HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190812 Ver 1_PCN Submitted 10.31.19_revised_2019121710/31 /2019
Submission Completed
M
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can
print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https:Hedocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/O/edoc/624704/PCN%2OHelp%2OFile%202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes - No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?*
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 1/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
This form may be used to initiate the standard/individual permit process with the Corps. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items that are not provided in the E-PCN can
be added to the miscellaneous upload area located at the bottom of this form.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
check all that apply
✓ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual Permit
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
*
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes
No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
4 Yes
No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
10.01.19 Oak Park SD Acceptance Letter.pdf
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
Wel&VN:7
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 2/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
Yes No
1 j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
Yes No
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-
Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
1 a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Lauren Norris -Heflin
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
lauren.norris-
heflin@timmons.com
1d. Who is applying for the permit?*
Owner
(Check all that apply)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:*
Oak Park Developers, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Deed book 017299, page 02276
2c. Responsible party:
(for Corporations)
Oak Park Developers, LLC
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
(919)866-4943
Applicant (other than owner)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 3/24
10/31/2019 Submission Completed
2d. Address*
Street Address
1401 Aversboro Road
Address Line 2
Suite 206
City State / Province / Region
Garner NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27529 USA
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
(919)772-3929
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
douglas@ballrentals.com
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:*
Douglas Ball
3b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
3c. Address*
Street Address
1401 Aversboro Road
Address Line 2
Suite 206
city
Garner
Postal / Zip Code
27529
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 4/24
10/31/2019 Submission Completed
3d. Telephone Number:*
(919)772-3929 3e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx
3f. Email Address:*
douglas@ballrentals.com
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:*
Lauren Norris -Heflin
4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Timmons Group
4c. Address*
Street Address
5410 Trinity Road
Address Line 2
Suite 102
City
State / Province / Region
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27607
USA
4d. Telephone Number:*
(919)866-4943 4e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx
4f. Email Address:*
lauren.norris-heflin@timmons.com
Agent Authorization Letter*
Please provide the Agent Authorization Letter if you are submitting this document.
2017-12-01 Signed Agent Authorization. pdf
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
102.19KB
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 5/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project:*
Oak Park Subdivision
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Oak Park
1c. Nearest municipality / town-.*
Garner
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
(tax PIN or parcel ID) (in acres)
1629024188 47.63
2c. Project Address
Street Address
0 New Bethel Church Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Garner NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27529 USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS
device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was determined. (For example, most mobile
phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal
place.)
Latitude: *
35.651743
ex: 34.208504
Longitude: *
-78.593095
-77.796371
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 6/24
10/31/2019 Submission Completed
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
unnamed tributary of Swift Creek, nearest Stream Index
#27-48-(8)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C; NSW
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.*
030202011004
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 7/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the
time of this application: *
The project site for this permit application encompasses approximately 38.44 acres and is located southeast
of the intersection of the Clifford Road and New Bethel Church Road in Garner, North Carolina within Wake
County. The project site consists of Phase 2 and 4 of a larger approximately 97.91-acre development area
(phases 1 and 3 have no impacts to Waters of the U.S. or associated buffers). Phases 2 and 4, the project
site, are located entirely within a Wake County parcel identified as 1629024188 which is 47.63-acres. For the
purposes of this review however, the project site is referred to as the aforementioned 38.44-acre area
comprising Phases 2 and 4. The project site is currently occupied by mixed hardwood -pine forest. The project
area is bounded to the north and east by forested and residential land, to the south by forested land, and to
the west by low density residential land associated with Phases 1 and 3. Land use within the vicinity of the
project site consists of low density residential, institutional, and undeveloped areas.
Three unnamed tributaries to Swift Creek are located within the western, northeastern, and southern portions
of the project site. The project site is located within the Neuse River Basin (HUC 030202011004) and within
the Mahlers Creek — Swift Creek sub -watershed. The project site drains to Swift Creek, which has a DWR
Stream Classification of Class C and NSW. According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps 3720162900J
and 3720161900J (issued May 2, 2006), the site is located within Zone X, areas located outside of the 100-
year floodplain.
