20190603 Ver 2_UPDATED PJD REQUEST_20191121

Strickland, Bev
From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 12:20 PM
To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Haupt, Mac; Davis, Erin B
Subject: [External] FW: WILDANDS - FOLLY SWAMP _ UPDATED PJD REQUEST Post-6Nov2019
Field Verification
Attachments: Wildlands Folly Swamp-PJD Request -SEC 13997_Updated_11-18-19(signed).pdf
Importance: High
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<maiIto: [e-mail]>
FYI
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Dr, Ste. 105 1 Wake Forest, NC 27587 1 919.554.4884 x60
BUILDING STRONG
-----Original Message -----
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 11:01 AM
To: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Chris Roessler
<[e-mail]>
Cc: John Hutton <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: WILDANDS - FOLLY SWAMP _ UPDATED PJD REQUEST Post-6Nov2019 Field Verification
Importance: High
Kyle:
Attached is the updated PJD Request package reflecting your field verification on November 6, 2019.
Don't hesitate to contact me if you need anything else or have any questions.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-----Original Message -----
From: Bob Zarzecki
1

Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 9:50 AM
To: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Chris Roessler
<[e-mail]>
Cc: John Hutton <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: WILDANDS - FOLLY SWAMP _ PJD, Streams & Alternate Spoil Area
Thanks Kyle. I'll go ahead and send you the updated PJD request for your verification. We'll include the new proposed
spoil areas and northern field as well. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions after reviewing the updated
information. Have a great weekend.
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-----Original Message -----
From: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 8:20 AM
To: Chris Roessler <[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Cc: John Hutton <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: WILDANDS - FOLLY SWAMP _ PJD, Streams & Alternate Spoil Area
Sounds good.
-----Original Message -----
From: Chris Roessler [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 8:18 AM
To: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Cc: John Hutton <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: WILDANDS - FOLLY SWAMP _ PJD, Streams & Alternate Spoil Area
No worries, Kyle! Glad we're all on the same page.
Separately, I indicated that I thought we would be developing the Acorn Hill Creek preservation site separately from
Folly Swamp but would confirm.
I do confirm that it will be done separately but using the same UBMI (so separate Prospectus, mitigation plan, etc.).
So please feel free to send the post -comment period Prospectus letter for Folly Swamp.
We'll pull together a pre -Prospectus for the Acorn Hill site and look to get on the IRT's schedule to see it in January.
Glad to close the loop, Chris
Chris Roessler I Senior Scientist/Project Manager
0: 919.851.9986, x 111 M: 919.624.0905
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 W. Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609

-----Original Message -----
From: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 8:08 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Cc: Chris Roessler <[e-mail]>; John Hutton <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV
USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: WILDANDS - FOLLY SWAMP _ PJD, Streams & Alternate Spoil Area
Bob and Chris,
Sorry for the confusion. Bob you are correct, we had established that we would leave the streams as -is except for Jordan
and Pollo Branch. I re -read my notes and your summary is correct.
Chris, We will not need to meet onsite to review or gather additional data for the delineation.
Once again I hope I didn't cause too much confusion. Let me know if you have any additional questions.
Kyle
-----Original Message -----
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 3:49 PM
To: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Chris Roessler <[e-mail]>; John Hutton <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV
USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] WILDANDS - FOLLY SWAMP _ PJD, Streams & Alternate Spoil Area
Importance: High
Kyle:
I spoke with Chris Roessler of WILDLANDS today. He mentioned that you all might be going back out on Wednesday,
December 4th to look at the streams again. I was curious why you would, as I understand that they are conceding to
calling Jordan Branch and Pollo Branch (headwaters of Greene Branch) as wetland ditches/swales and not streams. And,
I thought after our site visit that all the others (Folly Swamp, Morgan Branch, Greene Branch (up to weir), Barker Branch
& Powell Branch) were considered streams.
Is there another reason (NCSAM, etc.) that you're wanting to go back out at this point? Just curious, as Chris thought it
wouldn't hurt for me to attend.
My goal is to just complete the PJD. I've revised the WoTUS sketch map and PJD based on your field verification. Our
current plan is to include the stream calls along with the wetlands all in one PJD request.
The only thing I was waiting on was the identification of an alternate spoils area to replace the Gates Poultry Farm Inc
Spoil Area as they agreed not to pursue that area given the potential wetlands we found during our site visit (this was
the disturbed area near the ponds). To that end, they've identified areas around Folly Swamp near Jordan Branch as
depicted in yellow polygons on the attached map and excerpt below. The primary area is the cotton field by the vacant

