20191657 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191204

December 4, 2019
t�
�1
MIN
kT ❑ W E R
ENGINEERING
PROFESSIONALS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers- Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC DWQ- WBSCP Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Joint Application for Nationwide Permit, Section 401 Certification, and NC Stream Buffer Authorization
American Towers LLC Site: ATC Culvert Upgrade (3500 Regency)
3500 Regency Pkwy
Cary, NC 27518
(Wake County)
To Whom It May Concern,
Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP) has been contracted by American Towers LLC to provide environmental services for the
replacement of an existing culvert within a stream crossing along an existing road which connects Regency Forest Drive/Regency Parkway
with the American Towers Office Building, located at 3500 Regency Parkway, in the Town of Cary, on a portion of an approximately
10.69-acre parcel identified as PIN #0762302536 by the Wake County, NC Tax Assessors Office. The proposed project will involve the
removal of one (1) existing arch culvert and the installation of three (3) new circular culverts within a stream crossing in order to facilitate
stormwater flow. Currently, the culvert is not sufficient to facilitate stormwater flow and frequently results in flooding of the area and
adjacent parking lot, preventing ingress & egress and causing property damage and erosion.
On behalf of our client, American Towers LLC, we hereby submit an application for Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 3,
Section 401 Certification, and NC Stream Buffer Authorization for the proposed project.
During preliminary research of the site, TEP personnel confirmed that the aforementioned stream, an intermittent tributary of Swift Creek,
is mapped as a "blueline" stream on the USGS 7.5-minute Apex, NC topographic quadrangle. In addition, at the time of inspection, TEP
delineated the intermittent stream from 0 to 50-ft up and down -stream of an existing stream crossing. The proposed work will require
permanent and temporary impacts to the jurisdictional stream and riparian buffer. No wetlands are anticipated to be impacted by the
proposed culvert upgrade. The approximate latitude and longitude of the project area is N 35' 43' 48.29", W 78' 47' 16.63" (NAD 83).
American Towers LLC proposes the replacement of one (1) existing arch culvert with three (3) new 48" diameter High Density
Polyethylene (HDPE) culverts beneath an existing private road which connects Regency Forest Drive/Regency Parkway to the existing
parking lot associated with the American Towers office building. American Towers LLC is proposing the repair of a 30-ft wide stretch of
the aforementioned paved road, the relocation of an existing light pole, the removal of one (1) existing arch culvert, and the installation of
three (3) 65-ft long x 48-inch diameter HDPE culverts. The culvert upgrade project is anticipated to result in 120-linear feet of stream
disturbance, 236-square feet of stream impacts below the ordinary high water mark, 612 cubic yards of permanent stream fill, 204 cubic
yards of temporary stream fill, and 5,663 square feet of disturbance to Zone 1 of the riparian buffer.
Please don't hesitate to contact me if there are any questions or concerns related to the site or the information attached herein.
Sincerely, ,
To er Engi Bering Professionals, Inc.
Ryan Malek
Environmental Division Manager
326 Tryon Road, Raleigh, NC 27603 C) 919.661.6351 F) 919.661.6350
[e-mail]

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20191657
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY - ATC Culvert Upgrade (3500 Regency)
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Ryan Malek of Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc.
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
12/4/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Unnamed tributary of Swift Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-III;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.729853-78.786756
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
7 Standard (IP)
Version#*
1
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
V

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 03 - Maintenance
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)iress
V Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification: r Yes r No
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit: r Yes r No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
American Towers LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
015022/01191
2c. Responsible party:
Patrick Barry
2d.Address
Street Address
3500 Regency Parkway
Address Line 2
aty
Cary
Postal / Zip Cate
27518
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Ryan Malek
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
The United States of America
2f. Fax Number:

4b. Business Name:
Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
326 Tryon Road
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27603
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Signed Agent Authorization Form.pdf
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
The United States of America
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
201.99KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^)
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Cary, NC
2. Project tt Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0762302536
2c. Project Address
Street Address
3500 Regency Pkwy
Address Line 2
City
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27518
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Unnamed tributary of Swift Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-III;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011001
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
10.69
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
The United States of America
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is currently occupied by a portion of an unnamed tributary of Swift Creek, herein referred to as the stream. The stream is traversed perpendicularly by an eAsting paved access
road, via an eAsting arch culvert, which is the sole access point to the American Tower Corporation Office Building and parking lot from Regency Forest Drive / Regency Parkway. The
land use to the west and north is primarily commercial / office and the land use to the south and east is primarily undeveloped and recreational (Swift Creek Greenway and Harold D.
Ritter Park).
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
DeLorme 2-D Map Document.pdf 1.37MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soil Survey.pdf 969.01 KB

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
510
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The proposed project will involve the removal of one (1) existing arch culvert and the installation of three (3) new circular culverts within a stream crossing in order to minimize
accelerated erosion and sedimentation both during and after the proposed construction activities and to control the stormwater runoff into the wasting parking lot and surrounding
areas. High precipitation events cause flooding of the stream, crossing, and adjacent parking lot, preventing vehicular ingress from the public right-of-way and egress from the parking
lot. Therefore, the culvert is being upgraded to facilitate higher flows.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project Will involve the replacement of an existing 36" diameter arch culvert with three 48" diameter HDPE culverts, placement of rip rap along the stream banks, paved
road & sidewalk repair, relocation of light pole with new underground conduit, and relocation of existing water pipe. Project is anticipated to occur over the course of 1 weekend to
prevent disruptions to weekday office building access. Construction is anticipated to involve the use of three 48" diameter HOPE culverts, rip rap (24" thickness), sand bags, silt fence,
water pump and line, asphalt saw, sheepsfoot roller or rubber tired roller, smooth drum vibrator, and excavator.
Construction sequence:
1) Install temporary construction BMPs
2) Relocate existing lightpole and conduit
3) Remove existing culvert and dispose offsite
4) Regrade stream, compact subgrade, and sawcut existing asphalt road
5) Install culverts and rip rap along stream banks. Backfill.
6) Install geotextile fabric on subgrade, install base coarse and surface coarse and compact with rollers
7) Reinstall curbing and concrete sidewalk
8) Permanently seed and stabilize all disturbed areas
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
STAMPED PDF.OPS @ 3500 REGENCY ATC CULVERT UPGRADE, NC (INTERNAL).AE(CD).REV1.pdf 6.2MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
r No
Comments:
Wetland (none identified) and stream delineation completed by TEP on 10/10/19
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): George T. Swearingen, III
Agency/Consultant Company: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc.
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
ATC Cary Parking Lot Stream Packet_10.10.2019.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
9.41 MB
r Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries [L Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
❑ 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*

S1
Culvert replacement
P
Permanent
Culvert
Unnamed tributary of Swift
rY
Creek
Intermittent
Both
10
Average (feet)
85
(linearfeet)
S2
BMPs, stabilization, etc.
Tem orar
P Y
Other
Unnamed tributary of Swift
rY
Creek
Intermittent
Both
10
Average (feet)
35
(linearfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
85
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
120
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
35
3j. Comments:
Project anticipated to involve 120-linear feet of stream disturbance, 236-square feet of impacts belowordinary high water mark.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
R Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
r- Catawba r Randleman
r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
C Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Culvert Replacement and associated
disturbance
P
Unnamed tributary offf]E_
5,663
0
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00
Zone 1
Total Permanent impacts: 5,663.00
Zone 1
Total combined buffer impacts: 5,663.00
61. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
0.00
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation u
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed action was designed to include sufficient improvements to the existing culverted stream crossing while minimizing impacts to surface
water features as much as possible.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Erosion and sedimentation controls are to be used on site including silt fence, rock construction entrance, infiltration basin with rip -rap spillway, and a
roadside ditch with erosion control blanket. Additionally, there is no proposed landscaping involved with this project, only vegetation clearing along
banks. All existing surrounding tree canopies shall remain.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The project requires minimal impacts to jurisdictional waters (less than 150 linear feet) and is replacement of an existing culvert which no longer functions as needed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)

1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
P Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
3500 Regency Pkwy- SWM Report (Stamped).pdf 2.41 MB
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
W Phase II r NSW r USMP f Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Cary
Comments:
Project is subject to Town of Cary Local Zoning permit, Building Permit, and Stormwater Permit.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a culvert replacement and is not anticipated to result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*

r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
Sh. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC) preliminary species list for Wake County, NC and Informal Biological Assessment
completed by TEP
Consultation Documentation Upload
USFWS documentation.pdf 5.7MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper (online).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office Online GIS Mapper.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO Map.pdf 1.61MB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project location is within the 100-year floodplain according to FEMA FIRM community panel number
3720076200J, with an effective date of May 2, 2006. The project is subject to review and permitting via the Town of Cary.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA FIRM panel 3720076200J dated of May 2, 2006
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
ATC Cary Parking Lot - Transmittal Letter.pdf
FEMA Flood Map.pdf
39.45KB
2.27MB
Signature U
*
rJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Ryan Malek

