20181502 Ver 2_401 Application_20191126

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORMFI
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
Cheyney
2. Work Type: Private Fv-(]
Institutional
Government
Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and 133e]:
The purpose of the project is to develop the property for single-family housing. This is a
modification request to a previously issued Nationwide Permit.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41:
Mattamy Homes; POC: Mr. Brian Johnson
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS; POC: Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: SAW-2006-41171
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 61b]:
35.361839,-80.814918
East of the Independence Hill Road and Arthur Davis Road intersection
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 02716471, 02716472, 02716475-02716477, 02716634-02716651, 02772327-D2772351, and 02772132
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
_-
EG11aENR1DWR
RE
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: UT to Clarks Creek NOV 2 6 2019
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 62c]: Yadkin 03040105 V4gter Resources
hrnk,ing sects
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Fv_/1 Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 27 & 29
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
To: Mr. David Shaeffer Date: November 22, 2019
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte Satellite Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St., 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Permit Modification Request
Cheyney (SAW-2006-41171)
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Mr. Johnson,
The Cheyney site is approximately 163 acres in extent and is located east of the Independence Hill Road
and Arthur Davis Road intersection in unincorporated Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2,
Attachment A). Mattamy Homes has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section
404/401 permitting services for this project. An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment
B).
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has previously issued a Nationwide Permit Nos. 29 and 27
Verification for this project. This verification authorized 0.019 acre of permanent wetland impacts and 38 If of
permanent stream impacts for a road construction, 120 If temporary and 30 If permanent stream impacts for
three open trench sewerline crossings, 80 If temporary stream impacts for dam removal and stabilization,
1.1 acre of permanent pond impacts for conversion to stream channel, and 141 of temporary stream impacts
to restore the channel below two previously installed bottomless culverts.
This Permit Modification Request will request authorization for one additional open trench sewerline
crossing. This crossing was originally designed to be constructed utilizing jack -and -bore methods;
however, due to the rock that was recently encountered at the other stream crossings, it was
determined that the jack -and -bore method would not be feasible at this location. The new additional
impacts total 10 If of permanent stream impacts due to rip rap stabilization along bank (S12) and 40 If
temporary impacts associated with the utility line installation (S13).
CWS is submitting a revised Pre -Construction Notification pursuant to Nationwide Permit No 29 to the
USACE for proposed impacts to the jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with developing the
subdivision into a single-family development.
The previously issue Nationwide Permit Verification and Jurisdictional Determination is included as
Attachment E (SAW-2006-41171)
A copy of the PCN application is being provided to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ) with a check of $570 for the 401 Water Quality Certification approval fee.

Cheyney
Transmittal Letter
November 22, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED:
Attachment A - Figures 1-6
Attachment B - Agent Authorization Form
Attachment C - Overall Phasing Plan and List Property Owners
Attachment D - Permit Drawings
Attachment E - SAW-2006-41171 Nationwide Permit Verification and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Attachment F - Water Quality Certification
Attachment G - SHPO Letter
Please do not hesitate to contact Aliisa Harjuniemi at 980-259-1222 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
Project Scientist
Christine Geist, PWS, CE
Principal Scientist
Page 2 of 2

Oj�O��W A T��9pG
o <
i
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
N Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 and 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
N Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
N Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Cheyney
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple, please see the attached list (Attachment C)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
-
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
-
3e.
City, state, zip:
-
3f.
Telephone no.:
Contact Mr. Brian Johnson, Mattamy Homes: [phone] ext 3253
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
Contact Mr. Brian Johnson, Mattamy Homes: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
Agent Mattamy Homes
4b. Name:
Mr. Brian Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Mattamy Homes
4d. Street address:
2128 Ayrsley Town Blvd., Suite 201
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone] ext 3253
4g. Fax no.:
N/A
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
980-259-1222
f. Fax no.:
N/A
g. Email address:
P
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
02716471, 02716472, 02716475-02716477, 02716634-02716651,
02772327-02772351, and 02772132
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.361839 Longitude:-80.814918
1 c. Property size:
163 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Clarks Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin (HUC 03040105)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The property is approximately 163 acres in extent and is located east of the Independence Hill Road and Arthur Davis Road
intersection in unincorporated Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2).
The land is being currently developed into a residential development under the Nationwide Permit authorization issued
in January 2019. Land use consisted of forested and agricultural land with a residential house and farming structures.
Surrounding land use consist of single-family subdivision, forested areas, and agricultural land. Interstate 485 is located along
he northern property boundary (Figure 3).
According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) USDA-
NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County (Figures 4 and 5) on -site soils consist of ten different soil units. Of the on -site soils,
only Monacan loam is listed the Web Soil Survey database as containing hydric inclusions.
There are several jurisdictional waters of the U.S. located within the property. These waters consist of seven jurisdictional
stream channels (Streams A-G), nineteen jurisdictional wetlands (Wetlands AA-QQ), and four jurisdictional ponds.
There are several old stream crossings located within the Cheyney property. These old crossings were permitted under non -
notifying NWP26 and are further discussed in Section 5b in this PCN.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.457 acre wetland, 1.2 acre pond
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 4,528 linear feet of
perennial stream, 772 If intermittent stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to develop the property into a single-family residential subdivision. This project will provide
residential housing for Charlotte, North Carolina to meet the growing demand for housing due to population growth.
Page 3 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project proposes developing the site for a single-family residential development. Construction of this project will require
one road crossing over stream and two small wetlands and four open trench sewerline crossings. Fill for a road will result in
0.019 acre of permanent impacts to Wetlands AA and BB (W1 and W2) and 38 If permanent impacts to Stream A (S1).
The four open trench sewerline crossings would permanently impact 40 linear feet of stream bank due to rip rap bank
stabilization and temporarily impact 160 linear feet of stream channel (S2-S7, S12 and S13). The project proposes draining thi
Pond A and restoring Stream E at the location of the current pond. Additionally, the project proposes restoring streams below
the existing bottomless culverts within the adjoining Meridale Subdivision. The site plan and impact drawings were included in
the original permit submittal.
Road Crossing (S1, W1-W2)
The proposed road crossing is necessary to connect the southwestern portion of the subdivision to the rest of the property.
Due to City of Charlotte set back requirements and as the begin of these jurisdictional features fall close to the property
boundary, the grading fill for the proposed road crossing must permanently impact 38 linear feet of Stream A (S7), 0.013 acre
of Wetland AA (W1), and 0.006 acre of Wetland BB (W2). The proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are
minimal and required due to limited space between the rail road set back and existing wetlands.
Open Trench Sewerline Crossings (S2-S7, S12 and S13)
Four open trench sewerline crossings are required for this project as the soils are too shallow at these locations to allow
directional boring methods. Each sewerline crossing will temporarily impact 40 linear feet of stream due to sewerline
installation, temporary fill due to dewatering system, and bank stabilization. Additionally, each crossing will permanently
10 linear feet due to stabilization with rip rap along the bank, extending below the ordinary high water mark.
All work will be completed in dry and the temporary dewatering system will be removed after the work has been completed.
The pump -around system details are included in Exhibit 7 (Attachment D). The disturbed stream bed will be returned to the
existing grade and the stream banks will be graded to 2:1 slope, matted, and stabilized with seeding and live stakes. The width
of the rip rap along the stream bank will be limited to 10 linear feet. The bank stabilization details are depicted in Exhibits 7-8
(Attachment D).
Pond Draining and Stream Restoration
The project will include draining Pond A within the Cheyney development site followed by excavation of the earthen dam to
remove the primary outlet structure. UT -Clarks Creek will be restored within the old pond footprint. Stream restoration will be
performed in the dry. The restored stream channel will be constructed as a Rosgen classified B5 channel using log and rock
structures for grade control, building bankfull benches, and providing access to flood prone areas. Streamside and riparian
vegetation will be installed, and the old lake bed will be stabilized by seeding and matting. Stream restoration length will total
624 linear feet. An additional 40 linear feet of bank stabilization is proposed on the lower end of the stream restoration
construction corridor. Due to uncertainties regarding specific characteristics of the pond bed, some field adjustments may be
needed to the stream restoration plan following draining of the lake. Any major changes will be coordinated with the agencies
prior to implementation. Typical heavy equipment will be used in the grading operations (bulldozers, excavators, dump trucks,
graders, etc.). The Pond Removal and Stream Restoration Plan is found in Attachment E.
Stream Restoration Below the Bottomless Culverts within Existing Meridale Subdivision
Per a phone conversation with Mr. David Shaeffer from the USACE on November 6, 2018, the bottomless culverts within the
adjacent Meridale subdivision may have unintentionally impacted stream banks and some of the sidecast material may have
been placed in the stream. Per the USACE's request, the banks under the bottomless culverts will be restored and the
sidecast material will be removed from the stream bed. These temporary impacts due to stream restoration will be included to
this PCN. All work will be completed by hand without using heavy machinery. Impacts to Cheyney are considered
cumulatively due adjacency. Cheney is a single and complete project and separate from the existing Meridale subdivision.
The stream banks will be graded to 2:1 slope and stabilized with biodegradable coconut matting. The bank contours and
stream bed will be tied to the existing upstream and downstream elevations. The existing bottomless culverts lengths are 62 If
and 79 If. Therefore, the proposed stream restoration below the bottomless culverts totals 141 linear feet of temporary stream
impacts (S10 and S11). Photo documentation will be provided to the USACE after the restoration work has been completed.
Page 4 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by
91, ° Yes No Unknown
the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this
property / project(including all priorphases) in the
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination,
®; Preliminary [' Final
what type of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other: CWS
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination dated January 24, 2019 is included in the Attachment E (SAW-2006-41171).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or
Yes No Unknown
obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in!
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Previously Authorized Impacts and Permit Modification Request
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has previously issued a Nationwide Permit Nos. 29 and 27 Verification for this project.
This verification authorized 0.019 acre of permanent wetland impacts and 38 If of permanent stream impacts for a road
construction, 120 If temporary and 30 If permanent stream impacts for three open trench sewerline crossings, 80 If temporary
stream impacts for dam removal and stabilization, 1.1 acre of permanent pond impacts for conversion to stream channel, and
141 of temporary stream impacts to restore the channel below two previously installed bottomless culverts.
The previously issue Nationwide Permit Verification and Jurisdictional Determination is included as Attachment E (SAW-2006-
41171)
This Permit Modification Request will request authorization for one additional open trench sewerline crossing. This crossing
was originally designed to be constructed utilizing jack -and -bore methods; however, due to the rock that was recently
encountered at the other stream crossings, it was determined that the jack -and -bore method would not be feasible at this
location.
Adjoining Subdivision - Meridale
The adjoining subdivision, Meridale, resulted in approximately 0.087 acre of permanent wetland impacts (SAW-2007-01172).
These impacts are counted cumulatively with this permit. The same permit authorized also a permanent stream impact
associated with a road crossing, but a site inspection revealed that a bottomless culvert was installed instead of a previously
permitted box culvert, resulting in no permanent impacts to jurisdictional stream channels.
Old Stream Crossings
There are nine old stream crossings located within the Cheyney property. As these crossings were put in place prior to 2000
and the acreage of the stream impacts was approximately 0.03 acre (below the one acre notification threshold), they were
permitted under non -notifying NWP26.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes C No
Page 5 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6b. If yes, explain.
The Cheyney project consist of four phases as depicted in the overview map. All four phases are included to this permit
application. This project will not result in additional phases in foreseeable future.
The Cheyney is not another phase to the adjoining Meridale project. The Meridale was originally developed by different
developer and the Cheyney site has independent utilities and access. However, as these two subdivisions are both currently
owned by Mattamy Homes and share connecting road, the impacts are treated cumulatively.
Page 6 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
ICI' Wetlands ®, Streams —tributaries D, Buffers
0 Open Waters 0 Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f. Area
of
impact
(acres)
W1
p
Fill
Headwater Forest
Yes
Corps
0.013
W2
Fill
Headwater Forest
Yes
Corps
0.006
W3
_
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.019
2h. Comments:
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetland total 0.019 acre.
Page 7 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts
(including temporary impacts) proposed
on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
name
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1
P
Fill
Stream A
PER
Corps
3
38
S2
P
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
PER
Corps
5
10
S3
T
Open Trench Sewer Crossing
Stream A
PER
Corps
5
40
S4
P
Bank Stabilization
Stream G
INT
Corps
3
10
S5
T
Open Trench Sewer Crossing
Stream G
INT
Corps
3
40
S6
P
Bank Stabilization
Stream F
INT
Corps
3
10
S7
T
Open Trench Sewer Crossing
Stream F
INT
Corps
3
40
S8
T
Bank Stabilization
Stream E
PER
Corps
5
40
S9
T
Dewatering
Stream E
PER
Corps
5
40
S10
T
Stream Restoration
UT1
INT
Corps
3
62
S11
T
Stream Restoration
UT2
PER
Corps
5
79
S12
T
Bank Stabilization
Stream E
PER
Corps
5
10
S13
T
Open Trench Sewer Crossing
Stream E
PER
Corps
5
40
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
459
3i. Comments:
Proposed permanent stream impacts total 78 If.
Proposed loss of stream channel total 38 If
Proposed temporary stream impacts total 381 If
S8 — no work in the stream channel, restricted to the
stream bank
entirely. S9 — dewatering measures used in the pond removal
and stream restoration construction.
Impacts S10 and S11 are within existing Meridale subdivision. No Jurisdictional Determination
is requested for this
area.
Impacts to Cheyney are considered cumulatively due adjacency.
Page 8 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Pond A
Drainage
Pond
1.1
02
Choose One
Choose
03
Choose One
Choose
04
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
1.1
4g. Comments: 1.1-acres of permanent open water impacts, with no permanent loss of waters associated with the impacts since
a stream restoration project will be completed within the pond footprint.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose `One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
f Neuse Tar -Pamlico Catawba Cl Randleman C Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/N
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes�Nc
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 9 of 15
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
o avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the Cheyney site was delineated prior to finalizing the site
plan. Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable while still
meeting the project goals. The proposed permanent impacts associated with this project are minimal and draining the pond in
order to restore the stream will provide ecological uplift.
The number of open trench sewerline crossings is limited to four and jack -and -bore crossings were utilized whenever possible.
The open trench crossings are in an area where the soil is too shallow to allow directional boring methods.
The proposed development will avoid most on -site jurisdictional waters. However, a proposed 0.019 acre permanent wetland
impact and 38 linear feet permanent stream impacts are required to provide street connectivity and comply with City of Charlotte
ordinances. Based on the City of Charlotte set back requirements and required road network connectivity, avoiding the impacts
o wetlands would have adverse impacts on the site layout.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Silt fence will be
installed around the jurisdictional features, outside of the avoided wetlands, streams and ponds. Construction activities and
impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit Nos. 27 and 29.
All work will be completed in dry and the temporary dewatering system will be removed after the work has been completed.
The disturbed stream bed will be returned to existing grade and the stream banks will be graded to 2:1 slope, matted, and
stabilized with seeding and live stakes. No rip rap will be placed in the streambed other than along the banks below the
ordinary high watermark for the sewerline crossings. The width of the rip rap along the stream bank will be limited to 10 linear
feet.
The proposed sewerline construction corridors are wider than 40 ft. Installing the sewerline per the specifications and the
required by-pass pumping will require a wider corridor. However, the proposed impacts for each of the crossings are limited to
50 If.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes r! No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
El; DWQ Corps
l; Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
0 Payment to in -lieu fee program
CT Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
Quantity:
Type: Choose One
Page 10 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
®' Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Noose One
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.106 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Acceptance letter from DMS was included in the original permit submittal.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
p Yes 18l No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 11 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
{ Yes No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The site is not adjacent to protected NC Riparian Buffers.
Yes f No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
_.,. Yes C( No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The City of Charlotte has reviewed the stormwater plan. The preliminary location of the Stormwater Control Measures (SCM)
are depicted in the overall plan vie (Attachment D). Due to buffer requirements along the existing streams and wetlands, the
SCM outlets will drain through the buffers as overland flow prior to reaching the existing streams or wetlands.
A copy of the stomwater plan will be provided to NCDEQ per request.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Charlotte
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
O NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
Water Supply Watershed
0 Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes it No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
I' Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
El Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
177 Yes Cl No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
0 Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
b Yes ❑ No
Page 12 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
b Yes
0 No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
Yes
U? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Ll Yes
D No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
M, Yes
It No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
[; Yes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not result in cumulative impacts to jurisdictional waters in foreseeable future.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewerlines will be connected to an existing off -site municipal sewerline in the southeastern property corner.
On -site
sewage will be treated off site at a Charlotte treatment plant.
Page 13 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
0' Yes III No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Q Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
o determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the project vicinity, and prior to
conducting the on -site field investigation, CWS consulted the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered and
Threatened Species and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina online database for Mecklenburg County. In addition,
WS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on April 18, 2018 to
determine if any record occurrences of federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat were
located within the project limits. The results of the desktop review and habitat assessment are included in the Protected Species
Habitat Assessment Report included in the original permit submittal.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
Cp Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.htmi
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes tki No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=79ea671 ebdcc45639f0860257d5f5ed7
TRC conducted a cultural resources survey on approximately seven acres of the Chayney Tract corresponding to the Permit
Areas defined by the USACOE. A total of 44 shovel test pits were excavated in which no archaeological resources were
identified. TRC recommended that no significant cultural resources will be impacted and no further work is necessary. SHPO
concurred with the TRC's findings and recommendations. A copy of the SHPO concurrence letter is included as an Attachment
G.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
L' Yes I$f No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
.No aboveground fill is proposed within FEMA floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710455900K
Page 14 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Ms. Aliisa Harjuniemi 11.22.19
Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name signature is valid only if an authorization letter Date
from the applicant is provided.)
Page 15 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Cheyney
Attachments
November 22, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
ATTACHMENT A:
Figures 1-6