A wetland delineation was conducted by Angler Environmental in 2015 and an on -site jurisdictional
determination was conducted by David Schaeffer — USACE representative on December 29, 2015 (USACE
Action Id: SAW-2015-02534). A Neuse River Buffer Determination was issued on February 2, 2016 by DWR
(NBRRO# 15-516).
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the
past? *
Yes No Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the
location of the project site. (for DWR)
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Figure 1 - VIC.pdf
File type must be pdf
758.62KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Figure 5 - NRCS.pdf
File type must be pdf
I77UTA141:t:1:3
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.017
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 8/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
3,910
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct an affordable and family friendly residential subdivision
with community cohesion and the necessary amenities within the southern section of the Town of Garner,
designed to provide housing to the southeastern section of Wake County, North Carolina.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project (38.44-acres) is part of a larger development (97.91-acres) consisting of single family
lots and amenities in addition to roadway and utility improvements. Three (3) road crossings (Crossings 1, 2, and
3) and one (1) utility crossings (Buffer Impact Adjacent to Crossing 3) associated with the residential development
are required in order to connect Phases 2 and 4 to the remaining portions of the development. The attached
Impact Maps include the specific details of proposed construction, impact areas, and includes tables summarizing
disturbance amounts.
Installation of Reinforced Concrete Pipes (RCPs) at the three road crossings will be countersunk underneath
the road to maintain the hydrologic connection between the up -gradient and down -gradient portion of the
streams. The Road Crossing Impact "Crossing 1" will have dual 72-inch RCP culverts, and the culvert outfalls
are designed with an energy dissipater pad constructed of class 2 riprap. Both Road Crossing Impact
"Crossing 2" and "Crossing 3" are designed with an energy dissipater pad constructed of Class 1 riprap, and
will utilize a 54-inch RCP culvert and a 48-inch RCP culvert, respectively.
The Utility Crossing Impact adjacent to "Crossing 3" will involve clearing for directional boring within portions
of buffer Zone 2. No impacts will occur within the associated stream or buffer Zone 1 as the utility line will be
bored beneath these areas, avoiding any aboveground disturbance.
The proposed pipe orientations are as close to the existing stream alignment as possible with the least
amount of environmental impacts. Due to how the existing stream alignment meanders, realigning the
culverts in a way different to the proposed design would create additional environmental impacts. Dissipator
pads are shown at the crossings to help minimize/eliminate any potential erosion concerns.
All work will be conducted in accordance with all local state and federal regulations. No BMPs are required for
the proposed project. Please see the attached project plans. Traditional equipment will be used consisting of
front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 9/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Oak Park Impact Maps 2019-10-02.pdf 2.74MB
CDs - Oak Park Phases 2 & 4 - 2019-10-10.pdf 54.84MB
File type must be pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
1►n
A PFO wetland, a perennial stream, and three intermittent
stream segments were delineated within the project site.
Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
Example: SAW-2017-99999
SAW-2015-02534
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Angler Environmental
Company:
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by
the Corps or DWR.
USACE PJD issued by David Shaeffer on December 29, 2015. A Neuse River Buffer Determination was
issued by Danny Smith of DWR on February 2, 2016 (NBRRO# 15-516). A copy of the PJD was unable to be
obtained from Angler Environmental.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 10/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
DWR Buffer Determination. pdf
File type must be PDF
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
7b. If yes, explain.
The project site consists of Phases 2 and 4 of a larger development, consisting of 4 total phases. Based on
the wetland, stream, and buffer boundaries verified during the USACE PJD and NCDWR Neuse River Buffer
Verification, Phases 1 and 3 were determined to have no impacts to Waters of the U.S. and associated
buffers. Therefore, development commenced on the entirely upland Phases 1 and 3. Development of Phases
2 and 4 are pending completion of this PCN. A map depicting all overall project phases is attached under
Miscellaneous below ("20190927 OakPark Lot -Phasing".
