20191668 Ver 1_AR18-10-0003NoSitesPresent_20191209

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
o ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
& f p
-q;,?.° This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
`. valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the .Q
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: NA County: Cabarrus
WBS No: 17BP.10.R.108 Document: MCC
F.A. No: NA Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: ?
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 10 intends to replace
Bridge No. 292 on SR 2625, Mauney Road, over Little Meadow Creek. No preliminary designs
were available at the time of the request for archaeological review, but a study area that
encompasses roughly 32.8 acres (approximately 13.27 hectares) was provided with the request.
For the purposes of the archaeological investigation, this study area will be considered the Area
of Potential Effects (APE).
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME), on behalf of NCDOT, performed an archaeological resource survey for
the planned replacement of Bridge No. 292 on SR 2625, Mauney Road, over Little Meadow
Creek, roughly one mile east of the small community of Georgeville, in Cabarrus County, North
Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). As there are no preliminary design plans at this stage, S&ME was
provided a study area that is roughly 3250 feet (approximately 990.6 meters) long and
approximately 440 feet (roughly 134.1 meters) wide, with the study area covering roughly 32.8
acres (approximately 13.27 hectares).
A background literature review and records search was conducted at the North Carolina Office of
State Archaeology (OSA) and at the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in Raleigh. The
records examined at SHPO included a review of National Register and survey files for properties
listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register and an examination of HPOWEB, a
GIS-based program containing information about aboveground historic resources in North
Carolina. Records examined at OSA included master archaeological site maps, state
archaeological site files, and associated archaeological reports. The area examined was a 0.5-
mile radius around the APE.
A review of the files and records at SHPO and OSA indicated there are no archaeological sites
and no aboveground resources recorded within a 0.5-mile radius of the project APE (Figures 1
and 2).

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
As part of the background research, the Collett (1770) map; the Price-Strother (1808) map; the
McRae -Brazier map (1833); the Harris Map of Cabarrus County (1875); a 1900 railroad map; a
1910 Cabarrus County United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil survey sheet; a
1921 United States Postal Service rural route map; North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) maps from 1938, 1953 and 1968; and United States Geological Survey (USGS)
topographic maps from 1957 and 1980 were examined.
The Collett map shows the project APE is in a sparsely populated area between two unnamed
roads (Figure 3). The Price-Strother map shows the APE near the Cabarrus and Montgomery
county line, with the city of Concord established to the northwest of the project area; the network
of roads was forming in both Cabarrus and Montgomery counties (Figure 4). The McRae -Brazier
map shows a similar setting to the Price-Strother map, with an increase in the network of roads
and landowners in the vicinity of the APE (Figure 5). The Harris map shows that the community
of Mount Pleasant had been established to the northwest of the APE and a few gold mines were
located in the vicinity of the project APE (Figure 6).
The 1900 railroad map depicts one rail line running through Cabarrus County; Mount Pleasant is
shown as a community north of the project area (Figure 7). The 1910 USDA soil survey map
shows Georgeville had been established to the west of the project APE and that a few residences
had been established in the vicinity of the project area (Figure 8). The 1921 USPS Rural Route
map shows a similar environment to the USDA soil survey map, with roadways and structures in
the vicinity of the project APE (Figure 9). The NCDOT highway map from 1938 depicts a few
structures in the vicinity of the project APE (Figure 10). The NCDOT maps from 1953 and 1968
do not have much detail, other than the roadways; the 1968 map is the first to show SR 2625,
Mauney Road, and the location of Bridge 292 (Figures 11 and 12). The topographic map from
1957 show one structure at the edge of the project APE (Figure 13); the topographic map from
1980 shows the structure from 1957 is gone and no other structures are within the project area
(Figure 14).
There are five soil types located within the APE (Figure 15); their descriptions can be found in
Table 1 (USDA Web Soil Survey, Accessed March 15, 2019). The National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) Mapper, shows one mapped stream and a freshwater forested/shrub wetland that within
APE (Figure 16).
Table 1. SDecific soil tvues found within the nroiect APE.
Baden channery silt loam (BaB)
Well drained
Summits
2-8%
22.3%
Baden channery silt loam (BaD)
Well drained
Hillslopes
8-15%
4.3%
Chewacla loam (ChA)
Somewhat poorly drained
Floodplains
0-2%
14.3%
Kirksey silt loam, (KkB)
Moderately well drained
Summits
1-6%
40.3%
Tarrus silty clay loam (TaB2)
Well drained
Summits
2-8%
18.8%
On March 21 and 26, 2019, S&ME completed an archaeological reconnaissance survey within
the APE. A pedestrian survey was conducted throughout the APE and was complemented by
shovel testing, both systematic and judgmental, based on the current conditions of the project
area. Shovel tests were excavated along transects placed 100 feet (30 meters) apart and
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
excavated at 100-foot (30-meter)intervals along the transect; judgmental shovel tests were
placed in areas that appeared to be disturbed or lack integrity to determine if intact soil
deposition was present. Shovel tests were at least 38-cm (15 inches) in diameter and excavated to
sterile subsoil. The shovel test locations were recorded with a Trimble GPS unit. Soil from the
shovel tests was screened though 1/4-inch wire mesh and soil colors were determined through
comparison with Munsell Soil Color Charts.