State Location Extent
Kentucky
South Carolina
Georgian
ttitxi
Rog, ! nai
Park 'y
421
HjgNarr3
!'.raak
O
C,+0 club
Al�+tartppr�
� 4E
Rry
�Qd
t ➢tip#
4
'3
ri
.,, ,
C # .1
00 i i t,
lt;€l�ry
4�,p
+7-� � �.. �:�!"
!"�c rat• nsy � iF , r
�
'r
14 h +i
b
GO"r_
t dy
Gt~awn&
17
cm r� .
w
mod:
u
Hornefa Nest
q4
F4,goona1 Park
�b
Nr,
Legend
5�`
o,
Project Limits (163 ac.)
# Nevin
'-VVI!
"
irk
5,000 2,500 0 5,000 Feet
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, 2018.
RiN-r,n i 5,i
SCALE:
1 inch = 5,000 feet
DATE:
10/9/2018
Vicinity Map
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0103
DRAWN BY:
MLS
Cheyney
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
CAROLI N A
Mecklenburg County
35.361947,-80.815124
CAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0103 Meridale Bol[-0n\Permit (NWP 29)\ArcGIS\Figure1_Vicin1ty.mxd

AW, SO
✓ � �' `�,Now
Ksrrti �
_
Legend
Project Limits (163 ac.)
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC OUADRANGLE(S): DERITA, NC AND CORNELIUS, NC (2017).
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 2,000 feet 10/9/2018 USGS Topographic Map
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2018-0103 MLS Cheyney 2
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: CAROL 1 N A Mecklenburg County
35.361947,-80.815124 GAG WETLAND SERVICES Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0103 Meridale Bolt-0n\Permit (NWP 29)\ArcGIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd

GATeam Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0103 Meridale Bolt-OnTermit (NWP 29)\NrcGIS\Figure3 Aedal.mxd

CeD2 HeB CeD2
eB2 PaE CeD2
VaB
V MO
#J,i D
APD
✓.a C
CeD2
MeB
L41
H
EnD ^�
HeB
CeD2
eB2
CeD2 CeD2
EnB
HeB
MeB
MID
1
PaE EnD IrB
MeD IrB
DaB
MeD
CeB2
MeB J
MeB
e6
MeD EnB
CeD
PaE
IrB
CeB2
WkD
CeB2
CeD2 g' '
�EnB
\
MO EnD MeD
" "
CeD2
En
IrB CeB2
Ce
t CeB2 MeB
PaE
EnB
MeD
CeD2
i
CeD2 n
EnB
Cecil sandy day loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
'-
12 7
.: D2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
2.7
Legend
,,, Davidson sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
72
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
kedell fine sandy loam, l to 8 percent slopes
No
No
3.3 I
0 }
//163
r --B Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
41 ,. HeB /
Project Limits 1 ac. -%
_1 Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
No
23.2
nD
= Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
6.8
Roads
2. Pacolel sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
No
1.5
bV Water
No
0.8'
WkD Wilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
No
0 7
i ..
r
D ��
- - . - 1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet I,
=�N� -NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC, DATED 2017. B
M
EnB
WkD
SCALE:
inch = 1,000 feet
DATE:
10/9/2018
USDA "
Current Soil Survey
of Mecklenburg Count
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0103
DRAWN BY:
DJZ
L
4
CAR ❑ h I N A
Cheyney
Mecklenburg County
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
35.361947,-80.815124
CAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Team Dnves\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0103 Mendale Bolt-On\Permit (NWP 29)VArcGIS\Figure4_CurrentSoils.mxd

_
lie$ , ( Ty�'I,r 7 !V.,;
x\ 41ti:
'r r �..� a � �, Sys .r��� ` 41.'i• ht,?
I fif(
u ;
t A r,F<, br3"N r;' ,+ i- "'-"""• r� fT., , QJ ( lift
7
Va � .�Y� 1, y`1:,C1 •:f%j 4:r[)2 �' � ;�• � � ,t...! f� ��� 'r..,�J"'�� ,
r,
1 M'-1+ A
'ra[+ n i�: t ,i}r? `'t• trr lanj8 � � i:r!B.'
ZA
;l f
CcB.' It
n if d , f ii
lmec,-
�`�.
Arthur Davis Road
I "fi
M�a
•♦•� i Old Statesville Road ;
1 _ o y fi ,
M4.'
f.kV£
�'7fy`". _._1.i1FiP4
44
/ ,, Mrlt V,F Pit,
tft ✓ ,s; ti�J/.a—++f r'. rart�
C
Crt3:%
Ci•h.' \
V)o
Map Unit Name and Symbol yrio��(Y/IS'�C.vir.ga()
_ If
`CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes. moderately eroded No, 12 7` r F t•
L CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded No 2.7,1
DaB Davidson sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes No 1.2 �.
EnB Enon sandy loam. 2 to 8 percent slopes No 3.3
1 IrB Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes No 0 •y`"� "
MeB Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes No 41 ` r nB 1,`y�
MeD Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes No 23.2 �,, �, Legend
l MO Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently Flooded Yes 6.8 J1JJ1
PaE Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes No 1.5 MrF3 i
W Water No n.s' ('f 1. Project Limits (163 ac.)
WkD Wilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes No
Totals for Area . Interest: 00
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC, SHEET 4, DATED 1976. f
/ , n
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 2,000 feet 10/9/2018 USDA-NRCS Historic Soil
CWS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY. Is Survey of Mecklenburg Count
2018-0103 MLS �7 /� Cheyney
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: C A h. O L I N A Mecklenburg County
35.361947,-80.815124 CAG WETLAND SERVICES Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0103 Meridale Bolt-On\Permit (NWP 29)WrcGIS\Figure5_HistoricSoils.mxd

4
°moo Savoy tv
O
O�kon
Farm
eaa�
G
Gten
`5 -
Oa� b g
pddin9ham h\te ta
o` �.
\e Rd
MaP
Dc o N o _ Btaok MaPte Pv
Q N G
S m 11en p grown Ftd
toss\
Me<\date G
y
m'
o Eas�,eia
o` Station Or
�m Ptan0 W
�o Y
�r 6
m
ersI e Ln O
Nottinghiii n
ary Pond
v
Branth `°
�rst Dr
d
x
0
tY Rd
cLi
cov
a)2
a�
U Cr ft Haven Dr
�a o
�v
REFERENCE: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA PROVDED BY UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR NORTH CAROLINA, ACCESSED 2018.
BACKGROUND LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2017.
SCALE:
DATE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
10/9/2018
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
2018-0103
MLS
�+
j A R O L I N A
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:`
35.361947,-80.815124
CAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Legend
Project Limits (163 ac.)
Roads
National Wetlands Inventory
MFreshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
FIGURE NO.
National Wetlands Inventory
Cheyney 6
Mecklenburg County
Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0103 Meridale Boft-On\Permit (NWP 29)VucGIS\Figure6_NWl.mxd

Cheyney
Attachments
November 22, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
ATTACHMENT B:
Agent Authorization Form