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to
authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant
crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -
construction notification.
fry
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on
the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
"S." will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream".
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 11/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
3a. Reason for
3b.lmpact
3c. Type of
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream
3f. Type of
3g. S.
3h.
impact* M
type*
impact*
Type* M
Jurisdiction
width*
Impact
length
S1
Stream Crossing
Permane
Other
Unnamed
Perennial
Both
7
154*
#1
nt
Tributary of Swift
Average
(linear
Creek
(feet)
feet)
S2
Stream Crossing
Permane
Other
Unnamed
Intermitten
Both
7
128*
#2
nt
Tributary of Swift
t
Average
(linear
Creek
(feet)
feet)
S3
Stream Crossing
Permane
Other
Unnamed
Intermitten
Both
7
114*
#3
nt
Tributary of Swift
t
Average
(linear
Creek
(feet)
feet)
S4
Stream Crossing
Temporar
Other
Unnamed
Perennial
Both
7
37
#1
y
Tributary of Swift
Average
(linear
Creek
(feet)
feet)
S5
Stream Crossing
Temporar
Other
Unnamed
Intermitten
Both
7
26
#2
y
Tributary of Swift
t
Average
(linear
Creek
(feet)
feet)
S6
Stream Crossing
Temporar
Other
Unnamed
Intermitten
Both
7
27
#3
y
Tributary of Swift
t
Average
(linear
Creek
(feet)
feet)
37
N/A - Impact
Removed
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
396*
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
90
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
486
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 12/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
3j. Comments:
Of the permanent disturbance proposed in the vicinity of the three road crossings, 276-ft will be
associated with the installation a culvert along each stream segment and will count toward
compensatory mitigation. The remaining 120-ft of permanent disturbance is associated with
dissipator pads which will be keyed in below grade. Therefore, these impacts are permanent but do
not count toward loss of water, and do not count toward the mitigation threshold.
Culvert details, including the plan and profile, for each road crossing are included in the attached
site plans (see attached Impact Maps, Sheets C2.1 through C4.2). Temporary disturbance in the
vicinity of the three road crossings will be associated with grading.
See Impact Maps for additional details. Details on each Road Crossing impact provided on Sheets
C2.1 through C4.2. Section 3, 4i includes a more detailed description of culvert sizes.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list
all buffer impacts below.
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?*
Check all that apply.
Neuse
Catawba
Goose Creek
Other
Tar -Pamlico
Randleman
Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type* (')
6c. Per or
6d. Stream name*
6e. Buffer mitigation
6f. Zone 1
6g. Zone 2
Temp* (?)
required?*
impact*
impact*
Crossing #1 Culvert Fill
P
Unnamed Tributary
No
4,293
2,582
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
Crossing #1 Bank
P
Unnamed Tributary
No
4,196
3,003
Stabilization
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
Crossing #2, Culvert fill
P
Unnamed Tributary
No
4,973
2,725
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
Crossing #2, Bank
P
Unnamed Tributary
No
3,102
1,028
stabilization
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 13/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
Crossing #3, Culvert fill
P
Unnamed Tributary
No
4,397
2,724
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
Crossing #3, Bank
P
Unnamed Tributary
No
2,333
1,287
stabilization
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
Crossing #1 Riprap T Unnamed Tributary No 1,200 0
of Swift Creek (square feet) (square feet)
Crossing #1, Construction
T
Unnamed Tributary
No
2,332
1,151
Access
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
Crossing #2, Riprap T Unnamed Tributary No 485 0
of Swift Creek (square feet) (square feet)
Crossing #2, Construction
T
Unnamed Tributary
No
1,805
953
access
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
Crossing #3, Riprap T Unnamed Tributary No 286 0
of Swift Creek (square feet) (square feet)
Crossing #3, Construction
T
Unnamed Tributary
No
1,901
1,008
access
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
Crossing #3, Sanitary
T
Unnamed Tributary
No
0
1,633
sewer
of Swift Creek
(square feet)
(square feet)
N/A, impact no longer
proposed
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 8,009.00 4,745.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 23,294.00 13,349.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 14/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
Total combined buffer 31,303.00 18,094.00
impacts
6i. Comments:
Permanent disturbance in the vicinity of the three road crossings will be associated with
the construction of a road, sidewalk, and adjacent managed vegetated right-of-way.