Signature
Date
12/4/2019

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 0762302536
STREET ADDRESS: _3500 Regency Parkway, Cary, NC 27518
Please print:
Property Owner: American Towers LLC
Property Owner: Patrick Barry of American Towers
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
_Ryan Malek_, of _Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (Contractor / Agent)
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance
of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: _(919) 466-5224
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
_Patrick Barry of American Towers LLC
Authorized Signature
Date:
Authorized Signature
Date: 1,LL/`- / 2

Data use subject to license. ,N Scale 1 : 24,000
o soo 1- 1- zaoo a000
© DeLorme. Topo North America TM 10. M (9.3" ) "
www.delorme.com
0 1" 2,000.0 ft soo Data Zoom 13-2

0
Hydrologic Soil Group —Wake County, North Carolina
a
699950
699990 700030 700070
700110 700150 700190
35° 43' 51" N
n
F
_ Lr�LJ
Soil MaN may not he valiel at this scale.
35° 43' 42" N
699990 700030 700070
700110 700150 700190
b
Map Scale: 1:1,880 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
`
Meters
N 0 25 50 100
150
Feet
0 50 100 200 300
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA
Natural Resources
Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service
National Cooperative Soil Survey
700230 700270 700310
70MM 700270 700310
v
a
700350
35° 43' 51" N
35° 43' 42" N
700350
v
a
12/4/2018
Pagel of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group —Wake County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating
Polygons
0
A
0
A/D
0
B
0
B/D
0
C
0
C/D
0
D
0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Lines
r 0
A
r 0
A/D
B
r
B/D
N 0
C
r 0
C/D
r 0
D
r 0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Points
0
A
0
A/D
0
B
0
B/D
❑ C
0 C/D
0 D
❑ Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
— Rails
­0 Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 27, 2014—May
6, 2014
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/4/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group —Wake County, North Carolina
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AaA
Altavista fine sandy
loam, 0 to 4 percent
slopes, rarely flooded
C
5.0
26.8%
ChA
Chewacla and
Wehadkee soils, 0 to
2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
B/D
11.4
61.1 %
Ur
Urban land
1.9
10.2%
W
Water
0.4
1.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
18.7
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/4/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group —Wake County, North Carolina
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Higher
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/4/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4

Clegg
N
Le[ ivlQrff34dIE � _
i
�.I
Cary (J, T
Raleigh
',3500 RegeocyParkway
Apex �
Gamer
L
Auburn
Feltonvdlc
W d 4iams n
Molly Springs Crossroads
VICINITY MAP
COMPLIANCE CODE
ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE
FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES- NOTHING IN THESE PLANS 1S
TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO
THESE CODES.
1. INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC)
2. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC)
3. LOCAL BUILDING CODE
4. CITYICOUNTY ORDINANCES
AMERICAN TOWER"
SITE NAME: ATC CULVERT UPGRADE
SITE NUMBER: 3500 REGENCY
SITE ADDRESS: 3500 REGENCY PKWY
CARY, NC 27518
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS
PROJECT LOCATION
SITE ADDRESS:
3500 REGENCY PKWY
CARY, NC 27518
COUNTY: WAKE
GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES:
LATITUDE: 35' 43' 47.47" N
LONGITUDE: 78' 47' 12.32" W
GROUND ELEVATION: 332' AMSL
PROJECT LOCATION DIRECTIONS
— — — FROM RALEIGH. NC:
SURVEY INFORMATION GET ON 1-40 W FROM US-401 S1US-70 E. CONTINUE ON 1-40 W.
1. TOPOGRAPHY AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKE US-1 S TO TRYON RD IN CARY. TAKE EXIT 9BA FROM US-1
S. TAKE REGENCY PKWY TO YOUR DESTINATION
OBTAINED FROM SURVEY PLAN DATED 10/24119 BY TOWER
ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDES REPLACING AN EXISTING
CULVERT SYSTEM FOR APPROPRIATE DRAINAGE.
UTILITY COMPANIES
POWER COMPANY: UNKNOWN
TELEPHONE COMPANY: UNKNOWN
5
Know whays below.
Call before you dig.
PROJECT TEAM
TOWER OWNER:
AMERICAN TOWER
10 PRESIDENTIAL WAY
WOBURN, MA 01801
PROPERTY OWNER:
AMERICAN TOWER
10 PRESIDENTIAL WAY
WOBURN. MA 01801
ENGINEERED BY:
ATC TOWER SERVICES
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY SUITE 100
CARY. NC 27518
PROJECT NOTES
SHEETINDEX
1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL CURRENT APPLICABLE
SHEET
NO:
DESCRIPTION:
REV:
FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES, INCLUDING
ANSI1EIAfTIA-222, AND COMPLY WITH ATC CONSTRUCTION
G-001
TITLE SHEET
1
SPECS.
j
---
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL
S-1
SURVEY PLAT
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS.
3. ALL DIMENSIONS TO, OF, AND ON EXISTING BUILDINGS,
C-101
OVERALL SITE PLAN
0
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE
VERIFIED IN FIELD BY CONTRACTOR WITH ALL DISCREPANCIES
1 OF 1
SITE SURVEY
REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER.
- _—
4, DETAILS SHOWN ARE TYPICAL; SIMILAR DETAILS APPLY TO
C-401
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
1
SIMILAR CONDITIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION OF
C-501
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
0
EXISTING UTILITIES, GROUNDS DRAINS, DRAIN PIPES, VENTS,
SIC
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS WORKSHEET
0
ETC. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY
CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT TO MATCH EXISTING
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS TO THE SATISFACTION OF
THE ATC CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. ..._ _
7. WHERE EXISTING CONDITIONS DO NOT MATCH THOSE SHOWN
IN THIS PLAN SET, CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY THE ATC
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IMMEDIATELY.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL RUBBISH AND DEBRIS FROM -
THE SITE AT THE END OF EACH DAY.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK SCHEDULE WITH
LANDLORD AND TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE IMPACT AND
DISRUPTION OF OTHER OCCUPANTS OF THE FACILITY.
10. PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID, CONTRACTOR WILL
COORDINATE WITH ATC CONSTRUCTION MANAGER TO
DETERMINE If ANY PERMITS WILL BE OBTAINED BY ATC. ALL
REQUIRED PERMITS NOT OBTAINED BY ATC MUST BE
OBTAINED, AND PAID FOR, BY THE CONTRACTOR.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE
PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS,
METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND
FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE
CONTRACT.
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SAFETY
INCLUDING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE OSHA
STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND SHALL PROVIDE
ALL NECESSARY SAFETY DEVICES INCLUDING PPE AND PPM
AND CONSTRUCTION DEVICES SUCH AS WELDING AND FIRE
PREVENTION. TEMPORARY SHORING, SCAFFOLDING, TRENCH
BOXESISLOPING, BARRIERS, ETC.
DATE: BY:
11/25/19 NRP
11/05/19 NRP
11/25/19 NRP
11105/19 NRP
11/05/19 NRP
DRAWN BY:
NRP
APPROVED BY:
KRF
DATE DRAWN:
111051i9
ATC JOB NO:
INTERNAL
TITLE SHEET
SHEET NUMBER
G-001

