NC0021253_wasteload allocation_19821220

0
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Engineer Date Rec. #
Date:
Permit No.: Pipe No.: ��� County:f�Yi�
Design Capacity (MGD): �J� Industrial (% of
Receiving Stream: �l QGI/N•, C►rI
Reference USGS Quad:
(Please attach)
Flow) : Domestic (% of Flow):__ i©6
Class: W Sub -Basin: -1U
Requestor: Regional Office �.
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to
be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: oC
7Q10:
Drainage Area:
Avg. Streamflow•
+:.
Winter 7Q10:
30Q2: �-
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below
4.2`
outfall): © orr
Slope: �.
Velocity ity (fps) : D. � K
1
(base e, per day, 2VC): �Jl�
z
K2 (base e, per day, i8°C):
0
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
/ f
�5 5
O(4
b I
27Ce0/ZG/)m
/�S0
4 AW1
Effluent Monthly
Characteristics Average Comments
Original Allocation Q
Revised Allocation Q ntw f%w Date(s) of Revision(s)
Confirmation (Please attach previous allocation)
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
V
Date:

REQUEST NO, 3 505
• # �k7k �k**�k#* �k WAS ELOAD ALLOCATION AF'!-`Fi(3VAL FORM � ���-#•��,��k:#••��:�Y#::�:�:��##
l �
FACILITY NAME HAVELOCK
TYPE OF WASTE DOMESTIC
COUNTY CRAVEN
REGIONAL OFFICE WASHINGTON REQUESTOR Y REGGIE BAIRD
RECEIVING STREAM E. PRONG SLOCUM CR SUBBASIN 03-04--10
DRAINAGE ;AREA d 0450 SQ f M I f STREAM CLASS : L-SW
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
WASTEFLCIW (S )
(MGD )
1.25
BOD-5
(MG/L )
11
NH 3--•N
(MG/L )
f
2
D.O.
(MG/L )
a
it
PH
(SU)
r
6-8,5
FECAL CCILIFORM
(/100ML
);
1000
TSS
(MG/L)
1
30
FACILITY IS t PROPOSED ( } EXISTING (/I ) NEW ( }
LIMITS ARE:. : REVISION (,Q ) CONFIRMATION ( } OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
MODELER
SUPE=RVISOR:MC:DELING GROUT'
RE'..GIONAL.. SUPERVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
APPROVED BY :
-----DATE
+-__--_---_.-
7_.
_DATE
43_
____. _._..._DATE
:.. �� �� A�.s.....
DIVISION DIRECTOR
i
f - f j '�ZD
;TE. �__. -_._ ..._.

°
,
~ '
DISCHARGER
HAVELOCK
NAME OF ESTUARY
E. PRONG SLOCUM CREEK
DEPTH
5.00
FEET
WIDTH
65^00
FEET
FRESHWATER INFLOW
0.00
CFS
WASTEWATER FLOW
1^25
MGD
ULT, BOD OF WASTE
19^00
MG/L
MAX TIDAL VELOCITY
0^12
KNOTS
CROSS-SECTION AREA
325^00
SQ^FT^
ADVECTIVE VEL^
0°10
MI/DAY
DISPERSION
0.12
SQ.MI./DAY
K1
O~53
PER DAY
K2
0.44
PER DAY
BOD AT OUTFALL = 3^6079334319 MG/L,
D,O^ AT OUTFALL = 5,01358759873 MG/L
MILEPOINT UPSTREAM BOD UPSTREAM D^O.
O^OO 3^61 5,01
-0^10 2^80 5~13
-0^20 2^17 5^29
MILEPOINT
DOWNSTREAM BOD
DOWNSTREAM DO
0^00
3^61
5^01
0^10
3~03
4^97
0^20
2^55
4.98
0°30
2^14
5^04
0^40
1^80
5~13
0.50
1,52
5~23
0^60
1^27
5^35
0,70
1,07
5^47
0~80
0^90
5^59
000
0^76
5,71
1100
0^64
5^83
1^10
0^54
5^94
1^20
0^45
6^04
1^30
0.38
6,14
1^40
O^32
6^23
1^50
0^27
6^31
THE WASTELOAD ALLOCATION FOR HAVELOCK IS 19 MG/L

6 VH GER
- F ESTU Ri
E1
YLUME
A MA FR INFLOW
WAS E A ER FLOW
LT* : �. P W�,T
X IDAL ELOC Y
C SS -ACTION AE
DVEC E EL
ISPERSI ,
K1
�
, HAVELOC
� E PRONG �
OCLM �REEK
� 5.00
FEET
1 61^0
FEE'!
2^717E+C 6
CJBIC V
� ,0
CFS
, I^O6
oD
� 23.O.
AL
O^12
KNO'S
� .-5, O
SO F .
0 08
MI/DAY
C^ 2
1-5
SQ,MI~/D Y
� O 5
FE Y
PER �
cOD ^ DUTFALL tt7988378O63 MG/
., AT OUTFALL = 3 :8 , 4�- 4 MG.'
M1LEP5I T UFSTRE BOB UPST'EAM D ,
^0 3~ M.
2,9 410.
- ,20 2.-c ,6
MlLEPOI;
-WNSTREA- BOD
I�OWNST EM D
O'
3 1
3189
10
3,10
3. 5
0 2
.60
K.
013
2^17
3.9
^
1.82
4 Cl
O.5O
l°52
4.16
'^60
�.2
4^2`
0. O
1 06
4^4.t
0 0O
066
4^5�
0.90
O 74
4 69
1^0O
0 62
4.72
010
0.52
4,-4
1 28
O^`
5^0.
1130
0.36
5,16
1 40
0 3O
512'
�,50
0~25
5.35
ME WSTELOAD ~-LOCA-ION FOR HA'ELOCK IS 23 M'/

51SC` RGER
!E OF ES jAR\
D '-
IDTh
0 LbME
F ESRWA�E INFLOW
WASTEWATER FLOW
ULT^ B 1 WASTE
M X TI AL �ELOCI7Y
C 3SE-SECTI0/' AREA
DV IVE VEL,
J.SEPSI '
1
2
H VELD SO�-
E R G SLOCUM [REE!,
. 5 OO FEE-
| 65~OO FEE''
� 2-9 7E-006 CUBIC FEET
2 O. D CFS
� O 90 nGD
� 23. hG.
12 FNO S
� 30.00 SQ,P`:
07 MI/DAY
/ 53 PER DAY
^ 48 - LP -'
ODD AT odTFALL = 3,181944664x3 Mw/L,
NO AT OUTFALL = 4,. 62515 51 M /L
MILEIOINT PS REAM BOD PSTRFAM D,O
^'0 3.
'01O 2 5 ,2
-0l 96 40
MILEP3INT
D W S R AM BOD
OW REAM O
O 30
2^18
'l
0 1
2.65
.�
~2O
0 30
1.84
4,2
0
1°5�
4^N5
,5O
1.28
4^0.
^6C
7~O7.
4^58
0.70
0^88
4^70
8O
O^7/
4.B2
9 90
0-61
4,93
1 O
O.&
5.0
1 1O
0^43
5^15
1^20
0^35
5.24
100
0,30
5.3�
1^41D
0.2�
5,n2
.50
C.2O
5^49
AE WASTELOAD ,LLOCATION FOR HAVELOCK SOC IS 23 M8''

DISCHARGER
HAVELOCK
NAME OF ESTUARY
EAST PRONG SLOCUM CREEK
DEPTH
5^00
FEET
WIDTH
65^00
FEET
FRESHWATER INFLOW
0,00
CFS
WASTEWATER FLOW
1^00
MGD
ULT, BOD OF WASTE
43^00
MG/L
MAX TIDAL VELOCITY
0,06
KNOTS
CROSS-SECTION AREA
325^00
SQ,FT,
ADVECTIVE VEL.
0^08
MI/DAY
DISPERSION
0^12
SQ,MI,/DAY
K1
0^53
PER DAY
K2
0.40
PER DAY
BOD AT OUTFALL = 6^54698842834 MG/L,
D.O. AT OUTFALL = 5,06040842101 MG/L
MILEPOINT UPSTREAM BOD UPSTREAM D^O,
O^OO 6^55 5^06
-0,05 5^79 5,14
-0^10 5^12 5^25
-0^15 4.53 5^38
-0~20 4^00 5^53
MILEPOINT
DOWNSTREAM BOD
DOWNSTREAM DO
O^OO
6~55
5^06
0^05
5,98
5^01
0^10
5^46
5^00
0^15
4,99
5,01
0°20
4^56
5,05
0^25
4^17
5^11
0^30
3^81
5°18
0435
3,48
5.27
0^40
3^18
5^36
0^45
2^90
5^47
0^50
2,65
5,58
0^55
2,42
5^69
0^60
2^21
5^81
0^65
2.02
5,93
0^70
1^85
6^06
0^75
1,69
6^18
000
1.54
6^30
0~85
1.41
6,42
0^90
1^29
6^54
0^95
1,17
6465
1^00
1^07
6^77
1.05
0.98
6,87
1^10
0.90
A.9R

i
�ODpt37R�O®'Ci0
�O ,-� C•! M d• �7 �O R
!R R R R R R R R
i
C+i L7 CO fiJ R fi•! W M
0 C7 O 0 0 00 0
100000000
j --t fi•J Cd M M � Q' ��
. .
r=a
[L
O
J
Lli
h-
[fi
CC
3
LLJ
S
4--

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL M MAGEMENT
October 29, 1982
iI R111.�s 1 .
TO: Jim Mulligan, Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Randy Williams, Technical Services Unit
SUBJECT: Its -stream Assessment
Town of havelock, Craven County
The town of Havelock discharges its waste to East prong Slocum Creek,
a Class C-Swamp stream in the Reuse River Basin. The portion of the creels
which receives the waste is tidally influenced; thus, a Level 8 estuarine
analysis was conducted to determine whether a significant impact on DA.
would occur if 50,000 gpd were added to the present wasteflow. At the
present time, the following data describe the plant's operational status:
Sept. 1981-August 1982 Avg.
Flow
0.816 mgd
BOD5
2.7 mg/1
NH3N
;0.46 mg/l
TSS
14 mg/1
The values of these parameters indicates that the plant is well
operated. No impact to D.O. in East Prong.Slocum Creek is predicted to
occur under these conditions (the D.O. minimum will exceed 5 mg/1). No
change is expected if the 50,000 gpd are added to the present flow.
In addition to this analysis, I have attached a memo indicating effluent
limits required for wasteflows ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 mgd. Please call if
you have any questions.
RW:cs
cc: Arthur Mouberry

I zip 5 N' • 11 C
To.. .-.
FROM:
SUBACT:
DIVISION. OF EIS RMV:EM
October 26, 19821,
Jim Mligan, Pagional Sqpervisor
11ashir-gton Regional PEW
Maj, Williams, '-s-echnical Services Unit
Effluent limits
town of Nhvelcodcz
ANA'.
In response to pur inquest., I :=ve 7iq,:.---.yzcd. C,.- T(x,,TL of Havelock Is
disctarga to nho last ?Yang of Slocum Week. Me attacheC- table shows the
affluent livits for vaW of the flaws ycru requestAw Also, the Weljag
sh(xfs t"'lat tv' to 2 --1 = 1'dsc-'rrga�i to !-.74:" tic"al Vs.,idth-
"�Tot'zztion O-L 7—tor k=i= is apliod to
She .:IEII Wj-'s, 2 :Igll
-o-j hame any questia"z r� eeia 7, malysLi.
Ple&se let r� �,acxv if On lin ds
JC%CS
cc: Bill MIS
x".
Ted how
.'l
4
lot
T-
py. n
WHO to, nyl Q
. fx.'
-.Z
not
".A