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, Brian Johnson, representing Mattamy Coro, hereby certify that I have authorized Aliisa
Harjuniemi of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary
to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands determination/
permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Mecklenburg County
Parcel ID
Applicant Name
Owner/Representative
Address
02716471, 02716472,
02716475-02716477,
Mattamy Corp
02716634-02716651,
POC: Brian Johnson
2025 Ayrsley Town Blvd, Suite 1104
02772327-02772351,
Email:
Charlotte, NC 28273
and 02772132
[e-mail]
Phone:[phone] ext 3253
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Authorized signature
11 /22/19
Agent's signature
Date Date
11.22.19
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

Cheyney
Attachments
November 22, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
ATTACHMENT C:
Overall Phasing Plan and List Property Owners

�
/
i)
(
•
.-@!!E
© !
w`R'•§
K/
'..»B;.
§J
dJpQ,
-
�
� �.��||;,
"_`
`�'�`
,�
:. | �.
, .
> ,',j,,.•
||||(|sILa
! A
1121
t
)|§|)||)]||||||||§|����`
191,
|||| OVERALL PHASE SITE PLAN I PRELIMINARY
\�\�NP4 NOT FOR
GSS##� Sr \�\
CONSTRUCpON

Cheyney
Attachments
November 22, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
ATTACHMENT D:
Permit Drawings

FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
o�mnnm
q
.mei w�n�i-ass �
mwa
twn n 3)
PHASE 2TO
t J�
(LOCATION
SUBJECT 70
:CHANGE)
nmerx w_
„mm u�iw�w �w Ra.s
FUTURE
PHASE 3
,°c,a�O�ECT
NOTES:
1 34 1= ggg E
1.
WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER -WETLAND
i!
1h E
SURVEY OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED
U
911812018.
2.
WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH- DATED
N2512018.
3.
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER -TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
OF: MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.8t ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES. INC. DATED 911812018.
\
J y
CHEYNEY IS A SINGLE AND COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT. MERIDALE IS
.ma+iur� •c taJl,
AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT THAT CONNECTS TO CHEYNEY.
q 1104 W W
E°�rAN4A
iW an -akin
�
m
PROP. BMP
(LOCATION
W
'p
a
SUBJECT TO
a
o
CHANGE)
S8-S9, 01
(authorized 1.24.19, � Aotp OA Proposed Pond Draining and
o �� ��� SAW-2006-41171) p ,,c Stream Restoration
I FUTURE (authorized 1.24.19,
2 V-�
PROP. BMP PHASE 1 SAW-2006-41171
W1-W2, S1 I j Fu7uae ` SUBBJecpro]Sl2-Sl3 )
(authorized
'�PHAS 84� I CHANGE), (new impacts)
1.24.19, °`""`E' PRORTEMPOWRYIMPACT rp1-
SAW
-2006- TO STREAM PLAN
(SEE AN AND SECTION \ ^ EXIST.
T.
VIEWS FOR Af ' \
41171) n SUBDIVISION
sUBDi
I VISIO
P P. BMP
(LOCATpN�.
UBJECTTO�jjt
a CHANGE)
PROP. BMP\Z (LOCATION SUBJECT'
OE
70 GNANGE)
RE ` / )I JSPRINc�f"
PHASES
r(IAi EOBJECT\ \"
o PROP. BMP
�T/C / �I (LOCATION SUBJECT
TO CHANGE)
77 �/
/n /
S2-S5
(authorized 1.24.19,
SAW-200641171)
GRAPHIC SCALE
m
x
( IN FEET) rev 11.18.19 W
1 INCH = 400 FT.
F-
m
X
w
E-
IL QZ
LU
LLl W
U N 9
>
0
Q O
Z
g
o
0

NOTES:
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
,;
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
A
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL- BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 4125/2018.
LEGEND
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.83 ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 9118T2018.
EXIST. WETLANDS
EXIST. WETLANDS BUFFER
PROP. WETLAND IMPACT AREA 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O❑ O O II
`DD0012001200o_0
Q
R
EXIST. STREAM .—
FUTURE CHEYNEY
EXIST. PCSO BUFFER
rc
SUBDIVISION
W
�
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
EXIST. MAJOR CONTOUR
8 2O
EXIST. MINOR CONTOUR
EXIST 815
NVI-Well"\"
- 0.01 3 ac
811
B!
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR
FUTURE STORM Impact (Fill)
RAINAGE SYSTEM ——
8 8
— —
PROP. MINOR CONTOURO
(LAYOUT SUBJECTRMANENTTO
CHANGE)WERANDFl
r
I I ^ FUTURE SANITARY
SEWER SYSTEM
°
8/7 ♦
W
FUTURE EDGE OF
PAVEMENT��
_ (LAYOUT SUBJECT
- TO CHANGE)
F-
FUTURE
S1 - Stream A
m Z
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
'° -, gd''
'O�s.I
°� - 38 If pernlanent o
W a
_
impact (till)
FUTURE
RIGHT OF
_
Q
WAY
815
814
316
Q
812
811- EXIST. 8
INTERMITTENT
d Q
810
808- STREAM A S
} W
W
PROP. PERMANENT
IMPACT, INTERMITTENT
STREAM
\ �,
PROP. PERMANENT
L IMPACT, WETLAND 88 0.
IJJ
Z Q Fn
A (78 LF)
�p -
�_ (292 SF) is
r LLI 0
NN'2-Wetland BB
EXIST.
(Tr o �i
W W
Q
U Z
pennanent im0.006 acre
ilt
AT �a EXIST. 50'PccO CHE
�
000
Z [n
1
(fill)
�pp�o j�
BUFFERFUTURE
`` SUBDIVISION
\\\
°�
°ia�
Q
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
Z
EXIST. 10'
WETLAND
GRAPHIC SCALE
LLj
g
BUFFER (iYP.) EXIST. TOP
OF BANK
EXIST.
INTERMITTENT
W
a,
STREAM A
(IN FEET)
04
k
1 INCH = 40 FT.
m
X
LU
it

NOTES:
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
Y y
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
b xF 1
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 9119/2018.
2. WETLANDS AND
STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 412512018,
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.81 ACRES" BY ESP
�} {---30.7434.28-1
21-M �
r T �
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
8200
4. SEE EXHIBIT 2 FOR PLAN VIEW OF IMPACTS.
Q H
Z
62
In~z
r� 'n�w
O '
i
PROP.
z
m
GRADE
tv
810 --- ---
w
PROP.
/� /�
m J
PERMANENT
l
\� ��
LL
X
FILL OVER
j
O
WETLANDS AA
ui W
-
U '
Qa
-
a
800
lll�\
> w
EXIST.
PROP _ GRADE
z Q
GRAPHIC SCALE
PERMANENT
r �j
FILL OVER -
LLJ Q1
INTERMITTENT
U fn Z
STREAM A
p Q
Z m
( IN FEET)
'FILL
Q co1
INCH = 40 FT.
PROP.
p 06
-
PERMANENT-
OVER
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
WETLANDS ss
w z
J
790
3
( IN FEET)
A
As
$
1 INCH = 4 FT.
CO
S
o
u

NOTES:
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911612018.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 4125/2018.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.83 ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
'775
TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING
EXIST. 100' (SEE CLDSM STD. NO. 30.22A)
PCCO BUFFER (SEE IMPACT EXHIBIT 9)
771
PROP. TEMPORARY
S4 - Scream G IMPERVIOUS DIKE
- 10 If permanent impact (rip rap stabilization
along banks)
S5 - Stream G
- 40 If temporary impacts (sewerline
installation, bank stabilization, and dew'aterrine
system)
EXIST. 15'
UPLAND ZONE
SWIM BUFFER
\
768
TEMP. TIMBER BRIDGE
BY OTHERS
(CONTRACTOR
RESPONSIBLE FOR
D TIM
N,
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY
GRAPHIC SCALE
LEGEND
( IN FEET) EXIST. WETLANDS
1 INCH = 40 FT. ILL;
EXIST. WETLANDS BUFFER
PROP. WETLAND IMPACT AREA O D D o D D D 0 0 0 0 D D 0
`DD_DILO Do_DD_D
EXIST. STREAM
10
EXIST. 50'
PCCO BUFFER
EXIST. PCSO BUFFER
EXIST. MAJOR CONTOUR
EXIST. MINOR CONTOUR
EXIST
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR
EXIST.
STREAM SIDE� �.
ZONE SWIM \ '�
BUFFER
EXIST.
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
PROP. STREAM CROSSING (TO BE \ \
INSTALLED BY OPEN CUT METHOD) \
(SEE EXHIBIT 8 FOR STREAMBANK
RESTORATION)
�--
♦\\ \\ •, \ \
PROP. TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE \\
PROP. TEMPORARY
RIP RAP APRON FOR \\V
A \
BYPASS
�. A
_DISCHARGE
�V .�
♦ A
EXIST.
PROP. TEMPORARY
DEWATERING DEVICE
-
TOP OF\
BANK
EXIST.
TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING
ADJACENT (SEE CLDSM STD. NO. 30.22A)
PROPERTY (SEE IMPACT EXHIBIT 7)
BOUNDARY
I—a-�.
PROP. TEMPORARY -
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
INTERMITTENT �s
STREAM G \ �s PROP. S2 - Stream C
EXIST. - 10 If permanent impact (rip rap stabilization
PROP. TEMPORARY PROPERTY along banks)
IMPACT, INTERMITTENT BOUNDARY
STREAM G (50 LF FOR EXIST. 100' S3 - Stream C
-- SEWER INSTALLATION PCCO BUFFER - 40 If Icmporary impacts (sewerline
AND BYPASS PUMPING)
EXIST. 100 YEAR installation, bank stabilization, and dewaterring \ STORMWATER I system)
PROP. GRAVITY / ELEVATION
SEWER TRUNK LINE
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING
I CHANGE ) (SEE CLDSM STD. NO.30.
-- _ (SEE IMPACT EXHIB
r
a
BER BRIDGE - BY OTHERS
♦�
C ' B ..
ONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR
♦..
DESIGN)
A
PROP. TEMPORARY IMPACT,
s ?
PERENNIAL STREAM C (50 LF
a o
FOR SEWER INSTALLATION AND
-,a
BYPASS PUMPING)
\
PROP. TEMPORARY
e°
\
\ RIP RAP APRON FOR
- a
\ \
BYPASS DISCHARGE
PROP. TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
PERENNIAL
iO
STREAM
\
PROP. TEMPORARY
PROP. STREAM CROSSING (TO BE B
DEWATERING DEVICE
INSTALLED BY OPEN CUT METHOD)
\
(SEE EXHIBITS FOR STREAMBANK
RESTORATION)

0
CD770 1 7 1 7, I 1 1 1 770�
AN
BOTTOM i OF OPEN CUTS
STREAM BANK
TO BE RE-ESTABLISHED
WITH RIP RAP
750
740
0
c�D
EXIST.
GRADE
PROP.
CLASS `
RIP RAP
A' VERT. DIST.
r
-PROP. 8" SAN.
SWR.
v
r
B Bi
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET)
1INCH = 40 FT.
'RQP.
CIDN611117E
LANK
I
tP. CONCRETE
EEP COLLAR
ATED SPACE
BETWEEN
AND MANHOLE
EVENLY
BANK
I
r
co colv�
6 cn
rn
760
2.7' VERT. DIST
I
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
p 3
ly
a2 Fct
W
PROP.
CLASS
RIP RAP
m
a
i
5-
U
tJJ
O
vg
¢
F
-BOTTOM 4 OF OPEN CUT
STREAM BANK
TO BE RE-ESTABLISHED
w
WITH RIP RAP
k
PROP. 8" SAN.
SWR.
PROP, CONCRETE
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR
F
LOCATED AT TOP OF
m
750
BANK
W W
NOTES:
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND
SURVEY OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC.
DATED 911812018.
Q LL!
a �
LL.
0
z a a
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH"
DATED 4/2512018.
W L
0 N 06
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY OF: MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.8±
ACRES" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
4 SEE EXHIBIT 4 FOR PLAN VIEW OF IMPACTS
p 0
Z N
Q
Q la
Z
740 F-
a-6
�� coco L `no
N N N &
c0 c��D t0 Zo p
r r r a
C Ci
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
m
( IN FEET) LxLI
1 INCH = 4 FT.

