Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0024406_Fact Sheet_20191212DEQ/DWR FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT Minor Modification NPDES No. NCO024406 Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC- Belews Creek Steam Station Applicant Address: 13339 Hagers Ferry Road; Huntersville, North Carolina 2807 Facility Address: 3195 Pine Hall Road; Belews Creek, NC 27009 Permitted Flow N/A Type of Waste: Industrial (- 100%); Domestic (< 1%) Prim.SIC Code: 4911 Facility/Permit Status: Class I /Active; Renewal County: I Stokes County Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: Belews Lake (001, 005, 007), UT to Dan River (003, 003A) , Dan River 006 Regional Office: Winston-Salem (WSRO) Stream Classification: C (Belews Lake), WS-IV (Dan River and UT to Dan River) State Grid / USGS Quad: 1318SE/Belews Lake 303(d) Listed? No Permit Writer: Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. Subbasin: 03-02-01 Date: 10/29/2018 Drainage Area (mi2): 501 (Dan River) 001: Lat. 36° 16' 49.5" N 003: Lat. 36° 18' 22.0" N 006: Lat. 36° 18' 34.8" N Long. 80' 03' 39.8" W Long. 80' 04' 50.7" W Long. 80° 04' 36.1" W Summer 7Q 10 (cfs) 80 (Dan River) Winter 7Q 10 (cfs): 160 (Dan River) 30Q2 (cfs) 195 (Dan River) Average Flow (cfs): 576 (Dan River) IWC (%): 26.5 BACKGROUND Duke Energy's Belews Creek Steam Station is a coal fired steam electric plant in Stokes County. The facility is subject to the federal effluent guidelines 40 CFR Part 423. In addition to NPDES Permit NC0024406, the facility also holds the following permits: 01983R12 (air permit), NCD000856591 (Hazardous wastes), and 85-03 (industrial landfill). Duke Energy requested a Modification to the permit that allows the ash basin decanting flow to be released through Internal Outfall 006A/External Outfall 006. The request has been granted. A new RPA has been conducted based on the projected maximum decanting flow of 5.5 MGD. Based on the results of the RPA, Daily maximum and Monthly average limits for lead have been reduced (Outfall 006A). The Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet and Page 1 of 5 Condition A. (4.) have also been amended to allow decanting flow to be released through Internal Outfall 006A. All remaining terms and conditions of the permit remain unchanged. The facility operates the following outfalls: • Outfall 001: once through cooling water consisting of intake screen backwash, recirculating cooling water, station equipment cooling water and once -through cooling water, this Outfall discharges to Belews Lake. • Outfall 003: ash basin discharge consisting of waste streams from the power house and yard holding sumps, ash sluice lines, chemical holding pond, coal yard sumps, stormwater, coal pile collection basins (collecting contact stormwater from coal piles), remediated groundwater, emergency release of anhydrous ammonia, seepage from coal ash basin, emergency overflow from the retention basin, emergency overflows from the existing effluent channels, and treated FGD wastewater from internal outfall 002. The wastewater from this outfall discharges to Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Dan River. Internal outfall 002: FGD wastewater (discharging to ash pond) • Outfall 003A/006. Upon completion of construction, discharge from the new lined retention basin. Basin will accept wastes from holding basin, ash contact water, various sumps, coal pile runoff, stormwater runoff, cooling tower blowdown, FGD wastewater, and various low volume wastes such as boiler blowdown, oily waste treatment, wastes/backwash from the water treatment processes, coal pile collection basins (collecting contact stormwater from coal piles), plant area wash down water, cooling tower blowdown, equipment heat exchanger water, remediated groundwater, emergency overflow (rain in excess of designed storm event), toe drain (potential discharge to outfall 006 only), emergency release of anhydrous ammonia, release of ammonia during quarterly testing, and treated domestic wastewater. Outfall 003A discharges to UT to Dan River via the Outfall 003. Upon completion of construction all waste streams previously discharged to ash basin, will be re-routed to the new retention basin. During the transition period, wastewater from the ash pond can also be discharged from Outfall 003. Construction of new Outfall 006 has been completed. Outfall 006 will discharge to Dan River. This Outfall will be used for decanting and dewatering of the ash basin. • Outfall 005. This is a former stormwater outfall SW002, consists of once through non -contact chiller water and stormwater. The wastewater from this outfall discharges to Belews Lake. • Internal Outfall 006A. This is a temporary internal outfall for decanting and dewatering of the ash basin, it will discharge through new Outfall 006. • Outfall 007 (lat. - 36016'51.604"; long. 80003'52.995"). This is an emergency spillway for South Coal Basin. This outfall discharges to Belews Lake. The spillway is designed for a flood greater than 100-year event. Sampling of this spillway is waived due to unsafe conditions associated with sampling during overflow event. • Internal outfall 009. Domestic wastewater plant. The wastewater from this outfall discharges to UT to Dan River via Outfall 003 or to Dan River via Outfall 006. • Toe Drain Outfall 111 (lat. - 36017'54.94"; long. - 80.04'32.57")- potentially contaminated toe drain. This outfall discharges to UT to Dan River. Page 2 of 5 PROPOSED CHANGES • Internal Outfall 006A now allows discharge of the wastewater from the decanting procedure. • The Water Quality Based Effluent Limits (Monthly Average and Daily Maximum) for Total Lead have been reduced (Internal Outfall 006A) due to the increase in the flow through this Outfall. The projected decanting flow is 5.5 MGD. PROPOSED SCHEDULE Draft Permit Modification to Public Notice: August 21, 2019 Permit Modification Scheduled to Issue: October 18, 2019 STATE CONTACT If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at (919) 707-3606 or sergei.chernikov@ncdenr.gov. RESPONSE TO THE SELL COMMENTS Delete Outfall 003 The facility requested a Major Modification to the permit that allows decanting through the Outfall 006/006A. This modification only