Temporary disturbance in the vicinity of the proposed utility near crossing #3 will be
associated with direct boring of an underground utility line.
See Impact Maps for additional details. Details of specific impacts for road crossings 1
through 3 is provided on pages C2.1 through C4.2.
Supporting Documentation - i.e. Impact Maps, Plan Sheet, etc.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Oak Park Impact Maps 2019-10-02.pdf 2.74MB
File must be PDF
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
Impacts to jurisdictional features have been avoided and minimized to the maximum
extent practicable by incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of
the wetland and stream delineation to adjust the project layout in order to avoid and
minimize impacts. The proposed stream and associated buffer impacts are the result of
the necessary infrastructure and facility layout, without which the project's goals would
not be realized. The stream/buffer impacts at Crossing #1 are required to connect the
project to the larger development.
Stream/buffer impact Crossing #2 are required to gain access to the southern section of
the project site as this section is surrounded by undeveloped forested land and there are
no other existing road for it to connect to.
Stream/buffer impacts at Crossing #3 are required to gain access to the northeastern
section of the project site, as an additional entryway from New Bethel Church Road would
be located significantly closer than the NCDOT and Garner intersection spacing
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 15/24
10/31/2019 Submission Completed
requirements for safe stopping distances and required connectivity (potentially causing a
traffic hazard if constructed).
Additional Zone 2 buffer impacts at Crossing #3 are required for construction of an
underground sanitary sewer easement, due to elevation requirements preventing the
utility line beneath the proposed road, which would render the utility line ineffective. The
Utility Crossing will involve clearing for directional boring within portions of buffer Zone 2.
Impacts to the stream and Zone 1 will be avoided as the utility line will be bored beneath
these areas, avoiding any aboveground disturbance.
The location of the proposed road crossings have been minimized impacts to the
maximum extent practicable by aligning the crossing as close to 90 degrees as possible.
In addition, utilities (i.e. water) and sidewalks have been aligned adjacent and parallel to
the proposed road crossings. Dissipater pads associated with the culverts will be installed
flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage.
The proposed pipe orientation is as close to the existing stream alignment as possible
with the least amount of environmental impacts. Due to how the existing stream
alignment meanders, realigning the culverts will create additional environmental impacts.
Dissipator pads are shown at the crossing to help minimize/eliminate any potential
erosion concerns.
Access to the adjoining properties to the east and south were unavailable as they are
owned by other entities. Therefore, alternative access routes could not be obtained and
Crossings #2 and #3 were required.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 16/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques: *
Proper land use control measures will be utilized during all phases of construction and
will be in compliance with applicable regulations. All work will take place during dry
conditions and can be facilitated from upland, non -jurisdictional, stable ground. Measures
will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris, and other pollutants from entering the
adjacent jurisdictional streams and buffer areas. Any excess excavated materials not
utilized as backfill will be placed and contained within upland areas and
permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into adjacent jurisdictional streams and buffer
areas. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional areas will be
strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project construction
activities initiated within jurisdictional streams and buffers will be carried to completion in
an expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance within the jurisdictional
streams.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the
State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream
(linear feet)
276 at a 2:1 ratio
temperature:
warm
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 17/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only)
(square feet)
N/A
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested
(acres)
N/A
4h. Comments
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
N/A
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
N/A
Timmons Group contacted three mitigation banks associated with the project HUC (RES,
Wildlands, and Restoration Systems), however, none of the banks had available stream
mitigation. Therefore, a Letter of Acceptance was obtained from the NC DEQ Department
of Mitigation Services for the required mitigation.