During the investigations, one archaeological site, 31 CA327, was identified (Figure 1 and 2;
Table 2). Site 31CA327 is mid -twentieth century house site and artifact scatter and a prehistoric
lithic scatter. The historic house site is likely associated with a structure that appears on the 1957
topographic map but is absent on the 1980 topographic map (Figures 13 and 14). It is the opinion
of S&ME that site 31 CA327 is not eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. The archaeological site
and each of the four quadrants of the project APE are discussed below.
Table 2.
Site
31CA327 Mid-201 century house site; Prehistoric lithic scatter Not Eligible
Northwest Quadrant
During the time of the archaeological survey, this quadrant was being timbered and heavy
equipment was active (Figures 17 and 18). The area had been heavily altered, with a pond being
constructed, and the heavy equipment had disturbed the soils; no shovel testing is recommended
in this area as intact deposits are not likely to remain. To the west of the area being cleared,
vegetation remained intact and consisted of mixed pine and hardwoods with a light understory
(Figure 19); disturbances within this portion of the APE include two gravel roadways and areas
of standing water (Figures 20 and 21). Three transects, containing 11 shovel tests, were placed in
this portion of the project APE and one typical soil profile was encountered (Figures 22 and 23;
Table 3). The portions of this quadrant that were not shovel tested were a result of ongoing
timbering, roadway disturbance, and wet areas that contained standing water (Figures 17, 18, 20,
21).
8-1 15" (38-cm) 10YR 4/3 (brown) silty loam 0-2+ 0-5+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-2
0-5
8-2 15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 6/6 (light red) silty clay loam
2-6+
5-15+
10YR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-4
0-10
8-3 15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 6/6 (light red) silty clay loam
4-8+
10-20+
10YR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-4
0-10
8-4 15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 6/6 (light red) silty clay loam
4-8+
10-20+
10YR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-7
0-18
8-5 15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 6/6 (light red) silty clay loam
7-11+
18-28+
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
9-1 15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam 0-4 0-10
2.5YR 6/6 (light red) silty clay loam 4-8+ 10-20+
10YR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty loam 0-2 0-5
9-2 15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 6/6 (light red) silty clay loam 2-6+ 5-15+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam 0-4 0-10
9-3 15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 6/6 (light red) silty clay loam 4-8+ 10-20+
10-1 15" (38-cm) 2.5Y 6/6 (olive yellow) silty clay 0-6+ 0-15+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam 0-2 0-5
10-2 15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 6/6 (light red) silty clay loam 2-6+ 5-15+
10-3 15" (38-cm) 2.5Y 6/6 (olive yellow) silty clay 0-4+ 0-10+
Northeast Quadrant
Vegetation in this portion of the project APE consisted of an area that had been cleared of
vegetation and areas of mixed pine and hardwoods with secondary growth (Figures 24 and 25);
disturbances within this portion of the APE include the area that had been timbered, a roadway,
areas of standing water, and an area that contained small trench scars that were holding water
and their associated back dirt (Figures 26 through 28). Six transects, containing 53 shovel tests,
were placed in this portion of the project APE (Figure 22); two typical soil profiles were
encountered (Figures 29 and 30; Table 4). Archaeological site 31CA327 was identified in this
portion of the project APE and will be discussed in greater detail below.
Table 4. Shovel Test Profiles, Northeast Quadrant.
1-1 15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/2 (grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-2 0-5
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay 2-6+ 5-15+
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
1-2 15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) mottled with 2.5YR 4/6
0-8
0-20
1-3 15" (38-cm)
(red) silty clay loam
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay
8-12+
20-30+
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) mottled with 2.5YR 4/6
0-4
0-10
1-4 15" (38-cm)
(red) silty clay loam
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay
4-8+
10-20+
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
1-5 15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1-6
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-2 0-5
2.5YR 4/6 (red) silty clay 2-6+ 5-15+
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
1-7
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 4/6 (red) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
1-8
15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
1-8+15m W
15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-6
0-15
1-9
15" (38-cm)
10YR 6/6 (brownish yellow) silty clay
6-10+
15-25+
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-6
0-15
2-1
15" (38-cm)
10YR 6/6 (brownish yellow) silty clay
6-10+
15-25+
2-1+15 N
15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) mottled with 7.5YR
0-4+
0-10+
5/6 (strong brown) silty clay
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-4
0-10
2-2
15" (38-cm)
10YR 6/6 (brownish yellow) silty clay
4-8+
10-20+
2-2+15 N
15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown mottled with 7.5YR 5/6
0-4+
0-10+
(strong brown) silty clay
2-3
15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay
0-4+
0-10+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay loam
0-4
0-10
2-4