NOTES:
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 4l2512018.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.81 ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
S6 - Stream F
- 10 If permanent impact (rip rap stabilization
along banks) _
S7 - Stream F 801
- 40 I f temporary impacts (sem erline 8
installation, bank stabilization, and de, aterrmg
system)
EXIST. 10' 1 �'
WETLAND `O D' \ \
BUFFER
y�-'k
EXIST. 11 �49
POND\ i J
(TYP')
PROP. TEMPORARY �✓ /
IMPERVIOUS DIKE/ �'-
PROP. TEMPORARY
DEWATERING DEVICE
EXIST. 0'
WETLAND
BUFFER -`
EXIST. ti
TOP OF
BANK \o o 1
\ �4d
O
O
810r
TEMP. TIMBER BRIDGE - BY OTHERS
(CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR
DESIGN)
PROP. TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE' --EXIST 100 YEAR
STO R � ELEVATION
800
i EXIST,
-__ 804 INTERMITTENT
_ STREAM F
_.� EXIST. 50'
I ti PCSO BUFFER
TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING
(SEE CLDSM STD. NO. 30.22A)
`. (SEE IMPACT EXHIBIT T)
PROP. TEMPORARY IMPACT,
j 1 INTERMITTENT STREAM F (50 LF
FOR SEWER INSTALLATION AND
j BYPASS PUMPING)
PROP. STREAM CROSSING (TO BE
INSTALLED BY OPEN CUT METHOD)
(SEE EXHIBIT 8 FOR STREAMBANK
RESTORATION) 790
o �^a
\ EXIST. 100 YEAR '
STORMWATER
ELEVATION
)
D PROP. GRAVITY
SEWER TRUNK LINE
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO
CHANGE)
PROP.TEMPORARY� \ \ EXIST. 100'
RIP RAP APRON FOR Jg4\\1.. ��0 PCSO BUFFER
BYPASS DISCHARGE.,
ti �Is
1� 780
EXIST N, \ �? 00
WETLAND1s ' m
EXIST. 10' D
WETLAND
BUFFER GRAPHIC SCALE
r�
( IN FEET)
1 INCH = 40 FT.
8" SAN.
0
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
O L0
LEGEND
+
EXIST. WETLANDS
EXIST.
WETLANDS BUFFERir
PROP. WETLAND IMPACT AREA
0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�
`011.01-0S-0-00)_00l_0
EXIST. STREAM
,
EXIST. PCSO BUFFER
m
EXIST. MAJOR CONTOUR
IC
EXIST. MINOR CONTOUR
U
VaV n
O <
m
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR
PROP. MINOR CONTOUR
U
BOTTOM 4 OF OPEN CUT
STREAM BANK
TO BE RE-ESTABLISHED
D'
co
Q M

NOTES:
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018. C
S12- Stream E +
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA W ETLAND - 10 if permanent impact (rip rap Stabilization 00O
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 412512018. along banks)
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 168.8t ACRES" BY ESP S13 - Stream F.
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 9/1812018. - 40 If temporary impacts (sewerline
installation, bank stabilization, and dewaterring
system)
Aga I
EXIST. 100 YEAR
\ \ STORMWATER
ELEVATION
79\
EXIST. , 790
TOP OFakN\ 789
^ PROP. GOLF 8" STEEL ENCASEMENT
EXIST. PIPE T-0.25" NSTALLED BY OPEN
10 CUT METHO (3 CASING SPIDERS
WETLAND \ PER PIPE S MENT)
EXIST. 10"
WPROP. TEMP Y
BUFFER A8S DE It DEVICE
..."
\y�1.� IST.
PROP. TEMPORARY I ; ETLAND
IMPERVIOUS DIKE >
TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING f
(SEE CLDSM STD. NO. 30.2_) TBB\
(SEE IMPACT EXHIBIT PROP. TEMPORARY
\�_ A \ �MAPERVIOUS DIKE
PROP. TEMPORARY IMPACT, '7v00
INTERMITTENT STREAM E (50 LF i PROP. TEMPORARY /
FOR SEWER INSTALLATION AND lap RAP APRON FOR
BYPASS PUMPING) BYPASS DISCHARGE
PROP. STREAM CROSSING (TO BE S EXIST.
INSTALLED BY OPEN CUT METHOD) O 4� ' STREAM
(SEE EXHIBIT 8 FOR STREAMBANK CROSSING
RESTORATION).^ `� �_
E
EXIST. 100' 770
PCSO BUFFER
EXIST. 100 YEAR
STORMWATER
ELEVATION E
PROP. GRAVITY GRAPHIC SCALE
SEWER TRUNK LINE
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO
CHANGE) °
( IN FEET)
1 INCH = 40 FT.
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY. 11 y
O M LEGEND a�
r-•-•-•---•1 Q�
■■■■■■■■■■
rIM
■EMEMMEM■■■■
■■■■MME■■MIMMEMMEM■■■
No
AM■■■■■
MEMO
EEEEE
mom
MEMO
"
ON
5OEM
IIIN�M
fa"E■11
0M
2■
IMMORMINNELF
■M■MMry
ffI��8i�
INNIMMEM11110pa
Rio.Z;■waa0■M►.
■■
NOON
EXIST. WETLANDS
EXIST. WETLANDS BUFFER
[7�j \ I
PROP. WETLAND IMPACT AREA ODD ❑ DSO D OHO O D D OJO
O`OD�OO�OO�OD�D
�.
EXIST. STREAM
\
z
EXIST. PCSO BUFFER
s
�
LL
R
EXIST. MAJOR CONTOUR
EXIST. MINOR CONTOUR
w
3
o
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR
PROP. MINOR CONTOUR
0
0
m �
S
W LU
�
H
L) W
J
'o
a�
As
O
o
LLI 2 11
Z a 06
w Z
v�
�Cf) g
PROP. 60 LF 18" STEEL
Z liJ
ENCASEMENT PIPE T=0.25"
INSTALLED BY OPEN CUT
p
METHOD (3 CASING SPIDERS
PER PIPE SEGMENT)
Z W
g uw'
� jF--
to 0
U
E•
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
Q k
C
f=
m o
a
( IN FEET) rev 11.18.19 :r a 1 INCH = 4 FT. UJI

FOR USACE PERWTTING ONLY.
LL
R
era)rR«woE wx �.aEc
sEcnoRw�wr.nc wm) rr uR.
raeeaa
ww of
enw�
Xi
U
m
DISCHARGE HOSE
^w^rrw
mwuw.x vr..mw rrn.� —
S
8
ENERGY DISSIPATION
)nwrt rtnswwE Eom
FLOW
�aF
IMPERVIOUS DICE
SUCTION HOSE
t
`\
FLOW
o I I
�q
\
wo�R ow ExosoR wmwi recnoRsr
w)REr rr �ccoRaRCE
I
wrtR
y
IEGB) SPECIf�rgNS
`73
Q
w
I
PROJECT
TOP OF BANK
wiu: I
Ez�s*rw
cwvna
`
P�
DEWATERING DEVICE
_
i—
N
.
\\
U891 N'w11CR RA Rn.
QLL
IL O
` WORK AREA
tu
NOTE
ANCHOR ALL PUMPS AND PIPES SECURELY
awR«Ei
Z W
x
NOT TO SCALEI
NOT TO SCALE
W
v
aTr 0P CBeB1p7T!<
STREAMBANK RESTORATION
JLt-m DVEAP= seeanA= BYPASS
PUMPING
PLANTING DETAIL
Z
OaWIt17E 11CD!>® CommRJ
30.22A 15
Q
C G
i
3

FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY. Y
10.
S„REAMSIDE
TOP OF BANK
I I III-
rZONE 1
STREAM CENTERLINE
_
I-
\ CUSS I RIP RAP 24" THICK
O
WIDTH VARIES
3' MIN.
HIGH PERFORMANCE
x
BOTTOM OF BANK
—`Z` I STABILIZATION
( MATTING
ANCHOR FOR HIGH
PERFORMANCE SLOPE WATERLEVEL
MATTING
HIGH PERFORMANCE
I
TOP OF BANK
WOVEN COIR NET EROSION
I
2' MIN.
STABILIZATION
MATTING
I
CONROL BLANKET (ECS)
I (I(
i
TOP OF BANK Mil
EXTEND FILTER
CLASS 1 24' FABRIC 2' MIN.
THICK RIP RAP BOTTOM OF CREEK BEYOND RIP RAP
PROP. SANITARY
RFILTER
III
FABRIC PPOPOSM
s-
LL
IRAFl OR SANRARf SEWER
I -I
I I BOTTOM OF BANK
Q 0
APPROVED
'Z"
I I
a
EOUK
I
cm
NOTE:
SEE EXHIBIT 7 FOR
I I I III I
W
RIP RAP PLACEMENT MUST BE LIMITED TO A WIDTH OF 10-FEET
PLANTING DETAIL
W
W
ALONG STREAMBAWS. CENTERONED ON THE SANITARY SEWER
} _
CROSSING. NO RIP RAP SHALL BE PLACm WITHIN THE CREEK BED.
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALEI
W
UV~!y
STREAMBANK
RESTORATION
RIP RAP PLACEMENT LIMITS
Z a
QJ-u
cc
z --
3

Cheyney
Attachments
November 22, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
ATTACHMENT E:
SAW-2006-41171 Nationwide Permit Verification and
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-200641171 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-Derita
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Mattamv homes
Bob Wiggins
Address: 2128 Avrslev Town Blvd., Suite 201
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704-604-8424
E-mail: Bob.Wigainsaa,mattamvcorp.com
Size (acres) 163 Nearest Town Huntersville
Nearest Waterway Clarks Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.3626
Longitude:-80.8133
Location description: The project area is located west of the intersection of Meridale Forest Drive and Allen A Brown Road.
PINs: 02762101, 02762102, 02761168, 02718125, 02718126, 02718185, and 02718103 (partial parcel).
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the grading and placement of fill material in 0.019 acre of
wetlands and 409 linear feet of stream and the conversion of 1.1 acre of impounded water to stream to facilitate the
construction of a residential subdivision. The project would result in the loss of 0.019 acre of wetlands and 38 linear feet of
stream for the construction of a residential roadway, temporary impacts to 120 linear feet of stream for the open -cut
Installation of a sewer line, permanent impacts to 30 linear feet of stream at each sewer crossings for bank stabilization,
temporary impacts to 80 linear feet of stream for the removal of a dam and stream stabilization/restoration, the permanent
conversion of 1.1 acres of impounded waters to stream channel, and temporary impacts to 141 linear feet of stream associated
with the restoration of two streams under two previously installed bottomless arch culverts.
Applicable Law(s): ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 29. Residential Developments and Nationwide Permit 27. Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Enhancement, and
Establishment Activities
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated 11/7/2018, and the enclosed plans Exhibit 1 and Figure X dated 10/30/2018
Exhibits 1-8 dated 10/28/2018, Exhibit 1 dated 10/15/2018. and Figures A-E dated 10/30/2018 (Figure A), 6/27/2017 (Figure B),
and 10/31/2018 (Figure C-E). Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization. Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated
above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Resources
(telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements. This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the
permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact David L. Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or david.l.shaefferCa,usace.army.mil.
D"* sipped by SHAEFFERDAVIDIErHA260750573
DH: c-M ZUS. Gowmnrnt oo-ND, ou-K owUSA.
Corps Regulatory Official:U�• SHAEFF 1.241 :NU2l1.i260750573 Date: 01/24/2019
D,ee 2oi9oi�+iise:3s-0sroD�
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022

SAW-2006-41171
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ® There are waters including wetlands, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an
approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any work
in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ❑ There are waters including wetlands, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued DATE. Action ID: FILE NUMBER.
Basis For Determination: See the preliminary iurisdictional determination form dated O1/24/2019.
Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdiction determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdiction determination for the above described site. if you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit �n RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
@`/ w _r D S Mys bVIDIFI PERDAVIDS73 1260750573
7,i//�l/'I/—_ DN:-Lr.­U.S. Gwamment—WD,ou- Ml ou--USAF
Corps Regulatory Official: DtSHAEfFEMDAVID.tEIGN.txt9759S73
Wtr.7019A134 17l9A9 -0S'00'
David L. Shaeffer
Date of JD: O1/24/2019
Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-200641171
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.an-ny.mil/cm_apex/Vp=1 36:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Allisa Hariuniemi
Address: 550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 980-259-1222
E-mail: aliisana,cws-inc.net

SAW-200641171
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
a. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in accordance
with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility
Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby
incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization.