N/F
REGENCY PARK OFFICE DEVELOPMENT I
PIN, 0767216042
BM 1907 PG 465
ZONED POOMAIOR
------ -------------- _--- EXISTING PARKING LO!
�-------------------
ey N/F NBe"3T17-�
--7( TOWN OF GRY 83. 47'
PIN, 0761204860
\Da 7022 PC 730
ZONED PDOMWOR
1 1C Z 1 1'Yn
L470 '
EXISTING PUMP
STATION EASEMENT
8M 1965 PG 1044
�-
BM 1996 PC 157
WE
EXISTING S4NrTAR'r
SEWER EASEMENT
TOWN OF CARY
PIN,/ 0762204660
06 IN, PG 861
D8 7022 PG 730
GM i996 PG 157
ZONED POObi
CARY GREEN wAY EASEMENT Oil TSMe I
�r=r�
YAR.ABLE WIDSHTOWN OF n
CARY GREENWAY EASEMEi
OFFERED FOR OC-FATIDN
TOWN OF
.. PIPELINE EP
FOR D=
EXISTING LIFT 57AI71IN
FORCE -MAIN EASEMENT
BM 7 987 PG i 120
BM 7987 PG I503 Il\
fx STING I
=•, SANITARY SEWER
MANHOLE
CARY
GREEN
WAY EASEMENT
Fareel Lim
T ItAe
UAe 7
Uml
OYx1'en
L1
7a.Ea
sr4sxts3w
L2
12.14
STI' 26' ]T.30
S3
2.13
54.9' 36' C4.43
EXISTING
GREENWAY
L4
1E.51
S6V 53' 2C.74
L5
14,62
NaB•2506.67
EXISTIMC STREAM
LB
0.50
1 2812.55
1.7
171
12F 004
La
123,29
SRI 25W.47'
L9
0.5a
559° 2a' 12.55'
L10
icu
588'79D IP
Ltt
16.51
NES'S320.T4
L12
2.13
N4I 29' OL_4]•
LI3
22.56
N71'2637.]C'
Lt
40.61
NBT•,0'42,83'
WATER UNE THAT 15 CENTERED OVER STRUCTURES AND UtIUTY LINES
AS BVILT.
REFERENCES NOTE: NO
SLIBACKS APPLY
PLAT BOON 1999 PAGE 1713 FOR PARCELS
ZERT PDDMF
OEFD BOOK 1501E PACE 1191 PER TOWN OF
PLAT GOOK 2001 PACE Tt CARY PLANNING
PLAT 8001C 1997 PAGE 486 DEPARTMENT,
PLAT 800K 1999 PAGE 939 [phone]
FLOOD NOTE:
PORTIONS CE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. IT IS LOCATED IN ZONE '%• AND ZONE 'AE'
ACCOiDIN I TO EEMA FIRM COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 37200762011J.
III AN LFFLCl1YL DATE OF MAY 2. 2005.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH I
BEARING
1100
34.89'
NM'2bV5W
LPf70
gf„38,
M48'5011fW
ox
76, f8'
N542144W
1400
941'
N87 2855•W
PROPERTYBOUNaWYCURVETABLE
CURVE I LENGTH RADIUS 2610RD GNORp BEARING
1' 4T
QI SURVEY MARKERS
U
j QIRF/:'rRgvREaAR1FDUNp1
a @)IRS
Y'rRCw RE84R(6ETf
dOIPF
I.IRONPIPE (Faml
m ®ECM
WS77AG COWRETEAV MIfM
0
N
PROPERTY CORNER
®
lIMCUA110)
oM BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN
`- BASED ON TOWER
ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS LAND
a SURVEY.
- INSTALLED DITCH
INSTALLED (2115'
RCP
i TILTY AND
NT OFFERED
ON (SEE Ni T
EXISDNL 30' PRrvATE R£GErrCY PARK OFFICE DEVELOPMENT LP
RICkr-UF-WAY Plhj' 0762209152 J!/F
DE 7903 Pi. 577 r C 2ovi PG 71 CRESCENT LAKES tIC
@AI 1997 PG 4111 TUNED PDDMaJOR PINE D76Z31Bi27
- 08 14e26 PG Iel6
\ ORSIEL
EX<5TfNG CONCRETEKPDOMAIOR
MONUMfNT ZONEb
1 1 ELEV = 332.24' AL4SL
LTD' _ _ s88'25.00 e
T `1A J47.83-� - - �_ - tCM - _ y - y - y - 586'14'l [
I 523.6fi"
4 INSTALLED
DETENTION POND _ f ri_
- -__ �'�� � �-� BRIcK abrLDING a •\ _ f
71T, �l 1 I ITT,
1 fj1� Ir
T /
A�
S
F,
EXISTING 30 SANITARY '� 1
SEWER EASEMENT
SAI 3995 PC 1895
BM 7987 PC I.5t03
N/F
TOWN OF CARY
P1Nif 0761299670
DB 847e PG 1962
20NED PDOMAlOR
LEGEND AND SYMBOLS
- Ex15 twC PROPERTY LINE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING EASEMENT
£xisrw& SANITARY SEWER
✓ EXISTING WATER LINE
EXISTING cu eil NE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANPOLE
i5 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
+r.0 EXISTING WATER VALYF
E EXISTING WATER MITER
PFNhf
ZONED PDOMAIIi
70.61 ACRES
r
\i ^ram
1 PARKING
\ ( �(PAN93ONAJiEA
es 6Le
to :.
1 1 �• , EXISTING WATER LINE
(.APPROXIMATE LOCAriON)
T dF CARY-IUTY A.
• - "PIPECME E4JSF:MENT OFFERED
[ FO roEOIGAT r R M¢N [SEE NOTEI
�Isnrvc
BAEEBl.I.i
FIEiC
INSTALLED DETENTION
POND
N/F
TOWN OFTARY
PIN® 076Z„G9278
DB 4670 PC 424
ZONEO R/R
1PF EX!$TING 20 SANI7A11
s_ ��- y SEWER EASEMENT
_ T8- roM ffJ
EXISTING LIFT STATION
461a f FORCE -MAN EASEMENT
` r If' 7Re7 PC 1720
+1 BM 7987 PG 1903
4-
RE � 1
SURVEY PLAT
s
ScuE- ✓.flal„airy
, ter• t21sc11
CNtitisale III of Cary Acknowledgement of Ofler of Dedications
i, . Town CltMDcputy Town Clerk of Cary, NC - ify that the
Town of Gary acknowledges the offer o1 dedication oT 1he sireab. easements, rights
III way and public parks shown herein to the public, but the III— of Cary assumes
np rasponaibifw ty to sept.opan or maintain pre muntil sae it is in Ill. public iirl1 l
to do so and action is taken by the Town of Cary to aCcePt bald offer o1 dedtcall,i
Town Clerk or Deputy Town Clark. -- Cate —
I5-SP.D44
Hill le-D439
Approved by the Town of Cary
Development Review Committee
AMERICANTOWER"
A.T. ENGINEERING SERVICE, PLLC
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY
SUITE 100
CARY, NC 27516
PHON E: (919) 46M112
COk P•1177
THESE DRAWINGS ANGIOR THE ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERWAN TOWERS U.C. THEIR USE
AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL
SITE FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED, ANY USE OR
DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO
AMERICAN TOWERS LLC OR THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS
STRICTLY PROIJI&TED, TITLE TO THESE DOCUMENTS BEII
REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWERS LLC WHETHER
OR NOT THE PROJECT IS EXECUTED. NEITHER THE ARCHITECT
NOR THE ENGINEER WILL BE PROVIDING ON SITE
CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTORI
MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE AMERICAN
TOWERS LLC OF ANY DMCRLPANCIES, ANY PRIOR ISSUANCE
OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST VERSION
ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWERS LLC.
REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE
, FOR RECORD BRL 02106118
ATC PROJECT:
PLAT PLAN APPLICATION
ATC SITE NAME:
CARY PARKING LOT
EXPANSION
SITE ADDRESS:
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY
CARY. NC 27518
SEAL:
���Y`G ^R•O<<N X�G
'S"i 10iy9
E
q
Authorized by "EOR"
Feb 16 2018 8:42 AM COSIQ1i
DRAWN BY:
BRL
APPROVED BY:
KRF
DATE DRAWN:
02,1
ATC JOB NO:
3500
I.i.[aamuu:s
SURVEY PLAT
ISHEET — 1 ER: REVISION NUMBER: `

CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO ANY PUBLIC ROADWAY OR SIDEWALK
SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BY THE END
OF EACH WORK DAY AND DISPOSED IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED
IN THIS PLAN- IN NO CASE SHALL THE SEDIMENT BE WASHED,
SHOVELED, OR SWEPT INTO ANY ROADSIDE DITCH, STORM
SEWER, OR SURFACE WATER.
2. NOTIFY ATC CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT LEAST 7 DAYS PRIOR
TO STARTING ANY EARTH DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES.
3. AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING ANY EARTH DISTURBANCE
ACTIVITIES, THE ONE CALL SYSTEM, INC. SHALL BE NOTIFIED.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. ALL EARTH DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES SHALL PROCEED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEQUENCE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN
DRAWINGS. DEVIATION FROM THAT SEQUENCE MUST BE
APPROVED IN WRITING FROM AMERICAN TOWER PRIOR TO
IMPLEMENTATION.
2. INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION BMPS AS SHOWN
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION,
3, RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHTPOLE AND CONDUIT AS SHOWN.
3.1. COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY.
4. REMOVE EXISTING CULVERT AND DISPOSE OFFSITE.
5. BEGIN EARTHWORKIGRADING.
5-1. REGRADE STREAM AS SHOWN IN PROFILE.
5.2, COMPACT SUB -GRADE TO ATC STANDARDS.
6. INSTALL CULVERTS.
6.1. SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AS SHOWN TO PREPARE FOR
NEW INSTALLATION.
6.2. INSTALL NEW CULVERT(S)
6-3- INSTALL RIP RAP ON BANKS OF STREAM WHERE INDICATED.
6.4. BACKFILL AREA PER DETAIL
-
7. CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROAD
7A. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE ON SUBGRADE,
7.2. INSTALL BASE COURSE TO MATCH DEPTH SHOWN.
7.3. INSTALL SURFACE COARSE TO MATCH DEPTH AND CROSS
SLOPES AS INDICATED ON THE DETAIL.
7.4. COMPACTION SHALL BE WITH SHEEPSFOOT ROLLER OR
RUBBER TIRED ROLLERS WEIGHING AT LEAST EIGHT TONS
FOR BASE COURSE AND SMOOTH DRUM VIBRATOR ROLLERS
FOR SURFACE COURSEIFINISH GRADE PER ATC
SPECIFICATIONS.
8- REINSTALL CURBING AS SHOWN.
9. REINSTALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK AS SHOWN.
10. PERMANENTLY SEED AND STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS.
10.1. FINAL SEEDING WILL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATION.
LEGEND
cX Sii,NG ADI. PROPERTY
EXlSDIvG EASEIVfEl
—XXX— — EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR)
— — —X)(X— — — EXISTING CONTOUR (NI,NOR;
„w EXISTING TREELWE
_ Ex.Isr,ti13U!L0:Nc
5J sD EXISTING STORM DRAIN
EX.'S-'NG .ROAD (RAuED)
EXISTING CONCRETE
r,Y L T. POLE
SEE ENLARGED SITE
PLAN ON SHEET C-401
EX15T1:0.fG ATC
BL!ILDWG
kill"all'i
--J =—--------------
w/
EXISTING ATC
3U!LD.WC
I
EXISTING LIGHT POLE
ExrsIvG wA.TERLI,NE OVERALL SITE PLAN
1
EX;S'L-NG 1 VIDERG.ROUNO PONER
EXISTING J,NDE,RGROLf:4'D TELCO 0 100' 200' N
EX'STI:rY'G HIGH WATER MARK
EXSTIb'G :OC—YR F-LOGu;P!A!N
SCALE: 1"=100' (11X17)
EX,lST'IdG F�OODWAY VI=50' (22X34)
a
m
t
u
"m
a
A or
AMERICAN TOWER"
A.T. ENGINEERING SERVICE, PLLC 6
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY
SUITE 100
CARY, NC 27518 J
PHONE: {919) 468-0112 G
COA: P-1177 O
THESE DRAWINGS ANDIOR THE ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER THEIR USE AND
P U BUCATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE
FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE
OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR
THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PRCHISITE❑ TITLE TO
THESE DOCLMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF
AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS
EXECUTEC NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL
BE PROVIDING CNSITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS
PROJECT CONTRACTOR(S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND
A➢VISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ANY PRIOR
ISSUANCE OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST
VERSION ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER
REV.
DESCRIPTION
BY
DATE
O�
FOR CONSTRUCTION
NRP
11/0511
ATC SITE NUMBER:
3500 REGENCY
ATC SITE NAME:
ATC CULVERT UPGRADE
SITE ADDRESS:
3500 REGENCY PKWY
CARY. NC 27518
SEAL:
G�A
P C-
DRAWN BY:
NRP
APPROVED BY:
KRF
DATE DRAWN:
11/05119
ATC JOB NO.
INTERNAL
OVERALL SITE PLAN
SHEET � 0 � REVISION: I
I

,�,— SITE
I VICINITY MAP n.t.s. 16)
1, PLAN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE
REPORT.
2, PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ALTA/NSPS LAND
TITLE SURVEY.
3. BASIS OF THE BEARINGS AND COORDINATES IS THE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,
NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD 83/2011) BASED ON
DIFFERENTIAL GPS OBSERVATIONS PERFORMED ON
OCTOBER 14, 2019; TIED TO THE NATIONAL SPATIAL
REFERENCE SYSTEM VIA CORS STATIONS AND OPUS;
AND EXPRESSED IN US SURVEY FEET.
4, VERTICAL INFORMATION BASED ON THE NORTH
AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD '88) AND
EXPRESSED IN US SURVEY FEET.
5. THIS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL
BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT PARCEL. PROPERTY
N/F
ALIDADE RECENCY 3700 LLC
PARCEL # 0762216042
DB 16966 PC 261
N88'25'00"W
215,62'
` EXISTING
WOODED
AREA
EXISTING STREAM
TOP OF BANK
EXISTING CENTER
LINE OF STREAM
15' D BUFFER
SM 1999 PG 989
25' D BUFFER
BM 1999 PG 989
12" CULVERT WITH
FLARED END SECTIONS
INV. IN: 325.15'
4NV. OUT: 324.93'
EXISTING TELCO
VAULT
36" PIPE UNDER DRIVE
WITH FLARED END
SECTIONS
INV. IN: 322.09'
INV. OUT: 321.76'
\1
N/F
RECENCY PARK CORPORATION
PRIVATE RIW
1 PARCEL # 0762217f35
DB 4502 PC 866
�I
V ,
`, zpNe k
f ,
,
ExISTING N/F
WOODED ALIDADE RECENCY 3333 LLC
AREA l PARCEL # 07622f9f62
DB 16966 PC 195
I EXISTING
TRIBUTARY
N88'25'00"W
EXISTING STREAM 347.83'
TOP OF BANK
EXISTING CENTER
LINE OF STREAM
LINES ARE DRAWN FROM FIELD LOCATIONS OFF
MONUMENTATION, GIS, TAX MAPS, AND INFORMATION
N/F
FOUND IN DEED BOOK 15022, PAGE 1191, OF THE WAKE
AMERICAN TONERS LLC
COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS.
PARCEL # 0762302536
DB f5022 PC ff9f
6. DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
7, PROPERTY LOCATED IN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD
`
AREAS BASED UPON FEMA COMMUNITY PANEL#
AC
MOOD''
3720076200J, EFFECTIVE MAY 02, 2006.
8. LESSEE INFORMATION;
AMERICAN TOWERS, LLC
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY, SUITE 100
EXISTING
CARY, NC 27518
PARKING
9. PROPERTY INFORMATION:
.`\ LOT
AMERICAN TOWERS, LLC
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY, SUITE 100
CARY, INC 27518
\
\
\
SITE SURVEY
SCALE: 1" = 30'
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
— — —
ADJOINERS PROPERTY LINE
(NOT SURVEYED)
UTILITY POLE
•
GUY (ANCHOR)
TELCO PEDESTAL
H
WATER VALVE
WATER METER
FIRE HYDRANT
LIGHT POLE
*IRF
)�" IRON REBAR (FOUND)
QIPF
1" IRON PIPE (FOUND)
® CMF
CONCRETE MONUMENT
(FOUND)
O
PROPERTY CORNER
(CALCULATED)
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
OVERHEAD WIRE
---R/W---
RIGHT--OF-WAY
X -----
CHAIN LINK FENCE
e�y-y-"
EXISTING TREE LINE
0 30 60
SCALE IN FEET
PREPARED FOR:
j %mUCAM TOw =
AMERICAN TOWERS, LLC
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY, SUITE 100
CARY, NC 27518
PROJECT INFORMATION:
ATC CARY PARKING LOT
I 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY #1DO
CARY, NC 27518
(WAKE COUNTY)
PREPARED BY:
:� TEP ENGINEERING, PLLC
326 TRYON ROAD
A RALEIGH, NC 27603-3530
[phone]
\� COA # P-1403
SURVEYOR CERTIFICATE
"1, DALE A. LOVELACE. CERTIFY THIS PLAT WAS
DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN
ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
(DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK 15022
AT PAGE H91) THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS BROKEN
LINES, DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN
BOOK AND PAGE AS REFERENCED HEREIN;
THAT RATIO OF PRECISION OR POSITIONAL
ACCURACY IS 1: 10.000 OR GREATER; THAT
THIS MAP MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND
SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56.
1600.)".
THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019.
DALE A. LOVELACE
NORTH CAROLINA PLS # L-4901
SHEET TITLE:
SITE SURVEY
DATE: 10/2412019 REVISION: O
SHEET #: I OF TEP #: 55470

