WQ0003717_Staff Report_20191218

Dow& n Envelope ID: 993810EF-9FDC-4812-ADE6-8CACF1A7B705
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: WQ0003717
Attn: Ashley Kabat Facility name: Parks Family Meats WWTF
From: Bryan Lievre
Wilmington Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge fg acili , staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 12/04/2019
b. Site visit conducted by: Bryan Lievre
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Geno Kennedy and their contact information: (910) 289 - 0395 ext.
e. Driving directions: 1618 NC Hwy's 24/50, Warsaw, NC 28398. From Wilmington: Interstate I40 West to
Exit 364 & NC Hwv 24 East. right on NC Hwv 50 make left onto dirt road in one mile between child care
facility & Warsaw HVAC company.
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS N/A
2. Afe the tfeatment faeilifies
for- the t-fpe disposal
system? El Yes or- El No
new adeqtta4e
•
of waste a -ad
3. Are depth to
table, the
E] Yes [Z—] NO E] N
site eenditions (soils,
wcAer- ete) eensistent with
s4fni4ed r-epot4s?
ifHe, Please explaifi:
4, Do the
the lines,
ete.)? E] Yes E] No
pla-as a -ad site map fepr-eseat
aettial site (pr-epef�y wells,
ifHe, Please explaifi:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Pagel of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 993810EF-9FDC-4812-ADE6-8CACF1A7B705
i
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: An 1,100 gpd surface irrigation and disposal facility consisting of a grease trap,
an aeration basin, a clarifier with sludge return, a chlorine contact tank, a polishing_ lagoon of approximately
180,000 gallons, and a spray irrigationystem with a 100 gpm pump and approximately 8,836 square feet of spraX
field with two spray heads. each with an influence diameter of 75 feet.
Proposed flow: 1,100 gpd
Current permitted flow: 1,100 gpd
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
Svstem continues to prefer to send all wastewater to The Town of Warsaw collection system. as permitted with
W00029886. Although the components of the on -site wastewater and irrigation are present at the facility, and
they do not intend on utilizingthe he systems, the system would like to continue with the existing "Zero Discharge"
permit status to enable them to use the systems in the event wastewater can no Ionizer be sent to the towns
collection system
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 993810EF-9FDC-4812-ADE6-8CACF1A7B705
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
O l lI
O I II
O l lI
O I II
O / //
O I it
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Reviewed records from 1/2015 through 11/2019 and
only issues noted were a result of system not submitting_ reports on a timely basis and these issues have been
resolved with staff in January 2018.
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 993810EF-9FDC-4812-ADE6-8CACF1A7B705
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit, Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
5
0
Condition Reason
Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ D o W..J �y:state reasons: )
Signature of report preparer ­Docuftned by:
Signature of regional supervisor?4249ABED37443E... (A1b Sa " _"_"' 1_��
Date: 12 / 18 / 2 01 g DABAUA=C434...
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 993810EF-9FDC-4812-ADE6-8CACF1A7B705
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Permit renewal seems appropriate with same terms and conditions as last permit renewal.
Please note that the term "aerated" was removed from the description of the grease trap since it is not applicable.
Also, it is recommended that the 1,100 gpd language remain in place somewhere in the description of the facility
operations to maintain this knowledge.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5