Action ID Number: SAW-200641171 County: Mecklenburg
Permittee: Mattamy homes, Bob WiSains
Project Name: Cheynev Residential Subdivision
Date Verification Issued: O1/24/2019
Project Manager: David L. Shaeffer
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
or
[e-mail]
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Mattamy homes Bob Wiggins File Number: SAW-2006-41171 Mate: 01/24/2019
Attached
is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of erinission
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
ZI
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.gpny.inil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ug latoaProgramandPennits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
pen -nit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION 11- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
CESAD-PDO
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the o ortunit to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David L. Shaeffer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
Permittee: Mattamy homes, Bob Wiggins Action ID: SAW-2006-41171
Project Name: Cheyney Residential Subdivision County: Mecklenburg
Instructions to Permittee: The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the Mitigation Sponsor, either an approved
Mitigation Bank or the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS), who will then sign the form to verify the
transfer of the mitigation responsibility. Once the Sponsor has signed this form, it is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure
that to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Project Manager identified on page two is in receipt of a signed copy of this
form before conducting authorized impacts, unless otherwise specified below. If more than one mitigation Sponsor will be
used to provide the mitigation associated with the permit, or if the impacts and/or the mitigation will occur in more than one
8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC), multiple forms will be attached to the permit, and the separate forms for each Sponsor
and/or HUC must be provided to the appropriate mitigation Sponsors.
Instructions to Sponsor: The Sponsor must verify that the mitigation requirements (credits) shown below are available at the
identified site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the identified mitigation, regardless of
whether or not they have received payment from the Permittee. Once the form is signed, the Sponsor must update the bank
ledger and provide a copy of the signed form and the updated bank ledger to the Permittee, the USACE Project Manager, and
the Wilmington District Mitigation Office (see contact information on page 2). The Sponsor must also comply with all
reporting requirements established in their authorizing instrument.
Permitted Impacts and Compensatory Mitigation Requirements:
Permitted Impacts Requiring Mitigation* 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03040105, Yadkin River Basin
Stream Impacts (linear feet)
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
0.019
*If more than one mitigation sponsor will be used for the permit, only include impacts to be mitigated by this sponsor.
Compensatory Mitigation Requirements: 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03040105, Yadkin River Basin
Stream Mitigation (credits)
Wetland Mitigation (credits)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
0.033
Mitigation Site Debited: NCDMS
(List the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the specific site. For NCDMS, list NCDMS. If the NCDMS
acceptance letter identifies a specific site, also list the specific site to be debited).
Section to be completed by the Mitigation Sponsor
Statement of Mitigation Liability Acceptance: I, the undersigned, verify that I am authorized to approve mitigation
transactions for the Mitigation Sponsor shown below, and I certify that the Sponsor agrees to accept full responsibility for
providing the mitigation identified in this document (see the table above), associated with the USACE Permittee and Action
ID number shown. I also verify that released credits (and/or advance credits for NCDMS), as approved by the USACE, are
currently available at the mitigation site identified above. Further, I understand that if the Sponsor fails to provide the
required compensatory mitigation, the USACE Wilmington District Engineer may pursue measures against the Sponsor to
ensure compliance associated with the mitigation requirements.
Mitigation Sponsor Name:
Name of Sponsor's Authorized Representative:
Signature of Sponsor's Authorized Representative Date of Signature

Conditions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit:
• Once this document has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the USACE is in receipt of the signed form, the
Permittee is no longer responsible for providing the mitigation identified in this form, though the Permittee remains
responsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in the permit conditions.
• Construction within jurisdictional areas authorized by the permit identified on page one of this form can begin only after
the USACE is in receipt of a copy of this document signed by the Sponsor, confirming that the Sponsor has accepted
responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. For authorized impacts conducted by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), construction within jurisdictional areas may proceed upon permit
issuance; however, a copy of this form signed by the Sponsor must be provided to the USACE within 30 days of permit
issuance. NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the USACE has received this form, confirming that the
Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein.
• Signed copies of this document must be retained by the Permittee, Mitigation Sponsor, and in the USACE administrative
records for both the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument. It is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that the USACE
Project Manager (address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form.
• If changes are proposed to the type, amount, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to
the USACE, the Sponsor must obtain case -by -case approval from the USACE Project Manager and/or North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). If approved, higher mitigation ratios may be applied, as per current District guidance
and a new version of this form must be completed and included in the USACE administrative records for both the permit
and the Bank/ILF Instrument.
Comments/Additional Conditions: A letter from NCDMS, confirming their willing and able to accept the applicants
compensatory mitigation responsibility, dated 10/25/2018 was included with the preconstruction notification.
This form is not valid unless signed below by the USACE Project Manager and by the Mitigation Sponsor on Page 1. Once
signed, the Sponsor should provide copies of this form along with an updated bank ledger to:1) the Permittee, 2) the USACE
Project Manager at the address below, and 3) the Wilmington District Mitigation Office, Attn: Todd Tugwell, 1140S Falls
of Neuse Road, Wake Forest, NC27S87 (email. [e-mail]). Questions regarding this form or any of the
permit conditions may be directed to the USACE Project Manager below.
USACE Project Manager: David L. Shaeffer
USACE Field Office:
Charlotte Regulatory Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Email:
[e-mail]
Dlgltally signed by
5 HAEF FER.DAVID.LEIG H.1260750573
DN: c=US, o=U.s. Govemment, ou=DoD, ou=PKI,
ou=USA, cn=SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Date: 2019.01.2411:39:50.05'00'
USACE Project Manager Signature
01/24/2019
Date of Signature
Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, including information on mitigation ratios, functional assessments, and
mitigation bank location and availability, and credit classifications (including stream temperature and wetland groupings) is
available at http://ribits.usace.army.mil

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 01/24/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Mattamy homes, Bob Wiggins, 2128 Ayrsley Town
Blvd., Suite 201,Charlotte, NC 28273
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Cheyney Residential Subdivision,
SAW-200641171
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is located west of the
intersection of Meridale Forest Drive and Allen A Brown Road. PINs: 02762101, 02762102, 02761168, 02718125,
02718126, 02718185, and 02718103 (partial parcel).
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Huntersville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.3626 Longitude:-80.8133
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Clarks Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 6/8/2018
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
review area (acreage
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
Stream A
35.360496
-80.818407
1,194 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
Stream B
35.359836
-80.816656
16 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
Stream C
35.358345
-80.815522
2,190 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
Stream D
35.358789
-80.815448
41 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
Stream E
35.363003
-80.816496
1,342 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
Stream F
35.363263
-80.815521
370 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters

Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquaticwhich
aquatic resources. in
-the aquatic resource
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
resources (i.e.,
Nmay
Site Number
review area (acreage
be subject (i.e.,
degrees) `
(decimaldegrees)
wetland vs. non-"
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Stream G
35.359027
-80.810672
104 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
Wetland
35.360475
-80.818366
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
AA
Wetland
35.36046
-80.818202
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
BB
Wetland
35.360358
-80.817907
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
cc
Wetland
35.360299
-80.817784
0.004 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
DD
Wetland
35.359269
-80.815984
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
EE
Wetland
35.358922
-80.814904
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
FF
Wetland
35.358823
-80.81399
0.05 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
GG
Wetland
35.359003
-80.813413
0.05 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
HH
Wetland II
35.359329
-80.813089
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
Wetland
35.361188
-80.815353
0.07 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
J1
Wetland
35.362171
-80.816011
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
KK
Wetland
35.362577
-80.816177
0.005 ac
Wetland Waters
Section 404
LL
Wetland
35.362892
-80.816446
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
MM
Wetland
35.363212
-80.816755
0.1 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
NN
Wetland
35.363606
-80.817069
0.02 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
00
Wetland
35.359333
-80.812846
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
PP

Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
aquatic resources in
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
review area (acreage
resources (i.e.,
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
and linear feet, if
wetland vs. non -
Section 404 or Section
applicable
wetland waters)
101404)
Wetland
35.365793
-80.809653
0.04 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
QQ
Wetland
35.35881
-80.81063
0.01 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
RR
Wetland
35.362502
-80.81611
0.003 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
Yy
Wetland
35.358892
-80.815239
0.004 ac.
Wetland Waters
Section 404
u
Pond A
35.360054
-80.813958
1.1 ac.
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
Pond B
35.362767
-80.816354
0.03 ac.
Non -wetland
Section 404
Waters
Non -wetland
Pond C
35.36063
-80.816619
0.05 ac
Section 404
Waters
Non -wetland
Pond D
35.363507
-80.815352
0.04 ac
Section 404
Waters

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 7.7a, and 7b dated 6/11/2018.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web soil survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: FEMA NFHL Mapservice
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: []Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
EVIPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
Q SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260710173
DN: c=US, UGovernment, ou=DoD,
ou=PKI, ou=USASA,
cn=SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Date:2019.01.24 11:40:11 -05'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
01/24/2019
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
N�
/ c
W1-W2, S1 ill
PROP. PERMANENT I
IMPACT TO
WETLANDS AA 8 BBM AND STREAM A tSEE
PLAN AND SECTION
VIEWS FOR DETAILS)
wwn: w
n n'
lmmn.m �
• PROP. !
(LOCATION SUBJ1
TO CHAN
NOTES:
I @1 161 dfi
vFiE
11!
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND
e; 11
1
SURVEY OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED
911812013.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
"FLAG
T
.mm'_��"s�/�e-nro ice.\
R SERVICES (CWS) ON MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED
rlmoi w�ovy p 412512018.117
sa�inm
��+r•I R1�
S. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
OF: MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.8t ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES. INC. DATED 911812013.
4. CHEYNEY IS A SINGLE AND COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT. MERIDALE IS
AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT THAT CONNECTS TO CHEYNEY.
ME
w
�
FUTURE
FUTURE
'
PHASES
PROP. BOP
.
PHASE 2
tutu r suaecr
CM41'OEI
(LOCATION
a
lu*WTsuaecr
SUBJECT TO
a
o
0
o cwu+csl
CHANGE)
Cheyney
Bottomless Culverts within Meridale
w
Subdivision (See Figure X, Attachment F)
o
Meridale
I
f
Subdivision �1 S10 St R t t'
PROP. BMP
S Y� (LOCATIONSUBJECT /
y TOO CHANGE) �UJ
FUTURE
/?
O � [
PHASE4
3-S7
)P. TEMPORARY IMPACT
EPLAANANDSECTION i\ �90oRG Proposed Pond Draining and
WS FOR DETALS) _ nil Stream Restoration (See
r./ U—jf 1l Attachment E)
= FUTURE
P PHASE
IUYroWT. IECT
TA \SUBJECT TO
'E)
IEXIST." �
MERIDALE
SUBDIVISION
PROP. TEMPORARY IMPACTS
TO STREAMS C AND G
P pRK OR
(SEE PLAN AND SECTION
VIEWS FOR DETAILS)
`r
ream es ora ton.
- 62 if temporary impacts
S11: Stream Restoration
- 79 If temporary impacts
H
m
W
U
a z
�g
W d
Z Q J
L J Q
U Cn im >
aQ
0
Z
O
W a
0
a
a

GATeam Drives\Consulting Team Drive120IM2018 Consulting Projects12018-0103 Meridale Bolt-0MPerrnit (NWP 29)WrcGIS\Photomap.mxd

FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
riw>a w
PROP. PERMANENT
IMPACT TO
WETLANDS AA d BB
AND STREAM A (SEE
PLAN AND SECTION
VIEWS FOR DETAILS)
PROP. TEMPORARY IMPACTS
TO STREAMS C AND G
(SEE PLAN AND SECTION
NOTES:
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 412512018.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.8t ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
GRAPHIC SCALE
(IN FEET)
1 INCH = 400 FT.
r�
m
X
W
U
a
IL Z
Wig
W uj
Ja
U c% w
O >
Z 0
Q .r
0
4Z
J
I—
W

NOTES:
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 412512018.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER -TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.8t ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
FUTURE STORM
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
(LAYOUT SUBJECT
TO CHANGE)
FUTURE EDGE OF
PAVEMENT
FUTURE -
CONCRETE
SIDEWALK
FUTURES
RIGHT OF
WAY
NI'1-Wetland AA
- 0.013 acre permanent
impact (fill)
FUTURE CHEYNEY
SUBDIVISION
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
EXIST. 1 ?O
L xE7lAND 815
Ir c�J
511 ��
g
J
-J
e
�p ems) ...•
818
, 81
812
PROP. M PERANENT
IMPACT, INTERMITTENT
STREAM A LF)
—r
(M
W2-Wetland BB
- 0.006 acre
permanent impact
(fitl)
f
EXIST. 10'
WETLAND
BUFFER (TYP.)
EXIST. TOP
OF BANK
ERMANENT - ------
WETLAND 1.._..._.__..___
SF)
813
e�9
10 w
_ S1 -Stream A - —
' 1 - 38 If permanent 61
impact (fill) s� —
s
PROP. PERMANENT
IMPACT, WETLAND SB °p
(282 SF)
EXIST.
WETLAND
(TYPJ
A m`p POCo BUFFER FUTURE CHEYNEY
SUBDIVISION
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
FUTURE SANITARY
SEWER SYSTEM
(LAYOUT SUBJECT
TO CHANGE)
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
LEGEND
r �,
EXIST. WETLANDS
L
EXIST, WETLANDS BUFFER
,LD
1
PROP. WETLAND IMPACT AREA 000 O D D D D D O D D O D 0
t�0000 DOD DOD O 00
EXIST. STREAM
EXIST. PCSO BUFFER
EXIST. MAJOR CONTOUR
EXIST. MINOR CONTOUR
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR
PROP. MINOR CONTOUR
to p`�1�n1°I�ti°N
GRAPHIC SCALE
EXIST.
INTERMITTENT
STREAM A
( IN FEET)
1 INCH = 40 FT.

