19990726 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19990712

II Date Received . Fee Paid Permit Number
'V
1 ? , 5 2p?1 , U
1 ? \ JAN
441'Ei
State of North Carolina
of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
TER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
cants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
2. Print O??wner/Signiinng Offcial's name and title (person ??legally,?r[espons/?ible for lfacility and compliance):
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
City: ' a//t wl State: X& Zip:
Telephone Number: ( %/9 ) 6 p2Q 2F3 a
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Ex?ar+s7orr arid' ?rry?/v??torrs it. -77-1-t ? 4ye-We lem
17 07 7 Mes- 7;--,,,/& ,4y,,,GI e
City: DNJ'AAAg County: Dltr/isi.h
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
m L SBaY?t B ?- ?s - Grysot S?rcc? /zn fLrG,&HC? d/o
L7IZ5se,. Sfitef_ ,A #G GBIwel- o ?resso?n/ S?rc?T a.rr? ?'.nr? /Y??n C
7. Latitude: 36 Longitude: 78 S / W of project
5. Location of Project (street address):
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name: S ?L vG/! pGt1 ?Gy Telephone Number: (q/9 ) ?Sa - 0368
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): y New Renewal Modification
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 1 of 4
Number
State of North Carolina
department of Environment and Natural Resources
1 j Division of Water Quality
tiNN???E`G?REO WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
OE This form may be photocopied for use as an original
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, indi"v'iduaal, etc. who owns the project):
/rkl ?e oe ??'CSDVDcrJ?rJ G?tst?-Cy
2. Print Owner/Signing OfAcial's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
h?w /l y& f T;?r ? /arc
City: 'ja/yt #M State: / Zip: 9 71701
Telephone Number: ( 2y-7a
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Ex?li.vsfa r A.,?/ ?e.?U??A7i?rrs >{0 7r.?.,f ?f ,?IIG/1l(G Prrsd?, r .,
5. Location of Project (street address):
q,7'7 1US-1
city: _IpArAA 1 County: VArXA•h
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection): / l
'WI/4 1a7?T L O /f [Z- S Env So/1 7 ?rGG7 `Zn T[! G Asp i On
6/ZSSdn ?T / GGT • /7 7 ? CalweI" o -. CEp-e Svn S?rcG7 A'W Aw
7. Latitude: .3(7 0 > Longitude: 78 0 . / "
of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name:?/{av6s7 &W 4Y Telephone Number: (q/? ) h8a - o36g
H. PERMIT INFORMATION: I `
1. Specify whether project is (check one): f? New Renewal Modification
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 1 of 4
N. OFFJQE USE OM- -
Date Received . Fee Paid Permit Number

?`X State of North Carolina
i
2p0? `pepartment of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
!? .. NNR ?aLE
DE This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
r"'ml y Ifzwge-
2. Print Owner/Signing Offfiicial's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
AMPS ,, 4rfg
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
City: State: Zip: 7 ?B
Telephone Number: ( ?/9 ) Y Z® 2y3Q
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
X1?Gy'ts! o? 6t.071 ?hU?o? 7IanS ?lr.sf? ?`ti/c?,?L? ?res1??.TCrc,.-,
5. Location of Project (street address):
City: Dy??'h?? County: Df2r?I?i.YJ
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection): / 1.
.yl s?G S014 79 OF Gr?55o/7 STrca? ?.?TGrc/??i?? Dew
nysv? Sfi?ef. ? e cUrrsefi o ??.?SSon s?ree? Gi r'.,EJ?y evyt
7. Latitude: 36" ® C*AC7 "" Longitude: 7.? a s7 0 141 of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name:g?G-44 'FR/ ley Telephone Number: ( 61f
II. PERMIT INFORMATION: I `.
1. Specify whether project is (check one): New Renewal Modification
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 1 of 4
2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit number and its issue date (if known)
3. Specify the type of project (check one): Y /
Low Density High Density Redevelop General Permit V Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
CAMA Major ?Sedimentation/Erosion Control /404/401 Permit NPDES Stormwater
Information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at
1-877-623-6748.
in. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) describing stormwater management for the project.
A //S?vnn wafcl?? // 5"'W ?/? t L?? /? /Se GtfC?` ?G ? ??rt,? 7? /?.rte o? ?` 7?1c ilesc`
G?ZGt?GA AIWA rn G2?2W /t? /luau /GTR
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the /V River basin.
3. Total Project Area: o ®/ acres 4. Project Built Upon Area: %
5. How many drainage areas does the project have?
6. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.
Basin I nformatron
-- Wain al;e Areal } rainag Area'2
Receiving Stream Name
Receiving Stream Class
Drainage Area
Existing Impervious" Area
Proposed Impervious`Area Om 31
% Impervious` Area (total) Sq?
miler zvus? urF € c At a Dralnage 1?rE a l Dralrtag ? Area<?
On-site Buildings
?o f' ?crc5
On-site Streets
On-site Parking w
On-site Sidewalks
Other on-site
Off-site
Total: Q 3? qc J cs Total:
Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
Form SW-101 Version 3.99 Page 2 of 4
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above derived?-14
4p? ragb`j /c
?TirY! SITG o ?
IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
The following italicized deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all
subdivisions, outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a table
listing each lot number, size and the allowable built-upon area for each lot must be provided as an attachment.
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with state stormwa ter management permit number
as issued by the Division of Water Quality. These covenants may not be
changed or deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No more than square feet of any lot shall be covered by structures or impervious materials.
Impervious materials include asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but do not include wood
decking or the water surface of swimming pools.
3. Swales shall not be filled in, piped, or altered except as necessary to provide driveway crossings.
4. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount requires a state stormwater management permit modification prior to
construction.
5. All permitted runoff from outparcels or future development shall be directed into the permitted stormwater control
system. These connections to the stormwater control system shall be performed in a manner that maintains the integrity
and performance of the system as permitted.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the applicable items required above, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each
BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the status
and availability of these forms.
Form SWU-102
Form SWU-103
Form SWU-104
Form SWU-105
Form SWU-106
Form SWU-107
Form SWU-108
Form SWU-109
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off-Site System Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Neuse River Basin Supplement
Innovative Best Management Practice Supplement
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 3 of 4
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided
next to each item.
Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form Sn
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP &eA
• Permit application processing fee of $420 (payable to NCDENR) 5P !3
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment /management • Two copies of plans and specifications, including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm
-Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage areas delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf, please complete this section.
X Designated agent (individual or firm): G&cdle r Jet dl rX to t
Mailing Address: _/// I?eS"/ ?zG1Jn ?a'te?
City: .D11 11AM State: /fI6 Zip: aZ 77®f
Phone: 6 `dot - 036F
Fax: ( 4/°I ) 6S8 - 5XA/X
VIII. APPLICANTS CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) finej le y
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, an that the proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A
NCAC 2H.1000. A /J // .
Date: / ®/
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 4 of 4
7 ,t ??: ?3x ••1.55<.Ax ,..r. S>i S<.s \ i q'
?#£',ss£?s?`rR
.>. s:.:r:???£#
Date Received. Fee Paid 5 j : i)#j.3?it.>g ?s

Permit Number

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
rln; ?y ?i/GrIlTC' ?lPs jy &114,-7 < ?/71VZIX
2. Print Owner/Signing Official' s name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
e.9 felreg
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
City:_ fill dl iwi State:X(I Zip: ` 7,4
Telephone Number: (_ V I ) Z,, 4' 2Y a
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications,. letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
?X1?GcrrSFo? GtyJG? OC@r10i/o?7/ons ?o -%I-?'nf ?y ./-?I/cnGt? ?res1?`TCr?,,?
5. Location of Project (street address):
City: Dk?-/?A.•7 County: OAV-XA.?
r.. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection): / t 1.
/ j!/s?L SCJtt7yl O ?- ?S Gr?JsO? STrGa7 TGre On
_?5sd., Sf tef_ ? )?Ae Col'r/ct- o e ?vL e r G
7. Latitude: 30 r? e'o" V Longitude: 78 - A/ of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name: eve4 Ki;IeV Telephone Number: (?/Cf ) 6gZ - 0368
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): i? New Renewal Modification
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page I of 4
2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit number and its issue date (if known)
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop General Permit V Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
_CAMA Major ?Sedimentation/Erosion Control /404/401 Permit NPDES Stormwater
Information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at
1-877-623-6748.
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) describing stormwater management for the project.
A S4rri /Wf 7?ra; rumoY 7?r? ?lesv
s/,Y A mil
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the VeRA-__ River basin.
3. Total Project Area: ;? • acres
4. Project Built Upon Area: 5.5. -? %
5. How many drainage areas does the project have?
6. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.

r 3
Basinktnfoatrart
'? £1 £?, I)rairage `?rYa ] f".`
Da?n?c Area; ks?f
Receiving Stream Name
Receiving Stream Class
Drainage Area „ Sa rt
Existing Impervious* Area
Proposed Impervious*Area Dm/?
% Impervious* Area (total) Sq 6
<Im ervtot i?rt. e 1rr ,} }, f U uii;lr A.n 1 1-1: ai>>a e Ar:ill >
On-site Buildings
vo / GGIz'S
On-site Streets
On-site Parking res.
On-site Sidewalks
0e (,? G TG
Other on-site O
Off-site 6