trailer. However, they don't think that area is big enough and have identified additional areas as well. Obviously, they
would like to keep the spoils as close to the excavation area as possible, which this map represents. But, they would also
like to confirm that the agricultural field the north of the clear cut is also non -jurisdictional and any portion of it could be
used if needed for spoils. Please review the attached map and let me know if you feel a need to visit these areas or can
desk top the verification based on our site visit.
Thanks!
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone] Office Phone
[phone] Direct Line
[phone] Fax
[phone] Mobile
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Visit us at SancIEC.com<BlockedBlockedBlockedhttp://www.SandEC.com> !
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain
confidential information. This electronic communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality
control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should
not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal.
If you are not the named addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and
delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Multiple, see Aqent Authorization Form
City, State: Sunbury, NC
County: Gates
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple, see agent authorization f
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Bob Zarzecki
Mailing Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Multiple, see agent authorization forms
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area +/- 77 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
36.487057
-76.584852
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
aCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorregdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App_A_Prelim _JD_Form _fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Gates City: Sunbury
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.487057 Long.:-76.584852
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 1983
Name of nearest waterbody: Folly Swamp 30-3-2-1-2
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
* See attached aquatic resources table

Table of Aauatic Resources
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority
Estimated amount of
resource (i.e.,
to which the aquatic
Site number
Latitude
Longitude
aquatic resource in
wetland vs. non-
resource "may be"
review area
wetland waters)
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404
Wetland A
36.488748
-76.574195
+/- 0.75 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland B
36.485907
-76.565060
+/- 1.56 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland C
36.483781
-76.567606
+/- 0.14 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland D
36.495076
-76.595345
+/- 0.67 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland E
36.494916
-76.594085
+/- 0.08 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Jordan Branch
Folly Swamp
36.493157
-76.593183
+/- 3,790 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
Powell Branch
36.486978
-76.586772
+/- 1,370 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
Morgan Branch
36.493280
-76.570832
+/- 3,000 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
Greene Branch
36.486245
-76.566251
+/- 900 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
Barker Branch
36.485001
-76.565069
+/- 1,175 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Sketch Map
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Sunbury, NC Quadrangle
❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Gates County Soil Survey Sheet 9
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
G
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Digitally signed by Bob Zarzecki
Bob Zarzecki Co cn=Bob Zarzecki, o=Soil &Environmental
Consultants, PA, ou=Wetlands Department,
email=[e-mail], c=US
Date: 2019.11.21 10:56:17-05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of \ease Road, Sure 104, Raleigh, NC 2761S • Phone ()19) 846-5900 • Fm: [phone]
sandm.com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
i
Project Name/Description: ��� ��� �������1//! S&EC Project
Date: ? / /o
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Field Office:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION: _
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
Site Address:
City, —County, T r,^^T ,.T.^*Goran�g"64 //G 7_44cs 'M/?
Name: S7dC�
Address: /%G Sti b14
Phone No.: ( )
Email
Contract Purchaser (please
M
27
Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
M2 Fills of Neuse Road Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 - Phone: ()19) 846-5900 • Fam: [phone]
s:m imcom
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: �`�S&EC Project #
Date: � /2 /
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Field Office:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s)(PIN): %CaGg%/6�266�
Site Address:
City, County, State: —a Lf, /L//C--
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: J py17'
Address: 1961 Szfys9e
Phone No.: Fax No.: Mobile No.: Z.S A0 g
Email: & &-) JoY 41-7
(�71'2S
Contract Purchaser Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412falls of Neese Road, Suite 104, RA6bA,, NC 27615 • Phonc O19) 846-5900 • Pan: [phone]
sandeacom
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT
} /AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: —JEj `t, /J�/��n1 /''/74,fZ S&EC Project
Date: �17r l
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Field Office:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 7660 %z%` ?,
Site Address: a t e�-
City, County, State: / �-
Name: J eC6�'I
Address:
Phone No.: ZS Fax No.: Mobile No.: LS 35 35
Email: �?Zl 6A)f72,L�J/J
Contract Purchaser
Contract Purchaser Signature
:2�0-/i�
Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge,