LacX+SlZtNOG 20
NE 2
RAR' RUFER `
l
r
PROPOSED 34`
C-501 C-541 PAVED ROAD & r
f _ SIDEWALK REPAIR f
EXISTING
/ GREENWAY I /
/ / 4 PROPOSED 65' OF (3) 48"
HDPE@1%SLOPE
INV IN: 321.54'
_
INV OUT 320.89'
F
K5
cX!ST!NG 30'
ZONE 'r
TC'RIC
{TO BE PROTECTED DURING
CONSTRUCTION)
ool
/
CC-501 PROPOSED 25' OF
SILT FENCE
4 so/
!
-7.
77 a
PROPOSED R-5 RIP RAP /
ON BANKS OF STREAM /
(24" THICKNESS)(264 SF)
//
d k PROPOSED ASPHAL�
CIVIL LEGEND C-501 SAW CUT (815 SF)
�.. sC s°_ PROPOSED CULVERT
PROPOSED LOD
PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PROPOSED EDGE OF CLEARING
XXX PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR)
XXX PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR)
PROPOSED RIP RAP
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
LEGEND
-------
EXISTING PROPERTY
ADJ. PROPERTY
------------
EXISTING EASEMENT
— —XXX— —
EXISTING CONTOUR (,VAJOR)
— — —XXX— — —
EXIST IG CONTOUR (MlIVORj
EXISTING TR-ELIAE
I
i X•!sANG RJiLDiNG
—so—so—
EXIST NG STORM DRAIN
EXISTING ROAD (PAYED)
' i
EXiST;NG CONCRETE
XX LT. POLE
EXISTING LIGHT POLE
x
EXISTING WATERL,NE
EXr'STL'VG UNDERGROUND POWER
EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELCO
EX! STNG H10-t WATER .MARK
—...
EXISTING r00-YR FLODDPLAW
—.--
FX,ST,NG FLOODWAY
328
327
326
GRAD
325
324
GRADE BREAK STA =
ELEV =
323
322
321
320
w_
{°
N
I r
r
I+
i
r �
ff't1�
c
L1V ul'`. c /
PROPOSED ROAD
GRADE
I !
� I RELOCATED LIGHTPOLL
- / (RUN NEW
/ UNDERGROUND
CONDUIT TO TIE INTO°D-
1 EXITING AS SHOWN} \ \ 1 j� ' y%"" _ W—
PROPOSED SAND BAGS
AK229? �1
I
c
I
AMERICANTOWER*
A.T. ENGINEERING SERVICE, PLLC
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY
SUITE 100
CARY, NC 27518
PHONE: [phone]
COA: P-1177
THESE DRAWINGS ANDrOR THE ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER THEIR USE AND
PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE OR*INAL SITE
FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE
OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR
THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED TITLE TO
THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF
AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS
EXECUTED NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL
BE PROVIDING ON -SITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS
PROJECT. CONTRACTOR{S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND
ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY PRIOR
ISSUANCE OE THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST
VERSION ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER
�PROPOSEU
PROPOSED PUMP LINE REV.DESCRIPTION BY DATE
��0, FORCONSTRUCTION NRP 11l05/1
P�x 1`, PER ENVIRO COMMENTS NRP 11/2511
ON BANKS OF STREAW
(24" THICKNESS)(310 SF)—
// PROKOSED LIMITS OF /
.DISTURBANCE
(0.13 ACRES)
LiGHTPOLE
�(TO BE RELOCATED) ENLARGED SITE PLAN
— EXISTNG ARC'4
CULVERT /
(TO BE REMOVED) /
E_X_SRN1 WATER A;
(CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE
PIPE AND RE-ROUTE OVER
PROPOSED CULVERTS AS
NECESSARY)
0 29 40'
SCALE:1"=20'(11X17) N
1"=10'(22X34)
0
PBOPOS D
C LVERT
f
/
i
BREAK
STA =
40.00
d
LEV =
sn
°
1320.89
°
5O
GRAD
BREAK
STA = 1
4 5.00
ELEV =
321.54 ,
PROPOSEil
GLADE
20.00
STREAM
320.71
GRADE BREAK
STA = 1
40.00
ELEV=-321.62
o
/
2590
-
/
1
00°b
E XIS, !NG
-
GRAD_
..-.
M W D <p N th
N N N N N N N N N N
t7 c� cJ th f3 (7 M C1 t'1 f7
)28
327
326
325
324
323
322
321
320
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00
STREAM DISTURBANCE TABLE
ITEM
TOTAL
STREAM DISTURBANCE (LF)
120
IMPACTS BELOW OHWM
(SF)
236
SOIL REMOVED BELOW
OHWM (CY)
123E
RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1
DISTURBANCE (SF)
5663
RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2
DISTURBANCE (SF)
0
PERMANENT STREAM FILL
(CY)
612
TEMPORARY STREAM FILL
204
(Cy)
2 CULVERT PROFILE
0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=3'(11X17) VERT. 1"=30' (11X17) HORIZ.
1"=1-5' (22X34)VERT. 1"=15' (22X34)HORIZ.
ATC SITE NUMBER:
3500 REGENCY
ATC SITE NAME:
ATC CULVERT UPGRADE
SITE ADDRESS:
3500 REGENCY PKWY
CARY, NC 27518
SEAL
`o o�gS1p �'L9/
;0. $ �77
0 c c
-a a- r
DRAWN BY:
NRP
APPROVED BY:
KRF
DATE DRAWN_
1110511E
ATC JOB NO:
INTERNAL
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER: REVISION
C-401 1

