20191504 Ver 1_More Info Received_20191218

Strickland, Bev
From: Mairs, Robb L
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 6:55 AM
To: Benson, Tyler G
Subject: Fwd: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune -Splashpoints PCN
Attachments: MCBCL_SP43_Additional_Info_for_USACE.pdf, ATT00001.htm
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Hartshorn, Jason" <[e-mail]>
Date: December 17, 2019 at 10:21:47 PM EST
To: "Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)" <[e-mail]. mil>,
"'[e-mail]"' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Baker CIV Jessi O <[e-mail]>, Spears CIV Courtney A
<courtney.spears o,usmc.mil>
Subject: RE: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune -Splashpoints PCN
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all
suspicious email as an attachment to report. spam o,nc.gov<mailto:report.spam o,nc.gov>
: , ,>FV; ' • 11M
Attached is the additional info package for SP43 as discussed at the field review last week. Let
me know if you need any other documentation!
Thanks!
-Jason
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Kimley-Horn 1 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
Direct: 919 678 4155 1 Mobile: [phone] www.kimley-hom.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Hartshorn, Jason
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 1:43 PM
To: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>;
'Robb.Mairs [e-mail]' <Robb.Mairs [e-mail]>
Cc: Baker CIV Jessi O <jessi.baker(cr�,usmc.mil>; Spears CIV Courtney A
<courtney.spears o,usmc.mil>
Subject: RE: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune -Splashpoints PCN
IIF� ' • RE

Attached are the additional info packages for SP22 and SP32, consisting of revised figures and
upland/wetland data form pairs for the wetlands shown in the study area for each SP.
Let me know if you have any questions! See you tomorrow at 9am for SP38 and SP43 site
reviews!
-Jason
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Kimley-Horn 1 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
Direct: 919 678 4155 1 Mobile: [phone] www.kimley-hom.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 8:36 AM
To: Hartshorn, Jason <[e-mail]>; Baker CIV Jessi O
<iessi.baker(cr�,usmc.mil>
Cc: Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune -Splashpoints PCN
Jason/Jessi,
Robb attempted to view sites 38 and 43 from the water last week while participating in the
ambient water monitoring run. Using the coordinates from the PCN packages he indicated he did
not see any well -established access areas.
Therefore, I think the next logical step would be to visit the sites to confirm their condition and
view any marsh fringes.
We were hoping to visit the second week of December, either the IOth or 13th.
Please advise if either of these days work for your both.
Also as soon as I can get the data packages for the other two areas I can issue the verifications.
Brad
-----Original Message -----
From: Mairs, Robb L [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 5:00 PM
To: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune-Splashpoints PCN
Hey Brad,
The first image is from SP#43, which we were not able to access the shore due to the tide. This
location does not appear to be in use. The second image is from SP#38, which also does not
seem to be in use. It should be noted, that there is also an existing ramp at the end of Town Point
Road just upstream from SP#38 (see attached).

Hope this helps.
-----Original Message -----
From: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:25 PM
To: jason.hartshorn(cr�,kimley-horn.com; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Cc: Baker CIV Jessi O <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune -Splashpoints PCN
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all
suspicious email as an attachment to report. spam o,nc.gov<mailto:report.spam o,nc.gov>
Jason,
I have reviewed the images and had a chance to correspond with Robb as well. It looks like most
of the sites are clear cut as expected but I do have additional questions concerning splash points
38 and 43. Splash point 38 has one image looking up the shoreline and you can see patchy
marsh. Based on the photo angles I am not clear whether or not the proposed splash point will go
through the marsh fringe or not. Also it would be helpful to have the image like others provided
that shows the approach from high ground toward the river.
I have similar questions regarding splash point 43 and more concerns as the marsh fringe appears
much healthier. Again the vantage point from high ground to river would be very helpful.
As before if it is easier to visit the sites in person I feel like Robb and I can make time.
Brad
-----Original Message -----
From: Hartshorn, Jason [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:47 AM
To: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Mairs,
Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune-Splashpoints PCN
Brad and Robb -
Attached are a set of photo pages showing each of the 7 splash points for reference. Per Brad and
I's conversation last week, I am compiling data sheets for each site to demonstrate the results of
our delineations. The mapping previously submitted indicated 'Approximate Wetlands' because
we did not detail delineate the entire polygon shown as they are primarily out of the study areas,
however we did field delineate wetland features along the boundary closest to or within the study
area at the respective splash points.
Robb -- Full submittal fees have also been paid to NCDWR as of yesterday (hand delivered to
NCDWR central office on 1115) covering each splash point as it's own permit action/project.