* Total: Q 3? act?S Total:
Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 2 of 4
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above derived?_ ?j7Y._
?cs 1 SlTG • ?-
IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
The following italicized deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all
subdivisions, outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a table
listing each lot number, size and the allowable built-upon area for each lot must be provided as an attachment.
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with state stormwater management permit number
as issued by the Division of Water Quality. These covenants may not be
changed or deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No more than square feet of any lot shall be covered by structures or impervious materials.
Impervious materials include asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but do not include wood
decking or the water surface of swimming pools.
3. Swales shall not be filled in, piped, or altered except as necessary to provide driveway crossings.
4. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount requires a state stormwater management permit modification prior to
construction.
5. All permitted runoff from outparcels or future development shall be directed into the permitted stormwater control
system. These connections to the stormwater control system shall be performed in a manner that maintains the integrity
and performance of the system as permitted.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the applicable items required above, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each
BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the status
and availability of these forms.
Form SWU-102
Form SWU-103
Form SWU-104
Form SWU-105
Form SWU-106
Form SWU-107
Form SWU-108
Form SWU-109
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off-Site System Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Neuse River Basin Supplement
Innovative Best Management Practice Supplement
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 3 of 4
. . • VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided
next to each item.
Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form S
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP
• Permit application processing fee of $420 (payable to NCDENR) SP ty
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management :5y13
• Two copies of plans and specifications, including: 5P/j
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm
-Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage areas delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf, please complete this section.
X Designated agent (individual or firm): Goad er
Mailing Address: 14/eVA .5_:?rea-
City: Dkrl ?? State: G Zip: R 77G'%_
Phone: ( '71el ) 101-P - 036F
VIII. APPLICANTS CERTIFICATION
Fax: (916I ) 608 - S6,41X
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) Tmr,j /1 IeX-r y
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, ancj?that the proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A
NCAC 2H.1000. A i9 ?
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99
Page 4 of 4
Date: / Y O /
General
Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church in Durham, N.C., proposes to place fill material in
330 feet of stream for the purpose of installing a box culvert and expanding the existing
Church. The project was approved on July 28, 1999, for 401 Quality Certification. The
project has been previously assigned DWQ Project #990726.
A storm water sand filter will be constructed to treat storm water runoff from the new
church addition and from the new parking lot. The below ground filter will be located
between the new addition and Trinity Avenue. The filter has been placed below ground
due to site limitations and the desire to limit visual impacts on the site. Two large access
hatched have been provided for maintenance.
Desisn
The sand filter has been designed based on guidelines included in the April 1999 revision
of the "Storm Water Best Management Practices" by NCDENR. The sand filter is
designed to remove 85% of Total Suspended Solids. The filter will not be effective at
removing total dissolved solids or nitrate-nitrogen. The sand filter is designed to treat the
runoff from the first inch of rainfall from a storm.
There is a drainage area of 0.52 acres to the filter. The drainage area has a composite "C"
value of 0.83 (0.19 acres at 0. 8, 0.14 acres at 0.9, 0.02 acres at 0.4, 0.10 acres at 0. 8, and
0.07 acres at 0.95).
The filter is required to have storage equal to the runoff from a one-inch storm. The
required storage by the rational method is 0.52 acres X 0.83 X 43,560 sf/acre X 1" X
1'/12" = 1567 cf. The overflow weir in the filter is located 2.25' above the top of the
sand. The provided storage is 2.25' X 12' X 60.5' = 1634 cf.
The drainage area to the sand filter is comprised of 0.31 acres of impervious surface and
0.21 acres of pervious surface. The percent impervious (I) is 60%. The runoff coefficien
(Rv) is equal to 0.05 + 0.009*60 = 0.59. The runoff volume calculated by the "Simple
Method" is equal to 1 inch rainfall * 0.59 in/in * lft/12in * 0.52 acres * 43560 sf/acre =
1114 cubic feet. The runoff volume calculated by the "Simple Method" is less than the
volume calculated by the Rational Method.
The sediment chamber and the sand filter both have a surface area of 360 sf (12' X 30').
Both chambers are 18" deep and have a volume of 540 cf.
Maintenance
The sand filter must be inspected at least once a year after a storm to determine if the
filter bed is passing the runoff as expected. Maintenance should be performed when
storms of approximately one inch are passing through the filter with in 24 hours.
Maintenance for the filter consists of removing the first 2 or 3 inches of discolored sand
and replacing it with new sand. The sediment chamber should be cleaned out at the same
time maintenance is performed on the sand chamber.
Two large access hatches are provided to facilitate maintenance operations. One hatch is
over the sediment chamber, and the other is over the sand chamber. Should it be
necessary to gain full access to the sand filter, the top slab can be removed.
/,. -?/ Homestead ig:i ?i , I : • /« ; yp/-?_-.%?
1321 %/ • • 1443 6 / 1 3/? ?))i r 2 \? _ i
1003
•
94 r
94
40/
501 / Igp 64
/ : O 1 344
\ 410;1
I
I CHA BL Y ' O_J ?'I ?m ?? ?? ? i ? /1 ? /' •? f ? ? r v 1 ) ? ?_ - I ? ?. ?/' ,
KrRKwoao FOR Y ? ?_ ? urr Fr• ser>
41 - O FR /SE ST 6/ ?j?'? W • J y?? ^
.?CAMMlE ST C\r
A
A \ GARNER
/
r
I ? ? ?J Dlr. ? a- r?? •? ? ? ? :v ??l??.?-. I o /i- /_ ?_
U i CAl?VER _ O \ . rl ? 40_0
?? AYE, - ?/ r r V '? ?_'
I C
CItY •I? ?= ?V/N•? Li_
ti - Duke
n J `<_ Horgestea _o?Stadium
I', F? 'f-* ?-, -. - ? _ A _-?? '?? _350 f 1 • ?V? •'?•• Scli -/ ?. ?.C
coo J ?•-
i:_ . Q 19 ?E? o? ? ? I ?? •o? ? ? ??`-???--?%I ?•; wC'p' Oar n
I. FAWNS .; AVE Li A ory
'Bra cv WHpt
?? ?? oP ???? ? Radi
? .J"• 85 _ ¦ L ,"? ? ? O O ? ? `? I ", ? r ?St
7 ?? y/'/? MuRRA? vE 3 o Lrfe'and Science
?? ? ?! ?, 350 v F?O?
Li?f r' /o- ^F \ ?/??? ?? .lam i `., ?:? \ r. \?\-.
Q ?? _ ? J L
Rai II wer
I r ?EOIJ ? ST did"To? T{K
1j
_ sT
? W
li <-?'-?)os?, Sr H s? r,r
Course
• I ?? ? ? f ? ? ?,. ? ? ?.? .J o ~ J 324 _? ?? '1 ? ? IQ ?
??-
Jf
I` :2. ?i ? ?_ r? .I./%,. "(.? !-? ??E_ ? y - q?? - IEe?? _???\?rv vi tr1 I . ?r ?R.
"So
a l; ` hoppingl - _ --? f' -00
I c
_ L? r¢ ?L o o to Ctrl V? G i? o
I all w' li ¦ ? , o ry ?
cre6tio r/t r \ ??I .. ?:' f J
Q d r i l 39/x- ? ?\ ?'? . - ? •, ,?.
1. P. r
IF-
54-
coo u ` ?` r ? e \ `
22 'S? GR ti? l ?? .J p, r ?`??? r 1 /? I I ?? ?'? •.
? o i Swag ?? ,? , ?? . sr ? I ?'f ? i i'\ ? / / y i / '?: ;:• ?
_-J tt DI poSal_ ?? ?i i o I ?? °'?: ' - '1' j ? ? '? ?? I ( ? •?oRadio
86
EL ER S'r \ %? • \ ?• i_'?-AM ^?' 1. ?'),) I - ?\ ?.?? ;"/?? ti%f3J? /\.
p' l' `- i p ¦ r r \, 36 / r, ? /.: \.. g? ` ???vj? ?\ r?- ?I "\+ _..a
C'Wa Ch-?? r 1i? /Q, O ??. 'fir .? ..,
DUKE- NIV+ O 1 Q ??
`II .? R 1
ITY3 E . ? / ?rn ? ? ? w ? - ` ?? ? ? ,? 55 • •• ?\ -
i/ ?,3? °03 r- \,? y1 3soti v Sch 1 I? \ owA/ 1. r<?=
BM . ? S c'i59 I I • ?? ? ?r 1? \? J rS/
'., ? 4? \ \ ' I ?. 414 '-?1 I I ^` r 10 . 1 - ?---??35
`? -??` ? ?`/ ? r r r1` ? I ( , ?1 i • -fTigh ` ?h? l ? ? ? ?? ? ?--?_ ? . ~: ?"?i
/ o
-T DURHAM! 681 55' 6$$ l CITY HALL 0.5 Ml. • INTERIOR-GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, RESTON, VIR(
i NW '? RALEIGH 23 Ml. 690
.:24 000 1 MILE A/aW-0 Pore ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Primary highway, Light-duty
)0 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET &Ak hard surface.. ....................... improve
SAND FILTER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
At least once a year inspect the filter after a runoff-producing storm. Maintenance is
required to be performed when storms of approximately one (1) inch are not passing
through the filter in a 24-hour period.
2. Remove the top 2"-3" of discolored sand from the top of the filter and replace it with new
sand when maintenance is required.
3. Pump and clean the sediment chamber each time that maintenance is performed on the
sand filter. When the sediment chamber is cleaned, it should be returned to the original
design dimensions.
4. Inspect the outlet structure at least monthly for blockages and deterioration. Remove any
blockages and maintain the structure as originally designed.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the
above-maintained procedures. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or
changes in the name of the project, responsible party, or address.
Print Name:
Address:
'14?r??i /??L a ??
Phone:
Title:
Signal
Date:
I, 060" O?Q?K_ a Notary Public for the State of ?? Lrl- CO'AL rIV
County of do hereby certify that, 7,-Z-,,,&,, l y?
Personally appeared before me this _ day of ?aG_r-? , aq l , and acknowledge
the due execution of the forgoing sand filter maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
SEAL.
My commission exp es U -6-OQ_

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 28, 1999
Wake County
DWQ Project 4990726
APPROVAL OF 40IQuality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS and Neuse River Buffer Rules
Mr. Jim Petrea
Trinity Ave. Presbyterian Church
Dear Mr Petrea:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place rill material in 330 feet
stream for the purpose of expanding an existing church (Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church), as you described in your
application dated 6 July 1998. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number 3108. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 26 when the Corps of
Engineers issues it. This approval is also valid for the Neuse River buffer rules (15A NCAC 2B .033). In, addition, you should
get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to), Sediment and
Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when
the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit
expires or as otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed
in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
I. An additional condition is that a final, written storm plan including a wet detention basin must be
approved by DWQ before wetland (or stream) impacts occur. Also before any building is occupied at
the subject site the stormwater treatment facilities shall be constructed and operational and the
stormwater management plan be implemented.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-744 7. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. if you have any
questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-178PEI
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
John Domey
Central Files
Todd St. John
Jay Carter: J Carter and Associates 990726.Itr
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
?r? Iie
Ih
DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] • Fax [phone]
6 July 1999
Mn John Dorney
N.C. Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear John:
Enclosed is an application for a 401 Certification for Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church,
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church proposes to place 330
feet of an unnamed, intermittent tributary of Ellerbe Creek in a culvert in order to allow expansion of
the existing church facilities. The stream also is an existing health and safety hazard (see below). The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has authorized this project under Nationwide Permit No. 26 (8 June
1999).
The USGS topographic quadrangle and Durham County Soil Survey show no intermittent and
perennial stream at this location. Therefore, we believe that the new Neuse River Buffer Rule does not
apply.
Most of the stream channel is culverted beneath Durham except for this section between Trinity
and Minerva Avenues. The channel bisects the church property. A fenced playground is located
immediately adjacent to a section of the creek. A child could scale the fence and, because the bank
beyond the fence is very steep, fall in the creek and be swept into the culvert. Water in the creek is
urban stormwater runoff and judging from odor, is mixed with sewage. The channel has a granite
bottom and no jurisdictional wetlands border it.
Based upon the meeting between Mr. Jim Petrea, representing the Church, and you on 14 June
1999, the Church proposes to conduct onsite stormwater management to treat runoff from the new
impervious surfaces created by this project. A stormwater management plan using best management
practices will be submitted for DWQ approval.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,/I
D J.H. Carter III
Environmental Consultant
Cc: Jim Petrea, Building Committee -
Dan Jewell, Coulter, Hart, Jewell & Thames
Endangered Species Surveys 9 Environmental Assessments • Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting

qw
T i'MIY April 19,1999
AVEWE
PRESBYTERIAN
Mr,
John Dotney
NCDHNR
Division of Water Quality`
4101 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Dourer
Please use this letter as audwrizafm for Dr. J. H. Carter III, to submit, on behalf of Trinity
Avenue Presbyterian Church, applications pursuant to 404/401lNeuse rover buffer rules.
It is our hope that we can . find a solution that allows our church to meet same very critical
budding expansion requkcmenta, alleviate a safety hsz d for our child= and to support the
e:VU'V0snnet W obligations of our community. Since this is such a small unpiped section of a
lmrgrr city smsm water syst= With mmimal .natural vegent M we believe the impact to the
Neuse River can be a ffeet. Of fire options we vn= p c3 tcd with, mitigation appears to be the
most reasonawc.
Like many urban cbuxehes the options for expansion on rho existing campus are limited.
However, it is the mission of out church not to move away from our conminity of ministry;
therefore,. We mead your consideration to our proposal. The financial side of the mitigation
proposal will be challenging to our budget, but if requirtd we will find a means to satisfy that
We sincerely sppreciata yota franc anti prompt consideration to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Donovan Drake -?
Senior Pastor
r committee
Donavan Drake. Pantw
927 W.w Tnnity Avenue. Dusham. NC 27702-1715 0 Phono 919492-3865 • E maik Tr mTrA o0sol.cont
DEM ID: 990406 CORPS ACTION ID: 199920767
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) :
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD OFFICE
OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church (Jim Petrea)
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 927 West Trinity Avenue
CITY: Durham
STATE: N.C. ZIP CODE: 27701-1715
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): N/A
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): Jim Petrea [phone] (WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc., Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891, Southern Pines, NC 28388 [phone]
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Durham NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Durham
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD
NUMBERS,. LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Corner of Trinity Avenue and Gregson Street
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Unnamed tributary to Ellerbe Creek
RIVER BASIN: Neuse
7a.
IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
N/A
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ ] NO [ X ]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
No
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PERMIT? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 2.24
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
Wetland = 0 Jurisdictional water = 0.265 ac = 330 ft of creek channel
WATER
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: N/A EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: OTHER:
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE E"TACTED:
A
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION) :
LENGTH BEFORE: 330 FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
WIDTH AFTER: in culvert
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: 0.25 FT AFTER:
15 FT
FT
0.25 FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/ FLOODING:
OTHER: placement of stream in culvert
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
12. DECRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 ''/z" X 1 I" DRAWINGS
ONLY):
Placement of stream in culvert to allow for building expansion and to remove safety / health
hazard posed by creek.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Expand building across creek channel. Place creek
channel in culvert for safety and health concerns.
AFTER: 0 (culverted) FT
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS):
Insufficient space onsite to expand existing facilities without impacting creek; creek is
safety and health hazard.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT
IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: Species list on file - no habitats for protected species onsite.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: 20 April 1999
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [ ] NO [ X ] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [ ] NO [ X ]
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [ ] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
IS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26,
29, AND 3 8). AL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY
MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1
INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY?
Urban residential / commercial.
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
(1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
(2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
(3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
t I ? rz"t
OWNER'S GE SIGNATURE
?fk 7 /1 cf
DA
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18G.))
Q _ti v _ -?•O •_-? a ice: 1 _? -.
myS
W ?` ? ?? ::,t\\ o ? ?; Nw _ ;?^ o +'? ? i - • c\? •.A '? rte'. dim 1
O ?.+ Uhl GJ ? :.:•,:•`iN ?• d ...?.
Al y ??? ,- - 1e. v • D 1 w 1
z
C 330: \ .ti p 1 O. n 1 1 ' +1
W G ,-_? ?• A m?? TAM AIVE`^ 'y _- 2 DARTMOUTH -OR
3 - -
00
AV
rn
8 ?
V
to , J`
m 1
w
_mw
t
?• r
t is

n
O
O N Of {,?
=
? C0
r o
7C
S
y •
Z

0
D
O °
r
Q

U)
_
r ?