The proposed Neuse River Buffer Impacts are either exempt or allowable use activities.
Therefore, buffer impact mitigation is not required.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required
by DWR)
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC
Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes
No
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If
the project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully
documents how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM)s must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual. Associated supplement forms and other documentation shall be provided.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 18/24
10/31/2019 Submission Completed
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
(check all that apply)
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Diffuse Flow Documentation
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Oak Park CDs - Diffuse Flow Sheets.pdf 5.25MB
File type must be PDF
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?*
IY�R.7
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
Comments:
The proposed development has been evaluated to ensure that the proposed site development will meet or
exceed the intent of the Town of Garner's stormwater requirements for stormwater quality and control. Due to
the geographical location of the proposed development, the site must meet nitrogen runoff requirements.
Based on the current design, and the fact that the site is limited to 30% impervious, the nitrogen runoff
requirements can be met via a buydown and there will be no need to install water quality measures for
treatment. In addition, the site was evaluated to determine if, due to location within the watershed, detention
would be beneficial or detrimental to downstream flooding. As per an analysis of stormwater detention, it was
determined that detention would not be beneficial to this project and would result in adverse impacts
downstream; therefore, detention facilities are not included in the proposed project.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 19/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland
Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC
2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The entire project is a single and complete project with appropriate land use control
measures in place for specific areas which require them.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
Waste water will be directed into an existing treatment facility operated by the Town of
Garner. Project is going through normal municipal review processes to confirm designed
adequately for available capacity.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps
Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 20/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
2re,
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
Yes No
Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?*
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
Yes No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?**
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by
machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?*
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or
Designated Critical Habitat?*
The NC Natural Heritage Program and IPaC databases were used to determine whether
or not any federally protected species have been known to occur within the project limits.
An aquatic species survey report was prepared by Three Oaks Engineering for Timmons
Group to determine the presence of any federally protected aquatic species within the
project limits. The Aquatics Survey determined the project would "not likely adversely
affect" protected species, and Kathy Matthews of the USFWS informally concurred with
that determination on 9/26/19.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 21/24
10/31/2019 Submission Completed
Consultation Documentation Upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
NC NHP Report.pdf 1004.38KB
Official IPaC.pdf 241.44KB
Oak Park Freshwater Mussel Surveys Final Report Submitted Sept ... 997.57KB
09.26.19_KM to LNH_Aquatics Conf..pdf 119.93KB
File type must be PDF
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data:
http_//gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as
having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties
significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?*
NC SHPO online resources map and site files review at the Office of State Archaeology
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Oak Park -New Bethel —Cultural Resources 06132019.pdf 669.1 KB
File must be PDF
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 22/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps 3720162900J and 3720161900J (issued
May 2, 2006), the site is located within Zone X, areas located outside of the 100-year
floodplain.
Miscellaneous
Comments
This application is a re -submittal of a previous PCN submitted on 06/14/19. Per USACE request, the previous
consultation was closed out in order to confirm potential to impact protected aquatic species in addition to
finalizing plan revisions. As requested, this new PCN application is being submitted with the requested Impact
Map changes, Aquatic Species Investigation, and Mitigation Acceptance Letter.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
20190927 OakPark Lot-Phasing.pdf 1.44MB
Figure 2 - HUC.pdf 2.26MB
Figure 3 - EIM.pdf 1.95MB
Figure 4 - Parcel.pdf 1.19MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
*
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
■ 1 have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
■ 1 agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
■ 1 agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
■ 1 understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
■ 1 intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 23/24
10/31 /2019
Submission Completed
Full Name:*
Lauren Norris -Heflin
Signature
Date
10/31 /2019
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 24/24