NOTES
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 9/19/2018.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 412512018.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.81 ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 9118/2018.
4. SEE EXHIBIT 2 FOR PLAN VIEW OF IMPACTS
GRAPHIC SCALE
(IN FEET)
1 INCH = 40 FT,
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET)
1 INCH = 4 FT.
+ �70.74--t-24,2{- 1 21.36 j{
820 I I
E:4i[17
PROP. —
PERMANENT
FILL OVER
WETLANDS AA
:11
790
A
901111111
E�;PERMANENT
x
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY
0
w
~ Lu
C� J_
_ LL-
W 2'
Q Q
a �
�a
w
Z Q
wO
�
=Fo
" cn a
0
Z m
m
p od
Z Q
Q Q
H O
J
H-
W �
F K
m_
2 0
W

NOTES:
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
E �lq
pp3�
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
GRAPHIC SCALE
OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 9/1812018.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 412512018.
LEGEND
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
( IN FEET)
r. , .1
w
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.81 ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES INC DATED9118/2018
1 INCH = 40 FT.
EXIST, WETLANDS ,
`
'775'
TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING
EXIST. 100' (SEE CLDSM STD. NO. 30.22A)
PCCO BUFFER (SEE IMPACT EXHIBIT 9)
771
PROP. TEMPORARY
�\ IMPERVIOUS DIKE - 0^
1
S4 - Stream G 768
- 10 If permanent impact (rip rap stabilization `TEMP. TIMBER BRIDGE
along banks) - - BY OTHERS
IMS (CONTRACTOR .-766
RESPONSIBLE FOR
S5 - Stream G DES a
- st Iftemporary impacts (sewerline \
installation, bank stabilization, and dcwatcrrmg
\
system) � \b `
UPLAND ZONE `
SWIM BUFFER
EXIST. 20'
STREAM SIDE �ar �(b'���`,. A
ZONE SWIM \ \ \
BUFFER
EXIST.
PROPERTY \
BOUNDARY
PROP. \CROSSING (TO BE � \
INSTALLED BY OPEN CUT METHOD)
(SEE EXHIBIT 8 FOR STREAMBANK \ \ N
RESTORATION)
♦ PROP. TEMPORARY
�.� IMPERVIOUS DIKE\\
PROP. TEMPORARY \
RIP RAP APRON FOR
BYPASS DISCHARGE
�'' ~� ♦ EXIST.
PROP. TEMPORARY TOP OF
DEWATERING DEVICE BANK
t•
EXIST. TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING
ADJACENT (SEE CLDSM STD. NO. 30.22A)
PROPERTY (SEE IMPACT EXHIBIT 7)
BOUNDARY
PROP. TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
EXIST. WETLANDS BUFFER (✓" , ' ; " I
PROP. WETLAND IMPACT AREA O O O O O O O B O 0 0 0 0 0J)
Lu OHO OHO OHO 1i0
EXIST. STREAM LL R
B
Y
EXIST. PCSO BUFFER czi
_ ♦ Q m
�/ EXIST. BUFFER EXIST. MAJOR CONTOUR
J• '\ EXIST. MINOR CONTOUR i
J! ' PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR
EXIST.
INTERMITTENT �s o
\ STREAM G \ 'S� 9 PROP. MINOR CONTOUR g
Ae \ EXIST. S2 - Stream C 3
\ PROP. TEMPORARY PROPERTY - 10 If pemranent impact (rip rap stabilization
IMPACT, INTERMITTENT BOUNDARY along banks)
STREAM G (50 LF FOR
SEWER INSTALLATION p ICO BUFFER
AND BYPASS PUMPING) S3 - Stream C
MST. 100 YEAR - 40 If temporary impacts (sewerline �-
i \ \ STORMWATER PROP. GRAVITY installation, bank stabilization, and dew'aterring m
SEWER TRUNK LINE -.ELEVATION systcrn) X
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO. TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING Lu
CHANGE) (SEE CLDSM STD. NO. 30.22A) LJJ
(SEE IMPACT EXHIBIT T) U ;
9 TEMP. TIMBER BRIDGE - ERS Q
C (CONTRACTOR R SIBLE FOR w a
ti ) .
o Z Q
PROP. TEMPORARY IMPACT, a p >- Lu
\ PERENNIAL = STREAM C (50 LF S n
FOSEWoiS
FOR SEWER INSTALLATION AND b z U N (,)
BYPASS PUMPING) > g N
\ PROP. TEMPORARY 21 Z M
RIP RAP APRON FOR = 0 Q w
\ \ BYPASS DISCHARGE 0
Z H
\ /LLJ
\ \ z
PROP. TEMPORARY �
EXIST \ \ U IMPERVIOUS DIKE
PERENNIAL >s1 ., \�
STREAM ' A
PROP. TEMPORARY 1-
PROP. STREAM CROSSING (TO BE
DEWATERING DEVICE m
INSTALLED BY OPEN CUT METHOD) x w
(SEE EXHIBIT 8 FOR STREAMBANK LU
RESTORATION)

770, 770,
0
760
BOTTOM 4 OF OPEN CUTJ 1.v ♦cm.
STREAM BANK
TO BE RE-ESTABLISHED
WITH RIP RAP PQ
750
PCONCRETE j_
A TISEEP COLLAR
LOCATED SPACED
EVENLY BETWEEN TOP OF
BANK AND MANHOLE
PROP. 8" SAN.
SWR.
740
OR
m n v
C
N
B
Be
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET)
1 INCH = 40 FT.
760
PROP.
CLASS
RIP RAP
2.T VERT. DIET. BOTTOM } OF OPEN CUT
- - - STREAM BANK
TO BE RE-ESTABLISHED
WITH RIP RAP
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY. x !K
;1{118aE
W
R
w � m
U LS
k
0
PROP. 8" SAN.
SWR.
PROP. CONCRETE
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR
LOCATED AT TOP OF
m
750
BANK
x
w w
NOTES:
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND
SURVEY OF MERIDALE-MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC.
DATED 911812018.
Q Lu
ILL.
— 0
LL
z Q n
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH"
DATED 4/25/2018.
} w
LLJ of
) F- 06
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY OF: MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.8t
ACRES" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 9118/2018.
4 SEE EXHIBIT 4 FOR PLAN VIEW OF IMPACTS
p V
Z (N
Q
p Q
Z w
740
cn
co
to 10
c
cN to
n
C
Co
VERTICAL
GRAPHIC SCALE
IN FEET )
1 INCH = 4 FT,
w
L
m_ o
= o
w

NOTES:
1. WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "WETLAND SURVEY
OF MERIDALE•MAXWELL" BY ESP ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911812018.
2. WETLANDS AND STREAMS DELINEATED BY CAROLINA WETLAND
SERVICES (CWS) ON "FLAG MAP NORTH AND SOUTH" DATED 412W2018.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN PER "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF:
MERIDALE-MAXWELL PROPERTY BEING 166.8t ACRES" BY ESP
ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 911912018.
S6 - Stream F
- 10 If pcmiancnt impact (rip rap stabilization
along banks)
S7 - Stream F
- 40 I f [cmpOTWY impacts (sc, crline
installation, bank stabilization. and de,oterrine
s,'stem)
EXIST. 10'
WETLAND
BUFFER
PONDA, 199
(TYP.)
PROP. TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
PROP. TEMPORARY v
DEWATERING DEVICE
EXIST. 10' �
WETLAND
BUFFER
EXIST. ti
TOP OF
BANK
WETAND
PROP. TEMPORARY`
RIP RAP APRON FOR
BYPASS DISCHARGE._
WETLAND`*., \.
EXIST. 10—
WETLAND
BUFFER GRAPHIC SCALE
M 6rt
( IN FEET)
1 INCH = 40 FT.
B0401
\t
TEMP. TIMBER BRIDGE - BY OTHERS
(CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR
DESIGN)
PROP. TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE � EXIST 100 YEAR
STORMWATER
ELEVATION
-0� 800
INTERMITTENT
STREAM F
r� �f
.,� EXIST. 50'
PCSO BUFFER
TEMP. BYPASS PUMPING
(SEE CLDSM STD. NO. 30.22A)
,(SEE IMPACT EXHIBIT 7)
PROP. TEMPORARY IMPACT,
y 1 INTERMITTENT STREAM F (50 LF
FOR SEWER INSTALLATION AND
j \ BYPASS PUMPING)
PROP. STREAM CROSSING (TO BE
l INSTALLED BY OPEN CUT METHOD)
(SEE EXHIBIT 8 FOR STREAMBANK
_ RESTORATION) 790
10 0
'� r SEXIST. 100 YEAR
STORMWATER
'
' r
/ 1
ELEVATION
)
\
/`
-•�
D
PROP. GRAVITY
SEWER TRUNK LINE
(LAYOUT SUBJECT TO
1
.
CHANGE)
h �• �'
�� EXIST. 100'
_
t
PCSO BUFFER
'9J
k
780
00
D
FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
L
+
LEGEND
EXIST. WETLANDS
-
EXIST. WETLANDS BUFFER
PROP. WETLAND IMPACT AREA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0
`0000000.000�0
'��`
EXIST. STREAM
EXIST. PCSO BUFFER
EXIST. MAJOR CONTOUR
!C
a
EXIST. MINOR CONTOUR
V
sF
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR
S
PROP. MINOR CONTOUR
BOTTOM 44 OF OPEN CUT
STREAM BANK
1
_
&I
VERT.
DIST.
TO BE RE-ESTABLISHED
WITH RIP RAP
F-
W W_
Q _J
n °a
PROP. CONCRETE
LL
Lu d
} W 06
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR a
LOCATED AT TOP OF o
- BANK
Z
= Q
U fA a
C3 .
Z LL
'SAN
Q
0 �
Z Q
4 LLj c's
P
P
tD
LLI to
VERDTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
�
G
F=
m
�
x
( IN FEET)
uJ
1 INCH = 4 FT.
a

FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
R
e�cKniraav+m wom
Z
8lCMMOG WT1G10 YIIIX YY �N
\W F14GSOt
�
Z
1tMOF
M1G!
l�Ji53
m
DISCHARGE HOSE
ENERGY DISSIPATION"�
\ ~' ROW
��..
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
SUCTION HOSE
I
�
-O '
rew wGUGGnwo
I
PROJECT
TOP OF BANK
wrcN
DEWATERING DEVICE
.
QLL
` WORK AREA
NOTE:
ANCHOR ALL PUMPS AND PIPES SECURELY
ow�rt�
W
W W
Z =
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
Ij 4D
My OF
STREAMBANK RESTORATION
v y y
term DVMLop==mWs BYPASS
PUMPING
PLANTING DETAIL
aKTDoe aurora m
30,2 t s
Q
00
3