15" (38-cm)
5YR 4/6 (yellowish red) silty clay
4-8+
10-20+
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
2-5
15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay loam
0-6
0-15
2-6
15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay
6-10+
15-20+
2-7 15" (38-cm) 10YR 6/6 (brownish yellow) silty clay 0-4+ 0-10+
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-6 0-15
2-8 15" (38-cm)
10YR 6/6 (brownish yellow) silty clay 6-10+ 15-25+
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
2-9 15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
2-9+15 W 15" (38-cm)
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
3-1 15" (38-cm) 1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay loam
0-4+
0-10+
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) mottled with 1 OYR
3-1+30 W 15" (38-cm) 6/1 (gray) and IOYR 6/6 (brownish yellow) silty 0-8+ 0-20+
clay loam
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-2 0-5
3-1+15 W 15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay 2-6+ 5-15+
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
3-2 15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-6 0-15
10YR 5/6 (yellowish brown) silty clay 6-10+ 15-25+
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-6 0-15
3-3 15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay 6-10+ 15-25+
1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-4 0-10
3-4 15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay 4-8+ 10-20+
3-5 15" (38-cm) 7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay 0-4+ 0-10+
3-6 15" (38-cm) 7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay 0-4+ 0-10+
3-7
15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay
0-4+
0-10+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay loam
0-4
0-10
4-1
15" (38-cm)
IOYR 5/6 (yellowish brown) mottled with 7.5YR
5/6 (strong brown) silty clay
4 8+
10-20+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
4-2
15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 5/6 (yellowish brown) mottled with 7.5YR
5/6 (strong brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay loam
0-4
0-10
4-2+15 N
15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 5/6 (yellowish brown) mottled with 7.5YR
5/6 (strong brown) silty clay
4 8+
10-20+
4-3
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 5/6 (red) silty clay
0-4+
0-10+
4-4
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 5/6 (red) silty clay
0-4+
0-10+
4-5
15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 5/6 (yellowish brown) mottled with 7.5YR
0-4+
0-10+
5/6 (strong brown) silty clay
1 OYR 5/2 (grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
4-6
15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 5/6 (yellowish brown) mottled with 7.5YR
5/6 (strong brown) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
1 OYR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-1
0-2
5-1
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 5/6 (red) silty clay
1-5+
2-12+
1 OYR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-1 0-2
5-2 15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 5/6 (red) silty clay 1-5+ 2-12+
2.5Y 5/6 (light olive brown) silty clay loam 0-8 0-20
5-3 15" (38-cm)
2.5Y 7/4 (pale yellow) silty clay 8-12+ 20-30+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay loam 0-2 0-5
5-4 15" (38-cm)
2.5Y 7/4 (pale yellow) silty clay 2-6+ 5-15+
1 OYR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-2 0-5
5-5 15" (38-cm)
5YR 6/8 (reddish yellow) silty clay 2-6+ 5-15+
5-6
1 OYR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-2 0-5
1J kJo-ciii)
2.5Y 7/4 (pale yellow) silty clay 2-6+ 5-15+
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
6 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty clay loam 0-2 0-5
5-7 15" (38-cm)
5YR 5/6 (yellowish red) silty clay 2-6+ 5-15+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay loam 0-8 0-20
6-1 15" (38-cm)
10YR 6/6 (brownish yellow) silty clay 8-12+ 20-30+
6-2 15" (38-cm)
5YR 6/4 (pale olive) silty clay 0-6+ 0-15+
6-3 15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 7/1 (light gray) silty clay; terminated at water 0-8+ 0-20+
6-4 15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 7/1 (light gray) silty clay; terminated at water 0-6+ 0-15+
6-5
No Dig — Water at Surface
6-6 15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 7/1 (light gray) silty clay; terminated at water 0-6+ 0-15+
6-7 15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 7/1 (light gray) silty clay; terminated at water 0-6+ 0-15+
6-8 15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 7/1 (light gray) silty clay; terminated at water 0-2+ 0-5+
Site 31CA327
Site Number: 31CA327
NRHP Recommendation: Not Eligible
Site Type: House site; Prehistoric lithic
scatter Elevation: 600 ft AMSL
Components: Mid-20' century; Middle
Archaic Landform: Hilltop/Hillslope
Quad Name: Locust
Distance to Water: 20 m/65 ft to Little Meadow
Creek
UTM Coordinates: E551251, N3908094 (17N, NAD 83) Soil Type: Badin channery silt loam; Kirksey silt
loam
Site Dimensions: 260 m E/W x 110 m (?) N/S Vegetation: None, clear cut
Artifact Depth: Surface; 0-5 cmbs
No. of STPs/Positive STPs: 41/27
Site 31 CA327 is a mid -twentieth century house site and Middle Archaic lithic scatter, located on
a hilltop and hillslope overlooking Little Meadow Creek (Figure 1). The site is located in an area
that has been clear cut and the vegetation removed (Figure 31). The site measures approximately
260 m east/west by approximately 110 m north/south, and is bounded by Little Meadow Creek to
the west, Mauney Road to the south, and Mission Road to the east; the site boundaries continue
at least 50 meters (164 feet) outside the project APE to the north, although artifacts were greatly
diminished in number compared to the portion of the site within the project APE (Figure 32).