O Q D T A O ?
c
a -1 di
o

A Z 0

O
1 !?'• r r.
I ? ?(

02
,
W
N 1
!
W W
5? ' p
C) I
I 1.1 ?, ? • A. rim ? S ° ?_ Gtr .
v N / C.tR /NAB ? \ _ I ? _ : ¦ - ? -
4100
^f- ! ?9? j "fie, •? ti; -? ?;=i_' i?
tj, "YO
VIM
4 ? It p ° o ' \'rO c
1 ? Ro eo 1 sso sr < \
'fI _-
:\` , )r ,,f7 I • AN ER
1 _ SGti ' , • ,5 r
All!
I. GORMAN G M.;. ',E i ".6 so
V r HENDERSON 38 A: g° c
all -a- L- I
N

¦
w
z
w
a
a
z
m
3s
1 3f
V
I
i ?
n
I
11=f
4
? I
i?
7 - -- l j -, a ------- ; b= 'il
_-3381s NO-SO380 •s - b=
I i i
1 -
n

C
O
d
c
O
s
o s,
A ?

117A .p
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality.
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
/ •
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 28,1999
Wake County
DWQ Project #990726
APPROVAL OF 401Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS and Neuse River Buffer Rules
Mr. Jim Petrea
Trinity Ave. Presbyterian Church
Dear Mr Petrea:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 330 feet
stream for the purpose of expanding an existing church (Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church), as you described in your
application dated 6 July 1998. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number 3108. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 26 when the Corps of
Engineers issues it. This approval is also valid for the Neuse River buffer rules (15A NCAC 213 .033). In addition, you should
get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when
the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold,. the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit
expires or as otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed
in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. An additional condition is that a final, written storm plan including a wet detention basin must be
approved by DWQ before wetland (or stream) impacts occur. Also before any building is occupied at
the subject site the stormwater treatment facilities shall be constructed and operational and the
stormwater management plan be implemented.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-178F I.Sltee III
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
John Domey
Central Files
Todd St. John
Jay Carter; J Carter and Associates 990726.1tr
Division of Water Quality - Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Trinity Church
Subject: Trinity Church
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 13:23:31 EST
From: "Steven R. Mitchell" <Steve [e-mail]>
Organization: DENR - Raleigh Regional Office
To: [e-mail]
Still do not like allowing people to culvert
streams. That being said... although this piece
does not show up on either of the maps, it is at
least marginally perennial. The sad aspect is
that it is hammered by the city of Durham as it
passes underneath of it. The biological integrity
is barely there. Several univalve mollusca
(snails), a few hydropsychides (caddisflies),
and oligochaetes (worms). At best, a poor
assemblage of extremely tolerant species. Would
be nice to be able to mitigate but stormwater
would work also. Whatever
1 of 1 7130/99 1:53 PM
I
F t

??
May 13, 1999
NR Dr. J.H. Carter III
Post Office Box 891
Southern Pines, N. C. 28388
• JAMES B. HUNT JR.
ERNOR
`G
Subject:
OV
W E MCDEVIYT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 99-091
Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church
Durham County
AYN
SECRETARY Dear Dr. Carter:
On April 8, I met with you at the subject site and conducted a site visit. This project is referenced by the
Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 99-091. It was determined that the unnamed tributary to Ellerbe Creek
is an intermittent stream and therefore subject to the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Management Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code
T15A:02B.0233 (NCAC 0233).
The line delineating the forested vegetation varies from non-existent to thirty feet in width. Please be
reminded that the riparian buffer is protected in two zones totaling fifty feet of protection where forest
vegetation exists. In accordance with the Rule, sheet flow from stormwater must be maintained, to the
maximum extent practical, through dispersing concentrated flow and/or re-establishment of vegetation to
maintain the efficacy of the riparian area.
This Office is aware that a Pre Construction Notification (PCN) has been filed with the Wetlands Group for
this project and thank you for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if
you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Steve Mitchell
Environmental Scientist
cc: RRO/Dorney
H:\nbrlet.for\neuse.bufltrinpres.091
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
r. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
1
o $a o?'i;y A£ .NOSa30N3H ? n
! ?. '1W 7 NVWb09 'l i
LL.
t-
/ r, f?C `i • /, _•. ; I ? 1/ \..•\ .1S-- ?! 71OrOS. _ _ ?I .e. --? ? ,"?^ } j 1
08 r
.J ?
E •,e? 1.?,''? ? to 3?'.???j r??? ?j '?f ? .'??` ? ` d
42
h?. U
? Js; • : ? r `?l, ? ..? a ? ?\ ?"' ?? / /?? ? .;.. y ?1 ?? ? is r y ( fl s-
n
lanB91lr \ •? , - J? _ . , l U , I
_ --? 1 ® ?\ " ! mil; ?.., ,_'? ' -' ? a •'
040
- ,) %/ : .:'?Z\ • \ ?? o i are `? i
_am
44
o S 3nB-- - sal ??,? °? ? 1 m •: O / kCA .
zc o
_I N

l e
07
O•s ^ I
L i

2
R t

CJ
CL
L
- ? m
1E
N

8 ?
0 0
;`w Q

?
O$
3•

z R
?? r. tx
• t
v L
rg oo
R i
N
M A c
E -C!
{w' 0- L uS
4
• 4 •! lL)
-I'll
Dr z

I .-
la
e
I p ?
g ?
n ?
T
? ` _r Wrl. ? _\\
__ •,?? _ _ I ?j '=ELI /' °?., •., £'• v ,`?titi ? °???'RJ?i? _? a
M ' d 10101 G
? S, °' Y70Nrtl fc? ' tS T?; d p>' ? ?:. "' f_ '• fLx '•? ti „• ?c sq•, ? ? i
ti
`p ?j ? Z ? ? ,n..?' ? •w '! r•. , err. w '...'?? f ¦oUA .? ? .
a ua, , ?? P ?'? ?t_ x a? ` ? fy4)?' za .._. _ ti _...?.5 ? -•L T
fIb J.ty, J•? •n ?` ` _ ? 'q1 ? n I!v? vY ?M? 4 AI 17 tle
QIR F ? .? n? O'}Q}u ? C ..'?'?!_ • ? l?'' j ?O?D $ 4 `y( $ a
er 67fd I ?it1 + e A f w? • ?' '• ? -_9 ! S -r•r:'? ,Yl: ?, ,•`? s ;K • 00 /?a ? ?? ? •: . _ ? 3t yi
M 'G? qs x TA ? ? $ M1'I'? M1` SS r I_ ? • ,, `' •? W' A^• .. ?? • •.` .?. ? i -'r 7 t ?:.. iw0•
71pP? ?0?, / ?r ! ., ;,..1 D7 a vd'? t-: i+:. ? -Q'@ ,•,",v_ - ? re - ??+' "'• w". `••'i I a o
l "t•, Y yy
?.70CK .eJ,• O,y? IS 14 ? e! _ - -?• _ ? :. ,.?~ n• -fin' ` X
? ? t & o? i° r6 33.' :•r:r.. YIiQO? iS •" s ?, rg 7• r ? - ?. ?i,. quT It v?
ear QN7 - I:.J 1S .$•t' _ ;tr. •?Y °? o. a, a ne ^ v,•1 I
?° ` ^`? ? . Tt •??` ' . .?-? ? ! :... .._'i Z rrr ? nTana. e ? •9 ar *w • OAIB ° a r ?
•'• .• + - V? ?I 9 ? •R .? : ° f?°L ? JtldRO r _ iS t73R •: , ft`. rw a A.... ptyr Vi QWe1RJL7S ?'? -
F00• • .rf • _ ` a lhll., .?.. I MI 7,r , t *.- ^. •j! b
?. ,a. - : ? P fe wr. n _ r ire ` m ? tl. 7008 a 7b 011 r7TS ? •w•
/i1 l Y M1, a • Y " .. Tr ' ?N O •C ' ? ` l1:J ,
Idh •S 7wS w !S Y ?+ ??1/n7? ?Y. I_ ?°• -f± ; t• ^. .'.? t$ OtlIlr a=a::
t F ?-• !!•7a -0• ° _ ?'-_°q e 15 37r 77x.1) _ _. S rme:
'+R ttv ? ? :S eaTV ? ..< ? .. 3R e 3 IS SSON7 ._ e:g.??s ? a xe .. • r'.._ i' ` 3
vn :I Il ms.tii
x

is 7WD
a
?OL?Z
3
ct s ?T9T:YT.-..
I .?„ ?•
t d u7 '- ='C
$ R nx =•
? e7tlnQ _ Cr _ .
AV
R'n:
.1 lp
M?btln •n.:r •p35ir '. _..,. Ili _
^r rrr GO r _ MA1R7
7S i
y '? >a c '? ? W3
?x • ?
a ' Ar w y ?
a c e? u QOQAy 7
" '•' ." a JT rA7@ 1

N v
? ? S •
r ra a ?
e ! k) 11 a ?
'b ? 91
e'
•
!
SQOM
? Ar ?, 7; IAS
8
• >i{

'
O i '?• _

t
w
•F l9 ? ..

> 09
Q
AM rR : NN ,
' ? SS N037
i .. I .
a°
?
> -
?7? 7001•i r ? ,`j
1&u 'vat NOI7 er., >? ?
7tT• + - YO b @r i
? s :a.
_
1
? t
?° ' e =
w r xaa Otlvwl ra s ? +ISit ? S m Ar Obr I ? app Oj d : " ¦. t, g
:• Y
ap j
? p T
n.?TM r•
dA
? T
• ? .8? • at , , r-'J?; b r•T aryY?d\ °- ? '+.7 r.•J•+R ...

dN-77drr1 Y° JI?-f
4G y
? •'J
7 w
? ."t-
c A `
?
... 'I.la r ? .? J

.
.
a
;..JY :.. t11
•
? ? n` 9? ?I
*
??
i
1 FY
s+•7 Ar a
3 :,,:?_ ?
t•? .?
.R! tl7e
? .
a ??o ..?tlQ
i V
?Ilnlcr ?...
•
/
•
• p
44
00 11 I
~ ?
r
° .. a
T 1
\ /, F'1yP..: do - :M: : ?
,' !• h+lrt ; 2--• s _
@R fS i .?:•? _• !? T T?a7n ,-. ^
i ? l ; :.x'i...t¦ # -' .t r

?;,

_

N

TS 1
y
?
073wrwM0 1

?

? t

a . e
?
•
• - _ - L ? ,
I ' ?
• ? • S MdN
! 9 ?
y :T? h
? A y ?
+i ' .M7717
l5 fib .y
r
? '
Ov .?.A ?e s ,?!
?t77• iS
1105 3
M • g ,
w ?
wMl MI@!_;? ^ 1S i1M17
P
f j?? t ? -
i69- i . ?a a
•n er ? i 'a- 3w
. 'tl71
3
p

u JA t
a
?

z01z0'd S2:9T 666T-90-dO,
"' "?noo
_NN? ?l1i1l N C3
i l ? ?•?
<
i
? 1 ??1 Q (D t
^
- f
S i
H? ?v1=: ?37i f? d. V ¦
I
I
I
j I j e i F I
.. L? rte.- i,ae.m•?. > ~
,

iu 3:

------------ --.-__-W rc
I rc Z
j ai Z
f 1 I !' -- ;,i I
do)
o z

z !

a
Y /e
m F- a a ! a
I
\ o)
`
\
` En
I
? I ?
I
?
' Y N e7 Z

E d

n a------ TIT
-' '
I ,__
355'
"I-- I ` i a
L.

