent
HM%percent humic matter
K-I potassium index
K2O potash
Mg%% CEC occupied by magnesium
MIN mineral soil class
Mn manganese
Mn-Al1 Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-AI2 Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I manganese index
M-O mineral-organic soil class
N nitrogen
Na sodium
NO3-N nitrate nitrogen
ORG organic soil class
pH current soil pH
P-I phosphorus index
P2O5 phosphate
S-I sulfur index
SS-I soluble salt index
W/V weight per volume
Zn-AI zinc availability index
Zn-I zinc index
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
$Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients
www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/obpart4.htm#fs
A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/uyrst.htm
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.