NC0025453_meeting notes_20010425

MEETING AGENDA
Town of Clayton
April 25, 2001
I. Moratorium
II. Town of Clayton's Short Term Plan
III. Town of Clayton's Long Term Plan
IV.- Neuse River Basin NSW Requirements f:=

/Z5 01 G Tod
�L f�/?y ! � {�77�'17 Oy !,!r�[j(�f�j0/� �pyt/Gf��ll✓IN�CCS.
• +� � �?�.�1,��'! G�/as�.7 G�1 f��r5 Gc �l'I�Y7�--f7f''�i
//14
14
/
' /

��onl5
Cpy!{rrr
/iamww/olla
Gr/ Gdu.�r Ln c-, oT�
-ri.-
. C� 1 �sta� lacy
avG v rco/r2l�t f l?"rtela 7�d 7 _ice_ . f vt/��✓ �2 y'

O
Nc�r�s

AJOV LM
IL
ATC:
',,El 7
�o �510
yqoyt 0 Ir r
TK6
,44 C7
jut y-
Lrolel

�� PC-Rtilt'a°$ aMIT D D. 7S��vl 7r-ML.
4M[13; AAP j't.a� c ot�e6C- vo IS

clayton ATC
"ATC
To: Dave Goodrich <Dave.Goodrich@ ncmail.net>
ok, after having looked at what he submitted i think i have an idea of
what they're doing now (or what they want - which is similar to the
e-mail i sent to the RRO last week) .
i think he's really trying to circumvent (or jump start) the ATC process
by submitting this prior to them having a permit for the expansion from
1.9 mgd to 2 .5 mgd. i did approve, via the spec letter, many of the
things they requested in this ATC. the only thing i have not approved
is their replacement of the existing aerators in the 2 oxid. ditches and
the additional clarifier (both of which, in my mind - esp. the
clarifier, are needed to take them up to 2 .5 mgd) . Michael will argue
that they should at least be able to switch out the aerators and this
will help with current operation - but really, he's submitted some
calculations indicating that this modification will allow them to meet
limits at 2.5 mgd - which i have some trouble believing because their
detention time at 2.5 mgd will be reduced from 24 hrs to 18 hrs - makes
it a lot harder to meet the low ammonia limits of 2/1.
i really need to speak with him about this and possibly return this
ATC. but. . .i don't want to do that until we are all on the same page
about designing for the 3 .5 mg/l. with their current proposal for 2.5
mgd, doubt there is any way they can achieve 3 .5 mg/l TN. based on my
last voice mail to Michael, likely clayton is doing sommersaults because
it essentially scraps their entire proposal for the re-rating - which
will be a big problem for Clayton (which i already have some heartburn
over their proposal, regardless of the TN requirement) .
they still need a FONSI for the 2.5 mgd (and i haven't seen their
revised EA yet) .
we need to speak about this soon before Clayton calls Tommy or Bill Ross
(which I'm surprised they haven't, given that they are approaching
capacity on the 1.9 mgd) .
r
1 of 1 3/5/01 10:38 AM