-- ----------- --------- ---------- -----
1'33a1s N'OS0389 ' - -"- d'

-? i
i - - - - - - - - - - - - -i --------------------
a a - - -j
¦

¦
ins SIMS
0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Jim Petrea
Trinity Ave Presbyterian Church
927 west Trinity Ave.
Durham N.C. 27701-1715
Dear Mr. Petrea:
Re: Trinity Ave. Presbyterian Church
Orange County
DWQ # 990406
1?•
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
APRIL 29, 1999
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal for a 404/401 Permit for culverting of 330
feet of stream at Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church in Orange County. Your application was not complete since
seven copies of the joint application form and a check for 475.00 for the certification fee were not included. Finally a
variance form the N.C. Environmental Management commission will be needed to allow this project. Please contact
Mr. Pete Colwell of my staff at 919-733-1786 in this regard. Please provide information regarding the location of
your project. This information is needed by DWQ in order for us to decide whether this project is approvable.
Please respond with three weeks of the date of this letter by sending us the appropriate information. If
we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will
consider the project as withdrawn.
I can be reached at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions. Until this information is received, I will
request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this project on hold. Also, the project will be placed
on hold for our processing due to incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H.0507(a)(4)). Your processing time will
begin once we receive a complete application.
Attachment
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Wilmington District of Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
John Dorney
Central Files
Pete Colwell
Jay Carter; Jay Carter and Associates
Joh. Dor ' 01
Wa er Quality Certification Program
990406.hld
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
lit.

relo CJoy\,.
AJ^A)
of
DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] • Fax [phone]
1 June 1999
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney:
G ?
t G,
I am in receipt of your memo dated 29 April 1999 in reference to the Trinity Avenue
Presbyterian Church in Durham County, NC and our application pursuant to the Neuse River Buffer
Rule. This letter is to inform you that we are withdrawing our application (DWQ #990406) effective
immediately.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sin ely,
Dr. .H. Carter III
Environmental Consultant
Cc: Jim Petrea, Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church
Dan Jewell, Coulter, Hart, Jewell & Thames
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments • Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] 9 Fax [phone]
20 April 1999
Mr. John Dorney n
N.C. Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
_s
L lyyy
Raleigh, NC 27607 APR 6
Dear John:.
}44 41
Enclosed is an application made pursuant to compliance w? -tlie'Neiise River Buffer (NRB)
Rules for a project in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church
proposes to place 330 feet of an unnamed, intermittent tributary of Ellerbe Creek in a culvert in order
to allow expansion of the existing church facilities. The stream also is an existing health and safety
hazard (see below).
The USGS topographic quadrangle and Durham County Soil Survey show no stream at this
location. Most of the channel is culverted beneath Durham except for this section between Trinity and
Minerva Avenues. The channel bisects the church property. A fenced playground is located
immediately adjacent to a section of the creek. A child could scale the fence and, because the bank
beyond the fence is very steep, fall in the creek and be swept into the culvert. Water in the creek is
stormwater runoff and judging from odor, is mixed with sewage. The channel has a granite bottom
and no jurisdictional wetlands border it.
Mr. Steve Mitchell (DWQ) visited the property on 8 April 1999. He felt that the Neuse River
Buffer (NRB) Rules applied and we agreed on a line delineating the "forest" vegetation. Most of the
vegetation is non-native (mostly Asiatic) and several sizeable areas have no vegetation adjacent to the
channel. Mr. Mitchell indicated that a 401 Water Quality Certification would not be required. He
suggested that a wet stormwater basin would be required to offset unavoidable impacts to forest
vegetation. However, a stormwater pond is not possible due to the small size of the property. Such a
pond would also create a safety hazard.
He indicated that the Church could propose to pay, a compensatory mitigation fee to DWQ in
lieu of pursuing a waiver of the NRB Rules (approximately $1.00 / sq. ft.). The NRB Rule area,
including the stream channel, is 11,560 sq. ft. Therefore, Trinity Church proposes to mitigate the
impact via payment of $11,560.00 to the State of North Carolina.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sin rel
Dr J.H. Carter III
Environmental Consultant
Cc: Donovan Drake, Senior Pastor
Jim Petrea, Building Committee
Dan Jewell, Coulter, Hart, Jewell & Thames
Phillip Kiester, TISE Kiester Architects
Steve Mitchell, DWQ
Todd Tugwell, ACOE
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments 9 Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
04/19/1999 16:58
? arr•
1
11111 ITY
AVENUE
PRESBYTERIAN
John Dorsey
NCDHNR
Division of Water Quality
4101 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney:
April 19,1999
PAGE 02
Please use this letter as authorization for Dr. J. H. Carter ID, to submit, on behalf of Trinity
Avenue Presbyterian Church, applications pursuant to 404/401 /Neuse River buffer rules.
It is our hope that we can find a solution that allows our church to meet some very critical
building expansion mquirements, alleviate a safety hazard for our children, and to support the
environmental obligations of our community. Since this is such a small unpipcd section of a
larger city storm water system with minimal natural vegetation, we believe the impact to the
Neuse River can be affect. Of the options we were presented with, mitigation appears to be the
most reasonable.
Like many urban churches the options for expansion on the existing campus are limited.
However, it is the mission of our church not to move away from our community of ministry;
therefore, we need your consideration to our proposal. The financial side of the mitigation
proposal will be challenging to our budget, but if required we will find a means to satisfy that
requirenunt.
We sincerely appreciate your time and prompt consideration to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Donovan Drake
Senior Pastor
Pe1 ' B Committee
iA
919-682-6021 TRINITY AVE PRESBY
Donovan Drake, Pastor
927 W=9 Trinity Avenue, Durham, NC 27701-1715 • Phone 91%.692-3865 • E mail: TrinityAveDaol.com
DEM ID:
CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) :
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD OFFICE
OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church (Jim Petrea)
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 927 West Trinity Avenue
CITY: Durham
STATE:
N.C.
ZIP CODE: 27701-1715
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): N/A
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): Jim Petrea [phone] (WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc., Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891, Southern Pines, NC 28388 [phone]
LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Durham NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Durham
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD
NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Corner of Trinity Avenue and Gregson Street
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Unnamed tributary to Ellerbe Creek
RIVER BASIN: Neuse
7a.
IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
N/A
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ ] NO [ X ]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
No
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PERMIT? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 2.24
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
Wetland = 0 Jurisdictional water = 0.265 ac = 330 ft of creek channel
WATER
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: N/A
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
EXCAVATION:
OTHER:
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: 330 FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
15
FT
WIDTH AFTER: in culvert
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: 0.25 FT AFTER:
FT
0.25 FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/ FLOODING:
OTHER: placement of stream in culvert
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
12. DECRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 'h" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY):
Placement of stream in culvert to allow for building expansion and to remove safety / health
hazard posed by creek.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Expand building across creek channel. Place creek
channel in culvert for safety and health concerns.
AFTER: 0 (culverted) FT
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS):
Insufficient space onsite to expand existing; facilities without impacting creek: creek is
safety and health hazard.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT
IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: Species list on file - no habitats for protected species onsite.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: 20 April 1999
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [ ] NO [ X ] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES[ ] NO [ X ]
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [ ] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26,
29, AND 38). AL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY
MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE I INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR I
INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY?
Urban residential / commercial.
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
(1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
(2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
(3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
4 1j, G-*? f,
AGENT SIGNATURE
I /j j . /12
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18G.))
8 oo ,5v
Yo ko O
rn co W 8£ NOSa30N3H? a^o °D M_M
Pn' m "IW b NbW&OO I.°ii n I N
th"t
00
ca
0: 0 -0
/il, ,??, / J ?? ?(9h? / '': rb ti r. mares ??
ILO E
C-)
I ;? W o
"11 /1 O ?- `\? ` J ..* a3 NV ?1 l O w ¢g
/i 1 ?. 1 1S -I £ 08 Oa ( \\7 ¢O
O
09
crl 1\ '
t)o a)
ter- ?'j \
?«°
14,
.r- co (v
CL I-- U)
,5'-
350 l 9f y ?;,
M
is,
A
anesldb ? ? , trJ ¦i ;
000,
' , \-" ?, o<' - % lr ; ; ? - ` ` `` `off, p l I `?" ? ? • D ?? J
i
00? ?O C? Q• 5 ": ./1 .j Y
_ ( o
10
L-j
-r ( Tm 1 t_it e p
aQ--H1LJOW1ab0 Z ? ? _? r-c` ? , _... ? O? ? - J •7-`. _ ?? '? ' ?" = O
nabHO- ': 3 1' ?` o ? ? v j ° 1 ` 1111i? + oA` ? O ?
1 1
1 d ?6 c7 d v W

•`-uao 1
? ¢ -5

pP
I T f
i9
l S
v
X?
IM +
Sif
€
l
Bi H CL- V ¦ ¦ ¦

?
c
0
d
c
0
a
u
? b
n
r^ 1-1
113a1S NOSO380
-? -------------
- - -------------------- - -.I - - - - - - -- - - - - -i
¦

?

¦
13131 s31ra
E > a
' ??aa i}??. Q m s
Ali
•? ?

u

j

. ------- - - :- - - .
2J1SNDSJ32JO
?-
J --
, ,-
--
-

c
a
a
m
r b
Oa
•? 1
r-

?
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+3iin t31Y0t
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
WO Supervisor: Ken Schuster
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church County Durham
Project Number 99 0406 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 4/26/99 Recvd By Region
Project Type
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet "-
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. supp. Basin' Req. Req.
_=F_ F7-0 F-FT717T I v NSW FTT6T- F_- F_-F_ F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? p Y p N
Is Mitigation required? p Y p N Recommendation: p Issue O ISSue/Cond ® Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
THIS PROJECT FLIES RIGHT INTO THE FACE OF THE BUFFER. IT IS THE ONLY PIECE OF
THIS STREAM THAT IS NOT CULVERTED AND THE CHURCH CAN EASILY SPAN ACCROSS
WITH A BRIDGE TO GET TO THE BUILDING ON THE ADJACENT LOT
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Wetlands Tracking UPa?s<? =k
Facility Name TrinitN- Avenue Presbyterian Church
Project Number 99 0396
Project Type pli j)ose of County `Durham
Location County2
Received From D«'Q COE ID # I Region Raleigh
Received Date JIa} 14.1999 l COE Susp Date I Reg. Contact
Sent to Region Date ?I DCM Susp Date APPLICATION FEE INFO
Rcvd Region Date I TIP Number I Payment Date
Last Action Date Vii`" 28.1999 I More Info Requested; I Amount Paid
Last Action Issue NBR l More Info Received I Payor
Latitude (ddmrrss) 360018 Mitigation ? I Check #
Longitude (ddmmss) 78-5427
Certificates Stream Area
F Area Length Length
Permit Wetland Wetland Stream Class Wetland (acres) (acres) (feet) (feet)
T e Cert # T e Im act Score Index Prin. Su Subbasin Class Req. A r. Req. A r.
YP YP P PP. PP PP
N1 R ° o -? 27-5-(0.7) 11'tif\ xS\1 030401 Total for 401.
WRP Mitigation Stream Impacts (ft
ti a Project Wetland Wetland Completion Peren- Inter-
rdlitigationType Number Type Class Acres Feet Date Subbasin nial mittent
` 't'otal Mitigation:
}
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact:
WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Tr.initN, AN,enue Presbyterian Chrir•ch
Project Number 99 0496
Recvd From DNVQ
Received Date 5/14/99 Recvd By Region
Project Type
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet -
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
?I? r o o ?- ?TS(b'Tr wsIV NSW ,` - ?T ? ?-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? p Y p N Did you request more info? p Y p N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? p Y p N
Is Mitigation required? p Y p N Recommendation: p Issue p Issue/Cond p Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 360018 Longitude (ddmmss) 785427
Comments:
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
County Durham
County2
Region` Raleigh
DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388 40101
[phone] 9 Fax [phone]
6 July 1999
Mr. John Dorney PAYMENT
N.C. Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road REC??VED
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear John:
Enclosed is an application for a 401 Certification for Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church,
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church proposes to place 330
feet of an unnamed, intermittent tributary of Ellerbe Creek in a culvert in order to allow expansion of
the existing church facilities. The stream also is an existing health and safety hazard (see below). The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has authorized this project under Nationwide Permit No. 26 (8 June
1999).
The USGS topographic quadrangle and Durham County Soil Survey show no intermittent and
perennial stream at this location. Therefore, we believe that the new Neuse River Buffer Rule does not
apply.
Most of the stream channel is culverted beneath Durham except for this section between Trinity
and Minerva Avenues. The channel bisects the church property. A fenced playground is located
immediately adjacent to a section of the creek. A child could scale the fence and, because the bank
beyond the fence is very steep, fall in the creek and be swept into the culvert. Water in the creek is
urban stormwater runoff and judging from odor, is mixed with sewage. The channel has a
bottom and no jurisdictional wetlands border it.
Based upon the meeting between Mr. Jim Petrea, representing the Church, and yo 4 Jurie
1999, the Church proposes to conduct onsite stormwater management to treat runoff fro nev?y
impervious surfaces created by this project. A stormwater management plan using best gernt a
C\1 C11:1 I
practices will be submitted for DWQ approval.
Please call me if you have any questions. C «..Q
Sincerely, ti
D J.H. Carter III
Environmental Consultant
Cc: Jim Petrea, Building Committee
Dan Jewell, Coulter, Hart, Jewell & Thames
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments 9 Land Management 9 Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
r
/f
TRINITY
AVENUE
PRESBYTERIAN
16:58 919-b91
IKINI I Y 04VQ rR
April 19,1999
John Domey
NCDHNR.
Division of Weser Quality
4101 Reedy C=k Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Dorsey:
Please use this lamer as authorization for Dr. L H. Carter III, to submit, on behalf of Trinity
Avenue Presbyterian Church, applications pursuant to 404/401Meuse Rives buffer rules.
It is our hope that we can find a solution that allows our church to meet same very critical
building atpansion rrgva+e =ts, alleviate a safety, hazard for our cWldre% and to swport the
enviromneatal obligations of our community. Since this is such a small unpiped section of a
largo city storm water system with minimal .nat»sal vegetation, we believe the impact to the
Neuse River can be offset, of the options we were presented with, mitigation appears to be the
most reasonable.
Lft many urban cburchcs the options for expansion on rho existing campus arc limited.
However, it is the mission of out cbutch not to move away from our com nudty of ministry;
therefore. we need your consideration to our proposal. The financial side of the mitigation
proposal will be challenging to our budget, but if requited we will End a means to satisfy that
regture:nmt.
we sincerely appreciate your time arid prompt consideration to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Donovan Drabs
l k-
senior Paswr
J' P
Bwl ' Committee
Donovan Drake. Psl<atoc
927 W. TAxity Avenue. Dssrbaos. NC 27702-1715 • Phoao 91"M3865 • E mail: TrieiryAve0aol•coa?
DEM ID: 990406 CORPS ACTION ID: 199920767
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) :
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD OFFICE
OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church (Jim Petrea)
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 927 West Trinity Avenue
CITY: Durham
STATE: N.C. ZIP CODE: 27701-1715
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): N/A
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): Jim Petrea [phone] (WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc., Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891, Southern Pines, NC 28388 [phone]
LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Durham NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Durham
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD
NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Corner of Trinity Avenue and Gregson Street
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Unnamed tributary to Ellerbe Creek
RIVER BASIN: Neuse
7a.
IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
N/A
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH.CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ ] NO [ X ]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
No
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PERMIT? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 2.24
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
Wetland = 0 Jurisdictional water = 0.265 ac = 330 ft of creek channel
WATER
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: N/A
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
EXCAVATION:
OTHER:
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTHBEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: 330 FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
WIDTH AFTER: in culvert
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: 0.25 FT AFTER:
15 FT
FT
0.25 FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/ FLOODING:
OTHER: placement of stream in culvert
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
AFTER: 0 (culverted) FT
12. DECRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8'/z" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY):
Placement of stream in culvert to allow for building expansion and to remove safety / health
hazard posed by creek.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Expand building across creek channel. Place creek
channel in culvert for safety and health concerns.
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS):
Insufficient space onsite to expand existing facilities without impacting creek: creek is
safety and health hazard.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT
IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: Species list on file - no habitats for protected species onsite.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: 20 April 1999
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [ ] NO [ X J (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES[ ] NO [ X
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [ ] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26,
29, AND 38). AL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY
MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1
INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY?
Urban residential / commercial.
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
(1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
(2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
(3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
t
OWNER'S GE SIGNATURE
?1/0 (7 /17
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18G.))
?sww ills - j
.¦ .=ww ? ?1 ? ?JQ L d
03,
u?t JIM F- ? V i d ? I
¦ ¦ ¦
¦
¦
I I I 1 ? ,
? I I f- ? p 1 I