A total of 41 shovel tests were excavated in and around site 31 CA327; a typical shovel test
consisted of five cm of 1 OYR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) silty clay loam, terminating with 10+ cm
(5-15+ crabs) of 7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay subsoil (Figure 33). A total of 201 artifacts
were recovered from the site, 181 from the surface and 20 from 0-5 cm in a single shovel test;
125 artifacts were associated with the historic occupation of the site and 76 artifacts were
prehistoric in nature. Shovel tests were considered positive if artifacts were recovered from the
surface in the vicinity of the shovel test or were identified/collected while screening the soil
excavated from the shovel test. Table 5 provides a summary of the artifacts recovered; the full
artifact catalog can be found in Appendix B.
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
7 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Table 5. Artifact Summary from site 31CA327.
Whiteware, plain
28
Whiteware, polychrome decal
3
Whiteware, blue/green glaze
3
Whiteware, yellow glaze
1
Whiteware, blue transfer print, flowing colors
1
Stoneware, Bristol glazed
1
Stoneware, glazed
5
Coarse Earthenware, Unidentified Vessel
2
Porcelain, plain
1
Window glass
9
Glass, amber
1
Glass, amethyst/solarized
1
Glass, aqua
8
Glass, brown
1
Glass, clear
28
Glass, cobalt blue
3
Glass, green
9
Glass, jadeite
1
Glass, light blue
2
Glass, light green
3
Glass, milk
6
Metal fence staple
1
Metal wire fragment
1
Metal, unidentified
2
Metal rolled lid can opener
1
Brick fragment
1
Ceramic tile fragment
1
Plastic button, 2-hole, flower
1
Morrow Mountain projectile point, quartz
1
Late Stage Biface (1 quartz, 1 rhyolite)
2
Scraper (1 quartz, 1 rhyolite)
2
Knife fragment, rhyolite
1
Utilized flake (3 rhyolite, 1 quartz)
4
Debitage, quartz
12
Debitage, rhyolite
54
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
8 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
In addition to the artifacts recovered from the site, a stone -lined well, a wooden shed, and a brick
pile are associated with the site (Figures 32, and 34-36). There is no evidence of a house
foundation. The house was first depicted on the 1957 topographic map and, by the time the 1980
topographic map was generated, the house was gone (Figures 13 and 14). The historic artifacts
recovered from the site are consistent with a twentieth century occupation and, given the
concrete surrounding the stone -lined well and machine -made bricks found throughout the site,
the house and historic artifact scatter dates to the mid -twentieth century.
The prehistoric artifacts recovered suggest a hunting camp or short-term resource extraction
camp, due to the variety of tool types, expedient and formal, identified. A single Morrow
Mountain projectile point was recovered and is temporally diagnostic to the Middle Archaic
subperiod (8000-5000 B.P.). Although a wide variety of artifact types and a few material types
were identified at the site, the prehistoric artifacts came from the surface of the site. The integrity
of the site has been compromised by the clearing of the area and there is no remaining site
stratigraphy.
Based on the information presented, it is S&ME's opinion that the site is not known to be
associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history
and is not eligible for inclusion in the NRHP under Criterion A; the site is not associated with the
lives of significant persons in the past and is not eligible for inclusion in the NRHP under
Criterion B. Site 31 CA327 does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
methods of construction; represent the work of a master; possess high artistic values; or represent
a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction and,
therefore, is recommended not eligible for inclusion in the NRHP under Criterion C. The level of
disturbance that has occurred at the site, due to timber harvest and clearing; the lack of intact
deposits seen in the soils transitioning directly from plowzone to subsoil; and that 90 percent
(n=181) of the artifacts were recovered from the surface and the other 10 percent (n=20) were
recovered from the plowzone, signifies that site 31CA327 is unlikely to yield significant
information on the prehistory or history of the area and is recommended not eligible for inclusion
in the NRHP under Criterion D. As such, S&ME recommends that site 31CA327 is not eligible
for inclusion in the NRHP.
Southeast Quadrant
Vegetation in this portion of the project APE consisted of areas of pine and secondary growth
(Figure 37); disturbances within this portion of the APE include a transmission line corridor and
areas of standing water (Figures 37 and 38). One transect, containing 12 shovel tests, was placed
in this portion of the project APE (Figure 22) and one typical soil profile was encountered
(Figure 39; Table 6). The portions of this quadrant that were not shovel tested were a result of
areas of standing water (Figure 38).
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
9 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty loam 0-6 0-15
7-1 15" (38-cm)
1OYR 7/1 (light gray) silty clay 6-10+ 15-25+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-1
0-2
7-2
15" (38-cm)
5Y 5/6 (olive) silty clay loam
1-5+
2-12+
7-3
15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty loam
0-4+
0-10+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-1
0-2
7-4
15" (38-cm)
5Y 5/6 (olive) silty clay loam
1-5+
2-12+
7-5
15" (38-cm)
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty loam
0-10+
0-25+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-1
0-2
7-6
15" (38-cm)
5Y 6/4 (pale olive) silty clay loam
1-5+
2-12+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-1
0-2
7-7
15" (38-cm)
5Y 7/4 (pale yellow) silty clay loam
1-5+
2-12+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty loam
0-12
0-30
7-8
15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay
12-16+
30-40+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam
0-1
0-2
7-9
15" (38-cm)
2.5Y 6/8 (olive yellow) silty clay loam
1-5+
2-12+
7-10
15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay
0-4+
0-10+
7-11
15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 5/8 (strong brown) silty clay
0-8+
0-20+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty loam 0-1 0-2
7-12 15" (38-cm)
7.5YR 4/6 (strong brown) silty clay loam 1-5+ 2-12+
Southwest Quadrant
Vegetation in this portion of the project APE consisted of areas of fallow field, pine, and
secondary growth (Figures 40 and 41); disturbances within this portion of the APE include
buried utilities, a transmission line corridor, household/farm debris in yard, and areas of standing
water (Figures 40, 42, and 43). Two transects, containing six shovel tests, were placed in this
portion of the project APE (Figure 22) and one typical soil profile was encountered (Figure 44;
Table 7). The portions of this quadrant that were not shovel tested were a result of buried utilities
and areas of standing water (Figures 42 and 43).
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
10 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
11-1 15" (38-cm) 2.5YR 4/6 (red) silty clay loam 0-4+ 0-10+
10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) silty clay loam
0-2
0-5
11-2
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 4/6 (red) silty clay
2-6+
5-15+
12-1
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 4/6 (red) silty clay
0-4+
0-10+
12-2
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 4/6 (red) silty clay
0-4+
0-10+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay
0-6
0-15
12-3
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 4/6 (red) silty clay
6-10+
15-25+
1 OYR 4/3 (brown) silty clay
0-4
0-10
12-4
15" (38-cm)
2.5YR 4/6 (red) silty clay
4-8+
10-20+
RECOMMDATIONS
In March 2019, S&ME completed an archaeological reconnaissance survey for the proposed
replacement of Bridge No. 292 on SR 2625, Mauney Road, over Little Meadow Creek. The
survey included a pedestrian survey of the APE and systematic shovel testing.
As a result of the survey, one archaeological site, 31 CA327, was identified and is recommended
not eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. Active tree and vegetation clearing has disturbed portions
of the project APE, there is standing water in areas containing poorly drained soils, and soils
transition from the plow zone to subsoil or have exposed subsoil on surface. Based on the
investigations, no intact soil deposition remains and archaeological site 31 CA327 has been
identified in a primarily disturbed context. It is the opinion of S&ME's Principal Investigator,
Kimberly Nagle, M.S., RPA, that the APE has a low potential for containing significant
archaeological resources and that no additional archaeological investigations are necessary for
the currently proposed APE.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed
the subject project and determined:
® There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's
area of potential effects.
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
❑ All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
® There are no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present
or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needed)
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
11 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s)
Signed:
❑ Previous Survey Info ® Photos
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
❑Correspondence
April 12, 2019
Date
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
12 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
REFERENCES CITED
Brown, Henry C.
1900 Railroad Map of North Carolina. North Carolina Corporation Commission. Rand
McNally and Company, Engravers, Chicago. Available at:
<http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/g3901p.rrOO2740>
Collet, John
1770 A Compleat Map of North Carolina From an Actual Survey. I Bayley. Copy from W. P.
Cumming, 1966, North Carolina in Maps, State Department of Archives and History, Raleigh,
Plate VII. Available through North Carolina Historical Publications Shop.
Harris, Thomas C.
1875 Map of Cabarrus County, North Carolina. North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh.
Available at: <http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/235/rec/4>
MacRae, John and Robert H. B. Brazier
1833 A New Map of the State of North Carolina, Constructed from Actual Surveys. North
Carolina Maps. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Available at:
<http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/I 8 I/rec/7>
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
1938 Cabarrus County. State Highway Map. North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh. Available
at: <http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/431/rec/18>
1953 Cabarrus County. State Highway Map. North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh. Available
at: <http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/ncmaps/id/7700/rec/21>
1968 Cabarrus County. State Highway Map. North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh. Available
at: <http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/ncmaps/id/3324/rec/27>
Price, Jonathan and John Strother
1808 First Actual Survey of the State of North Carolina. W. Harrison, Philadelphia.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
1910 Soil Map, North Carolina, Cabarrus County. North Carolina Maps. University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill. Available at:
<http://dc.lib.unc. edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/291 /rec/28>
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1957 Mount Pleasant. 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle. Available at:
<http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/>
1980 Locust. 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle. Available at:
<http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/>
United States Post Office (LISPS)
1921 Rural Delivery Routes, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. Available at:
<http://dc.lib.unc. edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/ 1746/rec/ 14>
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
13 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Appendix A - Figures
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
14 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
l�
31 CA327
40
-01'
Legend
— OProjectAPE
00.5-mile Search Radius
MILES
Locust 7svscs quadrangle.. r v Newly Recorded Archaeological Site
0 0.125 0.25
I�I
SCALE: 1 14,611
Topographic Map of APE
PA 18-10-0003; Bridge No.292
FIGURE NO.
PROJECT NO: 4261-18-05
DRAWN BY. KJN
DATE: 4/512019
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
15 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
i
�
J
yr�f
r�
rtoo
OL
mill
r a • rq,�
*I C30.5-mile Search Radius
EU [ 0 ^Newly Recorded Archaeological
I�I =
SCALE: 1.14,611
Aerial Map of APE
PA 18 10-0003; Bridge No-292
FIGURE NO.
PROJECT NO: 4261-18-056
DRAWN BY: KJN
DATE 4/5/2019
Cabatrus County, North Carolina
`NO NATIONAL. REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minar Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
16 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 3. Portion of Collett's map (1770), showing vicinity of project area.
ti
Figure 4. Price-Strother Map (1808) of North Carolina, showing vicinity of project area.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
17 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 5. MacRae -Brazier Map (1833) of North Carolina, showing vicinity of project area.
Figure 6. Harris Map (1875), showing vicinity of the project area.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
18 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
g ' �►,� China Grove-Moc-kwell
nt
o ethpl Gold Hill �
Davlt son Glsts,3 Missabei mer
Caldw ea] l r MewLonJ
l Co !� n-ot
Iluntgiviile oi• f rye
o- 0 I'M Pleasant
Croft AI.
A� -T
IDerita, Rnualll
oTioneer Mills
arlotae Big Zick O
i•
LT BURG Leo o
;;f� arc3ia �� / 1llills
A;
Figure 7. Railroad map of North Carolina, showing Cabarrus County (Brown 1900).
A
rr nl 5 AS ' J
a
As
Jf 1 1'•.,
lc-
--�, AS eCeville
i r I
r
i 1 � r A E Jim
f y
If IJ V,r r
As
r r/' dr Jr
As
As
Figure 8. USDA Cabarrus County soil map (1910), showing vicinity of project area.
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form jor Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
19 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
V
'Btu T& MILLS
• sue. 'GEORGEVII-L, ,r--
V ° V
Figure 9. USPS Rural Route Map of Cabarrus County (1921), showing vicinity of the project
area.
Figure 10. NCDOT highway map of Cabarrus County (1938), showing vicinity of the project
area.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
20 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 11. NCDOT highway map of Cabarrus County (1953), showing vicinity of the project
area.
r
t
1006
en
r
44
2623
Geor eville
1105
i 2625
•9
2623"
F C4
1006
1100
� �5 co
r
1104
A
1190 .�
, 200
1106
�I f
1*0
!/ �[3
_n
1102
Figure 12. NCDOT highway map of Cabarrus County (1968), showing vicinity of the project
area.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
21 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
I
fpfJ
Figure 13. USGS Mount Pleasant topographic quadrangle (1957), showing vicinity of the project
area.
Figure 14. USGS 7.5-minute Locust topographic quadrangle (1980), showing vicinity of the
project area.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
22 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
R
P
E
4
O
Legend
I= P roject APE
z
Soil Types
Badin channery silt loam; 2-8%
Badin channery silt loam, 8-15%
Chewacla sandy loam, 0-2%
Kirksey silt loam, 1-6%
ESRIAenal Imagery.
FEET Source =sre, Digital to Tarrus silty clay loam, 2-8%
Q 250 500 DS, USJA, USG-, Aer
SCALE:
1 6,000
FIGURE
I�I �
Soil Map of APE
PA 18-10-0003; Bridge No.292
NO.
15
PROJECT ND: 4261-18-056
DRAWN BY. KJN
DATE: a/s/zo>g
Cabarrus County, North `Carolina
`NO NATIONAL. REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minar Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
23 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 16. Mapped streams and wetlands within the project APE; US Fish and Wildlife Service
Map Service.
Figure 17. Image of equipment in northwest quadrant of the project APE, facing northwest.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
24 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 18. Recently made pond and clear-cut area in northwestern quadrant, facing west.
11 b
l ��
�� 2? �t•
r
i
Y 7,
tr4�- a .
I� f
41r.
.44
r
.r
II tI_ nv�
Figure 19. Typical vegetation in the undisturbed portion of the northwest quadrant of project
APE, facing east.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
25 of 44

- Ulf
4`L
�s�
Fp-
,
h 0
14V
h F l
F E f!"Sl
j1 ` a..

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
N
z
STP3-8 STP6--8NA-
5
5TP 6-1
STP 5-fi
STP 3-1
STP 8-1
STP 2-8
Off` ©
STP 5-1
®R
STP 7-1
.move
71C
STP 7-12
STP 11-4
E'
STF 11-1
n
5TP 10-3
STP 12-1
STP 9-3
5TP 10-1
a
0
Legend
O Negative shovel test location
z
NER
• Positiue shovel test location
—Transect Location
� P roject AP E
_Area Not Surveyed -Active Clearing
Area Pedestrian Surveyed
ES RIAena Imagery.
FEET Area Shovel Tested
ouree_ -sr, Dfft I
0
0 260
SQ©
SCALE:
15,617
FIGURE
0
Aerial Map of APE Showing Field Methods
NO.
PROJECT No: 4261-18-056
`tV0 NATIONAL. REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
27 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 23. Typical shovel test profile in northwest quadrant.
Figure 24. Typical vegetation in an area of mixed pine and hardwood in the northeastern
quadrant, facing southwest.
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
28 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 25. Typical vegetation in an area of mixed pine and hardwoods in the northwest quadrant,
facing northeast.
1'
"yh1-4
,..
�'�
Figure 26. Roadway within the northeast quadrant of the APE, facing northeast.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
29 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 27. Area of standing water in the northeast quadrant, facing north.
Figure 28. Typical water filled trenches and associated back dirt throughout the northeast
quadrant of the APE, facing north.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
30 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Ai
! } r
de
4
Figure 29.
Typical shovel test profile in cleared area of the northwest quadrant.
Figure 30. Typical shovel test profile in wet area of northwest quadrant.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
31 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
M,..
Figure 31. Overview of site 31CA327, facing southwest.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
32 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
33 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 33. Typical shovel test profile at site 31 CA327.
Ira �5 I
Y � -
;rat
«�• `
-
s n
fir.
-'�'_.. `'•c
Figure 34. Stone -lined well at site 31CA327.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
34 of 44

TIN
;g4m
-t _ J

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 37. Typical vegetation and transmission line in southeast quadrant of the project APE,
facing southwest.
K—
it
4 m
-05
�=y �` � °�:�� t .fir"' k _. •. '�. "�
T'
Figure 38. Area of standing water in southeast quadrant, facing south.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
36 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 39. Typical shovel test profile in southeast quadrant.
Figure 40. Typical vegetation and transmission line in southwest quadrant of the project APE,
facing east.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
37 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 41. Typical fallow field in the southeast quadrant of the project APE, facing northeast.
Figure 42. Buried utilities and household/farm debris within the project APE, facing east.
`NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
38 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Figure 43. Area of standing water within the project APE, facing northeast.
Figure 44. Typical shovel test in southwest quadrant of project APE.
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
39 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
Appendix B — Artifact Catalog
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
40 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
y MN M N N CO N M r r N M N N CO N M N r CO
M
U
u
w
N
O
z
ao
M
O
O
O
O
.w
O
z
a
O
O.
N �
U i
s_ �
J
O
Y
(r
m
in
CO Of
cc)m
CO
m m
m
10
N
N N
N
N N
N
N
N 0I
N
9,1 N
N QI
N
N N
ccO
7
O��
7 L
7 7
O O
L L
O
L
O O
L L
O
L
O
L
O O
L L
O
L
O O
L L
O
L L
0
L
0 0
L L
O
L
L D
7 7
r
0
.Q
Nc
d
G
m
d
C
�
O N
Q1
N
~�
o
E
u7
`o�
c
v
3 �
m.�
c c
c
�
(9
m
01Qa�mm
��
v
army
�m�
�
�
J
�J
C7¢UUa
UC7C7U
UU¢
C7U=
J
J
O
C
m
m
°
a-
0 0
o�
IDcf6i
U Fa
C'C
N
N_.-L
L
cFi
�
O
V U7
O O
(p 0
0
?
3
0 D
{p >
> (p
O O
LL
>
N 0
00
O
O O
MO
d
U
U U
U C
�C
U O
N
O O
D U
U
'Cr..g
0 0
U
'C
V V
N
N
O U
fl-
c
N N
U
U U
�� O D
U
7
y�
c
o
w
�
c c
0 0
c
0 0
0
c 0 0
0E
o o
s= o
0 o
c o
,o
o=
o 0
o
o
0 0
g.2
-
0 0
0._
� Z
0.. CO
Z Z
U Z
2 CO
D [0
CO 7j
Z Z
U 5
CO MF
U
Z Z
Y O]
09 B
U Z
Z UJ
CO CO
CO Z
Z Z
[O U
Z CO
N
N N
N
N N
N�
N
N N
N
o N
N@
o
N N
N
N
-O
Ci
O
O O
0
0 0
0
o
O o
0 o
O
o o
O
O
d
�
U) UJ
����
L
��
�
5c
U)2E
2E 2E
UJ
2 2
2
Ul
is
y m.o.o
4) 4)
m m
m a)
a) d
d�
m m
o d
d d
d m
ID
0
0y
m 0)
ma
a)d
Z,m
m m
ID a)
m-0
6
�
N' r6
i--
W N
W
L
N
N 2Q
w
Y6
o�
W
m m
�
L
U L
.fl'.9-Q
L
L
L
-0-0
L
9 U
L L
U U
L
U L
L L
L
L L
00
L
L
L L
U U
O
05
S] L
L
U
(6 N
L t
N N
� 0
N N
� 0
N (6
!]
(6 (6
(6 N
��
N N
0 0
N (6
0���ii
(6 (6
(6 N
0
N N
!] 0
L (6
U2
(6 (6
2 ii
N N
D D
N t
D U2
(6 (6
(6 N
2F C
N N
C 02
(6 N
D
N L
0 U
U_
N
�
A
�
U_
U U
U H
O N
U U
U U
N y
U
U U
N U
U
V
N
(p L_
L_ L
L L_
L L
fll
fA N
N U
N
L_ L_
N
L [p
f/] fll
N N
tll
N L_
L L_
N
L_
fA N
f/1 N
ML_
N
(11
ML_
.0
L_ L_
C7 J
J J
J J
J J
J
(D S
J J
J U
CD CD
CD J
J J
J 0
0tD
J
(D
O J
J J
(D J
J J
S
q �
Co M
M
MlnM
rM
r
CO cp
� 00
V
M inN�MNV
Q
CO I-
r- V
(9001D.0
10
r0)N
r
�
•� VI
OOI�-p
�
M
CO
MOCONO
� N
N
V N
ISO
N fob
M N
�MONr�O�rM
(OOOO
N
COrMNrM�N
�
6!