We also discussed the plan sheet for each splash point, and while the numbers/dimensions shown
overlap a bit, based on field conditions and confirmation from the contractor, the proposed
disturbance below NHW is 35'. The concrete mats will be constructed in the existing road (high
ground) away from the shoreline, and then will be placed into place by an excavator. Limited
substrate regrading will be necessary based on field conditions to install the mat per the plan
sheet.
Data sheets will follow shortly, but wanted to get you all as much info as quickly as possible to
avoid any further delays in processing these applications.
Thanks! Let me know if you have any questions, or if you think a field visit is still necessary
based on the attached photo pages.
-Jason
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Kimley-Horn 1 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
Direct: 919 678 4155 1 Mobile: [phone] BlockedBlockedwww.kmley-horn.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 9:25 AM
To: Wojoski, Paul A <Paul.Wojoski o,ncdenr.gov>; Baker CIV Jessi O <[e-mail]>;
Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Cc: Montalvo, Sheri A <[e-mail]>; Hartshorn, Jason
<j ason.hartshorn(cr�,kimley-horn.com>
Subject: RE: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune -Splashpoints PCN
Paul,
We will have to authorize as separate actions as they are in such distinct and separate locations.
We have not started processing yet as we are awaiting a response from Camp Lejeune regarding
the wetlands determinations and additional location background information.
Thanks,
Brad
-----Original Message -----
From: Wojoski, Paul A [mailto:Paul. Wojoski o,ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 9:15 AM
To: Baker CIV Jessi O <[e-mail]>; Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW
(USA) <[e-mail] .mil>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Cc: Montalvo, Sheri A <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune -Splashpoints PCN
Hi Brad -
Can you clarify if the Corps is processing this as one single/complete project (at multiple
locations) or if you are processing the splash points each as small individual projects?

Thanks,
Paul
Paul Wojoski
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
[phone] office
Paul. Wojoski o,ncdenr.gov
512 N. Salisbury Street (Archdale Building), Suite 942-F, Raleigh, NC 27604
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Baker CIV Jessi O [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 11:05 AM
To: 'Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)' <Brad.E.Shaver(cr�,usace.army.mil>; Mairs,
Robb L <[e-mail]>
Cc: Montalvo, Sheri A<sheri.montalvo(cr�,ncdenr.gov>; [e-mail]
Subject: [External] MCB Camp Lejeune-Splashpoints PCN
Brad and Robb,
Please accept the attached PCNs for repairs at seven separate splashpoints (where amphibious
vehicles drive in and out of the water) on base. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Have a fantastic weekend!
Jessi
Jessi Baker
NEPA Program Manager
12 Post Lane
Camp Lejeune, NC 28547
910-451-4542
[e-mail]

A 40
•
moo
22
0
1
0
Legend •' -
F'J Project Study Area - «•-• _ 0 500 1,000
" Feet
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Camp Lejeune Splash Point Repair
Splash Point #43
Onslow County, Camp Lejeune, NC

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Camp Lejeune Splash Points - SP43 City/County: MCBCL/Onslow Sampling Date: 8/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: Marine Corps Installations East - Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune State: NC Sampling Point: W1-UP
Investigator(s): J. Hartshorn, K. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: ---
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Dirt Road Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.685504 Long:-77.410467 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CrC - Craven fine sandy loam, 4-8% slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
W1-UP is taken within a maintained sand road approach a dirt boat launch and amphibious assault vehicle splash point
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were identified. Data point is within a sand road on moderate slope, approximately 75' inland.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1-UP
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
60
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species 140 x 3 = 420
1.
Pinus taeda
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
2.
Morella cerifera
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 160 (A) 500 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.13
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
30
=Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Chasmanthium latifolium
50
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Eupatorium capillifolium
10
No
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
60
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Data point in a maintained road, woody vegetation observed along edge of road corridor
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14
14-24
10YR 7/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
10YR 6/3 75 10YR 7/6 25 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): I Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Soils are bright and clayey. 14-24" layer is likley not concentrations but a result of frequent tracked vehicle use turning and mixing soils.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Camp Lejeune Splash Points - SP43 City/County: MCBCL/Onslow Sampling Date: 8/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: Marine Corps Installations East - Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune State: NC Sampling Point: W1-WET
Investigator(s): J. Hartshorn, K. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: ---
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Ravine Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.685570 Long:-77.410430 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CrC - Craven fine sandy loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
W1 -WET is within a narrow crenulation tying into the New River. W1 is seperated from the project area by a distinct topographic ridge
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
W1-WET is a linear depressional wetland draining
to the New River. Slopes within W1 are relatively steep and W1 is defined by distinct topography
on all sides.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1-WET
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
75 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
75 =Total Cover
OBL species 50 x 1 = 50
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
1. None
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
2.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 125 (A) 275 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.20
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
=Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Spartina spp.
20 Yes
OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Juncus spp.
20 Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex spp. 10 Yes OBL
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
50 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4
10YR 2/1
90
10YR 5/4 10 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
4-10
10YR 3/1
90
10YR 5/4 10 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
10-20
10YR 6/2
90
10YR 5/4 10 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Soils dark and saturated at the surface. W 1 is within a narrow crenulation and is likely permanently saturated
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0