ILJ

Y Y
--
i ---------4------?? W
c l / i i 1 ??`l I m rc~ ~ ! a

N N N I
1 >
I I < N ? A
•
?,
? "`` 2
?1 I
`
(
I

ALA

al.-
-
i
-
€i
_-4t--
? ' /
/ L
1 !
•? /
E
--
_-__-_-_ 7
04

y
..
-- -
I-
-
1 ¦
1.332i1S NU
S03HO •A
k:

i I i - - - ...............
?- -: - ---------------•---------
I I I
?
r
¦
+n¦ ??v¦
go °08 •!;Y 9£ NOS?J30N3H eg
a o
'!W b NVWLOE) R'+
it:
> / S .? OQ,.,q /?? -. ? ? ?. a3\ \` -- 1. ?^ ? ? ?/?`? I?
• ?? . , ; ?. Jam. ? /"'?:' ,. ^?? ?; '??1 ; ,.; ?• ?%/ ?. l\ "'_.L-11 ? _
16
*IV
-_= ? __ - ` %"• -,G -•_ ',\ ? ? j,/? ? ? t . iron I J
¢ e t l7
to O
eo
Pn m M
I tV

l e

O ?
? I

I v
`

?. c
o
L
Q 60
> O
Z H

?
r +' O O
B
?P O?
c
Q
>

' U` m E
?.

?
r U)
(
? c U

/ 0 Q

0

t A
z ?+ 3
O m L
; u
?• o -o
io H c

1llau' W a ?c N
?= I
? ? of
?;_g=??- •,=::' ?' / s ? ? -ea?'? ?,t `iii
Cb.
kWibw
_ _ ?ftr l I
MO - M1nOW12lY0 = -- ( ?3At1" .Y WYl
WHO z
1. C\I
4 IV
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Bill Ross, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director

NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
January 22, 2001
Mr. James W. Thames, P.E.
Coulter, Jewell, Thames
111 West Main Street
Durham, NC 27701
Subject: Trinity Ave. Presbyterian Church
DWQ Project No. 990726
Durham County
Dear Mr. Thames:
The Wetlands Unit staff reviewed the stormwater management plans for the subject project and determined
that additional information is necessary to complete the technical review process. The required additional
information is as follows:
Requirement for a Wet Detention Basin
The 401 Water Quality Certification issued July 28, 1999 specified that a wet detention basin be used to
treat the stormwater from the subject site. The plans propose a sand filter. In our meeting with the
applicant/applicants representatives on June 14, 1999 options discussed for stormwater management
included bioretention, a wet detention basin, or an extended detention wetland. As such, any of these will
be acceptable. However the sand filter is not acceptable.
Drainage Area
The drainage area to be treated must include all of the new impervious area or an equivalent amount of
existing and new impervious area.
Division Wetlands Unit staff will strive to complete a final technical review within 10 working days of
receipt of the requested information. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this project, please
contact me at [phone]. Also, please note that the NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual, April 1999, and other documents and information can be downloaded from the Wetlands Unit web
site at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/.
Sinter ly,
Todd St. John, E
Environmental Engineer
cc: John Dorney, Wetlands/401 Unit
Raleigh Regional Office
File
4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
- An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
E -? i t-t C $rl "v
FEB 8 2001
Coulter Jewell Thames, PA
PLANNING ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE--J
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: 2/7/01
To: Division of Water Qual
Attn: Todd St. John
Wetlands Unit
Project: Trinity Avenue Presbyterian
Church
WE TRANSMIT TO YOU HEREWITH:
# Copies Sheet No. Date Description
1 NA 5/30/00 Subsurface Investigation Report
Remarks:
Todd, attached is the boring report for Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church. Bore B-5 appears to be
the closest to the proposed location of the bioretention area/sand filter. Partially weathered rock was
encountered 3.5 feet below ground level and auger refusal at 3.8 feet. The approximate ground
elevation at that point is 346. The top surface of the proposed bioretention area is 343.6. It looks
like a couple of feet of rock would have to be removed to make the bioretention area. Let me know
if you need any more information.
Copies To:
From: Steve Bailey
Kenneth R. Coulter, FASLA, RLA office: 111 West Main Street, Durham, NC 27701-3690
Daniel A. Jewell, ASLA, RLA phone: [phone]
James W. Thames, PE fax: [phone]
email: sbailev -chit.com
jaded jawnsuoo-Isod %0l /pel3Aoaa %09 jeAoldw3 uolloy anlIewj14y A4!unpoddo lenb3 UV
6966-CCL-616 XVJ 9691-E£L-616 euogdaial L09LZ ON `g6iapeu `peon Magio Apead LOt,ti
-------------------------- --- - - - ---- ------- -a1i3--------
aowo luuol2md g2lalug - - - - - - - - -
liufl spuulIQAk `Ulof IS PPo,L 'JW :oo
Jos! do 1iufl spoutp
,Cauio •g
` .9-1
(6i6) lu ugof •iS ppo,L -jW iouluoo asuald `iallutu sig12uipzu2w suoi;sanb Xuu anuq nox 3I
•sosodind,Clop,S uzuQ poj u2isop urup oill jo lunoaddu uu su panusuoo
oq iou llugs lunozddu sigi wqi mu asuald •olquidooou uragl puno3 puu suuld oql paenarnaz
irun spuullaAk oq; moij 33uIS ' I OOZ `ZZ Luniga3 uo uolslnlQ aqI of pallnugns puu sauzuq L
llomo f iallnoO,Cq jlugoq moX uo paiudoid ,?Iiliouj loofgns aql ;u plums posstB pun pwilo n
p food .ialummols aql ioj I OOZ `6I faurugo palup suuld aql jo idwai ui si aowo slq,L
:Uoilod •jw JUO(l
9ZL066 #6tAG
ON `,flunoD uzugzn(I
go.mgD uuuol,Cgsaad •anV X111JU,L
alumS Put' puu110AA, lalumUIJOIS :IoofgnS
IOLLZ Du `uruginQ
any XIiuu,L IsQAA, LZ6
goingO uuij;)IXgsoj l `anV XI!UUZ
L'a3Iad un f -IN
IOOZ `£Z fauruga3
AJ,IgVfla Ual'VAk JO NOISIAM
HN3a3N
v,rJ;!kv
a0109aiQ `suana}S •1 JJO)q
iG181aaoas '-jr ssoa .E) wplim
.louaanoq `AE)lsU3 `3 18040M
?4!lenC) iolu N to uoisiAia
sooinosau painluN pue
}uauauOJIAu3 to luempedaa
Uu110aB0 4PON 10 GIBIS
A rn
HCDENR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 23, 2001
Memorandum To: John Dorney
From: Todd St. John
Subject: Trinity Ave. Presbyterian Church
Durham County
DWQ# 990726
I have reviewed the plans for this project and have determined that they meet the
design requirements for a grassed Swale and pocket wetland for the purposes of this
project. In fact, the pocket wetland is oversized and is 77% the size it would need to be to
meet the requirements for an extended detention wetland. As such, I recommend the
plans be approved.
Project No. DWQ ` - 990726
Project Name: Trinity Road Pres.
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN.
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 334.3
Permanent Pool (ft) 342.3 3 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 344 1.7 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft)
611
252 sq. ft.
ok
7 X
Drainage Area (ac) 0.77 5? G
Impervious Area (ac) 0.45 58.4%
-
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft)
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 1633' 1610 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) #DIV/0! % #DIV10!
other parameters
SA/DA 0 0.75 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 0.5 0.01 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 3.1 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA ***
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA from Table
Next Lowest 50 0.75
Project Impervious 58.4 0.75
Next Highest 60 0.75
5W4 GMA41
?yl
0V kp?
<kao 100
/01?p
Coulter Jewell Thames, PA
February 19, 2001
Mr. Todd St. John, P.E.
NCDENR/Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Mr. St. John:
Re: Expansion and Renovations to Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church
Durham, NC
DWQ Project #990726
FEB 2 2 20Q?
Please find attached a Stormwater Plan for a grass Swale and pocket wetland at Trinity Avenue
Presbyterian Church. The plan includes a revised original and one copy of pages 2 and 3 the
Stormwater Management Application Form, a revised narrative of the stormwater
treatment/management plan, and two sets of the revised grading plan and planting plan for the
project.
We have eliminated the sand filter from the Storm Water Plan and have included a grass Swale and
pocket wetland. The revised Stormwater Management Application Form pages, narrative and
grading plan reflect these changes.
The grass swale and pocket wetland treat storm water runoff from on-site and off-site impervious
areas. Grass swales are proposed along the Church's south property line and between the proposed
building and parking lot. The grass swales will convey_stor_rttwater from an offsite parking lot and
from roof leaders to the pocket wetland. e new parking o rains tot the pocket wetland.
Please review the enclosed information at your earliest convenience. If you have any question
concerning the project, feel free to contact me or Steve Bailey with this office. We look forward to
a favorable response.
Very Truly Yours,

James W. Thames, P.E.
Cc: Jim Petrea
PLANNING ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
J
Kenneth R. Coulter, FASLA, RLA
Daniel A. Jewell, ASLA, RLA
James W. Thames IV, PE 111 West Main Street Durham North Carolina 27701 919 682 0368
Fax [phone]
STORMWATER WATER PLAN
FOR
TRININTY AVENUE
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
February 19, 2001
Prepared By:
Coulter Jewell Thames
111 West Main Street
Durham, NC 27701
Ph: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
.• 4
_ 1 99
?I
4??`dlq??t L I P1s,++`
General
Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church in Durham, N.C., proposes to place fill material in
330 feet of stream for the purpose of installing a box culvert and expanding the existing
Church. The project was approved on July 28, 1999, for 401 Quality Certification. The
project has been previously assigned DWQ Project #990726.
The Church proposes to build grass swales and a pocket wetland to treat stormwater
runoff from the new church addition and from the new parking lot. The grass swale is
located in front of the proposed fellowship addition. The pocket wetland is located
between the proposed fellowship addition and Trinity Avenue.
The expansion and renovations by the Church will create 19,452 sf of additional
impervious area on the site. The dry detention basin will treat 12,186 sf of the new
impervious area and 7,320 sf of an existing off site parking lot south of the proposed
construction.
Design
The grass swale and the pocket wetland have been designed based on guidelines included
in the April 1999 revision of the "Storm Water Best Management Practices" by
NCDENR. The trapezoidal grass swale is over 100 feet long. The swale has 4:1 side
slopes, a variable width bottom, and a slope that varies from 2% to 4%. The pocket
wetland has been sized to capture the runoff from a 1" storm and release it over a period
of 66 hours.
The bottom width of the grass swale and its longitudinal slope increases along its length.
The velocity of the two year peak flow was checked to verify that it is less than 2 ft/sec.
The analysis checked a section with a 10' bottom width and a slope of 4%. The 2 year
peak flow was calculated by the rational method. The calculation is as follows: Q = CIA
= 0.75 X 5.76 in/hr X 0.42 acres = 1.81 cfs. The velocity in the channel was calculated to
be 1.94 ft/sec.
The grass swale is required to have a minimum length of 100 feet per acre of drainage
area. The total drainage area to the pocket wetland is 0.80 acre. The grass swale is over
100 feet long,
The pocket wetland is sized to capture the runoff from a 1" rainfall and release it over a
period of 2 - 3 days. The "simple method" was used to determine the amount of runoff
from a 1" rainfall. The drainage area to the basin is 33,616 sf. The drainage area is 58%
impervious. Rv = .05 + .009I = .05 +.009 *. 5 8 = 0.57 in/in. Volume = 1" * 0.57 in/in * 1
ft/12 in * 33,616 sf = 1597 cf. The provided storage in the pocket wetland was calculated
by the average end area method. The provided storage is 1633 cf between elevation
344.0 and the permanent pool elevation of 342.3.
The outlet structure for the pocket wetland is a raised cover catch basin with a weir
elevation of 344.0. A reverse siphon draw-down tube is constructed of 4" flanged ductile
iron pipe. A plate with a'/z" diameter orifice will be installed between two of the flanges
to act as the restriction.
Maintenance
The grass swale will be mowed at least twice annually to a maximum height of six
inches. At least once annually, excess sediment will be removed from the swale to
maintain original contours and grading. At least once annually, erosion will be repaired
and the swale will be regraded to ensure that the runoff flows evenly in a thin sheet. The
vegetation will be inspected at least once annually and will be revegetated to maintain a
dense growth of vegetation.
The pocket wetland must be inspected annually after a rain event to ensure that it is
operating as designed. The outlet structure should be inspected to insure that it is not
clogged, nor that it has been damage to allow too rapid a release of water. The banks and
areas around the inlet and outlet should be inspected for erosion. The amount of
sediment accumulation should be noted and removed as necessary. Debris should be
removed from the basin whenever it accumulates, or at least twice annually.
Swale in front of Church
Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel
Project Description
Project File s:\projects\trinavepres\trinity .fm2
Worksheet SWALE
Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient 0.030
Channel Slope 0.040000 ft/ft
Left Side Slope 4.000000 H : V
Right Side Slope 4.000000 H : V
Bottom Width 10.00 ft
Discharge 1.81 cfs
Results
Depth 0.09 ft
Flow Area 0.93 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 10.74 ft
Top Width 10.72 ft
Critical Depth 0.10 ft
Critical Slope 0.028767 ft/ft
Velocity 1.94 ft/s
Velocity Head 0.06 ft
Specific Energy 0.15 ft
Froude Number 1.16
Flow is supercritical.
02/13/01 FlowMaster v5.15
02:47:25 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 [phone] Page 1 of 1
Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church
orifice size (in) 0.5
CL height (in) 0

time (hr)
elev
stage
storage outflow rate
(cfs) outflow
(cf)
0 343.20 1.70 1633 0.011 82
2 343.13 1.63 1551 0.011 80
4 343.06 1.56 1470 0.011 79
6 342.99 1.49 1392 0.011 77
8 342.92 1.42 1315 0.010 75
10 342.86 1.36 1240 0.010 73
12 342.79 1.29 1166 0.010 72
14 342.73 1.23 1095 0.010 70
16 342.67 1.17 1025 0.009 68
18 342.61 1.11 957 0.009 66
20 342.55 1.05 890 0.009 65
22 342.50 1.00 826 0.009 63
24 342.44 0.94 763 0.008 61
26 342.39 0.89 702 0.008 59
28 342.34 0.84 642 0.008 58
30 342.29 0.79 585 0.008 56
32 342.24 0.74 529 0.008 54
34 342.18 0.68 475 0.007 52
36 342.11 0.61 423 0.007 49
38 342.04 0.54 374 0.006 46
40 341.97 0.47 327 0.006 43
42 341.91 0.41 284 0.006 40
44 341.85 0.35 244 0.005 37
46 341.80 0.30 207 0.005 34
48 341.75 0.25 172 0.004 31
50 341.70 0.20 141 0.004 28
52 341.66 0.16 113 0.004 25
54 341.63 0.13 87 0.003 22
56 341.59 0.09 65 0.003 19
58 341.57 0.07 46 0.002 16
60 341.54 0.04 29 0.002 13
62 341.52 0.02 17 0.001 10
64 341.51 0.01 7 0.001 6
66, 341.50 0.00 1 0.000 2
Pocket Wetland Routing
Pocket Wetland Sizing
Drainage Area to Pocket Wetland = 33,616 sf
Percent Impervious = 58%
For less than 70% Imperviousness, SA/DA = 0.75%
Required Permanent Pool Surface Area = 0.0075 * 33,616 sf = 252 sf
Contour Surface Area (so
341 7
342 485
343 904
344 1389
Permanent Pool Elevation = 342.3
Permanent Pool Surface Area = 611 sf

C - IT, h 1 1 1
32:X1 Wellington Court, Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
May 30, 2000 9 19 954-1514
Fax 919-954 ;428
Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church
c/o Tise Kiester Architects
118 ! Fast iviain Street
C'arrhoro, NC' 27510
Attention: Mr. Phil Kiester
Reference' Report of Subsurface 111WStigation
Proposed Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church Additions
Durham, North Carolina
t: icoTechriologies Project No. 1-00-0468-EA
(jentlemen:
(- feoTechnolOgics, Inc. has completed the authorized suhsurface imestiptii,n for
additions to the exlstlny Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church located in Durliani, Nol-tli
Carolina. Subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by perfornling 9 soil test
honn?'s at the approxitllate locations indicated on the attached site plan. The test borings
werc located in the. Feld by measuring distances and estimating right ankles froth
adjacent roadways and structures. As such, the indicated boring locations should lie
considered as approxitllatc. The test boring depths range from approximately 2 to 10 feet
below existing ground surface and all borings wore sampled at selected intervals using
standard penetration test procedures designated in ASTM D-15$6. This report presents
the findings of the. investigation and our recommendations For site grading and foundation
support hased on these findings.
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of
'Crinity Avenue and (sregsott Street in Durham, North Carolina. The project will involve
an addition to the east side of the existing Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church. The
addition will extend out across an existing creek, which will be piped under the proposed
building through a box culvert, and on into a vacant lot located fl,rthor towards the cast.
No detailed inforniation concerning structural loads was av4tilahle at this time; however,
we anticipate that MaXIrnUm c01311111 loads will not exceed 100 kips. We understand that
finished floor elevation for the structure will be sot at approximately elevation 350 which
will require the majority of the pad to bo filled with the exception of ilic far eastern
comer where son)e cut will be required.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
A generalized suhsurtace profile prepared ti-onl the test boring data is attached to
this report as Figure 2 to -graphically illustrate subsurface conditions encountered at this
Ge-otechnicat and Constnit-ti n Morarlak THsriop Se?vk, es
site. Nlore detailed descriptions of the conditions encountered in the individual test
boring ry locations are then presented on the attached test boring; records.
The subsurface profile encountered at this site is somewhat variable in the upper
few Feet. Some Of' the borings encountered near surface topsoil while other borings
encountered till materials. The deepest till sections were encountered in those borings
located along the east side of the existing building and appear likely to be associated with
hacktill trom the existing basement level. Underlying the topsoil and near surface fill
and alluvium, the borings encountered residual soils typically comprised of sandy and
silty clays and silty sands. With increasing depth the soils typically transitioned to
partially weathered rock (pwr). Penetration resistances within the near surface fill and
alluvium were relatively low generally in the range of 4 to 8 blows per foot (bpt).
Penetration resistance within the underlying residual silts, clays and sands were generally
higher ranging From 10 to 34 bpf. Penetration resistances within the pairtially weathered
rock were in excess of 100 bpf. The depth to partially weathered rocs: varied from as
shallow as 1.5 feet at boring 134 to as deep as 10 feet in boning B-2. t lovvever, the pwr
was generally in the range of 3 to 5 feet in depth. Auger ref isal was encountered on
Much more. competent rock at relatively shallow depths. Auger refusal depths ranged
from as shallow as 2 feet in boring B-8 to as much as 10 Feet in horings B-2 and B•9.
However, the majority of the borings encountered auger refusal at depths of
approximately 3 to 5 feet below existing ground surface.
Croundwater was not encountered in the majority of the borings at the time of
boring completion. An exception was at borings B-Z and B-9, which w?erc; the only
horings that penetrated below depths of approximately 5 to 6 feet. Groundwater in those
borings ranged from approximately 8.5 to 9 feet below existing ground surface.
However, due to the tine grained near surface soils, the site is conducive to the
development of a temporarily higher perched groundwater condition following periods of
inclement weather. Additionally, regional groundwater levels will tluetuatc with
seasonal and climatic changes and may he diftcrent at other tinges.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations are based on a review of the attached test boring
records, our understanding of the proposed construction, and past expcricrice with similar
projects and subsurface conditions. If structural loads will be significantly heavier than
those anticipated, we would appreciate all opportunity to review and comment upon the
recommendations of this report so that they may be confiniVd. extended, or modified as
necessary. Additionally, if subsurface conditions adverse to those indicated by this report
arc encountered during construction, those conditions should be reported to its for review
and comment.
Site Gradfij (:onsiderations. The soils It existing; grade arc n-toisture sensitive;
and will be difficult to compact during the typically wetter wither months of December
through April or May. To avoid delays during site grading operations, we recommend
that earth work activities be scheduled aftcr May and prior to December it'possibte, in
order to facilitate site grading work.
Nlay. 2000
Y» gc• 2
Sitc grading should begin with the removal of all vegetation and topsoil from
those areas designated for construction of tf}e proposed building additions. Following
swipping of the topsoil we recomrttcnd that the areas to receive till or areas which will be
constructed at grade be proofrolied with a partially loaded dumptruck to identify areas
necessitating additional repair. We anticipate that some near surface repairs will likely be
rctluired in the lower lying portions of the site close to the creek where alluvial soils were
encountered. These soils can be repaired in the upper several fact to provide suitable
support for it slab. However, there are some alluvial soils which will require deeper
undercutting beneath fOLItidations to provide suitable support. The need for additional
repair beneath toundations is discussed in a subsequent report section. We recommend
that the near surface soils requiring repair prior to fill placement or for slab support, be
evaluated in the field by an engineer at the time of grading operations. 'T'ile need for
repairs beneath slab areas can be limited by grading the site during periods of dry
weather.
It appears that earth work on the site will not be balanced from on-site cuts. As
such, the majority of the fill materials required to achieve finished floor elevatiotl will
need to be imported from off-site. We recommend that all fill materials consist of siity
and clayey sands or low plasticity elatys and silts with unified soil classifications of SM,
SC, CL and 1AL. All fill material placed oil the: site should be compacted to a minimurti
of 955% of the standard proctor maximum city density except ill the final foot beneath
pavements and floor slabs where this requirement should be increased to 98`/> of the
standard proctor maximum dry density. We recomnlcrid that field density tests be
perfortttcci during the compaction operations to verify that the required degree of
compaction is being achieved.
Qn the fat- eastern portion of the site, it appears that some cutting will Occur. In
this area partially weathered rock was encountered at depths as shallow as 1.5 feet below
existing ground surface with auger ref isaal qn harder rock being encountered at a depth of
2 feet below grade. As such, we anticipate that difficult excavation will be encountered.
It is possible that some of the materials can be ripped with a large dozer such as a UX
pulling a single tooth ripper. However, because of the hardness of the materials it is
likely that some light blasting will be required if excavations must extend below tile;
auger refusal level indicated on the boring logs. We recommend that a unit price he
established in the contract for rock removal if required.
Foundation Support Considerations. The proposed stnlcaturc may he supported on
shallow spread footings and/or continuous wall footitlg foutxlatiotis designed for a
itttiximum allowing bearing pressure of 3,000 psf, bearing oh approved subgradcs. It
should be noted that some soft till materials and alluvium were encountered in the
vicinities of borings B-2 and B4, drilled immediately adjacent to the existillg church. As
such, we anticipate that footings will need to be undercut through those SORCr rnaltcrials
to firm bearing residual soils or partially weathered rock, if encountered first. The
foundations can be excavated neat line to the firttter soils and theta be backfilled to design
bearing elevation with uniformly graded washed No. 57 or No. 67 stone. An engineer
will need to be on site during the undercut operations to approve subgrades immediately
prior to stone placetttcnt. The stone should be placed in maximurn lifts of 2 to 3 feet and
be tamped with a backhoe bucket to achieve some degree of consolidation. Additionally,
May, 2000 ?
Nge 3
?110 t
4 (.
once tits stone has been brought to final grade we recommend that the stonclbe tamped
utilizing a vibratory sled or similar type of compaction device to thoroughly consolidate
the stone prior to concrete placement. We anticipate that undercut to as much 0 to 8 feet
could Occur in some areas adjacent to the existing stnucture.
On the eastern portion of the property we anticipate that the foundations will
encounter partially weathered rock above the bearing elevation. As such, difficulties may
be encountered excavating footings in this area. Auger refusal was encountered at a
depth oft feet in boring B-8 indicating presence of very hard rock. We recommend that
consideration be given to excavating footings with a large track mounted backhoc
equipped with a narrow bucket with rock teeth to allow soiree penetration into this
material, However, even with this type of equipment, there may be some areas where
refusal with the backhoe is encountered and some other techniques such as it veneer rock
saw may need to be considered.
We recommend that all column and wall footings have minirnutn dimcnsions of
24 and 16 inches, respectively, and all footings should bear at least 18 inches below
finished grade for frost protection. We recommend all footing excavations he inspected
by a geotechnical engineer to verify that subgrade soils have adequate. strength to support
the anticipated loads. 011Ce foundations have been repaired as previously discussed, we
anticipate that total settlements will not exceed i inch with differential settlements of
approximately !% that magnitude.
Box Cuivert Construction. It is our understanding that a 6 x 6 box culvert will he
extended beneath the proposed additions to handle water from the existing creek. Since
the box will extend under the building, we recommend that certain precautions be taken
to prevent an adverse impact to the proposed structure. We recommend that the box be
adequately reinforced to handle structural loads associated with any foundations which
may hear directly over the pipe. Additionally, we recommend that all joints on the box
culvert be properly wrapped with nonwoven geotextile fabric to prevent any migration of
fines into the box should any joint movement of the pipe ever occur. Since additional
load from the building will he supported over the pipe, it is important that the pipe he
properly bedded on firm materials. C-;eoTechnologies recommends that the channel in
which the pipe will he placed be excavated (town to firm material to prevent future
settlement of the box culvert. A mud mat could then be placed on the undercut subgrade
to achieve design invert elevation for the culvert if desired. Unifornily graded wash stone
can be placed beneath the. culvert-, however, that would likely result in excessive
underflow of the box culvert unless the stone is limited to the middle portion of the
culvert and a mud mat is placed under at least 10 linear feel at both ends. We
recommend that all till materials placed along the sides of the box culvert be carefully
compacted at least 95% of the standard proctor maximum dry density to- prevent
settlement of soils adjacent to the box culvert site. Additionally, all fill materials placed
above the pipe should he compacted to at least 95% of the standard proctor maximum dry
density. The box should be adequately sized to support compaction equipment which
will be necessary to achieve the required levels of compaction.
May, 2000
Page 4
SUMMARY
In summary, subsurface conditions at the site appear suitable for the proposed
construction. Because of the shallow partially weathered rock which was encountered on
the eastern portion of the site, some difficult excavation play be encountered during
grading operations. We recommend that provisions be included within the. contract to
establish a unit rate fbr rock removal if required. Additionally, sonle undercutting
beneath foundations will be required on the western portion of the proposed additions
where some soft fill and alluvial soils exist which are associated with the adjacent
building foundation and/or nearby creek. Once footings are properly repaired, they can
he designed to support a hearing pressure of 3000 lbs. per square foot. Some repair may
also be required beneath the proposed box culvert to provide a stiff subgrade for
placement of the box so that the box will not settle when subjected to the loads of the
building which will be constructed over the top of the pipe.
(jeoTeehnologies appreciates the opportunity to have provided our serviCQ oil this
stage of the, projeet. Please contact us should you have any questions concerning this
report or if we may be of additional service on this or other projects.
Sincerely.
(jcoTechnologics, tile, P.A.
z
'
David L. Israel, P.E. ;?
?? et?6•
en
rr

?istration No. 14311)
NC. Re ` { A
?/?il?^
`'i?vi'1'
,+

f
69
t

w = • o
• -431

P_E.
Hearn
Edward B ,
t
,
,
NC Registration No. 9520
y4 m ?/? S J`? _ ??•?
DLI/hjs
4
May, 2000
pa r 5 \\

i w
? J
-

j
O
LLi

V 1
N i
C) 1 _ .. -n -n o ? t
Z F z °
°
7 7 z i A z z i
ac r
O
m

I r t;
p
AL 1 1 j

(V { .? 11
I
'' .m aD ? .

LIJ

'
11141

w. L
nll, ..•1
,, 13MIS NOS03aJ 0
Q
w
W
O
C7
O
T 0
z
o w
z w
m C7
O LL
L
U
U
C
d
y. C
? a
CL U
a? t
t
= O
Z
Q ?
t~ o
I ?
V
, N
O
w
O
z
w
J
Q
U
z
w
W
J
W
J
u.
cr-
m
LLJ
U
LL
D
W
co

z
W
C7
Q?
Q1
G
N
O
m
c
N

t
C
0

y
Z,
U ?
o
a
ro
m c

m o

F

`
V

a m
-

a .o ?

U

c

a
'a
e
a
q iA J ?
.°?
?°- ii a
a vii
? o
t9 Q
ll
??
i?
d O
r- .K)
t17 fV
JJ ? o `v
m
0
?i
co \
.:.+
C6
M
0 c
r a
(D - <
ao
LO
90
h
3
M
m
_v
N d u4i
N
p r !'J m d ?f'! <D N 40 Q1 O ?'
r ?
c
3
0
U7
N
Q
J
U

Q
W
(D
0
O CV
O O
r z
Q LLl
z
CD 0
O ti.
s
L
.C
U
G
eC
U) y
i R
CL v
d ?
y z
N
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION' BLOWS PER
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FTj SIX INCHES
0.0
tl 4
1.0
U lU ZU 4U
Brown Silty Fine to Medium SAND SM I III
Medium L)cnsc Brown Clayey Fine to Medium ML
Sandy SILT
7-4-13
1.2

Auger Refusal at 3.2'
r
O
C7
r
V
ti
a
v
z
v
Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
JOB NUMBER 1-00-0468-EA
BORING NUMBER 8-1
DATE 5-18-00
PAGE 1 OF I
VU11-GJ-VV VJ.•YGr I I.?C-I? IC71-C1 Mf 1-11. 7177V/ViJJ I .VJ
TEST BOI2(NG RECORD
Iwrril DESCRIFT(ON ELEVATION PENETILATION BLOWS PER
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/6•'('.) SIX INCHES
0.0 0 10 20 40 60 lUU
Fill • Firm Kcddish 13ruwtt Fine Sandy Nlicaccous MI. j
SILT i ?
jl
l
3.55 _ i
Alluaium - Very Loosc Dark Brown Silty Fine SM

SAND with Topsoil r
61

SO
Alluvium • Soft Park, Brown Clapey SILT Mt.
MT
t,.0
Vcry Soil Hro,-m Silty CLAY CL

i

Very Loosc Gray k T3rown Silty Finc to hfcdium SM
SAND
i 0.0 -

l(J,; ?fl]ll1lV Weathcred ROCK ...
._. 1
tJ
Boring Tc minatcd at 10.3'
1
?I
I?
l-i.2
!II
I ?
1
a i
tii
Groundwater encountered at 8.5' at time of boring;,

11OB NUMBER 1-00-0468-EA ?
BORING N13MBER B- 2
DATE 5-18-00 [*F,'ZccoTe(?Lo1oqie5.
PAGF. I OF I
i
II .
i
I ,
d
i
a
<
I 21
?____'0
• Juln-z`.J--UU U?S:4zv 1 lse--KlestCer' ArIc". yl?yb/U15'>
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
(FT.)
0.0
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION PENETRATION
(FT.) (BLOWS/FT.)
Loose Black Silty Fine to Mcdium SAND SM
L?
2.0 Medium Dense LigJtt Orangish Brown Silty zinc to ;SMT
.l
Mcdiuni SAND
2.5 Gray Silty Fin-t: to Mcdium SAND SM. • '
Auger Rcfusat at 2.5'
BLOWS PER
SIX INCHES
N.1U
5
r
a
r
z
Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
JOB NUMBER 1-00-0468-EA
BORING NUMBER B-3
DATE 5-I8-00 Cw-eoTechnologjes,
PAGE I OF I
Q
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.)
0.0
Fill - Loose Light Orangish Tan Silty Fine to SI\
Medium SAND
1.0
Alluvium - Louse Dark 13rown Silty Fine to Sh
Medium SAND
3.0 Soft Gray Fine Sandy CLAY M
Auger RerwKal at 3.9'
5-5-3

n
a
z_
P
f
Groundwater not encountered at time of"boring.
JOB NUMBER 1-00-0468-EA
BORING NUMBER B- 4
DATE 5-18-00
PACE 1 OF 1
BLOWS PER
SIX INCITES
ytrr?'1 G'?i
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION
(FT.) (F.r.) (BLOWS/FT.)
0.0 170
Topsoil
0.7
Fill - Firm Brown Finc Sandy Silly C:(,AY L(.
35
- -- -- -
3 g Pa_rtialiy Wealh ted Rock
Auger Refwml at 3.h'
GLOWS PER
SIX INCHES

c?
0
c?
s
u
z_
i?
Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
.JOB NUMBER
BORING NUMBER
DATE
PAGE J OF 1
1-00-0468-EA
13-5
5-
18-QO ??????" • - ? 1 ? '
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION H'LF:VATION VENETRATION BLOWS PER
(VI") (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
0.0 , . _._._. __. 0 10 20 40 60 100
I). j Ibpsuil _ l 1 ? ,
Pill - t.«psc rhirk fp lrown & t friiy Silty Fine to SN! I {
l U Mcdumt SAND With Rock Fragrntcnis i
Stiff 6ro1tn K Cray Silty Finc to Mcdium Sandy Cf. l
CLAY ? I
j 13-5.5
I
2 5
Medium Dense Brown Silty Fine to Medium SMf
SAME)
I ? 1
5.7 I i
Partially Wratherod Rock 1 13.13.50.:3
5.5 I A o rr Rofi,.il of S 5' I I 17
Crroundwatcr riot encountered at time of boring.

i I
i
i

i

I
?
, ?

i
?
i
I

I '
?
i I
I
i

JOB NUMBER 1.00-0468-FA
BORING NUMBER B-6
DATE 5-18-00 p . s, n
PAC E 1 OF 1
r
O
c?
a'
8
d
i,
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/1; f.)
0.0
0.3 70pso0 Fill - (Jerk Gray & Black Silty Fine to Mcdium SM
1.0 SAND with Rock Fragments
Stitt Urattgc & tirnwn Fine to Medium Sand Silt CL %'/!
C:I.A Y f '.
it
f?•
r
3.8 ___
.?u'cr RCfIiSUI i1t 3.8'
Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
1-4-4
JOB NUMBER 1.00-0468-EA
BORING NUMBER B- 7
DATE 5-18-00 c-caTe(hnologies,
PAC E 1 Of. i
BLOWS PER
$ X INCHES
r
f?
rp-
C7
r
v
i?
s
r
Jun-29-00 03:44P Tisca-Kiester Arch. 91996/U151
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION
(FT.) \ (FT-)
0.0 (3. 1
0.3 Topsoil ...:..._...... -- -
Stiff Brown Fine to Medium Sandy Silty CLAY CL,'/.
2.0 Partially Weadtered Rock
Auger Refusal at 2'
BLOWS PER
SIX INCHES
6-9.50/1"
r'. la
5
0
s
a
z
Groundwater not encountercd at time of boring.
JOB NUMBER
BONING NUMBER
DATE
PAGE I OF I
1-00-0468-EA
9-8 5- t 8-00 cile(hno t+ g -
PENETRATION
(BLOWSIFT.)
TEST BORING RF,CORD
DEPTH I)ESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
0.0
o.3
1.0
5.0
9.0
0 1 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 0
To soil
Yellowish Drown Claycy Silty Finc to Mcdium SM
SAND
I lard Brown Fine to Mcdium Sandy Cluyny SILT ML

t

; 1-11-23
I Partially Wcathcred Ruck
I II
? i
1 26-27 SOTS"
i

in
T
inated ai
B _ 9'
50/2"
ur
g
enn
j
I
I
i
Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
JOB NUMBER 1-00-0468-EA
BORING NUMBER B- 9
?ATE 5-18-00
PAGE 1 OF 1

ii
S
0
a
JU-n-29-00 03:44P Tise-Kiester
Arch-TEST BORING RECORD 1

919670159
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
oo 0 10 20 40 60 100
1).3
0.9
1.5
3.5
4.0
P.17
Tu soil _
Fill - Black Silty Fine m Medium SAND With
Chick SM ".
Stiff Dark Brown Finc Sandy Silty CLAY CL
!vt??iium Dense Brown Silty Fine to Medium
SAND with Rock Laycrs SM

I

? 4-5-9
Piutinlly Weathered Kock
Auger Refusal 3t 4' j 50/3

Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
JOB NUMBER
BORING NUMBER
DATE
PACE 1 OF l
1-00-0468-EA
B-t0
5-18-00
Q
Z