CONCRETE CONCRETE
CURB (TYP.) SIDEWALK
(MATCH
20' EXISTING)
rX,'ST'N'-_^, 2% 2%
GRAD �
r
SURFACE COARSE: �
6" DEPTH OF BITUMINOUS WEARING
io
COARSE (COMPACTED)
BASE COARSE:
COMPACTED SUB -GRADE 4" DEPTH OF CRUSHED STONE, UP TO V WITH
SOME FINES AND SAND
NOTES:
1. SUBGRADE AND FILL SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN SOIL. NO DELETERIOUS MATERIALS OR ORGANICS TO
BE USED. REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL AND ORGANICS BEFORE COMMENCING ACCESS ROAD OR A MIN.
DEPTH OF 6".
2. TYPICAL ACCESS ROAD COMPACTION SHALL BE WITH SHEEPSFOOT ROLLER OR RUBBER TIRED
ROLLERS WEIGHING AT LEAST EIGHT TONS FOR BASE COURSE AND SMOOTH DRUM VIBRATOR
ROLLERS FOR SURFACE COURSEIFINISH GRADE.
3. THE PREFERRED CUT AND FILL SLOPE IS 2:1, HOWEVER THE ENGINEER OF RECORD MAY REVISE THE
CUT SLOPE TO 1 A OR 1.5:1 IF CUT SLOPE IS ROCK OR WELL CEMENTED SOIL AND THE FILL SLOPE TO
3:1 OR GREATER IF THE FILL SLOPE IS POOR SOILS AND PRONE TO LANDSLIDES OR SEVERE EROSION. 118" RADIUS
4- REFER TO SIEVE ANALYSIS IN ATC SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 312000 PART 2.1 SOIL MATERIALS FOR
APPROVED GRADATION. COMMON REFERENCED NAMES ARE CRUSHER RUN, ABC, ZA, 2RC.
5. MARGINAL SOIL CONDITIONS ARE FOR ROADS OVER LOOSE SANDY SILTS, SANDY AND FIRM CLAYS.
MEDIUM TO STIFF SOIL FEEL CONDITIONS. CBR BETWEEN 1.0 TO 4.0
i�
AMERICAN TOWER MASTER SPECIFICATION:
1. DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK SECTION 0312000 FOR ACCESS ROADS AND EARTH WORK
2, DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK SECTION 0312500 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS
3. DIVISION 32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS SECTION 321216 ASPHALT PAVING
PAVED CROSS SECTION
SUALE. NOT TO SCALE
STABILIZE UPSTREAM
AND DOWNSTREAM ROADWAY EXl3TiA'G
BANKS WITH R-5 RIP -RAP. STREAM
MIN. 24" THICK 80770M
1 STREAM,
BOTTOM
SECTION VIEW TYP.
CULVERT
ROADWAY z 48" HDPE ([ 1 % SLOPE
EARTH COVER °D
12"
i
BACKFILL WITH EXISTING
STREAM BED MATERIAL a EX "NG
PLACE LARGER ROCKS
NEAR CULVERT SG;J'd
NOTES:
1. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING. THESE
AREAS SHALL BE BLANKETED OR USE RIP -RAP WHEREVER THEY ARE LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF
A SURFACE WATER OR WHERE A SUITABLE VEGETATIVE AREA DOES NOT EXIST.
2. DISTURBANCE OF THE STREAMBED AND BANKS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO THAT NECESSARY TO
PLACE THE CULVERT. AFFECTED BANK AND BED AREAS SHOULD BE RESTORED TO PRE -PROJECT
CONDITIONS FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF THE CULVERT AND THE STEEP BANKS SHOULD
STABILIZED WITH R5 RIP -RAP AND FLATTER BANK AREAS PLANTED WITH NATIVE VEGETATION,
CONSISTENT WITH THAT WHICH EXISTED PRIOR TO THE CULVERT INSTALLATION. SEEDED BANKS
SHOULD BE COVERED WITH MULCH TO ACCELERATE PLANT GROWTH.
AMERICAN TOWER MASTER SPECIFICATION:
1- DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK SECTION 0312500 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS
4 STREAM CULVERT PLACEMENT PROFILE
SCALE' NOT TO SCALE
118" RADIUS (TYP.)
FRONT ELEVATION
TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT
2'-6"
JOINT FILLER
(MAINTAIN 59 MAX
BETWEEN JOINTS
OR AT ALL RIGID
OBJECTS.
4 112"
SUBGRADE
SAW CUT EXISTING
ASPHALT, REMOVE
AND REPLACE WITL
NEW ASPHALT
ONCE TRENCHING
IS COMPLETED
SURFACE
CUTBACK
:PTH OF
BITUMINOUS
ASPHALT WEARING
COARSE OR
MATCH EXISTING,
WHICHEVER IS
GREATER
2'-0"
3" RADIUS 112"RADIUS
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF
3" RADIUS
UNDERGROUND SERVICES. SERVICE LOCATIONS TO BE CONFIRMED PRIOR
m
TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. REMOVE ALL UNSUITABLE OR DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AS REQUIRED.
COMPACT UNDERLYING SOIL TO 90% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY. REPLACE
REMOVED SOIL WITH 8" LIFTS OF GRANULAR "B" MATERIAL TO A DEPTH OF
4" BELOW PROPOSED GRADE- COMPACT TO MINIMUM 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2006 IBC.
CURB AND GUTTER
REVIEW WITH PROJECT MANAGER AND GEOTECH PRIOR TO
SIDE ELEVATION
CONSTRUCTION.
2 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
AMERICAN TOWER MASTER SPECIFICATION:
1. DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK SECTION 312000 ACCESS ROADS AND EARTHWORK
2. DIVISION 32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS SECTION 321216 ASPHALT PAVING
3 NEAT CUT ASPHAHLT DETAIL
SCALE: N.T.S.
_ 8'-0" MAX
MAX IN HIGH 2"X2" WOOD OR
FLOWgREgS #4 REINFORCED STEEL BARS
Z
III
USING "HOG RINGS"
OR PLASTIC TIES
V r!VC� SEDIMENT CONTROL
D FABRIC ATTACHED
10 FT, F� COMPACTED SOIL
MIN. c PUMP KEY 8" - 12" OF FABRIC 4 1'L BACKFILL
INTO TRENCH
TRENCH II
SPOILS
SANDBAGS (TYP.)
NOTES:
- - 1. FABRIC WIDTH SHALL BE 30IN- MINIMUM STAKES SHALL BE HARDWOOD OR EQUIVALENT
EX.'ST 1.NG RGAD
STEEL STAKES.
-----• 2. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT LEVEL EXISTING GRADE. BOTH ENDS OF THE FENCE
SHALL BE EXTENDED AT LEAST 8 FEET UP SLOPE AT 45 DEGREES TO THE MAIN FENCE
ALIGNMENT.
(TO BE REMOVED
AFTER SANDBAGS i AND PUMP ARE 3. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN ACCUMULATIONS REACH HALF THE ABOVE GROUND
HEIGHT OF THE FENCE.
OPERATIONAL)
4. ANY SECTION OF SILT FENCE WHICH HAS BEEN UNDERMINED OR TOPPED SHALL BE
IMMEDIATELY REPLACED.
5. FENCE SHALL BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WHEN TRIBUTARY AREA IS
PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
AMERICAN TOWER MASTER SPECIFICATION:
1. DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK SECTION 0312500 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS
STREAM SANDBAG AND PUMP BYPASS DETAIL 6 SILT FENCE DETAIL
SCALE_ NOT TO SCALE SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
I
i
AMERICAN TOWER'
A.T. ENGINEERING SERVICE, PLLC
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY
SUITE 100
CARY, NC 27518
PHONE: [phone]
COA: P-1177
THESE DRAWINGS ANDI THE ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER THEIR USE AND
PUBLICATION SHALL SE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE
FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE
OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR
THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TITLE TO
THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF
AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS
EXECUTED NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL
BE PROVIDING ONSETS CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS
PROJECT. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND
ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY PRIOR
ISSUANCE OF THES DRAWING I5 SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST
VERSION ON FILE WET AMERICAN TOWER
REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE
//0� FOR CONSTRUCTION NRP 11105119
!._\ -- —
ATC SITE NUMBER:
3500 REGENCY
ATC SITE NAME
ATC CULVERT UPGRADE
I SEAM
SITE ADDRESS:
3500 REGENCY PKWY
CARY, NC 27518
rr�tsa>�
DRAWN BY:
NRP
APPROVED BY�
KRF
DATE DRAWN-
111D5119
ATC JOB NO:
INTERNAL
CONSTRUCTION
DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:
C-501 0