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suim 104, RnWg6, NC 27615 • Phonc ()19) 846-5900 • Pas: [phone]
sandcc.com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: fQL !iegr cZ6 � // /' 70? S&EC Project
Date: /Z /
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Field Office:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
Site Address:
City, County, State:
Name:
Address:
�o�uot�lCc� il/G �e8 �.
S�S4n
Email: /ud e e, AI?lro- C-- //,i// '//'/s
Contr ser
Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge,

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412Falls of Neese Road, Suitc 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phonc (919) 846-i900 • Faz: [phone]
s:mdec.com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description:('%%„S yi /�u S&EC Project #
Date: 212 �/�
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
Site Address:
City, County, State:
Name:
Address:
Phone No.:
Email:
Contract Purchaser Signature
Fax
Mobile No.:
L�"S �2�
V/z / I
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge,

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls ,d Ne,mc Road, Suitn 103, Raleigh, NC ^_761 i • Phone: ()19) 846-5900
sandmxom
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description:S&EC Project#
Date: T//y
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Field Office:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
Site Address:
City, County, State:
7D /6732cISfn
SSA
Name: /4/G/�Gr �r»l2l (A
Address: //,�- Zv v,-/77 rl L Z32:33
Email:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge,

11(,11: Glove
l
17y-
ban
ch cerm
dn'
%
0
Ir
17�
._ —I� �r��[: — J — ¢Y%P¢� 1tt v+ � Y� r1 Nye � 1*1�' �� � ` l 5�11^l'
�J
Project Number: 13997.W1 Map Title: 0 2,000 4,000 N
Figure 1 - USGS Map
Project Manager: I I I I I I I I I
BZ Folly Swamp Mitigation Site Feet
Scale: Gates County, NC A
1 2000' Source: 2019 USGS Sunbury, NC Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 9/17/2019 and Corapeake, NC Quads im L Pakw' NC 2�15 - Fh-: (919) P4."W - F­ (919) R45�'
d....

1x n GoA
RaA
.{� CrA ()A:ir1
CrABnR
� No11y
CTA Grove f"A
Lela GcA
LeA CIA
Rnk CrA DnA CrA 132f RnA 32 Di1A
L�l1 rs d_e�
Lef� wrF4 GSA EinA
f f LeA BT)A Cr
` CIA X
PnA L � -L,JA r BriA
CrA � l.yl�1 1326
l nrl 3A C:rA
- CrA CIA 1 U
qV
�:l�h
Rn
LeR � CI -A 13
Cr
fr �3n4 {a0A C[aA
j UoA
CIA 5Ci+
CIA_
CIA r- I A
LYr''
n
FnA {�-1B GOA
jA
B n A Fx
Col!
PPA ^R ExA CrA -
� uvA t ��, •+' Cris
� � � LeA � -'rtaA � CrA•
;f�aA c3
Ly"A rl LeA GoA briA LeA 4
Br ,4 1 gn,4 Lef
{ - Le+1
lLy ck LyA i3n A LeA
Ly,h GOA)
Br-,A
ti ti
k yfl � BnA
Lela, �
r PnA
C.fA
� -
RaA lieNaFk
GoA
LonA yA
LeA C' A `1
Project Number: Map Title: N
13997.W1 Figure 2 -Soil Survey Map o � ,500 3,000
Project Manager: I I I I
Folly Swamp Mitigation Site I I I I Feet
BZ Scale: Gates County, NC )41 " = 1500' •
Source: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Gates County
FY12 ]calk W'ticia. &uav, Fun. iW, Naleiglu 1C lTbIS • i'hun<: f91Y] �•±� • L'ea: [Y 191 N,WYi6
9/17/2019 Soil Survey Sheet 9 1-