FOR USAGE PERMITTING ONLY.
-1O-
TOP OF BANK
\
-
rSTREAMSIDEJ
ZONE
STREAM CENTERLIIE J
\
I-
CLASS I RIP RAP 24' THICK
WIDTH VARIES
3' MIN.
HIGH PERFORMANCE
BOTTOM OF BANK
—`r I
I
STABILIZATION
MAn�
ANCHOR FOR HIGH
PERFORMANCE SSA
= WATER LEVEL
HIGH PERFORMANCE
TOP OF BANK
WOVEN COIR NET EROSION
I
j"� 2' MIN.
STABILIZATION
MATTING
—I
CONTROL BLANKET (ECB)
III
IIIIII
(TYP.)
—
—IIIII
— 2.
TOP OF BANK
�
EXTEND FILTER
CLASS 1 24"
THICK RIP RAP
—
FABRIC 2' MIN.
BOTTOM OF CREEK BEYOND RIP RAP
PROP. SANITARY
'
I-
FILTER FABRIC
PROPOSED
MIRAFI OR
SANRNfY SEWER
8070M OF BANK
APPREOUAL OVED
�1
I I I I
NOTE
SEE EXHIBIT 7 FOR
I I I III
RIP RAP PLACEMENT MUST BE UIITED TO A WIDTH OF 10-FEET
PLANTING DETAIL
ALONG STREAMBANKS. CENTEROINED ON THE SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING. NO RIP RAP SHAM BE PLACED
WI THIN THE CREEK BED.
NOT TO SCALEI
NOT TO SC
STREAMBANK
RESTORATION
RIP RAP
PLACEMENT
LIMITS ,GHQ
y,
F_
m
au.
C
N
F j W
Z � W
Lu co
U co J
�a
�I -U
00
Z --
u
3
°D C
F �
n
W
i

NOTES: FOR USACE PERMITTING ONLY.
yyy Y y a � x
1. WETLANDS AND STREAM INFORMATION SHOWN PER "FLAG MAP
NORTH AND SOUTH" BY CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES (CWS) DATED
4/251201B.
Ary�wTM `MU AMM
Tw
p�"rza vm � I xmm � M n-xz.m • w.s \ (cox,�.eo wm1 r� -
-
FUTURE � m
G \ FUTURE PHASE2 w
O�� e'er PHASE 3 -avcu� suecr PROP. BMP .. 3
OP A .b (LOCATION
- SUBJECT TOT. a H o
CHANGE)
"PROP. TEMPORARY IMPACT
PTO STREAM F IpG\
Pit (SEE PLAN AND SECTION PD00 \N6
or ® VIEWS FOR DETAILS) ,p RrM
Ecological MERIDALE m
Reference SUBDIVISION =
PROP. PERMANENT I ® \ Mi'" �, Reach@S and '2, w
WETLANDS na a ee I t -160 If total M �� p I� z V
AND STREAM A (SEE ® ®'�,� PROP. BMP �ES RN z y Q
PLAN AND SECTION (LOCATION f Sd
�'���9''�jj o m d Z
VIEWS FOR DETAILS).SUBJECT TO a
PROP. BMP \ J�CHANGE) l z J
(LOCATION SUBJECT \ ; ., Y LjJ d
TO CHANGE)' '�-�--� Ecosystem ;�
Enhancement Lu w
Location = w �
U cn w
Dam Removal Z O
Q
pPROP.BM (\ 0
(LOCATION SUBJECT
S� [�7TO/CHANGE) ]h �``�j'i( ��� \� TO STREAMS TEMPORARY NDIGPACTS J
"RE RI� 1 (SEE PLAN AND SECTION
FUTURE
PHASE 4 c_ PRK U VIEWS FOR DETAILS) W g
r,T.
, SPRIaGRr« �l GRAPHIC SCALE o
.J I (IN FEET) k
1 INCH = 400FT. m
= o
r,a ral�cr +. • x
� w rc /A Ili w

Wetland JJ
Stream E
Zl'
Stream E
Restoration T e-in
Reference Survey
Reach 1 and 2
1) Drain Pond
2) Hydro -seed entire lake bed with temporary
erosion control seed mix
3) Install temporary inlet protection at existing
pipe outfall
4) Excavate dam - ensure work is performed in
the dry
5) Install temporary water diversion for stream
restoration sequence
6) Complete stream restoration channel work
7) Stabilize restored stream channel banks
with EC mat Nedia S40ON or similar
8) Seed riparian areas with native riparian
seed mixed
9) Plant live stakes and bare root material in
riparian corridor, 25-ft either side of restored
channel
Legend
Proposed Stream Restoration (642-ft.)
Stream Restoration Corridor (0.59-ac.)
Proposed Bank Stabilization
Perennial Stream
- Intermittent Stream
Forested Wetlands
Herbaceous Wetlands
Jurisdictional Pond
--- Pipe
Pond A- 1.1-ac.
To Be Removed
100 50
Stream E
To Be Restored
Within Pond Footprint
100 Feet
Cheyney Ecosystem Enhancement -.)Kt
Meckknbung County, N.C.
Assessed by: Sean Martin and Daniel Roberts
Watershed Area: 82.6-aces or U.13-sp.mlles
Watershed land -Use: Agricultwal, Forested, Residential
Streambed Substrate: Sand
Valley Type: Alluvial
Valley Slope: 2%
Stream Length: 642-feet
Bankfull Slope: 1.5%%
Channel Morphologyar
H
Abkf: riffle bankfull cross-section area
4sf
Regional Curve Data
3.66f
Reference Survey
Wbkf/Dbkf: bankfull width to depth ratio
11-20
Regional Stream Data
14-19
Reference Survey
Stable Streambank Side Slopes
2:1 . 4:1
Regional Stream Data
Sinuosity of Channel
1-1.6
Regional Stream Data
1.35
Reference Survey
Meander Width Ratio
1.3
Regional Stream Data
1.48
Reference Survey
Radius of Curvature Patio
2.3
Regional Stream Data
2.27
Reference Sarver
Pool Spacing Ratio
3-5
Regional Stseam Dab
4.975
Reference Survey
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.5
Regional Stream Data
1-83
Reference Survey
Rank Height Ratio
1
R ZEi Stream Dab
Bankfull Discharge(cfs)
5.0
Regional Curve Data
4.3
Reference Survey
m
N a a
o to U
0
�
C
a
Y
=
01
CL
� �
ra
:: c
o
M
r
�a
w �
z
C ai
d t
to
U L
80-ft. of Pipe Removal
to
0
U
W
U
40' Bank Stabilization
Wetland JJ FICURENo.
-=� Wetland II 6
Stream E
Restoration Tie-in /l

STREAM RESTORATION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
NOTES:
1. DRAIN POND USING PIPE DIVERSION. PIPE DIVERSION TO BE
1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT ON FINAL
SIZED APPROPRIATELY BASED ON TWO-YEAR STORM EVENT.
STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN ONCE THE POND HAS BEEN DRAINED. FINAL
STAKE DIVERSION PIPE DOWN TO PREVENT MOVEMENT PLACE
SANDBAGS OR RIPRAP AT, OUTFALL AS VELOCITY DISSIPA70R.
LOCATION FOR LOG GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURES AND BOULDERS SHALL BE
ALLOW POND BED TO DRY OUT FOR SEVERAL DAYS BEFORE
DETERMINED BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS.
BEGINNING STREAM RESTORATION WORK.
2. NOT TO DISTURB HERBACEOUS WETLANDS ABOVE POND AREA. ACCESS TO
2. SEED ENTIRE POND BED WITH TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL
POND - STREAM RESTORATION SITE NEEDS TO AVOID THE WETLANDS.
SEED MIX FOLLOWING DRAINING. SPREAD STRAW COVER OVER
SEED MIX.
3. COMPLETE STREAM RESTORATION WORK. REFER TO STREAM
RESTORATION PLAN SHEETS (FIGURES C AND 0).
4. STABILIZE RESTORED STREAM CHANNEL BANKS AND RIPARIAN
CORRIDOR (REFER TO STABILIZATION PLAN SHEET, FIG. C).
5. PLANT LIVE STAKES IN RIPARIAN CORRIDOR DURING
IMMEDIATE DORMANT VEGETATION SEASON (SEE
STABILIZATION PLAN SHEET, FIG. C).
�.♦•`••'■••■� POND FOOTPRINT/ "�■�,, XISTING EARTHEN BERM
XISTING WETLAND FRINGE ♦�•♦•'••'■��•••••
♦♦♦�♦`♦ ROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
♦♦♦ 20-FT. FROM EDGE OF RESTORATION CHANNEL �♦
TYPICAL POOL : `�♦
S SECTION
i TYPICAL LOG GRADE
`j CONTROL STRUCTURE
(RIFFLE)
■ `
• � ` : Fop
XISTING UT-CLARKS CREEK
CREEK ABOVE POND
PROPOSED UT-CLARKS CREEK RESTORATION
CHANNEL APPROX. 642-LINEAR FEET IN LENGTH,
2% SLOPE
PROPOSED RESTORED STREAM CHANNEL TO TIE
TO EXISTING CHANNEL BELOW SPILLWAY
NOT TO SCALE
z
LJ
U
Z
LJ
D r
LLJ wu,
Vl ) I
WWu
Z CL r~
0 >om ri ZOLW
a
U MUM
7 U W
lY �
z
0
u
me
NO.

LIVE STAKING
- BANK STABILIZATION (N.T.S.)
SQUARE CUT
BUDS (FACING UPWARD)
NOTES-
L
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED 4 FEET APART.
LIVE CUTTING
2.
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN UNTIL APPROXIMATELY % OF LIVE STAKE
()¢'-11¢' DIAMETER)
2-3 FEET IN
LENGTH
3.
IS WITHIN P"O'"D
IF STARTER HOLE IS NEEDED, MINIMIZE AIR POCKET AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
ANGLE CUT
4.
UTILIZE ON SITE TRANSPLANT MATERIALS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE OVNEIL
30-45 DEGREES
ONCE SOURCE OF TRANSPLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN HARVESTED. UTIIZE
LIVE STAKING.
NOTE -
STAKING MAY BE REQUIRED THROUGH
MATTING, ROCK, OR COMPACTED SOILS.
REQUIRE STARTER MILE IF THE CASE.
LIVE STAKES
III- -11t
I
NORMAL DEPTH
NOT TO SCALE
TYPICAL DEPICTION OF POND REMOVAL
MATTING LOCATION (N.T.S.)
NA GREEN SC150 BN
MATTTING FROM TOE
OF CHANNEL TO 5
FEET BEYOND
BANKFULL
sm oNNNNFI ra
NOTES
FR
TRENCH MATTING
MI DEPTH OF 6A
1) USE WOOD STAKES OR
INCHES AND BACKF0.l
EC13STAKES (NOT METAL) FO
MATTING INSTALLED IN PUMP PROPOSED
AROUNDS OR IN THE WET. BANKFULL
BULL
t
2) USE OF METAL STAPLES NA GREEN SC150 BN
IS ACCEPTABLE WHEN
CONSTRUCTING IN THE DRY NA GREEN cm
AND VEGETATION IS OUTSIDE�OF
MA GREEN u, tnNO
ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO TO TOP
DIVERTING WATER. [IF FLUaDPLAIN,
APPROX. S-FT VIDE
Ii" MA MINE=TAI(6
STABILIZE NEWLY EXPOSED POND BOTTOM FROM
AND STREAM RESTORATION •• • •••`�•I••I•••• BERM TO EDGE OF STREAM RIPARIAN CORRIDOR •�
•
• INCLUDING DISTURBED LIMITS WITH EROSION
•.•.•�-�•=••- - _ _ _ CONTROL SEED MIX AND STRAW COVER. - - - is
••
EMPORARY t 4.5' WIDE AVERAGE
iANDBAG (� BANKFULL CHANNEL - - - • •
AVERSION. _
f a
- - - - - - - STREAM RIPARIAN CORRIDOR (-25'
WIDE) - EROSION CONTROL
►• ` MATTING, NATIVE PLANT SEEDING
•• `. AND LIVE STAKES WITHIN RIPARIAN
CORRIDOR. NO MATTING BELOW
BANKFULL ELEVATION IN STREAM
•�..,_ CHANNEL.
'EMPORARY PIPE
HIVERSION - SIZED
'0 CONVEY 2-YEAI
NORM FLOW.
NAKED DOWN AT
0-FT INTERVALS.
TEMPORARY PIPE
DIVERSION OUTFALL
ONTO SANDBAG
VELOCITY DISSIPATOR.
F�IREC\I
N
H m
C3 R
Z W
W 7 U
Of Ci A U
N
QWy n
Z�B
JN�
OOW
m<l S'
10Li les
F
V inmucL
r
F z
LlZO
ce
aim
row
J
a
} Q J
x
2 U U
U W
&I