CAP EX INSPECTION NOTES
SPECIAL INSPECTOR
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
THE SPECIAL INSPECTION (81) PROCEDURE IS INTENDED TO CONFIRM THAT CONSTRUCTION AND
THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AS SOON AS RECEIVING A
THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE SI INSPECTOR AS SOON AS RECEIVING A
INSTALLATION MEETS ENGINEERING DESIGN, ATC PROCEDURES AND ATC STANDARD
PO FROM ATC. UPON RECEIVING A PO FROM AFC THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AT A MINIMUM MUST:
PO FOR THE MODIFICATION INSTALLATION OR TURNKEY PROJECT TO, AT A MINIMUM:
SPECIFICATIONS FOR WIRELESS TOWER SITES.
. REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SI CHECKLIST.
• REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SI CHECKLIST.
TO ENSURE THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SI ARE MET, IT IS VITAL THAT THE GENERAL
WORK WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO DEVELOP A SCHEDULE TO CONDUCT ON -SITE INSPECTIONS,
. WORK WITH THE SI TO DEVELOP A SCHEDULE TO CONDUCT ON -SITE INSPECTIONS- INCLUDING
CONTRACTOR AND THE INSPECTOR BEGIN COMMUNICATING AND COORDINATING AS SOON AS A PO
INCLUDING FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS.
FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS.
IS RECEIVED FROM AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION (ATC). IT IS EXPECTED THAT EACH PARTY
WILL PROACTIVELY REACH OUT TO THE OTHER PARTY. IF CONTACT INFORMATION IS NOT KNOWN,
ANY CONCERNS WITH THE SCOPE OF WORK OR PROJECT COMMITMENT MUST BE RELAYED TO THE ATC
. BETTER UNDERSTAND ALL INSPECTION AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS.
CONTACT YOUR AMERICAN TOWER POINT OF CONTACT.
POINT OF CONTACT IMMEDIATELY.
THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM AND RECORD THE TEST AND INSPECTION RESULTS IN
THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COLLECTING ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR INSPECTION AND
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SI CHECKLIST.
TEST REPORTS, REVIEWING THESE DOCUMENTS FOR ADHERENCE TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, CONDUCTING
THE IN -FIELD INSPECTIONS, AND SUBMITTING THE SI REPORT TO AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION_
CAP EX SPECIAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST
INSPECTION
SI REVIEW REQUIRED
INSPECTION FREQUENCY
INSPECTION ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TESTING
RESPONSIBILITY
PRE CX
DURING CX
POST CX
PERIODIC
CONTINUOUS
REQUIRED
DOCUMENTATION AND SITE VISIT CONDUCTED BY AN ATC APPROVED SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY ATC AND OTHER
SPECIAL INSPECTION FIELD WORK & REPORT
AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. INSPECTION PARAMETERS TO FOLLOW ATC'S CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR
Y
SI
WIRELESS TOWER SITES.
ENGINEERING ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS
GC SHALL SUBMIT DRAWINGS TO SI FOR INCLUSION IN 51 REPORT
Y
GC
VERIFICATION & INSPECTION
MTR AND OR MILL CERTIFICATIONS FOR SUPPLIED MATERIALS GC SHALL SUPPLY SI WITH REPORTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SI
Y
Si
FABRICATED MATERIAL
REPORT WHEN REQUIRED BY ATC
STONE SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6". ENTRANCE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 20' FOR A MINIMUM LENGTH OF
30' AND A 30' RADIUS, IF POSSIBLE. TRAVEL LANE SHALL HAVE A MIN. WIDTH OF 12' IN THE TANGENTS AND 15AT THE CURVES.
Y
GC / SI
J
J
ROAD INSPECTION
ROAD HAS NO SIGNS OF RILLS AND EROSION. ROAD IS PROPERLY CROWNED OR SUPER -ELEVATED. ALL DIMENSIONS AND
DEPTHS SHALL BE PER THE PLANS OR ABOVE UNLESS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
A DITCH SHOULD BE INSTALLED PER THE APPROVED PLANS. INSPECT EROSION PROBLEMS, DAMAGE TO VEGETATION,
SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION (ADDRESS WHEN >3 INCHES AT ANY SPOT OR COVERING VEGETATION). INSPECT FOR
POOLS OF STANDING WATER. IF REQUIRED, DEWATER AND DISCHARGE TO AN APPROVED LOCATION AND RESTORE GRADE
DITCH INSPECTION
TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. VEGETATION ALONG THE SURFACE OF THE DITCH SHOULD BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION,
Y
SI
AND ANY BARE SPOTS IMMEDIATELY RF-VEGETATED. IF THE DITCH IS RIP -RAP VERIFY IF ADDITIONAL RIP -RAP NEEDS TO BE
INSTALLED. THE CHANNEL SHOULD BE CLEANED WHENEVER THE TOTAL DEPTH IS REDUCED BY 25%AT ANY LOCATION OR A
MINIMUM 9' DEPTH IS NOT ACHIEVED.
INSPECT AND CORRECT CHECK DAMS WHEN SIGNS OF ALTERED WATER FLOW (CHANNELIZATION, OBSTRUCTIONS, EROSION
CHECK DAM INSPECTION
ETC.) ARE IDENTIFIED.CHECK DAMS SHOULD BE HALF OF THE DITCH HEIGHT. A CHECK DAM SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE
N
SI
CULVERT TO PREVENT BYPASS FLOW.
IS THE WATER BAR FUNCTIONING PROPERLY AND PREVENT WATER FROM TRAVELING DOWN THE ROADWAY IN STEEP SLOPES
WATER BAR INSPECTION
OR AT CURVES. SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED AT A CROSS SLOPE OF 2% AND DISCHARGE TO A DITCH OR WELL
N
SI
VEGETATED AREA.
IS THE TURNOUT LOCATED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES OR BUFFER AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE?
TURN -OUT INSPECTION
INSPECT AND VERIFY IF THE TURNOUTS ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY AND IF EARTHEN BERMS OR RIP -RAP IS NECESSARY TO
N
SI
MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE PATTERN.
INSTALLED THE CORRECT SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE AND AT THE PROPER LOCATIONS WITH A MINIMUM OF V COVER.
CULVERT INSPECTION
CULVERTS SHOULD BE KEPT CLEAN AND ENSURE WATER FLOW. UNLESS AT A LOW POINT ALL A DOWNSTREAM EARTHEN OR
Y
SI
STONE BERM SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE CULVERT TO PREVENT BYPASS FLOW.
SHALL BE INSTALLED ON LEVEL GRADE TO PREVENT SCOUR AND EROSION AT PIPE OR CHANNEL OUTFALL-DISPLACED RIP -RAP
OUTLET PROTECTION INSPECTION
SHALL BE REPLACED. DEPTH SHALL BE 1.5 TIMES THE STONE SIZE OR MIN OF 9'. A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 8' IS REQUIRED. MIN
Y
SI
STONE SIZE: AASHTO R-3 RIP RAP f3"-6" CLEAN STONE).
UP GRADIENT CULVERTS, CATCH BASINS AND INLETS OF BASIN SHOULD BE INSPECTED AND CLEANED. VEGETATION ALONG
THE SURFACE OF THE BASIN SHOULD BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION, AND ANY BARE SPOTS REVEGETATED AS SOON AS
BASIN INSPECTION
POSSIBLE. INSPECT FOR ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT, DAMAGE TO OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURES, EROSION CONTROL
N
SI
MEASURES, SIGNS OF WATER CONTAMINATIONISPILLS, AND SLOPE STABILITY IN THE BERMS AND PONDING OF WATER
GREATER THAN 72 HOURS SINCE THE LAST RUNOFF EVENT.
ALL SILT FENCE AND STAKES SHOULD BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE SITES HAS ACHIEVED STABILIZATION.
Y
SI
SILT FENCE INSPECTION
NO LONG TERM MAINTENANCE IS REQUIRED.
SEEDING INSPECTION
SITES SHOULD OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN AT LEAST 70% STABILIZATION. STONE IS CONSIDERED STABILIZED.
Y
SI
v
V
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY CERTIFIED INSPECTION WHICH PROVIDES TEST RESULTS FOR
Y
GC I TA
COMPACTION VERIFICATION
COMPACTION TEST OF SOILS IN PLACE TO ASTM STANDARDS.
THE COMPOUND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM GRADE OF 5% AND A MINIMUM OF 1 % IN ANY DIRECTION. A V MINIMUM GRAVEL
APRON AROUND THE COMPOUND WITH A DITCH INSTALLED PER THE PLANS SURROUNDING THE UP GRADIENT PERIMETER OF
N
GC I TA
COMPOUND INSPECTION
THE COMPOUND. THE DITCH SHALL FREELY GRAVITY DRAIN TO AN APPROPRIATE LOCATION WITH NO IMPACT TO DOWN
GRADIENT FEATURES SUCH AS THE ACCESS ROAD OR OTHER STRUCTURES.
EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE USED ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 2HAV OR STEEPER OR AS DIRECTED BY LOCAL
SLOPE STABILITY INSPECTION
REGULATING AGENCIES. AND WHERE POTENTIAL EXISTS FOR SEDIMENT POLLUTION TO RECEIVING SURFACE WATERS. SINCE
Y
SI
ROCK SLOPES POSE LITTLE, IF ANY, POTENTIAL FOR EROSION, CUT SLOPES IN COMPETENT BEDROCK AND ROCK FILL SLOPES
DO NOT NEED TO BE BLANKETED.
POWER PANELS, DISCONNECTS, ATS, TROUGH, H-FRAME, CONDUIT AND GROUNDING SYSTEMS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH
SI
POWER AND GROUNDING
THE DESIGN DRAWINGS
N
GC AS -BUILT DRAWINGS WITH CONSTRUCTION RED -LINES
GC SHALL SUBMIT "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS INDICATING ANY APPROVED CHANGES TO ENGINEERED PLANS TO SI FOR
Y
GC
APPROVALIREVIEW AND INCLUSION IN SI REPORT
SI AS -BUILT DRAWINGS WITH INSPECTION RED -LINES (AS REQUIRED)
SI SHALL SUBMIT "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS INDICATING ANY APPROVED CHANGES TO ENGINEERED PLANS WITHIN SI REPORT
Y
SI
PHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF SPECIAL INSPECTION, ON SITE REMEDIATiON, AND ITEMS FAILING INSPECTION & REQUIRING
Y
GC I SI
FOLLOW UP TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE SI REPORT_ COMPLETE PHOTO LOG IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN SI REPORT.
NOTE: SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ARE INTENDED TO BE A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT BETWEEN GC AND SI, WHENEVER POSSIBLE GC IS TO PROVIDE SI WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE EVIDENCE OF PROPER INSTALLATION IF PERIODIC INSPECTION FREQUENCY IS ACCEPTABLE, THE GC AND S1 SHALL
WORK TO COMPILE EVIDENCE OF PROPER CONSTRUCTION AND LIMIT THE NUMBER OF SI SITE VISITS REQUIRED.
TABLE KEY:
COMMENTS:
SI - ATC APPROVED SPECIAL INSPECTOR CX - CONSTRUCTION
SPECIAL INSPECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY ATC CIVIL ENGINEERING TEAM,
GC- GENERAL CONTRACTOR CM - CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
TA - 3RD PARTY TESTING AGENCY ATC - AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION
v
m
w
d
v
AMERICAIV TOWER® a
A.T. ENGINEERING SERVICE, PLLC
3500 REGENCY PARKWAY -
SUITE 100 -
CARY, NO 2751E F
PHONE: [phone] ¢
COA: P-1177
c
n
THESE DRAWINGS ANDiOR THE ACCOMPANYING y
SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE L
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER THEIR USE AND
PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE j
FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE
OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TOAMERICAN TOWER OR
THE SPECIFIED CARRIER 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED TITLE TO L
THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF
AMERICAN TOWER VOIETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS
EXECUTED. NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL
BE PROVID WG ON -SITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS
PROJECT CONTRACTORIS) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND
ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ANY PRIOR
ISSUANCE OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST
VERSION CN FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER
REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE
0,. FOR CONSTRUCTION NRP 11105119
A
ATC SITE NUMBER:
3500 REGENCY
ATC SITE NAME:
ATC CULVERT UPGRADE
SITE ADDRESS:
350D REGENCY PKWY
CARY, NO 27518
SEAL:
� �Slp• �
kk
04 777
CK
DRAWN BY:
NRP
APPROVED BY:
KRF
DATE DRAWN:
11/05119—
ATC JOB NO:
INTERNAL
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
WORKSHEET
SHEET NUMBER:
REVISION:
Sic
o