rl
f{ lry t •, 1 Y rr I" �I i� S 7 tea; 4 L �j�
I l 1 j�l �- � •ti, i `k I f��� � y tiJ ti� Jr f *f
J y .mawor
44� +� � � � �I� LL;�I I\'1�� l� {} frr� r}`' {L.." a tlr'--�tir7 �' r �I • +� r-- �� L j 1`�
f / r
�--
-•
rf t f� _r~ \; -wI j - -s, `a•�R� i j I� r f ti ti��� k i 11
� �_{ �} iL •� L�t`"� l w ,� � ���� Lr�_� �;tw.
of ------
La
Aland
`�---t1��_-_-►� ti •�- I �1 1tiJ I ti f J rr `�� ti� tea+.
�� �\ u y 4i� }�, ti� -_ ~Y -~J ` Jf tt�k ��ti•� �/ - r! _ J
J
r? J x 4
Is �� ��. Y� r rf k`�' y%y ct j �ti\`�►`�� ��f ��l r.`r.-�,y 1�` ;�'' ,y 0.75 f .
cr
�` J t'��. / � � • ti... r `•r 1 `��ti5 4�R � I � tirr--ti t �O/ � l� yti � �� 1J
k 1 C
�rl L~�' J/ f\ 5 r ��_ti r ^�� r+j�•� rr_r, f�l
I j `J j r,[�� ��' � I r � ••, � ; / r/r � 1 t�\� � .titi� '\fit t ` h�iJ
;ail
r. ail -
t�4_J Iti
I
S
}�
fr��--��; rt rf/J•
r

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Michael Baker
11522 Ivy House Terrace
Henrico, VA 23233
NORTH CAROLINA
£nvironmentaI Qua[ity
June 7, 2019
DWR #19-0603
GATES County
Subject: On -Site Determinations for Applicability to Water Quality Standards (15A NCAC 02B .0211)
Subject Property/ Project Name: Folly Swamp Stream Mitigation Site
Address/Location: 555 Folly Road, Sunbury
Stream(s) Evaluated: Unnamed Tributary to Folly Swamp
Determination Date: 06/06/19 Staff: Anthony Scarbraugh
Determination Type:
Buffer:
Stream:
❑ Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0233)
® Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B .0259)
❑ Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0243)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
❑ Randleman (15A NCAC 02B .0250)
❑ Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
Stream
E/I/P*
Not
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
USGS
Subject
Survey
Topo
19-0603
E
X
Flag:19-0603
Flag:19-0603
X
Begin
E/I
19-0603
1
X
Flag:19-0603
Flag:19-0603
X
E/I
End
*E/I/P/NSP = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial/No Stream Present
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) has determined that the streams listed above and included
on the attached map have been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of GATES
County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale
and evaluated for applicability to the Water Quality Standards. Each stream that is checked "Not
Subject" has been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property. Streams
that are checked "Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify
them to be at least intermittent streams. There may be other streams or features located on the
property that do not appear on the maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional
according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
cr�-_D E Washington Regional office 1 943 Washington Square Mall I Washington, North Carolina 27889
NORTH O:Ci. inn
oepanmeM rEl 252.946,6481

GATES County
Page 2 of 2
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of date of this letter to the Director in
writing.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of date of this letter to the Director in
writing.
If sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
clo Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding
applicability to the Clean Water Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Washington
Regulatory Field Office at [phone].
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Anthony Scarbraugh at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Poz T""
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: LASERFICHE
Kyle Barnes, US Army Corps of Engineers Washington Regulatory Office
Mac Haupt, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit (via email)
Chris Roessler, Wildlands Engineering (via email)

Folly Swamp Stream Mitigation Site
Google Earth Imagery from May 2, 2018.
APPROVED
North Garoiina Environmental
Manawmant Commission
Mviston of Water resources
®ate
06/07 20 19
# 19-0603
PermitR r
Legend
4% 19-0603 Not Subject
*% 19-0603 Subject
V Flag:19-0603

Folly Swamp Stream Mitigation Site _ •-
USGS Topographic Map
10
APPROVED� •
North Caro;ina Environmental
Management Commission . 0
C)hrisilon of water Resources '
r% gate 06/07 2 19
��;t # 19-0603
? � 1
Legend
4% 19-0603 Not Subject
19-0603 Subject
' Flag:19-0603 IF
: s
REP 0.0
Grove Ch ONO"/
Ce
e,00- *Aft .0-* ","W 0111
1b42AOWM 40,
0
1
r
loop • `
r Q
--

Folly Swamp Stream Mitigation Site
1996 Soil Survey of Gates County Sheet No 9 w �rg
i�J ST CrB
NaA
}
APPROVED �� •�.� .LV
North Carolina Environmental -
IVlanagBrlOn' Cal m uion
• OWisinn oillNater R85aurcesLeA
C 9J Date 06/07 20 19
19-0603 � J
C BB
8nA
•
RoA
0
Legend
4% 19-0603 Not Subject
*% 19-0603 Subject
V Flag:19-0603
RoA
PaA
StB
GoA
PnA
LyA
r-

Folly Swamp Mitigation Site
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: / / / h
ProjectfSite:� ��2'
atitude:
Evaluator:
County: l
Longitude:
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent �%
��
Stream Dete,[n�ina: _ circle one)
Ephemeral �(ntermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2: 19 or perennial if >_ 30* v
A. Geomorpholog (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
.ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0�
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
ro
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3O
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussio sin manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ,r• , , )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
/ 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water able?
No = 0
Yes =3 G�
C. Biology (Subtotal = (• 6�,7 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using o her
methods. See p.
35 of
manual. 4z
_
Notes:C
Sketch:
C/

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: /`�1
Project/Site: ���
Latitude:
Evaluator: ��
County: `
Longitude,
Total Points: CC�
at intermittent �J
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if _> 19 or perennial if >_ 30* =
if rperes
perennial
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
�J
A. Geomor hology (subtotal = /U- )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
LIVOg
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
p
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = %L
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
.2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1�L
1.5
17. Soikbased evidence of high water able?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = / 0 )
18Fibrous roott s in sreambd
e .
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified usi g other methods. See p.
35 of manual.
2,
Notes: ''t 1,� G� C
s-
12ee e.
6
1 /tee
s Z.
e.
Sketch:

NC DWV Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date. l
��
ProjectlSite: f 73l✓�� ����
Latitude:
Evaluator:
C
fK�
County: / 2f _ .. ,
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least
intermittent 2
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral tt Perennial
Other
Quad Name:
if ? 19 or perennial
if z
30* ,
_ntermit-e
e.g.
A. Geomor hology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
13Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1_
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
rip le- ool sequence
0
/
01
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
'0�
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No - 0 `
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ x )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
Ull
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high wate e?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1)
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL " 1.5y Other =
0
*perennial streams may also be Identified using
other methods. See p.
35 of manual.
Notes: LS k
Sketch:
11�
6r�
�✓� /�
G �l
We
��c�G
Id2�
00

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1
Project/Site: Q �j ZU
Latitude:
Evaluator: �
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or Perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
St ,U g
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
, 2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
T3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
40.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
(Yes:: 3tj
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discu ions in manual -
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 ;
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soikbased evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = Q ) -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
(2/1
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OB = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using o her methods. See
p,,PP5 of
manual.
Notes: /5 Z72
&1�rjjell '
G�
,l/tLaylick
,
Sketch: ��/ //%.%fc,�,C�%�/mil
117J7i `S '`
/
G�

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: // 7L16Project/Site:
�=UIll�i:ee 6r
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ,
Stream Determination circle one
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
if> 99 or perennial if 30*
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor hology (Subtotal =)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
'1>
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
'0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
12
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
10
0.5
1 J
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- animal ditches are not rated; see discusspris in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0)
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soikbased evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C:. tilOIOQV (Subtotal = u y /i� )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
22
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
C0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
(00.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5-�
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW
0.75, OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified usi
g other methods. S, a p. 35 of manual.
Notes:/ / ' /
l ,, % '1
/q4
Sketch:`6)'
�j
�
,/� , !,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �� B
Project/Site: /�� e / "
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude.
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 7
Stream Determin ' (circle one)
Other
if>_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral lntermi Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor hology (Subtotal =)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3.
8. Headcuts
'b
1
2
3
9. Grade control
707
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
-artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolopv (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5�Q
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
_ 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high wate able?
No = 0
Yes = 3
G. t3lologv (Subtotal = /. //J )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
D)
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
9
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
*perennial stre ms may also be identified usi g other
methods. See p. 35 of manual.
r
=1
Notes hG/CC S li'� S�e
/IBC
T6(
Sketch:

14C DWQ Strew Identification Form V ersion 4.11
Date: r
Pro ectlSite: If //� ;
1 L ,
Latitude:
Evaluator:L/
County: �'
Longitude:
Total Ports:
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
Stream is of least intermittent J ,
Ephemeral ;tntermittentP Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
i230*1
if >_ 9 9 or perennial if >_ 30* l
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = u
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. ln-channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1 ;t
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 `
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
_
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B.
12.
Hydrology (Subtotal = ��. _ )
Presence of Basefiow
0
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
% 0.5
1
1.5
16,
Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
(
Yes
2
1 ��
0
18. Fibrous roots in streambe
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
i
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5 ``
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1- 0 a ,.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 9/19/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 1
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.489029 Long:-76.587725 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: BnA - Bladen Loam, 0-2 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer saccharinum
25
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
45
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Acer saccharinum
10
Yes
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 125 x 3 = 375
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 125 (A) 375 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
20
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Ligustrum sinense
60
Yes
FAC
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy
2-13 10YR 4/1 90 7.5YR 5/8 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 9/19/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 2
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.487741 Long:-76.585283 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: BnA - Bladen loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI classification: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
25
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer saccharinum
15
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
50
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Acer saccharinum
10
Yes
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 110 (A) 330 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
20
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Ligustrum sinense
40
Yes
FAC
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy
3-13 10YR 4/2 80 10YR 5/8 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 9/19/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 3
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.489059 Long:-76.574729 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NaA - Nawney Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer saccharinum 50 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Platanus occidentalis
10 No FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5
(A)
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 No FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata:
5
(B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100.0%
(A/B)
70 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover: 14
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Acer saccharinum 30 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Ligustrum sinense 20 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 15 x 2 =
30
FAC species 115 x 3 =
345
FACU species 0 x 4 =
0
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 130 (A)
375 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2.88
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
(Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
20 =Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover: 4
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Boehmeria cylindrica
5 Yes FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-13 7.5YR 5/1 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 9/19/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 4
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.489482 Long:-76.574421 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CrA - Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes NWI classification: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 4
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
40 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3•
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
50 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1.
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
2.
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 290 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.76
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Ligustrum sinense
20 Yes
FAC
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Arundinaria gigantea
25 Yes
FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Microstegium vimineum
10 Yes
FAC
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-13 10YR 5/4 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C M Sandy Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 9/19/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 5
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.493533 Long:-76.593673 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: LeA - Lenoir Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI classification: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 5
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Quercus alba
20 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer saccharinum
10 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3•
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5•
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
30 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1.
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2.
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
3.
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 90 (A) 290 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.22
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1. Smilax rotundifolia
60 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
60 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/4 100 Sandy
8-13 10YR 5/4 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M Sandy Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 9/19/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 6
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.485563 Long:-76.588538 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CrA - Craven fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI classification: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 6
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1.
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2.
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
4.
UPL species 100 x 5 = 500
5.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 500 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.00
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Zea mays
100 Yes UPL
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
g
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-13 10YR 5/3 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 11/6/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 7A
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.486226 Long:-76.565380 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NaA - 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 7A
Absolute Dominant
Indicatc
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
2. Salix nigra
5 Yes
OBL
3.
4.
5.
6.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: _
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Solidago altissima
2. Persicaria virginiana
3. Juncus effusus
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
20 Yes FACU
20 Yes FAC
20 Yes FACW
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 75 (A) 215
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.87
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 7A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-13 10YR 5/1 70 10YR 5/8 30 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 9/19/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 7B
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.485974 Long:-76.565844 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NaA - 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 7B
Absolute Dominant
Indicatc
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
2. Salix nigra
5 Yes
OBL
3.
4.
5.
6.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: _
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Solidago altissima
2. Persicaria virginiana
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
20 Yes FACU
20 Yes FAC
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 55 (A) 175
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.18
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 7B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-13 10YR 5/1 70 10YR 5/8 30 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Folly Swamp Mitigation Site City/County: Sunbury/Gates Sampling Date: 11/6/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: 8
Investigator(s): S&EC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 36.495207 Long:-76.595385 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: LeA - Lenoir loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI classification: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 8
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
OBL species 40 x 1 = 40
1. Pinus taeda
20 Yes
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Yes
FAC
FAC species 25 x 3 = 75
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 65 (A) 115 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.77
25 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Juncus effusus
40 Yes
OBL
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
g
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-13 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153113, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0