HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0079227_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20191209ROY COOPER
G vernvt•
MICHAEL S. REGAN
S..tretnry
LINDA CULPEPPER
Difora:r
Mr. Russell Eiler
SchIage Lock Company, LLC
11819 N Pennsylvania Street
Carmel, IN 46032
Mr. Eiler:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 9i11, 2019
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Wastewater Discharge
Permit No. NCO079227
Schlage — Nash Remediation
Nash County
On December 9t11, 2019, Josh Brigham of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) conducted a site visit at the
subject facility. Present during the inspection was i4lr. William Minchew, the Operator in Responsible
Charge, whose help and guidance was greatly appreciated. Findings during the inspection were as
follows:
At the time of the inspection, the NPDES permit was issued effective June 151, 201 5, and expired
on October 3I", 2019. The Division received Schlage Lock Company's permit renewal
application on June 7"i, 2019, and is in the process of renewing the permit. Please note that Part
11, Section B. 10 of the subject permit requires the permittee to request permit renewal at least
180 days prior to expiration in order to maintain authorization to discharge after the expiration
date (May 4t', 2019).
2. The facility is authorized to operate and discharge wastewater from a facility which discharges to
receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Beech Branch classified as Class B,
Nutrient Sensitive Waters in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin,
3. The facility consists of the following units: collection wells, product separator, equalization tank
with transfer pump, air stripper and blower, discharge tank with effluent pump, bag filters, and
effluent flow meter with totalizer. Outfall 001 was observed and was free of solids and foam.
4. A review of laboratory results indicates that all parameters are being monitored and analyzed
according to the permit.
7. The only field parameter collected at the site is p[-I and the meter is calibrated prior to collection
by Mr. Minchew. Other sample analysis is performed by Pace Labs,
6. The treatment system was discharging effluent at the time of the inspection.
1[
Uu-
a tf! t,.rr 'I n,� hr p rr to r nt ��f Fn'..:� n rr t if (,?ie r!ir� t3iaisi�tn �f 1':;tt!'r klrsnuttcs
R_r'�':r�lrl!!rirat,rU'!' idr!(Jf'..����I'Ur�-r f�tl•it;fi,:r'c•rrl,('.s;c�Ln,r!ii'f}q
Qt-M, 4 MO
If you have questions concerning this report please contact Josh Brigham at 919-791-4251 or e-mail at
joshua.brigham�&,ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office, Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Attachments: EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Laserfiche
William IVlinchew via e-mail at W\+finchew u_Geosyntec.com
71 paup
United Stales Environmental PrctectlOn Agency
EPA Washington. D C 20450
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Section A: National Data System Coding (Le., PCS)
Form Approved.
OMB No 2040-0c57
Approval expires 8-31-98
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspectic^ Type
Inspector Foe Type
1 1u l 2 15 1 3 NCO079227 11 12 19/12109 17 18 �l I,• I
I 201 I
19 I c LI LJ
21
6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating at CA
Reserved
67 70 r ' 72 L,J 73I J 74
71 L_j
75I1 1 I I I 60
Section B. Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW also include Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09 45AM 19/12/09 15:06:01
Nash remediation site
3551 N Weslyan Blvd Ex4Time/Date
Permit Exprraton Date
Rocky Mount NC 27804 11 15AM 19; 12109 19:10: 31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)1Tides(s)lPhone and Fax Number(s) Cther Facility Data
lid
William Atlas Minchew/ORC/252-212-5995/
Name, Address of Responsible Ci icialfFitlelPhone and Fax Number
Russell E Eiler,11819 N Pennsylvania SI Carmel IN 46032IGIobal E:FES Contacted
Compliance1317-810-38741 No
Section C Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit E Flow Measurement E Operations & Maintenance 0 Retards/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Facility Site Review N Effluent/Receiving Waters N Laboratory
Other
Section D: Summary of FindinglComments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) Ager:ylOftice;Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
Joshua S Brigham D WR. R RO VV01919-791-42001
Signature of Manaeernent O A Reviewer AgencylCitficelPhone and Fax Numbers
Date
xbo
EPA Form 3560.3 (Rev 9-94) Previous ed tons a-e obsc:ete.
Pagel;
NPDES yrlmolday lnspectonType (Cont.)
31 NCO079227 12 19/12109 17 18 u
Section D- Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
1. The current permit was issued and became effective June 1 st, 2015. The permit expired on
October 31 st, 2019. A new permit was submitted on June 6th, 2019. It is recommended that in the
future you submit six months in advance.
2. The facility is authorized to operate and discharge water from a facility which discharges to
receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Beech Branch classified as Class B, Nutrient
Sensitive Waters in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin.
3. The facility consists of the following units: collection wells, product separator, equalization tank with
transfer pump, air stripper and blower, discharge tank with effluent pump, bag filters and effluent flow
meter with totalizer. Outfall 001 was observed and was free of solids and foam.
4. A review of laboratory results indicates that all parameters are being monitored and analyzed
according to the permit.
5. The only field parameter collected at the site is pH and the meter is calibrated prior to collection by
Mr. Minchew. Other sample analysis is performed by Pace Labs.
6. The treatment system was discharging effluent at the time of the inspection.
Permit: NC0079227 Owner -Facility: Nash remedialion sde
Inspection Date: 12fO912019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
❑
application?
Is the facility as described .n the permit?
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
■
❑
❑
El
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
M
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Permit ex fired October 31 st 2019. New submitted June 7th 2019.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
.
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
13
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
N
❑
Comment. Flow meter calibrated or replaced and calibrated at the factory annually.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex- MLSS, MCRT, Settleable N ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge and other that are appl,cable7
Comment:
Equalization, Basins
Yes No NA NE
Is the basin aerated?
❑
❑
.
❑
Is the basin free of bypass Ines or structures to the natural environment?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
0❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
0❑
❑
❑
# Is basin sizefvolume adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? M❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 3
Permit: NCO079227 owner -Facility: Nash remedialion site
Inspection Date: 1210912019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratury?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
M
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage Mbpt at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
❑
❑
❑
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 deg •ees Celsius+!- 0 2 degrees?
❑
❑
0
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +;-1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
Comment: Lab picks up samples and stores at appropriate temperature.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
1
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
0
❑
❑
❑
Dates. times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
0
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWO?
❑
❑
0
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 246 with a certified operator
❑
❑
M
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
❑
❑
❑
Page# 4
Permit: NCO079227
Owner • Facility: Nash remediation site
Inspection Date: t214912019 Inspection Type: -i;mpl ante Evaluation
Record Keeping
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment: Corp -orate Geos ntec roduces annual report. but this is not kept on site.
Other
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
page#