ATC Cary Lot Stream Delineation ;.!- ` Cross -Section Location
Tv
rx
10/10/2019
4 v' R '► +-
oc
y ,
�•. _ Aug- .
• r
,• •�•;. .�. fir,
�L_U `f.
1

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/10/2019
Project/Site:ATC Cary/ Sp1
Latitude:350 43' 48.25" N
Evaluator: George Swearingen, Lisa Long, Matt Moore
County: Wake
Longitude: 78' 47' 16.69 W
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 25.5
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
Apex, NC 7.5-Minute Quad
Ephemer ntermltten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 orperennial if>_ 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
C9
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
CD
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/10/2019
Project/site:ATC Cary/ SP 2
Latitude:350 43' 48.25" N
Evaluator: George Swearingen, Lisa Long, Matt Moore
County: Wake
Longitude: 78' 47' 16.69 W
Total Points: /
II
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemer ntermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name: Apex' NC 7.5-Minute Quad
if>_ 19 orperennial if>_ 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
20
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
to,%
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
OO
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
INo = 0
1Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 3.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/10/2019
Project/Site:ATC Cary/SP 3
Latitude:350 43' 48.25" N
Evaluator: George Swearingen, Lisa Long, Matt Moore
County: Wake
Longitude: 78' 47' 16.69 W
Total Points:
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 25
Ephemer ntermltten erennial
e.g. Quad Name: Apex, NC 7.5-Minute Quad
if>_ 19 orperennial if>_ 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 16 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
20
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
OO
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
1 0.5
1 1
1 .5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
INo = 0
1Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Rip rap apron upstream + downstream culvert acting as grade control (#9)
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/10/2019
Project/Site: ATC Cary/ SP Tributary
Latitude: 350 43' 48.25" N
Evaluator: George Swearingen, Lisa Long, Matt Moore
County: Wake
Longitude: 78' 47' 16.69 W
Total Points: I I
II II
St r Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
phemera ntermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Apex' NC 7.5-Minute Quad
if>_ 19 orperennial if>_ 30'
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 8 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
O
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes = 3
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
OO
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Location of t .�jr
Reaches
~ 7 Ism
�,
1
�'1 tj�, '
Ot
jkl

National Flood Hazard Layer FI RMette
*1U9`—"'1-1 FEMA
Legend
35°44'2.92"N
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway S
0.2 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone x
Future Conditions 1% Annual
— Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
ITHER AREAS OF ," Levee. See Notes. zone x
FLOOD HAZARD I F,&O' d Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone o
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone o
GENERAL ---' Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES I I I I I I I Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
R zos Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
17•s Water Surface Elevation
o- — — Coastal Transect
—513.•«.. Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
-- --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
E7 Digital Data Available
No Digital Data Available
N
MAP PANELS
® Unmapped
The pin displayed on the map is an
approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 11/14/2019 at 11:20:47 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.

11/14/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
jF7 \ f 'W
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 1 /12

IPaC: Explore Location
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
�o�
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 2/12

11/14/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required. 4 4
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 3/12

IPaC: Explore Location
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Proposed Threatened
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed Endangered
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolate Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 4/12

IPaC: Explore Location
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php t
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures. php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A
_.............................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
............................................................................................................
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 5/12

IPaC: Explore Location
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Breeds May 1 to Jun 30
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
U ** _:Tw
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 6/12

IPaC: Explore Location
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (s)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2. f % 1k
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 7/12

11FIEFAU11111411
IPaC: Explore Location
SPECIES
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable
r .................................................
(This ..is not a i
.. ................................ Conservation
Concern . . '' (BCC) in this
................................................ area, but warrants
...........................................
attention because of
the Eagle" Act' ' or r for
..............................................
potential
susceptibilities ......................
-.-. .- -. i-i.in
.........................................
offshore areas from
.................................................
......................................
certain " types ' ' ' " o ' f
development or
............
activities.)
.......................
Blue -winged
Warbler
BCC - BCR (This is a
...............................................
Bird of Conservation
'.' .' . "''­'"'' ,
Concern BCC only in
... '""'i"..................
particular Bird
Regions
...................................................
(BCRs) in the
...............................
continental USA)
JAN FED MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV [DEC
[phone] 1111 1,+++ +.111 11+11 +101 1++4 1111 01+1 +11+
I
++++ ++++ ++++ ++*+ Jill Jill ++++ ++++ +++I ++++ ++++ ++++
Eastern Whip- ++++ ++++ ++++
poor -will
BCC Rangewide
ia Bird
ofConservation''' ...........
......................................
, '
.................................. throughout its range
in the continental
' "
.........................................
USA and Alaska.) yy
.........................................
Prairie Warbler +
BCC Rangewide ++++ +++* I Jill
is a Bird
of Conservation
''' ...........
................................. Concern(BCC)
throughout its range
..................................
i ' n ­&­ continental
USA and d Alaska.) ""'1 0
........... ........................ Prothonotary
Warbler + I*+ ++++
BCC Rangewide
is' a Bird
............................................... of Conservation
.......................................
6nc en(BCC)
'' C)
.................................. throughout its range
i ' n the continental
' ' ' ' ' " ' ' ' '
.......................
6S�and '": "' ' A" 1"a s k a )
.........................................
Red-headed Oil I I I I I I I list 11111111 1+1+ mill 1111 1101 +1+0 1+1+
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
......................................
(CON) (This is a Bird
...............................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout '' ' its" range
..............................................
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 8/12

IPaC: Explore Location
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
...............................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern
(BCC)
...................................
throughout its range
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
...............................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern(BCC)
throughout its range
..................................................
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
I I I I I � ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++0 ++o+ +++I
F+++ ++++ ++++ 01 1 1 loll lilt Illill11+11 +++++ o+++ ++++ ++++
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site. 7%
\\00
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 9/12

IPaC: Explore Location
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. r-4
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring. ,
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 10/12

IPaC: Explore Location
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ 'Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN WETLANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 11 /12

IPaC: Explore Location
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
�o�
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/AH4GDO63KJEFLMK20FVGYPCLNA/resources 12/12

Species Name
Federal Species Status
Habitat Requirement
Species Effect
Rationale
Red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
Endangered
Forests with open stands of pine trees at
No Effect
No suitable habitat to be
borealis )
least 60 to 120 years old
impacted
Neuse River waterdog (Necturus lewisi)
Proposed Threatened
Low to moderate gradient streams and
No Effect
Intermittent stream to be
low current velocity
impacted is low quality
with insufficient flows
Carolina madtom (Noturus furiosus)
Proposed Endangered
Riffles, runs, and pools in medium to large
No Effect
Intermittent stream to be
streams and rivers.
impacted is low quality
with insufficient flows
Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia mosoni)
Proposed Threatened
Coarse sand and gravel in small creeks to
No Effect
Intermittent stream to be
larger rivers with excellent water quality
impacted is low quality
where flows are sufficient to maintain
with insufficient flows
clean, silt -free substrates
Dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonto
Endangered
Small streams to large rivers in a variety of
No Effect
Intermittent stream to be
heterodon)
substrate types
impacted is low quality
with insufficient flows
Yellow lance (Elliptio lanceolate)
Threatened
Medium-sized rivers to smaller streams in
No Effect
Intermittent stream to be
clean, coarse to medium sand and gravel
impacted is low quality
substrates. Requires clean, moderate
with insufficient flows
flowing water with high dissolved oxygen.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Endangered
Sandy or rocky open woods in association
No Effect
I
No suitable habitat to be
with basic soils
impacted
Site Inspection Date: 10/10/2019
Site Inspector: George T. Swearingen, III of
Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc.