20080229 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report Stream_20091022

Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank
Year 2 Stream Monitoring Report
Orange County, North Carolina
USGS H UC: 03020201020020
October 2009
t , rf' r r
vow,
{j g ?CY r?r-. r -9§:
f ?'{1l r.', F l.?rV L Jri
? df?
?'?. J ,.; _ ?!:?a.{4 h? 7 r aS} . f A - Fib 'l

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT ABSTRACT
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING
2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES
3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
3.1.1 Soil Data
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
3.1.3 Stem Counts
3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary
3.2 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
3.2.1 Cross Sections
3.2.2 Bank Full Events
3.2.3 Longitudinal Profiles
3.2.4 Site Summary and Remedial Actions
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Figure 2: Monitoring Plan View
TABLES
Table L Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Table H. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table HI. Project Contacts
Table IV. Preliminary Soil Data
Table V Installed Plantings
Table VI. Stem Counts by Species
Table VII. Stem Counts by Plot
Table VIII. Bankfull Events
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
7
8
8
11
11
12
12
13
5
5
6
6
7
9
10
12
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank i Monitoring Year 2 of 5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A. Vegetation Raw Data
APPENDIX B. Cross Sections
APPENDIX C. Profile Survey
Pebble Counts
APPENDIX D. Photo Logs
APPENDIX E. Bank Full Event Photo Log
Rainfall Table
Repairs
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank ii Monitoring Year 2 of 5
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank (Bank) is located in Orange County North Carolina
within land owned by Milton A. Latta and Sons Dairy Farms, Inc. A permanent
conservation easement covers the restored stream and surrounding riparian buffer. This
easement defines the Bank's boundaries. The Bank is located on an active dairy farm
approximately seven miles northeast of Hillsborough and six miles northwest of Durham
in northeastern Orange County, North Carolina. The stream(s) lie within USGS
hydrologic unit 03020201020020 in the Neuse River Basin. The North Carolina Division
of Water Quality (NCDWQ) classifies the main reach, Forrest Creek, as a WS-II (water
supply II), HQW (high quality water), and NSW (nutrient sensitive water).
Prior to restoration, pasture land surrounded most of the length of the project reaches and
the stream banks lacked strong rooted vegetation (e.g. woody or deep rooted herbaceous
vegetation). Due to the lack of bank protection and partially cleared watershed, the
stream channels became entrenched within the floodplain and showed signs of high shear
stress. In this condition and with regular impacts due to cattle traffic, bank erosion had
accelerated and the variety of bed features diminished.
Two types of vegetative communities surrounded the stream reaches prior to restoration.
The first zone consisted of a mix of woody vegetation that included significant
populations of invasive species including privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose
(Rosa multiflora), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Japanese Stilt Grass
(Mircostegium vimineum), Tree-of-Heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and Princess Tree
(Paulownia tomentosa). This zone covered the lower section of the Ut Forrest Creek and
the upper section of Forrest Creek. The second zone consisted primarily of herbaceous
vegetation with scattered woody vegetation. The woody vegetation included a mix of
natural, invasive, and succession species. This zone covered the remaining restoration
areas.
The altered conditions of the stream and the riparian buffer reduced water quality and
impaired habitat. Pasture derived nutrients flowing untreated through the riparian zone
and fine silts sloughing from the incised banks raised biochemical oxygen demand. This
with the lack of sufficient reoxygenating riffle features reduced dissolved oxygen within
the water column. Water quality had also diminished due to raised turbidity from bank
erosion and elevated water temperatures caused by the lack of tree shading. Habitat
potential had been reduced by the diminished water quality and loss of physical habitat
such as bed features, undercut banks, and a well developed vegetative community.
The Forrest Creek reach was restored within the existing floodplain using a Priority II
approach and the Ut Forrest Creek reach bed was raised to the abandoned floodplain
using a Priority I approach. A portion of Forrest Creek immediately above the Forrest
Creek restoration reach was enhanced by modifying a downstream crossing that had
caused ponding upstream of it. The crossing modification reestablished natural flow and
will create a natural channel profile. Above the enhancement area, a section of Forrest
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 1 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Creek has been placed under a conversation easement to preserve a functional stream
channel and riparian buffer.
The stream restoration work is regulated under the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Banking Instrument signed by the Sponsor and the US Army Corp of
Engineers (USACE), the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the NC
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), and the NC Wildlife Resouces Commission
(NCWRC) all comprising the Interagency Review Team (IRT) formerly the MBRT in
accordance with Federal guidelines and regulations including the Compensatory
Mitigation losses of Aquatic Resources Final Rule, 33 CFR Parts 325 and 332 and 40
CFR Part 230. Restoration work resulted in the restoration of 6,825 linear feet,
enhancement (Level I) of 325 linear feet, and preservation of 3,005 linear feet of stream.
With the restoration, water quality will be improved due to a decrease in nutrients,
turbidity, and moderation in water temperature. Biochemical oxygen demand will be
reduced through filtering in the riparian buffer and riverine wetlands. Potential habitats
have been added through the creation of bed features and reestablishment of riparian
vegetative community.
Monitoring Plan
The annual monitoring work will assess the Bank's streams, the Forrest Creek main
channel and the Unnamed Tributary to Forrest Creek, to determine restoration success.
The monitoring plan has been set up based on guidance provided by The Stream
Mitigation Guidelines developed by the United States Corps of Engineers - Wilmington
District (McLendon, Scott, Fox, Becky et al. 2003), version 1.2 (11/16/2006) of the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) document entitled "Content, Format,
and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports", version 2.0 (3/27/2008) of the EEP
document entitled "Mitigation Plan Document Format, Data Requirements, and Content
Guidance", and the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Mitigation Plan (May 2008).
The monitoring will occur annually for five years. The monitoring period should include
two separate years with bankfull events. Bankfull events will be verified using an
installed crest stage gauge that will be inspected during each monitoring visit. Monitoring
reports will be submitted during years 1-5.
Monitoring work will include reference photographs, vegetative stem counts, materials
sampling, site survey, bankfull event documentation, and visual assessment and mapping
of significant features. Mid- Atlantic Mitigation and the MT in coordination with the
appropriate regulatory agencies, will determine when stream and riparian restoration have
met success criteria. The sections below provide a framework for determining and
assessing success criteria.
Stream restoration will be considered successful through achievement of stable channel
geometry, appropriate channel materials, and lack of significant erosion. The riparian
buffer will be monitored for survivability and specific densities of planted vegetation and
exclusion of invasive species. The site will be maintained during the monitoring period to
allow it to continue on a trajectory that meets project goals and success criteria. Repairs
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 2 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
will be completed as necessary to reestablish channel stability and the site will be
replanted if vegetation shows signs of significant failure or if vegetative density goals
contained in the NMI are not achieved.
Year 2, 2009 monitoring was completed on September 1st, 2009. Survey work was
completed in July. Strategies and methodologies laid out in the Monitoring Plan will be
followed for a minimum of five years of monitoring. The stream will be monitored for
stability of dimension, pattern, and profile using standard practices including permanent
cross sections, longitudinal profile, and pebble counts. Vegetative success of associated
plantings will be monitored for species diversity and survival with standardized,
permanent (10m by 10m) vegetation plots to be monitored annually for 5 years.
Monitoring data will be analyzed to determine what remedial actions, if any, are required.
Any remedial actions proposed will be detailed in the following monitoring report.
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING
The Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank (Bank) is located in Orange County North Carolina
within land owned by Milton A. Latta and Sons Dairy Farms, Inc. A permanent
conservation easement covers the restored stream and surrounding riparian buffer. This
easement defines the Bank's boundaries. The Bank is located approximately seven miles
northeast of Hillsborough and six miles northwest of Durham in northeastern Orange
County, North Carolina. The stream(s) lie within USGS hydrologic unit 03020201020020
in the Neuse River Basin.
Streams within the Bank consist of two reaches. The larger reach (Forrest Creek) flows
through the property from north to south and drains a 3.6 square mile area consisting of
predominantly forest and pasture land. The smaller tributary (UT 1) flows from west to
east before joining with Forrest Creek and drains a 0.1 square mile area consisting of
predominantly pasture land.
2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES
The goals of the project relate to providing ecological improvements to the Bank's
streams and riparian buffers through beneficial modifications of hydrology, water quality,
and habitat.
Goals related to hydrology include:
? Re-establishing floodplain connection by raising bed elevations (UT1) or
lowering adjacent floodplain (Forrest Creek)
? Increasing flood storage by re-establishing floodplain connection
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 3 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Goals related to water quality include:
? Reducing turbidity and pollution by reducing sediment and nutrient inputs
(cattle exclusion)
? Reducing water temperatures by providing shading
? Increasing / stabilizing oxygen levels by reducing BOD/COD and increasing
reoxygenating turbulence
Goals related to habitat include:
? Improving in stream bed habitat by increasing riffle - pool diversity, reducing
sedimentdeposition, and improving low flow water depths
? Improving bank habitat by increasing stability and woody biomass
? Improving floodplain habitat by establishing microtopography and hydrology,
removing invasive vegetation, and increasing habitat diversity
? Improving food web dynamics by adding biomass (such as detritus, coarse
woody debris, and leaf matter) and re-establishing floodplain connection
The restoration achieves these goals through the following objectives:
? Stabilizing channel bed and banks through modifying dimension, pattern, and
profile using natural channel design
? Installing in-stream structures such as rock vanes, log vanes, and constructed
riffles
? Raising stream bed elevations or lowering floodplains
? Restoring soils in riparian buffer by excluding cattle and adding organic
components
? Removing invasive vegetation
? Planting native vegetation in riparian buffer
? Fencing out livestock
Together, these improvements will provide functional uplift for the watershed as a whole.
The dimension, pattern, and profile were restored using Rosgen Priority I and II
restoration approaches (Rosgen, David L. 1997). The Priority I approach was used on Ut
Forrest Creek to raise bed elevations and reconnect the stream to the abandoned
floodplain. The Priority II approach was used on Forrest Creek to reestablish an active
floodplain at the existing bed elevation. These methods will decrease stream bank
erosion, establish an active floodplain, reduce channel stress during floods, improve
aquatic habitat, and reduce fine sediments. A portion of Forrest Creek immediately above
the restoration reach was enhanced by modifying a downstream crossing that had created
ponding upstream of it. The crossing modification reestablished natural flow and will
create a natural channel profile. Above the enhancement area, a section of Forrest Creek
has been placed under conservation easement to preserve a functional stream channel and
riparian buffer.
The remaining impaired riparian buffer was planted as four (4) zones. Zones 1 and 2 are
the stream channel and bank zones consisting of tree and shrub species and native
herbaceous seeding typically found along stream banks in the region. Live stakes
comprised the bulk of installed species within these zones. Zone 3 is the riparian zone
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 4 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
consisting of selected tree and shrub species with a range of tolerances to inundation and
saturation. Zone 4 is the transitional zone that includes the buffer areas (subject of a
separate report prepared for NCDWQ).
Pre As Built Mitigation
Feature Mitigation Construction Length/ Credit Mitigation
Type Length/Area Area Ratio Credits
Forrest Creek Restoration 3,405 ft 3,484 ft 1:1 3,484 ft
UT to Forrest
Creek Restoration 2,436 ft 3,371 ft 1:1 3,371 ft
Forrest Creek Enhancement 325 ft 325 ft 1.5:1 217 ft
Forrest Creek Preservation 3,005 ft 3,005 ft 5:1 601 ft
Total Stream Credits (SMU) 7,673 ft
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Report Calendar Year of Completion or
Planned Completion
MBI Signed March 2007
Buffer Agreement Signed April2008
Construction March to June 2008
Temporary /Permanent seeding March to Jul 2008
Containerized Plantings March to Jul 2008
Mitigation Plan November 2008
Year 1 Monitoring December 2008
Year 2 Monitoring October 2009
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 5 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table III. Project Contacts
Project Manager 1960 Derita Road
Mid-Atlantic Mitigation, LLC Concord, NC 28027
Rich Mogensen [phone]
Designer 3001 Weston Parkway
Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. Cary, NC 27513
Todd St.John & Daren Pait (919) 653-
2950
Construction Contractor
Shamrock Environmental Corporation P.O Box 14987
Browns Summit, NC 27214
Mike Granson: 336 708-5930
Planting Contractor 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Carolina Wetland Services Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Joshua Frost [phone] ext 102
Monitoring Performers
Mid-Atlantic Mitigation, LLC 1960 Derita Road
Concord, North Carolina 28027
Christine Cook [phone]
3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
3.1.1 Soil Data
Table IV. Preliminary Soil Data
Series Max Depth
in % Clay on
Surface K T OM
%
Chewacla 60 10-27 .28 5 1-4
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 6 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
The site is stabilized and vegetated with native woody and herbaceous species. Invasive
species listed in the executive summary and in the Mitigation Report have not
reestablished themselves and will continue to be monitored and noted in future reports.
Kudzu, which was previously kept at bay by grazing cattle has began to establish along
UT1 between Stations 119 and 127, approximately. This population will be treated this
year and annual treatments will be scheduled for this area. The Sponsor is taking this
threat very seriously and will begin necessary measures to control the problem
immediately.
An unidentified species of commelina (Dayflower) has colonized the riffle areas along
the main channel somewhat aggressively. It is expected that the plants will die back over-
winter. Care will be taken in the spring and summer of 2010 (year 3) to prevent regrowth.
A more detailed discussion of the effects of these populations can be found with the
Pebble Count analysis in the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Stream Monitoring report.
As documented in the previously submitted Supplemental Planting Report, supplemental
livestaking was done on January 14th and 15th and a supplemental planting of 1,000
gallon size trees was completed on January 29th, 2009 by Carolina Wetland Services.
Findings of the 2009 monitoring activities and stems counts are discussed in the
following section.
Table V. Installed Plantings
Bare roots
and tublings
(2008)
Livestakes
(2008)
Livestakes
(2009)
Gallons
(2009)
Asimina triloba 600
Betula nigra 600 200
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
600
Cornus amomum 600 3775 500
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica
600
200
Ilex opaca 600
Jugulans nigra 600
Platanus
occidentalis
600
200
Quercus michauxii 600 200
Quercus palustris 600
Quercus phellos 600 200
Salix nigra 11325 1000
Total 6600 15100 1500 1000
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 7 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
3.1.3 Stem Counts
Four planting zones were established as follows: Zone 1 - Stream channel; Zone 2-
Stream Bank; Zone 3 - Riparian; and Zone 4 - Transitional (including buffer areas).
Live stakes were installed along the new constructed channel within Zones 1 and 2.
Zones 2 - 4 consist of tublings, gallon and 3 gallon size plants. A reduction in the
percentage of nuisance vegetation in areas with existing vegetation to less than 10% will
indicate establishment of native wetland vegetation. Study plots show that the
composition and density of vegetation in the restoration areas compares closely to the
reference areas, indicating restoration success for vegetation. Success will be gauged by
stem counts of planted species. Stem counts of over 320 woody stems per acre after 5
years will be considered successful. Presence, numbers and health of desirable
volunteers will be considered before a replant will be deemed necessary. Photos taken at
established photo points should indicate maturation of riparian vegetation community.
Photographs will help to capture the health of the planted vegetation and the severity of
any invasive or exotic species that establish within the site. Permanent vegetative plots
have been established at 14 locations. The success of vegetation plantings will be
measured through stems counts. Height and DBH were measured at baseline and will be
measured in years 3 and 5. These plots will be used to sample primarily Zones 2, 3 and 4.
Each plot covers 100 square meters for tree counts. Within each plot, a 1 meter plot will
be sampled to measure herbaceous coverage. During the counts, the health of the
vegetation will be noted. In addition to stem counts, the samples will inventory species
diversity to allow for comparison between the reference and restoration wetlands and
track the percent cover of nuisance species. The vegetation survey will occur during the
growing season.
On September 1st, 2009, the second year vegetative monitoring was performed on the
established vegetative plots.
3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary
The success of riparian vegetation planting will be gauged by stem counts of planted
species and an assessment of community composition including (desirable) volunteers.
Stem counts of over 320 trees and shrubs per acre after 5 years will be considered
successful. The composition of the vegetation community should trend toward a
predominance of target species. A majority (80%) of the target species should be present
in the reforestation area in numbers and condition conducive to continuing the species
through the maturation of the community. The population of invasive species will be kept
below 10% of the total population. Photos taken at established photo points should
indicate maturation of riparian vegetation community.
The Year 2 monitoring numbers indicate approximately 80% survival and 413 stems per
acre overall. The Tributary reach maintained an overall stems per acre count of 358 not
counting volunteer species. The main channel reach maintained an overall stem per acre
count of 468 without including volunteer species. This number (main channel reach) was
improved by supplemental plantings done prior to the 2009 growing season.
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 8 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table VI: Total Stem Counts by Suecies
-FU
>
O
0 ?
a' L
C O ~ O 4,
- O N O C
VI
f6
c I
L -
N
N
L U
L
C
? Q

Q z U
Species
Asimina triloba 10 9 10 7 70
Betula nigra* 7 5 12 12 100
Cephalanthus
occidentalis 4 4 4 8 100
Cercis
canadensis 3 2 3 1 33
Cornus
amomum 12 9 12 8 67
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica* 14 11 21 21 100
Ilex opaca 1 1 1 0 0
Jugulans nigra 15 11 15 5 33
Liriodendron
tulipifera 1 0 1 0 0
Morus rubra 1 1 1 1
Quercus
michauxii* 3 2 11 11 100
Quercus
palustris 64 45 64 43 67
Quercus
phellos* 1 1 11 11 100
Salix nigra 20 7 22 22 100
Unknown 13 10 - - -
Total 168 118 188 150 80
*Species included in 2009 supplemental Planting
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 9 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table VII: Stems per Acre by Plot and Year
Replant -
Baseline MY1 Year 2 MY2 wi Vol.
Vegplot Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre
VQ1 283 202 324 445 688
VQ2 364 243 486 445 -
VQ3 486 364 364 364 -
VQ4 486 364 364 283 364
VQ5 364 202 445 405 647
VQ6 324 81 647 688 850
VQ7 405 81 607 607 -
Average
stems/acre
= (Main
Channel) 387 220 462 468 566
Vegplot Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre
VQT1 647 283 688 647 728
VQT2 688 607 607 283 -
VQT3 647 486 486 324 -
VQT4 526 445 445 202 -
VQT5 486 324 324 324 -
VQT6 607 526 526 607 -
VQT7 486 405 405 121 162
Average
stems/acre
(Tributary) 584 439 497 358 376
Average
stems/acre
= (Total) 486 330 480 413 471
Along the Main channel only Plot VQ4 indicated a stems per acre count of below 320.
283 stems per acre were counted; however inclusion of 2 volunteer stems of Cottonwood
and Smooth Sumac increased the count to 364 stems per acre. Both Cottonwood and
Sumac tend to colonize in large numbers, however, this is not currently the case and
neither species is classified as invasive.
The 2009 supplemental planting covered the main channel only and stem counts on the
main channel for 2009 do not indicate the need for a replant. A handful of new
individuals will be added to VQ4 to boost stem counts for 2010. However, 2009 stem
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 10 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
counts indicate a need for supplemental planting on UT I. Plots VQT2, VQT4, and VQT7
all indicated stems per acre counts below 320, while plots VQT3 and VQT5 both
indicated stems per acre counts of 324, which is low for this stage (Year 2) in site
development. Desirable volunteers do not yet contribute significantly to stems counts
along UT1. A second supplemental planting covering only UT1 will be done this winter.
Please note a change in the number of individuals labeled as Unknown. Final
identifications were made during the 2009 count.
Along the main channel of Forrest Creek, herbaceous cover is well established. Sample
plots indicated an average of 94 % cover with a range of 80% (VQ6) to 100% cover
(VQ3, 4, 5, and 7). VQ1 and 2 tend to hold standing water leaving some areas slightly
bare. VQ6 was most recently stabilized with annual rye due to equipment traffic for
repairs to the stream bank in winter 2008. Cattle grasses and grasses used for stabilization
are beginning to be out competed by natural herbaceous cover such as soft rush and
ploygonum in the wet areas; and narrow leaved sunflower, dog fennel and cockle burr in
the drier areas.
Along the unnamed tributary, herbaceous cover is well established and more mature than
on the main channel. Sample plots indicated 100% cover throughout with similar
composition to the main channel.
Detailed vegetation survey information is located in Appendix A; including herbaceous
cover, stressed individuals, and volunteers.
3.2 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
3.2.1 Cross Sections
The stream geometry will be considered successful if the cross-section geometry, profile,
and sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium. It is expected that there will be
minimal changes in the designed cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition.
Changes that may occur during the monitoring period will be evaluated to determine if
they represent a movement toward a more unstable condition (e.g. down cutting, erosion,
mid-channel bars, etc.) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (e.g.
settling, vegetative changes, coarsening of bed material, etc.).
Deviation from the design ratios will not necessarily denote failure as it is possible to
maintain stability and not stay within the design geometry. Additionally, determination of
true bankfull will be difficult until the stream has had adequate flooding events to create
strong bankfull indicators.
Morphological data used for this report was collected in July, 2009 and is shown in
Appendix B.
Bankfull elevations are still not fully established and determination of true bankfull is
still difficult, as noted above. Commelina is present in almost every riffle and throughout
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 11 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
the tributary, this vegetation in the channel at time of survey creates a slight artificial rise
in bed elevation on some cross sections. Overall the cross-section graphs for Year 2
compare well to Year 1 and show stable dimension with normal, minor fluctuations.
3.2.2 Bank Full Events
Crest Stage Gages (CSG) are located on Forrest Creek and on the Tributary. Photo
documentation is shown in the Bank Full Event Photo Log in Appendix E. Rain fall data
is also presented in table form in Appendix E. A total of two bankfull events were
documented since the submittal of the Year 1 Monitoring Report as noted in Table VI.
Significant rain events were recorded by the on-site rain gage in May, June and July, but
the CSG's were not triggered. It is typical for CSG's to be more difficult to trigger in the
summer months. At the time of monitoring both gages were found to be water logged,
and may have malfunctioned due to debris or vegetation blockage.
Repairs were made to the swale area above the confluence of the main channel and UT1
in February. This repair was a hold over from Year 1 storm damage due to Hurricane
Hanna. Before and after photos of this repair are located in Appendix E.
Exhibit Table VI. Bankfull Events

Site Visit Date Associated Rainfall Event
Date Rainfall Amount
(Inches) Method
Documented
12-15-2008 Nov. 30 - Dec. 1st 1.25 CSG/Photos
4-15-2009 March 27 - 29th 1.99 CSG/Photos
3.2.3 Longitudinal Profiles
Profiles 1, 2, and 3 are along portions of the UT and Profiles 4 and 5 cover larger sections
of Forrest Creek. Commelina is present in almost every riffle and throughout the
tributary, this vegetation in the channel at time of survey creates a slight artificial rise in
bed elevation in some areas, particularly riffles. Overall the profile graphs for Year 2
compare well to Year 1 and show a stable profile with normal, minor fluctuations.
Bed material was also sampled at five riffles throughout the project. Cross Sections T1,
T3 and T6 on the UT are located in LP 1, LP 2, and LP 3, respectively. Cross Sections 2
and 4 on Forrest Creek are located in LP 4 and LP 5, respectively. All riffles are
currently similar in composition dominated by larger class gravels and small cobble. All
riffles show some silt/clay content, especially T3 and T6. Increase in silt content for 2009
is due to the presence of a semi-aquatic plant growing thickly in the riffles of the main
channel and throughout UT I. Periodic dry conditions allowed Dayflower to establish in
the shallower areas. Once the plant and organic matter was cleared away from the cross
section(s) bed material similar to the previous years' count was found. The commelina
will be watched this winter to determine if it will die back completely on its own or will
need to be removed prior to the start of the growing season. At a minimum, herbicide
treatments will be used to prepare cross sections for 2010 pebble counts if necessary.
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 12 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Morphological data used for the profiles in this report was collected in July, 2009 and is
shown in Appendix C. Pebble count data was collected on September 1st, 2009.
3.2.4 Site Summary and Remeadial Actions
The herbaceous vegetative cover has developed a healthy and diverse community
throughout most of the site. The planted trees and shrubs in the riparian and buffer areas
have also done relatively well and are supplemented by an existing buffer community
which will provide a seed source for native volunteers well suited to the current site
conditions.
Low stem counts along UT1 are likely due to herbaceous competition. Original plantings
were done with bare roots and tublings. Tublings, in particular, are not well suited to
these competitive conditions. A 2010 replant along UT1 will be done with only gallon
size trees, which typically maintain a higher level of success and can be planted in
smaller numbers. Approximately 500 to 700 trees will be installed during this replant.
Invasive species will be treated with herbicide this year and full scale removal of Kudzu
along UT1 near VQT2 will be scheduled for the spring and late summer, with annual
treatments thereafter.
Beaver activity was not noted in 2009. On-going beaver management will be maintained
as part of the monitoring requirements as discussed in the Mitigation Plan.
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank 13 Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Prepared by Jason Diaz ???ruxaia im
APPENDIX A. Vegetation Raw Data
APPENDIX B. Cross Sections
APPENDIX C. Profile Survey
Pebble Counts
APPENDIX D. Photo Log
APPENDIX E. Bank Full Event Log
Rainfall Table
Vegetation Quad Photo Log
LP97vy?-.9 P J{rs?i ?'? - }?C P yry?
W _ `iL J
{ ? E
yF f kt b, Atf
0
4ir
ryFy?? .{ '"?l
?,; i r 1 v t i b ?Nc:.
VQ 1
VQ3
VQ2
M4 R .t L
3Yt ?? '??i sa-:b W, _ ?"• S ,:.' 9I { FJ Fp §D ?} ;? -i t,?
31
VQ4

VQ5
Ij??Yp7'. # ? ? b as • ? r '14
4 i L4 gyp.
Nl?
r +
1.
r
VQ6

rr M1'?..
i

. n S 3
' ? 5
? ?• cif,

i
s c
L ti
5

4 1
VQ7 VQT 1
l yY` ? ?
a
?: 7 .f e e Yr. ? xv-
rw?
V,-
a
i
VQT2
x
r 1 yf9}s d -
I?t
. f? ..:•4 fr i' A',.
3 5 r,
:f 1 r v',e ? 5 "
t'P r,z a? A ?eix f.'?
VQT3
?A
VQT4
f. ? l
F ?
I! ? `4. 7 '4, ?. ??r Lk,?? ??: 7 l • ? t? '1 /.rig" rye
?5.f `? ,?.s? S alrii - `R• 1 1
4.Vf ._'`.. •,r.?x e ?, t„ s;?:: A: a.. ? ?, ,o-1 s ?t ....k =?.? ...
VQT5

t.

t

t i ) f

?
,l. f f y? w
.
VQT6

.

P f ?
t
y ?
f i
?
q 5

VQT7
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 7
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ1 stems/acre = 283
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
4.3 0.5 Unknown sp Unknown sp
9 2.1 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
6.9 3.9 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
3.1 3 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
2.2 6.8 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
6.4 6.9 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
10 7.6 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 5
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ1 stems/acre = 202
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
4.3 0.5 Unknown sp Unknown sp Stressed
9 2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.1 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.2 6.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
10 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2.4 8.5 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
ddh (mm) Height (cm)
6 47
4 48
3 26
3 38
3 30
3 25
3 36
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 8 stems = Vol. = 9
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ1 stems/acre = 324 stems/acre = 364
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
9 2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.1 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.2 6.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
10 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2.4 8.5 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
1.7 3.5 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
6.6 8.8 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
4.9 0 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 1/29/09 Replant
6.8 2.6 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Vol.
1 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2.3 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
6.9 3.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0 5.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
4.2 6.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2 6.8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
1.2 9.5 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 11 stems = Vol. = 17
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ1 stems/acre = 445 stems/acre = 688
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel; m ixed cattle grasses = 85%
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
9 2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.1 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.2 6.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
10 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2.4 8.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Replaced Sweet gum
6.6 8.8 Betula nigra River Birch
4.9 0 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
6.8 2.6 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust Vol.
1 5.1 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Replaced Sweet gum
2.3 5.1 Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut Oak Replaced Sweet gum
6.9 3.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0 5.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
4.2 6.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
2 6.8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native
1.2 9.5 Salix Nigra Black Willow Replaced Sweet gum
VQ1
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
Black Willow
River Birch
Green Ash

Pin Oak
Sweet Gum Pin Oak ¦
Sweet Gum

Swamp
Sweet Gum Sweet Gum Chestnut Oak

Willow Oak Sweet Gum
Pin Oak
¦
Pin Oak
Black Walnut
Pin Oak

¦
Willow Oak
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
X (m)
8 9 10
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant (Year 2) MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 9
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ2 stems/acre = 364
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
2.8 0.4 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 22
3.7 3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 30
4.7 7 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 35
1.9 9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 34
1.5 5.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 39
6.9 1.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 28
9.8 4.1 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 36
7.2 4.3 Unknown sp Unknown sp 3 12
8.3 8.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 32
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ2
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
2.8 0.4 Quercus palustris
4.7 7 Quercus palustris
1.9 9 Quercus palustris
1.5 5.6 Quercus palustris
6.9 1.3 Quercus palustris
8.3 8.3 Quercus palustris
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
6
100
243
Condition Comments
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ2 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
2.8 0.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
4.7 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.9 9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 5.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.9 1.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.3 8.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.6 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant
1.3 5.9 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
4.6 7.5 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
6.8 5.1 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
9.4 3.2 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 1/29/09 Replant
3.7 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQ2
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover:
X (m)
4.7
1.9
1.5
6.9
8.3
2.6
1.3
4.6
6.8
9.4
9.8
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
mixed cattle grasses, porcupine sedge, cokleburr = 90%
y (m)
7
9
5.6
1.3
8.3
1.9
5.9
7.5
5.1
3.2
4.1
Scientific Name
Quercus palustris
Quercus palustris
Quercus palustris
Quercus michauxii
Quercus palustris
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Quercus phellos
Quercus michauxii
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Pin Oak
Green Ash
River Birch
River Birch
River Birch
Willow Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
11
100
445
Condition
Comments
VQ2
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
River Birch
Pin Oak
River Birch
Pin Oak
River Birch
Swam
¦ Chest
Willow Oak
Green Ash
Pin Oak
¦
A Oak
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 2 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/1/2008
Name: VQ3
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 60% grass
x (m) y (m)
3 0.3
6.4 0.1
9.2 1.6
7.4 4.3
4.5 2.8
0.9 4.8
3 7.3
5.8 6.6
9.7 6.5
8.2 8.7
5.1 9.3
2.3 9.9
Scientific Name
Asimina triloba
Asimina triloba
Asimina triloba
Cornus amomum
Asimina triloba
Cornus amomum
Cornus amomum
Asimina triloba
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Asimina triloba
Asimina triloba
Cornus amomum
stems =
plot size (m"2) =
stems/acre =
Common Name
Common Pawpaw
Common Pawpaw
Common Pawpaw
Silky Dogwood
Common Pawpaw
Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
Common Pawpaw
Green Ash
Common Pawpaw
Common Pawpaw
Silky Dogwood
12
100
486
Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
9 89
11 114
10 120
7 84
15 124
5 42
6 65
9 107
4 23
11 106
11 100
4 65
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQ3 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 60% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
3 0.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
6.4 0.1 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
9.2 1.6 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
7.4 5.3 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
4.5 2.8 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
0.9 4.8 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
5.8 6.6 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
9.7 6.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5.1 9.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
MY2
9
100
364
Condition Comments
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name:
Size:
VQ3
10m x 10m
Cover:
X (m)
3
6.4
9.2
7.4
4.5
0.9
9.7
5.1
0
stems = 9
plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 364
mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush = 100% cover
y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
0.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
0.1 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
1.6 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw stressed
5.3 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
2.8 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
4.8 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
6.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw stressed
7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Comments
not on previous counts but now touching the line
VQ3
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
¦
Common pawpaw
¦
Pin Oak ¦
¦ Green Ash
Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
¦
Common pawpaw
Common pawpaw
Common pawpaw
Common pawpaw
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ4 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 50% Herbaceous Dicots
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 68
8.1 3.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 40
3.5 2.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9 55
1 5.4 Unknown sp Unknown sp 4 28
6.2 4.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 27
3.5 6.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 36
1 8 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 36
5.7 7.9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 36
9.5 8.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 7 62
0 9.8 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestake 40 15
0.6 9.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestake 38 16
1.2 9.5 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestake 17 19
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 9
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ4 stems/acre = 364
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 50% Herbaceous Dicots
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
8.1 3.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.5 2.7 Fraxinus Pennsylvanica Green Ash Stressed
1 5.4 Unknown sp Unknown sp
6.2 4.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.5 6.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1 8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.7 7.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.5 8.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 7 (w/vols) stems = 9
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ4 stems/acre = 283 stems/acre = 364
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel, mi xed cattle grasses = 100%
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
1 5.4 Populus deltoides Cottonwood vol.
6.2 4.6 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
3.5 6.3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
1 8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
5.7 7.9 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
0.6 9.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestake
1.2 9.5 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestake
6.4 0.2 Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac Vol.
VQ4
10
I
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Black Willow
Live stakes

Pin Oak ¦
Pin Oak

Pin Oak
Cottonwood
Pin Oak
¦
¦
Black Walnut
Smooth Sumac Vol.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/1/2008
Name: VQ5
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Broomsed ge
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
0.3 0.2 Quercus sp.
5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.5 0.3 Quercus sp.
4.4 9.4 Unknown sp
5.5 3.7 Quercus sp.
2.6 3.1 Salix nigra
1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.6 8.5 Quercus sp.
7.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
Common Name
Oak sp.
Green Ash
Oak sp.
Unknown sp
Oak sp.
Black Willow
Green Ash
Oak sp.
Green Ash
9
100
364
Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
3 41
4 34
2 35
8 28
3 37
4 19
5 33
3 44
2 20
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ5
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Broomsed ge
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.5 0.3 Quercus palustris
1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.6 8.5 Quercus palustris
7.5 8.7 Quercus palustris
1.2 6.3 Unknown sp
2.3 6.8 Unknown sp
stems = 5 stems+ Vol. = 7
plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 202 stems/acre = 283
Common Name
Green Ash
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Unknown sp
Unknown sp
Condition Comments
Vol.
Vol.
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 11 stems+ Vol. = 16
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ5 stems/acre = 445 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Broomsedge
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.5 0.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.6 8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.2 6.3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
2.3 6.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
7.7 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.4 9.4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
0.3 0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.5 3.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.7 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
1.4 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
0.5 7.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
7.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.4 9.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.3 9.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Condition Comments
Vol.
Vol.
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
1/29/09 Replant: mis-identified @ nursery?
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 10 stems+ Vol. = 16
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ5 stems/acre = 405 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel, narrow leaved sun flower = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.5 0.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.6 8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.2 6.3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
2.3 6.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
2.4 9.4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
0.3 0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.5 3.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.7 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
1.4 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
0.5 7.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
7.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.4 9.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.3 9.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.6 3.1 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon
Condition Comments
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
VQ5
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
Willow Oak Pin Oak
Pin Oak

Pin Oak

Green Ash
Buttonbush
Buttonbush

Buttonbush
Green Ash
Buttonbush
Buttonbush

Pin Oak
Persimmon vol.

¦
Green Ash
Pin Oak Pin Oak

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 2 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/1/2008
Name: VQ6
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% Annual R ye
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
1.1 1 Juglans nigra
8.7 0.3 Quercus alba
1.5 4.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.8 3 Quercus alba
7.7 3.1 Juglans nigra
5.8 7.1 Unknown sp
3.8 9.6 Quercus sp.
9.2 7 Quercus sp.
MY1
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
Common Name
Black Walnut
White Oak
Green Ash
White Oak
Black Walnut
Unknown sp
Oak sp.
Oak sp.
ddh (mm) Height (cm)
8 55
2 19
3 33
4 20
8 51
3 32
2 17
4 38
8
100
324
Condition Comments
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ6
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% Annual Rye
x (m) y (m)
1.1 1
3.8 3
2.2 1.6
5 3.1
Scientific Name
Juglans nigra
Quercus michauxii
Unknown sp
Unknown sp
stems = 2 stems + Vol. = 4
plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 81 stems/acre = 162
Common Name
Black Walnut
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Unknown sp
Unknown sp
Condition Comments
Vol.
Vol.
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 5/29/2009
Name: VQ6
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% Annual R ye
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
1.1 1 Juglans nigra
3.8 3 Quercus palustris
2.2 1.6 Juglans nigra
6.3 2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1.5 4.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
7.5 6.4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.6 8.2 Betula nigra
3.4 1.9 Betula nigra
4.9 0.5 Sailx nigra
5.6 0.3 Sailx nigra
6.7 0.3 Sailx nigra
8.7 0.3 Sailx nigra
4.2 3.2 Diospyros virginiana
0.5 3.8 Platanus occidentalis
5.8 7.1 Quercus palustris
6.4 7.7 Quercus phellos
3.2 10 Diospyros virginiana
3.8 9.6 Quercus palustris
stems = 16 stems +Vol. = 19
plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 647 stems/acre = 769
Common Name
Black Walnut
Pin Oak
Black Walnut
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
River Birch
River Birch
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Persimmon
Sycamore
Pin Oak
Willow Oak
Persimmon
Pin Oak
Condition Comments
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
livestake - Replant
livestake - Replant
livestake - Replant
livestake - Replant
Vol.
Vol.
1/29/09 Replant
Vol.
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17 stems +Vol. _
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQ6 stems/acre = 688 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, bare spots where annual rye is gone and not grown over yet = 80% cover
x (m)
1.1
3.8
2.2
6.3
4.1
1.5
7.5
3.6
3.4
4.9
5.6
6.7
8.7
1
4.2
0.5
5.8
6.4
3.2
3.8
9.2
Y (m)
1
3
1.6
2.5
5
4.5
6.4
8.2
1.9
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0
3.2
3.8
7.1
7.7
10
9.6
7
Scientific Name
Juglans nigra
Quercus palustris
Juglans nigra
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Sailx nigra
Sailx nigra
Sailx nigra
Sailx nigra
Sailx nigra
Diospyros virginiana
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus michauxii
Quercus phellos
Diospyros virginiana
Quercus palustris
Platanus occidentalis
Common Name
Black Walnut
Pin Oak
Black Walnut
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
River Birch
River Birch
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Persimmon
Sycamore
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Willow Oak
Persimmon
Pin Oak
Sycamore
Condition Comments
Stressed
Stressed
Stressed
Stressed
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
21
100
850
previously not counted
VQ6
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Persimmon Pin Oak

River Birch

Willow Oak
Swamp
Sycamore
Chestnut Oak
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
Sycamore

Persimmon
Pin Oak

Green Ash
River Birch
Black Walnut

Black Walnut
Black Willow
Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 2 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 10
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ7 stems/acre = 405
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
0.7 0.7 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 31
3.9 2.1 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 5 50
6.7 2.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 31
9.8 2.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 45
3.9 2.1 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 40
7.5 4.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 34
4.5 4.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 42
1.8 7.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 42
7.5 9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 31
9.8 2.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 27
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 2
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ7 stems/acre = 81
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
3.9 2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.5 4.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ7 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
7.5 4.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 8.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.7 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.5 0.2 Betula nigra River Birch
9.5 8.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
6.7 2.3 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.8 0.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
9.8 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.7 2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.9 9.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.8 7.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.7 0.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.5 9 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.5 6.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
5.1 1.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
Comments
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant: mis-identified @ nursery?
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQ7
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover:
x (m)
7.5
1.5
1.7
6.5
9.5
6.7
9.8
9.8
6.7
2.9
1.8
0.7
7.5
7.5
5.1
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
polygonum, narrow leaved sunflower, cocklebur = 100%
y (m)
4.6
8.2
1.6
0.2
8.8
2.3
0.8
2.5
2
9.2
7.2
0.7
9
6.7
1.7
Scientific Name
Quercus palustris
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Betula nigra
Quercus phellos
Quercus phellos
Quercus michauxii
Quercus palustris
Quercus palustris
Quercus palustris
Quercus palustris
Quercus palustris
Quercus michauxii
Quercus michauxii
Quercus michauxii
Common Name
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Green Ash
River Birch
Willow Oak
Willow Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
15
100
607
Condition
Comments
VQ7
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
Pin Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Willow Oak

Green Ash

Pin Oak

Swamp Chestnut Oak

Pin Oak
¦

Willow Oak Pin Oak

¦
Green Ash Pin Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Pin Oak River Birch

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 2 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 16
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT1 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
3 0.7 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 5 32
7.9 1 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 46
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 28
0.2 1.6 Salix nigra Black Willow 23 14
0.3 2.2 Salix nigra Black Willow 26 17
0.1 3.1 Salix nigra Black Willow 21 17
0.6 3.7 Salix nigra Black Willow 16 17
0.1 3.9 Salix nigra Black Willow 31 19
0.6 4.6 Salix nigra Black Willow 23 21
0.1 4.9 Salix nigra Black Willow 15 18
0.5 5.8 Salix nigra Black Willow 29 21
0.4 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow 30 14
8.8 6.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 18
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 33
0.5 7.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 47
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 52
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQT1
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
3 0.7 Quercus palustris
7.9 1 Quercus palustris
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.8 6.3 Quercus palustris
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.5 7.3 Quercus palustris
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Pin Oak
Green Ash
7
100
283
Condition Comments
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17 stems + Vol. = 22
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT1 stems/acre = 688 stems/acre = 890
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
3 0.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.9 1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.8 6.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.5 7.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.1 3.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 1/29/09 Replant
7.5 7.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 1/29/09 Replant
0.1 0.8 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
0.2 1.6 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake
0.3 2.2 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake
0.5 5.8 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake
0.4 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake
0.4 7.2 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
0.4 8.5 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
0.8 8.8 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Vol.
2.8 5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
3.8 5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
4.2 7.2 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
5.2 4.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant
6.2 1.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 16
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT1 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses = 100%
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
3 0.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.9 1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.8 6.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.1 3.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.5 7.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
0.1 0.8 Salix nigra Black Willow
0.2 1.6 Salix nigra Black Willow
0.3 2.2 Salix nigra Black Willow
0.5 5.8 Salix nigra Black Willow
0.4 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow
0.4 7.2 Salix nigra Black Willow
0.4 8.5 Salix nigra Black Willow
2.8 5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
5.2 4.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.2 1.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
stems + Vol. = 18
plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 728
Comments
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
Vol.
Vol.
VQT1
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Green Ash
¦
Black Willow
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Green Ash
¦Black Willow ¦
Black Willow Pin Oak
Black Willow Buttonbush
¦
¦
¦ Green Ash
Swamp Chestnut Oak
¦
¦ Green Ash
¦
Black Willow
Black Willow
Buttonbush Pin Oak
Black Willow
Pin Oak
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 2 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT2 stems/acre = 688
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Eupatorium and grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
1.2 1.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 37
7.8 0.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 36
8.4 2.4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 6 53
5.5 2.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp 3 28
1.9 3.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 8 41
1.5 3.8 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 40
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra River Birch 5 62
6.2 4.2 Ilex opaca American Holly 3 34
8 4.9 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 7 32
1.9 6.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 43
4.4 6.3 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 9 20
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 7 94
9.2 6.9 Unknown sp Unknown sp 5 40
7.3 9.1 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 6 53
4.7 8.9 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 10 53
2.7 8.5 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 6 73
0.2 8 Betula nigra River Birch 5 49
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT2 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Eupatorium and grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
1.2 1.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.8 0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.4 2.4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
5.5 2.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp
1.9 3.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 3.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra River Birch
6.2 4.2 Ilex opaca American Holly
8 4.9 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
1.9 6.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
4.4 6.3 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.2 6.9 Unknown sp Unknown sp
7.3 9.1 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
2.7 8.5 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 7
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT2 stems/acre = 283
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel = 10 0% Kudzu in plot
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
1.2 1.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.9 3.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 3.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra River Birch
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
7.3 9.1 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
4.9 0.8 Betula nigra River Birch
Comments
VQT2
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Silky Dogwood
¦
¦
Willow Oak
¦
¦
River Birch
Pin Oak ¦
Pin Oak
¦
¦
Pin Oak
River Birch
¦
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 16
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT3 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solide go sp and cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 10 108
6.4 0.9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 6 45
9.4 0.6 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5 84
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 9 74
0 3.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp 12 116
5 3.2 Unknown sp Unknown sp 7 52
9.5 3.5 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 8 84
2 4.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 6 89
3.7 5.5 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 6 82
5.8 5.4 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 6 65
8.3 5.5 Unknown sp Unknown sp 5 61
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 8 107
4 7.6 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 7 54
2 7.3 Unknown sp Unknown sp 9 177
1.8 9.9 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 7 93
3.3 9.9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 55
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT3 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
6.4 0.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.4 0.6 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0 3.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp
5 3.2 Unknown sp Unknown sp
2 4.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
3.7 5.5 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
2 7.3 Unknown sp Unknown sp
1.8 9.9 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
3.3 9.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 8
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT3 stems/acre = 324
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
6.4 0.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.4 0.6 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
5 3.2 Unknown sp Unknown sp
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
3.3 9.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.5 4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Comments
Nyssa? Cornus?
Morus rubra?
River Birch?
Comments
Morus rubra?
VQT3
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3?
2
1
0
¦
Pin Oak
Eastern Redbud
¦
¦
¦
Pin Oak
Red Mulberry ¦
Black Walnut
Pin Oak
Common Pawpaw Silky Dogwood
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT4 stems/acre = 526
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solide go sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
0.6 0.6 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 6 85
2.8 0.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 35
7.4 0.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 39
9.1 2.4 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 35
6.3 2.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 24
3.4 2.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 36
7.2 5.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 7 75
4.7 5.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 24
2.1 5.5 Unknown sp Unknown sp 4 57
0.2 6.1 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 30
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5 54
5.2 7.6 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 7 72
0.3 8.5 Unknown sp Unknown sp 4 48
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQT4 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
0.6 0.6 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
2.8 0.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.4 0.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.3 2.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.4 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.2 5.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
4.7 5.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.2 6.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
5.2 7.6 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
0.3 8.5 Quercus sp Oak sp
MY2
11
100
445
Condition Comments
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQT4 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: cocleburr, dog fennel = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
7.4 0.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.2 5.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
4.7 5.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
5.2 7.6 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
5
100
202
Condition Comments
VQT4
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
¦
Silky Dogwood Common Pawpaw
¦
¦ Pin Oak Buttonbush
¦
Pin Oak
¦
¦
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQT5 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
0.4 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.9 0.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
6.6 2.6 Betula nigra River Birch
3.1 2.3 Quercus alba White Oak
1.6 4.6 Betula nigra River Birch
4.8 5.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
7.6 5.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
0.8 3.2 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
3.1 7.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
6 7.9 Betula nigra River Birch
8.9 8.5 Betula nigra River Birch
1.6 10 Betula nigra River Birch
12
100
486
Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
6 42
8 42
6 59
3 35
6 66
8 40
4 54
8 58
2 24
6 53
7 71
5 55
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 8
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT5 stems/acre = 324
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
0.4 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.9 0.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Stressed
6.6 2.6 Betula nigra River Birch
3.1 2.3 Quercus alba White Oak
1.6 4.6 Betula nigra River Birch
3.1 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.9 8.5 Betula nigra River Birch
1.6 10 Betula nigra River Birch Stressed
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name:
Size:
Cover:
X (m)
0.4
6.6
3.1
1.6
3.1
8.9
3.8
9.5
VQT5
10m x 10m
narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses = 100%
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
Y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.6 Betula nigra River Birch
2.3 Quercus palustris White Oak
4.6 Betula nigra River Birch
7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.5 Betula nigra River Birch
0.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
6.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8
100
324
Comments
Condition Comments
not previously counted
not previously counted
VQT5
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
River Birch
¦
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
¦
¦
River Birch
¦
White Oak
River Birch
Green Ash
Green Ash
¦
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT6 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 97% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
8.6 2.9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 41
5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 20
3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 29
0.4 2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 7 58
4.5 4.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 35
6.9 5.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 33
0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 36 25
0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 18 22
0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 13 30
0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 20 27
0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 29 24
0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 20 25
3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 29
9.3 7.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 35
1.9 9.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 40
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT6 stems/acre = 526
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 97% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
8.6 2.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.4 2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
4.5 4.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9.3 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQT6
Size: 10m x 10m
stems = 15
plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 607
Cover: cokleburr, dog fennel, narrow leaved sunflower = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
8.6 2.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.4 2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
4.5 4.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow
0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow
0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow
0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow
0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow
0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow
3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9.3 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.9 9.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.1 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Condition Comments
Livestakes
Livestakes
Livestakes
Livestakes
Livestakes
Livestakes
not previously counted
VQT6
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Pin Oak
Black Willow
Black Willow
Pin Oak
Black Willow
I Pin Oak
Black Willow Green Ash

Black Willow
Black Willow
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Black Walnut
Green Ash
Green Ash

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT7 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
1.1 0.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
6.8 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
8.3 3.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
5.1 3.2 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
0 3.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
9.8 6.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
5.4 6.2 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
0.9 6.4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0 7 Salix nigra Black Willow
2.7 8.7 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
8 7.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0.1 9.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
dbh = 0.5 cm 21 155
7 41
3 27
dbh = 0.6 cm 26 175
4 36
7 42
9 132
5 47
30 32
3 32
5 62
3 26
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQT7
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp
X (M) Y (M)
1.1 0.7
6.8 1
5.1 3.2
0 3.2
5.4 6.2
0.9 6.4
0 7
2.7 8.7
8 7.5
0.1 9.3
MY2
Scientific Name
Cornus amomum
Juglans nigra
Cornus amomum
Quercus palustris
Cornus amomum
Juglans nigra
Salix nigra
Quercus palustris
Juglans nigra
Quercus palustris
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
Common Name
Silky Dogwood
Black Walnut
Silky Dogwood
Pin Oak
Silky Dogwood
Black Walnut
Black Willow
Pin Oak
Black Walnut
Pin Oak
10
100
405
Condition Comments
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQT7
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel, soft rush = 100%
X (M) Y (M) Scientific Name
1.1 0.7 Cornus amomum
5.1 3.2 Cornus amomum
5.4 6.2 Cornus amomum
3.4 8.7 Salix nigra
stems = 3 (w/ vols.) stems = 4
plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 121 stems/acre = 162
Common Name
Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
Black Willow
Condition Comments
vol.
VQT7
10
9
8
71
6
5
4
I
3
2
1
0
¦
¦
Black Willow
Vol.
¦
¦ Silky Dogwood
¦
Silky Dogwood ¦
Silky Dogwood
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2
Exhibit Table VII: Stems per Acre by Plot and Year
Replant -
Baseline MY1 Year 2 MY2 W/ Vol.
Vegplot Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre
VQ1 283 202 324 445* 688
VQ2 364 243 486 445 -
VQ3 486 364 364 364 -
VQ4 486 364 364 324 364
VQ5 364 202 445 405 647
VQ6 324 81 647 688 850
VQ7 405 81 607 607 -
Average
stems/acre =
(Main Channel) 387 220 462 468 566
Vegplot Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre Stems/acre
VQT1 647 283 688 647 728
VQT2 688 607 607 283 -
VQT3 647 486 486 324 -
VQT4 526 445 445 202 -
VQT5 486 324 324 324 -
VQT6 607 526 526 607 -
VQT7 486 405 405 121 162
Average
stems/acre =
(Tributary) 584 439 497 358 376
Average
stems/acre =
(Total) 486 330 480 413 471
* replaced 4 sweet gum trees with transplants
stems = 146 (w/ vols.) stems = 165
plot size (m"2) = 1400 plot size (m"2) = 1400
stems/acre = 422 stems/acre = 477
XS 1 stream left

s
b x t t
I
{{ 7
Y, I
Ikk
i"N
?t F J •. 5! ?A 9
? r '.? @p'F k b a S ?? ??8 s Ls f` r f ', ?' n tt °
k
XS 1 stream right
i![{r? rte. Q ¢ - D
? •F !?
r1?
i f I ra
s' F -et
?" b I t
XS 1 upstream
XS 1 downstream
(
w < r is
a s x:.; y'
?C, f Y t
Fs t
f:: ?' r'` ? ? ' 3f AA:" ?F ryl ? SI 'd ?J YI I(R fry tl Z ,?,
,.3?`,?,??.£?s.??.kv c-u..-k`Y.{,A.'???`?.'.s .tir,.? rl?r(h?Y$.t. "?„r? ,..,,.,. t?:•
XS2 downstream
qw,r
{ ??? a 1 S
Y y i : ' 4 '? a f sr i:'
W t a ,. ? ? Ir 4 7a 'd
M- i 1 , N V ??It x '
1' ?' g e vF ! y # r 4o- t r 1} r 3G fn?K j tMa.
6
''?•'., ? ? •:.f' r _:, ..??; ? ? .? l.rlR^_u3. v? ;•?., .t .<.? • Ira,s{9Y?rlu" ?,'se;i,a ?1 `??'.r
XS2 stream right
M
_ r3. s .fir _
v
??ti l? 1 k
XS2 stream left

t
ti? G ? •
L

?. q
?F F
a `? `? 0. r ,t C J
v4i 1
ti a
XS2 upstream

p, I ..

it ;? ?F 3
? ?iwp?r x

M L ?

21
y? rr a

XS3 downstream
. ?' i'y!'. ( f k 1•' i ? - r I + fit' ,
+ y ! { Pf o
I ?
f ? I f ,ll?,
' ? kn'!!°-a ??••,F?,?•-.?'c ¢M:+ H ? Y ?-^? wfy r, h ? ?'s>???Ca.§ ? .... y,s.5? ?'Sti:i, ;
} r..3 `S-cam' } x ern ` 3 #? $3 Y "
?i5 = I q
':!YY° Ylk?4?ay tt% ,. m(a1-zA?i?:^1e,i?ltrn kl..' S?, ?n ..,- ?,Ma ?'?J?'T•. .e S!fc.?

XS3 stream right

71,
?'
i
&

zfi
fe
?
« a'•.
r - m2 Off
,
y ?, '? ( §.`? _
?
?
f
rse? y ?sy? t ' ?
a r'

r

"! j ,Fr4
u
t^
F k
r A 12
?
: ? I{. t
a
r i
i
I
t ri 8.?1 R
9
.
f
?? I
f
-
it rJ1Y - ?/9/ i ?(
-
44
al ? "Y` ? X51 ???•
?1 ?=5 f
Y
b_' x) ti'tf, ,? T4 AY rv? M 4`? . r , a.. ;? ` ?'w+ ,+,??`,. ?e ? • 'v..tn '
XS3 stream left
!,, ?'? S rj 4 ?1lEZrf .'iprr-? 1... rl -.^' '? "s.r '^ .'• "
?4 III :. I -- ,?
! .t
r.{ x
a i;.srf Ci?7cp r a
"Ap
+ ' c+ J l J ? ? E.a
Ar,?? 1 c

r

XS3 upstream
rays a #Ykd:. Ak
z s
XS4 downstream

r
"
t
t'+ rt iH +.

?
?S+-p
7 T
b
?
! ? ? ? _
r?
??
.? fi
T? V
-•
p
1 h'K+Ki J'?1?}?
iN 1'? !`
?'y

? }1
?
alpd p
V
C

7-? x ?'fk ?rT. ,1
9d`:?dr FJ7 B ,ri i ?.' 3i
y
.' .... Y; .ru } -? wd .,:w1 k f
y
'i 4,R
i t r.' k 7
..
xr "7?? ?'"' ? • .d'?`°b"srP '?`??"????? e?,ry?2
r(
? '??. ` k ;I'F ? i ,
1
. + tar' j
?9 y
} a b
l
fi
,
? "
tom' +iArz? ?} ? r' ff???
?• ?8a- ¢
f
a
?yj /,i ?.
_
a Y L F 4 ?,a __h r
,

XS4 stream right
XS4 stream left
h ? ,Wi3f_ ? r yyyy •d' Y 3 F ., 'k ?b
r?? r 1 q 4 cwt ?
iw-
V 1 t. ,i k 5? s'.
XS4 upstream

.P 1

A
l
,

f
ya .? Y?? ?r `lt Sim.
a
5 ?? ?? ? ,•? _ ?..

y.
F.

XS5 downstream
? n
???? i??e Li:???? 31 °1?r? ?,? +C.:• ? ?$ ?ae?r `.? t? ?`w ?:w'1':
,I
l
ZI,
Y
F9 -M eu
? ?+• ? P f` I elr . °^??''t? ?? do ? ?vj,
?yyl Pt$@?,
XS5 stream right

t
a f "' I
? at
1 v a e
A6 1
d
'
?
?+' i .
?P' r'
?!.
1?? ? q
a Ier r=
n,g
? lf?
ft?.,Y`:J: t
XS5 stream left
s !
affrt$ ky?i4r41G
1'} pry rr k?k? ?i
'Ar
Ik-
XS5 upstream
aw
4? y,w 3

fir-

XS6 downstream
XS6 stream left
14 y
- 6 4 L.i;d,1.t .. n
XS6 stream right
XS6 upstream
f
N, T?
..n R? Ft 4 p ;i '?F' -y1!r`tr s? r ?*? t sa 1 al J
Y
N, v4,
` °.. a
? s
tq?
pSS 3? ye & A:,° ?, a zd:;
PLr ? ? r s "j" h., 's c s .,, !fit. .., ?.da'
i j T 4 }'?, 1. >rs_ "?•
XSTI downstream
r S
I I
F, ?Y t 4
?16 z'! i €S t :/ F ! L Y.F"e 'a 4 a +Y.. 1 4
r% -. St?3f + !a ?„ s AF" r. s 4. ?i ` s w?L
jj'
+? 4 -.r '°?' : .,"" h+a7r ? r'r-4 J s i+t f .• ?y i•.. •6 .?, i
XSTI stream right
a
Wi
off S '? ! 15
K ?'?i.# YS1 ?Y } ? r? (6L? ? 5 k ??9i/? d l ? f t
.46
#
.

r s ? .• t? d s I .: 1M rir t i 'v? x? a{
Y 3 '1 ! d 1'? ! F i 1f? t.? ! '? .t
1 t f.: R Fi r 4.°? ; § fi k ;j r es' t' f k
01
?? t .jig-` aa, ,a ,f ,r n iL f r II Tf''P 7 ?4r:
I'Y
k ' a ? is S.•'?..? /?^`'?b? l ?i ? ?? .k:J ? Af?..?Ta ? ,i r????? _,,. ? '? '
f
S?'yF Rf
XSTI stream left
1 ,
h ?
;
XSTI upstream
F 1
IA +?}b t? ? - b 'h M? •.jl ? ?'µ??
a xW r r a
7 dE 4s, Cap "? * _x ?, ?T ;`
XST2 downstream

-?? a ? _ p v, de ,. ? a of dr•. as _ ? ?

ji 4. i r3 l ? ? f ! =F

pp '. y { s F f i ? .t t ,. I

f l ' t
le,
{ ,'7I1 ?? f x'.12 ;.;
??^^ !
qq `
v?
F-?
A ? Ph; v
C
as °:
k
X
4
as
j l
p
4
p ;

a
XST2 stream right
M
Yr u ?, ?' 1 ? •??1,y?MkStM1 ? ?t ?IY S }?i1??? "i, ? !1 ???' ?"' ? (` q ?.
h, Q ? l? t
1 ?
? y ? v I 4? r ? y? jr
wk :ai:4 y? ; t
'`k`Cr' ? ?(r '.? 1•?.. §,t *?M $^t z'Y ?rh?d 'q, , t ? tY? ?3.r = ? a? a 4..
XST2 stream left
P- *1
r? q
? ? h t t ?' ? 11 ? ?i4i }S R ! ? r n ? f [
1FL" Y
- ] { '? A y . j t £ ? w? .., 1 •i ??: r3 !fir ?, ?.
1
w
qqr
;i A71
. # :sb, >3C. .9ti'_'{Yl4eF T!a, r,t ?'st ?p.fln rs. 1'et:: . . "` ?T ,'yte:F?
XST2 upstream
?F.
? 6t? z' li f. r .
?! i? - 13rwt Y
fhb f? ?1?4??i` IS. .yi „•
rl S
I?A

/' -1.
? E ! 1 .
XST3 downstream
11,16
,.
"Y z ? F r rsR f 'Y\ + j{4"? k`? ?. ',i`3 kip. 1s .
? ?. ! Iii 1 r 3 0
k ' tr, f
XST3 stream right
XST3 stream left

XST3 upstream
XST4 downstream
e
l ! '
3iy 3 M.L
7 4 ?+' b i
• ,? yr ? e ?, e??7t I „5 _ ?' 3 -: F F .
F.'.. 7# 1 s. 7 A x 7 gti' f i S j?.
z z
XST4 stream right

N

G
• ?t L'
• :
? a y ,
1 1 #YC*.' .k,
' I ? P t ?.1 b r l( i` y, `1
,.Y r n 1N d i? > A

LS
s, ? N a

x t .? ? r
f \
r
S`I .} ? ? M*PA A}r
s {
el''

XST4 stream left
XST4 upstream

XST5 stream right XST5 upstream
XST5 downstream
XST5 stream left
711
d f ?',• A
? T
V /
-N .7
??y5y?iRt 8
XST6 stream left

f
f
a?f_ I ?v
r /+ ed ?`?ed?"?

(
.
Ell?
(
,
$ s L;^ tea, r.
ct

r
all.
'fix .4? ?Sr 4 ?T i k"y '.

r < r i

/ ?
1? ,ff Y }
XST6 stream right
XST6 upstream
XST6 downstream
XSR1 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 591.08 591.05
13.09 590.35 590.60
17.41 589.73 589.75
29.50 BKF 589.34 589.10
35.70 588.53 588.29
43.60 586.38 586.30
45.80 586.19 586.10
48.74 TW' 585.89 585.98
52.24 TWZ 586.25 585.73
62.27 589.16 588.90
78.47 BKF 588.85 589.06
88.59 590.12 590.15
103.41 BM 590.21 590.28
XSR2 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 592.06 592.10
13.24 591.71 591.60
34.89 590.70 590.50
42.91 BKF 589.96 590.00
49.50 587.64 587.80
50.83 587.43 587.50
56.08 587.44 587.50
61.03 TW 587.36 587.40
62.18 587.56 587.60
69.14 BKF 590.09 589.90
77.97 590.13 590.70
90.05 591.67 591.40
115.70 BM 591.80 591.90
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 48.97 48.97
Dbkf 3.45 3.37
Abkf 132.62 129.55
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 26.23 26.23
Dbkf 2.60 2.60
Abkf 53.54 53.54

592.00
591
00 XSP1
.
590
00
.
589.00
588
00
.
587
00 °
.
586
00 -
.
585
00
.
584
00
.
583
00
.
582
00
. 0.0 13.1 17.4 29.5 35.7 43.6 45.8 48.7 52.2 62.3 78.5 88.6 103.4
+2008 X2009

593.00
592
00 XSR2
.
591
00
.
590
00
.
589
00
.
588
00
.
587
00
.
586
00
.
585
00
.
584
00
.
583
00
. 0.0 13.2 34.9 42.9 49.5 50.8 56.1 61.0 62.2 69.1 78.0 90.1 115.7
+ 2008 X2009
XSP3 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 592.56 592.60
26.22 BKF 591.69 591.80
40.88 590.83 590.80
52.18 589.36 589.50
61.56 TW 588.14 588.20
67.76 589.26 589.30
75.16 BKF 591.94 591.80
106.73 BM 592.65 592.70
XSR4 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 595.92 595.80
6.31 595.64 595.70
13.34 594.67 594.80
24.61 BKF 594.57 594.30
31.17 592.74 592.90
32.66 592.58 592.80
34.64 592.50 592.70
42.92 TW' 592.21 592.70
45.39 TWZ 592.59 592.60
46.13 592.67 592.70
53.15 BKF 594.23 594.30
64.31 594.94 595.00
74.00 594.87 595.00
76.95 595.53 595.30
91.94 BM 595.55 595.60
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 48.94 48.94
Dbkf 3.55 3.60
Abkf 136.38 138.30
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 28.54 28.54
Dbkf 2.36 1.70
Abkf 52.87 38.09

594.00
593
00 XSP3
.
592
00
.
591
00
.
590
00
.
589
00
.
588
00
.
587
00
.
586
00
.
585
00
.
584
00
.
0.0 26.2 40.9 52.2 61.6 67.8 75.2 106.7
+ 2008 X2009

597.00
596
00 XSR4
.
595.00 -
r
594
00
.
593
00
.
592
00
.
591
00
.
590
00
.
589
00
.
588
00
.
587
00
. 0.0 6.3 13.3 24.6 31.2 32.7 34.6 42.9 45.4 46.1 53.2 64.3 74.0 77.0 91.9
? + 2008 X2009
XSP5 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 598.01 598.10
14.50 597.01 597.10
23.06 595.58 595.90
31.85 595.43 595.20
31.96 BKF 595.39 595.20
43.68 593.70 594.20
45.54 592.96 593.30
50.72 591.72 592.20
50.74 592.10 592.20
52.77 TW 592.02 592.20
54.96 592.57 592.90
56.07 593.90 594.10
62.41 BKF 596.14 596.20
88.18 596.59 596.60
95.75 597.31 597.10
99.32 597.77 597.20
106.66 BM 597.60 597.70
XSR6 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 598.74 598.90
2.85 598.41 598.40
7.10 BKF 597.60 597.90
19.52 597.47 597.50
24.91 595.71 596.00
31.42 TW 595.57 595.78
36.94 595.67 596.04
45.45 BKF 598.10 597.94
73.93 BM 598.89 599.07
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 30.45 30.45
Dbkf 3.37 3.00
Abkf 80.55 71.71
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 38.35 38.35
Dbkf 2.03 2.12
Abkf 61.11 63.82
XSP5
599.00
598
00
.
597
00
.
596
00
.
595
00
.
594
00
.
593
00 -
.
592
00
.
591
00
.
590
00
.
589
00
.
00 1?1h o^ ^* ?o 01 ?h o1 01 ti? ?o ?^ Roti ?w o? 0A
ti o o rx a ? o o o
+2008 X2009

600.00
599
00 XSR6
.
598
00
.
597
00
.
596.00
595
00
.
594
00
.
593
00
.
592
00
.
591
00
.
590
00
.
0.0 2.9 7.1 19.5 24.9 31.4 36.9 45.5 73.9
+ 2008 X2009
XSRT 1 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 619.82 619.60
0.00 619.73 619.60
9.63 619.52 619.40
14.46 BKF 619.56 619.40
18.44 618.71 618.50
20.17 TW 618.65 618.50
23.05 619.07 618.74
26.48 BKF 619.69 619.41
40.54 619.88 619.80
53.14 620.28 620.23
53.14 BM 620.43 620.23
XSPT2 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 619.63 619.63
0.00 619.49 619.40
9.86 619.51 619.23
33.21 618.88 618.55
33.47 618.81 618.54
35.84 BKF 618.76 618.40
42.36 617.71 617.56
44.87 TW 617.32 617.26
44.91 617.34 617.28
46.72 617.74 617.65
46.80 617.78 617.57
50.14 BKF 618.80 618.78
50.25 618.85 618.80
61.17 618.98 618.89
72.34 620.06 619.84
72.34 BM 620.07 619.84
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 12.02 12.02
Dbkf 0.91 0.90
Abkf 8.59 8.49
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 14.30 14.30
Dbkf 1.44 1.14
Abkf 16.16 12.80

621.00
620
00 XSRT1
.
619
00
.
618
00
.
617
00
.
616
00
.
615
00
.
614
00
.
613
00
.
612
00
.
611
00
.
0.0 0.0 9.6 14.5 18.4 20.2 23.1 26.5 40.5 53.1 53.1
+ 2008 X2009

621.00
620
00 XSPT2

'
.
619
00 /
------
.
618
00
.
617
00
.
616
00
.
615
00
.
614
00
.
613
00
.
612
00
.
611
00
. 0.0 0.0 9.9 33.2 33.5 35.8 42.4 44.9 44.9 46.7 46.8 50.1 50.3 61.2 72.3 72.3
+2008 X2009
XSRT3 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 609.93 609.95
8.97 BKF 609.51 609.50
14.42 609.48 609.38
16.15 608.90 609.00
17.16 TW 608.58 608.69
18.49 608.92 608.95
22.39 BKF 609.66 609.65
29.60 609.38 609.45
37.90 BM 610.10-1 -610.11
XSPT4 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 608.76 608.80
3.45 607.30 607.86
15.04 606.59 606.72
20.54 606.18 606.06
22.91 BKF 605.42 605.57
25.68 TW 604.24 604.03
32.76 BKF 605.43 605.55
39.73 605.61 605.45
40.38 605.34 605.45
46.80 605.44 605.58
52.36 605.50 605.75
62.62 606.02 606.19
66.65 606.22 606.42
73.54 BM 606.78 606.78
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 13.42 13.42
Dbkf 0.93 0.81
Abkf 9.80 8.53
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 9.85 9.85
Dbkf 1.18 1.54
Abkf 9.12 11.91

611.00
610
00 XSRT3
.
609
00
.
608
00
.
607
00
.
606
00
.
605
00
.
604
00
.
603
00
.
602
00
.
601
00
.
0.0 9.0 14.4 16.2 17.2 18.5 22.4 29.6 37.9
+ 2008 f 2009

610.00
609
00 XSPT4
.
608
00
.
607
00
.
606
00
.
605
00
.
604
00
.
603
00
.
602
00
.
601
00
.
600
00
.
0.0 3.5 15.0 20.5 22.9 25.7 32.8 39.7 40.4 46.8 52.4 62.6 66.7 73.5
+ 2008 X2009
XSRT5 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 602.21 602.20
0.86 601.56 601.89
11.30 601.64 601.85
20.76 BKF 601.79 601.85
24.15 600.65 601.36
25.81 TW 600.53 600.92
27.67 600.87 601.25
31.88 BKF 601.70 601.68
47.49 601.84 601.84
60.60 601.24 601.40
74.71 601.87 602.50
74.93 BM 602.52 602.50
XSRT6 Survey Data
Station Notes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
0.00 BM 595.81 595.97
0.09 595.33 595.96
14.85 595.57 595.62
22.22 BKF 595.57 595.50
25.92 594.60 594.70
27.91 TW 594.41 594.30
29.88 594.65 594.87
34.31 BKF 595.77 595.55
40.31 595.68 595.90
53.93 595.68 595.89
53.93 BM 596.22 596.30
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 11.12 11.12
Dbkf 1.26 0.93
Abkf 11.00 8.12
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Wbkf 12.09 12.09
Dbkf 1.16 1.20
Abkf 11.01 11.39

603.00
602
00
- XSRT5
.
-
601.00
600
00
.
599
00
.
598
00
.
597
00
.
596
00
.
595
00
.
594
00
.
593
00
.
0.0 0.9 11.3 20.8 24.2 25.8 27.7 31.9 47.5 60.6 74.7 74.9
+2008 X2009

597.00
596
00 XSRT6
.
595
00
.
594
00 -
.
593
00
.
592
00
.
591
00
.
590
00
.
589
00
.
588
00
.
587
00
.
0.0 0.1 14.9 22.2 25.9 27.9 29.9 34.3 40.3 53.9 53.9
+ 2008 X2009
LP 1
622
621

620

619

618
617

616 I

15 65 115 165 215 265 315 365 415 465
-*- 2008 f 2009 B KF
LP2
611
r
610

609

608
1 k
?
607

606

605

604 '
d

603

1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750
2008 2009 B KF
LP3
597

596
5
.
596

595
5
.

595

594.5 -IN
594
593
5
.
593

592
5
.
2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950
--0-2008 --m-2009 B KF
LN
596
595

594

593

592
II
591 ?
>i

590 -
589

588

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
2008 f 2009 B KF
LP5
591
590

589

588
587 q
R

586

585

584

350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150
2008 --m- 2009 B KF
XS4
Particle
Size
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0.062 16 17
0.13
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
6 10
8 10
11 3
16 4 4
22 7 7
32 13 8
45 15 10
64 15 14
90 19 12
128 8 5
180 5
256 1
362
512
1024
2048
4096
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
ooort, ono ooh N tK o w NN No ti? oti ?h o°` oo New N?o ??o Doti ?op eo
? 2008 ¦ 2009
XS2
Particle
Size
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0.062 10 25
0.13
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
6 3 11
8 7 5
11 4 9
16 10 8
22 10 10
32 3 4
45 15 5
64 12 6
90 13 10
128 10 6
180 2
256 2
362
512
1024
2048
4096
30
1
25
20
15
10
5
0
ooo? ono ooh o``' N o w NN Nb o°` oo Np Np rho oon, 4 ?N lvp Op
? 2008 ¦ 2009
XST1
Particle
Size
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0.062 1 20
0.13 3
0.25 2
0.5
1
2 2
4 2 1
6 3 3
8 13 8
11 19 10
16 22 9
22 18 16
32 12 12
45 5 4
64 6 3
90 2 6
128 1
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
4096
25
20
15
10
5
0

o o
ooti no ooh Ip N ti IK o o NN No ti? oti ?h o? :P Np Noo ?ooo
? 2008 ¦ 2009
XST3
Particle
Size
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0.062 36 63
0.13
0.25
0.5
1
2
4 2 1
6 3 5
8 1 3
11 3 6
16 4 3
22 4 5
32 12 2
45 13 4
64 14 3
90 11 5
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
4096
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

?? oh Oh N `L NN Nb bp,
co N?) "'b", b
ooo?l.O O
? 2008 ¦ 2009
XST6
Particle
Size
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0.062 40 53
0.13
0.25
0.5
1
2
4 2
6 3 2
8 1
11 4 3
16 6 2
22 4 5
32 8 6
45 16 11
64 18 12
90 15 5
128 1
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
4096
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
oooti oN ooh N o o NN No ti? oti ?h o°` oo NI) Noo ??o Doti AV?o ?ooo
? 2008 ¦ 2009
reruiaueut ruutu ruuit i,u

• ' i „? ?,.. ark ? t - > -???? ?..;:??:?
r.
f •$P 1 y
,# ?yJ??+. ,-.. s?.?•?* ;? ACV. -?.'?' ???`' d '7 .'?:. ???g^,.. 5Z°?
Y-
r?§
N.
? ? • . ? '. I ,!- °.. l?, I Iril'1?. _/} f 0. 'Sp tv`p.° `•
?.r`?J' . • . ? ? ?p ?.O'' ? a'yK? Wit` l'Sd i( '?{ • ? 4 n t kg??
t e: } u z t'+I,? P .r yak'- YL,?.:
15, 4

Photo Point 1 - Looking downstream from cattle crossing upstream of Edmund Latta Road (STA 200+00).
Photo Point 2 - Looking upstream from Edmund Latta Road bridge (STA 203+75).
a ?, ?. y} y .l
f . z 4 V A'
a
?,a i -a e P• ?,
r
p ? s5ak
Cqp } f:? 4 +}x F
r?
y, pr ? s ,M [ tic y?-r
J44 { ?° {?.?r •x1,'e' a,lx2°' JJa?i,, r f .
' +• ' "Yad "+t1FC .:: r'` y f yT..y'ty. [Yi- g,, ?1 ybyf pv
44
X '.
iiff y{y'. rt J %y6
+\ a r7 ?1?0.'r A [j?.?.ifeL?§;f 44 rF Yd i
Photo Point 3 - Looking upstream from cattle crossing below the confluence of FC and UT (STA 223+00).
IE y
d g r e S r {_yFl t yy y ..
J ?v
t x, ', r f
t ?# %q y A'
f?, T?f ?,?,;•? yl +? ,'r a F,,d ti"^ F r. ? ? rt s ?? p i q'"r
? A.aT 5?? 4? x, ? ?. - ?...-•"y? 41?j K"?• ?i?.F?,'-??'* ?'. F! sJ? F{':? ?t?l?[-"
"?" r 1+. ,r, a ? ?Sa k t?N ?i?tR?L yn :.'` ? ?+ 4d1 rt.?[t?ai { 'r[
} ?. ?ea ? ?'}t t - >< a [? ? r?Y'i "•'}, ! } r '? ry!;•? r s J ? '? sa x dish"i y; ?::
Photo Point 4 - Looking downstream from cattle crossing below the confluence of FC and UT (STA 223+00).

r
R

R+FT i
? !
??:. l ?. +
oaf

a ar 4 ? s'.k j?
? max ??b 5a +1? ?x V6S _
x. 4+a
M4, 1
rR S€' ?i h}h f V
Y +? Y Sr ? 4 ¢? t
A 31

41
a ; =
-tr
r} * 4
?i.
r'. eu
? r
X I'
i iv a
•,ara
Photo Point 5 - Looking upstream from London Lane (STA 232+00).

Photo Point 6 - Looking upstream (UT) from the cattle crossing above the confluence (STA 126+50).
Y`-..` V
! j `?' +[
?,- 3 n tr1C ^'g'T tS 9ti "?„.' r
_ ? ? ? hti rte- ? ? -. ? y ? C???:: ,.?'
A Y S
fir- i k •, i r ? ? : / F ? x Aas - ' v lii
f4.?r?
Photo Point 7 - Looking downstream (UT) from cattle crossing above Edmund Latta Road (STA 106+25).
Photo Point 8 - Looking upstream (UT) from cattle crossing above Edmund Latta Road (STA 106+25).
f
!.•y?s ,F ? ?'#' '44?.. ?, by ?`' ,"? 1 i (? t _'v ? f r } •? ;
f, ? I ??: q ?.. ? ?tt',y ti?r. I+, r # •"£1*i I cif r?f ?1 ? la J.??
aF• f ?? •. c?''fA ? J. (? y r'N .: rr. ? r ' ?a ,,: rd t y1?'?YP
f? ! K'.'y''?i ??f . e•. r? `1F: f '? hr ;? t ?? iI u ..! ,.
•? f ,, ? a ` ? ?,?+°'° r r 7 i ?r ? F f r ?.5 ? ? : ? t a t ,` ? Gr- 4 ,?},
^y? ?i '? ? ? ; }? r`} c `Y a- ? ? R ?y r gv 734? f.:J fr'F?f'S,.P +!
s , 1 4
X, t
a? t 1T {r
M1 lt' ?? yt a?'}wo yt 4ti ?$, a e, { :}*' ! a x, -j,
?.y ?$s r.
riS?R ?? ,''t' a?4 i9"•??'?:? 3+ Y #-??i? ? ? '7'? y!*?r
S y? C ff .y.} M 1 I[?'?I§'$' "J' .! =Se 'tq'?R ' " M ?5`{?.IiF,? .+s 7 •.'
i?????,?F?,
? e,. .,?', .•.. .°'*"`+t•t ;1 ,r ...? »?, .: .?Mr..?7V.5:•?i??'.? '•? +?$?,.x.. ...a rh':v'" ,r:•'??.:. .ar`_?s i...
`+ M 1. Vs.. ', y' Str Tow '.'}* tkagk ?t ?'+4't•]r - {
Yr
' r r ! F i r. .,
? . J ' ? 9 .?. !• r?' T J 1? ! ?. ?1'' SFSV.2e nnL'- ?s '?ei' Via. A f4
Photo Point 9 - Looking downstream (UT) from Edmund Latta Road (STA 110+50).
W?
. S ?
i

r P a
.u 1_..l
Photo Point 10 - Looking upstream (UT) from Edmund Latta Road (STA 110+00).
BANKFULL EVENT LOG

Ti .

4

Event not documented in 2008 Monitoring Report. Event most likely took place
November 30th and Dec 1st, onsite rain gage logged 1.25 inches.

lI
d
'l 79

0
i
J

.po
•S .'?%
?
.
i ..

I
14, Kvil-i
y # ??'. - r
04
1
t
P I?f?y fA! I! r ?, f'.
r Art
r f/1
P i
f !?
7
Y l
Several potential bankfull events took place in March 2009.
1.38 inches March 2nd and 3rd
2.31 inches March 14th through 17th
1.99 inches March 27th through 29th
At the time of monitoring (9-1-09), both CSG's were water logged as shown above.
The largest storm event s recorded between April 16th and September 1st were:
May 6 - 8: 1.89 in.
June 5 - 6: 2.39 in.
July 6 and 7: 2.02 in
It is typical for the CSG's to be more difficult to trigger in the summer months when
vegetation is in full growth, the CSG's may have also malfunctioned due to debris or
vegetation.
User Name
Data Acquired
Next Measurement
Serial Number
User Message
Batt. Installed
Batt. Voltage
Batt. Capacity
Alarm Interval
Readings per Day
Measurements
Amt. to Log:
Memory Wrap
Latitude
Longitude
************
Date
dd-mmm-yyyy
************
8/30/2008
8/31/2008
9/1/2008
9/2/2008
9/3/2008
9/4/2008
9/5/2008
9/6/2008
9/7/2008
9/8/2008
9/9/2008
9/10/2008
9/11/2008
9/12/2008
9/13/2008
9/14/2008
9/15/2008
9/16/2008
9/17/2008
9/18/2008
9/19/2008
9/20/2008
9/21/2008
9/22/2008
9/23/2008
9/24/2008
9/25/2008
9/26/2008
9/27/2008
9/28/2008
9/29/2008
FCRG
01-Sep-2009 10:12:00
02-Sep-2009 00:00:00
N48660DD
31 character message
6/08
5.95
90
24 h r(s)
1
368
0
24-Apr-2020 00:00:00
29 59.999 N
81 59.999 W
**********
Rainfall
inches
**********
0
0
0.16
0
0
0
0
0.66
4.71
0
0
0.03
0.29
0.01
0
0
0
0
1.01
0
0
0.04
0.01
0
0
0
0.01
0.24
1.7
0.02
0.01
1.94
9/30/2008 0
10/l/2008 0.65
10/2/2008 0.08
10/3/2008 0
10/4/2008 0
10/5/2008 0
10/6/2008 0
10/7/2008 0.01
10/8/2008 0
10/9/2008 0.01
10/10/2008 0.03
10/11/2008 0.01
10/12/2008 0
10/13/2008 0
10/14/2008 0
10/15/2008 0.01
10/16/2008 0.01
10/17/2008 0
10/18/2008 0.4
10/19/2008 0.01
10/20/2008 0
10/21/2008 0
10/22/2008 0.01
10/23/2008 0
10/24/2008 0
10/25/2008 0
10/26/2008 0.18
10/27/2008 0.01
10/28/2008 0
10/29/2008 0
10/30/2008 0
10/31/2008 0.02
11/l/2008 0
11/2/2008 0
11/3/2008 0
11/4/2008 0.15
11/5/2008 0.63
11/6/2008 0
11/7/2008 0
11/8/2008 0
11/9/2008 0.01
11/10/2008 0
11/11/2008 0
11/12/2008 0.04
11/13/2008 0.01
11/14/2008 0.08
11/15/2008 0.72
11/16/2008 0.01
11/17/2008 0
11/18/2008 0
11/19/2008 0
11/20/2008 0
11/21/2008 0
11/22/2008 0.06
11/23/2008 0
11/24/2008 0
11/25/2008 0.26
11/26/2008 0.01
11/27/2008 0
11/28/2008 0
11/29/2008 0
11/30/2008 0.28
12/l/2008 0.97
12/2/2008 0
12/3/2008 0
12/4/2008 0.01
05-Dec-2008 0.03
06-Dec-2008 0
07-Dec-2008 0.05
08-Dec-2008 0
09-Dec-2008 0
10-Dec-2008 0.01
11-Dec-2008 0.02
12-Dec-2008 0
13-Dec-2008 0
14-Dec-2008 0
15-Dec-2008 0.01
16-Dec-2008 0
17-Dec-2008 0.01
18-Dec-2008 0
19-Dec-2008 0
20-Dec-2008 0
21-Dec-2008 0
22-Dec-2008 0
23-Dec-2008 0
24-Dec-2008 0
25-Dec-2008 0
26-Dec-2008 0.01
27-Dec-2008 0
28-Dec-2008 0.01
29-Dec-2008 0
30-Dec-2008 0
31-Dec-2008 0
01-Jan-2009 0
02-Jan-2009 0
03-Jan-2009 0.07
04-Jan-2009 0.01
05-Jan-2009 0.25
06-Jan-2009 0
07-Jan-2009 0.64
08-Jan-2009 0.39
09-Jan-2009 0.08
10-Jan-2009 0
11-Jan-2009 0
1.25
1.11
12-Jan-2009 0.01
13-Jan-2009 0
14-Jan-2009 0
15-Jan-2009 0
16-Jan-2009 0
17-Jan-2009 0
18-Jan-2009 0
19-Jan-2009 0
20-Jan-2009 0
21-Jan-2009 0.03
22-Jan-2009 0
23-Jan-2009 0
24-Jan-2009 0
25-Jan-2009 0
26-Jan-2009 0
27-Jan-2009 0
28-Jan-2009 0.27
29-Jan-2009 0.23
30-Jan-2009 0.14
31-Jan-2009 0.06
01-Feb-2009 0.01
02-Feb-2009 0
03-Feb-2009 0.14
04-Feb-2009 0.15
05-Feb-2009 0
06-Feb-2009 0
07-Feb-2009 0
08-Feb-2009 0
09-Feb-2009 0
10-Feb-2009 0
11-Feb-2009 0
12-Feb-2009 0
13-Feb-2009 0
14-Feb-2009 0
15-Feb-2009 0
16-Feb-2009 0
17-Feb-2009 0.06
18-Feb-2009 0.03
19-Feb-2009 0.57
20-Feb-2009 0
21-Feb-2009 0
22-Feb-2009 0
23-Feb-2009 0
24-Feb-2009 0
25-Feb-2009 0
26-Feb-2009 0
27-Feb-2009 0
28-Feb-2009 0.04
01-Mar-2009 0.87
02-Mar-2009 1.25
03-Mar-2009 0.13
04-Mar-2009 0.03
1.38
05-Mar-2009 0.03
06-Mar-2009 0
07-Mar-2009 0
08-Mar-2009 0
09-Mar-2009 0
10-Mar-2009 0
11-Mar-2009 0
12-Mar-2009 0
13-Mar-2009 0
14-Mar-2009 0.36
15-Mar-2009 0.78
16-Mar-2009 0.8
17-Mar-2009 0.37
18-Mar-2009 0
19-Mar-2009 0.01
20-Mar-2009 0.32
21-Mar-2009 0.01
22-Mar-2009 0
23-Mar-2009 0
24-Mar-2009 0
25-Mar-2009 0
26-Mar-2009 0.09
27-Mar-2009 0.41
28-Mar-2009 0.52
29-Mar-2009 1.06
30-Mar-2009 0
31-Mar-2009 0
01-Apr-2009 0
02-Apr-2009 0.04
03-Apr-2009 0.54
04-Apr-2009 0.46
05-Apr-2009 0
06-Apr-2009 0
07-Apr-2009 0.38
08-Apr-2009 0
09-Apr-2009 0
10-Apr-2009 0
11-Apr-2009 0.53
12-Apr-2009 0.01
13-Apr-2009 0
14-Apr-2009 0.04
15-Apr-2009 0.08
16-Apr-2009 0.07
17-Apr-2009 0
18-Apr-2009 0
19-Apr-2009 0
20-Apr-2009 0.01
21-Apr-2009 0.85
22-Apr-2009 0.08
23-Apr-2009 0
24-Apr-2009 0
25-Apr-2009 0
2.31
1.99
26-Apr-2009 0
27-Apr-2009 0
28-Apr-2009 0
29-Apr-2009 0
30-Apr-2009 0
01-May-2009 0
02-May-2009 0.05
03-May-2009 0
04-May-2009 0
05-May-2009 0.2
06-May-2009 0.69
07-May-2009 0.29
08-May-2009 0.91
09-May-2009 0
10-May-2009 0.16
11-May-2009 0
12-May-2009 0.23
13-May-2009 0.01
14-May-2009 0
15-May-2009 0.01
16-May-2009 0.08
17-May-2009 0
18-May-2009 0.18
19-May-2009 0.04
20-May-2009 0
21-May-2009 0.01
22-May-2009 0
23-May-2009 0
24-May-2009 0.29
25-May-2009 0.11
26-May-2009 0
27-May-2009 0.24
28-May-2009 0
29-May-2009 0.13
30-May-2009 0.07
31-May-2009 0
01-Jun-2009 0.04
02-Jun-2009 0
03-Jun-2009 0
04-Jun-2009 0
05-Jun-2009 1.08
06-Jun-2009 1.31
07-Jun-2009 0
08-Jun-2009 0.01
09-Jun-2009 0
10-Jun-2009 0.84
11-Jun-2009 0.03
12-Jun-2009 0.7
13-Jun-2009 0
14-Jun-2009 0
15-Jun-2009 0
16-Jun-2009 0.1
1.89
2.39
17-Jun-2009 0.28
18-Jun-2009 0.12
19-Jun-2009 0.04
20-Jun-2009 0
21-Jun-2009 0
22-Jun-2009 0
23-Jun-2009 0
24-Jun-2009 0.01
25-Jun-2009 0
26-Jun-2009 0
27-Jun-2009 0
28-Jun-2009 0
29-Jun-2009 0
30-Jun-2009 0
01-Jul-2009 0
02-Jul-2009 0
03-Jul-2009 0
04-Jul-2009 0
05-Jul-2009 0
06-Jul-2009 0.89
07-Jul-2009 1.13
08-Jul-2009 0.01
09-Jul-2009 0
10-Jul-2009 0
11-Jul-2009 0
12-Jul-2009 0.03
13-Jul-2009 0
14-Jul-2009 0.16
15-Jul-2009 0
16-Jul-2009 0
17-Jul-2009 0
18-Jul-2009 0.87
19-Jul-2009 0
20-Jul-2009 0
21-Jul-2009 0.11
22-Jul-2009 0.08
23-Jul-2009 0.34
24-Jul-2009 0
25-Jul-2009 0
26-Jul-2009 0
27-Jul-2009 0
28-Jul-2009 0
29-Jul-2009 0
30-Jul-2009 0.24
31-Jul-2009 0.31
01-Aug-2009 0.46
02-Aug-2009 0.01
03-Aug-2009 0.28
04-Aug-2009 0
05-Aug-2009 0
06-Aug-2009 0.72
07-Aug-2009 0
2.02
1.3
08-Aug-2009 0
09-Aug-2009 0
10-Aug-2009 0
11-Aug-2009 0
12-Aug-2009 0.65
13-Aug-2009 0.03
14-Aug-2009 0
15-Aug-2009 0
16-Aug-2009 0
17-Aug-2009 0
18-Aug-2009 0
19-Aug-2009 0
20-Aug-2009 0
21-Aug-2009 0.74
22-Aug-2009 0
23-Aug-2009 0.37
24-Aug-2009 0
25-Aug-2009 0
26-Aug-2009 0
27-Aug-2009 0
28-Aug-2009 0
29-Aug-2009 1.17
30-Aug-2009 0.02
31-Aug-2009 0.02
01-Sep-2009 0.12
Problem Area Before:
t7 ?
yy ! Y 7` `any ;'? ? +
si E?' e? ' i i \ ?,\m .. .i.13 ? L ?' t .i J} y I F ? „? ?'.
i4 k' M,• +._ Y _ k 7'"7 a . ?, r fe .,fir
. ? ytY+ ? kY I'd yA ..
P IwS4 EyrYYk '? tx bs. 4'a c?5. Jf4T.. r:. F"?7^?E•. q do f'?.lw,?..«.>
A ty
i} ? U. F + Yg9.K f?$ ?Sl'.t .ft? .ytl . '•
+it?6'fY:. a, ? 4.gX•, § tijwwS{?r? .? ?{?d??? Tn? f
Problem Area After:
r
pp t ??y,??
_, yY
??p?,Y?i, {'i V+V : Y Y Y•" V .. M1y ,x+4*i f,:'? S ? ? 4 f{ yl L4. [I Mo
WKI,
in,
Oik
}y '"'J{py .C I .
?? YS .?? 4 ??? L ? .?_ 13 ?? •',.1??i.?y?p??Y3 ;? h•ai ?' h1r t.?-. •?y?{ I?. '?:...
i t `i'e f?"+,:? "?? ".• wC ?'..w S - d 'Y ?4 l { f, a f e1.
I., j
t ?. @f, r _+„ a ,r,. Mry ?,Sy, 3 bl„
ale
a r,r "Nar.,L't _+! .?.;_ a r ? ,. _'i. , .1 i t ti .. ?+.?3 ?LM A•'i?:'tr{!?'i,d X 7:1§f. Y Jr LY
"'?OT° t,EN i 7PT'TFUT"f'I7. , PLAIT .
HOLY
R I- [ON TNIBERAN] .,THIS. H'. K .
ALC ALLEXIYN, PLS 1. SLl

NOTE.
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION AND
C'ONTTROL DATA INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY
ENTITLED"LATTA-EARTH_MARKDATED
JULY-DECEMBER, 200" BY ALOIS CALLEMYN, PLS.
M=M LATOI A0.
SIR T
ALL NEWT DATA SHOGUN ON THIS SURVEY IS TIED TI-I
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANTE COORDINATE SYST
NAD 1983 M (HORIZONTAL) AND NA VD-29 (VERTIC
57
EXISTING CENTERLINE
OF FORREST CREEK,
UPSTREAM OF
CONSTRUCTION
B
/IGG
+D
00
ITOB
--------------------
CONSTRUCTED N
RIFFLE, TYP. +
0
O
e CULMERTEO
A CROSSING
G QUAD
7
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE, TYP.
N07E A"
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND, EXCEPT THOSE SHOWN AS GRID
AND AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
NOTE $'
EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY STATED OR SHOWN, THIS SURVEY DOES NOT
REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING, EASEMENTS, OTHER THAN
THOSE VISIBLE DURING HELD EXAMINATION, BUILDING SETBACKS,
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, ZONING OR LAND USE RECULATTONS AND ANY
FACTS WHICH A SHE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE.
NOTE 'C'
THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND URLRES ARE NOT SHOWN,
LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UULJOES AGO STRUCTURES MAY VARY
FROM LOCARONS SHOWN HEREON, AND AWIRONAL BURIED
VALUES MAY EXIST CONTACT RB APPROPRIATE URLTY COMPANIES
FOR INFORMATION REGARDING BURIED URLITIEE
r
2
J 5TA 206+83 TO
/ STA 218+13
f \
2C16x ? ..-.-` ... TGB \ i
a
r \
\Li LIMINARY L
Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales
d
Xtri
HEW
1, ALOIS CALLEMYN, N.C.P.L.S.#2544, CERTIFY THAT THE N.C. GRID
COORDINATES AND BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR DOCUMENT WERE
DETERMINED BY AN ACTUAL GIGS SURVEY PERFORMED BY ME. THAT THIS
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO CLASS C FGCC SPECIFICATIONS AND THATI
ROCK CROSS USED GPS-RTK SURVEY FIELD PROCEDURES COORDINATES WERE
VANE, TYP. DETERMINED BY LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT THAT THIS SURVEY WAS
PERFORMED USING ONE (1) TOPCOAT GPS "VIPER" RECEIVER LOGGED INTO
NOSS RTK NETWORK. ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON HAD 83(2007)
AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAND 88.
NOTE '0'
THIS SURVEY WAS DONE WMOUT A THE SEARCH AND IS BASED
ON REFERENCES INFORMAROV. THERE MAY EXIST OTHER
DOCUMENTS OF RECORD AMICH COULD AFFECT MIS PROPERTY
NOTE 'C
WERANGS, JURWOCTCNAL WRITERS OR OTHER CONDITIONS WHICH MAY
BE REGULATED BY FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES WERE
NOT INNESRGARD DURING GiIS SURVEY RIPARIAN SUFFERS AND
OTHER RESTRICDONS ON DEVELOPMENT MAY BE REOU.WED.
NOTE 'F'
TOW ZONES OR BASE FLOW ELEVATORS HERE NOT INVESTING,=
DURING THIS SURVEY.
NOTE 'G°
EXCEPT AS LABELED OTHERWISE, ALL CORNERS SHOWN AS SET
ARE 0.625 INCH COPPER COATED WTON ROSS 'PK" NAILS ARE
SET M ALL ASPHALT ROADS.
moTTNStALL
TYP.
VANE,
AS-BUILT
BANKFULL, TYP.
/-AS-BUILT
4 / CENTERLINE,
TYP.
B
KEN QUAD
?a FFL 5 ,Vppx .LEW \ ?? r LTOB ""'11 x0 / B ?W // a8 HEtiN ',a ` ' e
a 05 L HEW ./ G QUA aax \ LTC' X00
4E4W A Pe GB 6 00 L e. 00 Jr,
REW LE ??(? Q? ?._ ame.`4 e
Ftt0. \ ^. / REw L7oBBww
"'?Q7° t,EM1! i 7PT'I?FU?"f'I7. , °LA'L .
[7 ''1 us
5? - ZIGINAL -LLKE
R L'i- H: J E,: " .
A. --. - LICBNSHN0.. L -544

\ QUAD s Y
\ 4
ag
Y? TRIBUTARY

l
94\
PRELIMINARY Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales
NOTE:
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION AND
CONTROL DATA INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY
ENTITLED"LATTA-EARTHMARKDATED
JULY-DECEMBER, 2007 BY ALOIS CALLEMYN, PLS.
ALL NERD DATA SHOGUN ON THIS SURVEY IS TIED D-1
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,
NAD 1981-2007 (HORIZONTAL: AND NAVD-29 (VERTIC
m m a
r
r
r
226+00
> VfG QUA
3
REW 6
"'
r
hk
s?
CULVERTED
AGRICULTURAL
CROSSING
"'?C)I° t,F.N i 7NT'I-FN"f'I7 , nLA1
[7 ''' Rs
51 - 21GINAL -PLRE
R L'i- H: J E,: " .
A. --. - LICBNSHN0.. L -544
hk
s?
NOTE:
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION AND
CONTROL DATA INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY
ENTITLED"LATTA-EARTHMARKDATED
JULY-DECEMBER, 2007 BY ALOIS CALLEMYN, PLS.
ALL NEW DATA SHOGUN ON THIS SURVEY IS TIED D-1
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,
NAD 1981-2007 (HORIZONTAL: AND NAVD-29 (VERTIC
BOULDER WALL
(VEGETATED)
BEGIN
LONGITUDINAL
PROFILE 5
STA 224+41 TO
STA 231+40
r
r
r
l
a?P
PRELLV___-4-A1KY PLAT
Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales
NN!
_. .BFI L..cI
51 - UGINALSIC_ -.1`Rr-
1 , TH_ i 1[
A. --. LICBNSHNO. L -544
E
NOTE.
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION AND
CONTROL DATA INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY
ENTITLED"LATTA-EARTHMARKDATED
JULY-DECEMBER, 2007 BY ALOIS CALLEMYN, PLS.
ALL NEW' DATA SHOGUN ON THIS SURVEY IS TIED D-1
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYST
NAD 1983 ,M (HORIZONYAL) AND NA VD-29 (VERTIC
1, ALOIS CALLEMYN, N.C,P.L.S.#2544, CERTIFY THAT THE N.C. GRID
COORDINATES AND BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR DOCUMENT WERE
DETERMINED BY AN ACTUAL CPS SURVEY PERFORMED BY ME. THAT THIS
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO CLASS C FGCC SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT I
USED GPS-RTK SURVEY FIELD PROCEDURES. COORDINATES WERE
DETERMINED BY LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT. THAT THIS SURVEY WAS
PERFORMED USING ONE (1) TOPCON CPS "HIRER" RECEIVER LOGGED INTO
NCGS RTK NETWORK. ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD 83(2007)
AND ALL ELEVA BONS ARE BASED ON NA VD 88.
a'T
a?r
60• ?Y
Q O
4.0
Q --- --- --- ---
ANGFRJDINAL G QUAD
"E 1 ?GQUAD T3
00+25 wa
BEGIN./
LONGITUDINAL
PROFILE 2
STA 111+35 TO
STA 117+55
AGRICULTURAL
FORD
GROSSING
PRELIMI AT
Not for ecordatio ,Convey Tce or Sales
SPRING -
EASEMENT FOR
WATER SUPPLY
4
y 4
n
"'?QI° t,EM1! i 7PT'I?FU1"f'I7. , °LA'L ? .
_. .BFI L..cI
51 - 2IGINALSIL..'_1`Rr-
I , TH_ i 1[
A. --. LICENSE NO. L -541

NOTE
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION AND
CONTROL DATA INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY
ENTITLED "LATTA-EARTHMARK", DATED
JULY-DECEMBER, 2007 BY ALOIS CALLEMYN, PLS.
ALL NEW' DATA SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY IS TIED D-1
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PEANE COORDINATE SYST
NAD 1983 HORIZONI'AL) AND NA VD-29 (VERTIC
BEGIN "
z
LONGITUDINAL m END
PROFILE 3 LONGITUDINAL
STA 127+68 TO PROFILE 3
STA 130+09 STA 127+68
30" pAP _ _ _ STA 130+09
' VFf. VIA
n1
ENO
LONGITUDINAL
PROFILE 2 _ ----°"-"'
STA 111+35 TO _ " -
----
TA 1i7+55 ,®---®-
S
UEG
m
QUAD
T2
x

r 4 1
7?B -0

rrr
r
r -
r
o 0
a s ?e
PRELIMINAR'x'_
Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales
,? TRIBUTARY