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley., Governor
Bill Ross, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. James W. Thames, P.E.
Coulter, Jewell, Thames
111 West Main Street
Durham, NC 27701
Dear Mr. Thames:
i ?
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
January 22, 2001
Subject: Trinity Ave. Presbyterian Church
DWQ Project No. 990726
Durham County
The Wetlands Unit staff reviewed the stormwater management plans for the subject project and determined
that additional information is necessary to complete the technical review process. The required additional
information is as follows:
Requirement for a Wet Detention Basin
The 401 Water Quality Certification issued July 28, 1999 specified that a wet detention basin be used to
treat the stormwater from the subject site. The plans propose a sand filter. In our meeting with the
applicant/applicants representatives on June 14, 1999 options discussed for stormwater management
included bioretention, a wet detention basin, or an extended detention wetland. As such, any of these will
be acceptable. However the sand filter is not acceptable.
Drainage Area
The drainage area to be treated must include all of the new impervious area or an equivalent amount of
existing and new impervious area.
Division Wetlands Unit staff will strive to complete a final technical review within 10 working days of
receipt of the requested information. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this project, please
contact me at [phone]. Also, please note that the NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual, April 1999, and other documents and information can be downloaded from the Wetlands Unit web
site at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/.
Sincer ly, t9 ? `??pp N1' '1
yJ r?
Todd St. John, I E
Environmental Engineer
cc: John Dorney, Wetlands/401 Unit
Raleigh Regional Office
File
4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Project No. DWQ (to be provided by DWQ)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWQ Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Proiect Name :
Contact Person: Phone Number:
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to:.
Basin Bottom Elevation
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
Permanent Pool Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Permanent Pool Volume
Temporary Pool Volume
Forebay Volume
SA/DA used
Diameter of Orifice
ft. (average elevation of the floor of the basin)
ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
cu. ft.
(surface area to drainage area ratio)
in. (draw down orifice diameter)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of
why.
Applicants Initials
The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch storm event.
The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
Access is provided for maintenance.
A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet.
A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M plan.
A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
FORM SWG100 09/97 Page 1 of 1
'- - - - 7-o- -7 <?'
Coulter Jewell Thames, PA
December 20, 2000
PLANNING ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE Al
Mr. Ken Schuster
NCDENR/Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Mr. Schuster:
Re: Expansion and Renovations to Trinity Avenue Presbyterian Church
Durham, NC
DWQ Project 4990726
Please find attached a Storm Water Plan for a sand filter at Trinity Avenue Presbyterian
Church. The plan includes an original and one copy of the Stormwater Management
Application Form, the permit application processing fee of $420, a narrative of the
stormwater treatment/management, the sand filter maintenance agreement, and two sets of
plans for the project.
The Storm Water Plan was required as a condition of the 401 Qualtiy Certification. A
copy of the 401 Quality Certification approval letter and application are also attached.
The 401 Certification was requested to allow the Church to place 330 feet of unnamed,
intermittent tributary of Ellerbe Creek in a culvert to allow expansion of the existing
church facilities. The sand filter will treat stormwater runoff from the new Church
addition and new parking lot.
Please review the enclosed information at your earliest convinence. If you have any
question concerning the project, feel free to contact me or Steve Bailey with this office.
We look forward to a favorable response.
o.qs
..t4lIIItrip
ms
Very Truly Yours,
mes W. Thames, P.E.
Kenneth R. Coulter, FASLA, RLA
Daniel A. Jewell, ASLA, RLA
James W. Thames IV, PE
?o-
•
S EAL
M ? 11995
L NO
4148
48I 4611%
11 West Main Street Durham North Carolina '27701 919 682 0368
Fax [phone]
11VC;I:9 ??e
I
?N 3nN3AV ` A83NI
L91K 'AN[
1&.KlrO X09 'f X,9 'X3

x
x--zy-x-x-z-z-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-z-x-x-x-z-x--xr"'x'??
.?..

J I
111 ?
w'
N'
M
Ntl0
6?v
M1 W+
3381 „4'

12i3l+VO X08 ,9 X,9 'X3
m

1 ?
ll?d

1S

?Nialne :E
e
1S -^
a
3NIl 83MS°7:WIINVS .0 9NUSIX3
3 n Nand Ail-N,181
GRASS SWALE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Remove excess sediment to maintain original contours and grading at least once
annually.
2. Repair any erosion and regrade the swale to ensure that the runoff flows evenly in a thin
sheet through the swale at least once annually.
3. At least once annually, inspect vegetation and revegetate. the swale to maintain a dense
growth of vegetation.
4. Mow grass swales at least twice annually to a maximum height of six inches.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the
above-maintained procedures. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or
changes in the name of the project, responsible party, or address.
Print Name:
Address: us-O.? Sd,Y-ti ,&
Phone
Title:
Signal
Date:
I, side , a Notary Public for the State of N&ff? ? ?? ? ti'
County of b yr N -a, , do hereby certify that Z,? p s Mr P z
Personally appeared before me this day of Feb r v ab y a oo I , and acknowledge
the due execution of the forgoing sand filter maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
la. SEAL
?Q°?
My commission expires D et em b e r 0_&i
POCKET WETLAND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Remove debris that collects in the pocket wetland whenever it accumulates, or at least
twice annually.
2. Inspect the pocket wetland annually after a rain event to ensure that it is operating as
designed. At a minimum the following items are to be inspected and corrected:
¦ clogging of the outlet or too rapid a release,
¦ erosion on the banks,
¦ erosion at the inlet and outlet, and
¦ sediment accumulation and the need for removal.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the
above-maintained procedures. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or
changes in the name of the project, responsible parry, or address.
Print Name:
Address: 115-o s S. /®QVr//
geh4eJ.4, lilt`.
Phone
Title:
Signal
Date:

a Notary Public for the State of 7704V C-4A•- ,
County of i, Aiao, -,do hereby certify that Tarr*s ?. ??fr e 2
Personally appeared before me this R' A day of f eh;,yzr. oo/ , and acknowledge
the due execution of the forgoing sand filter maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
CyC n. Qg -yJ,i4,4/ SEAL
My commission expires e cemh er .?G 20,0-7-
2. If this application Is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit'number _ and its issue date (if known)
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop General Permit V Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
_CAMA Major Sedimentation/Erosion Control 404/401 Permit _NPDES Stormwater
Information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at
1-877-623-6748.
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) describingd stormwater management for the project.
A CJrASS SAIAle- cac flaeki Avei1A4,L y,Ml be RS4A-
?Gti'1 0? ?rOM /! G` '1 L b? / flli_,?"
_c? clrcv'?I ,ms s
AOI?bn T OIL U S?7`G ?7YTK??I? (OTs
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Ae use River basin.
3. Total Project Area: a?a 1y acres
4. Project Built Upon Area: a` , v"Z fo;K %
5. How many drainage areas does the project have?,
6. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.

asin Ir o
= Drainut*? _?rea I i
Y
a ij I L
Receiving Stream Name
Receiving Stream Class
Drainage Area 33 ?/6 s F 0, 77ac-)
Existing Impervious* Area -7 190 ? On /71
Proposed Impervious*Area / G s 40m
% Impervious* Area (total) SS o?
REM M fVnY ???JICSf ?7?>!?. <Y:?i.Yk3.#1??
wIAV3{?.eYf #kF#S #
.. F ?ry{;?C?C? 1"1rC.a 1 ?k,
£?lY;t.. 2 #YtF ?3 t ;
1119.
On-site Buildings
On-site Streets
On-site Parking iy/7 s-f
On-site Sidewalks 90q
Other on-site 0
Off-site --/, 3.7 O s F
Total: 9 ?C s p 4T a4 Total:
Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
Form SW-101 Version 3.99 Page 2 of 4
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above derived?-
IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
The following italicized deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all
subdivisions, outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a tablg a
listing each lot number, size and the allowable built-upon area for each lot must be provided as an attachment. -?,
The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with state stormwater management permit number
as issued by the Division of Water Quality. These covenants may not be
changed or deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No more than square feet of any lot shall be covered by structures or impervious materials.
hnpervious materials include asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but do not include wood
decking or the water surface of swimming pools.
3. Swales shall not be filled in, piped, or altered except as necessary to provide driveway crossings.
4. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount requires a state stormwater management permit modification prior to
construction.
5. All permitted runoff from outparcels or future development shall be directed into. the permitted stormwater control
system. These connections to the stormwater control system shall be performed in a manner that maintains the integrity
and performance of the system as permitted.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the applicable items required above, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each
BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the status
and availability of these forms.
Form SWU-102
Form SWU-103
Form SWU-104
Form SWU-105
Form SWU-106
Form SWU-107
Form SWU-108
Form SWU-109
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off-Site System Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Neuse River Basin Supplement
Innovative Best Management Practice Supplement
Form SW-101 Version 3.99 Page 3 of 4
2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit number ' and its issue.date (if known)
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop General Permit ? Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
_CAMA Major Sedimentation/Erosion Control V 404/401 Permit _NPDES Stormwater
Information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at
1-877-623-6748.
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) describing <stormwater management for the project. Al
A yraSS [j S!?F.le- ctA^ T-ac?t waf?a.7? 1//, be, AfSele A
O? /TOm `?J?G i?G/rrJ G?LU'?11 !EL S ?'?/'t -?{?/G i1 C!?/ F2G?-Ir? ?OT ?o G11dL.
D Pvr 'v.. e? at Of y4 '?7 5??rhJ. lv?•
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the /fe aS` River basin.
3. Total Project Area: ;?e 1y acres
5. How many drainage areas does the project have?
4. Project Built Upon Area: a? ' ;?
6. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.
>f s«,'? Y>iiYif>:.<i5tzsf<,L".2x}sxakfff'sffs s s
$as?nlrxYionS>:>. ;}; „;.3:. 'a
<»,»n»,.,.»..,»»»,<,??<»«<K<«<»«<««<««<«<Y.HKnu<lff f<'f°
«a«<:<:u««<u«un«urov?«<u«<w.c«<•u«<u«u<u<.?«««u:,«..,. < , ,: r f x. s 2
35 Zirainat
Ei?rE}... .- b;<,_ fF<£^F
?.. , < < <n<.u<, c : ...x ,x<..< <. < .w .. .x<. , :fsFUSSx;#ss#s#: :iY•:s> a s< s, s<.
?(y
3£££2; ?e:2?r? 2??<.?<ff i«• } 3
:,, < .,« ., . -,::u:.,:...w,uk,< u
Receiving Stream Name
Receiving Stream Class
Drainage Area 3? 6lX s F Oa 77,,?,-)
Existing Impervious" Area 7 Sao -F 1,9,17A,-)
Proposed Impervious*Area / G Sf L'Oa ;
% Impervious* Area (total) S8 ??
4Y<#- 'f?f :t ?? i k' S: Ta<'
j ' ?l?.. , . ?3,}:3sa

htt «<N.
On-site Buildings } `kt• .U , EY:2"m 2}`5}'{ >2f? }2 S
i<s y?

i?.a 1 Sr ik??
k°,.k ",}322 ?2 2:.?-?. 2.2E
MN
863 ice' SEfE2££' f £ Y t f •.s 5
£I 1} I`"S?f `? £5' ? 4s }s <

,?} ??: ? y2$???2,? F? ?:: <} ?` •.3 ?5
2Ew£b:3 5 Eti}>}2k} .f ..<S.k 25YS£:5
YE
On-site Streets O
On-site Parking 6y?7 ST
On-site Sidewalks 909 c7t
Other on-site p .
Off-site 7 3a 0 s f
Total: g Total:
Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99
Page 2 of 4

`t ?
' .. ''. 3 .?`
7. How was the off--site impervious area listed above derived? ??Sp?l?'yr o oTj?
54 fxYll?i'l5 /D I 5o4.A y OE ieC?, '

IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
The following italicized deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all
subdivisions, outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a table
listing each lot number, size and the allowable built-upon area for each lot must be provided as an attachment.
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with state stormwa ter management permit number
as issued by the Division of Water Quality. These covenants may not be
changed or deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No more than square feet of any lot shall be covered by structures or impervious materials.
Impervious materials include asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but do not include wood
decking or the water surface of swimming pools.
3. Swales shall not be filled in, piped, or altered except as necessary to provide driveway crossings.
4. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount requires a state stormwater management permit modification prior to
construction.
5. All permitted runoff from outparcels or future development shall be directed into. the permitted storm water control
system. These connections to the stormwater control system shall be performed in a manner that maintains the integrity
and performance of the system as permitted.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the applicable items required above, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each
BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the status
and availability of these forms.
Form SWU-102
Form SWU-103
Form SWU-104
Form SWU-105
Form SWU-106
Form SWU-107
Form SWU-108
Form SWU-109
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off-Site System Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Neuse River Basin Supplement
Innovative Best Management Practice Supplement
Forms SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 3 of 4