SW3191105_Millbridge 7-8- Isolated Excavated Pond Evaluation 5.15.17_12/18/2019

ISOLATED POND STUDY DETAIL AREA
WETLAND U
x
t
STREAM F
_
WETLAND H
r '
_
STREAM RR
�'"
",•: =". f
Wetland
STREAM I
WETLAND T
Form DP 2
Upland
{ I
Stream form
WETLAND V
Form DP1
• •
DP8
STREAM D
9
STREAM S
•�
STREAM P
•:
STREAM R
5
. STREAM G
.
`Wetland
7 Stream form
WETLAND N
• • •
6
•'
• • • •
Form DP5 DP7
Upland
Form DP4
o`
Upland
STREAM A
�,
+
WETLAND M
STREAM B
Form DP3
10
�
STREAM C
LEGEND
•'
•�`.
Project boundary study limits
POND
3-4
1 '•.
•:
ISOLATED PONDS
�y Waters of the US Stream/RPW
EXCAVATED IN UPLANDS
_
® Waters of the US Wetland
t Open Water
WETLAND K
Stream
STREAM L
}
`
Non -Jurisdictional Swale/Gulley
form DP 6
t � �~�
Landscape photo/direction
FIGURE NO.
6
MILLBRIDGE 7 & 8
Union Co., NC
DELINEATION MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
Drawn By
NRN
_u V.a W�u Ly.
LSR
DATE:
9/16/16
Update 10/14/16
Pond study detail 0�17

Jurisdictional Pond
- With adjacent wetlands
(Not shown)
Sian c
"I'd
ISOLATED POND STUDY DETAIL
Stormwater drainage Stream
evaluation form Jurisdictional Wetland M
(Stream evaluation score (ppg) = 15.5 pts.) 30' x 30')
i � 4 �, •1 '� 11 P12
• .
Jurisdictional features or
13 hydrologic connections not
l-
observed (+/- 300')
w
Stream
evaluation form
1. `J
(DP6)
Jurisdictional Stream L
- Moved (+/-) 75' downslope from
original L1 location based on current
}
hydrological conditions
(Stream evaluation score = 20+ pts.)
LEGEND
aIe
*0'*AJ* Jurisdictional stream/RPW
® Jurisdictional Wetland
Landscape photo and direction
Agricultural Pond 1
O - Excavated in uplands and
appears to be isolated
14,15
51 sofa B
i �05-1fi8�
Stormwater
1s
drainage
Swale
Agricultural Pond 2 { 19,20 i 05168010A
- Excavated in uplands and �O
appears to be isolated O 21,22
-�
Jurisdictional features or
hydrologic connections not
observed between pond and road
L Z --
SCALE Study area limited to
•1� �. 250 125 0 250(Feet)
- - those areas in detail
5
FIGURE NO. PC..
� Millbridge Phases 7 & 8
�+ Union County, NC
Drawn By:
PJ K
1:3.38 9
0 0.0275 0.055 0.11 mi
0-04C 0.09 0.18 km
Reviewed By: I Date:
LSR 05/12/17
Prepared for:
APPROXIMATE MAP LANDEAVOR, LLC Acres:
EXISTING CONDITIONS ISOLATED POND STUDY 9101 Southern Pine Boulevard
For Study purpose only Suite 210
Subject to USACE/NCDWR verification Charlotte, NC 28273

-
i.- z
J
or
c,
t
■

ll
koi
At-
r
W -
7^�
a

- vi
$ i _ ?
�Av
- v - Ww
4 c„g j q yy s a vM s ;4 .
c°TV tc - d wT /+ •G `r7. .
i 3' -
f
■

„WF P_
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
PHOTO 17: Berm of Agricultural Pond 1.
Millbridge Phase 7 & 8 Pond Study
Union County, NC — Photos taken 05103117
Leonard S- Rindner, PLLC.

a
gsi
�8i13�%.�
V 1•1 S y,
r %
Y
� 1
r
. _ h
�aa'e��An .eH
s
1
B�
1F
r
i
Al
�...�'�'
1
a

PHOTO 21: Drainage area downslope of Agricultural Pond 2 (facing downslope).
.r
i
to4.
Jmi
PHOTO 22: Typical soils downslope of Agricultural Pond.
Millbridge Phase 7 & 8 Pond Study
WF1 Union County, NC — Photos taken 05103117
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S- Rindner, PLLC.

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date: I
I Evaluator: I WEPG
I Easting:
- 80.780 W
Project:
I Millbridge Ph 7 & 8. Stormwater channel upslope of Stream L1
I Northing:
34.924 N
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
15.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
9.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Hydrology Subtotal
2.0
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
4.0
. perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
No water in channel
Silty, clay substrate. Small amounts of sand.
Fibrous roots in channel
Some scour but generally weak to non-existent OHWM
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)
Origins.

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
9/16/15 1 Evaluator: I HAC
Easting:
-80.7813 W
Project:
Millbridge: Seasonal RPW L (DP 6)
Northing:
34.92307N
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
21.5
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
14
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
4.5
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
3.0
. perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Representative Stream Form for intermittent Streams/RPW's C, D, and E
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)
Origins.