Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0079227_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20191209ROY COOPER G vernvt• MICHAEL S. REGAN S..tretnry LINDA CULPEPPER Difora:r Mr. Russell Eiler SchIage Lock Company, LLC 11819 N Pennsylvania Street Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. Eiler: NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality December 9i11, 2019 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection NPDES Wastewater Discharge Permit No. NCO079227 Schlage — Nash Remediation Nash County On December 9t11, 2019, Josh Brigham of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) conducted a site visit at the subject facility. Present during the inspection was i4lr. William Minchew, the Operator in Responsible Charge, whose help and guidance was greatly appreciated. Findings during the inspection were as follows: At the time of the inspection, the NPDES permit was issued effective June 151, 201 5, and expired on October 3I", 2019. The Division received Schlage Lock Company's permit renewal application on June 7"i, 2019, and is in the process of renewing the permit. Please note that Part 11, Section B. 10 of the subject permit requires the permittee to request permit renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration in order to maintain authorization to discharge after the expiration date (May 4t', 2019). 2. The facility is authorized to operate and discharge wastewater from a facility which discharges to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Beech Branch classified as Class B, Nutrient Sensitive Waters in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin, 3. The facility consists of the following units: collection wells, product separator, equalization tank with transfer pump, air stripper and blower, discharge tank with effluent pump, bag filters, and effluent flow meter with totalizer. Outfall 001 was observed and was free of solids and foam. 4. A review of laboratory results indicates that all parameters are being monitored and analyzed according to the permit. 7. The only field parameter collected at the site is p[-I and the meter is calibrated prior to collection by Mr. Minchew. Other sample analysis is performed by Pace Labs, 6. The treatment system was discharging effluent at the time of the inspection. 1[ Uu- a tf! t,.rr 'I n,� hr p rr to r nt ��f Fn'..:� n rr t if (,?ie r!ir� t3iaisi�tn �f 1':;tt!'r klrsnuttcs R_r'�':r�lrl!!rirat,rU'!' idr!(Jf'..����I'Ur�-r f�tl•it;fi,:r'c•rrl,('.s;c�Ln,r!ii'f}q Qt-M, 4 MO If you have questions concerning this report please contact Josh Brigham at 919-791-4251 or e-mail at joshua.brigham�&,ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Raleigh Regional Office, Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ Attachments: EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report cc: RRO DWR File Copy Laserfiche William IVlinchew via e-mail at W\+finchew u_Geosyntec.com 71 paup United Stales Environmental PrctectlOn Agency EPA Washington. D C 20450 Water Compliance Inspection Report Section A: National Data System Coding (Le., PCS) Form Approved. OMB No 2040-0c57 Approval expires 8-31-98 Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspectic^ Type Inspector Foe Type 1 1u l 2 15 1 3 NCO079227 11 12 19/12109 17 18 �l I,• I I 201 I 19 I c LI LJ 21 6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating at CA Reserved 67 70 r ' 72 L,J 73I J 74 71 L_j 75I1 1 I I I 60 Section B. Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 09 45AM 19/12/09 15:06:01 Nash remediation site 3551 N Weslyan Blvd Ex4Time/Date Permit Exprraton Date Rocky Mount NC 27804 11 15AM 19; 12109 19:10: 31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)1Tides(s)lPhone and Fax Number(s) Cther Facility Data lid William Atlas Minchew/ORC/252-212-5995/ Name, Address of Responsible Ci icialfFitlelPhone and Fax Number Russell E Eiler,11819 N Pennsylvania SI Carmel IN 46032IGIobal E:FES Contacted Compliance1317-810-38741 No Section C Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit E Flow Measurement E Operations & Maintenance 0 Retards/Reports Self -Monitoring Program 0 Facility Site Review N Effluent/Receiving Waters N Laboratory Other Section D: Summary of FindinglComments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) Ager:ylOftice;Phone and Fax Numbers Date Joshua S Brigham D WR. R RO VV01919-791-42001 Signature of Manaeernent O A Reviewer AgencylCitficelPhone and Fax Numbers Date xbo EPA Form 3560.3 (Rev 9-94) Previous ed tons a-e obsc:ete. Pagel; NPDES yrlmolday lnspectonType (Cont.) 31 NCO079227 12 19/12109 17 18 u Section D- Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) 1. The current permit was issued and became effective June 1 st, 2015. The permit expired on October 31 st, 2019. A new permit was submitted on June 6th, 2019. It is recommended that in the future you submit six months in advance. 2. The facility is authorized to operate and discharge water from a facility which discharges to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Beech Branch classified as Class B, Nutrient Sensitive Waters in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. 3. The facility consists of the following units: collection wells, product separator, equalization tank with transfer pump, air stripper and blower, discharge tank with effluent pump, bag filters and effluent flow meter with totalizer. Outfall 001 was observed and was free of solids and foam. 4. A review of laboratory results indicates that all parameters are being monitored and analyzed according to the permit. 5. The only field parameter collected at the site is pH and the meter is calibrated prior to collection by Mr. Minchew. Other sample analysis is performed by Pace Labs. 6. The treatment system was discharging effluent at the time of the inspection. Permit: NC0079227 Owner -Facility: Nash remedialion sde Inspection Date: 12fO912019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ ❑ application? Is the facility as described .n the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ El Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0❑ ❑ ❑ Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Permit ex fired October 31 st 2019. New submitted June 7th 2019. Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? . ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the flow meter operational? 13 ❑ ❑ (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ ❑ N ❑ Comment. Flow meter calibrated or replaced and calibrated at the factory annually. Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex- MLSS, MCRT, Settleable N ❑ ❑ ❑ Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge and other that are appl,cable7 Comment: Equalization, Basins Yes No NA NE Is the basin aerated? ❑ ❑ . ❑ Is the basin free of bypass Ines or structures to the natural environment? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the basin free of excessive grease? 0❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps present? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Are float controls operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Are audible and visual alarms operable? 0❑ ❑ ❑ # Is basin sizefvolume adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? M❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 3 Permit: NCO079227 owner -Facility: Nash remedialion site Inspection Date: 1210912019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratury? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? M ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the facility using a contract lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage Mbpt at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 deg •ees Celsius+!- 0 2 degrees? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +;-1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ Comment: Lab picks up samples and stores at appropriate temperature. Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is all required information readily available, complete and current? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the chain -of -custody complete? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Dates. times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWO? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 246 with a certified operator ❑ ❑ M ❑ on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 4 Permit: NCO079227 Owner • Facility: Nash remediation site Inspection Date: t214912019 Inspection Type: -i;mpl ante Evaluation Record Keeping Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? Comment: Corp -orate Geos ntec roduces annual report. but this is not kept on site. Other Comment: Yes No NA NE Yes No NA NE page#