15
� N
N �
NM
r 'V
r
—
—
N �
r
N r
� N
r �
N —
r
N �
3
O
U
N
U U
U U
U U
U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
ate+
f�J
c0.1
UJ U)
U) U)
U) G<)
(fl UJ
M (fJ
......
UJ
......................
0
d
C
rr
N(')
M MMCJ
(hV
L?S9
1f7
19 SO
fO. SO��r�-
1�r
r
r�
ro rowed
eor
rCY
CV M
d
r
r N
N N
N N
oaaaaadaaaaaaaaaao_aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
a
m v?
cn cn
m cn
cn cn
cn cn
cn cn
cn m
cn in
cn cn
cn cn
cn cn
cn cn
cn cn
in to
cn m
m cn
in cn
cn cn
cn uS
cn cn
m cn
�
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
ya¢a¢¢¢aa¢a¢¢a¢a¢aa¢¢¢¢a¢a¢¢aa¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢a¢aa¢
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
N
M
M M
M Cl)
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
Mn
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
`tV0 NATIONAL. REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
41 of44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
C� N N N r N N co N N M N M N N N co
O
cy
M
D
cd
U
u
iy
N
O
z
ao
M
O
O
O
O
O
z
a
a
N
U i
J
O
L'
a°•
�
0)
co
co m
m
� cc)
Of m
m
cc) cc)
m
m m
m
m
m
m m
m m
m
m
m m
m m
d
m
a)m
m
Q1
O O
0
0
0
O
A
L L
L L
L 7
7 L
L L
L L
L
L
L
L
(Y 0-,
Of(Y
Of d
d w
(Y elf(Y
0�
`tV0 NATIONAL. REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minar Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
42 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
C� N N M N Cl)
O
M
M
OA
D
rR
U
V
w
s.
N
a
N
O
z
tQ
M
O
O
O
O
O
..
O
z
a
a
C�
N
U i
J
C
O
V
N
Z
r
0.il����EEEtYm
m�
ff�mm
NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
43 of 44

Project Tracking No.:
18-10-0003
O
bA
O
R
ce
U
u
a
N
O
z
00
M
0
0
0
0
00
..
0
z
P,
O
N
M N
N M
N
M
N
N �
i
sU
J
D
Y
m°O��
�
m°�mmz
m
o
m
o
m
�(30,Odof
tr
Q0�
a
X
W
O
Q
N
'C
f6
V
N
c
Q
E
N
F
N
O
�
C
C�
N
C
C C
C O
Y
� C
N N
p
f6
f6 N
O
i6
N f6
f6 O
�
N
Q
ariU[7
a
aaEL
a+
_
d
U
� vQ
N
N
U
0
(�
-E_
W r
W N
f6
C f6
f6 f0
f6 f6
(� �
W
p�
N
�
o m-ooa3�y
oo�
3333
m o
o�
o
�
�
>�
yzUDzD����
z�u�Um`aU��m
m
m
m m
m m
d
U
U.
CiJ
L
o
�
0 0
� 2
0 �
- —
U
aWW
OOO�W
Q�WWWW
Ntt£sp
N N
ooUOU��cn��0�c)o����cn2�2�2�a
L N£
N
N-0
(6
N N£
N
N N
N N�
(6
(6 f6
(6 N
a
E
E E
E
E E
E�E
E
�
U U
U U
12
U d
2 2
O d
N
16
U_ Q
V U
f6 N
N N
2 fib
N N
[i
N N
N f/l
0
V
L_ L_
L_ L
L U
U U
L_ f6
£ U££
U U
U U
U S6
f0 (6
[6 L_
JJ
JJ
JSSSOC)JSJ
J
SS
SSS
0
0 000
V r
�r
I- O
M M
CO V
idl CO
�
M O
�
—
3
O
U
ate+ N
U U
U U
U U
U
Q,
W f0
!6 f4
fQ
f6 (6
[0 f6
!6 !6
f4 f4
f6 f6
{6
f6 f6
N fO
f6 f6
V
d
'c
0
(Dr
c� 44e4444444vv4v444444v44
rM
V
� V
V Vqu)��CO
C4
fD f0
19 19
f9 19(O
SO
oaaaaadaaaaaaaaaao_aaaaaaa
a
m v?
cn cn
m cn
cn cn
cn in
cn in
cn m
cn in
cn cn
cn cn
cn cn
cn in
ti���ti��ti�titi���ti����tir•�ti�
�
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
ya¢a¢¢¢¢a¢a¢¢a¢a¢aa¢¢¢¢a¢
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
UUU�U�U�o���UUUUUUUUUUU�
N
`tV0 NATIONAL. REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form far Minar Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
44 of 44