TVpinl 0e *m Pool Cross-section
.. 3]FeeSMFw I�TW IIvee BeYllbe ,A
1�
hNAA El.v�mn
15
14
13
12
11
10
rrl 9
D
_I g
7
m
ri 6
<
5
0 4
3
2
1
0
weM.ap Ere. tus Arr. eo
TVpic..�. Deng, RiM. Coss- . or
ttE SAe SEopn Blood Anne DeMEIw
----------------------------
f
WW." ohm-" AMe•AD
TYPICAL LOG GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE
LOG GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE
1. 12' MIN. DIAMETER LOGS
OemE O=Am
2. 12' MIN. LENGTH LOGS
1 NAIL HEADER LOG TO
liV[
FOOTER LOG USING >]"
aim
REBAR
4. NAIL NON -WOVEN FILTER
CLOTH TO UPSTREAM SIDE
_
OF LOGS (FOLLOW LOG
CONTOURS) AND BURY
UPSTREAM END BENEATH
ROCK FOOTER AND CHANNEL
BED
aCUT 2'X 12' NORMAL FLOW
NOTCH IN TOP OF HEADER
j(
LOG
�S
6. EMBED ENDS OF LOG VANES
IN STREAM BANKS
LOG - MINIMUM 12'
Z. ANCHOR ENDS OF LOG
DIAMETER. AVERAGE
VANES WITH BALLAST
N 70 lOP OF LOGS AND
LENGTH 12'.
BOULDER OR DUCK BILL
Bl/® BELOW STREAM BED
ANCHORS WITH GALVANIZED
CABLE ATTACHED
NARRAL STREAM
MEDIUM
-STREAM BED
ROIX FOOTERS
ROCK FOOTERS
FILL
NATURAL STREAM
B. NATURAL/NATIVE STONE
FILTER CLOTH SHOULD
FOLLOW LOG CONTOM
MEDIUM
ROC( FOOTERS
6'-12MEDIAN DIAMETER
TO PREVENT VOIDS
9. ROCK CLUSTERS EMBEDDED
XISTING POND WATER SURFACE
STREAM DESIGN TABLE
DA: 0.129 S0. MI.
Wbkf. 4.5—FT
Dmax: 1.5—FT
Abkf: 4.25—FT
W/D: 10.5
Slope: 2X
P—P Spacing: 12-18'
Pool Length: 10-15'
Riffle Length: 10-15'
Pool Wbkf. 8'
Riffle Wbkh 6'
XISTING BOTTOM OF t-UNLr
ATER SURFACE
ARTHEN BERM
TYPICAL PROPOSED STREAM
RESTORATION POOL TO POOL
SPACING AT 12-18' INTERVALS
POND PROFILE IS A DEPICTION BASED ON UDAR DATA.
PROPOSED STREAM PROFILE NOT TO SCALE. LOCATION OF
PROPOSED IN -STREAM STRUCTURES IS TYPICAL ONLY. TYPICAL PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WATH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT CONTROL WITH ROCK FOOTERS
ON FINAL STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN ONCE THE POND HAS
BEEN DRAINED. FINAL LOCATION FOR LOG GRADE CONTROL (RIFFLES) SPACED AT 15-20'
STRUCTURES AND BOULDERS SHALL BE DETERMINED BASED ON INTERVALS
EXISTING CONDITIONS.
0 1 +00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00
STATION TIE PROPOSED CHANNEL TO
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL

ANCHOR -
FABRIC 6"
INTO EARTH
FILL
RESLOPE EXISTING STREAM BANK TO ORIGINAL
CONTOURS AND STABILIZE WITH NATIVE PLANT SEED
MIX.INSTALL NORTH AMERICAN GREEN S-75BN MATTING
OR EQUAL ON STREAMBANK WHEN SEEDING IS
=1 I I -III- COMPLETED.
BANKFULL ELEVATION
NORMAL STREAM LEVEL
'EiI ���I11��� IE I1 -
1=1 I -1 I I-1 11=1 v i
;II1=1IMIMI I- - .-
=I I -111-I I 1=1I_ VARIES
=111-11-
=11 I M 11=1 11=1 11
-11 M I I == I 1=1 1I-
-1 I; I I 1=1 I =1 11= 1
12" NA GREEN ECOSTAKES I=111-111-I 11-111=
1 1111111 III1= STREAM BED ELEVATION
TYPICAL STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
(NO FERTILIZER TO BE USED WITHIN 10' OF BANK)

e
♦� Figure 7a
Figure 7b
REFERENCES BACKGROUND GIB LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED W18.
NDTEJURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED (FLAGGED IN THE FIELD). CLASSIFIED,
ANDMAPPEDUSINGASUB-FOOTGPB UNIT BYCWS, INC..ONAPRIL10AND11, 201S. JURISDICTIONAL
FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE.
QN W
Zj
W
❑o
as
U3
N
07
t
'L
m
�
�
C
7
mtO0
D
c�
Rd
T�L3egend
O
m r
ProjecLimits (162.7 ac.)
to
°z
v m
L
o
— Perennial Stream
7
- - - Intermittent Stream
U
I® Forested Wetlands
O
Herbaceous Wetlands
y
Jurisdictional Pond
Z
— - Pipe
d
— Roads
0
Parcel_NoData
W► Photo Location and Direction
A SCP Stream Classification Point
•nP Data Point
1=1GlRI
NO
Indicates Flow
7
350 175 0 350 Feet
I

DPI• Potential Wetland e
7Wetland�
WateroftheUSDP' Welland CC: 0.01 ac.
DP4
etland
e US
B: 0.01 ac.
PotenWater of the USPotential Wetland
Wetland AA: 0.0Water of the US
Wetland DD: 0.004 ac.
1 inch = 100 feet
6�
Match to Figure 7a
Potential Wetlandtenn-wetland
Water of the USUS
Stream E
Wetland EE: 0.01
l Pond A
- - j
(Figure 7a for length
agged in field)
and flow information)
Potential Wetland
Water of the USWetland
II: 0.01 ac.
Potential Wetland
Water of the USWetland
ZZ: 0.004 ac.
SC
Potential Wetland
Potential Wetland
Water of the US
Wetland FF: 0.01 ac.
DPI20
Water of the US
Wetland RR: 0.01 ac.
DP))
Potential Wetland
Water of the US
Wetland PP: 0.01 ac.
SCP4 _
Potential Non -wetland
Water of the US
Intermittent Stream D
41 If
Potential Non -wetland
Water of the US
Perennial Stream A:1,194If SCP5
CfD(,e�de In
Potential Non -wetland e
Water of the US
Intermittent Stream B
16 If
p
7 SCP3
1 inch = 50 feet
REFE_RUGE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT. DATED MIS.
V,QM JURISDICTgWLL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELJNEATEO (FLAGGED W THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED.
ANDAUIPPEDUSNGASUB-FOOTGPSLN BYCWS.HC.,ONAPRRIOAN011,MI8. JURISDICTIONAL
FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USAGE.
rS
F
I Potential Welland
Water of the US
Potential Wetland
Wetland HH: 0.05 ac.
Stream C
Water of the US
Wetland GG: 0.05 ac.
Potential Non -wetland
Water of the US
Perennial Stream C
q
2,190 If
<n
Z;
a
JW
N
Oo
az
QJ
F
U3 i
t
7
O
Potential Non -wetland i
�
Water of the US z
rn
d
Intermittent StreamG
104 If /i
f0
Legend
°
0Vc
0
into
Q Project Limits (162.7 ac.)
m
M
^z4
v_ o
- Perennial Stream
G
aD
3 0
- Intermittent Stream
++
a
® Forested Wetlands
v
0 Herbaceous Wetlands
fA
L� Jurisdictional Pond
7
-wa % Pipe
— Roads
Parcels
H Photo Location and Direction
. SCP Stream Classification Point
GDP Data Point
FIGURE NO.
Indicates Flow
/ 201 100 0 200 Feet
7 b
NM

Cheyney
Attachments
November 22, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
ATTACHMENT F:
NCDEQ Water Quality Certification

I,"OY ('Or, PLIZI t'i0l, I II':Ac?U,INA
Envlronmenful Quality
I IND.-1 ('UI I'I PH f,'�
December 7, 2018
DWR# 18-1502
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Bob Wiggins
Mattamy Homes
2128 Ayrsley Town Blvd., Ste. 201
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Cheyney Project
Dear Mr. Wiggins:
You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those conditions listed
below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated October 13, 2018, and received by the
Division of Water Resources (the Division) on November 15, 2018, and subsequent information on
December 3, 2018. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered
by Water Quality General Certification Number 4134 & 4139 which can be viewed on our web site at
his://cieq nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/401-
wetIands_buffer-permits/401-401-isolated-wetlands-waters-program The General Certification allows
you to use Nationwide Permit Number 27 & 29 once they are issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE). Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion
Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions of the Certification are
reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the requirements of the Certification, you must
also comply with the following conditions:
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application and
subsequent information submitted on December 3, 2018. If you change your project, you
must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a new
Certification. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 300 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may
be required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and
approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. 15A NCAC
02H .0506 and 15A NCAC 02H .0507
- - N41':10)1()( (it I! p,II t -,
State orNorlh Carolina I linrirrnuncntnl Qualit.s
1611 Mail Scrn ice Cenler I Raleigh, North Carolina 27099- l6l I
1)19-707-0M)

2. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved
impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)
3. Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Temporary Impact
Amount Approved
Permanent Impact
Stream
200 linear ft.
68 linear ft.
Wetland
0 acre
0.019 acre
4. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and erosion
control measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and turbidity. This
includes interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
5. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be matted.
15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
6. Please provide documentation showing that water quality from the development will not be
impaired. A storm water management plan (City of Charlotte) in lieu of such documentation is
acceptable if approved by a delegated or state authority. 15A NCAC 2H .1000
7. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the
potential receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations,
scouring or erosion of the stream banks. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)
8. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques is recommended
where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it
shall not be placed in the streambed, unless approved by DWR
9. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters
of the U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
10. No rock, sand or other materials shall be dredged from the stream channel except where
authorized by this Certification. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
11. The permittee shall report to the Mooresville Regional Office any noncompliance with this
certification, any violation of stream or wetland standards [including but not limited to sediment
impacts, and any violation of state regulated riparian buffer rules. Information shall be provided
orally within 24 hours (or the next business day if a weekend or holiday) from the time the
applicant became aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided
within 5 business days of the time the applicant becomes aware of the circumstances. The
written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its causes; the period
of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, if the noncompliance has not been
corrected, the anticipated time compliance is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned
to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The Division may waive
the written submission requirement on a case -by -case basis. 15A NCAC 02B .0200
12. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the permit
drawings submitted for approval. 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2)
and (c)(2)

13, Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return a "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Branch of the Division using the following link:
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Certificate-of-Completion. 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute 150B
by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the Administrative Hearings
(hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at htta://www,ncoah.com/or by
calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A
petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee
is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm,
excluding state holidays).
The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one (1)
copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Bill Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-
663-1699.
Sincerely,
11 �
( 0" Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
Attachments
cc: David Shaeffer, Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte, email
Greg Antemann, CWS, email
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file
MRO, Land Quality

Cheyney
Attachments
November 22, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0103
ATTACHMENT G:
SHPO Letter

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
January 17, 2019
Sean Norris
TRC Solutions
621 Chatham Avenue, 2❑d Floor
Columbia, SC 29205
[e-mail]
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Cultural Resources Survey of Four Stream Impact areas on the Cheyney Tract, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, ER 18-3276
Dear Mr. Norris:
Thank you for your submission of December 26, 2018, concerning the above referenced project. We have
reviewed the information provided and offer the following comments:
TRC conducted a cultural resources survey on approximately seven acres of the Chayney Tract corresponding
to the Permit Areas defined by the USACOE. A total of 44 shovel test pits were excavated in which no
archaeological resources were identified. TRC recommended that no significant cultural resources will be
impacted and no further work is necessary. We concur with the findings and recommendations and accept the
draft report as final.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.review cgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
cz,
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599