applies to this narrow aspect of the permit, the DEQ is not re -opening the entire permit. The permit expiration date does not change and it will be re -opened during the next renewal period when all aspect of the permit will be reviewed and reconsidered. The facility might need to use Outfall 003 before the ash pond closure is completed. Duke Energy must treat all, not iust a small portion, of its contaminated decanting wastewater The facility requested a Major Modification to the permit that allows decanting through the Outfall 006/006A. This modification only applies to this narrow aspect of the permit, the DEQ is not re -opening the entire permit. The permit expiration date does not change and it will be re -opened during the next renewal period when all aspect of the permit will be reviewed and reconsidered. The DEQ assigns the appropriate permit limits based on the Reasonable Potential Analysis or 40 CFR 423 requirements. The facility has the ability to choose the mechanism to achieve the compliance with these limits. In the past the DEQ had an authority to issue Authorization to Construct permits, which in effect prescribed a treatment method for a particular wastewater. However, the state legislature has removed this authority from DEQ and now the Department cannot issue ATC permits for industrial facilities (Session Law 2011-394). The Outfall 006A permit limits violate the Clean Water Act The facility requested a Major Modification to the permit that allows decanting through the Outfall 006/006A. This modification only applies to this narrow aspect of the permit, the DEQ is not re -opening the entire permit. The permit expiration date does not change and it will be re -opened during the next renewal period when all aspect of the permit will be reviewed and reconsidered. The need for water quality based effluent permit limits is determined based on the results of the reasonable potential analysis (RPA). The RPA procedure utilized by the Division is conducted in accordance with the EPA's regulation (40 CFR 122.44(d)(1)). Page 3 of 5 When the permitting authority determines, using procedures in paragraph (d) (1) (ii) of this section, that a discharge causes, has the reasonable potential to cause, or contributes to an in -stream excursion above the allowable ambient concentration of a State numeric criteria within a State water quality standard for an individual pollutant, the permit must contain effluent limits for that pollutant. Permit limits are added only if the results of the RPA indicate the potential for exceeding the water quality standards, and are not arbitrarily assigned. However, absence of permit limits does not allow the facility to violate instream water quality standards. Increased Monitoring at Outfall 002 The facility requested a Major Modification to the permit that allows decanting through the Outfall 006/006A. This modification only applies to this narrow aspect of the permit, the DEQ is not re -opening the entire permit. The permit expiration date does not change and it will be re -opened during the next renewal period when all aspect of the permit will be reviewed and reconsidered. Outfall 002 is an internal outfall it does not directly discharge to the Waters of the State. Wastewater from this Outfall undergoes an additional treatment at the Lined Retention Basin and then discharged to Dan River through Outfall 006. Frequency of monitoring at Outfall 006 and number of parameters that are being monitored are based on results of the reasonable potential analysis (RPA) and requirements contained in Federal and State rules and regulations. If a parameter shows reasonable potential and requires a limit, monitoring is generally at a monthly or quarterly frequency. If a parameter does not show reasonable potential, monitoring might not be required. Monthly discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and priority pollutant scans (required with each permit renewal) are evaluated for RPA with each renewal. The proposed monitoring frequencies will provide adequate information to conduct RPA for the next permit renewal. The Division has a long term monitoring data for coal-fired facilities' discharges and accumulated a statistically significant dataset for all typical pollutants associated with the coal ash. This data set allows for an accurate characterization of the discharge from ash ponds at the frequency prescribed in the permit. In addition, Duke submitted chemical characterization of the wastewater in ash lagoons that demonstrates little variation in the pollutant concentration at the different depth levels. Therefore, additional monitoring is not likely to provide any additional useful information. Flow limit at Outfall 006A The facility requested a Major Modification to the permit that allows decanting through the Outfall 006/006A. This modification only applies to this narrow aspect of the permit, the DEQ is not re -opening the entire permit. The permit expiration date does not change and it will be re -opened during the next renewal period when all aspect of the permit will be reviewed and reconsidered. The flow limit for decanting for Outfall 003 was included in the permit to provide an additional protection for a zero -flow stream. Outfall 006/006A discharges to Dan River with a substantial dilution. Adding a flow limit to this Outfall can delay decanting beyond SOC and statutory deadlines due to the high stormwater inputs. In addition, a Reasonable Potential Analysis for this flow was based on the projected decanting volume of 5.5 MGD and appropriate limits have been implemented to protect Dan River. Therefore, a flow limit for Outfall 006/006A is unnecessary. Outfall 009 and Outfall III The facility requested a Major Modification to the permit that allows decanting through the Outfall 006/006A. This modification only applies to this narrow aspect of the Page 4 of 5 permit, the DEQ is not re -opening the entire permit. The permit expiration date does not change and it will be re -opened during the next renewal period when all aspect of the permit will be reviewed and reconsidered. Both Outfalls will continue discharges in the near future and will remain in the permit until next renewal or Major Modification. Page 5 of 5